information trends in libraries get more value from data give more value to users get users involved...
TRANSCRIPT
Information Trends in Libraries
Get More Value from DataGive More Value to Users
Get Users involved
July 9, 2007
Stuart WeibelSenior Research Scientist
OCLC Programs and Research
What do we mean by value?
The Library Business Model• Make information look free to end users
The SCOAP (of the Mission)• Selection• Collection• Organization• Access• Preservation
Return on (society’s) investment Return of Patrons
Value Domains
Societal• Authoritative curation of the cultural, technical,
and scientific assets of a society• Information Neutrality• Public Trust
Technical• Systems for supporting SCOAP activities
• Bookshelves• Cataloging (and catalogs)• Electronic systems
Value Domains (continued)
Social: So-called Library 2.0 approaches• Promote community engagement• Recommender Services (reader advisories)
• People who bought X, also bought Y• LibraryThing.com does this well
• Tagging – folksonomies: what value?• Public Bibliography
• What is more important for discovery and use: a book review or a MARC record?
• Linking structure among first class objects is a central feature of the Web
What is a First Class Object? An information entity that has:
• Identity on the Web• A persistent identifier
• Accessible by anyone or any application• Stands alone
• Attribution (authorship)• Intellectual property Rights are clear
• Curated (don’t leave lying around)
FRBR entities should all be First Class Objects All FRBR entities should be addressable on
the Web• Group One
• Works, expressions, manifestations, and items
• Group Two• Named entities – people, organizations
• Group three• Subjects, concepts, terms, places…
Allow the user to enter and traverse the catalog from any of these entry points
Book Reviews:Again, First Class Objects
Persistently identified – with a single naming strategy
Accessible on their own Attributable – give me credit Linked appropriately – to WorldCat
Records Curated – don’t leave them lying around
in blogs
WorldCat Identities (beta)
Thom Hickey & Ralph LeVan, OCLC Programs and Research
20,000,000 names of people (real and fictional), organizations, and a smattering of animals (real and fictional)
Mined from OCLC records (100,000,000 records representing a billion plus of the common library holdings of OCLC’s global membership
http://orlabs.oclc.org/Identities/
WorldCat Identities: Summary Mine the data, extract value Summarize the larger context Link to all things useful
• Content (or its surrogates)• Related authors• Reviews• Authority Data
Consumer environment that is attractive, useful, shareable, and richly linked
Where is the Library as a Brand?
Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources A Report to the OCLC Membership
3300 Respondents to questions on:• Library use • Awareness and use of library electronic
resources • The Internet search engine, the library and the
librarian • Free vs. for-fee information • The "Library" brand
The over-all picture:
Libraries are trusted sources of information Search engines are trusted about the same People care about the quantity and quality of
information they find… speed is less important They do not view paid information as more
accurate than free information The overwhelming branding image of libraries is…
BOOKS• Patrons do not think of the library as an important
source of electronic information !
Building out the library brand
Build on the trust of our patrons Build on our business model:
Making information look free to end-users Build on the scale that libraries represent
• Presence in every community• Global scope and reach
Greater awareness of library resources Make libraries a part of the new electronic
environments that dominate social, educational, and work environments
Social Networking Software
Deliver library services into the emerging social networks
Motivate people to participate• Tagging• Book Reviews• Emergent relationships that are evident
from data about what people have and like
Social Consumer environments
Social Networking is not just for games• Facebook• Myspace• Second Life• Orkut
All are flawed as service delivery models• Business models are closed• Features are rudimentary
But… they foretell our digital future
Libraries must compare favorably with experiences that our patrons expect:
Discovery and recommender services Web 2.0 social network capabilities Experiences of comparable commercial service
providers Last-mile delivery capability Bookstore social experiences
• Coffee-shop salons• People to help us navigate the intricacies of a
complicated knowledge space We are offering an experience as well as a service
The future of Library catalogs?
Evolving towards the network level Collections linked to people, organizations,
global locations, concepts, context, metadata, and social networking benefits
Fit into the flow of the work and social lives of patrons
Help create a scaffolding for past knowledge and future productivity
Connect the User to the Library
Web or Scaffolding?http://www.smart-kit.com/s291/what-spider-webs-can-teach-us-about-caffeines-effect-on-the-brain/
Web is a wonderful metaphor, but perhaps something a bit more durable?
We want more• Coherence and context• Mature, durable environments that will
help us preserve our work and fix it in the context of our culture
• Honor the long-term mission of librarianship by embedding it in the emerging technologies of a social Web
Obrigado!
Find me on the Web at… http://weibel-lines.typepad.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/weibel-lines/sets/ [email protected]