interpolation 2013

52
In context of Arc GIS INTERPOLATIO N TECHNIQUES Rabia Munsaf Khan 01 Atiqa Ijaz Khan 03 Zertasha Ramzan 10

Upload: atiqa-khan

Post on 16-Jan-2015

150 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interpolation 2013

In context of Arc GIS

INTERPOLATION

TECHNIQUES

• Rabia Munsaf Khan01

• Atiqa Ijaz Khan03

• Zertasha Ramzan10

• Anwar Akhtar16

• Kalsoom Anjum22

Page 2: Interpolation 2013

Our aim is to apply interpolation techniques, mostly in the context of GIS.

We have discussed few of the methods such as: Nearest neighbor, IDW, Spline, Radial Basis Function, and Kriging.

But we have done analysis on: IDW, Spline (tension and registration) and Kriging (ordinary and universal).

Introduction

Page 3: Interpolation 2013

The study area includes different states of USA :

Nevada

Idaho – Rocky Mountains (side of Montana)

Oregon

Wyoming

Utah

Washington DC

Study Area

Page 4: Interpolation 2013

Google Earth View

Page 5: Interpolation 2013

The data we use to achieve our goal is of the different weather stations in different states of the USA.

The information it includes is: Station Names (in text format)

Lat/long (in degress)

Elevation Values (in meters)

Rain Percentage (in %)

Given Data

Page 6: Interpolation 2013

Map Layout

Page 7: Interpolation 2013

Map Layout

Page 8: Interpolation 2013

The method which we adopt here is the technique of Interpolation data from sample points.

As defined earlier, the software that aid us is the Arc GIS and Arc Scene (version 9.3) .

Different types of interpolation techniques gives us separate results.

As we display the sample points on Arc GIS, and also label them.

We interpolate data using the attribute of Elevation field. (others can also be used).

Methodology

Page 9: Interpolation 2013

Literature Review

Page 10: Interpolation 2013

Interpolating A Surface from Sample Point Data

InterpolationEstimating the attribute values of locations that are within the range of available data using known data values.ExtrapolationEstimating the attribute values of locations outside the range of available data using known data values.

Page 11: Interpolation 2013

Interpolation

Page 12: Interpolation 2013

Extrapolation

Page 13: Interpolation 2013

Linear Interpolation

Elevation profile

Sample elevation data A

B

If

A = 8 feet and

B = 4 feet

then

C = (8 + 4) / 2 = 6 feet

C

Page 14: Interpolation 2013

Non-linear Interpolation

Elevation profile

Sample elevation data A

B

C

• Often results in a more realistic interpolation but estimating missing data values is more complex

Page 15: Interpolation 2013

Sampling Strategy

Random

Regular

Sampling Strategies

Page 16: Interpolation 2013

Guarantees a good spread of points.

Regular Strategy

Page 17: Interpolation 2013

It produces a pattern with clustering some areas.

Random Strategy

Page 18: Interpolation 2013

Spatial Interpolation Methods

Spatial Interpolation Methods

Global

Deterministic

Exact

Inexact

Geo-Statistical

Exact

Inexact

Local

Deterministic

Exact

Inexact

Geo-Statistical

Exact

Inexact

Page 19: Interpolation 2013

Global Interpolation

Sample

data

Uses all Known Points to estimate a value at unsampled locations.

More generalize estimation. Useful for the terrains that do not

show abrupt change.

Page 20: Interpolation 2013

Local Interpolation

Sample data

• Uses a local neighborhood to estimate value, i.e. closest n number of points, or within a given search radius

Uses a neighborhood of sample points to estimate the a value at unsampled location.

Produce local estimation. Useful for abrupt changes.

Page 21: Interpolation 2013

Grouping of Interpolation

Grouping

Deterministic

Geo-Statistical

Page 22: Interpolation 2013

Deterministic interpolation techniques create surfaces from measured points.

A deterministic interpolation can either force the resulting surface to pass through the data values or not.

Deterministic Technique

Page 23: Interpolation 2013

Geo-statistical techniques quantify the spatial autocorrelation among measured points and account for the spatial configuration of the sample points around the prediction location.

Because geo-statistics is based on statistics, these techniques produce not only prediction surfaces but also error or uncertainty surfaces, giving you an indication of how good the predictions are

Geo-statistical Technique

Page 24: Interpolation 2013

Exact Interpolation: predicts a value that is identical to the measured value at a sampled location.

Page 25: Interpolation 2013

Inexact interpolator: predicts a value that is different from the measured value

Page 26: Interpolation 2013

Examples

Page 27: Interpolation 2013

Nearest Neighbor(NN)

Predicts the value on the basis of the perpendicular bisector between sampled points forming Thiession Polygons.

Produces 1 polygon per sample point,With sample point at the center.It weights as per the area or the volume.They are further divided into two more categories. It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact.

Page 28: Interpolation 2013

Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)

It is advanced of Nearest Neighbor.Here the driving force is Distance.It includes ore observation other than

the nearest points.It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact.With the high power, the surface get

soother and smoother

Page 29: Interpolation 2013

Result

IDW with 8

IDW with power 2

Page 30: Interpolation 2013

IDW with power 4

Page 31: Interpolation 2013

IDW with power 8

Page 32: Interpolation 2013

SplineThose points that are extended to the

height of their magnitudeAct as bending of a rubber sheet while

minimizing the curvature.Can be used for the smoothing of the

surface.Surface passes from all points.They can be 1st , 2nd , and 3rd order: Regular (1st, 2nd , & 3rd ) Tension (1st , & 2nd )They can 2D (smoothing a contour) or 3D

(modeling a surface).They can be Local, Deterministic, and

Exact.

Page 33: Interpolation 2013

Regularized Spline: the higher the weight, the smoother the surface.

Typical values are: 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.5 etc Suitable values are: 0-5.

Tension Spline: the higher the weight, the coarser the surface.

Must be greater than equal to zero Typical values are: 0, 1, 5, 10.

Page 34: Interpolation 2013

Result

Regular Spline

Page 35: Interpolation 2013

Tension Spline

Page 36: Interpolation 2013

The number of point are set by default in most of the software.

The number of points one define, all the number are used in the calculation

Maximum the number, smoother the surface.

Lesser the stiffness.

Page 37: Interpolation 2013

Radial Basis Function (RBS)

Is a function that changes its location with distance.

It can predicts a value above the maximum and below the minimum

Basically, it is the series of exact interpolation techniques:

Thin-plate Spline Spline with Tension Regularized Spline Multi-Quadratic Function Inverse Multi-quadratic Spline

Page 38: Interpolation 2013

Trend Surface

Produces surface that represents gradual trend over area of interest.

It is Local, Estimated, and Geo-statistical.

Examining or removing the long range trends. 1st Order

2nd Order

Page 39: Interpolation 2013

Kirging

It says that the distance and direction between sample points shows the spatial correlation that can be used to predict the surface

Merits: it is fast and flexible method. Demerit: requires a lot of decision

making

Page 40: Interpolation 2013

In Kriging, the weight not only depends upon the distance of the measured and prediction points, but also on the spatial arrangement of them.

It uses data twice: To estimate the spatial correlation, and

To make the predictions

Page 41: Interpolation 2013

Ordinary Kriging: Suitable for the data having trend. (e.g. mountains along with valleys)

Computed with constant mean “µ”

Universal Kriging: The results are similar to the one get from regression.

Sample points arrange themselves above and below the mean.

More like a 2nd order polynomial.

Page 42: Interpolation 2013

Result

Ordinary Kriging

Page 43: Interpolation 2013

Universal Kriging

Page 44: Interpolation 2013

It quantifies the assumption that nearby things tend to be more similar than that are further apart.

It measures the statistical correlation. It shows that greater the distance

between two points, lesser the similarity between them.

Semi-variogram

Page 45: Interpolation 2013

It can be: Spherical

Circular

Exponential

Gaussian

Page 46: Interpolation 2013

Kriging Spherical

Page 47: Interpolation 2013

Result

Kriging Circular

Page 48: Interpolation 2013

Kriging Exponential

Page 49: Interpolation 2013

Kriging Gaussian

Page 50: Interpolation 2013

Summary

Serial No. Techniques

Observations

01. IDW

02. Regularized Spline

03. Tension Spline

04. Krging Universe with

05. Krging Universe with

Page 51: Interpolation 2013

Serial No. Techniques

Observations

06. Krging Gussain

07. Kriging Exponential

08. Kriging Circular

09. Kriging Spherical

Page 52: Interpolation 2013

The final outcome of our experimentation is :

Conclusion