ir.amu.ac.inir.amu.ac.in/688/1/t 5432.pdf · abstract the present work on the problem entitled,...

Influence of Certain Personality Variables and Organizational Characteristics on Perceived Quality of

Work Life-A Study of Industrial Workers

ABSTRACT

THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF

Bottor of $Iitlos;opt)p IN

PSYCHOLOGY

BY

ARSHI NASREEN

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF

PROP. SHAMIN AHMAD ANSARl

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY

ALIGARH ( INDIA)

1998

/ r - „ ^ - ^ •

; -v '"

( Ace. No ) '

A B S T R A C T

The present work on the problem entitled, "Influence

of Certain Personality Variables and Organizational

Characteristics on Perceived QWL - A Study of Industrial

Workers" is quiet fascinating because as evident from survey

of literature such study has not been ever conducted on the

sample of middle level managers working in electronic gadget

manufacturing industry especially in Indian context.

The first chapter of the thesis deals with the

concepts and available literature pertaining to QWL (a

dependent variable); and personality variables and organi

zational characteristics (independent variables). The

literature on QWL reveals to the fact that it was only in

1972 that a comprehensive term "Quality of working life" was

coined by Davis. Thereafter, the phenomenon of QWL attracted

the attention of psychologist, managers and supervisors for

undertaking it as a philosophy or as an approach in

designing the strategy for motivating people at work. So far

as the meaning of the term QWL is concern, it will be quiet

significant to point out that QWL refers to "the degree to

which work provides an opportunity to an individual to

satisfy a wide variety of personal needs to survive with

seme security, to interact with others to have a sense of

personal usefulness, to be reorganized for achievement and

to have an opportunity to improve one's skill and

knowledge", though numerous efforts have been made to define

this concept. The chapter, in the light of the available

survey of literature has clearly pointed out that QWL has

not been studied in relation to personality variables and

organizational characteristics, therefore the present

endeavour was definitely a novel task for adding some

information towards the knowledge in the area of QWL

studies. Because of this fact, it was hypothesized that none

of the personality variables and organizational

characteristics as well will not significantly influence

overall QWL and its various dimensions.

Chapter II incorporates details of the methodolo

gical and procedural aspects of the study. The study was

conducted on the sample of middle level managers consisting

of Hindu middle level managers (N = 250) Muslim middle level

managers (N = 90) and thus, the total sample size consisted

of N = 340 middle level managers. Keeping in view the

pattern of research, QWL scale developed by Sinha and Sayeed

(1980) which consist of 85 items covering 17-dimensions was

used for measuring QWL.

To measure personality variables and organizational

characteristics, researcher herself had developed the scale

consisting of 34 personality adjectives/attributes and 15

organizational characteristics respectively. For analyzing

the influence of independent variables on dependent one,

multiple regression analysis treatment were given to the

data obtained.

In chapters III, IV and V respectively, results,

discussion of results and conclusion and suggestions have

been presented. Conclusions of the findings which have been

highlighted in Chapter V advocate in a nut-shell that

personality variables and organizational characteristics are

independent to QWL and its various facets or in other words

it can be said that QWL is not the function of either

personality variables or organizational characteristics

especially for middle level managers irrespective of their

religious affiliation.

Influence of Certain Personality Variables and Organizational Characteristics on Perceived Quality of

Work Life-A Study of Industrial Workers

* SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF

Bottor of $I)ilos^opI)p

PSYCHOLOGY i

4/^' " ^

S^ BY

ARSfll NASREEN

UNDER T H E SUPERVISION OF

PROF. SHAMIM AHMAD ANSARI

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY

ALIGARH (INDIA)

1998

PROFESSOR

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALI6ARH (UP.) INDIA

CERTIFICATE

C e r t i f i e d t h a t t h e t h e s i s e n t i t l e d " I n f l u e n c e

of C e r t a i n P e r s o n a l i t y V a r i a b l e s and O r g a n i z a t i o n a l

C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s on P e r c e i v e d QWL - A S t u d y of

I n d u s t r i a l W o r k e r s " i s a r e c o r d of b o n a f i d e

r e s e a r c h c a r r i e d o u t u n d e r my s u p e r v i s i o n by M i s s .

A r s h i Nasreen a s a r e g u l a r s t u d e n t o f t h i s

u n i v e r s i t y . She h a s c o m p l e t e d t h e t h e s i s w i t h i n t h e

p r e s c r i b e d p e r i o d and T am s a t i s f i e d t h a t h e r work

i s o r i g i n a l and u p t o t h e s t a n d a r d . I recommended

t h a t Miss . N a s r e e n be a l l o w e d t o s u p p l i c a t e f o r t h e

d e g r e e of D o c t o r of P h i l o s o p h y i n Psycho logy of t h e

A l i g a r h Muslim U n i v e r s i t y , A l i g a r h .

(SHAMIM AHMAD ANSARI) S u p e r v i s o r

RES. AB-84, MEDICAL COLONY. AMU. ALIGARH

C O N T E N T S

PAGE N o .

Acknowledgements

Chapter I INTRODUCTION

Chapter II METHODOLOGY

Chapter III RESULTS

Chapter IV DISCUSSIONS OF RESULTS

Chapter V CONCLUION AND SUGGESTION

1

47

57

164

174

46

56

163

173

177

SUMMARY

REFERENCES

178

182

181

193

APPENDICES

Appendix I Q.W.L. Scale

Appendix II Personality Variable Scale

Appendix III Organizational Characteristic Scale

Appendix IV Biographical Information Blank

* ****** ***** *** *

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The accomplishment of this endeavour would not have been

possible without the will of Almighty ALLAH. I, very humbly

thanks to ALLAH and pray that He will give me strength in

successful completion in all my rightful endeavours in

future.

I take this opportunity to express my sincere

appreciation and grateful thanks to Dr. Shamim A. Ansari,

Professor, Department of Psychology, A.M.U. Aligarh for

sparing his valuable time in providing guidance throughout

the period of research.

I would also like to thank Prof. (Mrs) Hamida Ahmad,

Chairperson, Dept. of Psychology for providing facilities in

conducting the present study. I am also thankful to Prof.

Qamar Hasan former Chairman of the Department of Psychology

and Prof. Saeeduzzafar for their continuous help and moral

support.

I will be failing in my duty if I do not extend

thank to Mr. R.D. Shukla; HRD Manager, Uptron India Ltd.

Lucknow who provided all support and help for conducting the

study.

Words fail in expressing regards to my beloved

father. Late Mr. Waseem Ahmad, who had been a life time

inspiration in a quest for achieving the degree of Doctor of

Philosophy. Also, I would like to thank my brother, Mr.

Manzar Waseem; sister-in-law, Mrs. Adeeba Waseem and Mr.

Tariq Ali Khan who were a constant source of inspiration to

me in keeping my interest alive in this endeavour.

Mr. Zaki Akhter, Mr. Nasir Ali my senior colleagues

deserve special thanks for their cooperation throughout my

thesis work. I am also thankful to my other research

colleagues - Miss Rehana Ahmad, Mrs. Rizwana Pervez and Mr.

Sheikh Abul Barkat for their moral support.

I am highly indebted to Dr. Md. Manzoor Alam,

Chairman, Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi and Mr.

Md. Moquimuddin, Coordinator, lOS Aligarh Chapter who helped

me by awarding research fellowship to me. Thank is also due

to Mr. Serajuddin,Assistant Coordinator lOS Aligarh Chapter

for his kind cooperation and help.

Last but not least, I would like to express my thank

to Mr. Ashfaq Ahmad for helping me in the statistical

analyses of the data with the help of Computer.

(ARSHI NASREEN)

CHAPTER - I

I N T R O D U C T I O N

I N T R O P D C T I O N

Psychologists' role in improving industrial and

organizational efficiency was realized in the beginning of

the present century with the work of a non-psychologist

namely, Winslow Fredrick Taylor. Later, his work became

instrumental in the creation of an independent branch of

psychology called. Industrial Psychology. Industrial

psychology passed through various phases ranging from

management-orient ed-approach (Taylorism) to employee-

oriented-approach (Mayo, et al. ) and the later approach

became highly acceptable by both management and the workers

which still remains focus of attention and its scope is

getting increasingly widened day by day.

Employee-centered-approach, infact, had opened the

ways for developing the organizational efficiency by

humanizing the job conditions and as a consequent to it

motivational theories started pouring-in explaining human

needs and other factors like processes involved in the

determination of human motivation in the work context. The

efforts of Maslow (1943, 1954); Herzberg et al. (1959), and

Vroom (1964) are highly commendable who studied human

motivation and identified the peculiar reasons for human

motivation at work. Their contributions generated a lot of

interest among psychologist, supervisors and managers who

started using motivational theorists' views as strategy

while making efforts to deal with the subordinates and

gradually, the concept of job enlargement, job enrichmeh"t and

there-after the concept of QWL in the chronological order

emerged. We cannot deny the significance of improving QWL

strategy in enhancing workers' as well as organizational

productive efficiency as almost two decades back there was a

slogan in most of the affluent organizations as a matter of

their strategy that 'you make the people happy, they will

themselves be motivated towards work' '

After giving a bird's eye look over the history of

industrial psychology which has a chequered history, now has

changed from earlier management-centered-approach to

employee-centered-approach emphasizing over the better work

conditions as well as the work environment leading to the

present day focus on QWL, hence, the following description

will pertain to QWL as it is a dependent variable of the

problem entitled, "Influence of the Certain Personality

Variables and Organizational Characteristics on Perceived

QWL - A Study of Industrial Workers".

QWL (Quality of work life) is relatively a new term

but it is not completely a novel idea and it never fails to

spark some reactions. Some people think of it as a

manipulative exercise used by employers to protect

themselves from the union's oppsition or to stop a union from

establishing itself as an organization to withstand against

the employees grievances and exploitation, others tend to

deny the need to improve the quality of working life

specially the time when unemployment is high. For them, the

first priority is job creation. Some others view it as a

play on the part of organization to increase its

competitiveness and with regard to productivity, at the

expense of the workers energy and efforts. Finally, there

are those who simply see it as a passing fad in the wake of

many others, or as an effort of the intellectual elite to

impose its ideology as panacea against the ills of the

working environment.

In order to have clarity of understanding of the

evolution and exposition of the concept of "quality of work

life", one must refer to its dimensions in the light of

historical perspective. Even though, the expression is new

but in reality what it encompasses is not recent in origin.

"QWL" concept can be perceived as the top layer of the

series of attempts made for the purpose of improving the

conditions of work life. It is a matter of reality that even

after industrialization the work or industrial organizettions

have passed through various phases : when the condition of

work life were so unsatisfactory, and in some cases so

inhumane, that is the both economic and human interests it

became necessary to seek changes in the process that would

improve the quality both at psychological and physical

environment levels to enhance employees' quality of work

life.

It is evident from the history that at the end of

ninteenth century and the beginning of twentieth century,

the efficient role of workers in industry continued to be

evolved. This evolution was heading towards the strict

assimilation of the worker into the very operations of

machine. Scientific management, devised by Taylor with its

emphasis on increased productivity through specialization

was born. Taylor had advocated that if the principles of

Scientific Management are properly taken care of then it is

possible that human efficiency at work could have been

tremendously enhanced. His principles in brief follows which

have been discussed in detail in his book, "The Principles

of Scientific Management" published in 1911 :

1) Separation of planning from doing

2) Functional foremanship of supervision, having eight

different supervisors to give instructions in their

respective field.

3) Job analysis based on time, motion and fatigue studies to

determine fair amount of work.

4) Standardization of tools, period of work, working

condition and cost of production.

5) Scientific selection and training of workmen.

6) Financial incentives to motivate workmen.

Taylorism had and, it may still be argued that it

has undeniable economic advantages because one can observe

noticeable increase in productivity accompanied by higher

economic gains and raising standard of living for most

workers. It provides a greater emphasis for planning work

and enhancing standards of performance of industrial

organization. In recent decades, however, these economic

advantages have been considerably offsetted by increasing

human problems like boredom, alienation, absenteeism, under-

utilization of human skills, etc. and sometimes these turn

into organizational problems like absenteeism and at worst

the employees turn over.

Inspite of greater and wide-spread appeal of the

scientific management approach, it could not get rid-off

from increasing criticisms that later led the people to

evolve more positive thinking. Some people believed that

such thinking is a reaction to the obvious problems caused

by the reduction of the work cycle and simple repetitive

task. The "Human relation school" centered in the U.S. made

concerted efforts in the 1830's to acquire knowledge through

the disciplines of sociology and psychology for applying

these to the day to day industrial life. Not withstanding

the wide-spread criticism, the work of many of the social

scientist of the "Human Relation School" was directed

towards the refinement of Scientific Management by applying

new insight in evolving industrial system, not only in the

interest of workers but to optimize its manipulative

capacity in the interest of higher productivity and profit.

What had been the major approaches of human relation

movement initiated b\ the concerted efforts of mainly three

stalwards namely Mayo, Roethilisberger and Dickson in mid

1920's under the leadership of young Mayo but the most

important aspect focussed by them has the social needs which

emerge as one of the important turning point in the history

of industrial psychology and the administrative approaches

of the organizations. It will not be untrue in emphasizing

that human relation movement since its inception still

remains a dynamic concept, a philosophy, as well as approach

of the management to run the organization. As a consequence

to such realities motivational theories came into being one

after the other from the very first quarter of 1940's, all

explaining and identifying the factors of motivation in an

effort to focus on employees' centered approach as against

earlier management-oriented approach. In this regard

Roethilisberger and Dickson (1939), Trest and Bamforth

(1951), Mayo (1945), Homans (1950) and Trist, Higgin, Murray

and Pollock (1963) were of the very clear contention that

although economic incentives are essential but social needs

are important too. The other needs like self actualizing

needs has also been highly emphasized. Maslow (1954),

McGregor (1969) and Argyris (1964) pointed out that workers

are likely to be alienated because sometimes they are asked

to do some task, do not permit them to use skills and

capacities in a mature and productive way.

The above realities have been most likely

instrumental in the development of some of the strategic

approaches to motivate employees at work across hierarchial

levels right from the top to the bottom. What we are talking

about the approaches here have appeared in the form of

theories explaining the factors as well as the processes

involved. Therefore, motivation theories have been broadly

classified into two different categories that are given as

under :

(i) Content theories : Theories associated with human needs

which includes Maslowian need hierarchy and Herzberg's

two factor theories.

(ii) Process Theories : These includes Vroom's theory of

instrumentality and porter and Lawler's multivariate

model.

The above theories given in both the categories were

propounded which began from the first theory given by Maslow

namely. Need hierarchy theory of motivation which later

extensively used as a theory of job motivation since 1954.

Maslowian efforts generated a lot of interest among other

behavioural scientist, especially, psychologist who started

thinking to explain human motivation either in terms of

identifying the need structure or emphasizing the processes

involved in any motivating behaviour. Since the time in

memorial the phenomenon of human motivation was present but

in the very beginning of 1940's the .aspect of human

motivation was infact realized and people started working on

it. The greatest appeal related to the studies of human

motivation still occupies the same importance or it will not

be wrong to view that there is an increasing importance and

need of human motivation studies as the present era is

experiencing work complexities and the future is certainly

8

most likely to be tending towards more and more complexities

hence, the significance of analysing human motivation to

keep human being dynamically motivated and job involved will

remain a reality.

Since the objective of the present study is to

investigate the influence of personality variables and

organizational characteristics on perceived quality of work

life,,so, the description of motivational factors as well as

the processes involved in motivation have been discussed in

the last few paragraph were not out of context because QWL

approaches were and still all are directed to enhance human

motivation through the process of humanizing job and

enhancing employees' well being particularly on the job.

Now, the fore-going description will pertain specially to

QWL concept and studies.

It is imperative to mention that in the beginning of

1970's, the term quality of working life had moved

permanently into the vocabulary of unions and management,

even if a lot of people using it weren't exactly sure that

what territory it covers. Thereafter, quality of working

life approach with its strong emphasis on human dignity and

values to this traditional labour thrust by many unions has

been clear indicator at least in a descriptive term that QWL

had permanently entered the language of industrial relations

in the world at large.

Redesigning of job and organization had failed to

keep up wide-spread changes in worker aspirations and

attitudes. To have a better quality of life in the

organization, employers had two reasons for redesigning the

job - the first one was that classical design originally

gave inadequate attention to human needs and secondly, the

needs and aspiration of workers themselves were changing,

hence, required appropriate attention. There were several

remedies for the problem but the foremost option was to

redesign jobs to have the attributes desired by the people,

and to redesign organizations to have the environment design

by the people. This approach seeks to improve QWL.

QWL refers to the degree of favourableness with

regard to job environment for people. QWL produces more

humanized working environment hence, improving QWL is an

effort to meet human needs at work, atleast, minimum to the

adequate level where higher order needs are of more focus of

attention but importance of basic needs remain the key and

prerequisite aspects. The basic assumption of humanized work

is that work is most advantageous when it provides a "best

fit" among incumbents, jobs, technology and the environment.

Accordingly, the best design will be different to fit-in

different arrangements of these variables. The interest of

modern organization in enhancing quality of work life

developed as a consequence of the emphasis on job

enrichment. The term job enrichment was coined by Fredrick

Herzberg based on his research findings of two factors of

10

motivation viz., motivators and maintenance factors. Job

enrichment means that additional motivators are employed to

a job to make it more rewarding, although the term has come

to apply to almost any effort to humanize jobs. Job

enrichment is an expansion of an earlier concept of job

enlargement which sought to give workers a wide variety of

duties in order to reduce monotony. Job enrichment brings

many benefits such as Employee growth and self actualization,

improved motivation, reducing turnover, absence and moreover

enhancing job satisfaction through looking into employee's

grievances positively and favourably. It is also true that

the quality of human effectiveness in work organization, if

given a show, could be much more humanly, rewarding and

result-producing. Hence, hallmark of the quality of working

life is a co-operative approach encompassing mutual respect,

i.e. between superior-subordinates, among workers at the

horizontal levels, and the management and the employees

unions at the vertical level.

The term QWL is important both in industrialized as

well as developing countries. In India, its scope seems to

be more broader as many labour legislation enacted to

protect the workers in terms of both security and job

enrichment. It is more than a sheer work organization

movement which focusses on job security and employee's

socio-economic affluency.

11

since early 1970's psychologists and managers became

interested in studying the aspects of QWL. It was only in

1972 that a comprehensive term "quality of working life" was

coined by Davis who presented a paper at an international

conference at Arden House, New York.

Walton (1974) one of the major interpreters of

quality of work life movement has proposed eight main

conceptual areas for understanding the concept of QWL. These

are (1) adequate and fair compensation, (2) safe and healthy

working conditions (3) immediate opportunity to use and

develop human capacities (4) opportunities for continued

growth and security (5) social integration in the work

organization (6) constitutionalization in the work

organization (7) work and total life space (8) the social

relevance of work life.

Beinum (1974) has defined QWL in terms of the

quality of relationship between man and his task.

Seashore (1975) has pointed out that much of the

research in the quality of work life areas has been

primarily on the assumption that it is the individual's own

personal satisfaction and dissatisfaction that defines

quality of his or her work rather than any "objective"

criterion.

Spink (1975) made a concerted effort to define the

concept of QWL as "the degree of excellence in work and

working condition, when contributed to the over all

12

satisfaction of the individual and enhances the individual

as well as organizational effectiveness",''^

Attempt to define the concept of QWL have at times,

emphasized only selective issues such as job security, wage

equity, individualization or work place democracy.

Lippit (1977) thought of it as "the degree to which

work provides an opportunity for an individual to satisfy a

wide variety of personal needs to survive with some

security, to interact with others to have a sense of

personal usefulness, to be reorganized for achievement and

to have an opportunity to improve one's skill and knowledge.

Cherns (1978) as an area emphasizing to 'humani-

zation of the work place', work place democracy, work

restructuring or 'job design'. Chems contention to view

concept of QWL seems to be an inspiration taken from the

movement started by Elton Mayo, Roethlisberger and Dickson

in 1930's which is known as human relation movement - an

employee oriented approach for humanizing the job.

Menton (1979) described QWL as a relatively new term

for a bundle of old tissues that have long been of interest

to philosophers, theologians, social scientist, workers and

employers. It is a broad term that can embrace every

conceivable aspect of work ethic and work conditions,

workers expression of satisfaction and dissatisfaction,

managerial concern about efficiency of output and broaden

consideration of social cohesion and stability.

13

The 'American Society of Training and Development',

established a task force on the QWL in 1979 which defined it

as a process of work organization which enable its members

at all levels to actively participate in shaping the

organizational environment, methods and outcomes. This value

based process is aimed towards meeting the twin goals, i.e.

enhanced effectiveness of organization and improved quality

of life at work for employees (Skroun 1980).

A wider definition of QWL puts it as an "inter

nationally defined efforts to bring about increased labour

management co-operation to jointly solve the problem of

improving organizational performance and employee

satisfaction" (Cohen-Rosenlhal, 1980).

On the basis of the available survey of literature,

Needier and Lawler (1983) came to conclude that the

defintion of QWL underwent several changes and modification.

With regard to its conceptual understanding infact, they

came across six significant definitions of the term which

modified through various stages depending upon the type of

work environment.

A more specific definition by Davis (1983) describes

QWL as "the quality of relationship between employees and

the total working environment with human dimension added to

the usual technical and economic dimensions".

According to Reddy (1985) the concept of QWL has

been viewed differently. He pointed out that QWL is viewed

14

as "work redesigning in U.K., it is humanization of work

performance" in West Germany, and for the Japanese it is

"improving the quality of products". It is worth mentioning

here that Japanese appeared to initiate quality circle

movements in a large way in their industries and gradually

such programmes dominated in western world and European

organizations. Thus, quality circles also contributed

towards improving the quality of life of employees at work.

The above definition characterize that the goal of

QWL is a creation of organizational conditions that faster

learning and development and that subsequently provide

individuals with substantial influence and control over what

they do and now they are to do it, and that also provide

individuals to experience interesting and meaningful work

leading to personal satisfaction and to perceived valued

personal rewards^-^

Historically, the concept of QWL had originally

included only issues of wages (Lawler, 1968, Seashore and

Barnowe, 1972, Flangers et al. 1974, Pierce and Danham

1976), working hours and working conditions (West, 1969,

Ganguli and Joseph, 1969, Davis, 1971, Bell, 1974, Vaszkb,

1975, Johnson, 1975) .

The concept now has been expanded to include such

factors as extent of worker's level of satisfaction with

various aspect of work environment (Knave, 1984) by which

organization becomes responsible not merely to offer goods

15

and services of a high quality in the market place but

provide employees with jobs and an organizational climate

which allow them to experience intra-psychic rewards and

general life satisfaction which engaging in work (Sekeran

1985, Rue, 1984, Veno & Dufty 1982, Jouvenal, 1979). It was

realization, from 1970's onwards, that the total structure

of the work place based on sociotechnical principles and the

organization of work is necessary to meet the changing

expectations of employee and to increase productivity and to

improve QWL (Walton, 1972, Thorsurd, 1970, Walton 1972,

Anderson's, 1975, Griffeth, 1985).

Recently, it is contended that quality circles

programmes enhance employees participation that leads to

valued outcomes (Mohram and Novelli, 1985; Ballance, 1984).

Emphasis is also placed upon shared values by management and

labour for QWL measures to be successful (Peterson et al.

1982; Ranney, 1982). Involvement of human resources

development specialist can foster participant personal and

interpersonal capabilities which result in greater

satisfaction as employees enjoy jobs which permit discretion

(Elden and Taylor, 1983; Rosenfield, 1981, Rosow, 1979;

Mehta 1977). Recent finding reveals a mixed acceptance by

both labour and management of a concept of union management

cooperation in QWL improvement efforts (Hoiley et al. 1981;

Myers, 1971; Mire, 1974) and it has been claimed that

workers are more productive and interested in their

16

work and consequently QWL can be improved together (Katzell

and Guzzo 1983; Katzell, 1983; Sayeed and Sinha, 1981;

Orpen, 1977).

There are some challenging problems posing threat to

QWL which was not faced by early 1970's researcher. There

are adverse effect of advanced technology on QWL/negative

aspects of new technology with understandable concern about

its effect on unemployment leading to serve dislocation,

dehumanization, boredom and montony (Hackaray, 1981; 1980).

Having given a comprehensive detail of the concept and

definition of quality of work life in its historical

perspective, now, a birds eye view is necessary to look into

the quality of work life dimensions which are being

described below :

Heizel et al. (1973) have proposed four dimensions :

1. growth

2. mastery

3. involvement

4. self control

Walton (1975) has identified eight dimensions of

QWL. These are -

1. adequate and fair compensation

2. safe and healthy working conditions

3. development of human capacities

4. growth and security

5. social integration in the work organization

6. Constitutionalization in the work organization

17

7. work and total life space

8. social relevance of the work life

Boiswert (1977) identified fifteen dimensions of QWL

while Carlson (1978) has identified sixteen dimensions. The

work in American Institute has identified eleven dimensions.

According to Rosow (1981) these are (1) Pay (2) Employee

Benefit, (3) Job security, (4) Alternative work schedule,

(5) Job stress, (6) Participation in decision making, (7)

Democracy in work place, (8) Profit sharing, (9) Pension

right, (10) company programmes designed to enhance worker

welfare, (11) Four days work week.

The above mentioned aspects of work life were the

most important quality of work life issues of the 1980's and

Takezawa (1984) came across the following determinants of

QWL -

1. Occupational safety and health

2. Working hours

3. Job security

4• Fair treatment at work

5. Influence on decision making

6. Opportunity for advancement

7. Workers representation at ccsnpany's Board meetings etc.

It is apparently clear from the above mentioned

different identified clusters of QWL that interest in QWL

studies increased over the year as chronological description

advocates that with the passage of time there is an evidence

18

of increasing number of QWL-dimensions. From the post trend

it can be visualized that in future new QWL dimensions are

likely to emerge posing challenge to managerial strategy and

employees well-being at work.

We have been focussing on various dimensions of

quality of work life proposed by different non-Indian

authors. Indian researchers too have worked on QWL and have

found various QWL dimensions in Indian setting. Seventeen

dimensions have been identified by Sinha and Sayeed (1980)

which they have incorporated in the scale of QWL. These

dimensions are :

1. Economic Benefit

2. Physical working conditions

3. Career orientation

4. Advancement on merit

5. Effect on personal life

6. Mental state

7. Union Management Relations

8. Self respect

9. Supervisory Relationship

10. Intra group Relation

1 1 . Apathy

1 2 . C o n f i d e n c e i n Management

1 3 . Mean ingfu l deve lopment

14. Control influence and pa r t i c i pa t i on

1 5 . Employee commitment

19

16. General l i f e sa t i s fac t ion

17. Organizational climate

Identification of QWL-dimension is a continuous

process. It has been earlier mention that with the passage

of time, it may be witnessed that there are growing needs

which may pose challenge for the management and productive

efficiency could hardly be enhanced and maintained unless

these growing needs are properly taken care of. Having

stressed some light on the dimensions of QWL, now it is

necessary to give the description of the relevant studies

which may provide scientific and logical explanation for the

relevance of the present larger study in question. These

studies follow :

Rice (1958) initiated an experiment in a cotton

textile manufacturing group in Ahmedabad in 1953. Socio-

technical systems approach was introduced after a diagnostic

study in a participative form in four loomsheds - two

automatic and two non-automatic in the Calico mills and the

Jublee mills. The action were documented by rice in terms of

productivity as well as worker employment. The evaluation

further revealed that the 'whole' task approach to formation

of work groups, which is a basic tenet of the sociotechnical

approach resulted in substantially increased earnings for

the workers.

Payne and Pheysey (1971) pointed out that organi

zational climate is positively related to job satisfaction

20

to highlight the quality of employees work life, it is

important to mention here that job satisfaction is an

indication of positive QWL.

During (1984) Leinne et. al., to define QWL. A step

by step Delphi analysis was used to develop a definition and

measures of quality of working life in a case specific

setting. 64 employees from a large insurance company

constituted the Delphi panel that engaged in defining QWL

utilizing a 6 phase Delphi methodology. A 34 team QWL

questionnaire developed from that definition was then tested

with 450 of the company's employees. Result identified 7

predictors of QWL. Four of which extend beyond specific job

content.

a) Degree to which supervisor show respect and can have

confidence in the employees abilities.

b) Variety in a daily work routine.

c) Work challenges

d) degree to which present work leads to good future work

opportunities.

e) self esteem

f) extent to which life outside of work affects work

g) the extent to which work contributes to the society.

Bellanca (1984) describes the advantages of the

quality circle problem solving method for gifted students.

With the emphasis on analytical thought, a task structured

group process, school and community issues, implementation

21

of an action plan and evaluation of results, quality circle

develops not only the gifted students analytic thinking

skills but also their responsibility and leadership skills.

Hartenstein et al. (1984) emphasis that for QWL

measures to be successful, management and labour must have

shared values. Without such values, managers are often

authoritarian and deny worker's sense of involvement,

responsibility and autonomy - resulting in a lack of

committment and low productivity.

Schlesinger and Oshry (1984) discussed the need to

recognize the problems that QWL activities create for the

professional roles of middle managers. QWL activities may

indicate the problems that middle managers already face,

such as adequate recognition, lack of influence, and hectic

work place. It is argued that organizational changes adopted

as part of QWL effort must be linked to existing structure

and system over time. Means must be provided for middle

managers to discuss concern, share problems, develop skills

in the organization. The implementation of QWL measures must

be monitored with attention paid to the consequences of QWL

activities for all people in the organization.

For improving QWL Sinha (1983) conducted 2 studies

in chemical and textile factories in India that were

designed to improve the QWL by reorganizing the work and

introducing participatory management. The studies used

participatory workshop, goal setting exercises, interviews

22

and questionnaires. Significant changes were introduced in

the chemical company, including redefinition of the plant

manager's role, modification in the organizational

structure, and introduction of interdisciplinary projects

during the training of engineers. Plant production also

increases. No changes could be made, however in the textile

company, where everyone viewed the researchers as 'experts'

who had come to improve efficiency. This image was

strengthened by the fact that the action plan was not

evolved by the people who were to be affected by the change.

It is concluded that the consultant is willing to tap the

internal knowledge resources he/she will find it difficult

to implement change.

Two studies in 1985 highlights some issues of QWL in

the Indian context (Sengupta, 1985; Sekaran, 1985) Sekaran

made study on bank employees and found that QWL in bank is

not high, and he recognized reasons fairly for this area.

The external environment (Govt, and unions interference)

facing the banks are seen as impediments to take effective

actions by the banks. Findings of the study may suggest

govt, to formulate broad policies, leaving it to banks to

attain the goal by whichever means they think. Greater

decentralization, more autonomy power and control will

facilitate the individual banks to recruit the right people,

design the job as could be done, reward employees

differentially on the basis of performance and enhance QWL

and offering quality service to public.

23

Rice and with others (1984-1985) emphasis on

relationship between work satisfaction and quality of

people's lives. He contends that work experiences and

outcomes can affect person's general quality of life both

directly or indirectly through their effects on family

interaction, leisure activities and levels of health and

energy. Modification in work place can have their effect by

changing environment or changing worker's own

characteristics and they can affect his QL and family life.

Harrison (1985) emphasis on participative decision

making necessary precondition for successful ccmmunication

between superior and subordinate, but Griffeth (1985)

contrary to their hypothesis participation did not enhance

the effects of enriched workers.

Mathur and Pararype (1988) found significant

relation of overall job satisfaction with QWL feelings and

conditions.

Sharma (1989) on the basis of her investigatern

highlighted the importance of QWL and organization design

significant dimension of organizational functioning.

Gupta (1989) conducted a study with 170 professionals

working in government public sector organizations in India,

and found a significant positive relationship between QWL

and role efficacy. They also found that supervisory

behaviour is the most important dimensions of QWL.

24

Sehgal and Rana (19 90) made a comparative study of

male and female managers in the perception of QWL and they

obtained sex differences on the perception of quality of

work life.

The study of Dhillon and Dandona (1990) here

receives special mention at their study entitled "quality of

work life and job involvement". A comparative study of

managers of public and private banks is almost similar to

the present endeavour. The findings of the study advocate

significant difference in the QWL variables related to job

involvement in public and private banks.

Fields and Thacker (1992) conducted a study on the

influence of QWL on company and union commitment after the

implementation of the joint union management QWL program.

Result indicate that company commitment merged only when

participant perceived the QWL effort as successful, but

union commitment increased irrespective of the perception of

QWL success.

Aston and Lavery (1993) examined the possible

benefits of the workplace experience for women in terms of

rewards and concern intrinsic to the job, rewards and

concern extrinsic to the job, social support and cynicism.

Results reveal that intrinsic factors were generally related

to psychological well being, while extrinsic factors were

most closely related to physical health. A cynical attitude

was found to influence the value of work life or role, with

25

effects being particularly marked in the clerical group.

Davis and Sullivan (1993) conducted a new type of labor-

management contract involving the quality of working life.

Long and Richard (1993) conducted the study to see

the impact of new office information technology on job

quality of female and male employees and found significant

increase in job 4^ality of both male and female employees

subsequent to the introduction of computerization female

experienced significantly larger increase than males. This

occurred because clerical and secretarial employees

experienced much larger increase in job quality than did

professional/technical employees or managerial employees.

Apart from the above, QWL has also been studied in

relation to managerial levels. Extensive studies have been

conducted on need satisfaction and job satisfaction across

managerial levels. It is imperative to clarify at this

juncture that needs leading to satisfaction and different

aspects of job satisfaction are no more different from the

various dimensions of QWL as there also contribute the same

way to enhance QWL perception.

Porter getting inspiration from Maslowian model did

a significant work and established that the higher order

needs are differentially satisfied at various managerial

levels in an organization. Very recently Karrier and Khurana

(1996) related the QWL of 491 managers from three sectors of

industry (public, private and cooperative) with six

26

backg round v a r i a b l e s ( a g e , e d u c a t i o n a l q u a l i f i c a t i o n ,

e x p e r i e n c e , n a t i v e / m i g r a n t , number of d e p e n d e n t s and income

l e v e l ) and t h r e e m o t i v a t i o n a l v a r i a b l e s ( j o b s a t i s f a c t i o n ,

job i n v o l v e m e n t and work i n v o l v e m e n t ) . R e s u l t s r e v e a l e d t h a t

managers w i t h h i g h e r m o t i v a t i o n a l v a r i a b l e s had t h e

p e r c e p t i o n of h i g h e r QWL.

S r i v a s t a v a (1996) p o i n t s o u t t h a t o r g a n i z a t i o n a l

c l i m a t e and h i g h e r o r d e r needs ( s e l f e s t e e m , autonomy and

s e l f a c t u a l i z a t i o n ) a r e found t o b e p o s i t i v e l y r e l a t e d t o

job i n v o l v e m e n t . I t i s n e c e s s a r y t o p o i n t o u t t h a t t h i s s t u d y

has n o t d e n o t e d t h e v a r i a b l e s which had been u n d e r t a k e n f o r

s t u d y a s t h e t e r m QWL b u t o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c l i m a t e , h i g h e r

o r d e r n e e d s and a l l o t h e r b i o - s o c i a l needs a r e t h e

d e t e r m i n a n t s of q u a l i t y of work l i f e . Very r e c e n t l y Nasreen

and A n s a r i (1997) s t u d i e d on s u p e r v i s o r s and m i d d l e l e v e l

managers and r e p o r t e d t h a t s o c i o - p s y c h o p e r s o n a l i t y

v a r i a b l e s f a i l e d t o i n f l u e n c e QWL p e r c e p t i o n s . In a s i m i l a r

e f f o r t B a r k a t and Ansa r i (1997) found s i g n i f i c a n t i n f l u e n c e

of j o b t e n u r e and number of p r o m o t i o n s e a r n e d on p e r c e i v e d

QWL.

The p r e c e e d i n g a v a i l a b l e s u r v e y of l i t e r a t u r e were

p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e s t u d i e s on q u a l i t y of work l i f e which was

u n d e r t a k e n a s a d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e i n t h e p r e s e n t

i n v e s t i g a t i o n . Now, t h e d e s c r i p t i o n which a r e b e i n g p u t

f o r t h i n t h e w r i t i n g s t o p r o c e e d w i l l p e r t a i n t o t h e

i n d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e s v i z . , p e r s o n a l i t y v a r i a b l e s and

27

organizational characteristics. Firstly, personality

variables will be given a comprehensive look that may entail

its concept, determinants and available survey of studies

and therefore, another independent variable will be

discussed on the same above lines.

Personality Variable :

Of the several billion people who presently inhabit

the earth, no two are exactly alike. The vast differences

among them have made it difficult to identify what they

share in common as members of the human race. It is indeed,

true in the present circumstances and predicted to be

important in future too that quality of human life is likely

to be dependent upon an increased understanding at both

intra individual group and inter-individual/group levels.

Personality factors are extremely important in

organizational setting. One of the famous psychologist D.E.

James considers the individual aspect as the whole house

built of bricks, but held together with cement.

The term personality has been derived from latin

word 'personare' which means to speak through. The latin

term denotes the mark which the actors used to wear in

ancient Greece and Rome. Thus, personality is used in terms

of influencing others through external appearances.

According to Ruch, personality should include

(i) external appearance and behaviour or social stimulus

value

28

(ii) inner awareness of self as a permanent organizing

force

(iii) the particular pattern or organization of measurable

traits, both inner and outer.

It may mean different things to different people.

Thus, there prevails a great deal of controversy over the

meaning of personality. Allport (1937) has identified fifty

different definitions of the term. He has categorized them

into five areas as follows -

1. Omnibus - Personality as the sum total, aggregate or

constellation of properties or qualities.

2. Integrative and Configurational - under this view of

personality, the organization of personal attributes is

stressed.

3. Hierarchial - These definitions specify the various

levels of integration or organization of personality

4. Adjustment - This view emphasize the adjustment of the

person in the environment.

5. Distinctiveness - The definition for this category stress

the uniqueness of each personality.

Furthermore, he has given the definition of

personality. "Personality is the dynamic organization within

the individual of those psychophysics system that determine

his unique adjustment to the environment". However this

definition also suffers from deficiency as it fails to

emphasize individuals complete picture of dynamic

29

personality espec ia l ly t ha t emerges during interpersonal

re la t ions sometimes in the most opposing socia l s i t u a t i o n s .

What i t i s but i t i s cer ta in ly a composition of various

combinations of personal i ty t r a i t s and psycho-social make up

of human individual r e f l ec t ing e i the r in i so l a t ion or during

the course of in t e rac t ions with objec ts e i the r l i v ing ,

non-living and or favourable unfavourable.

/^ Personal i ty i s the basic core s t ruc tu re and as one

advances in age/ the re comes a change in one 's personal i ty

as a consequence of maturity experience and greater exposure

to the environment. I t also has key influence on

organizational e f fec t iveness . In jobs, where most of the

working days i . e . 1/3 f one 's job l i f e a re spent in te rac t ing

with ther people, personal i ty is the major determinant tha t

allows one to cope with the work envirorwent and a l so

influence the behaviour of others . Each man's personal i ty

reveal i t s e l f in the way he works with h i s superior , h i s

subordinates and other people.

There i s suf f ic ien t research evidence to support the

effect of personal i ty a t t r i bu t e s on job performance. Ghosh

and Munerikar (1974) have found t h a t Indian Managers are

somewhat emotional, casual , sens i t ive , tough, tense and group

dependent.

Menon (1974) on the basis of a study on 26 Managers

found that persons wh aggressive, l e ss secur i ty minded,

•ore cmmunicative, less anxious, more imaginative, l e ss

30

dependent, high achievement oriented, less cynical, more

open minded, less angry, more work oriented, less depressed,

less inhibited, more energetic, more money oriented and more

sensitive seem to develop attitudes favourably towards their

organizations.

Ghosh and Munerikar (1975) studied on similarities

and differences in personality characteristics among

managers have found that they are shy, aloof, emotional,

anxious, tense and excilable on one hand and on the other

they are independent and indifferent but resourceful with

the quality of moderate self sentiment. As compared to

Indian managers, they have found that American managers are

more matured, calm, somewhat suspicious talkative and

persistent.

' Patil and Munerikar (1976) in a study of 55 managers

have found that they are active, ambitious, relaxed,

self-confident, and somewhat depressed.

^Sen (1976) has studied the 15 personality traits of

25 senior executives in a commercial bank and found that

dominance, order, difference, achievement and introspection

are the main characteristics of these executives.

Saiyadain and Monappa (1977) conducted a survey on

various facets of the life and work of 17 2 middle level

managers from both public and private organizations

representing various functional areas. On two personality

characteristics viz., authoritarian and machiavellianism.

31

the study rlisclosed that there is an equal distribution of

those on the high side and those on the low side of the

scale whereas, two thirds of the managers score higher than

average on such personality traits as competence and need

for achievement.

Diwedi (1978) conducted a study on perception of

personality traits of managers (22 managers from public

sector and 30 from private sector) which provide evidence

for manager's perception for giving relatively high

importance to cooperativeness, intelligence, energetic and

sociability, low importance to aggressiveness, dominance,

confirmity independence and such personality factors as

flexibility, preservance, self controlled abilities are

placed in between. The correlation coefficient between

personality traits of public sector and private sector

managers was .90 which show no difference among the workers

of the public and private sector.

Sah (1989) conducted a study on personality

characteristics on 3 3 accident free and 32 accident involved

Indian railway drivers using the Rorschach test. Results

revealed that accident free group had better perception of

the reality situation, faster reaction time, higher levels

of the ego-functioning and better emotional control than

accident involved group.

Similarly, Nicholas (19 92) conducted a study to

examined the personality profiles of 71 female and 61 male

32

managers from the civil services using 16 PF. Results

suggest that managers scored higher or trait associated with

intelligence, dominance, confidence and extra version. This

pattern did not differ as a function of gender.

In accordance of our plan, now we would be making

efforts to give a comprehensive details of the other

independent variable viz; organizational characteristics is

being given as under :

Organizational Characteristics

To enhance perception towards Quality of work life of

job incumbents, organizational characteristics play very

significant role. It will not be unrealistic to say that

organizational characteristics do contribute in enhancing

the perception of quality of work life. Characteristics of

any organization are generally believed to be those

characteristics which are embeded in the organizational

structure as well as in the functioning of the organization

but the present investigator has viewed the scune with the

slight modification in meaning these characteristics. The

present researcher has not undertaken the characteristics

pertaining to organizational structure whereas, the focus of

attention is on those organizational characteristics which

are directly exerting influence over the job incumbents that

are most likely to generate motivation, satisfaction with

work and to enhance overall quality of work life

perception.

33

It has already been mention in the preceeding

paragraph that only functional aspects of the organization

as organizational characteristics have been taken for

studying its influence on QWL perception. These

characteristics are classified into several components

namely/ nature of supervisions, autonomy. Employee's

participation, feedback, organizational climate/culture,

promotional opportunities, organizational/company policies

and union-management relations. These organizational

characteristics appears to play inevilability very

significant role in developing a very conducive culture

directly influencing worker's motivation, satisfaction and

perceived quality of life in the work situation as has

already been stated above.

The very nature of organizational characteristics

presented above reflect on the behavioural side embeded in

organization and definitely we have not undertaken the

physical components of the organization like organizational

structure based on hierarchy and channels of communication.

It will not be out of context to mention here that physical

organizational characteristics like structure and channels

are gradually losing thair significance and importance in

this present day modern world of work as it has come to its

optimum level where organizations are physically known be

well structured and interlinked with all techniques of

information systems but what aspect are again being realized

very important in this late 2 0th century and is being

34

predicted to be dominating in the 21st century is that of

human related problems at work. Because of this reason for

the last twenty years HRD functions are being considered as

to play vital role in developing, maintaining and utilizing

human potentialities to the optimum level and for achieving

high economic benefits.

Since, organizations today are more emphasizing on

developing orgapizational culture which could positively

influence people at work. People-oriented organizational

policies and supervisory behavioural are definitely very

much the determinants of organization characteristics.

Hackman and Oldham (1975) have given five core

dimension popularly known as Job characteristicis i.e. (1)

Skill variety, (2) Task identity (3) Task significance (4)

Autonomy and (5) Feedback.

These five job characteristics are definitely related

to job itself and it can't be denied that these all appear

in the work environment as a matter of organization strategy

to improve organizational effectiveness are considered to be

organizational characteristics. It is very apparent from the

very five core dimensions that these are related to the

organizational functions directly influencing job

incumbents. The meaning associated to these five core

dimensions briefly follows :

1. Skill variety : One of the core dimension of job

characteristics is skill variety. It allows skill to perform

35

different operations that often require different skills.

Jobs are high in variety are seen by employees as more

challenging because of the range of skills involved. These

jobs also relieve monotony that develops from any repetitive

activity. Variety gives employees a greater sense of

competence, because they can perform different kinds of work

in different ways.

2. Task identity : A second core dimension is task identity,

which allows employees to perform a complete piece of the

work. Individual employees worked on such a small part of

the whole that they were unable to identify any product with

their efforts. When tasks are broadened to produce a whole

product or an identifiable part of it, then task identity

has been established.

3. Task significance : A third core dimension task

significance. It refers to the amount of impact, that the

worker has no another people. The impact can be on others in

the organization, as when the worker performs a key step in

the work process, or it may be on those outside the firm as

when the worker helps to make a life saving medical

instrument.

4. Autonomy : A fourth core dimension is autonomy. It is the

job characteristics that gives employees some discretion and

control over job related decision, and it appears to be

fundamental in building a sense of responsibility in

workers. Although they are willing to work within broad

36

constraints of an organization, they also insist on a degree

of freedom. The practice of management by objectives is one

way establishing more autonomy because it provides a greater

role for workers in setting their own goals and pursuing

plans to achieve them.

5. Feedback : A fifth core dimension is feedback. It refers

to information that tell workers how well they are

performing. It can directly come from the job itself, or can

be given verbally by management and other employees. The

idea of feedback is of much significance to people at work,

because they are investigating a substantial part of their

lives in work they want to know how well they are doing. The

workers should receive complete job feedback, both positive

and negative. If they receive only negative feedback, it may

not be motivating.

There has been scores of researches in support of

these job characteristics that when employees perceive these

characteristics as high in their job, they are likely to

have greater work commitment and to experience high quality

work. Leaders need to give special attention to the aspects

of autonomy and feedback while making strategy in

supervising subordinates. Other job characteristics should

also be properly taken care of to build conducive

organizational culture to promote positive employees feeling

towards their work. It has been emphasized earlier that the

present endeavour was made to see the influence of

37

organizational characteristics and certain personality

variables on perceived QWL. It, is indeed, important to note

here that organizational characteristics/variables are

important to effect human behaviour at work. The emphasis of

the modern management is to create such an organizational

and working conditions which may compel to the employees to

get motivated towards work rather than to evolve coercive

method for forcing the employees to work effectively. Hence,

there seems to be the greater implications of organizational

characteristics to improve the feelings of QWL among the job

incumbents.

Studies regarding organizational characteristics, it

has already been mention earlier that Hackman and Oldham

(1976) initiated to work on this aspect and there-after a

number of investigation have been undertaken (Hackman, 1977;

Miner, 1980; Noe Moeller and Fitzgerald, 1985; Click,

Jenkins (Jr), and Gupta, 1986; Fried and Ferris, 1987;

Zaccaro and Stone, 1988).

Apart from the above the studies on this problem

continues to attract the attention of researcher and as a

consequent to this reality that speaks of the significance

of the job characteristics in enhancing the perception of

high quality of work life as well as work related outcomes.

Snizek and Neil (1992) conducted a study on job

characteristics, gender stereotypes and perceived gender

discrimination in the work place and found that 37% of the

38

women claimed to have been victims of promotional

discrimination and 4% alleged that they had experienced day

to day discrimination.

Jones and Johnson (1993) conducted a study on 113

professional and support staff in a large petrochemical

company suggest that perceptions about management's

commitment to the success of the intervention was related to

perceptions of reduced role stress, more positive

relationships with management and more positive job related

attitudes.

Similarly Holcom, Lehman and Simpson (1993)

conducted a study to assessed relationships between employee

substance use and accidents at work in a scimple of 1,325

municipal employees. Results indicate that sample studied

likely to have accidents tended to have dysfunctional

personal backgrounds and reported that they were

dissatisfied and tense at work. Associating with substance

using peers, high level of depression and low levels of

religious service attendance were characteristics of sample

who had accidents.

Chatman, Jennifer and Sigal (1995) explored the

personal and situational sources of cooperation by

contrasting behaviour under conditions of personality fit

and misfit with culture in an organizational stimulation.

Results shows that cooperative people were more responsive

to the individualistic or collecting norms characterizing

their organization's culture.

39

Parks, Gallagner and Fullagar (1995) discuss the

apparent multidimensional nature of the ccxistruct of the

union participation. Result suggest that three distinct

dimension to union participation, each representing

potentially varying strengths of union commitment. The

administrative factors reflect office holding duties, the

intermittent factor reflects participation in activities

schedule and the supportive factor reflects ongoing

participation activities in support of other members of the

union. Findings also suggest that these dimension are

relatively stable across time periods among this group.

Bolfikova (1995) conducted a study to establish

criteria for evaluating fairness and justice in the decision

process regarding employees lay offs. Results suggest that

the decision process should contain a 3rd party/independent

element, employee participation, and an account of employee

value to the organization and employee characteristics.YAt

length, while terminating the introductory chapter of the

thesis, it is imperative to point out that whatever the

available studies cited in the preceeding pages either

related to personality variables or organizational

characteristics, though, these have not directly reflected

their influence on employee's QWL perception but it will not

be a very optimistic view if it is claimed that all these

studies if have been studied in relation to either

employee's work performance, productivity, satisfaction or

40

on other work related behaviour then definitely, indirectly

these are presenting to the parallel notion of QVTL.J KJ^'

Inspite of the above reality, it is very much clear

that studies fails to provide any strong evidence about the

effects of personality variables and organziational

characteristics on perceived QWL. Therefore, null

hypotheses were proposed to have micro level in-depth

investigation of the various aspects/factors of independent

variables on different facets of QWL as well as overall QWL

which have been dependent variables in the present

investigation. The details of the null-hypotheses follow :

Hoj Politeness - A personality disposition will not

significantly influence either of the 17-QWL facets

and overall QWL.

H02 Active - A personality disposition will not signi

ficantly influence either of the 17-QWL facets and

overall QWL.

Hoj Loyalty - A personality disposition will not signi

ficantly influence either of the 17- QWL facets and

overall QWL.

Ho^ Tactfulness - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Ho, Physically ac t ive - A persona l i ty disposi t ion wi l l not

s ign i f i can t ly influence e i t h e r of the 17-QWL facets

and overal l QWL.

41

Ho^ Easily pleased - A personality disposition will not


and over all QWL.

Ho^ Quick temp red - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Hoo Boring - A personality disposition will not signi


overall QWL.

HOg Responsibility - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Ho,Q Stubborn - A personality disposition will not signi


overall QWL.

Ho-|-j Flexibility - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

HO] 2 Prejudiced - A personality disposition will not signi


overall QWL.

Hoj 3 Manipulative - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

42

HOj ^ Unsociability - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Hoi5 Self Centered - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

HO] g Untrustworthy - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Ho] 7 Competitive - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Ho,g Cooperation - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

HOj g Assertiveness - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H020 Risk taking - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

Hojj Quick Decision - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

43

HOjj Thinking before taking decision - A personality

disposition will not significantly influence either of

the 17-QWL facets and overall QWL.

H023 Open hearted - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H024 No privacy - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

HO25 Talkative - A personality disposition will not signi


overall QWL.

Ho2g Uncontrolled - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H027 Depression - A personality disposition will not

significantly influence either of the 17-QWL facetls

and overall QWL.

H028 Cheerful - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H029 Realistic - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

44

Ho^Q Harshness - A personality disposition will not signi


overall QWL.

Ho3i Aggressive - A personality disposition will not signi

ficantly influence either of the 17-QWL facets and_L

overall QWL.

H032 Polytheist - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H033 Monotheist - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H034 Religiousity - A personality disposition will not


and overall QWL.

H035 Poor organizational prestige - An organizational

characteristics will not significantly influence

either of the 17-QWL facets and overall QWL.

Ho^g Poor organizational conditions - An organizational



H037 Inconvenient working hours - An organizational



45

HOoo Undemocratic Boss - An organizational characteristics

will not significantly influence either of the 17-QWL

facets and overall QWL.

HooQ Harsh Leadership - An organizational characteristics



H040 Less opportunity in decision making - An organizational



HOA-^ Unfair policy - An organizational characteristics will

not significantly influence either of the 17-QWL


Ho^2 Less opportunity in getting feedback - An

organizational characteristics will not significantly

influence either of the 17-QWL facets and overall QWL.

H043 Lack cf Autonomy - An organizational characteristics



H044 Tight Supervision - An organizational characteristics



H045 Beauracratic Leadership - An organizational charac

teristics will not significantly influence either of


46

Ho.g Supportive management - An organizational charac

teristics will not significantly influence either of


Ho -y Poor Union - Management relations - An organizational


either of the 17-QWL facet and overall QWL.

H048 Poor employee's participation - An organizational


either of the 17-QWL facet and overall QWL.

H049 Poor promotional opportunities - An organizational



CHAPTER - I I

M E T H O D O L O G Y

M E T H O D O L O G Y

S c i e n t i f i c invest igat ion involve sound procedures in

quest of achieving objec t iv i ty in f indings or r e s u l t s . All

s c i e n t i s t s including behavioural s c i e n t i s t s do agree that

ob jec t iv i ty in research finding i s not poss ib le unless i t

i s carr ied out in a very systematic and planned manner.

Hence, in carrying out any research i t becomes necessary to

have careful and adaptation of research design; se lect ing

standardized tools and t e s t ; ident i fy adequate sample

through appropr ia te sampling technique to undertake sound

procedures for co l lec t ing data and the rea f t e r data be

carefully tabula ted and analyzed by giving treatment of

appropriate s t a t i s t i c s to the data c o l l e c t e d .

The s teps cited above enhance o b j e c t i v i t y as well as

predict ive value of the f indings. Therefore, the findings

obtained through s c i en t i f i c procedure may be generalized to

predict behaviour and any other cause-ef fec . e la t ionship

especial ly a segment of population from where the data is

gathered and in giving of overal l populat ion in general .

Sample : In behavioural researches, a sample of a larger

population i s choosen which is a f rac t ion of population.

Mohsin (1984) contended tha t sample i s a small pa r t of the

t o t a l ex i s t i ng events, objects or the information.

Kerlinger (1983) believes that sampling i s an por t ion of a

population or universe as to be the r ep resen ta t ive of that

population or universe. Thus sampling i s a small portion of

population se lec ted for observation. Hence, i t i s possible

48

to draw reliable inferences or to make generalizations on

the population as a whole from where the sample is drawn.

The survey of available literature on QWL have

revealed that none of the QWL studies have been carried out

in relation to personality variables and organizational

characteristics specially on supervisors working in

industrial organization.,Therefore it was decided to conduct

survey on supervisors. Fpr this purpose General Manager,

Uptron India Limited (Lucknow) was approached who assured to

extend help in this regard and subsequently he extended

cooperation and provided me opportunity to meet supervisory

level en4>loyees in order to collect information.

It is imperative to mention here that this study was

planned to be conducted on both Hindu and Muslim

supervisors, hence it is successfully attained from a very

reputed company namely, Uptron India Ltd - a public sector

unit which has already been mentioned in the preceeding

paragraph too. UP Electronics Corporation Limited (UPTRON)

was established and incorporated on March 30, 1974 as a

subsidiary to the Pradeshiya industrial ana investment

Corporation or u.P. IPICUP) and later in i^^b it was

separated trom PICUP. It is wholly State Government owned

undertaking and was established with the sole aim ot prom

oting electronics in the state ot Uttar Pradesh and equity

ot this company was/is raised through shares subscribed by

U.P. Government.

49

At present UP Electronics Corporation Limited and

Uptron India Limited ccxnbined together have a human resource

of 2500 employees located at its various factories,

marketing offices and its corporate office at LucXnow.

At present, the total number of middle level

managers or officers in the Uptron India Ltd. Lucknow are

3 50 and out of the total human resources employed in the

company, the total number of employees in the category of

supervisors and other executive and managerial levels totals

N = 350 and almost all the entire population of middle level

managerial staff were approached for filling the

questionnaire, hence, N = 340 could be obtained. This is

definitely a larger chunck of population approximately 97%

were covered. The break of the sample population undertaken

for the present investigation is given below in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1. Showing sample Break-up.

Sample group No. of Employees

Hindu 250

Muslims 90

Total 34 0

50

And sample characteristics have been shovm in Table 2.2.

Tools Used : In order to have very clear cut understanding

of . human behaviour psychological tests are developed and

used. It must be kept in mind that there is no

psychological test which can tell about all aspects of

behaviour because of the complexity and variability of

psycho-emotional attributes of personality and human

behavioural dimensions. Therefore, every psychological test

is developed for some specific purpose. Among the various

methods used for understanding human . being, the

questionnaire method has been considered as the most

convenient and favourable instrument. A questionnaire

consist of number of statements/questions and the

respondents answer each according to the instruction which

is used here for measuring employees perception towards

quality of work life (QWL) and organizational

characteristics. Moreover, for identifying personality

characteristics of respondents semi-structured

adjectives-cum-statements type scale was developed. The

description of the questionnaires/scale follows :

QWL Inventory : This inventory has been developed by Sinha

and Sayeed (1980). The scale initially consisted of 18

dimensions but finally one dimension i.e. of Job stress had

been dropped on the basis of judges ratings. The ranaining

17 dimensions which were finally selected are given below

along with their meanings :

51

1. Economic Benef i t (EB) - Ge t t ing adequa t e monetary income

and rewards .

2. Physical Working Condi t ions (PWC) - Cond i t i ons a f fec t ing

physical comfort and convenience on and a t t he j ob .

3 . Mental S t a t e (MS) - Fee l ing of d e p r e s s i o n or being upset

a t work.

4 . Career O r i e n t a t i o n (CO) - Having o p p o r t u n i t i e s for

p rogres s .

5. Advancement on Merit (AM) - The e x t e n t t o which rewards

are based on m e r i t .

6. Effect on Personal Life (EPL) - The Langover e f f e c t on

the worker which may be p o s i t i v e or n e g a t i v e .

7. Union Management R e l a t i o n (UMR) - The r e l a t i o n s h i p

between union and management, c o n s i d e r a t i o n of each

o t h e r ' s p o i n t of view.

8. Self Respect (SR) - The f e e l i n g of be ing t r e a t e d with

respec t and due d i g n i t y .

9. Supervisory R e l a t i o n s h i p (SR) - Mutual unders tanding and

r e l a t i o n s h i p with the s u p e r v i s o r s .

10. I n t r a -g roup R e l a t i o n (IGR) - The way workers i n t e r a c t in

a group.

1 1 . Apathy (A) - Workers concern for work.

12. Confidence in Management (CIM) - B e l i e f t h a t management

i s aware of and has concern for workers problem and

i n t e r e s t .

52

13. Meaningful Development (MD) - Opportunities to learn

more and to use skills and abilities in a challenging

way.

14. Control, Influence and Participation (CIP) - The extend

of workers influence and control on their work, moreover

involvement in decision making.

15. Employee Commitment (EC) - Loyalty to organization and

concern for future.

16. General Life Satisfaction (GIS) - Fulfilment of Life

needs apart from the work situation i.e. in family in

society etc.

17. Organizational Climate (OC) - The organizations outlook

and approach in the interest of the worker for the

betterment of the organization.

Each item of the questionnaire was required to be

assessed by the respondents on a 7 point scale from minimum

scale value of '1' to maximum scale value of 7. By summing

up the score of items dimension wise the extent of presence

of QWL in each dimension or facet were obtained in the

respondent's experimental as well as perceptual perspective

in context of the organization in which an employee was

working. Moreover, the summation of the total scores of the

inventory irrespective of the dimensions provided an overall

picture of quality of work life condition of the

respondents. QWL - inventory is appended, hence consult

Appendix I. So far as the reliability of the inventory is

53

concerned, the inventory is found to be highly reliable as

obtained value of coefficient alpha .97 is substantially

very high. The validity of the sub-scales reported to have

obtained by means of known group methods. The t-ratio of the

sub-scale ranges from t = 4.18 to t = 6.68 and subsequently,

all the value of sub-scale are reported to be significant

beyond the level of .01, hence the validity of the scale is

found confirmed.

Personality Attribute Scales (PAS) : Personality attributes

scale was developed by the researcher herself. There were 34

adjectives plus statements representing personality

characteristics and the respondents were required to respond

on 5 point scale by giving a score of 1 to the personality

attributes which were present in themselves in minimum

degree and score of 5 when these were present in maximum

degree (Appendix II). The scoring was simple because it was

done by simply adding the scores given to various attributes

but reversing the scores having negative attribution for

understanding overall personality characteristics of the

respondents. On the other hand each attribute present

individual characteristics in itself.

Organizational Characteristics Scale (OCS) - The third scale

of organizational characteristics was also developed by the

researcher herself. The scale consisted of 15

characteristics plus statements representing organizational

characteristics and the respondents were required to respond

54

on 5-point scale by giving a score of 1 to the

organizational characteristics which were present in

themselves in minimum degree and the score of 5 when these

were present in maximum degree (Appendix III). The scoring

was simple because it was done by simply adding the scores

given to various characteristics but reversing the scores

having negative characteristics for understanding overall

organizational characteristics of the respondents.

Biographical Information Blank (BIB) - To know the

information about the biographies of the respondents, a

biographical information blank (BIB) was prepared that

includes age, designation, department. . ob tenure, income,

family structure, salary, qualification, number of

promotions received, marital status, training received if

any. General health and religion (Appendix IV).

Statistics Used - For giving statistical treatanent to the

data, multiple regression analysis which is a powerful set

of statistical technique and permit to assess the

relationship of many independent variables simultaneously

with one dependent variable was applied. The technique

consist of multiple, hierarchial and . the stepwise

regression. The term regression and correlation are used

more interchangably. The regression is used with an eye on

prediction, where as correlation is more meaningful for

determining the degree of association.

55

Multiple regression is the technique by which the

value of the dependent variable is predicted from the

knowledge of the value of the independent variable. The

variables used for predictor is called predictor variables

and the variables that is predicted is called Criterion

variable. As a preliminary step it can be determined how

strong the relationships are between independent variables

and dependent variables.

In a simple way, we can say that multiple regression

is a statistical technique which is used to relate

independent variable to dependent variable.

In the present analysis standard multiple regression

analysis has been applied. This standard or simultaneous

strategy calls for entry of all independent variables into

the regression equation at once. Each independent variable

is assessed as if it had entered the regression after all

independent variable has been entered. Each independent

variable can be evaluated in terms of what it adds to

prediction of the dependent variable 'F' value of Anova for

regression predicted overall influence of all independent

variable on the dependent one and the main variable

predicting dependent variable are confirmed by significant

'f value.

f r ^ •: ' ' Ace. iv. ^ •'

\5\:^^3:1- ••

M

U c 10

o <

<:

u • H 4J ID

• H U <a *j V (0 u £ U

E

10 c o

• H M-l 4J "O

o o -i «0

(0

c 0)

o c • a

O (U

> 1

0)

0)

u c

• H C u <u 0 ) CO

ad)

u a a

(U o c 0)

•iH - ^ »-l to (U U a«D X (U

^ c

o

c ro (U

c 10

c 10 0)

0)

C (0

c «0

c 10 PS

c

on C m

C <0 0)

s

(1) en c m «

(0

a D O J-i

o

CM

I

CM

I CM

VO

CM

I

CM

o>

o

C O I

0 0

i n I

CM

CM

o

n

o

I

r-t CM

CTi

I I D

0 0 IT)

oo

00 I

LD

n I I

i n

in in

CM

I

o

i n I

CN

cri

0 0 CM

i n

I

CM

cn IX)

n

0 0 I

o

<Ti

56

CO

I

to E

•rH r—1

w D 2

(0 D -0 c •H E

(0

o EH

1-1 XI (0 4J

(U > o (0

(U

c >

• H t7^ Q) U rO

CO C o

• H 4-) fO

E

O c

• H

•0 u

• H s: a )-i

O - H CQ

CHAPTER - I I I

R E S U L T S

R E S 0 L T S

The present chapter is the soul of the entire

endeavour. It has already been described, time and again, in

the preceeding chapters that the aim of the present larger

investigation was to study the influence of certain

personality attributes and organizational characteristics on

perceived Quality of Work Life. To acconplish the afore

mentioned task, supervisors and middle-level managers were

chosen as sample on whom test administered and data

collected; and thereafter, tabulation of data undertaken and

through computer analysis the results were obtained.

Before discussing results and giving interpretations

of the findings, it seems important here to describe the plan

on which basis results will be presented. The table of the

results have been classified into three cluster of groups. In

one cluster of tables, which ranges from Table 3.1 to Table

3.36pertain to Hindu supervisors, and middle-level managers;

the other cluster of tables consists of tables from Table

3.37 to Table 3.72 are related to Muslim incumbents whereas,

the third cluster of tables from T ble 3.73 to Table 3.108

provide the findings of the total sample population

irrespective of Hindu-Muslim job incumbents. Apart from the

grouping of tables it is also very important to point out

here that all the seventeen dimensions of dependent variable

that is of QWL have been separately undertaken for studying

the influence of independent variables viz. personality

58

attributes and organizational characteristics on each QWL

dimensions separately and on QWL as a whole.

As mentioned above, the ongoing description will

follow the same sequence in highlighting the results. Having

described the results of this larger study, the findings

will then only be discussed in detail. The description of

results would be empirically testing the influence of IV's

(personality attributes and organizational characteristics)

on 17 dimension of QWL separately and then on total QWL for

Hindu supervisors, Muslim supervisors/middle level managers

and the total sample independently.

Hindu Middle Level Managers :

It is evident from Table 3.1 which gives a brief

picture of the influence of independent variables

(personality variables and organizational characteristics)

on dependent one i.e., "economic benefit" - one of the QWL

facet" that F value which is F = .95027 is highly

insignificant even at .05 level of confidence. The

reliability of the findings were further verified the

influence of each independent variable through statistical t

value and these again found to be very low even at .05

level.

For the convenience is seems necessary important to

mention here that instead of mentioning the details of the

personality variables and organizational characteristics in

59

each table of multiple regression analyses, time and again,

we are here giving the details from Variable No. 19 onward,

hence, the same corresponding variable No's given in Tables

will mean the same as given below :

Personality Attributes

19. Polite

20. Mentally Active

21. Loyal to supervisors/organizations

22. Tactful

23. Physically Active

24. Easy to be pleased

25. Quick Tempered

26. Boring

27. Responsible

28. Stubborn

29. Flexible

30. Prejudiced

31. Manipulative

32. Unsocial

33. Self Centered

34. Untrustworthy

35. Competitive

36. Co-operative

37. Assertive

38. Easy to take risk

39. Take quick decision without caring the decision are

right or wrong.

60

40. Have a thinking before taking a decision in quest of

taking right decision.

41. Open Hearted

42. No privacy

43. Talkative

44. Not easy to be pleased

45. Depressive

46. Cheerful

47. Realistic

48. Harsh

49. Aggressive

50. Polytheist

51. Monotheist

52. Religious

53. Total of the Personality Variable

Organizational Characteristics :

54. Poor Organizational Prestige

55. Poor Organizational Conditions

56. Inconvenient Working hours

57. Undemocratic Boss

58. Harsh Leadership

59. Less opportunity in decision making

60. Unfair policy

61. Less opportunity of getting feedback

62. Lack of autonomy

63. Tight Supervision

61

6 4 . B u r e a u c r a t i c

6 5 . S u p p o r t i v e Management

6 6 . P o o r u n i o n management r e l a t i o n

6 7 . P o o r e m p l o y e e ' s p a r t i c i p a t i o n

6 8 . Poor p r o m o t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s

6 9 . T o t a l of O r g a n i z a t i o n a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

Table 3.1. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the Influence of IV's on Economic Benefit - a

facet of QWL

S o u r c e of PP 5 5 ^ j , S . : . v a l u e V a r i a t i o n

A t t r i b u t i o n 51 8 2 2 . 0 4 3 5 8 16 .11850 0 .95027 t o R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 208 3528 .09521 16.96200 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 259 4350 .13867

S i n c e , F v a l u e found t o b e i n s i g n i f i c a n t i n T a b l e 3 . 1

h e n c e i t i s n e c e s s a r y t h a t a l l I V ' s a s g i v e n above i n t h e

p r e c e e d i n g p a r a g r a p h s must have i n s i g n i f i c a n t i n f l u e n c e on

DV, wh ich a r e found h e r e t o o , a s t v a l u e s r a n g i n g from

minimum t = .0 0684 t o maximum t = .0 4075 a r e found t o b e

s t a t i s t i c a l l y h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t .05 l e v e l of

c o n f i d e n c e ( T a b l e 3 . 2 ) .

The above o b t a i n e d f i n d i n g s r e v e a l t h a t o r g a n i z a t i o n a l

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s do n o t h a v e any

Table

•

V A H J

I V

2 6

2 1

2 i

i l

2 4

2 S

2 6

el

2e

i<r

3 C

3 1

1 2

3 3

3 *

3S

3 6

3 7

J e

3V

4C

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 4

4 S

4 0

4 7

4a

4 9

so S I

S 2

S3

S 4

5 5

5 6

5 7

i i

5 9

6C

6 1

6 c

6 3

6 4

6 5

o c

o 7

o S

6 9

oi.Pt.

1

3 . 2 . Showi dimen

• K i t " L J " .

4 . 0 1 1 5 ^

3 . 7 2 S 9 :

3 . 6 S J 0 0

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 5 0 0 0

2 . ! 5 7 6 9

2 . 4 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 S 4 6

2 . E i 5 3 S

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 8 4 t

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 6

3 . 1 5 6 1 5

3 . ( 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 F 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

2 . 9 5 C 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . C 5 7 6 ?

3 . O C 0 0 0

2 . ( C 7 6 9

2 . 6 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 9 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . S 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 6 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 S 5

2 . 6 0 3 S 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 ( 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 0 7 6 C

2 . » i i C 7 7

2 . 3 2 3 0 c

3 . 0 1 5 3 ?

2 . 3 1 5 ? ?

2 . 5 6 5 ? i

2 . 4 5 3 S 5

2 . 4 9 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 » ( > 7 7

S D E N T

1 4 . 0 S 4 i > 2

Regression Analyses - Economic Benefit 62

l N T i « C £ P I

hJLIIPLE CCrRlL»TICK

iii>. tiiRca Of tsuftn

I V U I I O N

0 . i f 9 5 9

1 . 1 ? 4 » «

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 ? 0 S

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 1 0

1 . 1 J 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 ^ 5 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 * 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 J 2 t 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 / 6 8

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 6 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 8 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 6

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . J 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

1 . 2 5 8 1 5

1 . J 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 i

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 , 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 t 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

4 . 0 9 8 2 8

2 3 . 8 7 7 3 5

a . 4 3 4 7 1

< . . 1 1 { 4 9

» V S Y

- 0 . C 7 1 2 2

- 0 . 1 1 3 0 6

0 . 0 3 7 7 2

0 . 0 5 6 6 3

- 0 . 0 7 3 8 0

- 0 . 0 0 3 1 4

0 . S 4 7 C 1

- 0 . 1 0 5 4 1

0 . 0 2 9 7 4

- 0 . 0 0 7 6 7

- 0 . 0 7 3 8 4

- 0 . 0 3 4 1 4

0 . 0 3 0 7 4

C . 0 1 7 3 S

0 . 0 6 3 B C

0 . 0 2 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 1 3 9 7

- 0 . 0 5 0 9 6

- 0 . 0 9 3 9 0

- 0 . 0 4 5 6 9

0 . 0 5 2 4 7

0 . 0 3 5 7 :

- 0 . 3 8 5 8 3

- 0 . 0 1 7 1 8

- 0 . 0 7 7 0 4

- 0 . 0 1 2 6 8

- 0 . 1 1 0 8 5

- 0 . 1 4 3 - 0

0 . 0 6 3 ' . 4

- C . 0 4 3 9 3

- 0 . 0 « 9 0 3

0 . 0 4 2 7 2

0 . 0 6 4 4 9

0 . 0 6 4 7 3

- 0 . 0 7 6 4 3

- 0 . 0 0 9 8 8

0 . 0 2 6 2 4

- 0 . 0 0 5 7 6

- 0 . 0 4 0 6 S

0 . 0 1 4 1 6

3 . 0 3 5 2 7

- 5 . 0 2 6 4 S

- O . C 4 4 f l 7

- 0 . 0 0 7 5 2

0 . C 4 3 3 5

0 . 0 3 3 4 5

- 0 . 0 3 7 5 I

- 0 . 5 1 9 2 C

0 . C 2 5 3 4

0 . d l 9 4 £

S . 0 C 1 4 1

W f O R f S 5 I C N C C t F f I C H M

- 1 . 2 3 0 7 4

- 1 . 8 3 7 1 0

- 1 . 0 1 7 1 9

- 1 . 1 3 8 3 9

- 1 . 4 6 9 9 9

- 1 . 1 0 8 0 3

- 1 . 1 7 8 5 5

- 1 . 6 3 5 8 4

- 0 . 7 6 6 8 9

- 1 . 3 8 9 5 5

- 1 . 4 4 3 6 1

- 0 . 8 8 1 0 4

• 1 . 2 8 9 9 8

- 1 . 3 6 1 0 4

- 1 . 2 0 1 7 5

- 1 . 0 2 5 3 4

- 0 . 9 2 8 9 0

- 1 . 6 1 1 9 8

- 1 . 5 1 9 2 9

- 1 . 5 5 3 9 6

- 0 . 9 0 5 0 0

- 0 . 9 2 4 3 4

- 1 . S 1 4 8 4

- 1 . 0 9 J 5 5

- 1 . 6 7 3 0 6

- 1 . 0 5 6 9 6

- 1 . 4 7 7 6 5

- 1 . 9 4 J 5 3

- 1 . 0 1 3 P 0

- 1 . 5 0 4 4 8

- 1 . ( 1 6 8 1

- 1 . 1 0 1 6 0

- 0 . 9 1 b l 7

- 1 . 1 2 5 7 9

1 . 1 9 4 7 3

- 0 . 7 0 7 4 3

- 0 . 3 9 7 5 1

- 0 . 5 4 0 3 8

- 0 . 7 6 3 0 4

- 0 . 6 4 5 7 1

- 0 . 2 4 6 9 7

- 0 . 5 6 3 9 9

- C . 8 9 9 4 1

- 0 . 2 8 5 9 0

- 0 . 2 7 2 6 9

- 0 . 3 1 8 0 2

- 0 . 7 4 5 6 4

- C . 7 0 9 4 9

- J . J 1 8 4 9

- 0 . 3 6 3 6 4

0 . 4 7 9 3 0

O f K t O . C C t f .

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 5 6

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 0 7

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 1 $

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 3 1

1 1 2 . 1 3 5 2 5

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 5

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 1 ?

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 8 1

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 0

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 0 9

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 1 7

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 2

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 4 4

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 0 6

1 1 2 . 1 3 S B 3

1 1 2 . 1 3 5 6 4

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 7 3

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 9 6

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 9 7

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 3 8

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 3 4

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 1 5

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 2 0

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 1

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 2 9

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 4 9

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 3 1

1 1 2 . 1 3 5 6 5

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 8

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 6 2

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 7 5

1 1 2 . 1 3 7 0 2

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 2 2

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 5 1

1 1 2 . 1 3 6 8 C

2 2 . C 6 6 7 6

2 2 . 0 6 9 3 0

2 2 . 0 6 8 0 0

2 2 . 0 6 9 7 1

2 2 . 0 6 9 5 5

2 2 . 0 6 8 6 2

2 2 . 0 6 8 5 7

2 2 . 0 6 9 1 1

2 2 . 0 6 7 7 3

2 2 . 0 6 6 6 4

2 2 . 0 6 8 1 0

2 2 . 0 6 8 4 1

2 2 . 0 6 6 5 6

2 2 . 0 6 9 8 5

2 2 . 0 6 8 0 4

2 2 . 0 6 7 1 7

— —

( 0 - P U U D 1 V * L U t

9 . 0 1 0 9 8

0 . 0 1 6 3 8

0 . 0 0 9 0 7

e.etois 0 . 0 1 3 1 1

0 . 0 0 9 8 8

O . O 1 0 1 5

0 . 0 1 4 6 1

0 . 0 0 6 8 4

0 . 0 1 2 3 9

0 . 0 1 2 8 7

.• 0 . 0 0 7 8 6

0 . 0 1 1 5 0

0 . 0 1 2 1 4

0 . 0 1 0 7 2

0 0 9 1 4

1 . 0 0 8 2 8

- 0 . 0 1 4 3 8

0 . 0 1 3 5 5

0 . 0 1 3 8 6

0 . 0 0 8 0 7

0 . 0 0 8 2 4

0 . 0 1 3 5 1

0 . 0 0 9 7 5

0 . C 1 4 9 2

0 . 0 0 9 4 3

0 . 0 1 3 1 8

0 . 0 1 7 3 3

- 0 . 0 0 9 0 4

0 . 0 1 3 4 2

0 . 0 1 2 6 3

0 . 0 0 9 8 2

0 . 0 0 8 1 7

0 . 0 1 0 0 4

0 . 0 1 0 6 5

0 . 0 3 2 0 6

O . O I B O I

0 . 0 2 4 4 9

0 . 0 3 4 5 7

0 . 0 2 9 2 6

0 . 0 1 1 1 9

' 0 . 0 2 5 5 6

0 . 0 4 0 7 S

0 . 0 1 2 9 6

0 . 0 1 2 3 7

3 . 0 1 4 4 1

0 . 0 3 3 B O

0 . 0 3 2 1 5

0 . 0 1 4 4 3

0 . 0 1 6 4 B

0 . 0 2 1 7 2

http://oi.Pt

Table 3 . 4 . Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Physical Working 63A Condition - dimension of QWL

VARUBLt ( •0 .

IV 1

2w

21

4 2

23

2«

2S i

26 i

27

26 :

29 :

30 i

31 I

32 ]

33 i

H 1

35

36

37

38

39 .

«0

^1

H

43

'•I- i

t-i 4

46

47 :

48 i

•>1 i

SO 4

S I <

S2 ,

S3 lO i

S4

ss

S6

S7

se

S9

oO

61

62

63

6 4

OJ

06 1

67 ,

08 i

69 *t

i>£PENOENT

2 I J

i N T E R C t F t

m i L T l P L E C(

STD. ERROR

" I A N S

> . 0 ) 1 ) 4 (

1 . 7 2 0 0 2 1

I . 6 S 0 O 0

( . 2 9 2 3 1 1

I . S 1 1 5 4 ;

1 . 0 5 0 0 0 1

! . 3 5 7 6 9 I

( . 6 4 2 3 1 1

I .SBB46 1

E.S6SS8 J

M 9 6 1 S 1

[ . 7 3 0 7 7 ]

( . 7 3 8 4 6 J

> . 5 4 2 3 1 1

' . 9 3 0 7 7 ]

1 . 0 2 3 0 8 1

1 . 1 9 6 1 5 ]

1 . 2 5 0 0 0

1 . 0 8 4 6 2 J

S . 0 2 3 0 8 I

( . 9 5 0 0 0 J

J . 1 3 0 7 7 ]

1 . 0 8 4 6 2 J

1 . 0 5 7 6 9 J

t.OOOCC J

( . 9 0 7 6 9 J

( . S 1 1 5 4 1

1 . 0 7 6 9 2 1

t . 0 9 2 3 1 1

( . 7 6 9 2 3

( . 8 4 2 3 1 )

( . 3 9 2 3 1 )

( . 2 0 3 4 5

( . 1 8 0 7 7 1

( . 4 1 1 5 4 1(

1 . 2 1 1 5 4 J

I . 0 0 3 S 5 J

! . 8 9 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

; . 3 3 4 6 2

? . 6 3 4 6 2

f . o o r i s s

( . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 0 8 0 7 7

( . 8 2 3 0 8

S . 0 1 5 3 8

2 . 8 1 5 3 8

( . 5 6 5 3 8

( . 4 5 3 8 5 J

( . 4 9 6 1 5

K79977 t

! . 2 3 0 7 7 }

)RREL»TIOX

OF EST I fATF

t«NC«RO V IAT ION

) . '»89J9

. 1 2 4 6 8

l . ) l f t?8

1.172*S

l .» IS9«

. } * • • (

i.trsa?

1 .29706

L . i 6 S 8 2

. ^ 0 2 1 4

. 2 1 6 0 4

L .21629

1 .2798S

. 3 5 9 2 7

. 2 7 7 6 0

. 3 3 2 4 9

. 2 3 4 9 4

1 .23768

L .18246

1 .22689

L .25371

. 2 6 9 7 2

1 .28270

L .22101

L .19845

1 .2609J

1.2S214

. 2 9 2 1 8

1 .25785

1 .24298

. 3 2 7 6 6

1 .30928

L.24924

. 3 2 4 7 0

> . 7 ; » 4 0

1 -20707

. 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 0 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

.;>s«.is

L.1624S

1 .24972

1.2 3629

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

l . 2 1 f 4 < .

1 .29729

. 2 4 9 3 2

1 . 2 * 2 7 7

k .54236

. 0 8 7 0 0

7 . 5 9 6 6 8

0 . 4 1 8 8 5

3 . 1 2 8 0 0

CCRKI l * ! I O S X vs y

0 . 0 1 7 J O

- 0 . j s o e i

- O . O . ' 3 9 ?

- 9 . 0 1 6 5 8

- 0 . 0 5 3 1 7

0 . C 6 5 0 4

- 0 . 0 1 2 1 0

0 . 0 0 2 3 7

0 . 0 0 4 6 3

- 0 . 0 2 9 0 5

- 0 . 0 0 3 S 8

- 0 . 0 7 2 8 5

- 0 . 0 5 5 0 3

- 0 . 0 1 5 2 2

- 0 . 0 6 3 4 8

0 . 0 4 0 0 0

- 0 . 0 2 6 1 0

- 0 . 0 0 5 0 5

- 0 . 0 4 5 5 6

- D . 0 3 4 0 3

- 0 . 0 9 7 3 8

0 . C 3 9 5 5

C . 0 2 8 2 0

0 . 0 7 7 3 8

- 0 . 1 0 0 1 9

- 0 . 0 7 3 S 6

- 5 . 0 6 9 9 4

3 . 0 1 3 9 2

- 0 . 0 2 1 4 2

0 . 0 2 2 9 9

- 0 . 0 5 4 2 0

- C . 0 2 6 3 1

- 0 . 0 1 6 2 5

- C . 0 1 4 0 2

- 0 . 0 8 9 C 8

- 0 . C S 6 6 7

0 . C C 3 1 2

- 0 . B 2 7 1 0

- C . 1 C 9 7 0

0 . C 2 1 7 J

- 0 . 3 1 2 8 4

- 0 . 1 » 4 4 9

- 0 . 0 9 1 9 5

0 . 0 2 1 1 7

C . 0 5 9 3 0

0 . 0 0 3 2 0

-O.OJBV 0

- 0 . 1 0 4 0 5

O . C 2 ? 8 e

- 0 . 1 7 7 0 7

-o.ieioa

•

R f O R t S S l O N C C l f F I C U N T

• 0 . 4 0 6 6 6

- 0 . 9 2 2 0 7

- 0 . 3 7 6 7 4

- 0 . 5 3 5 0 0

- 0 . 4 9 5 8 3

- 0 . 3 3 3 1 1

- 0 . 5 9 0 1 8

- 0 . 4 4 6 2 5

- 0 . 3 8 0 1 5

- 0 . 6 0 1 8 6

- 0 . 5 1 5 6 5

- 0 . 6 1 4 6 8

- 0 . 6 9 7 2 4

- 0 . 4 7 9 0 5

- 0 . 7 9 2 8 3

- 0 . 3 4 3 8 9

- 0 . 6 0 5 4 0

- 0 . 4 2 8 6 9

- 0 . 7 9 5 4 3

- 0 . 5 7 C 0 6

- 0 . 5 3 6 4 8

- 0 . 3 7 9 8 8

- 0 . 4 6 S 8 5

- 0 . 2 5 6 7 7

- 0 . 8 6 5 3 1

- 0 . 8 2 2 4 5

- 0 . 6 9 5 9 7

- C . 5 2 2 5 9

- 0 . 5 5 6 0 3

- 0 . 5 6 2 6 8

- 0 . 6 5 3 9 5

- 0 . 4 2 3 6 6

- 0 . 5 4 0 5 5

- 0 . 5 2 7 9 7

0 . 6 1 0 9 9

- 0 . 3 S e 3 6

6 . 5 1 2 3 9

- 0 . 2 0 1 5 1

- 0 . 3 8 6 8 3

0 . 1 S S 3 1

0 . 0 1 0 2 5

- 0 . i 7 579

- 0 . 3 2 4 1 7

0 . 0 4 4 6 3

0 . 2 2 1 9 0

- 0 . 1 5 4 3 0

- 0 . 0 6 5 5 1

- 0 . 5 5 6 5 5

0 . 4 ( 6 59

- 0 . 4 8 9 * 0

0 . 0 r j 7 2

OF R E C . C C t F .

8 S . 1 6 7 6 9

8 5 . 1 6 8 0 8

8 5 . 1 6 8 1 4

8 S . 1 6 7 5 0

8 5 . 1 6 6 6 9

8 5 . 1 6 7 7 6

8 S . 1 6 8 1 1

8 5 . 1 6 7 8 8

8 1 . 1 6 7 7 2

8 5 . 1 6 7 3 4

8 5 . 1 6 8 1 5

8 5 . 1 6 7 7 4 ^

8 5 . 1 6 7 6 0

8 5 . 1 6 8 0 8

8 5 . 1 6 7 1 4

8 5 . 1 6 6 9 9

8 5 . 1 6 7 8 2

8 S . 1 6 8 0 0

8 5 . 1 6 8 0 0 .

8 5 . 1 6 7 5 6

8 5 . 1 6 8 2 8

8 5 . 1 6 8 1 4

8 5 . 1 6 7 4 2

8 5 . 1 6 7 7 3

8 5 . 1 6 7 4 9

8 5 . 1 6 7 6 4

8 5 . 1 6 7 5 0

8 5 . 1 6 7 1 5

8 5 . 1 6 7 7 9

8 5 . 1 6 7 7 4

8 5 . 1 6 7 8 3

8 5 . 1 6 8 0 4

8 5 . 1 6 7 4 3

8 5 . 1 6 7 6 5

8 5 . 1 6 7 8 7

1 6 . 7 6 1 2 2

1 6 . 7 6 1 6 3

1 6 . 7 6 0 6 4

1 6 . 7 6 1 9 *

1 6 . 7 0 1 8 2

1 6 . 7 6 1 1 1

1 6 . 7 6 1 C 7

1 6 . 7 6 1 4 8

1 6 . 7 6 0 4 3

1 6 . 7 6 1 1 3

1 6 . 7 6 0 7 2

1 6 . 7 6 0 9 5

1 6 . 7 6 1 0 7

1 6 . 7 6 2 0 5

1 6 . 7 6 0 6 7

1 6 . 7 6 0 0 1

-

CO«PUT|0 t VALUE

0 . 0 8 4 7 7

0 . 0 1 0 8 )

0 . 0 0 4 4 2

0 . 0 0 6 2 8

0 . 0 0 5 8 2

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 0 6 9 3

0 . 0 0 5 2 4

0 . 0 0 4 4 6

0 . 0 0 7 0 7

0 . 0 0 6 0 5

0 . 0 0 7 2 2

0 . 0 0 8 1 9

0 . 0 0 5 6 2

0 . 0 0 9 3 1

0 . 0 0 4 0 4

0 . 0 0 7 1 1

0 . 0 0 5 0 3

0 . 0 0 9 3 4

0 . 0 0 6 6 9

0 . 0 0 6 3 0

0 . 0 0 4 4 6

0 . 0 0 5 7 4

0 . 0 0 3 0 1

0 . 0 1 0 1 6

0 . 0 0 9 6 6

0 . 0 0 8 1 7

0 . 0 0 6 1 4

C . 0 0 6 5 3

' 0 . 0 0 6 6 1

0 . 0 0 7 6 8

0 . 0 0 4 9 7

0 . 0 0 6 3 5

0 . 0 0 6 2 0

0 . 0 0 7 1 7

0 . 0 2 3 1 7

0 . 0 1 8 6 4

0 . 0 1 2 0 2

0 . 0 2 3 0 8

0 . 0 1 1 0 6

0 . 0 0 0 6 1

0 . 0 2 2 3 0

0 . 0 1 9 3 4

0 . 0 0 2 6 6

0 . 0 1 3 2 4

0 . 0 0 9 2 1

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 3 3 2 0

0 . 0 2 7 4 8

0 . 0 2 9 2 0

0 . 0 0 4 4 0

• -

64

In view of the patterns of the findings mentioned in

Table 3.3 and Table 3.4, it is found that all the null

hypotheses pertaining to the influence of personality

attributes and organizational characteristics on perceived

QWL-facet viz. "physical working condition" rendered to be

accepted.

Table 3.5. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IVfe on MS - a facet of QWL

Sources of Variation DF S.S. M.S. F.value

Attribution to 51 699.56573 13.716 3.7449 Regression

Deviation from 208 3832.32300 18.42463 Regression

Total 259 4531.88867

It is evident from Table 3.5 that third facet of QWL

i.e. mental state is also found to be insignificantly

influenced by both IV's (personality attributes and

organizational characteristics) as obtained statistical value

F = .7449 which is highly insignificant even at .05 level of

confidence. The findings were further verified when the

influence of each independent variable was seen on the

dependent variable viz., "mental state" - a QWL-facet as

statistical t value again found to be very low even at .05

level of confidence. It is also evident from Table 3.6 that

all the obtained statistical t values ranging from as low as

Table 3.6. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Mental State dimension of QWL.

vAKi A SC.

IV

20

; : 22

23

24

23

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

33

36

37

38

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

48

49

50

5 1

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

B L I H l . » \

4 . 0 1 1 K.

3 . 7 ^ 6 ' » ^

3 . O 5 0 0 0

3 . J 9 2 J 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 5 0 0 C

2 . B S 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 8 4 6

2 . 6 6 5 3 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 8 4 e

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 J D 7 7

3 . C 2 3 0 8

1 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 S 0 0 0

3 . 3 8 4 6 ?

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

C . 5 5 C 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . C c 4 6 ;

3 . 0 5 7 6 < !

3 . S 0 0 0 C

2 . 9 0 7 6 O

2 . 3 1 1 J 4

3 . C 7 6 9 i

3 . 0 9 2 J 1

2 . 7 6 0 ? 3

2 . 3 4 2 : i

2 . i V 2 ? l

2 . 2 0 3 6 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 8 5

2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . C 3 - 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 V

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 4 S 0 7 7

2 . S 2 3 0 e

3 . 6 1 5 ^ 6

2 . 8 1 5 3 8

2 . 5 6 5 3 3

2 . 4 5 3 8 5

2 . 4 9 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

OEPtNOEST

3 2 D . 5 3 4 6 t

P[ V I * t I O N

0 . d 8 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 6 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 S 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 S 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 S 9

1 . 2 5 3 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

l . 2 » 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 S 4 5

1 . 2 6 C 9 1

1 . 2 f 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 i l 8

1 . 2 b 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 ? « B

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 5

1 . 2 4 9 2 ,

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

i.iooeo 1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . I ' a l t

1 . 2 5 3 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

CCKKI L A I I O N X VS Y

- 0 . 0 7 2 1 2

0 . 0 8 3 9 2

0 . 1 1 5 3 1

0 . 0 0 1 2 4

0 . 1 0 3 2 3

- 0 . 0 3 9 6 3

0 . 0 1 1 5 9

- 0 . 0 0 8 8 1

0 . 0 8 9 7 0

0 . 0 3 7 7 9

- 0 . 0 2 2 4 4

3 . 0 3 9 0 2

- 0 . 0 8 2 4 0

- 0 . 0 3 8 4 9

0 . 0 5 1 3 1

- 0 . 0 9 0 7 5

- 0 . 0 5 1 9 9

0 . 0 9 6 0 2

0 . 0 2 9 3 8

- 0 . 0 3 2 3 6

0 . 0 6 6 6 2

0 . 0 7 S 9 6

- 0 . 0 2 3 3 2

- 0 . 0 5 3 3 1

0 . 0 2 0 0 2

ccno-. - 0 . 3 0 1 4 3

- O . C 4 2 * 4

O . O t * ' * '

0 . D 1 5 fr '>

C . 0 8 7 0 1

- O . C 2 1 ? 4

0 . 0 3 5 2 ?

0 . 0 5 9 7 6

0 . 0 5 4 3 2

0 . 0 4 7 0 1

- 0 . 0 1 9 8 2

0 . 0 3 5 6 7

0 . : 6 2 6 l

0 .0949f t

0 . : 5 5 1 t

0 . : 3 7 5 1

0 . 0 6 2 3 4

3 . 0 5 8 5 5

- 0 . 0 1 4 1 3

- C . 3 C 2 5 t

C.C3411

- 0 . 0 0 4 C 5

3 . 0 5 4 7 1

0 . 0 5 9 4 5

0 . 1 0 2 5 :

cctr f ic f tM 1 . 0 4 6 9 7

1 . 6 2 7 1 9

2 . 0 4 2 0 2

1 . 3 1 8 3 7

1 . 8 0 0 6 3

1 . 3 2 7 5 9

1 . 6 2 7 0 1

1 . 4 8 6 5 2

1 . 4 4 2 3 4

1 . 6 5 B 2 7

1 . 4 2 4 3 2

1 . 9 6 1 4 0

1 . 2 5 1 2 2

1 . 4 9 0 6 1

1 . 9 1 8 4 3

1 . 2 5 0 7 9

1 . 1 3 7 8 9

2 . 1 9 1 5 4

1 . 6 3 0 5 9

1 . 1 7 2 0 0

1 . 6 8 7 5 9

1 . 8 0 1 6 5

1 . 3 7 5 7 8

1 . 3 3 8 2 3

1 . S 8 1 5 1

1 . 4 7 7 3 0

1 . 6 S 2 2 4

1 . 3 4 0 3 9

1 . 7 6 6 6 9

l . t ! 0 0 8

1 . 7 9 6 8 7

1 . 3 7 2 8 0

1 . 7 7 6 8 6

1 . 7 0 2 2 0

- 1 . 5 5 8 4 4

0 . 6 7 6 6 4

0 . 2 4 2 9 4

0 . 4 4 5 3 5

e . 4 6 2 2 7

0 .703<.4

0 . 5 2 2 7 1

0 . 2 8 5 7 2

0 . 7 2 5 6 6

0 . 6 5 3 4 8

0 . 4 1 6 3 3

0 . 2 4 4 7 8

0 . 7 8 2 2 0

0 . 1 8 2 6 3

0 . 6 0 9 2 9

0 . 2 9 7 6 1

- 0 . 3 9 2 1 0

& T U . IRCiOK OF R t C . C O t F .

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 3 7

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 6 9

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 9 8

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 1 1 '

1 1 6 . 6 7 0 0 0

1 1 6 . 6 7 1 4 6

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 9 5

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 6 4

1 1 6 . 6 7 1 4 1

1 1 6 . 8 7 0 6 9

1 1 6 . 6 7 2 0 0

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 4 3

1 1 6 . 6 7 1 2 4

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 9 0

1 1 6 . 8 7 0 6 1

1 1 6 . 8 7 0 4 1

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 5 5

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 7 9

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 8 0

1 1 6 . 3 7 1 1 8

1 1 6 . 8 7 2 1 8

1 1 4 . 3 7 1 9 9

11 . 8 7 0 9 9

11 . 8 7 1 4 2

1 1 J . 5 7 1 0 9

1 1 4 . S 7 1 3 0

1 1 6 . a 7 l l 0 '

1 1 6 . 3 7 0 6 3

1 1 6 . 3 7 1 5 0

1 1 ^ . 8 7 1 * 3

1 i 6 . B 7 l 5 6

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 8 4

1 1 6 . 8 7 1 0 1

1 1 6 . S 7 1 3 1

1 1 6 . 3 7 1 6 1

2 3 . 0 0 C 5 8

2 3 . 0 0 1 1 4

2 2 . 9 9 9 7 6

2 3 . 0 0 1 5 7

2 3 . 0 0 1 4 0

2 3 . 0 0 0 4 4

2 3 . 0 0 0 3 8

2 3 . 0 0 0 9 4

2 2 . 9 9 9 5 1

2 3 . 0 0 0 4 6

2 2 . 9 9 9 9 0

2 3 . 0 0 0 2 2

2 3 . 0 0 0 3 8

2 3 . 0 0 1 7 2

2 2 . 9 9 9 8 3

2 2 . 9 9 8 9 2

T VALU

0 . 0 0 1 9 6

0 . 0 1 3 9 2

0 . 0 1 7 4 7

0 . 0 1 1 4 5

0 . 0 1 5 4 1

0 . 0 1 1 3 6

0 . 0 1 3 9 2

0 . 0 1 2 7 2

0 . 0 ^ 2 3 4

0 . 0 1 4 1 9

0 . 0 1 2 1 9

0 . 0 1 6 7 8

0 . 0 1 0 7 1

0 . 0 1 2 7 5

0 . 0 1 6 4 2

0 . 0 1 0 7 0

C 974

C 875

0 . 0 1 3 9 5

0 . 0 1 0 0 3

0 . 0 1 4 4 4

0 . 0 1 5 4 2

0 . 0 1 1 7 7

0 . 0 1 1 4 5

0 . 0 1 6 1 0

0 . 0 1 2 6 4

0 . 0 1 4 3 9

0 . 0 1 1 4 7

0 . 0 1 5 1 2

0 . 0 1 3 9 5

0 . 0 1 * 3 7

0 . 0 1 1 7 5

0 . 0 1 5 2 2

0 . 0 1 4 5 6

0 . 0 1 3 3 3

0 . 0 2 9 4 3

0 . 0 1 0 5 6

0 . 0 1 9 3 6

0 . 0 2 0 1 0

0 . 0 3 0 5 6

0 . 0 2 2 7 3

0 . 0 1 2 4 2

0 . 0 3 1 5 5

0 . 0 2 8 2 8

0 . 0 1 8 1 0

0 . 0 1 0 6 4

0 . 0 3 4 0 1

0 . 0 0 7 9 4

0 . 3 2 6 4 9

0 . 3 1 2 9 4

0 . 0 1 7 0 5

4 . 18SC2

INTtKCEFT l f c . n 2 9 J

nULlIPLE CCKi»£LATIOS 0 . 3 « 2 8 9

STO. CSKCI Cf E5TIr»TE , . 2 9 2 3 7

66

t = .00794 to as high as t = .03401 have no influence of IV's

on DV mental state (a QWL dimension) .

The above findings reveal that none of the TV's viz.

organizational characteristics and personality attributes

have any significant influence on mental state, hence, all

the null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of IV*s on

one of the facet of QWL i.e., mental state stand accepted.

Table 3.7. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IVfe on CO - a facet of QWL

Sources of Variation DF S . S . M.S. F.value



Total 259 9469.60938

The fourth facet of QWL i . e . . Career Orientation i s

also found to be insignif icantly influenced by both

personality a t t r ibu tes and organizational character is t ics as

obtained value F = 0.64528 i s highly insignificant even a t

.05 level of confidence which can be seen in Table 3.7.

The findings were further confirmed by Table 3.8 as

a l l the obtained t s t a t i s t i c a l values ranging from minimum t

= .00010 to maximum t = .03837 have been found s t a t i s t i c a l l y

insignif icant . Therefore, the resu l t s advocate that nei ther

Table 3.8. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses — Orientation dimension of QWL.

67 Career

VARiAeLL NO.

li

it

H

li

23

it,

i J

it

?7

£«

29

SC

Si.

a a u 35

36

37

36

39

* 0

t i

* i

t j

<•<.

* 5

te.

47

46

* 9

56

S i

a S3

S<.

SS

Sb

57

3S

i t

bO

61

ti

63

ti.

65

66

67

66

69

i t Pi. ND£NT

4

- t »K

4 . 0 1 1 5 -

3 . 7 ? ' j 9 2

3 . 6 5 0 0 0

3 . ^ 9 ^ J l

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 3 5 0 0 0

a . S 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 8 4 6

2 . 9 6 5 3 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 8 4 6

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 9 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 0 3

2 . 9 5 0 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 6 4 & 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 ?

3 .0CCC0

2 - 9 C 7 6 9

2 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . ; 7 6 ; 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 )

2 . 7 6 9 ? J

2 . i 4 J 3 l

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 C 3 6 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 C 2 . 4 1 1 ' : 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 8 5

2 . 6 0 3 8 5

2 . 5. 6V2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 5 t e 2

2 . t : 7 6 ?

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 8 0 7 7

2 . : 2 3 0 8

3 . 0 1 5 3 3

2 . 5 1 5 3 6

2 . 5 o 5 3 i

2 . 4 5 3 8 5

2 . 4 9 6 ] J

4 0 . 7 6 J 7 7

9 . J 6 1 5 4

ST«NC4f)D DLV IAT ICN

0 .8SQS9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 B

1 . 1 7 2 0 3

1 . 2 1 J 9 0

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

i . i«se7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 7 9

1 . ^ 7 9 8 0

1 . 5 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 S 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 ^ 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

l . l « 8 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 9 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 8

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 10 9 8 C

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 17616

1 . 2 5 8 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 t ? 9

1 . 2 3 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 5 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 .2 4C32

1 . 2 t 2 ' ' 7

6 . 5 4 ; M

6 . 0 4 6 6 7

CCHHt L*T IC»> X VS V

- 0 . 0 2 5 7 6

- 0 . 0 7 6 4 9

- 0 . 0 0 9 7 1

0 . 0 3 4 8 3

- 0 . 0 3 9 3 2

0 . 0 0 1 9 2

- 0 . 0 1 1 5 4

- 0 . 1 0 3 6 7

- 0 . 0 1 3 1 4

- 0 . 1 2 7 1 3

- 0 . 0 3 7 8 3

- 0 . 0 0 9 7 6

- 0 . 0 1 4 2 8

- 0 . 0 6 9 8 0

- 0 . 0 5 5 8 2

0 . 0 1 0 1 7

- 0 . 0 6 8 2 7

- 0 . 0 7 0 4 2

- 0 . 1 7 6 1 ?

- 0 . 1 0 5 0 1

0 . 0 4 3 3 7

- 0 . 1 2 6 C 7

- 0 . 1 4 6 4 3

- 0 . 0 9 7 4 9

- 0 . 0 1 9 7 1

0 . 1 3 0 6 9

0 . 3 1 1 C 1

- 0 , C P 5 5 7

- 0 . 0 « 4 ' ' ?

- 3 . 0 J 3 0 5

- C . 0 8 2 C 4

- 0 . 1 0 5 7 9

- 0 . U 1 4 ]

- 0 , 1 3 4 5 8

- 0 . 2 1 1 2 4

0 , 0 7 7 2 9

- 0 . 0 C 9 7 6

- 0 . 1 1 4 3 1

- 0 . 0 5 6 6 8

C . 0 0 3 5 3

0 . 0 4 8 5 1

- 0 . 1 0 1 9 7

- 0 . 0 2 2 4 8

0 . 3 3 8 2 2

0 . 0 1 S 2 0

3 . 0 6 1 1 9

0.C1631

-C.03755

0 . 0 0 3 ; 1

- 0 . 0 6 4 2 4

- 0 . 0 2 5 9 8

R £ 0 R C $ i I O N C C l F f I C I f M

0 . 1 6 5 9 5

- 0 . 1 0 5 0 1

0 . 1 8 4 4 9

0 . 2 9 2 2 1

0 . 1 A 4 S 3

- 0 . 2 7 8 2 6

0 . 0 8 9 6 9

- 0 . 2 5 4 9 4

0 . 4 0 0 2 4

- 0 . 2 2 5 9 5

0 . 1 9 4 2 4

0 . 4 8 5 4 9

0 . 4 0 6 0 3

- 0 . 1 3 0 3 3

0 . 0 3 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 1 7 7 3

0 . 0 9 5 6 3

0 . 4 4 8 4 7

- 0 . 4 6 9 4 2

- 0 . 1 8 2 8 9

0 . 5 4 4 1 9

- 0 . 2 3 2 5 3

- 0 . 2 7 6 2 1

0 . 0 3 8 6 9

0 . 1 1 8 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 3 3

0 . 3 5 9 2 3

0 . 1 2 7 9 5

0 . 0 7 5 1 1

0 . 5 9 8 5 8

- 0 . 2 9 5 5 4

- 0 . 1 7 1 3 8

0 . 1 1 3 4 4

0 . 1 4 2 6 4

- 0 . 0 5 2 80

0 . 4 6 7 8 0

0 . 4 8 9 5 1

- 0 . 1 9 9 1 2

0 . 2 7 1 2 1

. 0 . 1 3 5 8 6

1 . 2 8 9 0 2

C . 3 3 S 5 1

C . 3 2 3 8 3

1 . 1 5 2 3 2

0 . 4 9 3 C 1 0 . 9 3 4 9 s

0 . 5 8 2 9 0

- 0 . 0 6 3 7 2

1 . 1 3 1 2 9

0 . 2 5 8 9 4

- 0 . 4 5 1 2 7

STD. t m C R OF R l C . C C ( f .

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 6 6

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 4 2

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 5 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 2 8

1 7 0 . 7 0 3 6 6

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 8 0

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 5 1

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 0 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 7 0

1 7 0 . 7 0 4 9 6

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 5 7

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 7 5

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 4 7

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 4 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 4 5 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 4 2 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 9 2

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 2 7

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 2 8

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 3 8

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 8 5

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 5 6

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 1 1

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 7 3

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 2 5

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 5 5

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 2 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 4 5 7

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 8 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 7 5

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 9 3

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 3 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 1 4

1 7 0 . 7 0 5 5 7

1 7 0 . 7 0 6 0 2

3 3 . 5 9 5 3 1

3 3 . 5 9 6 1 2

3 3 . 5 9 4 1 4

3 3 . 5 9 6 7 5

3 3 . 5 9 6 5 0

3 3 . 5 9 5 1 0

3 3 . 5 9 5 0 2

3 3 . 5 9 5 6 3

3 3 . 5 9 3 7 3

3 3 . 5 9 5 1 3

3 3 . 5 9 4 3 1

3 3 . 5 9 4 7 7

3 3 . 5 9 5 0 1

3 3 . 5 9 6 9 7

3 3 . 5 9 4 2 1

3 3 . 5 9 2 8 6

tCIPUTtO T VALUE

0.00097

0.00062

o.oeiot 0 . 0 0 1 7 1

0 . 0 0 1 0 8

0 . 0 0 1 6 3

0 . 0 0 0 5 3

0 . 0 0 1 4 9

0 . 0 0 2 3 4

, 0 . 0 0 1 3 2

O . O O l l i

0 . 0 0 2 S 4

0 . 0 0 2 3 8

0 . 0 0 0 7 6

0 . 0 0 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 0 1 0

0 . 0 0 0 S 6

0 . 0 0 2 6 3

0 . 0 0 2 7 5

. 0 0 1 0 7

. 0 0 3 1 9

. 0 0 1 3 6

. 0 0 1 6 2

, 0 0 0 2 3

. 0 0 0 6 9

. 0 0 7 2 4

. 0 0 2 1 0

. 0 0 0 7 5

. 0 0 0 4 4

. 0 0 3 5 1

. 0 0 1 7 2

. 0 0 1 0 0

. 0 0 0 6 6

. 0 0 0 8 4

0 . 0 0 0 3 1

0 . 0 1 3 9 2

0 . 0 1 4 5 7

0 . 0 0 5 9 3

0 . 0 0 8 0 7

0 . 0 0 3 9 8

0 . 0 3 8 3 7

0 . 0 1 0 0 8

0 . 0 0 9 6 4

0 . 0 3 4 3 0

0 . 0 1 4 3 8

0 . 0 2 7 8 3

0 . 0 1 7 3 5

0 . 0 0 1 9 0

0 . 0 3 3 6 7

0.00771

0 . 0 1 3 4 3

l.NT£«CEPT 1 . 7 0 9 4 9

' W L T I P L E CORWELATICN 0 . 3 6 9 6 0

S I D . CSRCR CF ESTl . -ATE 6 . 2 6 9 5 9

68

personal i ty a t t r i b u t e s nor organizat ional cha rac t e r i s t i c s are

re la ted to employees career o r i e n t a t i o n - a QWL face t .

In view of the above f indings shown in Table 3.7 and

Table 3.8 i t can be said without any reservat ion t h a t a l l the

proposed null hypotheses (pp. 40-46 ^ pertaining to the

influence of personali ty a t t r i b u t e s and organizat ional

cha rac t e r i s t i c s on perceived QWL facet v i z . Career

Orientat ion are rendered t o be accepted.

Table 3.9. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IVfe on AM - a facet of QWL

Sources of Variat ion DF S.S. M.S. F.value



Total 259 9085.30371

The fifth dimension of QWL i.e. "Advancement on

Merit" is also found to be insignificantly influenced by both

IV's (personality attributes and organizational

characteristics) as obtained statistical value given in Table

3.9, i.e. F = 1.01372 is found highly insignificant even at

.05 level of confidence. The reliability of the findings were

further verified by assessing the influence of each

independent variable through statistical t and these again

found to be very low and insignificant even at .05 level.

69 10. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Advancement on

Merit dimension of QWL.

S O .

1«

2S,

il

22

23

24

2S

26

27

2i

2 9

3C

3 1

32

3 3

3 4

l i

36

37

3B

39

40

41

42

43

4 4

45

4 0

4 7

4 6

4 9

5C

5 1

52

53

S4

55 56

• 57

56

59

6 :

6 1

62

6 3

6 4

6S

6 6

6 7

6 S

6 9

4 . 0 1 M < i

J . 7 2 6 9 C

3 . t 5 0 0 0

3.?<»? J l

3 . 5 1 1 5 *

3 . 0 5 0 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 0 9

2 . 6 4 2 J i

3 . 5 8 S 4 f

2 . 8 6 5 3 8

3 . 1 9 6 J S

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 S 4 <

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 C 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 9 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 C 8

2 . 9 5 0 C 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . 8 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 0 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . 8 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 V 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 8 5

2 . 1 S 0 7 7

1 C 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 S S 2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 8 0 7 7

2 . 8 2 3 0 8

3 . 0 1 5 3 3

2 . 8 1 S 3 S

2 . 5 6 5 3 8

2 . 4 5 3 8 5

2 . 4 9 a l 5

4 0 . 7 5 0 7 7

D t P t N D t N T

5 2 0 . 0 8 0 7 7

0 1 V I A I I O N

C . S 8 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 5 0 S 0

1 . 1 B 5 0 7

J . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 5 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 S 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 8 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 ; i 8

1 . 2 5 7 S J

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 7 7 6 6

1 . 3 9 9 2 8

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

V . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0 1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 6 J 6

1 . 2 5 8 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 .24032

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

5 . 9 2 2 7 0

» V& T

0 . 0 0 4 2 2

- 0 . 0 7 8 9 8

• 0 . 0 1 1 6 0

- 0 . 0 5 5 1 4

- 0 . 0 2 7 2 0

a . 0 6 7 7 7

C . 0 7 0 4 1

- 0 . 0 8 2 1 7

0 . C 2 3 4 5

- 0 . 0 1 0 9 4

- 0 . 0 5 1 5 3

0 . 1 4 5 0 6

0 . 0 9 7 0 3

- 0 . 0 3 9 9 9

0 . 0 0 2 7 8

0 . 1 0 7 3 9

- 0 . 0 4 8 6 3

- C . 0 1 5 4 1

- 0 . C 7 3 7 5

0 . 0 2 7 9 0

e . C 6 S 9 1

C.C65R5

- 0 . 0 8 1 2 0

- J . C 1 9 3 3

- C . 0 6 2 0 1

- 0 . 0 2 1 2 3

- : . 0 2 4 4 3

- J . C 3 2 0 '

C.12649

3 . 5 3 5 5 !

- 0 . 0 0 3 6 9

- 0 . 0 6 C 8 6

C . 0 1 0 8 1

0 . 0 3 7 9 9

S . C 1 1 4 4

- t . C 2 4 0 C

C .CC406

- 0 . 0 0 5 1 3 .

0 . 0 1 5 3 9

- 0 . 0 1 8 3 2

- e . C 3 C 11

- 0 . 0 3 6 6 4

C . C 1 9 7 6

- 0 . O C 2 2 4

0 . C 5 8 9 1

- 0 . 0 2 7 3 0

0 . 0 3 5 2 2

- 0 . C 1 C 4 9

- 3 . 0 C 5 C 1

C . 0 C 2 3 6

- : . C C 4 7 2

RIGRISSICN ccLi-r I C I L M

0 . 6 1 2 7 9

- 0 . 9 1 2 8 3

- 0 . 2 9 7 2 1

- 0 . 7 8 3 4 1

- 0 . 1 6 7 6 7

0 . 1 8 7 9 7

- 0 . 0 1 0 9 8

- 0 . 8 3 6 1 0

0 . 3 2 2 5 1

- 0 . 4 7 5 1 2

- 0 . 6 0 1 6 8

0 . 9 7 7 2 3

0 . 0 6 4 4 0

- 0 . 9 5 2 0 9

- 0 . 0 9 7 3 3

0 . 6 9 7 7 6

- C . 5 4 7 9 7

0 . 0 3 5 0 5

- 0 . 7 2 6 3 7

- 0 . 3 2 6 4 6

0 . 3 7 5 6 5

0 . 3 5 7 5 9

- 0 . 7 4 1 7 5

- 0 . 1 2 0 7 9

- 0 . 4 9 9 5 0

- 0 . 1 6 8 5 7

- 0 . 2 6 7 2 8

- 0 . 4 B 9 0 6

0 . 7 0 5 8 3

- 0 . 1 3 4 9 4

- 0 . 1 4 7 0 3

-0 .6< :246

0 . 3 7 5 5 0

0 . 0 0 5 4 6

0 . 1 7 1 3 1

- 0 . 4 3 3 3 5

- 0 . 0 0 7 2 5

- 0 . 1 2 0 3 9

- 0 . 1 2 5 2 1

- 0 . 2 0 8 1 8

0 . 1 3 3 3 9

- 0 . 0 3 1 0 2

- 0 . 1 1 9 1 0

- 0 . 0 1 1 5 7

C.52705

- 0 . 0 4 6 4 8

0 . 0 6 0 6 2

- 0 . 4 4 9 3 3

0 , 0 7 4 3 2

0 . 2 2 1 4 3

0 . 0 3 5 9 1

S T O . IRBCR OF HEO.CCLF

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 3 5

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 0 7

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 1 9

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 9 8

1 6 1 . 0 4 1 4 6

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 4 7

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 1 4

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 7 0

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 4 0

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 6 8

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 2 2

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 4 4

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 1 7

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 0 8

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 3 0

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 0 2

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 5 9

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 9 3

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 9 3

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 0 9

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 4 6

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 1 9

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 8 2

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 4 1

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 9 5

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 2 4

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 9 7

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 3 3

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 5 2

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 4 4

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 6 1

1 6 1 . 0 4 4 0 1

1 6 1 . 0 4 2 8 5

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 2 6

1 6 1 . 0 4 3 6 9

3 1 . 6 9 3 7 4

3 1 . 6 9 4 5 1

3 1 . 6 9 2 6 4

3 1 . 6 9 5 1 0

3 1 . 6 9 4 8 7

3 1 . 6 9 3 5 4

3 1 . 6 9 3 4 6

3 1 . 6 9 4 2 4

31 . 6 9 2 2 6

3 1 . 6 9 3 5 7

3 1 . 6 9 2 7 9

3 1 . 6 9 3 2 4

3 1 . 6 9 3 4 5

3 1 . 6 9 5 3 0

3 1 . 6 9 2 7 0

3 1 . 6 9 1 4 5

COfPUttO VALUt.

0 . 0 0 3 8 1

0 . 0 0 5 6 7

O.OOIBS

0 . 0 0 4 8 6

0 . 0 0 1 0 4

0 . 0 0 1 1 7

0 . 0 0 0 0 7

0 . 0 0 3 1 9

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 . 0 0 2 9 5

0 . 0 0 3 7 4

0 . 0 0 6 0 7

0 . 0 0 0 4 0

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 0 0 6 0

0.0-0433

0 . 0 0 3 4 0

0 . 0 0 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 1

0 . 0 0 2 0 3

0 . 0 0 2 3 3

0 . 0 0 2 2 2

0 . 0 0 4 6 1

0 . 0 0 0 7 5

0 . 0 0 3 1 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 5

0 . 0 0 1 6 6

0 . 0 0 2 9 8

0 . 0 0 4 3 8

0 .000B4

0 . 0 0 0 9 1

- 0 . 0 0 4 3 0

0 . 0 0 2 3 5

0 . 0 0 0 0 3

0 . 0 0 1 0 6

' . 0 . 0 1 3 6 7

( 0 . 0 0 0 2 3

0 . 0 0 3 8 0

0 . 0 0 3 9 5

0 . 0 0 6 5 7

0 . 0 0 4 2 1

0 . 0 0 2 S 6

0 . 0 0 3 7 6

0 . 0 0 0 3 7

0 . 0 1 6 6 3

0 . 0 0 1 4 7

0 . 0 0 1 9 1

3 . 0 1 4 1 8

0 . 0 0 2 3 4

0 . 0 0 6 9 9

0 . 0 0 1 1 3

1N1ERCEFI

«vJLTIf>j.£ COHRfLATIO^

i T C . ERRCR CF ESTIMATE

1 3 . 4 4 1 4 5

0 . 4 4 6 1 8

5 . 9 1 4 7 2

70

Since, F value found to be insignificant (Table 3.9)

then it is necessary that all IV's must have insignificant

influence on "Advancement on Merit" - a facet of QWL as is

evident from Table 3.10 that t values ranging from minimum t=

.00003 to maximum t = .01663 are found to be statistically

insignificant even at .05 level of confidence.

The above findings reveal that organizational

characteristics and personality attributes do not have any

influence on "advancement on merit", a QWL facet, hence, all

the null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of IV s on

DV i.e., "Advancement on merit" - a QWL facet stand accepted.

Table 3.11. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the Influence of IVfe on EPL - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DF S . S . M.S. F . v a l u e

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 435.98874 8 . 5 4 8 8 0 0 .95195 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 208 1867.90088 8 . 9 8 0 2 9 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 259 2303.88965

I t i s e v i d e n t from T a b l e 3 . 1 1 t h a t t h e s i x t h f a c e t of

QWL i . e . " E f f e c t on p e r s o n a l l i f e " i s a l s o found t o be

i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n f l u e n c e d by b o t h I V ' s ( p e r s o n a l i t y

a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) a s o b t a i n e d

s t a t i s t i c a l v a l u e F = .95195 i s h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t a t even

.05 l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e . The f i n d i n g s w e r e f u r t h e r v e r i f i e d

71 Table 3.12. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Effect on personal life dimension of QWL.

VAfil AdLl

1«

2b

21

22

23

24

2S

26

27

28

29

i C

3 1

32

33

it.

35

36

37

36

39

40

41

42

43

44

43

46

47

48

49

SC

3 1

52

53

54

55

56

57

56

59

o6

61

6^

63

64

65

66

67

68

6V

- | . i K

4 . 3 1 1 5 4

1 .7 . -6 7 2

3 . 6 5 J 0 3

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . 5 n " i 4

5.osaeo

2 . 5 5 7 4 9

2 . 6 4 2 J J

3 . 5 S S 4 6

2 . 3 t 5 3 e

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 8 7 7

2 . 7 3 S 4 e

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 r

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 C 5 a

3 . 9 3 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 C e

2 . 9 S 0 2 C

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 ?

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 3 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . S 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 S 9 2

3 . 0 O 2 3 1

2 . 7 69 2 •

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 8 5

2 . 1 6 3 77

1 0 2 . - 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 8 5

2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 6 :

2 . 6 0 7 e S

2 . e C 7 t o

< ! . o S ; ' 7

2 . 3 2 3 0 e

3 . 0 1 5 3 1 !

2 . 6 1 5 3 5

2 . 5 6 5 3 8

2 . * 5 3 ? 5

2 . 4 5 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 3 7 7

n t v i A t l o s

e . 8 « 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

i.2.<oeo 1 . 1 8 5 C 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 t

1 . 2 6 S 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 5 7 6 8

1 . 1 S 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 S 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 3 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 ( i

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 ? 9 e

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 9

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 4 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 .2 5 6-64

1 . 0 5 5 9 6

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 6 U

1 . 2 5 S 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

> VS Y

0 . 0 2 2 5 5

- 0 . 0 1 2 3 6

0 . 0 0 3 1 4

- 0 . 0 0 1 5 8

- 0 . 0 3 1 9 4

- 0 . 0 7 6 6 2

- 0 . 0 2 1 9 8

- 0 . 0 6 1 2 6

0 . 0 3 0 9 2

- 0 . 0 0 4 2 3

C.06966

0 . 0 8 6 6 6

0 .C169S

0 . 0 7 5 5 4

0 . 0 5 6 7 7

0 . 0 5 5 ? 7

- 0 . 0 1 8 4 1

- 0 . 0 5 1 5 1

0 . 0 5 2 1 5

0 . 0 0 1 0 5

- 0 . 0 5 5 6 9

- 0 . 0 1 3 6 4

0 . 0 2 6 8 8

- 0 . 0 3 0 2 4

0 . 0 0 4 3 2

- 0 . 0 2 7 6 9

- 0 . 0 7 2 8 C

- 0 . 0 7 5 B 3

0 . 0 8 0 2 4

- 0 . 0 6 2 * 1

0 . 0 3 7 2 7

- 0 . 0 8 5 1 6

- 0 . 1 4 9 4 7

- C . 1 0 1 8 5

- 9 . 0 4 0 3 1

0 . 0 0 5 4 7

- 0 . 0 8 2 6 3

- 0 . 0 3 8 5 6

3 . 0 4 0 0 4

- 0 . 0 0 9 0 4

0 . 0 5 9 7 5

- 0 . 0 6 3 6 6

- C . 0 ? 3 3 b

- 0 . 0 4 6 3 3

- 0 . 0 5 8 2 3

0 . 0 6 9 6 7

0 . 1 2 4 2 7

0 . 0 2 1 2 7

0 . 0 8 6 1 2

0 . 0 0 1 3 7

O.C0506

»fCK{ SSJCN t c i f r i c i t N T 0 . 2 3 2 4 6

0 . 2 0 0 0 6

0 . 2 2 7 4 9

0 . 1 6 5 8 8

0 . 33054

- 0 . 0 0 5 3 2

0 . 1 4 0 7 1

0 . 0 3 3 1 2

0 . 4 5 9 6 8

0 . 2 2 4 1 1

0 . 5 3 4 7 2

0 . 4 8 0 7 3

0 . 1 9 0 0 3

0 . 4 0 4 96

0 . 1 8 1 2 4

C .45902

0 . 2 5 7 6 7

0 . 0 1 1 1 8

0 . 5 2 7 7 3

- 0 . C 4 5 1 1

0 . 0 2 1 9 8

0 . 2 3 4 5 5

0 . 4 2 5 1 8

0 . 0 8 5 8 7

0 . 1 5 6 1 5

0 . 2 4 3 7 0

0 . 0 9 5 4 1

- 0 . 0 7 5 5 1

0 . 6 3 5 6 2

- 0 . 0 1 0 5 4

0 . 2 6 4 3 5

0 . 0 7 7 8 6

- 0 . 1 4 5 7 2

0 . 0 4 2 8 7

- 0 . 2 0 7 2 6

0 . 1 6 4 5 3

0 . « 0 4 2 6

0 . 0 0 3 9 8

0 . 2 4 7 6 3

- 0 . 0 7 3 6 5

0 , 3 8 2 9 1

0 . 0 9 4 1 2

- 0 . 1 5 3 3 1

0 . 3 1 1 6 5

- 0 . 1 6 0 6 4

0 . 3 6 4 3 6

0 . 3 6 2 2 3

0 . 0 7 8 9 3

C .46312

0 . 0 9 6 1 5

- 0 . 1 2 7 4 9

S I D . EKHCR OF R I C . C C I F .

B l . 5 9 3 2 1

8 1 . 5 9 3 5 7

8 1 . 5 9 3 6 3

S I . 5 9 3 0 3

8 1 . 5 9 2 ? 5

8 1 . 5 9 3 2 7

8 1 . 5 9 3 6 1

8 1 . 5 9 3 3 9

8 1 . 5 9 3 2 3

8 1 . 5 9 2 8 6

8 1 . 5 9 3 6 4

8 1 . 5 9 3 2 5

8 1 . 5 9 3 1 2

8 1 . 5 9 3 5 8

8 1 . 5 9 2 6 7

8 1 . S 9 2 S 3

8 1 . 5 9 3 3 3

8 1 . 5 9 3 5 0

8 1 . 5 9 3 5 0

8 1 . 5 9 3 0 7

8 1 . 5 9 3 7 7

8 1 . 5 9 3 6 4

8 1 . 5 9 2 9 4

8 1 . 5 9 3 2 4

8 1 . 5 9 3 0 1

8 1 . 5 9 3 1 5

8 1 . 5 9 3 0 2

8 1 . 5 9 2 6 9

8 1 . 5 9 3 2 *

81 . 5 9 3 2 5

S I . 5 9 3 3 4

8 1 . 5 9 3 5 4

8 1 . 5 9 2 9 6

8 1 . 5 9 3 1 6

8 1 . 5 9 3 3 8

1 6 . 0 5 7 7 5

1 6 . 0 5 8 1 4

1 6 . 0 5 7 1 9

1 6 . 0 5 8 4 4

1 6 . 0 5 8 3 2

1 6 . 0 5 7 6 5

1 6 . 0 5 7 6 1

1 6 . 0 5 8 0 0

I t . 0 5 7 0 0

1 6 . 0 5 7 6 6

1 6 . 0 5 7 2 7

1 6 . 0 5 7 5 0

1 6 . 0 57 6 1

1 6 . 0 5 6 5 4

1 6 . 0 5 7 2 2

1 6 . 0 5 6 5 9

COfPUflD T VALUi

0 . 0 0 2 8 5

0 . 0 0 2 4 5

0 . 0 0 2 7 9

0 . 0 0 2 0 3

0 . 0 0 4 0 5

0 . 0 0 0 0 7

0 . 0 0 1 7 2

0 . 0 0 0 4 1

0 . 0 0 5 6 3

o : 0 0 2 7 5

0 . 0 0 6 5 5

0 . 0 0 5 8 9

0 . 0 0 2 3 3

0 . 0 0 4 9 6

0 . 0 0 2 2 2

0 . 0 0 5 6 3

0 . 0 0 3 1 6

0 . 0 0 0 1 4

0 . 0 0 6 4 7

0 . 0 0 0 5 5

0 . 0 0 0 2 7

0 . 0 0 2 8 7

0 . 0 0 5 2 1

0 . 0 0 1 0 5

0 . 0 0 1 9 1

0 . 0 0 2 9 9

0 . 0 0 1 1 7

0 . 0 0 0 9 3

0 . 0 0 7 7 9

0 . 0 0 0 1 ]

0 . 0 0 3 2 4

0 . 0 0 0 9 5

0 . 0 0 1 7 9

0 . 0 0 0 5 3

0 . 0 0 2 5 4

0 . 0 1 0 2 5

0 . 0 0 0 2 7 '

0 . 0 0 0 2 5

0 . 0 1 5 4 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 9

0 . 0 2 3 8 5

0 . 0 0 5 8 6

0 . 0 0 9 5 5

0 . 0 1 9 ^ 1

0 . 0 1 0 0 0

0 . 0 2 2 6 9

0 . 0 2 2 5 6

0 . 0 0 4 9 2

0 . 0 2 8 6 4

0 . 0 0 5 9 9

0 . 0 0 7 9 4

DEPtNCtNT

6 8 . S 3 4 6 2 2 . 9 8 2 5 0

lNtLr<C£PT 7 . 2 7 5 2 8

f W L T I P L t C O « i R t H I I O N C . 4 3 5 0 2

i l O . (.liUZn CF t S T I f ' A T E 2 . 9 ? t 7 1

72

when t h e i n f l u e n c e of each i n d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e was s een on

d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e v i z . , " E f f e c t on p e r s o n a l l i f e " - a QWL

f a c e t w h e r e i n t - v a l u e s a g a i n found t o b e v e r y low even a t .05

l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e . I t i s a l s o e v i d e n t from T a b l e 3 .12 t h a t

a l l t h e o b t a i n e d s t a t i s t i c a l t - v a l u e s r a n g i n g from a s low a s

t = .0007 t o a s h igh a s t = .02884 have no i n f l u e n c e on DV,

i . e . , " E f f e c t on p e r s o n a l l i f e " - a QWL f a c e t . I t i s

t h e r e f o r e , c l e a r from t h e f i n d i n g s g iven i n T a b l e 3 . 1 1 and

T a b l e 3 .12 t h a t a l l t h e n u l l h y p o t h e s e s p r e d i c t i n g t o

i n f l u e n c e of p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s on p e r c e i v e d QWL - f a c e t namely , " E f f e c t on

p e r s o n a l l i f e " a r e r e n d e r e d t o b e a c c e p t e d .

Table 3 . 1 3 . A n a l y s i s of V a r i a n c e f o r t h e R e g r e s s i o n Showing t h e I n f l u e n c e of IVfe on UMR - a 1 c e t of QWL

S o u r c e of DF S . S . M.S. F . v a l u e V a r i a t i o n

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 8 1 1 . 4 4 9 8 3 15 .91078 0 .66870 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n frcan 208 4 9 4 9 . 0 8 6 4 3 23.79368 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 259 5 7 6 0 . 5 3 6 1 3

"Union management r e l a t i o n " - f a c e t of QWL i s found

t o be i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n f l u e n c e d by e i t h e r of t h e I V ' s

( p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s )

a s F = 0.66870 i s i n s i g n i f i c a n t a t .05 l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e

( T a b l e 3 .13) .

Table 3 .14 . Showing

VA»<1 A

19

20

li.

22

^ i

21.

2i

2t

27

25

29"

30

31

32

3 3

34

3S

3 6

37

38

3 9

4 3

4 1

42

4 3

44

45

46

47

* 8

4 9

50

5 1

52

53

34

55 5 6

57

56

59

bC

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

60

69

Oirlf^Di.

7

611 " t »N

4 . 0 1 1 5 4

3 .7?si ;?

3 . 6 5 0 0 0

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 5 0 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 8 4 e

2 . 6 6 5 3 ?

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 3 4 4

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 J 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

3 . 1 9 5 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

2 . 9 5 0 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . 8 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 9 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 1 -

2 . 7 6 9 2 J

2 . 3 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 ? 1 -

2 .2C385

2 . 1 6 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 d 5 2 i 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 0 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 8 0 7 7

2 . 8 2 3 0 8

3 . 0 1 5 3 8

2 . 8 1 5 3 8

2 . 5 6 5 3 5

2 . 4 5 3 8 5

2 . 4 9 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 f 0 7 7

NT

6 . 4 5 7 6 9

Mul t i p i e Regression analyses ent r e l a t i o n d imension o f QWL

STANDARD Pt V M T I C N

0 . 8 8 6 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 ) 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 D 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 8 5 C 7

I . 2 9 7 P 6

1 . 2 6 3 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 A 8

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 S 8 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 8 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 S

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 ? B

: . 2 4 5 2 4

1 . 3 2 * 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 V 8 0 1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 e ' > l

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

1 . 2 5 S 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 J 5 6

f C » R ' L O T I O N > VS Y

- 0 . 1 0 8 9 4

0 . 0 0 9 1 0

- 0 . 0 0 0 9 1

- 0 . 0 1 5 2 2

0 . 0 1 0 S 6

- C . 0 0 1 9 6

0 . 0 3 0 3 5

- 0 . 0 5 2 0 3

- 0 . 0 1 3 5 7

0 . 0 5 8 5 8

- 0 . 0 1 8 4 1

0 . 0 1 4 1 6

- 0 . 0 0 1 8 4

- 9 . 0 7 0 1 9

- 0 . 0 7 9 9 5

- 0 . 0 7 4 8 0

0 . 0 7 9 9 9

o.ooos; - 0 . 0 5 8 2 1

- 0 . 0 5 7 8 8

0 . 0 3 4 4 4

- C . 0 0 3 1 5

0 . 0 3 5 7 0

C . 0 3 8 3 1

C . 0 8 8 1 2

- 0 . 0 1 2 3 5

0 . C 3 6 C 3

5 . 0 4 1 7 2

0 . 0 3 5 1 6

- 0 . S 5 4 3 6

0 . C 1 0 9 5

- O . O U S l

0 . 0 3 0 6 3

0 . 1 C 0 4 2

0 . 0 C 3 8 1

C . 0 3 5 8 3

0 . 0 7 9 ^ 3 - 0 . 0 1 1 5 0

0 . 0 5 4 5 0

0 . C 4 3 1 0

- 0 . 0 4 9 0 9

0 . 0 2 7 1 ?

0 . 1 1 6 6 9

0 . 0 6 ^ 5 0

0 . 0 7 6 1 9

- C . 0 C 1 2 5

- 0 . 0 1 4 1 2

- C . 0 3 9 9 3

- 0 . 0 0 3 9 7

o . c i e i 3

0 . 0 7 0 2 1

RECKESSIC*^ CCEFf I C I t M

- 1 . 2 4 2 5 2

• 0 . 5 4 0 5 4

- 0 . 6 2 1 0 0

- 0 . 7 0 7 3 1

- 0 . 3 7 8 7 5

- 0 . 7 0 3 4 8

- 0 . 5 4 4 0 9

- 0 . 7 8 1 1 7

- 0 . 6 9 6 9 2

- 0 . 2 4 5 1 9

- 0 . 8 0 2 9 2

- 0 . 4 3 9 2 4

- 0 . 5 0 3 8 1

- 0 . 7 3 1 8 6

- 0 . 7 3 5 3 9

- C . 8 4 3 3 5

- 0 . 0 2 9 8 3

- 0 . 6 1 0 2 6

- 0 . 7 7 8 9 8

- 0 . 8 8 5 9 1

- 0 . 3 9 5 1 6

- C . 8 4 1 5 2

- 0 . 3 4 4 6 9

- 0 . 3 1 6 8 4

- 0 . 1 3 8 3 4

- 0 . 7 3 0 5 1

- C . 2 1 5 5 2

- 0 . 5 2 7 5 0

- 0 . 5 1 2 6 0

- 0 . 7 1 1 4 1

- 0 . 2 9 1 3 9

- 0 . 6 3 3 1 7

- 0 , 2 6 5 4 4

- 0 . 0 9 7 3 5

0 . 4 9 4 1 7

- 0 . 0 4 5 7 9

0 . 4 2 9 5 ? - 0 . 2 9 1 3 7

0 . 3 4 3 4 6

0 . 2 6 6 0 3

- 0 . 1 4 4 8 8

- 0 . 2 1 V 6 3

0 . 5 3 3 8 7

- 0 . 0 0 9 2 1

0 . 3 2 7 8 3

- 0 . 4 6 5 7 0

0 . 2 7 0 0 4

- 0 . 4 3 8 4 4

0 . 2 4 6 9 3

- 0 . 1 1 3 0 6

C .03660

STO. ERROH OF REC.CCCF.

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 7 0

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 2 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 3 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 4 1

1 3 2 . 8 1 1 1 4

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 8 1

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 3 5

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 9 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 7 3

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 1 5

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 4 2

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 7 7

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 5 5

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 3 1

1 3 2 . 8 1 1 8 2

1 3 2 . 8 1 1 6 0

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 9 1

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 1 7

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 1 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 4 8

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 6 3

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 4 0

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 2 7

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 7 6

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 3 8

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 6 2

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 3 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 1 8 6

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 8 5

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 7 7

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 9 1

1 3 2 . 8 1 3 2 3

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 2 9

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 6 4

1 3 2 . 8 1 2 9 7

2 6 . 1 3 7 8 7

2 6 . 1 3 8 5 1 2 6 . 1 3 6 9 7

2 6 . 1 3 9 0 0

2 6 . 1 3 8 8 1

2 6 . 1 3 7 7 1

2 6 . 1 3 7 6 5

2 6 . 1 3 8 2 9

2 6 . 1 3 6 6 5

2 6 . 1 3 7 7 4

2 6 . 1 3 7 1 0

2 6 . 1 3 7 4 6

2 6 . 1 3 7 6 4

2 6 . 1 3 9 1 7

2 6 . 1 3 7 0 ?

2 6 . 1 3 5 9 9

73 Un ion

COfPUTtO T VALUE

0 . 0 0 9 3 6

0 . 0 0 4 0 7

0 . 0 0 4 6 8

0 . 0 0 5 3 3

0 . 0 0 2 8 5

0 . 0 0 5 3 0

0 . 0 0 4 1 0

0 . 0 0 5 8 8

0 . 0 0 5 2 5

0 . 0 0 1 8 5

0 . 0 0 6 0 5

0 . 0 0 3 3 1

0 . 0 0 3 7 9

•O.OOSSl

0 . 0 0 5 5 4

0 . 0 0 6 3 5

0 . 0 0 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 9

0 . 0 0 5 6 7

0 . 0 0 6 6 7

0 . 0 0 2 9 8

- 0 . 0 0 6 3 4

0 . 0 0 2 6 0

0 . 0 0 2 3 9

0 . 0 0 1 0 4

0 . 0 0 5 5 0

- 0 . 0 0 1 6 2

0 . 0 0 3 9 7

0 . 0 0 3 8 6

0 . 0 0 5 3 6

0 . 0 0 2 1 9

0 . 0 0 4 7 7

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 7 3

0 . 0 0 3 7 2

- 0 . 0 0 1 7 5

0 . 0 1 6 4 3 ,

o.oius' 0 . 0 1 3 1 4

0 . 0 1 0 1 8

0 . 0 0 5 5 4

1 . 0 0 8 4 0

0 . 0 2 0 4 2

0 . 0 0 0 3 5

0 . 0 1 2 5 4

0 . 0 1 7 6 2

0 . 0 1 0 3 3

0 . 0 1 4 7 7

0 . 0 0 9 4 5

0 . 0 0 4 3 3

0 . 0 0 1 4 0

4.71608

INTERCEPT 10.65315

MULTIPLE CORRELATION 0.37SJ2

STC. ERfiCR OF ESTIMATE 4.87788

74

The findings were further clarified from the Table

3.14 where all the obtained t values ranging from t = .00022

to t = .0 2042 are again insignificant even at .05 level of

confidence.

Since both F value and t-values are insignificant at

.05 level. Therefore, all the null hypotheses pertaining to

the influence of personality attributes and organizational

characteristics on perceived QWL-facet i.e., "union

management relation" are rendered to be accepted.

Table 3.15. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the Influence of IVfe on SR - a facet of QWL

Sources of Variation DF S . S . M.S. F . v a l u e

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 9 9 5 . 6 6 1 9 3 19.52278 1.15924 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 208 3 5 0 2 . 9 4 1 6 5 16.84107 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 259 4 4 9 8 . 6 0 3 52

I t can be V i t n e s s e d from T a b l e 3.15 t h a t t h e " S e l f

r e s p e c t " - a QWL-facet i s a l s o found t o be i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y

i n f l u e n c e d by t h e f a c t o r s r e l a t e d t o p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s

and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a s o b t a i n e d s t a t i s t i c a l

v a l u e F = 1.15924 i s found h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t a t even .05

l e v e l o f c o n f i d e n c e . The f i n d i n g s were f u r t h e r v e r i f i e d by

c a l c u l a t i n g t ' s g i v e n i n Tab le 3 . 1 6 a g a i n show i n s i g n i f i c a n t

i n f l u e n c e of p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l

Table 3 .16. Showing Mul t ip le Regress ion Analyses - Self d imension of QWL.

r e s p e c t 75

f"[ »N

IV

2 0

<!1

21

2 3

2«.

2S

26

27

2 «

29

iO

31

3i

i i

it.

3S

36

37

3e 39

40

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 4

4 5

40

4 7

4fc

•.9

SO

5 1

5 2

S3

S4

5 5

56

57

se 59

63

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

4 . Oi I '-4

3.72s<92

3 . 6 5 0 0 C

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . S 1 1 S *

3 .0S0OO

2 . 8 S 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . S 8 8 4 e

2 . 8 6 S 3 S

3 . 1 9 6 1 S

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 ? 8 4 d

2 . S 4 2 3 J

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 3

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 0 3

2 . 9 S 3 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . ( ; S 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 3 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 ?

2 . 8 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 5 £

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 1

2 . 9 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 M

2 . 2 0 3 S S

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 8 S

2 . 8 0 3 8 S

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

i . t i t , t i

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 8 0 7 7

2 . S 2 3 0 S

3 . 0 1 5 J !

2 . 0 1 5 3 S

2 . 5 6 5 3 S

2 . 4 S 3 S 5

2 . 4 9 5 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

ST«sD«fiO

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . I S 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 l e ? 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 J 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 e s

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 .2SS71

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 .19S4S

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 S 2 1 4

. 29218

. 25785

. 2 4 2 9 8

. 3 2 7 6 4

, 30928

. 2 4 9 2 4

. 32470

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 « , U

1 . 2 ? 8 1 5

. 1 6 2 4 5

.2497?

.2 362 9

. 2 0 1 5 7

,21944

. 2 9 7 2 9

. 2 4 0 3 2

. 2 J 2 7 7

. 5 4 2 5 6

C C B » K » T 1 0 ^ > VS t

- 0 . 0 2 9 0 6

- 0 . 0 2 7 7 6

0 . 0 0 0 9 9

- 0 . 0 2 5 1 4

- 0 . 0 4 6 4 3

0 . 0 1 4 3 8

0 . 0 2 9 7 8

0 . 0 7 5 6 4

- 0 . 0 2 9 8 6

0 . 0 0 0 3 9

- 0 . 0 7 6 4 1

0 . 1 1 1 9 7

- 0 . 0 3 5 9 0

- 0 . 0 1 9 9 7

• 0 . 0 3 8 1 4

- 0 . 0 4 8 5 J

0 . 0 7 2 S 4

0 . 0 6 8 4 9

0 . 0 4 1 ) 5

- 0 . 3 0 8 9 1

- 0 . 0 4 7 9 1

- 0 . 0 0 5 2 5

- 0 . 0 9 3 6 0

- 0 . 0 9 0 6 7

- 0 . 0 4 0 9 7

0 . 1 0 4 4 8

- 0 . 0 0 8 3 9

O . C 1 0 7 5

- C . 0 4 4 5 5

3 . 1 1 7 7 6

- C . 0 3 9 5 4

- 0 . 0 1 4 5 5

- 0 . 0 7 3 3 4

- 0 . 0 6 3 3 1

- 0 . 0 3 0 8 1

• 0 . 0 4 4 9 0

0 . 0 6 9 0 4

0 . 0 5 9 9 4

0 . 0 0 5 1 !

- 0 . 0 2 5 6 1

0 . 0 0 2 7 6

0 . 0 1 2 2 2

C . 0 2 7 5 7

0 . 0 3 4 0 3

- o . c 2 e 6 ?

- C . 0 3 3 5 1

• 0 . 1 0 7 5 8

- 0 . 0 7 5 7 7

0 . 0 9 8 3 0

- 0 . 1 2 5 2 3

- 0 . 0 2 6 6 1

Of GR( S i l O N t C t F F IC ILKT

- 0 . 6 3 5 9 4

- 0 . 2 4 6 0 8

0 . 1 5 3 9 3

- 0 . 2 8 4 7 5

- 0 . 5 2 2 1 4

- 0 . 0 5 9 5 2

- 0 . 1 7 8 5 9

- 0 . 1 4 4 3 4

- 0 . 4 3 6 2 4

- 0 . 1 9 6 36

- 0 . 4 3 5 1 0

0 . 3 2 7 9 3

- 0 . 5 7 2 4 2

- 0 . 2 S 7 4 4

- 0 . 5 1 6 0 7

- 0 . 7 2 0 8 4

0 . 1 5 8 1 9

- 0 . 0 6 5 7 7

- 0 . 1 2 3 9 1

- 0 . 2 5 8 7 5

- 0 . 2 3 2 8 1

- 0 . 2 8 8 4 9

- 0 . 6 7 2 6 7

- 0 . 5 7 3 3 2

. - 0 . 3 1 2 4 3

C . 1 2 9 1 1

- 0 . 6 2 2 1 7

- C . 1 4 4 8 S

- 0 . 4 4 5 9 3

C . 3 3 3 9 S

- 0 . 4 9 0 4 3

- 0 . 1 1 1 9 1

- 0 . 4 C 3 9 8

- 0 . 6 3 9 0 5

0 . 2 9 1 1 3

- 0 . 2 6 1 7 3

0 . 5 3 0 3 3

0 . 0 1 7 8 1

0 . 2 2 5 4 7

- 3 . 0 1 9 0 7

0 . 1 4 9 2 ?

0 . 2 0 1 3 7

0 . 1 1 4 2 3

0 . 2 1 S 6 1

- 0 . 0 6 4 7 7

0 . 1 9 i e o

- 0 . 0 6 S 7 5

- 0 . 3 8 0 3 9

0 . 9 3 1 0 9

- 0 . 7 4 3 8 6

- 0 . 1 3 1 8 S

&TD. EDHOO OF RtO.CCEF.

i n . 7 3 6 1 1

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 6 1

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 6 9

1 I I . 7 3 5 8 6

1 1 1 . 7 3 4 8 0

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 2 0

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 6 6

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 3 6

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 1 S

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 6 5

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 7 2

1 1 1 . 7 36 1 7

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 9 8

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 6 2

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 3 8

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 1 8

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 2 8

1 1 1 - 7 3 6 5 1

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 5 2

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 9 3

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 8 9

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 7 0

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 7 5

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 1 6

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 8 4

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 0 5

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 8 4

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 4 0

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 2 3

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 1 7

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 3 0

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 5 4

1 1 1 . 7 3 5 7 7

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 0 5

1 1 1 . 7 3 6 3 4

2 1 . 9 8 9 9 5

2 1 . 9 9 0 4 9

2 1 . 9 8 9 1 9

2 1 . 9 9 0 8 9

2 1 . 9 9 0 7 4

2 1 . 9 8 9 8 1

2 1 . 9 8 9 7 6

2 1 . 9 9 0 3 0

2 1 . 9 8 8 9 2

2 1 . 9 8 9 8 3

2 1 ^ 9 8 9 3 0

2 1 . 9 8 9 6 0

2 1 . 9 8 9 7 5

2 1 . 9 9 1 0 4

2 1 - 9 8 9 2 3

2 1 . 9 8 8 3 6

COWPUTEO VALUE

0 . 0 0 5 6 9

0 . 0 0 2 2 0

0 . 0 0 1 3 8

0 . 0 0 2 S S

0 . 0 0 4 6 7

0 . 0 0 0 S 3

0 . 0 0 1 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 2 9

0 . 0 0 3 9 0

0 . 0 0 1 7 6

0 . 0 0 3 8 9

0 . 0 0 2 9 3

0 . 0 0 5 1 2

0 . 0 0 2 S 7

0 . 0 0 4 6 2

0 . 0 0 6 4 S

0 . 0 0 1 4 2

0 . 0 0 0 5 9

0 . 0 0 1 1 1

0 . 0 0 2 3 2

0 . 0 0 2 0 8

0 . 0 0 2 S 8

0 . 0 9 6 0 2

.O0S13

0 0 2 8 0

0 0 1 1 6

00SS7

0 0 1 3 0

, 0 0 4 1 7

0 0 2 9 9

0 0 4 3 9

0 0 1 0 0

0 . 0 0 3 6 2

0 . 0 0 5 7 2

0 0 2 6 1

0 1 1 9 0

0 2 4 1 2

0 0 0 8 1

0 1 0 2 5

0 . 0 0 0 8 7

0 . 0 0 6 7 9

0 . 0 0 9 1 6

0 . 0 0 5 1 9

0 . 0 0 9 9 4

0 . 0 0 3 8 5

0 . 0 0 8 7 2

0 . 0 0 3 0 4

0 . 0 1 7 3 0

0 . 0 4 2 3 4

0 . 0 3 4 7 4

0 . 0 0 6 0 0

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

WLPLNOtM

8 1 2 . 3 0 3 0 0 4 . 1^.76 3

I M E a C E P T

f i U L l l P L k C O H f t L A T I C N

S I D . IRRCR CF E S T l r A T E

14.05624

0.47045

4.1C379

76

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s on "Self Respect" dimension of QWL. Hence,

a l l the proposed nu l l -hypo theses prede termining no in f luence

of IV*s on DV stand a ccep ted .

Table 3.17. A n a l y s i s of Variance for t h e Regress ion Showing t h e In f luence of IVfe on SR - a f a c e t of QWL

Source of Var i a t ion DF S.S. M.S. F . v a l u e

A t t r i b u t i o n t o Regression

Deviat ion from Regression

51 13645.67285 267.56223 1.30264

208 32723.10156 205.39952

Total 259 56368.77344

The o t h e r f a c e t of QWL - "Supervisory r e l a t i o n s h i p "

i s a l so found t o be s i g n i f i c a n t l y unchanged by both IV's

v i z . , ' p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l charac

t e r i s t i c s ' a s ob t a ined s t a t i s t i c a l v a l u e F = 1.30264 i s

obtained h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t .05 l e v e l of confidence

which i s w i t n e s s e d from Table 3.17.

The f i n d i n g i s f u r t h e r confirmed when a l l IV ' s were

independent ly found t o have no ef fec t on employees pe rcep t ion

towards Superv i so ry r e l a t i o n s - a f a c e t of QWL a s obtained

s t a t i s t i c a l v a l u e s ranging from t = .00112 t o t = .04248 are

a l s o i n s i g n i f i c a n t and consequent to t h i s f a c t a l l n u l l -

hypotheses a r e found accep t ed .

77 Table 3 .18 . Showing M u l t i p l e Regression Analyses - Supervisory R e l a t i o n s h i p dimension of QWL.

N 5 . DIVMIION X VS Y C C i r i l C I l M OF W O . C O f F . T V»LUt

19 « . 0 I 1 5 « i ) . 8 ^ 9 S « 0 . 0 1 3 ( 1 -1 .0?0?K 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 0 6 0 . 0 0 2 6 1

iO 3 .7? j«Z 1 . 1 2 4 6 8 - C . C 3 1 7 1 -2 .35 f t«9 3 9 0 . 2 2 0 8 3 0 . 0 0 6 0 t

21 3 . a J 0 0 0 1 . 2 1 6 2 8 - 0 . 0 6 4 3 6 - 5 . 0 7 9 7 0 J 9 0 . 2 2 1 0 7 0 . 0 0 7 8 9

ic 5 . 2 « 2 M 1 . 1 7 ^ 0 5 - 0 . 0 3 3 6 7 - 2 . 9 1 5 2 ? 3 9 0 . 2 1 8 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 * 7

25 3.Sll"«4 1 . 2 I S 9 V - U . 0 2 3 1 1 - 2 . 7 8 k 2 S 5 9 0 . 2 1 4 4 8 0 . 0 0 7 1 4

24 5 .35009 1 . 2 5 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 - 2 . 1 1 6 6 6 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 3 6 0 . 0 0 5 4 5

25 2 .85769 1 . 1 8 5 0 7 0 . 0 5 5 8 2 - 1 . 5 0 0 8 0 5 9 0 . 2 2 0 9 8 0 . 0 0 5 5 5

26 2 .64251 1 . 2 9 7 0 6 0 . 0 2 2 2 6 - 2 . 5 5 4 6 8 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 9 4 0 . 0 0 6 5 5

27 5 .58846 1 . 2 6 8 8 2 - 0 . 0 5 5 4 4 - 2 . 6 5 4 2 6 3 9 0 . 2 1 9 1 8 0 .00675

26 2 .96558 1 . 2 0 2 1 4 -0.092c>9 - 5 . 2 5 5 7 8 5 9 0 . 2 1 7 4 4 ' 0 . 0 0 8 2 9

29 5 .19615 1 . 2 1 6 0 4 0 . 0 9 5 2 2 - 1 . 2 2 0 2 8 5 9 0 . 2 2 1 1 6 0 . 0 0 5 1 3

50 2 . 7 3 0 7 7 1.11619 - 0 . 0 0 1 1 9 - 2 . 4 9 9 2 8 J 9 0 . 2 J 9 2 7 0 . 0 0 6 4 0

31 2 . 7 5 5 4 c 1 . 2 7 9 8 0 0 . 0 9 3 4 5 - 1 . 6 2 1 0 ? 5 9 0 . 2 1 8 6 5 0 . 0 0 4 1 5

52 2 .54251 1 . 5 5 7 2 7 - 0 . 0 2 4 5 1 - 7 . 9 6 7 7 1 5 9 0 . 2 2 0 8 5 0 . 0 0 7 6 1

33 2 . 9 5 9 7 7 1 . 2 7 7 6 0 0.0554e> - 1 . 5 8 9 9 9 5 9 0 . 2 1 6 4 9 0 . 0 0 4 0 7

34 5 .02508 1 . 3 3 2 4 9 0 . 0 2 1 5 6 - 1 . 6 5 4 2 5 5 9 0 . 2 1 5 8 2 0 . 0 0 4 2 4

35 5 .19615 1 . 2 3 4 9 4 0 . 0 0 5 1 7 - 1 . 6 5 6 5 8 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 6 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 5

30 5.2590C 1 . 2 3 7 6 8 - 0 . 0 4 4 0 9 - 5 . 7 2 4 8 7 3 9 0 . 2 2 0 4 6 0 . 0 0 9 5 5

37 3 .08462 1 . 1 8 2 4 6 0 . 0 4 1 9 5 - 1 . 5 5 5 1 6 5 9 0 . 2 2 0 4 6 0 .00393

3d 5 .32538 1 . 2 2 6 8 9 - 0 . 0 7 2 1 5 - 5 . 8 6 5 3 1 5 9 0 . 2 1 8 4 1 0 . 0 0 9 9 0

39 2 .95000 1 . 2 5 8 7 1 0 . 0 1 3 4 5 - 2 . 1 2 8 9 0 5 9 0 . 2 2 1 7 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 6

40 3 .13077 1 . 2 6 9 7 2 0 . 0 8 0 9 9 - 1 . 2 3 6 7 7 3 9 0 . 2 2 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 7

41 3 .08462 1 . 2 8 2 7 0 0 . 0 3 5 3 9 - 2 . 3 9 2 3 * 3 9 0 . 2 1 7 7 7 0 . 0 0 6 1 3

*2 3 .05749 1 . 2 2 1 0 1 0 . 0 1 5 0 5 - 2 . 5 2 4 4 5 3 9 0 . 2 1 9 2 4 0 . 0 0 5 9 6

43 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 1.I9»«45 - 0 . 1 1 9 0 ? - 4 . 5 5 6 0 4 3 9 0 . 2 1 8 1 1 - 0 . 0 1 1 6 8

44 2 . 9 0 7 6 ? 1 . 2 6 0 9 1 0 . 0 6 2 4 7 - 0 . 5 5 9 8 6 5 9 0 . 2 1 8 8 1 0 . 0 0 1 4 5

45 2 . 8 1 1 5 4 1 . 2 8 2 1 4 - 0 . 0 4 0 9 9 - 3 . 2 9 ? 3 ? 5 9 0 . 2 1 8 1 4 -0 .00844

46 3 .0749? 1 . 2 9 2 1 S 0 . 1 2 4 1 2 - 1 . 1 7 0 6 7 3 9 0 - 2 1 6 5 8 0 . 0 0 3 0 0

*? 3 . 0 9 2 3 1 1 . 2 5 7 8 5 0 . 0 5 6 5 1 - 1 . 9 9 ? 9 3 3 9 0 . 2 1 9 4 8 0 . 0 0 5 1 1

48 2 . 7 6 9 2 5 1 . 2 4 2 9 3 - 0 . 0 7 9 7 0 - 5 . 0 1 5 5 6 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 2 7 0 . 0 0 7 7 ?

49 2.8425-1 1 . 5 2 7 6 6 0 . 0 1 6 2 7 - 2 . 5 0 0 4 6 5 9 0 . 2 1 9 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0

50 2 .59251 1 . 3 0 9 2 8 C.20365 - C . 3 4 7 2 8 3 9 0 . 2 2 0 6 * 0 . 0 0 2 1 7

51 2 .20555 1 . 2 4 9 2 4 0 . 2 2 8 3 5 - 0 . 4 5 8 2 5 5 9 0 . 2 1 7 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 1 2

52 2 . 1 8 0 7 7 1 . 5 2 4 7 0 C .10199 - 1 . 6 8 5 7 1 5 9 C . 2 1 8 8 4 0 . 0 0 4 3 2

53 1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4 1 0 . 7 3 6 4 D C.0»'?41 2 . 5 6 1 6 9 3 9 0 . 2 1 9 8 8 0 . 0 0 6 0 5

5* 5 .21154 1 . 2 0 7 C 7 - 0 . 0 6 5 6 2 - 2 . 3 9 V 7 7 7 6 . 7 9 6 1 0 0 . 0 5 1 2 5

55 5 .00585 1 . 1 0 9 8 0 - 0 . 0 3 0 7 1 - 2 . 1 8 9 0 1 7 6 . 7 9 7 9 7 0 . 0 2 8 5 0

56 2 .805S5 1 . 2 5 4 6 4 0 . 0 9 7 1 8 - 0 . 2 5 5 6 5 . 7 6 . 7 9 5 4 3 0 . 0 0 5 5 0

57 2 . 5 2 5 9 2 1 . 0 5 5 9 8 0 . 0 8 8 S 6 - C . 8 8 5 0 9 7 6 . 7 9 9 5 9 0 .01152

58 2 . 5 3 4 6 2 1 . 1 4 6 9 1 a . 0 4 9 3 2 - 1 . 3 9 3 5 4 7 6 . 7 9 8 8 4 0 . 0 1 8 1 5

* ' 2 . 6 3 4 6 ? 1 . 1 7 a l f t - 3 . D 0 2 M - 1 . 5 3 0 8 7 6 . 7 9 5 6 ? 0 . 0 1 7 5 8

0 . 0 1 0 6 9

0 . 0 1 5 6 5

0 . 0 0 7 7 4

0 . 0 4 2 5 4

*° 2 . 6 0 7 6 5 1 . 2 5 S 1 5 O.OlSSt - 2 . 1 8 7 1 0 7 6 . 7 9 5 4 5 - 0 . 0 2 8 4 8

61 2 .60^69 1 . 1 6 2 4 5 0 . 0 4 4 6 2 - 0 . 8 2 1 0 7 7 6 . 7 9 7 J 0

' 2 2 . 6 6 0 7 7 1 . 2 4 9 7 2 0 . 0 7 1 6 6 - 1 . 2 0 0 3 6 7 6 . 7 9 2 5 0

*3 2 .82308 1 . 2 3 6 2 9 0 . 0 2 6 5 8 - 0 . 5 9 4 3 2 7 6 . 7 9 5 6 9

** 3 .01553 1 . 2 C 1 5 7 - 3 . 0 4 8 1 0 - 3 . 2 5 1 5 4 7 6 . 7 9 5 8 ?

*** ? .41538 l . ? 1 9 4 4 0 .056C5 - 0 . 4 3 2 7 0 7 4 . 7 9 4 8 8 0 . 0 0 5 6 3

*" 2 .56556 1 . 2 9 7 2 ? - 0 . 0 4 9 7 4 - 2 . 0 4 J 3 5 7 6 . 7 9 5 4 1 0 . 0 2 6 6 1

" 2 .45585 1 . 2 4 0 3 2 - 3 . 0 6 4 2 5 - . ' . ? 6 ? 4 5 7 6 . 7 9 9 9 0 0 . 0 4 ? 4 8

** 2 - 4 9 e l 5 1 . 2 6 2 7 7 - 0 . 5 ^ 4 8 3 - 1 . 7 5 . ' 3 1 , , 7 6 . 7 9 3 5 9 0 .02254

* ' * " • ' " " 6 . 5 4 2 5 6 0 . 0 1 6 8 7 l^e9^.J>-^- 76V.,?,b56 0 . 0 2 4 6 8

JEPENDEM / , ^ ^ , \

9 5 4 . 2 0 7 6 9 1 4 . 7 5 2 6 3

INTERCEPT 2 6 . 5 1 * 5 4

MULTIPLE CCHRELAIIOK 0.4V?C1

SID. ESfiCR Cf ESTIMATE 1 4 . 3 3 1 7 7

78

Table 3.19. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of ivfe on IGR - a facet of QWL

Source of Var ia t ion DF S.S. M.S. F.value



Total 259 36418.88672

It is evident from Table 3.19 that one another facet

of QWL i.e. "Intra-Group relations" is also found to be

insignificantly influenced by both IV's viz., personality

attributes and organizational characteristics as statistical

value F = 0.85559 is found highly insignificant.

The reliability of the finding were further verified

by calculating X*s which are given in Table 3.2 0 and all the

obtained statistical t values ranging from lowest t = .01693

to highest t = .07792 were found insignificant even at .05

level of confidence which shows that IV's have no influence

on DV i.e., "Intra-Group relation" - a QWL aspect. Having

observed the trend of results given in Table 3.19 and Table

3.2 0, the null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of


perceived QWL facet - 'Intra Group relation' are found to be

accepted.

?9 Table 3.20. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Intra-group

relation dimension of QWL. VANi « r c (

N C .

I f

20

i i

zz Zi

^ Zi

2 6

Z7

Zi

Zi

3 0

3 1

iZ

3 i

3 4

3 5

3 6

3 7

3 6

3 9

4 0

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 4

4S

4 6

4 7

4 6

4 9

5 0

5 1

a 5 3

5 4

5 5

5 6

5 7

SB

5 9

6 0

6 1

6 2

6 3

6 4

6 5

6%

6 7

6 c

6 9

i ) t P £ N C t M

1 0

i N I t H C t P I

W L T l P L t

« ( « s

4 . 0 1 1 ^ 4

J . 7 7 * 9 ?

3 . £ 5 9 0 0

3 . . ' 9 7 ^ 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 " i 0 0 0

2 . e 5 7 t 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 3 4 6

2 . 8 6 5 ? *

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 3 4 6

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 S

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 0 E

2 . 9 5 0 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . 8 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 9 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 2

2 . 3 4 2 3 1 .

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 8 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 *

3 . 0 C 3 ! ' -

2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 , 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 6 2

2 . 4 0 7 * 9

2 . 4 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 8 0 7 7

2 . 3 2 3 0 8

3 . 0 1 5 3 8

2 . 8 1 5 J t

2 . 5 6 5 3 6

2 . 4 5 5 8 5

2 . - V 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

3 9 . 1 8 0 7 7

C C K H U A T I C N

S I O . t R K C I OF £ S T i r * T E

«.» « f , f ;» i? l ) Of V I » n r N

0 . 8 9 9 5 9

i . 1 2 4 ( > «

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 8 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 6 0

1 . 3 ^ 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 * 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 ^ 8 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 C 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 S 4 S

1 . 2 A 0 9 1

1 . 2 3 2 14

1 . 2 « 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 8

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 5 4 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 8

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 4 1 6

1 . 2 5 9 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 5 7 2

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 t

1 . 2 9 7 2 V

1 . 2 4 C 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

4 . 5 4 2 5 6

l l . 8 5 t 0 5

4 4 . 7 7 1 3 1

0 . 4 1 6 4 2

1 2 . 0 3 0 3 3

C C R ^ r l « J l O V » WS >

- 0 . 0 9 1 3 S

- 0 . 0 6 1 3 4

0 . 0 6 6 3 2

O . O I O I J

- 0 . 0 2 9 7 J

- 0 - C 0 6 4 2

0 . 0 3 3 4 6

- 0 . 0 3 7 4 8

0 . 0 3 9 3 8

- e . i i 7 » 7

0 . 0 4 8 5 9

- 0 . 1 1 5 4 7

- 0 . 0 0 4 1 5

a.oeiAv 0 . 0 2 5 1 4

0 . 0 C 3 4 9

0 . 1 2 3 5 2

0 . 3 1 4 6 7

- 0 . 0 1 7 7 8

- 0 . 0 0 4 » 4

- 0 . 0 0 0 7 1

C . C 4 S 1 2

0 . 0 2 3 5 4

0 . 0 0 0 7 4

- 0 . 0 8 9 9 3

- 0 . 0 C 3 7 5

0 . 0 1 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 0 7 2 1

0 . 0 1 7 9 8

- O . O C l ' . l

- 0 . 1 1 5 C 9

0 . 0 6 1 9 1

0 . 0 9 3 3 7

0 . 3 4 3 8 5

0 . 0 1 1 S 4

- 0 . 0 3 5 7 3

0 . S 4 9 1 5

C . 0 3 6 4 1

- 0 . 0 7 6 5 9

- 0 . 0 1 5 2 8

0 . U 5 4 7 2

0 . C 1 2 9 5

- 0 . 0 0 2 2 1

C . 0 4 t C l

0 . 0 4 1 5 J

0 . 0 5 5 3 0

- 0 . J 2 4 1 5

- O . C JvC -'

- O . C i S i l

O . C 2 7 5 f

0 . 0 1 5 8 5

c c t f f T c u N t - 7 . 8 6 2 4 9

- 8 . 1 5 4 7 2

- 5 . 8 4 5 8 5

- 7 . 1 6 3 2 0

- 7 . J 2 3 3 5

- e . 9 0 5 9 4

- 6 . 3 8 0 9 4

- 7 . 4 8 1 0 4

- 6 . 4 7 0 8 4

- 8 . 5 3 4 8 1

- 5 . 5 6 1 3 4

- 7 . 8 1 6 6 4

- 6 . 9 3 1 0 5

- 5 . 6 3 9 8 1

- 7 . 0 9 7 1 0

- 7 . 0 7 4 1 4

- 4 . 9 6 0 4 7

- 7 . 6 4 2 8 3

- 7 . 1 7 8 4 5

- 6 . 9 6 5 6 9

- 6 . 4 5 8 3 7

- 6 . 2 4 7 3 8

- 6 . 9 0 6 3 6

- 6 . 4 7 7 6 0

- 8 . 1 4 5 5 3

- 6 . 0 0 6 2 8

- 6 . 6 8 3 5 9

- 7 . 8 5 0 4 3

- 7 . 0 0 6 C 1

- 6 . 9 5 0 0 6

- 8 . 3 2 0 9 9

- 5 . 5 4 1 5 8

- 7 . 1 7 « , 7 7

- 6 . 3 S 1 4 3

6 . 8 3 3 9 2

-<..oes6e - 3 . 4 9 6 2 0

- 2 . 9 6 4 * 1

- 5 . 0 2 3 2 0

- 3 . 9 3 9 6 5

- 2 . 8 9 V 5 6

- 3 . 7 5 4 4 1

- 4 . 3 2 4 0 5

- 3 . 0 2 6 5 9

- 3 . 3 0 1 8 0

- 3 . 3 3 6 3 S

- 4 . 2 0 5 6 !

- 3 . 5 2 5 3 4

- 4 . 1 2 7 2 6

- 3 . 1 0 3 C 5

3 . 7 3 8 1 8

S T D . I R » C I » OF H l C . C C f f .

3 2 7 . S S 6 6 1

3 2 7 . 5 3 8 0 7

3 2 7 . S S 8 3 2

3 ? 7 . f S S 8 B

3 2 7 . J S 2 7 6

3 2 7 . 5 S 6 B 5

3 2 7 . 5 3 8 2 !

3 2 7 . S S 7 J 4

3 2 7 . S S 6 7 0

3 2 7 . 5 5 5 2 4

3 2 7 . 5 5 8 3 8

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 7 9

3 2 7 . S S 6 2 4

3 2 7 . 5 3 8 1 1

3 2 7 . 5 5 4 4 7

3 2 7 . S S 3 8 9

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 1 0

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 7 7

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 8 0

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 0 6

3 2 7 . 5 5 8 8 7

3 2 7 . 5 5 8 3 2

3 2 7 . 5 5 5 5 4

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 7 6

3 2 7 . 5 5 5 8 2

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 4 0

3 2 7 . 5 5 5 8 5

3 2 7 . 5 5 4 5 3

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 9 5

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 7 9

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 1 6

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 9 2

3 2 7 . 5 5 5 6 0

3 2 7 . 5 5 6 4 3

3 2 7 . 5 5 7 2 8

< 4 . 4 6 3 9 7

6 4 . 4 6 5 5 5

6 4 . 4 6 1 7 3

6 4 . 4 6 6 7 4

6 4 . 4 6 6 2 7

6 4 . 4 6 S 5 6

6 4 . 4 6 3 4 2

6 4 . 4 6 4 9 9

6 4 . 4 6 0 9 5

6 4 . 4 6 3 6 2

6 4 . 4 6 2 0 5

6 4 . 4 6 2 9 5

6 4 . <.63 J 9

6 4 . 4 6 7 1 6

6 4 . 4 6 1 8 6

6 4 . 4 5 9 3 2

C O t ' P U T l O r V A L U l

e . « ? 4 » o

0 . 0 2 4 9 0

0 . 0 1 7 8 5

0 . 0 2 1 8 7

0 . 0 2 2 3 6

0 . 0 2 1 0 8

0 . 0 1 9 4 8

0 . 0 2 2 8 4

0 . 0 1 9 7 5

' 0 . 0 2 6 0 6

0 . 0 1 6 9 8

0 . 0 2 3 8 6

0 . 0 2 1 1 6

t.elTZZ

0 . 0 2 1 6 7

- 0 . 0 2 1 6 0

0 . 0 1 5 1 4

0 . 0 2 3 3 9

0 . 0 2 1 9 2

0 . 0 2 1 2 7

• 0 . 0 1 9 7 2

0 . 0 1 9 0 7

0 . 0 2 1 0 8

0 . 0 1 9 7 8

0 . 0 2 4 8 7

- 0 . 0 1 8 3 4

0 . 0 2 C 4 0

• 0 . 0 2 3 9 7

0 . 0 2 1 3 9

0 . 0 2 1 2 2

0 . 0 2 5 4 0

• 0 . 0 1 6 9 3

• 0 . 0 2 1 9 0

0 . 0 1 9 4 8

0 . 0 2 0 8 6

' 6 . 0 6 3 4 3

• 0 . 0 5 4 2 3

0 . 0 4 5 9 9

0 . 0 7 7 9 2

0 . 0 6 1 1 1

0 . 0 4 4 9 8

0 . 0 5 8 2 7

0 . 0 6 7 0 8

• 0 . 0 4 6 9 5

0 . 0 5 1 2 2

0 . 0 5 1 7 6

0 . 0 6 5 2 4

3 . 0 5 4 4 9

0 . 0 6 4 0 2

0 . 0 4 8 1 4

0 . 0 5 7 9 9

80

Table 3 . 2 1 . Ana lys i s of Variance for the R e g r e s s i o n Showing t h e i n f l u e n c e of IVfe on Apathy - a f a c e t of QWL

Source of Va r i a t i on DF S.S. M.S. F.value



Total 259 2309.76172

It has been witnessed from Table 3.21 that QWL

aspect, i.e. Apathy is also found to have insignificant

influence on both IV's (personality attributes and organi

zational characteristics) obtained statistical value F =

0.7680 0 is highly insignificant at .05 level of confidence.

The findings were further verified from Table 3.22 in

which influence of each independent variable was seen on

dependent variable viz.. Apathy; as all the obtained

statistical t value ranging from lowest t = 0.00578 to

highest t = .05202 were found insignificant even at .05 level

of confidence which shows that IV's (personality attributes

and organizational characteristics) have no influence on

DV-Apathy - a QWL aspect.

In view of the above findings from Table 3.21 and

Table 3.22, it is found that all the null hypotheses

pertaining to the influence of IV's on DV-Apathy (QWL

dimension) are rendered to be accepted.

81 Table 3 .22 . Showing Mult ip le

dimension of QWL. R e g r e s s i o n Analyses Apa thy

Mk,<l A I 'LI

IV

10

il

ii

Zi

ei.

23

26

* 7

iL

2V

30

ZX

ii

JJ

J4

i S

i o

37

Jfc

39

ki,

1.1

42

43

44

43

46

47

4 0

•.9

50

5 1

52

53

54

55 56

57

5c

59

6 0

e l

62

63

64

65

0 6

67

6 b

6 >

u t F t s o t s

11

r i « ' .

4 . 0 ) 1 ^ 4

3 .7^fcO^

3 . i 5 C 0 0

J . ?C<' 51

J . 5 1 1 5 »

3 . D S O C J

2 . ! 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 M

3 . 5 8 J 4 t

: . 6 t 5 3 e

3 . 1 5 S 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 3 4 6

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 C 7 7

3 . C 2 30 S

3 . l O s l S

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 e 4 6 2

3 . J 2 3 0 5

2 . 9 5 0 C £

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 6 4 6 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . e l l S i .

3 . C 7 6 9 2

3 . C 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . 2 4 2 } !

2 . 3 - 2 5 1

2 , 2 0 3 8 5

2 . 1 E 0 7 7

1 C 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 ^

3 . 0 0 3 6 5 2 . 8 0 3 : 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 * 2

2 . e ' < 4 s 2

2 . e C 7 6 s i

2 . 6 C 7 t ?

2 . 6 * 0 7 7

2 . E 2 J 0 E

3 . C 1 5 3 6

2 . 5 1 5 ! =

2 . ; 6 5 : c

2 . 4 5 3 3 5

2 . ^ ">1 5

».&. ' S : ' ?

1

6 . 1 1 1 5 4

t N n t P o

V I * 1 I O N

. 9 ^ 9 5 9

. 1 2 4 6 S

. 2 1 6 2 B

. 1 7 2 0 5

. ? 1 5 9 »

. 2 3 0 8 0

. 1 8 5 0 7

. 2 9 7 0 6

. 2 6 S 8 2

. 2 0 2 1 4

. 2 1 6 0 4

. 2 1 6 2 9

. 2 7 9 8 0

. J 5 V 2 7

. 2 7 7 6 C

. 3 5 2 4 9

. 2 3 4 9 4

. 2 3 7 6 8

. 1 8 2 4 6

. 2 2 6 8 9

. 2 5 5 7 1

. 2 6 9 7 2

. 2 8 2 7 0

. 2 2 1 0 1

. 1 9 3 4 5

. 2 6 0 9 1

. 2 8 : 1 4

. 2 9 2 1 8

. 2 5 7 F 5

. 2 4 2 9 5

. 3 2 7 c t

. 3 0 9 2 8

. 2 4 9 2 4

. 3 2 4 7 0

. 7 3 6 4 0

. 2 0 7 0 7

. 1 0 5 3 : . 2 5 6 6 4

. 0 5 5 ' : e

. 1 4 6 9 1

. 1 7 M t

. 2 5 8 1 5

. 1 6 2 4 5

. 2 4 < ; - 2

. 2 0 1 S "

. ? 1 •/ 4 ^

. ^ '"": ;

. 2 4 0 15

. 2 t . 7 7

S . ^ 4 ? •^-

2 . 9 ^ 3 "

» V . t

0 . 0 3 1 4 V

o . 0 5 l ^ 4

- 0 . 0 6 3 6 2

9 . 0 5 1 5 2

- 0 . 0 5 2 9 9

- 0 . 0 1 2 0 3

0 . 0 3 5 0 5

0 . 0 3 9 2 5

- 0 . 0 6 1 2 1

- O . l O O l 3

0 . 0 2 5 E 5

0 . 0 2 1 0 6

- 0 . 0 5 2 7 5

- 0 . 0 3 2 0 ?

C . 0 7 2 ? 7

0 . 0 3 1 3 7

- C . 0 8 4 4 S

- C i . 1 2 4 4 6

0 . 0 0 1 6 9

- 0 . 0 6 5 9 3

- 0 . 1 1 4 5 8

- 0 . C 9 7 5 4

- 0 . C 6 0 9 3

- 0 . 0 2 4 1 3

C . 0 2 3 7 3

0 . 0 7 0 4 2

0 . C 2 3 t f

C. C0577

- 0 . 0 4 4 = 9

0 . 0 2 7 7 6

- 0 . 0 .' 2 5 'j

- 0 . 0 0 4 3 2

- 0 . 0 4 4 4 1

- 0 . 0 6 5 4 3

- 0 . C 7 2 9 7

C . 0 0 6 2 8

C . 0 4 v 9 i

0 . 0 1 1 0 0

C . 0 1 3 1 2

O.C?»74

C . 0 1 7 1 4

- 0 . 0 7 0 5 ?

- 5 . 1 1 7 4 ?

- O . D S t i 3

0 . : 1 7 '. 2

0 . 0 4 : 4 - :

- 0 . : 144 7

- 0 . 1 } ' - '

- 0 . c 4 ' . ?

- 0 . 0 9 7 ^ 7

- 0 . D 4 -. = ?

t c i I t m i N t

0 . 9 8 3 4 8

1 . 2 4 4 6 4

C . 6 5 2 1 8

1 . 1 3 4 6 5

0 . 6 7 1 5 2

0 . 9 0 0 3 9

0 . 9 8 4 3 5

1 . 0 1 6 2 8

0 . 8 6 4 2 2

0 . 8 3 4 5 2

0 . 9 8 8 0 6

0 . 9 4 9 4 9

C . 7 6 5 6 5

C . 4 9 5 1 4

1 . 0 5 0 0 2

C . 8 1 4 1 6

0 . 7 2 7 3 4

0 . 4 8 0 6 8

1 . 0 2 5 9 8

C . 7 7 0 1 5

0 . 7 1 3 6 0

0 . 7 2 5 8 0

0 . 8 2 7 5 8

0 . 8 9 8 0 5

0 . 7 5 9 2 2

1 . 0 8 2 4 2

C . 8 4 6 1 4

1 . 0 9 2 5 3

0 . 8 6 2 4 8

1 . 0 7 9 2 6

C . 8 0 8 3 4

0 . 8 4 6 4 2

0 . 7 3 7 6 9

0 . 8 5 4 1 5

- 0 . 9 4 7 4 4

0 . 4 8 6 8 3

C . 6 5 2 0 6 0 . 5 4 1 8 9

0 . 56684

C . 4 0 5 8 1

0 . 6 9 0 5 5

: . 5Sb4<.

0 . 3 9 0 7 4

: . 5 2 b 5 6

0 . 4 2 9 3 5

0 . 4 6 0 17

: . 4 9 5 5 4

C . 2 3 1 '54

: . 4 ^ 3 0 7

0 . 4 3 C 71

• : . 592P4

ni tuc.ccK.

8 5 . 2 5 5 1 1

8 5 . 2 5 5 4 8

8 3 . 2 3 3 5 4

8 5 . 2 5 2 9 3

8 3 . 2 3 2 1 3

8 3 . 2 3 5 1 8

8 5 . 2 3 3 5 2

8 3 . 2 3 3 2 9

8 3 . 2 3 3 1 3

8 3 . 2 3 2 7 7

8 3 . 2 5 3 5 6

8 3 . 2 3 3 1 5

8 3 . 2 3 5 0 2

8 3 . 2 3 3 4 9

8 3 . 2 3 2 5 7

8 3 , 2 3 2 4 2

8 3 . 2 3 3 2 4

8 3 . 2 3 3 4 1

8 3 . 2 3 3 4 1

8 5 . 2 3 2 9 7

8 3 . 2 3 3 6 9

8 3 . 2 3 3 5 4

8 3 . 2 3 2 8 3

8 5 . 2 3 3 1 5

8 3 . 2 3 2 9 1

8 3 . 2 3 5 0 6

8 3 . 2 3 2 9 2

8 3 . 2 3 2 5 8

8 3 . 2 3 3 2 0

8 3 1 2 3 5 1 5

8 3 . 2 3 5 2 5

8 3 . 2 3 3 4 4

e 3 . : 3 ? 9 5

8 5 . 2 - : 0 6

8 5 . 2 3 3 2 8

1 6 . 3 8 0 4 9

1 6 . 3 8 0 8 9

1 6 . 3 7 9 9 2

1 6 . 3 8 1 1 9

1 6 . 3 8 1 0 7

1 6 . 3 8 0 3 8

1 4 . 5 8 0 3 4

1 6 . 3 8 0 7 4

1 6 . 3 7 9 7 2

1 6 . 5 8 0 4 0

1 6 . 3 8 0 0 0

1 6 . 3 3 0 2 3

1 6 . 3 5 0 3 4

1 4 . 5 8 1 3 0

I s . 3 7 9 9 5

1 4 . 3 7 9 3 0

tO'*«'Ut| 1 V tLUI

O . O I I S ?

0 . 0 1 4 9 5

0 . 0 0 7 8 4

0 . 0 1 3 6 3

e.ooBor

0 . 0 1 0 8 2

0 . 0 1 1 8 3

0 . 0 1 2 2 1

0 . 0 1 0 3 B

0 . 0 1 0 0 3

0 . 0 1 1 8 7

O . O I U I

0 . 0 0 9 2 0

0 . 0 0 8 3 5

0 . 0 1 2 6 2

0 . 0 0 9 7 8

0 . 0 0 8 7 4

0 . 0 0 5 7 8

0 . 0 1 2 3 3

0 . 0 0 9 2 5

0 . 0 0 8 S 7

0 . 0 0 8 7 2

0 . 0 0 9 9 4

0 . 0 1 0 7 9

0 . 0 0 9 1 2

0 . 0 1 3 0 0

0 . 0 1 0 1 7

0 . 0 1 3 1 2

0 . 0 1 0 36

0 . 0 1 2 9 7

0 . 0 0 9 7 1

0 . 0 1 0 1 7

0 . 0 0 8 8 6

0 . 0 1 0 2 6

0 . 0 1 1 3 8

0 . 0 2 9 7 2

0 . 0 S 2 0 2

0 . 0 3 3 0 8

0 . 0 3 4 6 0

0 . 0 3 & V 8

0 . 0 4 2 1 6

0 . 0 3 5 8 0

0 . 0 2 3 8 S

0 . 0 3 2 2 7

0 . 0 3 8 4 5

0 . 0 4 0 3 0

0 . 0 4 2 3 4

0 . 0 1 4 1 4

0 . 0 3 9 2 6

0 . 0 2 6 3 0

0 . 0 3 6 1 9

INUHCEPT

• (O. .UPLE CC5 = F L * T I 0 N

<-T-, r . . -crc .-t t « . I l - * T E

1 4 . M ' t J

o . 5 « c c ;

82

Table 3.23. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing

the influence of IVfe on CM - a facet of QWL

Source of DP g.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 259 5627.30664

The twelfth-facet of QWL, i.e., 'Confidence in

Management' is also found to be insignificantly influenced by

both IV's (personality attributes and organizational

characteristics) as obtained F = 1.03210 is insignificant

even at .05 level of confidence which is given in Table 3.23.

The finding is further confirmed when all TV's independently

found to have their non-influence on employees perception

with regard to 'confidence in Management' - a facet of QWL as

t values given in Table 3.24 are as low as t = .00936 and as

high as t = .06245 are very low and statistically

insignificant, hence, all the null hypotheses pertaining to

the influence of personality attributes and organizational

characteristics on perceived QWL facet viz., "Confidence in

Management" are found accepted.

Table 3.24. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Confidence in Management dimension of QWL.

83

V A X l A

1 9

2 b

2 1

? 2

2 3

2 4

2 i

2 6

2 7

2 8

2 9

3 C

3 1

3 2

3 3

31 .

3 5

3 6

3 7

3 6

3 9

>•&

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 «

4 5

4 S

4 7

4 S

4 9

S t

5 1

5 2

5 3

5<.

5 5

5 t

5 7

5 £

5 9

6C

6 1

e.2

S 3

S <i

6 5

S i

6 7

6 s

6 9

CLL M t « N

( . 0 1 1 5 4

3 . 7 . - * 9 :

3 . t 5 0 0 0

3 . ^ 9 ^ 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 *

3 . 0 5 0 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 8 4 6

2 . S 6 5 5 8

3 . 1 9 M 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 3 4 6

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . 0 2 3 C 8

2 . 9 5 0 0 9

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 9 6 4 6 2

3 . 1 ) 5 7 4 9

3 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 C 7 6 9

2 . 8 1 1 5 4

3 . C 7 6 9 ^

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . 3 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 8 " ^

2 . 1 6 3 7 7

1C2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 ? 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 5 < . ( S 2

: . 0 3 4 6 ?

2 , i 0 7 f ! 9

2 . t 0 7 6 ^

: . o ? 0 7 7

: . 2 2 3 0 3

3 . o : 5 ! e

2 . 3 1 5 J i

2 . 5 6 5 3 i

2 . 4 5 J " 5

2 . « . 9 a 15

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

D l V M T I O N

O . S « ? 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 S 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 B 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 5 S 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 , 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 9 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 S 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 J I 4 5

1 . 2 6 C 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 ^ 13

1 . 2 5 7 E 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 5 0 9 2 8

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

I S . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 6

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . I 7 ,M s

1 . 2 5 6 1 5

i . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 ?

1 . 2 3 s ? 9

1 . 2 ! ! 1 ' . 7

1.2 I ?<. -

1 . 2 ' ' 7 ? ;

1 . 2 4 3 3 2

1 . 2 4 2 7 7

^ . 5 4 i 5 c

> VS Y

- 0 . 1 5 4 7 9

- 0 . 0 8 B 5 7

- 0 . 0 4 3 3 5

- 0 . 0 0 8 5 ?

- 0 . 0 8 6 3 4

- 0 . 0 0 7 4 4

- C . 0 5 4 5 3

- 0 . 1 1 6 5 4

0 . U B S 2 9

- 0 . 0 7 1 7 8

0 . 0 9 8 0 1

- 0 . 0 6 2 8 9

C . C 2 8 8 0

- 0 . 0 0 8 7 7

0 . 0 7 0 3 2

C . 0 0 9 6 4

- 0 . 0 6 2 5 ?

- 0 . 0 4 5 0 1

- 0 . 0 4 6 7 8

- 0 . 0 0 5 0 5

0 . 0 3 0 9 6

C . 0 5 1 0 5

0 . 0 1 3 7 1

- 0 . 0 5 9 8 4

- 0 . 0 2 0 7 3

- 0 . C 5 0 6 2

- : . C 4 7 8 3

- C . 1 3 7 5 7

0 . 0 2 5 0 6

- 0 . 0 4 6 7 5

C . 0 1 9 5 4

0 . 0 4 7 9 3

C . 0 4 3 5 8

C . 0 1 4 5 1

- C . 0 7 4 5 8

C . 0 3 5 3 8

- 0 . 0 5 9 7 7

0 . 0 1 2 6 0

- C . 0 4 8 6 !

0 . 0 6 7 7 3

: . 0 H 4 9

- C . 1 1 3 3 5

r . ; 4 ? 2 i

C . : i 3 7 1

: . r ? 9 2 9

c . ; ; 0 7 9

C . 0 7 3 9 6

- : . l 3 9 7 5

- C . 1 0 > ? 1

- c . i r i « 8

- C . C 4 J ? 0

W f O R l S S I C N C C l f f I C U M

- 2 . 4 8 6 8 !

- 1 . 9 5 8 9 2

- 2 . 0 0 6 0 D

- 1 . 5 0 6 9 1

- 2 . 1 4 8 7 J

- 2 . 0 7 1 1 0

- 1 . 9 4 3 6 1

- 2 . 3 1 6 2 4

- 1 . 4 5 6 5 6

- 2 . 1 4 3 2 0

- 1 . 3 3 2 6 1

- 2 . 0 2 0 9 6

- 1 . 6 9 3 0 3

- 1 . 8 8 8 7 4

- 1 . 3 1 1 15

- 1 . 7 6 2 7 3

- 2 . 1 1 5 7 6

- 1 . 5 5 2 0 5

- 1 . 9 6 3 2 9

- 2 . 0 1 0 9 2

- 1 . 6 2 0 1 3

- 1 . 5 4 8 7 4

- 1 . 8 5 9 5 4

- 1 . 9 9 8 2 3

- 1 . 7 0 1 6 0

- 2 . 0 2 8 8 6

- 1 . 7 0 4 1 4

- 2 . 4 3 7 7 1

- 1 . 6 3 6 3 9

- 1 . 8 9 7 0 0

- 1 . 7 4 1 7 2

- 1 . 6 6 S 6 1

- 1 . 6 3 9 7 1

- l . e 9 o 8 D

1 . 8 5 8 7 1

- 0 . 6 9 4 8 3

- 0 . 7 3 9 3 2

- 0 . 4 3 8 4 4

- 1 . 1 2 0 7 7

- 0 . 7 3 5 2 4

- 0 . 3 1 V ..' 9

- 1 . 5 5 < . 8 3

- 0 . 2 5 2 9 9

- 0 . 5 2 9 9 7

- 0 . 6 H 9 4

- 0 . 8 0 5 9 7

- 0 . 3 0 2 3 4

- 1 . 1 5 4 4 0

- 0 . 8 2 5 7 5

- 0 . 9 5 7 9 7

0 . 8 3 1 4 2

OF R f G . C C l f .

1 2 6 . S U 7 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 2 9

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 3 8

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 4 4

1 2 6 . 5 1 3 2 4

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 8 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 3 4

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 0 0

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 7 6

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 2 0

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 4 0

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 7 9

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 5 8

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 3 0

1 2 6 . 5 1 3 8 9

1 2 6 . 5 1 3 6 7

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 9 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 1 7

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 1 8

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 5 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 6 0

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 3 9

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 3 1

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 7 8

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 4 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 6 4

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 4 3

1 2 6 . 5 1 3 9 2

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 8 6

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 7 9

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 9 3

1 2 6 . 5 1 5 2 4

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 3 3

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 6 6

1 2 6 . 5 1 4 9 8

2 4 . 8 9 8 4 2

2 4 . 8 9 9 0 2

2 4 . 8 9 7 5 5

2 4 . 8 9 9 4 9

2 4 . 8 9 0 3 1

24 . I « 9 n 2 6

2 4 . 8 9 8 2 0

2 4 . 5 9 8 6 1

2 4 . 8 9 7 2 5

2 4 . 3 9 6 2 8

2 4 . 8 9 7 6 8

2 4 . 8 9 8 0 2

2 4 . 8 9 8 2 3

2 4 . 8 9 0 6 5

2 4 . 8 9 7 6 0

2 4 . 8 9 6 6 2

COMPUTED T V « L U l

0 . 0 1 9 « «

0 . 0 1 S 4 S

0 . 0 1 5 B »

O . O U V l

0 . 0 1 6 * 8

0 . 0 1 6 3 7

0 . 0 1 5 S 6

-o.oissi . O . O l l S l

' 0 . 0 1 6 9 4

O . O I O S S

0 . 0 1 5 9 7

0 . 0 1 3 5 8

0 . 0 1 4 9 3

0 . 0 1 0 3 6

0 . 0 1 3 9 3

0 . 0 1 6 7 2

0 . 0 1 2 2 7

0 . 0 1 S S 2

0 . 0 1SB9

0 . 0 1 2 S 1

- 0 . 0 1 2 2 4

0 . 0 1 4 7 0

0 . 0 1 5 7 9

0 . 0 1 3 4 5

0 . 0 1 6 0 4

0 . 0 1 3 4 7

0 . 0 1 9 2 7

9 . 0 1 3 3 3

0 . 0 1 4 9 9

0 , 3 1 3 7 7

0 . 0 1 3 1 9

0 . 0 1 2 9 6

0 . 0 1 4 9 9

0 . 0 1 4 6 9

0 . 0 2 7 9 1

0 . 0 2 9 * 9 .

- - 0 . 0 2 5 A 4 •

0 . 0 4 5 0 1

0 . 0 2 9 5 3

0 . 0 1 ? 8 2

0 . 0 6 2 4 5

0 . 0 0 9 3 6

0 . 0 2 1 2 9

0 . 0 2 6 0 6

0 . 0 3 2 3 7

C . 0 1 2 1 4

0 . 0 4 6 3 7

0 . 0 3 3 1 6

0 . 0 3 8 4 8

0 . 0 3 3 3 9

L)iri..iui.Sl

12 1 3 . 0 5 0 7 7 4 . . 6 1 2 3

i V T c K C t P T 9 . 9 P : 4 5

f J L T l P L E C C I » K L L » 1 I 0 N 0 . 4 4 9 ^ 9

s T O . tiJKCK Cr t S T I f A I t 4 . 6 4 ( 5 7

84

T a b l e 3 . 2 5 . A n a l y s i s of V a r i a n c e f o r t h e R e g r e s s i o n Showing

t h e i n f l u e n c e of IVfe on MD - a f a c e t of QWL

S o u r c e of OF S . S . M.S. F . v a l u e V a r i a t i o n

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 6 0 6 . 2 0 7 8 2 11 .88643 0 . 6 4 7 8 0 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 208 3816 .57837 18 .34893 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 259 4 4 2 2 . 7 8 6 1 3

The t h i r t e e n t h a s p e c t of QWL, i . e . , "Meaningful

Deve lopment" l i k e o t h e r QWL-facet i s a l s o found t o be

i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n f l u e n c e d by b o t h I V ' s ( p e r s o n a l i t y

a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) a s o b t a i n e d

s t a t i s t i c a l v a l u e F = 0 .64780 i s h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t

. 0 5 l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e ( T a b l e 3 . 2 5 ) . The f i n d i n g s were

f u r t h e r v e r i f i e d from T a b l e 3 . 2 6 i n which i n f l u e n c e of each

i n d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e was s e e n on d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e v i z . ,

" m e a n i n g f u l deve lopment" and o b t a i n e d s t a t i s t i c a l t - v a l u e s

r a n g i n g t = .01343 t o t = .06664 were v e r y low and found

i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t . 0 5 l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e which shows

I V ' s ( p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) have no i n f l u e n c e on DV i . e . , "Meaningful

Deve lopment" - a QWL a s p e c t .

Keeping i n view of t h e a b o v e f i n d i n g s men t ioned in

T a b l e 3 .25 and Tab le 3 . 2 6 , i t c a n be s a i d w i t h o u t any

r e s e r v a t i o n t h a t a l l t h e n u l l h y p o t h e s e s p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e

Table 3.26. Showing Multiple Regression development dimension of QWL.

Analyses - Meaningful 85

"r >K

IV (.OHM

i i 3.7269?

a 3 . 6 S 0 0 C

2 2 3 . 2 ( 2 3 1

23 3 . S n 5 *

2 * 3 . 0 S 0 0 0

2S 2 . 8 5 7 6 9

io 2 . 6 ( 2 3 1

27 3 . 5 8 8 t t

2o 2 . 3 6 5 3 6

25 3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3C 2 . 7 3 0 7 7

3i 2 . 7 3 3 * 6

32 2 . 5 t 2 ? l

33 2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3«. 3.023Cfc

35 3 . 1 9 4 1 5

3 6 3 .250CC

37 3.a8<.62

3c 3 .0230?.

39 2 .V500C

* i 3 . 1 3 0 7 7

4 1 3 . 0 S 4 d 2

k t 3 . 0 5 7 6 9

43 3 . 0 0 0 0 0

t t 2 . 9 0 7 6 9

45 2 . 8 1 1 5 4

40 3 . 0 7 6 ° :

47 3 . 0 9 2 3 1

4£ 2 . 7 6 0 2 3

«.» 2 . e t 2 J l

5C 2 . 3 9 2 ! !

5 1 2 . 2 0 i E 5

Si 2 . 1 6 0 7 7

5 3 1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

54 3 . 2 1 1 " - -

55 3 .0015" '

5o 2 . 8 0 3 S S

57 2 . 5 2 6 9 2

S 8 2 . S ' 4 (k.'

59 2 . 6 3 4 6 2

6C 2 . i C 7 6 i ;

61 2.6076?

62 2.6S077

63 2.3230S

6". 3.S15IS

65 2.S1S36

66 2.5t53£

67 2 . 4 5 3 S 5

6c 2 . 4 9 6 1 5

6 9 4 0 . 7 e j r 7

Ji ri. t ; C £ M

13 1 2 . 2 C 7 6 V

C L V : * T I C N

0 . e » 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 f l

1 .2 1628

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 6 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 3 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 5

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 .2 3494

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 ! 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 6 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 8 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 n 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . S O I ? ?

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

I C . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 C 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 ! C

1 . 2 5 f * 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 6

1 . 146<: i

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

1 . 2 5 8 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 .23f>29

1 . 2 C 1 ' ; 7

1 . 2194<,

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 D I 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

5 . 5 4 2 5 6

4 . 1 3 2 3 6

C ' > P r L « T I O N » VS V

0 . 0 0 3 5 5

O.0C976

- 0 . 0 1 3 9 ?

0 . 0631 5

C .064C6

C . 0 3 6 6 7

0 . 0 4 8 6 3

- 0 . 0 6 0 2 3

0 . 0 C 3 E 5

- C . 0 C 5 2 3

0 . 0 3 2 5 8

- 0 . 1 0 2 5 2

- 0 . CS612

- 0 . C C 4 3 2

C . 1 1 6 0 9

C .C6995

- 0 . 0 3 » 2 8

C . C 3 6 t l

0 . 0 6 0 ? 9

D . 0 2 9 5 1

- 0 . C 2 G J 6

- C . 0 0 2 2 5

0 . 0 3 6 9 2

0 . 0 8 6 6 =

- 0 . 0 1 8 7 1

- c . : i ? e 1

C . 0 4 0 5 4

: . 0 0 7 5 4

C . 0 2 2 7 :

C . C 6 1 2 3

- C . C 2 5 t £

C . C 1 5 ^ 5

c. c ?: 11

O . C C S ' l

: . 0 6 : 5 1

- : . C ? 4 3 2

- C . 0 7 1 7 4

c . : J ? ' 4

0 . : 5 : G C

C. 0 - 1 5 5

0 . e i 4 C 9

- ; . 0 2 1 4 0

0 . 0 2 5 « 7

• c . : : V : 4

- C . r 4 » 9 3

- -J. :• 2 1 1 4

C . : 2 5 2 t

- C . C 5 t 5 6

- c . : i 3 1 0

- C . C 7 5 3 ?

- C , G26C1

fltCRtSSICK CClFf K I t K T

2 . 0 0 5 0 7

2 . 1 1 7 0 0

1 . 9 3 7 6 6

2 . 4 1 0 1 9

2 . 3 7 6 1 9

2 . 0 3 9 4 0

2 . 2 8 1 5 5

1 . 7 9 2 0 9

1 . 8 2 5 6 2

2 . 1 4 5 4 5

2 . 1 5 7 0 7

1 . 5 6 6 0 4

1 . 7 9 1 0 3

2 . 0 3 6 6 5

2 . 7 1 6 4 5

2 . 3 5 6 2 1

1 . 6 7 9 6 4

2 . 3 4 7 5 9

2 . 2 8 6 5 8

2 . 1 0 5 1 0

1 . 9 9 4 1 7

2 . 0 3 4 1 0

2 . 1 6 4 5 2

2 . 2 7 3 8 8

2 . 0 9 4 4 4

1 . 8 8 1 8 7

2 . 5 2 4 2 8

2 . 0 9 2 4 2

2 . 2 3 9 3 7

2 . 3 5 0 5 7

2 . 0 3 0 4 3

2 . 0 9 5 9 1

2 .24187

1.9374E

• 2 . 0 2 6 8 4

1 . 2 6 3 7 6

0 . 7 2 4 0 7

1 . 1 4 7 2 6

1 . 5 2 9 58

1 . 1 9 4 1 ?

1 . 1 0 1 3 6

0 . 9 4 1 8 0

1 .5105f t

1 . 2 4 1 6 0

0 . 6 2 0 5 4

1 . U 1 6 3 7

1 . 3 0 5 1 1

0 . 9 7 2 1 0

1 . 2 6 5 6 5

0 . 7 6 5 7 9

• 1 . 1 5 2 2 0

STD. ERRCR OF R E C C t t F .

U 6 . 6 3 1 0 S

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 5 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 6 S

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 7 9

1 1 6 . 6 2 9 6 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 1 4

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 6 2

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 3 1

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 0 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 5 6

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 6 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 1 1

ll6.6S09i

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 5 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 2 9

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 0 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 2 3

1 1 6 . 6 i l 4 7

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 4 7

: i 6 . 6 3 0 8 6

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 8 6

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 6 7

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 6 7

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 1 0

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 7 7

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 9 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 7 8

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 3 1

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 1 7

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 1 1

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 2 4

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 5 2

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 6 9

1 1 6 . 6 3 0 9 9

1 1 6 . 6 3 1 2 9

2 2 . 9 5 3 2 9

2 2 . 9 S 3 8 S

2 2 . 9 5 2 4 9

2 2 . 9 5 4 2 7

2 2 . 9 5 4 1 1

2 2 . 9 5 3 1 *

2 2 . 9 5 3 0 9

2 2 . 9 5 3 6 5

2 2 . 0 5 2 2 1

2 2 . 9 5 3 1 6

2 2 . 9 5 2 6 0

2 2 . 9 5 2 9 2

2 2 . 9 5 3 0 6

2 2 . 9 5 4 4 2

2 2 . 9 5 2 5 4

2 2 . 9 5 1 6 3

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 1 7 1 9

0 .01815

0 . 0 1 6 6 1

0 . 0 2 0 6 7

0 . 0 2 0 3 7

0 . 0 1 7 4 9

0 . 0 1 9 5 6

0 . 0 1 5 3 7

A .01565

0 .01842

0 . 0 1 8 4 9

0 . 0 1 3 4 3

0 . 0 1 7 4 6

0 . 0 2 3 2 9

0 .02020

0 .01440

0 .02013

0 . 0 1 9 6 1

0 .01S05

0 .01710

0 . 0 1 7 4 4

0 . 0 1 8 5 6

0 .01950

0 .01796

0 . 0 1 6 U

0 . 0 2 1 6 4

0 .01794

0 .01920

0 .02015

0 . 0 1 7 4 1

0 . 0 1 7 9 7

0 .0192?

0 . 0 1 6 6 1

0 . 0 1 7 8 9

0 . 0 5 5 2 8

0 .03154

0 .04998

0.066C4

0 . 0 5 2 0 2

0 .04798

0 .04103

0 . 0 6 5 8 1

0 .05410

0 .03575

0 . 0 4 4 2 8

0 .05686

0 .04235

0 .05514

0 . 0 3 3 3 6

0 . 0 5 0 2 0

I S I t R C t F T l C . 5 f 5 0 7

N o i - T I P ^ t CCRRLL4TICN C. 37022

bTC. tKnCR CF ESTIMATE 4 . 2 E 3 5 7

86

iftfluenee of persdtJarity attributes and organizational

characteristics ^n perceived QWL facet viz. Meaningful

Development stand accepted.


the influence of IVfe on CIP - a facet of QWL

Source of ^^ 5 5 „ g F.value Variation



Total 259 29888.13281

It is evident from Table 3.27 that the fourteenth

aspect of QWL i.e., "Control, influence and participation" is

not found to be influenced by both IVfe (personality

attributes and organizational characteristics) as F = 0.75789

is rendered to be highly insignificant at .05 level of

confidence.

The findings were further confirmed when influence of

each independent variable was seen on Dependent variable

viz., "Control influence and participation" and all the

obtained t-values ranging from as low as t = .00006 to as

high as t = .02313 were insignificant even at .05 level of

confidence which confirms that IV's have no influence on DV

i.e. 'Control, Influence and Participation' - a QWL aspect.

Therefore, all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

87 Table 3.28. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Control,

Influence and Par t ic ipa t ion dimension of QWL.

VAklAbU NO.

19

;o ii

2i

23

24

Zi

26

27

26

29

30

3 1

32

33

H.

35

3o

37

3o

39

40

41

42

43

4

49

so 51

ii

53 1

54

55

56

57

5S

59

oC

61

6^

63

6«

65

66

67

63

69

OEPtNDEM

1<.

I N T t H C t P T

N U L T iPLE

STU. iH-iZ

- M N

4 . CI 1 ^»

i.f!t><j:

l.tiiOD

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . 5 1 I 5 4

3 . ; 5 0 c 0

2 . 0 5 7 6 ?

2 . 6 4 2 5 1

3 . S 5 » 4 6

2 . 8 6 5 3 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

2 . 7 J 0 7 7

2 . 7 J « 4 «

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 !

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . C 5 4 t E

3 . 0 2 3 0 6

2 . 9 5 C 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 6 i 6 2

3 . 3 5 7 6 9

3.0C0CC

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . a i l 5 -3 . 3 7 6 9 ?

3 .C92 U

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . S t ? 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 7 1 -

2 . 2 C 3 5 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

C 2 . t l l f i t

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 .CC3J5

i.ms'-

2 . S 2 t 9 ( '

2 . 5 3<.e:-

Z.&-}'.t2

2 . t :? (sv

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 S 0 7 7

2 . 5 2 3 C P

5 . 0 1 5 3 ?

2 . 5 1 5 3 :

2 . 5 6 5 3 8

2 . 4 5 3 ? 5

2 . i ' 5 i i 5

4 C . 7 S 0 7 7

3 7 . 9 4 2 7 1

ZC'trjiiAllZS

: cr t s i l t 'AT f

0. V K T I C K C . 8 S « 9 «

1 . 1 2 4 6 (

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 S 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 8 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 (

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

J . 2 3 4 9 4

i . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 3 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 8 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 8 4 S

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 8

: . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

: . 3 C 0 2 8

i . 2 4 9 2 4

i . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 < S 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 S

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 1 7 6 1 *

1 . 2 5 3 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 C 1 5 7

i . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

: ; . 7 4 2 3 6

5 i . 5 5 £ 3 9

0 . 3 « 5 ? t

1 1 . 0 0 7 9 6

CCHRf l *T ION X VS Y

0 . 0 0 6 1 3

0 . 0 0 9 2 4

0 . 0 6 4 0 5

0 . 0 S 2 9 3

• 0 . 0 1 1 0 3

- 0 . 1 0 7 2 4

» 9 . 0 J 6 7 4

- 0 . 0 7 4 6 4

0 . 0 0 5 3 3

- e . 0 5 9 5 0

• 0 . 0 1 5 6 8

0 . 0 8 8 0 5

0 . 0 2 2 2 1

- 0 . 0 0 8 9 5

- 0 . 0 6 8 3 5

0 . 0 5 4 9 4

0 . 1 1 6 6 9

0 . 0 S 4 2 3

- 0 . 0 3 1 5 3

0 . 0 1 9 4 4

0 . 0 5 4 0 4

0 . 0 2 2 0 7

- 0 . 0 2 9 3 5

- C . 0 5 3 3 2

- 0 . 0 7 0 7 B

- 0 . 0 0 2 3 9

- 0 . 0 3 9 4 6

C.C5512

C .06040

- 0 . 0 5 8 * 3

- C . 0 4 R 2 9

- 0 . 0 7 0 C 3

- 0 . 0 9 2 0 5

- O . O f t l t ?

- 0 . 0 3 5 1 . 5

- 0 . 0 3 6 5 7

e . 0 2 9 4 9

0 . 0 2 6 0 4

- 0 . 0 1 8 C 7

- 0 . 0 1 5 9 6

0 . 0 4 1 1 1

- i . C 4 0 t ! 2

- 0 . 0 2 2 5 4

0 . 0 3 2 8 5

- 0 . 0 S 6 6 3

- : . 0 4 5 4 0

- 0 . 0 5 3 8 7

0 . 0 0 1 2 4

0 . 0 5 1 2 4

- 0 . 0 5 3 6 7

- 3 . 0 3 5 S 3

•ffcmssioN C C E F F K H N T 0 . 0 4 7 1 7

- 0 . 1 8 6 5 5

1 . 0 S 2 2 6

- 0 . 3 2 2 2 2

0 . 5 0 0 3 8

- 0 . 8 6 9 3 9

0 . 1 0 6 2 3

- 0 . 9 5 4 3 8

0 . 4 2 9 9 4

- 0 . 0 3 4 9 1

0 . 2 5 8 8 1

1 . 2 7 6 5 1

0 . 3 7 7 06

0 . 5 4 0 2 5

- 1 . 0 5 1 0 3

0 . 9 7 6 2 4

1 . 4 6 1 1 1

0 . 3 2 2 0 9

- 0 . 3 5 4 8 7

- 0 . 0 1 7 1 0

0 . 4 0 0 0 5

0 . 1 6 5 2 4

- 0 . 0 9 S 1 4

- 0 . 3 9 5 2 2

- 0 . 3 S 5 1 5

0 . 7 8 2 0 6

- 0 . 6 7 0 9 3

C . 1 4 6 1 3

0 . 9 8 4 1 2

- 0 . 1 8 5 6 8

- 0 . 2 8 ^ 4 6

0 . 2 7 2 4 ?

- 0 . 8 2 2 9 6

- 0 . 3 4 8 4 4

- 0 . 2 3 4 5 1

- 0 . 5 6 0 5 7

1 . 0 5 9 8 9

0 . 0 3 5 4 S

- C . 1 0 9 2 8

- 0 . 0 4 0 0 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 4

0 . 0 4 3 7 7

- 0 . 5 1 7 7 8

1 . 3 6 4 0 9

- 0 . 7 7 8 5 5

0 . 5 1 2 9 3

- 0 . 0 4 5 1 6

0 . 2 8 1 0 1

1 . 0 7 S 3 9

- 0 . 6 0 6 4 6

- 0 . 2 5 9 7 6

S I D . fKRCR Of H E G . C C I F .

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 8 5

2 9 9 . 7 2 U 9

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 4 1

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 1 8

2 9 9 . 7 1 6 3 4

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 0 9

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 3 4

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 5 2

2 9 9 . 7 1 0 9 4

2 9 9 . 7 1 8 6 0

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 4 7

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 0 0

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 5 1

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 2 2

2 9 9 . 7 1 7 9 0

2 9 9 . 7 1 7 3 8

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 3 1

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 9 2

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 9 5

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 3 <

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 9 5

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 4 4

2 9 9 . 7 1 8 8 7

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 0 0

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 1 2

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 6 7

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 1 8

i 9 9 . 7 1 7 9 6

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 1 5

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 0 0

2 9 9 . 7 i 0 3 4

2 9 9 . 7 2 1 0 7

2 9 9 . 7 1 8 9 3

2 9 9 . 7 1 9 7 0

2 9 9 . 7 2 0 4 9

5 8 . 9 8 5 6 3

5 8 . 9 8 7 0 6

5 8 . 9 8 3 5 8

5 8 . 9 8 8 1 6

5 8 . 9 8 7 7 3

5 8 . 9 8 5 2 6

5 8 . 9 8 5 1 2

5 8 . 9 8 6 5 5

5 8 . 9 8 2 8 7

5 3 . 9 8 5 3 1

5 8 . 9 8 3 8 7

5 8 . 9 8 4 6 9

5 3 . 9 8 5 1 0

5 8 . 9 8 8 5 4

5 3 . 9 8 3 7 0

5 8 . 9 8 1 3 7

COnPUTlD T VALUE

0 . 0 0 0 1 6

0 . 0 0 0 6 2

0 . 0 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 0 1 0 8

0 . 0 0 1 6 7

0 . 0 0 2 9 0

0 . 0 0 0 3 5

0 . 0 0 3 1 8

0 . 0 0 1 4 3

0 . 0 0 0 1 2

O.00C86

0 . 0 0 4 2 6

0 . 0 0 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 1 8 0

0 . 0 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 0 3 2 6

0 . 0 0 4 8 7

0 . 0 0 1 0 7

0 . 0 0 1 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 0 6

0 . 0 0 1 3 3

0 . 0 0 0 5 5

0 . 0 0 0 3 3

0 . 0 0 1 3 2

0 . 0 0 1 2 9

0 . 0 0 2 6 1

0 . 0 0 2 2 4

0 . 0 0 0 4 9

0 . 0 0 3 2 8

0 .00C62

0 . 0 0 0 9 5

0 . 0 0 0 9 1

0 . 0 0 2 7 5

0 . 0 0 1 1 6

0 . 0 0 0 7 8

0 .009SO

0 . 0 1 7 9 7

0 . 0 0 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 8 5

0 . 0 0 0 6 8

0 . 0 1 9 0 5

0 . 0 0 0 7 4

0 . 0 0 8 7 8

0 . 0 2 3 1 3

0 . 0 1 3 2 0

0 . 0 0 8 7 0

0 . 0 0 0 7 7

0 . 0 0 4 7 6

0 . 0 1 8 2 8

0 .01028

0 . 0 0 4 4 0

88

influence of personality attributes and organizational

characteristics on perceived QWL facet viz., "Control

influence and participation" are rendered to be accepted.

Table 3.29. Analysis of variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IVfe on EC - a facet of QWL

Source of ^ pp g.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 259 6816.55420

The fifteenth aspect of QWL i.e. "Employee's

commitment" when assessed is also found to be insignificantly

influenced by both IV's (personality attributes and

organizational characteristics) as obtained F = 1.00624 is

found highly insignificant which are shown in Table 3.2 9. The

t-values given in Table 3.30 again confirms the reliability

of the finding as values are statistically low and

subsequently insignificant.

On the basis of t-values given in Table 3.30 it is

found that all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

influence of personality attributes and organizational

characteristics on perceived QWL facet viz., "Employee's

Commitment" stand accepted.

Table 3 .30 . Showing Mul t ip le Regress ion Commitment dimension of QWL.

89 Analyses - Employee

VAHlAeLL "F t\ NC.

19

20

21

a 11

2 *

as 26

n It

i »

30

11

i i

33

3 *

35

36

37

36

39

«0

<i

i.i

* 3

< 4

* 5

46

* 7

5

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

J . 5 1 1 S 4

3.OSDO0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 8 S 4 i

2 . 3 6 5 3 8

3 . 1 9 6 1 S

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 8 4 4

2 . 5 t a J j

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 C !

3 . 1 5 4 1 5

J . 2 5 0 C 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 . C 2 3 0 e

2 . 9 5 ; : c

3 . 1 3 0 ^ 7

3 . O S * * ;

3 . C 5 7 4 ?

3 . 0 0 C :o

2 . J C 7 S ?

2 . S I 1 « 4

3 . 0 7 i ; i"

3 . u y > ' 1

2 . 7 ; ? r . '

2 . = 4 3 1 ;

2 . I f c ' . ' l

2 . 2 C } « 5

2 . 1 6 ; 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 U 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 5 4

3 . C 0 3 S 5

2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 i 9 2

2 . S 3 4 6 i

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . s 0 7 t 5

2 . 6 6 0 7 7

2 . 5 2 J C S

3 . 0 1 S I S

2 . 5 1 5 3 ;

2 . 5 6 5 11

2 . 45JS5

2 . 4 9 l i " .

4 0 . 7 8 . - 7

1 7 . 3 6 9 2 3

CCRiJELATlON

ST4N1URP I H V I A T I O N

0 . 5 1 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 J 6 ? »

1 . 1 ' 2 0 $

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 8 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 .268B?

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 S 0

1 . 3 S 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . 1 6 2 4 6

i.Z2tt<)

1 . 2 S S 7 I

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 * 2 7 0

1 . 2 2 1 0 J

I . 1 9 d 4 S

1 . 2 6 0 5 1

1 . 2 S 2 1 4

1 . 2 0 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 .24?9S

1 . 3 ; 766 •"

1 .3C52e

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 .0SS98

1 . 14691

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

1 . 2 5 8 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 5 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 C i 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 t 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

5 . 1 3 0 1 8

l - i . 5 8 1 2 4

0 . 4 4 4 8 6

CCRHF.LATION X VS V

- 0 . 0 5 1 7 0

0 . 0 3 6 2 8

0 . 0 5 0 4 9

- 0 . 0 2 1 2 3

0 .09B96

0 . 1 1 1 4 1

0 . 0 6 S 8 3

- 0 . 0 1 2 S 7

0 . 0 3 3 S 2

0 . 0 1 3 7 3

- C . 0 2 7 7 S

- 0 . 0 6 0 1 2

- 0 . 0 7 2 8 6

- 0 . 0 0 3 3 6

0 . 1 1 1 1 3

0 . 1 1 4 5 4

0 . 0 7 2 5 2

0 . 0 3 4 6 6

0 .01SS3

0 . 3 6 3 6 6

- 0 . 0 1 4 4 7

0 . 0 4 8 2 8

0 . 0 2 3 4 0

O.0JS50

- 0 . 0 9 9 8 5

- 5 . 1 1 4 0 9

0 .01? ' ' 4

- 0 . C 6 3 1 3

- 0 . 0 4 J 4 0

0 .CC957

- : . 1 1 5 5 1

0 . 0 4 1 5 ?

0.OS2S0

0 . 0 4 5 8 ?

0 . 0 5 0 5 8

0 . 0 6 7 7 7

0 . 0 0 9 2 4

- 0 . 0 1 6 2 7

- 0 . 0 5 4 6 3

0 . 0 4 1 7 *

- 0 . 0 0 1 6 7

- 0 . 0 1 2 1 7

- o . o : 4 i o

O . D : : i 6

- C . 0 2 ? ? 3

- C . C 9 J59

0 . 0 1 7 1 1

D . O h l t i

0 . 0 6 5 1 5

0 .047JC

O.C3005

PfORESSICN ccfrr ic i iNT 1 , 2 7 2 7 7

2 . 0 1 3 4 5

2 . 1 0 0 7 2

1 . 5 1 3 1 8

2 . 3 S 6 6 7

2 . 1 6 5 S 0

1 . 9 7 8 5 0

1 . 6 9 1 7 9

1 . 5 5 5 7 1

2 . 0 1 7 0 9

1 . S 8 2 0 4

1 . 7 3 0 0 0

1 . 4 0 1 4 3

2 . 0 1 9 7 9

2 . 3 6 8 5 1

2 . 3 7 6 2 1

2 . 2 0 6 9 1

1 . 8 4 5 8 2

1 . 7 4 5 5 9

2 . 2 6 2 2 3

1 . 7 1 1 4 9

2 . 1 9 3 8 2

2 . 1 8 7 2 3

2 . 0 2 6 9 4

1 . S 7 I 8 1

1 . 2 4 7 6 0

2 . 0 3 9 7 1

1 . 3 8 8 C 1

1 . 7 5 6 5 7

1 . 8 5 4 0 7

1 . 4 1 1 2 9

2 . 3 0 3 5 4

2 . 0 S 3 3 2

1 . 8 7 5 6 4

- 1 . 8 6 6 5 3

1 . 1 5 6 4 4

0 . 4 0 2 9 0

0 . 7 5 1 5 1

0 . 3 6 6 5 0

1 . 0 4 9 4 1

0 . J 2 2 6 I

0 . 2 0 2 0 9

C . 5 7 9 1 5

C . 7 2 £- c :

C. e 5497

- 0 . 2 3 7 U

0 . 7 5 3 3 3

1 . 0 6 9 7 3

C .B87e2

0 . 7 5 5 30

- 0 . 6 2 5 6 1

-

S T n . tRROB or HEC.coef.

1 J 9 . 5 9 6 S 1

1 3 9 . J 9 7 1 4

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 2 4

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 2 1

1 3 9 . 5 9 4 8 8

1 3 9 , 5 9 6 6 2

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 2 0

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 B 2

1 3 9 , 5 9 6 5 6

1 3 9 . 5 9 5 9 3

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 2 6

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 5 9

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 3 6

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 1 5

1 3 9 . 5 9 5 6 0

1 3 9 . 5 9 5 3 5

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 7 3

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 0 2

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 0 2

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 2 8

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 4 9

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 2 4

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 0 5

1 3 9 . J 9 6 S 7

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 1 8

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 4 2

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 1 9

1 3 9 . 5 9 5 6 3

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 6 6

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 5 9

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 7 4

1 3 9 . 5 9 7 0 8

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 0 8

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 4 4

1 3 9 . 5 9 6 8 0

2 7 . 4 7 2 9 5

2 7 . 4 7 3 6 2

2 7 . 4 7 1 9 9

2 7 . 4 7 4 1 2

2 7 . 4 7 3 9 !

2 7 . 4 7 2 7 7

2 7 . 4 7 2 7 1

2 7 . 4 7 3 3 8

2 7 . 4 7 1 6 6

2 7 . 4 7 2 8 0

2 7 . 4 7 2 1 1

2 7 . 4 7 2 5 1

2 7 , 4 7 2 7 0

2 7 . 4 7 4 3 0

2 7 . 4 7 2 0 5

2 7 . 4 7 0 9 6

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 9 1 2

0 . 0 1 4 4 2

0 . 0 1 5 0 S

0 . 0 1 0 8 4

0 . 0 1 6 B B

0 . 0 1 5 5 1

0 . 0 1 4 1 7

0 . 0 X 2 1 2

0 . 0 1 1 1 4

0 . 0 1 4 4 S

0 . 0 1 1 3 3

0 . 0 1 2 3 9

0 . 0 1 0 0 4

0 . 0 1 4 4 7

0 . 0 1 6 9 7

0 . 0 1 7 0 2

0 . 0 1 5 B 1

0 . 0 1 3 2 2

0 . 0 1 2 5 0

0 . 0 1 6 2 1

0 . 0 1 2 2 6

0 . 0 1 5 7 2

0 . 0 1 5 6 7

0 . 0 1 4 5 2

0 . 0 1 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 8 9 4

0 . 0 1 4 6 1

0 . 0 0 9 9 4

0 . 0 1 2 4 4

0 . 0 1 3 2 8

0 . 0 1 0 1 1

0 . 0 1 6 5 0

0 . 0 1 4 7 1

C . 0 1 3 4 4

0 . 0 1 3 3 7

0 . 0 4 2 0 9

0 . 0 1 4 6 7

0 . 0 2 7 3 6

0 . 0 1 3 3 4

0 . 0 3 8 2 C

0 . 0 2 9 9 4

0 . 0 0 7 3 6

0 . 0 2 1 0 8

0 . 0 2 6 3 0

0 . 0 2 3 8 4

0 . 0 0 8 6 3

0 . 0 2 7 4 2

0 . 0 3 3 9 4

0 . 0 3 2 3 1

0 . 0 2 7 4 9

0 . 0 2 2 7 7

90


the influence of IVte on GLS -. a facet of QWL

Source of pp S.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total .259 23683.73242

It is evident from Table 3.31 that the sixteenth

aspect of QWL i.e. "General Life Satisfaction" is also found

to be insignificantly influenced by both IVs (personality

attributes and organizational characteristics) as its

obtained statistical value F = 0.85103 is found highly

insignificant at .05 level of confidence. The findings were

further confirmed when all IV*s independently found to have

their no influence on employee's perception with regard to

"General Life Satisfaction" - a dimension of QWL (Table

3.32). It is witnessed from t values given in Table 3.32 that

all the obtained statistical values ranging from t = .0 0254

to t = .05896 tend to show almost zero influence of IV's on

DV - "General life satisfaction".

In view of the patterns of the above findings mention

in Table 3.31 and Table 3.32 it is found that all the null

hypotheses predicting the influence of personality attributes

and organizational characteristics on perceived QWL facet

viz., "General Life Satisfaction" rendered to be accepted.

91 Table 3.32. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - General Life

Satisfaction dimension of QWL. VARl A8Lt

NO.

19

20

2 1

22

23

24

25

2 6

27

28

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

33

36

37

36

39

40

41

42

43

44

4 i

46

47

oH

49

SO

51

52

53

S4

55

56

57

5B

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

DEPENDENT

l 6

I M t R C E P T

n U L l I P L t

r^L*N

4 . 0 U 5 4

3 . 7 2 6 9 2

3 . 6 5 0 0 0

3 . 2 9 2 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 5 0 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 .58B46

2 . 8 6 5 3 8

3 .19615

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 3 4 t

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . 9 3 0 7 7

3 .02306

3 .1961S

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 8 4 6 2

3 .0230E

2 . 9 5 0 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 . 0 * 4 6 2

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

J.COOOC

2 - 9 0 7 6 ?

2 . 3 1 1 5 4

3 . J 7 6 9 2

3 . 0 9 2 3 1

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . 8 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 0 3 8 5

2 . 1 8 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 .21154

~ 3 . 0 0 3 8 5

2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2 •

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 3 4 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 . 6 3 0 7 7

2 . 8 2 3 0 8

3 . 0 1 5 3 3

2 .S153S

2 . 5 6 5 3 3

2 . 4 5 3 8 5

2 . 4 9 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

3 0 . 2 5 7 6 9

CCRRILATICN

STD. ERRO"? CF t S T l " « T E

S I * N D * « » 0 D E V I A I I C N

0 . 8 8 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 6 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 0 6

1 . 2 6 8 8 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 5 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 5 3 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 !

1 . 1 8 2 4 6

1 . 2 2 6 6 9

1 . 2 5 S 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 e ? 7 C

1 . 2 7 1 0 1

1 . 1 9 S 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 8

1 . 2 5 7 8 5

1 . 2 4 2 9 8

1 . 3 2 7 6 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 3

1 . 2 ( 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 0

1 0 . 7 3 6 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 0 7

1 . 1 0 9 8 0

1 . 2 5 6 6 4

1 . 0 5 5 9 S

1 . 1 4 6 « 1

1 . 1 7 6 1 6

1 . 2 S S 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 2

1 . 2 3 6 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

9 . 5 6 2 5 S

4 t . 4 7 5 9 6

0 . 4 1 5 5 2

9 . 7 0 4 0 C

CORNILATIOK » VS V

- 0 . 0 2 0 7 8

- 0 . 0 3 1 1 3

- 0 . 0 1 0 1 4

0 . 0 0 3 5 9

- 0 . 0 1 7 0 3

- 0 . 0 2 1 1 1

0 . 0 6 3 8 9

- 0 . 1 0 8 0 3

- 0 . 0 1 0 6 4

0 . 0 0 6 7 2

0 . 0 3 0 5 0

- 0 . 0 1 4 2 6

- 0 . 1 0 5 2 1

- 0 . 0 7 4 6 6

3 . 0 0 5 6 9

- 0 . 0 1 5 6 ?

- 0 . 0 1 3 1 2

3 . 1 1 0 0 ?

0 . 0 0 5 9 ?

- O . O O O l !

- 3 . 0 4 4 4 3

0 . 0 7 0 3 5

0 . 0 0 9 8 4

-0 .03B9l>

- 0 . 0 4 3 1 ?

- 0 . 0 0 4 4 2

- 0 . 0 3 2 8 7

C.02964

- 0 . 0 0 4 0 3

- 0 . 0 1 2 8 4

0 . 0 1 8 7 2

C.04373

- 0 . 0 1 4 7 4

0 . 0 2 8 0 1

- 0 . 0 2 5 0 7

- 0 . 0 8 9 0 3

- 0 . 0 6 1 9 «

0 . 0 3 2 i r

0 . 0 5 3 0 3

0 . 0 4 0 9 0

0 .C2282

- 3 . 0 6 6 3 4

- 0 . 3 7 7 C 1

- 0 . 0 3 8 9 7

- 0 . 3 6 0 4 7

0 . 1 0 0 8 0

0 . 1 6 7 9 9

- 0 . 0 1 2 4 1

0 . 1 0 3 7 1

- 0 . 0 4 7 0 8

0 . 0 1 1 7 1

REGhLSSICS COt I f i C U K T

0 . 9 7 1 0 2

1 . 5 2 3 6 4

1 . 8 1 1 9 8

2 . 1 2 7 3 6

1 . 4 0 5 3 9

1 . 4 7 9 5 3

2 . 4 2 7 0 8

0 . 9 6 4 7 6

1 . 0 3 7 7 6

2 . 3 3 8 2 3

2 . 0 4 2 7 3

2 . 1 8 S 1 8

0 . 7 2 9 6 8

1 . 4 9 0 8 3

2 . 2 5 8 6 0

1 . 9 3 4 2 8

1 . 1 2 6 7 2

3 . 5 9 9 0 3

1 . 2 6 3 6 0

1 . 9 5 6 1 5

1 . 7 0 6 3 8

7 . 0 9 6 1 1

1 . 5 4 3 4 3

1 . 4 9 1 3 9

1 . 4 3 3 7 4

1 . 9 4 0 4 0

1 . 6 1 3 5 9

2 . 2 1 8 6 5

1 . 5 7 J 9 2

1 . 7 5 0 5 2

1 . 9 2 7 2 5

2 . 3 5 3 7 2

1 . 2 7 0 8 0

2 . 0 7 2 5 5

- 1 . 9 1 3 5 5

0 . 7 6 5 9 1

0 . 9 9 4 5 0

: . 3 9 6 1 6

1 . 7 3 2 7 5

1 .555^0

1 . 6 7 9 ? 6

0 . 5 1 3 5 3

1 .279?2

1 . 8 6 6 2 5

0 . 6 4 0 1 7

1 . 3 0 3 0 7

3 . 0 6 6 5 6

0 . 1 3 2 2 7

2 . 5 3 6 3 2

0 . 3 0 4 2 3

- 1 . 3 5 5 2 4

S I U . ERROR OF R t O . C O E F .

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 6 0

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 7 6

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 9 7

2 6 4 . 2 6 9 9 9

2 6 4 . 2 6 7 4 9

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 8 1

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 8 8

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 1 8

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 6 6

2 6 4 . 2 6 9 5 0

2 6 4 . 2 7 2 0 0

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 7 5

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 2 9

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 7 9

2 6 4 . 2 6 6 8 6

7 6 4 . 2 6 6 4 0

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 0 0

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 5 5

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 5 5

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 1 7

2 6 4 . 2 7 2 4 3

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 9 7

2 6 4 . 2 6 9 7 4

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 7 2

2 6 4 . 2 6 9 9 6

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 4 2

2 6 4 . 2 6 9 9 9

2 6 4 . 2 6 6 9 2

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 6 7

2 6 4 . 2 7 0 7 5

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 0 3

2 6 4 . 2 7 1 6 7

2 6 t . 2 6 9 7 8

264 . "^045

2 6 4 . 2 ^ . I S

52 . 0 0 9 1 ?

5 2 . 0 1 0 3 9

5 2 . 0 0 7 3 2

5 2 . 0 1 1 3 5

S > . 3 1 0 9 8

5 2 . 0 0 C 8 0

5 2 . 0 0 8 6 7

5 2 . 0 0 9 9 4

5 2 . 0 0 6 6 9

5 2 . 0 0 6 3 5

5 2 . 0 0 7 5 7

5 2 . 0 0 8 3 0

5? . 0 0 8 6 6

5 2 . 0 1 1 6 9

5 2 . 0 0 7 4 2

5 2 . 0 0 5 3 7

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 3 6 7

0 . 0 0 5 7 7

0 . 0 0 6 6 6

0 . 0 0 8 0 5

0 . 0 0 5 3 2

0 . 0 0 5 6 0

0 . 0 0 9 1 6

0 . 0 0 3 6 5

. 0 . .00393

0 . 0 0 6 8 5

0 . 0 0 7 7 3

0 . 0 0 8 2 8

0 . 0 0 2 7 6

0 . 0 0 5 6 4

0 . 0 0 6 5 5

0 . 0 0 7 3 2

0 . 0 0 4 2 6

0 . 0 1 3 6 2

0 . 0 0 4 7 8

0 . 0 0 7 4 0

0 . 0 0 6 4 6

0 . 0 0 7 9 3

0 . 0 0 5 8 4

0 . 0 0 5 6 4

0 . 0 0 5 4 3

0 . 0 0 7 3 4

0 . 0 0 6 6 6

0 . 0 0 6 4 3

0 . 0 0 5 9 6

0 . 0 0 6 6 2

0 . 0 0 7 2 9

0 . 0 0 8 9 1

0 . 0 0 4 6 1

0 . 0 0 7 6 4

0 . 0 0 7 2 4

0 . 0 1 4 7 3

0 . 0 1 9 1 2

0 . 0 2 6 8 5

0 . 0 3 3 3 1

0 . 0 2 S 6 3

0 . 0 3 2 2 9

0 . 0 0 9 8 7

0 . 0 2 4 6 1

0 . 0 3 5 8 6

0 . 0 1 2 3 1

0 . 0 3 4 6 7

0 . 0 5 8 9 6

0 . 0 0 2 5 4

0 . 0 4 8 7 7

0 . 0 1 5 4 6

0 . 0 2 6 0 6

92

Table 3 . 3 3 . Analysis of Var iance fo r t h e Regress ion Showing

the in f luence of IVis on OC - a face t of QWL

Source of V a r i a t i o n DF S.S. M.S. F.value



Total 259 19974.22266

The seventeenth and the last dimension of QWL i.e.

"Organizational climate" is also found to b- insignificantly

influenced by both IV's (personality attributes and organi

zational characteristics) as statistical value F = 1.44527 is

insignificant even at .05 level (Table 3.33) of confidence.

The reliability of the findings were further verified from

Table 3.34 where all the obtained statistical value ranging

from as low as t = .00012 to as high as t = .03252 are found

very low and consequently showing insignificant cause- effect

relationship.

In view of the above findings, it is found that all

the null hypotheses related to the effect of personality


QWL facet viz., "Organizational climate" stand accepted.

93 Table 3.34. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Organizational

Climate dimension of QWL.

CANlAtiLC NO.

19

20

2 1

22

23

24

li ib

27

28

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

3£

39

4C

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

46

49

SO

5 1

52

53

54

55 56

57

56

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

66

69

rt*^

4 . 0 1 1 5 4

3 . 7 2 6 9 ?

3 . 6 5 0 9 0

3 . 2 » ^ 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . J 5 0 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

3 . 5 e 8 4 6

2 . 8 6 5 3 6

3 . 1 9 4 1 5

2 . 7 3 0 7 7

2 . 7 3 5 4 4

2 . 5 4 2 3 1

2 . J 3 9 7 7

3 . : 2 3 C 8

3 . 1 ? i l 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 0 6 4 6 2

3.023C<<

2 . 7 5 3 0 0

3 . 1 3 5 7 7

3 . 0 S 4 6 2

3 . 3 5 7 6 9

3 . J 0 9 e C

2 . 9 0 7 6 9

2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 9 2

3 . ^ 9 ^ 3 l

2 . 7 6 0 2 3

2 . 6 4 2 3 1

2 . 3 9 2 3 1

2 . 2 C 3 » 5

2 . 1 5 0 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 2 1 1 3 4

3 . 0 C 3 P 5 2 . 8 0 3 8 5

2 . 5 2 6 9 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . '. 3 4 ri.:

v ' .6C76V

2 . 6 C 7 6 9

2 . 6 f 0 7 7

2 . 3 2 3 0 J

3 . 3 1 5 3 ?

2 . b l S 3 S

2 . 5 t 5 3 S

2 . 4 S 3 S 5

2 . 4 9 6 1 5

4 0 . 7 8 0 7 7

S T « v r * P C O C V l A t l O N

0 . 6 » ( 9 5 9

1 . 1 2 4 6 8

1 . 2 1 6 2 8

1 . 1 7 2 0 5

1 . 2 1 5 9 9

1 . 2 3 0 8 0

1 . 1 8 5 0 7

1 . 2 9 7 C 6

1 . 2 6 8 6 2

1 . 2 0 2 1 4

1 . 2 1 6 0 4

1 . 2 1 6 2 9

1 . 2 7 9 8 0

1 . 3 5 9 2 7

1 . 2 7 7 6 0

1 . 3 2 2 4 9

1 . 2 3 4 9 4

1 . 2 3 7 6 8

1 . l * ^ 4 e

1 . 2 2 ' > » ?

1 . 2 5 B 7 1

1 . 2 6 9 7 2

1 . 2 8 2 7 0

I . 2 2 I O I

1 . 1 < ' S 4 5

1 . 2 6 0 9 1

1 . 2 8 2 1 4

1 . 2 9 2 1 6

1 . 2 5 7 * 5

1 . 2 4 3 9 S

1 . 3 2 7 4 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 5

1 . 2 4 9 2 4

1 . 3 2 4 7 C

1 0 . 7 3 4 4 0

1 . 2 0 7 C 7

1 . 1 D « 8 C 1 . 2 5 4 4 4

i . 0 5 5 C 6

1 . 1 4 6 9 1

1 . 17e. 16

1 . 2 5 6 1 5

1 . 1 6 2 4 5

1 . 2 4 9 7 ?

1 . 2 I i 2 9

1 . 2 0 1 5 7

1 . 2 1 9 4 4

1 . 2 9 7 2 9

1 . 2 4 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 2 7 7

6 . 5 4 2 5 6

CCKWHATJO^ » V5 Y

- C . 1 1 2 1 ?

- 0 . 1 0 5 5 (

- 0 . 0 7 0 7 6

0 .0K26O

- 0 . 1 7 7 5 2

D .0J0B6

0 . 0 0 9 4 5

- 0 . 0 1 1 6 9

0 . 9 3 0 4 2

- 0 . 0 7 5 6 5

0 . 0 4 0 5 9

0 . 0 3 6 6 2

C . U 6 4 5

- 0 . 0 1 5 6 2

e . l l ! ^ 5

J . l ? 0 1 1

0 .DP732

- o . o r i 7 4 - 0 . 1 9 7 6 4

- c . c n - 1

- w . C 1 7 c 6

- C . 0 1 7 4 S

C.C1C09

- 0 . 1 4 7 6 0

- 0 . 1 0 2 3 5

- 0 . 01817

- 0 . 0 5 5 4 1

- 0 . 0 2 7 3 0

0 . J0244

- 0 . 0 4 ^ 2 6

- 0 . 0 1 9 1 7

- 0 . 0 2 5 6 E

- 0 . 0 5 0 3 5

-S.CI7CC6

- 0 . 0 7 1 2 V

- 0 . 0 2 5 2 7

0 . 0 4 6 4 8 0 . 0 5 3 7 9

- 9 . 5 0 2 7 < ;

0 . 1 0 4 2 V

- 0 . 0 ? S . 7

- 0 . 0 1 2 7 6

0 . 0 3 3 ? 4

- 0 . 0 2 2 9 0

- 0 . C 3 3 9 9

-C.00<53S

- 0 . 0 1 7 3 9

- 0 . 12311

- c . o s e s i

- 0 . 0 5 6 1 7

- 0 . 0 3 2 2 6

C O l f F l C U N T

- 0 . 2 5 C e 5

0 . 0 3 0 5 0

- 0 . 4 3 7 1 6

J . 5 6 5 8 6

- 1 . 1 4 2 5 4

C . 7 3 8 5 9

C .41973

0 . 3 4 3 8 2

1 . 5 0 0 5 1

0 . 1 4 2 6 8

0 . 3 5 2 6 2

0 . 9 8 7 1 3

0 . 9 5 1 5 5

- 0 . 4 2 9 0 3

1 . 2 6 1 9 7

0 . 9 1 3 9 2

1 . 4 5 5 3 4

o.oooco

- 0 . 9 5 7 3 5

C.55C20

- 0 . 1 6 3 5 2

0 . 5 1 3 3 2

C . 8 9 5 9 1

- 0 . 1 1 2 3 3

- 0 . 4 8 6 6 0

0 . 5 7 1 3 2

- 0 . 0 6 4 8 9

0 . 1 4 6 0 1

1 . 2 4 0 8 !

- 0 . 0 2 7 6 0

0 . 3 7 4 6 5

3 . 2 8 5 2 1

C .53547

- C . 3 8 5 4 3

• - 0 . 4 1 4 5 4

- 0 . 1 6 4 0 !

1 . 3 5 6 1 2 0 . 9 5 6 2 9

C .39998

1 . 4 6 7 4 6

C . l O l 1 7

0 . 9 2 1 0 6

C.70S24

0 . 6 4 4 0 7

0 . 5 1 7 3 i

1 . C 3 7 5 9

0 . 9 5 8 2 1

- 0 . 1 6 6 0 9

0 . 6 4 4 7 6

0 . 7 6 0 1 7

- 0 . 6 5 1 4 7

S T O . £BRCR OF R F C . C O ( r .

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 0 5

2 2 9 . 2 6 * 0 7

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 2 3

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 5 3

2 2 9 . 2 6 S S S

2 2 9 . 2 6 B 2 2

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 1 8

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 5 4

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 1 0

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 0 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 2 7

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 1 6

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 7 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 0 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 6 5 4

2 2 9 . 2 6 6 1 4

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 3 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 8 6

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 8 8

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 6 5

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 6 4

2 2 9 . 2 6 9 2 *

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 2 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 1 4

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 4 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 9 0

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 5 2

2 2 9 . 2 6 6 S 9

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 2 8

2 2 V . 2 6 8 1 6

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 4 2

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 9 7

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 3 3

2 2 9 . 2 6 7 9 1

2 2 9 . 2 6 8 5 2

4 5 . 1 2 0 5 3

4 5 . 1 2 1 6 3 4 5 . 1 1 8 9 7

4 5 . 1 2 2 4 7

4 5 . 1 2 2 1 4

4 5 . 1 2 0 2 5

4 5 . 1 2 0 1 4

4 5 . 1 2 1 2 4

4 5 . 1 1 8 4 2

45 . 1 2 0 2 9

4 5 . 1 1 9 1 9

4 5 . 1 1 9 8 2

4 5 . 1 2 0 1 2

4 5 . 1 2 2 7 6

4 5 . 1 1 9 S 6

4 5 . 1 1 7 2 8

COf'PUTEO T VALUE

D. 0C109

0 . 0 0 0 1 3

0 . 0 0 1 9 1

0 . 0 0 6 8 3

0 . 0 0 4 9 8

0 . 0 0 3 2 2

0 . 0 0 1 8 3

0 . 0 0 1 5 0

0 . 0 0 6 5 4

0 . 0 0 0 6 2

0 . 0 0 1 5 4

0 . 0 0 4 3 1

0 . 0 0 4 1 5

0 . 0 0 1 8 7

O.OOS50

0 . 0 0 3 9 9

0 . 0 0 6 3 6

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 4 1 8

0 . 0 0 2 4 4

0 . 0 0 0 7 1

0 . 0 0 2 2 4

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 0 0 4 9

0 . 0 0 2 1 2

0 . 0 0 2 4 9

0 . 0 0 0 2 9

0 . 0 0 0 6 4

0 . 0 0 5 4 1

0 . 0 0 0 1 2

0 . 0 0 1 6 3

0 . 0 0 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 2 3 4

9 . 0 0 1 6 9

0 . 0 0 1 9 0

0 . 0 0 3 6 8

0 . 0 3 0 1 0

0 . 0 2 1 1 9

0 . 0 0 8 8 6

0 . 0 3 2 5 2

0 . 0 0 2 2 4

0 . 0 2 0 4 1

0 . 0 1 5 7 0

0 . 0 1 8 7 1

0 . 0 0 7 0 3

0 . 0 2 3 0 0

0 . 0 2 1 2 4

0 . 0 0 3 6 8

0 . 0 1 4 2 9

0 . 0 1 7 2 9

0 . 0 1 4 4 4

DEPENDENT

1 7 2 7 . 4 0 1 5 4 3 . 7 E 1 S 3

1NTE«C£PT 5 7 . 3 0 6 1 0

n U L l l P L E CCHRtLATlCK 0 . 5 1 1 5 2

STD. EfifiCR OF E S I I f A l f • . 4 2 0 4 4

http://-c.cn-

94


the influence of IVfe on total QWL

Source of Variation ^^ ^-S- M-S. F.value



Total 259 564890.56250

At length, we can say that overall QWL which is a

Dependent Variable is also found to b- insignificantly

influenced by both TV's (personalit\ variables and

organizational characteristics) as obtained statistical value

F = 0.94435 is insignificant at .05 level of confidence

(Table 3.35). The findings further confirmed from t-values

shown in Table 3.36 where all the obtained statistical value

ranging from t = .00009 to t = .02739 tend to show almost no

influence of IV's on DV i.e., onjpverall QWL", hence null


attributes and organizational characteristics on total QWL

stand accepted.

95 Table 3 . 3 6 . Showing Mul t ip le Regress ion Analyses of o v e r a l l QWL.

VARUbLl rHK

I V

20

Zl

22

23

2<.

2&

26

27

26

29

30

3 1

i i

33

3;.

35

36

37

36

3V

kC

1.1

42 .

43

4 4.

I.i

46

<i7

46

<.9

SC

5 i

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

49

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

6B

0 *

L»tP£sDt

16

4 . 0 1 1 5 4

3 . 7 2 6 9 2

3 . 6 S 3 0 3

3 . 2 5 2 3 1

3 . 5 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 5 3 0 0

2 . 8 5 7 6 9

2 . » 4 2 3 1

3 . S e » t f

2 . ? 6 S ? e

J . 1 * 6 1 5

2 . 7 3 3 7 7

2 . 7 3 S 4 £

2 . 5 4 J 3 1

2 . 9 2 3 7 7

3 . 0 2 3 0 5

3 . 1 9 6 1 5

3 . 2 5 0 0 0

3 . 3 8 4 6 ?

3 . 0 2 3 0 8

2 . 7 5 3 0 0

3 . 1 3 0 7 7

3 .C81.62

3 . 0 5 7 6 9

3 . 3 0 3 0 0

2 . 9 0 7 4 9

2 , « l i 5 4

3 . 0 7 6 9 :

3 . 3 9 ; 3 i

2 . 7 6 9 2 3

2 . 3 4 2 J 1

2 . } 5 2 3 1

i.ZZZi^

2 . 1 J 3 7 7

1 0 2 . 4 1 1 ^ 4

3 . ^ 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 0 3 5 5

2 . S 0 3 S 5

2 . 5 2 6 « 2

2 . 5 3 4 6 2

2 . 4 n 6 2

2 . 6 0 7 6 9

2 - 6 C 7 6 9

2 . S 8 0 7 7

2 . « 2 3 C e

3 . C1538

2 . = 1 5 3 2

2 . 565 33

2 . 4 5 3 »5

2 . , 9 6 1 '

4 J . 7 5 3 7 7

M

3 4 3 . : C 3 5 5

V U t I C K

. 8 8 9 5 9

. 1 2 4 6 8

. 2 1 6 2 8

. 1 7 2 0 5

. 2 1 5 9 9

. 2 3 0 8 0

. 1 8 5 0 7

. 2 9 7 0 6

. 2 6 8 8 2

. 2 0 2 1 4

. 2 U 0 4

. 2 1 6 2 0

. 2 7 9 8 0

. 3 5 9 ? 7

. 2 7 7 6 0

. 3 3 2 4 9

. 2 3 4 9 4

. 2 3 7 6 8

. 1 8 2 4 6

. 2 2 6 8 9

. 2 5 6 7 1

. 2 6 9 7 2

. 2 8 2 7 0

. 2 2 1 0 1

. 1 9 8 4 5

. 2 6 0 9 1

. 2 8 2 1 4

. 2 « 2 1 8

. 2 5 7 8 5

. 2 4 2 9 8

. 3 2 7 6 6

. 3 0 9 2 8

. 2 4 0 2 ( ,

. 3 2 4 7 0

. 7 3 6 4 0

. 2 0 7 0 7

. 1 0 9 8 0

. 2 5 6 6 4

. 0 5 5 « 8

. 1 4 6 9 1

. 1 7 6 1 6

. 2 5 3 1 5

. 1 6 2 4 5

. 2 4 9 7 2

. 2 3 6 2 9

. 2 0 1 5 7

. 2 1 9 4 4

. 2 9 7 2 9

. 24032

. 2 6 2 7 7

i . 5 4 2 5 6

4 3 . 7 0 1 6 6

C C « « f i l L * U O K > VS V

- 0 . 0 8 8 1 3

- 0 . 0 8 5 0 2

0 . 0 0 0 6 4

0 . 0 1 7 3 6

- 0 . 0 6 4 3 0

- 0 . 0 0 9 0 9

0 . 0 5 6 3 6

- 0 . 0 9 5 9 5

0 . 0 2 2 2 9

- 0 . 1 0 9 7 9

0 . e » 9 5 5

0 . 0 0 5 7 6

0 . 0 2 1 5 6

- C . 0 3 2 0 9

0 . 0 5 2 4 7

0 . 0 6 4 8 6

0 . 0 S 5 2 1

- 0 . 0 0 2 1 2

- 0 . 0 7 1 6 1

- 0 . 0 4 2 9 7

0 . 0 1 9 6 6

0 . 3 6 0 6 5

- 0 . 0 2 1 4 2

- 0 . 0 6 1 6 5

- 0 . 1 3 4 4 5

0 . 0 1 5 9 6

- 0 . C 5 0 5 7

S . 0 0 0 7 C

0 . 0 6 6 0 9

- 3 . 0 4 6 1 4

-0.C«>5J 7

C . 0 4 8 9 6

0 . 3 5 7 3 4

3 . 3 2 3 1 4

- 0 . 0 3 7 4 8

- 0 . 3 4 4 6 4

C . 0 C 6 4 0 ,

O.C<107

0 . 0 0 9 5 3

0 . 0 6 3 1 9

0 . 0 3 9 7 1

- 0 . 0 6 5 2 8 0 . 0 0 1 5 4

3 . C 4 9 1 9

- 0 . 0 0 5 3 0

0 . 3 1 0 8 4

C . 5 3 4 7 1

- 0 . 3 9 4 2 7

C.CC452

- 3 . 0 8 5 5 5

- 0 . C C 7 9 0

C C l F f K I I M

- 1 0 . 4 3 2 9 4

- 1 1 . 6 5 8 4 5

- 6 . 4 6 8 2 5

- t . 6 5 4 0 2

- 8 . 9 2 6 4 6

- 7 . 9 2 9 7 4

- 3 . 1 3 6 5 2

• 1 2 . 4 6 4 8 7

- 4 . 8 1 6 5 7

• 1 0 . 6 9 8 6 2

- 4 . 8 7 5 6 1

- 3 . 9 7 4 6 7

- 8 . 6 4 1 7 3

- 9 . 6 4 6 3 6

- 4 . 8 9 0 5 6

- 3 . 8 8 * 7 6

- 2 . 5 1 1 2 8

- 7 . 9 5 9 3 6

- 1 0 . 9 3 4 4 9

- 1 0 . 5 5 7 1

- 5 . 9 7 8 4

- 4 . 0 5 8 8

- 8 . 4 0 8 6

- 8 . 7 2 1 f

• 1 4 . 0 6 1 2

- 4 . 3 0 4 2

- 9 . 2 4 8 4

- 8 . 6 4 7 1

- 3 . 9 5 2 1

- 8 . 7 3 2 6

• 1 3 . 3 7 4 1

- 3 . 8 6 ^ 5

- t . o v o e

- 7 . 1 4 3 8

6 . 9 6 3 5

- 5 . 6 4 7 4

- 0 . 0 2 5 1

- C . 2 7 2 2

- 2 . 9 5 a S

- 0 . 1 4 4 1

2 . 3 1 3 2

- 4 . 9 29."

- 1 . 9 9 2 3

3 . 0 3 0 1

- 1 . 2 2 6 6 0

- 2 . 1 5 6 3 9

2 . 6 2 7 3 6

- 4 . E 9 1 5 9

1 . « 0 7 4 9

- 4 . 6 2 5 2 1

1 . 5 6 4 9 5

S I D . f I.ROH o r R f O . C C l F ,

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 7 0 5

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 2 7 8

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 3 7 6

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 4 2 4

1 2 7 8 . 5 8 2 0 3

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 8 0 2

1 2 7 B . 6 0 3 3 9

1 2 7 8 . S 9 9 9 S

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 7 5 3

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 1 8 0

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 4 0 0

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 7 7 8

1 2 7 B . 5 9 5 7 0

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 2 9 1

1 2 7 8 . 5 8 8 7 5

1 2 7 8 . 5 8 6 5 5

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 9 0 0

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 1 6 8

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 1 6 8

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 4 9 7

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 5 9 6

1 2 7 8 . 6 0 3 8 8

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 2 9 0

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 7 6 6

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 3 9 9

1 2 7 S . 5 9 6 3 1

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 4 1 2

1 2 7 6 . 5 8 8 9 9

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 8 5 1

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 7 7 8

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 9 2 4

1 2 7 8 . 5 0 2 2 9

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 3 1 4

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 6 4 4

1 2 7 8 . 5 9 9 7 3

2 5 1 . 6 3 1 1 3

2 5 1 . 6 3 7 2 8

2 5 1 . 6 2 2 4 2

2 5 1 . 6 4 1 9 4

2 5 1 . 6 4 0 1 4

2 5 1 . 6 2 9 5 8

2 5 1 . 6 2 8 9 7

2 5 1 . 6 3 5 1 0

2 5 1 . 6 1 9 5 7

2 5 1 . 6 2 9 8 1

2 5 1 . 6 2 3 6 4

2 5 1 . 6 2 7 1 5

2 5 1 . 6 2 8 8 9

2 5 1 . 6 4 3 5 7

2 5 1 . 4 2 2 9 2

2 5 1 . 6 1 2 9 9

COnPUTfO t VALUt

0 0 8 1

0 0 9 1

0 0 5 0

0 0 5 2

0 0 6 9

0 062

0 0 2 4

0097

0 0 3 7

0 0 8 3

0038

0 0 3 1

0067

0 . 0 0 7 5

0 . 0 0 3 8

0 . 0 0 3 0

0 . 0 0 1 9

0 . 0 0 6 2

0 . 0 0 8 5

0 . 0 0 8 2

0 . 0 0 4 6

0 . 0 0 3 1

0 0 6 5

0 0 68

0110

0 0 3 3

0 0 7 2

0 0 6 7

0 0 3 0

0 0 6 8

0 0 8 1

0 0 3 0

0 0 4 7

0 055

0 0 5 4

0 2 2 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

0 1 1 6

ooos

0 0 9 1

0 1 9 5

0 . 0 0 79

0 . 0 1 2 0

0 0 4 8

0 0 8 5

0104

0 2 7 3

0 0 7 1

0 1 8 3

0 . 0 0 6 2

i N T t K C t P T 3 9 2 . e P C 2 2

n U L T l P i l E C C K R E - » T 1 0 ^ 0 . 4 3 3 6 1

> I t . CKRCR CF t S I I f A T E 4 6 . 9 5 9 6 6

96


the influence of IV's on EB - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DF S.S. M.S. F.value



Total 89 1602.72253

Having given the findings, pertaining to Hindu middle

level managers working in electronic manufacturing company,

the ongoing description of results will pertain to Muslim

middle level managers who were working in the same

organization from where the sample of Hindu middle level

managers were taken. The description of the two religious

group will provide a comparative picture of the findings

highlighting the variations if there are.

Muslim Middle Level Managers :

It is evident from Table 3.37 that very clearly and

briefly highlights the overall picture of the influence of

all personality attributes and organizational characteristics

(independent variables) on dependent one i.e. 'economic

benefit' - one of the QWL facet as obtained F = 1.03423 is

found highly insignificant at .05 level of confidence. The

reliability of the findings were further verified when the

?7

Table 3

VARIABLE NO.

19

20

2 1

22

2 3

2 4

2S

26

27

I t

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

3S

36

37

36

39

40

4 1

42

43

4 4

4S

46

4 7

48

4 9

SO

S I

S2

S3

S4

SS

S6

$ 7

S8

59

60

6 1

62

6 3

64

6S

66

67

68

69

.38 . Showing M u l t i p l e Regression Anal Benef4-fer-dimension o f QWL.

MEAN iT

4 . 0 6 6 6 7 C

3 . 7 6 6 6 7 1

3 . 4 8 8 8 9 1

3 . 3 4 4 4 4 1

3 . 4 7 7 7 8 I

3 . 1 7 7 7 8 1

2 . 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 . 6 3 3 3 3 1

3 . S 2 2 2 2 J

2 . 9 3 3 3 3 ]

3 . 2 0 0 0 0 ]

2 . 8 0 0 0 0 ]

2 . 9 2 2 2 2 J

2 . 6 8 8 8 9 J

3 . 0 6 6 6 7 1

2 . 7 4 4 4 4 1

3 . S 0 0 0 0 1

3 . 2 6 8 8 9 1

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 S S S 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9 1

2 . 9 0 0 0 0 ]

2 . 6 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 5 3 3 3 1

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8 J

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6 11

3 . 2 4 4 4 4 J

2 . 9 3 3 3 3 J

2 . 8 S S S 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . S 1 1 1 1

. 2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7 J

2 . 7 3 3 3 3 J

2 . 6 4 4 4 4 ]

2 . 6 1 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4 J

2 . S 4 4 4 4 ]

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9 i

DEPENDENT

1 1 S . 0 S S S 6 i

INTERCEPT

MULTIPLE CORRELATION

STD. ERRCR OF ESTIMATE

ANDARO V I A T I O N

1 . 8 8 4 3 2

. 0 4 9 8 8

. . 1 7 3 1 S

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

. 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

. 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

L . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

U 2 S 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 5 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

L . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 5 1

L . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 5 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 5 8 4

L . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 5

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

) . 7 4 8 4 0

L . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 5 1

1 . 2 2 5 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 5 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

L . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 5 2 5 3 0

' . 1 6 6 7 5

> . 2 4 5 6 0

1 9 . 5 7 7 2 9

0 . 7 6 2 4 0

4 . 2 0 2 S t

CCRRELATIO^ X VS Y

0 . 0 1 9 9 6

- 0 . 0 3 2 3 6

- 0 . 1 7 0 2 7

• 0 . 0 1 0 5 8

- 0 . 0 0 0 8 3

- 0 . 1 2 1 3 0

- 0 . 0 2 5 4 7

- 0 . 1 2 1 9 8

- 0 . 0 3 6 9 0

0 . 0 6 0 6 6

0 . 0 5 5 1 1

0 . 1 2 0 1 6

0 . 0 9 1 9 4

0 . 0 3 5 0 4

0 . 0 7 9 9 5

0 . 0 5 8 6 3

0 . 0 2 9 5 0

- 0 . 0 1 0 5 6

- 0 . 0 1 0 4 6

- 0 . 0 2 4 9 9

- 0 . 0 4 1 5 5

0 . 0 8 4 0 6

- 0 . 0 9 3 8 0

0 . 0 5 7 8 1

0 . 0 0 5 5 0

0 . 0 1 4 6 9

0 . 1 6 2 1 2

- 0 . 1 2 0 6 2

- 0 . 0 6 7 9 5

- 0 . 1 1 5 8 4

0 . 0 6 9 0 0

0 . 0 5 8 0 6

0 . 0 7 5 8 7

0 . 0 4 4 6 S

0 . 0 1 4 7 0

- 0 . 0 8 2 6 3

0 . 0 4 9 5 6

0 . 0 9 4 1 6

- 0 . 0 7 8 9 1

- 0 . 0 8 0 6 8

- 0 . 0 5 4 5 6

- 0 . 1 5 8 0 0

- 0 . 0 6 6 2 5

0 . 0 8 5 1 1

0 . 1 7 8 4 2

0 . 0 8 5 2 7

0 . 2 3 5 1 0

- 0 . 0 5 1 7 7

- 0 . 1 1 2 3 9

- 0 . 1 0 1 3 3

- 0 . 0 1 6 6 0

REGRESSION C C E F M c l l N T

- 0 . 3 8 3 3 2

- 0 . 0 4 0 0 9

0 . 1 2 4 2 4

- 0 . 5 3 4 6 6

0 . 6 8 8 4 5

0 . 0 0 2 7 5

- 0 . 5 5 0 6 9

- 0 . 8 8 9 2 4

- 0 . 2 5 8 6 3

1 . 2 8 7 0 4

- 0 . 1 1 7 3 1

0 . 8 1 2 9 5

0 . 2 4 4 0 7

- 0 . 6 4 9 1 7

- 0 . 0 9 7 9 9

0 . 2 4 2 3 4

- 0 . 4 0 7 3 6

0 . 6 0 0 5 0

- 0 . 3 9 2 4 5

0 . 0 8 9 8 8

- 1 . 0 5 6 2 6

0 . 9 2 5 5 8

- 0 . 7 7 1 6 0

0 . 3 0 9 8 6

- 1 . 2 6 3 9 2

- 0 . 6 2 5 4 8

1 . 5 3 5 1 7

- 0 . 6 5 5 6 6

- 1 . 1 4 0 5 9

- 0 . 5 0 3 4 5

0 . 6 6 2 5 8

0 . 5 4 J 3 5

0 . 2 8 4 7 3

1 . 1 3 3 0 2

0 . 0 2 5 9 8

- 1 . 1 5 5 4 9

1 . 6 7 6 3 0

- 0 . 7 6 0 6 8

0 . 2 6 8 4 5

- 1 . 1 9 2 1 7

0 . 0 9 4 6 7

- 1 . 1 6 6 1 0

- 0 . 4 4 7 7 5

- 0 . 1 2 9 1 5

0 . 5 7 3 1 1

0 . 7 0 4 2 S

0 . 6 4 7 1 4

- 1 . 4 C 1 2 6

- 1 . 1 0 6 1 7

- 0 . 5 5 7 2 4

D . 1 8 0 3 6

yses

S T D . ERROR OF REC.COEF

8 7 . 8 6 4 5 4

8 7 . 8 6 4 0 2

8 7 . 8 6 4 1 6

8 7 . 8 6 5 1 9

8 7 . 8 6 3 1 5

8 7 . 6 6 4 4 9

8 7 . 8 6 4 1 0

8 7 . 8 6 2 4 1

8 7 . 8 6 3 9 8

8 7 . 8 6 4 0 4

8 7 . 8 6 3 3 1

8 7 . 8 6 4 7 1

8 7 . 8 6 3 7 8

8 7 . 8 6 5 6 2

8 7 . 8 6 2 6 9

8 7 . 8 6 5 5 4

8 7 . 8 6 3 7 5

8 7 . 8 6 3 7 9

8 7 . 8 6 3 6 8

8 7 . 8 6 3 7 5

8 7 . 8 6 2 6 9

8 7 . 8 6 2 7 1

8 7 . 8 6 3 6 1

8 7 . 8 6 3 1 1

8 7 . 8 6 3 6 8

8 7 . 8 6 2 9 2

8 7 . 8 6 2 7 9

8 7 . 8 6 2 8 9

8 7 . 8 6 5 2 2

8 7 . 8 6 5 9 6

8 7 . 8 6 5 1 9

8 7 . 8 62 9 5

8 7 . 8 6 5 5 6

8 7 . e c 3 3 4

8 7 . 8 6 1 2 9

9 7 . 5 0 7 7 8

9 7 . 3 0 8 7 2

9 7 . 5 0 7 8 5

9 7 . 5 0 8 5 2

9 7 . 5 0 7 1 5

9 7 . 5 0 7 5 5

9 7 . 3 0 8 3 0

9 7 . 3 0 8 7 8

9 7 . 5 0 7 0 8

9 7 . 5 0 8 2 5

9 7 . 3 0 7 6 2

9 7 . 5 0 8 4 3

9 7 . 3 0 7 8 3

9 7 . 3 0 9 6 3

9 7 . 3 0 7 4 6

9 7 . 5 0 5 9 5

Economic

COflPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 4 3 6

0 . 0 0 0 4 6

0 . 0 0 1 4 1

0 . 0 0 6 0 9

0 . 0 0 7 8 4

0 . 0 0 0 0 3

0 . 0 0 6 2 7

. 0 . 0 1 0 1 2

0 . 0 0 2 9 4

0 . 0 1 4 6 5

0 . 0 0 1 3 4

0 . 0 0 9 2 5

0 . 0 0 2 7 8

0 . 0 0 7 3 9

0 . 0 0 1 1 2

0 . 0 0 2 7 6

0 . 0 0 4 6 4

0 . 0 0 6 8 3

0 . 0 0 4 4 7

0 . 0 0 1 0 2

0 . 0 1 2 0 2

0 . 0 1 0 5 1

0 . 0 0 8 7 8

0 . 0 0 3 5 3

0 . 0 1 4 3 8

• 0 . 0 0 7 1 0

0 . 0 1 S 2 0

0 . 0 0 7 4 6

0 . 0 1 2 9 8

0 . 0 0 3 4 5

0 . 0 0 7 5 4

0 . 0 0 5 9 5

0 . 0 0 5 2 4

0 . 0 1 2 9 0

0 . 0 0 0 3 0

0 . 0 1 1 8 5

0 . 0 1 7 2 3

0 . 0 0 7 8 2

0 . 0 0 2 7 6

0 . 0 1 2 2 5

0 . 0 0 0 9 7

0 . 0 1 1 9 8

0 . 0 0 4 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 5 3

0 . 0 0 5 8 9

0 . 0 0 7 2 4

0 . 0 0 8 7 1

0 . 0 1 4 & 0

0 . 0 1 2 2 9

0 . 0 0 6 1 4

0 . 0 0 1 8 5

98

influence of each independent variable were seen on

dependent one, i.e., 'economic benefit' through 't'

statistical test and these all were again found to be very

low even at .05 level (Table 3.38).

It is very pertinent to clarify here that if F value

is found insignificant then it is necessary that all TV's

must have insignificant influence on DV which are found here

too as 't' values ranging from minimum t = .00003 to maximum

t = .01723 are statistically highly insignificantly even at

.05 level of confidence (Table 3.38).

The above obtained findings reveal that organizational

characteristics are personality attributes do not have any

influence on economic side of ones perception towards quality

of life, hence all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

influence of IV's on DV i.e. economic Benefit - a dimension

of QWL stands accepted.

Table 3.39. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on PWC - a facet of QWL




Total 89 985.99988

Tahie 3 . 4 0 . Showing M u l t i p ie Regress ion Analyses Working Condi t ion dimension of QWL

VAMASLE ft£AN

•^ I t

M

2 1

22

2J

2«

2S

2 *

2T

2 *

2 *

M

S I

32

33

M

33

3 f

31

3*

3 t

41

«1

42

43

44

4S

4«

47

4«

4 t

St

SI

S2

S3

34

SS

s* 37

SS

St

* t

« I

ftZ

63

64

65

66

67

61

69

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 B 8 S 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . X 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 3 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

S.SOOOO

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 S S S 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 S

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 8 0

2 . 8 0 « t t

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 S S S 6

2 . 7 0 0 8 0

2 .S im 2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . S 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

0£ PENDENT

2

INTERCEPl

m i L l l P L E

1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0

r CORRELATION

S I O . ERRCR OF ESTIMATE

STANCARO D E V I A T I O N

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 S

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S i e 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 S 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 S 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 382 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 S 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

3 . 3 2 8 4 6

1 2 . 7 7 9 9 7

0 . 7 1 7 0 e

3 . 5 S 0 4 6

CORRELATION > vs t

• 0 . 0 4 1 9 9

- 0 . 1 3 8 2 6

- 0 . 1 5 8 2 6

- 0 . 0 8 2 8 3

- 0 . 0 8 7 2 4

0 . 0 0 5 7 4

0 . 0 0 2 9 5

0 . 1 0 9 3 2

- 0 . 1 2 4 6 1

- 0 . 0 4 4 0 5

- 0 . 1 0 3 9 9

0 . 2 1 9 2 8

0 . 0 6 5 1 4

- C . 0 5 3 9 7

0 . 0 4 6 2 5

- 0 . 0 3 9 6 5

- 0 . 0 4 7 0 3

0 . 1 3 3 3 1

0 . 1 3 2 7 5

- 0 . 0 1 1 0 8

- 0 . 0 3 8 4 7

0 . 2 0 1 1 6

0 . 0 9 0 7 S

- 0 . 0 6 9 2 0

- 0 . 0 S 2 4 8

0 . 0 1 9 0 4

0 . 1 0 9 7 1

0 . 1 3 3 0 6

- 0 . 0 8 2 5 8

0 . 0 5 1 0 7

0 . 0 1 0 S 6

o.oooot

0 . 0 9 2 0 3

0 . 0 8 1 2 9

0 . 0 4 5 5 4

- 0 . 0 0 5 6 6

- 0 . 2 1 8 3 8

0 . 0 4 7 2 6

0 . 0 S 0 9 8

0 . 1 1 4 7 2

0 . 0 8 2 7 9

0 . 0 0 7 8 9

0 . 0 2 9 3 9

0 . 0 8 4 7 1

0 . 0 4 5 6 8

0 . 0 4 6 5 9

0 .C0S90

- 0 . 0 7 0 6 3

- 0 . 1 0 8 9 8

- 0 . 0 2 0 J 8

0 . 0 1 7 8 9

REGRESSION COEFMCIENT

- 0 . 2 S 4 2 S

- 0 . 5 4 2 3 4

0 . 7 2 4 84

• 0 . 0 7 4 6 9

- 0 . 5 8 4 9 0

0 . 3 4 9 8 0

- 0 . 6 2 4 4 1

0 . 1 0 3 5 8

• 0 . 6 4 5 0 4

1 . 0 5 5 4 4

- 0 . 2 1 4 3 0

1 . 7 0 9 9 4

• 0 . 4 2 0 5 8

0 . 0 6 9 1 8

0 . 1 4 6 7 5

0 . 0 0 7 0 0

0 . 3 1 9 5 1

0 . 5 2 0 0 1

- 0 . 0 1 6 1 9

0 . 0 5 2 0 7

0 . 0 6 6 8 1

0 . 9 2 2 2 1

0 . 8 6 1 0 0

- 0 . 1 3 1 S S

- 0 . 6 9 7 4 3

• 0 . 3 1 1 8 3

0 . 3 8 4 93

0 . 4 2 8 7 !

- 0 . 8 6 9 8 4

0 . 5 8 0 0 6

- 0 . 0 3 4 0 7

- 0 . 2 1 1 9 7

0 . 3 9 6 5 6

0 . 8 3 5 8 4

• 0 . 1 0 8 8 7

0 . 6 0 9 0 6

- 1 . 2 9 1 9 9

0 . 4 S 3 8 0

0 . 1 7 0 5 0

- 0 . 3 0 0 5 6

- 0 . 0 4 2 5 2

0 . 2 5 4 6 3

- 0 . 3 4 0 9 0

0 . 3 3 1 5 3

0 . 1 4 0 2 2

0 . 2 1 8 7 1

0 . 7 3 4 0 2

- 1 . 1 6 3 4 4

0 . 2 0 2 39

- 0 . 1 7 9 0 4

0 . 0 0 3 6 3

S T D . ERROR OF REO.COEF,

7 4 . 2 3 0 4 8

7 4 . 2 3 0 0 4

7 4 . 2 3 0 1 6

7 4 . 2 2 9 3 4

7 4 . 2 2 9 2 9

7 4 . 2 3 0 4 4

7 4 . 2 3 0 1 1

7 4 . 2 2 8 6 6

7 4 . 2 3 0 0 0

7 4 . 2 3 0 0 6

7 4 . 2 2 9 4 4

7 4 . 2 3 0 6 3

7 4 . 2 2 9 8 4

7 4 . 2 2 9 7 1

7 4 . 2 2 8 9 2

7 4 . 2 2 9 4 7

• 7 4 . 2 2 9 8 1

7 4 . 2 2 9 8 5

7 4 . 2 2 9 7 6

7 4 . 2 2 9 8 0

7 4 . 2 2 8 9 1

7 4 . 2 2 8 9 4

7 4 . 2 2 9 7 0

7 4 . 2 2 9 2 7

7 4 . 2 2 9 7 6

7 4 . 2 2 9 1 1

7 4 . 2 2 9 0 0

7 4 . 2 2 9 0 9

7 4 . 2 2 9 3 6

7 4 . 2 3 0 0 0

7 4 . 2 2 9 3 4

7 4 . 2 2 9 1 2

7 4 . 2 2 9 6 6

7 4 . 2 2 9 4 7

7 4 . 2 2 7 7 4

8 2 . 2 0 8 4 0

8 2 . 2 0 9 2 0

8 2 . 2 0 8 4 4

8 2 . 2 0 9 0 3

8 2 . 2 0 7 8 7

8 2 . 2 0 8 1 9

8 2 . 2 0 8 8 5

8 2 . 2 0 9 2 5

8 2 . 2 0 7 8 1

8 2 . 2 0 8 7 8

8 2 . 2 0 8 2 7

8 2 . 2 0 8 9 S

8 2 . 2 0 8 4 4

8 2 . 2 0 9 9 7

8 2 . 2 0 8 1 5

8 2 . 2 0 6 8 6

Phys ica l

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 3 4 3

0 . 0 0 7 3 1

0 . 0 0 9 7 6

0 . 0 0 1 0 1

0 . 0 0 7 8 8

0 . 0 0 4 7 1

0 . 0 0 8 4 1

. 0 . 0 0 1 4 0

0 . 0 0 8 6 9

0 . 0 1 4 2 2

0 . 0 0 2 8 9

0 . 0 2 3 0 4

0 . 0 0 5 6 7

0 . 0 0 0 9 3

0 . 0 0 1 9 8

0 . 0 0 0 0 9

0 . 0 0 4 3 0

0 . 0 0 7 0 1

0 . 0 0 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 0 7 0

0 . 0 0 0 9 0

0 . 0 1 2 4 2

0 . 0 1 1 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 7 7

0 . 0 0 9 4 0

0 . 0 0 4 2 0

e.eesi9

0. I0S7B

I . t l l 7 2

i .otrii . 0 . 0 t 0 4 6

.8 .00286

I.B0S34

0.11126

0.10147

8.80741

t . 0 I S 7 2

e.tossz t . t 0 2 0 7

0 . 0 0 3 6 6

• 0 . 0 0 0 5 2

0 . 0 0 3 1 0

0 . 0 0 4 1 5

0 . 0 0 4 0 3

0 . 0 0 1 7 1

0 . 0 0 2 6 6

0 . 0 0 8 9 3

0 . 0 1 4 1 5

0 . 0 S 2 4 6

0 . 0 0 2 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 0 4

100

The second dimension of QWL, i.e.. Physical Working

Condition is also found to be insignificantly influenced by

both personality attributes and organizational charac

teristics as obtained statistical value F = 0.78859 is

rendered statistically highly insignificant at .05 level of

confidence which is evident from Table 3.39.

The findings were further confirmed from Table 3.40

where all the obtained statistical t values ranging from as

low as t = .00004 to as high as t = 0.0 230 4 are tending to

show almost zero influence of IV's on DV (physical working

condition) - a QWL dimension.

In view of the patterns of the findings mentioned in

Table 3.39 and Table 3.40 it is found that all the null



QWL facet, viz., physical working, condition are rendered

accepted.

Table 3.41. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on MS - a facet of QWL

Source of ^^ g S_ „g^ F.value Variation



Total 89 1080.45532

Table 3 . 4 2 . Showing Mul t ip le Regression Analyses - Mental S t a t e dimension of QWL.

S 1 U . IRROR LUrtKUi tu

T OF REO.COLF. T VALUE

7 S . 1 4 0 S S O . t e i O i

7 S . 1 4 0 4 4 O . « 0 1 « 3

7 S . 1 4 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 6

7 5 . 1 3 9 7 3 0 . 0 0 1 2 1

7 5 . 1 3 9 6 8 0 .OO0J7

7 1 . 1 4 0 S 5 0 . 0 1 6 3 5

7 5 . 1 4 0 5 1 0 . 0 0 8 2 8

7 5 . 1 3 9 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 3 9

7 5 . 1 4 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 9 5

7 5 . 1 4 0 4 6 0 . 0 0 2 6 1

7 5 . 1 3 9 8 3 0 . 0 1 4 4 5

7 5 . 1 4 1 0 4 0 . 0 0 5 9 2

7 S . U 0 2 4 0 . 0 0 3 2 7

7 S . l i 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 1

7 5 . 1 3 9 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 7 2

7 5 . 1 3 9 8 6 0 . 0 0 2 7 1

7 5 . 1 4 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 0 8

7 5 . 1 4 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 2 5

7 5 . 1 4 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 3 2

7 5 . 1 4 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 0

7 S . 1 3 9 3 0 0 . 0 0 3 6 2

7 5 . 1 3 9 3 2 0 . 0 0 2 1 1

7 5 . 1 4 0 0 9 0 . 0 1 2 1 0

7 5 . 1 3 9 6 6 0 . 0 0 3 1 2

7 5 . 1 4 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 6 9 5

7 5 . 1 3 9 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 8 7

7 5 . 1 3 9 3 9 0 . 0 0 3 1 2

7 5 . 1 3 9 4 7 0 . 0 0 4 5 9

7 5 . 1 3 9 7 6 0 . 0 0 7 9 4

7 5 . 1 4 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 7

7 5 . 1 3 9 7 3 0 . 0 0 1 3 6

7 5 . 1 3 9 5 1 0 . 0 0 0 1 8

7 5 . 1 4 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 3 8 S

7 5 . 1 3 9 8 6 0 . 0 0 5 9 9

7 S . 1 3 8 1 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 3

8 3 . 2 1 6 6 5 0 . 0 0 6 4 4

8 3 . 2 1 7 4 5 0 .0143S

8 3 . 2 1 6 7 0 0 . 0 0 4 7 1

8 3 . 2 1 7 2 9 0 . 0 0 7 1 5

8 3 . 2 1 6 1 2 0 . 0 0 6 7 2

8 3 . 2 1 6 4 4 0 . 0 1 2 1 7

8 3 . 2 1 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 5

8 1 . 2 1 7 5 1 0 . 0 1 8 2 5

8 3 . 2 1 6 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 4 6

6 5 . 2 1 7 0 3 0 .006S0

8 5 . 2 1 6 5 1 0 . 0 0 2 4 0

8 J . ; i 7 2 1 0 . 0 0 6 7 2

8 J , 2 1 6 7 0 0 . 0 1 0 6 3

8 3 . 2 1 8 2 * 0 . 0 0 5 4 1

8 5 . 2 1 6 4 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 3

8 3 . 2 1 5 0 9 0 . 0 0 4 0 2

3 . 4 8 4 2 4

INTERCEPT 2 1 . 1 2 6 3 9

MULTIPLE CORRELATION 0 . 7 3 8 7 2

STO. ERRCR CF E S T I W * T £ 3 . 5 9 4 0 1

VARJABLI

I t

2 0

2 1

2 2

2 3

2 4

2 5

2 6

2 7

2B

2 9

3 0

3 1

3 2

3 3

3 4

3 5

3 6

3 7

3 8

3 9

4 0

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 4

4 5

4 6

4 7

4 8

4 9

SO

5 1

5 2

SS

S «

5 5

5 6

5 7

5 8

5 9

6 0

6 1

6 2

6 3

64

6 5

6 6

6 7

6 8

6 9

DEPENDENT

3

MEAN

6 . 0 6 6 6 7

J . 7 6 6 6 7

S . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

J . 4 7 7 7 8

5 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

5 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 S 8 B 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 S 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

' 2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . ( 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 J 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 11

2 . 64444.

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

2 1 . 4 7 7 7 8

ii^min O . I « 4 S 2

1 . 0 « t M

1 . 1 7 5 1 S

i . i a i f o

l . ^ 5 • ^ 3

1 .1763A

1 . 1 4 3 * 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 S 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 8 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 5

1 . 2 1 8 5 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 5 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 5 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 * 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 5 5 5

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 5 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 5 5 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

CORRELATION

0 . 1 5 1 7 7

• 0 . 0 2 1 4 0

0 . 0 5 7 6 6

0 . 1 0 6 9 3

• 0 . 0 0 4 7 6

- 0 . 1 0 8 6 8

0 . 1 7 5 7 0

• 0 . 0 5 4 0 0

- 0 . 0 5 0 9 9

- 0 . 0 6 7 7 0

- 0 . 1 0 3 6 3

0 . 0 7 0 5 9

0 . 0 7 9 3 9

- 0 . 0 0 1 6 0

0 . 1 1 5 7 0

0 . 0 2 2 7 0

0 . 0 1 7 1 8

0 . 0 7 1 1 3

- 0 . 0 6 2 6 3

- 0 . 0 4 6 8 5

0 . 0 7 5 6 3

- 0 . 0 1 5 8 2

- 0 . 0 4 5 0 6

- 0 . 0 7 5 3 8

0 . 0 5 5 2 1

0 . 1 1 7 5 3

0 . 1 0 7 8 1

0 . 0 3 1 1 0

0 . 1 2 4 2 6

0 . 0 1 6 9 5

0 . 0 5 5 1 3

- 0 . 0 8 9 1 4

0 . 0 8 1 6 3

0 . 1 1 8 4 9

0 . 0 9 1 6 1

• 0 . 0 9 0 6 0

0 . 1 4 1 1 0 0 . 0 2 0 5 9

- C . 0 3 8 7 0

- 0 . 1 5 5 4 1

- 0 . 1 0 7 4 5

0 . 1 4 9 3 6

0 . 1 0 4 5 1

0 . 0 1 7 4 6

0 . 1 2 7 4 7

- 0 . 2 0 7 J 4

- 0 . 0 7 2 4 3

- 0 . 2 0 5 5 0

- C . 1 6 0 4 1

- 0 . 2 1 0 2 6

- 0 . 1 2 3 7 6

mnn 0 . 1 5 2 9 5

- 0 . 1 2 2 7 5

0 . 3 0 4 9 0

- 0 . 0 9 0 6 9

- 0 . 0 1 3 0 5

- 1 . 2 2 8 6 0

0 . 6 2 1 B 3

- 0 . 0 2 9 1 5

0 . 0 7 1 5 6

- 0 . 1 9 6 4 7

- 1 . 0 8 6 0 4

0 . 4 4 4 7 0

- 0 . 2 4 5 8 5

- 0 . 3 8 4 1 8

0 . 0 5 4 3 9

C . 2 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 8 1 2 2

C . 3 1 9 1 2

- 0 . 3 2 4 9 2

0 . 5 2 6 1 1

- 0 . 2 7 1 7 7

- 0 . 1 5 8 2 4

- 0 . 9 0 9 3 8

- 0 . 2 3 4 7 5

- 0 . 5 2 2 0 4

- 0 . 2 9 0 8 8

0 . 2 3 4 6 9

- 0 . 3 4 4 8 4

0 . 5 9 6 6 7

- 0 . 3 1 5 5 7

- 0 . 1 0 2 0 9

0 . 0 1 3 3 8

- C . 2 8 9 6 2

0 . 4 5 0 0 1

0 . 1 3 0 1 1

- 0 . 5 3 6 3 0

1 . 1 9 4 2 2 C . 3 9 1 6 8

C. 5 9 4 9 4

- 0 . 5 5 9 3 4

1 . 0 1 2 5 7

0 . 2 4 4 0 0

1 . 5 1 S 9 8

C . 1 2 1 1 9

C . 5 4 1 C 7

- 0 . 1 9 9 5 9

0 . 5 5 8 S 2

- C . 8 8 4 8 2

0 . 4 4 9 8 7

- 0 . 5 E S 3 7

- 0 . 3 3 4 I S

102

The third dimension of QWL i.e., 'mental state' is

also found to be insignificantly influenced by both IV's

<personality attributes and organizational characteristics)

as obtained statistical value F = 0.89504 is highly

insignificant even at .05 level of confidence (Table 3.41).

The findings were further verified when the influence

of each independent variable was seen on dependent variable

viz., mental state - a QWL facet as statistical value again

found to be very low to touch the degree of confidence level.

It is also evident from Table 3.42 that all the obtained

statistical t values ranging from t = .00017 to t = .01825

show no influence of IV's on DV - mental state (a QWL

dimension) .

The above findings reveal that organizational

characteristics and personality attributes do not have any

influence on mental state (a dimension of QWL) of Muslim

middle level managers hence, all the null hypotheses

pertaining to the influence of all IV's on DV i.e., on mental

state - a dimension of QWL found accepted.

Table 3.43. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on CO - a facet of QWL

Source of ^p S.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 3686.05615

Table 3 . 4 4 . Showing

VikRIABLE NO.

19

20

2 1

22

23

24

25

26

27

26

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

3«

39

40

4 1

42

4 3

4 4

4S

4 6

47

48

49

SO

51

52

5 3

54

55 56

57

56

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

DEPENDENT

4

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 S 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 .6SSS6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3 2 . 6 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2.ti2ll

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . S 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 ' i 4 4 4

2 . i l l 11

2 . bi.i.i.>.

2 . 54(,44

4 1 . 18SS9

1 0 . 7 2 2 2 2

INTEhCEPT


STD. ERKCR CF ESTIMATE

[ M u l t i p l e Regression Ana t i o n d imension of

STANDARD DEVIAT ICK

0 . 8 6 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 S

1 . 1 8 1 9 6

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S 1 C 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 6 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 6 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 6 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 6 0

1 . 2 6 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 6 1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 6 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

6 . 4 3 5 5 5

5 . 7 9 9 5 2

o . e o i i ;

5 . 8 9 4 0 C

QWL.

CCRRELATION RECRL&SICN X VS Y COEFMCIENT

0 . 1 2 9 6 5

- 0 . 1 7 1 0 1

- 0 . 0 1 7 5 3

0 . 0 7 3 2 9

0 . 1 0 1 4 4

0 . 0 2 4 4 1

- 0 . 1 4 0 4 5

- 0 . 0 7 7 8 0

- 0 . 0 1 3 1 0

- 0 . 1 6 5 0 5

0 . 0 1 8 9 0

- 0 . 0 7 7 6 8

0 . 0 5 7 2 0

0 . 0 7 4 2 8

0 . 1 1 7 8 4

0 . 0 2 2 7 1

0 . 0 6 0 8 1

- 0 . 0 8 4 2 7

- 0 . 0 8 9 6 8

0 . 0 2 0 7 8

0 . 2 0 9 4 6

0 . 0 9 7 6 7

- 0 . 1 6 3 0 6

- 0 . 1 3 0 1 7

- 0 . 0 8 1 7 7

- 0 . 0 9 7 6 7

0 . 1 0 9 6 4

- 0 . 0 6 5 3 9

- 0 . 0 8 7 4 7

- 0 . 0 0 4 1 7

- 0 . 0 2 6 8 5

- 0 . 1 7 9 0 7

- 0 . 0 1 6 1 7

- 0 . 1 2 4 2 8

- 0 . 0 7 9 0 0

- 0 . 0 4 5 2 1

0 . 0 1 5 6 3 - 0 . 0 2 9 3 5

- 9 . 0 4 9 2 6

0 . 0 3 2 8 1

- 0 . 1 0 3 4 1

- e . 3 1 6 0 2

- 0 . 2 4 4 5 3

C . 0 7 6 4 8

o . :777e

- : . 0 5 5 2 2

: . J 5 2 6 9

- : . 1 6 0 1 1

-C . C J J 4 0

C. 0'9302

- C . 1 0 7 7 1

1 . 3 2 0 1 0

- 1 . 7 3 2 9 9

1 . 1 5 6 4 7

- 1 . 0 6 0 1 7

0 . 5 2 6 5 9

1 . 6 4 3 5 2

- 0 . 6 4 2 1 8

- 1 . 0 0 9 9 8

1 . 0 7 8 8 7

C .54674

0 . 7 0 4 4 1

0 . 6 6 2 0 0

0 . 5 3 2 52

1 . 1 0 0 1 9

0 . 1 2 7 3 7

- 0 . 8 6 3 7 6

0 . 4 3 3 9 5

0 . 4 2 9 3 9

- 0 . 0 7 8 2 2

- 0 . 1 6 8 9 4

0 . 3 7 4 0 9

0 . 5 4 6 7 5

- 0 . 5 6 8 2 5

0 . 7 1 5 4 3

- 1 . 3 3 1 3 4

- 1 . 5 3 3 3 4

0 . 8 6 3 5 5

- 0 . 1 0 9 9 0

- 0 . 8 7 4 2 3

1 . 2 1 5 2 9

0 . 3 4 9 4 8

- 1 . 3 7 0 0 6

1 . 4 5 2 4 1

- 0 . 3 3 3 6 2

- 0 . 0 7 1 9 2

- 0 . 2 5 2 9 1

- 0 . 1 1 0 2 9 - 1 . 6 4 2 4 1

- 0 . 2 9 9 6 9

- C . 1 3 9 0 7

- 1 . 6 8 5 2 9

- 1 . 7 8 3 1 2

- 2 . 2 8 6 2 8

0 . 5 0 8 7 4

0 . 0 4 2 5 3

- C . 8 8 9 1 2

2 . 0 2 0 4 3

- 1 . 9 1 6 0 7

- 1 . 6 8 1 1 9

1 . 0 8 1 2 0

0 . 5 6 1 0 8

l y ses

S T D . ERI OF R E C . I

1 2 3 . 2 2 7 4 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 6 9

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 6 8

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 5 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 4 4

1 2 3 - 2 2 7 3 5

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 8 0

1 2 3 . 2 2 4 4 3

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 6 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 7 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 6 9

1 2 3 . 2 2 7 6 6

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 3 6

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 1 4

1 2 3 . 2 2 4 8 3

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 7 4

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 3 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 3 7

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 2 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 2 8

1 2 3 . 2 2 4 8 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 4 8 S

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 1 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 4 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 2 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 1 5

1 2 3 . 2 2 4 9 6

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 1 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 5 6

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 6 1

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 5 2

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 1 6

1 2 3 . 2 2 6 0 4

1 2 3 . 2 2 5 7 3

1 2 3 . 2 2 2 6 6

1 3 6 . 4 7 1 2 8

1 3 6 . 4 7 2 6 1 1 3 6 . 4 7 1 3 6

1 3 6 . 4 7 2 3 2

1 3 6 . 4 7 0 4 0

1 3 6 . 4 7 0 9 3

1 3 6 . 4 7 2 0 2

1 3 6 . 4 7 2 7 0

1 3 6 . 4 7 0 2 9

1 3 6 . 4 7 1 9 1

1 3 6 . 4 7 1 0 5

1 3 6 . 4 7 2 2 0

1 3 6 . 4 7 1 3 6

1 3 6 . 4 7 3 8 8

1 3 6 . 4 7 0 8 7

1 3 4 . 4 6 8 7 2

Career 103

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 1 0 7 1

0 . 0 1 4 0 8

0 . 0 0 9 3 1

0 . 0 0 6 6 0

00427

01334

00683

00620

00876

00444

00572

00537

00432

00893

00103

00701

00352

00348

0 . 0 0 0 6 3

0 . 0 0 1 3 7

0 . 0 0 3 0 4

0 . 0 0 4 4 4

0 . 0 0 4 6 1

0 . 0 0 5 8 1

0 . 0 1 0 8 0

0 . 0 1 2 4 4

0 . 0 0 7 0 1

0 . 0 0 0 8 9

0 . 0 0 7 0 9

0 0 9 8 6

00284

01112

01179

00271

00058

0 . 0 0 1 8 5 .

0 . 0 0 0 8 1

0 . 0 1 2 0 3

0 . 0 0 2 2 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 2

01235

01307

01677

00373

00031

00652

01480

01404

01232

0 0 792

00411

104

Table 3.43 shows that the fourth aspect of QWL i.e.,

•Career Orientation' is also found to be insignificantly

influenced by both TV's (personality attributes and organi

zational characteristics) as obtained F = 1.33542 is found

insignificant at .05 level of confidence.

The findings were further analysed which is evident

from Table 3.44. It is amply clear from the Table that all

obtained 't' values depicting insignificant influence of

Organizational characteristics and personality attributes on

Muslim superiors' perceived feeling towards career

orientation as statistical values ranging from t = .00058 to

t = .01677 are statistically very low.

In the light of the afore-mentioned patterns of

findings, all the null hypotheses are recommended to be

accepted that argue no influence of iVs on Muslim's perceived

feeling towards their career-orientations.

Table 3.45. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IVs on AM - a facet of QWL

Source of pp S.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 3118.48926

Table :

VARIABLE NO.

19

19

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2S

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

36

39

40

4 1

( 2

43

44

4S

46

47

48

49

SO

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

SB

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

66

t 9

DEPENOEN'

5

3.46. Show: Lng Mu l t ip ] Me r i t dimensior

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 6 6 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . B 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 S S 3 3

3 . $ 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 B B 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 6 6 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 6 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 6 6 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 6

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 6 8 6 9

r

1 6 . 4 8 8 6 9

INTERCEPT

nULTlPLE CORRELATION


0 . B B 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 S 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 6 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 S 7 1

1 . 2 S 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 S

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

5 . 9 1 9 3 9

1 0 . 3 2 8 8 7

0 . 7 8 4 2 C

5 . 6 2 0 4 9

le Regression Analyses - Advancement or J o f QWL.

CCRRELATIOK

0 . 2 3 8 4 0

0 . 1 1 4 3 8

- 0 . 0 3 1 5 7

- 0 . 0 4 8 4 3

0 . 1 4 1 0 0

0 . 0 2 9 3 3

0 . 0 9 2 6 2

0 . 0 6 1 6 6

- 0 . 0 1 7 4 6

0 . 0 1 9 7 1

0 . D 3 3 S 0

0 . 1 4 1 S 4

0 . 1 3 2 8 4

0 . 0 9 2 0 8

0 . 0 8 8 2 3

- 0 . 0 3 0 8 5

- 0 . 0 1 2 4 5

0 . 0 7 8 8 6

0 . 1 2 3 3 2

- 0 . 0 5 7 0 2

0 . 1 2 3 6 5

0 . 1 3 2 3 6

0 . 0 8 2 8 2

0 . 0 7 6 6 0

- 0 . 1 8 8 7 0

- 0 . 0 5 8 6 6

0 . 0 9 6 8 5

0 . 0 8 2 8 7

0 . 0 5 3 2 0

- 0 . 0 1 8 4 4

0 . 1 3 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 5 0 1 1

0 . 2 0 0 0 1

0 . 0 2 5 1 6

0 . 2 0 9 5 6

- 0 . 2 0 3 3 1

- 0 . 1 6 6 6 6

0 . 1 9 2 4 5

0 . 0 4 8 5 6

0 . 0 7 8 7 7

- 0 . 0 0 8 3 5

- 0 . 1 7 3 5 3

- 0 . 1 1 5 3 5

- 0 . 0 4 3 2 6

- 0 . 0 4 6 3 6

0 . 1 5 5 4 8

0 . 0 1 9 3 1

- 0 . 1 2 4 6 6

- 0 . 0 3 5 5 4

- 0 . 1 0 7 3 5

- 0 . 0 9 J 2 9

;st^M^i^;:T 1 . 1 4 2 1 6

1 . 2 6 3 6 3

- 0 . 0 4 1 2 7

- 1 . 1 8 3 6 2

0 . 5 9 6 7 3

0 . 5 2 0 2 6

- 0 . 3 1 4 6 6

• 0 . 1 4 8 5 7

- 0 . 2 8 6 7 3

0 . 9 2 9 0 8

- 0 . 4 8 7 2 9

1 . 2 8 9 1 8

0 . S 2 2 5 4

- 0 . 0 7 0 4 7

0 . 1 2 5 4 1

- 0 . 1 9 4 6 6

0 . 0 3 6 1 2

0 . 5 6 7 5 6

0 . 2 6 9 6 5

• 0 . 2 2 6 9 4

1 . 0 4 8 7 2

0 . 8 8 4 9 0

0 . 6 5 3 7 9

0 . 8 6 2 0 2

- 1 . 7 2 6 3 7

- 1 . 2 1 1 8 7

. 0 l 3 8 6 1 9

0 . 7 0 0 8 9

- 1 . 5 2 6 4 1

0 . 4 0 6 7 4

1 . 3 4 4 5 5

- 1 . 4 7 2 6 6

2 . 5 7 5 0 1

- 0 . 1 6 3 9 8

- 0 . 1 3 3 9 2

- 0 . 9 6 9 2 6

0 . 2 0 2 8 9

" 0 . 6 1 1 4 7

- 0 . 4 2 2 6 7

• 0 . 2 1 9 2 9

0 . 1 1 3 4 2

- 0 . 5 7 6 7 4

- 0 . 5 6 7 3 7

- 0 . 1 4 9 7 4

0 . 5 0 S S 1

0 . 7 5 7 9 7

0 . 7 4 7 3 8

- 1 . 2 0 9 4 9

0 . 3 1 9 ? J

- 0 . 5 7 5 7 5

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

l?''jiEE??8E%. 1 1 7 . 5 0 9 1 1

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 4 2

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 6 1

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 3 1

1 1 7 . 5 8 7 2 3

1 1 7 . 5 0 9 0 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 5 3

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 2 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 3 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 4 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 4 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 9 3 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 1 0

1 1 7 . 5 8 7 8 9

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 6 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 5 1

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 0 6

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 1 2

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 9 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 0 3

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 6 4

. 1 7 . 5 0 6 6 7

. 1 7 . 5 0 7 8 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 9

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 9 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 9 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 7 7

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 9 1

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 3 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 8 3 5

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 3 2

1 1 7 . 5 0 6 9 ?

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 8 0

1 1 7 . 5 0 7 S 1

1 1 7 . 5 0 4 7 8

1 3 0 . 1 3 8 4 0

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 6 6

- 1 3 0 . 1 3 8 4 7

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 3 9

1 3 0 . 1 3 7 S 6

1 3 0 . 1 3 8 0 8

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 1 1

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 7 6

1 3 0 . 1 3 7 4 7

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 0 1

1 3 0 . 1 3 8 1 8

1 3 0 . 1 3 9 ^ 8

1 3 0 . 1 3 8 4 7

1 3 0 . 1 4 0 8 8

1 3 0 . 1 3 6 0 2

1 3 0 . 1 3 5 9 6

COBPUTtO T VALUI

0 . 0 1 5 6 8

0 . 0 1 8 7 S

0 . 0 0 0 3 5

0 . 0 1 0 0 7

0 . 0 0 5 1 0

0 . 0 0 4 4 3

0 . 0 0 2 6 6

0 . 0 0 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 2 4 4

0 . 0 0 7 9 1

0 . 0 0 4 1 5

0 . 0 1 0 9 7

0 . 0 0 4 4 5

0 . 0 0 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 7

0 . 0 0 1 6 6

0 . 0 0 0 3 1

0 . 0 0 5 0 0

0 . 0 0 2 2 9

0 . 0 0 1 9 5

0 . 0 0 8 9 2

0 . 0 0 7 5 3

0 . 0 0 5 5 6

0 . 0 0 7 3 4

0 . 0 1 4 6 9

0 . 0 1 0 3 1

0 . 0 0 3 2 9

0 . 0 0 S 9 6

0 . 0 1 2 9 9

0 . 0 0 3 4 6

0 . 0 1 1 4 4

0 . 0 1 2 5 3

0 . 0 2 1 9 1

0 . 0 0 1 4 0

0 . 0 0 1 1 4

0 . 0 0 7 4 5

0 . 0 0 1 5 6

0 . 0 0 4 7 0

0 . 0 0 3 2 5

0 . 0 0 1 6 9

0 . 0 0 0 8 7

0 . 0 0 4 4 3

0 . 0 0 4 3 6

} . 0 0 1 1 5

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 0 5 8 2

0 . 0 0 5 7 4

3 . 0 0 9 2 9

0 . 0 0 2 4 6

0 . 0 0 4 4 2

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

105

106

The fifth facet of QWL i.e., 'Advancement on Merit'

is also found to be insignificantly influenced by both

clusters of IV's (personality attributes organizational

characteristics) as obtained statistical value F = 1.19055 is

found insignificant (see Table 3.45).


where all the statistical t values ranging from as low as t =

.00031 to as high as t = .02191 show no influence of IV's on

DV viz., 'Advancement on Merit' - an aspect of perceived QWL.

In the light of the findings mentioned in Table 3.45

and Table 3.46, it is advocated that all the null hypotheses

proposed to test the influence of independent variables on

Dependent Variable viz.. Advancement on Merit are accepted.

Table 3.47. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on EPL - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DF S.S, M.S. F . v a l u e

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 38 R e g r e s s i o n

348 .65305 6 .83633

191 .83597 5.04832

1 .35418

T o t a l 89 5 4 0 . 4 8 9 0 1

I t h a s been o b s e r v e d from T a b l e 3.47 t h a t " e f f e c t on

p e r s o n a l l i f e d i m e n s i o n " of QWL i s a l s o found i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y

i n f l u e n c e d by b o t h i n d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e s ( p e r s o n a l i t y

Table 3

VAnIABIE NO.

19

20

2 1

22

23

2«

2S

26

27

2S

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

4«

49

SO

51

52

. 4 8 . Showing M u l t i i Personal L i f e c

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 A 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 S S S 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

53 1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

54

55 __

S6

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

6S

69

DEPENDENT

6

INTERCEPT

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . S S S S 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 ?

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 &

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

1 1 . 1 S 8 8 9

8 . 4 8 8 8 9


STD. ERROR OF ESTIMATE

STANDARD D E V I A T I O N

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 S 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

i : 2 S 8 2 S

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 S 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

2 . 4 6 4 3 3

1 4 . 3 0 5 4 S

0 . 8 0 3 1 6

2 . 2 4 6 6 5

>le Regression ana ly Jimension of QWL.

CCRBr iAT ION X VS t

0 . 0 4 1 5 9

- 0 . 0 7 2 6 7

• 0 . 0 5 6 4 0

• 0 . 0 1 2 1 7

• 0 . 1 0 3 1 8

- 0 . 0 6 5 2 0

• 0 . 0 7 2 5 6

• 0 . 0 0 2 9 8

0 . 0 2 6 8 6

0 . 1 3 4 6 0

- 0 . 1 4 3 4 9

- 0 . 0 6 1 6 7

0 . 0 3 6 0 4

0 . 0 0 2 5 1

0 . 0 0 3 7 0

- 0 . 1 0 9 8 2

0 . 0 1 1 2 1

0 . 0 5 4 3 8

0 . 0 4 0 6 1

- 0 . 1 1 0 7 8

- 0 . 1 1 0 7 6

0 . 0 4 6 2 9

0 . 0 2 2 7 3

0 . 0 0 7 8 3

- 0 . 0 2 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 4 9 1 3

- 0 . 0 1 4 3 4

- 0 . 0 4 0 5 6

- 0 . 1 0 2 5 2

0 . 0 6 4 6 2

0 . 1 0 3 1 4

- 0 . 0 4 1 5 1

- 0 . 0 9 1 4 9

- 0 . 1 0 9 2 0

- 0 . 0 9 3 4 6

- 0 . 1 0 6 1 0

- 0 . 1 6 0 2 9

- 0 . 0 1 2 9 2

- 0 . 2 6 J 8 0

- 0 . 0 2 6 9 9

- 0 . 1 5 7 9 7

- 0 . 0 5 7 8 9

- 0 . 0 5 6 9 4

- 0 . 1 9 2 5 0

0 . 0 6 1 1 9

0 . 0 1 8 6 2

0 . 0 6 2 3 1

- 0 . 2 0 4 0 4

- 0 . 1 9 0 5 0

- 0 . 0 6 8 6 5

- 0 . 2 3 9 3 4

RfCRESSlCN C C E F M c l t N T

0 . 4 5 1 7 5

0 . 1 9 0 2 6

0 . 1 8 7 7 0

- 0 . 1 1 9 1 2

- 0 . 5 1 4 0 7

0 . 5 4 3 1 6

- 0 . 0 8 3 1 2

- 0 . 4 1 5 9 7

• C . 1 2 5 6 8

0 . 9 9 0 2 6

- 0 . 1 5 8 7 9

0 . 0 7 1 2 0

0 . 5 1 8 8 7

0 . 1 4 9 0 9

0 . 0 6 1 3 7

- 0 . 5 5 0 7 8

0 ^ 1 8 5 4 0

0 . 4 6 5 4 6

0 . 1 5 1 0 2

- 0 . 2 1 0 8 7

- 0 . 3 8 2 4 8

0 . 3 8 2 4 2

0 . 4 2 1 5 4

- 0 . 3 1 1 6 7

- 0 . 2 7 6 4 7

- 0 . 4 2 5 5 2

0 . 2 9 1 5 7

0 . 1 6 8 8 0

- 0 . 6 2 0 5 2

0 . 9 4 2 2 2

- 0 . 0 2 0 7 0

- 0 . 0 4 0 2 1

0 . 7 2 1 8 6

- 0 . 1 9 0 5 3

- 0 . 0 9 4 4 9

- 0 . 0 8 0 7 0

- 0 . 4 8 9 8 9

0 . 0 2 9 9 5

- 1 . 2 2 4 1 0

- 0 . 1 6 7 3 7

- 0 . 8 3 4 2 2

0 . 1 9 5 0 9

- C . 9 2 9 5 7

- 0 . 6 7 0 1 4

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 6 7 2 7 5

- 0 . 7 6 2 4 8

- 0 . 6 9 5 5 6

0 . 1 4 5 2 7

0 . 2 1 4 6 5

107 ses - E f f e c t on

ST1>. ERROR OF K t C . C O l F .

4 6 . 9 7 5 4 3

4 6 . 9 7 5 1 5

4 6 . 9 7 5 2 3

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 1

4 6 . 9 7 4 6 8

4 6 . 9 7 5 4 1

4 6 . 9 7 5 2 0

4 6 . 9 7 4 2 9

4 6 . 9 7 5 1 3

4 6 . 9 7 5 1 6

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 7

4 6 . 9 7 5 5 2

4 6 . 9 7 5 0 3

4 6 . 9 7 4 9 4

4 6 . 9 7 4 4 5

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 9

4 6 . 9 7 5 0 1

4 6 . 9 7 5 0 3

4 6 . 9 7 4 9 7

4 6 . 9 7 5 0 0

4 6 . 9 7 4 4 4

4 6 . 9 7 4 4 5

4 6 . 9 7 4 9 5

4 6 . 9 7 4 6 7

4 6 . 9 7 4 9 7

4 6 . 9 7 4 5 7

4 6 . 9 7 4 4 9

4 6 . 9 7 4 5 5

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 2

4 6 . 9 7 5 1 2

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 1

4 6 . 9 7 4 5 7

4 6 . 9 7 4 9 1

4 6 . 9 7 4 7 9

4 6 . 9 7 3 6 9

5 2 . 0 2 4 1 2

5 2 . 0 2 4 6 2

5 2 . 0 2 4 1 4

5 2 . 0 2 4 5 1

5 2 . 0 2 3 7 8

5 2 . 0 2 3 9 8

5 2 . 0 2 4 3 9

5 2 . 0 2 4 6 5

5 2 . 0 2 3 7 4

5 2 . 0 2 4 3 5

5 2 . 0 2 4 0 3

5 2 . 0 2 4 4 6

5 2 . 0 2 4 1 4

5 2 . 0 2 5 1 1

5 2 . 0 2 3 9 6

5 2 . 0 2 3 1 4

COHPUTEO T VALUE

0 . I 8 9 6 2

P . I 0 4 0 S

O.I«AOO

e.o«2s« • .81094

0.01156

0.00177

0.00886

0.00268

0.02108

0.00338

0.00152

0.01105

0.00317

0.00131

0.01173

0.00395

0.00991

0 .00321

0.00449

0.00814

0.00814

0.00897

0.00663

0.00589

0.00906

0 .00621

0.00359

0 .01321

0.02006

0.00044

0.00086

0.01537

0 .00406

0 .00201

0.00155

0.00942

0.00058

0.02353

0.00322

0.01604

0.00375

0.01787

0.01288

0.00000

0.00000

0.01293

0.01466

0.01337

0.00279

0.00413

108

attributes and organizational characteristics) as F = 1.35418

is found insignificant at 0.5 level. Table 3.48 further

reveals to the obtained fact none of the IV's have influence

on dependent variable viz./ i.e., Effect on personal life (a

QWL facet).

It is witnessed from the above findings that all

independent variables and the dependent variable (i.e. effect

on personal life) are found to be independent to each other,

hence, all proposed null hypotheses stand accepted (pp.40-46').

Table 3.49. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of TV's on UMR - a facet of QWL

Source of pp g.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 1125.60022

Seventh facet of QWL namely, "union management

relations" is not found to be the function of either of the

clusters of independent variables namely, personality

attributes and organizational characteristics and this

observation is extracted from the obtained value F = 0.85929

which is very low and highly insignificant (Table 3.49).

Tab le 3.

VARIABLE NO.

1 *

2 0

11

22

2 3

2 i

2S

26

27

2 «

29

30

3 1

32

33

U

3S

36

37

3B

39

40

4 1

42

4 3

44

4S

4 6

4 7

4 «

4 9

SO

5 1

S2

50 . Showing M u l t i p i e Re Manaqement R e l a t i o n d i

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . ( S 8 « 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2.ML.S89

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . S 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

S3 1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

54

55

56

57

5S

59

60

6 1

62

6 3

64

65

66

67

68

69

DEPENDENT

7

INTERCEPT

KJLTIPLE

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2.<^^333

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

6 . 4 0 0 0 0

CORRELATION

STO. ERROR OF ESTIMATE

STANDARD DEVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 S B

1 . 1 7 S I S

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

U 2 6 S 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 S 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 S 3 0

" . 1 6 8 7 5

3 . S 5 6 2 9

I S . 1 6 6 1 5

0 . 7 3 1 8 4

3 . 7 0 8 9 7

CCRRELAT X VS Y

• 0 . 0 7 6 4 6

- 0 . 2 5 7 6 0

• 0 . 1 4 9 7 4

0 . 0 0 1 6 0

0 . 1 3 9 8 3

• 0 . 0 4 4 0 5

• 0 . 0 5 7 4 6

0 . 0 6 4 7 2

- 0 . 0 2 8 6 3

0 . 1 3 8 5 3

- 0 . 0 5 0 5 0

0 . 0 0 9 D O

- 0 . 0 8 2 7 0

- 0 . 0 0 7 0 7

0 . 0 8 8 0 2

0 . 0 4 S 0 3

- 0 . 1 3 7 2 4

- 0 . 1 9 3 9 6

- 0 . 2 1 9 9 5

0 . 1 1 3 0 7

• 0 . 0 1 6 9 7

0 . 0 4 0 0 7

- 0 . 0 8 1 2 2

- 0 . 1 6 0 4 3

• 0 . 1 8 2 3 0

• 0 . 0 8 2 4 6

- 0 . 1 0 7 7 0

- 0 . 0 6 7 4 0

- 0 . 0 0 8 7 5

0 . 0 3 0 6 9

- 0 . 0 7 8 0 6

- 0 . 1 4 4 S B

0 . 0 5 9 5 7

- 0 . 0 4 2 4 2

- 0 . 1 6 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 4 4 5 0

0 . 0 1 7 7 4

- e . 1 1 9 9 2

- 0 . 0 0 8 0 4

0 . 1 4 1 3 3

- 0 . 0 8 6 2 7

0 . 0 4 2 8 5

- 0 . 0 7 2 5 2

0 . 1 1 1 5 1

0 . 0 6 0 9 3

- 0 . 1 ) 6 6 5 0

- 0 . 0 6 1 2 7

0 . 0 8 ( 9 9

0 . 1 0 3 9 5

0 . 0 8 2 0 1

0 . 0 3 6 2 3

ION

5s ion i o n o f

A n a l y s e s QWL.

Un ion

nrnmrn^ hPkdtiih. s'::rr 0 . 1 6 1 0 2

• 1 . 2 7 1 5 9

• e . 4 2 9 9 0

0 . 1 0 1 9 3

0 . 3 9 9 1 5

• 0 . 1 0 4 2 5

- 0 . 9 1 8 4 4

0 . 1 4 0 9 2

- 0 . 2 8 1 4 3

0 . 2 9 7 5 9

- 0 . 1 0 1 6 5

0 . 3 5 0 5 6

- 0 . 8 4 7 1 2

- 0 . 7 3 2 6 3

0 . 1 4 7 0 5

- 0 . 7 0 1 3 5

- 0 . 6 2 1 7 4

- 0 . 7 5 1 5 8

- 1 . 1 5 3 2 8

0 . 6 3 9 2 5

- 0 . 3 7 0 0 7

- 0 . 1 8 9 7 1

- 0 . 4 2 0 1 4

0 . 2 6 8 1 9

- 1 . 1 6 3 9 2

- 0 . 5 0 5 3 2

-o.esios - 0 . 0 8 5 5 6

- 0 . 5 2 5 4 5

- 0 . 4 2 2 8 9

- 0 . 4 2 3 2 4

- 0 . 5 7 0 3 8

0 . 2 2 3 0 6

0 . 1 3 3 2 0

0 . 2 1 0 5 1

- 0 . 1 8 6 3 4

0 . 0 7 0 0 9

- 0 . 1 3 5 0 6

0 . 1 3 8 0 1

0 . 6 0 1 1 0

• 0 . 7 4 3 9 0

0 . 0 2 9 7 8

- 0 . 7 4 2 2 1

0 . 3 5 7 0 3

0 . 1 2 9 2 5

- O . 1 4 0 e i

- 0 . 8 3 1 2 9

0 . 4 5 6 7 5

- 0 . 6 8 6 0 9

0 . 1 3 6 2 7

0 . 0 6 2 0 1

7 7 . 5 4 4 3 1

T 7 . J 4 3 9 ,

7 7 . S 4 4 0 4

7 7 . 5 4 3 1 1

7 7 . 5 4 3 1 4

7 7 . 5 4 4 3 ;

7 7 . 5 4 3 9 5

7 7 . 5 4 2 5 1

7 7 . 5 4 3 8

7 7 . 5 4 3 9

7 7 . 5 4 3 2 1

7 7 . 5 4 4 5

7 7 . 5 4 3 7

7 7 . 5 4 3 5

7 7 . 5 4 2 7

7 7 . 5 4 3 3 ;

7 7 . 5 4 3 6

7 7 . 5 4 3 7 ;

7 7 . 5 4 3 6 ;

7 7 . 5 4 3 6

7 7 . 5 4 2 7

7 7 . 5 4 2 7 <

7 7 . 5 4 3 5 <

7 7 . 5 4 3 1 J

7 7 . 5 4 3 6 ;

7 7 . 5 4 2 9

7 7 . 5 4 2 8 :

7 7 . 5 4 2 9 J

7 7 . 5 4 3 2 1

7 7 . 5 4 3 8 '

7 7 . 5 4 3 1 1

7 7 . 5 4 2 9 !

7 7 . 5 4 3 5 J

7 7 . 5 4 3 3 ;

7 7 . 5 4 1 5

8 5 . 8 7 8 4 <

8 5 . 8 7 9 2 1

8 S . 8 7 8 5 (

8 5 . 8 7 9 1 )

8 5 . 8 7 7 9 ]

8 5 . 8 7 8 2 :

8 5 . 8 7 8 9 !

B 5 . 8 7 9 3 <

8 5 . 8 7 7 8 4

8 5 . 8 7 8 8

8 5 . 8 7 8 3

8 5 . 8 7 9 0

8 5 . 8 7 8 5

8 5 . 8 8 0 1

8 5 . 8 7 8 2

8 5 . 8 7 6 8

) 0 . 0 0 2 0 8

t 0 . 0 1 6 4 0

I 0 . 0 0 5 S 4

> 0 . 0 0 1 3 1

o.oosis t 0 . 0 0 1 3 4

) , 0 . 0 1 1 8 4

} 0 . 0 0 1 8 2

1 0 . 0 0 3 6 3

I 0 . 0 0 3 8 4

) 0 . 0 0 1 3 1

S 0 . 0 0 4 5 2

1 0 . 0 1 0 9 2

t 0 . 0 0 9 4 5

i 0 . 0 0 1 9 0

t 0 . 0 0 9 0 4

1 0 . 0 0 8 0 2

I 0 . 0 0 9 6 9

I 0 . 0 1 4 8 7

t 0 . 0 0 8 2 4

I 0 . 0 0 4 7 7

i 0 . 0 0 2 4 5

i 0 . 0 0 5 4 2

1 0 . 0 0 3 4 6

; 0 . 0 1 5 0 1

i 0 . 0O6S2

S 0 . 0 0 8 4 0

i 0 . 0 0 1 1 0

0 . 0 0 6 7 8

r 0 . 0 0 5 4 5

} 0 . 0 0 5 4 6

> 0 . 0 0 7 3 6

I 0 . 0 0 2 8 8

! 0 . 0 0 1 7 2

I 0 . 0 0 2 7 1

i 0 . 0 0 2 1 7

) 0 . 0 0 0 8 2

» 0 . 0 0 1 5 7

1 0 . 0 0 1 6 1

0 . 0 0 7 0 0

) 0 . 0 0 8 6 6

> 0.000:15

i 0 . 0 0 8 6 4

I 0 . 0 0 4 1 6

i 0 . 0 0 1 5 1

I 0 . 0 0 1 6 4

I 0 . 0 0 9 6 8

} 0 . 0 0 5 3 2

D 0 . 0 0 7 9 9

9 0 . 0 0 1 5 9

i 0 . 0 0 0 7 2

109

110

The Table 3.50 confirms the above findings (Table

3.49) as none of the 't' values are significant, hence, the

rejection of all the null hypotheses (pp40-46 ) obliterated.

Table 3.51. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on SR - a facet of QWL

Source of pp 5 5 „ 5 F.value Variation



Total 89 995.55566

Table 3.51 shows that eighth facet of QWL, i.e., self

respect is not found to be influenced by independent

variables (personality attributes and organizational charac

teristics) as obtained statistical value (F = 0.98882) is

statistically rendered highly insignificant.

In continuation of the Table 3.51, Table 3.52

describes the fact that self respect is not the function of

either of the IV's. In view of the above finding, it is

confirmed that all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

influence of independent variables on dependent one i.e. self

respect stand accepted.

Table 3.52. Showi dimen

VARIABLC ntAN NO.

19

20

21 22 23 ^^ 2S

26

2 7

28

29

30

31

32

33

3 (

35

36

37

3S

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

45

46

47

46

4 9

SO

51

52

S3

54

55

S6

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

6S

69

0£ PENDENT

8

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

J . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 .6SSS6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 8 0 0 0

2 . 8 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

10 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 .8SSS6

2 . 7 8 0 0 0

2 . S 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 S 8 8 9

1 2 . 2 2 2 2 2

ng Multiple sion of QWL.

Regression Analyses - Self Respect

STANOAftO O L V I A T I O N

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 S

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9 '

1 . 1 4 9 S 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 S 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 S 9 S

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 S 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 S B 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

3 . 3 4 4 S S

CCRttrLAIIOfi A VS V

0 . 0 8 2 3 1

0 . 0 5 9 7 3

0 . 1 2 9 5 0

0 . 1 3 6 7 5

0 . 1 0 9 7 3

- 0 . 0 0 7 3 0

- 0 . 1 5 8 6 3

- 0 . 1 3 8 3 2

0 . 0 0 1 5 7

- 0 . 0 3 4 1 0

- 0 . 0 8 3 9 1

- 0 . 0 0 5 9 8

0 . 0 7 2 0 3

- 0 . 0 0 2 0 9

0 . 0 5 2 8 5

- 0 . 1 7 5 9 8

0 . 1 1 8 3 9

0 . 0 4 2 8 8

0 . 0 4 8 1 0

0 . 0 9 6 5 1

0 . 1 5 0 1 0

- 0 . 0 1 9 9 6

0 . 0 7 7 1 4

0 . 0 8 S V 4

0 . 1 5 3 1 5

0 . 0 3 1 2 7

0 . 0 5 1 2 2

- 0 . 0 0 7 2 1

0 . 0 5 2 0 0

0 . 1 2 8 3 9

0 . 3 2 6 S 7

- 0 . 0 0 3 8 2

0 . 0 0 8 1 4

0 . 1 8 9 6 4

0 . 1 7 7 4 3

- 0 . 0 7 5 7 3

- 0 . 1 6 9 9 9

- 0 . 1 1 0 0 3

- 0 . 1 7 8 8 9

, 1 2 0 0 7

. 0 6 4 7 0

. 1 1 3 1 8

. 0 5 4 6 6

. 0 1 0 S 8

. 0 3 8 6 3

. 1 2 3 6 5

, 0 0 3 2 6

. 0 2 9 5 7

. 0 1 0 0 4

. 0 7 8 3 0

, 13720

- 0 .

0 .

- 0 .

0 .

- 0 .

0 .

- 0 .

0 .

0 .

• 0 ,

• 0 .

• 0 .

REORCS&tCN C C l f F I C I I K T

- 0 . 0 7 8 0 2

0 . 2 3 3 7 1

1 . 1 2 4 4 3

- 0 . 6 5 2 1 8

- 0 . 1 7 9 0 4

- 0 . 3 4 4 2 9

- 0 . 8 4 7 5 1

- 0 . 3 4 3 7 7

- 0 . 0 0 3 4 3

0 . 7 9 8 4 3

- 0 . 9 1 8 0 9

1 . 1 7 3 8 1

- 0 . 3 8 8 0 6

0 . 0 7 8 9 8

- 0 . 1 0 8 7 7

- 0 . 3 8 6 5 5

0 . 8 1 1 4 2

- 0 . 3 1 8 0 6

0 . 3 1 8 0 4

0 . 2 4 9 9 9

0 . 4 6 1 2 1

- 0 . 9 4 1 3 3

- 0 . 2 7 1 6 5

0 . 4 1 0 4 4

- 0 . 3 1 0 6 8

- 0 . 6 8 5 0 6

0 . 2 1 2 3 0

- 0 . 6 1 5 0 0

0 . 1 5 2 3 J

0 . 3 5 8 8 6

0 . 5 9 7 5 4

- 0 . 8 5 3 5 9

0 . 3 3 1 7 6

1 . 2 5 1 6 1

0 . 0 2 6 1 3

0 . 4 3 6 1 2

- 0 . 6 4 1 9 5

- 0 . 1 0 1 6 1

C . 4 0 4 9 S

- 0 . 3 5 1 0 6

0 . 5 8 7 4 6

- 1 . 1 0 9 9 8

1 . 2 5 1 2 6

C . 3 6 0 7 2

- 0 . 0 9 9 4 5

- 1 . 0 1 4 3 1

0 . 7 0 7 6 1

- 0 . 4 1 0 0 3

0 . 5 4 2 3 0

- 0 . 0 1 9 7 2

- 0 . 1 4 S 6 0

STO. ERROR OF RlC.COEr ,

7 0 . 1 5 0 4 4 •

7 0 . 1 5 0 0 3

7 0 . 1 5 0 1 5

7 0 . 1 4 9 3 7

7 0 . 1 4 9 3 2

7 0 . 1 5 0 4 1

7 0 . 1 5 0 1 0

7 0 . 1 4 8 7 5

7 0 . 1 4 9 9 9

7 0 . 1 5 0 0 5

7 0 . 1 4 9 4 7

7 0 . 1 5 0 5 8

7 0 . 1 4 9 8 4

7 0 . 1 4 9 7 2

7 0 . 1 4 8 9 7

7 0 . 1 4 9 5 0

7 0 . 1 4 9 8 2

7 0 . 1 4 9 8 6

7 0 . 1 4 9 7 6

7 0 . 1 4 9 8 0

7 0 . 1 4 8 9 6

7 0 . 1 4 6 9 9

7 0 . 1 4 9 7 0

7 0 . 1 4 9 3 1

7 0 . 1 4 9 7 6

7 0 . 1 4 9 1 5

7 0 . 1 4 9 0 5

7 0 . 1 4 9 1 3

7 0 . 1 4 9 3 9

7 0 . 1 4 9 9 9

7 0 . 1 4 9 3 7

7 0 . 1 4 9 1 6

7 0 . 1 4 9 6 7

7 0 . 1 4 9 4 9

7 0 . 1 4 7 8 6

7 7 . 6 8 9 6 7

7 7 . 6 ^ 0 6 2

7 7 . 6 6 9 9 1

7 7 . 6 9 0 4 6

7 7 . 6 8 9 3 6

7 7 . 6 8 9 6 7

7 7 . 6 9 0 2 6

7 7 . 6 9 0 6 7

7 7 . 6 8 9 3 0

7 7 . 6 9 0 2 2

7 7 . 6 6 9 7 4

7 7 . 6 9 0 3 8

7 7 . 6 8 9 9 1

7 7 . 6 9 1 3 5

7 7 . 6 6 9 6 3

7 7 . 6 6 6 4 1

CO«PUTE0 t VALUE

0 . 8 0 1 1 1

0 . 8 0 3 3 3

0 . 0 1 6 0 3

0 . 1 8 9 3 0

0 . 8 8 2 5 5

0 . 8 8 4 9 1

0 . 0 1 2 0 8

0 .00490

0 . 8 0 0 0 5

0 . 0 1 1 3 8

0 . 0 1 3 0 9

0 . 0 1 6 7 3

0 . 8 0 5 5 3

0 .00113

0 .00155

0 .00551

0 .81157

0 . 0 8 4 5 3

0 . 0 0 4 S 3

0 . 8 0 3 5 6

0 . 0 0 6 8 6

0 . 0 1 3 4 2

0 . 8 0 3 8 7

0 . 8 8 5 8 5

0 . 8 8 4 4 3

0 . 8 8 9 7 7

8 . 8 8 3 8 3

0 . 8 8 8 7 7

0 . 8 8 2 1 7

0 .80512

S.S8SS2

0 .81217

0 . 8 8 4 7 3

. 0 . 8 1 7 8 4

0 . 8 8 0 3 7

8 . 8 8 5 6 4

0 . 8 8 8 2 8

0 .08131

8 .00521

0 . 0 0 4 5 2

0 . 8 6 7 5 6

0 . 0 1 4 2 9

0 . 0 1 6 1 1

0 . 0 0 4 9 0

0 . 0 0 1 2 8

0 . 0 1 3 0 6

0 . 0 0 9 1 1

0 .00526

0 . 0 0 6 9 8

0 .00025

0 . 0 0 1 8 8

INTERCEPT


STD. ERRCR CF ESI I t«ATE

1 3 . 5 6 6 9 7

0 . 7 5 5 1 7

3 . 3 5 5 3 1

112


the influence of IV's on SR - a facet of QWL

Source of DF S.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 21665.55469

The other determinant of QWL i.e., "Supervisory

relationship" is again found to be insignificantly influenced

by both the independent variables viz., personality

attributes and organizational characteristics as evident from

Table 3.5 3 that obtained statistical value F = 1.6914 is low

and highly insignificant even at .05 level of confidence.

The comprehensive picture of the findings as shown

in Table 3.54 show the influence of all independent variables

on the dependent variable i.e. "supervisory relationship".

The Table 3.54 shows that all the statistical t values

ranging from lowest t = .00020 to highest t = .01855 are

found to be highly insignificant, hence, all the null

hypotheses pertaining to the influence of independent

variable on dependent one i.e. supervisory relationship stand

accepted.

Table 3 1

VARIA0LE

19

20

21

22

23

24

2S

2 6

27

2a 29

SO

3 1

32

33

34

3S

36

37

3S

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

48

4 9

SO

S I

S2

. 5 4 . Showi R e l a t

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

S . S 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2.92222

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

S3 1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

54

SS

S6

57

50

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

DEPENDENT

9

INTERCEPT

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2.6222Z

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 S 9

5 3 . 2 2 2 2 2


&T0. ERROR OF ESTIMATE

ng Mu,ltip! ionship o i

STANDARD DEVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 S 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 S 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 B

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 B 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

1 5 . 6 0 2 3 5

1 3 9 . 3 4 3 0 3

0 . 7 8 1 5 1

1 4 . 8 9 7 1 1

Le RegressioTi Analyses - Supe mension of

CORRELATION X VS ¥

- 0 . 1 4 0 3 4

0 . 0 4 5 0 4

- 0 . 1 2 3 8 6

- 0 . 1 0 1 6 9

0 . 0 2 7 0 1

- 0 . 0 4 0 7 4

- 0 . 0 0 3 1 5

- 0 . 0 2 9 1 1

0 . 0 0 9 4 0

- 0 . 0 2 3 6 0

- 0 . 0 8 9 9 3

- 0 . 0 9 7 4 0

- 0 . 1 0 0 5 6

0 . 0 1 3 3 7

0 . 1 0 3 9 7

- 0 . 0 S 8 5 9

0 . 0 0 7 0 8

- 0 . 0 3 6 7 0

0 . 1 1 6 3 6

- 0 . 1 2 8 8 6

- 0 . 1 7 0 0 6

0 . 0 6 6 6 9

0 . 1 7 1 4 2

0 . 0 4 6 2 5

• 0 . 0 7 0 4 3

- 0 . 0 0 7 8 0

- 0 . 1 6 8 4 6

0 . 0 9 3 6 3

0 . 1 5 4 3 0

- 0 . 0 7 1 1 0

0 . 0 3 7 3 5

- 0 . 1 4 1 8 1

- 0 . 0 0 7 2 3

0 . 1 8 7 8 3

- 0 . 0 5 3 0 9

- 0 . 4 1 8 9 4

- 0 . 1 4 5 7 5

0 . 0 4 1 3 9

- 0 . 0 1 0 3 0

- 0 . 0 2 9 72

- 0 . 1 8 1 6 0

- 0 . 0 4 3 3 5

- 0 . 0 6 1 2 4

- 0 . 0 1 1 5 9

0 . 1 1 0 6 6

- e . 0 5 1 3 5

0 . 1 1 3 3 1

- 0 . 0 0 2 2 7

- 0 . 0 4 9 2 1

- 0 . 2 2 4 9 0

- 0 . 1 6 6 9 4

QWL.

RECRESSION

cctrnciENT - 5 . 7 7 6 2 9

2 . 8 6 4 4 6

- 1 . 8 5 0 7 7

- 1 . 1 7 6 3 7

- 0 . 7 9 0 6 1 '

0 . 3 1 0 8 6

1 . 3 5 2 3 0

- 1 . 4 4 0 1 8

0 . 3 7 7 0 8

- 0 . 3 6 4 5 1

- 3 . 0 5 0 8 3

- 2 . 6 2 0 1 2

- 0 . 6 7 7 4 7

- 2 . 1 9 8 3 9

0 . 5 1 3 2 2

1 . 5 5 4 1 6

- 1 . 4 8 6 0 2

- 3 . 6 6 4 8 6

0 . 9 9 1 2 3

- 1 . 3 8 5 0 9

- 2 . 6 0 1 4 3

1 . 7 2 5 6 8

2 . 2 2 4 0 9

- 0 . 8 1 9 9 4

- 3 . 3 1 9 8 3

0 . 1 1 3 5 3

0 . 2 9 1 6 2

- 1 . 1 3 3 4 7

- 0 . 9 0 6 1 4

- 2 . 7 0 5 2 4

2 . 0 2 8 1 1

- 3 . 1 5 3 8 4

- 1 . 2 1 6 7 7

3 . 7 3 0 0 7

0 . 2 1 5 4 7

- 5 . 9 2 7 1 8

- 0 . 2 6 7 3 8

0 . 1 8 9 6 1

1 . 5 5 0 0 3

- 0 . 8 6 7 0 2

0 . 0 9 9 6 5

- 1 . 5 2 0 1 7

- 0 . 2 8 9 4 5

0 . 6 9 0 7 0

C . 2 0 6 2 0

- 1 . 1 5 6 6 5

- 1 . 2 2 4 5 7

- 1 . 0 0 1 9 3

2 . 9 9 8 3 4

- 5 . 4 2 6 4 6

0 . 0 6 8 0 1

-

STD. ERROR OF REC.COEF.

3 1 1 . 4 5 8 1 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 3 0

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 7 9

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 3 4

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 1 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 7 9 5 •

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 5 7

3 1 1 . 4 5 0 5 9

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 1 2

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 3 6

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 7 7

3 1 1 . 4 5 8 7 4

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 4 4

3 1 1 . 4 5 4 9 0

3 1 1 . 4 5 1 6 0

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 8 9

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 3 2

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 5 1

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 0 8

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 2 6

3 1 1 . 4 5 1 5 7

3 1 1 . 4 5 1 6 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 4 8 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 0 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 5 0 8

3 1 1 . 4 5 2 3 9

3 1 1 . 4 5 1 9 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 2 2 7

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 4 3

3 1 1 . 4 5 6 0 9

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 3 4

3 1 1 . 4 5 2 4 2

3 1 1 . 4 5 4 6 5

3 1 1 . 4 5 3 8 9

3 1 1 . 4 4 6 6 2

3 4 4 . 9 3 2 0 7

3 4 4 . 9 3 5 4 2

3 4 4 . 9 3 2 2 8 ' '

3 4 4 . 9 3 4 7 2

3 4 4 . 9 2 9 8 7

3 4 4 . 9 3 1 1 8

3 4 4 . 9 3 3 9 6

3 4 4 . 9 3 5 6 7

3 4 4 . 9 2 9 6 0

3 4 4 . 9 3 3 6 5

3 4 4 . 9 3 1 5 2

3 4 4 . 9 3 4 4 2

3 4 4 . 9 3 2 2 8

3 4 4 . 9 3 8 6 6

3 4 4 . 9 3 1 0 3

3 4 4 . 9 2 5 6 0

srvisory

COMPUTED t VALUE

O . O I I S S

• . 0 0 9 2 0

0 . 0 0 5 9 4

0 . 0 0 3 7 8

0 . 0 0 2 5 4

0 . 0 0 1 0 0

0 . 0 0 4 3 4

0 . 0 0 4 * 2

0 . 8 0 1 2 1

0 . 0 0 1 1 7

0 . 0 0 9 8 0

O . « 0 S 4 t

0 . 0 0 2 1 8

0 . 0 0 7 8 6

e.oous 0 . 0 0 4 9 9

0 . 0 0 4 7 7

0 . 0 1 1 7 7

0 . 0 0 3 1 8

0 . 0 0 4 4 5

0 . 0 0 8 3 5

0 . 0 0 5 5 4

0 . 0 0 7 1 4

0 . 0 0 2 * 3

O . O I O * *

0 . 0 0 0 3 6

0 . 0 0 0 9 4

0 . 0 0 3 6 4

0 . 0 0 2 9 1

0 . 0 0 8 6 9

0 . 0 0 6 5 1

0 . 0 1 0 1 3

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 0 1 1 9 8

0 . 0 0 0 6 9

0 . 0 1 7 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 7 8

0 . 0 0 0 5 5

0 . 0 0 4 4 9

0 . 0 0 2 5 1

0 . 0 0 0 2 9

0 . 0 0 4 4 1

0 . 0 0 0 8 4

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 3 3 5

0 . 0 0 3 5 5

0 . 0 0 2 9 0

0 . 0 0 8 6 9

0 . 0 1 5 7 3

0 . 0 0 0 2 0

114


the influence of IV's on IGR - a facet of QWL




Total 89 13183.78711

It is evident from Table 3.5 5 that the tenth aspect

of QWL i.e. Intra group relation is also found to have been

insignificantly influenced by both independent variable



insignificant even at .05 level of confidence.

The findings were further confirmed from the Table

3.56 which shows the influence of each independent variable

on dependent variable i.e., "Intra group relation" and all

the given statistical t values there are found to be very low

and insignificant.

Therefore, consequently all the null hypotheses

pertaining to the influence of IV's on DV (Intra group

relation) are rendered accepted.

Table 3 .56 . Showing Mult iple Regression Analyses - Int Relation dimension of QWL.

ra -Gronp

VARIABLE NO.

19

10

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2e 29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

36

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

45

46

47

46

49

SO

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

56

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

66

69

DEPENDENT

10

INTERCEPT

MULTIPLE

HEAN

4 . 0 * 6 6 7

5 . 7 6 * 6 7

3 . 4 S B 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 6

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

z.seooo 2 . 6 3 3 3 3

S . S 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2.seooo 2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . * S 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 6 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 !

3 . 1 7 7 7 6

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 6 6 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . C 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 J 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 J 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 6 6 6 9

3 9 . 4 1 1 1 1

CORRELATION

STD. ERRCR OF ESTlnATE

STANDARD DEVIXTle^ 0.»«iS2 1 . 6 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 * 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 * 2 3

1 . 1 7 * 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 * 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 J

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 * 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 * 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 * 3 1

1 . 2 2 * 5 1

1 . 3 0 * 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 * * 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 * 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 * 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 * 0

1 . 2 * 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 * 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 *

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 * 3 7 1

1 . 2 3 * 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 * 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 * 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 * 7 5

1 2 . 1 7 0 9 . 7

1 0 3 . 2 7 3 4 8

0 . 6 8 7 7 6

1 3 . S 2 1 6 C

CORRELATION K VS Y

- 0 . 1 4 9 7 7

• 0 . 0 6 9 7 9

- 0 . 0 * 8 9 9

0 . 0 0 9 5 7

- 0 . 1 1 6 0 7

• 0 . 0 3 2 6 3

- 0 . 0 4 2 4 6

• 0 . 0 8 5 1 3

• 0 . 1 0 0 9 3

- 0 . 1 5 1 4 1

- 0 . 1 3 1 7 4

0 . 0 1 7 5 8

0 . 0 4 6 3 7

- 0 . 0 0 7 0 0

0 . 2 6 6 7 1

0 . 0 2 7 0 8

0 . 1 2 7 4 9

- 0 . 2 0 9 3 7

- 0 . 0 6 5 1 5

- 0 . 0 5 1 7 5

0 . 1 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 7 2 1 6

- 0 . 2 6 7 7 6

- 0 . 1 4 5 2 7

0 . 0 1 6 1 6

0 . 0 4 9 6 1

- 0 . 0 5 0 5 7

- 0 . 0 7 4 6 3

- 0 . 1 1 5 2 9

- 0 . 0 6 4 3 9

- 0 . 0 9 7 1 0

- 0 . 2 1 8 9 4

- 0 . 0 5 9 0 1

0 . 0 9 2 5 7

• 0 . 1 7 0 0 3

- 0 . 1 6 0 3 7

- 0 . 0 5 0 6 5

- 0 . 0 8 4 4 8

- 0 . 1 5 9 6 6

- 0 . 0 4 6 6 2

- 0 . 1 0 2 6 6

- 0 . 0 9 4 4 9

- 0 . 1 5 7 6 3

- 0 . 0 5 9 9 7

0 . 1 1 4 7 3

0 . 0 0 0 6 9

0 . 0 7 5 9 5

- 0 . 0 8 9 4 1

- 0 . 0 6 6 5 9

- 0 . 1 2 1 3 1

- 0 . 1 6 6 4 7

CCEFMCIENT

- 4 . 1 3 4 6 4

8 . 2 * * 6 1

1 . 3 * 6 96

• 8 . 2 3 1 4 1

- 2 . 0 1 5 7 *

2 . 1 3 9 5 2

* . 2 4 6 * 4

• 1 . 4 2 1 0 9

• . 4 4 6 2 2

1 . 2 1 4 9 4

- l . * * 2 6 2

• . 7 9 3 2 3

- • . 4 6 3 6 6

- 1 . 1 8 9 9 *

3 . 3 7 6 9 5

- 1 . 1 S 4 1 8

6 . 9 7 6 5 5

- 2 . 3 3 3 5 1

- g . 8 7 6 2 0

- • . 2 3 6 5 6

- 0 . 7 0 6 2 7

1 . 6 5 2 6 2

- 1 . 4 9 7 8 0

- • . 1 9 6 6 0

- 1 . 9 7 6 6 6

0 . 4 7 3 9 3

1 . 8 0 4 8 4

- 0 . 5 1 2 1 4

- 0 . 8 8 3 5 7

- 1 . 3 4 6 1 4

0 . 2 2 0 7 0

- 1 . 2 4 7 6 3

- 0 . 9 0 0 5 5

2 . 3 1 3 4 7

- 0 . 1 9 0 2 0

- 2 . 7 . 1 0 4 0

- 6 . 3 3 3 7 3

6 . 0 0 0 0 0

- 0 . 1 5 1 1 4

- 0 . 4 5 0 6 9

0 . 6 2 1 9 0

- 1 . 2 5 9 9 6

- 0 . 2 2 5 7 9

- 6 . 0 7 6 9 7

0 . 5 6 2 9 9

. 1 . 3 1 2 3 9

- 0 . 5 8 1 4 6

- 2 . 2 0 2 6 4

1 . 0 9 6 3 7

- 2 . 7 9 8 1 1

0 . 1 0 6 1 1

S T D . ERROR, Ot R E C . C O i r .

2 * 2 . 7 0 1 1 1

2 * 2 . 6 9 9 4 6

2 * 2 . 6 9 9 * 9

2 * 2 . 6 9 6 7 8

2 * 2 . 6 9 6 5 9

2 * 2 . 7 0 0 9 6

2 * 2 . 6 9 9 7 1

2 * 2 . 6 9 4 2 7

2 * 2 . 6 9 9 3 1

2 * 2 . 6 9 9 5 2

2 * 2 . 6 9 7 1 7

2 * 2 . 7 0 1 6 9

2 * 2 . 6 9 * 7 0

2 8 2 . 6 9 8 1 8

2 8 2 . 6 9 5 1 9

2 * 2 . 6 9 7 2 7

2 * 2 . 6 9 8 5 8

2 8 2 . 6 9 * 7 3

2 * 2 . 6 9 8 3 6

2 6 2 . 6 9 6 5 2

2 8 2 . 6 9 5 1 6

2 6 2 . 6 9 5 2 5

2 8 2 . 6 9 8 1 2

2 * 2 . 6 9 6 5 0

2 8 2 . 6 9 * 3 6

2 * 2 . 6 9 5 9 2

2 * 2 . 6 9 5 5 0

2 8 2 . 6 9 5 6 3

2 8 2 . 6 9 6 8 7

2 6 2 . 6 9 9 2 6

2 6 2 . 6 9 6 6 1

2 8 2 . 6 9 5 9 5

2 8 2 . 6 9 7 9 7

2 8 2 . 6 9 7 2 7

2 8 2 . 6 9 0 6 7

3 1 3 . 0 8 4 4 1

3 1 3 . 0 8 7 4 3

3 1 3 . 0 8 4 5 9

3 1 3 . 0 8 6 6 2

3 1 3 . 0 6 2 4 0

1 1 3 . 0 6 3 6 2

3 1 3 . 0 8 6 1 2

3 1 3 . 0 6 7 6 5

3 1 3 . 0 8 2 1 5

3 1 3 . 0 6 5 6 8

3 1 3 . 0 8 3 6 9

3 1 3 . 0 6 6 5 2

3 1 3 . 0 6 4 5 9

3 1 3 . 0 9 0 3 9

3 1 3 . 0 6 3 4 7

3 1 3 . 0 7 6 5 5

COMPUTED T VALUE

Q . * 1 4 * 3

• . • • • 7 3

0 . * 0 4 * 2

e.*o**9 0 . * 0 7 1 3

O . * 0 7 S 7

• . • • • * 7

o.*es*3 O . * 0 1 S *

• . » 0 4 3 ^

• 0 . * « 6 6 6

• . • • t * l • . • • 1 * 4

* . 0 * 4 2 1

0 . 0 1 1 9 S

0 . 0 0 4 * *

• • • 0 3 4 $

0 . 0 0 * 2 5

0 . 0 0 3 0 *

0 . 0 0 0 * 4

0 . 0 0 2 5 0

0 . 0 0 5 * 5

0 . 0 0 3 3 0

0 . 0 0 0 7 0

0 . 0 0 7 0 0

0 . 0 0 1 6 *

0 . 0 0 6 3 *

. 0 . 0 0 1 * 1

0 . 0 0 3 1 3

0 . 0 0 4 7 6

0 . 0 0 0 7 8

. 0 . 0 0 4 4 1

0 . 0 0 3 1 9

0 . 0 0 8 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 6 7

" 0 . 0 0 8 6 6

0 . 0 0 1 0 7

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 4 8

0 . 0 0 1 4 4

0 . 0 0 1 9 9

0 . 0 0 4 0 2

0 . 0 0 0 7 2

0 . 0 0 0 2 5

0 . 0 0 1 6 0

0 . 0 0 4 1 9

0 . 0 0 1 6 6

0 . 0 0 7 0 4

0 . 0 0 3 5 0

0 . 0 0 6 9 4

0 . 0 0 0 3 4

116

Table 3.57. Analysis of variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on A - a facet of QWL




Total 89 902.9a027

Apathy - a QWL determinant is also found to be

insignificantly influenced by both IV's (personality

attributes and organizational characteristics) as obtained

statistical value F = 3.57 is found low and insignificant at

.05 level of confidence (Table 3.57).

It has been proved from Table 3.58 as all the

statistical t-values ranging from as low as t = .00003 to as

high as t = .01736 are very low and subsequently there is no

influence of IV's on dependent variable viz.. Apathy.

In the light of the above findings, it is advocated

that all proposed null hypotheses advocating no influence of

independent variables on dependent one stand accepted.

Table 3

VARJAatE

19

20

21

22

25

2 (

2S

26

27

2a 29

30

3 1

32

33

3«

3S

36

3 7

3B

39

«0

4 1

42

« 3

44

4S

46

47

46

49

SO

S I

S2

S3

S4

ss S6

S7

SB

S9

60

6 1

62

6 3

64

6S

66

67

68

6 9

DEPENDENT

11

INTERCEPT

HULTIPLE

. 5 8 . Showing M u l t i p l e Regress ion Analyses dimension of QWL.

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 0 8 0 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2.aoooo 2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 a 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3.S0OO0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 S S S 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 5 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

5 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 5 2 . 8 S S S 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . S 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 5 5 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . S 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 6 8 8 9

6 . 5 0 0 0 0

CORRELATION


STANDARD DEVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 5 1 $

1 . 1 6 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 5 2 7 7 $

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 S 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 5 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 5 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 S

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 S 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 S 1

1 . 3 0 6 9 S

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 S 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 5 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 5 6 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 S 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 5 S 3

1 . 5 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 6

1 . 1 5 9 6 8 1 . 2 8 S 7 1

1 . 2 S 8 2 5

1 . 2 6 S 5 1

1 . 2 2 5 1 6

1 . 2 6 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 5 5 8

1 . 2 5 S 5 S

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 5

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 5 5 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 5 2 S 5 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 J

5 . 1 8 S 1 1

1 1 . 7 9 5 5 5

0 . 7 9 0 9 1

2 . 9 8 2 8 7

CCRRELAl K V l 1

- O . e S S K

0 . 0 6 6 2 1

- 0 . 0 8 1 7 ^

- 0 . 1 7 6 9 <

0 . 0 6 0 0 <

0 . 0 5 9 S I

- 0 . 0 2 5 4 1

0 . 1 5 S 2 :

• 0 . 0 8 0 2 (

- 0 . 0 2 8 2 .

0 . 0 1 5 5 1

0 . 0 9 6 S 1

0 . 0 9 2 0 <

0 . 1 0 5 4 (

0 . 2 2 0 7

- 0 . 0 2 2 3 1

0 . 0 6 7 9 <

0 . 0 1 3 5 (

- 0 . 1 5 6 1 '

- 0 . 1 S 4 5

0 .03B11

0 . 1 1 9 1 ,

- 0 . 2 0 6 S (

- 0 . 1 6 0 7 -

- 0 . 1 1 7 6 !

0 . 0 5 4 6 '

- 0 . 0 1 6 5

0 . 0 3 0 8

• 0 . 0 6 9 8

0 . 1 2 7 5 1

- 0 . 0 7 2 2 (

• O . O S I O '

- 0 . 0 6 2 1

0 . 0 0 5 6

- 0 . 0 2 0 5

- 0 . 1 5 5 5 (

- 0 . 0 0 6 8 - 0 . 0 5 7 6 ^

0 . 0 5 5 9 ,

0 . 0 2 0 0 '

- 0 . 2 7 0 5

- 0 . 2 6 1 7 '

- 0 . 1 7 1 7 2

- 0 . 0 8 2 2 4

0 . 1 0 9 2 ]

- 0 . 2 1 8 4 ^

- 0 . 0 8 7 S J

- 0 . 0 5 0 5 1

0 . 1 2 6 3 (

O . l S J i e

- 0 . 1 5 0 6 3

riOK RECRESSICN r C C l F f l C l l N T

) - 0 . S O 0 7 8

0 . 1 7 6 1 5

) 0 . 2 0 8 4 6

) - 1 . 0 8 2 6 4

i 0 .162 .12

1 0 . 5 8 6 5 5

- 0 . 1 6 0 8 1

1 - 0 . 1 4 0 5 6

1 0 . 5 0 7 2 6

t 0 . 6 7 3 7 8

0 . 0 4 1 4 5

0 . 2 6 5 5 5

0 . 5 4 0 5 5

i 0 . 0 0 1 8 6

) 0 . 2 9 1 6 2

» - 0 . 8 7 3 8 7

I 0 . 0 0 1 9 1

) O . S 3 0 0 6

i - 0 . 3 3 4 1 1

} - 0 . 4 2 6 3 7

) - 0 . 0 6 4 5 6

; 0 . 0 9 0 8 9

i - 1 . 0 2 5 3 5

r 0 . 1 0 0 5 5

* - 0 . 4 8 0 2 5

r - 0 . 4 7 1 6 8

I 0 . 2 2 2 4 0

I - 0 . 0 5 5 4 9

S - 0 . 1 1 1 5 0

I 0 . 7 9 8 6 7

:> - 0 . 5 2 4 0 5

- 0 . 5 0 7 5 5

L 0 . 4 5 5 0 0

i 0 . 1 8 6 6 8

S 0 . 0 5 5 3 1

i - 0 . 5 6 4 1 5

1 0 . 0 7 6 4 2 > - 0 . 7 9 5 5 1

I 0 . 5 8 S 6 S

f 0 . 1 5 7 6 6

? - e . 7 s ^ 7 ^

r - 1 . 0 2 7 9 8

- 0 . 4 9 2 4 0

- 0 . 3 5 2 5 0

I 0 . 2 5 1 5 2

» - 0 . 6 9 7 6 3

0 . 2 1 7 3 8

- 0 . 0 5 7 1 9

r O . 6 8 6 6 0

0. Tint

0 . 1 1 1 0 8

STD. ERROR OF REC.COEF.

6 2 . 3 6 3 7 2

6 2 . 5 6 5 3 6

C 2 . 3 6 3 4 6

6 2 . 3 6 2 7 7

6 2 . 3 6 2 7 2

6 2 . 3 6 5 6 9

6 2 . 5 6 5 4 1

6 2 . 3 6 2 2 2

6 2 . 3 6 3 3 2

6 2 . 3 6 5 3 7

6 2 . 3 6 2 8 5

6 2 . 3 6 3 8 5

6 2 . 5 6 5 1 9

6 2 . 3 6 3 0 8

6 2 . 3 6 2 4 2

6 2 . 3 6 2 8 8

6 2 . 3 6 3 1 6

6 2 . 3 6 3 2 0

6 2 . 3 6 5 1 1

6 2 . 3 6 3 1 5

6 2 . 5 6 2 4 1

6 2 . 5 6 2 4 2

6 2 . 5 6 5 0 6

6 2 . 5 6 2 7 1

6 2 . 5 6 5 1 1

6 2 . 5 6 2 5 8

6 2 . 5 6 2 4 8

6 2 . 5 6 2 5 5

6 2 . 5 6 2 7 9

6 2 . 5 6 5 5 2

6 2 . 5 6 2 7 7

6 2 . 5 6 2 5 6

6 2 . 5 6 5 0 5

6 2 . 5 6 2 8 7

6 2 . 5 6 1 4 2

6 9 . 0 6 6 2 6

6 9 . 0 6 6 9 3 6 9 . 0 6 6 3 1

6 9 . 0 6 6 7 9

6 9 . 0 6 5 6 2

6 9 . 0 6 6 0 9

6 9 . 0 6 6 6 4

6 9 . 0 6 6 9 8

6 9 . 0 6 5 7 7

6 9 . 0 6 6 5 6

6 9 . 0 6 6 1 5

6 9 . 0 6 6 7 3

6 9 . 0 6 6 5 1

6 9 . 0 6 7 S e

6 9 . 0 6 6 0 6

6 9 . 0 6 4 9 6

117

Apathy

COMPUTED T VALUE

o.eaB03 • . 0 0 2 B 6

0 . 0 0 3 3 4

0 . 0 1 7 3 6

0 . 0 0 2 9 2

0 . 0 0 9 4 0

D . 0 0 2 5 8

9 . 0 0 2 2 5

0 . 0 0 4 9 3

0 . 0 1 0 8 0

0 . 0 0 0 6 6

0 . 0 0 4 S 4

0 . 0 0 5 4 6

0 . 0 0 0 0 3

0 . 0 0 4 6 B

0 . 0 1 4 0 1

0 . 0 0 0 0 3

O.OOBSO

0 . 0 0 S 3 6

0 . 0 0 6 8 4

0 . 0 0 1 0 4

0 . 0 0 1 4 6

0 . 0 1 6 4 4

0 . 0 0 1 6 1

0 . 0 0 7 7 0

0 . 0 0 7 5 6

0 . 0 0 3 5 7

0 . 0 0 0 8 6

0 . 0 0 1 7 9

0 . 0 1 2 8 1

0 . 0 0 S 2 0

0 . 0 0 4 9 3

0 . 0 0 6 9 6

0 . 0 0 2 9 9

0 . 0 0 0 5 7

0 . 0 0 6 4 6

0 . 0 0 1 1 1 0 . 0 1 1 4 9

0 . 0 0 S S 8

0 . 0 0 1 9 9

0 . 0 1 0 9 0

0 . 0 1 4 8 8

0 . 0 0 7 1 5

0 . 0 0 5 1 0

0 . 0 0 5 5 5

0 . 0 1 0 1 0

0 . 0 0 3 1 5

0 . 0 0 0 5 4

0 . 0 0 9 9 7

0 . 0 1 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 6 1

118

Table 3.59. Analysis of variance for the Regression Showing

the influence of IV's on CM - a facet of QWL

Source of pp Q^^ M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 2026.45520

Highlights of the Table 3.59 shows that one another

QWL facet i.e.. Confidence in Management is also found to

have no relationship with both IV's namely, personality

attributes and organizational characteristics as obtained

statistical value F = 1.05787 is highly insignificant even at

.05 level of confidence.

Table 3.60 confirms the findings predicted in Table

3.59 as all statistical t-values found to be very low and

failed to come up to the level of even .05 level of

confidence.

In view of the above findings, it is recommended

that all the null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of

independent variables on dependent one i.e. "Confidence in

Management" found accepted.

Table 3.60. Showing Multiple Management dimens

119 Regress ion Analyses - Confidence in ion of QWL.

VARIA NO.

19

20

2 1

22

2 3

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

3«

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

S3

54

55 56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

BLC H£AN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 S S 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

DEPENDENT

12 li.i2222

INTERCEPT



STANDARD DEVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 S 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

4 . 7 7 1 7 0

18.37309

0.76599

4.69451

CCRRELATIOK X VS »

REGRESSION C C E F H C I E N T

0 . 0 1 2 9 6

0 . 0 0 4 4 1

0 . 0 3 2 1 6

0 . 0 6 9 3 5

0 . 0 9 0 4 1

- 0 . 1 5 2 8 4

- 0 . 0 2 3 8 8

0 . 0 4 2 9 8

0 . 1 7 0 7 9

0 . 1 1 9 0 8

- 0 . 0 7 3 3 2

0 . 0 1 9 7 0

0 . 0 9 8 0 9

0 . 0 6 8 9 3

0 . 1 7 7 2 1

0 . 0 4 6 1 2

0 . 1 4 3 7 7

0 . 0 1 1 4 6

- 0 . 0 5 4 7 5

- 0 . 0 8 7 5 5

- 0 . 0 2 6 4 7

0 . 0 9 7 9 0

0 . 0 6 4 5 6

- 0 . 1 0 4 6 3

- 0 . 0 9 3 2 0

- 0 . 0 4 2 1 9

- 0 . 1 2 9 7 4

- 0 . 1 2 2 8 0

0 . 0 3 3 9 S

0 . 0 6 S 2 4

0 . 0 5 9 1 6

0 . 0 5 7 6 8

0 . 0 0 6 4 4

- 0 . 0 2 9 8 2

0 . 0 6 2 1 4

- 0 . 2 7 5 3 7

- 0 . 0 9 6 8 )

0 . 1 4 0 6 3

0 . 0 5 0 7 2

- 0 . 0 1 1 2 1

- 0 . 2 9 3 0 8

- 0 . 1 3 6 5 9

- 0 . 0 9 6 8 1

0 . 0 6 3 4 9

0 . 1 4 3 9 3

- 0 . 0 1 1 1 0

- 0 . 0 3 1 4 5

- 0 . 1 5 7 8 7

• 0 . 1 5 0 7 6

- 0 . 1 3 9 6 3

• 0 . 1 7 5 3 6

II''t,t'"'CR OF REC.COEF.

CONPOTEO T VALUE

- 0 . 3 9 7 1 8

- 0 . 2 9 7 3 8

0 . 8 9 8 6 9

0 . 5 5 2 9 6

0 . 7 4 8 9 0

- 1 . 4 4 6 8 8

0 . 1 8 8 4 5

0 . 2 1 2 3 3

0 . 7 7 5 0 2

0 . 7 7 1 2 4

- 1 . 2 7 8 3 3

0 . 7 6 1 9 3

0 . 4 9 6 4 8

- 0 . 5 1 6 8 2

0 . 8 0 2 5 3

0 . 1 7 5 1 6

0 . 9 9 7 7 4

0 . 4 2 7 6 3

- 0 . 4 0 7 4 5

0 . 7 1 2 3 8

- 1 . 1 0 7 5 9

0 . 1 0 2 3 5

- 0 . 0 3 6 2 1

- 0 . 1 9 7 4 9

- 1 . 5 2 0 4 5

- 0 . 4 3 0 7 4

- 0 . 0 6 8 9 9

- 0 . 5 3 1 2 3

- 0 . 0 9 6 8 0

0 . 4 4 3 3 6

- 0 . 7 7 6 0 1

0 . 6 0 3 6 4

0 . 1 1 2 5 5

0 . 7 0 1 3 0

- 0 . 0 0 5 2 0

- 1 . 3 1 2 6 6

- 0 . 1 3 0 8 4

0 . 3 4 7 9 4

0 . 2 0 7 4 0

- 0 . 0 8 8 3 9

- 0 . 7 0 0 9 8

- 1 . 1 0 4 1 8

0 . 1 4 7 5 4

0 . 5 1 3 0 1

- 0 . 1 2 6 1 3

- 0 . 4 5 0 2 2

0 . 6 1 8 7 6

- 1 . 0 0 2 8 4

- 1 . 2 8 9 5 2

0 . 0 8 4 3 9

0 . 0 8 J 2 0

9 8 . 1 4 9 3 8

9 8 . 1 4 8 8 0

9 8 . 1 4 8 9 6

9 8 . 1 4 7 8 7

9 8 . 1 4 7 8 0

9 8 . 1 4 * 3 2

9 8 . 1 4 8 8 9

9 8 . 1 4 7 8 0

9 8 . 1 4 8 7 5

9 8 . 1 4 8 8 2

9 8 . 1 4 8 0 0

9 8 . 1 4 9 S 7

9 8 . 1 4 8 5 4

9 8 . 1 4 8 3 5

9 8 . 1 4 7 3 2

9 8 . 1 4 8 0 4

9 8 . 1 4 8 4 9

« 8 . 1 4 8 S 5

9 8 . 1 4 8 4 2

9 8 . 1 4 8 4 8

9 8 . 1 4 7 3 1

9 8 . 1 4 7 3 4

9 8 . 1 4 8 3 4

9 8 . 1 4 7 7 8

9 8 . 1 4 8 4 2

9 8 . 1 4 7 5 7

9 8 . 1 4 7 4 2

9 8 . 1 4 7 5 4

9 5 . 1 4 7 9 0

9 S . 1 4 8 7 4

9 8 . 1 4 7 8 7

9 8 . 1 4 7 5 8

9 8 . 1 4 8 2 8

9 8 . 1 4 8 0 3

9 8 . 1 4 5 7 5

1 0 8 . 6 9 7 9 8

1 0 8 . 6 9 9 0 3

1 0 8 . 6 9 8 0 4

1 0 8 . 6 9 8 8 1

1 0 8 . 6 9 7 2 8

1 0 8 . 6 9 7 7 0

1 0 8 . 6 9 8 5 7

1 0 8 . 6 9 9 1 0

1 0 8 . 6 9 7 2 0

1 0 8 . 6 9 8 4 8

1 0 8 . 6 9 7 8 0

1 C 8 . 6 9 3 7 1

1 0 8 . 6 9 8 0 4

1 0 8 . 7 0 0 0 5

1 0 8 . 6 9 T 6 5

1 0 8 . 6 9 5 9 4

VALU

0 . 0 0 4 0 5

0 . 0 0 3 0 3

0 . 0 0 9 1 6

0 . 0 0 5 6 3

0 . 0 0 7 6 3

0 . 0 1 4 7 4

0 . 0 0 1 9 2

0 . 0 0 2 1 6

0 . 0 0 7 9 0

0 . 0 0 7 8 6

' 0 . 0 1 3 0 2

0 . 0 0 7 7 6

0 . 0 0 5 0 6

0 . 0 0 5 2 7

. 0 . 0 0 8 1 8

0 . 0 0 1 7 8

0 . 0 1 0 1 7

0 . 0 0 4 3 6

0 . 0 0 4 1 5

0 . 0 0 7 2 6

0 . 0 1 1 2 8

0 . 0 0 1 0 4

0 . 0 0 0 3 7

0 . 0 0 2 0 1

0 . 0 1 5 4 9

0 . 0 0 4 3 9

0 . 0 0 0 7 0

0 . 0 O S 4 1

0 . 0 0 0 9 9

0 . 0 0 4 S 2

0 . 0 0791

0 . 0 0 6 1 5

0 . 0 0 1 1 5

0 . 0 0 7 1 5

0 . 0 0 0 0 5

0 . 0 1 2 0 8

0 . 0 0 1 2 0

0 . 0 0 3 2 0

0 . 0 0 1 9 1

0 . 0 0 0 8 1

0 . 0 0 6 4 5

0 . 0 1 0 1 6

0 . 0 0 1 3 6

0 . 0 0 4 7 2

0 . 0 0 1 1 6

0 . 0 0 4 1 4

0 . 0 0 5 6 9

0 . 0 0 9 2 3

0 . 0 1 1 8 6

0 . 0 0 0 7 8

0 . 0 0 0 7 7

120

Table 3.61. Analysis of variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on MD - a facet of QWL

Source of DF S.S. M.S. F.value Variation



Total 89 2019.65613

The thirteenth dimension of QWL i.e.. Meaningful

Development is also found to be insignificantly influenced by


characteristics) as obtained statistical value F = 0.85813

which is highlighted in Table 3.61. The finding is further

witnessed from Table 3.62 which shows that all the

statistical t values are very low to get its significance

even at 0.05. The findings given in the Table also advocate

that there is no influence of independent variables on

dependent variable i.e. "meaningful development" - a QWL

facet. As a consequence of insignificant findings it is found

that all the null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of

independent variable on dependent one viz. meaningful

development rendered to be accepted.

Table 3 .62 . Showing Mul t i p l e Regres Development dimension of

sion Analyses - Mean QWL.

ingf 121 u l

VARIABLE NO.

19

20

21

22

23

2«

2S

2 *

27

2 1

29

39

31

32

33

34

3S

3«

37

3B

39

40

41

42

43

44

4S

4«

47

48

49

SO

51

S2

S3

S4

ss S6

57

SB

59

6S

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

DEPENDENI

13

INTERCEP1

NOLTIPLE

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 S B 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

f . 933 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

1.92Z22

2 . 6 B 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4 '

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2.6222Z

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

1 3 . 1 2 2 2 2

CORRELATION

STO. ERROR OF ESTIf lATE

STANDARD D E V I A T I O N

0 . 6 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 S

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 S 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 S 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 S 3 0

7 . 1 6 B 7 S

4 . 7 6 3 6 9

3 3 . 9 2 2 0 7

0 . 7 3 1 6 1

4 . 9 6 9 9 9

CORRELATION X VS Y

•0.08731

•0.00996

•0.00679

•0.19914

0.09285

-0.07811

0.08497

0.07645

0.09351

0.18002

-0.08876

-0.11502

-0.0873S

•0.01994

0.01125

-0.14073

-0.04736

-0.07870

-0.16694

-0.10435

-0.25000

0.03752

0.12530

-0.07245

-0.13BSB

-0.00540

-0.15687

-0.02348

-0.00749

0.00413

-0.13327

-0.10134

-0.04721

0.09129

-0.15324

-0.10419

0.04291

0.04694

-0.03318

•0.036SB

-ff.06S?6

0.920SS

0.03744

0.060SS

0.14058

-0.03676

-0.08672

0.09567

0.21560

0.09968

0.07400

REGRESSION.

cctrncitNT - 0 . 0 2 8 2 8

0 . 1 6 5 3 3

- 6 . 0 4 6 8 4

- 0 . 3 0 1 6 0

0 . 3 1 6 5 3

0 .1 .4385

0 . 1 5 7 6 3

0 . 2 0 8 0 3

0 . 1 8 6 1 1

1 . 0 4 7 9 2

- 1 . 1 2 2 7 1

- 0 . 2 7 3 4 7

- 0 . 5 2 8 0 9

- 0 . 6 1 7 2 9

0.22221

-1 .11752

0 . 1 2 0 5 8

- 1 . 1 3 5 6 6

- 0 . 7 0 0 8 9

0 . 0 8 1 3 8

- 1 . 1 7 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 5 8 6 4

0 . 6 1 9 2 1

- 0 . 4 8 2 3 S

- 0 . 9 2 2 6 9

0 . 3 3 8 2 0

0 . 1 6 7 5 7

- 0 . 0 2 2 9 2

- 0 . 8 9 3 9 *

- 0 . 1 0 5 1 0

- 0 . 4 1 1 4 S

- 0 . 6 9 3 6 2

- 0 . 6 2 8 3 8

1 . 3 1 1 S 6

- 0 . 0 3 4 1 9

- 0 . 1 3 2 6 1

0 . 2 5 3 0 8

0 . 6 7 3 0 0

0 . 9 0 9 S 3

- 0 . 4 9 2 6 7

0.25102 O . O U S O

- 0 . 2 5 0 3 9

0 . 2 6 3 6 0

1.32211 0 . 7 4 6 4 2

- 0 . 8 4 S 3 0

- 0 . 0 1 3 9 0

1 . 2 5 8 7 4

- 0 . 3 S 1 0 2

- 0 . 2 2 8 4 2

S T D . ER40H OF REO.COEF.

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 9 8

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 3 8

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 5 4

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 3 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 3 2

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 9 3

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 4 7

1 0 3 . 9 0 6 4 7

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 3 2

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 3 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 5 3

1 0 3 . 9 0 9 1 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 0 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 9 1

1 0 3 . 9 0 6 8 1

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 5 8

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 0 6

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 1 0

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 9 7

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 0 3

1 0 3 . 9 0 6 7 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 6 8 2

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 8 8

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 3 0

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 9 7

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 0 7

1 0 3 . 9 0 6 9 1

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 0 4

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 4 2

1 0 3 . 9 0 8 3 1

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 3 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 0 9

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 8 4

1 0 3 . 9 0 7 5 6

1 0 3 . 9 0 5 1 S

1 1 5 . 0 7 6 6 0

1 1 5 . 0 7 7 7 1

1 1 5 . 0 7 6 6 7

1 1 5 . 0 7 7 4 8

1 1 5 . 0 7 5 8 6

1 1 5 . C 7 6 3 1

1 1 5 . 0 7 7 7 9

1 1 5 . 0 7 5 7 7

1 1 5 . 0 7 7 1 3

1 1 5 . 0 7 6 4 2

1 1 5 . 0 7 7 3 8

1 1 5 . 0 7 6 6 7

1 1 5 . 0 7 8 8 0

1 1 S . C 7 6 2 6

1 1 5 . 0 7 4 4 4

COnPUTED T VALUE

8 . 8 0 0 2 7

0 . 8 0 1 5 9

0 . 8 0 0 4 5

8 . 0 0 2 9 0

0.00305 8 . 8 0 1 3 8

0 . 8 0 1 5 2

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 . 8 0 1 7 9

0.01009 • 0 . 0 1 0 8 0

8 . 8 0 2 * 3

8 . 0 0 5 8 8

8 . 8 0 5 9 4

0.00214

0.01075 8 . 0 0 1 1 6

0 . 0 1 0 9 3

0 . 0 0 6 7 5

8 . 0 0 0 7 8

s.oiiv 8 . 0 0 0 5 6

8 . 0 0 5 9 6

8 . 0 04*4

0 . 0 0 8 8 8

8 . 0 0 3 2 5

0 . 0 0 1 * 1

8 . 0 0 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 8 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 1

0 . 0 0 3 9 6

0 . 0 0 6 6 8

0 . 0 0 * 0 5

0 . 0 1 2 * 2

0 . 0 0 0 3 3

• O . O O l l S

0 . 0 0 2 2 0

0.00585

0.00790

0 . 0 0 4 2 8

0 . 0 0 2 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 1 3

0 . 0 0 2 1 8

0 . 0 0229

0 . 0 1 1 4 9

0 . 0 0 6 4 9

0.00735

0.00012

0 . 9 1 0 9 4

0.00305 0 . 0 0 1 9 9

122

Table 3 .63. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on CIP - a facet of QWL




Total 89 10472.05566

Table 3.63 speaks of the Obtained fact that the QWL

dimension namely "Control, Influence and Participation" is

not significantly influenced by either of the independent

variables (personality attributes and organizational

characteristics) as obltained statistical value F = 0.96127

is highly insignificant even at .05 level of confidence.


*^erein influenced of each independent variable was seen on

dependent variable i.e., on 'Control influence and

participation' and all the statistical t values found to be

very low which are statistically insignificant.

In the light of the above finding pattern, it is

found that all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

influence of independent variables (personality attributes

and organizational characteristics) on dependent one

(Control, Influence and Participation) stand accepted.

123 Table 3 .64 . Showing Mul t ip le Regres s ion Analyses - C o n t r o l ,

In f luence and P a r t i c i p a t i o n dimension of QWL.

VARIABLE NO.

19

20

2 1

12

23

24

25

26

27

2.«

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

3S

36

37

36

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

4B

49

SO

S I

S2

S3

S4

SS

S6

57

56

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

6S

66

67

66

69

MEAN

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 6 6 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . S 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 S 5 S 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 U

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . S 4 A 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

OEPENOeNT

14 3 7 . 7 2 2 2 2

INTERCEPT

MULTIPLE CORRELATION-


STANDARD OCVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

i .y3i$ 1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 $

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 .23S3S

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 0 2 4

1 . S 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 i S 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 $

1 0 . 8 4 7 2 8

4 . 2 5 3 5 0

0 . 7 5 0 S t

1 0 . 9 6 9 6 1

CORRELATION » VS Y

0 . 0 9 0 9 7

• 0 . 0 2 8 4 5

• 0 . 0 0 2 4 5

- 0 . 0 4 9 4 2

- 0 . 0 0 7 5 8

0 . 0 3 8 2 6

0 . 0 2 2 6 4

- 0 . 0 4 8 S 0

- 0 . 0 6 1 6 5

- 0 . 0 0 6 9 1

- 0 . 0 5 5 1 9

0 . 1 7 7 8 9

0 . 3 1 8 1 0

0 . 1 0 6 9 9

0 . 0 5 8 0 8

0 . 0 7 4 3 1

0 . 1 6 7 6 7

0 . 0 3 3 6 7

0 . 1 7 3 8 7

0 . 0 1 2 3 3

0 . 1 3 9 4 5

0 . 0 6 2 6 9

- 0 . 0 5 3 2 3

- 0 . 0 8 6 2 1

0 . 0 0 7 8 S

0 . 0 4 8 0 2

0 . 1 7 1 4 0

- 0 . C 0 3 4 2

0 . 0 7 5 5 3

0 . 0 1 4 8 4

0 . 0 8 1 2 5

• 0 . 0 1 9 0 9

- 0 . 1 0 6 4 4

0 . 0 1 5 4 5

0 . 1 5 3 1 0

- 0 . 0 3 8 9 8

0 . 0 8 3 0 1

0 . 1 6 7 8 9

- 0 . 0 7 6 9 7

- 0 . 0 8 5 3 2

- 0 . 1 9 1 7 6

- 0 . 1 1 4 0 2

- 0 . 0 9 9 9 8

0 . 0 S 9 B 1

0 . 1 0 1 3 4

- 0 . 0 6 7 6 1

- 0 . 0 * 2 4 3

- 0 . 1 3 6 0 1

- 0 . 1 3 9 2 S

- 0 . 1 5 7 0 e

- 0 . 1 2 4 0 1

REGRESSION COEFFICIENT

- 0 . 5 6 7 4 9

• 1 . 3 3 3 1 1

1 . 4 6 0 5 4

- 1 . 8 6 5 3 7

0 . 6 2 0 2 4

2 . 3 1 6 5 6

1 . 1 3 2 3 7

- 1 . 9 2 7 7 3

0 . 7 0 2 0 6

2 . 5 4 4 5 9

• 1 . 2 5 1 2 4

1 . 0 9 4 6 1

3 . 2 0 5 9 2

0 . 7 9 2 7 7

• 1 . 0 5 3 2 9

0 . 6 8 S 4 3

2 . 3 7 2 2 9

1 . 2 5 7 3 4

3 . 8 0 S 7 6

- 1 . 1 3 0 3 4

0 . 1 5 6 2 9

0 . 9 3 4 7 1

0 . 2 S S 8 6

- 2 . 4 5 7 7 0

• 1 . 2 0 6 6 4

- 1 . 8 0 0 4 9

3 . 9 2 1 9 1

- 1 . 8 2 8 8 3

0 . 0 2 8 0 5

1 . 9 6 8 2 8

1 . 6 1 7 0 6

- 0 . 0 4 0 6 0

- 2 . 0 0 9 6 3

2 . 5 9 6 1 7

- 0 . 0 5 8 1 5

- 0 . 3 9 0 7 6

2 . 1 9 3 5 6

- 0 . 6 9 2 0 8

0 . 6 7 1 5 2

- 2 . 2 7 7 1 6

- 1 . 1 7 7 8 1

0 . 5 2 8 4 4

- 2 . 3 4 7 7 1

0 . 8 9 1 7 9

0 . 3 9 4 2 4

0 . 8 0 4 1 4

1 . 8 1 3 7 7

- 2 . 8 4 9 6 4

C . 3 9 0 8 S

- C . 7 9 9 2 9

0 . 0 4 7 2 9

STO. ERROR OF REC.COEF.

2 2 9 . 3 4 6 1 5

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 8 0

2 2 9 . 3 ( 5 1 5

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 6 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 4 7

2 2 9 . 3 4 6 0 1

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 9 9

2 2 9 . 3 4 0 5 9

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 6 7

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 8 3

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 9 3

2 2 9 . 3 4 6 5 9

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 1 8

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 7 5

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 3 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 0 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 0 9

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 1 9

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 9 0

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 0 4

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 3 1

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 3 7

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 7 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 4 1

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 9 0

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 9 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 5 8

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 8 4

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 7 0

2 2 9 . 3 4 4 6 4

2 2 9 . 3 4 2 6 2

2 2 9 . 3 4 1 9 5

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 6 0

2 2 9 . 3 4 3 0 0

2 2 9 . 3 3 7 6 6

2 5 3 . 9 9 5 1 0

2 5 3 . 9 9 7 5 7

2 5 3 . 9 9 5 2 5

2 5 3 . 9 9 7 0 4

2 5 3 . 9 9 3 4 8

2 5 3 . 9 9 4 4 6

2 5 3 . 9 9 6 4 9

2 5 3 . 9 9 7 7 4

2 5 3 . 9 9 3 2 9

2 5 3 . 9 9 6 2 9

2 5 3 . 9 9 4 6 9

2 5 3 . 9 9 6 8 1

2 5 3 . 9 9 5 2 5

2 5 5 - 9 9 9 9 $

2 $ } . 9 9 * 5 5

2 S 3 . 9 9 0 3 4

COHPUTE T VALUE

0 . 0 0 2 4 7

0 . 0 0 5 8 1

0 . 0 0 6 3 7

0 . 0 0 8 1 3

0 . 0 0 2 7 0

0 . 0 1 0 1 0

0 . 0 0 4 9 4

0 . 0 0 8 4 1

0 . 0 0 3 0 6

0 . 0 1 1 1 0

' 0 . 0 0 5 4 6

0 . 0 0 4 7 7

0 . 0 1 3 9 8

0 . 0 0 3 4 6

0 . 0 0 4 5 9

0 . 0 0 2 9 9

0 . 0 1 0 3 4

0 . 0 0 5 4 8

0 . 0 1 6 5 9

0 . 0 0 4 9 3

0 . 0 0 0 6 8

0 . 0 0 4 0 8

0 . 0 0 1 1 2

0 . 0 1 0 7 2

0 . 0 0 5 2 6

0 . 0 0 7 8 5

0 . 0 1 7 1 0

0 . 0 0 7 9 7

0 . 0 0 0 1 2

0 . 0 0 8 5 8

0 . 0 0 7 0 5

0 . 0 0 0 1 8

0 . 0 0 8 7 6

0 . 0 1 1 3 2

0 . 0 0 0 2 5

0 . 0 0 1 5 4

0 . 0 0 8 6 4

0 . 0 0 2 7 2

0 . 0 0 2 6 5

0 . 0 0 8 9 7

• 0 . 0 0 4 6 4

0 . 0 0 2 0 8

- 0 . 0 0 9 2 4

0 . 0 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 0 1 5 5

0 . 0 0 3 1 7

0 . 0 0 7 1 4

0 . 0 1 1 2 2

0 . 0 0 1 5 4

0 . 0 0 3 1 5

0 . 0 0 0 1 9

124


the influence of IV's on EC - a facet of QWL

Source of QF S.S. M.S. F.Value Variation



Total 89 1932.62207

The fifteenth dimension of QWL i.e. "Employee

Commitment" is no more found to have been influenced by both

personality variables and organizational characteristics as

obtained F = 0.71504 is highly insignificant at .05 level of

confidence (Table 3.65). The findings were further confirmed

as in Table 3.66 all the statistical t values found to be

very low even at .05 ias t values ranging from lowest t =

.00002 to highest t = .01248 have advocated no influence of

IV's on DV viz., "Employee Commitment".

The above findings ensures the acceptance of all the

null hypotheses pertaining to the cause and effect

relationship.

Table 3.66. Showing M u l t i p ie Regression Analyses Commitment dimension o f

VAHIAeiE MEAN NO.

19

20

21

22

23

21.

25

26

2?

2B

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

3a 39

40

4 1

42

43

44

45

46

47

4<

49

50

5 1

52

S3

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

6S

69

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 6 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 2

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 0 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 5 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

DEPENDENT

15 1 7 . 6 4 4 4 4

INTERCEPT


STD. ERRCR OF ESTII^ATE

STANDARD D E V I A T I O K

0 . B B 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 B 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 6 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 3 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 B 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

4 . 6 5 9 9 2

2 1 . 7 0 7 9 5

0 . 6 9 9 7 9

5 . 0 9 4 3 8

CORRELATION X VS V

- 0 . 1 8 7 7 7

- 0 . 0 6 0 7 8

- 0 . 1 7 7 4 9

- 0 . 1 6 3 1 6

- 0 . 0 8 3 1 7

- 0 . 0 1 7 0 4

0 . 0 0 7 5 9

0 . 1 1 4 8 9

- 0 . 0 0 4 6 3

0 . 2 4 0 9 4

- 0 . 0 5 1 3 9

- 0 . 0 0 7 2 9

0 . 1 1 8 3 6

0 . 0 2 70 7

0 . 0 1 4 9 3

- 0 . 0 2 8 6 6

- 0 . 1 2 6 4 7

- 0 . 1 5 9 6 1

- 0 . 0 0 0 7 6

0 . 0 7 4 8 1

- 0 . 0 7 4 6 3

- 0 . 0 0 8 7 6

- 0 . 0 7 1 1 7

- 0 . 0 0 6 2 9

- 0 . 0 7 6 7 4

0 . 1 5 1 3 3

- 0 . 0 0 4 1 4

- 0 . 1 0 5 0 2

0 . 0 3 3 0 0

- 0 . 1 0 6 3 5

- 0 . 2 0 5 7 3

- 0 . 1 2 2 2 6

0 . 0 8 0 4 4

0 . 0 5 0 4 8

- 0 . 0 9 7 9 6

- 0 . 1 3 5 8 0

- 0 . 0 2 3 5 5

0 . 1 2 4 4 8

- 0 . 0 3 3 7 3

0 . 0 6 1 6 6

0 . 2 4 8 2 1

0 . 0 6 5 3 2

- 0 . 0 1 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 1 1 6 7

0 . 0 3 6 1 7

0 . 1 6 5 2 9

0 . 2 2 8 8 0

0 . 0 8 5 6 8

0 . 0 4 3 7 8

0 . 0 1 8 9 6

0 . 1 4 6 6 6

QWL.

REGRESS!CN COLFF tCIENT

- 1 . 3 2 8 9 5

0 . 3 5 9 2 2

0 . 2 5 2 62

- 0 . 4 2 8 3 5

- 0 . 4 5 8 4 8

0 . 2 6 1 1 3

- 0 . 4 1 7 3 2

0 . 4 7 2 9 8

0 . 0 0 2 3 9

1 . 1 6 1 9 2

- 0 . 7 2 4 1 2

- 0 . 1 5 9 9 5

8 . 3 7 1 2 7

- 0 . 4 5 0 1 5

0 . 2 5 5 4 7

- 0 . 4 3 4 7 8

- 0 . 2 0 5 6 0

- 0 . 3 8 2 3 9

- 1 . 0 9 3 2 9

9 . 5 4 6 2 8

- 0 . 4 3 5 7 1

• 0 . 4 2 6 7 5

- C . 6 1 8 8 6

0 . 6 4 9 4 5

- 0 . 5 4 4 4 1

0 . 6 8 0 9 2

0 . 1 4 7 0 8

0 . 2 8 8 4 1

- 0 . 2 5 6 2 7

- 0 . 0 1 2 6 8

- 1 . 0 3 4 4 6

- 0 . 3 9 6 2 8

0 . 1 7 2 8 4

0 . 2 8 1 4 2

0 . 0 5 4 1 9

- 1 . 0 6 8 2 6

0 . 2 3 9 5 8

0 . 6 9 3 7 3

- 0 . 2 3 1 4 7

- 0 . 1 7 2 6 3

1 . 2 0 5 4 2

- 0 . 2 6 9 5 8

0 . 1 7 2 9 0

- 0 . 4 7 1 S 2

0 .61SB6

0 . 5 6 S 2 9

0 . 5 4 0 6 6

- 0 . 2 7 2 0 4

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

- 0 . 8 7 9 0 3

o . o o c o o

125 Employee

S T D . ERROR COCPUTfO OF ^ E C C O E F . T V8LUE

1 0 6 . 5 0 9 5 9

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 9 6

1 0 6 . 5 0 9 1 3

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 9 6

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 8 8

1 0 6 . 5 0 9 5 3

1 0 6 . 5 0 9 0 6

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 0 1

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 9 0

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 9 8

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 0 9

1 0 6 . 5 0 9 8 0

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 6 7

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 4 8

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 3 5

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 1 4

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 6 4

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 6 9

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 5 4

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 6 1

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 3 5

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 3 7

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 4 6

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 8 5

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 5 4

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 6 3

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 4 7

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 5 9

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 9 9

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 9 0

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 9 6

1 0 6 . 5 0 7 6 4

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 4 0

1 0 6 . 5 0 8 1 3

1 0 6 . 5 0 5 6 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 7 0

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 8 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 7 7

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 6 0

1 1 7 . 9 5 5 9 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 4 1

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 3 4

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 9 2

1 1 7 . 9 5 5 8 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 2 4

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 5 1

1 1 7 . 9 5 7 5 0

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 7 7

1 1 7 . 9 5 8 9 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 6 3 5

1 1 7 . 9 5 4 4 9

0 .0124B

0 . 0 0 3 3 7

0 . 0 0 2 3 7

0 . 0 0 4 0 2

0 . 0 0 4 3 0

0 . 0 0 2 4 5

0 .00S92

0 . 0 0444

O . 0 O N 2

0 . 0 1 0 9 1

' - 0 . 0 0 6 8 0

O.OOISO

0 . 0 0349

0 . 0 0 4 2 3

0 . 0 0 2 4 0

0 . 0 0 4 0 8

0 . 0 0 1 9 3

0 . 0 0 3 5 9

0 . 0 1 0 2 6

0 . 0 0 5 1 3

- 0 . 0 0 4 0 9

0 . 0 0 4 8 1

•O.OOSBl

0 . 0 0610

0 . 0 0 5 1 1

0 . 0 0639

0 . 0 0 1 3 8

0 . 0 0 2 7 1

- 0 . 0 0 2 4 1

0 . 0 0 0 1 2

0 . 0 0 9 7 1

0 . 0 0372

0 . 0 0 1 6 2

0 . 0 0264

0 . 0 0 0 5 1

• 0 . 0 0 9 0 6

0 . 0 0 2 0 3

O.OOSBB

0 . 0 0 1 9 6

0 . 0 0 1 4 6

0 . 0 1 0 2 2

0 . 0 0 2 2 9

0 . 0 0 1 4 7

0 . 0 0 4 0 0

0 . 0 0 5 2 2

0 . 0 0 4 7 9

0 . 0 0 4 5 8

0 . 0 0 2 3 1

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 7 4 5

O.OOOOO

126


the influence of IV's on GLS - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DF S.S. M.S. F.Value



Total 89 7687.70953

Table 3.67 speaks of the sixteenth dimension of QWL

i.e., "General Life Satisfaction" which is found to be

insignificantly influenced by both independent variables

viz., personality variables and organizational

characteristics as the obtained F = 0.83698 is very low and

statistically highly insignificant. The finding is further

confirmed from Table 3.68 wherein influence of each

independent variable was seen on dependent variable i.e., on

"General Life Satisfaction" and here again all the t values

found to be very low even at .05 level of confidence as it is

evident from Table 3.68 that all the statistical t values

ranging from lowest t = .00019 to highest t = .01248 are very

low and insignificant. In view of the above findings all the

null hypotheses pertaining to the influence of IV's on DV

have been found accepted.

127 Table 3 .68 . Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - General Life

Sa t i s fac t i on dimension of QWL. VARIABLE rtCAK

NO.

19

2 0

2 1

22

2 3

2 4

25

2 «

2 7

2>

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4 5

46

47

48

49

50

5 1

52

S3

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

3 . 4 8 8 8 9

3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 0 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 . 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2.62222

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 ^

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 3 3 3 3

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 6 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . S 4 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 8 8 8 9

DEPENDENT

16

INTERCEPI

HULTIPLE

3 2 . 5 8 8 8 9

CORRELATION

STD. ERROR CF ESTIMATE

STANDARD DEVIATIOK

8 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 S 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 8 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8 1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

9 . 2 9 4 0 7

1 5 . 1 6 0 4 3

0 .72735

9 . 7 6 1 1 8

CCRRELATIOK X VS V

0 . 1 7 8 3 6

0 . 1 4 3 2 1

0 . 0 0 5 2 4

- 0 . 1 4 1 4 2

- 0 . 0 5 2 0 6

- 0 . 0 3 8 4 6

0 . 0 4 8 2 0

- 0 . 0 3 8 7 6

0 . 1 4 3 3 3

• 0 . 0 1 8 3 7

• 0 . 0 3 2 8 1

0 . 0 4 0 4 5

• 0 . 0 9 0 1 4

• 0 . 1 1 0 6 6

0 . 1 0 4 4 2

- 0 . 0 4 7 7 7

0 . 2 8 1 8 9

0 . 2 9 1 5 3

0 . 1 3 7 9 2

- 0 . 1 5 9 4 6

- 0 . 1 0 0 1 2

0 . 1 9 5 5 1

0 . 1 6 0 5 1

0 . 1 1 2 0 8

0 . 0 0 8 0 5

0 . 0 9 6 4 3

0 . 1 6 8 3 8

0 . 1 0 8 9 4

0 . 2 3 2 7 3

• 0 . 0 9 5 6 8

0 . 0 2 4 1 3

- 0 . 0 5 6 4 4

- 0 . 0 0 0 9 0

0 . 2 2 7 2 2

0 . 1 9 2 6 3

• 0 . 1 2 1 5 8

- 0 . 0 5 9 9 0

0 . 2 3 4 7 5

0 . 0 3 0 6 5

- 0 . 0 1 8 2 4

- 0 . 0 0 0 9 7

0 . 0 5 7 7 7

• 0 . 0 8 4 4 7

• 0 . 0 7 3 1 6

0 . 1 5 0 5 9

0 . 0 6 3 7 5

0 . 0 8 ( 3 2

0 . 2 0 4 7 2

- C . 0 2 2 4 S

• 0 . 0 * 9 1 3

0 . 0 7 2 3 4

R E C R I S & K N STD. ERROR COEFFICIENT OF HEC.COEF,

1 . 1 2 0 6 5

2 . 2 0 6 1 0

0 . 0 7 3 9 8

- 0 . 3 8 6 3 7

- 0 . 7 3 3 4 6

1 . 2 6 3 4 4

0 . 9 2 0 1 3

0 . 1 6 8 3 3

- 0 . 2 8 1 2 5

1 . 1 7 6 4 8

- 1 . 4 3 4 3 1

- 0 . 1 3 6 7 9

0 . 3 0 2 1 9

- 0 . 6 3 4 8 2

0 . 4 8 5 3 5

0 . 4 0 1 5 9

2 . 3 2 4 1 1

1 . 5 8 9 9 9

• 0 . 0 3 8 9 2

- 0 . 9 0 8 8 9

- 0 . 4 7 0 0 6

0 . 9 7 9 4 2

1 . 8 1 4 7 6

- 1 . 1 6 7 3 9

0 . 9 2 4 1 1

' 0 . 8 5 9 5 3

2 . 5 4 6 6 8

0 . 2 0 1 6 8

0 . 6 S S 3 0

0 . 7 5 8 7 6

0 . 4 2 1 3 3

- 0 . 8 2 1 5 9

• 0 . 3 0 3 1 8

l . l R O S l

- 0 . 3 7 9 9 9

- 0 . 7 0 0 0 6

- 0 . 0 4 7 7 8 2 . 4 8 4 8 7

- 0 . 2 8 8 5 4

- 0 . 5 8 8 2 0

0 . 0 7 4 2 0

0 . 9 7 6 2 9

• 1 . 6 5 2 3 *

- 0 . 3 5 2 6 6

1 . 5 8 1 * 6

2 . 0 5 1 3 3

- 0 . 5 2 3 3 0

1 . 0 3 0 9 0

1 . 1 4 * 2 0

- 0 . 6 8 * 8 *

• 0 . 1 0 1 2 9

2 0 4 . 0 7 9 7 8

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 5 1

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 8 3

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 5 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 4 3

2 0 4 . 0 7 9 5 9

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 6 9

2 0 4 . 0 7 4 7 5

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 3 8

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 5 4

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 8 4

2 0 4 . 0 8 0 1 1

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 9 4

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 5 8

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 4 2

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 9 3

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 8 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 9 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 7 1

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 8 2

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 4 1

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 4 5

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 5 5

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 3 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 7 1

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 9 4

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 6 4

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 8 8

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 6 3

2 0 4 . 0 7 8 3 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 5 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 5 9 7

2 0 4 . 0 7 7 4 4

2 0 4 . 0 7 6 9 2

2 0 4 . 0 7 2 1 7

2 2 6 . 0 1 3 1 7

2 2 6 . 0 1 5 3 5

2 2 6 . 0 1 3 2 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 4 8 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 1 7 0

2 2 6 . 0 1 2 5 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 4 3 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 5 5 0

2 2 6 . 0 1 1 5 4

2 2 6 . 0 1 4 2 1

2 2 6 . 0 1 2 7 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 4 6 8

2 2 6 . 0 1 3 2 9

2 2 6 . 0 1 7 * 7

2 2 6 . 0 1 2 4 8

2 2 6 . 0 0 8 9 1

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 5 4 9

0 . 0 1 0 8 1

0 . 0 0 0 3 6

0 . 0 0 1 8 9

0 . 0 0 3 5 9

0 . 0 0 6 1 9

0 . 0 0 4 5 1

0 . 0 0 0 8 2

- 0 . 0 0 1 3 8

, 0 . 0 0 5 7 6

0 . 0 0 7 0 3

0 . 0 0 0 6 7

0 . 0 0 1 4 8

0 . 0 0 3 1 1

0 . 0 0 2 3 8

0 . 0 0 1 9 7

0 . 0 1 1 3 9

0 . 0 0 7 7 9

0 . 0 0 0 1 9

0 . 0 0 4 4 5

0 . 0 0 2 3 0

0 . 0 0 4 8 0

0 . 0 0 8 8 9

0 . 0 0 5 7 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 3

0 . 0 0 4 2 1

0 . 0 1 2 4 8

0 . 0 0 0 9 9

0 . 0 0 3 2 1

0 . 0 0 3 7 2

0 . 0 0 2 0 6

0 . 0 0 4 0 3

- 0 . 0 0 1 4 9

0 . 0 0 5 7 8

0 . 0 0 1 8 6

- 0 . 0 0 3 1 0

' 0 . 0 0 0 2 1

0 . 0 1 0 9 9

0 . 0 0 1 2 8

0 . 0 0 2 6 0

0 . 0 0 0 3 3

0 . 0 0 4 3 2

0 . 0 0 7 3 1

0 . 0 0 1 5 6

0 . 0 0 7 0 0

0 . 0 0 9 0 8

• 0 . 0 0 2 3 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 6

0 . 0 0 5 0 6

0 . 0 0 3 0 3

0 . 0 0 0 * 5

128

Table 3.69. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on OC - a facet of QWL



Deviation from 38 3189.20093 83.9 26 34 Regression

Total 89 7183.28906

The last i.e., the seventeenth dimension of QWL i.e.

"Organizational Climate" is also found to be insignificantly

influenced by both independent variables viz., personality

attributes and organizational characteristics as obtained F=

0.93 315 is highly insignificant even at .05 level of

confidence (Table 3.69).

Table 3.7 0 also confirms the findings as obtained t

values found to be very low even at .05 level of confidence,

t values ranging from as low as t = .00033 to as high as t =

.01504 are found to have no influence of TV's on DV viz.,

organizational climate. Therefore, all the null hypotheses

pertaining to the influence of independent variables on

dependent one i.e. organizational climate stand accepted.

Table 3 . 7 0 . Showing Mult iple Regress Cl imate dimension of QWL

129 ion Analyses - Organizat ional

VARIAeLC NO.

MEAN

19

20

21

li 23

24

25

26

27

28

29

3S

31

32

33

34

3S

36

37

3a

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

4«

50

51

52

S3

54

55 56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

102

41.

.06667

.76667

.48889

.34444

.47778

.17778

.80000

.63333

52222

.93333

.20000

80000

92222

.68889

.06667

.74444

.50000

.28889

.14444

.90000

.65556

.2888^

.43333

.17778

.91111

.62222

.64444

.98889

90000

.80000

.93333

.42222

.24444

.17778

.66666

.24444

.93333

.85556

.70000

.51111

.62222

. 7 1 1 1 1

. 7 2 2 2 2

. 8 4 4 4 4

8 6 6 6 7

7 3 3 3 3

6 4 4 4 4

6 1 1 1 1

6 4 4 4 4

5 4 4 4 4

1 8 8 8 9

DEPENDENT

i 7 2 7 . 9 1 1 1 1

INTCRCEPT-

" U L T I P L E CORRELATION

STO. ERRCR OF ESTIMATE

STANDARD DEVIATION

0 . 8 8 4 3 2

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 .2B294

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 3 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1 "

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . 3 2 5 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 S

8 . 9 8 5 9 4

4 9 . 6 9 9 2 0

0 . 7 4 5 6 7

9 . 1 6 1 1 3

CORRELATION X VS t

8 . 0 0 6 4 1

8 . 0 2 6 3 7

0 . 1 0 4 3 B

0 . 8 4 6 3 0

8 . 0 6 9 5 1

• 0 . 0 6 5 4 7

0 . 0 3 4 3 4

• 0 . 2 4 2 0 2

0 . 1 4 2 8 8

0 . 0 5 7 0 8

0 . 0 9 7 4 6

0 . 0 3 8 2 8

8 . 1 3 5 7 5

- 0 . 0 1 6 4 8

- 0 . 0 3 7 5 7

- 0 . 1 5 0 8 8

0 . 0 3 3 8 3

- 0 . 0 8 0 4 7

- 0 . 0 0 0 8 8

- 0 . 0 2 1 3 5

- 0 . 1 7 5 8 7

0 . 0 5 7 6 3

- 0 . 0 4 1 5 4

0 . 0 9 0 1 5

0 . 0 8 4 5 7

- 0 . 0 7 7 6 0

- 0 . 0 1 0 7 0

- 0 . 0 4 1 6 5

0 . 0 0 6 3 2

- 0 . 0 6 2 3 3

0 . 0 7 9 6 6

- 0 . 0 5 6 6 6

- 0 . 0 4 3 8 9

0 . 0 2 8 6 8

- 0 . 0 0 4 0 3

- 0 . 2 8 2 1 0

0 . 0 7 7 3 3

0 . 2 1 4 8 3

0 . 0 0 4 S 7

- 0 . 0 0 8 8 1

- 0 . 1 7 0 7 8

- 0 . 0 6 6 S 9

- 0 . 1 , 1 8 0 4

0 . 0 8 0 7 4

- 0 . 0 1 1 7 1

0 . 0 6 8 9 0

0 . 0 8 1 0 2

- 0 . 0 3 1 8 8

0 . 0 8 8 6 0

0 . 0 4 0 9 1

0 . 0 1 2 6 S

REGRESS CCEFFIC

- 1 . 5 5 4 1 2

- 0 . 5 5 8 3 2

0 . 9 2 5 7 0

- 0 . 0 7 9 1 0

1 . 5 2 9 7 9

- 0 . 0 5 1 1 6

1 . 5 1 1 1 8

- 1 . 9 5 8 9 8

1 . 3 1 6 B 0

1 . 1 9 4 3 4

0 . 8 3 5 3 2

- 0 . 4 4 2 8 0

2 . 8 8 1 0 8

- 0 . 1 5 4 9 4

0 . 4 0 3 8 3

- 1 . 7 2 6 8 8

• 0 . 0 6 7 0 7

- 0 . 9 0 7 6 2

- 0 . 4 8 0 6 0

• 1 . 2 6 1 0 1

• 1 . 7 9 1 6 2

0 . 7 4 7 1 3

• 0 . 7 7 9 6 7

0 . 6 0 5 8 3

0 . 7 0 1 9 2

- 0 . 4 9 9 5 7

2 . 3 8 9 5 2

- 0 . 8 7 7 2 7

- 0 . 4 0 9 9 7

- 0 . 6 9 1 9 7

1 . 8 S 1 6 9

- 0 . 4 6 5 4 3

- 0 . 6 1 3 6 9

1 . 7 5 7 2 9

- 0 . 2 1 8 7 5

- 2 . 4 . 7 8 7 7

1 . 5 1 6 5 2

0 . 2 9 3 4 2

0 . 4 0 0 9 4

- 0 . 0 6 9 3 4

- 2 . 1 3 0 2 9

- 0 . 5 1 2 8 9

- 1 . 6 0 4 1 S

0 . 8 6 2 8 8

- 1 . 3 0 6 0 6

0 . 7 3 0 3 4

0 . 6 0 1 6 ;

- 0 . 6 7 8 5 *

- 1 . 0 9 2 5 J

0 . 6 3 S S 1

0 . 1 2 4 8 3

ICN STD. ERROR

lENT OF REC.COEF,

I 9 1 . S S 4 3 6

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 2 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 5 4

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 4 2

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 3 0

1 9 1 . 5 3 4 2 4

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 4 0

1 9 1 . 5 2 9 7 2

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 1 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 2 6

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 6 8

1 9 1 . 5 3 4 7 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 7 0

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 3 6

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 3 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 7 5

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 6 4

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 7 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 4 9

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 5 9

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 3 2

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 3 6

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 3 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 2 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 4 9

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 8 2

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 5 5

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 7 6

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 4 8

1 9 1 . 5 3 3 1 0

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 4 2

1 9 1 . 5 3 0 8 5

1 9 1 . 5 3 2 2 3

1 9 1 . 5 3 1 7 4

1 9 1 . 5 2 7 2 8

2 1 2 . 1 1 9 5 1

212.12155

2 1 2 . 1 1 9 6 3

2 1 2 . 1 2 1 1 2

2 1 2 . 1 1 8 1 3

212.11898 2 1 2 . 1 2 0 6 5

2 1 2 . 1 2 1 7 0

2 1 2 . 1 1 7 9 8

2 1 2 . 1 2 0 4 8

2 1 2 . 1 1 9 1 6

2 1 2 . 1 2 0 9 3

2 1 2 . 1 1 9 6 3

2 1 2 . 1 2 3 5 5

2 1 2 . 1 1 8 8 7

2 1 2 . 1 1 5 5 2

COMPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 8 1 1

0 . 0 0 2 9 2

0 . 0 0 4 8 3

0 . 0 0 0 4 1 '

0 . 0 0 7 9 9

. 0 . 0 0 0 2 7

0 . 0 0 7 8 9

0 . 0 1 0 2 3

0 . 0 0 6 8 8

0 . 0 0 6 2 4

0 . 0 0 4 3 6

0 . 0 0 2 3 1

0 . 0 1 5 0 4

0 . 0 0 0 8 1

0 . 0 0 2 1 1

0 . 0 0 9 0 2

O.OOOSS

0 . 0 0 4 7 4

0 . 0 0 2 5 1

- 0 . 0 0 6 5 8

0 . 0 0 9 3 5

0 . 0 0 3 9 0

0 . 0 0 4 0 7

0 . 0 0 3 1 6

0 . 0 0 3 6 6

- 0 . 0 0 2 6 1

0 . 0 1 2 4 8

0 . 0 0 4 5 8

0 . 0 0 2 1 4

0 . 0 0 3 6 1

0 . 0 0 9 6 7

0 . 0 0 2 4 3

0 . 0 0 3 2 0

0 . 0 0 9 1 7

0 . 0 0 1 1 4

0 . 0 1 1 6 9

0 . 0 0 7 1 5

0 . 0 0 1 3 8

0 . 0 0 1 8 9

0 . 0 0 0 3 3

0 . 0 1 0 0 4

0 . 0 0 2 4 2

• 0 . 0 0 7 5 6

0 . 0 0 4 0 7

0 . 0 0 6 1 6

0 . 0 0 3 4 4

0 . 0 0 2 8 4

0 . 0 0 3 2 0

O . O O S I S

0 . 0 0 3 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 5 9

130


the influence of IV's on Total QWL




Total 89 251617.00000

It is also evident from Table 3.71 that QWL as a

whole is also found to be insignificantly influenced by both

independent variables (personality attributes and organi

zational characteristics) as obtained F = 1.00865 is found

insignificant at .05 level of confidence. The findings were

further confirmed from the Table 3.7 2 wherein all the

statistical t values ranging from lowest t = .00034 to

highest t = .01596 are found statistically very low to be

significant. Hence all the null hypotheses pertaining to the

influence of (organizational characteristics and personality

attributes) on QWL as a whole stand accepted.

The detail descriptions of the two groups namely,

Hindu middle level managers and Muslim middle level managers

have already been given in the preceeding writings which were

especially meant for describing results.

131

Table 3 .72. Showing M u l t i p l e Regress ion Analyses of o v e r a l l QWL.

VARIABLE NO.

HEAS

2 (

25

26

27

2S

29

SO

- 3 1

32

33

> 34

3S

36

37

3B

39

i •<

• * i

4c

43

4 .

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

S3

54

55

'- S B "

f 5 9 t - ^ O I

I «. 63 G<.

6 5 .

6 4 -

6 ?

t !

4 . 0 6 6 6 7

3 . 7 6 6 6 7

- 3 . 4 B S 8 9

- 3 . 3 4 4 4 4

3 . 4 7 7 7 8

— - 3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 3 3 3 3

3 . 5 2 2 2 2

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

' 3 . 2 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2.92222

. 2 . 6 8 8 8 9

3 . 0 6 6 6 7

2 . 7 4 4 4 4

3 . 5 0 0 0 0

- 3 . 2 8 8 8 9

. 3 . 1 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 6 5 5 5 6

3 . 2 8 8 8 9

3 . 4 3 3 3 3

3 . 1 7 7 7 8

2 . 9 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 6 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 8 8 8 9

. 2 . 9 0 0 0 0

2 . 8 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 4 2 2 2 2 -

2 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 1 7 7 7 8

1 0 2 . 6 6 6 6 6

3 . 2 4 4 4 4

2 . 9 3 3 3 3

2 . 8 5 5 5 6

2 . 7 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 1 1 1 1

2 . 6 2 2 2 2

2 . 7 1 1 1 1

2 . 7 2 2 2 2

2 . 8 4 4 4 4

2 . 8 6 6 6 7

73333

64444

6 1 1 1 1

6 4 4 4 4

54444

41.18889

STANDARD DEVIATIOK

0.88432

1 . 0 4 9 8 8

1 . 1 7 3 1 5

1 . 1 8 1 9 0

1 . 2 3 8 2 3

1 . 1 7 6 3 4

1 . 1 4 3 6 2

1 . 3 2 7 7 5

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 1 4 9 5 0

1 . 2 0 1 1 2

1 . 1 2 3 8 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 1 0 2

1 . 3 1 3 7 1

1 . 2 7 6 9 4

1 . 2 2 0 1 5

1 . 1 1 4 2 0

1 . 1 9 5 1 3

1 . 2 1 8 3 1

1 . 2 2 8 5 1

1 . 3 0 8 9 5

1 . 1 9 0 3 2

1 . 2 6 8 2 6

1 . 1 5 7 7 2

1 . 2 4 1 4 0

1 . 3 8 4 6 0

1 . 2 9 3 8 4

1 . 2 2 7 4 9

1 . 2 5 6 0 0

1 . 2 7 9 0 4

1 . 2 7 1 8 0

1 . 2 8 3 5 3

1 . 3 7 0 4 6

1 0 . 7 4 8 4 0

1 . 1 9 2 7 8

1 . 1 3 9 6 8

1 . 2 8 5 7 1

1 . 2 5 8 2 3

1 . 2 6 5 3 1

1 . 2 2 3 1 6

1 . 2 8 2 9 4

1 . 2 6 3 3 8

1 . 2 3 5 3 5

1 . 1 8 2 2 7

1 . 1 5 9 2 3

1 . 1 4 4 7 1

1 . 3 3 8 2 4

1 . 3 0 0 9 2

1 . S 2 S 3 0

7 . 1 6 8 7 5

CORRELATIOK X VS V

0 . 0 0 1 9 6

• 0 . 0 1 8 2 6

• 0 . 0 8 6 6 8

• 0 . 0 7 8 5 4

0 . 0 2 4 7 6

• 0 . 0 6 5 8 9

• 0 . 0 0 1 4 0

• 0 . 0 7 0 2 0

0 . 0 1 7 8 9

0 . 0 0 2 9 0

• 0 . 0 9 3 4 9

0 . 0 5 ) 6 7

0 . 1 0 9 0 5

0 . 0 3 3 1 8

0 . 1 9 7 0 8

- 0 . 0 5 2 1 4

0 . 1 2 7 38

• 0 . 0 3 0 6 9

0 . 0 4 5 8 1

• 0 . 0 9 9 6 1

- 0 . 0 3 2 4 6

0 . 1 5 9 7 0

• 0 . 0 2 1 7 8

• 0 . 0 4 6 9 5

• 0 . 0 6 8 3 8

0 . 0 1 9 6 1

0 . 0 2 0 8 5

- 0 . 0 0 5 9 9

0 . 0 6 7 9 S

- 0 . 0 4 9 2 3

0 . 0 3 S 9 8

- 0 . 1 7 3 0 3

- 0 ^ 0 0 7 5 1

0 . 1 4 2 5 1

0 . 0 1 1 2 3

• 0 . 3 5 0 0 0

- 0 . 0 7 5 6 9

0 . 1 4 2 8 1

- 0 . 0 7 8 7 5

- 0 . 0 3 5 7 1

- 0 . 2 0 0 2 0

- 0 . 1 4 5 9 7

- C . 1 5 2 4 6

0 . 0 2 2 6 1

0 . 1 7 9 3 8

- 0 . 0 1 3 6 4

0 . 1 0 8 4 7

- 0 . 0 7 3 9 8

- 0 . 0 7 1 7 0

- 0 . i * i S 0

- C . 1 5 6 S 0

RECRESSICN C C E F F K I E N T

S T U . ERROH or R E O . C C I F .

- 9 . 1 8 1 9 1

2 . 5 0 9 9 9

6 . 8 9 3 6 6

• 7 . 6 8 8 36

1 . 3 2 0 9 5

7 . 5 2 6 0 6

2 . 1 6 8 04

- 7 . 8 0 1 9 2

4 . 1 1 6 5 5

1 5 . 7 0 8 4 6

- 1 1 . 4 9 9 2 4

6 . 3 0 6 9 5

6 . 5 8 8 6 5

- 4 . 8 2 5 0 8

6 . 2 7 4 6 3

- 3 . 8 . 9 3 5 1

6 . 5 2 1 7 3

- 1 . 6 8 3 5 2

0 . 3 8 0 1 6

- 2 . 0 9 9 0 6

• 7 . 5 9 7 4 0

9 . 6 8 9 1 5

0 . 7 0 6 8 7

• 1 . 3 4 0 8 4

f l f . 6 7 1 8 1

- 5 . 7 0 9 4 7

1 5 . 5 5 3 8 8

- 4 . 1 9 3 6 2

• 6 . 9 6 9 1 7

2 . 4 7 0 1 6

6 . 9 2 1 7 2

- 9 . 7 8 8 4 6

1 . 7 3 9 5 6

1 7 . 7 0 3 5 0

• 1 . 4 1 0 6 3

• 1 7 . 0 6 4 7 9

4 . 3 7 3 8 4

2 . 2 6 1 6 2 .

3 . 6 3 1 5 9

• 6 . 8 9 4 2 8

- 3 . 3 9 6 1 0

- 7 . 7 7 0 6 6

• 8 . 8 7 7 5 8

3 . 0 2 6 3 4

5 . 6 2 1 7 3

3 . 0 4 5 8 8

6 . 5 3 1 9 3

- 1 4 . 2 7 8 7 0

1 . 5 9 6 5 6

- 1 0 . 3 4 3 4 0

0 . 4 6 3 5 7

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 8 6 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 2 1 4

1 1 0 6 . 9 4 3 8 5

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 1 6 4

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 0 9 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 8 0 0

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 3 1 2

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 1 7 5

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 1 5 3

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 2 2 6

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 3 1 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 5 0 8 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 9 0 9

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 7 0 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 5 2 9

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 3 5 9

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 8 6 0

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 9 2 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 7 7 4

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 6 3 5

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 5 1 7

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 5 5 4

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 6 8 9

1 1 0 6 . 9 3 0 5 4

1 1 0 6 . 9 3 7 7 4

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 8 2 2

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 6 5 1

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 7 8 6

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 1 8 8

1 1 0 8 . 9 4 l 2 t

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 1 6 4

1 1 0 8 . 9 2 8 3 4

l l O S . 9 3 6 2 8

1 1 0 8 . 9 3 3 4 7

l l O S . 9 0 7 5 9

1 2 2 6 . 1 3 2 8 1

1 2 2 8 . 1 4 4 7 8

1 2 2 8 . 1 3 3 5 4

1 2 2 8 . 1 4 2 2 1

1 2 2 8 . 1 2 5 0 0

1 2 2 6 . 1 2 9 6 4

1 2 2 8 . 1 3 9 4 0

1 2 2 8 . 1 4 5 5 1

1 2 2 8 . 1 2 4 0 2

1 2 2 8 . 1 3 8 4 3

12 2 3 . 1 3 0 7 4

1 2 2 3 . 1 4 1 1 1

1 2 2 8 . 1 3 3 5 4

1 2 2 S . 1 5 6 2 5

1 2 2 8 . 1 2 9 1 5

1 2 2 8 . 1 0 9 7 4

CO'IPUIED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 6 2 8

0 . 0 0 2 2 6

0 . 0 0 6 2 2

0 . 0 0 6 9 3

0 . 0 0 1 1 9

0 . 0 0 6 7 9

0 . 0 0 1 9 6

0 . 0 0 7 0 4

0 . 0 0 3 7 1

0 . 0 1 4 1 7

' 0 . 0 1 0 3 7

0 . 0 0 5 6 9

0 . 0 0 5 9 4

0 . 0 0 4 3 5

0 . 0 0 5 6 6

0 . 0 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 0 5 8 8

0 . 0 0 1 5 2

0 . 0 0 0 3 4

0 . 0 0 1 8 9

0 . 0 0 6 8 5

0 . 0 0 8 7 4

0 . 0 0 0 6 4

0 . 0 0 1 2 1

0 . 0 1 3 2 3

0 . 0 0 5 1 5

0 . 0 1 4 0 3

0 . 0 0 3 7 8

0 . 0 0 6 2 8

0 . 0 0 2 2 3

0 . 0 0 624

0 . 0 0 8 8 3

0 . 0 0 1 5 7

0 . 0 1 5 9 6

0 . 0 0 1 2 7

- 0 . 0 1 3 6 9

0 . 0 0 3 5 6

0 . 0 0 1 6 4

0 . 0 0 2 9 6

0 . 0 0 5 6 1

0 . 0 0 2 7 7

0 . 0 0 6 3 3

0 . 0 0 7 2 3

0 . 0 0 2 4 6

0 . 0 0 4 5 8

0 . 0 0 2 4 8

0 . 0 0 5 3 2

0 . 0 1 1 6 3

0 . 0 0 1 3 0

0 . 0 0 8 4 2

0 . 0 0 0 3 8

DEPENDENT

16 3 4 6 . 2 9 9 9 9 5 3 . 1 7 1 0 2

INTERCEPT 5 1 9 . 1 1 5 6 0

HULTIPLE CORRELATIOK 0 . 7 5 6 3 <

STO. ERRCR CF ESTlnATE 5 3 . 0 4 1 2 6

132

Since, it is a matter of fact that Hindu-Muslim

communities in India are highly inter-dependent to each

other, hence where ever they are they have to work in

coordination with each other, so it is also pertinent to look

into the overall picture of the cause and effect relationship

irrespective of their religion bias. Therefore the present

investigation has also undertaken to study the problem of the

present endeavour undertaken the sample as a whole that

follows :

Total Saoqpler:

It has been mentioned in the preceeding writing that

the researcher has made efforts to analyze the data also

undertaking the total sample of the study irrespective of

their religious groups working as middle level managers.

Since, like previous findings the pattern of results remains

the same for the total sample that none of the personality

attributes and organizational characteristics are found

likely to influence either of the "17-QWL dimensions" and

"over all QWL" so, there is no necessity to repeat the

description of results, however the tables are being given to

highlight the clear picture of the total sample and to affirm

what contended by the present researcher. The findings in the

form of Tables are being presented for a look and

understanding on these that follows :

133

Table 3.73. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on EB - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DF S.S. M.S, F.Value

Attribution to Regression

51 836.37823 16.39957


0.94354

Total 349 6015.88770

Table 3.73 that highlights F = 1.03423 and all the t

statistical values given in Table 3.74 are found to be highly

insignificant, hence. IV's found to have no influence on DV

i.e., "economic benefits" - a QWL facet. The insignificant

findings accept all the proposed null hypotheses.

Table 3.75. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on PWC - a facet of QWL



51 496.83459 9.74185


0.98048

Total 349 3457.71558

"Physical Working Condition" - dimension of QWL has

also been found not to be influenced by either of the

Table 3.74. Showing M u l t i p l e Regression Bene f i t dimension of QWL.

Analyses 134

Economic

V A K I ACLI

I V

20

21

22

23

24

25

2 6

27

26

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

36

39

40

41

* i

43

44

45

4e .

47

46

49

50

51

52

S3

54

55

S6

57

Sd

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

6b

69

u t P L N D t M

1

JNTt^C£Pl

nULTIPLF

bTD. £ H R :

I "t. »^

4 . 0 2 3 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 i

S .60S57

3 . 3 0 5 7 J

3 . 5 0 2 3 6

3 . 0 e 2 ! c

i.HlBt

2 . b 4 0 C j

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 C 7 1 ,

2 . 7 4 5 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 7 5 1 4 3

3 . ; 7 4 ? ?

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 3 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 J

2 . 8 7 i ? 5

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 -

i.V*i^7

2 . J 7 7 1 4

^ . 5 54?''

2 . ^ ^ 3 5 7

3 .05429

3.042i>c>

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 :

2 .2142V

2 .1«D00

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 5 8 5 7 1

2 . 3 1 7 1 4

2 .5714 . '

2 .S2S57

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 8 *

2 . 3 3 4 ? «

2.042J1*

2 . 7 7 1 4 2

2 .57714

2 . 5 0 2 ? 6

2 . 5 0 » 5 ?

4C.S85 7 i

r t

1 4 . 3 3 4 2 9

COPiJtLMIOM

H OF £SI I«<«Tf

51 »-.r4«Jp in V I 4 | i c N

C . B f 7 3 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 - 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 S 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 6 6 4 6

• 1 . 5 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 7 4 5 8

1 - 2 C 5 6 9

1 . 1 » 4 3 3

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 O 0

1 . 2 7 v 9 0

1 . 2 t 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 ? « 2

1 . 1 « 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 b

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 C 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

i . 2 9 a o o

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 C 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . t 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 a 6 f

1 . 1 6 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 P 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 4 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 138

1 . 3 0 S 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 - ' 7 3 9

5 . 7 C 1 C 3

4 . 1 5 1 K 1

I 7 . 5 9 « 6 4

o . 3 7 ^ ^ £

t . l 6 « C 4

CCR'M l » H O N

• 0 . 0 4 4 3 4

- 0 . 0 9 0 7 5

- 0 . 0 7 1 2 9

0 . 0 7 6 0 2

- 0 . 0 5 5 3 4

- 0 . D 2 8 1 9

0 . 0 2 6 1 1

- 0 . 1 0 9 5 7

0 . 0 1 0 5 8

0 . 0 1 2 0 3

- 0 . C 3 9 9 S

0 . C 0 6 M

0 . 5 5 2 1 3

0 . C 2 6 5 0

0 . 0 7 2 4 3

0 . 3 2 5 9 3

C . 0 9 5 3 2

- 0 . 0 6 9 5 0 .

- 0 . ; t 9 1 7

- 0 . 0 4 4 5 4

0 . 0 1 7 4 ?

0 . 0 i » " . «

- O . D 7 4 ? f i

5 . :• c 2 : 4

- 0 . : ••949

- 0 . : i 5 ^ 7

- C . D 4 0 S 5

- 0 . n9«><i

C .022«. l

- 0 . 0 6 0 9 5

- 0 . 0 4 5 3 2

3 . C 4 7 4 3

0 , 0 6 8 6 ?

0 . C 5 J 9 2

- 0 . 0 5 1 1 5

- S . 0 2 7 4 2 •

C . 0 2 9 4 7

0 . 0 2 2 6 3

- 0 . 0 4 4 S 9

- C . C 1 5 4 0

C.C1054

- 0 . 0 5 7 4 7

- C . 0 4 6 1 9

C . ; ? ! " !

O.D7S7i5

D . 0 3 5 6 1

D . 0 2 3 4 1

- 0 . 0 2 0 . " ?

- & . 0 0 4 8 5

- 0 . C I 162

- o . : o o 6 «

CClFf I C H M

C .31394

0 . 1 5 8 1 8

0 . 4 1 9 4 9

0 . 6 5 9 7 0

0 . 3 1 4 1 5

0 . 3 9 1 3 6

0 . 6 3 5 2 5

- 0 . 0 3 5 6 8

0 . 6 8 8 2 5

0 . 5 6 0 1 3

0 . 4 2 8 9 4

0 . 7 0 7 S 0

0 . 5 3 3 8 1

0 . 4 2 3 9 8

0 . 6 4 6 2 9

0 . 5 2 3 2 8

0 . 6 6 6 4 2

0 . 2 8 2 6 6

0 . 2 3 0 6 6

0 . 2 4 7 1 7

3 . 5 0 6 1 5

0 . 8 « 4 l ?

0.22?9>!

0 . 6 7 0 1 0

0 . 0 5 4 3 3

0 . 5 3 3 9 1

0 . 4 6 1 4 ?

- 0 . 1 6 4 7 4

0.6>iS10

0 . 2 2 6 3 1

0 . 2 7 0 8 2

0 . 6 7 1 1 0

0 . 7 0 1 7 8

0 . 7 1 2 6 7

- 0 . 4 8 1 6 4

4 . 3 ? 5 1 0

4 . 5 9 2 6 1

. 4 . 5 0 4 0 1

4 . 2 5 6 0 7

4 . 5 t S 7 3

4 . 6 6 0 4 0

4 . 2 2 1 2 3

4 . 2 7 4 7 8

4 . 5 9 0 1 9

4 . 6 2 6 9 3

4 , 5 ^ 9 2 1

4 . 4 5 0 1 4

4 . 2 5 S e 6

4 . 4 0 9 3 8

4 . 5 4 6 8 2

- 4 . 4 3 3 6 9

i T i ) . I HHOK o r R ( O . C O I F .

3 4 . 3 9 B 6 B

3 4 . 3 9 9 0 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 7 2

3 4 . 3 9 8 4 5

3 4 . 3 9 8 0 6

3 4 . 3 9 8 1 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 3 7

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 2

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 5 '

3 4 . 3 9 8 3 0

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 4

3 4 . 3 9 8 4 7

3 4 . 3 9 8 0 0

3 4 , 3 9 8 3 5

3 4 . 3 9 7 9 1

3 4 . 3 9 7 7 1

3 4 . 3 9 8 3 4

3 4 . 3 9 8 7 4

3 4 . 3 9 8 4 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 4 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 5 3

J 4 . 3 9 8 5 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 5

3 4 . 3 9 8 1 4

3 4 . 3 9 6 2 0

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 0

3 4 . 3 9 8 0 7

3 4 . 3 9 8 3 2

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 5

3 4 . 3 9 8 3 2

3 4 . 3 9 8 1 6

3 4 . 3 9 8 2 8

3 4 . 3 9 8 5 9

3 4 . 3 9 8 6 4

3 4 . 3 9 7 6 1

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 0 9 . - -

2 3 0 . 4 3 6 3 3

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 1 8

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 7 8

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 6 5

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 8 4

2 3 0 . 4 3 4 6 5

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 9 9

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 6 7

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 3 5

2 3 0 . 4 3 6 9 4

2 3 0 . 4 2 5 2 4

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 1 2

2 3 0 . 4 3 6 1 9

2 3 0 . 4 5 5 7 6

2 3 0 . 4 3 5 5 2

COfPUTfO 1 VALUl

0 . 0 0 9 1 3

0 . 0 0 4 6 0

0 . 0 1 2 2 0

0 . 0 1 9 1 8

0 . 0 0 9 1 3

0 . 0 1 1 3 8

0 . 0 1 8 4 7

0 . 0 0 1 0 4

0 . 0 2 0 0 1

0 . 0 1 6 2 8

0 . 0 1 2 4 7

0 . 0 2 0 5 7

0 . 0 1 S 5 2

0 . 0 1 2 4 7

0 . 0 1 8 7 9

0 . 0 1 5 3 6

0 . 0 1 9 3 7

0 . 0 0 8 2 2

0 . 0 0 6 7 }

0 . 0 0 7 1 9

0 . 0 1 4 7 1

0 . 0 2 5 7 0

0 . 0 0 6 4 8

0 . 0 1 9 4 8

0 . 0 0 1 5 8

0 . 0 1 5 5 2

0 . 0 1 3 4 1

0 . 0 0 4 7 9

0 . 0 2 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 6 5 8

O.OIOTB

0 , 0 1 9 5 1

0 . 0 2 0 4 0

0 . 0 2 0 7 2

0 . 0 1 4 0 0

0 . 0 1 8 7 7

0 . 0 1 9 9 3

0 . 0 1 9 5 5

0 . 0 1 8 4 7

0 . 0 1 8 9 5

0 . 0 2 0 2 2

0 . 0 1 8 3 2

0 . 0 1 8 5 5

0 . 0 1 9 9 2

0 . 0 2 0 0 8

0 . 0 1 9 7 0

0 . 0 1 9 4 4

0 . 0 1 8 4 8

0 . 0 1 9 5 3

0 . 0 1 9 7 3

0 . 0 1 9 2 6

135 Table 3.76. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Physxjal

Working Condition dimension of QWL.

V A N I A C K 1 L * N M.

19

?0

2 1

ii

23

li.

2S

26

27

26

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

3S

36

37

3«

39

40

4 1

42

43

4 4

45

4 6

47

4 6

49

SO

51

32

a S4

ss 5«" .

57

sa 59

60

61

62

63

64

63

66

67

66

69

0 £ P E N D t M

2

I N I t a C E P T

MULTIPLE

STD. ERRC

4 . C 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 S 5 7

3 . : 0 $ 7 1

3 . » 0 ; S 6

3 . 0 8 2 S 6

2 . 8 4 2 S 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 * 3

2 . 9 6 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 9

I . I O O O C

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

J . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 8 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 : 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 8 d 0 0

1 8 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1 2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . S 2 S 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 8 6

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 0 2 8 6

2 . 5 0 3 5 7

4 0 . 8 6 5 7 2

1 2 . 1 7 1 4 3

C C ' i » E L * T I C N

3 OF E S T J - > T r

«.T »NP*HO D t V I A T I O N

0 . 8 ^ 7 3 0

1 .101.5b

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 6 1 6

1 . 1 5 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 C 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 « 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

. 1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 8 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 8 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 6 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

• 1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 1 3 S

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

t . 7 0 1 0 3

3 . 1 4 7 6 2

1 7 . 2 8 8 0 6

0 . 3 7 9 0 6

: . I 5 2 U

CCJfif L»T IOV X VS V

0 . 0 0 0 4 7

- 0 . U 7 7 1

- e . 0 6 4 5 4

- 0 . 0 3 5 1 9

- 0 . 0 4 2 0 6

0 . 0 4 7 O 1

- 0 . 0 0 7 4 3

o.o3 ies - 0 . 0 2 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 3 3 7 1

- 0 . 0 3 0 7 0

0 . 0 0 0 9 3

- 0 . 0 2 6 1 4

- 0 . 0 2 6 1 7

- 0 . 0 3 4 6 3

0 . 0 2 1 9 7

- 0 . C 3 4 9 4

O.C?e99

0 . J 0 2 » l

- 3 . 0 2 6 ^ 9

- 0 . 0 7 7 8 9

0 . 0 8 2 3 0

0 . 0 3 9 9 0

0 . 0 ? 5 2 ?

- 0 . 0 3 6 ^ 7

- 0 . 0 4 5 5 4

- 0 . 0 1 6 7 7

0 . 0 4 7 0 5

- 0 . 0 3 5 3 4

9 . 0 3 0 2 6

- 0 . 0 3 S C 6

- 0 . 0 1 9 6 4

0 . 0 1 3 1 4

C . C 1 2 4 1

- 3 . 0 5 2 < ' J

- 0 . 0 4 i J «

- C . 0 5 4 7 5

- O . 0 0 7 2 3

- 0 . 0 4 2 4 4

9 . 0 4 8 9 6

0 . 0 1 S ' O

- 0 . 1 1 3 2 0

- 0 . 0 5 6 J «

C . 0 3 6 2 5

0 . 0 5 5 1 2

0 . 0 1 7 P 4

- 0 . 0 ? 5 ? 2

- 0 . 0 5 5 2 2

- C . 0 2 3 3 0

- 0 . 1 3 3 4 3

- 0 . 0 8 3 ] 6

HEORISSION STO. fKHOR C C l f f I C I E K T Of R E G . C O I F .

C . 3 8 8 0 0

- « . 1 3 9 1 4

9 k 2 9 0 6 3

0 . 2 9 3 4 7

0 . 1 8 6 4 4 '

C . 5 0 5 3 0

0 . 2 3 5 8 1

0 . 3 9 1 5 7

0 . 3 2 5 0 8

0 . 2 5 3 6 6

0 . 1 6 2 5 2

0 . 4 1 2 6 0

0 . 1 6 1 1 8

0 . 2 0 7 6 8

0 . 2 5 3 2 7

9 . 4 9 7 4 9

0 . 1 0 9 3 7

0 . 4 9 9 6 9

0 . 1 2 9 7 7

0 . 4 1 1 8 1

0 . 1 8 1 1 2

0 . 6 1 9 6 2

0 . 3 0 5 6 5

0 . 4 6 8 8 2

0 . 0 6 2 1 4

0 . 2 1 4 6 2

0 . 2 4 8 8 6

0 . 4 7 6 0 7

0 . 1 3 7 5 8

0 . 3 4 5 7 6

0 . 2 1 5 2 0

0 . 2 5 1 0 2

0 . 4 0 6 1 2

0 . 3 6 S S 0

- 0 . 3 0 7 2 5

2 . 2 9 1 7 2

1 . 9 3 8 4 7

1 . 8 6 9 8 3

1 . 7 6 8 7 9

2 . 1 7 3 4 4

2 . 1 5 5 1 4

2 . 0 2 4 0 3

1 . 9 8 6 4 1

2 . 3 6 7 6 6

2 . 2 S 5 4 8

2 . 1 3 9 1 0

1 . 9 6 5 0 0

1 . 4 5 6 7 5

2 . 1 9 0 9 4

1 . 6 9 4 0 7

- 2 . 1 1 3 7 5

2 6 . 0 0 8 0 6

2 6 . 0 0 8 3 7

2 4 . 0 0 8 0 9

2 4 . 0 0 7 8 8

2 6 . 0 0 7 5 9

2 6 . 0 0 7 6 9

2 6 . 0 0 7 8 3

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 1

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 3

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 7

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 2

2 6 . 0 0 7 9 0

2 6 . 0 0 7 5 5

2 4 . 0 0 7 8 1

2 6 . 0 0 7 4 7

2 6 . 0 0 7 3 2

2 6 . 0 0 7 8 0

2 4 . 0 0 8 1 0

2 6 . 0 0 7 9 2

2 6 . 0 0 7 9 1

2 6 . 0 0 7 9 4

2 6 . 0 0 7 9 9

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 3

2 6 . 0 0 7 6 5

2 4 . 0 0 7 6 9

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 0

2 6 . 0 0 7 6 0

2 6 . 0 0 7 79

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 4

2 4 . 0 C ' ' 7 8

2 4 . 0 C 7 6 6

2 6 . 0 0 7 7 6

, 2 6 . 0 0 7 9 9

2 6 . 0 0 8 0 3

2 6 . 0 0 7 2 5

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 7 2

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 6 6

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 7 9

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 2 3

1 74 . 2 2 71 4

1 7 i . 2 2 7 2 8

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 3 8

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 4 0

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 1 7

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 9 1

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 1 2

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 8 4

1 7 4 . 2 2 6 7 6

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 5 5

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 2 3

1 7 4 . 2 2 7 0 7

COHPUttO T VALUE

0 . 0 1 4 9 2

0 . 0 0 5 3 5

0 . 0 1 1 1 7

0 . 0 1 1 2 8

0 . 0 0 7 1 7

0 . 0 1 9 4 3

O.0O907

0 . 0 1 5 0 6

0 . 0 1 2 5 0

0 . 0 0 9 7 5

0 . 0 0 6 2 5

0 . 0 1 5 8 6

0 . 0 0 6 2 0

0 . 0 0 7 9 9

0 . 0 0 9 7 4

0 . 0 1 9 1 3

0 . 0 0 4 2 1

0 . 0 1 9 2 1

0 . 0 0 4 9 9

0 . 0 1 5 8 3

0 . 0 0 6 9 6

0 . 0 2 3 8 2

0 . 0 1 1 7 5

0 . 0 1 8 0 3

0 . 0 0 2 3 9

0 . 0 0 8 2 5

0 . 0 0 9 5 7

0 . 0 1 8 3 1

0 . 0 0 5 2 9

0 . 0 1 3 2 9

0 . 0 0 8 2 7

0 . 0 0 9 6 5

0 . 0 1 5 6 2

0 . 0 1 4 1 7

0 . 0 1 1 8 1

0 . 0 1 3 1 5

n . n i I M

0 . 0 1 0 7 3

0 . 0 1 0 1 5

0 . 0 1 2 4 7

0 . 0 1 2 3 7

0 . 0 1 1 6 2

0 . 0 1 1 4 0

0 . 0 1 3 5 9

0 . 0 1 2 9 5

0 .0122< l

0 . 0 1 1 2 8

0 . 0 0 9 5 1

3 . 0 1 2 5 8

9 . 0 0 9 7 2

9 . 0 1 2 1 3

136

p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and

o b t a i n e d F = 0.98048 (Table 3 . 7 5 ) and a l l t h e o b t a i n e d t

v a l u e s g i v e n i n Table 3 . 7 6 have been rendered s t a t i s t i c a l l y

h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t and s u b s e q u e n t l y a l l the n u l l h y p o t h e s e s

a r e bound t o be accep ted .

T a b l e 3 . 7 7 . Ana lys i s o f Var iance f o r t h e R e g r e s s i o n Showing the i n f l u e n c e o f IV' s on MS - a f a c e t o f QWL

Source of pp g . S . M.S. F .Va lue V a r i a t i o n

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 881 .37067 17 .28178 1 . 0 8 2 2 4 R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from 298 4758 .62939 15 .96856 R e g r e s s i o n

T o t a l 349 5640 .00000

As e v i d e n t from Table 3 . 7 7 (F = 1 .08224) and t h e t

v a l u e s ranging from t = .01451 t o t = .04833 g i v e n i n 3 .78

c l e a r l y shows t h a t none of t h e I V ' s found t o i n f l u e n c e

'mental s t a t e ' dimension o f QWL, h e n c e , proposed n u l l

h y p o t h e s e s g e t s t h e i r a c c e p t a n c e .

Table 3.78 137

Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Mental State dimension of QWL.

M R U e L C n£ AN

1 *

2 1

2 1

22

23

24

2S

2 *

27

2 t

2»

!• SI

32

33

34

35

36

37

3S

3»

4b

41

42

43

44

4S

46

47

4e

4V

39

S i

S2

J3

34

55

36

57

58

5V

66

6 1

62

63

64

ttS

6e

67

6e

69

4 . 0 Z S 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 U

3 . 6 0 6 S 7

3 . 3 0 S 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 6 6

3 . 0 B ? g e

2 . 8 4 2 B 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

Z . S 8 2 a e

3 . 1 t 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . S 8 0 0 C

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 9

3 . lOOOC

2 . 5 9 1 * 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

i . 0 8 : S 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . S 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 B S 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 3 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 8 0 0 C

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 ; 9

, 6 3 7 U

, 7 2 2 8 6

. 6 3 4 2 9

. 9 4 2 8 t

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 0 2 E e

2 . 5 0 5 5 7

4 0 , 8 £ 5 7 2

i ) t P £ N u £ M

3 2 : . c e o o o

I M t W C t P l

M L . tSKCK OF C S T ! « i I (

STANDARD D r V l A t l O M

0 . 8 S 7 3 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 e

1 . 2 0 5 7 3 .

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 S

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 90 V

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 S 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 8 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 3 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5.3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 8 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 9 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 4 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 1 3 8

1 . 3 0 e l 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

6 . 7 0 1 0 3

*•. 0 2 0 0 1

3 . 8 6 3 4 3

« . 9 9 t C T

C C » R t L * T I O K « V5 Y ?s??nnF::T STO. ERROR

Of REC.COEF. C O l f U T f O

- 0 . 0 2 4 9 0

0 . 0 6 2 5 9

0 . 0 9 8 1 3

0 . 0 2 6 1 3

0 . 0 5 9 S 9

- 0 . 0 5 0 9 7

0 . 0 4 4 9 6

- e . 0 1 9 1 4

0 . 0 6 2 2 4

0 . 0 1 6 S 1

- 0 . 0 4 0 3 4

C . 0 4 7 2 c

- 0 . 0 4 3 6 0

- 0 . 0 2 7 2 9

0 . 0 6 S 7 0

- 0 . 0 7 2 2 3

- 0 . 0 2 8 S 2

0 . C 9 1 6 3

0 . 0 1 0 2 3

- C . 0 3 8 4 3

0 . 0 6 0 7 3

0 . 0 6 0 7 0

- 0 . 0 2 3 0 6

- D . 5 5 4 9 3

0 . 0 2 5 2 2

0 . 0 3 3 3 7

0 .C141S

- 0 . 0 2 S 1 5

C . 0 J 5 3 2

C . C 1 6 6 1

0 . 0 9 1 9 0

- 0 . 0 3 5 1 4

0 . 0 4 6 S 2

0 . 0 7 2 6 3

3 . 0 6 2 9 4

0 . 0 1 S 9 8

0 . 0 1 4 6 9

, 0 3 3 3 1

. 041C1

.CI 74?

. 0 S 4 » 7

C . 0 7 4 1 7

C. 0157*

- 3 . C 5 3 6 5

0 . : 0 7 ] r

- C . C t ' * 5 7

0 . 0 0 9 6 4

- C O O l * . ?

0.OC9P9

- 0 . 8 4 5 0 6

- 0 . 6 3 2 6 3

- 0 . 3 9 0 7 1

- 0 . 8 1 6 5 4

- 0 . 5 9 5 2 8

- 1 . 0 0 0 2 9

- 0 . 4 7 8 5 1

- 0 . 8 5 5 5 8

- 0 . 7 2 0 2 6

- 0 . 6 1 1 5 6

- 0 . 8 8 5 3 7

- 0 . 3 9 1 9 2

- 0 . 9 3 8 8 0

- 0 . 8 1 3 4 2

- 0 . 3 9 0 6 1

- 0 . 9 6 7 9 0

- 0 . 9 8 4 1 6

- 0 . 2 5 0 7 2 - 0 . 7 0 9 3 a

- 1 . 0 6 7 9 3

- 0 . 5 2 8 27

- 0 . 5 4 5 9 7

- 0 . 9 3 2 5 *

- 0 . 9 3 3 1 8

- 0 . 5 1 9 2 0

- 0 . 6 8 2 1 4

- 0 . 5 9 1 7 0

- 0 . 9 5 6 3 5

- 0 . 4 8 9 4 7

- 0 . 6 6 5 5 4

- 0 . 4 2 4 2 1

- 0 . 9 4 9 6 9

- 0 . 4 9 3 6 8

- 0 . 5 7 0 6 4

0 . 7 0 2 8 2

- 1 0 . 1 3 9 5 8

- 1 0 . 3 5 3 0 6

- 9 . 9 5 0 2 9

- 1 0 . 1 6 5 6 2

- I C . 1 4 ? 4 6

- 1 0 . 0 5 7 0 7

- 1 0 . 1 4 1 1 8

- 9 . 6 1 9 3 1

- 1 0 . 0 7 9 6 0

- 5 . S 7 6 3 6

- 1 0 . 2 9 7 4 1

- 9 . 8 2 9 3 6

- 1 0 . i 7 5 a 3

- 9 , 8 9 3 5 7

- I D . 2 2 7 8 9

1 0 . * 9 3 * o

3 2 . 9 7 1 4 8

3 2 . 9 7 1 8 7

3 2 . 9 7 1 5 1

3 2 . 9 7 1 2 5

3 2 . 9 7 0 8 8

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 1

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 9

3 2 . 9 710 4

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 6

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 2

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 5

3 2 . 9 7 1 2 8

3 2 . 9 7 0 8 3

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 6

3 2 . 9 7 0 7 4

3 2 . 9 7 0 5 4

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 5

3 2 . 9 7 1 5 3

3 2 . 9 7 1 3 0

3 2 . 9 7 1 2 9

3 2 . 9 7 1 3 3

3 2 . 9 7 1 3 9

3 2 . 9 710 6

3 2 . 9 7 0 9 6

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 2

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 2

3 2 . 9 7 0 8 9

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 4

3 2 . 9 7 1 0 7

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 3

3 2 . 9 7 C 9 S

3 2 . 9 7 1 1 0

3 2 . 9 7 1 3 9

3 2 . 9 7 1 4 4

3 2 . 9 7 0 4 6

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 3 3

2 2 0 . 8 7 5 5 3 2 2 0 . 8 7 4 4 2

2 2 0 . 9 7 4 9 f

i^J.S748e

2 2 0 . 8 7 5 0 5

2 2 0 . 8 7 3 9 0

2 2 0 . 8 7 5 2 0

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 8 9

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 5 9 '

2 2 0 . 8 7 6 1 0

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 4 8

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 3 7

2 2 0 . S 7 5 3 8

2 2 0 . 8 7 4 9 8

2 2 0 . 8 7 * 7 6

0 .

0 .

c. 0 .

0 .

0 .

VALUE

0 . 0 2 S 6 )

0 . 0 1 9 1 9

0 . 0 1 1 8 S

0 . 0 2 * 7 7

e.oisos 0.03034

0.01451

0.02595

0.0 2185

o.oiass

0 . 0 2 6 8 5

0 . 0 1 1 8 9

0 . 0 2 8 4 7

0 . 0 2 4 6 7

0 1 1 8 5

0 2 9 3 6

0 2 9 8 5

0 0 7 6 0

0 2 1 5 2

0 3 2 3 9

0 . 0 1 6 0 2

0 . 0 1 6 5 6

0 . 0 2 8 2 8

0 . 0 2 8 3 0

0 . 0 1 5 7 5

0 . 0 2 0 6 9

0 . 0 1 7 6 4

0 . 0 2 8 4 0

• 0 . 0 1 4 8 5

0 . 0 2 0 1 9

0 . 0 1 2 8 7

0 . 0 2 8 8 0

0 . 0 1 4 9 7

0 . 0 1 7 3 1

0 . 0 2 1 3 2

0 . 0 4 5 9 1

0 . 0 4 6 8 7

0 . 0 4 5 0 5

0 . 0 4 6 0 2

0 4 5 9 2

0 4 5 5 3

0 4 5 9 1

0 4 3 5 5

0 4 5 6 3

0 4 4 7 1

0 4 6 6 2

0 . 0 4 4 5 0

0 . 0 4 8 3 3

0 . 0 4 4 7 9

0 . 0 4 6 3 1

0 . 0 4 7 5 3

• 0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

138


the influence of TV's on CO - a facet of QWL

Source of DF S.S. M.S. F.Value Variation



Total 349 13194.35156

One of the QWL facet i.e. "Career Orientation" (DV)

failed to received any influence of either personality

attributes or organizational characteristics (IV's) as

obtained F = 1.30991 given in Table 3.79 and all the t values

highlighted in Table 3.80 have been found highly

insignificant advocating the acceptance of all the null

hypotheses.

Table 3.81. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on AM - a facet of QWL




Total 349 12373.21680

139 Table 3.80. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Career

Orientation dimension of QWL.

V A R I A C L L NO.

19

20

2 1

22 23 24

2S

26

27

2«

2 9

SO

3 1

32

33

34

33

3 6

37

3 t

39

40

41

42

43

4 *

45

4 6

47

48

49

SO

5 1

52

S3

5 4

55

5 6

57

50

59

6 0

61

62

63

6 4

6S

6 6

6 7

6e

6 9

nut:

4 . 0 ? 5 7 J

3 . 7 5 7 1 *

3 . 6 0 S 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . S 0 2 5 6

3 . 0 e 2 S A

2 . 6 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 ]

2 . 8 B 2 8 A

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 3 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 B 0 0 O

2 . 9 & 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 C C

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 * 5

2 . 8 7 * 2 9

5 . 1 7 1 * 3

3 . 1 7 * 2 5

5 . 0 8 S 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 *

2 . 8 5 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 S 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 * 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 *

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 9 0 0

2 . 2 1 * 2 9

2 . ieooc 1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 *

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 *

2 . 5 7 1 * 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 5 1 * 3

2 . 6 j i . ? -

2 . 0 3 7 1 *

2 . 7 2 2 8 t

2 . 8 5 * 2 9

2 . 9 * 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 1 * 5

2 . S 7 7 U

2 . S C 2 8 i

2 . 5 0 S 5 7

* C . S S 5 7 :

STANPARi) CCRHtL lT IOK R t O R C S ' j l C K S T U . ERROR CONPUtlD

S e v i A T I O N X VS T C O £ F F I C I t N T OF REC.COEF. f VALUE

0 . 9 ^ 7 3 0 0 . 0 1 7 1 1 0 . 9 4 0 ( 4 4 9 . 6 2 1 4 0 0 .01S96

1 . 1 0 4 5 8 - 0 . 0 9 9 5 7 - 0 . 4 1 3 1 4 4 9 . 6 2 1 9 9 0 . 0 0 8 3 3

1 . 2 0 5 7 3 - 0 . 0 1 4 8 7 0 . 6 4 2 4 2 4 9 . 6 2 1 4 5 0 .9129S

1 . 1 7 3 1 1 0 . 0 4 6 1 5 0 . 6 3 4 6 9 4 9 . 6 2 1 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 7 9

1 . 2 2 0 0 5 - 0 . 0 0 1 7 8 0 . < 4 9 6 5 4 9 . 6 2 0 5 0 0 . 0 1 3 0 9

1 . 2 1 6 6 4 0 . 0 1 0 1 5 0 . ( 2 1 8 5 4 9 . 6 2 0 6 9 0 . 0 1 2 5 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 9 - 0 . 0 * 6 2 2 0 . 2 6 1 0 3 4 9 . 6 2 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 5 2 6

1 . 3 0 3 1 1 - 0 . 0 9 6 6 3 - 0 . 1 7 0 4 9 4 9 . 6 2 0 7 4 0 . 0 0 3 4 4

1 . 2 4 8 1 6 - 0 . 0 1 4 5 5 0 . 7 6 4 9 0 4 9 . 6 2 0 7 7 0 . 0 1 S 4 I

1 . 1 « 7 S 6 - 0 . 1 5 5 2 1 - 0 . 2 4 2 7 0 4 9 . 6 2 0 8 5 0 . 0 0 4 8 9

1 . 2 1 0 5 0 - 0 . 0 2 2 6 5 0 . 4 2 6 5 9 4 9 . 6 2 0 7 6 0 . 0 0 8 6 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9 - 0 . 0 2 * 7 0 0 . 7 3 0 4 3 4 9 . 6 2 1 1 0 0 . 0 1 4 7 2

1 . 2 S S 7 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 5 0 . 5 5 5 3 7 4 9 . 6 2 0 4 2 0 . 0 1 1 1 5

1 . 3 3 2 0 6 - 0 . 0 5 0 7 5 0 . 5 1 1 0 3 4 9 . 6 2 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 6 2 7

1 . 2 8 6 4 6 - C . 0 0 5 S * 0 . 4 6 2 0 8 4 9 . 6 2 0 2 9 0 . 0 0 9 3 1

1 . 3 2 2 2 5 O .0DS3* 0 . 2 7 7 0 1 4 9 . 6 2 0 0 0 O.OOSSB

1 . 2 3 6 5 8 - 0 . 0 2 7 9 2 0 . 4 3 7 0 2 4 9 . 6 2 0 9 1 0 . 0 0 8 8 1

1 . 2 0 5 6 9 - 0 . 0 7 2 7 3 0 . 4 1 5 5 5 4 7 . 6 2 1 4 8 0 . 0 0 8 3 3

1 . 1 S 4 3 0 - 0 . 1 5 1 3 0 - 0 . 0 8 1 1 2 4 9 . 6 2 1 1 4 0 .00163

1 . 2 2 4 1 3 - 0 . 0 7 3 6 7 0 . O S 5 9 6 4 9 . 6 2 1 1 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 9

1 . 2 5 5 9 0 0 . 0 8 0 8 6 1 . 0 3 7 5 0 4 9 . 6 2 1 1 8 0 . 0 2 0 9 1

1 . 2 7 7 9 0 - 0 . 0 6 1 6 9 0 . 5 0 4 9 * 4 9 . 6 2 1 2 8 0 . 0 0 6 1 5

1 . 2 e 7 1 4 - 0 . 1 * 2 5 * 0 . 0 6 6 5 * * 9 . 6 2 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 1 3 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2 - 0 . 1 0 5 9 2 0 . 5 1 6 6 4 4 9 . 6 2 0 6 2 0 . 0 0 6 3 8

1 . 1 F 7 1 0 - 0 . 0 5 7 5 8 0 . 1 9 7 2 7 * 9 . 6 2 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 8

1 . 2 * 0 3 6 0 . 0 6 * 3 0 0 . 7 9 0 8 5 * 9 . 6 2 0 7 2 0 . 0 1 5 9 4

1 . 3 0 9 2 7 0 . 035SS 0 . 6 5 1 2 4 4 9 . 6 2 0 5 2 0 . 0 1 3 1 2

1 . 2 « l ! 3 - 0 . 0 S 9 1 ! 0 . 5 2 S 4 9 * 9 . 6 2 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 6 5 6

X . 2 S 1 2 0 - 0 . 0 8 8 7 8 0 . 2 5 4 1 5 4 9 . 6 2 0 7 8 0 . 0 0 5 1 3

1 . 2 4 ^ 6 1 - 0 . 0 2 * 9 9 0 . 4 1 0 0 8 * 9 . 6 2 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 8 2 6

1 . 3 1 4 1 2 - 0 . 0 6 5 8 2 C . 2 4 6 7 4 4 9 . 6 2 0 6 5 0 . 0 0 4 9 7

1 . 2 9 8 0 0 - C . 1 2 6 3 7 0 . 0 4 1 6 3 4 9 . 6 2 0 8 2 0 . 0 0 0 8 4

1 . 2 S 6 4 2 - 0 . 0 8 * * 9 0 . 4 8 7 4 7 4 9 . 6 2 1 2 7 0 . 0 0 9 8 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4 - 0 . 1 5 1 6 0 0 . 5 2 3 9 5 4 9 . 6 2 1 5 S 0 . 0 0 6 5 3

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7 - 0 . 1 7 4 0 1 - 0 . 4 7 0 3 0 4 9 . 6 1 9 8 6 0 . 0 0 9 4 8

1 . 2 0 1 7 9 0 . 0 4 5 5 5 7 . 5 5 4 6 2 5 3 2 . 4 1 1 3 5 0 . 0 2 2 1 3

1 . 1 1 6 3 4 - 0 . 0 0 4 2 6 7 . 2 2 9 1 1 3 5 2 . 4 1 3 1 5 0 .02175

1 . 2 6 2 5 3 - 0 . 0 9 0 0 * 6 . 5 9 2 0 * 5 5 2 . 4 1 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 9 2 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1 - 0 . 9 5 0 * 6 7 . 2 5 5 9 6 5 5 2 . 4 1 2 5 2 0 . 0 2 1 8 5

1 . 1 7 6 6 8 C.C11*6 7 . 1 8 5 0 0 5 5 2 . * 1 2 1 7 0 .02161

1 . 1 8 » 6 7 C .00S39 7 . 7 7 2 2 0 5 3 ? . 4 1 2 * 1 0 .02538

1 . 2 6 5 5 4 - O . l W i l 6 . 9 9 5 2 1 5 3 2 . 4 1 0 7 1 3 .0210*

1 . 1 9 5 4 3 - 5 . 0 8 3 1 5 6 , 6 2 8 8 9 3 3 2 . * 1 2 6 6 0 . 0 1 9 9 4

1 . 2 4 6 3 3 C . 0 5 1 3 2 7 . 8 6 2 6 5 5 5 2 . 4 1 2 2 0 0 . 0 2 5 6 5

1 . 2 2 1 1 0 0 . 0 3 * 3 9 7 . 5 5 3 0 * 3 3 2 . * 1 1 7 1 0 . 0 2 2 7 2

1 . 1 « 5 < 7 3 . 0 2 5 0 0 7 . 7 1 * 5 2 3 3 2 - * l * 0 0 0 .02521

1 . 2 0 1 3 8 0 . 0 * 7 5 * 7 . 5 1 7 0 9 3 3 2 . 4 1 1 5 * 0 .02261

1 . 3 0 6 1 7 - 0 . 0 7 0 1 9 6 . 6 1 9 8 1 3 5 2 . 4 1 1 4 1 0 .01991

1 . 2 5 7 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 5 0 7 . 6 4 2 6 2 5 5 2 . 4 1 2 9 3 0 .02299

I . 2 7 ? 3 9 - 0 .0196>> 7 . 5 2 1 0 2 3 5 2 . 4 1 2 5 2 0 . 0 2 2 6 5

6 . 7 0 1 0 5 - 0 . 0 4 7 8 3 - 7 . 1 I 1 1 S 3 3 2 . 4 1 1 9 9 0 . 0 2 1 5 9

DEPENDtNT

4 1 0 . 1 5 7 1 * 6 . 1 4 8 6 7

INIEKCEFI 1 2 - 1 9 3 9 5

IWLTIPLE CCRRtL»TION 0 . 4 2 7 9 1

STD. ERKCK CF E5Tl r«TE » i t O U O C

140 Table 3.82, Showing M u l t i p l e Regress ion Analyses - Advancement

on Merit d imension of QWL. VARUBLC H t * r .

MO.

1«

It

11

22

22

24

2i

26

27

26

2«

30

31

32

33

34

3S

36

37

36

39

40

41

42

43

44

4S

40

47

46

49

SO

SI

52

S3

H

i%

it

S7

S8

S9

60

61

62

6 j

6k

6S

60

67

66

69

4 . 0 r s 71

3 . 7 3 7 U

3 . 6 C 5 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3. iO.- '8h

3. i :8?B6

2 .3 ' i c t t6

2.6<.OC0

3 . S 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 E 2 R 6

3 . 1 9 7 U

2 . 7 4 B 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . S 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 5 9 1 * 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 7

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . C 8 e 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . Of 429

3 . C 4 ^ : £

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 C 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 8 C 0 0

1 C 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . S 2 6 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 1

2 .634r< ;

2 . 6 3 7 U

i.72:£»

2 . 8 3 4 ? V

2 .942PO

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 0 2 f 6

2 . 5 0 3 5 7

4 ! ! .S857?

ST « N D « 1 D Oi V U T I O K

0 . ^ 8 7 3 3

1 . 1 0 4 5 ^

1 . 2 0 5 7 5

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 3 6

1 . 2 1 0 S 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

l . ? S S 7 »

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 S

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 S 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4 .

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2 -

1 . 2 9 6 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 Oof 7

l . r 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 8 5 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 C 1 3 3

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 C 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

6 . 7 D 1 C 3

C C f w ( L * T I O N K v . r

0 . 0 6 0 1 9

- 0 . 0 33^5

- C . 0 0 9 5 ?

- 0 . 0 5 5 X 1

0 . 0 1 7 f t S

0 . 0 5 2 4 2

0 . 0 7 7 9 1

- 0 . 0 4 4 0 9

0 . 0 1 6 0 !

- 0 . 0 0 6 2 7

- 0 . C 2 9 O 5

0 . 1 4 0 1 2

0 . 0 9 7 2 5

- 0 . 0 1 3 8 4

0 . 0 1 9 4 7

0 . 0 8 3 1 3

- 0 . 0 5 1 5 5

0 . 0 0 5 1 5

- C . 0 2 5 4 0

0 . 0 1 1 4 1

0 . 0 9 3 7 C

0 . 0 7 6 ? 2

- 0 . 0 5 5 C 5

0.0COS5

- 0 . O S 9 C 3

- 0 . 0 1 8 7 3

C. C 1 4 ? 4

C O C O " 4

C. U 4 9 7

: . o 2 o ? ' ;

C . C 2 4 3 1

- C . o f 805

C . 0 5 8 D "

C . 0 3 4 5 1

0 . 0 6 0 4 «

- 0 . 0 7 0 3 5

- 0 . 0 3 6 9 2

0 . 0 4 3 8 2

0 . 0 1 6 7 5

C . 0 0 9 3 2

- C . t 2 3 ^ ?

- 0 . 0 7 5 8 1

- O . ; 2 1 7 o

- 0 . 0 I "5 ? t

0 . D 3 C 3 2

0 . 0 2 9 5 6

0 . C 3 S 3 4

- 0 . 0 4 1 " o

- 0 . : 2 0 7 4

- C . C ? 8 4 5

- c . c : i a ;

RlCKlSJlON ; 111) . t f iRcn C C I I f K J f N T 01 B i G . C O f F .

0 . 8 3 7 9 7

- 0 . 2 3 1 6 2

0 . 0 4 3 4 0

- 0 . 4 3 6 1 9

0 .314V5

0 . 4 0 1 4 6

0 . 4 2 6 2 4

- 0 . 2 4 5 4 2

0 . 3 5 4 0 5

0 . 0 4 4 0 7

- 0 . 1 8 2 5 4

1.000O2

0 . 3 3 7 2 3

- 0 . 2 8 3 7 4

0 . 1 3 1 0 8

0 . 6 4 2 0 5

- 0 . 4 3 2 6 1

0 . 5 4 4 9 7

- 0 . 2 7986

- 0 . 0 6 6 5 0

0 . 7 6 8 5 ?

0 . 5 6 7 6 9

- 0 . 4 1 3 0 0

0 . 3 3 0 2 2

- 0 . 3 ^ 6 9 6

- 0 . 1 7 5 3 1

0 . 1 9 0 9 7

- 0 . 1 8 0 1 2

0 . 8 7 3 7 0

0 . 1 6 8 1 9

0 . 3 9 5 2 3

- 0 . 4 9 2 7 7

0 . 8 9 3 2 0

0 . 0 6 0 9 9

- 0 . 1 0 8 4 4

2 . 9 4 1 7 3

3 . 2 5 0 2 5

3 . 5 3 7 1 1

3 . 3 4 5 9 8

3 . 3 2 0 7 9

3 . 4 4 0 6 3

3 . 0 9 2 5 0

3 . 7 5 7 6 4

3 . 1 3 5 1 9

3 . 8 0 9 5 0

3 . 5 7 9 5 8

3 . 4 0 7 3 9

2 . S 4 9 1 2

3 . 5 5 2 4 7

3 . 4 9 5 9 5

- 3 . 4 4 3 1 7

4 5 . 3 0 3 6 3

4 8 . 3 0 4 2 0

4 ! . 3 0 3 6 !

4 8 . 3 0 3 3 0

4 8 . 3 0 2 7 5

4 s . 3 0 2 9 4

4 ' i . 3 032 0

4 S . 3 0 2 9 6

4 8 . 3 0 3 0 1

4 9 . 3 0 3 0 9

4 8 . 3 0 3 0 0

4 8 . 3 0 3 3 3

4 8 . 3 0 2 6 7

4 8 . 3 0 3 1 6

4 8 . 3 0 2 5 4

4 8 . 3 0 2 2 6

4 8 . 3 0 3 1 5

4 i . 3 0 3 7 0

4 3 . 3 0 3 3 7

4 « . 3 0 3 3 5

4 3 . 3 0 3 4 1

4 S . 3 0 3 S C

4 2 . 3 0 3 0 1

4 8 . 3 0 2 8 6

4 9 . 3 0 2 9 4

4 E . 3 0 2 9 6

4 3 . 3 0 2 7 6

4 5 . 3 0 3 1 2

4 S . 3 0 3 0 3

4 ! . 3 0 3 1 1

4 J . 3 0 2 S 9

4 5 . 3 0 3 C 7

4 5 . 3C35 0

4 S . 3 C 3 5 7

4 - . 3 0 2 1 3

3 2 3 . 5 8 3 6 2

3 2 3 . 5 8 5 3 9

3 2 3 . 5 8 3 7 7

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 5 9

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 4 4

H i . 5 6 4 6 9

3 2 3 . 5 8 3 0 1

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 9 0

^ 2 3 . 5 8 4 4 7

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 0 1

3 2 3 . 5 8 6 2 4

3 2 3 . 5 S 3 3 6

3 2 3 . 5 6 3 7 1

3 2 3 . 5 3 5 1 7

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 5 9

3 2 3 . 5 8 4 2 6

C C f U l f O T V « t U l

0 . 0 1 8 3 6

0 . 0 0 4 8 0

0 . 0 0 0 9 0

0 . 0 0 9 0 3

0 . 0 0 6 5 1

0 . 0 0 8 3 1

0 . 0 0 8 8 2

0 . 0 0 5 0 8

0 . 0 e 7 3 3

0 . 0 0 0 9 1

0 . 0 0 3 7 8

0 . 0 2 0 7 0

0 . 0 0 6 9 8

0 . 0 0 5 B 7

0 . 0 0 2 7 1

0 . 0 1 3 2 9

0 . 0 0 6 9 6

0 . 0 1 1 2 8

0 . 0 0 5 7 9

0 . 0 0 1 3 B

0 . 0 1 5 9 1

0 . 0 1 1 7 6

0 . 0 0 8 5 5

0 . 0 0 6 8 4

0 . 0 0 8 0 1

0 . 0 0 3 6 3

0 . 0 0 3 9 5

0 . 0 0 3 7 3

0 . 0 1 8 0 9

0 . 0 0 3 4 6

0 . 0 0 8 2 4

0 . 0 1 0 2 0

0 . 0 1 6 4 9

0 . 0 0 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 2 2 4

0 . 0 0 9 0 9

0 . 0 1 0 0 4

0 . 0 1 0 9 3

0 . 0 1 0 3 4

0 . 0 1 0 2 6

3 . 0 1 0 6 6

0 . 0 0 9 5 6

0 . 0 1 1 6 1

0 . 0 0 9 6 9

0 . 0 1 1 7 7

0 . 0 1106

0 . 0 1 0 5 3

0 . 0 0 S 8 0

0 . 0 1 0 9 8

0 . 0 1 3 8 0

0 . 0 1 0 6 4

3 t PENDENT

5 I ? . t 7 l 4 3 5 . ' ; 5 4 2 7

iNTtRCCPT

n^U I P L E C C f - ' K i T i c s

1 7 . : ^ 7 5 i

0 . 4 1 7 ^ 1

5 . i 5 4 c ;

141

Table 3.81 highlighted the insignificant influence of


"Advancement on Merit" - a dimension of QWL as obtained F =

1.23574 and all the t values described in table 3.82 are as

Buch low that failed to elicit significance of either of the

statistical values even at .05 level of confidence. Again

hypotheses pertaining to the influence of IV's oh DV found

accepted.


the influence of IV's on EPL - a facet of QWL

Source of pp 2 5 „ S. F.Value Variation



Total 349 2852.36865

The six facet of QWL namely 'effect on personal life'

is not found to be the function of either of the clusters of

independent variables namely personality attributes and

organizational characteristics and this observation is

extracted from the obtained result values 'F' and 'ts' which

are very low and highly insignificant highlighted in Table

3.83 and Table 3.83 respectively, hence the rejection of all

the null hypotheses obliterated.

142 Table 3 .84. Showing Mul t ip l e Regress ion Analyses - Ef fec t on

Pe r sona l L i fe dimension of QWL. ST»Nli»Bi) CCPUr L i l l O ' * R I O W S S I O N S T U . E HROM tO»<PUTfD

p f v i * n o N X vs Y c c u f i c i i N T Of P I G . C O I F . T V A L U I

0 . 6 * 7 3 0 0 . 0 ? & i e - 0 . 2 7 0 S 9 2 1 . 1 1 1 6 9 0 . 0 1 1 2 2

1 . 1 0 4 S B - 0 . 0 2 S 7 6 -O.ittBO 2 4 . 1 1 1 9 7 0 . O U 4 7

1 . 2 0 S 7 3 . - 0 . 0 D 6 5 1 - 0 . 3 4 2 6 9 2 4 . 1 1 1 7 1 0 . 0 1 4 2 1

1 . 1 7 3 1 1 - 0 . 0 0 4 9 3 - 0 . 3 0 9 3 8 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 8 3

1 . 2 7 0 0 5 - 0 . 0 4 7 0 3 - 0 . 3 ( 9 0 1 2 4 . 1 1 1 2 3 0 . 0 1 6 1 3

1 . 2 1 6 6 4 - 0 . 0 7 6 3 1 - 0 . 3 0 4 8 3 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 4 0 . 0 2 0 9 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9 - 3 . 0 3 1 6 0 - 0 . 3 4 3 0 6 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 7 0 . 0 1 4 3 1

1 . 3 0 3 1 1 - 0 . 0 4 7 7 2 - 0 . 4 6 2 7 7 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 6 0 . 0 1 9 1 9

1 . 2 4 8 1 6 0 . 0 3 1 2 0 - 0 . 1 9 2 3 6 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 8 0 . 0 0 7 9 8

l . i e 7 S 6 0 . 0 2 2 4 3 - 0 . 3 1 3 0 2 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 2 0 . 0 1 3 0 7

1 . 2 1 0 3 0 0 . 0 2 2 P 1 - 0 . 2 3 3 7 0 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 7 0 . 0 1 0 3 2

1 . 1 9 1 9 9 0 . C 3 4 3 4 - 0 . 1 3 9 2 7 2 4 . 1 1 1 S 4 0 . 0 0 6 6 1

1 . 2 5 8 7 0 0 . 0 1 7 4 6 - 0 . 3 7 7 0 7 2 4 . 1 J 1 2 I 0 . 0 1 5 6 4

1 . 3 3 2 0 6 0 . 0 3 7 6 3 - 0 . 1 5 9 2 9 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 6 0 . 0 9 6 6 1

1 . 2 8 6 4 6 0 . 0 4 2 0 3 - 0 . 2 8 2 1 2 2 4 . 1 1 1 1 4 0 . 0 1 1 7 0

1 . 3 2 2 2 3 0 . 0 2 4 7 7 - 0 . 2 6 1 8 2 2 4 . 1 1 1 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 8 6

1 . 2 3 6 3 8 - 0 . 0 1 7 5 0 - 0 . 3 8 8 3 3 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 5 0 . 0 1 6 1 1

1 . 2 0 5 6 9 - 0 . 0 3 0 6 4 - 0 . 4 2 1 4 3 2 4 . 1 1 1 7 2 0 . 0 1 7 4 8

1 . 1 9 4 3 0 0 . 0 4 8 1 5 - 0 . 0 8 2 5 1 2 4 . 1 1 1 5 6 0 . 0 0 3 4 2

1 . 2 2 4 1 3 - 0 . 0 2 1 0 9 - 0 . 3 2 9 1 2 2 4 . U 1 5 5 - 3 . 0 2 1 9 4

1 . 2 5 5 9 0 - 0 . 0 6 1 6 0 - 0 . 4 6 6 8 3 2 4 . 1 1 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 9 3 6

1 . 2 7 9 9 0 - a . 0 0 2 9 3 - 0 . 2 4 4 3 0 2 4 . 1 1 1 6 3 0 . 0 1 0 1 3

1 . 2 6 7 1 4 ^ 0 . 5 1 9 3 9 - 0 . 2 2 0 3 3 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 8 - J . 0 0 9 1 4

1 . 2 . ' 2 6 2 - 0 . C 2 3 6 ? - 0 . 4 5 2 9 9 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 1 0 . 0 1 9 7 9

1 . 1 9 7 1 0 - 0 . 0 O 0 S 7 - 0 . 3 0 8 0 9 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 5 0 . 0 1 2 7 8

1 . 2 6 0 3 6 -C.S25'><. - 0 . 3 5 8 8 5 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 5 0 . 0 1 4 8 8

1 . 3 0 ? 2 7 - 8 . : 5 5 ' i 7 - C . 4 0 5 1 5 2 4 . 1 1 1 2 6 • ' 1 . 0 1 6 8 0

1.2<5133 - 8 . C 6 6 1 0 - 0 . 5 2 3 2 0 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 3 0 . 0 2 1 7 0

1 . 2 5 1 2 0 B.O^}Vl -0.10710 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 9 9 . 0 0 4 4 4

1 . 2 S 4 6 1 -D .C341 .9 - 0 . 4 8 9 0 1 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 3 0 . 0 2 0 2 8

1 . 3 1 i l 2 0 . 0 4 J M - 0 . 2 2 5 2 0 2 4 . 1 1 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 9 3 4

1 . 2 9 3 0 B -C .37S< '? - 0 . 4 3 8 7 8 2 4 . 1 1 1 4 0 0 . 0 1 8 2 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2 - 0 . 1 3 6 3 5 - 0 . 6 3 9 9 5 2 4 . 1 1 1 6 2 0 . 0 2 6 5 4

1 . 3 3 4 6 4 - C . 1 0 2 5 7 - 0 . 4 6 S 5 7 2 4 . 1 1 1 6 6 0 . 0 1 9 4 3

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7 - 0 . 0 5 2 3 8 0 . 3 3 3 2 1 2 4 . 1 1 0 9 4 0 . 0 1 3 8 2

1 .2 .0179 ,, - C . D 1 9 5 3 - 1 . 3 3 8 0 9 1 6 1 . 5 ^ 3 0 1 0 . 0 0 8 2 8

1 . 1 1 6 3 4 - 0 . 0 9 8 1 1 - 1 . 6 8 0 6 0 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 9 0 0 . 0 1 0 4 0

1 . 2 6 2 5 3 - 0 . 0 3 3 5 6 - 1 . 5 5 6 7 6 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 0 9 0 . 0 0 9 6 4

1 . 1 1 2 2 1 - 0 . 3 3 9 7 8 - 1 . 6 0 6 5 1 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 9 5

1 . 1 7 6 6 8 - 0 . 0 1 2 7 4 - 1 . 7 4 6 2 7 I t l . 5 2 3 4 1 0 . 0 1 0 8 1

1 . 1 8 6 6 7 0 . 0 1 3 3 0 - 1 . 6 5 6 2 P 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 5 3 0 . 0 1 0 2 5

1 . 2 6 3 5 4 - 0 . 0 6 i S 9 - 1 . 4 1 4 1 0 I t l . 5 2 2 7 1 0 . 0 0 8 7 5

1 . 1 8 8 4 3 -0 .07156S - 1 . 6 5 3 8 2 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 6 5 - 0 . 0 1 0 2 4

1 . 2 4 6 3 3 -O .O 'OOS - 1 . 5 0 5 3 1 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 4 2 . 0 . 0 0 9 3 2

1 . 2 2 1 1 0 - 0 . 0 3 3 4 5 - 1 . 6 8 2 7 4 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 1 9 0 . 0 1 0 4 2

1 . 1 9 5 5 7 0 .0^3 f ) i . - 1 . 3 4 5 0 5 1 6 1 . 5 2 4 3 1 . 0 . 0 0 8 3 3

1 . 2 C 1 3 3 C . l U O l - 1 . 1 1 5 4 5 1 6 1 . 5 ^ 3 1 2 0 . 0 0 6 9 1

J . 3 0 6 1 7 - 0 . 0 3 0 4 1 - 1 . 5 7 3 1 5 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 0 6 0 . 0 0 9 7 4

1 . 2 5 7 0 7 0 . 0 1 8 O 4 - 1 . 5 5 0 3 1 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 7 9 0 . 0 0 8 3 6

1 . 2 7 7 3 9 - a . P l S 4 9 - 1 . 3 2 6 B 3 1 6 1 . 1 2 3 4 8 0 . 0 0 8 2 3

6 . 7 0 1 0 3 -0 .U5JP .7 1 . 5 9 9 6 5 1 6 1 . 5 2 3 3 3 0 . 0 0 9 9 0

2 . S 5 8 J 4

i N T t K C t P I 5 . 4 3 9 5 0

n u L I I P L C CORRELATION e . 3 2 ! 3 5

ST5,. IRKCR CF t « ^ n - A T f ^.<:2!ti

VARI ACL( N J .

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 9

)» 3 1

32

33

34

3 i

36

37

36

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

SO

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

56

59

00

6 1

62

63

64

65

6 6

67

6e

69

UEPtNCENT

6

m IK

4 . 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 5 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 S 6

3 . 0 6 2 8 6

2 . 9 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 K ,

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 8 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 6 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 ^

2 . 7 6 5 5 7

3 . 0 5 * 2 ?

3 . 0 4 2 ? 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 6 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 3 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 0

2 . 1 8 0 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 V

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 6 6

2 . 8 3 4 2 f

2 . 9 4 2 * 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 0 2 8 6

2 . 5 0 8 S 7

4 3 . 8 8 5 7 2

8 . 7 4 5 7 1

143

Table 3.85. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on UMR - a facet of QWL

Source of pp g g „ g F.Value Variation



Total 349 6886.35840

Table 3.85 shows that the seventh facet of QWL, i.e..

Union Management Relation is not the function of independent

variables (personality attributes and organizational

characteristics) as obtained statistical value F = 0.67661

and all the 't' values given in Table 3.86 are found

statistically highly insignificant that compel to accept all

the related null hypotheses.


the influence of IV's on SR - a facet of QWL




Total 349 5494.56299

T a b l e 3 . 8 6 .

VARIABj NO.

19

20

; ; £2

2i 24

a 2o

27

26

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

3S

40

4 1

42

4 3

44

45

46

47

4S

49

59

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

' 58

59

60

6 1

o2

63

64

65

66

67

68

6 9

1 11 H £ * S

4 . C 2 5 7 J

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 8 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 .SC?P6

3 . 0 B 2 6 6

2 . 8 4 2 8 6

2 . O 4 0 0C

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 S 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . C 8 8 S 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . C 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 8 0 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 54 ? 0

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 8 6

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 0 2 8 6

2 . 5 0 8 5 7

4 0 . 8 8 5 7 2

OEP£^DE^T

7 6 . 4 4 2 8 6

Showing M u l t i p l e Reg Management

STANCARU Oi V I A I I C ^

0 . 8 9 7 3 0

i . i 0 4 s e

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 C 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 S 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S S 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 S 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 S O 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 36

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 .31^.12

' 1 . 2 9 8 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 6

1 . 1 * 6 6 7

1 . 2 e 5 * 4

1 . 1 8 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 C

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 8

1 . 3 C 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 ^ 7 3 9

t . 7 C l C 3

4 . 4 4 2 0 4

r e s s i o n R e l a t i o n d i m e n s i o n o f

CCRREL»TIOK X VS V

- 0 . 1 0 1 7 7

• 0 . 0 4 2 7 R

• 0 . 0 3 0 1 3

- 0 . 0 1 1 7 6

0 . 0 3 7 5 7

• 0 . 0 1 0 5 2

0 . 0 1 2 8 4

- 0 . 0 2 7 3 2

- 0 . 0 1 6 3 2

0 . 0 7 3 9 6

- 0 . 0 2 4 8 1

0 . 0 1 2 9 7

- 0 . 0 1 7 8 3

- 0 . 0 5 8 0 6

- 9 . 0 4 4 4 7

- 0 . 0 4 9 9 9

3 . 0 3 4 6 8

- 0 . 0 3601

- 0 . 0 9 1 2 3

- 0 . 0 2 2 4 9

0 . 9 2 4 3 9

0 . 0 0 1 7 3

0 . 0 1 2 2 1

- 0 . 0 0 4 0 4

0 . 0 3 3 9 8

- 0 . 0 2 5 7 5

0 . 0 0 4 8 6

C . 0 1 9 2 7

0 . C 2 6 4 8

- 0 . 0 3 I S 5 2

- 0 . 0 0 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 4 0 7 5

0 . 0 3 6 3 4

0 . 0 6 9 6 5

- 0 . 0 3 1 2 1

0 . 0 1 9 2 7

0 . 0 6 6 0 0 - 0 . 0 3 4 0 6

0 . 0 3 8 5 3

0 . 0 6 4 1 8

' - 0 . 0 5 6 4 6

0 . t 2 9 9 6

0 . 0 7 3 9 5

0 . 0 7 3 9 9

0 . 0 7 2 7 3

- 0 . 0 1 3 5 7

- 0 . 0 2 2 8 6

- 0 . 0 1 3 5 6

0 . 0 1 8 5 0

0 . 0 3 1 5 9

C . 0 6 1 7 7

Ana lyses QWL.

H l C R t S i l O S STD. ERROR C C t f r I C l t N t OF R t G . r O E F .

- 0 . 2 5 4 2 2

- 0 . 0 4 7 1 3

- 0 . 0 4 3 1 7

0 . 0 0 7 4 0

0 . 4 2 6 6 6 .

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 4 4 3 7

0 . 0 2 6 6 3

0 . 0 7 6 4 6

0 . 5 4 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 7 8 8 4

0 . 2 7 6 5 8

0 . 0 9 6 5 0

- 0 . 1 6 9 3 4

0 . 0 6 7 4 4

- 0 . 0 2 6 2 5

0 . 3 9 9 9 1

- 0 . 0 4 J 1 7

- 0 . 2 9 3 0 3

0 . 1 0 6 3 1

0 . 2 1 4 1 5

0 . 0 3 3 8 9

0 . 1 S 7 4 8

0 . 1 9 7 0 8

0 . 2 9 9 6 4

- 0 . 0 7 5 7 2

0 . 2 9 1 5 6

0 . 2 2 1 7 1

C . 2 C 1 0 9

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 1 9 8 0 6

- 0 . 0 8 0 2 1

0 . 4 1 4 3 1

0 . 4 8 1 0 4

- 0 . 1 5 5 3 2

5 . 7 7 5 2 8

e . 0 9 3 0 1

5 . 7 1 7 3 5

6 . 2 4 0 4 6

u . 2 5 2 4 6

5 . 7 3 1 9 1

5 . 7 1 2 7 7

5 . 8 4 0 2 0

6 . 4 5 9 9 1

6 . 3 6 6 0 4

6 . 0 3 7 5 5

6 . C 0 S 3 6

5 . 7 3 8 8 9

6 . 4 0 4 7 3

6 . 3 0 2 8 3

- 5 . 9 6 6 0 0

3 7 . 5 4 9 1 3

3 7 . 5 4 9 5 8

3 7 . 5 4 9 1 8

3 7 . 5 4 8 8 8

3 7 . 5 4 8 4 5

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 0

3 7 . 5 4 8 8 0

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 3

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 6

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 2

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 5

3 7 . 5 4 8 9 1

3 7 . 5 4 8 3 9

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 7

3 7 . 5 4 8 2 9

3 7 . 5 4 8 0 7

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 7

3 7 , 5 4 9 2 0

3 7 . 5 4 8 9 3

3 7 . 5 4 8 9 2

3 7 . 5 4 8 9 7

3 7 . 5 4 9 0 4

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 6

3 7 . 5 4 8 5 5

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 0

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 1

3 7 . 5 4 8 4 7

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 4

3 7 . 5 4 8 6 7

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 3

3 7 . 5 4 8 5 6

3 7 . 5 4 8 7 0

3 7 . 5 4 9 0 4

3 7 . 5 4 9 0 9

3 7 . 5 4 7 9 7

2 5 1 . 5 3 9 8 3

2 5 1 . 5 4 1 1 8

2 5 1 , 5 3 9 9 3

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 5 7

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 4 4

2 5 1 . 5 4 C 6 3

2 S 1 . 5 3 9 3 4

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 8 2

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 4 7

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 1 2

2 5 1 . 5 4 1 8 4

2 5 1 . 5 3 9 9 ?

2 5 1 . 5 3 9 8 9

2 5 1 . 5 4 1 0 3

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 5 7

2 5 1 . 5 4 0 3 1

144 U n i o n

CO^^PUtfO T VALUE

0 . 0 0 6 7 7

0 . 0 0 1 2 6

0 . 0 0 1 1 5

0 . 0 0 0 2 0

0 . 0 1 1 3 6

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 1 1 8

0 . 0 0 0 7 1

0 . 0 0 2 0 4

0 .01AS9

0 . 0 0 2 1 0

0 . 0 8 7 3 7

0 . 0 0 2 5 7

9 . 0 0 4 5 1

0 . 0 0 1 8 0

0 . 0 0 0 7 0

0 . 0 1 0 6 5

0 . 0 0 1 1 5

0 . 0 0 7 8 0

0 . 0 0 2 8 3

0 . 0 0 5 7 0

0 . 0 0 0 9 0

0 . 0 0 4 1 9

0 . 0 0 5 2 5

0 . 0 0 7 9 8

0 . 0 0 2 0 2

0 . 0 0 7 7 7

0 . 0 0 5 9 0

0 . 0 0 5 3 6

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 5 2 7

0 . 0 0 2 1 4

0 . 0 1 1 0 3

0 . 0 1 2 8 1

0 . 0 0 4 1 4

0 . 0 2 2 9 6

0 . 0 2 4 2 2

0 . 0 2 2 7 3

0 . 0 2 4 8 1

0 . 0 2 4 8 6

0 . 0 2 2 7 9

0 . 0 2 2 7 1

0 . 0 2 3 2 2

0 . 0 2 5 6 8

0 . 0 2 5 3 1

0 . 0 2 4 0 0

0 . 0 2 3 8 9

0 . 0 2 2 8 2

0 . 0 2 5 4 6

0 . 0 2 5 0 6

0 . 0 2 3 7 2

IMcHCEFI 9 .11511

nULTIPLE CORWELATrCN 0.52215

STD. i^KCO Of KSTlr-ATE 4.550»I7

145 Table 3.88 Showing Multiple Regress ion Analyses - Se l f - re spec t

dimension of QWL.

NO.

i«

26

21

22

23

2«

25

2«

27

2*

2V

sc

51

32

33

3«

3S

36

37

36

3V

iC

1.1

42

43

4«

4S

40

* 7

46

49

SO

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

56

i s

&c

s ;

t i

t i

Ss

65

00

t 7

66

4 ,

i .

i .

3 .

J .

J .

i .

Z.

3 .

. o r s 7 i . 7 J 7 H

, i C 3 5 7

, 3 0 5 7 1

. 5 0 ? « t

, O E ? f e

. 6 4 0 0 0

. 5 7 : 4 1

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 1 5 7

2 . 7 S J 7 1

2 . 5 6 3 0 0

, 9 6 5 - ' l

. 9 5 1 4 5

. 2 7 4 2 9

. 2 6 0 0 0

.ICOOO

, 9 9 1 4 J

,d742<;

. 1 7 1 4 5

, 1 7 * Z ?

J . 0 E S 5 7

2 . J 7 7 1 4

< : . oJ4 ;< :

. 7 6 8 5 7

. 5 5 4 2 9

, 0 4 ? £ 6

. 7 7 7 1 4

. 8 6 5 7 1

, 4 0 0 0 0

. 2 1 4 2 9

. 1 6 3 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 .< :2000

2 . 9 8 5 7 1 2 . 6 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 J

2 . 5 2 3 5 7

2 . J -•> i i .'

2 .

3 .

3 .

2 .

2 .

2 .

2 ,

t J " 1 4

7 2 J S t

5 3 4 2 9

9 4 ? » t

7 7 1 4 3

> 7 7 1 i

5 0 ? £ t

5 0 c S 7

4 C i . 5 £ 5 '

jiPi . M

STA»40A<>D D E V I « T I C ^

O. ( IS730

1 . 1 0 ( 5 8

1 . 2 C 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 6

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 5 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 * 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 S 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 .25R7C

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 ( 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 .1B71G

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 ( 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 8 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 S 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 5 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 ^ 4

1 . 1 8 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

I . 2 2 1 1 C

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 C 1 5 8

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 5 9

6 . 7 0 1 0 J

3 . 9 6 7 8 4

y vs Y

> 0 . 0 C 5 3 1

- 0 . 0 0 9 9 I S

D .D2B36

0 . 0 0 9 8 7

. 0 1 2 0 0

. 0 0 9 4 3

. 0 0 9 6 0

. 0 2 8 4 2

. 3 2 3 ) 4

. 0 C 7 J 1

. 0 7 7 7 4

D . 0 « 7 f t J

- 0 . 0 1 4 ^ 4

- C . C 1 6 7 2

- 0 . 0 1 8 3 2

- O . D 7 3 ; t

0 . 0 « 0 f «•

0 . 0 6 3 2 :

C . 0 4 2 2 D

0 . 0 1 4 0 i

- 0 . 0 0 4 O ' 5

- C . C C £ ? I

- C . 0 5 9 ^• '

- C . C 5 1 . ' 7

0 . 3 0 0 1 5

0 . 0 8 * 9 5

O.C0534

0 . 0 C 7 C 9

-C.02493

0.119<.3

.03191

•C1235

.05516

.00684

.01409

-0.05141

0 . 0 1 6 4 3 C . 0 2 2 2 6

- 0 . 0 4 0 2 6

- 0 . 0 4 7 1 3

C . C l o S C

- 0 . 0 I 5 ^ ,•

C . 0 3 3 1 5

5 . 0 2 3 « 5

- C . : i 4 6 4

- C . C 5 0 9 8

- C . C B 5 0 1

- C . C 5 2 2 B

C . C 7 ? >( 0

- C . 1 1 4 1 0

- C . 5 5 2 C 3

K t C K l S S I C N

ccrrr I C U M

- C . 0 7 8 6 1

- 0 . 0 4 n o 0 . 3 4 7 0 8

0 . 0 3 9 6 4

- 0 . 0 8 8 9 3

0 . 1 7 1 9 8

0 . 0 1 6 5 1

0 . 0 0 5 9 5

- 0 . 0 7 4 5 1

0 . 0 1 3 0 5

- 0 , 2 8 4 8 9

0 . 4 7 4 6 1

- 0 . 2 2 1 6 5

0 . 0 2 3 2 7

- 0 . 0 4 9 1 9

- 0 . 3 0 4 7 7

0 . 4 0 7 3 6

0 . 1 0 6 0 5

0 . 1 2 7 6 0

0 . 0 7 2 8 0

0 . 0 7 4 0 S

- 0 . 0 6 0 5 5

- C . 2 7 S 2 2

- 0 . 1 6 0 3 2

0 . 0 4 2 4 3

0 . 3 5 0 4 8

0 . 0 4 1 4 3

0 . 0 9 0 0 2

- 0 . 0 7 4 3 3

0 . 4 6 7 0 0

0 . 0 1 7 6 9

0 . 1 0 7 4 7

- 0 . 0 6 7 8 5

0 . 0 2 9 0 3

- O . C 2 S 9 0

1 . 8 5 7 15

1 . 9 9 9 3 1 1 . 7 6 7 8 1

1 . 8 9 5 2 5

1 . 5 8 0 6 6

2 . 0 5 9 S i 3

1 . 7 6 3 3 9

1 . 9 8 2 3 6

1 . 7 9 0 7 E

1 . 8 2 7 7 9

1 . 7 6 3 1 0

1 . 5 4 3 1 6

1 . 5 1 6 6 9

2 . 5 6 4 5 9

1 . 0 6 7 7 6

- 1 . 9 3 1 . 4 0

S t l ) . fRPOW or REC.COEF.

3 2 . 5 6 9 0 9

3 2 . 5 6 9 4 7

3 2 . 5 6 9 1 2

3 2 . 5 6 8 8 6

3 2 . 5 6 8 5 0

3 2 . 5 6 S 6 2

3 2 . 5 6 8 8 0

3 2 . 5 6 8 6 5

3 2 . 5 6 8 6 8

3 2 . 5 6 8 7 3

3 2 . 5 6 8 6 6

3 2 . 5 6 8 8 9

^ 2 . 5 6 8 4 4

3 2 . 5 6 8 7 8

3 2 . 5 6 8 3 6

3 2 . 5 6 8 1 6

3 2 . 5 6 8 7 7

3 2 . 5 6 9 1 4

3 2 . 5 6 8 9 1

3 2 . 5 68 9 0

3 2 . 5 6 6 9 4

3 2 . 5 6 9 0 0

3 2 . 5 6 S 6 8

3 2 . 5 6 8 5 7

3 2 . 5 6 S 6 3

5 2 . 5 6 8 6 4

3 2 . 5 6 6 5 1

3 2 , 5 6 6 7 5

3 2 . 5 6 8 6 6

3 2 . 5 6 8 7 4

3 2 . 5 6 8 5 9

3 2 , 5 6 8 7 1

3 2 . 5 6 9 0 0

3 2 . 5 6 9 0 5

3 2 . 5 6 8 0 6

2 1 6 . 1 7 8 7 3

2 1 8 . 1 7 9 9 2

2 1 ! . 1 7 6 6 3

2 1 5 . 1 7 9 3 8

2 1 8 . 1 7 9 2 8

<r l f . 1 794 3

. ' I " . 1 78 3 0

2 1 3 . 1 7 9 6 0

i l « . 1 7 9 2 9

2 1 S . 1 7 8 9 7

2 1 = t . l 8 C 4 B

2 1 8 . 1 7 8 S 6

2 1 S . 1 7 8 7 9

2 1 S . 1 7 9 7 8

i : n . l 7 < J 3 7

2 1 5 . 1 7 9 1 5

CORPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 2 6 1

0 . 0 0 1 2 9

O . O I O M

0 . 0 0 1 2 2

0 . 0 0 2 7 5

0 . 0 0 S 2 8

o.ooesi o.ooois .00229

.00061

.'00 875

.016S7

.00681

.00071

.00168

.00936

.01251

,0032«

.00392

.00226

.00227

.001C6

.0086S

.0 0692

.00150

,01076

,00127

.00276

.0 0228

.01636

.00056

0.00350

0.00208

0.000S9

0.00069

0.00851 .

0.00916 .

.00810

.00869

.00726

,00958

.00810

.00909

.00821

.00838

,00808

,00710

.00696

0.01175

0.00489

0.00882

0 .

0 .

3 .

0 .

1 .

0 .

0 .

3 ,

0 .

0 .

0 ,

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0.

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 ,

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

: M t ^ : t . > M 1 4 . 6 9 1 9 7

'••^I'lF^i C C R - f L A T l C ^ 0 . 5 9 3 6 4

146

The other determinent of QWL i.e., "Self respect" is

found again to be insignificantly influenced by either of the

independent variables viz., personality attributes and

organizational characteristics as obtained F = 1.07140 (Table

3.87) and t values ranging from lowest t = .00051 to highest

t = .01457 given in Table 3.88 are found to be highly

insignificant, hence, all the null hypotheses pertaining to

the influence of independent variable on dependent one i.e.

on 'self respect' stand accepted.

Table 3.89. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on SR - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation

DF S.S. M.S. F.Value



Total 349 78099.25000

It is evident from Table 3.89 that a QWL facet i.e.,

"supervisory relationship" is also found to have been

insignificantly affected by none of the independent variable



insignificant at .05 level and similarly all the given

statistical t value (Table 3.90) are found to be very low and

insignificant. Therefore, consequently all the null

147 Table 3 . 9 0 . Showing Mul t ip le R e g r e s s i o n Analyses - Supervisory

R e l a t i o n s h i p dimension of QWL.

VARlABLE NO.

19

20

21

22

23

21.

2&

26

27

2a 29

JO

31

it

il

34

a 36

37

3a 39

to

4 1

42

4 3

44

4S

4 6

47

4 0

4 «

SO

5 1

52

1C*K

4 . C 2 S 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 C 8 S 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 ! 6

3 . 0 S 2 e t

2 . 8 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 00

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 a 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 * 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 * 2 9

3 . 3 8 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 S S 7

3 . 0 5 4 ? c

3 . C 4 2 ; 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 6 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 C 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 8 0 0 0

53 1 C 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

54

55

56

57

56

59

ou

61

6 2

63

0 4

o5

66

67

6 0

64

DtPtNOENT

9

iNTEKCtPT

« U L l l P l . t

STD. tRKC

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

: . o 3 l 4 3

2 . o 3 4 r «

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 ? « ^

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 5 4 ^ e t

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 .5C2Sfc

2 . 5 0 3 5 7

4 0 . 8 8 5 7 2

; 3 . 9 5 4 ? e

C C R 9 E L A T I 0 N

S Cf E s r i n t l E

STANtlASD O t V I A T I O N

0 .BB730

1 . 1 0 4 5 9

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 3 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 C

1 . 1 6 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 6

1.2C'>69

1 . 1 8 ( 1 0

1 . 2 ? 4 : J

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 » ; ^ 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . J 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

l . ? 9 1 ? 1

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 i ' . e l

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

l.ifOSOO

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 U 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 »

I . 1 * 6 6 7

l . ? A 1 " i 4

1 . 1 S J 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 19557

1 . 2 0 1 3 8

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

6 . 7 0 1 0 3

1 4 . 9 5 9 2 8

6 J . 4 S 4 2 5

0 . ( 5 9 1 5

1 4 . 3 ? 1 4 5

C C P P f L * t l O N * VS Y

- 0 . 0 2 7 9 7

- 0 . 0 1 2 6 9

- O . 0 7 7 « »

- 0 . 0 5 2 4 3

- 0 . 0 0 9 7 3

- 0 . 0 1 1 7 6

0 . 0 3 9 5 9

0 . 0 0 8 4 1

- 0 . 0 2 3 4 6

- 0 . 0 7 5 4 6

0 . 0 4 6 2 3

- 0 . 0 2 6 2 0

0 . 0 4 2 3 9

- 0 . C 1 6 3 5

0 . 0 6 7 2 2

C . 0 0 3 5 1

0 . 0 C 2 5 4

- e . 0 4 2 5 S

C . 0 6 1 2 5

- 0 . 0 ! 5 7 7

- 0 . 0 3 1 4 ?

C .C7S39

0 . 0 6 5 5 7

0 . 0 2 0 1 9

- 0 . 1 0 5 ? 4

0.04»>5 t

- 0 . C 7 5 1 5

C.11(^75

0 . 0 » 4 C P

- S . C 7 7 6 5

0 . 9 2 0 « ?

0 . 1 1 3 1 3

C.163*tO

0 . 1 2 5 4 2

0 . 0 4 5 9 3

- C . 1 5 7 7 0

- 0 . 0 6 1 1 2 0 . 0 8 1 4 8

0 . 0 5 6 6 ^

0 . 0 2 6 9 3

- 0 . C 5 1 4 7

- o . c o ; " t

C . O l 3 ( 1

o.c(ac( 0 . 0 4 7 7 (

- 0 . 3 ( 5 6 5

C.D57? 9

- C . 0 3 7 2 1

- 0 . 0 6 1 5 6

- C . 1 C 9 ( (

- C . 0 3 6 ? 1

« t & R l S S I C N

ccirr i c i f M - 0 . 6 1 ( 9 6

- 0 . 1 5 6 7 1

- 1 . 7 5 6 6 2

- 1 . 1 5 6 1 2

- 0 . 5 6 6 7 2

- 1 . 1 6 6 7 3

- 0 . 0 3 7 3 6

- 0 . 6 2 7 7 9

- 0 . 8 4 2 7 0

- 1 . 0 8 2 5 2

0 . 1 2 0 6 6

- 1 . 0 6 6 2 5

- 0 . 4 0 6 2 2

- 1 . 2 6 1 2 0

0 . 2 3 8 4 7

- 0 . 1 7 6 7 7

- C . 1 7 7 2 1

- 2 . 3 3 8 4 7

0 . 2 8 3 7 1

- 2 . 3 8 6 7 8

- 0 . 9 7 7 0 9

0 . 4 4 5 1 4

- 0 . 2 9 9 7 5

- 0 . 3 7 9 2 5

- 2 . 5 9 6 6 0

1 . 1 3 5 9 1

- 2 . 0 3 0 7 3

0 . 3 7 3 3 2

9 . 1 0 5 0 8

- 1 . 4 4 3 7 2

- 0 . 2 6 6 8 0

0 . 0 5 6 2 7

0 . 7 3 2 5 1

0 . 0 9 8 5 1

0 . 5 7 7 5 5

- 1 2 . 8 3 6 4 8

- 1 0 . 8 8 7 75 - 9 . 6 2 7 0 5

- 1 0 . 9 2 8 1 9

- 1 0 . 3 2 9 4 4

- 1 1 . 8 1 6 2 5

- 1 0 . 7"79?7

- 1 0 . 6 2 0 6 3

- 1 0 . 1 2 7 2 3

- 1 0 . 3 ^ 6 5 0

- 1 2 . 1 2 1 2 5

- 9 . 7 2 7 9 4

- 1 1 . 0 9 ( 9 2

- 1 1 . 9 0 0 1 3

- 1 1 . 7 1 0 8 0

1 0 . 8 S 2 E 3

STO. EDDCR OF REC.COEF.

1 1 8 . 6 6 1 0 7

1 1 6 . 6 6 2 4 6

1 1 8 . 6 6 1 1 9

1 1 8 . 6 6 0 2 5

1 1 8 . 6 5 8 9 1

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 3 7

1 1 8 . 6 6 0 0 1

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 4 8

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 S 7

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 7 6

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 5 2

1 1 6 . 6 6 0 3 5

1 1 8 . 6 5 6 7 2

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 9 3

1 1 8 . 6 5 8 3 9

1 1 6 . 6 5 7 7 0

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 9 0

1 1 6 . 6 6 1 2 6

I I R . 6 6 0 4 3

1 1 6 . 6 6 0 4 0

1 1 8 . 6 6 0 5 3

1 1 6 . 6 6 0 7 7

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 S 7

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 2 0

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 S 9

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 4 2

1 1 6 . 6 5 6 9 5

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 8 3

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 5 9

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 8 1

1 1 8 . 6 5 9 2 6

1 1 6 . 6 5 9 6 8

1 1 8 . 6 6 0 7 6

1 1 8 . 6 6 0 9 3

l i s . 6 5 7 3 9

7 9 4 . 9 0 4 7 2

7 9 4 . 9 0 9 0 0 7 9 ( . 9 0 5 0 3

7 9 ( . 9 C 7 0 4

7 9 4 . 9 0 6 6 8

7 9 4 . 9 0 7 2 9

7 « ( . ' > 0 S 2 0

7 < ; ( . 9 0 7 6 4

7 9 4 . 9 0 6 7 4

7 9 ( . 9 0 5 6 4

7 5 ( . 9 1 1 0 7

7 t ( . 9 0 5 2 1

7 9 ( . 9 0 ( 6 5

7 9 ( . 9 0 3 5 1

7 9 ( . 9 0 7 0 4

7 9 4 . 9 0 6 2 5

coMPuiro T VALU^

0 . 0 0 6 8 7

0 . 0 0 1 3 4

0 . 0 1 4 8 1

0 . 0 0 9 7 6

0 . 0 0 4 9 4

0 . 0 1 0 0 2

0 . 0 0 0 3 1

0 . 0 0 5 2 9

0 . 0 0 7 1 0

0 . 0 0 9 1 2

0 . 8 0 1 0 2

0 . 0 0 8 9 9

0 . 0 0 3 4 2

0 . 0 1 0 6 3

0 . 0 0 2 0 1

0 . 0 0 1 4 9

0 . 0 O 1 4 9

0 . 0 1 9 7 1

0 . 0 0 2 3 9

0 . 0 2 0 1 1

0 . 0 0 8 2 3

0 . 0 0 3 7 5

0 . 0 0 2 5 3

0 . 0 0 3 2 0

' 0 . 0 2 1 8 8

0 . 0 0 9 S 7

0 . 0 1 7 1 1

0 . 0 0 3 1 5

0 . 0 0 0 8 9

0 . 0 1 2 1 7

0 . 0 0 2 2 5

0 . 0 0 0 4 7

0 . 0 0 6 1 7

0 . 0 0 0 8 3

0 . 0 0 4 8 7

0 . 0 1 6 1 5

0 . 0 1 3 7 0 0 . 0 1 2 1 1

0 . 0 1 3 7 5

0 . 0 1 2 9 9

0 . 0 1 4 8 7

0 . 0 1 3 5 0

0 . 0 1 3 3 6

0 . 0 1 2 7 4

0 . 0 1 3 0 0

• 0 . 0 1 5 2 5

0 . 0 1 2 2 4

C . 0 1 3 9 6

0 . 0 1 4 9 7

C . 0 1 4 7 3

C . O l 3 6 9

148

hypotheses pertaining to the influence of IV's on DV

(supervisory relationship) are rendered accepted.

Table 3.91. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of TV's on IGR - a facet of QWL




Total 349 49603.00000

The tenth dimension of QWL i.e., "Intra group

relation" is also found to be insignificantly influenced by


characteristics) as obtained statistics F = .99638 is highly

insignificant even at .05 level of confidence (Table 3.91)

and moreover all the obtained t values ranging from t =

.00098 to t = .02622 are found very low and insignificant

hence, all the null hypotheses found accepted.

Table 3.93. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on A - a facet of QWL




Total 349 3215.03418

14' Table 3.92. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Tntra-Group

Relation dimension of QWL. VAmAbL£ niAN

NO.

19

20

21

a a Zi

2S

26

27

28

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

36

39

t.0

4 1

42

43

44

45

46

47

46

49

50

51

52

53

5 -

55

56

57

56

59

60

61

62

6 3

0 4

65

06

67

66

69

OtPENDEM

10

] M £ ( < C £ P I

n U L T I P L t

STD. iRJtZ

4 . 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 5 7 J 4

3 . 6 0 8 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 J

3 . 5 0 2 8 6

3 . 0 S 2 8 6

2 . S 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 6 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 6 5 71

2.SBO00

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 1

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 9 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 8 8 5 7

c . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 5 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 5 5 7

3.05<i29

3 .042 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2'. 180 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 J

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 0 3 4 Z 9

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 722 8 t

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 .942A6

2 . 7714 J

2 .57714

2 . 502et

2 . 5 05 ^7

4C .3857£

3 9 . 4 e 2 5 a

CCRRtlATlCV

f? Of J S T I - 4 U

S I A M D A B D O t V I A T I C S

0 . 8 8 7 3 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 9

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 6 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 S B 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 0 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 S

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 « 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 1 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 ^ 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 ?

1 . 2 5 1 2 C

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 8 0 0

i . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 1 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 6

1 . 1 ^ 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 5 S 4 3

1 . 2 4 4 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 ?7

i . 2 C i 3 8

1 . 3 0 6 17

1 . 2 5TC7

1 . ? ' 7 ? 9

fc. 7 r 1 c J

1 1 . . ;2 i 75

5 i . 2 4 4 4 3

0 . 3 5 1 6 8

1: . ' ; ? 4 9 4

CCRHtLM 10^ X V i Y

- 0 . 1 0 6 5 0

- 0 . 0 6 3 4 1

0 . 0 2 6 9 9

0 . 0 0 9 9 3

- 0 . 0 5 2 4 9

- 0 . 0 1 3 1 2

0 . 0 1 4 2 3

- 0 . 0 5 0 1 1

0 . 0 0 4 5 1

- 0 . 1 2 6 2 9

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

- 0 . 0 8 2 7 2

0 . 0 0 8 1 6

0 . 0 5 9 5 5

0 . 0 8 9 2 2

0 . 0 0 9 7 9

0 . 1 2 3 5 3

- 0 . 0 3 9 2 9

- 0 . 0 3 0 2 9

- 0 . 0 1 7 9 9

0 . 9 2 6 1 0

0 . 0 5 4 3 1

- 0 . 0 4 9 3 f r

- 0 . 0 3 8 4 8

- 0 . 0 6 2 9 2

0 . 0 1 C 2 7

- 0 . 0 0 0 6 3

- 0 . 0 2 4 7 ?

- O . O I 5 0 ^

- 0 . 0 1 8 1 J

- C . l i a i i

- O . 0 C 9 7 ?

0 . 0 ' i ? 2 3

0 . C5&EI8

- 0 . 0 3 5 8 6

- 0 . 0 7 3 1 2

0 . 0 2 2 6 7

0 . 0 0 4 3 1

- 0 . 1 0 2 ^ 4

- 0 . 0 2 4 6 4

0 . 0 1 2 5 0

- 0 . 0 1 5 S 5

- 0 . 0 4 5 3 4

0 . 0 1 6 9 5

O.OftO? C

0 . 0 4 l ( , 6

- 0 . 0 0 0 5 9

- 0 . 0 5 2 5 ?

- C . C 5 7 2 6

- 0 . 0 1 2 ^ 5

- 0 . 0 4 D S <•

RFCmSSICN i » 0 . IHRCR C C l l f l C l l N l or B t O . C O f F .

- 0 . 6 0 3 5 7

0 . 1 5 8 1 0

1 .41941

1 . 0 2 2 2 1

0 .16222 ,

0 . 6 5 0 7 1

1 .12137

0 .19655

1 .12864

- 0 . 5 9 8 0 2

1 .38496

0 . 3 8 0 9 2

0 . 8 2 3 2 1

1 .42464

1 .52039

0 . 4 3 1 4 4

2 . 5 7 9 7 0

- 0 . 0 9 6 5 6

0 . 6 2 9 1 6

0 . 7 0 3 7 9

0 .96410

1 . 8 0 1 0 7

0 . 2 2 0 5 1

1 .10509

- 0 . 3 6 2 8 7

1 .71614

0 .87144

0 . 3 7 8 6 6

0 .61413

C.93542

- 0 . 380 96

1 .21088

0 .76910

1 . !9572

- 0 . 8 4 2 4 C

4 . 0 ^ 0 0 1

5 . 0 0 5 9 5 4 . 4 2 6 3 1

5 .01473

4 . 7 4 9 2 5

5 .02322

5 . 6 0 2 1 7

4 . 0 7 5 3 1

5 .081^7

4 .5764S

4 . 9 8 5 8 2

4 . 0 3 1 3 9

5 . 1 3 4 1 1

3 .85279

4 . 9 5 8 1 1

- 4 . 6 7 0 1 3

9 8 . 3 9 2 4 3

9 8 . 3 9 3 5 9

9 8 . 3 9 2 5 3

9 8 . 5 9 1 7 5

9 8 . 3 9 0 6 4

9 6 . 3 9 1 0 3

9 8 . 3 9 1 5 6

9 8 . 3 9 1 1 2

9 8 . 3 9 1 1 9

9 9 . 3 9 1 3 5

9 8 . 3 9 1 1 5

9 8 . 3 9 1 8 4

9 9 . 3 9 0 4 9

9 6 . 3 9 1 4 9

9 8 . 3 9 0 2 1

9 6 . 3 8 9 6 5

9 8 . 3 9 1 4 6

9 8 . 3 9 2 5 9

9 8 . 3 9 1 9 1

9 8 . 3 9 1 8 8

9 9 . 3 9 1 9 9

9 8 . 3 9 2 1 9

9 8 . 3 9 1 1 9

9 9 . 3 9 0 8 8

9 9 . 3 9 1 0 4

9 8 . 3 9 1 0 7

9 9 . 3 9 0 6 8

9 3 . 3 9 1 4 1

9 8 . 3 9 1 2 1

9 ? . 3 9 1 5 9

0 3 . 3 9 C 9 4

9 a . 3 9 1 2 9

" J . 3 9 2 1 7

9 9 . 3 9 2 3 2

9 9 . 3 8 9 3 3

6 5 9 . 1 2 6 1 0

6 5 9 . 1 2 9 7 0 6 5 9 . 1 2 6 4 0

6 5 9 . 1 2 8 0 5

6 5 9 . 1 2 7 7 5

6 5 9 . 1 2 8 2 3

6 5 9 . 1 2 4 8 2

6 5 9 . 1 2 8 7 2

6 5 9 . 1 2 7 8 1

6 5 9 . 1 2 6 8 3

6 5 9 . 1 3 1 4 1

6 5 9 . 1 2 6 5 3

6 5 9 . 1 2 6 2 8

6 5 9 . 1 2 9 2 7

6 5 = . J 2P 05

^ 5 3 . 1 2 7 3 8

C 0 1 P U U 1 V»LUf

0 . 0 0 6 1 3

0 . 0 0 1 6 1

0 . 0 1 4 4 3

0 . 0 1 0 3 9

0 . 0 0 1 6 5

0 . 0 0 6 6 1

0 . 0 1 1 4 0

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 . 0 1 1 4 7

0 . 0 0 6 P 8

0 . 0 1 4 0 6

0 . 0 0 3 6 7

0 . 0 0 6 3 7

0 . 0 1 4 4 8

0 . 0 1 5 4 5

0 . 0 0 4 3 9

0 . 0 2 6 2 2

0 . 0 0 0 9 8

0 . 0 0 6 3 9

0 . 0 0 7 1 5

0 . 0 0 9 6 0

0 . 0 1 8 3 0

0 . 0 0 2 2 4

0 . 0 1 1 2 3

0 . 0 0 3 6 9

0 . 0 1 7 4 6

0 . 0 0 8 6 6

0 . 0 0 3 6 5

0 . 0 0 6 2 4

0 . 0 0 9 5 1

0 . 0 0 3 6 7

0 . 0 1 2 3 1

0 . 0 0 7 6 2

0 . 0 1 4 1 9

0 . 0 0 6 5 6

0 . 0 0 6 1 1

0 . 0 0 7 5 9 0 . 0 0 6 7 2

0 . 0 0 4 5 7

0 . 0 0 7 2 1

0 . 0 0 7 6 2

0 . 0 0 8 5 0

0 . 0 0 6 1 8

0 . 0 0 7 7 1

0 . 0 0 6 9 4

0 . 0 0 7 5 6

0 . 0 0 6 1 2

0 . 0 0 7 7 9

0 . 0 0 5 8 5

0 . 0 0 7 5 2

0 . 0 0 7 0 9

Table 3.94 Showing Mul t i p l e Regress ion Analyses dimension of QWL.

Apathy 150

VARI ABLi MO.

19

20

2 1

22

2 }

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

3 1

32

33

34

35

36

37

3S

3«

40

4 1

42

43

44

4 5

46

47

46

49

50

5 1

52

53

54

55

S6

57

iC

59

bC

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

6a

69

MC*N

4 . 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 8 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 6 6

3 . 0 6 2 8 6

2 . 8 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 J

2 . 8 6 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 9 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 10000

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

i . l 7 4 ? 9

3 . 0 8 S 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . S J 4 Z 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 7

2 . 1 8 3 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 9 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 .5?8«:7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 8 6

2 . 3 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 S S

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . 5 C 2 6 6

2 . 5 C S 5 7

4 0 . « » 5 7 t

iit.PiSDi.N1

11 6 . 1 6 0 C a

IKTEKCEPI

nULTlF tE CORRELATION

STO. ESfiOR Of E S n u A T E

<.1AND4R|} 6 ( V I A T I 0 N

0 . 8 5 7 3 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1.2^2 62

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 5 0 9 7 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

l . ? * 1 2 C

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 J 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 8 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 8 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 C 1 3 8

1 . 3 0 5 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

t> .70103

3 . 0 3 5 1 5

1 0 . 6 4 7 6 6

0 . 3 7 3 2 5

3 . 0 4 7 2 4

C C K R r i t U O N X V5 V

0 . 0 1 4 4 3

0 . 0 5 6 1 7

- 0 . 0 6 9 7 5

- 0 . 0 0 9 7 5

- 0 . 0 1 7 1 5

0 . 0 0 2 6 1

0 . 0 1 9 1 5

0 . 0 6 5 3 2

- 0 . 0 6 6 5 6

- 0 . 0 8 0 6 4

0 . 0 2 2 5 9

0 . 0 4 1 7 5

0 . 0 0 0 7 5

0 . 0 0 3 9 1

0 . 1 1 4 4 2

0 . 0 1 4 7 9

- 0 . 0 4 0 7 4

- 0 . 0 9 1 2 7

- 0 . 0 4 0 3 3

- 0 . 0 8 9 0 9

- 0 . 0 7 6 6 4

- 0 . 0 3 6 5 8

- 0 . 0 9 I ^ 9

- 0 . 0 6 2 0 1

- 0 . 0 1 4 C 9

0 . 9 5 7 ^ 9

0 . 0 1 9 7 9

0 . 9 1 1 6 7

- 0 . 0 5 3 1 ?

0 . 0 5 4 9 8

- 0 . 0 4 2 0 1

- 0 . 0 1 6 2 9

- 0 . 0 4 6 8 4

- 0 . 0 4 6 0 3

- 0 . 0 5 8 5 1

- 0 . 0 3 6 3 9

0 . 0 3 3 6 6

- 0 . 0 0 7 3 0

C . 0 2 1 7 2

0 . 0 2 5 « 9

- 0 . 0 6 2 3 4

- 0 . 1 2 1 4 3

- C . 1 3 1 6 1

- 0 . 0 6 1 7 2

O . C 4 1 9 t

- 0 . 9 2 9 C t

- 0 . 3 3 4 7 3

- 0 . 1 C 6 4 ?

0 . C C 2 1 I

- 0 . 0 2 6 9 6

- 0 . 0 9 2 2 ?

RfOKI S i I ON CCIF> I C I I M

- 0 . 0 2 0 0 4

0 . 3 1 1 2 7

- C . 3 2 4 4 9

- 0 . 0 5 0 5 3

- 0 . 0 6 3 1 6 '

- 0 . 0 5 3 6 0

- 0 . 0 7 0 7 4

0 . 0 5 0 0 4

- 0 . 1 3 7 7 3

- 0 . 1 7 9 7 0

0 . 0 3 9 1 8

0 . 0 6 4 6 5

- 0 . 1 8 3 6 8

- 0 . 1 7 8 0 1

0 . 1 7 9 7 1

- 0 . 2 4 6 5 6

- 0 . 1 1 0 2 6

- 0 . 3 9 3 5 4

- 0 . 0 5 0 0 5

- 0 . 1 9 8 5 5

- 0 . 2 6 4 3 3

- 0 . 0 4 1 6 8

- 0 . 2 4 7 9 5

- 0 . 1 3 4 6 6

- 0 . 1 7 9 7 7

0 . 0 6 5 8 5

- 0 . 1 1 7 7 2

0 . 1 1 0 1 8

- 0 . 1 1 7 4 0

0 . 1 3 3 3 6

- 0 . 1 8 0 4 4

- 0 . 0 7 7 6 4

- 0 . 1 5 0 9 6

- 0 . 0 3 1 0 9

0 . 0 7 9 6 0

2 . 2 0 9 8 3

2 . 3 7 6 9 9

2 . 1 0 3 5 2

2 . 3 8 7 8 3

2 . 0 9 5 7 8

2 . 2 3 8 0 0

2 . 1 0 1 8 4

i . 7 5 5 8 1

1.9.78 65

2 . 3 3 0 2 4

2 . 3 8 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 0 5 9

2 . 0 3 3 2 5

2 . 2 6 5 5 6

1 . 9 3 0 5 4

- 2 . 2 6 4 6 9

STO. tRi r OF N r c .

2 5 . 1 4 2 6 9

2 5 . 1 4 2 9 8

2 S . 1 « 2 7 1

2 5 . 1 4 2 5 1

2 5 . 1 4 2 2 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 6

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 5

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 7

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 ]

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 6

2 5 . 1 4 2 5 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 1 9

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 5

2 5 . 1 4 2 1 2

2 5 . 1 4 1 9 7

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 4

2 5 . 1 4 2 7 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 5 5

2 5 . 1 4 2 5 5

2 5 . 1 4 2 5 7

2 5 . 1 4 2 6 2

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 7

2 5 . 1 4 2 2 9

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 4

2 5 . 1 4 2 2 4

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 3

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 7

2 5 . 1 4 2 4 2

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 1

2 5 . 1 4 2 3 9

2 5 . 1 4 2 6 2

2 5 . 1 4 2 6 6

2 5 . 1 4 1 9 1

i e S . 4 2 9 6 !

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 5 4

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 7 0

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 1 3

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 0 5

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 1 8

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 3 1

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 3 0

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 0 5

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 8 2

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 9 8

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 7 5

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 6 7

1 6 8 . 4 3 0 4 4

1 6 3 . 4 3 0 1 3

1 6 8 . 4 2 9 9 6

COKl'UTf 0 t VALUE

9 .00080

0 . 0 1 2 3 8

0 . 1 1 2 9 1

0 . 0 0 2 0 1

0 . 0 0 2 5 1

0 . 0 0 2 1 3

0 .10281

0 . 1 0 1 9 9

0 .00548

0 .00715

0 .00156

0 . 0 0 2 5 7

0 . 1 0 7 3 1

0 . 1 0 7 0 8

0 .00715

0 . 0 0 9 8 1

0 . 0 0 4 3 9

0 . 0 1 5 6 4

0 . 0 0 1 9 9

0 . 0 0 7 9 0

0 . 0 1 0 5 1

0 . 0 0 1 6 6

0 . 0 0 9 8 6

•0 .00536

•0 .00715

0 . 0 0 2 6 2

0 . 0 0 4 6 8

0 . 0 0 4 3 8

0 .00546

0 .00530

0 .00716

0 . 0 0 3 0 9

0 .00691

0 . 0 0 1 2 4

0 . 0 0 3 1 7

0 . 0 1 3 1 2

0 .01412

0 . 0 1 2 4 9

0 .01418

01244

01329

01246

01042

01175

01384

01413

01312

01207

01344

01146

9 .01345

http://iit.PiSDi.N1

151

I t has been observed from Table 3.93 t h a t QWL a s p e c t ,

i . e . , 'Apathy' a l s o could no t ge t inf luenced by both I V ' s

( p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s )

as ob ta ined F = 0.94582 and ' t ' va lue ranging from lowes t t =

.00080 t o h i g h e s t t = .01564 were found i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t

.05 l eve l of confidence which advocate t o the accep tance of

n u l l hypotheses .

Table 3 .95. Analys is of Va r i ance for t h e Regress ion Showing t h e in f luence of I V ' s on CM - a f ace t of QWL

Source of pp g . S . M.S. F .Value V a r i a t i o n

A t t r i b u t i o n t o 51 1400.91956 27.46901 1.30640 Regress ion

Dev ia t i on from 298 6265.87598 21.02643 Regress ion

T o t a l 349 7666.79541

The twe l f th f a c e t of QWL, i . e . , "Confidence in

management" i s s i m i l a r l y found t o be i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y

in f luenced by both I V ' s ( p e r s o n a l i t y a t t r i b u t e s and

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) as obta ined F = 1.30640

(Table 3.95) i s h ighly i n s i g n i f i c a n t a t .05 l e v e l and

t - v a l u e s given in Table 3.96 t h a t ranges from t = .00260 t o t

= .06245 which tends to show a lmos t zero in f luence of I V ' s on

"confidence in management" f a c e t of QWL and consequent upon

t h e t rend of f ind ings a l l n u l l hypotheses s tand a c c e p t e d .

Table

V A R U B L C

19

20

2 1

22

a it

2S

26

27

2a 29

30

3 1

32

33

34

3S

36

37

30

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

SO

S i

52

5 3

54

SS

56

57

se 59

69

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

63

69

OLPtKOENT

12

i N T E H C t F I

K O L U P L E

:>T0. ErtRC

3 .96 . Showing M u l t i p l e Regression Analyses - Conf i Management dimension o f QWL.

MEAN

4 . 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 X 4

3 . 6 0 9 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 S 6

3 . 0 8 2 S 6

2 . 8 4 2 B 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . S 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0 .

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 8 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 S 0 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . S 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 8 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 6 3 7 1 4

2 . 7 2 2 8 4

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 ?

2 . 5 7 7 1 i

2 . 5 0 2 S L

2 . 5 0 8 5 7

4 0 . £ 8 5 7 2

I J . 1 9 < . ? 9

CCPRCL*T ICM

K OF t S T I - * I f

ST«NO*>!D D I V I A I J C N

0 . 8 8 7 3 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4 •

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

2 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 5 1 2 0

l . ! 4 k 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 S 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . 1 8 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 8 9 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 1 3 8

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

6 . 7 0 1 0 3

4 . 6 8 6 9 9

2 1 . 1 3 3 1 6

0 . 4 ; 7 4 6

4 . 5 8 5 4 6

CCRRELATIOK

- 0 . 1 1 0 0 6

' o O . 0 6 4 8 2

- 0 . 0 2 6 5 6

0 . 0 1 2 6 2

- 0 . 0 4 0 1 8

- 0 . 0 4 2 0 2

- 0 . 0 4 7 5 8

- 0 . 0 7 4 3 7

0 . 1 0 5 3 7

- 0 . 0 2 2 6 7

0 . 0 5 3 8 3

- 0 . 0 4 1 4 9

0 . 0 4 8 3 6

0 . 0 1 2 1 9

0 . 1 0 0 4 3

0 . 0 1 4 9 4

- 0 . 9 1 9 6 0

- 0 . 0 3 0 7 7

- 0 . 0 4 7 9 0

- 0 . 0 2 S 1 7

0 . 0 1 1 9 5

0 . 0 6 5 6 0

0 . 0 3 0 9 5

- 0 . 0 6 9 9 4

- 0 . 0 4 0 4 C

- 0 . 0 5 2 2 6

- 0 . 0 7 2 5 C

- 0 . 1 5 4 7 8

3 . 0 2 4 4 7

- 0 . 0 1 6 1 3

0 . 0 3 0 7 6

0 . 0 5 0 7 7

0 . 0 3 4 2 7

0 . 0 0 2 6 4

- 0 . 0 3 8 5 0

- 8 . 0 4 4 2 4

- 0 . 0 7 0 6 6

0 . 0 4 7 1 8

- 0 . 0 1 6 4 1

0 . 0 4 5 2 3

- 0 . 0 2 7 7 9

- 0 . 1 2 1 5 0

0 . 0 0 5 4 9

0 . 0 3 0 3 4

0 . 0 5 8 7 1

0 . 0 3 0 6 2

0 . 0 4 5 0 6

- 0 . 1 4 3 8 9

- 0 . 1 1 7 3 0

- 0 , 1 2 9 5 0

- 0 . 0 7 7 2 9

R f C R l S S l O N C C i f f JCJfN1

- 0 . 1 0 3 1 7

0 . 2 5 6 9 1

0 . 2 5 0 5 5

0 . 5 6 1 8 5

0 . 2 6 2 6 1

0 . 1 5 0 4 8

0 . 4 6 0 3 7

0 . 0 9 8 3 5

1 . 0 1 2 1 2

0 . 4 7 7 9 2

0 . 7 1 0 8 6

0 . 4 0 7 0 3

0 . 5 4 5 4 6

0 . 3 8 4 8 5

0 . 8 3 9 6 7

0 . 5 4 6 9 4

0 . 3 0 3 5 2

0 . 5 4 6 6 6

0 . 3 0 9 1 9

0 . 2 0 9 3 9

0 . 3 9 3 6 1

0 . 9 9 4 1 7

0 . 5 2 7 3 8

0 . 1 8 5 6 7

0 . 2 5 4 4 5

0 . 2 9 7 7 9

0 . 3 7 7 5 6

- 0 . 2 S 3 S 6

0 . 6 5 1 1 6

0 . 3 C 1 5 6

0 . 5 3 6 3 9

0 . 6 4 8 8 4

C . 6 1 9 3 1

0 . 4 1 3 4 0

- 0 . 4 4 3 8 6

3 . 4 1 2 5 1

3 . 1 4 8 9 0

3 . 4 8 0 3 6

3 . 4 2 3 9 9

3 . 4 6 5 3 4

3 . 4 S 6 0 0

3 . 0 1 3 9 0

3 . 6 9 7 3 6

3 . 5 2 5 5 9

3 . 3 5 8 5 5

3 . 6 7 5 2 8

5 . 6 5 7 5 1

3 . 1 3 5 8 1

: . 2 6 2 4 4

2 . 9 8 J 2 2

- i . 4 9 7 2 2

STO. ERROR r OF REO.COEF.

3 7 . 8 3 4 5 3

3 7 . 6 3 4 9 8

3 7 . 8 3 4 5 7

3 7 . 8 3 4 2 7

3 7 . 8 3 3 8 4

3 7 . 8 3 3 9 9

3 7 . 8 3 4 2 0

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 3

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 6

3 7 . 8 3 4 1 2

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 4 -

3 7 . 8 3 4 3 0

3 7 . 8 3 3 7 9 '

3 7 . 8 3 4 1 7

3 7 . 8 3 3 6 8

37 .8334 -6

3 7 . 8 3 4 1 6

3 7 . 8 3 4 5 9

3 7 . 8 3 4 3 3

3 7 . 8 3 4 3 2

3 7 . 8 3 4 3 6

3 7 . 8 3 4 4 4

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 6

3 7 . 8 3 3 9 4

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 0

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 1

3 7 . 8 3 3 8 6

3 7 . 6 3414

3 7 . 8 34 0 6

3 7 . 8 3 4 1 3

3 7 . 8 3 3 9 6

3 7 . 8 3 4 0 9

3 7 . 8 3 4 4 3

3 7 . 8 3 4 4 9

3 7 . 8 3 3 3 6

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 6 9

2 5 3 . 4 5 3 0 8

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 8 0

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 4 5

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 3 2

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 5 1 -

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 2 0

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 7 0

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 3 5

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 9 6

2 5 3 . 4 5 3 7 4

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 8 6

2 5 3 . 4 5 1 7 5

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 9 1

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 4 4

2 5 3 . 4 5 2 1 9

152 dence i n

COHPUTED T VALUE

0 . 0 0 2 7 3

0 . 0 0 6 7 9

0 . 0 0 6 6 2

0 . 0 1 4 0 5

0 . 0 0 6 9 4

0 . 0 0 3 9 8

0 . 0 1 2 1 7

0 . 0 0 2 6 0

0 . 0 2 6 7 5

0 . 0 1 2 6 3

0 . 0 1 8 7 9

0 . 0 1 0 7 6

0 . 0 1 4 4 2

0 . 0 1 0 1 7

0 . 0 2 2 1 9

0 . 0 1 4 4 6

0 . 0 0 8 0 2

0 . 0 1 4 4 5

0 . 0 0 8 1 7

0 . 0 0 S 5 3

0 ^ 0 1 0 4 0

0 . 0 2 6 2 8

0 . 0 1 3 9 4

0 . 0 0 4 9 1

0 . 0 0 6 7 3

0 . 0 0 7 8 7

0 . 0 0 9 9 8

- 0 . 0 0 7 4 9

0 . 0 1 7 2 1

0 . 0 0 7 9 7

0 . 0 1 4 1 8

0 . 0 1 7 1 5

0 . 0 1 6 3 7

0 . 0 1 1 0 6

0 . 0 1 1 7 3

0 . 0 1 3 4 6

0 . 0 1 2 4 2 ~

0 . 0 1 3 7 3

0 . 0 1 5 5 1

0 . 0 1 5 7 5

0 . 0 1 3 6 4

0 . 0 1 1 8 9

0 . 0 1 4 5 9

0 . 0 1 3 9 1

0 . 0 1 3 2 5

0 . 0 1 4 5 0

0 . 0 1 4 4 3

0 . 0 1 2 3 9

0 . 0 1 2 8 7

0 . 0 1 1 7 6

0 . 0 1 3 8 0

153

Table 3.97. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on MD - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation

DF


Deviation from Regression

S.S. M.S.

51 566.68494 11.11147

298 5931.67529 19.90495

F.Value

0.55823

Total 349 6498.36035

The other aspect of QWL i.e. "Meaningful Development"

is also found unaffected as a function of both IV's


as obtained F = 0.55823 given in Table 3.97 and 't' values

highlighted in Table 3.98 are found highly insignificant,

therefore, there is no doubt in accepting null hypotheses.


the influence of IV's on CIP - a facet of QWL



Deviation from Regression

51 5496.18311 107.76830 0.92106

298 34867.24219 117.00417

Total 349 40363.42578

Table

N J .

I f

a 2 1

zz a ii.

a 16

n 2 6

^ 9

3 0

3 1

3 2

3 3

3 4

3&

3 6

3 7

3 «

3 9

4 6

4 1

4 2

4 3

4 4

4 S

4<,

4 7

4 6

4 9

5 0

S I

52

S3

• > • .

5 5

5 6

5 7

So

5 9

6 S

o l

6 2

Ol

6 4

6 5

6 6

6 7

6 6

6 7

3 . 9 8 . Showi Devel

» l « s

4 . 3 2 ^ - 1

3 . 7 5 7 U

3 . » 0 S 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 B « >

3 . 0 8 2 8 6

2 . B 4 2 R &

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 f c S

2 . 8 6 2 S 6

J . J 9 7 J 4

2 . 7 4 6 5 7

2 . 7 B 5 7 1

2 . 5 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . S 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 * 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 Q

3 . 0 5 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 k

2 . 3 3 A 2 C

2 . 7 6 3 5 7

3 . 0 S 4 ? 9

3 . 0 4 ? < s

2 . 7 7 7 K .

2 . 6 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 ? 9

2 . 1 f 0 0 C

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 C 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 i

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 3 ' ?

i.C<-\i.\

2 . s 3 t ? «

2 . i 3 7 ; L

2 . : J ? = 4

2 . i 3 4 ? 9

2 . V 4 ; f f

2 . 7 7 1 4 5

2 . 5 7 7 : 4

2 . 5 0 2 ? •

2 . 5 ; ! ? 7

4 0 . S S j 7?

O c P t N D t ST

1 5

I N T i . < C i . « "

. n j i . 1 I F L [

I i . i 4 : 5 5

T

C O S M L * T ! C ^

3^u. L « r . C ^ CF : <-T ! " ' T f

ng M u l t i p l e Regression Anal opment d imension of QW.L.

n V I » T I OK-

0 . » ' 7 5 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 B

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 C 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 1

i . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 J 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 R 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 ^ 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 6 7 0

1 . 5 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

l . i r k ? 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 6 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 F 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 C 3 6

1 . U 9 2 7

l . ? « 1 5 5

1 . ? 5 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 3 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 C 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

; . I 7 i 6 E

1 . 1 ! " . ^ 7

1 . 2 t } 5 4

1 . 1 ' 3 4 «

1 . 2 4 i J !

; . 2 2 1 1 3

1 . 1 < ; 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 1 3 < *

1 . 3 ? J 1 7

1 . 2 ^ 7 0 7

1 . 2 7 7 3 9

t . 7 0 1 0 3

4 . 3 1 5 C S

1 ? . 4 7

C . < *

> . 4 '

C C R - T L * T I ' > s » VS Y

- 0 . 0 1 V 4 5

O . C 0 5 8 6

- 0 . 0 1 7 2 5

- 0 . 0 0 9 S 4

0 . 0 7 0 7 8

0 . 0 0 9 3 6

0 . 0 5 6 2 4

- 0 . 0 2 0 9 9

0 . 0 2 5 7 6

0 . 0 4 7 6 2

- 0 . 0 0 1 4 0

- C . 1 0 2 5 2

- 0 . 0 5 7 9 2

- 0 . 0 0 3 9 4

0 . 0 6 9 4 6

0 . 0 0 3 2 B

- 0 . 0 3 0 3 5

9 . 0 0 7 5 5

- 0 . 0 0 2 5 2

- 0 . 0 1 2 3 0

- 0 . 0 9 2 8 0

0 . 0 1 4 2 3

0 . 0 7 2 3 1

0 . 0 4 5 4 0

- 0 . 0 5 4 5 1

- 0 . 0 1 9 6 4

- 0 . 0 2 3 4 D

- 3 . 0 C 3 ? ;

: . 3 0 7 ' , ?

0 . 0 4 5 6 4

- 0 . 0 5 2 1 4

- 0 . 0 1 2 7 9

O . C 0 9 4 0

O . C 5 0 4 C

3 . 0 0 0 9 9

- 0 . D 4 S 3 4

- 0 . 0 4 0 9 2

0 . 0 2 3 8 5

O . D 3 4 ) i e

C . 0 1 3 0 2

- r . 0 0 9 4 4

- 0 . 0 0 5 9 S

0 . C 3 3 1 0

0 . C 4 « i 7

C . 0 0 7 4 4

- S . 0 3 5 C 7

- C . 0 1 0 0. 2

- 0 . 0 1 0 ? 1

0 . 0 5 9 ' ' ^

- 3 . 0 2 2 ? ' .

O . O O i ? 1

4 2 4

- * r » c -

9 £ G f i ( S S I C N C C t f f I C I t S T

- a . 4 4 S 2 0

- 0 . J H 0 7

- 0 . 4 7 7 0 6

- 0 . 2 4 6 5 1

0 . 0 5 4 4 0

- 0 . 3 7 7 5 3

- 0 . 0 2 8 2 9

- 0 . 4 1 0 6 9

- 0 . 2 8 6 9 7

0 . 0 2 2 1 8

- 0 . 2 6 9 7 9

- 0 . 6 5 4 0 2

- 0 . 4 4 J 9 2

- 0 . 3 6 7 7 6

0 . 1 9 4 0 8

- 0 . 1 3 3 8 5

- 0 . 2 9 5 6 2

- 0 . 3 0 0 5 7

- 0 . 2 7 7 5 4

- 0 . 2 3 9 2 5

- 0 . 5 9 3 0 6

- 0 . 1 7 9 4 4

- 0 . 0 9 1 6 6

- 0 . 1 3 0 7 6

- 0 . 4 5 4 1 5

- 0 . 2 8 6 7 0

- 0 . 1 2 7 1 3

- 0 . 2 7 3 3 0

- 0 . 2 3 3 2 3

- 3 . 0 S 5 4 9

- 0 . 4 3 5 3 1

- 0 . 3 0 3 5 5

- 0 . 2 1 4 6 5

- 0 . 1 2 3 1 4

0 . 2 4 5 9 7

- 0 . 6 7 3 2 3

- 1 . 0 2 6 7 4

• 0 . 5 2 0 6 8

- 0 . 5 0 0 1 2

- 0 . t S 3 9 5

- 0 . 8 0 9 6 5

- 0 . 7 K ? 0 7

- 0 . 4 8 2 2 3

- 0 . 6 0 8 5 9

- 0 . 7 1 7 8 0

- 0 . 9 0 2 3 1

- 0 . 7 2 9 5 3

- 0 . 9 0 3 3 4

- 0 . 3 8 3 8 5

- 0 . 8 R 4 I 0

0 . 7 0 4 3 1

yses - Meaningfu l

S T D . £0«?0R C C P U T f O OF « f t G . C C £ F . T VALUE

3 6 . 9 1 1 7 3

3 6 . 6 1 2 1 (

3 ! . . 8 1 1 7 (

3 6 . 8 1 1 4 1

3 6 . 8 1 1 0 !

! 6 . 8 1 1 2 (

3 6 . 8 1 1 4 1

3 6 . 6 1 1 2 .

3 6 . a i l 2 <

3 6 . 8 1 1 3 J

3 6 . 8 1 I 2 <

3 6 . 6 1 1 5 1

3 6 . 8 1 1 0 1

3 6 . 8 1 1 3

3 5 . 8 1 0 9

3 6 . 3 1 0 6

3 6 . 8 1 1 3

3 6 . 1 1 1 7

3 6 . S 1 1 5

3 6 . 8 1 1 5

3 6 . 6 1 1 5

3 6 . ( ! 1 1 6

3 6 . ! 1 1 2 (

3 6 . 8 1 1 1

3 6 . 3 1 1 2

3 6 . S 1 1 2 ,

3s. euo 3 i . 3 1 1 3 '

. ' » . . = 1 1 2 •

2 5 . 5 1 1 3 ;

3 * . E i m

3 6 . 9 1 1 2 ^

3 6 . 3 1 1 6 3

3 6 . J l l 6 t

3 i . E n s ' !

2 4 * . 5 9 9 9 "

2 4 6 . 6 C 1 2 <

2 4 6 . 6 0 0 0 '

2 4 4 . 6 0 3 6 1

2 4 6 . 6 C 0 5 (

2 4 j . 5 0 C 7

-> 4» . S 9-3 fc

2 4 i . 6 S C 9 ;

2 4 s . 6 3 3 51

2 4 4 . 6 0 3 2 .

2 4 4 . 6 0 1 9 ]

2 4 t . 4 0 0 1 1

2 4 4 . 4 0 3 0 ]

2 4 * . 6 0 1 1 *

2 4 4 . 4 0 C 6 I

2 4 4 . 4 0 C 4 .

0 . 0 1 2 1 8

'> 0 . 0 0 5 0 0

\ ) . 0 1 2 9 6

0 . 0 0 6 7 0

0 . 0 0 1 4 8

0 . 0 1 0 2 6

1 0 . 0 0 0 7 7

! 0 . 0 1 1 1 6

i 0 . 0 0 7 8 0

> 0 . 0 0 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 7 1 3

) 0 . 0 1 7 7 7

> 0 . 0 1 2 0 1

1 0 . 0 0 9 9 9

J 0 . 0 0 5 2 7

S 0 . 0 0 3 6 4

I 0 . 0 0 8 0 3

» • 0 . 0 0 8 1 7

3 0 . 0 0 7 5 4

; 0 . 0 0 6 5 0

i 0 . 0 1 6 1 1

! 0 . 0 0 4 8 7

b 9 . 0 0 0 0 5

5 9 . 0 0 3 5 5

1 9 . 0 1 2 3 9

' 0 . 0 0 7 7 9

1 0 . 0 0 3 4 5

0 . 0 0 7 4 2

' 0 . 0 0 6 3 4

) 0 . 0 0 2 3 2

0 . 9 1 1 8 3

0 . 0 0 3 2 5

! 0 . 0 0 5 8 3

0 . 0 0 3 3 5

0 . 0 0 6 6 8

0 . 0 0 2 7 3

0 . 0 0 4 1 6 ^ 9 . 0 0 2 1 1

> 0 . 0 0 2 0 3

0 . 0 0 2 6 7

S 3 . 0 0 3 2 8

' 0 . 0 0 3 1 9

0 . 0 0 1 9 6

) 0 . 0 0 2 4 7

I 0 . 0 0 2 9 1

0 . 0 0 3 6 6

0 . 0 0 2 9 6

9 . 0 0 3 6 6

0 . 0 0 1 5 8

0 . 0 0 3 5 9

i 0 . 0 0 2 8 6

154

Table 3.100. Showing Multiple Regression Analyses - Control , 155 Influence and Par t i c ipa t ion dimension of QWL.

NO. P l V l i T I C N X VS Y C C E F M C U M OF R I G . C O I F . 1 V»LUl

17 l..:}S7l 0 . 4 F 7 5 0 0 . 0 ? 7 6 3 - 0 . 1 6 S 7 1 8 9 . 2 4 9 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 6

Zb 3 . 7 5 7 1 * . l . I O « . ^ « - 0 . 0 0 0 1 2 - C . 8 9 5 7 4 B 9 . 2 S 0 6 5 0 . 0 1 0 0 1

21 5 . 6 0 3 ^ 7 1 . 2 C S 7 3 0 . 0 4 7 P 1 0 .27S73 8 9 . ? 4 9 6 9 0 . 0 0 3 1 2

2i 3 . 5 0 5 7 1 1 . 1 7 3 1 1 0 . 0 1 1 4 1 - 0 . 6 4 1 5 5 8 9 . 2 4 8 9 f 0 . 0 0 9 4 5

2 3 3 .>02 ' !6 1 . 2 ? C 0 i - 0 . 0 1 0 0 ? - 0 . 1 2 0 5 1 8 9 . 2 4 7 9 8 0 . 0 0 1 3 5

24 3 . 0 E 2 a e 1 . 2 l 6 6 t - 0 . 0 7 1 3 ? - 1 . 1 2 2 1 5 8 9 . 2 4 8 3 3 0 ; . 0 1 2 5 7

i i 2 . 8 4 2 8 C 1 . 1 7 3 1 » - 0 . 0 2 1 6 4 - 0 . 4 2 9 6 9 8 9 . 2 4 8 8 0 0 . 0 0 4 8 1

26 2 . 6 4 0 0 0 1 . 3 0 3 1 1 - 0 . 0 6 7 7 6 - 1 . 3 5 5 9 7 8 9 . 2 4 8 4 1 0 . 0 1 5 1 7

27 3 . 5 7 1 4 3 1 . 2 4 8 1 6 - 0 . 0 1 0 9 2 - 0 . 3 3 6 5 7 8 9 . 2 4 8 4 7 0 . 0 0 3 7 7

28 2 . 8 6 2 8 6 1 . 1 « 7 » 6 - 0 . 0 4 6 6 0 - 0 . 9 3 7 4 1 8 9 . 2 4 8 6 2 O.f t lOSO

2V 3 . 1 9 7 1 4 1 . 2 1 0 5 0 - C . 0 2 5 7 8 - 0 . 6 2 4 6 7 8 9 . 2 4 8 4 4 O.OO700

JO 2 , 7 4 S 5 7 1 . 1 9 1 9 9 C . 1 0 9 5 1 0 . 4 9 3 4 0 8 9 . 2 4 9 0 6 0 . 0 0 5 5 3

3 1 2 . 7 8 5 7 1 1 . 2 5 S 7 0 0 . 0 9 5 6 5 0 . 1 8 3 5 6 8 9 . 2 4 7 8 3 0 . 0 0 2 0 6

32 2 . 5 8 0 0 0 1 . 3 3 2 C 6 0 . 0 1 8 6 4 - 0 . 1 5 7 6 8 8 9 . 2 4 8 7 4 0 . 0 0 1 7 7

33 2 . 9 6 5 7 1 1 . 2 8 6 4 6 - 0 . 0 5 3 2 0 - 1 . 2 2 4 5 5 8 9 . 2 4 7 5 9 0 . 0 1 3 7 2

34 2 . 9 5 1 4 3 1 . 3 2 2 2 5 0 . 0 5 9 6 6 0 . 2 8 5 9 4 8 9 . 2 4 7 0 7 0 . 0 0 3 2 0

35 3 . 2 7 4 2 9 1 . 2 ' 6 5 8 5 . 1 2 7 9 8 0 . 6 7 9 4 4 8 9 . 2 4 8 7 2 0 . 0 0 7 6 1

36 3 .26C00 1 . 2 0 5 6 9 C . 0 4 9 1 5 - 0 . 0 1 7 4 2 8 9 . 2 4 9 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 2 0

37 3 . 1 0 0 0 0 1 . 1 8 4 3 0 0 .C21 ' -C - 0 . 0 7 3 9 4 8 9 . 2 4 9 1 2 O . O 0 0 7 9

38 2 . 9 9 1 4 3 1 . 2 2 4 1 3 0 . 0 1 7 9 V - 0 . 7 2 0 6 6 8 9 . 2 4 9 0 9 0 . 0 0 8 0 7

39 2 .871.29 1 . 2 5 5 9 D 0 . ; 7 6 l i 0 .D6690 8 9 . 2 4 9 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 5

40 3 . 1 7 1 4 3 1 . 2 7 9 9 0 0 . 0 3 2 2 4 - 0 . 2 4 6 1 6 8 9 . 2 4 9 3 7 0 . 0 0 2 7 6

* 1 3 . 1 7 4 2 9 1 . 2 6 7 1 4 - 0 . 0 3 5 9 6 - 0 . 8 2 8 8 1 8 9 . 2 4 8 4 7 0 . 0 0 9 2 9

* i 3 . 0 S 6 5 7 1 . 2 3 2 6 2 - 0 . 0 6 2 ^ 5 - 1 . 0 7 3 5 5 8 9 . 2 4 8 1 9 0 . 0 1 2 0 3

* 3 2 . 9 7 7 1 4 1 . 1 P 7 1 0 - C . 0 5 0 7 0 - 0 . 6 3 6 9 S 8 9 . 2 4 8 3 4 0 . 0 0 7 1 4

• * 2 . S 3 4 2 9 1 . 2 ' . 0 ? * 0 . 0 1 1 2 8 - 0 . 0 1 6 6 7 8 9 . 2 4 8 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 1 9

* 5 2 . 7 6 0 5 7 1 .3C ' ;27 C . 0 1 8 4 7 - 5 . 4 f 5 2 4 8 9 . 2 4 8 0 1 0 . 0 0 5 2 1

* 6 5 . J 5 4 ; V 1 . 2 9 1 3 3 C . C 4 0 2 7 - 0 . 5 3 5 7 7 8 9 . 2 4 8 6 7 0 . 0 0 6 0 1

* 7 3 . 0 4 2 6 6 1 . 2 5 1 2 0 0 . 3 6 4 4 7 0 . 5 0 3 6 3 S V . 2 4 8 4 5 C . 3 0 5 6 4

'-^ 2 . 7 7 7 1 4 1 . 2 4 4 6 1 - 0 . 0 3 9 « 5 - C . 7 7 6 3 1 8 9 . 2 4 8 6 5 0 . 0 0 8 7 0

49 2 . 5 6 5 7 1 1 . 3 1 4 1 2 - 3 . 3 1 * : ; - C . « 3 9 3 5 8 9 . 2 4 8 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 1 6

50 2 . 4 0 0 0 0 1 . 2 9 3 0 0 - 0 . 3 5 7 ? 7 - 0 . 3 3 9 8 2 8 9 . 2 4 8 5 6 0 . 3 0 3 8 1

S i 2 . 2 1 4 2 9 1 . 2 5 6 4 2 - C . 3 9 5 5 < . - 1 . 4 3 7 7 2 8 9 . 2 4 9 3 7

52 2 . 1 8 0 0 0 1 . 3 3 4 6 4 - C . 3 4 1 i s - 0 . 5 3 5 0 9 8 9 . 2 4 9 5 0

53 i 0 2 . < . 7 7 l 4 1 0 . 7 2 < . e 7 3 . P 1 3 0 7 C.40737 8 9 . 2 4 6 8 3 C . 0 0 4 5 6

' * 3.220:.-> 1 . 2 : i 7 « - C . 0 3 7 2 9 - 2 . 7 9 4 4 2 5 9 7 . 8 7 8 7 2 0 . 0 0 4 6 8

" 2 . 9 8 5 7 1 1 . 1 1 6 3 4 0 . 0 4 3 7 8 - 1 . 8 0 6 2 9 5 9 7 . 8 8 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 3 0 2

56 2 . 8 1 7 1 * 1 . 2 6 2 5 3 C .0 f t3C3 - 2 . 6 6 1 8 * 5 9 7 . 8 7 8 9 7 0 . 0 0 4 4 5

57 2 . 5 7 1 4 3 1 . 1 1 2 2 1 - 3 . 0 3 5 7 5 - 3 . 3 ? 3 E ! 5 9 7 . S 8 0 4 9 0 . 0 0 5 5 6

58 : . i : " ; 7 l . l T s f t n - S . S S S O t - 3 . 1 4 1 7 ? 5 9 7 . 8 8 0 1 9 0 . 0 0 5 2 5

59 ; . 0 3 1 4 ^ l . l * ( t 7 - O . C ' C ^ J - l . ' . 9 9 ? 4 5 9 7 . 8 8 0 6 8 0 . 0 0 2 8 4

o: ? . ^ U ? > l . J ' - J S t - C . C t : ? 3 - ? . 1 ? 7 S 1 S 5 7 . S 7 7 5 6 0 . 0 0 3 5 6

61 2 . 5 W 1 U l . l - ' i ' - : . C < . . . : - > - 5 . 3 ? J 4 ? 5 9 7 . ? E 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 6 8

62 2.7?."t !.:'.t}: : . i t 5 f : -i.6i7sv 597.88525 o.ooi7i 63 2 . : } - ? . i , ? ? l l C - O . C i 3 : 7 - : . 3 0 2 6 4 5 9 7 . 8 7 9 3 9 0 . 0 0 5 5 2

6 . l.<)l.l<ii 1.1<55';7 - : . 0 < . 9 7 i - 2 . 6 1 0 9 7 5 9 7 . B S 3 4 6 0 . 0 0 4 7 0

65 2."'••143 i . 2 C 1 3 e - C . O ' . J S ? - 5 . 0 7 7 1 2 5 9 7 . 8 7 9 0 9 0 . 0 0 5 1 5

9 ' 2.5- '71<. l . ? C M 7 - : . C 1 5 : 7 - 2 . 5 7 2 ' ; 6 5 9 7 . 5 7 3 6 5 0 . 0 0 4 3 0

67 2 . ! .C?«e 1 . 3 5 7 C 7 - 0 . 0 C L 1 - -? . t :7 '< .S 5 9 7 . 5 8 1 5 9 C . 0 3 4 4 7

90 2 . 5 C ; 5 7 1 . 2 7 7 . ' ? - : . : 7 s c t - ! . t ! 3 2 » 5 9 7 . S 8 0 « . 9 0 . 0 0 6 1 6

O* 4 0 . S E 5 7 ? 6 . - ' 01C? -P .Of tC^O 2 . 4 0 7 3 3 5 9 7 . 3 7 9 8 8 C . 0 0 4 0 3

1« 3 7 . « P W ? 10.75fc?5

I N T C "vCt r T 4 « . 1 a 11 i

N O L T I P L E c ^ . - ^ i L 4 T 1 C \ : , 7 t ; c i

S l j . l.-":r;K Cf t S T I " * ! ' : 1 0 . ? U f 5

0 . 0 1 6 1 1

• 0 . 0 0 6 0 0

156.

It is evident from Table 3.99 that the fourteenth

dimension of QWL i.e., "Control, Influence and participation"

is also found to be insignificantly influenced by both

independent variables as obtained F = 0.92106 which is highly

insignificant even at .05 level. The obtained findings were

further confirmed from Table 3.100 where t values highlighted

ranging from lowest t = .0 0019 to highest t = .01611 are

highly insignificant even at .05 level of confidence and as a

result all the proposed null hypotheses found accepted.

Table 3.101. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on EC - a facet of QWL

Source of ^p g.S. M.S. F.Value Variation



Total 349 8754.24023

It is evident from Table 3.101 that the fifteenth

facet of QWL i.e., "Employee commitment" is found not to be

determined by either of the independent variable (personality

attributes and organizational characteristics) as obtained

F = 1.05300 and cited 't' values is given in Table 3.102 are

found highly insignificant advocating acceptance of null

hypotheses.

157 Table 3 .102. Showing Mul t ip le Regress ion Analyses - Employee

Commitment dimension of QWL. V A r f U t - L t

i V

2C

ii

21

2i

21.

2 J

2t,

27

2 e

2i

t.i

1,1.

<.i

to

4 7

1,1

4 9

S6

5 1

5 2

5 3

54

55

5 6

5 7

5b

5 9

60

O i

6 2

6 i

6 4

6 5

6 6

6 7

6 i

6 9

U t P £ s D £ M

I S

h [ AN

4 , 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 3 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 8 t

3 . 0 6 2 8 6

2 . 8 4 2 4 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 6 8 2 S 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 8 S 5 7

2 . V 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 3 4 Z 9

2 . 7 6 S 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 s

2 . " 7 1 4

2 . t 6 5 7 l

2 . 4 0 D 0 3

2 . 2 1 4 2 5

2 . 1 S O ? 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 c

>..;<.' r c:

. . . 9 S 3 7 1

2 . 6 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 'j 2 S " 7

t . 1 ' 1 4 •

2. t u : * 2 . i ? 7 1 4

2 . 7 ? : ; ;

2 . = ' - r v

2 . 5 4 ? F 5

2. nm 2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . " i ' V - ' »

? . 5 0 = •;7

4 C . ? t 5 7 ?

1 7 . - 4 0 C C

D I V U T I C K

0 . S 8 7 3 0

1 . 1 Oi.SE

1 . 2 0 5 7 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 7 0 0 S

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 C S 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 * 1 3

1 . 2 5 3 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 » ' 7 1 C

1 . 2 * 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 V 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

i . 2 ^ 1 2 0

1 . 2 4 4 e l

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

l . f l O o O O

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 f r 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

I . 1 7 6 6 5

1 . ^.'^^^7

1 . 2 6 J 5 4

J . ; 5 14 3

1 . ? 4 1 7 3

1 . r 2 1 1 0

1. l'''>i?

1 . 2 0 1 ! J

1 . 3 0 * 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 . 7 7 7 ^ 9

i . 7 0 1 C J

5 . 0 0 S 3 7

CCRHI L » T 1 0 S X VS Y

- 0 . 0 8 3 1 5

0 . 0 1 4 7 5

- C . 0 0 3 6 6

- 0 . 0 S 4 f 4

0 . 0 5 4 6 6

0 . 0 8 2 8 7

0 . 0 M 7 9

C . 3 1 8 1 9

0 . 0 2 4 2 9

0 . 0 6 6 5 0

- 0 . 0 3 3 2 5

- 0 . 0 4 7 6 5

- 0 . 0 2 8 1 8

0 . 0 0 4 5 9

0 . 0 S S 6 2

0 . 0 7 8 9 5

0 . 0 2 7 6 5

- 0 . C 0 7 6 1

0 . 0 1 2 3 7

0 . 0 6 5 1 1

- 0 . 0 3 0 S 1

0 . 0 3 55 8

0 . 0 0 5 3 4

0 . 0 2 S 4 ' i

- 0 . 0 9 5 1 7

- 0 . 0 5 3 7 S

0 . 0 1 1 6 4

- 0 . 0 7 5 7 0

- C , 0 2 7 7 5

- 0 . 0 1 3 7 0

- C . 1 3 8 5 ?

0 . 0 C 3 7 0

O . 0 ? 2 4 ?

C . C 4 6 ' ' 4

D . 0 1 5 4 4

0 . 0 2 0 0 5

0 . 0 0 0 6 1

0 . 5 1 8 2 0

- C . 0 3 2 4 1

0 . 0 4 6 4 :

c . ; i

c : 6 0 1 i

R f O R I S S I C K C C E f f K l l M

- 0 . 7 2 2 1 0

0 . 3 3 6 5 2

- 0 . 0 8 9 2 4

- 0 . 1 0 0 0 6

0 . 1 5 2 3 4

0 . J 0 5 5 2

0 . 2 0 8 4 5

- 0 . 0 3 0 0 3

0 . 0 3 1 3 5

0 . 4 1 1 8 5

- 0 . 1 5 3 5 4

- 0 . 0 9 6 4 8

- 0 . 1 3 2 1 2

- 0 . 1 1 7 5 0

0 . 3 7 2 5 9

0 . 4 S S 6 7

0 . 2 9 2 6 9

- 0 . 0 5 6 7 9

0 . 0 0 8 2 6

0 . 4 1 5 5 3

- 0 . 2 0 2 5 1

0 . 2 6 7 5 0

0 . ; i e l 5

0 . 3 0 1 5 6

- 0 . 4 2 3 4 9

- 0 . 1 6 2 9 9

0 . 1 7 1 8 4

- 0 . 3 2 5 7 3

- C . 1 0 9 4 5

0 . 0 5 5 0 2

- 0 . 4 7 6 4 0

0 . 1 5 0 7 2

0 . 4 2 0 4 2

0 . 0 2 9 3 2

- o . ; 3 6 4 ?

- 0 . 1 3 0 2 3

- 0 . 5 6 0 8 0

0 . 2 4 7 9 3

- C . ? 8 1 4 4

0 . 3 9 9 C 3

0 . M I <!«

- 0 . 2 4 7 7 4

- c . ? * ? ; »

- 0 . 2 ^ 1 1 6

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

- 0 . J 9 ? 7 J

o . o o o c o

o . o c o c o

0 . o o : 0 0

0 . c o : 0 0

0 . 3 " ' ; 7c

S I D . t H R C « or R i G . c o t r .

1 1 . 1 6 4 8 7

4 1 . 1 6 5 3 C

( I . 1 6 1 9 J

i l . 1 6 * 5 9

* 1 . 1 6 4 1 2

4 1 . 1 6 4 2 6

4 1 . 1 6 4 5 1

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 2

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 5

4 1 . 1 6 4 4 2

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 4

4 1 . 1 6 4 6 2

4 1 . 1 6 4 0 6

4 1 . 1 6 4 4 8

4 1 . 1 6 3 9 4

4 1 . 1 6 3 7 0

4 1 . 1 6 4 4 7

4 1 . 1 6 4 9 4

4 1 . 1 6 4 6 5

4 1 . 1 6 4 6 4

4 1 . 1 6 4 6 8

4 1 . 1 6 4 7 7

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 5

4 1 . 1 6 4 2 2

4 1 . 1 6 4 2 9

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 0

4 1 . 1 6 4 1 4

4 1 . 1 6 4 4 4

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 6

4 1 . 1 6 4 4 3

4 1 . 1 6 4 2 5

4 1 . 1 6 4 3 9

4 1 . 1 6 4 7 6

4 1 . 1 6 4 6 2

4 1 . 1 6 3 5 9

2 7 5 . 7 6 1 4 7

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 9 7

2 7 5 . 7 6 1 6 0

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 2 7

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 1 5

2 7 S . 7 6 2 3 6

2 7 5 . 7 6 0 9 3

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 5 4

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 1 8

2 7 S . 7 6 1 7 8

2 7 5 . 7 6 3 6 7

2 7 5 . 7 6 l 6 f

2 7 5 . 7 6 1 5 4

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 7 9

2 7 5 . 7 6 2 2 7

2 7 5 . 7 6 1 9 9

C O H P U T I D t V A L U E

0 . » t 7 S 4

0 . 0 0 8 1 7

0 . 0 0 2 1 7

0 . 0 0 2 4 3

0 . 0 0 3 7 0

0 . 0 0 7 4 2

0 . 0 0 5 0 6

0 . 0 0 0 7 3

0 . 0 0 0 7 6

0 . 0 1 0 0 1

0 . 0 0 3 7 3

0 . 0 0 2 3 9

0 . 0 0 3 2 1

0 . 0 0 2 8 5

0 . 0 0 9 0 S

0 . 0 1 1 1 4

0 . 0 0 7 1 1

0 . 0 0 1 3 8

0 . 0 0 0 2 0

0 . 0 1 0 0 9

0 . 0 0 4 9 2

0 . 0 0 6 5 0

0 . 0 0 S 2 5

0 . 0 0 7 3 3

0 . 0 1 0 4 1

) . 0 0 3 9 6

0 . 0 0 4 1 7

0 . 0 0 7 9 1

0 . 0 0 2 6 6

0 . 0 0 1 3 4

0 . 0 1 1 5 7

0 . 0 0 3 6 6

0 . 0 1 0 2 1

0 . 0 0 0 7 1

0 . 0 0 0 8 9

0 . 0 0 0 4 7 -

0 . 0 0 2 0 3

0 . 0 0 0 9 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 2

0 . 0 0 1 4 5

0 . 0 0 0 4 8

0 . 0 0 0 9 0

J . 0 0 0 9 6

0 . 0 0 0 9 1

0 . 0 0 3 0 0

0 . 0 0 1 4 2

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 1 3 6

INUSCEPT s . 3 ^ 7 5 7

njLTJPLE CC = =JtL»lIOK 3.39C7f

STu. ihnZP. Cf £ S T I " * : r <..9e?C?

http://Oi.SE

158


the influence of IV's on GLS - a facet of QWL

Source of pp s.S. M.S. F.Value Variation



Total 349 31734.85156

The sixteenth aspect of QWL i.e., "General Life

satisfaction" is also found to be insignificantly influenced

by both independent variables (personality attributes and

organizational characteristics) as obtained F = 0.97130 is

found highly insignificant (Table 3.103) and 't' values

ranging from as low as t = .00009 to as high as t = .01538

given in Table 3.104 are also found the same, hence, there is

no reservation in accepting the null-hypotheses.

Table 3.105. Analysis of Variance from the Regression Showing the influence of IV's on OC - a facet of QWL

Source of Variation DP S.S. M.S. F.Value



Total 349 27161.68945

Table 3.104. Showing Mul t ip le Regress ion Analyses - General Life S a t i s f a c t i o n dimension of QWL.

159

NO.

I v

iO

2 1

22

23

2k

23

26

27

ib

29

30

} ;

32

33

34

•3i

36

37

36

35

4C

« 1

42

4 3

44

4 5

46

47

46

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

se 59

c .

b i

e2

o i

64

65

6C

67

66

69

U t P t N C t M

16

f l •%

4 . 3 2 S 7 1

3 . 7 3 n t

i . 6 0 8 ^ 7

« . 3 0 5 7 1

3 . 5 0 2 8 c

3 .0S ;Ba

2 . ? 4 2 ! i

2 . 6 4 0 9 3

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . S S 2 8 t

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 .S80C0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . S 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 .08657

2 . V 7 7 U

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3.C542?

3 . 0 4 2 3 6

2 .77714

2 . 8 6 S 7 I

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2.150CC

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 J

2 , 5 ? ! S 7

2 . t J l 4 j

2.t,i.:-.

2 . ' . : : : « .

2.711'. t

2.i}.:i

2 . V i : ? ;

2 . 7 7 1 4 r

2 . 5 7 7 U

2.5C2e>

2.iO"'7

4 « . 3 S 5 7 2

[

3 0 . 3 5 7 1 4

«.TAS[)*l):> CCKMFlAt IO* ' n f C K l S S l O N S T O . IRBCO COfPUTEO

O l V M l l C N X VS Y C C l f F l C I t M Of R E O . C O t f . T V«LUt

0 . 8 ^ 7 3 0 0 . C J 1 5 9 - C . 4 1 9 8 0 7 5 . » 4 t » l 0 . 0 0 5 3 2

1 . 1 0 4 5 5 0 . 0 1 1 9 3 - 0 . 0 5 9 0 1 r S . 8 t 5 B 4 0 . 0 0 0 7 5

1 . 2 0 5 7 3 - 0 . 0 1 2 6 0 - 0 . 2 7 8 0 4 7 « . a 4 4 « 9 0 . 0 0 3 ) 3

1 . 1 7 3 1 1 - C . 0 3 0 6 6 - 0 . 3 1 7 5 ? 7 8 . 8 4 4 3 7 0 . 0 0 4 0 3

1 . 2 2 0 0 5 ' - O . C 2 7 0 6 - 0 . 5 1 9 0 2 7 8 . S 4 3 4 S 0 . 0 0 6 5 8

1 . 2 1 6 6 4 - 0 . 0 2 0 2 2 - 0 . 4 9 7 5 1 7 8 . 8 4 3 7 8 0 . 0 0 6 3 1

1 . 1 7 3 1 9 C . 0 5 7 4 1 0 . 7 1 4 3 6 7 e . 3 4 4 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 0 6

1 . 3 0 3 1 1 - 0 . 0 9 0 1 6 - 1 . 0 2 1 9 0 7 8 . 8 4 3 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 9 6

1 . 2 4 6 1 6 0 . 0 2 3 4 9 - 0 . 5 6 7 0 2 7 6 . 9 4 3 9 1 0 . 0 0 7 1 9

1 . 1 6 7 5 6 0 . C 0 3 3 3 0 . 2 6 6 6 1 7 6 . 8 4 4 0 4 0 . 0 0 3 3 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0 0 .C14S6 - 0 . 0 6 9 2 4 7 6 . 8 4 3 8 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 8

1 . 1 9 1 9 9 0 . C 0 1 3 7 0 . 2 3 4 3 7 7 6 . 3 4 4 4 3 0 . 0 0 2 9 7

1 . 2 5 6 7 0 - 0 . : 9 J 9 9 - 0 . 6 8 0 4 0 7 S . 8 4 3 3 5 0 . 0 1 U 7

1 . 3 3 2 0 6 - 0 . 0 7 7 3 7 - 3 . 5 5 2 2 8 7 6 . 8 4 4 1 5 0 . 0 0 7 0 0

1 . 2 6 6 4 6 0 . C 3 5 6 0 0 . 6 0 6 0 5 7 6 . 8 4 3 1 3 0 . 0 0 7 7 1

1 . 3 2 2 2 5 - 0 . 0 5 3 ; 3 0 . 0 9 1 5 6 7 8 . 8 4 2 6 ? 0 . 0 0 1 1 6

1 . 2 3 6 5 8 0 .C703E 0 . 0 6 0 2 5 7 B . 9 4 4 1 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 6

1 . 2 0 5 6 9 0 . 1 5 2 5 ? 1 . 2 1 2 6 0 7 3 . 6 4 5 0 4 0 . 0 1 5 3 8

. 1 . 1 8 4 3 0 0 . 3 4 1 3 e - 0 . 3 0 6 6 6 7 3 . 8 4 4 4 8 0 . 0 0 3 6 9

1 . 2 2 4 1 3 - 0 . 0 4 * 2 9 - 0 . 5 ! 2 5 1 7 3 . 8 4 4 4 e 0 . 0 0 6 7 5

1 . 2 5 5 9 0 - 0 . 0 6 ^ 5 3 - 0 . 6 0 0 6 0 7 3 . 3 4 4 S 5 0 . 0 0 7 6 2

1 . 2 7 9 9 0 C .1074? 0 . 6 6 2 0 9 7 8 . 8 4 4 7 1 0 . 0 0 9 4 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4 C.CS770 0 . 0 2 9 4 0 7 3 . 3 4 3 9 1 0 . 0 0 0 3 7

1 . 2 3 2 6 2 0 . 9 C 4 4 9 - C . 3 6 5 3 0 7 9 . 8 4 3 6 7 0 . 0 0 4 6 9

1 . 1 8 7 1 0 - 0 . C 3 3 9 5 - 0 . 5 C 9 6 9 7 S . 8 4 3 8 C 0 . 0 0 6 4 7

1 . 2 6 0 3 6 0 . C 0 9 7 1 C . M 0 3 2 7 3 . 6 4 5 6 2 0 . 0 0 3 9 4

1 . 3 0 9 2 7 0 . C 1 4 7 3 0 . 2 6 3 1 6 7 8 . 6 4 3 5 1 0 . 0 0 3 3 4

1 . 2 9 1 3 3 C . 0 4 6 : i - 0 . 1 7 3 C 7 7 S . 8 4 4 0 9 0 . 0 0 2 2 0

1 . 2 5 1 2 0 C.D4^5C D.20S40 7 ! . 8 4 3 9 3 0 . 0 0 2 6 4

1 . 2 4 4 6 1 - C . 5 3 2 I 9 - 0 . 2 5 4 3 9 7 3 . 8 4 4 0 7 0 . 0 0 3 2 3

1 . 3 1 4 1 ? C . 0 2 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 7 0 9 7 3 . 8 4 3 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 9

1 . 2 9 S O 0 ? . C 2 : i t 0 . 1 2 1 9 6 7 3 . 6 4 3 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 5 5

1 . 2 5 6 4 2 - 0 . : C 9 ^ 3 - 0 . 5 9 2 9 4 7 3 . J 4 4 7 C 0 . 0 0 7 5 2

1 . 5 ^ 4 6 4 L . 0 7 4 5 7 0 .« .3958 7 3 . 3 4 4 ! ? 0 . 0 0 5 5 8

1 0 . 7 2 * 6 7 : . ; » : 4 ? ; . o s 3 3 6 7 3 . 3 4 2 4 6 0 . 0 0 I C 6

1 . 2 0 1 7 9 - 0 . 0 5 5 . 2 i - 4 . 4 6 3 2 3 5 2 3 . 1 7 8 1 6 0 . 0 0 6 4 5

1 . 1 1 6 3 4 - 0 . 3 6 3 9 8 - 4 . 6 0 4 8 7 5 2 6 . 1 8 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 9 1 0 "

1 . 2 6 2 5 3 C.CS517 - 3 . 0 6 6 3 7 5 2 8 . 1 7 8 4 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 1

1 - 1 ' 2 ? 1 C. ;" ;3?f - 3 . 7 5 1 0 1 5 2 3 . 1 7 9 7 5 0 . 0 0 7 1 0

I ' l ^ f t ' S : . C 2 J « t - 3 . 9 2 5 3 7 5 2 B . 1 7 9 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 4 3

1-1''=><'7 J . O U n - 4 . 2 6 8 5 9 5 2 ! . 1 7 9 9 7 O.OOBOf

^•"••"•'- - O . r ' ^ ' S - 4 . 2 4 5 1 1 5 2 « . 1 7 7 1 9 0 . 0 0 8 0 4

l - l " - ' - ' - : . : ' ; : 7 - 4 . 1 3 7 2 8 5 2 d . l 8 e 3 C 0 . 0 0 7 8 3

i-i'-f'i'i - C . ; < . : 0 5 - 4 . 0 6 4 6 J 5 2 S . 1 7 9 5 7 0 . 0 0 7 7 0

1 - ^ ' ' 1 1 3 - : . ; C 5 t ? - ! . t 0 4 5 8 5 2 3 . 1 7 8 7 7 0 . 0 0 7 3 9

l - » ' 5 5 7 C . : : " ; - ' ! - 3 . 9 8 7 9 6 5 2 3 . 1 8 2 4 3

l - ? f l 3 e C . 1 4 : 2 1 - 2 . 9 7 6 5 1 5 2 a . l 7 S 5 9

1 . 3 3 6 1 7 C . 0 4 4 . i : - 5 . 0 1 9 1 5 5 2 5 . 1 7 3 3 4

' • ^ 5 7 C 7 - : . : : 7 4 ? - ! . 0 8 1 7 C 5 2 S . l 8 0 7 ! 0 . 0 0 5 8 3

0 . 0 0 7 9 5 l-!''7i'i - ; . ; < . 5 5 } - 4 . 1 9 9 0 8 5 2 ? . 1 7 9 7 5

^ - - ^ - ' P - : . : ' : 5 ; 4 . 0 9 1 2 1 5 2 J . 1 7 9 ? O

9 . 5 ? 5 7 t

0 . 0 0 7 5 5

3 . 0 0 5 6 4

3 . 0 0 9 5 0

0 . 0 0 7 7 5

i M c r i C t P T 2 3 . ? 9248

l^JLll^U CCK-<lL«TICN 0 . 3 7 7 5 4

STD. tSr.Cfi CF t 5 1 I " * T t » . 5 5 5 ! 2

http://-0.055.2i

Table 3 . 1 0 6 . Showing Multiple Regress ion Analyses - O r g a n i z a t i o n a l Cl imate dimension of QWL.

160

VANIABLC NO.

1«

iO

2 1

22

23

2 *

25

26

27

, 26

29

JO

31

32

33

34

3S

36

37

3a

39

fcO

4 1

42

43

44

4 i

46

47

4a

49

SO

S I

J2

S3

S4

ss S6

57

S8

S9

60

6 1

62

63

64

6S

66

67

6fi

6 f

J t i ' E r O t M

17

«<e«s

4 . a 2 S 7 l

S . 7 J 7 1 4

3 . 5 0 S 5 7

3 . S C 5 7 1

3 . S 0 2 R 6

3 . 0 8 2 8 6

2 . • 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 8 8 2 8 6

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 . 7 4 8 S 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 8 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 3

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 .CES57

2 . 9 7 7 1 *

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 7 6 8 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 9

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 4

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2.i«oeo 1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 )

2 . 9 8 5 7 1

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . S 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 E 5 7

Z.bZlul

2 . 6 3 4 2 ?

2 . 6 3 7 1 .

2 . 7 2 2 8 6

2 . 2 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 7 7 1 4

2 . : i 0 2 « t

2 . 5 0 S 5 7

4 0 . 5 5 5 7 2

2 7 . 7 2 5 7 1

ST«NU«RO

Of V I * I I C ^

O . S 8 7 5 0

1 . 1 0 4 5 B

1 . 2 0 5 7 J

1 . 1 7 3 1 1

1 . 2 2 0 0 5

1 . 2 1 6 6 4

1 . 1 7 3 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 4 8 1 6

1 . 1 6 7 5 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 9 1 9 9

1 . 2 5 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 8 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 5

1 . 2 3 6 5 8

1 . 2 0 5 6 9

1 . 1 8 4 3 0

1 . 2 2 4 1 3

1 . 2 5 5 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

. 2 5 1 2 0

. 2 4 4 6 1

. 3 1 4 1 2

. 2 9 8 0 0

. 2 5 6 4 2

. 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 ? !

1 . 1 7 6 6 8

1 . l S s 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 8 S 4 J

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

1 . 2 0 1 3 S

1 . J C 6 1 7

1 . 2 S707

1 . 2 7 7 J e

S . 7 0 1 0 J

1 . 6 2 1 9 7

1.

1 .

1 .

1 .

1 ,

1 .

ccm»ri«noK « vs V

• 1 . 0 8 1 0 9

> e . 0 7 2 7 0

- 0 . 0 2 7 0 9

0 . 0 7 3 4 7

• 0 . 1 1 2 5 4

- 0 . 0 0 7 7 5

0 . 0 1 5 4 8

- 0 . 0 7 2 6 7

0 . 0 5 7 9 9

- 0 . 0 4 1 9 1

0 . 0 5 5 2 5

0 . 0 3 7 2 9

0 . 1 2 1 6 5

- 0 . D 1 S 2 0

0 . 0 7 7 4 4

0 . 0 5 0 4 4

0 . 0 7 4 4 2

- 0 . 0 7 3 5 5

- 0 . 1 4 5 7 4

- 0 . 0 1 4 S 1

- 0 . 0 5 8 7 2

0 . 0 0 3 1 6

- 0 . 0 0 1 0 9

- 0 . 0 : 3 4 0

- 0 . 0 5 5 3 2

- 0 . 0 3 4 5 1

- 0 . 0 4 3 7 1

- 0 . 9 3 1 3 9

0 . 0 7 6 8 7

- 0 . 0 4 8 1 2

0 . 0 0 6 2 1

- 0 . 0 3 3 4 3

- 9 . 0 4 8 4 5

- 0 . 0 4 3 7 4

- 0 . 0 5 3 6 4

- 8 . 0 9 1 3 2

0 . 0 5 4 3 0

0 . 0 9 6 5 9

0 . 0 0 0 2 5

0 .C7252

- o . o ^ 6 f l l

- 0 . 0 2 6 5 C

0 . 0 2 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 4 S 3

- 0 . 0 2 8 1 7

C.C0910

3 . 0 0 6 2 3

- 0 . C 9 3 6 2

- 0 . 9 1 1 0 2

-C.02979

- 0 . 0 1 9 * 3

»{GKl SSI ON ccifr ic i tM

- 0 . 3 3 9 8 3

0 . 0 1 1 7 0

0 . 0 3 5 7 3

1 . 3 7 3 3 1

- 0 . 7 2 7 3 2

0 . 3 7 1 7 6

0 . 6 3 5 2 0

- 0 . 0 6 9 4 2

1 . 2 3 5 5 1

0 . 2 1 4 0 1

0 . 6 1 9 1 8

0 . 6 5 4 1 0

1 . 1 0 1 9 7

- 0 . 1 0 9 9 5

0 . 9 5 7 6 5

0 . 6 1 2 4 6

1 . 2 6 4 5 0

- 0 . 0 8 2 1 7

- 0 . 8 1 4 7 4

0 . 5 8 C 6 2

- 0 . 3 5 6 7 1

0 . 7 2 6 9 6

0 . 4 9 9 7 2

0 . 1 3 6 2 9

- 0 . 1 0 S B 6

0 . 3 2 4 6 9

1 . 3 4 8 7 5

- ; . 0 2 6 6 9

1 . 0 0 6 7 4

- C . 3 4 9 5 6

0 . 6 5 2 3 1

0 . 3 7 5 0 1

C .215 4 2

C . 0 7 5 S 0

- 0 . 3 6 9 5 2

6 . 9 9 6 6 0

t.64346

8 . S 4 3 6 1

7 . 3 1 2 2 7

6 . 6 6 6 6 3

7 . 2 0 1 9 2

7 . 9 6 3 7 9

8 . 1 1 9 1 3

8 . 1 ^ 4 3 4

7 . « 7 t l 5

6 . 0 7 0 6 6

8 . 3 7 5 8 5

7 . 3 8 7 3 0

7 . 6 9 5 1 3

7 . 4 8 5 3 3

- 7 . 7 5 1 3 4

S T D . fRRCH Of R l & . C C l F .

7 0 . 6 5 9 9 0

7 0 . 6 6 0 7 4

7 0 . 6 5 9 9 8

7 0 . 6 5 9 4 2

' 7 0 . 6 5 0 6 2

7 0 . 6 5 8 9 0

7 0 . 6 5 9 2 8

7 0 . 6 5 8 9 7

7 0 . 6 5 9 0 1

7 0 . 6 5 9 1 3

7 0 . 6 5 8 9 9

7 0 . 6 5 9 4 8

7 0 . 6 5 8 5 1

7 0 . 6 5 9 2 3

7 0 . 6 5 8 3 1

7 0 . 6 5 7 9 0

7 0 . 6 5 9 2 1

7 0 . 6 6 0 0 2

7 0 . 6 5 9 5 2

7 0 . 6 5 9 5 1

7 0 . 6 5 9 5 8

7 0 . 6 5 9 7 3

7 0 . 6 5 9 0 1

7 0 . 6 5 8 7 9

7 0 . 6 5 8 9 1

7 0 . 6 5 5 9 3

7 0 . 6 5 5 6 5

7 5 , 6 5 9 1 7

7 0 . 6 5 9 0 3

7 0 . 6 5 9 1 5

7 0 . 6 5 8 8 4

7 0 . 6 5 9 j 8

7 0 . 6 5 9 7 2

7 0 . 6 5 9 8 2

7 0 . 6 5 7 7 1

4 7 3 . 3 4 7 2 6

4 7 3 . 3 4 9 8 2

4 7 3 . 3 4 7 4 7

4 7 3 . 3 4 8 6 6

4 7 5 . 3 4 3 4 2

4 7 3 . J 4 S 7 9

4 7 3 . 3 4 6 3 4

4 7 3 . 3 4 9 1 2

4 7 3 . 3 4 6 4 5

4 7 3 . 3 4 7 8 1

4 7 3 . 5 5 1 0 4

- 7 3 . 3 4 7 6 0

4 7 3 . 3 4 7 3 8

4 7 5 . 5 4 9 S 5

4 7 3 . 3 4 « 6 e

4 7 3 . 3 4 " 1 B

COHPUTfO T VALUL

0 . 0 0 4 8 1

0 . 0 0 0 1 7

0 . 0 0 0 5 1

0 . 0 1 9 4 4

0 . 0 1 0 2 9

0 . 0 0 5 2 6

0 . 0 0 8 9 9

0 . 0 0 0 7 8

0 . 0 1 7 4 9

0 . 0 0 3 0 3 '

0 . 0 0 8 7 6

0 . 0 0 9 2 6

0 . 0 1 5 6 0

0 . 0 0 1 5 6

0 . 0 1 3 5 5

0 . 0 0 8 6 7

0 . 0 1 7 9 0

0 . 0 0 1 1 6

0 . 0 1 1 5 3

0 . 0 0 8 2 2

0 . 0 0 5 0 5

0 . 0 1 0 2 9

0 . 0 0 7 0 7

0 0 1 9 3

00154

00460

00494

0 0 0 3 8

01428

00495

0 . 0 0 9 2 3

0 . 0 0 5 3 1

0 . 0 0 4 4 6

9 . 0 0 0 5 0

0 . 0 0 5 2 3

0 . 0 1 4 7 8

0 . 0 1 8 2 6

0 1 8 6 8

01S4S

01831

01521

01682

01715

0 1 7 2 9

01622

01705

0 1 7 6 9

0 1 5 6 1 '

01668

01687

01686

INTEhCfcPI 3 3 . 4 6 5 5 S

1 J L T I P L E C O K « f L * I I O N 0 . 4 4 2 0 1

STO. ERRCK Zf E S T I - U ; : 9 . 5 * 3 8 2

161

The seventeenth and the l a s t dimension of QWL i . e . ,

"Organizational Climate" i s a l so found l ike previous QWL-

f a c e t t o be ins igni f icant ly influenced by both independent

v a r i a b l e s (personality a t t r i b u t e s and organizational

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) as obtained s t a t i s t i c a l value F = 1.41879

(Table 3.105) and a l l the obtained t - s t a t i s t i c a l value

ranging from as low as t = .00057 t o as high as t = .01944

which are very low and s t a t i s t i c a l l y ins igni f icant . Keeping

in view the above findings, i t i s found tha t a l l t he nu l l

hypotheses pertaining to the influence of personal i ty

a t t r i b u t e s and organizational c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s on perceived

QWL facet v i z . , "Organizational Climate" stand accepted.

Table 3.107. Analysis of Variance for the Regression Showing the influence of IV ' s on Total QWL

Source of Var ia t ion DF S . S . M.S, F . V a l u e

A t t r i b u t i o n t o R e g r e s s i o n

D e v i a t i o n from R e g r e s s i o n

51 1 2 2 3 9 3 . 2 4 2 1 9 2399.86743 1 .02931

298 6 9 4 7 9 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 2331.53345

T o t a l 349 8 1 7 1 9 0 . 2 5 0 0 0

I n t h e l a s t , " o v e r a l l QWL" which i s a d e p e n d e n t

v a r i a b l e , i s a l s o found t o be i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n f l u e n c e d by

b o t h I V ' s a s o b t a i n e d s t a t i s t i c a l v a l u e F = 1.02931 i s found

h i g h l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t even a t . 0 5 l e v e l of c o n f i d e n c e ( T a b l e

3 . 1 0 7 ) .

Table

VARIABLL NO.

19

20

2 1

22

25

24

2S

26

27

28

29

36

3 1

32

33

34

a it

37

36

39

40

4 1

42

43

44

4S

46

47

48

49

50

S i

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

6 1

62

63

64

65

66

67

66

6 y

3 . 1 0 8 .

H t * N

• . . 0 2 5 7 1

3 . 7 3 7 1 4

3 . 6 0 8 5 7

3 . 3 0 5 7 1

5 . 5 0 2 8 6

3 . 0 8 2 8 6

2 . 8 4 2 8 6

2 . 6 4 0 0 0

3 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 .882(16

3 . 1 9 7 1 4

2 , 7 4 8 5 7

2 . 7 8 5 7 1

2 . 5 8 0 0 0

2 . 9 6 5 7 1

2 . 9 5 1 4 3

3 . 2 7 4 2 9

3 . 2 6 0 0 0

3 . 1 0 0 0 0

2 . 9 9 1 4 3

2 . 6 7 4 2 9

3 . 1 7 1 4 S

3 . 1 7 4 2 9

3 . 0 8 8 5 7

2 . 9 7 7 1 4

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 - 7 6 8 5 7

3 . 0 5 4 2 5

3 . 0 4 2 8 6

2 . 7 7 7 1 *

2 . 8 6 5 7 1

2 . 4 0 0 0 0

2 . 2 1 4 2 9

2 . 1 6 C 0 0

1 0 2 . 4 7 7 1 4

3 . 2 2 0 0 0

2 . ; 8 5 7 i

2 . 8 1 7 1 4

2 . 5 7 1 4 3

2 . 5 2 S 5 7

2 . 6 3 1 4 3

2 . 6 3 4 2 9

2 . 6 3 7 U

2 . 7 2 2 6 6

2 . 8 3 4 2 9

2 . 9 4 2 S 6

2 . 7 7 1 4 3

2 . S 7 7 U

2 . 5 0 2 8 4

2 . 5 0 9 5 7

4 0 . E B 5 7 2

OtPtNDESt

16 5 4 3 . 9 2 5 7 ?

Showing Multiple Regres

o c v i Z f i C N

o . t s r s e

1 . 1 7 S U

t.titts

1 . 1 7 5 1 9

1 . 3 0 3 1 1

1 . 2 « 8 1 6

1 . 1 8 7 S 6

1 . 2 1 0 5 0

1 . 1 « 1 « 9

1 . 2 S 8 7 0

1 . 3 3 2 0 6

1 . 2 S 6 4 6

1 . 3 2 2 2 S

1 . 2 3 6 S 8

1 . 2 0 3 6 9

1 . 1 8 & 3 0

1 . 2 2 ^ 1 3

1 . 2 3 3 9 0

1 . 2 7 9 9 0

1 . 2 6 7 1 4

1 . 2 3 2 6 2

1 . 1 8 7 1 0

1 . 2 6 0 3 6

1 . 3 0 9 2 7

1 . 2 9 1 3 3

1 . 2 S 1 2 0

1 . 2 « A 6 1

1 . 3 1 4 1 2

1 . 2 9 8 0 0

1 . 2 5 6 4 2

1 . 3 3 4 6 4

1 0 . 7 2 4 6 7

1 . 2 0 1 7 9

1 . 1 1 6 3 4

1 . 2 6 2 5 3

1 . 1 1 2 2 1

1 . 1 7 6 6 S

1 . 1 8 6 6 7

1 . 2 6 3 5 4

1 . 1 8 8 4 3

1 . 2 4 6 3 3

1 . 2 2 1 1 0

1 . 1 9 5 5 7

• 1 . 2 0 1 3 8

1 . 3 0 6 1 7

1 . 2 5 7 0 7

1 - 2 7 7 3 9

6 . 7 0 1 0 5

4!-JS925

CCRSCL«TION X VS V

•0.06195

•0.06641

-0.02486

•0.00919

-0.0<«2I

-0.02311

0.03977

-0.08853

0.02035

-0.07809

0.00250

0.01766

0.04650

-0.01333

0.09505

0.03004

0.07782

-C.00910

-0.03762

-5.05990

-0.00421

0 . 0 9 0 4 2

- 0 . 0 1 7 7 8

- 0 . 0 5 6 0 5

- C - U 6 S 5

C . 0 1 3 9 9

- 0 . 0 3 1 1 2

- 0 . 0 0 2 0 4

0 . 0 6 4 3 2

- 0 . 0 4 6 6 2

- 0 . 0 3 6 9 7

- C . 0 1 1 8 4

C - 0 3 9 1 0

0 . 0 5 5 2 2

- C . 0 2 3 4 2

- C - 1 2 9 1 1

- 0 . 0 1 7 9 0

0 . 0 7 7 6 8

- 0 . 0 1 6 5 1

0 . 0 3 3 1 0

- 0 , 0 2 9 7 7

- 0 . 0 8 7 0 5

- C . 0 4 3 1 2

0 . 0 4 3 2 7

C.04S28

0 . 0 0 1 1 2

0,05240

-0,08786

-0.01568

-0.10350

-D.05167

s i o n A n a l

H t C B l S S l C N

- 1 . 9 1 7 2 6

• 1 . 3 6 8 9 9

0 . 3 9 1 9 2

0 . 9 2 6 4 8

• 0 . 0 7 7 4 6

• 0 . 6 2 1 4 5

3 . 9 0 7 0 7

- 4 . 0 6 1 4 8

2 . 9 5 3 0 6

- 0 . 6 3 6 6 7

1 . 5 6 1 5 0

4 . 0 4 3 6 8

1 . 2 0 1 3 7

- 0 . 8 5 1 4 1

4 . 9 9 5 6 4

2 . 8 5 9 0 6

5 . '235S6

0 . 1 1 7 5 8

• 0 . 7 9 6 0 2

- 2 , 4 3 1 9 9

0 . 6 0 2 0 3

6 . 4 9 S 0 8

- 0 . 5 9 6 6 8

0 . 5 7 5 0 6

- 5 . 0 9 5 3 0

4 . 4 2 4 2 1

0 . 6 4 9 6 7

- 1 . 0 2 4 6 3

4 . 6 0 7 6 9

- 0 . 3 7 9 6 8

0 . 1 4 3 8 4

1 . 5 2 9 0 5

2 . 5 5 7 5 4

3 . 1 1 5 7 9

- 1 . 1 5 8 4 9

2 3 . 9 0 6 9 3

2 8 . 4 4 6 0 6

3 1 . 1 4 0 9 1

2 4 - 4 7 2 9 2

2 8 . 2 7 2 5 1

2 8 . 0 3 4 5 0

2 6 . 3 2 3 9 1

2 6 . 7 2 0 4 6

3 1 . 5 4 » S 8

2 8 . 4 8 2 3 5

2 6 . 5 6 0 9 3

3 0 . 2 0 8 6 0

2 5 . 4 6 9 6 7

2 8 - 8 7 0 2 8

2 3 , 6 7 5 80

- 2 7 . 0 7 9 5 7

yses of Overa l l QWL. 162

STO or

. ERRCR REC.COEF.

3 9 8 . 4 0 6 5 2

3 9 8 . 4 1 1 2 2

3 9 6 . 4 0 6 9 2

3 9 8 . 4 0 3 7 8

3 9 8 . 3 9 9 2 9

3 9 8 . 4 0 0 8 2

3 9 8 . 4 0 2 9 8

3 9 8 . 4 0 1 2 1

3 9 8 . 4 0 1 4 6

3 9 J . 4 0 2 1 5

3 9 8 . 4 0 1 3 4

3 9 ! . 4 0 4 1 1

3 9 8 . 3 9 8 6 5

3 9 S . 4 0 2 7 1

3 9 3 . 3 9 7 5 5

5 9 i . 3 9 5 2 3

3 9 ? . 4 0 2 5 9

3 9 8 . 4 0 7 1 7

3 9 8 . 4 0 4 3 9

3 9 8 . 4 0 4 2 7

3 9 S . 4 0 4 7 2

3 9 5 . 4 0 5 5 2

3 9 9 . 4 0 1 4 6

3 9 3 . 4 0 0 2 7

3 9 8 . 4 0 0 9 1

3 9 5 . 4 0 1 0 0

3 9 8 . 3 9 9 4 4

5 9 8 . 4 0 2 3 7

; 9 « . 4 0 1 5 8

3 9 3 . 4 0 2 2 8

3 9 3 - 4 0 0 4 8

3 < : ! . 4 0 1 8 9

3 9 3 . 4 0 5 4 9

3 9 5 . 4 0 6 0 7

3 9 5 - 3 9 4 1 7

2 6 6 8 . 9 0 5 7 6

7 6 6 8 . 9 2 0 , 4 1

2 6 6 8 . 9 0 6 9 8

2 3 6 ! . 9 1 3 8 2

2 6 6 8 . 9 1 2 3 5

2 6 6 8 . 9 1 4 5 5

2 6 6 8 . 9 0 0 6 3

2 6 6 3 . 9 1 6 2 6

2 6 6 S . 9 1 2 6 0

2 6 6 8 . 9 0 8 9 4

2 6 6 3 - 9 2 7 2 5

2663 - 9 0 7 7 1

2 ^ 6 3 - 9 0 6 4 9

2 i 6 » . 9 1 8 7 0

2 t > * » , 9 1 3 8 2

2 t t 5 , 9 1 1 1 3

T VALUE

0 . 0 0 4 8 1

0 . 0 0 3 4 4

0 . 0 0 0 9 8

0 . 0 0 2 3 3

0«00«19

0 . 0 0 1 5 6

8 . 0 0 9 8 1

0 . 0 1 0 1 9

0 . 0 0 7 4 1

0 . 0 0 1 6 0

0 . 0 0 3 9 2

0 . 0 1 0 1 5

0 . 0 0 3 0 2

0 . 0 0 2 1 4

0 . 0 1 2 5 4

0 . 0 0 7 1 8

0 . 0 1 3 1 4

0 . 0 0 0 3 0

0 . 0 0 2 0 0

0 .0061P

0 . 0 0 1 5 1

0 . 0 1 6 3 1

0 . 0 0 1 5 0

0 . 0 0 1 4 4

0 . 0 1 2 7 9

0 . 0 1 1 1 0

0 . 0 0 1 6 3

0 . 0 0 2 5 7

0 . 0 1 1 5 7

0 . 0 0 0 9 5

0 . 0 0 0 3 6

0 . 0 0 3 8 4 .

0 . 0 0 6 4 2

0 . 0 0 7 8 2

0 . 0 0 3 0 1

0 . 0 0 896

0 . 0 1 0 6 6

0 . 0 1 1 6 7

0 . 0 0 9 1 7

0 . 0 1 0 5 9

0 . 0 1 0 5 0

0 . 0 0 9 8 7

01001

01182

01067

00995

01132

00954

01082

0OSS7

0 . 0 1 0 1 5

I N I t M C t n 355.II4VS5

noLl i r t L C 2 « < I : I L * U ( ; N 0 . 3 S 7 C 1

S I D . ERSCR OF E S I l r * T l & 8 . 2 ^ 5 9 5

163

The findings were further ascertained from Table

3.108 where influence of each independent variables can be

seen on dependent one viz., on "total QWL" and it can be

witnessed that t-values ranging from t = .00019 to t = .01631

are insignificant even at .05 level of confidence, hence,

insignificant statistical values obliterate significant

influence of IV's on DV, hence, all the proposed null

hypotheses stand accepted.

In the preceeding pages under the chapter "Results",

the description of results have been very plainly described

on the basis of the findings obtained. Now, the major aspect

of interpretation of results is a challenging task to be

undertaken by the researcher in the next subsequent chapter

specially meant for "discussion of results" where efforts

will be made to give logical explanation of the findings.

CHAPTER - IV

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

DISCDSSIOW OF RESULTS

This chapter is exclusively meant for the discussion

on the basis of the findings described in the preceeding

chapter III. The task is definitely challenging especially

in the present circumstances when none of the personality

variables/attributes and organizational characteristics

emerged to influence significantly either of the

17-dimensions of QWL and over-all QWL. Discussion of results

follow for personality variables and organizational

characteristics separately ;

Personality Variables : In this study 34 personality factors

or attributes were taken and their impact was measured on

overall QWL and on its various dimensions. During data

collection subjects were provided a list of factors and they

were asked to rate each factor on 5-point scale that 'to

%7hat extent these factors are perceived to be present in

your dynamic personality* and then their responses were

recorded. The interpretations of these are being given as

under :

Multiple regression analysis revealed that variable

No. 19: 'Politeness' is found to be statistically

independent to one's QWL perception either with regard to

over-all QWL or its various dimensions. The finding is not

very strange because politeness as a personality variable in

itself bear the essence of more and more accomodation. This

is the reason why, polite people have usually very balanced

personality, avoid confrontations, over-acting and try to

165

keep themselves happy in all circumstances either sweet or

sour, hence these reasons nullify the significant influence

of being polite on QWL perception atleast, in the

circumstance when there is no high feeling of QWL. Moreover,

it is to say, as evident from the findings that personality

variable viz., politeness has also been found to have

similar function among both Hindu and Muslim middle level

managers so far as their perception towards overall QWL and

its determinants are concerned.

Personality variable No. 20 'Mentally active' and

the previous discussed 'polite' dimension refer to personal

qualities of an individual which do not seem to be very much

related to the perception of QWL. It is evident from

multiple regression analysis tables that mean value of the

personality dimension i.e. "Mentally active" tend towards

positive side, hence the middle level managers irrespective

of their affiliation to various religion are found to be

active but this dimension fails to bring about any change in

the perception of Employee's overall QWL and or its various

facets.

The main reason for the obliteration of the

significant influence of the various levels of mental

activeness on perceived QWL is because of the fact that the

obtained values of "Mentally active" variable and QWL

perception both found to be slightly above to the moderate

level, hence such cause and effect relationship have been

found.

166

Similarly, variables No. 21 : Loyalty to supervisors/

organizations; No. 22 : Tactful; and No. 23 : Physically

active have also been witnessed to have their insignificant

influence on overall QWL and its various facets among both

the groups namely, Hindu and Muslim middle level managers.

It is again important to highlight that the sample groups

irrespective of their religious dimension possess positive

personality qualities and all, atleast, higher to the

moderate level and on the other hand, these people also have

slightly above moderate level of QWL experiences, hence, the

effect of these three personality variables have been found

to have no influence on QWL and its various dimensions.

Since, all the other remaining personality variables

from variable No. 24 to variable No. 52 assert no

significant influence on overall QWL and its various facets

like variables from No. 19 to 23, so there is no need to

explain each personality factors independently.

Overall picture that emerges out of the results

given in the various tables of multiple regression analysis

is that middle level managers either Hindus or Muslims all

are found to be easily pleased (No. 24), less "quick

tempered" (No. 25), less "Boring personality" (No. 26),

"responsible" (No. 27), less "stubborn" (No. 28), "Flexible"

(No, 29), less "prejudiced" (No. 30), less "manipulative"

(No. 31), less "unsocial" (No. 32), low "self-centered" (No.

33), less "untrustworthy" (No. 34), "competitive" (No. 35),

"Cooperative" (No. 36), less "assertive" (No. 37), "Risk

167

taker" (No. 38), "quick indecision making" (No. 39),

"openhearted" (No. 40), "Thoughful decision" (No. 41), "No

privacy" (No. 42), "less talkative" (No. 43), "Not easy to

be controlled" (No. 44), "less depression" (No. 45),

"Cheerful" (No. 46), "Realistic" (No. 47), "less Harsh" (No.

48), "less aggressive" (No. 49), and other personality

dimensions reflect the positive personality qualities as

their mean values fall slightly above the moderate level and

the same is true for the dependent variable, therefore,

significant influence of personality variables on QWL have

not been found.

The findings do not seem to be very strange enough

as moderate personality characteristics of the middle level

managers also have perception of moderate QWL, hence,

moderate influence on moderate DV's nullify the significance

of cause and effect relationship.

Apart from the statistical based explanation, it

also seems highly significant to keep on record the facts

that human beings by nature have never the feeling of high

satisfaction especially when they have to work under

management or organizational pressure. On the other hand,

when job incumbents get associated with any of the working

organization, they try to get them adjusted according to the

policies, rules and regulations of the organization.

It has usually been found that job incumbents when

get associated with any of the working organization they try

to get adjusted according to the company's policies, rules

168

and regulations. If one fails in making adjustment it is

most likely that he/she may come under the state of

conflict. This notion has already been pointed out by

Argyris in 1964 who had contended that major intra and

inter-individual conflicts arise in the work situation

because of the individual pattern's of development and

his/her expectations when he/she joins the organization. For

example, individual's personality gfows from dependency? "-to

independency and he/she enjoys the later state when he/she

become capable of joining any organization but joining the

organization again put them to start from dependency and

gradually with the promotion they may enjoy independency in

the form of increasing autonomy as it is linked with

increasing hierarchical position. In the light of this

reality and other perceptual and behavioural complexities of

the job incumbents, this assertion seems true that the job

incumbents hardly realize to use their utmost personality

qualities in the organizational endeavours to maximize their

own and organizational productive efficiency unless and

untill the job incumbents are entrusted with greater and

greater autonomy in exercising their potentials in the

achievement of organization's objectives. Since, this study

was conducted on the middle level managers who usually face

autonomy-crisis and have the feeling of being sandwiched

between the top level management and the departmental

supervisors, so they fail to enjoy free-lance autonomy in

169

the maximiun utilization of their personality positive

potentials in attaining the organizational productive

efficiency. This seems to be the reason why personality

characteristics of the middle level managers irrespective of

their religion found to be either moderate or just above the

moderate level.

Organizational Characteristics

Like personality variables, organizational

characteristics failed to significantly influence QWL

perception and its various dimensions of middle level

managers too. Before discussing the pattern of obtained

findings, it seems necessarily important to mention here

about the organization. The company where from the data %ras

collected for tlie present study is a electronic gadgets

manufacturing company located at Lucknow. This is a public

sector unit. The data of the company shows that during last

one decade sales turn over successively increased from 1990

onwards for four consecutive years and there-after it faced

a slight decrease and again the sales turnover gone up to

the all time high. The data of the last two years i.e. from

1996-97 and 1997-98 show a drastic downward curve and in the

last, its turn-over rate found to be drastically very low

i.e. almost 1/6 of the average of the previous years.

The present situation of this company is at a very

critical stage where the Government is in dilemma whether it

170

should be strengthened by investing more towards finances or

to make it privatized.

In the light of the above picture of the company it

is apparently clear that productive efficiency of the

organization has a decreasing trend to the extent that it is

facing a survival-crisis which ultimately is a reliable

indicator of employee's. Lack of concern with the company's

objectives which subsequently has reduced employee's

perception toward's the significance of QWL for all

especially, the middle level managers. It is a matter of

reality vrhich has already been emphasized by Maslowian

approach to job motivation (1954) that needs in hierarchy

come into prominence when the lower order needs are

adequately satisfied and in the present circumstances this

seems also true that since middle level managers are

fighting against the survival in the company as the company

itself is at the verge of collapse so at this stage when

employee's are very much concerned about the job security,

don't think in terms of their improving quality of work

life.

Keeping in view the above facts and realities all

the organizational characteristics have been found

independent to perceived QWL and its various dimensions. The

various characteristics which we had taken for the study

comprise Variable Number 54 : Poor organizational prestige;

No. 55 : Poor organizational conditions; No. 56 :

Inconvenient working hours; No. 57 ; undemocratic boss; No.

171

58 : Harsh Leadership; No. 59 : Less opportunity in decision

making; No. 60 : Unfair policy; No, 61 : less opportunity of

getting feedback; No. 62 : Lack of autonomy; No. 63: Tight

supervision; No. 64 : Bureaucratic Leadership; No. 65 :

Supportive management; No. 66 : Poor union management

relation; No. 67 : Poor employee's participation; and No.

68: poor-promotional opportunities. The findings show that

all organizational characteristics are almost bunched around

moderate level and on the other hand, perceived QWL and its

various facets also fall at the same response category and

this is one of the statistical reason why organizational

characteristics failed to influence QWL and its various

dimensions significantly even at .05 level of confidence.

As has already been emphasized above that the

condition of the company wherefrom the data of this study

were collected in the year 1996 has been actually the year

of company's turning point wherefrom sales turnover rate

drastically fell down hence, the present survival crisis is

being faced by the company and its thousands of employees.

This seems to be the another significant reason for

employees lack of commitment and involvement in the

company's objective and as a result, everyone sesns to be at

the cross-road putting them in the state of dilemma that

what to do and what not to do for organizational productive

efficiency. It is interesting to note here that various

organizational characteristics which usually had to be

172

perceived variably by the respondent are all been treated as.

the state of incertainity that neither is an indicator of

positive perception nor of the negative perception.

Similarly, the same pattern of responses have been witnessed

with regard to QWL perception which has been significant

reason for obliterating any significant influence of

organizational characteristics on QWL perception for middle

level managers.

There is no reservation in pointing out that all

organizational characteristics here have been found to be

similar to Herzberg's (1959) hygiene factor that is why,

these did not allow middle level managers even to have the

high QWL perception but definitely these hygiene factors

(organizational characteristics) prevent one against

increasing feeling of low or poor QWL perception.

At length, before terminating the discussion it is

to mention here that personality variables and perceived

organizational characteristics are not of any significant

use unless employees are perceived that their organization

is heading towards its growth and development ensuring

organizational competitive survival in this modern world of

work as well as employee's survival with dignity in the

organization itself. Moreover, organizational growth

condition also determines the level of utilization of human

potentials and skills. Hence, it seems that organizational

173

condition with regard to its growth and 3evelopinent is a

prerequisite for dynamically activating personality

variables as well as organizational characteristics for

asserting their influences on one's perceived QWL which is

most likely instrumental for enhancing job motivation, job

involvement and commitment with the job leading to maximum

utilization of human resources.

CHAPTER - V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

Having given the details pertaining results and

their interpretations in the preceeding Chapters III and IV,

now, the present chapter is aimed at highlighting the

conclusions drawn from the pattern of results and moreover,

to give suggestions for future studies on the similar

problem.

The. findings suggest that none of the personality

variables and organizational characteristics have their

significant influence on middle level managers' perceived

experience related to over-all QWL and its various

dimensions. In other words, it is to say that independent

variables namely, personality variables and organizational

characteristics are highly independent to DV viz., perceived

QWL perception or DV here is not found to be the function

of IV's.

The reason for the obliteration of significant

influence of IV's on DV lie in the very fact that average

response level of all, either IV's (personality variables

and organizational characteristics) or DV's (overall QWL and

its various dimensions) fall at the very moderate response

category, therefore, the average of all the moderate

responses comes almost to the same average. This is one of

the major statistical fact that IV's failed to influence

DV's.

Another important reason for the non-significant

influence of IV's on DV's can be attributed to the status of

175

the organizSition whether it is a growing one or the sick.

People in the growing organizations are most likely to be

happier, job involved, more particular about their duties and

about their productive efficiency, whereas, employees of the

sick organziations usually show symptoms like the lack of

concern with work, people and the organization. The

organization wherefrom the data for the present study were

collected falls under the later category of the sick

organization hence, it can be said without any reservation

that middle level managers irrespective of their religious

affiliations have been found to be passive even in realizing

and in utilizing their personal qualities and moreover,

found to be moderate even in attributing the organizational

characteristics which are perceived by them to be present in

the work organization. This is the factual story which is

statistically determined with regard to personality

variables and organizational characteristics perceived by

the employees in general and middle level managers in

particular. On the other hand, the phenomenon of perceived

QWL experience which was a dependent variable also found to

be very moderate across the total sample. These above stated

conditions may usually prevail among all the employees of

the sick organizations and it is most likely *to be true

specially for the public sector units. In public sector

units (PSU) there is a greater job security and in all

circumstances the employees on roll of the public sectors

176

are to be paid salaries and even in the worst circumstance

of company's closure they have to be adjusted anywhere, upto

their age of retirement which is not the service condition

in private sector units.

The above reasons have emerged as significant

determinants for nullifying the significant cause-effect

relationship in the present study.

SUGGESTIONS

The present investigator feels that since present

investigation fails to provide any significant influence of

personality variables and organizational characteristics on

QWL experiences of the middle level managers, so, it must be

verified in future especially conducting the surveys on sick

public sector units. Moreover, it is also suggested that a

comparative study between public sector and private sector

units must be made on the same problem for identifying

comparative relevance of personality variables and

organizational characteristics in enhancing the QWL

experiences of the employees if there are.

There is a third suggestion that the study should be

designed in such a way that direct as well as interactional

effect of independent variables on dependent one ca^n be seen

by using ANOVA which could have not been feasibly possible

in the present study as large number of independent

variables were taken.

177

In the last, it is very pertinent to highlight that

the present study has contributed at least, in identifying

the non-significant influence of IV's on DV here because of

the basic reason that this study was conducted on a sick

public sector unit, hence, such results were obtained. It is

being suggested here that such studies should be conducted

in future on growing public sectors as well as on private

"- sectors where we expect almost different results.

S U M M A R Y

S U M M A R Y

The present investigation was aimed to study the

"Influence of Certain Personality Variables and Organi

zational Characteristics on Perceived QWL - A Study of

Industrial Workers". It is witnessed from the history that

psychologists have been increasingly interested

in studying human behaviour at work in quest of identifying

the ways and strategies for enhancing individual productive

efficiency. The focus of attention changed from time to time

and in this modern age the major focus of attention is on

humanizing the total job where QWL studies are definitely

found to occupy significant place. Hence, the present

problem of research was undertaken to identify the sources

of QWL in guest for maximizing employee's motivation and

commitment with their work.

The description in the thesis are presented in five

different chapters. The first chapter of the thesis deals

with the concepts and available literature pertaining to QWL

(a dependent variable); and personality variables and

organizational characteristics (independent variables). The

literature on QWL reveal to the fact that it was only in

1972 that a comprehensive term "Quality of working life" was

coined by Davis. Thereafter, phenomenon of QWL attracted the

attention of psychologists, managers and supervisors for

undertaking it as a philosophy or as an approach in

designing the strategy for motivating people at work. So far

as the meaning of the term QWL is concerned, it will be

179

quiet significant to point out that QWL refers to "the

degree to which work provides an opportunity to an

individual to satisfy a wide variety of personal needs to

survive with some security to interact with others to have a

sense of personal usefulness, to be reorganized for

achievement and to have an opportunity to improve one's

skill and knowledge", though numerous efforts have been made

to define this concept.

Cherns (1978) describes it as an area emphasizing to

'humanization of the work place', work place democracy",

work restructuring or 'job design'. Cherns had taken the

inspiration from the human relation movement where pioneers

were Mayo, Roethlisberger and Dickson (1930's) which was

instrumental in changing the whole approach from management

to employee oriented approach - an approach for humanizing

the job in conceiving the term QWL.

The Chapter I also discusses the relevance of the

present study advocating the non-availability of survey of

literature which could have discussed QWL as a function of

either personality variables or organizational characteris

tics, hence there was no option except to formulate

null-hypotheses that can briefly be described in a single

sentence that none of the personality variables and

organizational characteristics will significantly influence

QWL and its various facets.

180

Chapter II incorporates details of the methodological

and procedural aspects of the study. The study was conducted

on the sample of middle level managers consisting of Hindu

middle level managers (N=250) Muslim middle level managers

(N=90) and thus, the total sample size consisted of N=340

middle level managers.

A QWL scale developed by Sinha and Sayeed (1980)

which consisted of 85 items covering 17-dimensions was used

for measuring employees QWL perceptions. To measure

personality variables and organizational characteristics,

researcher herself had developed the scale consisting of 34

personality adjectives/attributes and 15 organizational

characteristics respectively. For analyzing the influence of

independent variables on dependent one, multiple regression

analyses treatment were given to the data obtained.

In chapter III, IV and V respectively, results;

discussion of results; and conclusion and suggestions have

been presented. Conclusions of the findings which have been

highlighted in Chapter V advocate in a nut-shell that

personality variables and organizational characteristics are

independent to QWL and its various facets or in other words

it can be said that QWL is not the function of either

personality variables or organizational characteristics

especially for middle level managers irrespective of their

religious affiliation.

181

The Chapter V also incorporates suggestions. It has

been suggested that in future ANOVA should be run for

looking into the independent as well as interactional

effects ofl personality variables and organizational

characteristics of QWL. Moreover, instead of studying public

sector sick units, growing public sectors as well as private

sectors should also be studied where we expect to obtain

different results.

R E F E R E N C E S

BIBLIOGRAPHY

vftnderson, G. (1975) : The quality of work life : South

Australian Development in : Seminar on worker

participation in Australia, University of Melbourne.

Argyris, C. (1964) : Integrating the individual and the

organization, Wiley, New York.

i^ston, J. & Lavery, J. (1993) : Effects of quality of work

role, social support and cynicism on psychological

and physical well being. Women and Health, Vol.

20(3), 1-25.

uBarkat, S.A. & Ansari, S.A. (1997) : Effect of job tenure

and the number of promotions earned on perceived QWL.

Souvenir, Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, pp.

69-70.

'/Bell, C.R. (1974). : Man at work, London, Allen and Unwin,

144 p.

vBellanca, J. (1984) : Can quality circles work in class room

of the gifted. April, Vol. 6(4) : 199-200.

VBGisvert, P. (1977) : The quality of working life : An

analysis commercial de Montreal, Feb. Vol. 30(2),

155-160.

Bolfikova, Eva. (1995) : People's understanding of organi

zational fairness. Vol. 37(3), 190-191.

Carlson, H.C. (1978) : "On QWL in General Motors". The

Journal of Social Work, Vol. XII, No. 3, 1980.

183

v^ields, Mitchell W. & Thackar, James W. (1992) : Influence

of QWL on company and union commitment. Academy of

Management Journal. (Jun) Vol. 35(2), 439-450.

Flangagam, R.J. (1974) : Workers discontent and work place

behaviour. Industrial Relations. 13(2) May, pp.

101-123.

F r i e d , Y. & F e r r i s , G.R. (1987) : "The v a l i d i t y of t h e job

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s Model : A Review and meta a n a l y s i s " .

Personnel Psychology , pp . 287-322.

vp^nguly, O.N. & J o s e p h , J . S . (1969) : A s tudy of management

morale i n an i r o n and s t e e l i n d u s t r y . New D e l h i ,

Minis t ry of Labour .

' ^ ^ h o s h , P.K. & Munerikar (1974) : In sea rch of p e r s o n a l i t y

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of managers, I n d i a n Jou rna l of

Applied Psychology , January , pp. 1-6.

..^^\iOs\i and Munerikar (1975) : S i m i l a r i t i e s and d i f f e r e n c e s in

p e r s o n a l i t y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of I n d i a n managers.

Indian J o u r n a l of Applied Psychology, A p r i l , pp .

65-70.

C l i c k , W.H., J e n k i n s , G.D. J r . and Gupta, N. (1986) : Method

versus s u b s t a n c e : how s t rong a r e under ly ing

r e l a t i o n s h i p between job c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and

a t t i t u d i n a l outcomes. Academy of Management J o u r n a l ,

pp. 441-64.

_. Gordon W. A l l p o r t (1937) : P e r s o n a l i t y , New York, Henry Holt

pp. 43-47.

184

viSriffeth/ R.W. (1985) : Moderation of the effects of job

enrichment by participation : A longitudinal field

experiments. Organization Behaviour and Human

Decision Processes. Vol. 35(i), 73-93.

v^upta, P. Khandelwak, P. (1989) : Quality of work life in

relation to role efficacy. Psychological Studies,

33(1), 34-8.

Hackman, J.R., Oldham, R.G., Janson, Purdy (1975) : A new

strategy for job enrichment. California Management

Review, Summer 1975, pp. 57-71.

Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1976) : Motivation through

the design of work : Test of a theory. Organizational

Behaviour and Human Performance, pp. 250-79.

Hackman, J.R. (1977) : Work Design, Improving life at work.

Santa Monica, C.A. : Good Year, p. 129.

Halcom, Melvin L., Lehman, Wayne E. and Simpson, D. Dwayne

(1993) : Influence of personal characteristics, job

characteristics and substance use in job differing in

accident potential. Journal of Safety Research, vol.

24(4), 205-221.

v^artenstein, A. and Huddleston, K.F. (1984) : Values : The

cornerstone of QWL. Human Relations, Oct. Vol. 38(10)

65-66.

vflarrison, J.M. (1985) : Communication and participative

decision making : An exploratory study. Personnel

Psychology, April vol. (1), 97-116.

185

Helley, W.H. & Field, H.S. et.al. (1981) : Negotiating

quality of work life, productivity and traditional

issues : Union members' preferred roles of their

union. Personnel Psychology, 1981, vol. 34(2),

309-328.

Herzberg, F. Mausner, R. Snyderman, B. (1959) : The

motivation to work. John Wiley, New York.

Homans, G. (1950) : The human group. New York : Harcourt,

Brace.

Ibid., Fried, Y. and Ferris G.R. : The dimensionability of

job characteristics : Some neglected Issues. Journal

of Applied Psychology, pp. 419-26.

ames, D.E. : Introduction to Psychology, London, Constable,

p. 219.

Jones, Allan, P., Glaman, Joan M. & Johnson, Debra S.(1993):

Perception of a quality program and relationships

with work perception and job attitudes. April, vol.

72(2), 619-624.

vJouvenal, B. (1979) : Man and his needs in Hoftstede (ed.)

Futures for work. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.

v,^hnson, R. (1975) : Pay and job satisfaction; a survey of

some research findings. International Labour Review,

111(5), May, pp. 441-449.

Katzell, R.A. & Guzzo, R.A. (1983) : Psychological approaches

to productivity improvement. Journal of Applied

Psychology, vol. 38, 468-472.

186

-N/Ratzell, R.A. (1983) : Improving q u a l i t y of work l i f e .

Journa l of Occupat iona l Behaviour, v o l . 3 8 ( 1 ) , 126.

K a r r i e r , N. & Khurana, A. (1996) : Qua l i ty of work l i f e of

managers in Indian i n d u s t r y . lAAP : v o l . 2 2 ( 1 - 2 ) .

Knave, B. (1984) : Ergonomics and l i g h t i n g . Human R e l a t i o n s ,

1984 Mar. v o l . 1 5 ( 1 ) , 15-20 .

vi lawler , E.E. (1968) : E f f e c t s of hour ly overpayment on

p r o d u c t i v i t y and work q u a l i t y . Journa l of P e r s o n a l i t y

and Socia l Psychology, 1 0 ( 3 ) , 306-313.

Lev ine , M.F. e t . a l . (1984) : Defining q u a l i t y of working

l i f e . Organ iza t iona l Dynamics, J a n . v o l . 3 7 ( 1 ) ,

81-104.

\,irippit, G.L. (1977) : Quality of working life organizational

renewal in action. Training and Developmient Journal,

32(7), pp. 4-10.

viTong Richard J. (1993) : The impact of new office

information technology on job quality of female and

male employees. Human Relations, (August), vol. 46(8)

939-961.

Loher, B.T., Noe, R.A., Moeller, N.L. & Fitzgerald, M.P.

(1985) : A meta-analysis of the relation of job

characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of

Applied Psychology, pp. 280-89.

Maslow, A.H. (1943) : A theory of human motivation. Psycho

logical Review, 50, 370-396.

187

Maslow, A.H. (1954) : Motivation and Personality. Harper and

ROW/ New York.

.- athur, P. and Paranjpe, S. (1988) : Identification of

training areas for special educators as related to

job satisfaction factors of QWL perceptions. Paper

presented at 25th Annual Conference of Indian Academy

of Applied Psychology.

Mayo, E. (1945) : The social problems of industrial civili

zation. Harvard Univ. Graduate School of Business,

Boston.

v-Wehta, P. (1977) : The role of worker participation, Vikalpa

1976(4) 39-46, and Employees motivation and work

satisfaction in public enterprizes. Vikalpa, 2(3),

233-236.

Melamed, Turia and Bozionelos, Nicholas (1992) : Gender

differences in the personality features of British

Managers. (Dec), vol. 71, 979-986.

Lamed, T.B. & Nicholas (1992) : Gender differences in the

personality features of British managers.

Psychological Reports (Dec), vol. 71, pp. 979-986.

Menon, S.A. (1974) : Personality, Executive Training and

Organization. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations.

July, pp. 33-54.

v tenton (1979) : A look at factors effecting the quality of

working life. Monthly Labour Review, 100, (101), 64.

188

Miner, J.B. (1980) : Job characteristics theory of work

redesign. Theories of Organizational Behaviour

Hinsdale, IL : Dryden Press, pp. 231-66.

vMire, J. (1974) : Improving working life; the role of

European unions. Monthly Labour Review, 97(a) Sept.

pp. 3-11.

Mohraman, S.A. & Novelli, L. (1985) : Beyond testimonials:

Learning from quality circles programme. Journal of

Occupational Behaviour. (Apr.) vol. 6(2), 93-110.

N^asreen, A. & Ansari, S.A. (1997) : Influence of socio and

psycho-personality variables on total QWL

perceptions. Abstracted in Souvenir of Indian Academy

of Applied Psychology, 29-31 Dec, p. 69.

Nadler, D.A. Lawler, E.E. (1983) : Quality of works life :

Perspectives and directions. Organizational Dynamic,

vol. 11(3), pp. 20-23.

Orpen, C. (1977) : Current trends in industrial and organi

zational psychology. Psychologia Africana. Dec. V,

17(2) : 117-134.

atil, V. and Munerikar (1976) : The profile of Indian

executives using MMPI. Indian Journal of Applied

Psychology. January, pp. 16-20.

Parks, Judi Mclean; Gallagher, Daniel G. & Fullagar, Clive

J.A. (1995) : Operationalizing the outcomes of union

commitment. The Dimensionality of Participation,

vol. 16, 533-555.

189

Payne, R.L. and Pheysey, D.C. ( i y / 1 ) : G.G. s t e r n ' s o r g a n i

z a t i o n a l c l ima te index t a r e c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n and

a p p l i c a t i o n t o b u s i n e s s o r g a n i z a t i o n . O r g a n i z a t i o n a l

Behaviour and Human Performance . 6, pp. 7 7-9B.

P i e r c e , J . L . and Denham, R.B. (1976) : Task Design : A

l i t e r a t u r e r ev iew. Academy of Management Review,

1976, 1, 83-97.

P o r t e r , L.W. (1961) : P e r c i e v e d need s a t i s f a c t i o n . J o u r n a l

of Applied Psychology . 4 5 , pp . 27 -31 .

vR'anney, J.M. (1982) : QWL in t h e o f f i c e . T ra in ing and

Development J o u r n a l , A p r i l , v o l . 36(4) , 74-84.

v ^ e d d y , N.Y. (1985) ; Q u a l i t y of working l i f e in t h e Thi rd

World c o u n t r i e s . R e a l i t y on Myth ? P r e s i d e n t i a l

address d e l i v e r e d a t t h e 22nd Annual Conference of

t h e Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, C a l c u t t a .

v R i c e , A.K. (1958) : P r o d u c t i v i t y and Socia l O r g a n i z a t i o n .

The Ahmedabad Exper iment , London, Tav i s tock

P u b l i c a t i o n .

«-Rice, R.W. (1984) : O r g a n i z a t i o n a l work and t h e o v e r a l l

q u a l i t y of l i f e . Appl ied Soc ia l Psychology Annual,

v o l . 5, 155-1-78

^ - ^ i c e , R.W. (1985) : O r g a n i z a t i o n a l work and the p e r c e i v e d

q u a l i t y of l i f e - Toward a conceptual model. Academy

of Management Review. A p r i l , v o l . 10(2) , 296-310.

190

Rosow, J.M. (1979) : Human dignity in the public sector work

place public personnel management, Jan-Feb. Vol.

8(1), 7-14.

Roethlisberger, F.J. and Dickson, W.J. (1939) : Management

and the worker, harvard University Press, Cambridge.

^osonfield, S. (1981) : Self-managed professional development

School Psychology Annual, vol. 10(4), 487-493.

Sah, A.P. (1989) : Personality characteristics of accident

free and accident involved Indian railway drivers.

Journal of Clinical and Personality Studies (sep)

vol. 5(2), 203-206.

Saiyadain, M.S. and Monappa A. (1977) : Profile of Indian

Managers, New Delhi, Vidya Vahini.

v^ayeed, D.B. and Sinha, P. (1981) : The quality of working

life in relation to job satisfaction and performance

in two organizations. Managerial Psychology, vol.

2(1), 15-30.

V^hlesinger, L.A. and Oshry, B. (1984) : Quality of work

life and the managers; Middle in the Middle,

Organizational Dynamics, Sum vol. 13(1), 5-10.

Sen, A. (1976) : A study of personality makeup and off the

job activities in a group of Executives. Indian

Journal of Applied Psychology. January, pp. 42-46.

191

Weashore, S.E. and Barnowe, J.T. (1971) : Behind the

overages : a closer look at America's lower middle

income workers. In : Industrial relations Research

Association. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Winter

Meeting. Dec. 27-28, 1971.

v^engupta Anil K. (1985) : Quality of working life : Some

issues in the Indian Context, Economic and Political

Weekly, (Review of Management), Nov. 30, XX(48),

M.151-54.

v&Bkran, U. (1985) : Perceived quality of working life in

Bank in major cities in India. Prajanan V. 14(3),

273-284.

^ /Sharma, Anuradha (1989) : Humanization of work and job

performance : a study of woman workers. Paper

presented at 26th Annual Conference of Indian Academy

of Applied Psychology, Calcutta.

Skrovan, D.A. (1980) t Brief report from the ASTD. Quality

of working life task force. Training and Development

Journal, 34(3), 29.

Snizek, William, E. and Neil, Cecily C. (1992) : Job

characteristics, gender stereotypes and perceived

gender discrimination in the work place. Organi

zational Studies, vol. 13(3), 403-427.

v^pink, P. (1975) : Some comments on QWL. Journal of

Occupational Psychology,. Sep. Vol. 48(3), 179-184.

192

Takezawa Shinkhi (1976) : The quality of working life.

Trends in Japan, Geneva : ILO.

Tayler, F.W. (1947) : Principles of scientific management.

Harper & Row, New York.

\,;Phorsurd, E. (1977) : Democracy at work : Norwegian

experiences with nonbureaucratic forms of organi

zation. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science.

13(3), 410-421.

Trist, F.I. and Bamforth, K.W. (1951) : Some social and

psychological consequences of the long wall method of

coal getting. Human Relations, 4, 1-38.

Trist, F.I., Higgin, G.W. and Pollock, A.R. (1963) :

Organizational Choice. London : Taristock Publication,

Van B. et al. (1975) : Worker attitude towards employment

test. Personnel Psychology, vol. 4, 261-271.

vVeno, A. and Dufty, N.F. (1982) : Mine towns in Australia's

northwest : options for operation and quality of

life. Man Environment System, vol. 12(2-3), 67-72.

Vroom, V.H. (1964) : Work and motivation, John Wiley* & Sons

New York.

^^alton,R.E. (1975) : Criteria for quality of working life.

In L.E. Davis and A.B. Cherns (Eds.) The quality of

working life, (vol. 1), New York : Free Press,

1975.

193

vWest, L.J. (1969) : Fatique and performance variability

among typists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(1),

80-96.

Zaccaro S.J. and Slone, E,F. (1998) "Increamental valadity

of an Empirically based measure of Job

characteristics". Journal of Applied Psychology, pp.

245-52.

APPENDIX - I

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Answer the question serially, i.e. as they appear in the

format.

2. If some statements or questions appear to be similar,

even then you answer each of them separately.

3. It is expected that while answering, you do not consult

anyone else. We want to know your opinions, views and

feeling, not theirs.

4. Do not take too much time over any particular question.

Whatever, answer comes first of your mind, give that.

This in case of all items in this section, your

agreement or disagreement, satisfaction or dissatisfaction,

and your feelings - positive or negative have to be answered

from a minimum (10 to maximum (7). So give your judgements

to each and every item as specified above. Remember again,

we want your views opinions and feelings, not others, so

please do not consult any one.

So ahead, read carefully the items/quotations/

question/statements and give your frank answers.

Min Max

1. "My work gives me a feeling

of achievement" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2. "In decisions regarding selection of people for jobs, my views are

also heard" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

3. How satisfactory are your family relations ? \ 7 "^ A '=, f, i

4. To what extent are the working condi t ions such as plant maintenance, suff ic ient ? 1 2 3 4 5

5. "Sudden leave or break in work makes me feel relieved and happy"

6- "I am sa t i s f i ed with the f a i rness of promotion procedure in my company" 1 2 3 4 5

7. To what extent are you s a t i s f i e d with the working of the union in your company ? 1 2 3 4 5

8. How much does your supervisor encourage people to give t h e i r bes t e f fo r t ? 1 2 3 4 5

9. How much do persons in your work group encourage each o ther to work as a team ? 1 2 3 4 5

10. "I have opportunit ies to use my specia l s k i l l s and a b i l i t i e s in my job". 1 2 3 4 5

11. in case of emergencies and d i f f i c u l t i e s how much inf luence do you exercise in ge t t i ng a". way out ? 1 2 3 4 5

12. "I think of myself as p a r t of the ccanpany team" 1 2 3 4 5

13. How much are you s a t i s f i e d with respect to you and your family 's fooding ? 1 2 3 4 5

14. To what extent are work a c t i v i t i e s sensibly organised in t h i s company ? 1 2 3 4 5

15. To what extent do the "savings plan" f a c i l i t i e s present in your employment sa t i s fy you 1 2 3

16. "The management does not f a i l to appreciate the importance of my work". 1 2 3

17. "The management takes due care of my dignity as an individual"? 1 2 3

18. "My supervisor gets along well with people" 1 2 3

19. To what extent do you th ink your supervisor has confidence and t r u s t in you ? 1 2 3

20. To what extent does the company have a real i n t e re s t i n the welfare and happiness of those who work here ? 1 2 3

21 . "My company offers me education and t ra in ing to keep me in touch with my field and do b e t t e r " 1 2 3

22. "I give of my best e f f o r t s as par t of contr ibut ions to the company products" 1 2 3

23. To what extent to th ings about working here (people p o l i c i e s , or conditions) encourage you to work hard ? 1 2 3

24. How much are you s a t i s f i e d with the "retirement plans" of your company ? 1 2 3

25. "The management apprec ia tes my s k i l l s , a b i l i t i e s , and perfor -

26. "My s o c i a l r e l a t i o n s a r e s a t i s f a c t o r y " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

27. "My job has given me a f ee l i ng of s t a t u s i n s o c i e t y " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

28. To what e x t e n t does your superv i s o r show you how t o improve your per formances ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

29. "My fe l low workers are^^ very c o o p e r a t i v e " . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

30. "My company g i v e s me an opport u n i t y t o f e e l p a r t of t h e management". 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

3 1 . In g e n e r a l , how much say or in f luence do you have on how t o perform your job ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

32. How much i n f l u e n c e do you hold in s e t t l i n g d i f f e r e n c e s and

q u a r r e l s i n your company? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

33. How much a r e you s a t i s f i e d with c l o t h e s , d r e s s e s and o t h e r such

wears ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

34. How f a r a r e you s a t i s f i e d with your land and p rope r ty p o s i t i o n ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

35. Does your company's "overt ime" payments s a t i s f y you? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

36. "I devote myself t o t h e job" . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

37. "My company o f f e r s enough o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o change job wi th in t h e company". 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

38. To what e x t e n t does the management r e c o g n i z e s and pays

a t t e n t i o n t o your unions ac t ions? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

39. "My job has enough p r e s t i g e wi th in t h e company". 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

40. To what extent does your

supervisor provide the help

your need so that you can

schedule ahead of time.

41. To what extent do persons in your work group show you how to do a

better job ?

42. To what extent does the company make an effort to help employees

get and maintain good income?

43. In general, how much say or influence do you have on what

goes on in your work group?

44. To what extent do you have a say in termination of jobs of

people in your work place ?

45. How much are you satisfied with your place or residence/housing

facilities ?

46. What extent are you satisfied with educational facilities

available for your family ?

47. To what extent are you told

what you need to know to do

your job in the best possible

way ?

48. To what extent do you feel a real

responsibility to achieve the

success of the company ?

49. To what extent do you have control

in deciding to change the method

of your work?

50. "I make use of the company

sponsored training for my job"

51. When you talk with persons in

your work group, to what extent

do they pay attention to what

you are saying ?

52. "My supervisor always makes his expectations clear".

53. "My colleagues treat me with due respect"

54. "My contacts with fellow workers outside work is good"

5 5. "The management is fair enough in giving rewards of merit to individuals".

56. "There is very little in my job to keep me interested" .

57. "Thinking of going to the job makes me feel sick"

58. "I am sufficiently paid for the work I do".

59. To what extent is the "sick leave

policy" or "medical leave"

facilities sufficient in your

employment ?

60. "I feel incompetent for the job I am doing"

61. My company takes care of my future career plans".

62. My supervisor is good at planning and scheduling of work".

63. To what extent does your supervisor offer new ideas for solving job related problems?

64. To what extent do persons in your work group provide the help you need so that you can plan, organise and schdule work ahead of time? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

65. "My supervisor accepts my ideas and suggest ions" . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

66. To what extent do you influence dec i s ions regarding promotions? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

67. How s a t i s f a c t o r y i s your f inanc ia l condit ion ? (Money) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

68. To what extent does t h i s organisat ion have a real i n t e r e s t in welfare and happiness of those who work here ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

69. How adequate for your need is the amount of information you

get about what is going on in

other departments and shifts? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

70. To what extent do you influence decisions regarding pay bonus

etc.? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

71. "Doing my job w e l l , I get a f e e l ing of s a t i s f a c t i o n " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

72. How f r i end ly and easy to approach a r e pe r sons in your work group? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

73. "My s u p e r v i s o r has enough knowledge about the work and job" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

74. "T ge t r e c o g n i t i o n for the good work I do h e r e " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

75. To what extent does the company's medical aid facilities satisfy

you? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

76. To what extent do you enjoy performing the actual day to day activities that make upl-your job ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

77. "Promotion from within the company is adequately handled

by the management". 6 7

78. To what extent does your supervisor encourage persons who

whork for him to work as a team? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

79. To what extent do persons in your work group offer each other new ideas for solving

job related problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

80. "I have a say in deciding how to schedule my work". 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

81. How much this organisation tries to improve working conditions? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

82. To what extent does this organi sation have clear-cut reasonable

goals and objectives? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

83. To what extent do persons in your work group exchange

opinions and ideas? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

84. To what extent does your supervisor encourage people

who work for him to exchange

opinions and ideas? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

85. How much do persons in your work group emphasize a team goal? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

PLEASE RECHECK THAT YOU HAVE ANSWERED ALL ITEMS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

APPENDIX - II

INSTRUCTIONS

Some personality characteristics have been given below.

You are requested to go through the list and have to tick

mark ( ) the factors on a 5-point scale that to what

extent do you perceive to have these factors in your dynamic

personality. Be sure, this is not the test of your

personality but we are simply interested to understand the

extent to which you possess these factors.

You have to sate each factor in the manner given

below,

Assign 5 to the factor which is present in the maximum degree.

Assign 4 to the factor which is present above the average level.

Assign 3 to the factor which is present up to the moderate level.

Assign 2 to the factor which is present below the moderate level.

Assign 1 to the factor which is present upto the minimum level.

1. P o l i t e

2. Mentally Active

3. Loyal to supervisors/ organizations

4. Tactful

5. Physically active

6. Easily to be pleased

7. Quick tempered

8. Boring

9. Responsible

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

10.

1 1 .

1 2 .

1 3 .

14 .

1 5 .

16 .

1 7 .

1 8 .

1 9 .

20 .

2 1 .

Stubborn Flexible Prejudiced Manipulative Unsocial Self-Centered Untrustworthy Competitive Co-operative Assert ive Easy to take r i sk

Take quick dec i s ion without

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

22.

caring the whether the decision are right or wrong

Have a thinking before taking a decision in quest c

2 3 .

2 4 .

2 5 .

26 .

27 .

2 8 .

29 .

30 .

3 1 .

32 .

3 3 .

34 .

of taking r i Open hearted No privacy Talkat ive Not easy to Depressive Cheerful R e a l i s t i c Harsh Aggressive Po ly the i s t

Monotheist

Religious

g h t

I

b e

dec is ion

cont ro l led

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

5

5

5

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4 •

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

2

2

2

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

1

1

1

Not a l l Not a l l

Not a l l

a t

a t

a t

PLEASE RECHECK THAT YOU HAVE ANSWERED ALL ITEMS .

THANK YOU VERY MUCH

APPgNPIX - III

INSTRUCTIONS

Following are some of the characteristics related to

your organization with which you are attached. You are

required to tick mark ( ) the characteristics which you

think are present in your organization and rate them on a

5-point scale in the manner given below.

Assign 5 to the factor which is present to the maximum degree.

Assign 4 to the factor which is present above average level.

Assign 3 to the factor which is present upto the moderate level.

Assign 2 to the factor which is present below the moderate level.

Assign 1 to the factor which is present to the minimum level.

1. Poor organizational prestige

2. Poor organizational conditions

3. Inconvenient working hours

4. Undemocratic boss

5. Harsh leadership

6. Less opportunity in decision making

7. Unfair policy

8. Less opportunity of getting feedback

9. Lack of autonomy

10, Tight Supervision

11. Beauracratic leadership

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2

1 2

3

3

4 5

4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 . S u p p o r t i v e management 1 2 3 4 5

1 3 . Poor u n i o n management r e l a t i o n 1 2 3 4 5

1 4 . Poor e m p l o y e e ' s p a r t i c i p a t i o n 1 2 3 4 5

1 5 . P o o r - p r o m o t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s 1 2 3 4 5

PLEASE RECHECK THAT YOU HAVE ANSWERED ALL ITEMS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH

APPEBPIX - IV

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION BLANK (BIB)

Please furnish the following information ;

Designation : Department :

Age : Sex : Urban/rural :

Length of service :

Work experience present position t

No. of promotions received?

Marital status:

No. of dependents;

Educational qualification?

Training received, if any:

General health (very good, normal, poor, very poor)

ir.amu.ac.inir.amu.ac.in/688/1/t 5432.pdf · abstract the present work on the problem entitled,...

Documents