is there a best direct acting antiviral agent for...

17
Is There a Best Direct Acting Antiviral Agent for HBV? Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon INSERM U1052, Cancer Research Center of Lyon Lyon University, France

Upload: dinhkien

Post on 11-Feb-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Is There a Best Direct Acting Antiviral Agent for HBV?

Fabien ZoulimHepatology Department, Hospices Civils de LyonINSERM U1052, Cancer Research Center of Lyon

Lyon University, France

Entry inhibitors

Core inhibitors

Targeting cccDNA Polymerase/RNAseH inhibitors

RNA interference

Egress Inhibitors

Targeting HBx

Testoni and Zoulim, Hepatology 2015

What targets for what drugs?

Zoulim, et al, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013

Up- and/or Down- stream of cccDNA ?Potential to be curative ?

Li et al, elife 2012; Urban et al, Gastroenterology 2014

Entry inhibitors

Entry inhibitorsMyrcludex (pre-S1 peptide)Blank et al, J Hepatol 2016Bogomolov et al, J Hepatol 2016

EzetimibeLucifora, Antiviral Res 2013ProanthocyanidinTsukuda, Hepatology 2017Cyclosporin analogues Shimura, J Hepatol 2017

Pros & Challenges for entry inhibitors (Myrcludex-B)

Inhibition of new rounds of infection

Decrease the pool of cccDNA on the long term

Opportunity to treat HBV/HDV co-infections

SC administration

Inhibition of NTCP and elevationof bile salts

Slow kinetics of cccDNA decay(need cell turnover); whichcombination with other DAAs ?

Different classes of capsid assembly modulators

Compounds in evaluationBAY41-4109HAP-12AT-130NVR3-778JNJ-379ABI-H0731ABI-H0808GLS4JHSHAP_R01 SBA_R01AB-423

Heteroaryldipyrimidine derivatives (HAP) Phenylpropenamide derivatives (AT series)

Core inhibitors inhibit viral genome replication and prevent cccDNA formation when administered prior to HBV inoculation

NUCs“Polymerase inhibitors”

plasma

membrane

CpAMs“Capsid inhibitors”

CpAMs“Capsid inhibitors”

Berke et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00560-17

***

*

HBV DNA Change from Baseline during JNJ-379 administration (HPB1001 Phase Ib study)

***

Pooled placebo (n=8)JNJ-379 25 mg QD (n=8)JNJ-379 75 mg QD (n=8)

0

–1

–2

–3

0 1 2 3 4

Time (weeks)

HBV

DN

A ch

ange

from

bas

elin

e(lo

g 10

IU/m

L)

* and *** refer respectively to 1 and 3 patients with HBV DNA <LLOQ of the HBV DNA assay

F Zoulim et al, AASLD 2017

Will this be sufficient to accelerate cccDNA decay ?

Pros & challenges for CpAM

Decrease the pool of cccDNA on the long term

Opportunity to combine with NUCs, pegIFN and other DAAs

Oral administration

Short-term safety profile

Long-term safety profile

Mainly suppressive

How to combine with other DAAsto be curative ?

siRNA Development Candidates

5′-AS

5′-senseHN

O

O

O

O

O

O

HN

HN

HN

HN

NH

NH

O

O

O

O

O

OO

O

N

O

HO

PO

OO

O OH

OHHO

AcHN

O OH

OHHO

AcHN

O OH

OHHO

AcHN

ESC-GalNAc-Conjugate for subcutaneous administration

Journal of Controlled Release, Volume 209, 2015, 57–66

• Contains a hepatocyte targeted,reversibly masked membrane activepeptide (NAG-MLP)

• Endosomal release of two syntheticsiRNAs

• PEG modification to inhibitmembranolytic activity

Proprietary Lipid Nanoparticles

And others…

Decreased serum HBsAg levels in patients receiving ARC-520 every 4 weeks with daily entecavir

Week

HB

sAg

[IU/m

L]

0 20 40 60 8010

100

1000

10000

10000001-7981 E Pos01-7982 E Pos01-7985 E Pos

First dose ofextension

Last dose ofextension

Single doseCohort 7

ExtensionCohort 10

01-7988 E Neg

Week

HB

sAg

[IU/m

L]0 20 40 60 80

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

First dose ofextensionLast dose ofextension

Single doseCohort 7

ExtensionCohort 10

01-7973 E neg01-7974 E Neg

01-7983 E Neg01-7986 E Neg

HBeAg+ patients HBeAg- patients

- Impact of integrated sequences on siRNA efficacy

- Will the decrease of viral antigen load result in restoration of immune responses ?Wooddel et al, Science Trans Med 2017Yuen MF et al, EASL ILC 2017

Pros & challenges for siRNA

Decrease of HBsAg levels

Possibility of immune restoration ?

Opportunity to combine with NUCs, pegIFN and other DAAs

Combination with immunotherapeutic approaches ?

IV infusion

Long-term safety profile

Mainly suppressive

Impact of integrated sequences

How to combine with other DAAsor immune Tx to be curative ?

Virions

NucleusNAPS

cccDNA

Capsids

Replenishment of cccDNA

Elimination ofserum HBsAg

Nucleic acid polymers

Pros & challenges for NAPs

Decrease of HBsAg levels

Possibility of immune restoration, anti-HBs seroconversion ?

Opportunity to combine with NUCs, pegIFN and other DAAs

Mode of action to be better defined

IV infusion

ALT elevation: good or bad ?

Long-term safety profile

Lucifora et al, Science 2014; Xia et al, Gastroenterology 2015

Direct cccDNA targeting

IFNalpha /Lymphotoxin beta induced APOBEC3A/B dependent

degradation ; other cytokines

CRISPR/cas9 cleavage

cccDNA silencing through virus specific mechanimsBelloni et al, JCI 2012; Liu et al, Plos Path 2013; Tropberger et al, PNAS 2015

Seeger et al, Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014 & 2016

Therapy

HB

V D

NA

chan

ge fr

om b

asel

ine

(log

10c/

mL)

0.0

-1.0

-2.0

-3.0

-4.0

+1.0

Time

HBV cure - New treatment concepts – Will we need combination of DAA and immune therapy ?

HBsAgHBVDNA

cccDNA

SERUM

LIVER

Antivirals

NUCCapsid

SiRNAAg load

Immune restoration

TLR agonist

TxVaccine

Check point

inhibitors Anti-HBsAb

cccDNA degradationor permanent silencing

Acknowledgements

Hepatology Unit INSERM U1052 Collaborations

David DurantelBarbara TestoniJulie LuciforaBernd StadelmeyerGuada MartinezMaelle LocatelliFleur ChapusAurore InchauspéMaud MicheletJudith Fresquet

K. Lacombe, ParisF Carrat, ParisC Ferrari, ParmaP Lampertico, MilanA Craxi, PalermoJP Quivy, Institut CurieM Dandri, HamburgXX Zhang, Shanghai

Marc BoninThomas LahlaliLucyna CovaRomain ParentAnna SalvettiBirke BartoschEve PecheurBoyan GrigorovChristophe Combet

François BaillySamir BenmakloufMarie EcochardKerstin HartigFanny LebosséMassimo LevreroMarianne MaynardChristian Trépo