injectable therapies · 2016-09-24 · systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses hyaluronic...
TRANSCRIPT
GIUSEPPE FILARDO
E. KON, L. ANDRIOLO, D. REALE, S.A. ALTAMURA
and M. MARCACCI
BOLOGNA UNIVERSITY - RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE
NANO-BIOTECNOLOGY LAB.
Dir. E. Kon
I ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BIOMECHANICS LAB.
Dir. Prof. M. Marcacci
INJECTABLE THERAPIES
DISCLOSURE
CartiHeal LTD, Israel
Finceramica, Italy
Fidia Farmaceutici, Italy
GreenBone, Italy
Cartiheal LTD, Israel
Finceramica, Italy
Fidia Farmaceutici, Italy
GreenBone, Italy
IGEA clinical biophysics, Italy
Zimmer-BIOMET, USA
DSM Biomedical, USA
Piramal/Smith & Nephew, Usa
Institutional
support
Consultant
Giuseppe Filardo
NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL
EXERCISE
PHYSICAL THERAPIES
NON-SURGICAL TREATMENTS
PHARMACOLOGICAL
ANALGESIC/ NSAIDs/
SLOW-ACTING DRUGS
Filardo G, Kon E, Longo UG, Madry H, Marchettini P, Marmotti A, Van Assche D,
Zanon G, Peretti GM. Non-surgical treatments for the management of
early osteoarthritis. KSSTA 2016
INJECTIVE TREATMENTS
CORTICOSTEROIDS
VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION
INJECTIVE BIOLOGICS
NEW TREATMENT
OPTIONS
EARLY OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT
CORTICOSTEROIDS INJECTION
UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED CLINICAL USE
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE
ACTION
Pros
PAIN REDUCTION
Cons
TISSUE ATROPHY &
CARTILAGE DEGENERATION
REPEATED USE
SHOULD BE
AVOIDED
Law TY et al. Phys Sportmed (2015)
3 MONTHS TIME LAPSE
FROM EACH INJECTION ?
CORTICOSTEROIDS INJECTION
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTION
FOR SYNOVITIS
(common in early OA)
TISSUE ATROPHY &
CARTILAGE DEGENERATION
EARLY OA
Fibel KH et al. WJCC (2015)
Gerwin N et al. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2006)
INDICATION LIMITED TO EARLY
OA WITH PREVALENT SYNOVITIS
AFTER FAILURE OF COMMON
NON-SURGICAL THERAPIES
CORTICOSTEROIDS INJECTION
USE DURING THE INITIAL PHASE OF
POST-TRAUMATIC OA, DIMINISHING:
EARLY INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE
DIFFERENT POST-TRAUMATIC ALTERATIONS LEADING TO OA
SINGLE INJECTION OF
EXTENDED-RELEASE
FORMULATION
IN THE FUTURE…
Heard BJ et al. KSSTA (2015)
Bodick N et al. JBJSAm (2015)
NEW PARADIGM REVERSING CORTICOSTEROID REPUTATION
INHIBITS TISSUES NOCICEPTORS (ANALGESIC EFFECT)
STIMULATES ENDOGENOUS HA
SUPPRESSES THE PRODUCTION AND ACTIVITY OF
PROINFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS AND PROTEASES
INCREASE SYNOVIAL FLUID
ELASTICITY AND VISCOSITY
PREVENTS CARTILAGE
DEGRADATION AND PROMOTE ITS
REGENERATION
M Carrington Reid et al. Adv Ther (2013)
EFFECTS ON TISSUE HOMEOSTASIS
HYALURONIC ACID INJECTION
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF OVERLAPPING META-ANALYSES
HYALURONIC ACID INJECTION
Campbell KA et al. Arthroscopy (2015)
CLINICAL EVIDENCE
IA-HA RESULTS IN IMPROVEMENTS IN KNEE PAIN AND FUNCTION
THAT CAN PERSIST FOR UP TO 26 WEEKS.
IA-HA HAS A GOOD SAFETY PROFILE,
ITS USE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN EARLY KNEE OA
Rutjes AW et al. Ann Intern Med (2012)
META-ANALYSIS OF HIGH LEVEL STUDIES
BENEFIT MINIMAL OR NONEXISTENT
INCREASED RISK FOR SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS
ADMINISTRATION SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED
HYALURONIC ACID INJECTION
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
OARSI 2008 OARSI 2014
AAOS 2010 AAOS 2013
ACR 2000 ACR 2012
INDICATED
IN PATIENTS NOT RESPONDING TO NON-
PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY AND ANALGESICS
NO RECOMMENDATION
CONSIDER IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO ANALGESICS
NO
RECOMMENDATION
NOT
RECOMMENDED
INDICATED
PROLONGED DURATION OF BENEFIT
NO RECOMMENDATION
CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION: NOT INDICATED IN
EARLY OA DUE TO CHONDROTOXICITY
HYALURONIC ACID INJECTION: NOT INDICATED
RE-EVALUATE
APPROPRIATE
INDICATION?
OTHER SOLUTIONS?
IN EARLY OA
INJECTIVE OPTIONS?
PRP EFFECTS ON SYNOVIOCYTES
Enhancement of HA secretion and
increase MMP1,3 in OA
synoviocytes
PRP EFFECTS ON MENISCAL CELLS
Up-regulation of meniscal cells
viability in a dose dependent
manner
PRP EFFECTS ON CHONDROCYTES
Proliferation
ECM component deposition
Inflammation modulation
Analgesic action
PRP: INDUCTION OF POSITIVE CHANGES
IN THE WHOLE JOINT ENVIRONMENT
IN VITRO EVIDENCE
Filardo G, Kon E, Roffi, A, Marcacci M, et al. 2015
0
5
10
15
20
25
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Year
Pap
ers
Clinical studies
Preclinical studies
In Vitro studies
THE EVIDENCE FROM RCTs
PRP VS
CORTICOSTEROIDS
Forogh et al. 2015:
1 PRP INJ. > CS up to 6 m f-up
(clinical scores and
walking test, no ROM)
PRP VS
PLACEBO
Patel et al. 2013:
1 LP- PRP INJ. > saline (6M)
2 PRP INJ = 1 PRP INJ
Gormeli et al. 2015:
3 LR-PRP >> Saline (6M) even
in advanced OA grade
Smith et al. 2016:
3 LP-PRP >> Saline at any
time point up to 12 m
Cerza et al. 2012:
4 INJ. P-PRP >> 4 INJ. HA,
INDIPENDENTLY FROM OA
SEVERITY (6 M)
UNBLINDED
PRP VS
HA
Gormeli et al. 2015:
3 INJ. LR-PRP ARE
SUPERIOR TO 3 HA INJ. (6 M)
3 INJ PRP >> 1 INJ PRP
NO SUPERIORITY IN HIGH
GRADE OA
Sanchez et al. 2012:
3 INJ. PRGF vs 3 INJ. HA
PRP ONLY SUPERIOR (6M) IN
PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDERS
Vaquerizo et al. 2013:
3 INJ. PRGF >> 1 INJ. HA
(48 W) UNBLINDED
Raeissadat et al. 2015:
2 INJ. LR-PRP >>3 HA INJ. (12 M)
SIMILAR TREND IN ADVANCED OA
UNBLINDED
THE EVIDENCE FROM RCTs
Cerza et al. 2012:
4 INJ. P-PRP >> 4 INJ. HA,
INDIPENDENTLY FROM OA
SEVERITY (6 M)
UNBLINDED
PRP VS
HA
Gormeli et al. 2015:
3 INJ. LR-PRP ARE
SUPERIOR TO 3 HA INJ. (6 M)
3 INJ PRP >> 1 INJ PRP
NO SUPERIORITY IN HIGH
GRADE OA
Sanchez et al. 2012:
3 INJ. PRGF vs 3 INJ. HA
PRP ONLY SUPERIOR (6M) IN
PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDERS
Vaquerizo et al. 2013:
3 INJ. PRGF >> 1 INJ. HA
(48 W) UNBLINDED
Raeissadat et al. 2015:
2 INJ. LR-PRP >>3 HA INJ. (12 M)
SIMILAR TREND IN ADVANCED OA
UNBLINDED
THE EVIDENCE FROM RCTs
INCLUSION CRITERIA
•Monolateral symptomatic knee with history of chronic pain (at least 4
months) or swelling;
•Imaging findings of degenerative changes (Kellgren Lawrence 0 to 3
at X-ray or MRI evidence of degenerative chondropathy).
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
•Age > 80 years;
•Kellgren-Lawrence score > 3;
•Major axial deviation;
•Focal chondral or osteochondral lesion;
•Presence of any concomitant knee lesion;
•Causing pain or swelling;
•Haematological diseases;
•Severe cardiovascular diseases;
•Infections.
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
192 PTS, 1Y F-UP
PRP vs HA
DOUBLE - BLINDED
Filardo G, Di Matteo B, Di Martino A, Merli ML, Cenacchi A,
Fornasari P, Marcacci M, Kon E. Am J Sports Med. 2015
“ICRS 2015 AWARD”
IKDC SUBJ IMPROVEMENT at 12M F-UP
2 MONTHS
• PRP vs HA (n.s.)
6 MONTHS
• PRP vs HA (n.s.)
12 MONTHS
• PRP vs HA (n.s.)
NO STATISTICAL INTER-GROUP DIFFERENCE !!!
OTHER EVALUATIONS PERFORMED
EQ-VAS FOR GENERAL HEALTH
TEGNER SCORE
KOOS SCORE
SATISFACTION RATE
ROM AND TRANSPATELLAR CIRCUMFERENCE
Filardo G, Marcacci M, Kon E, et al. 2015
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ONLY ONE SIGNIFICANT
INTER-GROUP DIFFERENCE
WAS FOUND…
FAILURE RATE:
need for
reintervention
over 24 months
38.2%
HA GROUP
21.5 %
PRP GROUP
SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER
REINTERVENTION RATE IN
PRP GROUP (p=0.036)
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
PRP PRODUCES BETTER SUBJECTIVE
RESULTS WHEN PATIENTS ARE AWARE OF
THE TREATMENT RECEIVED, WHEREAS
LOWER OUTCOMES ARE DOCUMENTED IN
DOUBLE BLINDED TRIALS…
PRP = PRODUCT RICH IN PLACEBO (?!?!)
Filardo G and Kon E, KSSTA 2015
ANYWAY, POOR OUTCOME IN ADVANCED OA
(as seen for other treatments)
RIGHT INDICATION !!!
RIGHT TREATMENT PROTOCOL!
WHAT IS THE IDEAL NUMBER OF
INJECTIONS?
WHAT IS THE BEST TIME INTERVAL?
THAT IS STILL UNCLEAR…
MANY PROTOCOLS USED IN CLINICAL
PRACTICE
PATEL ET AL, AJSM 2013
NO CLINICAL DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN 1 OR 2 PRP INJ
3 L-PRP INJ. vs 3 HA INJ. vs 1 PRP+2 SALINE INJ. vs 3 SALINE INJ.
GORMELI ET AL, KSSTA 2015
OVERALL BETTER RESULTS WITH 3 INJECTIONS
1 LP-PRP INJECTION vs 2 PRP INJECTIONS vs 1 SALINE INJECTION
KADAVAR ET AL, J PHYS THER SCI 2015
1 PRP INJ vs 2 PRP INJs vs 3 PRP INJs
TWO WEEKS INTERVAL
3 INJECTIONS BETTER THAN 2 !
DIFFERENT PROCEDURES DIFFERENT PLATELETS
CONCENTRATES
DIFFERENT RESULTS
DIFFERENT PROPERTIES / DIFFERENT CLINICAL USE
(hemostasis, glue, scaffold, anti-inflammatory, analgesic,
antibacterial, enhancer of tissue healing potential…)
Blood volume harvested
Use of anticoagulant
Number of centrifugations
Speed of centrifugation
PRP volume obtained
Activation method
Integrity of platelets
Presence of leucocytes
Cryopreservation
PLATELET-RICH WHAT?
Pure PRP
(Cell separator PRP, Vivostat, Anitua’s PRGF)
PRP + leucocytes (Curasan,
Regen, Plateltex, SmartPReP, PCCS, Magellan,
GPS, Rizzoli’s PRP)
Platelet-rich fibrin
(Fibrinet)
Platelet-rich fibrin +
leucocytes (Choukroun’s PRF)
ACP (Arthrex)
PRPs EFFECT ON SYNOVIOCYTES
Assirelli E, Filardo G, Kon E, Marcacci M, et al. 2014
L-PRP: PROINFLAMMATORY / PRO-CATABOLIC
DOUBTFUL POSITIVE ACTION ON HA
P-PRP: WAS NOT ABLE TO EXERT A DIFFERENTIAL
PATTERN OF BIOLOGICAL EFFECT COMPARED TO PPP
PRPs EFFECT ON CHONDROCYTES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
Cavallo C, Filardo G, Kon E, Marcacci M, et al. 2014
PROLIFERATION: > PRP 1S
COLL GENE EXPRESSION: > PRP 1S
HYALURONAN EXPRESSION
AND SECRETION
> L-PRP (2S)
THE ROLE OF LEUKOCYTES…
38 PTS, INCLUDED IN A RCT,
UNDERWENT SYNOVIAL FLUID AND BLOOD SAMPLING
BEFORE EACH WEEKLY L-PRP or HA INJECTION (3 INJ)
PRO- AND ANTI-
INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINES
TESTED
NO DIFFERENCE IN
SYNOVIAL FLUIDS IN
INFLAMMATORY
MOLECULES
BETWEEN L-PRP AND
HA
THE LEUKOCYTE PRESENCE
DOES NOT UPREGULATE
INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE
ONE WEEK AFTER THE INJ.
Mariani E, Filardo G,
Kon E, Marcacci M, et al. 2016
ADVERSE EVENTS
PAIN SWELLING
PRP 2 STEP PRP 1 STEP PRP 2 STEP PRP 1 STEP
24 minor
34 moderate
14 severe
58 minor
9 moderate
5 severe
40 minor
21 moderate
11 severe
53 minor
16 moderate
3 severe
P = 0.0005 P = 0.03
CLINICAL
OUTCOME
IKDC SUBJ N.S.
AGE CORRELATION
COMPARATIVE STUDY
PRP 2 STEP (72 pts) vs PRP 1 STEP (72 pts)
Filardo, Kon, Pereira Ruiz, et al. KSSTA 2012
DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTRIC, CONTROLLED
PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (ITALY, BELGIUM, AUSTRIA, NORWAY)
46 PTS WITH EARLY TO MODERATE KNEE OA
SINGLE US GUIDED INJECTION: APS VS SALINE
APSS-33-00., “A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-
Controlled Pilot Study of a Single, Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous
Protein Solution in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee.” Ongoing Study.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
2 4 12 26 52
Pe
rc
en
t C
ha
ng
e fro
m
Ba
se
lin
e
Weeks After Injection
APS
Saline
APS >>> Saline
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY
CYTOKINES AND
GROWTH FACTORS
FROM WHOLE BLOOD
NOVEL SOLUTIONS: EU PILOT TRIAL
PRP: THE WAY IS STILL LONG...
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
CHARACTERIZATION
STANDARDIZATION
COMPARISON
OPTIMIZATION OF PRP!
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS FOR
MUSCULOSKELETAL TISSUES REPAIR
Caplan and S.P. Bruder 2001, TRENDS in Molecular Medicine, 7(6) 259-264
Mesenchymal stem cells are pluripotent progenitor cells
capable of differentiating into different cell lineages
SECRETE MASSIVE LEVEL OF
BIOACTIVE AGENTS
POWERFUL SITE-REGULATED
“DRUG STORES”
Caplan, Tisse Engineering Part A, 2010
SEVERAL SOURCES
Sakaguchi Y et al. Arthritis Reum 2005
Shirasawa S et al. J Cell Biochem 2006
Koga H et al. Cell Tissue Res. 2008
BMSCs
ADSCs
SDSCs
GOOD DIFFERENTIATION POTENTIAL
EASY COLLECTIBLE
LIMITED MSCs FREQUENCY/VOLUME
MINIMAL HARVEST MORBIDITY
LARGE AMOUNT
HIGHER MSCs FREQUENCY/VOLUME
GREATEST CHONDROGENIC POTENTIAL
CULTURE EXPANSION IS MANDATORY
EXPANDED
CONCENTRATED
PROS:
- higher MSCs number
- selected lineage
CONS:
- contamination risk during
amplification
- regulatory aspects
PROS:
- “minimally manipulated”
- one-step
CONS:
- heterogeneous composition
MSC PROCESSING
Filardo G, Madry H, Jelic M, Roffi A, Cucchiarini M, Kon E. Mesenchymal stem cells for the
treatment of cartilage lesions: from preclinical findings to clinical application in orthopaedics.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015
MECHANISM OF ACTION
EFFECTS
ON
CARTILAGE
PRE-CLINICAL EVIDENCE
EFFECTS
ON
MENISCUS
EFFECTS ON
SYNOVIAL TISSUE
IA INJECTION of MSCs
TARGETS ALL JOINT TISSUES
…DREAM
…OR REALITY?
MSCs INJECTIONS :
PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL EVIDENCE
Outcome N of Papers
+ 25
- 1
PRECLINICAL STUDIES
CLINICAL STUDIES
Outcome N of Papers
+ 13
± 2
IMPROVEMENT IN:
JOINT FUNCTION
PAIN
CARTILAGE THICKNESS
QUALITY OF LIFE
HISTOLOGIC AND MRI
SCORES
NOT UNIVOCAL RESULTS:
NO IMPROVEMENT AT X-RAY
BUT… “ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD”
STILL MANY OPEN QUESTIONS…
WHAT DO WE WANT…??
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS FOR
MUSCULOSKELETAL TISSUES REPAIR
HOPES…
WHAT DO WE WANT…??
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS FOR
MUSCULOSKELETAL TISSUES REPAIR
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS FOR
MUSCULOSKELETAL TISSUES REPAIR
AND FEARS…
WHAT DO WE WANT…??
CONCLUSIONS
MOST EVIDENCE ON ESTABLISHED OA
EARLY OA LESS STUDIED:
PRESERVE CARTILAGE!
CORTICOSTEROIDS AND HYALURONIC ACID
HAVE LIMITS, ESPECIALLY IN EARLY OA
SPACE FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS
NO EVIDENCE FOR REGENERATION!
HOMEOSTATIC TREATMENTS
(CYCLES?)
BUT
STILL MANY THINGS TO UNDERSTAND
(DOSAGE, SOURCE, INDICATION…)
THANK YOU
Supported by: Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Finalizzata (RF-2011-02352638).