informal federalism: self-governance and power sharing in afghanistan
TRANSCRIPT
Informal Federalism Self-Governance andPower Sharing in Afghanistan
Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili
University of Pittsburgh jmurtazpittedu
Although the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan establishes a highly centralized political system
this article suggests Afghanistan is an informal federation in which customary organizations com-
prise a legitimate level of government capable of providing many public goods and services at the
village level Despite the absence of formal village government governance in practice involves
extensive power sharing between district government officials and customary representatives
appointed by villagers themselves The effectiveness of such self-governing customary arrange-
ments is anticipated by the work of Elinor Ostrom while the finding that day-to-day relations
between levels of government are based in local norms rather than parchment institutions of the
state demonstrate the continued insight of Vincent Ostrom into intergovernmental relations
The 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan establishes a highly centralized system
of government in which local government officials have almost no independent
authority Despite formal centralization self-organized customary organizations
represent a de facto level of village government Local government in practice
involves extensive power sharing between district governors the lowest level of
formal government authority and self-governing village-based customary organi-
zations This article analyzes the nature of power sharing between the state and
customary authorities in rural Afghanistan by describing its characteristics as well
as specifying the conditions for its emergence maintenance and breakdown
This article draws on evidence from fieldwork conducted in 2006ndash2008 across six
provinces of Afghanistan and three follow-up trips in 2011ndash12 to articulate the
political relationship between customary governance organizationsmdashinformal polit-
ical organizations whose legitimacy is independent of the state which aggregates
interests and adjudicate conflicts outside of formal political institutionsmdashand formal
government officials at the district level The fieldwork illustrates that customary
forms of village governance which generally divides political authority between
community-selected village representatives (maliks) consensus-based councils (shuras
or jirgas) and religious arbiters (mullahs) has separate functions from that of the
state in terms of dispute resolution and public goods provision The jurisdictional
PubliusThe Journal of Federalism volume 44 number 2 pp 324^343doi101093publiuspju004AdvanceAccess publication February 8 2014 TheAuthor 2014 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CSFAssociates Publius IncAll rights reserved For permissions please email journalspermissionsoupcom
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
division of authority between district governors and customary authority as well as
the independent sources of legitimacy of customary officials and their capacity to
govern directly resemble political relations in federations where multiple levels of
government share power In Afghanistan however customary organizations have no
formal state mandate yet often serve as key partners in the federal arrangement For
this reason Afghanistan can be described as a federation in practice or an informal
federation In addition customary authorities often partner with formal district
governments in relationships that are collaborative rather than adversarial
The findings regarding norms of power sharing in the Afghan countryside are
anticipated by the work of Vincent Ostrom who noted that the modern study of
public administration focuses almost exclusively on creating forms of hierarchical
control that regard political and associational life outside such hierarchy as
lsquolsquofragmentedrsquorsquo (V Ostrom 2007) In contrast Vincent Ostrom saw legitimacy in
what appears to be organizational incoherence arguing that societies lsquolsquoare capable
of establishing good government by reflection and choice in a political system
characterized by substantial fragmentation of authority and overlapping jurisdic-
tionrsquorsquo (V Ostrom 2007 113) According to this perspective there is a certain virtue
of the untidy appearance of self-governing schemes and norms that shape relations
between multiple levels of authority (V Ostrom Tiebout and Warren 1961)
More generally these informal political arrangements in Afghanistan constitute
what Elinor Ostrom and Vincent Ostrom termed a lsquolsquopolycentric political systemrsquorsquo in
that these centers of power are formally independent of one another This article
integrates insights from the literature on polycentric governance as well that of self-
enforcing federalism to understand the origins breakdown and maintenance of
informal political relationships in rural Afghanistan Polycentrism shows us that
it is possible to have multiple levels of governmentmdashboth formal and informalmdash
within a single polity while the federalism literature shows us how these
polycentric units collaborate (E Ostrom 2005)
This study complements earlier work on village governance and the state in
Afghanistan by explicitly characterizing the country as a polycentric system of
governance Based on fieldwork in Northern Afghanistan in the 1970s Thomas
Barfield described relations between the state and villages as a lsquolsquoweak link on a rusty
chainrsquorsquo (1984) Several important studies consider the interplay between customary
law and state courts in promoting justice (Coburn 2013 Shahrani 1998) Another
perspective on center-local relations focuses on the extent of warlord governance at
the provincial level showing that warlords can be effective governors (Giustozzi
2009) As Mukhopadhyay (2013) explains former warlords often become effective
lsquolsquostrongman governorsrsquorsquo because they can transcend constraints imposed by the
state Finally there is an important and growing literature considering how local
decision-making procedures including the extent to which lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo actors
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 325
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
participate in development projects influence outcomes such as government
legitimacy and gender equity (Beath Christia and Enikolopov 2013)
None of these earlier studies explicitly consider power sharing between multiple
levels of government Barfieldrsquos study considered whether the state can control
villagers rather than reciprocity between villages and lower-level state officials
Studies of legal pluralism alert us to the interplay of formal and informal norms
but generally confine customary authorities as lawgivers thereby neglecting their
broader political significance Warlord governance is an important phenomenon
although warlords typically do not play important roles in day-to-day village
governance Finally impact evaluations of development projects confine analysis
to comparisons of customary governance versus aid projects in the lsquolsquoefficiencyrsquorsquo of
public goods provision within villages rather than the relationship between
customary representatives and higher levels of government
By focusing on norms of power sharing in rural parts Afghanistan this article
clarifies an important missing piece in studies of Afghan politics It casts doubt
upon pessimistic visions of customary and formal orders locked in perpetual wars
of elimination Although Afghanistan seems to be an exemplary case of conflict
between customary and lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo order customary representatives and state
officials often govern alongside one another through norms that are effective yet
whose origins lie outside the formal constitutional structure
Formal Government in Post-Taliban Afghanistan
The Afghan state has been highly centralized since King Abdur Rahman sought
to decimate customary authority as a state-building strategy during his ruthless
reign from 1880 to 1901 Since then most leaders have either sought to co-opt or
eliminate customary authority (Edwards 2002) The 2004 Constitution maintains
the same centralized system of subnational governance as under previous
monarchies where all local officials are appointed by the central government1
Afghanistan has four levels of government national provincial district and
village Each of the thirty-four provinces has a governor appointed by Kabul
District governors (woluswals) are appointed by the president sometimes in
consultation with the provincial governor There are around 400 districts2 Formal
village government called for in the Constitution has not been created Although
the Constitution calls for elected district and village councils elections have not
been held There have been elections for provincial councils yet these councils have
no budgetary authority and have no oversight over provincial governors
District governors enjoy very little formal autonomy reporting directly to
provincial governors who in turn report to the president3 The selection procedure
for provincial and district governors is unclear Based on my own observations and
interviews with officials responsible for appointing district governors (as exact
326 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
figures are unavailable) district governors are usually not from the districts they
serve serving for indefinite periods and are removed and rotated from one district
to another with little warning
Immediately after 2001 the international community focused most of its
attention on strengthening the national government with the hope that national
capacity would trickle down to provinces and districts Donors and the Afghan
Government began to pay more attention to subnational governance as the United
States and coalition partners viewed local politics as central to an effective
counterinsurgency strategy (Nagl et al 2007) Beginning around 2007 donors
began partnering with Afghan ministries to create ad hoc district councils
throughout the country as part of a governance strategy to defeat an insurgent
Taliban and to distribute development assistance (Saltmarshe and Medhi 2011)
Faced with a rising insurgency such efforts were mainly concerned with buying
loyalty rather than governing The lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo leaders who participated in these
councils often received a healthy stipend leading to intense competition between
community members and the government as to who might constitute an lsquolsquoelderrsquorsquo
As the goal was mainly aid delivery efforts to create district councils did not lead
to a viable source of governance Importantly there is no formal representation of
villages in the political system even though 80 percent of the population lives in the
estimated 20000ndash40000 villages Center-local political relations both formal and
informal are summarized in table 1
Research Methodology
The fieldwork was conducted in thirty-two villages across seventeen districts in six
provinces Provinces were selected to capture geographic and ethnic diversity
Provinces included Balkh (Nahri Shahi Dawlatabad Districts) Bamiyan (Panjab
Bamiyan Center Sayghan Shibar Districts) Herat (Karokh Anjil Pashtun
Zarghun Guzara Districts) Kabul (Paghman Guldara Qarabagh Districts)
Kunduz (Imam Sahib Khanabad Districts) and Nangarhar (Behsod Surkhrod
Districts) Kandahar was also selected but security deteriorated significantly during
the period of research making fieldwork untenable As Kandahar is a mostly
Pashtun district Pashtun communities in the remaining districts were oversampled
to ensure the data closely resembled the overall ethnic composition of Afghanistan
In each district research was conducted in one village close to the district center
and another one farther away At the time of research all districts were lsquolsquosafersquorsquo for
civilian travel Although this may have introduced bias into selection several years
later half these districts were insecure
The fieldwork produced more than 3000 pages of transcripts from interviews
conducted by the author and six Afghan researchers who came from a wide range
of ethnic groups each fluent in both Dari and Pashto under the auspices of a
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 327
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Kabul-based research organization the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Interviews and focus groups were transcribed from notes taken during the course of
interviews
It may seem that asking about government officials is a sensitive topic in
Afghanistan yet informants were quite willing to discuss their attitudes and rarely
hesitated to criticize local authorities Rather the potential source of lsquolsquodesirability
biasrsquorsquo arose from beliefs that researchers had come to bring aid projects Thus
many informants heaped enormous praise on aid during interviews Researchers
developed techniques to overcome this such as initially asking informants to
provide oral histories something rarely done by rapid aid appraisals In addition
team member met each day team to detect inconsistencies in stories told by
informants in communities
The Federal Dilemma in Afghanistan
A federation is conventionally defined by power sharing between multiple levels of
government Formally federalism is defined by three characteristics These include
geopolitical division subunits with independent bases of authority and govern-
ments at each level with the capacity to directly govern citizens within its
jurisdiction (Bednar 2008 18ndash19)
Table 1 Political representation in Afghanistan
Level Number of units Formal political
representative
Selection
method
Key informal
players
Province 34 Executive authority
Provincial governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Legislative authority
Provincial council
Elections
District 400 Executive authority
District governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Commanders
Legislative authority
District council
Elections have
yet to be held
Maliks
Mullahs
Village 20000ndash40000 Executive authority
None specified in
constitution or
existing legislation
ndash Maliks
ShuraJirgas
Mullahs
Commanders
Legislative authority
Village council
Elections have
not yet held
328 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
division of authority between district governors and customary authority as well as
the independent sources of legitimacy of customary officials and their capacity to
govern directly resemble political relations in federations where multiple levels of
government share power In Afghanistan however customary organizations have no
formal state mandate yet often serve as key partners in the federal arrangement For
this reason Afghanistan can be described as a federation in practice or an informal
federation In addition customary authorities often partner with formal district
governments in relationships that are collaborative rather than adversarial
The findings regarding norms of power sharing in the Afghan countryside are
anticipated by the work of Vincent Ostrom who noted that the modern study of
public administration focuses almost exclusively on creating forms of hierarchical
control that regard political and associational life outside such hierarchy as
lsquolsquofragmentedrsquorsquo (V Ostrom 2007) In contrast Vincent Ostrom saw legitimacy in
what appears to be organizational incoherence arguing that societies lsquolsquoare capable
of establishing good government by reflection and choice in a political system
characterized by substantial fragmentation of authority and overlapping jurisdic-
tionrsquorsquo (V Ostrom 2007 113) According to this perspective there is a certain virtue
of the untidy appearance of self-governing schemes and norms that shape relations
between multiple levels of authority (V Ostrom Tiebout and Warren 1961)
More generally these informal political arrangements in Afghanistan constitute
what Elinor Ostrom and Vincent Ostrom termed a lsquolsquopolycentric political systemrsquorsquo in
that these centers of power are formally independent of one another This article
integrates insights from the literature on polycentric governance as well that of self-
enforcing federalism to understand the origins breakdown and maintenance of
informal political relationships in rural Afghanistan Polycentrism shows us that
it is possible to have multiple levels of governmentmdashboth formal and informalmdash
within a single polity while the federalism literature shows us how these
polycentric units collaborate (E Ostrom 2005)
This study complements earlier work on village governance and the state in
Afghanistan by explicitly characterizing the country as a polycentric system of
governance Based on fieldwork in Northern Afghanistan in the 1970s Thomas
Barfield described relations between the state and villages as a lsquolsquoweak link on a rusty
chainrsquorsquo (1984) Several important studies consider the interplay between customary
law and state courts in promoting justice (Coburn 2013 Shahrani 1998) Another
perspective on center-local relations focuses on the extent of warlord governance at
the provincial level showing that warlords can be effective governors (Giustozzi
2009) As Mukhopadhyay (2013) explains former warlords often become effective
lsquolsquostrongman governorsrsquorsquo because they can transcend constraints imposed by the
state Finally there is an important and growing literature considering how local
decision-making procedures including the extent to which lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo actors
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 325
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
participate in development projects influence outcomes such as government
legitimacy and gender equity (Beath Christia and Enikolopov 2013)
None of these earlier studies explicitly consider power sharing between multiple
levels of government Barfieldrsquos study considered whether the state can control
villagers rather than reciprocity between villages and lower-level state officials
Studies of legal pluralism alert us to the interplay of formal and informal norms
but generally confine customary authorities as lawgivers thereby neglecting their
broader political significance Warlord governance is an important phenomenon
although warlords typically do not play important roles in day-to-day village
governance Finally impact evaluations of development projects confine analysis
to comparisons of customary governance versus aid projects in the lsquolsquoefficiencyrsquorsquo of
public goods provision within villages rather than the relationship between
customary representatives and higher levels of government
By focusing on norms of power sharing in rural parts Afghanistan this article
clarifies an important missing piece in studies of Afghan politics It casts doubt
upon pessimistic visions of customary and formal orders locked in perpetual wars
of elimination Although Afghanistan seems to be an exemplary case of conflict
between customary and lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo order customary representatives and state
officials often govern alongside one another through norms that are effective yet
whose origins lie outside the formal constitutional structure
Formal Government in Post-Taliban Afghanistan
The Afghan state has been highly centralized since King Abdur Rahman sought
to decimate customary authority as a state-building strategy during his ruthless
reign from 1880 to 1901 Since then most leaders have either sought to co-opt or
eliminate customary authority (Edwards 2002) The 2004 Constitution maintains
the same centralized system of subnational governance as under previous
monarchies where all local officials are appointed by the central government1
Afghanistan has four levels of government national provincial district and
village Each of the thirty-four provinces has a governor appointed by Kabul
District governors (woluswals) are appointed by the president sometimes in
consultation with the provincial governor There are around 400 districts2 Formal
village government called for in the Constitution has not been created Although
the Constitution calls for elected district and village councils elections have not
been held There have been elections for provincial councils yet these councils have
no budgetary authority and have no oversight over provincial governors
District governors enjoy very little formal autonomy reporting directly to
provincial governors who in turn report to the president3 The selection procedure
for provincial and district governors is unclear Based on my own observations and
interviews with officials responsible for appointing district governors (as exact
326 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
figures are unavailable) district governors are usually not from the districts they
serve serving for indefinite periods and are removed and rotated from one district
to another with little warning
Immediately after 2001 the international community focused most of its
attention on strengthening the national government with the hope that national
capacity would trickle down to provinces and districts Donors and the Afghan
Government began to pay more attention to subnational governance as the United
States and coalition partners viewed local politics as central to an effective
counterinsurgency strategy (Nagl et al 2007) Beginning around 2007 donors
began partnering with Afghan ministries to create ad hoc district councils
throughout the country as part of a governance strategy to defeat an insurgent
Taliban and to distribute development assistance (Saltmarshe and Medhi 2011)
Faced with a rising insurgency such efforts were mainly concerned with buying
loyalty rather than governing The lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo leaders who participated in these
councils often received a healthy stipend leading to intense competition between
community members and the government as to who might constitute an lsquolsquoelderrsquorsquo
As the goal was mainly aid delivery efforts to create district councils did not lead
to a viable source of governance Importantly there is no formal representation of
villages in the political system even though 80 percent of the population lives in the
estimated 20000ndash40000 villages Center-local political relations both formal and
informal are summarized in table 1
Research Methodology
The fieldwork was conducted in thirty-two villages across seventeen districts in six
provinces Provinces were selected to capture geographic and ethnic diversity
Provinces included Balkh (Nahri Shahi Dawlatabad Districts) Bamiyan (Panjab
Bamiyan Center Sayghan Shibar Districts) Herat (Karokh Anjil Pashtun
Zarghun Guzara Districts) Kabul (Paghman Guldara Qarabagh Districts)
Kunduz (Imam Sahib Khanabad Districts) and Nangarhar (Behsod Surkhrod
Districts) Kandahar was also selected but security deteriorated significantly during
the period of research making fieldwork untenable As Kandahar is a mostly
Pashtun district Pashtun communities in the remaining districts were oversampled
to ensure the data closely resembled the overall ethnic composition of Afghanistan
In each district research was conducted in one village close to the district center
and another one farther away At the time of research all districts were lsquolsquosafersquorsquo for
civilian travel Although this may have introduced bias into selection several years
later half these districts were insecure
The fieldwork produced more than 3000 pages of transcripts from interviews
conducted by the author and six Afghan researchers who came from a wide range
of ethnic groups each fluent in both Dari and Pashto under the auspices of a
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 327
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Kabul-based research organization the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Interviews and focus groups were transcribed from notes taken during the course of
interviews
It may seem that asking about government officials is a sensitive topic in
Afghanistan yet informants were quite willing to discuss their attitudes and rarely
hesitated to criticize local authorities Rather the potential source of lsquolsquodesirability
biasrsquorsquo arose from beliefs that researchers had come to bring aid projects Thus
many informants heaped enormous praise on aid during interviews Researchers
developed techniques to overcome this such as initially asking informants to
provide oral histories something rarely done by rapid aid appraisals In addition
team member met each day team to detect inconsistencies in stories told by
informants in communities
The Federal Dilemma in Afghanistan
A federation is conventionally defined by power sharing between multiple levels of
government Formally federalism is defined by three characteristics These include
geopolitical division subunits with independent bases of authority and govern-
ments at each level with the capacity to directly govern citizens within its
jurisdiction (Bednar 2008 18ndash19)
Table 1 Political representation in Afghanistan
Level Number of units Formal political
representative
Selection
method
Key informal
players
Province 34 Executive authority
Provincial governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Legislative authority
Provincial council
Elections
District 400 Executive authority
District governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Commanders
Legislative authority
District council
Elections have
yet to be held
Maliks
Mullahs
Village 20000ndash40000 Executive authority
None specified in
constitution or
existing legislation
ndash Maliks
ShuraJirgas
Mullahs
Commanders
Legislative authority
Village council
Elections have
not yet held
328 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
participate in development projects influence outcomes such as government
legitimacy and gender equity (Beath Christia and Enikolopov 2013)
None of these earlier studies explicitly consider power sharing between multiple
levels of government Barfieldrsquos study considered whether the state can control
villagers rather than reciprocity between villages and lower-level state officials
Studies of legal pluralism alert us to the interplay of formal and informal norms
but generally confine customary authorities as lawgivers thereby neglecting their
broader political significance Warlord governance is an important phenomenon
although warlords typically do not play important roles in day-to-day village
governance Finally impact evaluations of development projects confine analysis
to comparisons of customary governance versus aid projects in the lsquolsquoefficiencyrsquorsquo of
public goods provision within villages rather than the relationship between
customary representatives and higher levels of government
By focusing on norms of power sharing in rural parts Afghanistan this article
clarifies an important missing piece in studies of Afghan politics It casts doubt
upon pessimistic visions of customary and formal orders locked in perpetual wars
of elimination Although Afghanistan seems to be an exemplary case of conflict
between customary and lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo order customary representatives and state
officials often govern alongside one another through norms that are effective yet
whose origins lie outside the formal constitutional structure
Formal Government in Post-Taliban Afghanistan
The Afghan state has been highly centralized since King Abdur Rahman sought
to decimate customary authority as a state-building strategy during his ruthless
reign from 1880 to 1901 Since then most leaders have either sought to co-opt or
eliminate customary authority (Edwards 2002) The 2004 Constitution maintains
the same centralized system of subnational governance as under previous
monarchies where all local officials are appointed by the central government1
Afghanistan has four levels of government national provincial district and
village Each of the thirty-four provinces has a governor appointed by Kabul
District governors (woluswals) are appointed by the president sometimes in
consultation with the provincial governor There are around 400 districts2 Formal
village government called for in the Constitution has not been created Although
the Constitution calls for elected district and village councils elections have not
been held There have been elections for provincial councils yet these councils have
no budgetary authority and have no oversight over provincial governors
District governors enjoy very little formal autonomy reporting directly to
provincial governors who in turn report to the president3 The selection procedure
for provincial and district governors is unclear Based on my own observations and
interviews with officials responsible for appointing district governors (as exact
326 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
figures are unavailable) district governors are usually not from the districts they
serve serving for indefinite periods and are removed and rotated from one district
to another with little warning
Immediately after 2001 the international community focused most of its
attention on strengthening the national government with the hope that national
capacity would trickle down to provinces and districts Donors and the Afghan
Government began to pay more attention to subnational governance as the United
States and coalition partners viewed local politics as central to an effective
counterinsurgency strategy (Nagl et al 2007) Beginning around 2007 donors
began partnering with Afghan ministries to create ad hoc district councils
throughout the country as part of a governance strategy to defeat an insurgent
Taliban and to distribute development assistance (Saltmarshe and Medhi 2011)
Faced with a rising insurgency such efforts were mainly concerned with buying
loyalty rather than governing The lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo leaders who participated in these
councils often received a healthy stipend leading to intense competition between
community members and the government as to who might constitute an lsquolsquoelderrsquorsquo
As the goal was mainly aid delivery efforts to create district councils did not lead
to a viable source of governance Importantly there is no formal representation of
villages in the political system even though 80 percent of the population lives in the
estimated 20000ndash40000 villages Center-local political relations both formal and
informal are summarized in table 1
Research Methodology
The fieldwork was conducted in thirty-two villages across seventeen districts in six
provinces Provinces were selected to capture geographic and ethnic diversity
Provinces included Balkh (Nahri Shahi Dawlatabad Districts) Bamiyan (Panjab
Bamiyan Center Sayghan Shibar Districts) Herat (Karokh Anjil Pashtun
Zarghun Guzara Districts) Kabul (Paghman Guldara Qarabagh Districts)
Kunduz (Imam Sahib Khanabad Districts) and Nangarhar (Behsod Surkhrod
Districts) Kandahar was also selected but security deteriorated significantly during
the period of research making fieldwork untenable As Kandahar is a mostly
Pashtun district Pashtun communities in the remaining districts were oversampled
to ensure the data closely resembled the overall ethnic composition of Afghanistan
In each district research was conducted in one village close to the district center
and another one farther away At the time of research all districts were lsquolsquosafersquorsquo for
civilian travel Although this may have introduced bias into selection several years
later half these districts were insecure
The fieldwork produced more than 3000 pages of transcripts from interviews
conducted by the author and six Afghan researchers who came from a wide range
of ethnic groups each fluent in both Dari and Pashto under the auspices of a
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 327
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Kabul-based research organization the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Interviews and focus groups were transcribed from notes taken during the course of
interviews
It may seem that asking about government officials is a sensitive topic in
Afghanistan yet informants were quite willing to discuss their attitudes and rarely
hesitated to criticize local authorities Rather the potential source of lsquolsquodesirability
biasrsquorsquo arose from beliefs that researchers had come to bring aid projects Thus
many informants heaped enormous praise on aid during interviews Researchers
developed techniques to overcome this such as initially asking informants to
provide oral histories something rarely done by rapid aid appraisals In addition
team member met each day team to detect inconsistencies in stories told by
informants in communities
The Federal Dilemma in Afghanistan
A federation is conventionally defined by power sharing between multiple levels of
government Formally federalism is defined by three characteristics These include
geopolitical division subunits with independent bases of authority and govern-
ments at each level with the capacity to directly govern citizens within its
jurisdiction (Bednar 2008 18ndash19)
Table 1 Political representation in Afghanistan
Level Number of units Formal political
representative
Selection
method
Key informal
players
Province 34 Executive authority
Provincial governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Legislative authority
Provincial council
Elections
District 400 Executive authority
District governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Commanders
Legislative authority
District council
Elections have
yet to be held
Maliks
Mullahs
Village 20000ndash40000 Executive authority
None specified in
constitution or
existing legislation
ndash Maliks
ShuraJirgas
Mullahs
Commanders
Legislative authority
Village council
Elections have
not yet held
328 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
figures are unavailable) district governors are usually not from the districts they
serve serving for indefinite periods and are removed and rotated from one district
to another with little warning
Immediately after 2001 the international community focused most of its
attention on strengthening the national government with the hope that national
capacity would trickle down to provinces and districts Donors and the Afghan
Government began to pay more attention to subnational governance as the United
States and coalition partners viewed local politics as central to an effective
counterinsurgency strategy (Nagl et al 2007) Beginning around 2007 donors
began partnering with Afghan ministries to create ad hoc district councils
throughout the country as part of a governance strategy to defeat an insurgent
Taliban and to distribute development assistance (Saltmarshe and Medhi 2011)
Faced with a rising insurgency such efforts were mainly concerned with buying
loyalty rather than governing The lsquolsquotraditionalrsquorsquo leaders who participated in these
councils often received a healthy stipend leading to intense competition between
community members and the government as to who might constitute an lsquolsquoelderrsquorsquo
As the goal was mainly aid delivery efforts to create district councils did not lead
to a viable source of governance Importantly there is no formal representation of
villages in the political system even though 80 percent of the population lives in the
estimated 20000ndash40000 villages Center-local political relations both formal and
informal are summarized in table 1
Research Methodology
The fieldwork was conducted in thirty-two villages across seventeen districts in six
provinces Provinces were selected to capture geographic and ethnic diversity
Provinces included Balkh (Nahri Shahi Dawlatabad Districts) Bamiyan (Panjab
Bamiyan Center Sayghan Shibar Districts) Herat (Karokh Anjil Pashtun
Zarghun Guzara Districts) Kabul (Paghman Guldara Qarabagh Districts)
Kunduz (Imam Sahib Khanabad Districts) and Nangarhar (Behsod Surkhrod
Districts) Kandahar was also selected but security deteriorated significantly during
the period of research making fieldwork untenable As Kandahar is a mostly
Pashtun district Pashtun communities in the remaining districts were oversampled
to ensure the data closely resembled the overall ethnic composition of Afghanistan
In each district research was conducted in one village close to the district center
and another one farther away At the time of research all districts were lsquolsquosafersquorsquo for
civilian travel Although this may have introduced bias into selection several years
later half these districts were insecure
The fieldwork produced more than 3000 pages of transcripts from interviews
conducted by the author and six Afghan researchers who came from a wide range
of ethnic groups each fluent in both Dari and Pashto under the auspices of a
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 327
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Kabul-based research organization the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Interviews and focus groups were transcribed from notes taken during the course of
interviews
It may seem that asking about government officials is a sensitive topic in
Afghanistan yet informants were quite willing to discuss their attitudes and rarely
hesitated to criticize local authorities Rather the potential source of lsquolsquodesirability
biasrsquorsquo arose from beliefs that researchers had come to bring aid projects Thus
many informants heaped enormous praise on aid during interviews Researchers
developed techniques to overcome this such as initially asking informants to
provide oral histories something rarely done by rapid aid appraisals In addition
team member met each day team to detect inconsistencies in stories told by
informants in communities
The Federal Dilemma in Afghanistan
A federation is conventionally defined by power sharing between multiple levels of
government Formally federalism is defined by three characteristics These include
geopolitical division subunits with independent bases of authority and govern-
ments at each level with the capacity to directly govern citizens within its
jurisdiction (Bednar 2008 18ndash19)
Table 1 Political representation in Afghanistan
Level Number of units Formal political
representative
Selection
method
Key informal
players
Province 34 Executive authority
Provincial governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Legislative authority
Provincial council
Elections
District 400 Executive authority
District governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Commanders
Legislative authority
District council
Elections have
yet to be held
Maliks
Mullahs
Village 20000ndash40000 Executive authority
None specified in
constitution or
existing legislation
ndash Maliks
ShuraJirgas
Mullahs
Commanders
Legislative authority
Village council
Elections have
not yet held
328 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Kabul-based research organization the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Interviews and focus groups were transcribed from notes taken during the course of
interviews
It may seem that asking about government officials is a sensitive topic in
Afghanistan yet informants were quite willing to discuss their attitudes and rarely
hesitated to criticize local authorities Rather the potential source of lsquolsquodesirability
biasrsquorsquo arose from beliefs that researchers had come to bring aid projects Thus
many informants heaped enormous praise on aid during interviews Researchers
developed techniques to overcome this such as initially asking informants to
provide oral histories something rarely done by rapid aid appraisals In addition
team member met each day team to detect inconsistencies in stories told by
informants in communities
The Federal Dilemma in Afghanistan
A federation is conventionally defined by power sharing between multiple levels of
government Formally federalism is defined by three characteristics These include
geopolitical division subunits with independent bases of authority and govern-
ments at each level with the capacity to directly govern citizens within its
jurisdiction (Bednar 2008 18ndash19)
Table 1 Political representation in Afghanistan
Level Number of units Formal political
representative
Selection
method
Key informal
players
Province 34 Executive authority
Provincial governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Legislative authority
Provincial council
Elections
District 400 Executive authority
District governor
Appointed by
president
Warlords
Commanders
Legislative authority
District council
Elections have
yet to be held
Maliks
Mullahs
Village 20000ndash40000 Executive authority
None specified in
constitution or
existing legislation
ndash Maliks
ShuraJirgas
Mullahs
Commanders
Legislative authority
Village council
Elections have
not yet held
328 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
On paper Afghanistan is hardly a federation as formal government is
centralized To the extent that village-based customary organizations are a de facto
level of government Afghanistan resembles an informal federation Applying the
definition we will see that customary governance operates at the village level which
is distinct from district and provincial jurisdictions sources of customary authority
are usually independent of the state as its origins lie in custom and customary
organizations have capacity to govern directly
Scholars of Afghanistan have long understood the country is beset with
independent sources of customary authority beneath a weak state (Shahrani and
Canfield 1984) Nonetheless it was far from clear the extent to which customary
authorities weathered thirty years of warfare One contribution of the fieldwork was
to show that village governance is not only persistent but also that it consist of a
competitive balance of authority between three distinct organizations maliks
shurasjirgas and mullahs4 Maliks (sometimes called arbabs wakils namayenda or
khans) are village representatives usually selected by consent of villagers In the
past governments sought to co-opt or appoint maliks as part of a strategy to
control villages Afghans describe the malik (usually) not as a headman but a first
among equals who represents the community to outsiders such as aid organizations
or the state Shuras (an Arabic Koranic term jirga in Pashto) are deliberative
councils convening on an ad hoc basis to decide matters of collective importance
Villagers rarely use the term shura but instead refer to meetings of lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo
(rish-i safidan spingeri) although many lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo were simply men thirty or
older Mullahs are religious leader and usually arbitrate family disputes
In addition to serving as the only government at the jurisdictional level of the
village the legitimacy of customary organizations comes from citizens not the
state As a malik in Herat Province explained
We are citizens of Afghanistan if the government doesnrsquot support us then
the people will support us We behave justly and we are doing our work
with the help of the people We resolve the problems of people and we are a
bridge between people and the woluswal5
These differences in legitimacy were reflected in the power-sharing arrangements
between customary representatives and district governors In most districts in the
study there were long-standing informal district councils chaired by the woluswal
who met regularly with maliks This is why community members often referred to
their malik as a lsquolsquobridge between the people and the governmentrsquorsquo repeatedly during
interviews The malik appeared to represent communities to the government rather
than the other way around
Finally customary organizations are effective in providing local goods
including dispute resolution between neighbors and management of access to
natural resources (Nojumi Mazurana and Stites 2008 Brick 2008) As customary
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 329
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
organizations appear capable of governing directly there is a case to be made
that Afghanistan is a federation in practice These dimensions are summarized in
table 2
Although this description suggests Afghanistan resembles a federation the
stability of a federation requires a balance of authority between central and local
governments The notion of self-enforcing federalism begins by observing that
federations are inherently unstable because they seek to balance authority between
multiple levels of government (Bednar 2005) In order to persist a federation must
overcome its central dilemma which is assuring the central government is powerful
enough to provide public goods yet not so strong as to use its strength to engage
in predatory behavior (de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005)
In Afghanistan the lsquolsquofederal bargainrsquorsquo involves an implicit promise by district
governors to provide public goods (such as honest brokering of disputes basic
security and to forgo corruption) in exchange for information from maliks who in
turn rely on citizens regarding security issues Drawing on insights from theories of
stability and breakdown of formal federations several conditions must be satisfied
in order for informal power-sharing arrangements to prevail
First district governors must be strong enough to provide some public goods
Improvements in public goods provision is a central feature of demand-side
explanations for increasing centralization of state authority and a main reason why
local power brokers accept centralization (Hechter 2001) An implication of the
public goods rationale is that there are few reasons for communities to accept a
lsquolsquohigher political powerrsquorsquo unless district governors can deliver on promises to
provide public goods
Second district governors must be constrained from expropriating wealth from
communities Numerous and overlapping constraints on central governments yield
Table 2 Defining the informal federation
Dimension of federalism Satisfied
Geopolitical division Yes Customary organizations have jurisdictional authority at the
village level while formal state authority operates at the district
and provincial levels
Subunits with independent
bases of authority
Yes Customary authorities derive legitimacy from custom and
tradition while the state derives its authority from the
constitution
Governments with capacity
at each level
Yes Customary governance provides public goods and the
nature and characteristics of those goods typically differ from
those provided by district governors
330 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
more effective federal governance (Bednar 2008) The constraints are expected to
translate into more effective public goods provision
Third customary representatives require both incentives and capacity to uphold
their end of the bargain As village leaders are lsquolsquorationalrsquorsquo they will have a tendency
to act in bad faith (Popkin 1979) When customary leaders cannot be trusted by
the state or community members or when they have short time horizons due to
factors such as political uncertainty power sharing may not emerge (Olken 2007)
Applied to Afghanistan these theories suggest that power sharing between the
state and customary organizations is expected to depend on the ability of district
governors to provide public goods constraints on district governors as well as
constraints on village leaders Unlike most studies of federations which focus on
stability or breakdown of national systems my model of informal federalism
recognizes that federal bargains occur locally and that within a single country
federalism may be stable in some regions but break down in others Political
relations in each district between customary governance and the central
government provide several opportunities to explore why Afghanistanrsquos informal
federation is stable and when it breaks down
Studies relying on ethnographic data face challenges in measuring outcomes and
explanatory variables The dependent variable is a successful federal bargain which
is measured by provision of public goods by the district governor respect for
community autonomy by district governors and by customary leaders sharing
information with district governors regarding security These outcomes will be
measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively with conclusions discerned from
dozens of interviews in each district The lsquolsquoindependent variablesrsquorsquo which include
constraints on district governors and customary representatives are also measured
using field data
The concept of informal federalism reflects growing recognition that informal
political institutions are important in many countries characterized by weak formal
rules (Helmke and Levitsky 2004) For example Lily Tsai (2007) illustrates how
common temple affiliation generates social capital which engenders greater
accountability of local government officials in an authoritarian context The
conceptual framework and empirical evidence complements existing studies by
showing the conditions under which informal norms can yield power sharing
between communities and the state in an environment of extraordinary state
weakness
Dynamics of Decentralized Governance in Rural Afghanistan
Four case studies constructed from interviews focus-group discussions and field
observations illustrate the dynamics of stability and instability of informal federal
relations The first case illustrates successful power sharing and the emergence of
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 331
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
informal federalism while the three other cases illustrate various ways such norms
break down
These cases were selected from a universe of seventeen cases (one from each
district visited) There were nine cases of successful power sharing This case of
successful power illustrates the key features of power sharing in rural Afghanistan
as well as how customary governance operates There were eight cases that involved
breakdown of power sharing The three cases were selected because they illustrate
three different mechanisms of breakdown in the first case of failed power sharing
district governors were unconstrained in the second the district governor was too
weak in the third customary governance structures broke down In addition the
third case demonstrates breakdown and reassertion of power sharing
GoverningTogether Federal Norms in Guldara District Kabul
The center of Guldara District only an hour drive north of Kabul is nonetheless
quite isolated due to mountains sweeping across the district The district population
is around 25000 split between Tajiks and Pashto-speaking Kuchi nomads who
settled in the district long ago Tajiks live in the mountainous areas on the districtrsquos
western edges Kuchis reside on the flat arid land in the east Many Tajiks served as
fighters in the anti-Soviet anti-Taliban Northern Alliance The district experienced
heavy fighting during decades of war As one malik put it lsquolsquoWe should rename our
district ranjdara (lsquovalley of sufferingrsquo) not Guldara (lsquovalley of flowersrsquo)rsquorsquo
Both groups convened customary village councils which they referred to
as lsquolsquowhite-beard councilsrsquorsquo (rish-e safidan spingeri) or simply lsquolsquowhite beardsrsquorsquo to
resolve internal community issues Each group also had a malik which they seemed
very satisfied with largely because they were responsible for selecting him The Tajik
malik described his work resolving conflicts and providing security to the community
(illustrating the capacity of customary governance in the informal federation)
We had some conflicts with [the Kuchi] tribes who had good relations with
the Taliban Our people suffered a lot under the Taliban But eventually we
solved our problems with this neighboring community and now have good
relations with them Sometimes they have disputes in their village and
they will call me over for my advice I even work with them to help them
resolve their internal issues6
The malik in the Kuchi community who was only twenty-nine years old was
one of the few literate people in the village He believed one of his most important
responsibilities was representing community interests to the district governor He
visited the district government office to exchange information about security at
regularly scheduled meetings while the woluswal informed him about new aid
projects in the area7
332 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The woluswal in contrast to the maliks themselves understood maliks to be an
arm of the state Like many woluswals I spoke with he viewed the introduction of
the malik to him as a contract signifying community ties to the state
We have divided our districts into five parts or five valleys Every division has
one representative The five representatives of these valleys meet with each
other once a month They are a formal part of the government The
maliks in our district have a stamp which I issue to them They come
frequently to the district center to discuss some village problems with us and
we try to help them as much as we are able They [maliks] are registered
in the government but they donrsquot have a government salary They just work
for the people and they want to serve the people8
The division of the district into five administrative units was not called for by
law but was a management strategy developed by the woluswal Although there is
no law requiring maliks to have stamps this practice commonly employed by
woluswals
The maliks explained that they share information about security with their
woluswal at their regular meetings9 In exchange for this information about
security maliks expect the woluswal to resolve disputes that transcend several
communities Indeed this woluswal helped resolve tension between Tajiks and
Kuchis in the community who were on opposing sides during Taliban rule
A Kuchi male elder remarked on the evenhandedness of the Tajik woluswal
We like the woluswal Even though he is Tajik he has worked very nicely on
our behalf He made peace among the people and he has helped everyone
When he sees old men carrying water up the mountain he will always stop
and help them He is an example of a very good person10
Although Guldara District sat on the verge of conflict and chaos in 2001 the
district governor quickly diffused tension even though he was a partisan during
previous conflicts Because the governor was trusted by each of these groups both
sides were willing to share information about regional security threats11
This case illustrates informal federalism at work in Afghanistan District officials
and customary representatives have authority to act within their jurisdictions
Moreover the relationship between the two levels (village and district) is one of
reciprocity whereby the district government provides larger-scale public goods in
exchange for information from maliks This relationship is robust and common
throughout the countryside even though it is entirely informal as anticipated by
theories of polycentric governance that suggest much governance occurs outside the
parchment rules of the state
This case also illustrates the conditions for successful power sharing between
district governors and customary officials First the ability of the district governor
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 333
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
to provide the public good of dispute resolution brought different groups to the
table The district governor also had longer time horizons because he was from the
district he served As a result he understood that transgression on his part would
almost certainly result in retribution against his family Finally the maliks had
incentives to work for citizens because villagers had a say in selecting them
UnconstrainedWoluswals Karokh District Herat Province
The governance situation in Karokh District Herat Province proved to be quite
different from Guldara Karokh which has around 90000 people is a majority
Tajik region although there are significant Uzbek and Pashtun communities
Rather than shared governance this case illustrates how lack of constraints on the
district governor can lead to a breakdown of power sharing
The role of customary representatives in Karokh which they called arbabs is
similar to maliks in Guldara However in Karokh many arbabs were killed because
representatives of the communist government which came to power in late 1979
viewed them as obstacles in their efforts to collectivize agriculture After the fall of
the Taliban regime communities reconstituted customary governance as one of the
arbabs explained
In every village there was an arbab who was a large landowner he ruled the
village like a padshah (king) Now arbabs donrsquot have as much strength the
people are choosing the arbabs themselves as representatives to the woluswal
If the arbab does not work on behalf of the people the people will send him
back and take away his power Now the people are not afraid of the arbab
but in the past the people were afraid of them12
Another arbab indicated they are both empowered and constrained by the citizens
lsquolsquoEverything is in the hands of people themselves they can select an arbab and fire
him from his postrsquorsquo13 Selected by citizens and dependent upon them for salary and
status arbabs have incentives to act on behalf of their constituents Most arbabs
understand that if they do not act in good faith they will not be selected for service
in the future Just as the community depends on arbabs for dispute management
accessing government resources and liaising with the outside world arbabs depend
on their constituents for support status and sometimes for their salary In Karokh
villagers paid arbabs with wheat from their harvest only if they were satisfied with
their service
Unlike Guldara relations between the district governor and maliks were poor in
Karokh According to a male shopkeeper
The people are not happy to go to the woluswali If they try to go there they
know theyrsquoll have to spend a lot of money All of them [government
334 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
officials] are corrupt When the woluswal first arrives and is new they are
good for a few days but then they just become corrupt14
A woman described how the incompetence of the woluswal led residents to avoid
the government
In our village we resolve issues like fights and other things But if we canrsquot
resolve these issues we should go to the woluswal Thankfully we havenrsquot had
any issue in the past two years where we had to go to the woluswal Now the
arbab tries to resolve issues [that arise] between several villages Last year
there was a fight between two villages over water Instead of going to the
woluswal we went all the way to Herat City [about 30 miles away] to discuss
the issue with the provincial government because we didnrsquot want to go to the
woluswal15
Observations in the district government office verified villagersrsquo sentiments During
my visits there were no officials at work or citizens waiting to consult with
officialsmdashsomething common in districts characterized by effective power sharing
The district governor summoned several arbabs to his office to speak with me
placing one of his staff members to eavesdrop on the conversation The arbabs were
aware of this and whispered critical comments about the woluswal Despite the
obvious tension in the air the woluswal claimed relations were good16
In contrast to account offered by the woluswal villagers complained of
unresolved disputes that demanded outside mediation They also refused to share
information with the government about security issues A local policeman
summarized the situation
The woluswal is only looking out for himself Hersquos only looking to create
problems for the people He tries to use the arbabs for his own purposes But
we donrsquot let it happen Our people have made our own council [shura] by
ourselves and it belongs to us not to the government The arbab belongs to
us not to the government17
Besides the failings of the woluswal several villagers and some maliks reported that
other maliks began to collaborate with the woluswal to plunder citizens In these
communities maliks lost their legitimacy In case studies in northern Afghanistan
Wilde and Mielke (2013) find that maliks simply serve as a corrupt arm of the state
and warlords Although I did find instances where predatory maliks contributed to
the breakdown of power sharing between communities and the state corruption on
the part of the woluswal contributed to predation by maliks I found corrupt maliks
to be an exception In such cases where maliks were unreliable villagers excluded
maliks from shuras and mullahs assumed more important roles as governance had
to go on
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 335
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
In Karokh the main obstacle to power sharing was the absence of constraints on
the woluswal Several informants said that the woluswal engaged in corruption
because he was not from the district He was from another district in Herat and
had already served as woluswal in two other districts in the province He knew he
would be rotated out shortly had short time horizons Due to the absence of ties to
the community residents believed he had few incentives to serve the people
WeakWoluswals Guzara District Herat Province
The third example is from Guzara District with a population of approximately
125000 also in Herat Province For many years after 2001 Guzara District was
stable However a decades-old conflict between two Pashtun tribes threatened this
peace The district governor was willing to work for the people but lacked the
capacity to provide the public good of security As a consequence communities
seem to have overwhelmed the state
According to the woluswal a conflict between two Pashtun qaums [tribes or
solidary groups] over land consumed the district Over the years insurgent groups
had taken advantage of these disagreements providing both sides with weapons18
The woluswal conveyed the nature of the conflict
There is a dispute going on between two tribesmdashthe Alizai and Popalzai
These two qaums have a lot of weapons They fight with each other a lot We
donrsquot even know what they are fighting about anymore They are killing each
other The government cannot control them19
Instability had increased as the qaums were robbing cars on the road at
gunpoint Just the week before he said two Afghan nongovernmental organization
workers were kidnapped for two days before being rescued
Due to security concerns this was the only of seventeen districts visited where a
government official refused requests to conduct fieldwork Although research was
restricted to interviews and observations in the government compound these data
provided insight into a revolving door of district governors in Guzara each unable
to impose order on the qaums
Instability arising from feuds was exacerbated by a separate insurgency brewing
in the district led by a Tajik named Ghulam Yahya who was allied with Ismail
Khan a famous Northern Alliance lsquolsquowarlordrsquorsquo from the region During the civil war
in the 1990s Ismail Khan appointed Yahya as mayor of the provincial capital
Herat City After 2001 Yahya took a post in the provincial government but was
fired in 2006 and found himself suddenly cut off from provincial government
spoils Yahya fled with some followers to his hometown in eastern Guzara
According to the district governor lsquolsquoRecently the Yahya people have been upset
336 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
with the government Before Ghulam Yahya had a government position but he lost
that job Now he doesnrsquot have a job and is angry with the governmentrsquorsquo20
Disorder resulting from qaum feuds created an opening for Yahya to establish
camps in the district Yahya said he invited followers of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
to the district telling Al Jazeera that he allowed Arab fighters passage in Guzara21
Al Jazeera labeled him salaciously (and incorrectly) as a lsquolsquoTajik Talibanrsquorsquo to provide
evidence that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan had gained followers among
non-Pashtuns
In February 2008 followers of Ghulam Yahya shot and killed the woluswal of
Guzara interviewed here along with his young son
In this district the woluswal was not strong enough to provide basic law and
order Although arbabs may have been willing to cooperate and the district governor
wanted to provide security the government had no capacity to reciprocate The
informal federal bargain broke down as warring groups overpowered and weakened
arbabs and ultimately overwhelmed the district government
Breakdown and Reassertion Shibar District Bamiyan Province
Events from Shibar provide insight into the breakdown and reemergence of power
sharing between villages represented by customary authority and the state The
population of Shibar District is close to 30000 and is mostly Shirsquoa Hazara but
there is a significant Ismaili population As in Karokh the Soviet-backed
Communist government executed arbabs during their rule in the 1970s and 1980s
undermining an important source of community-based collective action that could
organize against an aggressive state In the 1980s communities were also ravaged
by anti-Communist mujahedeen warlords In the 1990s the Taliban imposed a
particularly harsh social order on the Shirsquoa and Ismailis as non-Sunnis levying the
jizya (a tax reserved for non-Muslims) believing the Shirsquoa and Ismailis to be
apostates A Hazara female elder described the breakdown of the arbab system
He [the arbab] was very respectful of the people If someone did anything
wrong in the village the arbab would fine them His presence was good
It kept order in our village [However] during the war with the mujahedeen
the warlord groups and commanders harassed the people a lot Our people
didnrsquot respect these warlords22
After the fall of the Taliban government villagers returned to their communities
and reconstituted customary governance but used new titles to describe such
governance
The leaders of our villages are just called rais (lsquolsquoleaderrsquorsquo) That is the word
the people give to these people In the past they were called arbab
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 337
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
The government did not give the name arbab to these people This is
something the people chose themselves23
Individuals in Shibar did not speak of maliks or arbabs but instead spoke of rais or
namayenda (lsquolsquorepresentativersquorsquo) selected by the people to represent their interests to
the government An illiterate male farmer described the role these individuals play
in dispute resolution similar to maliks and arbabs in Guldara and Karokh
In our village we have an elder (rish-e safid) Everyone in our village has
faced some challenges in life They go to this elder He resolves the disputes
for them He resolves any issue facing the village If the people in the village
arenrsquot satisfied with the decision of the elder then they go to the woluswali
for help24
Once the post-2001 government was established many woluswals began to search
for organizations and individuals to fill the void left by arbabs in those areas where
they were executed The woluswal in Shibar was aware of his inability to rule
villages directly and relied on village rais and lsquolsquoeldersrsquorsquo As he explained
People are coming directly to me If there are problems we then gather
the elders of the villages If there is a dispute between the people then I will
contact the elders If I want to rebuild secondary roads between villages then
I contact them and invite them to the woluswali and then they tell the people
in the villages of the plans If we want to talk about poppy issues I collect
the elders I even discuss security issues with the elders and they help me25
Governance in Shibar District came full circle Informal norms of power sharing
that had long existed in the district broke down during the war enabling
governments to expropriate wealth and govern ruthlessly After 2001 power sharing
reemerged as villages reorganized themselves Self-organization allowed communi-
ties to represent their interests to the state but perhaps most importantly provided
a bulwark to protect communities from government predation
The Significance of Informal Federalism
Although the case studies only considered a single case of effective power sharing
this outcome was not unusual occurring in around half of the districts visited
during fieldwork In these districts customary representatives petitioned the
government to help provide certain public goods and in exchange provided
governors with information In districts where relations between customary
representatives and the government were poor it was usually because woluswals
were unconstrained although it could also happen because customary authority
broke down either due to violence or because they became predatory Villagers in
338 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
these districts believed that corrupt district governors were responsible for violating
the implicit social contract that woluswals provide certain public goods in exchange
for communities to cede some of their autonomy to the district governor
These informal norms of power sharing provide insight into the political
foundations of insecurity in Afghanistan Erosion of constraints on district
governors and weakening of village-based customary governance contributes to
insecurity When district governors are predatory and unconstrained villagers cease
cooperation with the government in security affairs while breakdown of customary
governance means that district governors struggle to call on citizens to provide
information regarding insurgent activity The breakdown of these federal norms
helps us understand why the security situation in the country has deteriorated in
the years following 2001 If district government officials are predatory and
unwilling to respect citizen rights then communities will withdraw from their
willingness to cooperate with the state Maintaining and strengthening these power-
sharing norms is thus a potentially important way to improve state-building
prospects in the country
Conclusion
The self-governance approach pioneered by Elinor Ostrom (1990) anticipated the
power of customary organizations in Afghanistan to govern village affairs despite
profound state weakness In nearly every village visited during fieldwork in rural
Afghanistan villagers reported that they are able to provide small-scale public
goods building projects and resolving conflicts without the help of the state or aid
projects Simultaneously customary organizations interact with the state in
important ways Vincent Ostrom wrote that scholars of federalism should pay less
attention to lsquolsquoforms of government and what governments are supposed to do and
a much greater preoccupation with the languages and cultures of covenanting
societies and about the patterns of order in covenanting societiesrsquorsquo (1995 59) As
anticipated his insights into the lsquolsquocovenanting societyrsquorsquo formal political relations in
Afghanistan tell us little about governance in practice Rather than centralization
governance in Afghanistan is much closer to a federation one in which customary
representatives of villages govern together with formal officials at the district level
The case studies presented in this article illustrate why power-sharing works and
when it breaks down In a little more than half of the seventeen districts visited I found
robust cooperation between customary and formal officials usually when district
governors were from the region where they governed and villagers had a say in selecting
their representatives Unfortunately these relationships often break down either
because district governors face few constraints or are not tied to communities or more
rarely when village representatives did not work on behalf of citizens This suggests that
accountability of district government can increase if villagers have a voice in selecting
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 339
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
district governors Finally given the ubiquity of customary governance illustrated here
as well as in nationally-representative survey data (Murtazashvili 2012) efforts to
create new formal village government may be unnecessary
Customary authorities have been the primary target of communists mujahedeen
warlords and the Taliban because of the legitimacy they possess The Taliban
during their formal rule from 1996 to 2001 worked to undermine customary
governance and promote their own network of village based-religious leaders In
post-2001 Afghanistan in areas it contests The Taliban have continued its assault
on customary authority assassinating local notables in large numbers The cases
here show that villagers are adept at reconstituting and regenerating these
informal relationsmdashboth within their communities and between the community
and the statemdashonce violence ceases which bodes well for the future of informal
federalism
The presence of these informal relationships and their general stability suggests
that a increased decentralization of power is a viable political option in the country
In particular the evidence shows that prospects for state building may improve by
closing the gap between formal constitutional structures and political relations as
they are actually practiced Such a narrowing of the gap between the formal rules
and those in practice could likely strengthen these norms of power sharing and in
the process improve prospects for peace in a country that has too often ignored the
virtues of federalism
Notes
This research was supported by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
(AREU) through generous support from the Japanese International Cooperation
Agency I am extraordinarily grateful to Ghulam Sakhi Frozish M Hasan Wafaey
Nasreen Quraishi Gulalai Karimi Fauzia Rahimi and Abdul Hadi Sadat for their
courageous research assistance on this project This paper benefited from the
careful and encouraging comments of Elinor Ostrom and participants in the Policy
Workshop at Indiana University Paul Fishstein Hamish Nixon Paula Kantor
Adam Pain and Deborah Smith at AREU provided enormous support for this
project Ilia Murtazashvili Melanie Manion Scott Gehlbach Edward Friedman
Dave Weimer Dan Bromely and Meina Cai also provided important feedback on
earlier drafts of this paper Finally I wish to thank the invaluable comments of the
anonymous reviewers for extremely constructive guidance
1 Article 137 of the Constitution of the Government of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan
2 The exact number is not clear even to officials in the government agency responsible for
administering local government Interview Afghan Government Official Kabul
Afghanistan July 2011
340 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
3 In some parts of the country that are under insurgent control or are heavily contested
government presence is limited to a district police chief A district governor would rarely
travel to such districts
4 The names of these organizations vary by region and ethnic group but the author found
that this constellation of organizations in general terms was present in most villages
5 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
6 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
7 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
8 Interview District Governor Guldara District Kabul Province
9 Interview Malik Village 2 Guldara District Kabul Province
10 Interview Farmer Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
11 Interview Malik Village 1 Guldara District Kabul Province
12 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
13 Focus Group Discussion Maliks Karokh District Herat Province
14 Interview Male Shopkeeper Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
15 Interview Female Homemaker Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province Long lines
outside government offices is a measure of effective governance as it is costly for
individuals who must travel long distances to visit government offices and wait in line
If individuals do not expect officials to resolve problems fairly or without predation
they will avoid government offices
16 Interview District Governor Karokh District Herat Province
17 Interview Policeman Village 1 Karokh District Herat Province
18 Interview District Security Commander Guzara District Herat Province
19 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
20 Interview District Governor Guzara District Herat Province
21 lsquolsquoAfghan Mayor Turns Taliban Leaderrsquorsquo October 17 2008 Al Jazeera English Service
httpwwwaljazeeracomnewsasia200810200810173815406492html
22 Interview Female Homemaker Village 2 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
23 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
24 Interview Male Farmer Village 1 Shibar District Bamiyan Province
25 Interview District Governor Shibar District Bamiyan Province
References
Barfield Thomas 1984 Weak links on a rusty chain structural weaknesses in Afghanistanrsquos
provincial government administration In Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives ed M Nazif Shahrani and Robert Canfield 170ndash83 Berkeley
University of California Press
Beath Andrew Fotini Christia and Ruben Enikolopov 2013 Empowering women through
development aid Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan American Political
Science Review 107 (3) 540ndash57
Bednar Jenna 2005 Federalism as a public good Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2)
189ndash205
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 341
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
mdashmdashmdash 2008 The robust federation Principles of design New York Cambridge University
Press
Brick Jennifer 2008 Final report Investigating the sustainability of Community Development
Councils Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
Coburn Noah 2013 Informal justice and the international community in Afghanistan
Washington DC United States Institute of Peace Press
De Figueiredo Rui and Barry Weingast 2005 Self-enforcing federalism Journal of Law
Economics and Organization 21 (1) 103ndash35
Edwards David B 2002 Before Taliban Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad Berkeley University
of California Press
Giustozzi Antonio 2009 Empires of mud War and warlords of Afghanistan New York
Columbia University Press
Hechter Michael 2001 Containing nationalism New York Oxford University Press
Helmke Gretchen and Steven Levitsky 2004 Informal institutions and comparative politics
A research agenda Perspectives on Politics 2 (4) 725ndash40
Mukhopadhyay Dipali 2013 Warlords strongman governors and the state in Afghanistan
New York Cambridge University Press
Murtazashvili Jennifer Brick 2012 Survey on political institutions elections and democracy in
Afghanistan Washington DC Democracy International and United States Agency for
International Development
Nagl John David Petraeus James Amos and Sarah Sewall 2007 The US ArmyMarine
Corps counterinsurgency field manual Chicago University of Chicago Press
Nojumi Neamatollah Dyan Mazurana and Elizabeth Stites 2008 After the Taliban Life and
security in rural Afghanistan New York Rowman and Littlefield
Olken Benjamin A 2007 Monitoring corruption evidence from a field experiment in
Indonesia Jounral of Political Economy 115 (2) 200ndash249
Ostrom Elinor 1990 Governing the commons The evolution of institutions for collective
action New York Cambridge University Press
mdashmdashmdash 2005 Understanding institutional diversity Princeton NJ Princeton University Press
Ostrom Vincent 1995 Where to begin Publius 25 (2) 45ndash60
mdashmdashmdash 2007 The intellectual crisis in American public administration 3rd ed Birmingham
UK University Alabama Press
Ostrom Vincent Charles M Tiebout and Robert Warren 1961 The organization of
government in metropolitan areas A theoretical inquiry The American Political Science
Review 55 (4) 831ndash42
Popkin Samuel 1979 The rational peasant Berkeley University of California Press
Saltmarshe Douglas and Abhilash Medhi 2011 Local governance A view from the ground
Kabul Afghanistan Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit
342 J B Murtazashvili
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from
Shahrani M Nazif 1998 The future of the state and the structure of community
governance in Afghanistan In Fundamentalism reborn Afghanistan and the Taliban ed
William Maley 212ndash42 New York NYU Press
Shahrani M Nazif and Robert Canfield eds 1984 Revolutions and rebellions in Afghanistan
Anthropological perspectives Berkeley University of California Press
Tsai Lily 2007 Accountability without democracy Solidary groups and public goods provision
in rural China New York Cambridge University Press
Wilde Andreas and Katja Mielke 2013 Order stability and change in Afghanistan From
top-down to bottom-up state-making Central Asian Survey 32 (3) 353ndash70
Self-Governance and Power Sharing in Afghanistan 343
at Periodicals Dept U
niversity Libraries N
orthern Illinois University on Septem
ber 4 2014httppubliusoxfordjournalsorg
Dow
nloaded from