introduction to patient safety research presentation 2 - measuring harm: direct observation mixed...

19
Introduction to Patient Safety Research Introduction to Patient Safety Research Presentation 2 - Measuring Harm: Direct Observation Mixed Methods Study

Upload: barry-goodwin

Post on 29-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Introduction to Patient Safety ResearchIntroduction to Patient Safety Research

Presentation 2 - Measuring Harm: Direct Observation Mixed Methods Study

Presentation 2 - Measuring Harm: Direct Observation Mixed Methods Study

2: Introduction: Study Details Full ReferenceFull Reference

Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A look into the A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003, 12; 143-147 unit. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003, 12; 143-147

Link to Abstract (HTML)Link to Full Text (PDF)

3: Introduction: Patient Safety Research Team

Lead researcher – Dr. Yoel Donchin, MD Lead researcher – Dr. Yoel Donchin, MD Director of Patient Safety and Professor of Director of Patient Safety and Professor of

AnaethesiologyAnaethesiology Patient Safety Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Patient Safety Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University

Medical Centre in Jerusalem, IsraelMedical Centre in Jerusalem, Israel Field of expertise: Field of expertise: anaesthesia human factors anaesthesia human factors

engineeringengineering Other team membersOther team members

D. GopherD. Gopher M. OlinM. Olin Y. Badihi Y. Badihi M. BieskyM. Biesky C. L. SprungC. L. Sprung R. Pizov R. Pizov S. CotevS. Cotev

4: Background: Opening Points

Human factors engineering focuses on the study of Human factors engineering focuses on the study of the interface between humans and their working the interface between humans and their working environment, with a particular emphasis on environment, with a particular emphasis on technology technology Main goal is to improve the match between technology, Main goal is to improve the match between technology,

task requirements and the ability of workers to cope task requirements and the ability of workers to cope with task demandswith task demands

Health industry has largely neglected this approachHealth industry has largely neglected this approach

5: Background: Study Rationale

A previous review concluded that reducing the A previous review concluded that reducing the incidence of the preventable medical errors would incidence of the preventable medical errors would require identifying causes and developing methods require identifying causes and developing methods to prevent errors or reduce their effectto prevent errors or reduce their effect Almost no attention has been given to human factor Almost no attention has been given to human factor

consideration in the hospital settingconsideration in the hospital setting Further investigation was clearly neededFurther investigation was clearly needed

6: Background: Objectives

Objectives:Objectives: To investigate the nature and causes of human errors in To investigate the nature and causes of human errors in

the intensive care unit (ICU), adopting approaches the intensive care unit (ICU), adopting approaches proposed by human factor engineeringproposed by human factor engineering

(This study follows from the basic assumption that (This study follows from the basic assumption that errors occur and follow a pattern that can be uncovered)errors occur and follow a pattern that can be uncovered)

7: Methods: Study Design

DesignDesign: direct observation mixed methods study: direct observation mixed methods study Error reports made by physicians and nurses Error reports made by physicians and nurses

immediately after an error discoveryimmediately after an error discovery Activity profiles on a sample of patients created based Activity profiles on a sample of patients created based

on records taken by observers with human engineering on records taken by observers with human engineering experienceexperience

Errors were rated for severity and classified according Errors were rated for severity and classified according to the body system and type of medical activity involvedto the body system and type of medical activity involved

8: Methods: Study Population and Setting

PopulationPopulation: staff of the medical-surgical ICU of the : staff of the medical-surgical ICU of the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center at Ein-Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center at Ein-Kerem, JerusalemKerem, Jerusalem

SettingSetting: six-bed ICU unit with additional "overflow" : six-bed ICU unit with additional "overflow" bedsbeds Yearly occupancy rate reaching 110%Yearly occupancy rate reaching 110% Patient to nurse ratio of 2:1 for all shifts, regardless of Patient to nurse ratio of 2:1 for all shifts, regardless of

the severity of number of patientsthe severity of number of patients

9: Methods: Data Collection

Errors reported by physicians and nurses at time of Errors reported by physicians and nurses at time of discovery discovery Discovered errors rated independently by three senior Discovered errors rated independently by three senior

medical personnel on a 5-point severity scalemedical personnel on a 5-point severity scale Developed error report form for the use of nurses Developed error report form for the use of nurses

and physicians to collect data on:and physicians to collect data on: Time of discoveryTime of discovery Sectional identities of the person who committed the Sectional identities of the person who committed the

error and person who discovered iterror and person who discovered it Brief description of the errorBrief description of the error Presumed causePresumed cause

10: Methods: Data Collection (2)

Investigators recorded activity profiles based on 24 Investigators recorded activity profiles based on 24 hour continuous bedside observationshour continuous bedside observations Conducted on randomly selected group of 46 patients Conducted on randomly selected group of 46 patients

representative of patient population in the unitrepresentative of patient population in the unit Observations provided a baseline profile of daily activity Observations provided a baseline profile of daily activity

in ICU and reference point for the rate of errors in ICU and reference point for the rate of errors performedperformed

Investigators not medically trained but received training Investigators not medically trained but received training for the project from senior ICU nurse who also for the project from senior ICU nurse who also supervised their activitysupervised their activity

11: Methods: Data Analysis and Interpretation

Analyses performedAnalyses performed Frequency distributions, average activity, error rates, Frequency distributions, average activity, error rates,

and percentages computed and cross-tabulated using and percentages computed and cross-tabulated using statistical softwarestatistical software

Comparisons between the average number of errors per Comparisons between the average number of errors per hour at different times of the day conducted (t-tests in a hour at different times of the day conducted (t-tests in a planned comparison model)planned comparison model)

12: Results: Key Findings

During 4 months of data collection, a total of 554 During 4 months of data collection, a total of 554 human errors reported by the medical staffhuman errors reported by the medical staff Technician observers recorded a total of 8,178 activities Technician observers recorded a total of 8,178 activities

during their 24 hour surveillances of 49 patientsduring their 24 hour surveillances of 49 patients All observed patients were included in the studyAll observed patients were included in the study

Average of 178 activities per patient per day and an Average of 178 activities per patient per day and an estimated number of 1.7 errors per patient per day estimated number of 1.7 errors per patient per day (0.95% of activities)(0.95% of activities) For the ICU as a whole, a severe or potentially For the ICU as a whole, a severe or potentially

detrimental error occurred on average twice a daydetrimental error occurred on average twice a day Physicians and nurses were about equal contributors to Physicians and nurses were about equal contributors to

the number of errors, although nurses had many more the number of errors, although nurses had many more activities per dayactivities per day

13: Results: Key Findings (2) 29% of errors graded as severe of potentially 29% of errors graded as severe of potentially

detrimental to patients if not discovered in timedetrimental to patients if not discovered in time Compared with nurses, physicians had much higher Compared with nurses, physicians had much higher

rate of errorrate of error 45% of errors committed by physicians and 55% by 45% of errors committed by physicians and 55% by

nurses BUTnurses BUT Physicians carried out only 4.7% of daily activities, Physicians carried out only 4.7% of daily activities,

whereas nurses carried out 84%whereas nurses carried out 84%

Reproduced from: A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al, Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003; 12:143-147. Copyright © 2009 with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

14: Conclusion: Main Points

A significant number of dangerous human errors A significant number of dangerous human errors occur in the ICUoccur in the ICU Many of these errors could be attributed to problems of Many of these errors could be attributed to problems of

communication between the physicians and nursescommunication between the physicians and nurses Applying human factor engineering concepts to the Applying human factor engineering concepts to the

study of the weak points of a specific ICU may help study of the weak points of a specific ICU may help reduce the number of errorsreduce the number of errors

Errors should not be considered as an incurable Errors should not be considered as an incurable disease, but rather as preventable phenomenadisease, but rather as preventable phenomena

15: Conclusion: Discussion

Possible reasons for higher error rate among Possible reasons for higher error rate among physicians:physicians: While nurses mainly involved with routine and repetitive While nurses mainly involved with routine and repetitive

activities, physicians perform more reactive and activities, physicians perform more reactive and initiated interventionsinitiated interventions

Physicians must keep track of a larger number of Physicians must keep track of a larger number of patients and patient contact is much more intermittentpatients and patient contact is much more intermittent

Due to the training role of the ICU as part of a university Due to the training role of the ICU as part of a university hospital, many physicians less experienced than the hospital, many physicians less experienced than the nursesnurses

These factors highlight the importance of good These factors highlight the importance of good communication and transfer of information between communication and transfer of information between nurses and physiciansnurses and physicians Nurses have closer and more continuous contact with Nurses have closer and more continuous contact with

patients and thus should have a formal role in patients and thus should have a formal role in information exchangeinformation exchange

16: Conclusion: Practical Considerations

Study durationStudy duration Approximately 1 yearApproximately 1 year

CostCost About $1000 USDAbout $1000 USD

Competencies neededCompetencies needed Knowledge of research methods, human factors Knowledge of research methods, human factors

engineering, and cognitive psychology engineering, and cognitive psychology Ethical approvalEthical approval

Need for approval was waved as all that was done was Need for approval was waved as all that was done was observationobservation

17: Author Reflections: Lessons and Advice

If you could do one thing differently in this study If you could do one thing differently in this study what would it be?what would it be? "Look at the unit after implementation of the "Look at the unit after implementation of the

recommendations." recommendations." Would this research be feasible and applicable in Would this research be feasible and applicable in

developing countries? developing countries? "I cannot answer this. It is a matter of the ICU not of the "I cannot answer this. It is a matter of the ICU not of the

country . But the methods are as good for developing country . But the methods are as good for developing countries."countries."

18: Author Reflections: Ideas for Future Research

What message do you have for future researchers What message do you have for future researchers from developing countries? from developing countries? "The message is universal: if you want safety you can "The message is universal: if you want safety you can

get it in your own way, at your own working station. get it in your own way, at your own working station. The problem is that there is a need to create safety The problem is that there is a need to create safety culture, but that goes beyond this paper." culture, but that goes beyond this paper."

What would be an important research project you What would be an important research project you recommend that they do? recommend that they do? "Measure safety culture, and than start to improve "Measure safety culture, and than start to improve

according to findings the weak points." according to findings the weak points."

19: Additional Resources

See survey attached to questionnaire, PowerPoint See survey attached to questionnaire, PowerPoint presentationpresentation