iogp 2015 land transportation safety motor vehicle crash data

REPORT

2015mAUGUST2016

DATA SERIES

Safety performance indicators –Motor Vehicle Crash Data – 2008–2015

AcknowledgementsIOGP acknowledges the participation of the companies that have submitted motor vehicle crash data.

This report was produced by the IOGP Safety Committee’s Land Transportation Safety Subcommittee.

Photography used with permission courtesy of ©psphotograph/iStockphoto (Back cover)

Feedback

IOGP welcomes feedback on our reports: [email protected]

Disclaimer

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither IOGP nor any of its Members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.

This publication is made available for information purposes and solely for the private use of the user. IOGP will not directly or indirectly endorse, approve or accredit the content of any course, event or otherwise where this publication will be reproduced.

Copyright notice

The contents of these pages are © International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of IOGP and (ii) the sources are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of IOGP.

These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

DATA SERIES

Safety performance indicators –Motor Vehicle Crash Data – 2008–2015

Revision history

VERSION DATE AMENDMENTS

1.0 August 2016 First release

REPORT

2015mAUGUST2016

4International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Contributing companies 5

Preface 7

1. Executive summary 8

2. Introduction 92.1 Objective 92.2 Scope & Categories of IOGP Reportable MVC 92.3 IOGP Safety Database and Reporting Group 11

3. Motor Vehicle Crash data analysis 123.1 Motor Vehicle Crash fatalities 123.2 Motor vehicle distance driven 153.3 Motor Vehicle Crash Data Analysis 2008–2015 16

3.3.1 MVC by incident category 163.3.2 MVC by reporting group 173.3.3 MVC by Company and Contractor 183.3.4 MVC regional analysis for 2015 19

Appendix A. Motor Vehicle Crash reporting definitions 21

Appendix B. Data tables 23

Appendix C. Database dimensions 36

Appendix D. Contributing IOGP Members 38

Appendix E. Implementation of Report 365, Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice 40

Appendix F. Glossary of terms 42

Bibliography 48Society of Petroleum Engineers papers 48Report 365 and its Guidance Notes 48IOGP Data Series 49

Contents

5Motor Vehicle Crash data 2008-2015

The motor vehicle crash statistics for 2008-2015 were derived from data provided by the following companies:

Contributing companies

2015 2014 2013 2012ADNOC ADNOC ADDAX PETROLEUM LIMITED ADDAX PETROLEUM LIMITED

ANADARKO ANADARKO ADNOC ADNOC

BG GROUP BG GROUP ANADARKO ANADARKO

BHP BILLITON BP BASHNEFT BG GROUP

BP CAIRN ENERGY BG GROUP BP

CAIRN ENERGY CAIRN INDIA BHP CAIRN ENERGY

CHEVRON CHEVRON BP CHEVRON

DOLPHIN ENERGY DOLPHIN ENERGY CAIRN ENERGY CNOOC

DONG O&G E.ON CAIRN INDIA DOLPHIN ENERGY

E.ON GALP CHEVRON E.ON

ENGIE E&P INTERNATIONAL GDF SUEZ E&P INTERNATIONAL DOLPHIN ENERGY GDF SUEZ E&P INTERNATIONAL

GALP HESS CORPORATION E.ON HESS CORPORATION

HESS CORPORATION HUSKY GALP INPEX

HUSKY INPEX GDF SUEZ E&P INTERNATIONAL KOSMOS

INPEX KOSMOS HESS CORPORATION KUWAIT OIL COMPANY

KOSMOS KUWAIT OIL COMPANY INPEX MOL

KUWAIT OIL COMPANY MAERSK OIL KOSMOS OIL SEARCH

MAERSK OIL MOL KUWAIT OIL COMPANY OMV

MOL OIL SEARCH MOL PAN AMERICAN ENERGY

OIL SEARCH OMV OIL SEARCH PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD

OMV PAN AMERICAN ENERGY OMV PTTEP

ORIGIN PJSOC BASHNEFT PAN AMERICAN ENERGY RASGAS

PAN AMERICAN ENERGY PTTEP PTTEP REPSOL

PJSOC BASHNEFT RASGAS RASGAS SASOL

PLUSPETROL REPSOL REPSOL SHELL COMPANIES

PTTEP SASOL SASOL STATOIL

QATAR PETROLEUM SHELL COMPANIES SHELL COMPANIES SUNCOR

RASGAS STATOIL STATOIL TALISMAN ENERGY

REPSOL SUNCOR SUNCOR TNK-BP

SASOL TALISMAN ENERGY TALISMAN ENERGY TOTAL

SHELL COMPANIES TOTAL TOTAL TULLOW OIL

STATOIL TULLOW OIL TULLOW OIL WINTERSHALL

TALISMAN ENERGY WINTERSHALL WINTERSHALL WOODSIDE

TOTAL WOODSIDE WOODSIDE YEMEN LNG

TULLOW OIL YEMEN LNG YEMEN LNG

WINTERSHALL

WOODSIDE

YEMEN LNG


2011 2010 2009 2008ADNOC ADDAX PETROLEUM LIMITED ADNOC BG GROUP

BG GROUP ADNOC BG GROUP BP

BP BG GROUP CAIRN ENERGY CAIRN ENERGY

CHEVRON BP CHEVRON CHEVRON

DOLPHIN ENERGY CAIRN ENERGY DOLPHIN ENERGY HESS CORPORATION

DONG E&P CHEVRON HESS CORPORATION HOCOL

HESS CORPORATION DOLPHIN ENERGY HOCOL INPEX

INPEX HESS CORPORATION INPEX KUWAIT OIL COMPANY

KOSMOS INPEX KUWAIT OIL COMPANY MOL

KUWAIT OIL COMPANY KUWAIT OIL COMPANY MAERSK OIL NEXEN INC

MOL MOL MOL PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD

NCOC (NORTH CASPIAN OPERATING CO.)

NEXEN INC NEXEN INC PTTEP

OIL SEARCH OIL SEARCH OIL SEARCH QATAR PETROLEUM

OMV OMV OMV REPSOL

PAN AMERICAN ENERGY PERENCO PERENCO SAUDI ARAMCO

PERENCO PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD SHELL COMPANIES

PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD PTTEP PTTEP STATOIL

PTTEP RASGAS RASGAS SUNCOR

RASGAS REPSOL REPSOL TNK-BP

REPSOL SHELL COMPANIES SAUDI ARAMCO TOTAL

RWE DEA AG STATOIL STATOIL TULLOW OIL

SHELL COMPANIES SUNCOR SUNCOR YEMEN LNG

STATOIL TALISMAN ENERGY TOTAL

SUNCOR TNK-BP TULLOW OIL

TALISMAN ENERGY TOTAL YEMEN LNG

TNK-BP TULLOW OIL

TOTAL WINTERSHALL

TULLOW OIL WOODSIDE

WINTERSHALL YEMEN LNG

WOODSIDE

YEMEN LNG


Preface

Driving-related incidents have historically been the single largest cause of fatalities in IOGP member company operations. The IOGP Land Transportation Safety Subcommittee (LTSC) aimed to help reduce, and ultimately eliminate, the number of catastrophic, major and serious road traffic incidents and land transportation-related fatalities by providing guidance on how to implement land transportation safety elements within a management system.

In April 2005, IOGP published Report 365, Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice. The guidelines are designed to be applicable to all land transportation activities in the upstream oil and gas industry, including operators, contractors and subcontractors. It is recommended in IOGP Report 365 that all companies operating, or receiving or providing services involving land transportation, have a management system in place that includes land transportation operations and which is based on a full assessment of the risks as well as control measures to address such risks.

Data series

This report is published as part of the IOGP data series. IOGP produces additional annual reports of Safety, Process Safety and Environmental Performance Indicators. These data series reports are available from the IOGP website: http://www.iogp.org/Our-library/.


1. Executive summary

The analysis of the land transportation safety motor vehicle crash (MVC) data for the years 2008–2015 provides the following key insights and observations:

1. Land transportation-related incidents have historically been the single largest cause of fatalities in IOGP member company operations.

2. Efforts taken by the Land Transportation Safety Subcommittee and the industry in general might have contributed to the reduction in the number of land transportation-related fatalities (and MVC) since 2008.

3. There has been an increase in the number of IOGP Members submitting information on motor vehicle crashes, from 22 IOGP member company submissions in 2008 to 38 in 2015. 24 of the 38 participating companies reported the distance driven in 2015, representing 63% of the total number of companies reporting MVC data for 2015.

4. Data collection vs. reporting:

– In Report 365-5, crashes are categorized as Catastrophic, Major and Serious.

– Motor vehicle crashes are reported to the IOGP safety database in five groups.

5. Significant differences between companies reporting the MVC in Category S – Serious. The majority of companies do not report any MVC where the vehicle cannot be driven from the scene under its own power in a roadworthy state.

6. In the IOGP safety database a vehicle rollover is reported within Group 4, with a total of 720 vehicle rollovers for the period 2010–2015. However, Group 4 only includes vehicle rollover incidents that are not related to a recordable injury and/or fatality. For the same period there are an additional 221 vehicle rollovers which resulted in injury and/or fatality (Groups 1–3). The total vehicle rollovers for the period 2010–2015 is therefore 941. This is 31% higher than the number of vehicle rollovers with no associated injury, as reported in Group 4.

7. Rollovers continue to be an area of concern. During the period 2010–2015, IOGP member companies reported 941 rollover incidents, 221 of which resulted in recordable injuries (25 were fatal, 81 caused a LWDC and 115 caused a MTC or RWDC) (see Table B.9).

– At least 34% of all MVC incidents resulting in a fatality involved a vehicle rollover.

– At least 38% of all MVC incidents resulting in a Lost Work Day Case involved a vehicle rollover.


2. Introduction

2.1 ObjectiveThis report presents contributing IOGP Members’ global results for these indicators:

• Number of motor vehicle crash (MVC) fatalities• Number of MVC for each reporting group and category• MVC rate (motor vehicle crashes per million kilometres) for each reporting

group and category

Reporting companies will typically report their own data as well as that of their associated contractors. The indicators are analysed by region for both company and contractor data.

2.2 Scope & Categories of IOGP Reportable MVCIOGP Report 365-5, Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice. Guidance Note 5. Common Land Transport Incident KPIs for Motor Vehicle Crashes (MVC) defines a crash as:

Work-related vehicle damage or personal injury due to a vehicle-related event, or rollover.

The scope of a motor vehicle crash is defined in Report 365-5 as including company employees, contractors and their subcontractors. It covers all light duty vehicles, heavy duty vehicles, buses or motor coaches and motorized industrial equipment operating on a public road.

The scope is further defined as follows:

The following should not be reported as a motor vehicle crash when the vehicle is properly parked:• Injuries that occur when entering or exiting the vehicle.• Any event involving loading or unloading from the vehicle.• Damage to or total loss of a vehicle solely due to environmental

conditions or vandalism.• Another vehicle crashes into the parked vehicle.

In addition, the following should not be reported as a motor vehicle crash:• Superficial damage, such as a stone/rock chip damaging a

windscreen/or paintwork while the vehicle is being driven.• Damage related to the theft of a vehicle.

MVC reporting definitions are given in Appendix A.


Report 365-5 categorizes motor vehicle crashes in four categories:

Category C – Catastrophic• Any company, contractor or subcontractor or third party fatality associated

with a MVC.

Category M – Major• Any rollover.• Any MVC where a company, contractor or subcontractor has a LWDC

associated with the MVC.

Category S – Serious • Any MVC where a company, contractor or subcontractor has a recordable

injury (MTC and/or RWDC) associated with the MVC.• Any MVC where the vehicle cannot be driven from the scene under its own

power in a roadworthy state.

Category L – Light • Any company, contractor or subcontractor MVC resulting in either Minor

Injury (First Aid Case) or no injury.

IOGP Report 365, Guidance Note 5, specifies one indicator for benchmarking called

rMVC=ncatastrophic + nmajor + nserious

d

the Motor Vehicle Crash Rate (MVC Rate):

WhererMVC = MVC Ratencatastrophic = number of Category C motor vehicle crashesnmajor = number of Category M motor vehicle crashesnserious = number of Category S motor vehicle crashes

d = total distance driven (in million kilometres)

Note: Report 365-5 was revised in 2016 and the information listed here represents the old scope criteria and definitions. Future reports will be based on the information in the revised 365-5.


2.3 IOGP Safety Database and Reporting GroupIOGP member companies report their annual safety data and data for their contractors on a voluntary basis. The information is used to produce an annual report, Safety Performance Indicators.

The IOGP safety database is the largest database of safety performance in the upstream oil and gas industry. The main purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the annual global safety performance of the contributing IOGP member companies and their associated contractors on an annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by IOGP membership.

The annual safety data report provides trend analysis, benchmarking and identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance.

In terms of land transportation incidents, the IOGP annual safety database was limited to the number of fatal incidents in the activity category of ‘transport – land’. In 2005, the data request was extended to specifically collect global land transportation safety data. IOGP now collects motor vehicle crash (MVC) data in these five reporting groups:

Group 1: Leading to at least one fatality (includes third party fatality)

Group 2: Leading to a lost work day case (LWDC) as most severe outcome

Group 3: Leading to medical treatment case (MTC) or restricted work day case (RWDC) as most severe outcome

Group 4: Involving a rollover

Group 5: Where the vehicle cannot be driven from the scene under its own power in a roadworthy state – not resulting in a fatality, LWDC, RWDC or MTC.

The relationship of the safety data groups to the categories of Report 365 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Relationship of MVC categories (Report 365 Guidance note 5) to reporting groups (safety database)

Safety database reporting group 365-5 category

Group 1 Category C: Catastrophic

Group 2 Category M: Major

Group 3 Category S: Serious

Group 4 Category M: Major

Group 5 Category S: Serious


3. Motor Vehicle Crash data analysis

3.1 Motor Vehicle Crash fatalitiesIn 2005, the IOGP annual safety performance indicators report showed that over 37% of the reported fatalities were as a result of vehicle incidents and there was little evidence to suggest a reduction in the rate of vehicle incidents within the industry. It was against this background of a continued high level of land transport-related incidents that the IOGP Safety Committee formed the Land Transportation Safety Subcommittee. In April 2005, IOGP published Report 365, Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice.

In January 2010, the IOGP Safety Data Subcommittee held a fatal incident and high potential event workshop. Considering the plateau in fatal accident rates shown by the IOGP data, the objective of the workshop was to focus specifically on causes and prevention of fatal incidents and high potential events in the upstream oil and gas industry and provide recommendations to the IOGP Safety Committee on action that could be taken to prevent future fatal incidents and high potential events.

As a result of this workshop, the IOGP Safety Data Subcommittee conducted a comprehensive review of the data reported to IOGP from 1991 to 2011 (inclusive) for fatal incidents. The results of this review were published in 2012 in the SPE paper 157432, Improving the Opportunity for Learning from Industry Safety Data. The results of the analysis showed that over 25% of the fatalities reported to IOGP between 1991 and 2011 were as a result of land transportation incidents.

In 2014, an updated analysis was published in SPE 168375, Continuing the Efforts to Learn From Industry Safety Data, which showed that over 24% of the fatalities reported to IOGP between 1991 and 2012 were as a result of land transportation incidents.

Between 2000 and 2015, 339 work-related land transport fatalities associated with 302 fatal incidents have been reported to the main IOGP safety performance indicators database, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 1.

Fifteen of the reported land transport fatalities have resulted from assaults or violent acts between 2000 and 2015. These have been highlighted in Figure 1 because these are not likely to have been preventable by either the implementation of Report 365 or Report 459, IOGP Life-Saving Rules.

Narratives for fatal and high potential MVC can be found within reports 2015sf and 2015sh, supporting documents to 2015s, Safety Performance Indicators 2015 data.


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40 Land transport fatalities due to assault/violent acts

Land transport fatalities excluding assault/violent acts

Land transport fatal incidents

2015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000

Report 365 first published

April 2005

Fata

litie

s an

d fa

tal i

ncid

ents

Figure 1: Work-related land transport fatalities reported to IOGP 2000–2015 (See Table B.1)

Table 2: Work-related fatalities reported to the main IOGP safety performance indicators database 2000–2015 by category

Category of incident Fatal incidents Fatalities % of fatal

incidents % of fatalities

Assault or violent act 42 68 3.6 4.6

Caught in, under or between 168 169 14.5 11.5

Explosions or burns 73 179 6.3 12.2

Exposure electrical 67 70 5.8 4.8

Falls from height 119 119 10.2 8.1

Struck by 472 505 40.7 34.4

Water related, drowning 68 87 5.9 5.9

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 15 19 1.3 1.3

Pressure release 47 51 4.0 3.5

Confined space 15 27 1.3 1.8

Overexertion, strain 3 3 0.3 0.2

Other 72 170 6.2 11.6

Total 1,161 1,467


Table 3: Work-related fatalities reported to the main IOGP safety performance indicators database 2000–2015 by activity

Type of activity Fatal incidents Fatalities % of fatal

incidents % of fatalities

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

149 152 12.8 10.4

Diving, subsea, ROV 14 14 1.2 1.0

Drilling, workover, well services 137 161 11.8 11.0

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 117 118 10.1 8.0

Maintenance, inspection, testing 191 276 16.5 18.8

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 35 37 3.0 2.5

Production operations 27 52 2.3 3.5

Seismic / survey operations 33 37 2.8 2.5

Transport - Air 23 120 2.0 8.2

Transport - Land 302 339 26.0 23.1

Transport - Water, incl. marine activity 58 79 5.0 5.4

Unspecified - other 75 82 6.5 5.6

Total 1,161 1,467


3.2 Motor vehicle distance drivenDetailed information on motor vehicle crashes was submitted by 22 IOGP member companies in 2008 and by 38 companies in 2015. The list of companies is given at the beginning of this report.

90 countries are represented in the 2015 MVC database.

The distance driven reported by participating companies for company and contractor employees is shown in Figure 2 and Table B.4. See Table 4 for the number of companies that reported distance driven.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000 distance contractor

distance company

20152014201320122011201020092008

mill

ion

kilo

met

res

Company Contractor

Figure 2: Reported distance driven by company and contractor employees (See Table B.4)

Table 4: Reporting companies and company and contractor distance driven 2008–2015

Year

Companies reporting

vehicle crash data

Companies reporting distance driven

Distance driven (million kilometres)

Company Contractor Total

2008 22 15 638 1,643 2,281

2009 25 17 666 879 1,545

2010 29 17 716 1,880 2,596

2011 32 19 830 1,539 2,369

2012 34 21 776 2,210 2,986

2013 35 21 730 1,786 2,516

2014 35 24 686 1,835 2,520

2015 38 24 792 1,648 2,440


3.3 Motor Vehicle Crash Data Analysis 2008–2015In 2005 the IOGP data request to its member companies was extended to include detailed land transportation incident data as outlined in section 3.1. The number of motor vehicle crash incidents is reported to IOGP by country and broken down by company and contractor and by crash category. The data is further grouped to indicate the number of crashes that resulted in a rollover.

The analysis in this report includes submitted data for the years 2008–2015 inclusive for both companies and their contractors.

3.3.1 MVC by incident category

0

50

100

150

200

250

300 20152014201320122011201020092008

UnspecifiedSeriousMajorCatastrophic

10 10 10 9

215229

153

280

190172

256

145

58

81

1023

7

272

2813

139144136

189

141

13 13 16 15

96

136

22

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s

Figure 3: Number of MVC incidents by incident category 2008–2015 (See Table B.6)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20 Serious

Major

Catastrophic

Total

20152014201320122011201020092008

All Catastrophic Major Serious

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s pe

r mill

ion

km d

riven

Figure 4: MVC rate by incident category 2008–2015 (See Tables B.6 and B.7)


3.3.2 MVC by reporting group

0

50

100

150

200

250

UnspecifiedGroup 5:Not driven away

Group 4:Rollover

Group 3:MTC or RWDC total

Group 2:LWDC total

Group 1:Fatality total

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s

20152014201320122011201020092008

10131316151010 9

95

4250

4333

20

51

29

158

120

99

137

179

93

111119

102

143

122

160

142

240

124

28

58

1323

81

7 10

96

48

3221

52

1523

81

113

22

Figure 5: Number of MVC incidents by reporting group in 2008–2015 (See Table B.5)

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06 Group 5

Group 4

Group 3

Group 2

Group 1

20152014201320122011201020092008Year

Group 1:Fatality

Group 2:LWDC

Group 3:MTC or RWDC

Group 4:Rollover

Group 5: Not driven away

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s pe

r mill

ion

km d

riven

Figure 6: MVC rate by reporting group in 2008–2015 (See Tables B.4 and B.6)


Rollovers

34% of all fatal crashes involved rollover. Given their injury/fatality potential, the data is further grouped to indicate the number of crashes that resulted in a rollover. Information on the number of Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 MVC that involved a rollover has been collected since 2010.

0

50

100

150

200

250 Group 4: Rollover only (no recordable injury)Group 3: MTC or RWDC involving rolloverGroup 2: LWDC involving rolloverGroup 1: Fatality involving rollover

201520142013201220112010

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s in

volvi

ng ro

llove

r

4 5 5 3 488

119

48

10

81

135

111

1416

93

17

40

179

21

36

137

Figure 7: Number of rollovers incidents by reporting group (See Table B.7)

3.3.3 MVC by Company and Contractor

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s

0

50

100

150

200

250

300 UnspecifiedGroup 5: Not driven awayGroup 4: RolloverGroup 3: MTC or RWDCGroup 2: LWDCGroup 1: Fatality

2015201420132012201120102009200820152014201320122011201020092008Company Contractor

Figure 8: Number of MVC incidents by reporting group, company and contractors (See Table B.11)


0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

Contractor

Company

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

0.0 0.1 Contractor

Company

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

0.0 0.1 Contractor

Company

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

0.0 0.1 Contractor

Company

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

0.0 0.1

Contractor

Company

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s pe

r mill

ion

km d

riven

Group 1Fatality

Group 2LWDC

Group 3MTC or RWDC

Group 4Rollover

Group 5Not driven away

Figure 9: MVC rates by reporting group, company and contractor (See Table B.12)

3.3.4 MVC regional analysis for 2015

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s pe

r mill

ion

km d

riven

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35Unspecified

Group 5: Not driven away

Group 4: Rollover

Group 3: MTC or RWDC

Group 2: LWDC

Group 1: Fatality

South &Central America

NorthAmerica

Middle EastFSUEuropeAsia/AustralasiaAfrica

0 0

4 4

7

18

21

3

19

33

20

0 0 0 0 01 1

2

11

1

32

15

9

4 4

7

11

5

2

0

5

10

21

2

0

21

1716

Figure 10: Overall number of MVC incidents in 2015 by reporting group and region (See Table B.18)


Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40 UnspecifiedGroup 5: Not driven awayGroup 4: Rollover Group 3: MTC or RWDCGroup 2: LWDCGroup 1: Fatality

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Cont

ract

or

Com

pany

Africa Asia/Australasia

Europe FSU Middle East North America

South & CentralAmerica

Figure 11: Number of MVC incidents by region, company and contractor in 2015 (See Table B.15)

Num

ber o

f MVC

inci

dent

s pe

r mill

ion

km d

riven

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

South & Central AmericaNorth America

Middle East

FSU

Europe

Asia/Australasia

Africa

ContractorCompany

0.15

0.50

0.10

0.28

0.03

0.06

0.38

0.48

0.17

0.090.07

0.02

0.05

0.12

Figure 12: MVC Rate by region, company and contractor in 2015 (See Tables B.15 and B.16)


Appendix A. Motor Vehicle Crash reporting definitions

The following definitions are those used by reporting companies when submitting data, extract from IOGP Report 2014su IOGP Safety Data Reporting Users’ Guide.

Note: Report 365-5 was revised in 2016 and the information listed here represents the old scope criteria and definitions.

MVC work-relatedness

• Any crash involving a company, rental or personal vehicle while performing company business.

• Work-relationship is presumed for crashes resulting from business being conducted on behalf of the company while operating a company-assigned vehicle. Examples of company business include driving a client to the airport; driving to the airport for a business trip; taking a client or work colleague out for a meal; deliveries; visiting clients or customers; or driving to a business-related appointment.

• Personal business which should not be counted includes, but is not limited to: personal shopping; getting a meal by yourself; commuting to and from home; or driving to a private medical appointment.

• Contractor Motor vehicle crash includes any vehicle procured (owned, leased, fleeted or rented) by a contractor or sub-contractor while performing work on behalf of the company.

Crash

• Work-related vehicle damage or personal injury due to a vehicle-related event, or rollover.

Motor vehicle

• Any mechanically or electrically powered device (excluding one moved by human power), upon which, or by which, any person or property may be transported upon a land roadway. This includes motorcycles. Specifically excluded from the definition of motor vehicle are vehicles operated on fixed rails. In addition, vehicles which are not capable of more than 10 mph (16 kph) may be exempted.

Rollover

• Any crash where the vehicle has flipped onto any of its sides, top and/or rolled 360 degrees via any axis.


Commuting

• Travel from home to first work site and travel from last work site to home.• Travel between a worker’s identified work location and any location for

personal business, including a restaurant.• Travel between a worker’s established home-away-from-home to the first

worksite or to any location for personal business, including a restaurant.• Travel between home and a non-employer-endorsed local conference or

other similar function.

Commute travel

For injury/illness reporting, Commute travel begins when the worker is seated in the vehicle in preparation for departure and ends when the worker arrives at their home or worksite and the vehicle is placed in park or taken out of gear. For MVC reporting, Commute travel begins when the worker is no longer driving for company business and ends when the worker begins to drive for company business.

Note: Travel to and from field operations locations is consider to be company business travel.

An incident is considered to have occurred during commute travel if it meets the requirements above, regardless whether the incident occurs while driving a company or personal vehicle or whether the employee or contract employee is being compensated during this time. Where appropriate, any incident occurring during Commute travel may be considered as asset or property loss but not as an MVC.

Note: All work-related travel performed by workers that are home-based, i.e. work from their place of residence, is considered to be non-commuting travel.

Home away from home

When traveling, workers establish a home away from home when checked into a hotel, motel, or other similar temporary residence.

Travel directly to the temporary residence before check-in from the airport (train station, etc.) or rental car agency and travel direct from home to the temporary residence is considered business travel, when on work-related business.

Travel home directly from the temporary residence after checkout to the airport (train station, etc.) or rental car agency and travel direct to home from the temporary residence is considered business travel, when on work-related business.


Table B.1: Work-related land transport fatalities reported to main IOGP safety performance indicators database 2000–2015

Year Land transport fatal incidents

Total land transport fatalities

Land transport fatalities due to assault/violent acts

2000 28 31

2001 30 32 1

2002 28 30 1

2003 33 39

2004 25 26

2005 26 31

2006 31 32 2

2007 25 29 3

2008 23 28

2009 8 10

2010 7 8 2

2011 11 15 5

2012 9 9 1

2013 6 6

2014 5 6

2015 7 7

Appendix B. Data tables


Table B.2: MVC Rate – database dimensions

Year Number companies submitting MVC data

Companies that

submitted MVC data

as % of companies in Safety report

Work hours* relating to MVC data

‘000s

MVC work hours* as % of total onshore

work hours* in safety database

Number of companies reporting distance driven

% of companies

that reported MVC data that also reported

distance driven

Number of countries

represented in MVC

database

2008 22 56% 1,258,878 49% 15 68% 56

2009 25 58% 1,072,869 38% 17 68% 78

2010 29 69% 1,614,418 64% 17 59% 73

2011 32 71% 1,793,632 67% 19 59% 82

2012 34 69% 1,747,148 63% 21 62% 92

2013 35 70% 1,614,966 59% 21 60% 81

2014 35 67% 1,813,530 58% 24 69% 73

2015 38 78% 1,767,634 64% 24 63% 90

*Represents all reported work hours, not exclusively driving hours

Table B.3: Number of companies submitting company and contractor data and their work hours (2008–2015)

Year Company data: Number of companies

submitting

Contractor data: Number of companies

submitting

Company work hours*

‘000s

Contractor work hours*

‘000s

2008 19 20 333,975 924,903

2009 24 21 352,015 720,854

2010 26 28 339,132 1,275,286

2011 31 30 413,748 1,379,884

2012 33 31 369,574 1,377,574

2013 33 34 355,370 1,259,596

2014 33 34 357,416 1,456,114

2015 34 34 408,809 1,358,825



Table B.4: Company and contractor distance driven (2008–2015)

YearDistance driven

million kilometres

Company Contractor Total

2008 638 1,643 2,281

2009 666 879 1,545

2010 716 1,880 2,596

2011 830 1,539 2,369

2012 776 2,210 2,986

2013 730 1,786 2,516

2014 686 1,835 2,520

2015 792 1,648 2,440

Table B.5: Number of MVC incidents by reporting group (2008–2015)

Total number of MVC incidents

Year Total Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

2008 406 10 95 51 120 102 28

2009 384 13 42 29 99 143 58

2010 495 13 52 158 137 122 13

2011 524 16 50 96 179 160 23

2012 422 15 43 48 93 142 81

2013 433 10 33 32 111 240 7

2014 304 10 20 21 119 124 10

2015 263 9 15 23 81 113 22


Table B.6: Number of MVC incidents by incident category (2008–2015)

Total number of MVC incidents

Year Total Category C: Catastrophic

Category M: Major

Category S: Serious Unspecified

2008 406 10 215 153 28

2009 384 13 141 172 58

2010 495 13 189 280 13

2011 524 16 229 256 23

2012 422 15 136 190 81

2013 433 10 144 272 7

2014 304 10 139 145 10

2015 263 9 96 136 22

Table B.7: MVC incidents and distance driven for MVC Rate by incident category and year

Year Distance Driven Million km

Number of MVC* for MVC Rate

Total Catastrophic Major Serious Unspecified

2008 2,281 317 7 190 117 3

2009 1,545 265 11 104 92 58

2010 2,596 415 10 136 257 12

2011 2,369 392 10 157 202 23

2012 2,986 319 11 118 113 77

2013 2,516 302 9 110 176 7

2014 2,520 242 8 93 131 10

2015 2,440 221 5 80 115 21

*Excludes MVC where the related distance driven was not reported


Table B.8: MVC Rate by incident category and year (see Table B.7)

Year

MVC Rate MVC per million km driven Million km

DrivenTotal Category C:

CatastrophicCategory M:

MajorCategory S:

Serious Unspecified

2008 0.139 0.003 0.083 0.051 0.001 2,281

2009 0.172 0.007 0.067 0.060 0.038 1,545

2010 0.160 0.004 0.052 0.099 0.005 2,596

2011 0.165 0.004 0.066 0.085 0.010 2,369

2012 0.107 0.004 0.040 0.038 0.026 2,986

2013 0.120 0.004 0.044 0.070 0.003 2,516

2014 0.096 0.003 0.037 0.052 0.004 2,520

2015 0.091 0.002 0.033 0.047 0.009 2,440

Table B.9: Number of MVC incidents reported involving rollovers by reporting group (2010–2015)

GroupNumber of MVC incidents

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total 2010–2015

Group 1: Fatality involving rollover 4 5 5 3 4 4 25

Group 1: Fatality not involving rollover 8 7 8 7 6 4 40

Group 1: Fatality unknown if rollover 1 4 2 0 0 1 8

Group 2: LWDC involving rollover 21 17 14 13 8 8 81

Group 2: LWDC not involving rollover 29 30 14 18 12 7 110

Group 2: LWDC unknown if rollover 2 3 15 2 0 0 22

Group 3: MTC or RWDC involving rollover 36 40 16 5 8 10 115

Group 3: MTC or RWDC not involving rollover 115 50 31 27 13 13 249

Group 3: MTC or RWDC unknown if rollover 7 6 1 0 0 0 14

Total rollover incidents involving recordable injury 61 62 35 21 20 22 221

Group 4: Rollover only (no recordable injury) 137 179 93 111 119 81 720

TOTAL ROLLOVER INCIDENTS 198 241 128 132 136 103 941


Tabl

e B.

10: N

umbe

r of p

artic

ipat

ing

com

pani

es a

nd n

umbe

r of d

ata

sets

MVC

Gro

up20

1520

1420

1320

1220

1120

1020

0920

08

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

Com

pani

es

Repo

rtin

gDa

ta

Sets

All g

roup

s34

232

2917

834

215

3127

428

232

2818

222

117

1410

7

All g

roup

s an

d di

stan

ce23

116

1689

2111

420

134

1911

715

9014

479

48

Any

grou

p37

268

3521

635

216

3429

132

253

2919

225

166

2213

3

Any g

roup

and

dis

tanc

e24

147

2211

621

114

2114

019

117

1794

1750

1463

Dist

ance

driv

en24

147

2415

621

114

2114

119

117

1794

1750

1588

Grou

p 1

3626

634

207

3421

533

286

3125

129

190

2416

518

112

Grou

p 1

and

dist

ance

2414

621

107

2111

421

136

1911

716

9316

4912

52

Grou

p 2

3426

534

207

3421

533

286

3225

229

192

2516

520

116

Grou

p 2

and

dist

ance

2414

721

107

2111

421

137

1911

717

9416

4913

54

Grou

p 3

3526

535

208

3421

534

288

3225

229

192

2416

419

116

Grou

p 3

and

dist

ance

2414

622

108

2111

421

137

1911

717

9415

4813

55

Grou

p 4

3526

634

212

3521

633

288

3024

629

191

2313

019

119

Grou

p 4

and

dist

ance

2314

621

112

2111

420

138

1911

717

9315

4813

58

Grou

p 5

3423

231

184

3521

632

277

2823

228

183

2311

918

119

Grou

p 5

and

dist

ance

2311

618

9521

114

2013

719

117

1691

1548

1153

Data

Set

: a s

et o

f dat

a wi

th d

istin

ct c

ompa

ny, c

ount

ry a

nd lo

catio

n (o

nsho

re/o

ffsho

re) w

here

ther

e is

a p

ositi

ve re

turn

of v

ehic

le a

ccid

ent d

ata.


Table B.11: MVC incidents and distance driven for MVC Rate by reporting group, year, company and contractor


Year Distance Driven

Million km

Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

2008Company 638 2 16 9 20 36 1

Contractor 1,643 5 73 29 81 43 2

2009Company 666 5 12 10 28 30 51

Contractor 879 6 18 10 46 42 7

2010Company 716 1 12 36 21 67 3

Contractor 1,880 9 27 112 76 42 9

2011Company 830 3 9 19 39 43 8

Contractor 1,539 7 25 58 84 82 15

2012Company 776 6 9 8 6 18 46

Contractor 2,210 5 28 35 75 52 31

2013Company 730 4 1 7 11 61 0

Contractor 1,786 5 27 21 71 87 7

2014Company 686 1 3 4 17 50 3

Contractor 1,835 7 7 14 66 63 7

2015Company 792 1 4 3 12 55 16

Contractor 1,648 4 7 12 57 45 5



Table B.12: MVC Rate by reporting group, year, company and contractor (See Table B.10)

MVC Rate - MVC per million km driven

Year Data set All crashes Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

2008Company 0.132 0.003 0.025 0.014 0.031 0.056

Contractor 0.142 0.003 0.044 0.018 0.049 0.026

2009Company 0.204 0.008 0.018 0.015 0.042 0.045

Contractor 0.147 0.007 0.020 0.011 0.052 0.048

2010Company 0.196 0.001 0.017 0.050 0.029 0.094

Contractor 0.146 0.005 0.014 0.060 0.040 0.022

2011Company 0.146 0.004 0.011 0.023 0.047 0.052

Contractor 0.176 0.005 0.016 0.038 0.055 0.053

2012Company 0.120 0.008 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.023

Contractor 0.102 0.002 0.013 0.016 0.034 0.024

2013Company 0.115 0.005 0.001 0.010 0.015 0.084

Contractor 0.122 0.003 0.015 0.012 0.040 0.049

2014Company 0.114 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.025 0.073

Contractor 0.089 0.004 0.004 0.008 0.036 0.034

2015Company 0.115 0.001 0.005 0.004 0.015 0.069

Contractor 0.079 0.002 0.004 0.007 0.035 0.027


Table B.13: Incidents and distance driven for MVC Rate by reporting group and year


Year Distance Driven

Million km

Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

2008 2,281 7 89 38 101 79 3

2009 1,545 11 30 20 74 72 58

2010 2,596 10 39 148 97 109 12

2011 2,369 10 34 77 123 125 23

2012 2,986 11 37 43 81 70 77

2013 2,516 9 28 28 82 148 7

2014 2,520 8 10 18 83 113 10

2015 2,440 5 11 15 69 100 21


Table B.14: MVC Rate by reporting group and year

MVC Rate – MVC per million km driven

Year All crashes All crashes excl. Group 5

Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

2008 0.139 0.104 0.003 0.039 0.017 0.044 0.035

2009 0.172 0.125 0.007 0.019 0.013 0.048 0.047

2010 0.160 0.118 0.004 0.015 0.057 0.037 0.042

2011 0.165 0.113 0.004 0.014 0.033 0.052 0.053

2012 0.107 0.083 0.004 0.012 0.014 0.027 0.023

2013 0.120 0.061 0.004 0.011 0.011 0.033 0.059

2014 0.096 0.051 0.003 0.004 0.007 0.033 0.045

2015 0.091 0.050 0.002 0.005 0.006 0.028 0.041


Table B.15: Number of MVC incidents by region, company and contractor and reporting group in 2015

Total number of MVC

Region Data set Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

AfricaCompany 0 1 0 0 9 0

Contractor 0 3 4 7 9 0

Asia/ AustralasiaCompany 0 1 2 4 16 15


EuropeCompany 0 0 0 1 7 0


FSUCompany 0 0 0 2 5 0


Middle EastCompany 2 2 2 2 3 0


North AmericaCompany 0 0 1 2 11 1


South & Central America

Company 0 1 0 3 9 0



Table B.16: MVC incidents and distance driven for Rate by region, company and contractor in 2015

Region Data set

Distance driven million

kilometres


All Crashes

Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

AfricaCompany 61 9 0 1 0 0 8 0

Contractor 42 20 0 3 4 6 7 0

Asia/ Australasia

Company 66 33 0 0 1 3 14 15

Contractor 207 36 2 0 0 14 15 5

EuropeCompany 83 8 0 0 0 1 7 0

Contractor 69 6 0 0 1 1 4 0

FSUCompany 25 7 0 0 0 2 5 0

Contractor 295 20 1 2 0 13 4 0

Middle East

Company 281 9 1 2 2 2 2 0

Contractor 596 14 1 1 4 6 2 0

North America

Company 247 14 0 0 0 2 11 1

Contractor 270 13 0 0 2 4 7 0


Company 29 11 0 1 0 2 8 0

Contractor 170 21 0 1 1 13 6 0



Table B.17: MVC Rate by region, company and contractor in 2015 (See Table B.15)

MVC Rate – MVC per million km driven Distance driven million

kilometres

Region Data set All Crashes

Group 1: Fatality

Group 2: LWDC


Group 4: Rollover

Group 5: Not driven

away

Unspecified

AfricaCompany 0.148 0.000 0.016 0.000 0.000 0.132 0 61

Contractor 0.482 0.000 0.072 0.096 0.145 0.169 0 42

Asia/ Australasia

Company 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.045 0.212 0.227 66

Contractor 0.174 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.068 0.072 0.024 207

EuropeCompany 0.097 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.012 0.085 0 83

Contractor 0.087 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.014 0.058 0 69

FSUCompany 0.278 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.079 0.199 0 25

Contractor 0.068 0.003 0.007 0.000 0.044 0.014 0 295

Middle East

Company 0.032 0.004 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0 281

Contractor 0.023 0.002 0.002 0.007 0.010 0.003 0 596

North America

Company 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.045 0.004 247

Contractor 0.048 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.015 0.026 0 270


Company 0.382 0.000 0.035 0.000 0.069 0.278 0 29

Contractor 0.123 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.076 0.035 0 170


Table B.18: Overall number of MVC incidents by reporting group and region in 2015

Incident

ALL

REGI

ONS

Afri

ca

Asia

/ Aus

tral

asia

Euro

pe

FSU

Mid

dle

East

Nort

h Am

eric

a

Sout

h &

Cen

tral

Am

eric

a

Group 1: Fatality involving rollover 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 0

Group 1: Fatality not involving rollover 4 0 1 0 1 1 1 0

Group 1: Fatality unknown if rollover 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Group 2: LWDC involving rollover 8 3 0 1 0 2 0 2

Group 2: LWDC not involving rollover 7 1 1 0 3 2 0 0

Group 2: LWDC unknown if rollover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Group 3: MTC or RWDC involving rollover 10 2 0 1 1 4 1 1

Group 3: MTC or RWDC not involving rollover 13 2 3 0 1 3 4 0

Group 3: MTC or RWDC unknown if rollover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total rollover incidents involving recordable injury 22 5 0 2 1 9 2 3

Group 4: Rollover 81 7 19 2 15 11 10 17

TOTAL ROLLOVER INCIDENTS 103 12 19 4 16 20 12 20


Detailed information on motor vehicle crashes was submitted by 22 IOGP member companies in 2008 and by 38 companies in 2015. The list of companies is given at the beginning of this report.

The 2015 database represents 1.8 billion work hours1, 64% of the onshore work hours in Report 2015s, Safety Performance Indicators.

90 countries are represented in the 2015 MVC database.

The reported vehicle crashes are normalized in this analysis by the distance driven, and are presented as the MVC Rate.

MVC data are only included in normalized results where both the number of MVC incidents and the distance driven are reported. This reduces the 2015 database for normalized results to 24 companies, 63% of the total number of companies reporting MVC data for 2015, and to 15 companies (68% of reporting companies) in 2008.

Table C.1: MVC Rate – database dimensions

Year Number companies submitting MVC data

Companies that

submitted MVC data as percentage

of companies in safety

database for year

Work hours* (thousands) relating to MVC data

MVC work hours* as

percentage of total onshore work hours*

in safety database for

year

Number of companies reporting distance driven

Percentage of companies that reported MVC data that also reported

distance driven

Number of countries

represented in MVC

database

2008 22 56% 1,258,878 49% 15 68% 69

2009 25 58% 1,072,869 38% 17 68% 81

2010 29 69% 1,614,418 64% 17 59% 73

2011 32 71% 1,793,632 67% 19 59% 85

2012 34 69% 1,747,148 63% 21 62% 94

2013 35 70% 1,614,966 59% 21 60% 86

2014 35 67% 1,813,530 58% 24 69% 79

2015 38 78% 1,767,634 64% 24 63% 90

*represents all reported work hours, not exclusively driving hours

Appendix C. Database dimensions

1 Represents all reported work hours, not exclusively driving hours


Table C.2: Number of companies submitting company and contractor data and their work hours (2008–2015)

Year Company data: Number of companies

submitting

Contractor data: Number of companies

submitting

Company work hours*

‘000s

Contractor work hours*

‘000s

2008 19 20 333,975 924,903

2009 24 21 352,015 720,854

2010 26 28 339,132 1,275,286

2011 31 30 413,748 1,379,884

2012 33 31 369,574 1,377,574

2013 33 34 355,370 1,259,596

2014 33 34 357,416 1,456,114

2015 34 34 408,809 1,358,825


Note: in 2013 two companies reported only company MVC data and three companies reported only contractor data. In 2014 three companies reported only contractor data and one company reported only company data. In 2015 four companies reported only company data.


Table D.1: Companies that reported distance driven in 2015

Company Reported distance driven?

Distance driven (million kilometres)

Reported contractor data?

ADNOC Yes 253.9 YesANADARKO Yes 78.0 NoBG GROUP Yes 92.0 YesBHP BILLITON Yes 20.1 YesBP Yes 170.0 YesCAIRN ENERGY Yes 0.1 YesCHEVRON Yes 572.1 YesDOLPHIN ENERGY Yes 9.1 YesDONG O&G No 0.0 NoE.ON Yes 0.9 YesENGIE E&P INTERNATIONAL No 0.0 YesGALP Yes 0.0 YesHESS CORPORATION Yes 13.8 YesHUSKY Yes 40.0 YesINPEX Yes 29.3 YesKOSMOS No 0.0 YesKUWAIT OIL COMPANY Yes 507.0 YesMAERSK OIL No 0.0 YesMOL No 0.0 NoOIL SEARCH No 0.0 YesOMV Yes 147.3 YesORIGIN Yes 25.3 YesPAN AMERICAN ENERGY Yes 111.3 YesPJSOC BASHNEFT Yes 116.0 YesPLUSPETROL Yes 39.8 YesPTTEP No 0.0 YesQATAR PETROLEUM No 0.0 NoRASGAS Yes 11.7 YesREPSOL Yes 5.4 YesSASOL No 0.0 YesSHELL COMPANIES Yes 135.1 YesSTATOIL No 0.0 YesTALISMAN ENERGY No 0.0 YesTOTAL Yes 55.4 YesTULLOW OIL Yes 6.5 YesWINTERSHALL No 0.0 YesWOODSIDE No 0.0 YesYEMEN LNG No 0.0 Yes

Appendix D. Contributing IOGP Members


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

402015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Group 5+

distance

Group 4+

distance

Group 3+

distance

Group 2+

distance

Group 1+

distance

Group 5Group 4Group 3Group 2Group 1

Com

pani

es

Figure D.2: Number of participating companies and number of companies reporting both crashes and distance driven (2008–2015) (see Table B.10)


In 2013, IOGP conducted a membership survey to determine the level of implementation of Report 365, Land transportation safety recommended practice. The survey results are shown in Figures E.1 and E.2 below.

Yes, fully 50%

Partially - Not all RP sections 20%

No 13%

Partially - Regional differences 18%

Figure E.1: Does your company use and adhere to the IOGP Land Transportation Recommended Practice?

Yes, fully 40%

Partially - Not allRP sections 15%

Partially - Regional differences 33%

No 13%

Figure E.2: Does your company require its contractors to use and adhere to the IOGP Land Transportation Recommended Practice?

Appendix E. Implementation of Report 365, Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice


There were 35 responses, 25 from oil and gas operating companies and 10 from contractor companies, to the question of whether the Report 365 has been implemented for their company and contractors:

• Half of the respondents indicated that their company implements the recommended practice fully.

• 13% of the respondents indicated that their company does not use it at all.

Only 7 respondents reported on the degree of implementation of the specific elements of Report 365 and indicated that:

• The recommended practice on alcohol and drugs and seatbelts is widely in use.• Vehicle specifications, in-vehicle monitoring systems (IVMS) and journey

management are only partially implemented.

Further efforts are required to determine the extent of the influence of the implementation of Report 365 on member companies’ improved performance in relation to land transport fatalities shown since 2008.


Appendix F. Glossary of terms

AAssault and violent act (as an incident/event category)Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a person or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of unknown intent, includes intentional acts of damage to property.

CCaught in, under or between (as an incident/event category)Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly injured between machinery moving parts or other objects, caught between rolling tubulars or objects being moved, crushed between a ship and a dock, or similar incidents. Also includes vehicle incidents involving a rollover.

Causal factorsSee IOGP Report 2014su, Safety data reporting users' guide – 2014 data.

Company employeeAny person employed by and on the payroll of the reporting company, including corporate and management personnel specifically involved in E&P. Persons employed under short-service contracts are included as company employees provided they are paid directly by the company.

Confined space (as an incident/event category)Spaces that are considered confined because their configurations hinder the activities of employee who must enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces include, but are not limited to underground vaults, tanks, storage bins, manholes, pits, silos, process vessels and pipelines.

Construction (as a work function)Major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning)

at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities.

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning (as a type of activity)Activities involving the construction, fabrication and installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing activities to verify design objectives or specification, and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life.

ContractorA contractor is defined as an individual or organization performing work for the reporting company, following verbal or written agreement. Subcontractor is synonymous with contractor.

Contractor employeeAny person employed by a contractor or contractor’s subcontractor(s) who is directly involved in execution of prescribed work under a contract with the reporting company.

Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/event category)Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin.

DDiving operations The personnel, equipment and management systems to support a person who dives. A person dives if they enter water or any other liquid, or a chamber in which they are subject to pressure greater than 100 millibars above atmospheric pressure, and in order to survive in such an environment breathes air or other gas at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for such a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where a sealed internal atmospheric pressure is maintained and where the external pressure differential is greater than 100 millibars.


Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity)Operations involving diving (see definition for diving operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or operations involving underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV).

Drilling (as a work function)All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.

Drilling/workover/well services (as a type of activity) Activities involving the development, maintenance work or remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well.

EEventAn unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business operation or activity that has or could have contributed to an injury, illness, physical or environmental damage.

Exploration (as a work function)Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.

Explosion or burn (as an incident/ event category)Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and extremes of temperature. Explosion means a rapid combustion, not an overpressure.

Exposure: Electrical (as an incident/ event category)Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc.

Exposure: Noise, chemical, biological, vibration (as an incident/event category)Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen not associated with a confined space), hazardous biological material, vibration or radiation.

FFalls from height (as an incident/ event category)A person falls from one level to another.

Fatal accident rate (FAR)The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 000 000 (100 million) hours worked.

FatalityCases that involve one or more people who died as a result of a work-related incident or occupational illness.

First aid caseCases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported as medical treatment or more serious cases but nevertheless require minor first aid treatment, e.g. dressing on a minor cut, removal of a splinter from a finger. First aid cases are not recordable incidents.

HHigh potential eventAny incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities.

Hours workedThe actual hours worked, including overtime hours, are recorded in the case of onshore operations. The hours worked by an individual will generally be about 2,000 per year. For offshore workers, the hours worked are calculated on a 12-hour work day. Consequently, average hours worked per year will vary from 1,600 to 2,300 hours per person depending upon the on/off shift ratio. Vacations and leave are excluded.


Hours worked in year (thousands)Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand.

IIncident An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable injury or illness, or physical or environmental damage.

KKey performance indicators (KPI)In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rate.

LLifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a type of activity)Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and hoisting equipment, assembling and dis-assembling drilling rig equipment and drill pipe handling on the rig floor.

Lost time injury (LTI)A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is the sum of fatalities and lost work day cases.

Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) incidents per 1,000,000 hours worked.

Lost work day case (LWDC)Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which results in a person being unfit for work on any day after the day of occurrence of the occupational injury. Any day includes rest days, weekend days, leave days, public holidays or days after ceasing employment.

LWDC severityThe average number of lost days per lost work day case.

MMaintenance, inspection and testing (as a type of activity)Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities.

Medical cause of deathThis is the cause of death given on the death certificate. Where two types of causes are provided, such as pulmonary oedema caused by inhalation of hot gases from a fire, both are recorded.

Medical treatment case (MTC)Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as fatalities or lost work day cases or restricted work day cases but are more severe than requiring simple first aid treatment.

NNear missAn unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has not resulted in recordable injury, illness, physical or environmental damage but had the potential to do so in other circumstances.

Number of days unfit for workThe sum total of calendar days (consecutive or otherwise) after the days of the occupational injuries on which the employees involved were unfit for work and did not work.

Number of employeesAverage number of full-time and part-time employees involved in exploration and production, calculated on a full-time basis, during the reporting year.

Number of fatalitiesThe total number of a company’s employees and or contractor’s employees who died as a result of an incident. Delayed deaths that occur after the incident are included if the deaths were a direct result of the incident. For example, if a fire killed one person outright, and a second died three weeks later from lung damage caused by the fire, both are reported.


OOccupational injuryAny injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation, or any fatality, which results from a work-related activity or from an exposure involving a single incident in the work environment, such as deafness from explosion, one-time chemical exposure, back disorder from a slip/trip, insect or snake bite.

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering (as a type of activity)Activities related to work conducted in offices, warehouses, workshops, accommodation and catering facilities.

Offshore workAll activities and operations that take place at sea, including activities in bays, in major inland seas such as the Caspian Sea, or in other inland seas directly connected to oceans. Incidents including transportation of people and equipment from shore to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter, should be recorded as offshore.

Onshore workAll activities and operations that take place within a landmass, including those on swamps, rivers and lakes. Land-to-land aircraft operations are counted as onshore, even though flights are over water.

Other (as an incident/event category)Used to specify where an incident cannot be logically classed under any other category. In the case of incident activities, includes air transport incidents Note: the work function ‘other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006.

Overexertion or strain (as an incident/ event category)Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain.

PPressure release (as an incident/ event category)Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a pressurized system.

Process safety eventA process safety event, which can also be referred to as an asset integrity event, is a loss of primary containment (LOPC) and is recordable if:

i. the consequence was a reportable employee or contractor injury or fatality, a third party hospital admission or fatality, a community or site evacuation or a fire/explosion; or

ii. a pressure relief device discharge or material release occurs which exceeded defined thresholds (even if none of the consequences above occurred)

as specified within IOGP Report 456, Process safety – recommended practice on key performance indicators which provides consequence and threshold definitions consistent with API Recommended Practice No.754 http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456.pdf. The supplement to IOGP Report 456 provides process safety upstream PSE examples http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456supp.pdf.

Process safety relatedProcess safety related events are those which do not meet the specific criteria to be classified as Tier 1 or 2 process safety events but which have learning potential in the prevention of process safety events.

Production (as a work function)Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. Gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale including:

• work on production wells under pressure• oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and

separation (primary production)• heavy oil production where it is inseparable from

upstream (i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage) production

• primary oil processing (water separation, stabilization)

http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456.pdf

http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456supp.pdf


• primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids separation, sweetening, CO2 removal)

• floating storage units (FSUs) and sub-sea storage units

• gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale• secondary liquid separation (i.e. natural gas

liquids [NGL] extraction using refrigeration processing)

• liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas to liquids (GTL) operations

• flow-lines between wells and pipelines between facilities associated with field production operations

• oil and gas loading facilities including land or marine vessels (trucks and ships) when connected to an oil or gas production process

• pipeline operations (including booster stations) operated by company E&P business.

Production excludes:

• production drilling or workover• mining processes associated with the extraction of

heavy oil tar sands• heavy oil when separable from upstream operations• secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader)• refineries.

Production operations (as a type of activity)Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons from source such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon bearing geological structure, including primary processing, storage and transport operations. Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations.

RRecordableA type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or other outcome which has been determined to meet or exceed definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion and classification in reported data.

Restricted work day case (RWDC)Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day case which results in a person being unfit for full performance of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury.

Work performed might be:

• an assignment to a temporary job• part-time work at the regular job• working full-time in the regular job but not

performing all the usual duties of the job.

Where no meaningful restricted work is being performed, the incident is recorded as a lost work day case (LWDC).

SSeismic/survey operations (as a type of activity)Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas deposits including geophysical and seismic data acquisition.

Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an incident/event category)Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto something at the same height.

Struck by (as an incident/event category)Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by moving equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling objects. Also includes vehicle incidents where the vehicle is struck by or struck against another object.


TThird partyA person with no business relationship with the company or contractor.

Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

Transport – Air (as a type of activity)Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters. Injuries caused by accidents on the ground at airports are classified in one of the other categories.

Transport – Land (as a type of activity)Involving motorized vehicles designed for transporting people and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks. Pedestrians struck by a vehicle are classified as land transport incidents. Incidents from a mobile crane would only be land transport incidents if the crane were being moved between locations.

Transport – Water, including marine activity (as a type of activity)Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for transporting people and goods over water (including inland, marine, ice roads and marsh/swamp) e.g. supply vessels, crew boats.

UUnspecified – Other (as a type of activity)Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other headings or where the activity is unknown.

Unspecified (as a work function)Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not sepa rated out by function are reported as unspecified.

WWater related/drowning (as an incident/ event category)Incidents/events in which water played a significant role including drowning.

Work-related injurySee occupational injury.


Society of Petroleum Engineers papersSPE paper 157432. Improving the Opportunity for Learning from Industry Safety Data. K. Walker, Schlumberger; W. Poore and S. Fraser, IOGP.

SPE paper 168375. Continuing the Efforts to Learn From Industry Safety Data. K. Walker, Schlumberger; P. Toutain, W. Poore, IOGP.

Report 365 and its Guidance NotesIOGP. Report 365. Land Transportation Safety Recommended Practice. London: October 2014.

IOGP. Report 365-1. Guidance Note 1. Road Hazard Assessment. January 2006.

IOGP. Report 365-2. Guidance Note 2. Journey Management. London: January 2006.

IOGP. Report 365-3. Guidance Note 3. Driver Fitness for Duty Test. London: January 2006.

IOGP. Report 365-4. Guidance Note 4. Road/Vehicle Accident Checklist. London: January 2006.

IOGP. Report 365-5. Guidance Note 5. Common Land Transport Incident KPIs for Motor Vehicle Crashes (MVC). London: March 2016.

IOGP. Report 365-6. Guidance Note 6. Questionnaire/Checklist Assessment for the Implementation of Report. London: January 2006.

IOGP. Report 365-7. Guidance Note 7. Variation for Off-road Operations. London: September 2012.

IOGP. Report 365-8. Guidance Note 8. Driver Trainer Recommended Approach and Profile. London: September 2012.

IOGP. Report 365-9. Guidance Note 9. Driver Qualification Process. London: September 2012.

IOGP. Report 365-10. Guidance Note 10. Journey Management Process. London: September 2012.

IOGP. Report 365-11. Guidance Note 11. Commentary Drive Assessment. London: September 2012.

Bibliography


IOGP. Report 365-12. Guidance Note 12. Implementing an In-vehicle Monitoring Program— A Guide for the Oil and Gas Extraction Industry. London: March 2014.

IOGP. Report 365-14. Guidance Note 14. Vehicle specification and upfitting. London: October 2014.

IOGP. Report 365-15. Guidance Note 15. Bus and coach safety. London: October 2014.

IOGP. Report 365-16. Guidance Note 16. Emergency response vehicles. London: October 2014.

IOGP. Report 365-17. Guidance Note 17. Mobile Construction Equipment. London: October 2014.

IOGP. Report 365gloss. Glossary. Land transportation safety recommended practice – Glossary. London: October 2016.

IOGP Data SeriesIOGP. Report 2015s. Safety Performance Indicators – 2015 Data. London: June 2016.

IOGP. Report 2015su. Safety Data Reporting Users’ Guide, 2015 Data. London: February 2016.

IOGP. 2015sf. Safety Performance Indicators – 2015 Data. Fatal Incidents Report. London: June 2016.

IOGP. 2015sh. Safety Performance Indicators – 2015 Data. High Potential Events Report. London: June 2016.

www.iogp.orgRegistered OfficeCity Tower40 Basinghall Street 14th FloorLondon EC2V 5DE United Kingdom

T +44 (0)20 3763 9700F +44 (0)20 3763 [email protected]

Brussels OfficeBd du Souverain,1654th FloorB-1160 BrusselsBelgium

T +32 (0)2 566 9150 F +32 (0)2 566 [email protected]

Houston Office10777 Westheimer Road Suite 1100 Houston, Texas 77042 United States

T +1 (713) 470 [email protected]

iogp 2015 land transportation safety motor vehicle crash data

Documents