infrastructure working council (iwc) meeting presentations two... · day two june 9, 2016...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Day Two
June 9, 2016
Infrastructure Working Council (IWC) Meeting
Presentations
Ashley HorvatVice President, Electric Highways & Strategic Initiatives
Electric Highway: Past & Future
EPRI IWCSeattle, WA
June 9, 2016
#1 Ranked EV charging appAvailable for free iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Android, and web• 450k mobile installs• 1:1 Downloads to EV
registrations• 90k Global Stations• 400k reviews, 85k photos • 5 Star rating in App Stores• Apple-designated iTunes
EssentialsKey Features:• Charging station locator• Driver messaging• PlugScore – driver satisfaction
App Overview 2
3Best Infrastructure Coverage
More than 35,000 charging stations in US+CA
* Current as of 2016-Q1. Count excludes level 1 stations and residential stations
Includes Clipper Creek, Eaton, Siemens, Bosch, Schneider, Leviton
In‐Vehicle Mobile Web
E‐commerce Route Planning
Search Rich ManagedLocation Details
OEM ChargingPrograms
Driver & VehiclePersonalization
Availability
Network Repairs
Usage History
Driver Messaging`
PlugShare API
PlugShare Services List
White label app development
In-vehicle charging station POI data licensing
Customer service and maintenance tool
Embeddable charging maps
Dealership training and sales support
Consulting & EV infrastructure marketresearch and analytics tool
Consumer insights survey research
Custom in-app experience
Mobile payment for charging
Mobile app charging station POI data licensing
5
Electric Highways Division(Nationwide DCFC Network)
Founding principles• Why DCFC MattersPast• West Coast Electric Highway – Oregon & Washington• Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
– 300 DCFC Site analysis (Cost benefit for ratepayers and utility)– Document the crucial role of DCFC to promote EV adoption and maximize eVMT
in support of California’s ambitious ZEV and GHG reduction goals– Demonstrate how PG&E’s DCFC sites complement and support other private
and publicly funded EV charging stations and networks, both existing and planned
• Seattle City Light (SCL): EV Infrastructure gap analysis and policy/programmatic recommendations
Future• Electric Highway – California, then nationwide
Today’s discussion
Corridor charging adds value to long range BEVs
Why DCFC Matters
The price of no corridor charging?
Why dcfc matters
“Successful” Charging Rates
Why (RELIABLE) dcfc matters
85.7%
8.6%
5.7%Tesla SuperchargerBased on 35 evaluations
7.6%
24.7%
42.7%
25.0%
% success rate95‐100%
90‐94%
80‐89%
Below 80%
Other DCFCBased on 288 evaluations
Source: PlugShare, rating over 12 mos. ending 12/15
Case study: The west Coast
Electric Highway• In 2010, British Columbia, WA, OR, &
CA leaders signed Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate & Energy, which would…– Make the 1,350 miles of the West Coast’s
“Main Street,” I-5, an alternative fuels corridor
– First Step: Create an Electric Highway from BC to Baja (BC2BC)
• For more see: – www.westcoastelectrichighway.com– http://www energycentral com/enduse/elec
Pay with PlugShare is available at all West Coast Electric Highway Charging Stations (L2 & DCFC)
WCEH: Host Site Specs
½ mile of hwy
Easy access
Safety bollards
Restrooms, amenities
How is it going along WCEH?
Map of West Coast Electric Highway PlugScores on 04/16/2016. 56 sites in OR and WA represented. Color indicates PlugScore and size shows # of reviews since 05/2015.
PG&E contracted Energy and Environmental Economics (E3), PlugShare, & UC Davis to study optimal DC fast charger siting within Pacific Gas and Electric’s (PG&E’s) utility service territory.
• Utilized an existing transportation demand model created by UC Davis to identify 300 locations within PG&E’s territory, along popular transportation corridors and met minimal coverage requirements across PG&E’s 70,000 square mile territory. – Ranked based upon their modeled driver demand. – Modeled to have a 1-mile radius, specific sites were located within
the 1-mile radius that had available transformer capacity and were publicly accessible.
– Resulted in over 14,000 businesses, restaurants, etc. that can be investigated to host a DCFC.
PG&E Project: Siting DC Fast Charging for Electric Vehicles in PG&E’s Service Territory
PG&E Project: Overview of Team’s Approach to DCFC Site Selection
PG&E Project
1. Location of unmet charger demand (lat‐lon, from UCD)
2. 0.5‐mile radius bubble around location
3.Find potential sites for chargers within bubble
4. Check whether sites are within a 300 ft. radius of a secondary transformer with sufficient capacity for
x# of chargers
Best Practices in DC Fast Charger Siting • A Best Practices Guide & micro-siting tool were developed for a
“boots-on-the-ground” approach – helping DCFC installers to identify ideal locations that will meet customer needs and preferences, and minimize other installation costs.– Siting DCFCs to maximize EV Adoption
• The Driver Perspective • The Charger Host Perspective • The Charging Network Developer Perspective
Selecting Potential DCFC Sites in PG&E’s Territory• Forecasting EV Adoption in 2025 • Mapping the Existing Public Charging Landscape• Macro-Siting of DCFCs: Identifying Locations of Unmet Charger Need
– Fast Charging Demand Types • Corridor• Workplace• Home
– Site Selection Methodology • Conclusions: Literature review, expert interviews and siting analysis
PG&E Project: Siting DC Fast Charging for Electric Vehicles in PG&E’s Service Territory
PG&E Project: Identified DCFC Siting Opportunities
Energy and Environmental Economics (E3) evaluated the distribution grid impacts of PEV charging for Seattle City Light (SCL) and partnered with PlugShare to consult SCL on a path forward.
– Based on results of an in-depth data analysis of existing infrastructure in SCL territory and an audit of other utility EV Programs & activities, drawing from the work performed by E3 for California utilities on behalf of CalETC.
• For the period from 2016 to 2030 E3 finds that light-duty PEVs provide a net benefit of $374 million to the region, primarily gasoline savings that significantly outweigh the cost of delivered electricity for PEV charging. This equates to a benefit of $5,758 per battery electric vehicle (BEV) and $4,859 per plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). A 25% increase in PEV adoption would increase the net benefits by 79% to $669 million.
• The utility retail rate revenue exceeds the cost of delivered electricity for light-duty PEV charging, providing net ratepayer benefits of $83 million. The ratepayer benefits per BEV and PHEV are $1,250 and $1,117 respectively.
• In the medium- and heavy-duty sector, E3 finds that buses and forklifts also provide net regional benefits of roughly $620,000 & $5,000 per vehicle respectively under the base case.
SCL STUDy: A Cost Benefit Analysis, “Implications of Electric Vehicle Adoption in Seattle City Light’s Service Territory”
• PlugShare provided an assessment of PEV charging infrastructure in the Seattle area – Across all networks, of the seven sites with the most
use, with 100 or more PlugShare customer reviews, four sites had fewer than 80% positive and neutral reviews - more than twice as many negative reviews as the national average.
– Due in part to PEV Project funding, Blink is the largest network and controls 74% of the 1,237 stations in the Seattle area. However, growth in the Blink network has slowed considerably, with only 36 stations added since May 2013.
SCL STUDY
• Vision: A national DC fast charger network for long-distance corridor travel
• Mission: Unleash sales of new wave of long-range BEVs
• Established: Late 2015• Successes to date:
– Won nearly $2MM funding from the California Energy Commission to build a DCQC corridor on US-101
– Competing in several other projects for additional DCQC corridor charging
– Developed a plan to build a US national DCQC network
– Active discussions with worldwide partners
Electric highways division
• Network deployment schedule to reflect PEV installed base & % of trips that begin and end w/in the state– Phase 1 & Phase 2
Electric Highway Division
• Focused exclusively on building a corridor-based, long-distance nationwide DCFC network
• In partnership with automakers• We bring proprietary data science to network charging
design & operation • We own & operate EVSE
– Central control of pricing, maintenance, & repair, standards
– User experience drives all priorities – Redundancy
• Multi-faceted Electric Highway Software platform– Mobile & In-dash apps
Electric Highway Division
Electric Highway – Phase 1: U.S. Highway 101
CEC Grant-Funded Highway 101 (8 Locatio
Open Charge Alliance update
Electric Power Research Institute’s Infrastructure Working Council Meetings
Seattle, WA– June 8th & 9th 2016
Since its publication OCPP 1.6 has been downloaded more than 3600 times by 77 different countries
Top 10:1. Germany (583)2. Spain (344)3. France (266)4. Netherlands (253)5. United States (214)6. United Kingdom (159)7. Italy (153)8. Sweden (131)9. India (118)10. China (106)
OCA is hosting its Second Congress in Amsterdamon 13-14th June
Business Event on Monday 13th
• Open to members and non members• Festive release of the Compliance Test tool• Workshops on OCPP implementations, Compliance
testing, standardisation and certification
Member Event on Tuesday 14th
• Open to members• Deep dive workshops on the Compliance test tool,
next version of OCPP, RFCs, standardisation and certification
You are all invited to the Second OCA Congress!
• Attendance is free• If you would like to join the Business Event on Monday 13th via Webex and the phone bridge, please contact
[email protected] for dial-in details
At the Congress OCA will launch the Compliance test tool
Tool can be purchased by OCA members and non members For more information: www.openchargealliance.org
Benefits Can be used for validation of OCPP version 1.6 implementations Makes implementing OCPP version 1.6 easier Helps with integrating OCPP 1.6 implementations of different vendors
Whilst OCPP 1.6 is taking off, OCA is working on the next version of OCPP following market demand
OCPP 1.6
• General corrections• Additional support for JSON
over web sockets• Smart Charging added• Enhanced Security
• Restructured• Enhanced Configuration,
Commissioning and Control• Further alignment with Standards for
Demand response and IEC/ISO 15118• Enhanced Security
OCPP 2.0
2015 2016 2017
Enhanced Security
Better fit for DC fast charging
Focus on Customer experience
Plug&Charge mode 4 status information secure communication channel
mutual authentication secure firmware update logging of security
events
Some of the enhancements OCA is working on
Soon OCA will transfer development of OCPP to a Technical Committee at OASIS
OCPP 1.6RFCsRFCs
RFCs&
OCPP 2.0
Current Co-proposers
• Open Charge Alliance• Elaad• ESB• Greenlots• Schneider Electric• EVbox• ENEL
High Level Process
1
Publish TC proposal Call for participation in the TC Planning of the first TC meeting
2 3 4
Bi-weekly calls
5 6 7
Publication of the final draft for public review
Publication of the draft for public review
Processing comments
2 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks
Vote
8
Private Outreach with the draft TC proposal
OASIS and IEC cooperation
Developing aLiaison Agreement
Dedicated Liaison members Share the draft version of the standard, the
analyses of the OCPP-IEC standards alignment and RFCs
Discuss the drafts during IEC Working Group meetings.
Organize joint Technical Workshops
The relevant IEC working groups are:• TC57 WG 17 (alignment with 61850)• ISO TC 22 SC31/IEC TC69 JWG1
(alignment with ISO/IEC 15118)• TC57 WG21 (alignment with CIM)
If you would like to join the OASIS Technical Committee, please contact
[email protected]@openchargealliance.com
Join OCA!
Join the OCA Congress!
Get working with the test tool!
Join the development of the next version at OASIS!
Reasons for not joining OCA yet1) I am happy with OCPP, but I trust you guys to do a great job, so let me know when the next
version is available.
2) I am happy with my own solution, so I don’t need OCPP
3) I will use OCPP, it is missing some things I need, but I see no point in sharing my clever insights with OCA. I’ll keep those as a competitive advantage
4) I have been out campaigning for Donald Trump, so just haven’t had the time to think about it
5) I’ll tell you why, its because……..