international case study: getting more risk-literate
DESCRIPTION
Tony Taig, Director, from TTAC delivered this presentation at Rail Safety 2012. For more information on the annual conference, please visit www.railsafetyconference.com.au/TRANSCRIPT
© TTAC Limited - for more effective management of risk and uncertainty
© TTAC Limited - for more effective management of risk and uncertainty
Raising the game on “Risk”
presentation to the Australian Rail Safety Conference
“Identifying and strengthening the weakest link”
Darling Island Wharf, 28 March 2012
THEMES:Ancient History - risk in safety-critical industries
Evolution of UK rail risk knowledge
Benefits & relevance in Australia
Tony Taig, TTAC Ltd (UK)e-mail [email protected]
Rail Safety 2012 3
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
HISTORY
Rail Safety 2012 4
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
by 1977 ...... Nuclear
Aviation
Chemicals
...
...
Rail (?!?!?!)
Windscale Fire 1957
Rail Safety 2012 5
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
King’s Cross Fire 1987
Rail Safety 2012 6
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Clapham Junction 1988
35 dead, 500 injured
Rail Safety 2012 7
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Responses to King’s Cross and
Clapham Rail Accidents
“Get rid of wooden escalators”(Kings’ Cross)
“Introduce ATP”(Clapham)
....
....
....
“Improve knowledge of risk”(both)
Rail Safety 2012 8
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Development of railway risk
thinking & practice in the UK
Rail Safety 2012 9
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Railway Risk Assessments –
Early Insights
Inquiry recommendations (wooden
escalators, ATP) of limited effectiveness
BUT
Other investments could reduce risk
much more- sprinklers, flooding (Underground)
- train doors, hi-risk track staff (main line)
Rail Safety 2012 10
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Maximising Safety Benefits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Pro
ject
1
Pro
ject
2
Pro
ject
3
Pro
ject
4
Pro
ject
5
Pro
ject
6
Pro
ject
7
Pro
ject
8
Pro
ject
9
Pro
ject
10
Pro
ject
11
Pro
ject
12
Pro
ject
13
Pro
ject
14
Pro
ject
15
Pro
ject
16
Pro
ject
17
Pro
ject
18
Pro
ject
19
Pro
ject
20
Pro
ject
21
£m
pe
r li
fe s
ave
d
Start at left, work to right until budget spent
Rail Safety 2012 11
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
351
98
0
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
/92
19
92
/93
19
93
/94
19
94
/95
19
95
/96
19
96
/97
19
97
/98
19
98
/99
19
99
/00
20
00
/01
20
01
/02
Year
No
. o
f d
eath
s
Passenger fallsfrom trains
Railway Staff
Effect of post-Clapham Decisions
Rail Safety 2012 12
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Post-1990:
From “One off” to “Heartbeat”
Railtrack S&SD Railway Safety RSSB
Incident reporting (mandatory since 1997)
industry member RSSB
Safety Performance Reporting
Safety Risk Model
Rail Safety 2012 13
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Industry knows where it stands (1)(RSSB Annual Safety Performance Report 2010/11)
1.5
4.5
5.8
76.3
55.7
187.5
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Mainline railway Bus or coach Car Pedal cycle Pedestrian Motorcycle
Fa
talitie
s a
nd
we
igh
ted
inju
ries
pe
r billio
n tra
ve
ller k
mF
ata
liti
es
an
d w
eig
hte
d in
juri
es
pe
r b
illio
n tra
ve
lle
r k
m
Weighted major injuries
Fatalities
Pedestrians and other transport users
Trespassers
Travellers using named mode
Pedestrians and other transport users
Trespassers
Travellers using named mode
Rail Safety 2012 14
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Industry knows where it stands (2)(RSSB Annual Safety Performance Report 2010/11)
72.4
18.7
9.2 10.6
29.4
17.9
11.316.3
12.6 11.18.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80H
GV
drive
rs
Bu
s a
nd
co
ach
drive
rs
Aircra
ft p
ilots
an
d flig
ht
en
gin
eers
Tra
in d
rive
r
Oth
er o
n-b
oa
rd tr
ain
cre
w
Re
ve
nue
pro
tection
sta
ff
Sta
tio
n s
taff
Ele
me
nta
ry s
ecurity
op
era
tio
ns
Sa
les a
nd
re
tail
assis
tan
ts
Ele
me
nta
ry p
ers
on
al s
erv
ices
occu
patio
ns
Cu
sto
me
r ca
re o
ccu
pa
tion
s
FW
I pe
r 1
00
,00
0 w
ork
ers
pe
r ye
ar
(RID
DO
R-r
ep
ort
ab
le
on
ly)
Weighted RIDDOR-reportable minor injuries
Weighted major injuries
Fatalities
Rail workers
Rail Safety 2012 15
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Safety Outcomes(RSSB Annual Safety Performance Report 2010/11)
0
2
4
6
8
10
19
50
/51
19
52
/53
19
54
/55
19
56
/57
19
58
/59
19
60
/61
19
62
/63
19
64
/65
19
66
/67
19
68
/69
19
70
/71
19
72
/73
19
74
/75
19
76
/77
19
78
/79
19
80
/81
19
82
/83
19
84
/85
19
86
/87
19
88
/89
19
90
/91
19
92
/93
19
94
/95
19
96
/97
19
98
/99
20
00
/01
20
02
/03
20
04
/05
20
06
/07
20
08
/09
20
10
/11
Fa
tal t
rain
ac
cid
en
ts
Train accidents with passenger or workforce fatalities
Average number over preceding 10 years
~80% reduction
in train accident
risk 2001-2011
Rail Safety 2012 16
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
So what for Australian railways?
Benefits
&
Costs
Rail Safety 2012 17
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Benefits & Relevance
shared knowledge
industry performance
benchmarking
Improved &
shared safety
data
Risk analysis
and
modelling
richer risk picture
explore “what ifs”
demonstrate SFARP
Associated
policy
debate
better basis for
safety decisions
Better
safety
+
Better
decisions
Rail Safety 2012 18
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Activities and Costs
Industry – record incidents, investigate,
report to regulator
Regulators & government –
monitor hi-level performance,
investigate/enforce
Industry
Collate safety data
Analyse & apply
risk information
Rail Safety 2012 19
© TTAC Ltd, 2012
Australian rail industry:
“A risk information vacuum”
Share and use your
safety intelligence
(please)