is it better to use teachers or patient support group ... · and complete a medical record form...

1
Is it beer to use teachers or paent support group volunteers as surrogate paents to train students in clinical problem solving? Weng-Yee Chin, Amber LM Yip, Julie Y Chen, Vivian TW Chau Instute of Medical and Health Sciences Educaon, The University of Hong Kong, HONG KONG -Although both sengs were proved to be effecve, students valued the real paent interacon and the construcve feedback from paents. Examples of the comments made by students in the intervenon group are as follows: Having real paents for interview, this gives us a very good opportunity to pracce and reflect on how we are doing. This helps us gain confidence and improve our skills. A very good opportunity for us to have adequate pracce. Feedback session was parcularly useful, reminds me to have more eye contact, and now I understand more of paent's feelings For the control group, students found role playing effecve in training pracce skills, an example of student comments is as follows: Hands-on pracce in low-pressure seng and immediate feedback from teacher. Model answer available to check own performance. -Their performance on the OSCE showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion Role playing clinical cases either with paent volunteers or teachers are both useful for helping medical students to develop praccal skills and is an effecve approach for problem-solving training. Use of paent-educators enhances the student learning experience. It fosters beer student confidence and skill, and enhances awareness of interpersonal behaviors such as eye contact and empathy. Paents appreciate the opportunity to contribute to training future doctors. Future workshops might consider an increase in student exposure to paent educators in praccal training. Take-home Message Structured learning opportunies with paent educators can benefit both students and paents. Acknowledgement This study was funded by the Faculty Development Fund, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong. Background As an essenal clinical skill, medical students needs to learn to take and interpret a history from a paent. In order to do this, students need to develop a systemac approach to asking quesons, be able to idenfy and extract the relevant informaon, then problem- solve to form a likely diagnosis and management plan. Students also need to be able to summarize and synthesize the informaon for the purposes of communicaon with colleagues or medical record keeping. Learning these skills requires repeated pracce ideally with feedback on performance. Use of role play and simulated paents are two acve learning strategies used by medical educators to teach students such skills. Methods This was a mixed method study using a two-armed quasi-experimental study design to evaluate the effecveness of the workshop, and qualitave methods to examine the student’s perceived learning benefits of using simulated paents. In the 2012-13 academic year, all Year 3 medical students at the University of Hong Kong who parcipated in the Problem Solving Workshop during the Family Medicine rotaon were invited to take part in the study. Half of the students were allocated to the intervenon group where simulated paents role playing their own clinical cases, and the other half were in control group where the workshop facilitators role playing the idencal cases. Our simulated paents were members of various paent support groups who have volunteered to parcipate in teaching and recruited via simulated paents recruitment programme in 2012. These volunteers were individuals with illness experiences and previous interacons with doctors and nurses as real paents. Parcipants in all workshops underwent pre-post assessments on compleng a medical record form on a video-taped consultaon, and were evaluated in an end-of-rotaon Objecve Structured Clinical Examinaon (OSCE). Students provided feedback based on the learning experience and approach by compleng a workshop evaluaon form. Students parcipang in the intervenon group were asked to provide feedback on their opinions regarding the value of using SPs for the role play during debriefing session. Results -The quantave results revealed stascally significant increase in the total score of Medical Record Form in both groups aſter the Problem Solving Workshop. Figure 1. Mixed method study design 90 MBBSIII students attend prob- lem-solving workshop without SP (CONTROL GROUP) 90 MBBSIII students attend problem -solving workshop with SP (INTERVENTION GROUP) Outcome-based evaluation: Scores collected in the Family Medicine End-of-block OSCE 180 MBBSIII students Observe a 2 nd videotaped consultation and complete a 2 nd medical record form 180 MBBSIII students Observe a videotaped consultation and complete a medical record form Workshop evaluation: Evaluation form Pre-test assessment Observe a videotaped consultaon and complete a Medical Record Form Consultaon and problem idenfi- caon skills training Students paired up to role play as a doctor to take a history while SPs or facilitators role play the clinical cases Feedback by the SP or facilitator SPs or facilitator provide feedback regarding to the stu- dents’ performance on history taking or communicaon skills Model Answer Provide model answer for each clinical case Problem synthesis and presenta- on skills training Present a case history succinctly in 3 sentences as if ringing a consultant to ask for advise Post-test assessment Observe another videotaped consultaon and complete a Medical Record Form Procedure of the workshop Descripve stascs of pre-test and post-test scores Overall (N=158) Intervenon group (N=81) Control group (N=77) Mean SD p-value Mean SD p-value Mean SD p-value Pre-test MRF score 5.23 1.55 <0.001 5.23 1.65 <0.001 5.24 1.45 <0.001 Post-test MRF score 7.93 1.51 8.04 1.43 7.81 1.59 Paired samples t-test was performed to test whether there was a difference of pre-test and post-test score on Medical Record Form before and aſter the workshop. Objecve We aim to evaluate the effecveness of role play to train medical students in history tak- ing, problem idenficaon and problem synthesis, and to assess whether the use of pa-

Upload: others

Post on 26-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Is it better to use teachers or patient support group ... · and complete a medical record form Workshop evaluation: Evaluation form Pre-test assessment Observe a videotaped consultation

Is it better to use teachers or patient support group volunteers as surrogate patients to train students in clinical problem solving?

Weng-Yee Chin, Amber LM Yip, Julie Y Chen, Vivian TW Chau

Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, HONG KONG

-Although both settings were proved to be effective, students valued the real patient interaction and the constructive feedback from patients. Examples of the comments made by students in the intervention group are as follows:

Having real patients for interview, this gives us a very good opportunity to practice and reflect on how we are doing. This helps us gain confidence and improve our skills.

A very good opportunity for us to have adequate practice. Feedback session was particularly useful, reminds me to have more eye contact, and now I understand more of patient's feelings

For the control group, students found role playing effective in training practice skills, an example of student comments is as follows:

Hands-on practice in low-pressure setting and immediate feedback from teacher. Model answer available to check own performance.

-Their performance on the OSCE showed no significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Role playing clinical cases either with patient volunteers or teachers are both useful for helping medical students to develop practical skills and is an effective approach for problem-solving training.

Use of patient-educators enhances the student learning experience. It fosters better student confidence and skill, and enhances awareness of interpersonal behaviors such as eye contact and empathy. Patients appreciate the opportunity to contribute to training future doctors.

Future workshops might consider an increase in student exposure to patient educators in practical training.

Take-home Message

Structured learning opportunities with patient educators can benefit both students and patients.

Acknowledgement This study was funded by the Faculty Development Fund, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong.

Background As an essential clinical skill, medical students needs to learn to take and interpret a history from a patient. In order to do this, students need to develop a systematic approach to asking questions, be able to identify and extract the relevant information, then problem-solve to form a likely diagnosis and management plan. Students also need to be able to summarize and synthesize the information for the purposes of communication with colleagues or medical record keeping. Learning these skills requires repeated practice ideally with feedback on performance. Use of role play and simulated patients are two active learning strategies used by medical educators to teach students such skills.

Methods This was a mixed method study using a two-armed quasi-experimental study design to evaluate the effectiveness of the workshop, and qualitative methods to examine the student’s perceived learning benefits of using simulated patients.

In the 2012-13 academic year, all Year 3 medical students at the University of Hong Kong who participated in the Problem Solving Workshop during the Family Medicine rotation were invited to take part in the study.

Half of the students were allocated to the intervention group where simulated patients role playing their own clinical cases, and the other half were in control group where the workshop facilitators role playing the identical cases. Our simulated patients were members of various patient support groups who have volunteered to participate in teaching and recruited via simulated patients recruitment programme in 2012. These volunteers were individuals with illness experiences and previous interactions with doctors and nurses as real patients.

Participants in all workshops underwent pre-post assessments on completing a medical record form on a video-taped consultation, and were evaluated in an end-of-rotation Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Students provided feedback based on the learning experience and approach by completing a workshop evaluation form.

Students participating in the intervention group were asked to provide feedback on their opinions regarding the value of using SPs for the role play during debriefing session.

Results

-The quantitative results revealed statistically significant increase in the total score of Medical Record Form in both groups after the Problem Solving Workshop.

Figure 1. Mixed method study design

90 MBBSIII students attend prob-lem-solving workshop without SP

(CONTROL GROUP)

90 MBBSIII students attend problem-solving workshop with SP (INTERVENTION GROUP)

Outcome-based evaluation: Scores collected in the Family Medicine End-of-block OSCE

180 MBBSIII students

Observe a 2nd

videotaped consultation and complete a 2

nd medical record form

180 MBBSIII students

Observe a videotaped consultation and complete a medical record form

Workshop evaluation: Evaluation form

Pre-test assessment Observe a videotaped consultation and complete a

Medical Record Form

Consultation and problem identifi-

cation skills training

Students paired up to role play as a doctor to take a

history while SPs or facilitators role play the clinical cases

Feedback by the SP or facilitator

SPs or facilitator provide feedback regarding to the stu-

dents’ performance on history taking or communication

skills

Model Answer Provide model answer for each clinical case

Problem synthesis and presenta-

tion skills training

Present a case history succinctly in 3 sentences as if

ringing a consultant to ask for advise

Post-test assessment Observe another videotaped consultation and complete

a Medical Record Form

Procedure of the workshop

Descriptive statistics of pre-test and post-test scores

Overall (N=158)

Intervention group (N=81)

Control group (N=77)

Mean SD p-value Mean SD p-value Mean SD p-value

Pre-test MRF score 5.23 1.55 <0.001

5.23 1.65 <0.001

5.24 1.45 <0.001

Post-test MRF score

7.93 1.51 8.04 1.43 7.81 1.59

Paired samples t-test was performed to test whether there was a difference of pre-test and post-test score on Medical Record Form before and after the workshop.

Objective We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of role play to train medical students in history tak-ing, problem identification and problem synthesis, and to assess whether the use of pa-