iof malaga 2016 | preventing future fractures: implementing service improvement in fracture liaison...

52
Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing service improvement in Fracture Liaison Services throughout the UK Henry Mace, Professional Development Lead Jo Sayer, Service Development Manager Tim Jones, Commissioning Advisor Friday 15 th April 2016

Upload: national-osteoporosis-society

Post on 16-Apr-2017

624 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing service improvement in

Fracture Liaison Services throughout the UK

Henry Mace, Professional Development LeadJo Sayer, Service Development Manager

Tim Jones, Commissioning Advisor

Friday 15th April 2016

Page 2: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

The National Osteoporosis Society• The only UK-wide charity dedicated to

improving the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis

• Vision: A future without fragility fractures

• Mission: Working together for a brighter future for people with or at risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures across the UK, putting an end to preventable broken bones and helping people to live without pain and disability

Page 3: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK
Page 4: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK
Page 5: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK
Page 6: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK
Page 7: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

7

• 300,000 fragility fractures a year• 85,000 unplanned hospital

admissions for hip fractures alone• 1.8 million hospital bed days• 1 in 4 people die within a year of

suffering a hip fracture • 33% become totally dependent • £1.9 billion in hospital costs

What is the impact of fractures?

Page 8: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

The NHS wants a solution for Secondary Fracture Prevention

Would we accept less than 20% secondary prevention after heart

attack?

Page 9: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

What is the solution?

Page 10: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

10

Fracture Liaison Service (FLS)• An FLS is a proven model for fragility fracture

prevention• 50% of hip fracture patients have had a prior

fragility fracture• All patients > 50 years who fracture are targeted

• Where treatment is initiated

• Up to 25% hip fractures avoided in future

Find them

Assess them

Treat where appropriate Follow-up

Page 11: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

National Osteoporosis SocietyPriorities and Plans for 2016Aim 1: Every person aged over 50 who breaks a bone is assessed for osteoporosis and managed appropriately.Priority 1:

Extend coverage of Fracture Liaison ServicesPriority 2:

Improve quality of Fracture Liaison Services and osteoporosis services

Page 12: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

• FLS Implementation Group• UK FLS Clinical Standards• FLS Implementation Toolkit• FLS Implementation Workshops• Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP)

Training• Peer Review• Service Delivery Team

A National Approach to FLS

Page 13: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

FLS Implementation Group• National stakeholders & Government• Provide strategic leadership and coordination

across projects• Ensure good communication and partnership

across FLS stakeholders• Plan and deliver agreed actions and

milestones• Ensure delivery of high quality, efficient and

cost-effective FLS

Page 14: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Definition of an FLS‘‘A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) systematically

identifies, treats and refers to appropriate services all eligible patients aged over 50 years within a local population who have suffered a fragility fracture, with the aim of reducing their risk of

subsequent fractures.’’

Page 15: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

• FLS Implementation Group• UK FLS Clinical Standards• FLS Implementation Toolkit• FLS Implementation Workshops• Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP)

Training• Peer Review• Service Delivery Team

A National Approach to FLS

Page 16: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Service Delivery Team

Sonya StephensonService Development

Project Manager

Will CarrService Development

Project Manager

Hilary ArdenHead of

Service Delivery

Tim Jones Commissioning

Advisor

Mayrine FraserService Development

Project Manager

Debbie StoneService Development

Project Manager

Fiona GardnerOperation Projects

Officer

Henry MaceProfessional

Development Lead

Jo SayerService Development

Project Manager

Page 17: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

• Facilitate stakeholder engagement• Help establish patient/care pathway• Project manage commissioning/funding:

o The economic and business caseo Service specificationo Resource and capacity planning

• Work with commissioners to ensure services are sustained.

How the Charity Supports Implementation

Page 18: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

• Provide input to enable the development of an FLS meets the UK FLS Clinical Standards

• Help establish data collection, analysis, evaluation and reporting

• Identify gaps in service provision, put in place improvement plans and monitor against agreed actions

• Peer review

How the Charity Supports Implementation

Page 19: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

19

FLS Coverage England NI/IOM Scotland 

Wales  UK 

2015FLS Coverage

47/141 (33%)

4/6 (80%)

7/14 (50%)

6/11 (55%)

64/171 (37%)

Supporting New Service Development

38 0 2 4 44

Supporting Quality

Improvement

40 6 12 6 64

Number of additional sites

engaged

31 3 2 6 42

Total/Potential number of FLS

109/141(77%)

9/9 (100%)

16/16(100%)

16/16(100%)

150/182(82%)

No. of services commissioned

7 0 0 0 7

Page 20: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

FLS: Some Localities

Page 21: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

UK FLS Clinical StandardsThe 5IQ approach describes the key objectives of an FLS:

• Identification

• Investigation

• Information

• Intervention

• Integration

• Quality www.nos.org.uk/fls

Page 22: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

22

No. Standard Rationale

1 IDENTIFICATIONAll patients aged 50 years and over with a new fragility fracture or a newly reported vertebral fracture will be systematically and proactively identified.

Patients who have sustained a fracture are at higher relative risk of fracture than those who have not. Targeted interventions in this population will have most impact on reducing the future fracture burden.

2 INVESTIGATIONPatients will have a bone health assessment and their need for a comprehensive falls risk assessment will be evaluated within 3 months of the incident fracture.

Assessments need to be conducted promptly as the risk of having a further fracture is increased in the first year.

3 INFORMATIONAll patients identified will be offered written information about bone health, lifestyle, nutrition and bone-protection treatments.

Anyone aged over 50 years who has had a fracture needs to be aware of the steps they can take to maintain healthy bones and prevent further fractures.

4 INTERVENTIONPatients at increased risk of further fracture will be offered appropriate bone-protection treatments.

Appropriately targeted interventions reduce future risk of fracture.

5 INTERVENTIONPatients at increased risk of further falls will be referred for appropriate assessment or interventions to reduce future falls.

Evidence-based falls interventions are effective at reducing risk of falls.

FLS Clinical Standards - summary

Page 23: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

23

No. Standard Rationale

6 INTEGRATIONManagement plans will be patient-centred and integrated between primary and secondary care.

Effective communication is essential to ensure that long-term management is achieved and that patients are supported to engage with recommended interventions.

7 INTEGRATIONPatients who are recommended drug therapy to reduce risk of fracture will be reviewed within 4 months of initiation to ensure appropriate treatment has been started, and every 12 months to monitor adherence with the treatment plan.

Treatments must be taken consistently and appropriately over many years to be effective. Follow-up allows early identification of issues (side effects, compliance) with prescribed medications, reinforces need to take treatments and supports long-term concordance.

8 QUALITYCore clinical data from patients identified by the FLS will be recorded on a database. Regular audit and patient experience measures will be performed

Data recorded will allow the FLS to audit and improve the service they provide ensuring that high standards are met and maintained.

9 QUALITYThe FLS team will have appropriate competencies in secondary fracture prevention and will maintain relevant Continued Professional Development (CPD).

All staff need appropriate knowledge, skills and experience to fulfil their role. Engagement with relevant CPD activities ensures that these are up to date.

10 QUALITYThe FLS should engage in a regular peer-review process of quality assurance.

Clinical peer review facilitates quality standard assurance, equitable access to services, and provides a means of benchmarking and sharing best practice.

FLS Clinical Standards - summary

Page 24: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Gap Analysis

Page 25: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Generic FLS Pathway

FALLS RISKASSESSMENT

NEW CLINICAL FRACTURE

NEW VERTEBRALFRACTURE

(RADIOLOGY REPORT)

PREVIOUS FRACTURE OR FRACTURE NOT PRESENTING

TO ACUTE CARE

ORTHO IP

Virtual/#CLINIC

‘CASE-FINDING’ BY FLS‘CASE-FINDING’ BY COTE

‘CASE-FINDING’ BY GP/SEC CARE/CH

FLS RISK ASSESSMENTONE-STOP CLINIC

WITH DXA

EXERCISECLASSES

Rx FOR FRACTURE 2Y PREVENTION

EDUCATIONPROGRAMME

CARE OF THE

ELDERLY

4 & 12 MONTH FOLLOW UP

CLINIC

COMPLEX CLINIC

(IF REQUIRED)

Page 26: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Assist with Stakeholder Meetings • Lead clinician/local

champion• Consultants:

o Endocrinologisto Rheumatologisto Geriatriciano Radiologisto Orthopaedic surgeon

• Osteoporosis nurse specialists

• DXA radiographers• Service manager/s

• Pharmacist• Prescribing advisors• Physiotherapist• GPs/Primary care• CCGs• Commissioners• Health & Wellbeing

Board/s• Public Health• IT• Site services• Patient rep (NOS!)

Page 27: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

27

• Comprehensive service review- professional credibility

• Assessment of Service

• Clinical Governance

Quality Assurance

Peer Review

Page 28: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP) Training

• Officially launched April 2015 • Web-based training at Foundation and

Advanced levels • 478 healthcare professionals registered• 120 accredited FPPs• Accessed by over 130 different hospital trusts

and GP practices • Accessed from across 15 different countries

(US, AUS, NZ, SA, CA, ROI, FR)

Page 29: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

FPP Training

Endorsed by:

www.nos.org.uk/fpp

Page 30: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

30

FLS Implementation Toolkit1. Promotes commissioning of effective high-quality

services that are integrated within a system-wide approach

2. Ensures services are in accord with the evidence base and able to demonstrate outcomes

3. Stimulates provision of services that are sustainable

4. Make implementation easier, cheaper and more effective for commissioners and providers.

Page 31: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Contents Name Description Format

UK FLS Standards Clinical standards for FLS PDF

The Case for FLS A summary of evidence for providers and commissioners PDF

Service Specification A part populated service specification suitable for use with NHS Standard Contracts

MS Word

Benefits Calculator A financial model demonstrating potential cost savings Web

Cost Calculator A financial model to calculate the service requirements MS Excel

Service Improvement Guide A descriptive guide setting out step-by-step actions for providers to achieve a service improvement

PDF

Outcome and Performance Indicators

Practical, evidence-based indicators to demonstrate service improvement

MS Excel

Improvement Project Plan A list of tasks and activities for a development project MS Excel

Business Case Part populated case for investment in FLS MS Word

Page 32: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

To secure funding / reimbursement you need to show…

Benefits less

Costs =

Value

Page 33: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

Whose benefit? £Payor

Page 34: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

34

Two calculators• Have been designed by clinicians and payors• Have been used in more than 30 sites• Are regularly updated and revised• Are based on proven service models• Are based on empirical data (not clinical trials)• Use local age-stratified population

Page 35: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

35

The FLS Benefits Calculator

There is an online version (UK only) at http://benefits.nos.org.uk

Page 36: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

36

Define populationStep 2 - Select population cohort for analysis (by age/gender)

Male FemaleInclude within analysis? Yes YesAge from 50 - 54 50 - 54Age to 85 + 85 +

Percent of population in

hospital catchment

Population for inclusion

97.0% 234,200

10.0% 7,560

Select one or more from list

NHS Oxfordshire CCG

NHS Aylesbury Vale CCG

Page 37: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

37

Estimate fracture incidence from population

Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Number of fractures expected based on incidence data

324 371 1,292 297

Page 38: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

38

Estimate number to be treatedReference

Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Number of fractures expected based on incidence data

1 765 876 3,047 702

677 463 1515 210Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Proportion of patients to be seen in the FLS

2 88.48% 52.81% 49.72% 29.84%

Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Predicted number of FLS patients by category

677 463 1,515 210

Svedbom et al, Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in UK, Archives of Osteoporosis, 2013 8:137, P212

Incidence is calculated for age bands selected and applied to the input population. Parameters for 'Other site' in Calculator is calculated from 'forearm' and 'other' in source paper above.

Page 39: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

39

Apply rate of prevention

Department of Health, Fracture prevention services: An economic evaluation, 2009

Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Expected proportion of fractures prevented

2.26% 1.13% 1.13% 0.75%

YearHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

2016 31.42% 40.16% 40.16% 31.44%2017 22.29% 19.69% 19.69% 25.71%2018 22.86% 17.32% 17.32% 21.90%2019 14.29% 14.17% 14.17% 13.33%2020 9.14% 8.66% 8.66% 7.62%

All years 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Page 40: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

40

Calculate number of fractures prevented

Number of fractures prevented in each of 5 years for patients treated all years

YearHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

2015 6 4 4 22016 11 6 6 42017 16 8 8 52018 19 10 10 62019 21 11 11 7

All years 73 39 39 24

Page 41: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

41

Multiply by benefits per fracture

References – various, available on request

Estimated costsHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Acute care £7,791 £1,715 £314 £1,867Community and primary care £448 £57 £57 £59Social care £8,237 £150 £150 £2,908All £16,476 £1,922 £521 £4,833

Page 42: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

42

YearHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral Total Average benefit per year

Acute care 2016 £162,580 £23,257 £4,264 £13,636 £203,7372017 £284,515 £35,780 £6,560 £23,376 £350,2312018 £414,579 £46,514 £8,528 £33,116 £502,7372019 £495,869 £55,459 £10,168 £40,908 £602,4042020 £552,772 £60,826 £11,152 £44,804 £669,554

All years £1,910,315 £221,836 £40,672 £155,840 £2,328,663 £465,733

YearHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral Total Average benefit per year

Community and 2016 £8,960 £741 £741 £413 £10,855primary care 2017 £15,680 £1,140 £1,140 £708 £18,668

2018 £22,848 £1,482 £1,482 £1,003 £26,8152019 £27,328 £1,767 £1,767 £1,239 £32,1012020 £30,464 £1,938 £1,938 £1,357 £35,697

All years £105,280 £7,068 £7,068 £4,720 £124,136 £24,827

YearHip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral TotalAverage benefit per

yearSocial care 2016 £164,740 £1,950 £1,950 £20,356 £188,996

2017 £288,295 £3,000 £3,000 £34,896 £329,1912018 £420,087 £3,900 £3,900 £49,436 £477,3232019 £502,457 £4,650 £4,650 £61,068 £572,8252020 £560,116 £5,100 £5,100 £66,884 £637,2000

All years £1,935,695 £18,600 £18,600 £232,640 £2,205,535 £441,107

Page 43: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

43

The FLS Cost Calculator

This is not available on line

Page 44: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

44

Input data neededEstimated number of cases expected in Year 1

Hip fracture (inpatient)

Other fracture site (inpatient)

Other fracture site (outpatient)

Clinical vertebral

Calculated Total

Patients aged 50 - 74

0

Patients aged 75+

0

Total Patients

Patients aged 50 - 74Patients aged 75+

User input from Benefits Calculator or local audit.

User input if split by type of fracture is not known

Page 45: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

45

Output - Numbers of staff

WTE = whole time equivalent means one year working full time

Staff WTE required - non-tariff activity2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

WTE - nurse assessment appointments 1.27 0.74 0.63 0.63 1.06WTE - consultant planned activities 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06WTE - other nurse activities 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37WTE - radiology planned activities 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06WTE - administration 0.80 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12

Page 46: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

46

Output – numbers of appointments/scans

Summary of tariff activity 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Number of Dexa scans at tariff 950 950 950 950 950

Number of consultant appointments at tariff 2 2 2 2 2

Selected speciality

Number of nurse follow up appointments 633 1853 1853 1853 1853

Rheumatology

Page 47: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

47

Output – costs of service

Total costs2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

TOTAL COSTS £187,070 £200,181 £190,262 £190,262 £205,777

Cost per patient £94 £100 £95 £95 £103

Page 48: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

48

You can override any dataResource for assessment appointments

Length of appointment (minutes) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Default 30 30 30 30 30User defined 25 20 20 20

Length of support time (minutes) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Default 30 30 30 30 30User defined 10 10 10

Staff Grade 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Afc Band of staff Band 6 Band 6 Band 5 Band 5 Band 5Default annual salary £30,186 £30,186 £24,685 £24,685 £24,685User defined annual salary

Productive time % 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Default 81.00% 81.00% 81.00% 81.00% 81.00%User defined

Employment on-costs 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Default employment on-costs 27.10% 27.10% 27.10% 27.10% 27.10%User defined employment on-costs

Page 49: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

The financial case

• Costs = 37% of benefits

• Break even – 13 – 20 months from start of service

Page 50: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

50

How will you know if it is working?

Outcomes framework and reporting tool available for download at www.nos.org.uk/toolkit

Outcome Month 3 6 9 12 15 18 24Number of cases treated compared to predictedNumber of patient followed up at 4 monthsAdherence at 4 monthsNumber of patient followed up at 12 monthsAdherence at 12 monthsReduction in hip fractures admittedReduction in other fractures admitted

Outcome detected Outcome detected Statistically significant

with limited confidence outcome

Page 51: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

51

FLS BenefitsArea Population Cohort

(50+)Hip fractures prevented*

Total benefits (of hip fractures prevented)*

Bradford 459,142 129,011 119 £1,960,644East Sussex 374,801 167,905 188 £3,097,488Epsom 405,456 119,974 115 £1,894,740Rotherham 258,751 96,591 66 £1,111,902Salisbury 144,835 59,786 59 £972,084Stoke-on-Trent 214,991 88,334 88 £1,449,888Vale of York 348,363 131,411 128 £2,108,928Total 2,206,339 793,012 763 £12,595,674*Over a 5 year period

Page 52: IOF Malaga 2016 | Preventing Future Fractures: Implementing Service Improvement In Fracture Liaison Services Throughout The UK

52

National Osteoporosis Society

www.nos.org.uk

0808 800 0035