international association of maritime universities international maritime organization...

International Association of Maritime Universities International Maritime Organization Liaison Committee

Representative Report Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and

Watchkeeping – 2nd Session

2 - 6 February, 2015 London, UK

To: IAMU International Executive Board (IEB) From: Dmytro Zhukov, IAMU IMO Liaison Committee (IMOLC) Subject: IMO HTW, 2nd Session, London, UK The Report covers the session from Monday, 2 February to Friday, 6 February 2015. Annex 1 for this Report - HTW2 List of documents Annex 2 for this Report – HTW2 Report to the Maritime Safety Committee All the original HTW2 papers can be read at IMO website including HTW2 Report. The 2st session of the IMO HTW was held at the IMO headquarters in London, UK from Monday, 2 February to Friday, 6 February 2015 The Sub-Committee noted that its next meeting had been tentatively scheduled to take place in February 2016.

AGENDA Opening of the session and election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2014 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Decisions of other IMO bodies 3. Validated model training courses 4. Reports on unlawful practices associated with certificates of competency 5. Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes 6. Guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments 7. Follow-up action to the STCW-F Conference resolutions 6 and 7 8. Role of the human element 9. Mandatory Code for ships operating in polar waters 10. Review of STCW passenger ship specific safety training 11. Training in hot-work procedures on crude oil tankers 12. First outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) 13. E-navigation strategy implementation plan 14. Guidelines for shipowners and seafarers for implementation of relevant IMO

instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea 15. Non-mandatory instrument on regulations for non-convention ships 16. Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for HTW 3 17. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2016 18. Any other business 19. Report to the Maritime Safety Committee The following working/drafting groups were established at this session: 1. Working Group 1 on Training Matters (Agenda items 5 and 9); 2. Working Group 2 on Training Matters (Agenda items 6, 10 and 18 (part)); 3. Working Group 3 on Human Element (Agenda items 8, 14 and 18 (part)); 4. Drafting Group 1 on Validation of Model Courses (Agenda item 3 (part)); 5. Drafting Group 2 on Validation of Model Courses (Agenda item 3 (part)).

PROVISIONAL TIMETABLE of the SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING 2nd session (2 to 6 February 2015)

Date

Item Working and

drafting groups

Monday, 2 February

Opening of the session 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Decisions of other IMO bodies 3. Validated model training courses 5. Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes 9. Mandatory Code for ships operating in polar waters 6. Guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments 10. Review of STCW passenger ship specific safety training 18. Any other business (part) – Review draft MSC circular ECDIS – Guidance for good practice. Review the draft MSC Circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours

DG 1 & 2 WG 1 WG 1 WG 2 WG 2 WG 2 WG 3

Tuesday, 3 February

8. Role of the human element 14. Guidelines for shipowners and seafarers for implementation of relevant IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea 11. Training in hot-work procedures on crude oil tankers 15. Non-mandatory instrument on regulations for non-convention ships 7. Follow-up action to the STCW-F Conference Resolutions 6 and 7 12. First outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)

WG 3 WG 3

13. E-navigation strategy implementation plan 18. Any other business (part) 4. Reports on unlawful practices associated with certificates of competency 16. Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for HTW 3

Wednesday, 4 February

No Plenary session will be held on this day WGs and DG

Thursday, 5 February

No Plenary session will be held on this day WGs and DG

Friday, 6 February

17. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2016 Reports of working and drafting groups 19. Report to the Maritime Safety Committee

IAMU was one of observers from non-governmental organizations in WG 2. The most appropriate to IAMU activity field topics and documents were the following: 3. Validated model training courses SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report on the model course programme

This document provides information on the development, review, updating, translation and publication of model courses SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/1 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations

This document provides the draft of a revised model course on Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/2 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model Course – Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations

This document provides the draft of a revised model course on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING

HTW 2/3/3 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model Course – Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations

This document provides the draft of a revised model course on Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/4 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Maritime English

This document provides the draft of a revised model course on Maritime English SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/5 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Engine-Room Simulator

This document provides the draft of a revised model course on Engine Room Simulator SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/6 HTW 2/3/6/Rev.1 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Presentation to the international maritime community of the International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters (CIOAA) provided by the Maritime Authority of Chile

These documents introduces the International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters (CIOAA), which the Maritime Authority of Chile provides for deck officers; the course is a requirement for officers in charge of Chilean ships navigating in Antarctic waters SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/7 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Revision of IMO model course 1.07 on Radar Navigation at Operational Level

This document analyses the deviation of IMO model course 1.07 on Radar Navigation at Operational Level from the current performance standards for radar equipment laid down by IMO resolution MSC.192(79), and expounds the necessity to revise IMO model course 1.07 to be in line with the requirements of the SOLAS Convention, STCW Convention and resolution MSC.192(79)

SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/8 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Offer to develop an IMO model course on the special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels

This document provides an outline of the elements that a model course on the special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels should contain. Norway therefore offers to develop the IMO model course that should accompany the new training requirements. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/3/9 VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Proposed amendments to the ECDIS and IBS/INS Model courses, updating and validation processes

This document, based on the analysis of the contents of Model Course 1.27 on ECDIS, and Model Course 1.32 on IBS/INS, proposes some solutions due to their link with other IMO model courses, taking into account both the "Human Element Analysis Process" and the safety of navigation. A second and not less important proposal is regarding the task of the instructor to facilitate positive learning by the participants as stated by the model course programs themselves. Report of Drafting Group 1 General

Drafting Group 1 on Validation of Model Training Courses met from 2 to 5 February 2015, under the chairmanship of Capt. George Edenfield (United States). Terms of reference

The group, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary, and the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, was instructed to: .1 consider and comment, as appropriate, on the text and draft model courses set out in the annexes to documents HTW 2/3/1, HTW 2/3/2 and HTW 2/3/3; .2 compare the scope of the provisions in the STCW Code related to training in Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations, Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations and the contents of the aforementioned draft model courses as presented, with a view to validation by the Sub-Committee; and .3 submit its report to plenary on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Validation of model courses

As instructed by the Sub-Committee at its first session HTW 1, the model courses on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations were referred to an Intercessional Correspondence Group chaired

by the United States for further revision, to reflect closely the requirements of the 2010 Manila Amendments.

The drafting group, as instructed, sought to: maintain consistency between all the Tanker Cargo Operations model courses; ensure that the course syllabi met the knowledge, understanding and proficiency in the tables of competency in the STCW Code; and align the advanced level courses to maintain consistency of knowledge, skills and proficiency required at the management level.

The group noticed significant inconsistencies in the advanced model courses, especially in alignment of knowledge, skills and proficiency required at the management level.

The group recommended that all model courses should utilize standard language in certain sections of the documents for publication, i.e. Introduction, part A – IMO references, figure numbering in the appendices, etc. Revised model course on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations

As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations as set out in the annex to document HTW 2/3/2, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary.

The group prepared amendments to the draft revised model course on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations as set out in annex 1. Revised model course on Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations

As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations as set out in the annex to document HTW 2/3/3, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary.

The Group prepared amendments to the draft revised model course on Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations as set out in annex 2.

As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations as set out in the annex to document HTW 2/3/1, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary.

Due to significant inconsistencies in alignment with the STCW Code and time constraints, the group was unable to finalize review of the model course. The group prepared amendments to the draft and bearing in mind the urgent need for this model course, the group recommended that [this work is continued intersessionally by establishing a correspondence group under the coordination of the United States] and submit the completed model course to HTW 3 for validation. Action requested of the Sub-Committee The Sub-Committee is invited to approve the report in general and: .1 validate the following draft revised model courses on: .1 Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations (annex 1); .2 Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations (annex 2); and .2 establish the correspondence group coordinated by the United States, to finalize the model course on Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations (paragraph 12). Report of Drafting Group 2 General

The Drafting Group on Validation of model training courses 2 met from 2 to 5 February 2015, under the chairmanship of Capt. Kersi Deboo (India). Terms of reference

The drafting group, taking into account decisions and comments in plenary, and the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, to consider documents HTW 2/3/4 and HTW 2/3/5 and: .1 compare the scope of the provisions in the STCW Code related to Maritime English and the contents of the raft model course as presented, with a view to validation by the Sub-Committee; .2 give preliminary consideration to the model course related to Engine-Room Simulator and provide guidance to the course developers with a view to finalizing the revised draft for validation by HTW 3; and .3 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Validation of model course Revised model course on Maritime English

As instructed, the Group considered the draft revised model course on Maritime English set out in the annex to document HTW 2/3/4, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary.

The following views were expressed during the discussion: .1 the model course was primarily meant for trainees who were from non-native English speaking backgrounds and was drafted bearing this in mind; .2 training requirements were divided into two parts in the course, namely,General Maritime English (GME) and Specialized Maritime English (SME). GME covered elementary and intermediate levels of proficiency in maritime English applicable for trainees both officers and ratings who were at least at an elementary language level; .3 SME covered the specific learning requirements which were based on STCW tables A-II/1, A-III/1, A-III/6, A-IV and A-V/2. The SME related to STCW table A-II/4 could be included in the GME section as many of the learning competencies were already covered in that section; .4 specific learning requirements of STCW tables A-II/5, III/4 and III/5 should also be taken into account in the GME section. .5 the course was not expected to be delivered in its entirety, but instructors should customize it to the trainees' needs, by including relevant parts from the course as applicable. Accordingly, the timetables mentioned in individual parts were not necessary and hence, should be deleted; .6 as per the terms of reference set out by the Sub-Committee, the scope of the Maritime English Model Course should be confined to the provisions and KUPs within the context of the STCW Code. The KUPs not related to STCW competencies should be revised accordingly; and .7 the number of classroom hours were excessive and need to be rationalized with the view to effectively reduce the total classroom hours. The Group, based on the aforementioned views, prepared amended text of the draft revised model course on Maritime English, as set out in annex 1. Revised model course on Engine-Room Simulator

As instructed, the Group taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary,

gave preliminary consideration to the draft revised model course on Engine-Room Simulator. The Group, took into account the following views expressed at the plenary, that the

revised draft model course as submitted: .1 was not structured as an Engine-Room Simulator model course; .2 caused concern as it reflected that the KUPs in tables III/1 and III/2 should be conducted using simulators; .3 was not in the format of an IMO simulator model course; and .4 should be reviewed by the course developers taking into account the guidance provided by the Sub-Committee and further revised, with a view to validation by HTW 3.

Based on the aforementioned, the Group gave preliminary consideration to the draft model course, and the following observations were made: .1 the draft revised model course is a curriculum for the training of engineer officers under STCW tables A-III/1 and A-III/2 where simulation assessment is permitted. It is per se not only a simulator training course but covers many other elements of knowledge based learning criteria (covered in IMO Model course 7.02 and 7.04) instead of performance based learning. It covers KUPs such as basic construction, identify parts, list symbols, label the components, describe how components function, which do not form part of Simulator based training; .2 the CBT (Computer-based Training) has been taken as Simulator training, whereas the CBT in its true form does not conform to the performance specifications of a simulator as given in STCW table A-I/12, part 1; .3 the course does not follow the format of other IMO Model courses on simulator training, e.g. 1.35, 1.36, 1.37 on Tanker cargo and ballast handling simulator, and 1.22 Ship Handling and Bridge Teamwork; .4 the course covers extensive theoretical engineering knowledge which would form the underpinning material for a student to know when demonstrating the competence on the simulator. It is thus not necessary to include in this model course as it is already covered under IMO model courses 7.02 and 7.04; .5 the application of teamwork, decision making and resource management to demonstrate competence in the use of leadership and managerial skills through simulation, has not been covered in the course.

In light of the aforementioned observations, the drafting group prepared a draft guidance note for the course developers, as set out in annex 2, with a view towards finalizing the revised text for validation at HTW 3.

Some members of the Group expressed an interest to provide assistance to the developers in the revision of the model course and their contact details have been passed on to the developers for informal communication. The Sub-Committee is invited to approve the report in general and: .1 validate the revised model course on Maritime English (annex 1); and .2 approve the guidance note for the course developers with a view to further revise the model course on Engine-Room Simulator and submit to HTW 3 for validation (annex 2). Annex 1 REVISED MODEL COURSE ON MARITIME ENGLISH (See HTW 2/WP.7/Add.1) Annex 2 GUIDANCE NOTE FOR THE DEVELOPERS FOR THE MODEL COURSE ON THE ENGINE-ROOM SIMULATOR 5. Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and

validation processes SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/5 REVISED GUIDELINES FOR MODEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING AND VALIDATION PROCESSES Proposal for the development, review and validation of model courses This document provides information on the overall process for model course development, review and validation Report of the Working Group 1 GENERAL

As instructed by the Sub-Committee, the Working Group on Training Matters 1 met from 2 to 5 February 2015 under the chairmanship of Mrs. Marina Angsell (Sweden).

The working group, taking into account comments and decisions made in Plenary, was instructed to: .1 consider document HTW 2/5 (United States) and develop draft revised Guidelines for the model course development, updating and validation processes for consideration by the Sub-Committee with a view to approval by the Committee; .2 review the list of IMO model courses in document HTW 1/WP.3, annex 3 and identify those model courses that require revision/updating as a priority; .3 advise the Sub-Committee on a process for a regular review of outdated model courses. .4 consider documents HTW 2/9 (United States) and HTW 2/9/1 (China) and develop draft amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code including transitional arrangements relating to training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters; and .5 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. REVISION OF GUIDANCE FOR MODEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING AND VALIDATION PROCESSES Draft revised Guidelines for the model course development, updating and validation processes

The group considered HTW 2/5 (United States) on the development of revised Guidelines for the model course development, updating and validation processes for consideration by the Sub-Committee.

The group could not agree on text in a footnote describing the meaning of "validation" in the context of the guidelines. Some delegations were of the opinion that it was important to clarify that validation of model courses could not be considered an official interpretation of an IMO instrument whereas others were of the opinion that the text proposed was unnecessarily negative as compared to resolution 9 adopted by the Manila Amendments where it is stated that model courses provide guidance on the implementation of the training and assessment provision of the STCW Convention and Code. Therefore, it was decided to put the footnote in square brackets for the Sub-Committee to decide on its inclusion.

The group agreed on the proposed Guidelines for the development, review and

validation of model courses, as set out in annex 1, and invites the Sub-Committee to endorse it with view to approval by the Committee. Review of IMO model courses and identification of those model courses that require revision/updating as a priority

The working group reviewed the list of model courses as well as the revised list of model courses and priorities approved by HTW 1 (HTW 1/WP.3, annex 3), and identified those model courses that require revision/updating on the basis of the order for prioritization as drafted in section 3.2 of the Guidelines for the development, review and validation of model courses.

The revised list of model courses and priorities:

Full revised list of model courses and priorities see in Annex 5 to WG1 Report. Process for a regular review of outdated model courses The group agreed that a method for reviewing existing model courses, so those that needed updating could be identified, was a key element for the Committees and Sub-Committees to make a decision on what model courses should be developed. Therefore, the group included a new section 3 on prioritization and review of model courses for

development or updating in the draft Guidelines for the development, review and validation of model courses. Section 3 of the draft guidelines states that a review of the model courses should be carried out every five years to decide whether updating was necessary. The group recognized that since many courses were five years or older, it would put great burden on the Secretariat if it was to revise all of these model courses as soon as the guidelines were approved. In this context, the Sub-Committee is invited to instruct the Secretariat to conduct a preliminary review and submit to HTW 3 for consideration. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE

The Sub-Committee is invited to: .1 decide on the inclusion of the text in the footnote in paragraph 1.1 of the Guidelines for the model course development, updating and validation processes (paragraph 3.2); .2 endorse the MSC-MEPC circular on Guidelines for the development, review and validation of model courses, and invite the Commitees to approve it (paragraph 3.3 and annex 1); .3 note the revised list of model courses and priorities (paragraph 3.5 and annex 5); .4 instruct the Secretariat to conduct a preliminary review of model courses that are five years or older, and submit to HTW 3 for consideration (paragraph 3.7); .5 endorse the draft text of amendments to the STCW Convention, related to regulations I/1.1, I/11 and V/4 (paragraph 4.12 and annex 2), with a view to approval by the Committee; .6 endorse the draft text of amendments to part A of the STCW Code, related to sections A-I/11 and A-V/4 (paragraph 4.13 and annex 3), with a view to approval by the Committee; .7 endorse the revised draft text of amendments to part B of STCW Code (paragraph 4.14 and annex 4), with a view to approval by the Committee. Annex 1 GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW AND VALIDATION OF MODEL COURSES

Proposal (a). Possible IAMU Research Theme: Model Courses development, review and implementation. Possible key concepts to be structured and researched within the theme: MET Goals: IAMU Model( or Standard) Courses development and active participation in IMO Model Courses development, review and implementation 6. Guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/INF.5 GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Introduction of Leadership training on training ship in Japan This document provides information on one of the methods of leadership training on the training ship in Japan SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING

HTW 2/6 GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Medical examination requirements, including colour vision testing

This document provides information on the outcome of the Experts' workshop held in Kobe, Japan, from 20 to 21 January 2014 to review the currently available options for colour vision testing and to recommend valid alternatives to those currently listed. The workshop took place following the publication of STCW.7/Circ.20 on Interim guidance on colour vision testing. The workshop reviewed the currently available colour vision tests and their validity, and considered the steps needed to produce more definitive guidance on the criteria to be used for assessing the adequacy of colour vision for navigational lookout duties. The workshop report notes that it is essential to first quantify the risks from deficient colour perception in order to set valid criteria for the issue of certificates of fitness. Progress in meeting other requirements for the issue of medical certificates to seafarers is also summarized. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/6/1 GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Differentiate STCW-related information to be communicated through GISIS based on the consideration of transparency

This document analyses various reporting and information communication obligations of Parties under Article IV, VIII, IX of the STCW Convention, and Section A-1/7 of the STCW Code from the perspectives of transparency and legal effect. Based on the analysis, suggestions are provided on future practical application of a GISIS module, aiming to reduce the administrative burden for the implementation of the STCW Convention. Report of Working Group 2

The Working Group 2 on Training matters (the group) met from 3 to 5 February 2015 under the chairmanship of Ms. Maryanne Adams (Marshall Islands). TERMS OF REFERENCE

The group was instructed, taking into account the comments and decisions made in plenary, to: Agenda item 6: .1 consider document HTW 2/6/1 (China) and develop guidance for the development of a specific GISIS module to comply with the reporting and information communication obligations of Parties under the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended;

The group , as instructed, considered document HTW 2/6/1 (China) with a view to develop guidance for the development of a specific GISIS module to comply with the reporting and information communication obligations of Parties under the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended.

The group commenced by discussing the languages in which documents should be submitted under the reporting requirements as this was not addressed in the current Convention. To assist developing countries to have access to useful reference material when developing their own standards and regulations, the group agreed to encourage

Member States to provide translations of their submissions into one of the IMO working languages.

During the discussions it transpired that there was potential for duplication of reporting by Member States as sets of information might be communicated under various GISIS modules. Hence the group agreed that decisions should be made when developing this matter further on the relevant information that should be submitted under each specific module so as to reduce the administrative burden for Governments. The possibility of using internet web-links rather than up-loading documents in GISIS should be considered.

The group considered the table in the annex to document HTW 2/6/1 including the different categories specified therein on accessing the various information communicated by STCW Parties. There was general agreement on the three categories proponent, namely: 1. Publicly available; 2. Available on request; and 3. Confidential (table in the annex to document HTW 2/6/1).

The group acknowledged that further work was required, in particular with respect to functional requirements, technical specifications and appropriate access rights but agreed that the table in document HTW 2/6/1 and aforementioned categories should be retained in the development of the module.

The delegation of Spain pointed out that the GISIS module could also be used by IMO Member State Audit officers as a preliminary assessment tool for a country's compliance of the IMO mandatory instruments under the III Code.

The delegation of the Russian Federation proposed to develop a questionnaire containing the core points to be evaluated against the Manila amendments requirements to be included in GISIS. It could be used as a self-assessment tool for Governments in order to identify any gaps in the implementation of the 2010 Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code.

Due to time constraints and given the early stage in the development of a new STCW related GISIS module, the group was not able to finalize the guidance and, therefore, agreed to recommend to the Sub-Committee to invite submissions from interested Member States and International Organizations to HTW 3 to progress the work. 8. Role of the human element SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/8 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Proposed approach for the revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue

The Committee at its ninety-fourth session (MSC 94) considered document MSC 94/18/7 (Australia et al.) and agreed to include a new output on "Revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue" assigning the HTW Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ, and instructed HTW 2 to give preliminary consideration to the new output under its existing agenda item "Role of the human element" and place it on the agenda for HTW 3. This document provides information on a proposed approach for the revision and update of the Guidelines on Fatigue (annex to MSC/Circ.1014) for preliminary consideration by the Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watch keeping at its second session (HTW 2) SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING

HTW 2/8/1 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Human Element and Training Issues regarding the implication of e-Navigation

This document refers to document MEPC 66/21, paragraph 16.4 concerning the importance of the role of "human element on board ships". In particular, the Correspondence Group (CG) on e-navigation included an extensive discussion on the implication of specific elements including the human element. The CG on e-navigation identified and approved five factors directly related to safety (FSA) and seven factors related to risk and cost-benefits (RCO). The application of Human Centered Design (HCD) to obtain usability and security of equipment and systems has achieved a double objective, namely, to reduce training, and simplify their use for practical familiarization by the staff. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING S HTW 2/8/2 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Proposed approach on the revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue

This document comments on the proposals in document HTW 2/8 submitted by Australia, Dominica, the Marshall Islands, IFSMA and the Nautical Institute, with regard to a proposed approach to revising MSC/Circ.1014 – Guidelines on Fatigue SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/INF.2 IAMU understanding of some Human Element issues

This document provides the Sub-Committee with information on the outcome of the IAMU Forum on Maritime Education and Training (MET) in Higher Education, which was held in Tokyo in February 2014. The Forum was devoted to trends in the Industry and implementation of a quality standards system (QSS) for on board training (OBT), which is mandatory for the MET process in accordance with requirements of the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended, and the STCW Code. This document also presents some outcomes of the IAMU research project "Influence of resources on implementation of quality procedures in MET system and safety at sea" (IRMETS). SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/INF.3 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Human Error: Controlled Language in Operating and Maintenance Manuals Supplied to Ships

MSC.1/Circ.1253 invited Member Governments to recognize the necessity for up-to-date, accurate and user-friendly shipboard technical operating and maintenance manuals to be available in the working language of the ship. This document provides information on the introduction of a controlled language into operating and maintenance

manuals as a way of reducing human error associated with substandard content, specifically, the aviation standard of Simplified Technical English ASD-STE100 (STE). Evidence is presented to support the efficacy of error-rate reduction, and the flexibility of the standard which supports integration into other safety-critical and non-safety-critical industries. IMarEST recommends that a controlled language should be adopted as a standard for operating and maintenance manuals supplied to ships. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/INF.6 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Information on the CyClaDes Project: Crew-centered Design and Operations of ships and ship systems

This document provides information concerning the planned activities and outcomes from the CyClaDes Project related to the human element in shipping SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/INF.7 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Seafarer Fatigue, Minimum Manning and the Mitigation of Fatigue

The report of the forty-fourth session of the STW Sub-Committee (STW 44/19) stated that seafarer fatigue is an issue of serious concern and needed to be discussed urgently and that the Human Element Working Group needed to address fatigue in the context of hours of work, hours of rest and minimum safe manning. This document takes into account the discussions at STW 44 and provides information on its relation to the major area of concern to seafarers, in particular the master/chief mate two-watch system. Report of Working Group 3 GENERAL

Working Group 3 on Human Element issues (the group) met from 3 to 5 February 2015 under the chairmanship of Capt. Moises De Gracia (Panama). TERMS OF REFERENCE 3 The group was instructed, taking into account the comments and decisions made in plenary, to: Agenda item 8: .1 consider documents HTW 2/2/1, HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1 and III 1/18, annex 4 (Secretariat) and review the draft MSC-MEPC.4 circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code, taking into account the views expressed by IACS on further definitions needed, prior to their approval, and provide comments as appropriate, with a view to subsequent approval by the Committees; .2 consider documents HTW 2/8 (Australia et al.) and HTW 2/8/2 (United Kingdom) and advise the Sub-Committee, as appropriate; Proposal (b). Possible IAMU Research Theme: Role of the Human Element

Possible key concepts to be structured and researched within the theme: Human Element and Maritime Safety Goals: Increase Maritime Safety 9. Mandatory Code for ships operating in polar waters SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/9 MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS Training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters

This document outlines a proposal for the inclusion of training requirements into the STCW Convention and Code, for officers and crew on board ships operating in Polar waters SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/9/1 MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS Proposed transitional arrangements for training and qualification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters

This document proposes amendments to the draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code relating to the Polar Code, on transitional arrangements for training and qualification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters from the date of entry into force of the Polar Code Report of the Working Group 1 GENERAL

As instructed by the Sub-Committee, the Working Group on Training Matters 1 met from 2 to 5 February 2015 under the chairmanship of Mrs. Marina Angsell (Sweden).

The working group, taking into account comments and decisions made in Plenary, was instructed to: .4 consider documents HTW 2/9 (United States) and HTW 2/9/1 (China) and develop draft amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code including transitional arrangements relating to training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters; AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER V OF THE STCW CONVENTION AND CODE RELATING TO TRAININGREQUERMENTS FOR OFFICER AND CREW ON BOARD SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS

The group considered the proposal presented in HTW 2/9 (United States) and HTW 2/9/1 (China), and had a thorough discussion on the proposals presented.

The group discussed how to create flexibility in the sea service requirement for certification in advance training for ships operating in polar waters and agreed that it

would be inappropriate to introduce a description of areas or conditions that could be deemed as equivalent to "polar waters" as this could, potentially, be in conflict with the Polar Code or add confusion. The group agreed that it was Administrations that had the information needed to do the analysis needed and therefore were the most suitable to determine what is to be considered as sea service equivalent to sea service in polar waters.

On the understanding that article IX of the Convention was not used for equivalences made on a regular basis, the group agreed to include, in paragraph 4.2 of the new regulation V/4, a provision on acceptance of seagoing service equivalent to seagoing service in polar waters. The group agreed it would be appropriate if the equivalences granted according to the new regulation should be reported to the Secretary General, in conformity with article IX.

The delegation of the Russian Federation expressed the opinion that approved seagoing service should be limited to polar waters only.

The delegation of the United Kingdom was of the opinion that the term watchkeeping in regulation V/4 might be unclear in this context.

The group did extensive work on the tables in the Code in order to ensure that no duplication with other training requirements or inconsistencies were present. However, some Member States and observer delegations were of the view that a number of duplications to training mentioned in other parts of the STCW Code, and accompanying IMO model courses, still remained. These delegations also noted that in their view the group had been tasked to remove such duplications.

The group agreed that certificates of proficiency should be issued for basic as well as advanced training for ships operating in polar waters. This decision was based on the fact that there is a sea service requirement for advanced training and the need for consistency between basic and advanced certification. Some delegations stated that it would be more appropriate to require masters and officers to hold documentary evidence of basic training for ships operating in polar waters.

The group concluded that regulation I/11 or section A-I/11, on revalidation, would become applicable due to the decision of requiring certificates of proficiency to be issued and developed amendments accordingly. The group agreed that the requirements for revalidation should provide flexibility. The majority was of the opinion that paragraph 1 of section A-I/11 should be used as the model for the revalidation requirements as it would provide the most flexibility and clarity. However, some delegations preferred using paragraph 3 of regulation V/2 as a model for the revalidation requirements as they believed this option would create more flexibility.

The group also developed amendments to table B-I/2, List of certificates or documentary evidence required under the STCW Convention, to include the appropriate references to the new certificates of proficiency in basic training for ships operating in polar waters and in advanced training for ships operating in polar waters.

As instructed, the group developed transitional arrangements relating to training requirements for masters and officers on board ships operating in polar waters. Some delegations stated that it did not think the transitional arrangements agreed by the group for certification for basic and advanced training was practicable for non-ice strengthened category C ships performing seasonal operations and argued for a shorter sea going service time in the preceding five years.

The group noted that there was a transitional period between anticipated the entry into force of the Polar Code (1 January 2017) and the amendments to the SCTW Convention (1 January 2018), and agreed to include in the draft MSC resolutions amending STCW Convention and Code, text urging Parties to implement these amendments at an early date.

The group agreed on the proposed amendments to the STCW Convention regarding training and certification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters as set out in annex 2.

The group agreed on the proposed amendments to part A of the STCW Code regarding training and certification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters as set out in annex 3.

The group agreed on the proposed amendments to part B of the STCW Code regarding training and certification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters as set out in annex 4. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE

The Sub-Committee is invited to: .5 endorse the draft text of amendments to the STCW Convention, related to regulations I/1.1, I/11 and V/4 (paragraph 4.12 and annex 2), with a view to approval by the Committee; .6 endorse the draft text of amendments to part A of the STCW Code, related to sections A-I/11 and A-V/4 (paragraph 4.13 and annex 3), with a view to approval by the Committee; .7 endorse the revised draft text of amendments to part B of STCW Code (paragraph 4.14 and annex 4), with a view to approval by the Committee. Proposal (c). Possible IAMU Research Theme: Navigation in Polar Waters. Possible key concepts to be structured and researched within the theme: Methodological aspects of the training the personnel involved in Polar Water Navigation. Goals: Development and Implementation Polar Water Navigation Training Criteria 10. Review of STCW passenger ship specific safety training SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/10 REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Outcome of MSC 93

This document provides information on the decision taken by MSC 93 related to the Review of Passenger Ship Safety relevant to the work of the Sub-Committee Introduction

The Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) held its ninety-third session from 14 to 23 May 2014, and, having considered the report of the Working Group on Passenger Ship Safety, instructed HTW 2 to include the item "Enhanced damage stability training" under the existing planned output 5.2.2.2 on the review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training (MSC 93/22, paragraph 6.26.4). Action requested of the Sub-Committee

The Sub-Committee is invited to note the above information and take action as appropriate. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING

HTW 2/10/1 REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Report of the Correspondence Group

This document provides the outcome of the work of the Correspondence Group on development of training requirements to be used by seafarers on board passenger ships Discussion

There were a large number of areas of discussion emanating from the initial proposals from the United States. Some were small, textual changes that were easily agreed to and addressed. Others resulted in significant comments and will require further consideration and continued discussion to gain consensus.

General agreement was reached in the following: .1 Retention of the words "Human Behaviour" in the title of chapter V, section A-V/2; .2 The removal of "engaged on international voyages" from the proposed text; .3 Basic Emergency Training should be changed to Basic Emergency Familiarization and conducted onboard the ship; .4 Duplication of existing training requirements, particularly those requirements found in Regulation I/14 of the STCW Convention and chapter VI of the STCW Code should be avoided;and .5 A hierarchy and proper order of familiarization and training should be established to minimize any repetition of required competencies to be obtained.

As a result of the significant number of comments received during the group's work, it was not possible to achieve consensus within the correspondence group in many areas to develop clear training standards. Disagreement still exists in basic areas such as the timing in which the training should take place, the applicability for each type of training and the details of what competencies should be included under each type of training. In addition, a proposal on whether to use a three-tier or two-tier training system was made. Many excellent proposals were made in these areas to address concerns and inconsistencies and some support for various proposals. However, further discussion of each proposal, on a section by section basis, is still required.

In order to appropriately capture all input of the group, a single document was created which includes in it nearly all of the comments and proposals submitted. In some cases, omissions of general comments in support of a member's position or proposal were not included but the proposal for a change was put forward in the document.

This document contains three annexes: .1 Annex 1 contains the correspondence group's base document, with comments and proposals/changes captured; please note that due to the conflicting proposals, in some cases the references to individual sections are not correct and will be updated during further review; .2 Annex 2 contains the general comments submitted by correspondence group members; and .3 Annex 3 contains two tables that provide a reference for the original training requirements

Related Items for Future Review

There were two final items that were presented within the group's discussions that the group felt were premature to discuss. The first was the fact that transitional provisions

between the existing training agreements and any amendments agreed should be addressed at some point in the future. The development of such guidance would be dependent upon the changes to the training requirements. As such, there was general agreement that the development of any such transitional provisions would be required to take place at a future time, after any amendments to the STCW Convention and Code had been agreed upon. And second, there would be a need to develop training curricula in the future depending on the amendments agreed.

The correspondence group could not reach agreement on the following points which would require further discussion: .1 applicability of proposed amendments; .2 the basic approach of a two-tier or three-tier training system; .3 whether the applicable training/familiarization should be conducted prior to joining the ship, prior to being assigned shipboard duties or prior to being assigned emergency duties in accordance with the muster list; .4 the details of which competencies should be included under each type of training; and .5 the determination of which parts of the required training could be conducted on board the ship. Action requested of the Sub-Committee

The Sub-Committee is invited to consider the information provided and decide, as appropriate. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/10/2 REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Comments on the report of the correspondence group

This document comments on the outcome of the work of the correspondence group on the review and revision of passenger ship specific training within the STCW Convention and Code (HTW 2/10/1) Discussion

It is evident that well-drafted and comprehensive training proposals could clarify the training requirements to the benefit of passenger ship safety and all stakeholders. The co-sponsors approached the review of passenger ship specific safety training aware of the following four principles:

The proposed amendments should reflect the diversity of passenger ships and recognize the differing implications the amendments may have for the different ship types;

The proposed amendments should be clearly defined and appropriate to the differing capacities, duties and responsibilities of personnel on board all passenger ships;

The proposed amendments should not duplicate existing training in the STCW Convention and Code, nor conflict with the provisions of other IMO instruments; and

Any new training requirements should be based on a demonstrated compelling need related to passenger ship safety.

There are many different types of passenger ships, each having many and varying roles for personnel on board. The co-sponsors consider it essential to ensure that the scope of application of training and familiarization requirements is clear and precise. Clearly defined applicability can ensure that the correct persons receive the correct training and familiarization in accordance with their capacity, duties and responsibilities.

With regard to the structure of the proposed amendments, the co-sponsors recall that

competency tables are generally employed in section A of the STCW Code where training is to be approved by the flag State with a corresponding certificate to be issued by that State. However, other types of training, that are not required to be approved by the flag State, or specific training that may be carried out on board, or shipboard familiarization, do not require the development of competency tables. Therefore, it would be inconsistent with the STCW Code to develop competency tables where they are not required in these proposed amendments. The STCW Code also includes lists of "abilities" which serve to provide flexibility.

The co-sponsors therefore suggest that: .1 A competency table should only be included in section A of the STCW Code to provide detail where the training will culminate in a certificate issued by the flag State; and .2 "Abilities" set out in lists in section A of the STCW Code should be used for all other types of training and familiarization to provide detail of their components.

STCW regulation V/2, paragraph 2, states that "prior to being assigned shipboard duties on board passenger ships, seafarers shall have completed the training required in accordance with their capacity, duties and responsibilities". However, on passenger ships, it may be logistically difficult to determine and conduct the appropriate training and familiarization for certain personnel as all of their emergency duties and responsibilities may not have been assigned prior to their arrival to the ship. The co-sponsors suggest that a lack of flexibility could hinder efforts to ensure that personnel are sufficiently trained and familiarized.

The correspondence group agreed that shipboard familiarization was acceptable and appropriate for the basic level of training for passenger ships. Consequently, STCW regulation V/2, paragraph 2 requires amending to allow flexibility for the timing of each of the training levels. The co-sponsors consider that: .1 personnel should be trained and familiarized in accordance with their capacity, duties and responsibilities, and as appropriate to their actual responsibilities related to passengers in an emergency situation; and .2 a shipboard emergency and the requisite response is, by definition, ship specific, and consequently some shipboard familiarization and on board training is necessary.

The co-sponsors consider that the number of personnel on some passenger ships warrants the development of transitional provisions or interim guidance to support the amendments. It will be important to allow all stakeholders a sufficient period of time to make the necessary arrangements for any new requirements. Proposal

In light of the principles and clarifications above, the co-sponsors propose the following approach to the special training requirements in the STCW Convention and Code for personnel on passenger ships. Passenger ship emergency familiarization

The co-sponsors consider this to be the basic level for applicable personnel serving on board passenger ships in accordance with their capacity, duties and responsibilities. It should be carried out as shipboard familiarization. Documentary evidence of the familiarization should be recorded by the company with electronic records1 being considered acceptable.

Care should be taken to ensure that the abilities to be listed in section A-V/2 for passenger ship emergency familiarization do not duplicate the abilities listed under safety familiarization training (section A-VI/1, paragraph 1) and, as applicable, certain components of basic training (section A-VI/1, paragraph 2). Furthermore, the abilities should only address passenger ship specific "gaps". Abilities for inclusion in passenger ship

emergency familiarization should be listed in the format currently found in section A-V/2, paragraph 2, and amended as appropriate. Passenger ship crowd management training

The co-sponsors consider passenger ship crowd management to be applicable to personnel assigned duties on the muster list that involve interacting with and providing direct assistance to passengers or personnel assigned responsibility for a muster station. Passenger ship crowd management training should be supplemented by passenger ship emergency familiarization and should be for applicable personnel only. Documentary evidence of the familiarization training should be recorded by the company with electronic records being considered acceptable.

Care should be taken to ensure that the abilities to be listed under section A-V/2 do not duplicate the abilities listed under passenger ship emergency familiarization or any other chapters of the STCW Code. Abilities for inclusion in passenger ship crowd management training should be listed in the format currently found in section A-V/2, paragraph 1, and amended as appropriate. Passenger ship crisis management and human behaviour training

The co-sponsors consider crisis management and human behaviour training to be appropriate to personnel directly involved in evaluating, planning, managing and decision-making in an emergency response. Passenger ship crisis management and human behaviour training should be supplemented by passenger ship emergency familiarization and should be for applicable personnel only. In practice, this training should be for applicable management level personnel.

A competency table already exists in the STCW Code for this training as table A-V/2 and could be amended as appropriate. Ro-ro passenger ship training

The co-sponsors consider this to be specialized training for applicable personnel serving on board ro-ro passenger ships. Given the diverse abilities currently listed under section A-V/2, paragraph 4, the co-sponsors consider that personnel should be trained to attain the abilities appropriate to their capacity, duties and responsibilities. The applicable personnel should also be required to complete the training and familiarization for all passenger ships as applicable.

Care should be taken to ensure that the abilities to be listed in section A-V/2 do not duplicate the required abilities listed under the proposed passenger ship emergency familiarization or any other chapters of the STCW Code. Furthermore, the abilities should only address ro-ro passenger ship specific "gaps". Abilities for inclusion in ro-ro passenger ship training should be listed in the format currently found in section A-V/2, paragraph 4, and amended as appropriate. Action requested of the Sub-Committee

The Sub-Committee is invited to consider the comments in this document, the proposed approach in paragraphs 10 to 17, and take action as appropriate. SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/10/3 REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Enhanced damage stability training programme

This document, recalling the tangible output from the Cruise Ship Safety Forum related to enhanced damage stability training programme, provides comments which can serve as a basis for discussion on enhanced damage stability training during the Sub-Committee's review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training Discussion

Training is a fundamental component to ensure that knowledge is gained and sustained. Although the STCW Convention includes some standards for intact and damage stability training, this subject should be explored in greater detail for those officers and engineers that work on board passenger ships.

The purpose of this document is to recall a content framework developed by the Cruise Ship Safety Forum – a consortium of cruise ship operators, ship yards, classification societies, and CLIA – which could be used in the development of a damage stability training programme to enhance survivability for both new and existing ships. The intended audience of this course is licensed deck officers and marine engineers. The proposal for such a course is intended to ensure that uniform enhanced content standards are provided across the industry. CLIA recognizes that this is not an all-encompassing list and envisages that there may be additions to the curriculum. Enhanced damage stability training programme

The development of the course should be done with a target audience being the guiding principle for content detail. A majority of learning should take place through experience (practical exercises or case studies) with a minimum of time devoted to the standard textbook approach.

The material presented within the training course should be provided to the participant with the intent of "train the trainer". The participant returns to the ship to apply the learning in a ship specific manner, potentially holding on board ship specific training.

The subjects covered within a damage stability training course should contain but are not limited to: .1 Intact and damage stability theory: .1 refresher training in this subject as it pertains to cruise passenger ships; and .2 GZ curve. .2 International regulations: .1 highlights of SOLAS 90, SOLAS 2009 and Intact Stability Code as each pertain to designand operation of cruise passenger ships; and .2 stability criterion. .3 Operational stability management: .1 lightweight management and growth; .2 incline procedure and lightweight survey; .3 GM limit curves including impact of trim; .4 draft surveys; .5 use of loading computer for intact operation including ship model updates and certification process; .6 adding and removing weights; .7 strength limits and the impact of waves; .8 company specific policies and procedures; and .9 practical exercises to reinforce the above. .4 Damage stability management:

.1 structure of cruise passenger ships; .2 watertight integrity features; .3 survivability of cruise passenger ships based on damage location (grounding versus raking); .4 impact of weather on ship stability and survivability; .5 limitations of lifesaving equipment; .6 company specific damage response strategy; .7 cross flooding, down and up flooding and progressive flooding; .8 immersed angle and impact of list; .9 impact of free surface in compartments and tanks; .10 strength considerations following damage; .11 damage stability computer, including: .1 limitations; .2 use of a computer to replicate the incident and extract decision support information; .3 proactive use of a computer to simulate potential consequences of progressive flooding; and .12 case studies and practical exercises to reinforce the above. .5 Damage control techniques: .1 ship wide assessment strategy; .2 communication techniques including standard terminology; .3 boundary (compartmentalization) control; .4 evacuation of affected areas; .5 use of pumps and emergency bilge connections; .6 flow rates; .7 utilization of fire doors and other ship items for increasing ship survivability; .8 damage control strategy and practical techniques for addressing compromised design intent and progressive flooding items in that priority (see table 1); and .9 case studies to reinforce the above. .6 Practical training .1 wet trainer with command and control; and .2 exercises in protecting design intent and halting or slowing progressive flooding.

Conclusion

Enhanced damage stability training represents the culmination of operational damage stability management and is intended to drive a step change in safety on new and existing ships. CLIA invites HTW 2 to consider the content framework for enhanced damage stability training under the review of the STCW passenger ship-specific safety training programme.

CLIA will be pleased to provide additional input to the Organization on this subject as appropriate. Action requested of the Sub-Committee

The Sub-Committee is invited to consider the information in this document and take action as appropriate. Report of Working Group 2

The Working Group 2 on Training matters (the group) met from 3 to 5 February 2015 under the chairmanship of Ms. Maryanne Adams (Marshall Islands). TERMS OF REFERENCE

The group was instructed, taking into account the comments and decisions made in plenary, to Agenda item 10:

consider documents HTW 2/10/1 (United States) and HTW 2/10/2 (ICS, CLIA, INTERFERRY) and prepare draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code providing revised training requirements for passenger ships, for consideration by the Sub Committee with a view to approval by the Committee;

As instructed, the group considered the proposals made in documents HTW 2/10/1 (Report of the Correspondence Group) and HTW 2/10/2 on draft minimum requirements for training and qualifications for seafarers on passenger ships and used the annex to document HTW 2/10/1 as the basic document.

Following the seven principles discussed in plenary on the general approach to be taken in the development of a revised standard, the group commenced its work on the draft regulation and the proposed three levels of training.

During the initial discussions an inconsistency was identified between the proposals and the existing requirements of the Convention. The inconsistency related to the training requirements of Section A-V/2, paragraph 2 which needed to be further considered. Passenger ship emergency familiarization

The group considered the proposed emergency familiarization and agreed that such familiarization was to be distinguished from the requirements in chapter VI/1 for all types of ships as the former would be passenger ship specific and conducted in accordance with the duties and responsibilities of the seafarer concerned towards passenger safety.

In discussing the applicability of passenger ship emergency familiarization, the group agreed that this requirement should apply to personnel serving on board passenger ships.

The group discussed the need to provide evidence for passenger ship emergency familiarization which would not necessarily require documentary evidence as set out in regulation V/2, paragraph 8. The group agreed that it was a company's responsibility under regulation I/14, paragraph 1.4 to ensure that such evidence of familiarization is readily accessible. Passenger ship crowd management training

The group had a lengthy debate on whether ratings should receive crowd management training. While some delegations were of the opinion that all ratings should receive such training, regardless whether assigned in the muster list to assist passengers in emergency situations or not, other delegations argued that only those with assigned duties and responsibilities in this respect in the muster list should be required to undergo crowd management training.

The observer delegations from ICS, CLIA and INTERFERRY expressed concern about the addition of "ratings" as a new category as they considered it to be a significant expansion of the current scope of the current crowd management without providing the compelling need for such an expansion. It was their view that passenger ship crowd management training should only be applicable to persons designated on muster lists to assist passengers in emergency situations on board passenger ships. It was further argued that there were many ratings to whom crowd management would not apply as they may have not been assigned duties on the muster list to assist passengers in an emergency response; or have been assigned other duties in an emergency response.

In discussing regulation V/2 the group discussed what personnel constituted an "officer" and what personnel constituted "ratings" on passenger ships. The group noted that Governments and the industry applied the definitions of "officers" and "ratings" as defined in regulation I/1.

While discussing the matter of which persons on board are considered to fall under the definitions of "officers" and "ratings" the group voiced concern that there was currently no definition in the STCW Convention for the term "crew" which added to the confusion in the consistent application of the terms "officers", "ratings" and "other personnel".

The group agreed that passenger ship crowd management training would be applicable to masters, officers, ratings qualified in accordance with chapters II, III and VII and other personnel designated on the muster list.

The group debated the issue of approving passenger ship crowd management training with a slight majority in favour of removing the word "approved". However, during the discussion it was highlighted that until the criteria of evaluating competence, whether elements would be ship specific or not, it would be difficult to reach consensus within the group. The group therefore agreed that there was a need to revisit this issue when the table of competence for passenger ship crowd management training is discussed.

The delegation of the Netherlands stated that the current status quo with respect to regulation V/2, paragraph 5 should be retained, as they applied the provision for assessing the minimum safe manning of passenger ships, which was then taken into account when issuing the Minimum Safe Manning Document. Crisis management and human behaviour training

The group discussed regulation V/2, paragraph 6 on crisis management and human behaviour training and agreed that this requirement should continue to apply to masters, chief engineer officers, chief mates, second engineer officers and any person designated on the muster list as having responsibility for the safety of passengers in emergency situations on board passenger ships as was in the original text. The text also remained unmodified for the related tables of competency.

The delegation of China supported by others expressed concerns about the possible confusion caused by current paragraph 6 of regulation V-2 with respect to the applicability of Crisis Management Training. In their view the applicability to "person having responsibility for safety of passengers in emergency situations" is too general and could not be easily identified. Hence person having responsibilities to assist passengers in emergency situations required to obtain the crowd management training might also be considered to be "person having responsibility for safety of passengers in emergency situations" which was not the intention of the group. The delegation of China therefore proposed to define such responsibility by addition of the term "immediate".

The delegation of France and others cautioned the use of "immediate responsibility" as was could be subject to interpretations. It was therefore suggested that a definition of "immediate responsibility" could be prepared on the basis of the Section B-V/1 "Person with immediate responsibility" of the STCW Code

The delegation of Spain stated that when further exploring this issue, the principle of

non-downgrading the existing standards should be observed. Safety training for personnel providing direct service to passengers in passenger spaces

The group also discussed at length whether to retain existing regulation V/2, paragraph 5 (safety training for personnel providing direct service in passenger spaces) as this could possibly introduce a fourth tier of training in addition to the newly introduced passenger ship emergency familiarization and the existing training for crowd management and crisis management and human behaviour training. In order to ensure no downgrade to existing standards the group agreed to retain the existing requirements for personnel providing direct service to passengers in passenger spaces. However, no agreement could be found on the appropriate section in the Code. Extension of target completion date to 2016

The group could not finalize all the outstanding issues raised by the correspondence group as contained in document HTW 2/10/1 and the proposals submitted to this session of the Sub-Committee. In order to finalize this work the group recommends that the Committee be invited to extend the target completion year for this output to [2016].

The group agreed, in order to progress the work on the draft amendments to chapter V/2, to recommend to the Sub-Committee to invite member States and observers to make submissions to HTW 3 taking into account the text in document HTW 2/WP.4, annex 1 ACTION REQUESTED OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE

The Sub-Committee is invited to approve the report in general and in particular to: - note the group's discussion on the confusion as to the consistent application of the terms "officers", "ratings" and "other personnel" (paragraphs 20 and 21); - endorse, in principle, the draft amendments to regulation V/2 and section A-V/2, shown without square brackets, (paragraphs 12 to 29 and annex 1); - endorse the recommendation to invite the Committee to extend the target completion year for the output "Review of the STCW passenger ship-specific safety training" to 2016 (paragraph 30); - agree to invite Member States and observers to make submissions to HTW 3 taking into account the text in document HTW 2/WP.4, annex 1 (paragraph 31). 12. First outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)

The Sub-Committee recalled that MSC 90 had included in the 2012-2013 biennial agenda of COMSAR, NAV and STW Sub-Committees and provisional agendas for COMSAR 17 and STW 44 an unplanned output on "Review and modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)", with a target completion year of 2017, assigning the COMSAR Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ in association with the NAV and STW Sub-Committees.

The Sub-Committee, noting that no documents had been submitted for consideration or referred to the Sub-Committee by NCSR 1 for review, deferred further consideration to HTW 3 pending further input/referral from NCSR 2. 13. E-navigation strategy implementation plan The Sub-Committee will be invited to address any specific questions related to human

element aspects contained in the draft harmonized guideline, raised by the Correspondence Group on Harmonization of Guidelines related to e-navigation, and consider any relevant proposals submitted by Member Governments and international organizations, and decide accordingly.

The Sub-Committee recalled that HTW 1 had agreed that it was premature to consider any training requirements, pending the finalization of the SIP (HTW 1/21, paragraphs 20.9 to 20.13).

The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 94 had approved the e-navigation Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP), as set out in document NCSR 1/28, annex 7. The Sub-Committee, bearing in mind that MSC 94 approved the SIP, agreed to invite the Committee to delete this output, when discussing agenda item 16. 16.Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for HTW 3

Taking into account the progress made at this session and the relevant decisions of MSC 93 and MSC 94, the Chairman, in consultation with the Secretariat, prepared the proposed biennial agenda of the Sub-Committee for the 2016-2017 biennium and the draft provisional agenda for HTW 3 DRAFT PROVISIONAL AGENDA FOR HTW 3 Provisional agenda for HTW 3 Opening of the session 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Decisions of other IMO bodies 3. Validated model training courses (5.2.2.3) 4. Reports on unlawful practices associated with certificates of competency (5.2.2.4) [5. Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes (5.2.2.6)] 6. Guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments (5.2.2.1) 7. Role of the human element (n/a)

8. Revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue (to be assigned) [9. Review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training (5.2.2.2)] 10. Amendments to SOLAS chapter II-1 and associated guidelines on damage control drills for passenger ships (5.1.1.6) 11. First outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) (5.2.5.2) 12. Revision of requirements for escape route signs and equipment location markings in SOLAS and related instruments (5.1.2.3) 13. Amendments to the IGF Code and development of guidelines for low-flashpoint fuels (5.2.1.2) 14. Review MODU Code, LSA Code and MSC.1/Circ.1206/Rev.1 (5.2.1.32) 15. Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for HTW 4 16. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2017 17. Any other business 18. Report to the Maritime Safety Committee 17. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2016

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Maritime Safety Committee, the

Sub-Committee unanimously re-elected Mr. Brad Groves (Australia) as Chairman and Ms. Mayte Medina (United States) as Vice-Chairman for the year 2016. 18. Any other business SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/18/1 ANY OTHER BUSINESS Interim guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments

This document provides information on the decision taken by MSC 93 on Interim guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments (MSC.1/Circ.1483) relevant to the work of the Sub-Committee SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/18/2 ANY OTHER BUSINESS Consolidation of ECDIS-related IMO circulars

This document provides information on the decision taken by NCSR 1 related to the draft MSC circular on ECDIS – Guidance for good practice relevant to the work of the Sub-Committee SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING HTW 2/18/3 ANY OTHER BUSINESS Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours

This document provides information on the decision taken by III 1 on the draft MSC circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours relevant to the work of the Sub-Committee 19. Report to the Maritime Safety Committee The Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping (HTW) held its second session from 2 to 6 February 2015 under the Chairmanship of Mr. Bradley Groves (Australia), who was unanimously elected as Chairman for 2015 at HTW 1. The Vice-Chairman, Ms. Mayte Medina (United States) was also unanimously elected as Vice-Chairman for 2015 at HTW 1.

The session was attended by delegations and observers from Member Governments,

Associate Members of IMO; by observers from intergovernmental organizations; and by non-governmental organizations in consultative status, as listed in document HTW 2/INF.1. The Secretary-General welcomed participants and delivered his opening address.

Full text of the Report to the Maritime Safety Committee see IMO website - HTW 2/WP.1 - DRAFT REPORT TO THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE 13.02.2015 Respectfully submitted, Capt. Dmytro Zhukov Senior Lecturer Odessa National Maritime Academy

Annex 1 HTW Session 2 54 documents Meeting Documents > Sub-Committee > HTW > HTW Documents

Agenda Symbol & Title Originator Date

1. - HTW 2/INF.1 - LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Secretariat 10/02/2015

2. 1

HTW 2/1 - PROVISIONAL AGENDA for the second session of the Sub-Committee, to be held at IMO Headquarters, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR from Monday, 2 February to Friday, 6 February 2015

Secretariat 29/07/2014

3. 1 HTW 2/1/1 - ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Annotations to the provisional agenda


4. 1 HTW 2/1/2 - ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Arrangements for working and drafting groups at HTW 2


5. 2 HTW 2/2 - DECISIONS OF OTHER IMO BODIES Outcome of MEPC 66, MSC 93, NCSR 1 and III 1


6. 2 HTW 2/2/1 - DECISIONS OF OTHER IMO BODIES Outcome of MSC 94


7. 2 HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1 - DECISIONS OF OTHER IMO BODIES Outcome of MSC 94 Corrigendum


8. 3

HTW 2/INF.4 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Review and revision of IMO model courses pursuant to the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code

IMLA and IAMU 16/12/2014

9. 3 HTW 2/WP.6 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report of Drafting Group 1

Drafting Group 06/02/2015

10. 3 HTW 2/WP.6/Add.1 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report of Drafting Group 1




12. 3 HTW 2/WP.7 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report of Drafting Group 2





14. 3 HTW 2/3 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report on the model course programme


15. 3

HTW 2/3/1 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations


16. 3

HTW 2/3/2 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model Course – Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations


17. 3

HTW 2/3/3 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model Course – Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations


18. 3 HTW 2/3/4 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Maritime English


19. 3 HTW 2/3/5 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Model course – Engine-Room Simulator


20. 3

HTW 2/3/6 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Presentation to the international maritime community of the International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters (CIOAA) provided by the Maritime Authority of Chile

Chile 02/12/2014

21. 3

HTW 2/3/6/Rev.1 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Presentation to the international maritime community of the International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters (CIOAA) provided by the Maritime Authority of Chile

Chile 12/12/2014

22. 3

HTW 2/3/7 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Revision of IMO model course 1.07 on Radar Navigation at Operational Level

China 16/12/2014


23. 3

HTW 2/3/8 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Offer to develop an IMO model course on the special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels

Norway 12/12/2014

24. 3

HTW 2/3/9 - VALIDATION OF MODEL TRAINING COURSES Proposed amendments to the ECDIS and IBS/INS Model courses, updating and validation processes

Italy 22/12/2014

25. 4

HTW 2/4 - REPORTS ON UNLAWFUL PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY Reports of fraudulent certificates


26. 5,9 HTW 2/WP.3 - TRAINING MATTERS Report of the Working Group 1

Working Group 06/02/2015

27. 5

HTW 2/5 - REVISED GUIDELINES FOR MODEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING AND VALIDATION PROCESSES Proposal for the development, review and validation of model courses

United States 02/12/2014

28. 6

HTW 2/INF.5 - GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Introduction of Leadership training on training ship in Japan

Japan 12/12/2014

29. 6,10,18 HTW 2/WP.4 - TRAINING MATTERS Report of Working Group 2


30. 6

HTW 2/6 - GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Medical examination requirements, including colour vision testing

IMHA 09/12/2014

31. 6

HTW 2/6/1 - GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS Differentiate STCW-related information to be communicated through GISIS based on the consideration of transparency

China 12/12/2014

32. 8

HTW 2/INF.2 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT IAMU understanding of some Human Element issues

IAMU 24/11/2014


33. 8

HTW 2/INF.3 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Human Error: Controlled Language in Operating and Maintenance Manuals Supplied to Ships

IMarEST 14/11/2014

34. 8

HTW 2/INF.6 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Information on the CyClaDes Project: Crew-centered Design and Operations of ships and ship systems

WMU 16/12/2014

35. 8

HTW 2/INF.7 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Seafarer Fatigue, Minimum Manning and the Mitigation of Fatigue

Nautical Institute and

ITF 10/12/2014

36. 8,14,18 HTW 2/WP.5 - HUMAN ELEMENT ISSUES Report of Working Group 3


37. 8 HTW 2/8 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Proposed approach for the revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue

Australia, Dominica, Marshall Islands,

IFSMA and Nautical Institute

17/12/2014

38. 8 HTW 2/8/1 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Human Element and Training Issues regarding the implication of e-Navigation

Italy 13/01/2015

39. 8 HTW 2/8/2 - ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Proposed approach on the revision of the Guidelines on Fatigue

United Kingdom 08/01/2015

40. 9

HTW 2/9 - MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS Training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters


41. 9

HTW 2/9/1 - MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS Proposed transitional arrangements for training and qualification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters

China 12/12/2014

42. 10 HTW 2/10 - REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Outcome of MSC 93


43. 10 HTW 2/10/1 - REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Report of the Correspondence Group



44. 10

HTW 2/10/2 - REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Comments on the report of the correspondence group

ICS, CLIA and

INTERFERRY

08/01/2015

45. 10 HTW 2/10/3 - REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING Enhanced damage stability training programme

CLIA 13/01/2015

46. 12

HTW 2/12 - FIRST OUTLINE OF THE DETAILED REVIEW OF THE GLOBAL MARITIME DISTRESS AND SAFETY SYSTEM (GMDSS) Outcome of NCSR 1


47. 14

HTW 2/14 - GUIDELINES FOR SHIPOWNERS AND SEAFARERS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RELEVANT IMO INSTRUMENTS IN RELATION TO THE CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS IN PACKAGED FORM BY SEA Draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea

Australia, Japan,

Marshall Islands, New

Zealand, Papua New

Guinea, Tokyo MoU

10/12/2014

48. 16 HTW 2/WP.2 - BIENNIAL AGENDA AND PROVISIONAL AGENDA FOR HTW 3 Note by the Chairman

Chairman 05/02/2015

49. 18 HTW 2/18 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS Dispensations issued under article VIII of the STCW Convention


50. 18 HTW 2/18/Add.1 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS Dispensations issued under article VIII of the STCW Convention


51. 18

HTW 2/18/1 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS Interim guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments


52. 18 HTW 2/18/2 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS Consolidation of ECDIS-related IMO circulars


53. 18 HTW 2/18/3 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours


54. 19 HTW 2/WP.1 - DRAFT REPORT TO THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE

Secretariat 06.02.15

Annex 2

SUB-COMMITTEE ON HUMAN ELEMENT, TRAINING AND WATCHKEEPING 2nd session Agenda item 19 HTW 2/WP.1 6 February 2015 Original: ENGLISH

DRAFT REPORT TO THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE 1 GENERAL 1.1 The Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping (HTW) held its second session from 2 to 6 February 2015 under the Chairmanship of Mr. Bradley Groves (Australia), who was unanimously elected as Chairman for 2015 at HTW 1. The Vice-Chairman, Ms. Mayte Medina (United States) was also unanimously elected as Vice-Chairman for 2015 at HTW 1. 1.2 The session was attended by delegations and observers from Member Governments, Associate Members of IMO; by observers from intergovernmental organizations; and by non-governmental organizations in consultative status, as listed in document HTW 2/INF.1. Secretary-General's opening address 1.3 The Secretary-General welcomed participants and delivered his opening address, the full text of which can be downloaded from the IMO website at the following link: http://www.imo.org Chairman's remarks 1.4 In responding, the Chairman thanked the Secretary-General for his words of guidance and encouragement and assured the Secretary-General that his advice and requests would be given every consideration in the deliberations of the Sub-Committee and its working groups. 1.5 The Sub-Committee adopted the agenda (HTW 2/1), and agreed to be guided in its work, in general, by the annotations to the provisional agenda contained in document HTW 2/1/1 (Secretariat) and arrangements in document HTW 2/1/2 (Secretariat). The agenda, as adopted, with the list of documents considered under each agenda item, is set out in document HTW 2/INF.[…]. 2 DECISIONS OF OTHER IMO BODIES 2.1 The Sub-Committee noted the decisions and comments pertaining to its work by MEPC 66, MSC 93, NCSR 1 and III 1 as reported in document HTW 2/2 (Secretariat), and MSC 94 as reported in documents HTW 2/2/1 and HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1 (Secretariat) and took them into account in its deliberations under the relevant agenda items. 3 VALIDATED MODEL TRAINING COURSES Report on the model course programme 3.1 The Sub-Committee noted the updated information provided by the Secretariat (HTW 2/3) on the status of production of model courses and the progress made with their translation into French and Spanish, and urged French- and Spanish-speaking countries to identify suitably qualified personnel who could assist the Organization to translate model courses. 3.2 The Sub-Committee also noted that: .1 forty-seven of the 72 model courses listed in the aforementioned document were developed more than

http://www.imo.org/MediaCentre/SecretaryGeneral/Secretary-

five years ago; .2 it was important to ensure that information and guidance in model courses provided to training providers was accurate; .3 model courses should assist training providers in developing training programmes for seafarers to meet the requirements of the 2010 Manila Amendments; .4 model courses should accurately reflect the minimum standards in the STCW Convention and Code; .5 currently, there was no formal process for reviewing and validating course content on a regular basis; .6 a formal process of review and validation of course content should be set out at least on a five-yearly cycle; and .7 it was crucial to have in place robust criteria and a standardized and transparent process for the development, revision and validating of model courses. 3.3 In light of the foregoing, the Sub-Committee agreed that the above factors should be considered when discussing the Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes under agenda item 5. 3.4 The delegation of Australia informed the Sub-Committee that the review and updating of model course 1.21 on Personal Safety and Social Responsibility had not been completed as yet, and that they expect to submit the revised model course to HTW 3 for validation. Validation of model courses Revised model courses on Advanced training for chemical tanker cargo operations, Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations 3.5 The Sub-Committee gave preliminary consideration to the draft revised model courses related to training in Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations, Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations (HTW 2/3/1, HTW 2/3/2 and HTW 2/3/3, respectively). 3.6 In this context, the Sub-Committee noted that the model courses on Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Tanker Cargo Operations had been referred by HTW 1 to a correspondence group coordinated by the United States for finalization with a view to validation by HTW 2. 3.7 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 the principles for revision and updating of model courses agreed at STW 43 had not strictly been adhered to in revising model course 1.03 on Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations; .2 there was reference to the dangers of working during electrical storms in revised model courses 1.02 and 1.05 but not included in the draft revised model course 1.03; .3 course developers should bear in mind that IMO model courses were meant to be for global use and not restricted for any particular national requirement; and .4 the drafting group, when considering draft revised model course 1.03 on Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations, should take into account the principles for revision and updating of model course, set out in document STW 43/WP.7. 3.8 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred documents HTW 2/3/1, HTW 2/3/2 and HTW 2/3/3 to Drafting Group 1 to be established on validation of model courses for finalization of the model courses, taking into account the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, for detailed consideration and to compare the scope of the provisions in the STCW Code related to Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations, Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations and the contents of the draft model courses as presented, with a view to their validation by the Sub-Committee. Revised model courses on Maritime English and Engine-Room Simulators

3.9 The Sub-Committee gave preliminary consideration to the draft revised model course related to training in Maritime English (HTW 2/3/4) which had been revised/updated consequent to the adoption of the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code. 3.10 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 the draft revised model course did not accurately reflect the knowledge, understanding and proficiency required for maritime English as set out in the STCW Code; .2 definitions for "communicative approach" and "maritime English for ratings forming part of an engineering watch" would need to be included; .3 the qualifications of maritime English instructors should also take into account the experience of seafarers who have served on board in the Deck, Engine-Room and Radio departments; 4 number of teaching hours indicated for general maritime English was high and unreasonable; .5 the model course was meant to teach maritime English and not English; and .6 the course content for ratings was too advanced and should be aligned with the requirements of the STCW Code. 3.11 After some discussion and taking into account the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, the Sub-Committee referred this model course to Drafting Group 2 to be established for finalization of the model course, with a view to validation by the Sub-Committee. 3.12 The Sub-Committee gave preliminary consideration to the draft revised model courses related to training in Engine-Room Simulators (HTW 2/3/5) which had been revised/updated consequent to the adoption of the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code. 3.13 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that draft revised model course, as presented: .1 was not structured as an Engine-Room Simulator training course; .2 caused concern as it reflected that the standards in tables III/1 and III/2 should be conducted using simulators; .3 was not in the format of an IMO model course; and .4 should be reviewed by the course developers and further revised. 3.14 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred document HTW 2/3/5 related to Engine-Room Simulator to Drafting Group 2 to give preliminary consideration and provide guidance to the course developers with a view to finalizing the revised draft for validation by HTW 3. Development of a new model course on Special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels 3.15 The Sub-Committee considered document HTW 2/3/8 (Norway), which proposed the development of a new model course on Special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels, and offered to develop this model course. 3.16 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 it was helpful to develop a model course on Special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels; .2 as the Sub-Committee has approved in principle the amendment to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code related to Special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels, development of the model course could commence now; .3 the model course should reflect the proposed requirements in chapter V of the STCW Code; .4 the model course should be developed based on the revised guidance on the model course, revision and development processes expected to be completed at this session; and .5 interested delegations could coordinate with Norway to develop this model course.

3.17 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee accepted, with appreciation, the offer by Norway to develop a model course on Special training requirements for seafarers on ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels, and invited them to submit the draft model course for consideration by the Sub-Committee at its next session. In this context, the Sub-Committee urged interested delegations to coordinate with Norway for the development of this model course. Revision of the model course on Radar Navigation at Operational Level 3.18 The Sub-Committee considered document HTW 2/3/7 (China) which provided information on its analysis of the deviation of IMO model course 1.07 on Radar Navigation at Operational Level from the current performance standards for radar equipment set out in IMO resolution MSC.192(79), and the need to revise this model course. Accordingly, China proposed the revision of the model course on Radar Navigation at Operational Level as early as possible. 3.19 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 there was a clear need for model course 1.07 on Radar Navigation at Operational Level to be revised; .2 salient aspects in model course 1.08 on Radar Navigation at the Management Level would also require to be revised accordingly; .3 the revision should not extend beyond model course 1.07; and .4 the model course should be aligned with the requirements of the STCW Convention and Code, SOLAS Convention and resolution MSC.192(79) and take account of new and updated operational standards. 3.20 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee accepted with appreciation the offer by China to revise the model course on Radar Navigation at Operational Level and invited them to submit the draft revised model course for consideration by the Sub-Committee. In this context, the Sub-Committee urged interested delegations to coordinate with China to revise and update this model course. Amendments to the ECDIS and IBS/INS model training courses 3.21 The Sub-Committee considered document HTW 2/3/9 (Italy) which had analysed the contents of model course 1.27 on ECDIS and model course 1.32 on IBS/INS, and their link with other IMO model courses, taking into account the "Human Element Analysis Process" and the safety of navigation, and proposed amendments to the model courses related to ECDIS and IBS/INS. 3.22 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 ECDIS training should be integrated with other training, and occur at the most appropriate time during a training programme; .2 concerns expressed by Italy related to the design and performance standards for ECDIS rather than to training requirements in the model courses; .3 the complexity of ECDIS must be given due consideration; .4 the proposed amendment of performance standards were beyond the scope of a model course; .5 the ECDIS model course was recently revised in 2012 pursuant to the 2010 Manila Amendments; .6 the "S" mode has not been finalized and was still under development; and .7 the IBS/INS model courses required revision, however, not at this stage but could be placed on the priority list being updated by the Sub-Committee. 3.23 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee invited Italy to submit detailed proposed amendments for consideration by the Sub-Committee at the next session. International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters

3.24 The Sub-Committee considered document HTW 2/3/6/Rev.1 (Chile) that provided information on its International Course on Operations in Antarctic Waters (CIOAA), which the Maritime Authority of Chile had developed for deck officers, and was a requirement for officers in charge of Chilean ships navigating in Antarctic waters, for consideration by the Sub-Committee as a draft model course to be developed by the Organization for all ships operating in Antarctic waters. 3.25 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 the course complies with section B-V/g of the STCW Code and supplements the provisions set out in the guidelines for ships operating in polar waters; .2 it is premature to develop such a model course as amendments to chapter V on training requirements for master, officers and crew operating in polar waters have not been finalized; .3 the model course, as and when developed, should be aligned to the training requirements as set out in the STCW Convention and Code and not be restricted to one region; .4 a model course is not a mandatory instrument but reflects the requirements of the mandatory STCW Code; .5 it is not possible to validate a model course that did not reflect requirements of the STCW Convention and a precedent should not be set by developing a model course to meet the transitional provisions; and .6 a timeline for the development of a model course should be developed after the amendments to chapter V were approved. 3.26 In this context, the delegation of Argentina expressed its interest in collaborating with Chile for the development of the model course based on the amendments to chapter V on training requirements for master, officers and crew operating in the polar region. 3.27 The delegation of Canada informed the Sub-Committee that it intended to develop a model course on training requirements for master, officers and crew operating in the polar region. 3.28 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee agreed that it was premature to develop a model course on training requirements for master, officers and crew operating in the polar region before the amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention have been prepared. 3.29 The Sub-Committee invited Chile along with Argentina, Canada and other interested Member States to develop a draft model course after the aforesaid amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code had been finalized by the Sub-Committee. Review and updating of model courses on Assessment, Examination and Certification of Seafarers and Training Course for Instructors 3.30 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the offer by the International Maritime Lecturers Association and the International Association of Maritime Universities to jointly review and update model courses 3.12 on Assessment, Examination and Certification of Seafarers, and 6.09 "Training Course for Instructors", and invited them to submit the draft revised model courses for consideration by the Sub-Committee. Establishment of Drafting Groups 3.31 The Sub-Committee established Drafting Group 1, under the chairmanship of Capt. George Edenfield (United States), and instructed it, taking into account decisions and comments in plenary and the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, to consider documents HTW 2/3/1, HTW 2/3/2 and HTW 2/3/3: .1 and compare the scope of the provisions in the STCW Code related to training in Advanced Training for Chemical Tanker Cargo Operations, Advanced Training for Oil Tanker Cargo Operations and Advanced Training for Liquefied Gas Tanker Cargo Operations and the contents of the

aforementioned draft model courses as presented, with a view to validation of the model courses by the Sub-Committee; and .2 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. 3.32 The Sub-Committee established Drafting Group 2, under the chairmanship of Capt. Kersee Deboo (India), taking into account decisions and comments in plenary, and the urgent need for the model courses by STCW Parties to implement the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, to consider documents HTW 2/3/4 and HTW 2/3/5, and: .1 compare the scope of the provisions in the STCW Code related to Maritime English and the contents of the draft model course as presented, with a view to validation by the Sub-Committee; .2 give preliminary consideration to the model course related to Engine-Room Simulator and provide guidance to the course developers with a view to finalizing the revised draft for validation by HTW 3; and .3 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Reports of the drafting groups 3.33 On receipt of the report of Drafting Group 1 (HTW 2/WP.6) and Drafting Group 2 (HTW 2/WP.7), the Sub-Committee approved them in general,and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 3.34 The Sub-Committee recalled that validation of model courses by the Sub-Committee in this context meant that it found no grounds to object to their contents. In doing so, the Sub-Committee did not approve the documents and they could therefore not be regarded as official interpretations of the Convention. 4 REPORTS ON UNLAWFUL PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY Reports on fraudulent certificates as reported to the Secretariat 4.1 The Sub-Committee noted the information provided by the Secretariat (HTW 2/4 ), detailing fraudulent certificates found on board ships during inspections or reportedly being used, as reported to the Secretariat for the year 2013 and 2014, and urged Member Governments to report details of fraudulent certificates detected in the revised reporting format (STW 38/17, annex 1). 4.2 The Sub-Committee recalled that HTW 1 and STW 44 had reiterated the invitation at STW 43 to Member Governments and international organizations to submit proposals on a strategy to address the problems associated with fraudulent certificates of competency to the next session. 4.3 In this context, the Sub-Committee, noting the large number of fraudulent certificates reported by Parties, urged Member Governments and international organizations to submit proposals as requested by STW 43 and reiterated by STW 44 and HTW 1, for consideration at the next session. 4.4 In this context, the Sub-Committee urged Member Governments to provide the Secretariat updated information to facilitate verification of certificates, and to respond in a timely manner to requests for verification of certificates. 4.5 The delegation of Australia informed the Sub-Committee that in 2012 they had introduced plastic credit-card size certificates for basic safety training, and, based on its success, they had introduced in 2014 similar certificates for ratings, able seafarers and GMDSS radio operators. They further informed that updated information on the implementation of these measures will be provided to HTW 3. Certification verification facility

4.6 The Sub-Committee also noted the oral information provided by the Secretariat that the certification verification facility through the IMO website had been used 13,297 times during the year 2014. 5 REVISED GUIDELINES FOR MODEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING AND VALIDATION PROCESSES 5.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 91 had included in the post-biennial agenda of the Committee, an output on "Revision of the guidance for model course development, updating and validation processes", with two sessions needed to complete the item, assigning the STW, (now HTW) Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ; and .2 HTW 1 had noted the progress relating to the preparation of revised guidance for model course development, updating and validation processes, and had invited Member Governments and international organizations to submit comments and proposals to HTW 2. 5.2 The United States (HTW 2/5) provided draft revised guidelines that incorporated the improvements suggested by the working group at HTW 1, which included the draft instructions to the course developers, the review group and the drafting group. 5.3 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 there was general agreement that a formalized process was needed for model course revision, development and validation processes; .2 it was necessary to define a time frame for each stage to ensure that a model course could be published by the Organization without undue delay; .3 a five-yearly review cycle was too ambitious and that model courses should be reviewed on a need-based approach; .4 resolution 15 of the 2010 Manila Amendments recommended that significant and extensive amendments to the STCW Convention and Code should, as far as possible, be developed and adopted on a five-yearly cycle basis; .5 model courses need to be reviewed to ensure that the guidance provided was accurate and up to date; .6 the definition of validation needs to be clarified in the revised guidelines; .7 there was concern regarding the random nature of the proposed review group and that instead the review group should be formulated on a rotational basis; and .8 the resources available within the Secretariat for the proposed initial review should be given careful consideration and strengthened if necessary. 5.4 After an in-depth discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the document to Working Group 1 for detailed consideration and to prepare draft revised Guidelines for the model course development, updating and validation processes, taking into account the comments and views expressed, in particular those discussed under agenda item 3, for consideration by the Sub-Committee, with a view to approval by the Committee. Establishment of Working Group 1 5.5 The Sub-Committee established Working Group 1 under the chairmanship of Ms. Marina Angsell (Sweden) and instructed it, taking into account decisions and comments in the plenary, to: .1 consider document HTW 2/5 and prepare draft revised Guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes, for consideration by the Sub-Committee with a view to approval by the Committee; .2 review the list of IMO model courses in document HTW 1/WP.3, annex 3 and identify those model courses that require revision/updating as a priority; .3 advise the Sub-Committee on a process for a regular review of outdated model courses; .4 submit its report on 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group

5.6 On receipt of the report of Working Group 1 (HTW 2/WP.3), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 6 GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2010 MANILA AMENDMENTS 6.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 89 agreed to include, in the 2012-2013 biennial agenda of the STW Sub-Committee and in the provisional agenda for STW 43, a planned output on "Development of guidance for the emplementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments", with a target completion year of 2014; and .2 MSC 93, taking into account the need for further guidance on implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments, agreed to extend the target completion date of the output on "Development of guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments", until the end of the transitional arrangements, i.e. 2017. Medical examination requirements, including colour vision testing 6.2 IMHA (HTW 2/6) provided information on the outcome of the Experts' workshop held in Kobe, Japan, from 20 to 21 January 2014 to review the currently available options for colour vision testing and to recommend valid alternatives to those currently listed. 6.3 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 some issues related to current testing procedures and the use of obsolete equipment; .2 caution should be exercised as an academically-driven approach may not necessarily lead to practical solutions; .3 no specific issues had been raised which could be resolved by the Sub-Committee; .4 some countries were working towards harmonization of medical certification; .5 there was a possible inconsistency between the requirements of the Convention and its applicability to existing seafarers; and .6 medical standards for existing seafarers have been addressed in section A-I/9 of the STCW Code and these include eyesight standards and testing procedures. 6.4 Furthermore, the IFSMA observer made a statement, as set out in annex [...]. In this context, the Sub-Committee clarified the issues related to existing seafarers were adequately addressed in section A-I/9 of the STCW Code. 6.5 In this context, the delegation of Norway expressed their willingness to work closely with IMHA to find a resolution to the issues raised. 6.6 After ome discussion, the Sub-Committee invited interested Member States and international organizations to collaborate with IMHA to submit future proposals for consideration by the Sub-Committee. STCW-related information to be communicated through GISIS to reduce administrative burdens 6.7 China (HTW 2/6/1) provided information on its analysis of various reporting and information communication obligations of Parties under article IV, VIII, IX of the STCW Convention, and section A-1/7 of the STCW Code from the perspectives of transparency and legal effect, and suggested that a future practical application of a GISIS module could reduce the administrative burden for the implementation of the STCW Convention. 6.8 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that:

.1 recognition should be given to the working languages of the Organization when providing information through GISIS and that it should not be necessary to submit in English also; .2 the Country Maritime Profile has been developed by the Technical Cooperation Committee and that not all Member States were interested in completing it; and .3 there should be no need to translate all domestic legislation into English. 6.9 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the document to Working Group 2 to be established, for detailed consideration and to advise the Sub-Committee, as appropriate. Other issues 6.10 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the information provided by Japan in document HTW 2/INF.5 on "Introduction of Leadership training on training ship in Japan". Report of the Working Group 6.11 On receipt of the report of Working Group 2 (HTW 2/WP.4), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 7 FOLLOW-UP ACTION TO THE STCW-F CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS 6 AND 7 7.1 The Sub-Committee noted that no documents had been submitted for consideration at this session. 7.2 The Sub-Committee, noting that there have been no submissions under this agenda item for two sessions, and in accordance with the Guidelines on the organization and method of work of the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection Committee and their subsidiary bodies, agreed to invite the Committee to delete this output from the biennial agenda when considering agenda item 16. 8 ROLE OF THE HUMAN ELEMENT Outcome of MEPC 66 8.1 The Sub-Committee noted that MEPC 66 had noted that there were no documents submitted on the role of the human element to that session of the Committee. However, in view that the agenda of the HTW Sub-Committee contains items of relevance to the work of the Committee, MEPC 66 agreed to keep the item in its agenda to consider any human element-related issues and the outcome of the HTW Sub-Committee on the matter, as appropriate. Outcome of MSC 94 Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code 8.2 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 94 (HTW 2/2/1 and HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1), having been advised that MEPC 67 agreed that the draft Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code, as prepared by III 1 (III 1/18, annex 4) should be referred to the HTW Sub-Committee for comments, taking into account the views expressed by IACS on further definitions needed, prior to their approval, agreed that the draft Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code should be referred to HTW 2 for consideration under its agenda item on the "Role of the human element", prior to its approval by MEPC 68 and MSC 95. 8.3 The IACS observer, proposing amendments to the draft Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code, stated that the draft text could be improved to avoid those instances when, in

the past, deficiencies have been raised by port State control officers on the basis that a systemic failure had been established, without proper justification or an investigation having been undertaken to identify exactly what had failed and how. 8.4 In this regard, the IACS observer: .1 proposed the insertion in section 5 of appropriate definitions to distinguish between the terms "failures" and "serious failures"; .2 urged the Sub-Committee to consider the inclusion of a new paragraph 6.3.2 "In applying professional judgement, the PSCO should assess if there is evidence that deficiencies are already being dealt with adequately by the Company, including the personnel working on board, so that such deficiencies do not indicate a failure of the implementation of the ISM Code." related to the application of professional judgement by port State control officers to assess if there is evidence that deficiencies are already being dealt with adequately by the Company; and .3 urged the recognition of sections 9 and 10.2 of the ISM Code, which anticipate that non-conformities, accidents and hazardous situations are reported to, and addressed by, the Company. 8.5 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 the aforementioned IACS proposals should be given detailed consideration and included in the draft guidelines; .2 the guidelines need to provide a clear distinction between ''failures'' and "serious failures''; .3 restricting the judgement of port State control officers to assess implementation of the ISM Code was unhelpful and could undermine the ISM system; and .4 it was not appropriate for port State control officers to be conducting ISM Code type audits during PSC inspections and determine if companies had carried out corrective action. 8.6 After an in-depth discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the draft Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code, prepared by III 1, set out in document III 1/18, annex 4, to Working Group 3 to be established on Human Element Issues for consideration, taking into account the views expressed, in particular those by IACS, and to provide comments, as appropriate. Revision of the Guidelines on fatigue 8.7 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 94 had considered document MSC 94/18/7 (Australia et al.) that proposed to review MSC/Circ.1014 on Guidelines on fatigue mitigation and management, and included in the post-biennial agenda of the Committee a new output on "Revision of the Guidelines on fatigue", assigning the HTW Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ, and instructed HTW 2 to give preliminary consideration to the new output under its existing agenda item "Role of the human element", and place it on the agenda for HTW 3. Proposed approach for the revision of the Guidelines on fatigue 8.8 Australia et al. (HTW 2/8) provided information on a proposed approach for the revision and update of the Guidelines on fatigue (annex to MSC/Circ.1014) for preliminary consideration by the Sub-Committee. 8.9 The United Kingdom (HTW 2/8/2) provided comments on the proposed approach to revising MSC/Circ.1014 – Guidelines on fatigue (HTW 2/8). 8.10 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 the current guidelines were outdated and need to be revised; .2 since fatigue was still a major contributing factor in accidents, it should be addressed in a holistic manner; .3 international instruments such as the STCW Convention, the ISM Code and the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, have been amended and adapted to mitigate fatigue; .4 manning levels and fatigue were linked and the issue of manning of ships needs to be addressed;

however, the issue of manning of ships was outside the scope of this output; .5 consideration of causes and measures for the mitigation of fatigue should extend beyond the company and ship; .6 specific guidance in the current guidelines was limited to the shipowner, the master, the crew members, pilots, naval architects and training providers; .7 specific guidance addressing the role of external parties, including authorities, in mitigating fatigue on board ships should be included in the revised guidelines; and .8 all stakeholders should be engaged in developing practical solutions to mitigate and manage fatigue. 8.11 After an in-depth discussion, the Sub-Committee referred documents HTW 2/8 and HTW 2/8/2 to Working Group 3 on Human Element Issues to be established for preliminary consideration and to advise the Sub-Committee on the way forward. Human Element and Training Issues regarding the implication of e-navigation 8.12 Italy (HTW 2/8/1), taking into account the outcome of MEPC 66 (MEPC 66/21, paragraph 16.4), referred in particular to the extensive discussion in the e-navigation Correspondence Group on the implication of specific elements including the human element, and the five factors directly related to safety (FSA) and seven factors related to risk and cost-benefits (RCO) which had been identified, and suggested that the information provided should be taken into account during the training of personnel in the maritime sector. 8.13 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 aspects of the information provided by Italy could have been better considered under agenda item 5 on Revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes; and .2 it was too premature to consider addressing e-navigation related issues raised by Italy as the Committee had not yet decided on the way forward towards the implementation of e-navigation. 8.14 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee invited Italy and other interested delegations and international organizations to submit relevant proposals for consideration by the Committee in the future. 8.15 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the information contained in document HTW 2/INF.2 (IAMU) relating to the outcome of the IAMU Forum on Maritime Education and Training (MET) in Higher Education, which was held in Tokyo in February 2014. 8.16 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the information contained in document HTW 2/INF.3 (IMarEST) relating to the introduction of a controlled language in operating and maintenance manuals as a way of reducing human error. 8.17 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the information contained in document HTW 2/INF.6 (WMU) concerning the planned activities and outcomes from the CyClaDes Project related to the human element in shipping. 8.18 The Sub-Committee noted with appreciation the information contained in document HTW 2/INF.7 (NI and ITF) relating to seafarer fatigue and the need to address fatigue in the context of hours of work, hours of rest and minimum safe manning. Establishment of Working Group 8.19 The Sub-Committee established Working Group 3, under the chairmanship of Capt. Moises De Gracia (Panama), and instructed it, taking into account decisions and comments in plenary, to: .1 consider documents HTW 2/2/1, HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1 and III1/18, annex 4 and review the draft MSC-MEPC.4 circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code, taking into account the views expressed by IACS and provide comments as appropriate, with a view to subsequent approval by the Committees;

.2 consider documents HTW 2/8 (Australia et al.) and HTW 2/8/2 (United Kingdom) and advise the Sub-Committee, as appropriate; and .3 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 8.20 On receipt of the report of Working Group 3 (HTW 2/WP.5), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 9 MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS 9.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 94 had adopted the Introduction and parts I-A and I-B of the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code); and .2 HTW 1 (HTW 1/21, paragraph 11.16) had noted the progress made in the preparation of draft amendments to the STCW Convention and part A of the STCW Code relating to training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters (HTW 1/WP.4/Rev.1, annex 1) and had invited Member Governments and international organizations to submit comments and proposals to HTW 2. Training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters 9.2 The United States (HTW 2/9), based on the preliminary training requirements developed at HTW 1 (HTW 1/WP.4/Rev.1, annex 1), proposed revised training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters for inclusion in the STCW Convention and Code. 9.3 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 duplication of training requirements in chapter II, ISM Code and the Polar Water Operational Manual should be avoided; .2 the proposed sea service requirements have been restricted to polar waters; .3 sea service should not be restricted to polar waters for seafarers to obtain required qualifying sea service; .4 flexibility should be provided in obtaining the required sea service to ensure that there was no shortage of qualified seafarers for service in polar waters; .5 experience of navigators in ice covered waters should be considered for qualifying sea service as there were not many ships around on which qualifying sea service could be obtained if it was restricted to sea service in polar waters; .6 it was not appropriate to have separate model courses for Arctic and Antarctic waters; and .7 documentary evidence of sea service should be considered rather than certification of proficiency as this could lead to administrative burden. 9.4 After an in-depth discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the document to Working Group 1 to develop draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code relating to training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters. Transitional arrangements for training and qualification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters 9.5 China (HTW 2/9/1) proposed amendments to the draft amendments to the STCW Code relating to the Polar Code on transitional arrangements for training and qualification requirements for seafarers on board ships operating in polar waters from the date of entry into force of the Polar Code. 9.6 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that:

.1 interim guidance valid only for a short period of time could not be supported; .2 the burden of implementing requirements of the Convention were heavy and Administrations should not be further burdened with the task of implementing interim provisions; .3 transitional requirements were provided in section B-V/g and therefore additional transitional provisions were not required; .4 there was no need to issue a circular providing guidance on transitional provisions; and .5 sea service for transitional arrangements needed further discussion. 9.7 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the document to Working Group 1 for detailed consideration to develop draft amendments to the STCW Code relating to transitional arrangements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters. Instructions to Working Group 1 9.8 The Sub-Committee instructed Working Group 1, taking into account decisions and comments in plenary, to: .1 consider documents HTW 2/9 (United States) and HTW 2/9/1 (China) and develop draft amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code including transitional arrangements relating to training requirements for officers and crew on board ships operating in polar waters; and .2 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 9.9 Having considered the report of Working Group 1 (HTW 2/WP.3), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 10 REVIEW OF STCW PASSENGER SHIP SPECIFIC SAFETY TRAINING 10.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 91 had included an output on "Passenger ship training" in the post-biennial agenda of the Committee, with two sessions needed to complete the item and instructed STW 44 to include this item in the provisional agenda of STW 45 (renamed HTW 1); .2 HTW 1 had established a correspondence group coordinated by the United States, and instructed it, taking into account documents HTW 1/13 and Corr.1 (United States) and HTW 1/13/1 (ITF), as well as views expressed in plenary, to prepare draft amendments to chapter V of the STCW Convention and Code, providing revised training requirements for passenger ship-specific safety training, and submit its report to HTW 2; and .3 MSC 93 had agreed to include in the biennial status report of the SDC Sub-Committee and the provisional agenda of SDC 2 a new unplanned output on "Amendments to SOLAS chapter II-1 and associated guidelines on damage control drills for passenger ships", with a target completion year of 2016, in association with the HTW Sub-Committee, as and when requested by the SDC Sub-Committee. 10.2 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 93, having considered the report of the Working Group on Passenger Ship Safety, instructed HTW 2 to include the item "Enhanced damage stability training" under the existing planned output 5.2.2.2 on the review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training (MSC 93/22, paragraph 6.26.4). Revised training requirements relating to passenger ship specific safety training 10.3 The United States (HTW 2/10/1) provided information on the outcome of the work of the Correspondence Group on development of revised training requirements relating to passenger ship specific safety training.

10.4 CLIA et al. (HTW 2/10/2) provided comments on the outcome of the work of the Correspondence Group on the review and revision of passenger ship specific training within the STCW Convention and Code set out in document HTW 2/10/1. 10.5 In this regard, the delegation of the United States advised the Sub-Committee that the following issues should be agreed in principle by the Sub-Committee, prior to finalizing the proposed revised training requirements relating to passenger ship specific safety training: .1 there should be no downgrading of existing training requirements; .2 the levels of training should be agreed; .3 no duplication of exising training requirements; .4 proof of completion of training; .5 the structure of the proposed training; .6 requirements for course approval; and .7 training prior to being assigned shipboard duties. 10.6 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 passenger ship familiarization training should not be a stand-alone course but included by companies as part of mandatory familiarization package under regulation VI/1 and should apply to all; .2 some delegations preferred a "two-tiered" Basic and Advanced Passenger ship safety training, however the majority preferred a three-tiered approach; .3 basic training of onboard ship-specific training for masters, officers, ratings and other personnel designated to assist passengers in emergency situations, should be undertaken before being assigned such tasks and them being included on the muster list; .4 advanced training should consist of shore-based approved training for masters, officers and personnel that have management, command and control functions in emergency situations on board passenger ships; .5 there was a need for clarity on what constituted instructions as opposed to training and the applicability of training requirements, particularly for persons engaged/employed on board who may have limited or no assigned role or tasks in the event of an emergency; .6 assessment of the assigned ship-board emergency duties and the competence required should be undertaken to ascertain the level of training; .7 duplication of existing basic training and other specific training should be avoided; .8 documentary evidence was sufficient to demonstrate competence and proof of training should be retained on board; .9 there should be flexibility for providing training before being assigned shipboard duties; and .10 the focus of training should be on the tasks that a seafarer undertakes on board. 10.7 In light of the foregoing, the Sub-Committee agreed that: .1 there should be no downgrading of existing training requirements; .2 a three-tiered training approach should be adopted; .3 there should be no duplication of existing training requirements and consistency of standards should be ensured; .4 documentary evidence was sufficient as proof of training; .5 no tables of competences were required for tier one, while tiers two and three should include tables of competence; .6 the working group could discuss in detail on the need for approval of the top and middle tier courses; and .7 training should be undertaken prior to being assigned on board. 10.8 After an in-depth discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the above documents to Working Group 2 on Training Matters to be established for detailed consideration and to prepare draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code relating to revised training requirements for passenger ships, for consideration by the Sub-Committee, with a view to approval by the Committee. Enhanced damage stability training

10.9 CLIA (HTW 2/10/3) recalled the output from the Cruise Ship Safety Forum related to enhanced damage stability training programme, and provided comments which could serve as a basis for discussion on enhanced damage stability training during the Sub-Committee's review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training. 10.10 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 there was concern regarding the applicability of training to deck/all officers at management level and the scope of application should be clarified; .2 there may be some duplications with chapter II training requirements; .3 more clarify is required on the expected outcome; and .4 it was premature to consider the proposal at this stage. 10.11 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee agreed that it was premature to undertake a detailed consideration of the issues raised by CLIA to develop training requirements for enhanced damage stability training before the outcome of SDC 2 related to the output on "Amendments to SOLAS chapter II-1 and associated guidelines on damage control drills for passenger ships". Instruction to Working Group 2 10.12 The Sub-Committee instructed Working Group 2, taking into account comments and decisions in plenary, to: .1 consider documents HTW 2/10/1 (United States) and HTW 2/10/2 (ICS, CLIA and INTERFERRY) and prepare draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code providing revised training requirements for passenger ships, for consideration by the Sub-Committee with a view to approval by the Committee; and .2 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 10.13 Having considered the report of Working Group 2 (HTW 2/WP.4), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action, as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 11 TRAINING IN HOT-WORK PROCEDURES ON CRUDE OIL TANKERS 11.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 91 had included, in the post-biennial agenda of the Committee, an output on "Training in hot-work procedures on crude oil tankers", with one session needed to complete the item, assigning the STW Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ, in association with the FP (now renamed as SSE) Sub-Committee as and when requested by the STW (renamed HTW) Sub-Committee; and .2 a number of issues in Risk Control Option 8 related to hot-work procedures have been addressed in section A-V/1 under the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, and noting that no documents had been submitted for consideration at HTW 1, the Sub-Committee had deferred further consideration to HTW 2. 11.2 The Sub-Committee, noting that training related to hot-work procedures have been addressed in section A-V/1 under the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code, and no documents had been submitted for consideration by the Sub-Committee for two sessions, agreed to invite the Committee to delete this output from the biennial agenda when discussing agenda item 16. 12 FIRST OUTLINE OF THE DETAILED REVIEW OF THE GLOBAL MARITIME

DISTRESS AND SAFETY SYSTEM (GMDSS) 12.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that MSC 90 had included in the 2012-2013 biennial agenda of COMSAR, NAV and STW Sub-Committees and provisional agendas for COMSAR 17 and STW 44 an unplanned output on "Review and modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)", with a target completion year of 2017, assigning the COMSAR Sub-Committee as the coordinating organ in association with the NAV and STW Sub-Committees. 12.2 The Sub-Committee, noting that no documents had been submitted for consideration or referred to the Sub-Committee by NCSR 1 for review, deferred further consideration to HTW 3 pending further input/referral from NCSR 2. 13 E-NAVIGATION STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that HTW 1 had agreed that it was premature to consider any training requirements, pending the finalization of the SIP (HTW 1/21, paragraphs 20.9 to 20.13). 13.2 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 94 had approved the e-navigation Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP), as set out in document NCSR 1/28, annex 7. 13.3 The Sub-Committee, bearing in mind that MSC 94 approved the SIP, agreed to invite the Committee to delete this output, when discussing agenda item 16. 14 GUIDELINES FOR SHIPOWNERS AND SEAFARERS FOR PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF RELEVANT IMO INSTRUMENTS IN RELATION TO THE CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS IN PACKAGED FORM BY SEA 14.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that: .1 MSC 92 had included in the 2014-2015 biennial agenda of the HTW Sub-Committee and the provisional agenda for HTW 1, an output on "Development of guidelines for shipowners and seafarers for proper implementation of relevant IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea" with a target completion year of 2015, in association with the CCC Sub-Committee, as and when requested by the HTW Sub-Committee (MSC 92/26, paragraph 23.9); and .2 HTW 1 had agreed that it was premature to forward the draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea, to the CCC Sub-Committee and consequently invited the co-sponsors of the proposal and other interested Member Governments and international organizations to submit a revised draft for consideration by the Sub-Committee at this session. 14.2 Australia et al. (HTW 2/14) proposed revised draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea, aimed at those organizations responsible for the provision of suitable training to personnel involved with the transport of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea to ensure that the requirements of existing IMO instruments are met. 14.3 In the ensuing discussion, the following views were expressed that: .1 the revised guidelines would: .1 enhance the implementation of requirements for handling dangerous goods especially by personnel ashore; .2 clarify the existing IMO requirements; .2 the references related to the STCW Convention and ISM Code need to be reviewed; and .3 the revised draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea developed by the Sub-Committee, should be forwarded to CCC 2 for comments, prior to approval by the Committee. 14.4 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the document to Working Group 3 to be

established for detailed consideration, and to develop draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea, for consideration by the Sub-Committee. Instruction to the Working Group 3 14.5 The Sub-Committee instructed Working Group 3, taking into account comments and decisions in plenary to: .1 consider document HTW 2/14 and develop draft Guidelines for the implementation of IMO instruments in relation to the carriage of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea, for consideration by the Sub-Committee, and for comments by CCC 2 with a view to subsequent approval by the Committee; and .2 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 14.6 On receipt of the report of Working Group (HTW 2/WP.5), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] 15 NON-MANDATORY INSTRUMENT ON REGULATIONS FOR NON-CONVENTION SHIPS 15.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that MSC 92 had: .1 included in the 2014-2015 biennial agenda of the HTW Sub-Committee and the provisional agenda for HTW 2, an output related to the development of the Non-mandatory instrument on regulations for non-convention ships, with III as the coordinating Sub-Committee, with a target completion year of 2015; and .2 instructed the III Sub-Committee to report to the Committee prior to involving other Sub-Committees. 15.2 The Sub-Committee, noting the Committee's instruction referred to in paragraph 15.1.2 above, deferred further consideration pending further instruction from the Committee and agreed to invite the Committee to move this output to the post-biennial agenda when discussing agenda item 16. 16 BIENNIAL AGENDA AND PROVISIONAL AGENDA FOR HTW 3 [Biennial status report 16.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that MSC 94 approved the Sub-Committee's revised biennial agenda for 2014-2015 and the provisional agenda for HTW 2, as set out in annexes 25 and 26 to document MSC 94/21. 16.2 Taking into account the progress made at this session, the Sub-Committee prepared the biennial status report (HTW 2/WP.2, annex 1), as set out in annex […], for consideration by MSC 95. Proposed biennial agenda for the 2016-2017 biennium and provisional agenda for HTW 3 16.3 Taking into account the progress made at the session and the relevant decisions of MSC 94, the Sub-Committee prepared its proposed biennial agenda for 2016-2017 (HTW 2/WP.2, annex 2) and the proposed provisional agenda for HTW 3 (HTW 2/WP.2, annex 3), as set out in annexes […] and […], respectively, for consideration by MSC 95. Arrangements for the next session 16.4 The Sub-Committee agreed to establish at its next session working/drafting groups on subjects to be selected from the following: .1 validated model training courses (agenda item 3);

[.2 revised guidelines for model course development, updating and validation processes (agenda item 5)]; .3 guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments (agenda item 6); .4 revision of the guidelines on fatigue (agenda item 8); [.5 review of STCW passenger ship-specific safety training (agenda item 9)]; .6 amendments to SOLAS chapter II-1 and associated guidelines on damage control drills for passenger ships (agenda item 10); .7 first outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) (agenda item 11); .8 revision of requirements for escape route signs and equipment location markings in SOLAS and related instruments (agenda item 12); and .9 amendments to the IGF Code and development of guidelines for low-flashpoint fuels (agenda item 13), whereby the Chairman, taking into account the submissions received on the respective subjects, would advise the Sub-Committee well in time before HTW 3 on the final selection of such groups. Date of the next session 16.5 The Sub-Committee noted that the third session of the Sub-Committee has been tentatively scheduled to take place from 1 to 5 February 2016.] [17 ELECTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN FOR 2016 17.1 In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Maritime Safety Committee, the Sub-Committee [unanimously re-elected Mr. Brad Groves (Australia) as Chairman and Ms. Mayte Medina (United States) as Vice-Chairman] for the year 2016.] 18 ANY OTHER BUSINESS Consolidation of ECDIS-related IMO circulars 18.1 The Sub-Committee noted that NCSR 1 had endorsed the draft MSC circular on ECDIS – Guidance for good practice, set out in annex 1 to NCSR 1/WP.8, and forwarded it to the SubCommittee for review, in particular the provisions related to ECDIS training and the use of simulators, for subsequent approval by the Committee. 18.2 In the ensuing discussion, the Sub-Committee was of the view that some references to the STCW Convention and Code required to be reviewed for accuracy and consistency. 18.3 After a brief discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the aforementioned circular to Working Group 2 for review and finalization for the consideration of the Sub-Committee and consequent approval by MSC 95. Establishment of Working Group 2 18.4 The Sub-Committee established Working Group 2 under the chairmanship of Ms. Maryanne Adams (Marshall Islands), and instructed it, taking into account comments and decisions in plenary, to: .1 consider document HTW 2/6/1 (China) and develop guidance for the development of a specific GISIS module to comply with the reporting and information communication obligations of Parties under the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended; .2 consider documents HTW 2/10/1 (United States) and HTW 2/10/2 (ICS, CLIA and INTERFERRY) and prepare draft amendments to the STCW Convention and Code providing revised training requirements for passenger ships, for consideration by the Sub-Committee with a view to approval by the Committee; .3 consider documents HTW 2/18/2 (Secretariat) and NCSR 1/WP.8, annex 1 (Secretariat) and review the draft MSC circular on ECDIS – Guidance for good practice, in particular, the provisions related to

ECDIS training and the use of simulators, for consideration by the Sub-Committee with a view to subsequent approval by the Committee; and .4 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 18.5 Having considered the report of Working Group 2 (HTW 2/WP.4), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours based on the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended, and manning requirements from the flag 18.6 The Sub-Committee noted that III 1 had agreed on the draft MSC circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers' rest hours based on the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended, and manning requirements from the flag State (III 1/18, annex 5) and referred it to the HTW Sub-Committee for review, in general and, in particular, paragraphs 6.2.24, 6.2.26, 6.4.2.2, 7.2.7, 7.3.2.4 and 7.3.2.14 containing some text within square brackets, for subsequent approval by the Committee (HTW 2/18/3 and HTW 2/2/1/Corr.1). In this context, the Secretariat clarified that there was an editorial error in the title of the aforementioned draft MSC circular and that the correct title was "Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers, rest hours based on the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended, and manning requirements from the flag State". 18.7 In the ensuing discussion, the views were expressed that: .1 there was no provision for equivalent competency in the STCW Convention; .2 there were many concerns related to inconsistencies in the content and references to the STCW Convention in the draft guidelines; .3 the intent of the draft circular was unclear; .4 the draft circular needed thorough review prior to finalization; and .5 consideration should be deferred to HTW 3 pending further review by the III Sub-Committee. 18.8 After some discussion, the Sub-Committee referred the aforementioned draft MSC circular (III 1/18, annex 5) to Working Group 3 on Human Element Issues to review, in general and, in particular, paragraphs 6.2.24, 6.2.26, 6.4.2.2, 7.2.7, 7.3.2.4 and 7.3.2.14 containing some text within square brackets, with a view to possible approval by the Committee. Instructions to the Working Group 18.9 The Sub-Committee instructed Working Group 3, taking into account decisions and comments in plenary, to: .1 consider documents HTW 2/18/3 (Secretariat) and III 1/18, annex 5 and review the draft MSC circular on Guidelines for port State control officers on certification of seafarers, rest hours based on the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended, and manning requirements from the flag, in particular paragraphs 6.2.24, 6.2.26, 6.4.2.2, 7.2.7, 7.3.2.4 and 7.3.2.14, with a view to approval by the Committee; and .2 submit its report on Thursday, 5 February 2015. Report of the Working Group 18.10 Having considered the report of Working Group 3 (HTW 2/WP.5), the Sub-Committee approved it in general, and took action as summarized in the following paragraphs:

[to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the session, based on the group's report and the actions requested therein, taking into account the decisions taken by the Sub-Committee during subsequent discussions] Guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments 18.11 The Sub-Committee noted that: .1 MSC 93 had approved interim guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments; and .2 MSC 94 had approved MSC.1/Circ.1500 on Guidance on drafting of amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention and related mandatory instruments, and instructed its subsidiary bodies to start using the guidance with immediate effect. 18.12 The delegation of the United States observed that with respect to the guidance on footnotes in MSC.1/Circ.1500, this should also apply to the STCW Convention, and the status of footnotes in the STCW Convention must be clarified. 18.13 The delegation of Norway observed that a common understanding of the status of footnotes was required. 18.14 In this context, the Sub-Committee instructed the Secretariat to undertake an analysis of footnotes in the STCW Convention and submit a report to HTW 3. Dispensations issued under Article VIII of the STCW Convention 18.15 The Sub-Committee noted information provided by the Secretariat (HTW 2/18 and addendum) on the submissions made by the Parties in accordance with article VIII of the STCW Convention on dispensations granted by them in the years 2013 and 2014. The Sub-Committee also requested Member Governments to submit the information related to dispensations issued in the format, as set out in the annex to document HTW 2/18. 18.16 In this context, the delegation of Spain, observing the large number of dispensations that had been issued to Masters and Chief Engineers, reminded the Sub-Committee that article VIII (I) of the STCW Convention did not provide for dispensations to Masters and Chief Engineers, except in circumstances of force majeure and then only for the shortest possible period. Any other issues Information on simulators available for use in maritime training 18.17 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 81 had approved MSC.1/Circ.1209 requesting Member Governments to provide information on simulators available for use in maritime training. The Secretariat has received information from several Member Governments and added it to the GISIS database which can be viewed by the public on a "read-only" basis. The Secretariat requested those Member Governments who have not provided information to do so, at an early date, to enable the Secretariat to update the information on the GISIS database. Reports of independent evaluation pursuant to regulation I/8 of the STCW Convention and section A-I/8 of the STCW Code 18.18 The Sub-Committee reminded ember Governments of the requirement for the submission of the reports of independent evaluation pursuant to regulation I/8 of the STCW Convention and section A-I/8 of the STCW Code, which requires a periodical independent evaluation of a Party's quality standards system to be conducted at intervals of not more than five years and for the report of this evaluation to be communicated to the Secretary-General. In this context, the Sub-

Committee urged STCW Parties to refer to MSC.1/Circ.1164/Rev.13, with a view to ensuring that reports of independent evaluation pursuant to regulation I/8 of the STCW Convention and section A-I/8 of the STCW Code are submitted to the Secretary-General in a timely manner. Expressions of appreciation 18.19 The Sub-Committee expressed appreciation to the following delegates and observers, who had recently relinquished their duties, retired or were transferred to other duties or were about to, for their invaluable contribution to its work and wished them a long and happy retirement or, as the case might be, every success in their new duties: [to be added by the Secretariat] 19 ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMITTEES 19.1 The Maritime Safety Committee, at its ninety-fifth session, is invited to: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the meeting] 19.2 The Marine Environment Protection Committee, at its sixty-eighth session, is invited to: [to be prepared by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairman after the meeting] ANNEXES [to be prepared by the Secretariat after the session]