is intake of caffeine via a oral film as effective as an

1
Is intake of caffeine via a oral film as effective as an expresso? “Appetitive” outcomes Eugénia Fernandes (1), Fabiana Ribeiro (1), Ana Moreno (1), Patrícia Batista (2), Manuela Pintado (2), & Patrícia Oliveira-Silva (1) (1) HNL/CEDH – Human Neurobehavioral Labortory/Research Centre for Human Development, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal (2) CBQF – Centre for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry – Associate Laboratory, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal sleepiness and fatigue physical performance (endurance sports) cognitive performance (e.g., sustained attention) burn calories and fat (short-term effects) Coffee consumption (kg per person per year): Finland 12.0 Portugal 4.3 U.S.A 4.2 U.K. 1.7 Safe consumption of up to 400mg/day (Toxic at 10 g) Mostly consumed in drinks Caffeine is the most consumed psychoactive drug in the world (Jan 2018) Disavantageous outcomes 99% in 45 min after intake Rapid gut absorption Most consumers not aware of amount ingered Unknown concentrations Nervousness, gastrointestinal and cardiac alterations Risks of overconsumption and withdrawal effects (addiction pathways) Addiction Dysphagia, geriatric and mental patients Unavailable to some Problem to diabetics, obese, people on diets Carbonated and/or sugary CBQF’s Orodispersible Film (OF) for delivery of caffeine Psych. Study (experiment with human participants): psychophysiology of this OF o Estimated N = 20 adults, moderate caffeine-consumers (as of yet, N = 9) o Intra-subject, randomized, 4x4 Latin square counterbalanced, double-blind, controlled study o 4 exp. days per participant: o Procedure on each experimental day/session: Sustained delivery of caffeine within a customized period stability and residence time of caffeine in contact with the buccal mucosa (↓↓ 1 st -pass hepatic metabolism) In vitro tests (1) Characterize the psychophysiology of caffeine intake via our novel OF o Physiological correlates: Respiratory, Electrodermal and Cardiac activity (BIOPAC) o Mood and cognitive performance (2) Compare its effects with a traditional intake modality (espresso coffee) during ∆t=45’ post-intake Methods OF: Orodispersible Film with caffeine OF : Orodispersible Film without caffeine CoC: Cup of coffee (1 espresso) CoC : Cup of decaffeinated coffee CoC OF OF CoC Intake Pre-test Post-15’ Post-45’ Cognitive/Mood test Cognitive/Mood test Cognitive/Mood test caffeinated or not Cup of coffee / Oral film Physiological Baseline Post-30’ Cognitive/Mood test time Continuous physiological recording Preliminary Results o VAS self-report (score change from pre-test) o Visual Working Memory (% change) Contact Information HNL CBQF -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ -40 -20 0 20 40 -20 -10 0 10 20 o Auditory Working Memory (% change) -2 0 2 4 6 8 o Task Switching (change from Pre-test) -0,08 -0,04 0 0,04 0,08 o Alerting (change from Pre-test) -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 Fatigue (‘desire to close my eyes’, ‘drowsy’, etc.) Mental sedation (‘alert’, ‘quick-witted’, etc.) Backwards Corsi Blocks % change mean accuracy Trail Making Test change in # corrects Attention Network Task ↑ Alerting Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Backwards Digit Span % change mean accuracy OF caffeine CoC caffeine OF no caffeine CoC decaf. o Physiological data Pre-processing (visual inspection, triggers, filtering, smoothing...) Currently creating the cardiac, respiratory and electrodermal analysis templates (AcqKnowledge) o Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the financial and infrastructure support from: o From FCT through the project PTDC/BBB-NAN/3249/2014; o From the CEDH under the FCT project UID/CEDH/04872/2016. o From the CBQF under the FCT project UID/Multi/50016/2013. o The BIAL grant to the author P.O.S.: BIAL/2017/16. o The FCT grant to the author P.B.: PTDC/BBB-NAN/3249/2014. o The PhD grant (Norte-08-5369-FSE-000007) by the Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte (CCDR-N).

Upload: others

Post on 21-Apr-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Is intake of caffeine via a oral film as effective as an

Is intake of caffeine via a oral film as effective as an expresso?

“Appetitive” outcomes

Eugénia Fernandes (1), Fabiana Ribeiro (1), Ana Moreno (1), Patrícia Batista (2), Manuela Pintado (2), & Patrícia Oliveira-Silva (1)

(1) HNL/CEDH – Human Neurobehavioral Labortory/Research Centre for Human Development, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal

(2) CBQF – Centre for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry – Associate Laboratory, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal

↓ sleepiness and fatigue

↑ physical performance

(endurance sports)

↑ cognitive performance

(e.g., sustained attention)

↑ burn calories and fat

(short-term effects)Coffee consumption (kg per person per year):

Finland 12.0

Portugal 4.3

U.S.A 4.2

U.K. 1.7

Safe consumption of up to 400mg/day

(Toxic at 10 g)

Mostly consumed in drinks

Caffeine is the most consumed psychoactive drug in the world

(Jan 2018)

Disavantageous outcomes

99% in 45 min after intake

Rapid gut absorption

Most consumers not aware

of amount ingered

Unknown concentrations

Nervousness, gastrointestinal

and cardiac alterations

Risks of overconsumption

and withdrawal effects

(addiction pathways)

Addiction

Dysphagia, geriatric and

mental patients

Unavailable to some

Problem to diabetics, obese,

people on diets

Carbonated and/or sugary

CBQF’s Orodispersible Film (OF) for delivery of caffeine

Psych. Study (experiment with human participants): psychophysiology of this OF

o Estimated N = 20 adults, moderate caffeine-consumers (as of yet, N = 9)

o Intra-subject, randomized, 4x4 Latin square counterbalanced, double-blind,

controlled study

o 4 exp. days per participant:

o Procedure on each experimental day/session:

Sustained delivery of caffeine within a customized period

↑ stability and residence time of caffeine in contact with the buccal mucosa (↓↓ 1st-pass hepatic metabolism)

In vitro tests

(1) Characterize the psychophysiology of caffeine intake via our novel OF

o Physiological correlates: Respiratory, Electrodermal and Cardiac activity (BIOPAC)

o Mood and cognitive performance

(2) Compare its effects with a traditional intake modality (espresso coffee) during ∆t=45’ post-intake

Methods

OF: Orodispersible Film with caffeine

OF: Orodispersible Film without caffeine

CoC: Cup of coffee (1 espresso)

CoC: Cup of decaffeinated coffee

CoCOF OF CoC

IntakePre-test Post-15’ Post-45’

Cognitive/Mood test

Cognitive/Mood test

Cognitive/Mood test

caffeinated or not

Cup of coffee / Oral film

Physiological Baseline

Post-30’

Cognitive/Mood test

time

Continuous physiological recording

Preliminary Results

o VAS self-report (score change from pre-test)

o Visual Working Memory (% change)

Contact

Information

HNL CBQF

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

1 2 3 4

Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’

-40

-20

0

20

40

-20

-10

0

10

20

o Auditory Working Memory (% change)

-2

0

2

4

6

8

o Task Switching (change from Pre-test)

-0,08

-0,04

0

0,04

0,08

o Alerting (change from Pre-test)

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

Fatigue(‘desire to close my eyes’, ‘drowsy’, etc.)

Mental sedation(‘alert’, ‘quick-witted’, etc.)

Backwards Corsi Blocks% change mean accuracy

Trail Making Testchange in # corrects

Attention Network Task↑ Alerting

Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’

Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’

Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’ Post-15’ Post-30’ Post-45’

Backwards Digit Span% change mean accuracy

—— OF caffeine —— CoC caffeine

—— OF no caffeine —— CoC decaf.o Physiological data

Pre-processing (visual inspection, triggers,

filtering, smoothing...)

Currently creating the cardiac, respiratory

and electrodermal analysis templates

(AcqKnowledge)

o AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the financial and infrastructure support from:

o From FCT through the project PTDC/BBB-NAN/3249/2014;

o From the CEDH under the FCT project UID/CEDH/04872/2016.

o From the CBQF under the FCT project UID/Multi/50016/2013.

o The BIAL grant to the author P.O.S.: BIAL/2017/16.

o The FCT grant to the author P.B.: PTDC/BBB-NAN/3249/2014.

o The PhD grant (Norte-08-5369-FSE-000007) by the Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte (CCDR-N).