introduction...introduction •loertscher & woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see...

17

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or
Page 2: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Introduction

• Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in thenucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or “theelephant in the room”.

• “We may be led to more active partnerships for embedding of informationliteracy concepts within academic programmes” (Fullard, 2016).

• Change of teaching approach of academic librarians, close relationship withacademics is part of the change (ACRL, 2016)

• Librarians need to become partners in the curriculum design and teachingprocess (Schulte, Tiffen, Edwards, Abbot, Luca, 2018)

• New teaching approaches and pedagogies – impact service delivery of academiclibrarianship.

Page 3: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Problem statement

Teaching and collaboration in information literacy is a niche area. Hence, Mullins(2016) noted that there is no existing systematic approach to workingcollaboratively with faculty to integrate information literacy in academic courses.Furthermore, Molaison, Taylor, Erickson (2009) argued that there is not enoughliterature about concept mapping and dietetics students.

This case study intend to fill that gap. The purpose of this paper is to ascertain towhat extent team teaching and concept mapping result into student success.

Page 4: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Research questions

• How do team teaching in concept mapping assist the undergraduate students infinding relevant information?

• How would students benefit from using concept maps?

Page 5: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Literature Review

• Substantial documents exist about the librarian taking on a teaching role (Kolstad, 2015)

• Team teaching in information literacy

• Schulte et al. (2018) the role of the librarian is evolving to meet the requirements ofpedagogical changes.

• Gilman et al. (2017) and Shannon & Shannon (2016) state that skills learned could be usedthroughout their university career and beyond.

.Finding of relevant information by using concept maps

• The concept map, a graphic tool for organizing and representing knowledge, was developed byNovak and Gowin ( Novak & Gowin, 1984)

• Used in other domains: Science Education (Kilic, 2001), Medical Education(Daley,2013), Nursing(Chabeli, 2010)

• Malaison et al. (2009) argued that concept maps increase the student’s ability to be self-directed learners.

• Time is one of the challenges in using concept maps (Daley, 2002; Hwang, Wu & Kuo, 2013).

Page 6: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Theoretical frames

• Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education• The framework consists out of six frames: authority is constructed and contextual,

information creation as a process, information has value, research as inquiry, scholarship asconversation, searching as strategic exploration (ACRL, 2016)

• Constructivism teaching approach• Constructivism requires that we structure teaching and learning experience to challenge

students’ thinking so that they will be able to construct new knowledge (Schunk, 2012).

• Wang (2007) noted that in the 21st century cognitive constructivism learning theories havebeen applied to information literacy teaching

Page 7: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Methods & Data Collection

• Pilot study

• Qualitative

• Descriptive Survey

• Purposive sampling

• 42 English for Educational Development (EED) Dietetics undergraduate students

purposively selected.

• The data collection instrument – questionnaire (close and open-ended questions)

• Data analysis- Microsoft excel - close ended questions

• Thematic analysis - open ended questions.

• Data were triangulated

Page 8: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or
Page 9: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Open ended questions

• In your opinion was that a good idea to integrate information literacy into thecourse? (Team teaching)

• P6 “Because it is for educational development the skills we received in the librarywill contribute to our success and learning area development” Gilman, Sagàs,Camper, & Norton, (2017); Shannon & Shannon (2016) affirmed the statementmade by the student that the skills learned could be used throughout theiruniversity career and beyond.

• P16 “If it was not integrated I would have struggled” the response conclude whatOvern (2014) found that the students were surprised by the amount of help theycould get.

Page 10: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Open ended questions

• In your opinion was that a good idea to integrate information literacy into thecourse? (Team teaching) cont.

P38 “never taught in high school” Mojapelo (2018) agreed with the statement byreporting that after 1994 the South African government is till not able to linkstudent success with well-equipped functional school libraries. This statement issupported by Du Toit and Stilwell (2012) that stated that school libraries have beenlargely ignored in education reform strategies. Therefore, Paton-Ash & Wilmot(2013) agreed in saying that there is not enough functioning libraries to make animpact.

Page 11: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Open ended questions (con.)

• Did you find the practical exercise helpful? (Analyse research topic)

• P5 “I enjoyed the concept map exercises because they help me know how tobrainstorm and lay out my ideas in a logical way.” The statement is supported byMalaison, Taylor, Erickson & Connell (2009) that concept maps increase thestudent’s ability to be self-directed learners.

• P12 “learnt more from other people’s opinions on the given topic Hager, Kolar &Janke (2016) supported the statement made by P12 they reported that studentsfound peer sharing helpful.

• P23 “it allows me to see what I didn’t know and ask questions” The studyconducted by Schulte et al. (2018) supported the statement by P23 the studydemonstrated positive outcomes from co-teaching partnership between contentfaculty and academic librarians.

Page 12: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Open ended questions (con.)

• Which part did you enjoy the most? (Student perception)

• P42 “working in a team”, P34 “when we doing the task”, P40 “enjoying working ingroups” Maitaouthong, et al. (2012) reveal that university libraries have a role toplay in supporting and promoting the teaching of information literacy by differentmethods

• P11 “we discussed in groups in that way my mistakes were corrected” thisstatement relates to what Campbell, Matthews, & Lempinen-Leedy (2015) foundthat through working with faculty students will learn information literacy skillsand at the same time increase their knowledge of their discipline.

Page 13: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Open ended questions (con.)

• Which part did you least enjoy? (Student perception)

• P37 “presenting” is in line with the finding by Wu et al. (2012) that reported thatstudent would prefer other means of presenting their concept maps.

• The P33 statement about “not enough time confirms” the finding of previousstudies about concept mapping (Daley, 2002; Hwang, Wu & Kuo, 2013).

Page 14: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Conclusion and recommendations

• The finding clearly demonstrate that concept mapping can benefit EED Dieteticsstudents

• By using the constructivist approach for team teaching and the information literacyframe: searching as strategic exploration in constructing concept maps the librarianscontributed to student success

• The findings are from a small sample size, therefore the findings may not besubstantial enough to generalize.

• Recommendations

• Further study is necessary to determine if these results are consistent throughout theUniversity of the Western Cape.

• Study is recommended for the use of digital concept maps seeing that time andpresenting a problem is for some of the students.

Page 15: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Acknowledgement

• Dr. Sharita Bharuthram (UWC)• Lecturer for English for Educational Development

• Shehaamah Mohamed (UWC)• Senior Librarian Information Literacy

• Dr Mzwandile Shongwe (UCT)• MLIS lecturer

Page 16: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Gerald Louw

[email protected]

Page 17: Introduction...Introduction •Loertscher & Woolls (2012) argues that the librarian see themselves in the nucleus of the learning process, for too long were they in the periphery or

Reference list

• Campbell, L., Matthews, D., & Lempinen-Leedy, N. (2015). Wake up Information Literacy Instruction: Ideas for Student Engagement. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 577-586.

• Fullard, A. (2016). Using the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy to foster teaching and learning partnerships. South African journal of libraries and information science, 82(2), 46-56.

• Gilman, N. V., Sagàs, J., Camper, M., & Norton, A. P. (2017). A faculty–librarian collaboration success story: Implementing a teach-the-teacher library and information literacy instruction model in a first-year agricultural science course. library trends, 65(3), 339-358.

• Hager, K. D., Kolar, C., & Janke, K. K. (2016). Concept mapping, reflective writing, and patchwork text assessment in a first-year pharmaceutical care course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 492-500.

• Mojapelo, S. M. (2018). Challenges in establishing and maintaining functional school libraries: Lessons from Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616667801

• Øvern, K. M. (2014). Faculty-library collaboration: two pedagogical approaches. Journal of Information Literacy, 8(2), 36–55

• Paton-Ash, M., & Wilmot, D. (2013). The state of school libraries in South Africa. Journal of Education, 57, 127-162.

• Schulte, J., Tiffen, B., Edwards, J., Abbott, S., & Luca, E. (2018). Shaping the future of academic libraries: Authentic learning for the next generation. College & Research Libraries, 79(5), 685-696.

• Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Milrad, M., Ke, H. R., & Hang, Y. M. (2012) An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback meganism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 217 – 232