intracerebral hemorrhage contemporary management...hematoma evolution and rfviia rfviia within 4...

58
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Contemporary Management J. Teitlelbaum, MD, FRCP(C) McGill University Université de Montréal CCCF Toronto October 2014

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Intracerebral Hemorrhage Contemporary Management

    J. Teitlelbaum, MD, FRCP(C) McGill University Université de Montréal

    CCCF Toronto October 2014

  • Conflicts of Interest

    none

  • Objectives

    Be aware of new ideas beyond the guidelines Stroke. 2010;41:2108-2129

    Investigation

    Monitoring

    Therapy

  • Investigation

    Guideline: Dx: non-contrast CT (MRI)

  • Classification of ICH

    PRIMARY (78-88%) Hypertensive

    angiopathy (fibrohyalinosis)

    Amyloid angiopathy

    Anticoagulant Associated

    SECONDARY AVM Aneurysm Cavernoma Neoplasm Coagulopathy

    Alcoholic liver disease

    Hemophilia Hemorrhagic infarct Toxic-cocaine

  • CTA?

    Guideline 2007: CTA if young, no clear cause, no HBP, signs on CT No CTA if typical age, HBP & location

    Guideline 2010: Stroke. 2010;41:2108-2129

    CTA if young, no clear cause, no HBP, signs on CT

    More flexibility for others

  • Secondary Etiology in SICH

    Overall: 14 – 53% Under 50 years, no HBP, atypical location, no clear

    etiology 51%

    Over 50 years, HBP, typical location 2 – 4%

    Pathologic study, 144 pts 36% of HBP SICH had 2nd cause

  • Diagnosis of Vascular Lesions

    DSA Invasive Adverse events: 0.9 & 0.5%, transient or permanent

    CTA Accuracy very close to DSA High safety profile Low complication rate

  • Primary SICH - Outcome

    6 month prognosis dismal 40% dead within one month (half < 48H) 40% disabled and dependent 20% independent Main prognostic factor: volume

  • Secondary ICH - Outcome

    If SAH Mortality 33% immediate, 66% for re-bleed Rebleed: 20% first 14 days Serious morbidity 60%

    If AVM (Stroke 1998) 47% intact, 3% mRS>4, Φ mortality, rebleed 7%

    CVST Mortality 30-50% Good outcome: 30% Serious morbidity: 50%

  • Primary ICH Factors related to outcome

    GCS on presentation Age Hemorrhage location Intra-ventricular hemorrhage Blood pressure on admission Hemorrhage size (expansion)

  • Early growth occurs in all locations

    Brott (1997) N=103

    Kazui (1994) N=186

    Fujii (1996) N=359

    Initial CT time 0-3 hrs 0-24 hrs 0-24 hrs Putamen 34% 16% 19% Thalamus 50% 21% 10% Lobar 32% 29% 6% Cerebellar 0% 25% 12% Pons 40% 40% 28% Other 43% 25% 13% TOTAL 38% 22% 14%

  • Size is the most important predictor of patient outcome

    DEAD FULL RECOVERY

  • Predicting ICH expansion

    Time since onset

    Spot sign

    Blood pressure

    Shape of the hematoma

  • CTA - Spot Sign

    Extraluminal extravasation of contrast Serpiginous or spot-like, single or multiple,

    within the hematoma, no external vessel connection

    Seen in 20-30% within 3H of ictus Marker of hematoma expansion

    (OR 3.1, p

  • CTA Source Images: Additional Data

    Spot Sign

  • So…

    ICH location alone cannot R/O a vascular lesion

    All lesions do not have the same outcomes Primary SICH outcome related to ICH growth Etiology & Spot Sign: CTA

  • Investigation Follow the Guideline?

    Not this part of the guideline CTA for all SICH

  • SICH - Monitoring

    Traditional (guideline): Clinical exam SBP/MAP ICP / CPP Repeat CT @ 24H

  • SICH – Multi-modality Monitoring

    Beyond the guideline (?? Useful) cEEG Non-invasive Brain O2 Intracranial monitoring:

    PbtO2 (Licox) Microdialysis:

    lactate/pyruvate/glutamate/glycerol/glucose

  • cEEG Useful?

    Sz in 31% (lobar, cortical, ICH growth) NCS in 10% - 30% 85-94% of Sz detected ≤ 48 hours of cEEG

    initiation (56% in first hour)

  • cEEG Useful?

    Seizures & PEDs associated with Neurologic worsening (NIHSS) in midline shift (p < 0.03) poor outcome

  • cEEG Useful?

    Seizure prophylaxis Messé SR, Neurocrit Care 2009, (CHANT) DPH vs none, 10d, clear in cognition

    Taylor, Neurocrit Care 2011 Keppra vs DPH Better outcome, less Sz, better cognition

  • So… cEEG

    Find the seizures that matter Treat Sz, and ? PEDs Avoid prophylaxis

  • Brain Tissue Oxygenation

    Jugular venous bulb oxymetry Direct PbtO2 Near infrared spectroscopy Oxygen-15 PET

  • Brain Tissue Oxygenation

    Licox intracranial PbtO2 T° dependent Samples 15 mm of tissue Usual indications

    Diffuse injury Focal injury (SDH, contusion) SAH Infarction

    2

  • Brain Tissue Oxygenation

    Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)

    Reflectance mode Contribution of extracranial tissue Real time Δ regional SO2 Useful for general changes Several aspects need refinement

  • So… Get with the Guidelines or Go Beyond

    cEEG Will do this if possible, 48-72 hours

    Near Infra Red Spectroscopy (NIRS) Coming soon (when the kinks are ironed out)

    Intracranial monitoring: Not for prime time

  • SICH Treatment

  • Treatment Modalities

    General supportive care Treatment of ICHT Hematoma resection Management of intra-ventricular hemorrhage

    Seizure prophylaxis / treatment Prevention of hematoma growth BP management

  • Seizure prophylaxis / Treatment

    Do Seizures and ECS occur with ICH? Yes (2.7-17% clinical, 28-31% cEEG)

    Do they affect outcome? No (population based, clinical Sz) Yes (newer, cEEG based studies)

    Does prophylaxis Sz yes

  • Seizure prophylaxis / Treatment

    Does prophylaxis improve outcome? No: DPH Yes: Keppra

    Does Sz therapy improve outcome? Yes: clinical seizures Yes: EEG Sz with Δ in LOC ?: EEG PLEDS or Sz without Δ in LOC

  • Seizure prophylaxis

    Guideline: No

    Beyond the guideline No, if cEEG available Yes if unexplained LOC, first 48H cortical ICH Keppra (if can load)

  • Seizure Treatment

    Guideline Treat clinical Sz Treat EEG Sz if unexplained or Δ in LOC Consider cEEG

  • Blood Pressure Management

    Does BP affect prognosis? Can BP be lowered safely? Does this ICH growth? Does this affect outcome?

  • Prognosis and Acute Blood Pressure 1

    mon

    th m

    orta

    lity

    (%)

    MAP (mm Hg)

    Fogelhom et al, Stroke, 28: 1396-400, 1997 Okumura et al, J. Hypertension, 23: 1217-23, 2005

    ↑ Early Neurological Deterioration ↓ Functional Outcome (90 days)

    1 m

    onth

    mor

    talit

    y (%

    )

  • Prognosis and Acute Blood Pressure: ICH

    n=1097

    Fogelhom et al, Stroke, 28: 1396-400, 1997 Okumura et al, J. Hypertension, 23: 1217-23, 2005

  • Blood Pressure and Hematoma Evolution

    Target max SBP

    No Enlargement

    Hematoma Enlargement

    140 mmHg 16 2 9% p=0.025 150 mmHg 14 1

    160 mmHg 22 8 30%

    170 mmHg 8 5

    Ohwaki et al, Stroke, 35: 1353-1367, 2004 Retrospective, 170 Pts

  • BP & Outcome

    Neurology Meta-analysis 2014 ADAPT (

  • BP & Outcome

    Neurology 2014 meta-analysis,

    Syst to 140 mm Hg in ≤ 1H vs ≥ 180 syst

    Death or dependency (3 months)

    Greater in ICH growth

  • BP & Outcome

    Tanaka et al Stroke 2014: BP variability worsens outcome (mRS) No effect of ICH growth

    Kobayashi et al Stroke 2014: continuous 24H control ≤ 120-160 mmHg syst Improves outcome (mRS) No effect on ICH growth

  • BP & Outcome

    NEJM 2013: No Δ in D&D, mRS increment

    No Δ ICH growth

    PLOS one May 22, 2014 New meta-analysis

    No Δ in D&D, mRS increment

    No Δ ICH growth

  • So…

    Aggressive By 6H post event ≤ 1H of arrival Very little effect on ICH growth Better outcome ?? Statistical effect??

  • Lower BP Follow the guideline?

    If SBP ≥180 mm Hg or MAP is 130 mm Hg If no ICP, consider MAP ≤110 mm Hg or

    BP of 160/90 mm Hg) Re-examine the patient every 15 min. SBP to 140 mm Hg is safe

  • Or… Be ahead of the curve

    Aggressive (< 4-6H of event) Fast (

  • Prognosis and Acute Blood Pressure: ICH

    n=1097

    Fogelhom et al, Stroke, 28: 1396-400, 1997 Okumura et al, J. Hypertension, 23: 1217-23, 2005

  • 2.0 hours after onset 6.5 hours after onset

    Prevent Early Hematoma Growth

  • Prevent ICH Growth

    By BP ??

    By rFVIIa

  • -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70

    P l a c e b o 4 0 u g /k g rF V I Ia 8 0 u g /k g rF V I Ia 1 6 0 u g /k g rF V I Ia-20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70

    Percent Change in ICH Volume at 24 Hours

    Boxes depict 98.3%

    confidence intervals

    29%

    11% 14%

    52% RR

    16%

    45% RR 62% RR

  • Modified Rankin Scale at Day 90

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    160 µg/kg

    80 µg/kg

    40 µg/kg

    Placebo

    mRS 6 mRS 4-5 mRS 2-3 mRS 0-1

  • Onset-CT interval (h)

    Prospective Retrospective

    Brott Fujii Kazui Takizawa

    0-3 38% 18% 36% 17%

    3-6 N/A 8% 16% 6%

    6-24 N/A 2% 10% 0%

    Hematoma Evolution and rFVIIa

    rFVIIa within 4 hours: Dose dependent attenuation of hematoma expansion No effect on mRS at 90 days

    ↓3.3ml ↓4.5ml ↓5.8ml

    Mayer et al. NEJM 2005; 352: 777-85

  • Spot Sign Negative

    CTA Based rFVIIa Selection Trials The SpoT sign fOr Predicting and treating ICH growTh study: STOP-IT SPOTRIAS/NINDS PI: M. Flaherty

    ‘SPOT sign’ seLection of Intracerebral hemorrhage to Guide Hemostatic Therapy: SPOTLIGHT CSN/ CIHR PI: D. Gladstone

    CTA

    Acute ICH < 6 hours

    Spot Sign Positive

    rFVIIa Placebo

    NCCT at 24 hours

  • ICH Summary

    Poor prognosis Hematoma expands early (≤4h) ICH Expansion can be predicted HBP is a likely factor in prognosis Seizures occur early & may affect outcome

  • ICH Summary Beyond the Guidelines

    Investigation: CTA on all patients

    Monitoring: Add cEEG for 48H PbtO2: not yet NIRS: coming soon

  • ICH Summary Beyond the Guidelines

    Seizure prophylaxis: No, or Keppra x 48H BP therapy Aggressive (1H) to ≤ 140 mm Hg: not yet Aggressive (1H) to ≤ 160 mm Hg: OK

    Activated fVII: Will know soon

  • References

    Claassen J. Neurology. 2007 Sep 25;69(13):1356-65 Vesp PM. Neurology. 2003 May 13;60(9):1441-6. Vespa PM. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;22(2):99-106 Messé SR. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):38-44. Jensen MB. Neurol Res. 2013 Nov;35(9):984-7 Gilmore E. Neurologist. 2010 May;16(3):165-75 Pasero S. Epilepsia. 2002 Oct;43(10):1175-80 Ohwaki K. Stroke. 2004 Jun;35(6):1364-7. Barber PA. Int J Stroke. 2014 Jan;9(1):59-60

  • References

    Tanaka E. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2275-9. Kobayashi J. Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):868-70 Taylor S. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Aug;15(1):80-4 Gould B. Stroke 2013;44:1726-1728 McCourt R Stroke. 2014 May;45(5):1292-8 Hongxuan W PLOS One 2014;9(5):e97917 Anderson CS. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(5):391-9 Khosravani H. AJNR 2013;34(8):1481-7

  • Slide Number 1Conflicts of InterestObjectivesInvestigation�Classification of ICHCTA?�Secondary Etiology in SICHDiagnosis of Vascular LesionsPrimary SICH - OutcomeSecondary ICH - OutcomePrimary ICH�Factors related to outcomeEarly growth occurs in all locationsSize is the most important predictor of patient outcomePredicting ICH expansionCTA - Spot SignCTA Source Images: Additional DataSo…Investigation�Follow the Guideline?SICH - MonitoringSICH – Multi-modality MonitoringcEEG Useful?cEEG Useful?cEEG Useful?So… cEEGBrain Tissue OxygenationBrain Tissue OxygenationBrain Tissue OxygenationSo… Get with the Guidelines �or Go BeyondSICH TreatmentTreatment ModalitiesSeizure prophylaxis / TreatmentSeizure prophylaxis / TreatmentSeizure prophylaxisSeizure TreatmentBlood Pressure ManagementPrognosis and Acute Blood PressureSlide Number 37Blood Pressure and Hematoma EvolutionBP & OutcomeBP & OutcomeBP & OutcomeBP & OutcomeSo…Lower BP �Follow the guideline?Or…�Be ahead of the curveSlide Number 46Slide Number 47Prevent ICH GrowthPercent Change in ICH Volume at 24 HoursModified Rankin Scale at Day 90Hematoma Evolution and rFVIIaCTA Based rFVIIa Selection TrialsICH SummaryICH Summary�Beyond the GuidelinesICH Summary�Beyond the GuidelinesReferencesReferencesSlide Number 58