international journal journal home page ... -...

5
ISSN 2348 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46 42 Journal home page: http://www.journalijiar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE AND APPLIED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Incidence and Patterns of Clubfoot Deformity at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior *Dr. Ashish Sirsikar 1 and Dr. Nitin Kiradiya 2 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M. P.). 2. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M. P.). ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Abstract: Background: Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV), also referred to as Clubfoot, occurs in 1 in 1000 live births and is one of the most common birth defects involving the musculoskeletal system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and pattern of presentation of this deformity at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior. Methods: A prospective study was carried out from June 2011 to March 2014 of all the clubfoot patients, presenting at the clubfoot clinic in the Department of Orthopaedics at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior. The patterns of clubfoot with respect to gender, laterality, presence of other congenital anomalies and maternal obstetric history were recorded. Results: The total number of patients with clubfoot deformity recorded was 98, and the estimated incidence of clubfoot in our study is 1 in 1210 live births, or 0.8 per 1000 live births. The male to female sex ratio was 1.7: 1. Fifty seven (58 %) of the patients had bilateral clubfeet. Among the rest of 41 patients with unilateral affection, the left side was involved in 22 (23 %) of the patients. Nineteen (19%) patients had other associated congenital anomalies. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Neural tube defects were the commonest anomalies associated with clubfeet. Interpretation: There is requirement of more studies in order to establish the true incidence and pattern of presentation of this deformity in our region. Key Words: Clubfoot, congenital anomalies, CTEV. Abbreviation CTEV: Congenital Talipes Equinovarus. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Introduction Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV), also referred to as clubfoot, occurs in 1 in 1000 live births 1 and is one of the most common birth defects involving the musculoskeletal system. It is recognizable at birth and is readily distinguishable from positional foot anomalies because the foot is rigid and does not correct with passive movement. In contrast to metatarsus adductus and calcaneovalgus foot anomalies, both positional in nature, there is less evidence to suggest that CTEV results from intrauterine crowding or positional effects 1 . CTEV can present in 2 forms. In severe syndromic CTEV, other malformations are present such as spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, sacral agenesis, or arthrogryposis. Associated features may also include joint laxity, congenital dislocation of the hip, tibial torsion, ray anomalies of the foot, and the absence of some tarsal bones. In previous series the prevalence of associated anomalies in patients with CTEV varied from 11 to 48%, depending on the population and method of study 1,2,3 . In idiopathic CTEVthe more common formthe anomaly is isolated or may be associated with minor malformations. There may be a family history of foot anomalies. The purpose of our study was to determine the overall incidence of Clubfoot deformity and its pattern of presentation with respect to gender, laterality, presence of other congenital anomalies and maternal obstetric history. Material & Methods All the patients of Clubfoot presenting at the clubfoot clinic in the Department of Orthopaedics at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior from June 2011 to March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this research and informed consent was obtained from parents. A Postgraduate resident recorded the details of the patients on the Clubfoot Proforma. The Case information

Upload: doancong

Post on 15-Jun-2019

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Journal home page ... - journalijiar…journalijiar.com/uploads/2015-02-01_085352_947.pdf · ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied

ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46

42

Journal home page: http://www.journalijiar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE AND APPLIED RESEARCH

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Incidence and Patterns of Clubfoot Deformity at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior

*Dr. Ashish Sirsikar1 and Dr. Nitin Kiradiya

2

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M. P.).

2. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M. P.).

……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Abstract:

Background: Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV), also referred to as Clubfoot, occurs in 1 in 1000 live births

and is one of the most common birth defects involving the musculoskeletal system. The objective of this study was

to evaluate the incidence and pattern of presentation of this deformity at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out from June 2011 to March 2014 of all the clubfoot patients, presenting

at the clubfoot clinic in the Department of Orthopaedics at Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior. The patterns of

clubfoot with respect to gender, laterality, presence of other congenital anomalies and maternal obstetric history

were recorded.

Results: The total number of patients with clubfoot deformity recorded was 98, and the estimated incidence of

clubfoot in our study is 1 in 1210 live births, or 0.8 per 1000 live births. The male to female sex ratio was 1.7: 1.

Fifty seven (58 %) of the patients had bilateral clubfeet. Among the rest of 41 patients with unilateral affection, the

left side was involved in 22 (23 %) of the patients. Nineteen (19%) patients had other associated congenital

anomalies. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Neural tube defects were the commonest anomalies associated

with clubfeet.

Interpretation: There is requirement of more studies in order to establish the true incidence and pattern of

presentation of this deformity in our region.

Key Words: Clubfoot, congenital anomalies, CTEV.

Abbreviation

CTEV: Congenital Talipes Equinovarus.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Introduction Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV), also referred to as clubfoot, occurs in 1 in 1000 live births

1 and is

one of the most common birth defects involving the musculoskeletal system. It is recognizable at birth and is readily

distinguishable from positional foot anomalies because the foot is rigid and does not correct with passive movement.

In contrast to metatarsus adductus and calcaneovalgus foot anomalies, both positional in nature, there is less

evidence to suggest that CTEV results from intrauterine crowding or positional effects1.

CTEV can present in 2 forms. In severe syndromic CTEV, other malformations are present such as spina

bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, sacral agenesis, or arthrogryposis. Associated features may also include joint laxity,

congenital dislocation of the hip, tibial torsion, ray anomalies of the foot, and the absence of some tarsal bones. In

previous series the prevalence of associated anomalies in patients with CTEV varied from 11 to 48%, depending on

the population and method of study1,2,3

.

In idiopathic CTEV—the more common form—the anomaly is isolated or may be associated with minor

malformations. There may be a family history of foot anomalies.

The purpose of our study was to determine the overall incidence of Clubfoot deformity and its pattern of

presentation with respect to gender, laterality, presence of other congenital anomalies and maternal obstetric history.

Material & Methods All the patients of Clubfoot presenting at the clubfoot clinic in the Department of Orthopaedics at Gajra

Raja Medical College, Gwalior from June 2011 to March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study.

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this research and informed consent was obtained from parents.

A Postgraduate resident recorded the details of the patients on the Clubfoot Proforma. The Case information

Page 2: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Journal home page ... - journalijiar…journalijiar.com/uploads/2015-02-01_085352_947.pdf · ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied

ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46

43

included age at presentation, gender, laterality, other associated congenital anomalies and maternal obstetric history,

which included birth order, mode of delivery, gestational age.

Results Incidence

The number of patients with Clubfoot deformity presenting to us during the study period was 98. The total

number of live births during this study period was 1,18,654. This gave an estimated incidence of clubfoot of 1 in

1210 live births, or 0.8 per 1000 live births.

Patterns of Clubfeet deformity

Out of the total 98 patients, 62 (63 %) of patients with clubfoot were male and 36 (37 %) were female

(Male Female ratio= 1.7: 1). 57 (58 %) out of the total 98 patients, had bilateral clubfeet. Among the rest of 41 (42

%) patients with unilateral affection, the right side was involved in 19 (19 %) and left side in 22 (23 %) of the

patients.

Associated Congenital anomaly

79 (81 %) patients had primary idiopathic clubfoot, whereas the remaining 19 (19 %) patients had clubfoot

deformity associated with other congenital anomalies. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Neural tube defects

were the commonest anomalies associated with clubfeet.

Table 1: Demographic data of patients with idiopathic and non-idiopathic CTEV

Idiopathic Non-idiopathic

Number of Patients (%) 79 (81) 19 (19)

Male / Female 56/23 6/13

Bilateral (%) 45/79 (57) 12/19 (63)

Unilateral- Right (%) 15/79 (19) 4/19 (21)

Unilateral- Left (%) 19/79 (24) 3/19 (16)

Table 2: Presence of Associated Congenital Anomalies

S. No. Associated Congenital Anomaly Frequency

1. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita 5

2. Neural Tube Defect 4

3. Bilateral Constriction Bands of Leg & Syndactyly 3

4. Syndactyly 1

5. Maldeveloped Feet & 4 toes on Right Foot 1

6. Hexadactyly All 4 limbs 1

7. Genu Recurvatum 1

8. Tongue Tie Bilateral Webbing of Fingers 1

9. Imperforate Anus 1

10. Cleft Palate & Facial Nerve Palsy 1

Figure I. Non- idiopathic CTEV associated with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita

Page 3: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Journal home page ... - journalijiar…journalijiar.com/uploads/2015-02-01_085352_947.pdf · ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied

ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46

44

Figure II. Non- idiopathic CTEV associated with Neural Tube Defect

Figure III. Non- idiopathic CTEV associated with Constriction Band Syndrome

Birth order

The birth order of the child is shown below in the chart.

Mode of Delivery

Among the 98 patients with clubfeet, 87 were normal delivery, 11 delivered by Caesarean Section.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Gravida 1 Gravida 2 Gravida 3 Gravida 4 Gravida 5 Gravida 6

4238

13

31 1

Page 4: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Journal home page ... - journalijiar…journalijiar.com/uploads/2015-02-01_085352_947.pdf · ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied

ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46

45

Gestation Period

5 out of 98 patients with clubfeet were preterm, 2 had idiopathic clubfeet and 3 had clubfeet associated with

other congenital anomalies. 92 children with clubfeet were born at term, whereas one patient was post-term and

associated with microcephalus & autism.

Discussion The overall incidence of clubfeet deformity in our study is 0.8 per 1000 live births. Studies among black

South Africans showed that the incidence of congenital clubfoot is between 1.5 per 1000 and 3.5 per 1000 live

births4,5

. Amongst Caucasian populations the incidence of congenital clubfoot is between 0.64 and 2.5 per 1000 live

births6,7

.

The deformity was most often bilateral, and if unilateral, more often involved the left side. Previous studies

have found the prepondance of right over left side (Grunett et al 20088, Dobbs et al 2009

9, Parker et al 2009

10).

Moreover, our study confirmed that boys are more frequently involved as compared to girls, which also supports

previous studies (Byron-Scott et al 200511

, Carey et al 200512

, Dickinson et al 200813

).

Patients with clubfoot associated with other congenital anomalies comprise for 19% of all cases. The most

common congenital anomaly associated with clubfoot deformity includes arthrogryposis and neural tube defects.

Conclusion Although the vast majority of patients with CTEV are idiopathic, in our tertiary clinic, 19% were non-idiopathic.

Non-idiopathic CTEV is associated with a long list of associated congenital anomalies, majority of which include

arthrogryposis multiplex congenital, neural tube defect and constriction band syndrome. More studies in order to

establish the true incidence and pattern of presentation of this deformity in our region is recommended.

References

1. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and the cause of congenital clubfoot. Talipes equinovarus, talipes

calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964; 46: 445–63.

2. Bakalis S, Sairam S, Homfray T, Harrington K, Nicolaides K, Thilaganathan B. Outcome of antenatally

diagnosed talipes equinovarus in an unselected obstetric population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20:

226–29.

3. Byron-Scott R, Sharpe P, Hasler C, et al. A South Australian population-based study of congenital talipes

equinovarus. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19: 227–37.

4. Kromberg JG, Jenkins T Common birth defects in South African blacks. S Afr Med J 1982; 62: 599-602.

5. Pompe Van Meerdervoort HF. Congenital musculoskeletal malformations in South African blacks: a study

on incidence. S Afr Med J 1996; 50: 1853-5.

6. Danielson LG. Incidence of congenital clubfoot in Sweden. 128 cases in 138000 infants 1946 –1990 in

Malmo. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 424-6.

7. Valdirieso Garcia JL, Escassi Gil A, Zapatero Martinez M et al. Prospective study of equinovarus foot in

20000 live newborn infants. An Esp Pediatr 1988; 28: 325-6.

8. Gurnett C A, Boehm S, Connolly A, Reimschisel T, Dobbs M B. Impact of congenital talipes equinovarus

etiology on treatment outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50 (7): 498-502.

9. Dobbs M B, Gurnett C A. Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop 2009; (467) (5): 1146-

53.

Page 5: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Journal home page ... - journalijiar…journalijiar.com/uploads/2015-02-01_085352_947.pdf · ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied

ISSN 2348 – 0319 International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue (1): 42- 46

46

10. Parker S E, Mai C T, Strickland M J, Olney R S, Rickard R, Marengo L, Wang Y, Hashmi S S, Meyer R E,

National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot. Birth Defects

Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009; 85 (11): 897-904.

11. Byron-Scott R, Sharpe P, Hasler C, Cundy P, Hirte C, Chan A, Scott H, Baghurst P, Haan E. A South

Australian population-based study of congenital talipes equinovarus. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19

(3): 227–37.

12. Carey M, Mylvaganam A, Rouse I, Bower C. Risk factors for isolated talipes equinovarus in Western

Australia, 1980–1994. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19 (3): 238–45.

13. Dickinson K C, Meyer R E, Kotch J. Maternal smoking and the risk for clubfoot in infants. Birth Defects

Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 2008; 82 (2): 86–91.

14. Mkandawire N, Kaunda E. An audit of congenital anomalies in the neonatal unit of Queen Elizabeth

Central Hospital –1 year study period: 1st November 2002 to 31st October 2001. East Centr Afr J Surg

2002; 7: 29-33.