intermediate microeconomic theory

25
1 Intermediate Microeconomic Theory Cost Curves

Upload: jamil

Post on 22-Jan-2016

89 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Intermediate Microeconomic Theory. Cost Curves. Cost Functions. We have solved the first part of the problem: given factor prices, what is cheapest way to produce q units of output? Given by conditional factor demands for each input i, x i (w 1 ,…, w n , q) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

1

Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

Cost Curves

Page 2: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

2

Cost Functions

We have solved the first part of the problem: given factor prices, what is cheapest way to produce q units of output?

Given by conditional factor demands for each input i, xi(w1,…, wn, q)

However, this is only half the problem.

To model behavior of the firm, we also have to derive how much output a firm will find optimal to produce, given input and output prices.

Page 3: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

3

Cost functions

Key to firm’s output decision is the firm’s cost function Gives the total cost of producing a given amount

of output, given some input prices and assuming the firm acts optimally (i.e. cost minimizes).

Suppose a firm used n inputs for production, with conditional demand functions for each input given by: x1(w1,…, wn, q)

::

xn(w1,…, wn, q)

What would be the generic form for its cost function?

Page 4: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

4

Cost functions: Example

Consider a firm with Cobb-Douglas technology of the form q = f(x1, x2) = x1

0.25 x20.25

If w1 = 4 and w2 = 1, what will be optimal way to produce q = 5?

What will be this firm’s cost function given these prices and technology?

How much will it cost to produce q = 5 optimally?

Page 5: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

5

Cost functions and Opportunity Costs

It is important to remember that a cost function includes all costs of production, including opportunity costs.

With Cobb-Douglas technology assumed, figuring out costs is easy because we have implicitly assumed only two inputs.

Things can be more complicated though.

Page 6: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

6

Cost functions with Opportunity Costs

Suppose I am considering getting into the chair making business, where I would deliver however many chairs I make to Ikea one year from now. To make any chairs at all, I need to buy a saw which costs $400 (though I can re-sell it

for $200 at the end of the year) Then, each chair I make requires 3 boards of wood (at $2/board). Making chairs also required time. Specifically, I can turn my time into chairs according

to the production function q = L0.5.

If I currently have $1000 in savings at 10% annual interest, and any time I spent making chairs would mean less time working at my current job which pays $20/hr, what would be my cost function for making chairs?

Page 7: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

7

Short run vs. Long(er) run

It is often important to distinguish between the Short-Run (SR) and Long(er)-Run (LR) when considering costs.

Short-run: some factors of production are fixed (i.e. can’t be adjusted).

Long(er)-run: previously fixed factors of production can be adjusted.

Page 8: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

8

Short Run Cost Curve

The key aspect of a fixed factor of production is that it will mean there will be some component of cost that is the same regardless of how much output (if any) is produced (in short run).

How does this relate to the chair making example?

What might be some other production processes that have fixed inputs the short run?

Page 9: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

9

Short Run Cost Curve Analytically

Short-run cost function where x2 fixed at x2f

(and only two inputs) CSR(q) = w1x1(w1,w2,q|x2 = x2

f) + w2x2f

Short run cost function where there are n inputs, where inputs 1 to k are variable and k to n are fixed:

CSR(q) = cv(q) + F

So, short-run cost function can be written

n

ki

fii

fn

fkn

k

iii

SR xwxxqwwwxwqC1

121

1 )...|,,...,,()(

Page 10: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

10

Short Run vs. Long Run Costs Analytically

Example: Consider again a firm where: q = f(L, K) = L0.25 K0.25, wL = 4, wK= 1.

From before, we know long-run cost function in this case will be

C(q) = 4q2

Suppose in the short-run Capital (K) is fixed at 16 machine hrs. What is short-run cost function?

Page 11: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

11

Short-Run Cost function

Given how cost functions are derived, will the cost of producing any given level of output be greater in the short-run or the longer run?

Page 12: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

12

Cost functions and Returns-to-Scale

We can also describe returns-to-scale via a cost function. Consider the “Unit cost function C(1)” (Cost of producing one

unit) if C(q) > qC(1) then Decreasing Returns to Scale (DRS) if C(q) = qC(1) then Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) if C(q) < qC(1) then Increasing Returns to Scale (IRS)

Page 13: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

13

Cost functions and Returns-to-Scale

Consider Cobb-Douglas production function f(L,K) = L0.25K0.25, with wL = 4 and wK = 1

Recall that the (Long-Run) cost function for this technology was CLR(q) = 4q2. Does this exhibit CRS, DRS, or IRS?

What about if CLR(q) = 4q?

What about if CLR(q) = 4q0.5?

Graphically? In calculus?

Page 14: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

14

Cost functions and Returns-to-Scale

Now consider a Cobb-Douglas production function f(L,K) = L0.25K0.25, with wL = 4 and wK = 1, but where K is fixed at 16, or

Does this cost function exhibit DRS, CRS, IRS?

C(q) = q4/4 + 16

Page 15: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

15

Cost functions and Returns-to-Scale

From now on, we will generally be considering relatively Short-run (i.e. at least one factor fixed), so cost functions will exhibit DRS at some point.

Page 16: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

16

Cost Curves

In modeling optimal firm behavior, it will often be helpful to think of costs graphically via “cost curves”.

The first thing we want to think about is how the cost of producing “one more unit” changes over the production cycle.

Consider a “discrete” cost function where:c(1) = $20c(2) = $30c(3) = $35c(4) = $45c(5) = $60

What would graph of this look like? What if we graphed cost of “one more”?

How does this relate to Returns-to-scale?

What might we call the cost of producing “one more unit” and its associated curve?

Page 17: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

17

Marginal Costs Graphically

Marginal Cost Curve – MC(q) Denotes the cost of producing a “little

bit” more, given you have already produced q units

So MC(q) ≈ [C(q+1) – C(q)]/1

Actually rate of change, however, so MC(q) ≈ [C(q+Δq) – C(q)]/Δq

And taking the limit as Δq goes to 0,

Therefore, we can get an idea of what the MC(q) curve looks like from the cost curve and vice versa.

C(q)

q

MC(q)

$

$

q

q

qCqMC

)(

)(

Page 18: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

18

Cost Curves

In modeling optimal firm behavior, it will often be helpful to think of two other “cost curves” as well.

Average Cost Curve – AC(q) Denotes the average cost of producing each unit, given q units are produced.

AC(q) = C(q)/q

Average Variable Cost Curve – AVC(q) As discussed above, we can often think of our SR cost function as:

C(q) = cv(q) + F

So AVC(q) = cv(q)/q

Page 19: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

19

Cost Curves

Consider our example, C(q) = q4/4 + 16 (i.e. the cost function that arises from production function f(L,K)=

L0.25K0.25 with K fixed at 16 and wL = 4, wK= 1)

What is equation for AC(q)? What is Avg. Cost per unit for producing 2 units?

What is equation for AVC(q)? What is Avg. Variable Cost per unit for producing 2 units?

What is equation for MC(q)? What is Marginal Cost at 2 units?

Page 20: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

20

Cost Curves (cont.) How do these curves relate to each other?

First note: MC(q) ≈ [C(q) – C(q-1)]/1

Next, recall:

AVC(q) = cv(q)/q

= [C(q)-F]/q (noting that cv(q) = C(q)- F)

= [C(q)-C(0)]/q (noting that C(0) = F)

= [(C(q)-C(q-1) + (C(q-1)-C(q-2))+…+(C(1)-C(0))]/q

So AVC(q) ≈ [MC(q) + MC(q-1) + …+ MC(1)]/q

Page 21: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

21

Cost Curves (cont)

Given AVC(q) ≈ [MC(q) + MC(q-1) + …+ MC(1)]/q, AVC is essentially the average Marginal cost of producing each unit,

given firm has produced q units.

Therefore, If MC(q) < AVC(q) over some range of q, then AVC(q) must be

decreasing over that range (if you continually add something below the average, average will go down)

Alternatively, if MC(q) > AVC(q) over some range of q, then AVC(q) must be increasing over that range (if you continually add something above the average, average will go up)

So MC(q) must intersect AVC(q) at the q with the minimum Average Variable cost (call it q*)

Page 22: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

22

MC(q) and AVC(q)

q* q

$MC(q)

AVC(q)

Page 23: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

23

Cost Curves (cont)

Now, recall AC(q) = C(q)/q = [cv(q) + F]/q = AVC(q) + F/q

So AC(q) - AVC(q) = F/q (difference between AC(q) and AVC(q) decreases as q

increases)

Also, AC(q) ≈ [MC(q) + MC(q-1) + …+ MC(1)]/q + F/q Therefore, if MC(q) < AC(q) over some range of q, then AC(q)

must be decreasing over that range.

Alternatively, if MC(q) > AC(q) over some range of q, then AC(q) must be increasing over that range.

So MC(q) also intersects AC(q) at the q with the minimum Average Cost (call it q**).

Page 24: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

24

MC(q) and AVC(q)

q* q** q

$

F

MC(q)

AVC(q)AC(q)

Page 25: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

25

Long-run vs. Short-run MC curves

Recall our discussion of long-run vs. short-run.

For example, consider a firm deciding how large of a plant to build. Suppose there are three possible size plants. Each plant size will be associated with its own cost curve and MC curve: In the short-run, the firm is stuck with a given plant size, but over the longer-

run they can choose which plant size to use based on how much they plan to build.

How will cost curve and MC curve change from the short-run to the longer-run?