international civil aviation security
TRANSCRIPT
Jim MarriottDeputy Director, Aviation Security and Facilitation
OECD High Level Risk Forum Washington D.C.9 December 2015
International Civil Aviation Security
Standardization of International Civil Aviation
THEREFORE, the undersigned governments having agreed on certain principles and arrangements in order that international civil aviation may be developed in a safe and orderly manner and that international air transport services may be established on the basis of equality of opportunity and operated soundly and economically; Have accordingly concluded this Convention to that end.
ICAO global leadership• 191 Member States• Over 10,000 Standards and
Recommended Practices• Regular, systematic audits• No Country Left Behind
ICAO Strategic Objectives• Safety• Air navigation capacity and efficiency• Security and facilitation• Economic development of air transport• Environmental protection
Economic benefits of aviation worldwideAir transport is a vital economic engine and catalyst for economic development
58.1 million jobs* $2.4 trillion
Global economic impact*
* Including direct, indirect, induced and catalytic
1945
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Reve
nue
Pass
enge
r-Kilo
met
res
(bill
ion)
Aviation security challenges• Constantly evolving risks• Scale and growth of aviation• High public profile• Consequences of failure• Many risk management actors
Key critricisms• Always reactive, never predictive• Lack of consistency• Solutions are costly, not sustainable
Continuous assessment 3.1.3 Each Contracting State shall keep under constant review the level of threat to civil aviation within its territory, and establish and implement policies and procedures to adjust relevant elements of its national civil aviation security programme accordingly, based upon a security risk assessment carried out by the relevant national authorities.
Information sharing2.4.3 Each Contracting State shall establish and implement procedures to share with other Contracting States threat information that applies to the aviation security interests of those States, to the extent practicable.
Global Risk Context Statement• Best practice methods for assessing
risk• Scenario based, outcomes focused• Past + present + future risks
Conflict Zone Risk Repository• Response to MH17• Single platform for States’ conflict
zone risk information• Publicly accessible on ICAO
website
Information posted by StatesAffected States can post a response
Reporting State: United KingdomInformation Source Type: NOTAMState Affected: EgyptInformation Source Reference: 14/12/0274 AS6Information Title: Potential risk from anti-aviation weaponry
Content:
Q) EGXX/QROXX/IV/NBO/W/000/999/5218N01451W999 B) FROM: 15/11/18 16:00C) TO: 16/02/16 23:59 EST E) HAZARDOUS SITUATION IN EGYPT. POTENTIAL RISK TO AVIATION OVERFLYING AIRSPACE IN NORTH SINAI GOVERNORATE WITHIN THE AREA BOUNDED BY 311400N 322200E - 294000N 324000E - 293000N 345400E - 312000N 341200E - 311400N 322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI PENINSULA) AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL FROM DEDICATED ANTI-AIRCRAFT WEAPONRY. OPERATORS ARE ADVISED TO AVOID OPERATING AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL IN THIS AIRSPACE. CONTACT UK DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (+44) (0)20 7944 3260 OR (+44) (0)207 944 5999 OUT OF HOURS. 14-12-0274/AS6. LOWER: SFC UPPER: UNL
Area Affected:311400N 322200E - 294000N 324000E - 293000N 345400E - 312000N 341200E - 311400N 322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI PENINSULA)
Link to Information:Valid From: 2015-11-15Valid To: 2016-02-16
Status: The State Affected has indicated an objection.
Attachments: 2014120274NOT70SinaiFIRCairo text NB.pdf
Post Affecting Egypt Reported by United Kingdom: