internartional symposium on agricultural development in the eac partner states 4-7 nov 2013 closing...
TRANSCRIPT
1
INTERNARTIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE EAC PARTNER STATES
4-7 Nov 2013
Closing Remarks
by
Joseph K MukiibiChair Kilimo Trust
2
THE FARMER OF THE PASTEVIDENCE FROM PRESENTATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS SHOWED THAT:
1. FARMING WAS A WAY OF LIFE. FARMING WAS BY FATE AND NOT BY CHOICE
2. THE FARMER: Had little or no formal education Was mall scale Was almost wholly un-mechanised Had multitude of enterprises Used Little or no inputs Had limited access to technology Produced largely for own consumption Was not competitive in local, regional and global markets
WORKKED VERY HARD BUT REMAINS POOR!
3
THE FARMER OF THE PAST
Roza Nakate
4
FARMER OF THE FUTURE: 2063
FARMING WILL BE BY CHOICE AND A BUSINESS
• Good education• Economies of scale• Production enterprise specialisation• High level of mechanisation• High levels of access to all inputs including credit• Will produce almost entirely for the market• Will has access to local and regional markets• WILL WORK HARD. WILL BECOME WEALTHY.
5
PROFILE OF THE FARMER OF THE FUTURE
Mr Bruno Matovu
6
PROSPECTS?
One school of thought:
NO! It is impossible! Why? THE MINDSET.1. Their way of life will be disrupted and it may cause a
political and social crisis2. It will cause environmental disaster! Fertilisers, GMO’s!
Machines. Forests and wetlands will disappear3. Oh my God; what will NGO’s do without peasants?! 4. Smallholders are producing organic foods for the rich in
Europe (yet they themselves remain poor!)5. Africans can’t change!
7
PROSPECTS?
Other school of thought:YES. It is possible. Why? 1. We want to transform a system from low productivity
into a system of higher productivity - not human beings 2. The youth (the future) want change. Chantals!3. Our Governments say so in all their development
documents4. Transformation is already under way5. The task of governments is to manage this
transformation in a way that minimises social risks
8
TRANSFORMATION IS ALREADY HAPPENNING!
Table 1: Monetary and Non-Monetary Agriculture GDP in UgandaSource: MFPED (2013) Sub-sector Monetary Non-Monetary
2007-2008 2010-2011
2007-2008
2010-2011
Agriculture -Total
60.6% 60.5% 39.4% 39.5%
Food crops 47.6% 47.6% 52.4% 52.4%
Livestock 80.2% 80.1% 19.8% 19.9%
Forestry 39.7% 45.1% 60.3% 54.9%
Fisheries 97.6% 97.1% 2.4% 2.9%
9
TRANSFORMATION CAN BE SCALE AND GENDER NEUTRAL
Small scale already commercialTea sub-sector: Kenya, Rwanda, UgandaSugar subsector: Mumias, Kakira, Kinyara Rice sub-sector: Mwea, Olweny, Doho.Dairy sub-sector: W. Uganda, C. Kenya, RwandaPoultry, vegetables, flowers etc.Common Features: Specialisation (single enterprise)An off takerCentral Processing facility
10
THIS SUCCESSFUL MODEL CAN BE INTENSIFIED OR ROLLED OUT
CENTRAL FACILITY
Farmers Group A
Farmers Group B
Farmers Group C
Farmers Group D
Farmers Group E
Farmers Group F
Farmers Group G
11
ROLL OUT MODEL TO OTHER POTENTIAL VALUE CHAINS
Cereals – Maize, Sorghum, MilletsRoot crops – Cassava, Sweet potatoesBananasOther FruitsBeefOthers
IT CAN BE DONE!
12
THE FARMER OF THE FUTURE
Will require:A policy shift to Agriculture-led Economic
Development – Kilimo Kwanza Greater investment in agriculture and rural
development to create jobs in rural areas Infrastructure and Institutions that promote
a competitive Ag sector and inclusive economic growth
13
JOURNEY TO 2063
14
WHEN WE ARRIVE WE WILL CELEBRATE!
15
ASANTENI SANA.SEE YOU IN 2063!