international competitiveness in m&a
DESCRIPTION
Watch full webinar here: http://fir.mx/101C1OTTRANSCRIPT
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1
Firmex Webinar SeriesMarch 20th, 2012
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Please submit all questions to [email protected]
Ken SmithAuthor & Associate Dean, Executive ProgramsUniversity of GuelphMacKinnon Building, Suite 800University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1519-824-4120 ext. [email protected]
International Competitiveness in M&A
@Firmex, #FirmexWebinar
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2
About Firmex
Firmex is focused on providing the best virtual data room solution for managing corporate transactions and financial compliance
Who uses Firmex?• Firmex community includes
over 200,000 users worldwide• Conducted over 10,000 deals
in the last 18 months
Why offer a Webinar Series?• As part of our value-added service, we believe it is important
to offer educational resources to our expanding community
Joel LessemCEOFirmex
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 3
Ken SmithKen Smith is a professor of business and a strategy consultant. He has practiced as a strategy consultant for over 25 years, beginning with McKinsey & Company and later with SECOR Consulting, Canada’s leading international strategy consultancy, where he has been a Managing Partner and Chair of the Board. He is now Associate Dean of Executive Education at the University of Guelph and continues consulting part-time.
Ken’s client work and research interests are focused on business and public policy issues related to industry restructuring and international development. He published several articles relating to the corporate governance and public policy issues associated with global industry restructuring, including his article “Losing (Ownership) Control” in the Harvard Business Review. Earlier, he developed the first shareholder value-based metric of merger success and introduced the application of real options to acquisitions in restructuring industries. Much of this work is included in his new book “The Art of M&A Strategy” with Alexandra Reed Lajoux, McGraw Hill, New York, 2012.
Most recently, Ken has initiated a program of research and education applying this business and public policy background to issues of hunger and poverty. In collaboration with major international NGO’s and corporate partners, this work is aimed at understanding those problems in food industry development in developing countries that may be resolved with new business solutions.
Ken is also active in corporate governance. He is a director of ACCERTA, the Mergers & Acquisitions Leadership Council. He is also the past-Chair of the Ontario Chapter of the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD). Ken holds a B.Sc. in Mathematics from York University, and an M. Sc. and Ph.D. in Mathematics and an MBA from the University of Toronto. He is also an accredited director with an ICD.D from the Institute of Corporate Directors.
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4
Losing (Ownership) Control
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 5
Undertook research to answer four questions:
1. Are Canadian & US companies competitive in M&A internationally?
2. What is the impact of increased international M&A activity?
3. Should Canada & the US be more ambitious outside of North America?
4. Are corporations playing on a level field?
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 6
Losing Control
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 7
Cross-Border Transactions
Change of Ownership Control (Top 10 Buyers and Sellers, Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Net
Ou
tbo
un
d-I
nb
ou
nd
(U
SD
mil
lio
ns)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysisNotes: Pending deals are for 2009 only, INT includes deals with multiple acquirers
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 8
Canada Deal Flow
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
-75,000
-50,000
-25,000
0
25,000
-47,274
-16,619
372
16,2556,438
-18,170
-47,056-53,860
-13,985
4,594
Inbound Outbound
CDN Cross-Border Deal Flow(Total Value of Deals >US$100million, 2000-2009)
Tota
l V
alu
e (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9
US Deal Flow
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
-200,000
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
-162,561
-4,458
-15,405
26,093 12,747
-25,657-18,256
-72,480-90,277
-9,874
Inbound Outbound Net Deal Flow
US Cross-Border Deal Flow(Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Tota
l V
alu
e (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 10
Deal Flow vs US/Euro exchange
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
-200,000
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
-162,561
-4,458
-15,405
26,09312,747
-25,657-18,256
-72,480-90,277
-9,874
0.9911.0611.106
0.9570.794 0.740
0.8460.754
0.681 0.721
Net Deal Flow Exchange Rate
US Deal Flow v. USD(Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Eu
ro t
o U
SD
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 11
Price Premium vs. Acquiring Firms’ Three-Year Performance
*Price paid per share versus stock trading price 3 months prior to announcement.
Source:Bloomberg, SDC, FP Datagroup
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 12
Canada Cross-Border Activity
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
UNITED STATES
FRANCE BRITAIN SWITZER LAND
BRAZIL UAE CHINA NETHER LANDS
AUS TRALIA INT
-50,000
-25,000
0
25,000
50,000
CDN Cross Border Acquisitions by Country (Top 10 partners by cumulative value of inbound deals, Net Value of Deals >US$100million, 2000-2009)
Outbound
121,353.63 7,550.63 8,477.93 2,500.00 2,313.79 - - 405.33 17,072.85 -
Inbound
133,120.57 54,642.51 53,127.04 21,245.27 17,617.72 12,989.17 8,167.33 6,813.29 6,451.33 6,059.51
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
INT includes deals with multiple acquirers
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 13
US Cross-Border ActivityN
et
Ou
tbo
un
d-I
nb
ou
nd
(U
SD
mil
lio
ns
)
BRITAIN CANADA SWITZER LAND
NETHER LANDS
BELGIUM GER MANY FRANCE SPAIN JAPAN BERMUDA
-50,000
-25,000
0
25,000
50,000
US Cross Border Acquisitions by Country (Top 10 partners by cumulative value of inbound deals, Net Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Outbound
156,732.49
133,120.57 9,512.38 39,865.38 2,618.22 59,785.51 29,457.52 5,520.19 24,490.82 -
Inbound
165,397.46
121,353.63 95,274.48 67,486.44 67,162.09 63,991.42 59,122.65 40,020.86 38,082.96 36,880.10
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 14
Missed Opportunity or Risky Business?
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 15
Deal Flow by Sector – Canada
Basic Mate-rials
Commu nications
Con sumer Cyclical
Con sumer Non-cyclical
Diver sified Energy Financial Govern ment
Industrial Tech nology Utilities N/A
-75,000
-50,000
-25,000
0
25,000
50,000
CDN Acquisitions by Industry Sector(Total Value of Deals >US$100million, 2000-2009)
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 16
Deal Flow by Sector – US
Basic Mate-rials
Comm unications
Con sumer, Cyclical
Con sumer, Non-cyclical
Divers ified Energy Financial Industrial Tech nology Utilities N/A
-180,000
-150,000
-120,000
-90,000
-60,000
-30,000
0
30,000
60,000
US Acquisitions by Industry Sector(Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Ne
t O
utb
ou
nd
-In
bo
un
d (
US
D m
illi
on
s)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 17
Economic Impact of Net Lossof Control
At a company level ■ Loss of
headquarter jobs
■ Professional services
At an industry level ■ Loss of
consolidators■ Weakening of
industry clusters
At a community/ country level ■ Loss of
community leaders & donations
■ Reduced attractiveness as a financial center
12
3
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 18
“... could have been a contender”
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 19
Cross-border deal volume 2000 – 2010
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 20
M&A Value Creation – Canada
Domestic Continental Overseas
60.0% 68.0%54.5%
Percent Successful(Canada 3 YR Post Deal Acquisition Performance Relative to Industry Indices 2000-2009)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 21
U.S. Deal Performance
Domestic Continental Overseas
45.3% 44.8% 44.0%
Percent Successful(US 3 YR Post Deal Acquisition Performance Relative to Industry Indices 2000-2009)
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 22
Key messages
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 23
Value Creation in M&A
3. Manage to Completion• Accelerate transition
and act on strategic potential
1. Focus on Deal Logic• Identify path to
long-term strategic value
2. Align Organization and Culture
• Integrate structure, process, systems and culture
CEOs: Improve Deal Performance (esp. US Companies)
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 24
Domestic Continental Overseas
1.4066 1.2674 1.1449
Average Return (CDN 3 YR Relative to Industry Indices, Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
Boards: Take the Long View – Buyers are Creating Value
Domestic Continental Overseas
1.16501.1998 1.3456
Source: Bloomberg, SECOR analysis
Average Return (EU 3 YR Relative to Industry Indices, Total Value of Deals >US$1billion, 2000-2009)
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 25
Policy Makers: Level the Playing Field
• Drive market opening, but don’t take a long lead
• Ensure domestic regulation (competition policy, securities law, . . .) is designed in international context
• Support global growth
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 26
For discussion:
Canadian and US companies are not competitive in International M&A
■ Why not?
■ What should be done?
■ What are the roles of:Business leadersBoardsRegulators?
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27
Questions & Answers
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 28
The Art of M&A Strategyby Kenneth Smith and Alexandra Reed Lajoux
Rapid globalization, technological advances, and dramatic changes in public policy have made industry restructuring the “new normal.” In order to compete, M&A must be part of your overall business strategy.
Written by practicing experts in the field of mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, The Art of M&A series of professional guides is the number-one resource for anyone seeking practical, hands-on advice for planning for and executing successful deals.
Now, The Art of M&A Strategy breaks new ground by providing the tools and techniques to design a business strategy using M&A as a key element. It takes you through all the steps for making optimum use of M&A for corporate success.
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 29
Book Winners!
• Shane Handsaeme, Athabasca Oil Sands Corp• Sebastian Storfner, Corporate Finance Partners• John Henberger, Henberger Group Inc• Jim Jeffries, M&A Leadership Council• Phillip McGoohan, Oak Hill Business Partners
Congratulations! We will be following up shortlyto get your mailing address.
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 30
Thank YouOur next webinar is April 17th, 1pm Eastern
Trends in Technology M&Awith a review of overall Q1 Activity Featuring Cyrus Lam, Managing Director, KMPG New York.
www.Firmex.com/company/events
Today’s Recorded Webinar, Slides will be made available in a follow-up email shortly.
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 31
Appendix
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 32
0 <0.5
0.55
0.6 0.65
0.7 0.75
0.8 0.85
0.9 0.95
1 1.05
1.1 1.15
1.2 1.25
1.3 1.35
1.4 1.45
1.5 >1.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Three-Year Total Return Relative to Industry Index
Nu
mb
er
of
De
als
Success of US Deals in the 1990sMean = 0.99 = 0.30>1 = 44.3%
Source:Bloomberg, SDC, FP Datagroup
©COPYRIGHT 2012. KEN SMITH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 33
Investment banks with >5 $1 billion deals (listed alphabetically)
Performance by Advisor for Major US AcquisitionsAcquirer Total Return vs. Industry (%)
Bank of AmericaChase ManhattanCIBCCitiCredit Suisse
Deutshe BankDonaldson Lufkin*Dresdner Kleinwort**Evercore PartnerGoldman Sachs
JP MorganLazardMerrill LynchMorgan StanleyThomas Weisel
UBSWachovia***
*Acquired by Credit Suisse in 2000, but still uses the Donaldson brand name
**Rebranded under Commerzbank in September 2009***Absorbed by Wells Fargo during recent recession
18% 16% 14% 14% 13%10%
1% 1% 1%
-3% -4% -5% -8%
-25%-26%
-35%-39%