introduction to rfmems (microelectromechanical...

117
Microsystems Integration Laboratory Introduction to RFMEMS (Microelectromechanical Systems) Yu-Ting Cheng Microsystems Integration Laboratory (MIL) Department of Electronics Engineering National Chiao Tung University

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Introduction to RFMEMS (Microelectromechanical Systems)

    Yu-Ting Cheng

    Microsystems Integration Laboratory (MIL)

    Department of Electronics Engineering

    National Chiao Tung University

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Rf mems components and technology Antennas:

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    dx

    dxdLzdx

    zdxdL

    ddx

    dzdL

    x

    )(

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Capacitive Transducers

    • Parallel-plate capacitor:

    dg

    dCV

    A

    QW

    A

    gQ

    C

    QW(Q)

    εA

    QECVQdqqVW

    g

    A

    q

    2222

    0

    2

    1

    2Force,

    22 :Energy Potential Stored

    :Field Electrical, :Charge ,)( :Energy

    C :eCapacitanc

    Fixed plate

    W g

    V

    I

    L

    Movable plate

    Z •We can store energy in the capacitor by either fixing the gap and changing the charge Q, or by fixing the charge and changing the gap.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Two-Port Electro-Mechanical Capacitor

    • The capacitor has two port as shown in the following figure:

    • Electrical parameters: voltage V and current I • Mechanical parameters: Force F and velocity v

    W (Q, d)

    Capacitor

    F V

    I=-dQ/dt v=dg/dt

    A

    QgV

    A

    QW

    A

    gQ

    C

    QW(Q)

    2Force

    ,22

    2

    22

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Sensitivity

    g

    W

    S

    S

    vs.

    dx

    dC

    CC

    SS

    dx

    dCS

    ca

    cg

    ccr

    c

    :area overlap varying gap varyingof Comparison

    1:ysensitivit Normalized

    :ySensitivit

    00

    From Prof. K.

    Najafi’s MEMS Slides

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Mechanical-Electrical Equivalent

    From Prof. K.

    Najafi’s MEMS Slides

    Mechanical Electrical

    Variable Velocity

    Force

    Current

    Voltage

    Lumped Elements Compliance (1/k)

    Mass (m)

    Damper (c, or b)

    Capacitor (C)

    Inductor (L)

    Resistance (R)

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Factors in The Design

    • Fringing Fields: around the perimeter of the electrodes in a capacitive device, the electrical field lines have to bend which are called fringing fields. The fringing fields will make the actual area between the two plates appear larger.

    • Air Damping: for many capacitive transducers, we see limitation on bandwidth caused by a phenomenon called air damping. Most of these sensors operate at atmospheric pressures, and when the movable electrode moves, it has to push or squeeze air in and out of the very small gap in between electrodes which is called” squeeze film damping”. There is also viscous drag damping when two plates move parallel to another.

    )ln(2

    g

    WW

    g

    AC

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Squeeze Film and Viscous Drag Damping

    • Squeeze film damping

    • Viscous Drag Damping

    )./101.81 :(air fluidambient ofViscosity :

    ,~

    5- smkg

    MKA

    dQ

    air moving out of the gap

    Plate moving down

    separation Gap :

    Length :

    width: where

    )()/( 3

    g

    L

    W

    Lg

    WLWfb

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Type Switch

    Series contact switch:

    contacts.between separation physical theis and

    capacitor, theof area effective : voltage,applied :

    ratio. sPoisson' and modulus sYoung' theare and

    ly.respective beam, theof

    thicknessand length, width, thware and , , where

    2

    )1(6

    2

    2

    0

    3

    332

    g

    AV

    E

    tLW

    g

    AVF

    Wt

    L

    E

    LF

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Hysteresis Behavior

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Switch Factors

    MEMS switches, in general, work with very high driving

    voltage which is about several tens voltage. Such high

    actuation voltage make the switches far beyond the

    compatibility of standard IC technology because for RF

    applications and microelectronic systems the voltage

    should be around 5V.

    In order to achieve the goal, several approaches have

    been implemented for the design of the RF MEMS

    switches: (a)increasing the area of actuation (b)

    decreasing the gap between the switch and the bottom

    electrode, ( c ) designing the structure with a low spring

    constant.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Flexible Structural Design

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS

    and Their Applications ,

    Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Rf mems components and technology SP3T switch

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitive Switches

    • Voltage actuation For voltage actuation, a dc potential is applied between the bridge and the base

    electrode. The force downward on a charged beam above a ground plane is

    proportional to the square of the electric field E on the beam.

    V: applied voltage

    g: the height of the beam above the ground plane

    go: is the undeflected height

    A : the area

    K: spring constant include the beam thickness,

    length, and width, the Young's modulus, residual

    stress

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitive Switches

    • Voltage actuation

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitive Switches

    • Capacitance Ratio

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Switch

    Top view of the NTU capacitive shunt

    switch

    Cross section

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitors

    Feature

    • Remove lossy substrate from

    beneath

    • Tunable with movable,metallic

    MEMS structure

    Characteristics

    • High quality factor (Q)

    • Tunable

    Suspended capacitor

    Suspended metal-insulator-metal capacitor

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitors

    Top view of the the three-plate polysilicon MEMS varactor

    Cross section

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    High Performance Capacitors

    A metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor fabricated on a suspended

    membrane shows that the best Q of a 2.6pF capacitor exceeds 100 at

    2GHz as compared wit the same capacitor fabricated directly on silicon

    which has a Q less than 10.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Gap-Tuning Capacitor

    Structure: the electrodes are 200um by 200um with2 um by 2um holes

    spaced 10um apart.

    Performance: Q~62. The capacitance varied from 2.11 to 2.46 pF when

    applied voltage changed from 0 to 5.5.V, which corresponds to a tuning

    range of 16%

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Fundamentals of MEMS Gap-Tuning Capacitor

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MESA (MicroElevator by Self-Assembly) Capacitor

    The 250x250 um2 polysilicon plate is raised above the substrate by four

    300um long side supports which are controlled by microactuators. The

    capacitance is changed from 500fF to 20fF when the suspended

    electrode is raised by 250um.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Area-Tuning Capacitors

    The variable capacitor provides

    a capacitance change from

    0.035pF to 0.1pF with bias

    voltages ranging from 80 to 200V.

    The capacitor provides

    continuous tuning range of at

    least 200% or 3:1 tuning ratio.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Capacitors

    Top view of the University of Illinois Wide-tuning-range

    varactor

    Cross section

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    PZT (PizeoElectric-actuator) Tuning Capacitor

    A MEMS capacitor integrating

    with pizeoelectric actuator has

    advantages such as low driving

    voltages and linear tuning

    capacitance

    The PZT actuators are fabricated

    on silicon substrate and are diced

    and bonded to TML on a quartz

    substrate using flip-chip bonding

    technology.

    Low driving voltage ~6V

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Planar Inductors

    High Q’s (> 30) RF components

    are required for high frequency

    selectivity in communication

    systems especially for the high-

    performance low power RF

    transceivers.

    For the compactness requirement,

    on-chip planar inductor and diode

    capacitor design becomes the

    major approach in the fabrication of

    RF front end transceivers.

    In general, the Qs of planar spiral

    inductors or junction dioide

    capacitors are only of the order of

    low 10s at higher frequencies.

    inductance mutual the:

    segments.straight theall

    of inductance self theof sum the:

    .inductance total the:

    0

    0

    M

    L

    L

    MLL

    T

    T

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cont.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cont.

    The quality factor Q of an inductor is written as Q=L/R, where is the

    operating frequency.

    The separation between lines should be as small as possible.

    The circular spiral inductor has a shorter conductor then square spiral

    and the Q is about 10% higher than that of a square spiral having the

    same value of d0

    Higher Q can be achieved with increasing the number of turns per unit

    area; however, it also lowers the self-resonance frequency as a result of

    the increase in capacitance

    To avoid parasitic effects, the maximum diameter of the inductor should

    be less than /30.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Lumped Model of An Planar Spiral

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Substrate Effect

    Simulation Results:

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Air Gap Design

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Spiral Inductor with Air Gap

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Resistance Effect

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Type Inductor Design

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cont.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Summary

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and Their Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cont.

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cont.

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and

    Their Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Evolution of MEMS Type Capacitors

    Varadan et al., RF MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Filters

    Low-pass filter, high-pass filter, bandpass filter, and bandstop filter are

    very important components in RF circuit which are designed to accept or

    reject frequencies containing desired information.

    Varadan et al., RF

    MEMS and Their

    Applications , Wiley

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Micromachined Suspended Inductor and The Reliability Issue

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Process Flow of The Optimum Design

    Un-Deformed Spiral Inductor

    ANSYS Simulator for Mechanical Analysis

    Node Solution and Node Coordinate

    Deformed Spiral Inductor with Node Coordinate

    Re-building the Deformed Spiral Inductor in HFSS Simulator

    Equivalent Circuit Model Parameters Extraction

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Inductance Variation of the Suspended Inductor Due to the Accelerative

    Disturbance

    •Morphology deformation would result in large inductance variation

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Suspended Inductor with the Blanket Membrane Supporting

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Reliability Issue of The Blanket Membrane Inductor

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Fields Analysis and The Mechanical Analysis of the Micromachined Inductor

    The surrounding magnetic

    fields

    Orthogonal Magnetic Fileds

    Weak Magnetic Coupling

    Parallel Magnetic Fields

    Strong Magnetic Coupling

    The surrounding magnetic

    fields

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Thermal Stress Analysis of the Optimized Micromachined Inductor

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Fabrication Procedure of the Optimized Micromachined Inductor

    The proposed optimum inductor.

    The process flow of the optimum inductor.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Result & Discussion -Temperature Variation

    The inductance

    variation is

    increased with

    the increasing

    frequency.

    The increasing

    trend of the

    inductance

    variation is

    shifted to the

    higher

    frequency.

    Due to the

    unstable

    suspended

    structure and the

    complex motion,

    the inductance

    variation is not

    related with

    frequency directly.

    The thermal stress can

    be released by the

    corner region

    The deformation can be

    shifted to the corner.

    Low restrictive region

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Comparison of the Performance Between the Suspended, Blanket Membrane

    and Cross Membrane Inductors

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    The Modeling of Micromachined Inductor

    Ls Rs

    Cs

    Ls : physics-based closed-form expression [1]

    Cs : Distributed capacitance model (DCM) [2]

    Rs :

    depthskintheist

    w

    lRs

    ,

    exp1

    freq (2.000GHz to 12.00GHz)

    S(2

    1,2

    1)

    S(2

    1,2

    2)

    S(2

    5,2

    5)

    S(2

    5,2

    6)

    S(2

    4,2

    4)

    S(2

    4,2

    3)

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 112 12

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    -12

    0

    freq, GHz

    dB

    (S(2

    1,2

    1))

    dB

    (S(2

    5,2

    5))

    dB

    (S(2

    4,2

    4))

    dB[S11]

    Simulated by equivalent model

    Simulated by HFSS

    Measured result

    Compare the model, simulation, and measured results

    of inductor @2.3nH for frequency 2~12 GHz.

    dB

    S11

    S11

    S12

    Complete optimized design

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Physics-Based Closed-Form Inductance Expression

    l

    nd

    l

    nd

    nd

    l

    nd

    lnn

    twn

    llLp

    441

    441ln147.02.0ln

    2

    22

    0

    1231123

    i

    ii

    Nn

    NNnswd

    Distributed Capacitance Model (DCM)

    1

    1

    2)]1(1[4

    1n

    k

    kmms kdkdlCC

    kk hhhhkd 121

    kkk

    k lllllll

    h 121, .

    1ln

    0)(

    tw

    sC

    effr

    mm

    where w is the metal width, s is the spacing between segments, n is the number of turns,

    Ni is the integer part of n, and l is the total length of inductor

    ococps LLLL , is the contribution of inductance of the bridge.

    , the capacitance per unit length between adjacent metal tracks.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Kramers Kronig Relations

    • Anomalous Dispersion

    • Standing Wave B.C.’s

    • Compton Scattering

    • Inductance

    '

    'Im''

    2Re

    0 220

    dP

    '

    'Re'

    2Im

    0 22

    0

    dP

    rh

    qrE ˆ

    12csc2

    4sin8

    4

    1)(

    22

    0

    ))(Re1(02

    dI

    dvBHL

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    • Electron kinetic energy in sample metal

    Determination of Self-Resonant Frequency

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    • Scattering potential in corners

    Determination of Self-Resonant frequency

    inductor) (circular for , 7.24

    24

    4

    for , 2

    csc8

    4sin8

    4

    2

    3/2

    2

    2

    22

    32

    2

    eff

    effC

    NV

    q

    NV

    q

    E

    • Self-resonant frequency

    CLr ENE

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    • Frequency-depended form of inductance

    Determination of Inductance

    1

    2

    0

    3

    0 rec 1exp 2

    TkAn

    lnL

    B

    rrtotale

    1

    2

    0

    3

    0 oct 1exp 5

    3

    TkAn

    lnL

    B

    rrtotale

    1

    2

    0

    3

    0 cir 1exp

    TkAn

    lnL

    B

    rrtotale

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Model Validation

    Comparisons (n=3.5)

    SRF based on the model (GHz)

    SRF based on HFSS (GHz)

    Rectangular 23.9 22.9

    Octagonal 24.9 23.6

    Circular 25.8 24.6

    Number of Turns 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5

    ωr for HFSS (GHz) 39.5 27.1 22.9 20.6 19.4

    ωr for the model 38.6 28.6 23.9 21.4 19.9

    ωr for G model X X X X X

    L for HFSS @ 3GHz(nH) 1.58 2.94 4.27 5.31 6.01

    L for the model @ 3GHz 1.18 2.65 4.13 5.32 5.95

    L for G model @ 3GHz 1.60 3.02 4.28 5.18 5.60

    L for HFSS @ 5GHz 1.58 2.99 4.38 5.49 6.21

    L for the model @ 5GHz 1.19 2.71 4.25 5.51 6.20

    L for HFSS @ 9GHz 1.63 3.22 4.92 6.31 7.23

    L for the model @ 9GHz 1.24 2.91 4.74 6.33 7.30

    Less CPU processing time 6400 times difference (Ansoft HFSS)

    *3.4GHz double CPUs and 2048MB DDR2 RAMs.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Inductors

    Feature

    • Remove substrate from

    beneath coil

    • Achieve 3D coil

    geometry

    Characteristics

    • High quality factor (Q)

    • High resonant frequency

    • Compact size

    Micromachined inductors on thin

    membranes.

    The resonant frequency 70 GHz for

    the 1.1 nH inductor.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Inductors

    An on-chip tunable micro

    inductor with moveable

    magnetic core in the 3D on-

    chip solenoid coil

    Schematic of an on-chip tunable micro inductor

    http://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htmhttp://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htm

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Inductors

    An on-chip 3D arch-shape

    solenoid inductor

    A 3D on-chip toroidal

    inductor

    http://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htmhttp://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htm

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Inductors

    Micromachined 3D copper

    spiral inductors integrated on

    a TSMC-fabricated

    RFIC chip

    A 3D on-chip solenoid

    inductor with nano magnet wire

    core integrated in it

    http://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htmhttp://mems.utdallas.edu/pictures/rfid/index.htm

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Transmission Lines

    Feature

    • Substrate removed from

    between or beneath

    coplanar waveguide

    transmission lines

    Characteristics

    • Greatly reduced

    dielectric loss

    • Transmission is

    conductor loss limited

    • Reduction in unwanted

    moding of CPW

    W-band micromachined coupled-line filter

    Cross-section of the filter structure

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Distributed Phase Shifters

    Periodic loading of transmission lines with MEMS

    capacitive switches creates a structure with a variable phase

    velocity

    • Circuit schematic of the phase shifter

    • Equivalent Circuit

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Distributed Phase Shifters

    • Photograph of the fabricated one bit phase shifter

    • Photograph of the fabricated three bit phase shifter

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Switched delay line Phase Shifters

    The switches of the phase shifters in a cascaded are

    configured in different lines which can be selectively

    controlled for the propagation of RF signals

    • Circuit schematic of the phase shifter

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Switched delay line Phase Shifters

    • Photograph of the fabricated switched

    delay line phase shifter

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Phase Array Antenna

    Principle of a phased array antenna using phase shifters

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Resonator

    Vertically-Driven Micromechanical Resonator

    • To date, most used design to achieve VHF frequencies

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Resonator

    • Photograph of the fabricated

    HF MEMS Resonator

    • Extracted Q =8,000

    (vacuum)

    • Freq. influenced by dc-

    bias and Anchor effect

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Transceiver Front-End Architecture Using Vibrating Micromechanical Signal Processers

    •Proposed and Developed by Professor Nguyen at UM

    •Courtesy by Professor Nguyen

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Filter

    • Photograph of the fabricated HF Spring-

    Coupled Micromechanical Filter

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS-Based Transceiver Architecture

    Micromechanics are shaded in green

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS-Based Transceiver Architecture

    Micromechanics are shaded in green

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    RF MEMS Circuit

    C. T. C. Nguyen, Proceeding,

    1998, Sensors Expo. 447~455.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Wine-Glass Micromechanical-Disk Reference Oscillator -Nguyen

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Wine-Glass Micromechanical

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Wine-Glass Micromechanical-Disk Reference Oscillator -Nguyen

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Packaging Object

    • MEMS packaging: Object: a system

    IC +Mechanical+Optical+Bio...

    Function:

    protect system and provide

    special environment for inside

    devices

    Cost:

    More than 30% of product

    expense in IC than MEMS cost

    more!!!

    ADXL50 by Analog Devices. Inc.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Packaging Challenge

    • MEMS Packaging Challenge : no universal solutions, cost could be very high, multi-disciplines required but very few research effort.

    Hermetic/vacuum package

    Low temperature package

    High density IC interconnects (with IC integration)

    Chemical resistant

    Special requirements: high precision, high g shock, and high melting point…….

    • Solution: Using existing IC packaging solutions:

    MCM, BGA, Flip chip techniques, 3-D stacking….etc..

    Developing several unit processes for MEMS packaging applications

    Wafer to wafer bonding using anodic or fusion bonding

    Localized heating and bonding (LHB) technique

    High precise splicing using micropipes

    Metal composite for 3-D through via Interconnects

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    • Post-process packaging method: lid sealing, wafer bonding, and microshell encapsulation

    More process flexibility in the system

    Hermetic Encapsulation Approach

    • Integrated encapsulation:

    DC V

    AC V

    DC V

    AC V

    DC V

    AC V

    DC V

    AC V

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Localized Heating

    • Finite element analysis shows isotherms around a 5 m wide microheater capped with a pyrex glass substrate

    5m

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    mechanical Resonators with On-chip Resistive heaters

    • Design layout • Close SEM View

    • SEM of µ-mechanical resonators before vacuum encapsulation

    Aluminum(Si) Solder

    Folded-Beam, Comb Drive

    µMechanical Resonator

    • SEM of the resonator after breaking glass cap

    Ground Pad Bias Pad

    Sense Pad

    Drive Pad

    Anneal Pad

    Aluminum/Si Solder

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Device Fabrication Processes

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Scheme of Vacuum Encapsulation

    Device Substrate

    Glass Cap

    Pressure

    Heating Pad

    PECVD

    Vacuum ~ 25 mtorr,

    input power: 3.4 W,

    bonding time: 10 mins

    1st Step : resonator and glass cap fabrication

    2nd Step : alignment and contact

    3rd Step : vacuum and bonding

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Vacuum Encapsulated High Q resonator

    •Transmission spectrum with 120 mins. waiting time

    -80

    -65

    -50

    -35

    -20

    57.68 57.73 57.78 57.83 57.88

    Frequency [KHz]

    Tra

    ns

    mis

    sio

    n [

    dB

    ] Q=9600

    •Q factor vs. Pressure Q factor vs. Pressure

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    0.0001 0.01 1 100 10000Torr

    Q f

    ac

    tor

    Before

    Annealing

    After

    Annealing

    Before

    Annealing

    with higher Q

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Reliability

    •IEEE/ASME, JMEMS, Oct. , 2002, ~54 weeks

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Wafer Level Chip Scale Packaging Design

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    What is SOC?

    • SOC means “System on a Chip”. It is defined that the system contains embedded CPU, memory, interface circuits, such as USB, PCI, Internet, and mixed-signal blocks..etc.

    • In fact, it should contains more and more functional chips including MEMS sensors and actuators in the future.

    • Driving forces: demanding application, shrinking product cycles, process technology, and the need for mass productivity with lower cost.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Is Hermetic Package Necessary to MEMS?

    • Wafer level process cost • Structure release or dicing first?

    •Failed capacitive accelerometer.

    (a) washed out during the dicing process.

    (b) stuck to the bottom electrode during the dicing process.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Low temperature wafer level hermetic encapsulation

    • Low temperature wafer level hermetic encapsulation using UV curable adhesive (IEEE 54TH ECTC, 2004)

    Figure 10. Four inch wafer level bonding.

    Air Trapping

    600μm

    Figure 11. A packaged overlapping parallel capacitor.

    Capacitor

    Wafer

    Contact Pad

    Glass Protection Cap

    •Encapsulated accelerometer

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Packaging Process

    Figure 2. UV curable adhesive wafer level bonding scheme

    Transparent Vacuum Chuck

    Contact Pads

    UV Curable Adhesive

    Wafer

    Glass Protection Cap

    Device

    Separation Cut

    Die Cut

    Figure 4. The removal of glass over contact pads.

    Contact Pad

    Dummy

    Clip

    Glass Cap

    Vacuum Chuck Windshield

    Double Side Tape

    Figure 7. Second spin setup.

    (a)

    Glass Protection Cap

    Silicon Substrate

    UV Curable

    Adhesive

    Residue

    Bonding

    Region

    Glass Protection

    Cap

    Silicon Substrate

    Bonding

    Region

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Systems on a Package (SOP)

    •Goal: With the same performance as SOC (Systems on a Chip) using standard Si processes but with lower cost and higher manufacture yield.

    SCC

    DRAM

    DRAM DRAM

    DRAM

    CPUs with e-DRAM

    MSC

    Transceivers

    Transducers SCC SCD SCD MSC

    •Sze et al.,

    •2-D MCM

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    SoC: From Board to Chip

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    SoC (System-on-chip)

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Trends of Process Technology

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cu Interconnects

    Moore’s Law: the number of transistors per square inch on integrated

    circuitry had doubled every year since the integrated circuit was invented.

    Although in subsequent years, the pace slowed down a bit, but data

    density has doubled approximately every 18 months, and this is the current

    definition of Moore's Law.

    Chip Area (mm2)

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Cu Interconnects

    The speed limitations of circuitry caused by interconnects can be

    simply estimated based on the delay time:

    linect interconne theofy resistivit theis and field fringing the todue isK

    oxide, theofconstant dielectric theis K where

    1189.089.0

    I

    ox

    2

    0

    sox

    oxILWLHx

    LKKRC

    Ref. Havemann et al. IEEE,

    2001

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Capacitive Delay of Interconnections

    An interconnection can be treated as a capacitor which

    can either be charged and discharged using the inverter

    circuit as shown in the following since the capacitance

    arises in part from the metal conductors of the

    interconnect and ground circuitry. The stray capacitance is

    also introduced by the physical proximity of other

    interconnects.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    國立交通大學 電子與資訊研究中心 National Chiao-Tung University

    Microelectronics and Information Systems Research Center

    110

    2003 ITRS Roadmap

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Challenges in the Present and Future System Integration

    • Data communication speed limited

    • Process limited; hard to optimize system performance

    • High testing cost and thermal problem in a complex

    SOC system

    • Signal Integrity

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    DRIE for Packaging Applications

    Recent 3-D Packaging Structure; Sharp.

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    3-D Stacked Chip Concept

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    3-D Stacked Chip Concepts

    RPI Fraunhofer Institute

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Packaging Technology Roadmap

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    Si Based Heterogeneous Integration

    Performance Cost Form Factor Process Complexity

    Conventional SOC

    (System-on-Chip)

    Excellent Low

    (Batch Process)

    Small Complicate

    Silicon Based

    SOP

    (System-on-Package)

    Could be Similar to SOC

    Could be the Same (Batch Process)

    Could be Same Area to SOC but thicker structure

    Could be Simpler

  • Microsystems Integration Laboratory

    MEMS Challenges

    • From device fabrication point of view: the challenge is to integrated and process all of these heterogeneous materials together in a complex microsystems. Sometimes it has to include planar, nonplanar fabrication technologies, such as IC processes, micromilling, laser micromachining, wafer bonding…etc.,

    • From product point of view: there is no reliable method yet that would qualify as a versatile post-process packaging for MEMS with the rigorous process requirements of low temperature, hermetic sealing, and long-term stability….etc.