integrated shipbuilding environment (ise) ise4 project demonstration

27 Apr ‘06 1

Integrated Shipbuilding Environment (ISE)

ISE4 Project

Demonstration

April 27, 2006

27 Apr ‘06 2

ISE4 Participants

27 Apr ‘06 3

Presentation Agenda

• Interoperability Demo Scenario• Ship Arrangements Exchanges using AP215 and AP216

– Initial Design in TRIBON

– Transfer from TRIBON to LEAPS

– Modifications in FORAN

– Transfer from FORAN to LEAPS (and ISDP)

– Transfer from ISDP to Intelliship

• Electrical Demonstration using AP212• Engineering Analysis Exchanges using AP218 and AP209• Steel Processing Exchanges using AP218

27 Apr ‘06 4

Interoperability Demo Scenario

• During the demonstrations you are about to witness, we will be exchanging product model data from several disciplines between multiple computer systems

• The scenarios are not necessarily meant to be realistic, but more to convey the types of exchanges and requirements that can be satisfied by the tools developed in the ISE Project

• Data to be exchanged will include product model data used for Ship Arrangements, Electrical, Engineering Analysis, and Steel Processing

• The data will be representative of product models that could be exchanged at any phase of the Life Cycle, from Concept Design through Detail Design through Manufacturing, or continuing through Repair and Overhaul

27 Apr ‘06 5

Description of Exchange Scenarios• The models exchanged represent the TWR841

– Torpedo Weapons Retriever ship with data “Approved for Public Release – Distribution Unlimited”

– Product Models will capture TWR Compartmentation and details of the TWR Engine Room

– These transfers simulate a situation where STEP is in place to enable Shipyards to interoperate smoothly

• Ship Arrangements exchanges represent – Exchanges to go from Concept Design to Detail Design at two different Shipyards– Models developed will be analyzed by Customer and changes will be suggested– Partnering Shipyards will complete the Design and feed data to other applications for

analysis, manufacturing, repair, and lifecycle support

• Electrical Analysis is done on TWR systems during Preliminary Design

• New requirements (such as a request from an outside agency, e.g. Homeland Security) can necessitate model transfer to additional software packages for Engineering Analysis

• Steel Processing scenario shows how design data for a plate can be modified in STEP before being sent to two possible construction yards with different requirements (NGSS and EB)

27 Apr ‘06 6

Lifecycle Phases for Demo Scenario

Evolving Ship Design from Concept to Maturity

Initial Design Detail Design Manufacturing Lifecycle Support

Time

27 Apr ‘06 7

Demo Scenarios for the Four ISE4 Tasks

Four Tasks and Demonstrations


Engineering FEA Analysis

Concept & Preliminary Design Stage

DetailDesign Stage

Steel Processing

Electrical

Arrangements

27 Apr ‘06 8

Different Representations for Data• Part 21 vs. Part 28

– Part 21 is the traditional STEP physical file format– Part 28 is an XML representation of STEP data

• ARM vs. AIM– ARM (Application Reference Model) objects are in application

area terminology• e.g. “Ship” or “Plate”

– AIM (Application Interpreted Model) objects are in generic terminology

• e.g. “Product” or “Product Representation”

• ISE Project is developing mediation tools to enable a sender and receiver to communicate successfully no matter which format they select for their particular data representations– The ensuing Demos will involve the transfer of models using

both of these formats

27 Apr ‘06 9

Approach / Background

This Approach Employs the NSRP ISE Model for Information Interoperability

Translator = Modify Data between CAD System Proprietary Format and STEPMediator = Change Data Format between various STEP Representations

Application A

Translator

Application B

Translator

Data

ISO STEP Standard Information Model

XMLExpress

Part21 Part28

Mediator

27 Apr ‘06 10

Systems Involved in the Interoperability Demo


TRIBON ISDP

LEAPS

LEAPS


FORAN

Preliminary Arrangement

Feed Mfg from ISDP

ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

INTELLISHIP

Repair Shipyard

SuggestDesign

ChangesSubmit Design

ApprovalFinal Product Model Delivered to Navy

GDEB NGSS

Steel Processing

Navy AnalysisPrograms

Engineering Analysis

B

B

C

= Mediators Required

Concept & Preliminary Design

DetailDesign

Sener Intergraph

EBC

ADAPT

Key:

Atlantec

= Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

ElectricalKSS/KM

NavyResponse

Center

AP215P21

AP215P28

AP215P28

AP218P28

AP218P28

AP209P21

AP215P21

AAP212P28

AP212P21

SubmitDesign

For Approval

Arrangements

27 Apr ‘06 11

Integrated Shipbuilding Environment

Washington DC • April 27, 2006

Arrangements Demonstration

27 Apr ‘06 12

Ship Arrangements Demo Details


TRIBON ISDP

LEAPS

LEAPS

FORAN


ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

INTELLISHIP

Repair Shipyard

SuggestDesign



B

B



DetailDesign

Sener

Intergraph

Key:

Atlantec


NavyResponse

Center

AP215P21

AP215P28

AP215P28

AP215P21

SubmitDesign

For Approval

Arrangements



27 Apr ‘06 13

Overview – Tribon Translator

• Developed STEP AP215 Translator for Tribon Initial Design

• Translator Produces file in Part 28 ARM format defined by EB

• Worked with EB to test File Schema and Mediators

Atlantec Enterprise Solutions

27 Apr ‘06 14

Demo Scenario – Tribon Translator

Tribon Initial Design

AtlantecAP215

Translator

TribonOutput

Files

STEP / XMLAP 215 File

MediatorsSTEP

AP 215 File

FORAN

LEAPS

Translation Process – High Level

27 Apr ‘06 15

As-Is Process – Tribon Translator

Vendor Lock-in Ship designers and builders stay with one vendor to be able to transfer data between various design and manufacturing software packages

System-to-System Bridges Custom software can be created to link two software packages These solutions are fragile, as they must be updated with every version change in either software package Usefulness is limited to the two systems connected

Manual Reentry Ship designers and builders can manually reenter data in a second system This process is expensive, labor-intensive, and error prone

Initial Design Integration Options: Currently Available

27 Apr ‘06 16

ISE Process – Tribon Translator

No Vendor Lock-in Using STEP standards and translators ship designers and shipbuilders can move data between software packages provided by different vendors

No System-to-System Links Using STEP standards and translators there is no need to build system-to-system bridge software. A translator bridges each software package to the standard All software systems bridged to the standard are interoperable

No Manual Reentry With automated transfers via the standard, manual reentry can be avoided

Initial Design Integration Options: With STEP and ISE Translators

27 Apr ‘06 17

Overview – LEAPS AP215 Translators

Project accomplishments:

• Developed STEP AP215 Import and Export Translators for Navy LEAPS system.

• PDSC is ISO Editor of STEP AP215. Provided AP215 documents, ARM/AIM EXPRESS schemas, and training/consulting to ISE team.

• Developed and maintained ISE AP215 Implementation Agreements and Issues Logs for ISE Team.

• Submitted 20 SEDS (Standard Enhancement and Discrepancy System) to ISO for inclusion in next version of ISO AP215 standard.

Product Data Services Corporation (PDSC) for NSWC Carderock Division

27 Apr ‘06 18


LEAPS – Leading Edge Application for Prototyping Systems

• Central Navy Repository for Ship design and analysis.

• Developed and supported by NSWC Carderock Division.

• Common database for 3D Product Model Data and Analysis results for new Ship Acquisition.

• Direct translators from ASSET for initial arrangements and to NAVSEA analysis software for performance and vulnerability assessments.

27 Apr ‘06 19



Analysis Tools

Focus O bject M odel

M odelingTools

A SS E T

Part Library

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor

Analysis Tools

Focus O bject M odel

M odelingTools

A SS E T

Part Library

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor

27 Apr ‘06 20

As-Is Process - LEAPS AP215 Translators


• Existing LEAPS geometry data exchange capability for IGES surfaces developed by NSWC Carderock Division.

• Previous STEP AP216 (surfaces) import and export translator project completed in 2003-04 by NSWCCD, PDSC, and Atlantec under Navy e-Business Office funding.

27 Apr ‘06 21

ISE Process - LEAPS AP215 Translators

• ISE4 project added STEP AP215 import and export translators for LEAPS.

27 Apr ‘06 22

Sample Processes-(LEAPS-CBD)

GRIDGEN

CFX

AUTOCADAutoCAD

LEAPS Product ModelLEAPS Product Model

• Generic Class Structure

• Product Model Schema– NAVSEA Ship Focus Object

Model

• Product Model Data

Design Product ModelIRENE

RTS

TSSM

SMP

ASAP/SVM

CONTAM

EXCEL-COST

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

TLEAPS/Editor

ASSET

SBAAT

T

T

Initialize Federates

T

Logged Fed’n Data

T

PRO/E

CATIA

T

ST

EP

/IGE

S

T

T

T

UGT

T

LEAPS/Editor

ST

EP

/IGE

S

CFX

GRIDGEN

CONTAM

Analysis

Developed and implementedby JS CBD FY02 & FY03

Virtual Mockup

Presentation Mgr

DOORS

Initialize Federates

27 Apr ‘06 23

LEAPS Activity

VisMockup

IRENE

EXCEL

TSSM

SMP

SVM/ASAP

EMENG

SDWE

GENERAL

LEAPSLEAPSProduct ModelProduct Model

• Generic Class Structure• Product Model Schema–NAVSEA Ship Focus Object Model

• Product Model Data

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

LEAPS Product ModelLEAPS Product Model

Presentation Mgr

RTS

ASSET Surface

ASSET Sub

HLA Federate(s)T

CAD

FORAN

TRIBONT

STEP(214)IGES

T

T

T

IntellShipT

CFX

RTC

BAM

GMULT/GCPL

T

MultihullArrange

LEAPSEditor

In Development ExistingBeta Code Other

STEP/IGES

T

T

SHIP AP’sSTEP(216)STEP(215)STEP(218)STEP(227)

T

Capture HLA Sim Data

SHIPIR

CONTAM

FKS

DOORS S3D

VERES

PlannedD

SWPE

27 Apr ‘06 24

Demo Scenario – FORAN Translator

Detail Design in FORAN

ISDP used by Partnering Shipyard

LEAPS for Customer Review

and Approval

Preliminary Design done in TRIBON has been transferred to LEAPS for Navy review and suggestions for design changes are forwarded to shipyard using FORAN who will perform Detail Design

SENERAP215

Translator

STEPAP 215 File

27 Apr ‘06 25

SENER - FORAN

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L

C O M P A R T M E N T

N U M B E R

D E S C R I P T I O N L O N G .

P O S I T I O N S I

D E S H I P ’ S Z O N E

S e e F i g

1 L A Z A R E T T E F r . 2 5 – 2 8 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

2 E N G I N E R O O M F r . 1 6 – 2 3 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

3 P U M P R O O M F r . 1 2 – 1 6 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

4 P R O V I S I O N S T O R E R O O M F r . 1 0 . 5 - 1 2 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

5 O B S E R V E R S B E R T H I N G F r . 9 . 5 – 1 2 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

6 C R E W B E R T H I N G F r . 6 – 9 . 5 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

7 B O W T H U S T E R S P A C E F r . 4 . 5 – 6 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

8 B O S U N S S T O R E S F r . 2 – 4 . 5 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

9 V O I D S P A C E F r . 2 – 4 . 5 P - S D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

1 0 C H A I N S L O C K E R F r . 1 . 5 – 2 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

1 1 C . O . S T A T E R O O M F r . 4 . 5 – 7 P D E C K H O U S E 3

1 2 C . P . O . S T A T E R O O M F r . 4 . 5 – 7 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 3 W A S H R O O M , W C &

S H O W E R F r . 7 – 8 . 5 P D E C K H O U S E 3

1 4 E L E C T R I C A L

E Q U I P M E N T R O O M F r . 7 – 8 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 5 A I R H A N D L I N G R O O M F r . 8 – 1 0 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 6 G A L L E Y F r . 1 0 – 1 3 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 7 B O S U N S ’ S L O C K E R –

D E C K G E A R F r . 1 3 . 5 –

1 4 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 8 S H E L T E R D E C K A R E A F r . 1 3 . 5 – 1 5 P D E C K H O U S E

( O P E N A I R S P A C E ) 1

1 9 M E S S / L O U N G E F r . 8 . 5 –

1 3 . 5 P D E C K H O U S E 3

2 0 P I L O T H O U S E F r . 6 – 1 0 P - S P I L O T H O U S E 1

2 1 F O R E P E A K F r . ( - 2 ) – 2 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

2 2 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 1 F r . 6 – 9 S D O U B L E B O T T O M 3

2 3 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 2 F r . 6 – 9 P D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

2 4 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 3 F r . 2 3 – 2 5 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 3

2 5 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 4 F r . 2 3 – 2 5 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

2 6 P O T A B L E W A T E R T A N K

N o . 1 F r . 1 2 . 5 –

1 5 . 5 S I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 2

2 7 P O T A B L E W A T E R T A N K

N o . 2 F r . 1 2 . 5 –

1 5 . 5 P I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 2

2 8 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 1 F r . 9 – 1 2 S D O U B L E B O T T O M 3

2 9 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 2 F r . 9 – 1 2 P D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

3 0 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 3 F r . 1 6 – 2 2 C B E L O W E N G I N E R O O M 2

2 0

23

9

2 1

2 32 9

1 8

F i g . 1

1

3 0

2 7

2 6

6

4

5

78

1 0

2 5

F i g . 2

1 1

1 31 9

1 6

2 22 8

1 4

1 5

2 4

1 7

1 2

F i g . 3

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R

S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L ( 1 o f 2 )

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L

C O M P A R T M E N T

N U M B E R

D E S C R I P T I O N L O N G .

P O S I T I O N S I

D E S H I P ’ S Z O N E

S e eF i g

3 1 F U E L O I L D A Y T A N K

N o . 4 F r . 2 3 - 2 4 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 2 F U E L O I L D A Y T A N K

N o . 5 F r . 2 3 - 2 4 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 3 L U B R I C A T I N G O I L

S T O R A G E T A N K F r . 2 3 - 2 3 . 5 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 4 W A S T E O I L T A N K F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 C I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 6

3 5 S E W A G E T A N K F r . 1 2 . 5 -

1 3 . 5 C I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 6

3 6 W A S H R O O M , W C &

S H O W E R F r . 9 . 5 - 1 2 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 5

3 7 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 8 . 5 -

1 0 . 5 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 5

3 8 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 7 - 8 . 5 P - S D E C K H O U S E 4

3 9 S T A I R S F r . 8 - 1 0 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 0 E X H A U S T T R U N K - I N -

D E C K H O U S E F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 1 V E N T T R U N K - I N -

S H E L T E R D E C K A R E A ( V E N T I L A T O R ’ S B A S E )

F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 5 P D E C K H O U S E 5

4 2 S T A I R S F r . 1 3 . 5 - 1 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 3 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 2 3 - 2 5 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

4 4 C Y L I N D E R L O D G I N G T H E B O W T H R U S T E R

F r . 5 1 / 3 P - S

C I L I N D R I C A L H O L L O W I N S I D E B O W T H R U S T E R

S P A C E

6

4 5

H O L L O W I N S H I P ’ S H U L L - M A I N D E C K

D U E T O T O R P E D O ’ S R A M P

F r . 2 0 . 5 - 2 8 S

O N T O P O F L A Z A R E T T E ,

B A L L A S T T K . N o . 3 , F U E L O I L T A N K

N o . 4 A N D E N G I N E R O O M

5

4 6 E X H A U S T T R U N K -

I N S I D E P U M P R O O M F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 S I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 5

4 7 V E N T T R U N K -

I N S I D E P U M P R O O M F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 P I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 5

3 1

3 2

3 3

3 83 94 2

4 34 0

F i g . 4

F i g . 5

4 5

4 6

4 74 1

3 6

3 7

4 5

F i g . 6

4 4

3 43 5

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R

S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L ( 2 o f 2 )

FORAN Ship ArrangementsDetailed Design

Selective STEP Export to LEAPS

SpacesDeck zones

Zones

( P21 AP215-AIM STEP FILE)

Decks and Bulkheads

Details

List of Ship Spaces

Hull Forms

FORAN – ISE4 AP215 STEP Translator

FORAN – ISE4 Import STEP Translator

TRIBON - LEAPS

AP215 – SHIP ARRANGEMENTS

27 Apr ‘06 26

Demo Scenario - LEAPS AP215 Import

Part21 file from FORAN

27 Apr ‘06 27

Demo Scenario - LEAPS AP215 Import

Imported Product Model Data in LEAPS

27 Apr ‘06 28

Overview – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

• Transfer construction product model to Life Cycle Support for– Engineering support

• Onboard applications• Distance support• Maintenance aids• Analysis tools

– Decision support / simulation– Logistics support

• Typical deliverables are drawings / documents– Must be re-converted to electronic data– Manual, labor intensive, incomplete process– Integrated Product Model often lost

• ISE information models designed to interoperate and preserve integrated product model – Supports automated, complete process

27 Apr ‘06 29

As-Is Process – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Life Cycle Support SystemIntegrated

ConstructionProduct Model

Neutral File Geometry (IGES, STEP, ACIS, DXF)

Or Drawings

C&ADrawings

EquipmentArrangement

Drawings

StructuralDrawings

Molded FormModeler

ArrangementsModeler

StructuralModeler

EquipmentModeler

Manual, labor intensive & often incomplete process

27 Apr ‘06 30

ISE Process – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Life Cycle Support System

Integrated ConstructionProduct Model

AP 216Molded Form

Data

AP 215 Arrangements

Data

AP 218Structural

Data

AP 227 Equipment

Data

Highly automated, integrated, complete process

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

Integrated Life CycleProduct Model

27 Apr ‘06 31

Demo Scenario–Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Integrated ConstructionProduct Model

AP 216Molded Form

Data

AP 218Structural

Data

AP 227 Equipment

Data

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

Integrated Life CycleProduct Model

ISDP: Integrated Ship Design & Production

IntelliShip

Previous exchange

Compartments created using existing molded forms

ISE exchanges interoperate & preserve product model

AP 215 Arrangements

Data

27 Apr ‘06 32

Electrical Demo Details


ISDP



ModifyArrangement

Repair Shipyard

Steel Processing



Intergraph

Key: = Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

ElectricalKSS/KM

AAP212P28

AP212P21

DetailDesign

Arrangements

27 Apr ‘06 33

Project Objectives

Exchange and ARCHIVE electrical shipbuilding data using STEP AP212 (developed by the auto industry).

Adopt XML to exchange STEP data.

Lay the groundwork to exchange data between CAD and knowledge-based software systems using STEP.

Leverage existing initiatives in the industry (STEP Part 21, STEP Part 28, STEP AP212, and the Navy XML repository).

Publish project results.

27 Apr ‘06 34

Knowledge Systems Solutions

Knowledge management products and expert system software

Navy (SPAWAR) C4ISR

Ship Shore Installation Design Tool

(SSIDT)

KSS KnowledgeManager

Product to createuser-defined

knowledge bases

Air Force (OC-ALC) SBIR

Knowledge-based reverseengineering & automatic

creation of 3D CAD models

Navy (NAVSEA) SBIR

Knowledge-based retentionof shipbuilding expertise

*

* *

Transition of NSRP STEP translator technology*

27 Apr ‘06 35

Spiral Development

Knowledge-based system STEP XML AP212

TWRLightingTWR

Power Distribution

SystemSpec

FrameworkDesign

Single C4ISREquipment

Single C4ISRCircuit

Full C4ISRSystem

Generic Objects

DesignConfigurator

Integrated Prototype

Component Design File Data

Import

NavyAir Force

Commercial

STEP – Data – Translator

Full Engineering& Design Data Sets

27 Apr ‘06 36

Knowledge Management Demonstration

TWR Power Distribution System

Collect data and information into a knowledge base

Perform calculations and design functions

27 Apr ‘06 37

Component Design Framework

KnowledgeBasedSystem

ComponentPart

Catalog

ObjectClasses

STEP.stpFiles

AP SchemasAP

SchemasCAD Systems

Med

iato

rsM

edia

tors

DesignConfigurator

AP Schemas

AP Schemas

AP Schemas

Design File

Component Structure

CDF • Component Structure

• Multiple AP’s & Schemas

• Auto-configured Objects

• Structured Design File

• KB CAD (future)

• CAD KB (future)

27 Apr ‘06 38

Electrotechnical Results

Developed Component Design Framework for data translation and archival using STEP AP212.

Knowledge Management (knowledge & rules)

Engineering Data (results)

Created reusable STEP toolsets (mediator stylesheets) for DoN repository.

Tested AP212 with diverse electrotechnical test cases.

Demonstrated the joint use of STEP and XML with new programming resources.

27 Apr ‘06 39

Electrotechnical Future

– Continued joint service implementation and benefit.

– ISE4 follow-on project• Facilitates detailed engineering along with early

conceptual electrical engineering.

• Integrates knowledge management with 2D and 3D CAD via STEP formatted files.

– Automatically generate knowledge bases from existing CAD data elements.

27 Apr ‘06 40

Engineering Analysis Demo Details

DetailedDesign Stage

NGSS, Intergraph

EBCElectrical

Concept & Preliminary Design Engineering

FEA Analysis

XSLTs

NGSS, Intergraph

EBC

ADAPT

AP218P28

AP209P21

ISDP

Steel Processing


DetailDesign

Arrangements

27 Apr ‘06 41

Engineering Analysis Project

Final DemonstrationApril 27, 2006

Washington, DC

ISE-4

L = Left Screen

27 Apr ‘06 42

Engineering Analysis Project

Final DemonstrationApril 27, 2006

Washington, DC

ISE-4

R= Right Screen

Note: This was a simultaneous 2-screen demo; L = Left screen, R = Right screen.

27 Apr ‘06 43

Participating Organizations:

• General Dynamics / Electric Boat – Task Lead

• Northrop Grumman Ship Systems

• Intergraph Corporation

Engineering Analysis Task

L

27 Apr ‘06 44

Individual Participants:• Burt Gischner

• Ron Wood

• Steve Gordon

• Denny Moore

• Ted Briggs

• Art Hundiak

• Tom Rando

• Heidi Preston

• Steve Skrabacz


R

27 Apr ‘06 45


Focus and Outline:

• Multiple ISO STEP Application Protocols (APs)– Primarily AP218 and AP209

• Different file exchange formats– Traditional STEP Express and XML forms

• Leverage existing CAE software

Demonstrations:

• Demo 1 - Accommodating different formats– Both Part21 (Express) and Part28 Ed. 2 (XML)– Using mediation (XSLT transformation)

• Demo 2 - Using parametric geometry – AP218 ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ Geometry– Creating explicit from implicitL

27 Apr ‘06 46

Engineering Analysis Task Goals

Task Goals and Objectives:

• Extend interoperability capabilities by employing both the newer shipbuilding APs and the other existing ISO STEP 10303 standards.

• Build on work accomplished under previous ISE projects and related efforts.

• Illustrate flexible use of both STEP Express and XML formats for exchange and mediation.

• Demonstrate TWR structural model exchange from AP218 to AP209 for use with various engineering finite element analysis software packages

• Leverage these methodologies for both future Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Long Term Data Retention (LTDR) efforts.L

27 Apr ‘06 47Ready for Implementation

Interoperability

Extend ISO 10303 Interoperability

R

27 Apr ‘06 48

• The utility of the ISO STEP 10303-209 (AP209) for supporting interoperability and collaborative design (combining design geometry with detailed finite element analysis) has already been demonstrated in other venues (e.g. PDES).

• All of that collaboration has been based upon exchange of traditional STEP files encoded in Express (Part21).

• In this ISE-4 task we demonstrate extensions to that approach by integrating with STEP application protocols for ship structure (primarily AP218), and by employing more flexible collaboration and exchange scenarios using XML (Part28) encoded files.

Engineering Analysis Approach

PDES, Inc. R

R

27 Apr ‘06 49

Data

ISO STEP Standard Information Model

<XML>Express

Part21 Part28

The STEP Standards can be delivered (“wrapped”) in multiple forms, yet contain

exactly the same data!

ISO STEP 10303 Information Model = Core Content

ISE Paradigm

R

27 Apr ‘06 50

XML Mediation Addresses CAx Interoperability among the Ship APs and with other Existing ISO STEP APs

Ship CAD Tools

STP (Express) Files

XML Files

XSLTInteroperabilityCAE

Analysis Tools

Engineering Analysis Approach / Progress

CAx = CAD / CAE / CAM

CAD CAE

CAD CAM

L

27 Apr ‘06 51

Interoperability Backdrop

Ship CAD Tools

CAE Tools

STP

AP218 AP209

XML

R

27 Apr ‘06 52

EA Demo 1 Roadmap

Ship CAD Tools

CAE Tools

AP218

STP

AP209

XMLShipyard CAD

DS / CATIA

Sener / FORAN

Intergraph / ISDP

Aveva / TRIBON

Intergraph / IntelliShip

Atlantec

Step Tools

AP218ARMP28

AP218AIMP21

AP209AIMP21

EB / COMMANDS

FESOL

AP209

Existing CAE Structural Analysis

MSC / PATRAN

EB / ADAPT

AP203

?

R

27 Apr ‘06 53

Ship CAD Tools

CAE Tools

AP218

STP

AP209

AP209AIMP21

XML

Mediation Tools

AP218AIMP28

AP209AIMP28

AP209ARMP28

XSLT XSLT

P21-P28 P21-P28

XSLT

XSLT

NSRP Tools & Infrastructure

Shipyard CAD

DS / CATIA

Sener / FORAN

Intergraph / ISDP

Aveva / TRIBON


EB / COMMANDS

FESOL

AP209


Atlantec

Step Tools

AP218ARMP28

AP218AIMP21

MSC / PATRAN

EB / ADAPT

AP203

EA Demo 1 Roadmap

R

27 Apr ‘06 54

Actual EA Demo 1 Flow

DS / CATIA

Ship CAD Tools

Sener / FORAN

Aveva / TRIBON

MSC / PATRAN

CAE Tools

EB / COMMANDS

FESOL

AP209

STI

AP218ARMP28

AP218AIMP21

Atlantec

AP218

AP209AIMP21

STP

AP209

AP218AIMP28

AP209AIMP28

AP209ARMP28

XSLT XSLT

P21-P28 P21-P28

XSLT

XSLT

XML

Mediation


EB / ADAPT

AP203

Intergraph / ISDP

L

27 Apr ‘06 55

XML

STPSTP

NSRP ISE Demo GUI

Mediator GUI

R

27 Apr ‘06 56

Multiple APs

• Different ISO STEP Application Protocols have differing file content.– AP218 (Ship Structures) vs. AP209 (Composite and Metallic Structural

Design & Analysis).

• Several ship CAD vendors have selected XML (Part28) format for data exchange.

• Other CAx (CAD and CAE) vendors employ existing (older) ISO STEP exchange files in Express (Part21) format.

• AP203 (IS, 1994) has had more than a decade of usage. Along with AP214, they are the most commonly used APs. They are pervasively used for CAD geometry exchange in various industries today.

How can that work?

L

27 Apr ‘06 57

AP218: Ship Structures

L

27 Apr ‘06 58

Configuration Control, Approvals

• Part, product definitions

• Finite element analysis model, controls, and results

Configuration Control, Approvals

• Part, product definitions

• Finite element analysis model, controls, and results

Analysis Discipline Product Definitions

• Finite Element Analysis–Model (Nodes, Elements, Properties,...)–Controls (Loads, Boundary Constraints,...)

–Results (Displacements, Stresses,...)

• Analysis Report

Analysis Discipline Product Definitions

• Finite Element Analysis–Model (Nodes, Elements, Properties,...)–Controls (Loads, Boundary Constraints,...)

–Results (Displacements, Stresses,...)

• Analysis Report

Design Discipline Product Definition

• Shape Representations

• Assemblies

Design Discipline Product Definition

• Shape Representations

• Assemblies

Information Shared Between Analysis & Design

• 3D Shape Representations

• Composite Constituents

• Material Specifications & Properties

• Part Definitions

Information Shared Between Analysis & Design

• 3D Shape Representations

• Composite Constituents

• Material Specifications & Properties

• Part Definitions

Composite Constituents

• Ply Boundaries, Surfaces

• Laminate Stacking Tables

• Reinforcement Orientation

Composite Constituents

• Ply Boundaries, Surfaces

• Laminate Stacking Tables

• Reinforcement Orientation

Material Specifications & Properties

• Composites

• Homogeneous (metallics)

Material Specifications & Properties

• Composites

• Homogeneous (metallics)

3D Shape Representation

• AP202/203 Commonality Plus Composite Specific 3D Shapes

– Advanced B-Representation– Faceted B-Representation– Manifold Surfaces With Topology– Wireframe & Surface without Topology– Wireframe Geometry with Topology– Composite Constituent Shape Representation

3D Shape Representation

• AP202/203 Commonality Plus Composite Specific 3D Shapes

– Advanced B-Representation– Faceted B-Representation– Manifold Surfaces With Topology– Wireframe & Surface without Topology– Wireframe Geometry with Topology– Composite Constituent Shape Representation

AP209: Composite & Metallic Structural Analysis & Related Design

R

27 Apr ‘06 59

ISO STEP 10303-218 (AP218) Ship Structures

PDM

Geometric Shape Representations

Structural Parts and Features

CAD

Configuration Management, Class Approval

General Characteristics, Hull Cross Section, Weight Description Production Design &

Engineering Data

Wireframe, Non_Manifold Surfaces, Brep Solids

ISO STEP 10303-218 (AP218)

“Explicit” Geometry “Implicit” Geometry

(Parametric Geometry)

L

27 Apr ‘06 60

PDM

Product Data Management

PDM Info

AP209 = CAD + CCS + CAE + FEM + FEA + PDM

ISO STEP 10303-209 (AP209)

One can use STEP APs with any one or more of these pieces.

AP209

CADNominal CAD Geometry

CAEIdealized CAE “Simulation-Specific”

Geometry

FEAFinite Element Analysis FEA

Controls & Results

FEMFinite

Element Model(s) FEM

CCS

Composite Constituent

Shape(s) CCS

R

27 Apr ‘06 61

AP218: Ship Structures

Structural System Tank StructureL

27 Apr ‘06 62

ISO STEP 10303-209 (AP209)

R

27 Apr ‘06 63

This NSRP ISE-4 Task Demo

PDM

First Step is to Create a Starting AP209 File with

Explicit Geometric Shape Representations

CAD

Configuration Management, Class Approval

Multiple STEP Application Protocols, Different Formats: XML (P28), Express (P21)

AP218 P28 ARM

PDM

CAD

AP209 P21 AIM

XSLTs

L

27 Apr ‘06 64

PDM

CAD

PDM

CAE

FEM FEA

AP209

The Next Demo Step is to Illustrate Analysis of the

Exchanged Ship Structure

• Automated Creation of Idealized (Analysis) Geometry• Construct the Finite Element Model(s)• Solve, Display, and Interpret Analysis Results

All These can be Merged into a Single “Growing” AP209 File or Repository for LTDR and PLM

This NSRP ISE-4 Task Demo

R

27 Apr ‘06 65

Demos Employ TWR 3D

Product Model GeometryEngine

Room

Engineering Analysis Task Demos

EA Demo 1

L

27 Apr ‘06 66

TWR Engine Room Looking Aft with Bulkhead at FR 16 Removed

TWR Engine Room

L

27 Apr ‘06 67

Engines are Supported on Outboard and

Inboard Girders

TWR Engine Room

Twin Caterpillar Diesel Propulsion

EnginesFuel Oil Tank Top

R

27 Apr ‘06 68

Selected TWR Engine Room Solid Model Geometry with Port

Caterpillar Engine

Partial Design Change - Additional Brackets Inserted at FR 17 & FR 19

TWR Engine Room

L

27 Apr ‘06 69

Selected TWR Engine Room Solid Model Geometry with Port

Caterpillar Engine

TWR Engine Room

R

27 Apr ‘06 70

Port-Side Outboard Girder - Solid Model

Geometry for Analysis

TWR Engine Room Fuel Oil Tank & Engine Support Structure

Shown in Intergraph’s ISDP Software

Demo Geometry in ISDP

L

27 Apr ‘06 71

Demo 1


Demonstrations:


• Demo 2 - Using parametric geometry – AP218 ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ Geometry– Creating explicit from implicit

L

27 Apr ‘06 72

Demo 1


Demonstrations:



R

27 Apr ‘06 73

Port-Side Outboard Girder - Solid Model Geometry

Outboard Girder – Mid-Surface Shell Geometry for Analysis

Demo Geometry

Nominal (CAD) and Idealized (Analysis) Geometry in EB’s ADAPT code

L

27 Apr ‘06 74

Outboard Girder – Shell Finite Element Analysis Model

6 “G” Simulated Shock Loads Applied in Vertical and Athwartship Directions

Shock Stress FE Analysis Model

L

27 Apr ‘06 75

Analysis 2

Outboard Girder – With Intermediate Brackets at

Frames 17, 18, and 19

Analysis 1

Outboard Girder – With Single Intermediate Bracket at Frame 18

For the Simulated Athwartship Shock Loading, Adding the

Additional Brackets Results in an Eight-Fold Reduction in

Von Mises Stress Level

Shock Stress FE Analysis Result

L

27 Apr ‘06 76

Demo 2


Demonstrations:



R

27 Apr ‘06 77

AP218 Implicit Geometry

Various parts and features have parametric definitions in AP218 implicit geometry.

T Bar Cross Section Drain Hole Cutout

Bulbflat Cross Section

Outward Round Corner Cutout

L

27 Apr ‘06 78

EA Demo 2 uses ESTEP AP218 Test Case 2 (based on TWR Frame 12) from the ISE-2 project as input.

A prototype demonstrator code creates the explicit geometry, visualizes both, allows parametric change, an exports a STEP file.

EA Demo 2

L

27 Apr ‘06 79

Ship CAD Tools

CAE Tools

AP218

STP

AP2XX

AP203AIMP21

DS / CATIA

Sener / FORAN

EB / COMMANDS

FESOL

AP209


Step Tools AP218AIMP21

MSC / PATRAN

EB / ADAPT

AP203

EA Demo 2 Roadmap

STEPP21

Reader

3DViewer

MathLib

‘OneStop’

AIM218

Valid.

ManifoldSolid

Generator

ARMLister

PrototypeDemonstrator

AP218 Implicit to Explicit Geometry

& Visualizer

Implicit & ExplicitGeometry

Explicit Geometry

• Modular Java software

• Multiple project funding & support (EB, CNST, ISE)

ImplicitGeometry

Explicit Geometry

L

27 Apr ‘06 80

EA Demo 2

Part Selector and Parameter Change

Implicit (Parametric)

Geometry

CreatedExplicit

GeometryL

27 Apr ‘06 81

Demo 2


Demonstrations:



L

27 Apr ‘06 82

60 Degree Bevel

Outward Round Corner

Circular Cutout

Round Corner Rectangular Cutout

Inward Round CornerExamples of AP218

Parametric Features

EA Demo 2 – Implemented Features

L

27 Apr ‘06 83

AP218

ImplicitGeometry

Explicit Geometry

AP203

1. Implicit Explicit

2. Solid Import

3. Solid (TET) Meshing

EA Demo 2A

FEMAP Example

L

27 Apr ‘06 84

• It is an innovative integration of STEP and XML technologies– Supports sharing of geometry & geometric product models

• It employs a permissive (mediation) architecture– Lets each enterprise choose its own tool set

• It is accessible to both large and small shipyards– The only system dependency is Web infrastructure– Utilizes open standards

• It can be incorporated into CAD platforms used by U.S. shipbuilders and into software from other collaborating vendors

These demos show that the ISE approach and architecture do represent an innovative, practical solution to the information interoperability challenge.

ISE Approach

L

27 Apr ‘06 85

Steel Processing Demo Details


ISDP



Feed Mfg from ISDP

ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

Repair ShipyardGDEB NGSS

Steel Processing



DetailDesign

Intergraph

Key: = Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

Electrical

AP218P28

Arrangements

27 Apr ‘06 86

Agenda - Steel Processing

• Objectives/Proposed scope

• Manufacturing Rules Description/ Applicability

• Demonstration Scenario

• Benefits

27 Apr ‘06 87

Objectives/Scope

• General Objectives (from NSRP SIP)– Decouple CAM from CAD – Enable efficient partnering among yards

• Project Scope– Create a framework for defining manufacturing

rules/processes– Develop a Yard-Neutral Mfg Model (STEP AP218)

• Suitable for work package definition

• Make recommended enhancements to specification as required

– Apply manufacturing rules to generate a manufacturing product model that respects the requirements of a given yard

27 Apr ‘06 88

Usage Scenario S

hip

yard

A

Shop B

STEP 218STEP 218

Sh

ipya

rd B

Shop A

STEP 218 STEP 218

CAD(Detailed Design)

Steel Processor(Lofting/

Mfg Engineering)

Steel Processor(Lofting/

Mfg Engineering)

Mfg Rules

Mfg Rules

27 Apr ‘06 89

Mfg Product Model

Shell Plate Design

CAD

Develop Flat Plate

Specialized Macro

Add Excess Stock for Rolling

Manufacturing Rule

Adjust Size for Weld Shrinkage

Manufacturing Rule

Yard Processes and Assembly Plan

Add Edge Prep & Punch-marking

Sourc

ePro

cess

ManufacturingDesign

27 Apr ‘06 90

Rules Application

• Data Creation– Creation of manufacturing data based on the input data and rules

– Examples• Feature definition (edge preps, added/removed mat’l)

• Annotation creation and positioning

• Process definition

• Data extractions for post-processing applications (reports, mfg aids, nesting)

• Data Verification– Check the data for conformance to a set of yard-specific processes, geometry

correctness (e.g., closed parts), consistency, and produce-ability

– Examples• Data integrity (content, structure, associations)

• Geometry correctness

• Structural part relationships

• Correlation of processes applied to structural data

27 Apr ‘06 91

Demonstration Example

Deck Plates

Bulkhead

27 Apr ‘06 92

Yard-Specific Annotation Ex.

Thickness Throw Indicator(Northrop Grumman Ship Systems)

Thickness Throw Indicator(General Dynamics Electric Boat)

Stiffener

Marking Line

27 Apr ‘06 93

Demonstration ScenarioN

ort

hro

p G

rum

man

Avo

nd

ale

Shop B

STEP 218

Gen

eral

Dyn

amic

sE

lect

ric

Bo

at

Shop A

Launch Demo

STEP 218

1

2

ISDPISDP Steel ProcessorSteel Processor

Steel ProcessorSteel Processor

1Apply manufacturing rules for NG Avondale

2Apply manufacturing rules for GD Electric Boat

STEP 218

Mfg Rules

STEP 218

Mfg Rules

27 Apr ‘06 94

Benefits of Approach - Steel Processing

• Explicit definition and application of rules to structural data– Maintained separate from design/lofting systems– Streamline manufacturing product model creation

and verification

• Evolution of ship structural standards– Use STEP specifications as the native

import/export format and as a framework for the internal structure

27 Apr ‘06 95

Recap of the Interoperability Demo


TRIBON ISDP

LEAPS

LEAPS


FORAN


Feed Mfg from ISDP

ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

INTELLISHIP

Repair Shipyard

SuggestDesign



GDEB NGSS

Steel Processing

B

B

C



DetailDesign

Sener Intergraph

EBC

ADAPT

Key:

Atlantec


ElectricalKSS/KM

NavyResponse

Center

AP215P21

AP215P28

AP215P28

AP218P28

AP218P28

AP209P21

AP215P21

AAP212P28

AP212P21

SubmitDesign

For Approval

Arrangements



27 Apr ‘06 96

Availability of ISE Project Results

• ISE Project has:– Developed Information Models based on STEP – Created Mediator Tools– Verified that the above meet requirements of U.S. shipyards and

work with currently available CAD tools– Published Implementors Agreements to enable others to use these

tools effectively– Registered ISE Schemas with the DONXML Repository– Identified proposed changes/corrections to ISO STEP Standards– Created a Website to contain the relevant software tools, schemas,

etc. as provided by the ISE Project

• www.isetools.org– JEN-X Mediator from EXPRESS to XML will be publicly

available on Sourceforge and PDES, Inc. Websites

27 Apr ‘06 97

Goal: Implement in Production

• The ISE Project has developed tools and demonstrated interoperability between shipyards in the areas of:– Structure– Piping– HVAC– Common Parts Catalog Interfaces– Ship Arrangements– Electrical– Engineering Analysis– Steel Processing

• The goal of current and future efforts is to make these techniques and tools available in production and to all U.S. shipyards– STEP Shipbuilding Translators– XML Tools– Common Parts Catalog Interfaces

• A Website has been established to contain the relevant software tools, schemas, etc. as provided by the ISE Project– www.isetools.org

ISE2

ISE3

ISE4

27 Apr ‘06 98

Continuing Efforts

• An ISE4 Follow-On Project was awarded for 2006: – Electrical: Finish task including addition of 3D information– Program Management: Continue support and involvement of

ISO and DONXML activities

• An ISE Systems Technology Panel Project was awarded for 2006:– Steel Processing: Continue efforts with emphasis on STEP-NC

• Future Projects: Complete the Information Interoperability Roadmap– Goal is to turn all boxes “Blue”– ISE Project is providing tools to turn boxes from “Red” to

“Yellow” and then to “Green”– Customer must invoke Requirements on Contracts in order to

get these tools Implemented in Production

27 Apr ‘06 99

Information Interoperability Roadmap

Ship Product Model Data

Ship Structural Envelope

Distribution Systems

Equipment / Subsystems

Life Cycle Maintenance

Miscellaneous

HVACISO AP 227:2005

PipingISO AP 227:2005

Ship ArrangementISO AP 215:2004

Ship Moulded FormsISO AP 216:2003

Ship StructuresISO AP 218:2004

Reference Data Libraries

ISO 15926

Common Parts Catalog (CPC)

Mechanical SystemsISO AP 227:2005

Cable TraysISO AP 227:2005

Finite Element Analysis

ISO AP 209:2001

Product Config/ Geometry

ISO AP 203:1994

Systems EngineeringISO AP 233

Computational Fluid DynamicsISO AP 237

Logistics / SparesISO AP 232:2002

Outfit & FurnishingsNSRP 0428:1992

Manufacturing Support

ISO APs 224, 238, 240

Standard Approved

Information Model

Prototype Translators

Testing Framework

Deployment, integration,testing

Standard In Work

Product Life Cycle SupportISO AP 239

ElectricalISO AP 212:2001

Note: Circled boxes have been addressed under the ISE Project

27 Apr ‘06 100

Conclusions• These testing, modeling, and simulation efforts are part of

an attempt to develop a suite of product model data exchange tools that will enable U.S. shipyards to become more productive

• These efforts revolve around implementation of the ISO 10303 STEP Shipbuilding standards and XML technology

• The APs that enable these exchanges have completed their development and approval as International Standards

• The primary focus has shifted to testing and validating their implementations

ISE Tools Enable Interoperability between Shipyards and Reduce the Life Cycle Cost of Ships

27 Apr ‘06 101

• Two major challenges lie ahead of us:– Commercialization of this technology

– Continuing to prototype standards based data exchange in other application areas

• In order to increase the availability and lower the price of production ready tools:– The ship owner / operator needs to insist that data be delivered in a system

neutral format

– The shipbuilder needs to insist that STEP functionality be an integral part of computer software products

• The next challenge is to move this technology into the mainstream and insure that the technology is mature enough to transition into commercial CAD, CAE, CAM, and PDM products

Challenges

27 Apr ‘06 102

Summary

• Enabling interoperability is a major challenge in achieving the goals of NSRP

• Achieving these goals will have a major impact on reducing the cost of ships

• The ISE Project is attacking these problems in many different disciplines and environments

• Although ISE has been very successful, much work remains to achieve our goals

integrated shipbuilding environment (ise) ise4 project demonstration

Documents

design data

concept design

product model data

ap216initial design

feed data

model transfer

types of exchanges

steel processingthe