influencing salinity tolerance in macrobrachium ... · a thesis submitted in fulfilment of...

177
I ‘Identification and characterization of candidate genes influencing salinity tolerance in Macrobrachium australiense: a model for the molecular basis of colonization of low ionic environmentsAzam Moshtaghi BSc (General Biology), MSc (Cellular & Developmental Biology) Principal supervisor: Dr. David A Hurwood (EEBS, QUT) Associate Supervisor: Professor Peter B Mather (EEBS, QUT) School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Science Science and Engineering Faculty Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017

Upload: ngonga

Post on 17-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

I

‘Identification and characterization of candidate genes

influencing salinity tolerance in Macrobrachium australiense: a

model for the molecular basis of colonization of low ionic

environments’

Azam Moshtaghi

BSc (General Biology), MSc (Cellular & Developmental Biology)

Principal supervisor: Dr. David A Hurwood (EEBS, QUT)

Associate Supervisor: Professor Peter B Mather (EEBS, QUT)

School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Science

Science and Engineering Faculty

Queensland University of Technology

Brisbane, Australia

A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

2017

II

Key Words

Macrobrachium australiense, Osmoregulation, Na+/K+ -ATPase (NKA), V-type ATPase (VTA),

Carbonic Anhydrase (CA), Aquaporin (AQP), Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC), Calreticulin

(CRT), Na+/H+ exchanger, osmoregulatory genes, gill, hepatopancreas, antennal glands,

quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), transcriptome, next generation

sequencing (NGS), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), salinity tolerance, osmotic pressure,

haemolymph osmolarity, crustacean taxa, decapods, osmoregulator, osmoconformer, hyper-

osmoregulation, hypo-osmoregulation, particle per thousand (ppt,‰).

III

Abstract

Freshwater prawns in the genus Macrobrachium display a wide variety of life history strategies and

occur in a diverse array of aquatic environments and naturally occupy a wide range of habitats

(including salinities) while presenting a variety of behaviors to deal with changing environments

(Piao, et al. 2010). Functional genomic resources associated with effective osmoregulatory

capacity in crustaceans play a fundamental role in survival when individuals are exposed to

environmental stressors. Identifying candidate gene (CG) loci and functional mutations within

these genes that affect salinity tolerance as well as understanding gene expression patterns can

assist predictive power for likely outcomes of the effects of climate change on wild populations

and how impacts can be mitigated in both wild and farmed stocks.

Here I used Macrobrachium australiense (Palaemonidae) as a model for freshwater (FW) prawns

in the genus Macrobrachium more widely because it is the most widespread FW prawn species

across mainland Australia. Moreover, this species is successfully adapted to a complete freshwater

life cycle, yet under controlled conditions in the laboratory can tolerate up to 17 ‰ salinity. To

date based on published literature there has been no comprehensive data published about the role

of all categories of potential candidate genes that are directly involved in osmoregulation in FW

prawns. New genomic and molecular technologies provide powerful methods that can assist

understanding of adaptation to FW conditions at the molecular and cellular levels under

environmental stress. Environmental salinity is probably the most important abiotic factors that

can affect survival and natural distributions of a wide range of crustacean species. So, identification

and characterization of the major candidate genes influencing salinity tolerance and the mutations

in these genes that encode novel phenotypes can help to unravel the molecular basis of

osmoregulation in this important group.

IV

In chapter 2 (study 1), a comprehensive genomic resource was generated using NGST (next

generation sequencing technology) to identify the key candidate genes involved in osmoregulation

in M. australiense. The transcriptome data set was generated from four cDNA libraries (gill,

antennal gland, hepatopancreas and whole post-larvae) and resulted in 32 different candidate genes

families with potential major roles in osmoregulation and salinity tolerance processes. Overall

25.43% of the assembled contigs showed significant blast hits and around 17% contigs produced

GO term annotations. Of the osmoregulatory gene families identified here, 17 genes were

identified to be involved with transport of the most important ions (Na+, K+, H+, Ca2+, Mg2

+, HCO3-

and Cl-). Differential gene expression patterns (based on transcript abundance estimates) of

candidate genes involved with osmoregulation, clearly indicate major roles for gill and antennal

gland tissues in adult individuals as CG expression patterns in these tissues were high compared

with that seen in the hepatopancreas. Of interest however, was that post-larvae showed only

moderate expression levels of the same candidate genes. Differential gene expression analysis

suggested that the higher number of genes expressed differentially in post-larvae could be related

to rapid developmental changes that are occurring during early life history stages that require raised

levels of expression of genes involved with growth, tissue development and other developmental

processes.

In chapter 3 (study 2), potential outlier SNPs were identified in 3 populations of M. australiense

exposed to different natural osmotic niches using a comparative transcriptomics approach to

understand the molecular basis of osmoregulation. A hypothesis was tested that outlier SNPs

identified in M. australiense populations exposed naturally to different osmotic conditions

influence specific gene expression patterns that allow individuals to respond to variation in local

salinity conditions. Here, I found most mutations (outliers) in M. australiense were located outside

V

of coding regions (i.e. in UTRs), suggesting that osmoregulatory control under different

environmental conditions is not controlled by changes to amino acid sequences in M. australiense,

rather it is controlled by regulatory mutations that alter expression patterns of essentially identical

functional genes. This implies that adaptation by M. australiense to various osmotic niches is likely

to be an ongoing process and is currently largely controlled by changes in gene expression under

different environmental conditions. Four outlier loci were identified in target candidate

(osmoregulatory) genes: Na+/H+ exchanger, Na+/K+-ATPase, V-type-(H+)-ATPase and

Calreticulin. These four genes are considered to be the major genes controlling osmoregulation in

a wide variety of aquatic crustacean species. Following this, sequences of outlier contigs between

different sampled populations were compared to determine the physical locations of identified

outlier SNPs. All outlier SNPs in the 4 important osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense were

present in UTR regions and were located prior to the start codon region. This suggests that they

are likely to be regulatory mutations that control gene expression patterns of the critical functional

genes.

Chapter 4 (study 3) screened gene expression patterns under sub-lethal stress conditions to resolve

the molecular bases of gene expression regulation in response to stressors. The objectives of the

study were to measure relative gene expression levels of the five major candidate genes in M.

australiense controlling osmotic adaptation in experimental animals exposed to 3 experimental

sub-lethal salinity levels (0, 5 and 10‰) over a period of 5 days at different time intervals and to

understand the potential roles that they play in the adaptive response. Higher expression level of

NKA (1.4 to 3 fold higher) was observed at 5‰ and 10‰ compared with freshwater (0‰). For

NKCC, significant differences were observed for 0‰ vs 5‰, 0 ‰ vs 10‰ and 5‰ vs 10‰

treatments with 3-6 fold differences in expression level. Raised salinity (5‰ and 10‰) induced

VI

higher NKCC expression apparently to facilitate greater ion transport and ion exchange under

changed osmotic conditions.

NHE is known to play an important functional role in maintaining osmotic balance in low ionic

environments (freshwater habitats) compared with saltwater conditions (5‰ and 10‰). NHE

expression levels declined gradually over time in the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments. Expression levels

of the AQP gene were high initially after which expression of this gene also declined sharply.

Towards the end of the experiment, expression levels in all treatments reached a fairly constant

and relatively low level in contrast to initial levels. Significant differences in expression patterns

were noticed between the 0‰ and 10‰ treatments by the second day while, significant differences

were observed across the whole experimental period between the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments. Of

interest, higher AQP expression at 0‰ than in 5‰ at T4 to the end of the experiment was seen.

Also comparatively high relative VTA expression levels was observed in the 5‰ and 10‰

treatments over the first 24h; levels then declined between 24 and 48 hours and then reached a

relatively constant expression pattern in all treatments from T2 to the end of the experiment.

Significant differences among treatments were evident for first 24 hours, after which no significant

differences were evident between any treatments.

Overall, the three studies produced full-length gene sequences of the most important genes

involved in osmoregulation from M. australiense. In addition, deeper analyses were performed to

uncover the molecular/cellular bases of adaptation to FW conditions in this prawn as a model for

osmoregulation in other Macrobrachium family members. The study can provide a foundation for

future genomic investigations of FW prawns and can allow a comprehensive assessment of how

evolution of freshwater by species in the genus Macrobrachium is achieved at the molecular level.

VII

Table of Content

Key Words ______________________________________________________ II

Abstract _______________________________________________________ III

List of Figures ___________________________________________________XI

List of Tables __________________________________________________ XIII

List of Abbreviations ___________________________________________ XIV

General note on thesis preparation ________________________________ XVI

Statement of Original Authorship ________________________________ XVII

Works Published or Submitted for Publication by the Author incorporated

into the Thesis ________________________________________________ XVIII

Acknowledgements _____________________________________________ XIX

1 Chapter 1. General Introduction __________________________________ 1

1.1 Impacts of climate change _____________________________________________________ 1

1.2 An overview of osmoregulation in crustaceans ____________________________________ 6

1.2.1 Osmoconformers: ___________________________________________________________________ 8

1.2.2 Osmoregulators: ___________________________________________________________________ 10

1.2.3 Compensatory process ______________________________________________________________ 14

1.2.4 Limiting process ___________________________________________________________________ 14

1.3 Osmoregulation capacity (OC) during development (Ontogeny): _____________________ 15

1.4 The role of pivotal organs and identified genes in osmoregulation____________________ 19

1.5 Candidate gene approach (Transcriptomics) to identify key genes involved in osmoregulation

22

1.6 Macrobrachium australiense as a model for salinity tolerance in FW prawns. ___________ 24

1.7 Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) _____________________________________________ 26

1.8 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) identification ______________________________ 27

1.9 Differential gene expression (DGE) patterns and morphological changes under osmotic

challenge ________________________________________________________________________ 29

1.10 Knowledge gaps and research questions ________________________________________ 31

1.11 Objectives and aims _________________________________________________________ 32

VIII

2 Chapter 2: A transcriptomic scan for potential candidate genes involved in

osmoregulation in an obligate freshwater palaemonid prawn (Macrobrachium

australiense) _____________________________________________________ 34

2.1 Abstract___________________________________________________________________ 36

2.1.1 Background _______________________________________________________________________ 36

2.2 Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 37

2.3 Materials and Methods ______________________________________________________ 41

2.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance ____________________________________________________ 41

2.3.2 RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation and Illumina sequencing _________________________ 42

2.3.3 Quality control of Illumina sequence data _______________________________________________ 43

2.3.4 Bioinformatics analyses _____________________________________________________________ 43

2.3.5 Identification of potential genes _______________________________________________________ 44

2.4 Results ____________________________________________________________________ 46

2.4.1 Illumina sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation ____________________________________ 46

2.4.2 Identification of putative osmoregulatory gene families (contigs) ____________________________ 48

2.4.3 Differential gene expression (DGE) patterns _____________________________________________ 51

2.5 Discussion _________________________________________________________________ 52

2.6 Supplementary files _________________________________________________________ 59

3 Chapter 3. Understanding the genomic basis of adaptive response to

variable osmotic niches in freshwater prawns: a comparative intraspecific

analysis of Macrobrachium australiense ______________________________ 60

3.1 Abstract___________________________________________________________________ 62

3.2 Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 63

3.3 Materials and methods ______________________________________________________ 66

3.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance ____________________________________________________ 66

3.3.2 RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation and Illumina sequencing _________________________ 67

3.3.3 Quality control of Illumina sequence data _______________________________________________ 68

3.3.4 Bioinformatics analysis _____________________________________________________________ 68

3.3.5 SNP detection _____________________________________________________________________ 69

3.3.6 Outlier detection ___________________________________________________________________ 70

3.3.7 Differential gene expression (DGE) and functional enrichment analysis _______________________ 70

3.4 Results ____________________________________________________________________ 70

3.4.1 Illumina sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation ____________________________________ 70

3.4.2 Candidate gene identification and differential gene expression (DGE) analysis _________________ 71

3.4.3 SNP and outlier detection ____________________________________________________________ 73

3.4.4 Functional enrichment analysis _______________________________________________________ 74

3.5 Discussion _________________________________________________________________ 75

IX

3.6 Supplementary files _________________________________________________________ 81

4 Chapter 4. An investigation of gene expression patterns that contribute to

effective osmoregulation in Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of

adaptive responses to variable sub-lethal osmotic conditions _____________ 86

4.1 Abstract___________________________________________________________________ 88

4.2 Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 89

4.3 Methodology ______________________________________________________________ 92

4.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance ____________________________________________________ 92

4.3.2 Salinity stress experiment and tissue collection ___________________________________________ 92

4.3.3 RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis ___________________________________________________ 93

4.3.4 Primer design and quantification of gene expression via real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) ___ 94

4.4 Results ____________________________________________________________________ 95

4.4.1 Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) expression ______________________________________________________ 95

4.4.1.1 Within sampling times __________________________________________________________ 96

4.4.1.2 Between sampling times ________________________________________________________ 96

4.4.2 Na+/K+/2Cl-Co-transporter (NKCC)____________________________________________________ 97

4.4.2.1 Within sampling times __________________________________________________________ 97

4.4.2.2 Between sampling times ________________________________________________________ 98

4.4.3 Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) ____________________________________________________________ 98

4.4.3.1 Within sampling times __________________________________________________________ 98

4.4.4 Between sampling times _____________________________________________________________ 99

4.4.5 Aquaporin (AQP) __________________________________________________________________ 99

4.4.5.1 Within sampling times __________________________________________________________ 99

4.4.5.2 Between sampling times _______________________________________________________ 100

4.4.6 Vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (VTA) ____________________________________________________ 100

4.4.6.1 Within sampling times _________________________________________________________ 100

4.4.6.2 Between sampling times _______________________________________________________ 101

4.5 Discussion ________________________________________________________________ 101

4.6 Conclusions _______________________________________________________________ 108

5 Chapter 5: General Discussion _________________________________ 110

5.1 Group 1 Genes (Stress sensing and signalling) ___________________________________ 124

5.2 Group 2 Genes (Ion regulation) _______________________________________________ 125

5.3 Group 3 Genes (Cell volume control) __________________________________________ 126

5.4 Group 4 Genes (Water channel regulation) _____________________________________ 127

5.5 Group 5 Genes (Body fluid maintenance) _______________________________________ 128

5.6 Interaction of the five most important osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense under

salinity stress and their role with respect to FW adaptation ______________________________ 129

X

5.7 Conclusions _______________________________________________________________ 132

6 References: _________________________________________________ 135

XI

List of Figures

Fig 1-1: Transcriptome assembly and analysis workflow. The first step is to collect target tissue

from target species to obtain good quality RNA which is then converted to cDNA library to be

sequenced in NGS platforms. Sequence data is then processed by bioinformatics pipelines for

gene identification or discovery based on blast similarity matches with other species. Moreover,

DGE can be performed to compare between different biological or experimental conditions or

even between tissue types. _____________________________________________________ 27

Fig 2-1: represents the top hit species distribution chart from blast results. Daphnia pulex was

the top hit species. While D. pulex is distantly related to M. australiense, it is to date, one of the

crustacean species for which a complete sequenced and well annotated genome is available. The

‘Others’ category contained many crustacean taxa including commercially important Penaeids,

in particular, P. monodon and L. vannamei. ________________________________________ 47

Fig 2-2: Top most represented GO terms per biological categories: a) molecular function, b)

cellular component and c) biological process. ______________________________________ 50

Fig 2-3: Venn diagram showing the number of expressed transcripts shared among different

samples based on abundance of transcripts per million (TPM). _________________________ 52

Fig 2-4: Heatmap showing differential gene expression pattern (based on read counts) of

different tissues of adult and post-larvae. AEB= Antennal Gland, GB= Gill, HIB=

Hepatopancreas, PL= Post-Larvae. Y-axis represents the hierarchical clustering of differentially

expressed transcripts, while red colored lines indicate highly expressed transcripts and green

colored lines indicate lowly expressed transcripts. ___________________________________ 59

Fig 3-1: Venn diagram of outlier contigs for different population comparisons (Blunder/Bulimba

comparison in blue, Blunder/Stony comparison in yellow and Bulimba/Stony comparison in

green). _____________________________________________________________________ 74

Fig 3-2: Top hit species distribution chart (absolute values of blast match hits with different

species). ____________________________________________________________________ 81

Fig 3-3: Top most abundant GO term categories for different mechanisms: a) biological process,

b) cellular component and c) molecular function (absolute number of expressed transcripts

assigned to each GO categories). ________________________________________________ 83

Fig 3-4: Expression pattern of the differentially expressed transcripts for individuals collected

from different populations (the red coloured transcripts are highly expressed or upregulated and

the green coloured transcripts are downregulated). BuC = Bulimba Creek, StC = Stony Creek,

BlC = Blunder Creek _________________________________________________________ 83

Fig 4-1: NKA (Na+/K+-ATPase) mRNA expression patterns (relative to 18S expression) in the

gill of M. australiense for three salinity treatments over a five day period. Error bars represent

XII

+/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase

letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated

significant differences within treatments between sampling times). _____________________ 97

Fig 4-2: Relative NKCC (Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter) mRNA expression levels in M.

australiense in 3 salinity treatments. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars

indicate significant difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among

treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated significant differences within

treatments between sampling times). _____________________________________________ 98

Fig 4-3: Relative NHE (Na+/H+ exchanger) mRNA expression patterns in the gill tissues of M.

australiense in 3 salinity treatments. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars

indicate significant difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among

treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated significant differences within

treatments between sampling times). _____________________________________________ 99

Fig 4-4: Relative AQP (aquaporin) mRNA expression levels in M. australiense at 3 salinity

treatments. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant

difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments within

sampling time; uppercase letters indicated significant differences within treatments between

sampling times). ____________________________________________________________ 100

Fig 4-5: Relative VTA (V-type H+-ATPase) mRNA expression levels in 3 salinity treatments.

Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at the

α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time;

uppercase letters indicated significant differences within treatments between sampling times).101

Fig 5-1: A model for integration of potential candidate genes involved in osmoregulation in M.

australiense. _______________________________________________________________ 123

Fig 5-2: Expression levels of the five major osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense over a five

day period (a – 0ppt, b – 5ppt and c – 10ppt). _____________________________________ 130

XIII

List of Tables

Table 1-1: Specific genes previously identified as having a functional role in salinity tolerance.

___________________________________________________________________________ 21

Table 2-1: Specific genes previously identified as having a functional role in salinity tolerance in

crustaceans. _________________________________________________________________ 45

Table 2-2: Summary of raw reads and quality control of Illumina results (Q ≥ 30, 75 bp paired-

end reads). __________________________________________________________________ 46

Table 2-3: Summary of de novo assembly and functional annotation results for M. australiense.

___________________________________________________________________________ 47

Table 2-4: Summary of identified candidate genes potentially associated with osmoregulation in

M. australiense from this study. _________________________________________________ 48

Table 2-5: Top 10 osmoregulatory genes expressed in different tissues in adult and PL

individuals. _________________________________________________________________ 51

Table 3-1: Assembly, annotation and transcriptome completeness features of M. australiense. 71

Table 3-2: Abundance estimation (DGE) of the most important 15 osmoregulatory genes

between 3 different populations of Macrobrachium australiense. _______________________ 72

Table 3-3: Top 20 genes/transcripts expressed in different populations of M. australiense. __ 72

Table 3-4: SNP table for three Macrobrachium australiense populations. ________________ 73

Table 3-5: Enriched GO terms for the Blunder/Bulimba comparison and the Blunder/Stony

comparison. _________________________________________________________________ 74

Table 3-6: Summary of the identified candidate genes potentially associated with

osmoregulation in M. australiense from this study. (GenBank Accession Numbers will be

available upon acceptance of the paper). __________________________________________ 84

Table 4-1: Specific primers used in the current study (after Moshtaghi et al., 2016).________ 94

XIV

List of Abbreviations

ABCC= ATP Binding Cassette C12

ACBP=Acyl-CoA binding protein

AK= Arginine Kinase

ALD= Abbreviated larvae Development

AP= Alkaline Phosphatase

AQP= Aquaporin

BEST= Bestrophin

bp= base pair

CA= Carbonic Anhydrase

CCP= Crustacean cardiovascular peptide

CEGMA= Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach

CFTR= Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator

CG= Candidate Gene

COMT= Catechol-o-methyltransferase

CRT= Calreticulin

DGE= Differential Gene Expression

GO= Gene Ontology

HAT= V-type-(H+) ATPase

HOG= Hedgehog signaling pathway

ILF= Interlukin enhancer binding factor

ITG= Integrin

MAPK= Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase

MTCP= Mitochondrial Carrier Protein

NBC= Na+/HCO3- cotransporter

NCX= Na+/Ca+2 exchanger

XV

NGS= Next Generation Sequencing

NHE= Na+/H+ exchanger

NKA= Na+/K+-ATPase

NKCC= Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter

OC= Osmoregulatory Capability

OST= Oligosaccharyltransferase Complex

qRT-PCR= quantitative Real Time - Polymerase Chain Reaction

SNP= Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

SP= Selenoprotein

SPS1= Selenophosphate1

TPM= transcripts per million

UTR= Untranslated Region

XVI

General note on thesis preparation

In this study, each chapter contains an individual introduction, methodology, results, discussion and

conclusion section. Chapters 2, 3 and 4 of this thesis represent independent publishable studies (see below)

that address specific objectives that consequentially require individual introduction and discussion sections

distinctive to each study. In parts, repetition of information presented in the General Introduction (Chapter

1), General Discussion and Conclusions (Chapter 5) sections was unavoidable.

XVII

Statement of Original Authorship

This thesis is composed of my original work and contains no material previously published or

written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly

stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. The

content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my

research higher degree candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been

submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary

institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify

for another award.

Signature: Azam Moshtaghi

Date: May, 2017

QUT Verified Signature

XVIII

Works Published or Submitted for Publication by the

Author incorporated into the Thesis

Statement of contribution to jointly authored works in the thesis

1. Moshtaghi et al. (2016), A transcriptomic scan for potential candidate genes involved in

osmoregulation in an obligate freshwater palaemonid prawn (Macrobrachium australiense).

PeerJ 4:e2520; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2520

This manuscript is incorporated as Chapter 2 of this thesis. The first author was responsible for

conducting the research, analysis of data and writing this manuscript. The co-authors were involved

in refining the experimental design and provided conceptual and editorial support.

2. Moshtaghi et al. (submitted). Understanding the genomic basis of adaptive response to variable

osmotic niches in freshwater prawns: a comparative intraspecific analysis of Macrobrachium

australiense. Manuscript submitted in the Journal of Heredity.

This manuscript is incorporated as Chapter 3 of this thesis. The first author was responsible for

conducting the research, analysis of data and writing this manuscript. The co-authors were involved

in refining the experimental design and provided conceptual and editorial support.

3. Moshtaghi et al. (submitted). An investigation of gene expression patterns that contribute to

effective osmoregulation in Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of adaptive responses to

variable osmotic gradients. Manuscript submitted in the Hydrobiologia.

This manuscript is incorporated as Chapter 4 of this thesis. The first author was responsible for

conducting the research, analysis of data and writing this manuscript. The co-authors were involved

in refining the experimental design and provided conceptual and editorial support.

XIX

Acknowledgements

I wish to extend my sincere thanks to my excellent supervisors- principal supervisor, Dr. David Hurwood

(School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland

University of Technology) and my associate supervisor, Professor Peter B Mather (School of Earth,

Environmental and Biological Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of

Technology), for their steady support, guidance, and patience throughout the long years of my candidature.

In particular, I would like to acknowledge for introducing me to new ideas, and bringing out the research

insight. Also special thanks for providing me with the unique opportunity of working with the Molecular

Genetic Group at the Queensland University of Technology

I would like to acknowledge the funds provided by QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Higher

Degree Research Support for tuition fee waiver and a 6 months scholarship provided by EEBS, Head of

School, Professor Stuart Parsons that facilitated this research.

Thanks to all in the QUT Molecular Genetic Resource Facility (MGRF) for help during my project period

especially, Dr. Kevin Dudley and Vincent Chand and Sahana Maloni who supported me and arranged

facilities at QUT Molecular Genetics Lab. Also I would like to thank technical staff at Banyo Pilot Plant

Precinct who arranged and organised everything nicely for rearing live Macrobrachiums at the Banyo Pilot

Plant Precinct and I would also thank to Hamish Kelly for sequencing my samples and to Frank De Bruyne

and his team for providing equipment at Banyo Aqualab. I also would like to thank administrative,

technical, academic and research staff within the School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences

for making a friendly environment with a feeling of belonging to a community of people.

I would like to express my gratitude for support and cooperation of my best friend, Md. Lifat Rahi (PhD

student, EEBS, QUT) for his knowledge and experience and assisting me with sample collection and

appropriate laboratory work.

XX

Finally, I sincerely appreciate that all members of our group met regularly and discussed issues related to

our project work, shared our experiences and learnt new knowledge.

Special thanks to my beloved and supportive husband and dearest daughter for enduring the sacrifice and

difficulties during my study. No words are sufficient to acknowledge and thank for supporting and

encouraging me.

I dedicate the thesis to my father and mother. I know they will be happy more than anyone else to see its

completion.

1

1 Chapter 1. General Introduction

Impacts of climatic change on aquatic systems that result from human activities are increasing and

responses to this change can now be observed at most levels of life (Allison et al., 2005). Direct

and indirect impacts of climate change should be considered across all levels of organization from

gene expression and cellular/organism physiology to whole ecosystem structure. Taken together,

they can lead to changes in vital factors including growth, mortality, fecundity and distributions

via altering physiological and behavioral factors and can affect the structure of both freshwater

and marine ecosystems and their species compositions (Brander, 2010). Rate of vulnerability to

climate change depends on: 1) Exposure (E) which relates to the condition and degree of climatic

changes that can alter system productivity; 2) Sensitivity (S) which means rate of vulnerability of

climatic conditions under change; 3) Potential Impact (PI) that implies all impacts of climatic risks

on organisms including trends, shock and seasonality; and 4) Adaptive Capacity (AC) that is the

capacity of living systems to change or modify to deal with altered normal conditions (Allison et

al., 2005).

Constant change in the surrounding environment can place organisms at risk, leading to increases

in the rate of oxidative stress, changes to nutrient sources, changes in pH and temperature and

unbalanced osmotic gradients that demand adaptive responses to maximize survival at the cellular

and organism levels (Argüelles et al., 2013). These changes can adversely affect global

aquaculture production because this sector is highly susceptible to any sort of environmental

change.

1.1 Impacts of climate change

2

Significance of fisheries to national economies in many developing countries and lack of social

policies to address climate change impacts mean that resources for aquaculture may be

significantly negatively impacted if this problem is not addressed (Tyler et al., 2009). Rapid

impacts of climate change over the short term in both marine and freshwater ecosystems can

explain the physiological changes that lead to shifts in natural distributions and species abundance

as well as more explicit effects on farming of aquatic species (Pörtner and Knust 2007; Cochrane

et al., 2010).

Due to the direct effects of sea level rise, we have already seen a decline in natural breeding of

marine organisms in coastal regions that impact wild and farmed aquatic species. Results of this

damage can reduce profitability and cause loss of coastal ecosystems. In addition, indirect

influences of rapid temperature change in ocean currents increase the rate of drought on land and

reduce water flows, leading to shifts in river and lake water flows. All direct/indirect changes

described above are factors that can reduce productivity and yields from natural aquatic

ecosystems (de Nadal et al., 2011).

According to U.S. Global Change Research in 1990 (GCRA), predicted climate change may

potentially impact global productivity, the oceans and other natural water resources and ecological

systems that together could lead to a shift in the earth’s ability to sustain life as we currently know

it. Global warming already has resulted in melting of some glaciers, sea level rise, coastal ablation

and increased evaporation in some freshwater ecosystems. Currently, only 0.01% of all the world’s

water is fresh water that covers only 0.8 % of the planet surface area, yet this relatively small

quantity supports at least 100,000 freshwater taxa out of an estimated 1.8 million extant species

(almost 6% of all described species) (Dudgeon et al., 2006).

3

Associated impacts of climate change include negative consequences for food production and

reduced fresh water availability in many regions around the world (Eissa and Zaki, 2011). While

predictions regarding specific outcomes of climate change are still debated (Rodó and Comin,

2003), it is generally agreed that some of the most significant effects will be seen on aquatic

organisms and in particular on FW ecosystems, affecting all biological levels that include gene

expression, cellular and organismal physiology, behaviour and the dynamic structure of

populations and even whole ecosystems (Brierley and Kingsford, 2009; Harrison, 1979). One of

the key drivers of climatic change in freshwater is a shift in natural salinity levels that directly or

indirectly can influence farming of aquatic species (Perry et al., 2005; Adger et al., 2005; Haines

et al., 2006). Direct effects are coupled with changes to the frequency of hazards including

hurricanes and penetration of saline water into freshwater habitats and coastal areas (Mackenzie

et al., 2007). Indirect impacts of salinity change can lead to changes in ecosystem productivity by

changing quality and quantity of aquatic habitats (Edwards and Richardson, 2004). As a result of

coastal habitat loss, food security and food production at global and regional scales have been

impacted (Rosegrant and Cline, 2003).

The relative vulnerability of marine organisms remains unclear and physical changes to many

species are not predictable and depend on the change duration and each organism’s tolerance range

(Brierley and Kingsford, 2009). Salinity can act as an indirect but sensitive indicator and increases

in surface water temperatures in many evaporative areas, can lead to significant reductions in

surface ocean density, precipitation rates, more evaporation from surface waters, loss of breeding

regions and changes to circulation models of marine waters (Cochrane et al., 2009). Taken

together, the changes can cause declines in many important native species and give more

opportunity for expansion of warm-water species that, in turn, causes more stress to cold-water

4

species (Eissa and Zaki, 2011). Shifts in the distributions of cold-water species replaced by warm-

water species can lead to a reduction in species diversity (Allison et al., 2005; Cochrane et al.,

2009).

Dispersal to habitats with more favourable climatic conditions has already been documented in

some marine species, for example in shallow-water crabs (e.g. Cancer pagurus) (Pallas et al.,

2006). For freshwater taxa however, latitudinal migration is often more difficult due to the physical

constraints imposed by riverine or lacustrine environments (i.e. FW habitats are bounded by

marine or terrestrial habitat that is unfavourable to FW species) (Handisyde and Britain, 2006;

Eissa and Zaki, 2011). Furthermore, predicted sea level rises will promote incursion of saline

waters into many coastal FW ecosystems. All of these factors are likely to contribute to a

significant reduction in suitable FW habitat coupled with an associated decline in biodiversity

(Revenga et al., 2000).

Aquaculture plays an increasingly important role in economic growth and food security in a large

number of countries around the world. In fact, world fisheries supply more than 2.6 billion people

with at least 20% of their average annual per capita protein intake (FAO, 2007). Currently, billions

of humans rely on aquatic species for their primary source of protein and predicted changes to

fishery production will therefore impact human populations and economies worldwide (Ficke et

al., 2007). A number of researchers that have investigated the effects of climate change on aquatic

food abundance have suggested that production is likely to show drastic declines in certain

geographical regions because of changes to FW availability. As an example, climate warming will

cause greater eutrophication of many FW lakes making them less productive (Eissa and Zaki,

2011). Predicted changes to fishery production due to climate change will impact human

populations as well as regional economies worldwide (Ficke et al., 2007).

5

A number of studies have suggested that FW biodiversity is particularly vulnerable to rising

salinity levels. Therefore, many studies have focused on the negative impacts of salinity stress on

FW ecosystems (Halse et al., 2003) because currently there is significant pressure on expanding

production of farmed FW species. Unprecedented changes to salinity levels are one of the major

abiotic stresses that can have significant negative impacts on FW crustacean physiology and

survival (Ali et al., 2015).

Sub-lethal osmotic stress has been considered to be an acute stress and in multicellular organisms

can be controlled by specific functional genes in specific target tissues to prepare individuals to

cope with external change (Charmantier and Charmantier-Daures, 2001). Even allowing for

adaptive responses, current predictions are that 20% of FW species are at risk or are likely to face

extinction as a consequence of climate change effects (Revenga et al., 2000). Since approximately

65% of farmed aquatic species in inland waters are produced in tropical and sub-tropical areas,

these regions are particularly vulnerable (Cochrane et al., 2009).

Even without considering climate change impacts in Australia, a large portion of available ground

water is saline (Blinn et al., 2004) and this high level of inland salinity has resulted from three

main processes: 1) removal of deep-rooted native plants from freshwater catchments that has led

to saline water flow into rivers (Sliva and Williams, 2001); 2) active human controlled discharge

of extra salinity from water into rivers (Kefford, 1998); and 3) mining activity causing saline

incursion into rivers. Together this has reduced the growth rate of some FW species including clam

Carbicula fluminea and reduced fecundity levels in Ceriodaphnia (Kennedy et al., 2003). This is

because the majority of FW species have only limited ability to control their internal body fluid

(blood or haemolymph) osmolality compared with species that live in brackish or marine waters.

For these organisms, maintaining their internal osmotic pressure is crucial to individual survival,

6

and when faced with increased salinity levels, they will be exposed to increases in body fluid

(haemolymph) osmotic concentration, and will need to deal with raised ionic levels. This requires

increased levels of energy. In this situation viability or resilience can be affected over the long

term (Hart et al., 1991) and impose strong selective pressures on affected species (Piscart et al.,

2006). As a result, environmental salinity is one of the most important abiotic factors that impacts

adaptive osmotic concentrations in aquatic animals and this will affect not only natural

distributions of organisms, but also their physiology and long term persistence (Charmantier and

Charmantier-Daures, 2001).

Salinity tolerance/osmotic regulation in aquatic species relies on the ability of individuals to

control their haemolymph osmolality (i.e. the total amount of osmolytes in their body fluids and

cells including Na+ and Cl- ions, expressed in milliosmoles (mOsm) kg-1) (Lignot et al., 2000).

The osmoregulatory system plays a pivotal role in dealing with changes to ionic concentrations in

an organism’s body compared with the aquatic medium they occupy. This complex interaction

impacts regulation of total osmotic concentration, regulation of intracellular vs. extracellular ion

levels, acid-base balance and levels of several other organic ions (Lignot et al., 2000). Thus a

specific reaction to osmostress is to supply intracellular osmolytes to maintain the internal/external

osmolarity balance. Nevertheless, reactions of FW organisms to salinity stress vary from

remaining in diapause (cysts or eggs), moving locally to shallower areas or even migration to new

areas with lower conductivity (James et al., 2003; Karraker, 2007; Argüelles et al., 2013).

Osmostress can produce significant impacts on cell wall stability, modulation of gene

transcription, cell physiology, cytoskeleton structure and even cell the cycle. Thus one specific

1.2 An overview of osmoregulation in crustaceans

7

reaction to osmostress is to supply intracellular osmolytes to maintain the balance between

internal/external osmolarity (Lignot et al., 2000).

Crustaceans as a group are well-known for their successful colonisation of freshwater from the

marine environment and this evolutionary trend is associated with a wide diversity in

osmoregulatory capacity across this group (Freire et al., 2008). In terms of farmed aquatic species,

around the world, approximately 9.6 % are crustacean species and FW crustaceans contribute 29.4

% of all farmed crustacean taxa, so, they contribute an important aquatic resource (FAO, 2012).

Many decapods can utilise a wide range of salinity levels (freshwater, brackish and marine

conditions), with some species able to move among aquatic salinity gradients within their own life

times (Gillanders et al., 2003). Anatomical changes in crustaceans (development of

osmoregulatory epithelial tissue) lead to physiological changes (via increases in Na+/K+-ATPase

activity, the major enzymes involved in ion transportation in crustaceans) resulting in improved

osmoregulatory capacity with age that produces salinity tolerance and hence adaptation to new

osmotic environments that vary in mean salinity level (Williams and Sherwood, 1994). At least in

teleosts, osmoregulatory performance and growth rate are closely linked to each other as both

demand high levels of energy that are related to associations between genetic, physiological and

environmental factors. The osmoregulation system commonly accounts for around 25-50% of

metabolic production (Streelman and Kocher, 2002). Low rates of growth in Mytilus edulis in the

Baltic Sea has been shown to result from costly osmoregulation when salinity levels vary (Höher

et al., 2013).

Determining osmoregulatory capacity (OC) has been proposed as an appropriate and reliable way

for investigating physiological conditions and impacts of stressors on crustacean taxa (Lignot et

al. 2000; Romano and Zeng 2012). Each crustacean species’ relative ability to regulate hypo- or

8

hyperosmotic haemolymph is linked to variation they experience in their external environmental

salinity and behavioural responses that expose them to fluctuating salinities. With respect to ion

balance in their haemolymph therefore, crustaceans act either as osmoconformers or

osmoregulators (Rainbow and Black, 2001).

1.2.1 Osmoconformers:

Certain taxa acclimate to, and can tolerate, a wide range of salinities with their haemolymph

remaining nearly isosmotic with the external media. In fact they do not normally invest energy in

ionic transport mechanisms and they are unable to maintain significant osmotic gradients between

their internal body fluid and the external media (surrounding water) (Freire et al., 2008).

Isosmocity between internal and external media with tolerance to a wide range of salinity levels is

found widely in many invertebrate marine species in general, and many crustacean taxa, in

particular. Species in this group are referred to as osmoconformers (Lockwood, 1962). For

isosmotic crustaceans, ion regulation and OC are not very important since OC is close to zero and

they will die if they are exposed to lower salinity levels than that to which they are acclimated.

Because of the similarity in intracellular osmotic pressure in osmoconformers individuals with

their blood, osmoregulation is a low cost energy process. During salinity reduction, key ions are

excreted (mainly Na+, K+, Cl-) to maintain osmolarity regulation that requires elevation of ATP

demand (Somero, 2002). Under salinity stress, levels of allocated energy for other processes such

as growth and reproductive behavior will be reduced (Sokolova, 2013).

Osmoregulatory changes occur only marginally during their developmental stages, which mean

that no significant change in osmoregulation is required for metamorphosis. Adults are usually

either poor osmoregulators or are also osmoconformers. True osmoconforming organisms cannot

9

tolerate full fresh water because tissues are too thin to allow normal metabolic processes (their

body fluid ionic balance changes in parallel with external ion concentration changes) (Dall, 1967).

For freshwater osmoconformer species, most of the time there is a gradient between their internal

osmotic concentration and that of the external environment; consequently, osmoconformers will

vary in their cellular osmotic volume contents and as a result, some FW species (e.g. Daphnia),

osmoregulate at low salinity levels but are osmoconformers at raised salinities. Some physiological

processes, including reproduction and metabolic rate however, can be affected negatively by these

changes (this group regulate their osmotic pressure actively) (Chen and Stillman, 2012).

Results of several studies show that, there is a rapid, two way flux of Na+ across the body surface

in marine crustaceans (Dall, 1967). Additionally, when they are exposed to low salinity conditions,

production of Na+/K+-ATPase can be a costly strategy to achieve osmotic acclimation, and as a

result this response can have negative impacts on growth, oxygen consumption and/or immune

and excretory functions (Joseph and Philip, 2007). Among marine animals, teleosts (bony fishes)

have the lowest osmotic concentration in their bodies (they excrete excess salt via their gills). In

some marine crab species, stenohaline individuals cannot tolerate a substantial reduction in

environmental salinity, while other marine crabs are euryhaline osmoconformers and can tolerate

significant changes to external salinity levels (Bradley, 2009). Nevertheless, salinity acts as an

abiotic factor and can modify ion toxicity by increasing protection against ions and change

physiology (Fiol et al., 2006). For example, in some estuarine teleosts such as killifish, salinity is

a protective factor against tissue injuring oxidative stress by zinc (Loro et al., 2012).

Even in the euryhaline teleost Fundulus heteroditus, salinity is not a challenging factor as this

species can acclimate to very high salinity levels (Lushchak, 2011). In these individuals, high

salinity levels lead to an increase in the concentrations of significant competitive ions (Na+, K+,

10

Ca2+, Mg2+). Among these, Ca directly plays a role in zinc uptake in particular, in gill tissue. So

salinity as a significant abiotic factor acts against metal toxicity in estuarine conditions (Grosell et

al., 2007). Salinity can also protect against copper (Cu) accumulation in gill and liver tissues (Cu

accumulation is highest under FW conditions in this species) (Klos et al., 2015). Sub-lethal

concentrations of some metal ions like Cu can lead to a change in Na+ up by osmoregulatory organs

(gills) and alter their permeability under oxidative stress. These impacts have been reported in

investigations of zebrafish (Danio rerio), killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) and marine gulf toadfish

(Opsanus beta) (Craig et al., 2007, Grosell et al., 2004). High levels of Cu in marine species as a

result of changing water chemistry can cause damage to DNA structure (Costa et al., 2002) or alter

biomarker functions such as increasing lipid peroxidation and amount of protein carbonyls in gill

tissues, the major site for osmoregulation. These results have been reported in a large number of

fish species, and in Indian flying crab (Esomus danricus) (Craig et al., 2007; Eyckmans et al.,

2011; Vutukuru et al., 2006). A positive protective role for salinity stress against oxidative stress

caused by Ni has been documented in the euryhaline fish- inanga (Galaxias maculatus) that

produced less oxidative stress in individuals acclimated to high salinity levels (Blewett et al.,

2016).

1.2.2 Osmoregulators:

Among osmoregulating aquatic taxa, depending on the ion concentration of the surrounding media,

two classes of response have been identified; hypo-osmoregulation and hyper-osmoregulation

(Lockwood, 1962). In hyper-osmotic environments (where external osmolality is higher than the

haemolymph), individuals must compensate for ion influx via hypo-osmoregulation. When faced

with hypo-osmotic environments, they must compensate for ion loss from their haemolymph via

hyper-osmoregulation.

11

All FW species are osmoregulators and this trait affects their long term survival or resilience and

also affects fitness parameters (Piscart et al., 2006). Certain species show different osmoregulatory

capacity associated with their life cycle stage. For example, the freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium

rosenbergii) is found in brackish water as a larvae and then osmoregulates in freshwater

environments as an adult (Funge-Smith et al., 1995).

For hypo-osmoregulators, internal osmotic concentration is lower than the external medium

because cells contain low levels of ions so individuals have a tendency to lose water to their

environment. Greater plasticity of response to salinity in hyposmotic environments has been

documented compared with hyperosmotic conditions in salt water vs FW species.

The most well-known hypo-osmoregulators are certain marine shrimp taxa that survive in the face

of extreme osmotic gradients. In marine shrimps, the internal osmotic pressure of haemolymph

can vary from 200 to 400 mOsm (the average osmotic pressure in FW organisms and terrestrial

forms is 300 mOsm) and to compensate for loss of body volume, they drink water from the external

environment. Osmoregulatory mechanisms present in some shrimp taxa allow them to regulate

their internal osmotic content by modifying their body surface permeability and also by altering

urine production, hence affecting ion transport. Hypo-osmoregulating crustacean species

compensate for passive NaCl loss to dilute, external media by active NaCl absorption across their

gill filaments (Kaeodee et al., 2011). As occurs in the nauplii of Artemia salina, hyper-

osmoregulation of Na+ in the haemolymph appears to be related to active Na+ secretion associated

with increasing Na+/K+- ATPase activity (Charmantier, 1998).

Investigations of osmoregulatory capacity in five different species of FW prawn (Family

Palaemonidae) have determined that taxa that can tolerate marine and brackish water are well-

12

adapted to both hyper- and hypo-osmotic environments (Freire et al., 2003). Palaemonid shrimps

in saline habitats in general, show the highest OC, thus they have been very successful at invading

freshwater while this capacity has been lost in FW species faced with variation in environmental

salinities. Two species in this family including Palaemonetes varians (live in very dilute brackish

water) and Palaemon longirostris (from fresh water) have been studied in detail for their

osmoregulatory capacity. P. longirostris returns to salt water to breed but its osmotic concentration

remains in the same range as it was in fresh water and this ability is associated with levels of

Na+/K+- ATPase activity and haemolymph concentrations of Na+ and Cl- as the main haemolymph

osmolytes (Charmantier 1998).

Hyper-osmoregulators maintain their blood hyperosmotic in dilute media, while they are isosmotic

in concentrated media (Rainbow and Black, 2001). Regardless of variation in FW habitat for size,

mean temperature or speed of water flow, their osmotic concentration is similar. Many estuarine

and coastal crustacean species tend to belong to this group. When they are exposed to dilute sea

water (SW), their responses can vary, but they have only limited capacity for maintaining their

haemolymph hyper-osmotic in low salinity concentration (dilute) environments. In these

organisms, no significant change occurs in internal body fluid’s ion concentration regardless of

variation in external salinity. At very low salinity levels however, they show poorer survival than

do isosmotic forms, notably patterns of osmoregulation in adults are the same as for first post

embryonic stages (Lockwood, 1962).

FW organisms with hyper-osmoregulatory capacity are faced with two physiological challenges.

The first challenge is dealing with water influx via the body surfaces (i.e. gill, skin, body wall).

The second challenge is coping with low ion concentration in FW; (i.e. a poor external source of

Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Cl- ions that are required by all organisms). In FW conditions, physiological

13

mechanisms including hyper-osmoregulation are vital to meet their needs (Bradley, 2009).

Because of lower osmotic concentration in FW organisms, they are often poorly adapted to

exposure to high levels of salinity (higher than 25‰). At salinity levels above 25 ‰, their

osmoregulatory mechanisms tend to collapse as a result of cellular damage. As a consequence,

optimum performance of FW organisms will be at intermediate salinity levels where their energy

consumption for osmoregulation will be at the lowest level (Dall, 1967).

The endemic Australian freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium australiense is a good example of a

hyper-osmoregulator and when exposed to environments with increased osmotic stress, this

species has a mechanism to reduce Na+ loss from the body by producing hypo-osmotic urine

(Denne, 1968). Furthermore, when individuals experience changes in environmental ionic

concentration, specific histological changes occur, including to the gill epithelia that contribute to

maintenance of their osmotic pressure balance (Bradley, 2009). Weak hyper-regulators are those

that can survive in dilute SW but cannot cope with FW for any significant period of time. This

includes most crab and shrimp species (Kaeodee et al., 2011). For instance, the gut in some crabs

can condense water when the organism is hyper-osmotic (Bradley, 2009).

In euryhaline aquatic species such as the tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and the European green

crab (Carcinus maenas), both are strong osmoregulators and haemolymph osmolality is higher

than the surrounding environment (Wilder et al., 2009). In C. maenas, some changes occur at the

cellular level in muscle fibres (increasing water content) in response to salinity stress, at the same

time they lose ions like Cl-, during acclimation to different salinity levels (Shaw, 1958). In this

organism, K+ concentration changes as does Cl-, with both ions believed to be in electrochemical

equilibrium but permeability of the muscle fibre membrane is considerable for Na+. High

divergence of Na+ concentration from expected equilibrium levels against the electrochemical

14

gradient shows that Na+ must be involved in an active process of osmoregulation. The role of K+

appears to be to maintain the potential of the cell membrane against variation between the

haemolymph and the environment. This will cause changes to the metabolism of Na+ in muscle

cells, while the influx rate of Na+ into muscle fibres is associated with the gradient between the

internal body fluid and cells (Lockwood, 1962).

In crustacean taxa, two processes are responsible for controlling these ion concentrations, the

compensatory process and the limiting process:

1.2.3 Compensatory process

To maintain their osmotic balance, ions need to be moved actively into or out of the haemolymph.

The main enzyme responsible for ion transportation in this process is Na+/K+-ATPase, an enzyme

that is hyper-expressed in the branchial chambers (gill). This is the primary organ used for osmotic

and ionic regulation in all crustaceans (Lignot et al., 2000).

1.2.4 Limiting process

Reducing penetrance of the gill membrane is the best way to lower ion movement and water flow

without relying on active transport that requires energy. In fact, gill permeability in crustaceans

provides the ability to tolerate a wide range of ionic concentrations in aquatic environments

(Rainbow and Black, 2001). For effective osmoregulation two factors are important; the

concentration gradient between the haemolymph and the external environment and the relative

penetrance of the body surface, although FW, estuarine and semi-terrestrial species tend to limit

their body permeability (Romano and Zeng, 2012). Body surface penetrance in FW organisms is

in general very limited while it is at the highest levels in SW adapted forms (Lockwood, 1962).

15

Diet can also act as a factor that can contribute to OC under stress from changed osmotic conditions

and this has been recognised in farmed crustaceans where diet can be manipulated to improve

individual productivity. Osmoregulatory compensation using a supply of energy provided from

protein, lipids and phospholipids in a diet can reduce gill penetrance by increasing membrane

solidity. Additionally, Vitamin E can improve lipid stability in the gill structure by increasing

Na+/K+-ATPase activity. Some recent studies have also shown that a high concentration of Na+/K+

and Mg2+/Ca2+ ions can cause a decrease in the performance of gill Na+/K+-ATPase and as a result,

individuals may be exposed to low K+ concentration that can lead to mortality (Romano and Zeng,

2012).

The requirement for regular moulting to allow normal growth is a key characteristic of all

crustacean taxa. In decapod crustaceans, the moulting cycle is divided into four major stages (some

with sub-stages) that include:

1. Metecdysis (post-moult) (stage A, B): the period immediately following ecdysis (where rapid

calcification of the exoskeleton occurs).

2. Anecdysis (inter-moult) (stage C): the period of tissue growth and accumulation of food

reserves.

3. Proecdysis (pre-moult) (stage D): the period of active morphological and physiological changes

in preparation for the next moult.

4. Ecdysis (stage E): the shedding of the old cuticle (Chan et al., 1988).

1.3 Osmoregulation capacity (OC) during development

(Ontogeny):

16

Changes in osmoregulatory capacity during development occur via anatomical changes

(development of osmoregulatory epithelia) leading to physiological modification (increased

Na+/K+-ATPase activity, associated with an increase in OC) that improve salinity tolerance,

allowing acclimation to a wide range of environmental salinities (Conte et al., 1972).

Developmental studies of crustaceans that have focused on osmoregulation suggest that larvae and

post-larvae (PL) in general, show an increase in osmolality over time (Freire et al., 2003; Read,

1986).

During post-embryonic stages, ion-transporting epithelia are present and located in sites that vary

based on both species and specific developmental stage. For example, osmoregulatory sites in

Artemia salina nauplii include the neck, dorsal organ and salt gland, that contain numerous

transport cells (Conte et al., 1972). It appears that the inner surfaces of the branchial chambers in

larval decapods also play a role in osmoregulation before this function is later shifted to the

functional gills and epipodites. The role of the gut epithelium and excretory organs in salt

regulation are very limited in post-embryonic stages while the role of the antennal gland in ion

regulation is significant in the control of urine composition, during early pre-embryonic stages.

(Charmantier, 1998).

In coastal and estuarine environments, crustacean larvae face spatial variability in salinity and can

experience osmotic stress that may reduce growth and affect their survival (as discussed

previously). This effect will vary however, depending on physiological adaptations including

capacity for osmoregulation during early developmental life-history stages. In species where the

larvae are osmoconformers until metamorphosis (e.g. Libinia marginata), only a limited range of

salinity variation can be tolerated (Charmantier, 1998). Osmoregulating species, with larvae that

show the adult type of osmoregulatory capacity from the beginning of their larval development

17

(e.g. Macrobrachium petersi), occur in freshwater habitats or in environments with variable or

even extreme salinities; they possess a wide range of salinity tolerances (Charmantier, 1998). A

different pattern is found in some other species including P. japonicus, and H. gammarus

(Charmantier et al., 2001), where the larvae are osmoconformers while the adults are

osmoregulators.

Haemolymph osmolality in crustaceans in general, increases from larval through to the PL stages.

During the moult cycle, individuals tend to be hyper-osmoregulators in the hours or the day before

ecdysis and are nearly isomotic at the post-moult stage. Such variation in osmotic concentration

has been reported in a variety of species including: Rhithropanopeus harrisii, Cardisoma

guanhumi, Homarus americanus and Cancer irroratus. As an example, during the post embryonic

stage, in a large number of Cladoceran species, individuals are hyper-osmoregulators (freshwater

animals) or hypo-osmoregulators (those living in sea water) or there is an ability to be both hyper-

osmoregulators and hypo-hyper osmoregulators in nauplii of Artemia salina, when they mature to

the adult stage. In a number of species, osmoregulatory structures are temporary during

development, including dorsal or neck organs and will be replaced by contemporary organs

(usually gills) during later development. Significance of this temporary ability for hypo-hyper

osmoregulation is unknown, although it may be related to the appearance of the gills in juveniles

and adults and degeneration of the dorsal organ. This variation in osmoregulatory ability during

developmental stages appears to be one of the key factors that permits successful adaptation of

species to their habitats, in particular for post-embryonic development under salinity variation

(Charmantier, 1998). M. rosenbergii or (giant freshwater prawn (GFP)) is a widely cultured FW

prawn species that has been studied for preferred salinity and temperature conditions to optimise

growth rate (Agard, 1999). GFP have the ability to both hypo-hyperosmoregulate at the PL stage

18

of the life cycle but this ability declines as individuals pass through later developmental stages and

adults are only capable of hyper-osmoregulating (Sandifer et al., 1975). At raised salinity levels

(above the isosmotic point), individuals are exposed to stress, and OC reduces significantly,

resulting in an increase in haemolymph concentration. In fact in all osmoregulatory studies of GFP,

osmolality and Ca+2 concentration were maintained even at the highest salinities (Wilder et al.,

1998). In GFP, maximum osmotic concentration is associated with stage D and minimum levels

in stage E of moulting. Changing intracellular free amino acid concentration (FAA; involved in

mediating response to salinity exposure in FW prawns) (Huong et al., 2001), provides primary

facilitation for keeping osmotic equivalence between cells and the haemolymph in both early and

post-embryonic stages and adults. As an example in M. rosenbergii, three FAAs (glycine, proline,

alanine) levels in muscle tissues have been shown to be associated with salinity changes

(Charmantier and Charmantier-Daures, 2001). Fluctuations in Na+, Cl-, K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ levels

in this organism during the moulting cycle were also observed. Overall, Na+ and Cl- concentrations

in M. rosenbergii increased with the progression of the moulting cycle (especially between stages

C and D) and this rising trend affects relative water absorption between moulting stages. Similar

patterns have also been observed in some other crustacean taxa. For example, in C. maenas, Na+,

Cl- and K+ concentration and osmotic concentration rise significantly during the pre-moult stage

and in L. stylirostris, osmotic concentration reached maximum levels during the inter-moult and

then reduced during the pre-moult stage (Wilder et al., 2009).

Because of the need for raised salinity (~15‰) required for production of GFP larvae in hatcheries,

this can be a significant obstacle to development and growth of local culture industries unless a

source of sea water is available locally. Consequently, there is wide current interest in identifying

physiologically important candidate genes that influence salinity tolerance in this farmed

19

freshwater prawn and applying these data to optimize hatchery practices to reduce reliance on sea

water to complete the larval lifecycle in the hatchery effectively. Thus, a focus on understanding

salinity tolerance and natural adaptation of wild FW prawns to different salinity conditions is

linked to predictions of future climate change that reflect increasing problems with rising salinity

levels in many major rivers and streams where GFP and other Macrobrachium spp. occur

naturally.

The most important organs for osmoregulation in crustaceans include:

Gills - specialised organs for osmoregulation, gas exchange, maintenance of acid-base balance and

N2 extraction (osmoregulation occurs in the posterior gill sections) (Cieluch et al., 2004). The most

important ion transport functions occur in gill epithelial cells that possess a specific ultrastructure

featuring apical microvilli and basolateral infolds that host large numbers of mitochondria. From

a histological point of view, the gill thinness is similar to other external parts of the body but they

possess a highly penetrable layer that plays a major absorptive, rather than excretory role (Dall,

1967).

Antennal gland - the main role of this organ in osmoregulation is to produce urine (considered as

the main excretory organ). The antennal gland is also important for reabsorption of ions by active

transport or passively into water (Dall, 1967).

Hepatopancreas - is the major digestive gland and is a sensitive indicator of metabolism, ecdysis

(moulting) and feeding status. It also plays a role in acclimation to environmental stress of both

low and raised salinities (Li et al., 2008). In general, the hepatopancreas is considered the master

organ for the majority of body functions.

1.4 The role of pivotal organs and identified genes in

osmoregulation

20

All of these organs provide ideal targets for a comparative genomic analysis of the molecular basis

of adaptive physiological response to variation in salinity. An analysis of variation in gene

expression in the target tissues in a model FW prawn, M. australiense exposed to different salinity

concentrations within the natural tolerance range of the species can be used to understand adaptive

mechanisms for dealing with salinity stress. This can help to generate DNA sequence information

on Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs), in particular those that are likely play roles in regulatory

pathways during salt water acclimation. EST analysis is now a routine genomic method for rapid

identification of expressed genes and regulation of specific genes in different tissues,

developmental stages and under different environmental conditions. A subset of forward

subtracted transcripts can also be down/up-regulated and examined via quantitative real-time PCR

(RT-qPCR) to characterise differential expression patterns in selected tissues after experimental

exposure to different salinity conditions.

Crustaceans in general, show higher levels of differential gene expression patterns in comparison

with teleosts, because in general, they act as osmoconformers in high salinity environments and as

osmoregulators in low salinities, while teleosts are strong osmoregulators across a very wide range

of salinities. A major enzyme responsible for ion regulation in crustaceans is Na+/K+-ATPase that

shows greatest activity in the posterior gills (this enzyme has different isoforms expressed in the

anterior and posterior gills). For instance in Carcinus maenas, C. sapidus and Uca vocans, changes

in Na+/K+-ATPase activity in the gills are higher than in the antennal gland or gut. In the crab

Scylla sp., Na+/K+-ATPase activity and rate of mRNA production after transfer from high (45‰)

to low salinity levels (5‰), increased significantly. Rising mRNA concentration in the posterior

gills in dilute media in turn leads to more Na+/K+-ATPase activity and this appears to result from

increased gene transcription and/or mRNA translation, while mRNA expression in concentrated

21

media does not result in any change in Na+/K+-ATPase activity levels. Differences in gene

expression patterns in the genus Macrobrachium therefore is directly associated with

environmental salinity levels, tissue type and the period of exposure of the experimental prawns

submitted to osmotic stress (Havird et al., 2013). Table 1-1 summarises this and other genes

previously identified as contributing to osmoregulatory capacity in aquatic organisms, in

particularly, in crustaceans.

Table 1-1: Specific genes previously identified as having a functional role in osmoregulation

and salinity tolerance in a range of aquatic species.

GENE TISSUE FUNCTION ORGANISMS REFERENCE

USP gill

Antennal gland

Involved in salinity tolerance

Macrobrachium rosenbergii

(Barman et al., 2012)

(Zolk et al., 2006)

Calreticulin gill Involved in signal

transduction in many

biological processes of growth and moulting

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

(Luana et al. ,2007)

Na/K- ATPase (NKA) Gill creating electrochemical

gradient across the cell membrane in the gills of

crustaceans for active

absorbtion or release ions

Euryhaline animals

M. amazonicum

(Havird et al., 2013)

(Boudour-Boucheker et

al., 2013)

Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter

(NKCC) Gill Transport ions into gill

cells either from the

blood or media based on salinity.

Killifish

(Scott et al., 2005)

H+-ATPase (HAT) Gill Pumps protons to

influence HCO3- and Cl- exchange and Na uptake.

Euryhaline animals (Havird et al., 2013)

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) Gill Involved in in all main

gill functions such as ion

regulation

M. rosenbergii (Jasmani et al., 2008)

V-H ATPase Gill, hepatopancreas Role in salinity

acclimation

M. amazonicum (Faleiros et al., 2010)

22

LvCHH-ITP Eye stalk Protection of ion loss to

the environment though acclimation to low

salinity

Litopenaeus vannamei (Tiu et al., 2007)

Catechol-o-methyl

transferase (COMT)

gill, gut, muscle, high

expression in hepatopancreas

associated with low and

high salinity and crucial role in salinity stress

Penaeus monodon (Rajesh et al., 2012)

ATP-binding cassette

(ABC)

gill, hepatopancreas

Role in regulating ion

channels in the plasma membrane

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

HSP70 Gill Role in salt stress M. rosenbergii ,brown trout ,rainbow trout

(Barman et al., 2012)

ABC protein C12

(ABCC 12)

gill Functional role in

osmoregulation under osmotic stresses

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

Acyl-CoA binding

protein (ACBP)

gill, gut, muscle Role in salinity tolerance

and adaptation at low

and high salinity levels

Penaeus monodon (Kiruthika et al., 2013)

ILF2 (interlukin enhancer

binding factor 2)

hepatopancreas, gill a transcriptional

regulator against biotic

stresses

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

OST complex gill Maintaining homeostasis during salinity/osmotic

stress

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

Selenophosphate (SPS1) gill Involved in salinity tolerance

M. rosenbergii (Barman et al., 2012)

(Lobanov et al., 2008)

Crustacean taxa including Macrobrachium species contribute significantly to the global

aquaculture industry and this has encouraged development of programs to improve stock and

culture performance (Jung et al., 2013). A lack of comprehensive data on the genomes of many

aquatic species and limited knowledge about molecular and biochemical factors that support

1.5 Candidate gene approach (Transcriptomics) to identify key

genes involved in osmoregulation

23

important quantitative traits like growth, survival and other economically significant traits

however, has restricted endeavours to increase the output of crustacean species from culture.

Among crustaceans, certain species that possess specific quantitative traits including the ability to

survive variable environmental conditions or more specifically, that possess some physiological

adaptations that provide efficient osmoregulation can be used as models organisms for

investigating the physiology and genetic control of salinity tolerance and osmoregulatory

adaptation more widely in related species (Faria et al., 2011). Genomic approaches are

increasingly being applied to develop a better understanding of genetic factors that affect variation

in economically important traits in many cultured species (Jung et al., 2011) and provide efficient

and relatively low cost methods for such studies. Increasingly, genomic techniques are being

applied to a large number of model and non-model organisms to determine the role of functional

genes and specific mutations that contribute to important production traits in both agriculture and

aquaculture. As an example, transcriptomic studies are now beginning to shed light on cellular and

molecular regulatory mechanisms of salinity tolerance (Morrell et al., 2012). There is a huge

potential of the existing modern genomic tools to explore many different ecological and

evolutionary mysteries. We can use them to investigate how changes in environmental salinity

levels can impose serious stress on crustaceans that can ultimately hamper growth and negatively

affect commercial production. It would therefore, be a great interest to identify and characterize

genes that allow efficient osmoregulation for successful ionic balance due to salinity change.

24

The genus Macrobrachium is a member of the Palaemonidae family that has dispersed widely

across tropical and sub-tropical zones around the world. This genus currently constitutes over 250

species globally with 43 species being commercially important (Jung et al., 2011). Macrobrachium

species are found in all water types across the planet except for Antarctica (Ye et al., 2009). M.

australiense is an endemic Australian species, widely distributed across the continent, with

populations in both inland and coastal river systems (Short, 2004). Macrobrachium australiense

(Palaemonidae) was used here as a model for other freshwater prawns in the genus Macrobrachium

because it is the most widespread FW prawns species across mainland Australia and is the most

successfully adapted species to completing its entire life cycle in freshwater (Dimmock et al.,

2004), yet under controlled conditions in the laboratory can still tolerate up to 17 ‰ salinity

(Sharma and Hughes, 2009). The most important features of this model species include high

tolerance of saline conditions at all life history stages, short generation time (life cycle is

abbreviated into three zoeal stages, maturation normally takes 4-6 months after hatching), reduced

larval stage, mature stage at hatching and relatively large egg size (Dimmock et al., 2004).

M. rosenbergii (GFP) currently is the most important FW prawn species used in aquaculture.

Production levels of this prawn have increased rapidly over recent decades and now many people

depend on this culture industry for their livelihoods and food security. Female M. rosenbergii

migrate naturally from FW to brackish water after spawning and larvae must be released into

brackish water where they remain until the post-larval stage, then juveniles return to FW to

complete their lifecycle. M. rosenbergii is an osmoregulator (at salinities between 0-15‰) but acts

as an osmoconformer at higher salinities (> 15‰) (Huong et al., 2010). Studies have shown that

1.6 Macrobrachium australiense as a model for salinity tolerance

in FW prawns.

25

rates of protein synthesis and respiratory metabolism are affected significantly by changes in

salinity in this organism. Individuals are very sensitive to changes in salinity, pH and temperature

during the premoult stages of their life cycle and this can have significant effects on their immune

responses (Cheng and Chen, 2000). At raised salinity levels, mortality rate is considerable and

growth performance is compromised, while successful reproduction depends on availability of an

appropriate low salinity environment. Only under very low salinity conditions will juveniles show

optimum growth performance (Stephenson and Knight, 1982). M. nipponense is another FW

prawn species that shows maximum growth performance at low salinities (Wang et al., 2004).

Efficient osmoregulatory capacity is a fundamental requirement for coping with environmental

stressors and it will be important to identify physiologically significant candidate genes (CG) that

contribute to effective osmoregulation in these organisms in the face of rapid environmental

change. Understanding the genomic and/or functional genomic resources associated with effective

salinity tolerance in crustaceans is a basic requirement for survival under different environmental

conditions. Next generation sequencing technologies (NGST) in parallel with differential gene

expression (DGE) profiling are cutting-edge methodologies that allow deep understanding of gene

expression patterns and signaling pathway to be developed. Transcriptomic analysis has been used

widely in biological studies and has provided practical insights into gene discovery, differential

gene expression patterns under different environmental conditions and for molecular marker

discovery (Jin et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Manfrin et al., 2015; Song et al., 2015; Thanh et al.,

2014; Zhao et al., 2015).

Transcriptomic analysis can allow potential candidate genes involved in adaptation to divergent

osmotic environments to be identified and can determine consistent genomic changes that occur

in related species across micro/macro-evolutionary time scales (Jung et al., 2011). In crustaceans,

26

in particular Macrobrachium prawns, certain organs/tissues provide ideal targets for a comparative

genomic analysis of the molecular basis of adaptive physiological response to saline environments.

Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to develop a more complete understanding of the

molecular basis of osmoregulatory function by sequencing transcriptomes from the most important

organs involved in ion regulation and salinity tolerance using an Illumina platform. Transcriptomes

could then be used to identify the major candidate genes with osmoregulatory roles in

osmoregulatory organs including the gill, antennal gland and hepatopancreas.

NGS is a new technology for identifying genes and functional mutations in both model and non-

model species (Ekblom and Galindo, 2011) and can generate millions of sequence reads

concurrently with standard dye-terminator methods. Availability of large genomic datasets

generated with NGST can increase our understanding of factors that have influenced the evolution

of specific taxonomic groups and has important applications for improving the quality of stock

used in aquaculture (Morrell et al., 2012). NGS approaches provide massive amounts of genome

wide sequence data that can be used for better understanding various biological processes. This

approach can also provide a substantial opportunity to identify the molecular basis of phenotypic

variation in living organisms (Jung et al., 2013). Already these technologies have made significant

contributions to productivity in aquaculture species for example in catfish, Atlantic salmon and

rainbow trout (Kocher et al., 1998; Kartavtsev et al., 2007; Davidson et al., 2010; Salem et al.,

2010). A main focus of this approach is to identify and characterise genes and molecular markers

that contribute to variation in important Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs). Such markers can

potentially be applied in Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) programs to increase the rate of stock

1.7 Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)

27

improvement and to increase genetic gains in stock improvement programs for cultured species.

ESTs screened from the library encode functional proteins that are involved in cellular metabolic

processes, signal transduction and biological regulation and others vital steps. Information

generated from the current study is expected to provide new insights into salinity–mediated stress

tolerance mechanisms in M. australiense and to functionally validate these ESTs in vivo and to

determine their physiological significance in response to salinity tolerance.

Fig 1-1: Transcriptome assembly and analysis workflow. The first step is to collect target tissue

from target species to obtain good quality RNA which is then converted to cDNA library to be

sequenced in NGS platforms. Sequence data is then processed by bioinformatics pipelines for gene

identification or discovery based on blast similarity matches with other species. Moreover, DGE

can be performed to compare between different biological or experimental conditions or even

between tissue types.

Exposure to new osmotic conditions by migrants requires rapid adaptation to permit persistence in

the new environment. A common strategy during adaptation is that genetic plasticity can lead to

adaptation by selection (Lee et al., 2011). This phenomenon is considered by many to be an

1.8 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) identification

28

interesting problem and one where evolutionary biologists seek to understand changes at the

genomic level during local adaptation (Butlin, 2010). Of the diverse array of extant animal taxa,

only a few phylogenetic groups have been able to adapt successfully to low osmotic conditions

(inland freshwaters) following a marine ancestry. There are many crustacean species that provide

ideal candidate species for understanding the mechanisms underlying osmoregulatory capacity in

variable osmotic gradients.

Population genomics approaches are now widely available for investigating the molecular basis of

the adaptive process where populations are experiencing different natural environmental

conditions that show a clear footprint of natural selection on genetic variation (Kohn et al., 2006).

Such approaches are useful for understanding the process of speciation where markers derived

from transcriptomic data can identify candidate genes and functional mutations in key genes under

selection (Berdan et al., 2015). Modern genomic approaches (particularly NGS methodologies)

have made it relatively easy to either acquire a list of candidate polymorphic loci, or to search for

SNPs and/or outliers (loci under selection or adaptive loci) among a set of candidate genes in

contrast to using a blind shotgun approach to identify > 1000ʹ s of SNPs from massive sequence

dataset. SNP calling from transcriptomic data (using expressed sequences) provides a cost

effective way for reducing genomic complexity while still retaining a significant fraction of the

functionally relevant information (De Wit et al., 2015). An important additional outcome from this

type of data is the potential to identify outlier loci from expressed sequences. Another powerful

feature of a transcriptomic data set is the potential to examine changes in gene expression patterns

among natural populations or different individuals in a controlled experimental set up.

Furthermore, transcriptomic approaches can focus on genetic variation in specific candidate genes

29

that potentially may be under selection and therefore can be useful for investigating the molecular

basis of local adaptation in wild populations (Helyar et al., 2012).

A number of studies have confirmed that there is a genetic basis to differences in relative transcript

abundance (Gracey et al., 2004), that can lead to adaptive divergence in wild populations

(Eguavoen et al., 2015; Leder et al., 2015). Thus, combining gene expression pattern data

(transcript abundance) and SNP detection from the same set of individuals from transcriptomic

data set can provide a novel way of examining the functional roles of population specific SNPs in

controlling gene expression patterns.

For instance, M. australiense wild populations are exposed naturally to different osmotic gradients

that provide a genomic resource for identifying and characterising important osmoregulatory genes

and functional mutations in these genes that may have diverged during adaptation to inland

freshwaters. Such data can be used to investigate whether this process is controlled largely by

mutations in regulatory sequences or mutations in functional protein coding regions.

Changes in gene expression levels provide an important mechanism for stress response in living

organisms but currently very little information is available about differential gene expression

related to salinity tolerance in freshwater prawns. Recognition of key genes and key mutations in

one target species that are related to phenotypic regulation of important adaptive responses are

likely to have similar functions in closely related taxa due to conservation over evolutionary time,

thus providing a useful tool for identifying important candidate genes in a broad range of taxa. In

1.9 Differential gene expression (DGE) patterns and

morphological changes under osmotic challenge

30

eukaryote species, genes possess both coding and non-coding areas. During acclimation to osmotic

stress, significant changes may occur in the main factors associated with osmoregulation including,

change to protein structure, change in permeability and function of gill epithelium cells, alteration

of expression patterns of the most important ion transporter genes (Evans, 2002; Seeb et al., 2011).

Recently gene expression studies via new and developed technologies and platforms have

uncovered many quantitative traits in many taxa.

Changes in gene expression patterns at the cellular levels via activation of intracellular signaling

pathways have been considered to be a major component of stress responses that will be vital for

long-term adaptation. Recently high quality results from transcriptomic scanning and mRNA

stability studies have uncovered the molecular basis of gene expression regulation in response to

stressors. They used genomic technologies to focus on genome content and searching in

transcriptomes followed by sequencing studies that covered the influences of both non-stressed

and other abiotic stressors on cell physiology (Cochrane et al., 2009). The primary ability of

organisms to deal with changing environments is a complement of protein-coding regions across

the genome with factors that regulate gene expression to repair damage and produce better

functional phenotypes (Cochrane et al., 2009).

Comparative studies can help to identify the genes and mutations with common transcriptional

responses during acclimation to salinity stress. In fact, genome-wide sequencing can be used to

identify potential candidate genes involved in adaptation to divergent osmotic environments and

can determine consistent genomic changes that occur in related species across micro/macro

evolutionary time scales. Under different salinity conditions, mRNAs may produce different gene

products, because of this, we can target just a single specific gene using RT-PCR to describe

relative expression patterns of target genes under variable salinity conditions. During salinity

31

stress, high amounts of energy are required to increase metabolic rates that lead to more ATP

production for active transport within epithelial cells. These findings provide a framework for

using Macrobrachium australiense as a model to study gene expression changes with regards to

salinity stress, the potential outcomes will be to understand this process in crustaceans more

widely.

The culture industry for FW prawns is now confronted with a serious challenge; saltwater

penetration into many freshwater ecosystems as a result of impacts of climate change. To respond

proactively to this problem, we need to develop culture stock with better tolerance of raised saline

environments. Understanding the genomic basis of salinity tolerance and performance of the

osmoregulatory system can help address this problem. Macrobrachium species naturally occupy a

wide range of environments (e.g. salinity) and show a variety of behavioural strategies to deal with

changing environments. The capacity to resist significant changes in environmental salinities is

believed to depend on specific osmoregulatory mechanisms that are important in their natural life

cycle and in farming. A number of studies have shown specific key genes and mutations can play

pivotal roles in osmoregulation and sustainability in crustacean taxa (Liu and Cordes, 2004). In

the current study, M. australiense was used as a genetic model to address the following research

questions:

1. Which candidate genes are involved in osmoregulation in M. australiense?

2. Which key mutations (functional and/or regulatory) are associated with adaptation to variable

osmotic niches in the wild populations?

1.10 Knowledge gaps and research questions

32

3. How do changes in CG expression patterns influence salinity tolerance in the FW model, M.

australiense?

Comparative analysis of salinity tolerance in the model species with different natural tolerance to

salinity will be conducted to identify common candidate genes and mutations that affect

osmoregulatory performance under salinity stress in different populations.

In this Project, transcriptomic analyses were used to identify the major candidate genes and

functional mutations involved with osmoregulation in M. australiense. Three specific aims of this

project include:

1. Transcriptomic scan of M. australiense using NGS approach for identifying key CG

involved with osmoregulation and ion regulation.

2. Identifying outlier loci (adaptive loci) of M. australiense collected from different wild

populations that are exposed to different osmotic niches, using a comparative population

transcriptomic approach.

3. Investigating changes in expression patterns of osmoregulatory genes exposed to different

experimental salinity levels.

Identifying CG loci and functional (and/or regulatory) mutations within genes that affect salinity

tolerance as well as understanding how they are regulated (gene expression patterns) can assist our

understanding of the effects of climate change on wild populations and how impacts can be

mitigated in cultured stocks. The resulting data can provide the basis for understanding and

addressing both future conservation of wild stocks under changing environmental conditions and

1.11 Objectives and aims

33

also improve practices used in hatcheries and grow out ponds to produce larvae and juveniles for

the expanding culture industry. In the current study, a genomic approach was used to investigate

underlying genomic control of osmoregulation in M. australiense. M. australiense was used as a

model to identify key genetic loci that are responsible for osmoregulation more widely in other

Macrobrachium taxa. Data produced in this study can be applied to better understand salinity

tolerance in aquatic species generally and to discover key genes/SNPs in other Macrobrachium

species (e.g. M. rosenbergii) that play fundamental roles in this important trait. This information

can assist development of more saline-resistant culture lines that can withstand, and acclimate to,

increased salinity levels in farm ponds.

34

2 Chapter 2: A transcriptomic scan for potential candidate

genes involved in osmoregulation in an obligate

freshwater palaemonid prawn (Macrobrachium

australiense)

Published as: Moshtaghi et al. (2016), A transcriptomic scan for potential candidate genes

involved in osmoregulation in an obligate freshwater palaemonid prawn (Macrobrachium

australiense). PeerJ 4:e2520; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2520

35

A transcriptomic scan for potential candidate genes involved in osmoregulation in

an obligate freshwater palaemonid prawn (Macrobrachium australiense)

Azam Moshtaghi1, Md. Lifat Rahi1, Viet Tuan Nguyen2, Peter B. Mather1 and David A. Hurwood1

1Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Science and Engineering Faculty, School of Earth

Environmental and Biological Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia

2University of the Sunshine Coast, Science and Engineering Faculty

*Corresponding author: Azam Moshtaghi, [email protected]

Email addresses:

AM: [email protected]

MDR: [email protected]

TVN: [email protected]

PBM: [email protected]

DAH: [email protected]

36

2.1

2.1.1 Background

Understanding the genomic basis of osmoregulation (candidate genes and/or molecular

mechanisms controlling the phenotype) addresses one of the fundamental questions in

evolutionary ecology. Species distributions and adaptive radiations are thought to be controlled by

environmental salinity levels, and efficient osmoregulatory (ionic balance) ability is the main

mechanism to overcome problems related to environmental salinity gradients.

Methods: To better understand how osmoregulatory performance in FW crustaceans allow

individuals to acclimate and adapt to raised salinity conditions, here we; i), reviewed the literature

on genes that have been identified to be associated with osmoregulation in FW crustaceans, and

ii), performed a transcriptomic analysis using cDNA libraries developed from mRNA isolated

from three important osmoregulatory tissues (gill, antennal gland, hepatopancreas) and total

mRNA from post-larvae taken from the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium australiense using

Illumina deep sequencing technology. This species was targeted because it can complete its life

cycle totally in freshwater but, like many Macrobrachium sp., can also tolerate brackish water

conditions and hence should have genes associated with tolerance of both FW and saline

conditions.

Results: We obtained between 55.4 and 65.2 million Illumina read pairs from four cDNA libraries.

Overall, paired end sequences assembled into a total of 125,196 non-redundant contigs (≥200 bp)

with an N50 length of 2282 bp and an average contig length of 968 bp. Transcriptomic analysis of

M. australiense identified 32 different gene families that were potentially involved with

osmoregulatory capacity. A total of 32,597 transcripts were specified with gene ontology (GO)

terms identified on the basis of GO categories. Abundance estimation of expressed genes based on

2.1 Abstract

37

TPM (transcript per million) ≥ 20 showed 1625 transcripts commonly expressed in all four

libraries. Among the top 10 genes expressed in four tissue libraries associated with

osmoregulation, arginine kinase and Na+/K+- ATPase showed the highest transcript copy number

with 7098 and 660, respectively in gill which is considered to be the most important organ involved

in osmoregulation.

Discussion: The current study provides the first broad transcriptome from M. australiense using

next generation sequencing and identifies potential candidate genes involved in salinity tolerance

and osmoregulation that can provide a foundation for investigating osmoregulatory capacity in a

wide variety of freshwater crustaceans.

Keywords: Macrobrachium australiense, transcriptome, osmoregulation, Illumina, gill, antennal

gland, hepatopancreas

Currently, billions of humans rely on aquatic species as their primary source of animal protein and

so future predicted changes to fishery production are likely to have major impacts on human

populations and economies worldwide (Ficke et al., 2007). Among farmed aquatic species,

decapod crustacean taxa (Order: Decapoda) comprise more than 200 species (including

prawns/shrimps, lobsters and crabs), many of which support significant commercial industries. Of

these, prawns are particularly important to the FW aquaculture industry. The FW prawn

aquaculture industry worldwide depends largely on unimproved, essentially wild stocks for

farming, most of which are produced in basic hatcheries or that are harvested as juveniles from the

wild (Jung et al., 2011). Currently the most important FW prawns used in aquaculture are all

2.2 Introduction

38

members of the genus Macrobrachium (Family Palaemonidae). Macrobrachium spp. display a

wide variety of life history strategies and occur in a diverse array of aquatic habitats and naturally

occupy a wide range of environments (including salinities) and show a variety of behavioural

patterns that allow them to deal with changing environments (Huong et al., 2010). Culture of FW

prawns in some places (the Mekong River Basin (MRB) is a notable example), is confronted with

a serious challenge; saltwater penetration of freshwater ecosystems as many species are unable to

perform osmoregulation successfully in variable environmental conditions (Nguyen et al., 2014).

FW crustaceans need to control their body ion concentrations in the face of variation in

environmental salinity levels and therefore require an ability to regulate their osmotic haemolymph

pressure in order to survive. The osmoregulatory system plays a pivotal role in dealing with

changes in ionic concentrations (regulation of Na+, K+, H+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3- and Cl- ions) in an

individual’s body compared with the aquatic medium they occupy. This complex interaction

impacts regulation of total osmotic concentration, regulation of intracellular vs. extracellular ion

levels, acid-base balance and levels of a number of other organic ions (Lignot et al., 2000). This

is further complicated by the presence of an open blood system.

Crustaceans are a well-known group for their successful colonisation of freshwater from the

marine environment and this evolutionary trend is generally associated with a wide diversity in

osmoregulatory capacity (Freire et al., 2008). Many decapods can utilise a wide range of salinity

levels (freshwater, brackish water and marine conditions), with some species able to move among

ecotypes within their own life times (Gillanders et al., 2003). So, efficient osmoregulatory capacity

is a fundamental requirement for coping with environmental stressors and it will be important to

identify physiologically significant candidate genes (CG) that contribute to effective

osmoregulation in these organisms in the face of rapid environmental change. Understanding the

39

genomic and/or functional genomic resources associated with effective salinity tolerance in

crustaceans is a basic requirement to survive under different environmental conditions. Identifying

CG loci and functional mutations within these genes that affect salinity tolerance as well as

understanding how they are regulated (gene expression patterns) can assist predictive power for

likely outcomes of the effects of climate change on wild populations and how impacts can be

mitigated in farmed stocks.

Modern genomic approaches, particularly, next generation sequencing technology (NGST) in

addition to differential gene expression (DGE) profiling allow deep understanding of gene

expression patterns and signaling pathways to be developed. Transcriptomic analysis has been

used widely in biological studies and has provided practical insights into gene discovery,

differential gene expression patterns under different environmental conditions and also efficient

discovery of molecular markers (Jin et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Manfrin et al., 2015; Song et al.,

2015; Thanh et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2015).

Understanding the genomic basis of salinity tolerance and relative efficiency of the

osmoregulatory system under changing conditions can help us to understand the genomic basis of

osmoregulation itself (Freire et al., 2008). Salinity (ionic content) is one of the most important

abiotic factors that affect species distribution, population expansions and growth of local culture

industries. For instance, rates of protein synthesis and respiratory metabolism in M. rosenbergii,

the species supporting the largest FW crustacean culture industry worldwide, are affected

significantly by changes in salinity. M. rosenbergii individuals are very sensitive to changes in

salinity, pH and temperature during the pre-moult stages of their life cycle and this can have

significant effects on their immune response later (Cheng and Chen, 2000). At raised salinity

levels, mortality rate is considerable and growth performance is compromised. Alternatively, in

40

the marine shrimp Penaeus monodon, raised or lower levels of salinity (compared to the optimal

level~25‰) is associated with increased energy expenditure for active ion transport and involves

degradation of energy-rich compounds including lipids (Ye et al., 2009). This results in energy

being diverted from growth to ion balance maintenance, an outcome that affects production cycle

productivity.

Transcriptomic analysis can allow potential candidate genes involved in adaptation to divergent

osmotic environments to be identified and can determine consistent genomic changes that occur

in related species across micro/macro-evolutionary time scales (Jung et al., 2011). To this end, we

used Macrobrachium australiense (Palaemonidae) as a model (to better understand potential genes

involved in osmoregulation) for other freshwater prawns in the genus Macrobrachium because it

is the most widespread FW prawns species across mainland Australia and is the most successfully

adapted species that completes its life cycle in freshwater (Dimmock et al., 2004), yet under

controlled conditions in the laboratory can tolerate up to 17 ‰ salinity (Sharma and Hughes, 2009).

The most important features of this model species include high tolerance of saline conditions at all

life history stages, short generation time (life cycle is abbreviated into three zoeal stages,

maturation normally takes 4-6 months after hatching), reduced larval stages, mature stage at

hatching and relatively large egg size (Dimmock et al., 2004).

Adaptation to different salinity levels is a complicated process and is related to cell volume

regulation, organic ion transport, changes to cellular carbohydrate levels, nitrogen metabolism and

whole tissue remodelling (Henry et al., 2011). In crustaceans, in particular Macrobrachium

prawns, certain organs/tissues provide ideal targets for a comparative genomic analysis of the

molecular basis of adaptive physiological response to saline environments. Therefore, the primary

aim of this study was to develop a more complete understanding of the molecular basis of

41

osmoregulatory functioning by sequencing transcriptomes from the most important organs

involved in ion regulation and salinity tolerance using an Illumina platform. The transcriptomics

approach was used to identify the major potential genes involved with osmoregulation in

osmoregulatory organs including the gill, antennal gland and hepatopancreas of M. australiense.

2.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance

M. australiense specimens were collected from a site on Bulimba Creek (27°56 S, 153°09 E) (a

tributary of the Brisbane River, SE Queensland, Australia) (Field permit for this study was issued

by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry under Queensland Government, Permit

Number: 166312). This site had 0 ‰salinity but was only 22 km from the confluence with the

main channel of the Brisbane River where water salinity is approximately 30‰. Furthermore, tidal

influence occur upto only 5 km downstream from the sampling site with no barriers to dispersal

between the site and brackish water. Population genetic data (Rogl, 2015) using a CO1 marker

revealed no evidence for genetic differentiation between different M. australiense populations that

are separated by brackish water across the entire lower reaches of the Brisbane River drainage. It

was assumed therefore that M. australiense individuals collected in this study had ready access to

brackish water. Total genomic DNA was extracted from pleopods taken from each prawn for

taxonomic validation using a fragment of the mtDNA COI gene following methods outlined in a

previous study on M. rosenbergii (Hurwood et al., 2014). Sanger sequencing results for mtDNA

COI confirmed that all individuals used to generate the transcriptomes in this study were M.

australiense, with all individuals having haplotypes identical to, or minimally divergent from (one

or two bp), those previously detected for this species in the Brisbane River (Sharma and Hughes,

2009).

2.3 Materials and Methods

42

2.3.2 RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation and Illumina sequencing

For transcriptomic analyses, collected prawns were transported live to the Molecular Genetics

Research Facility (MGRF) at Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Live individuals were

then euthanized and dissected immediately to obtain fresh tissue for total RNA extraction. In total,

12 adults (body weight between 6-8 grams) prawn individuals were used for RNA extraction but

due to the small amount of available tissue, we pooled tissues from 4 prawns each time. Then we

used the best quality RNA samples for each tissue. In addition, we extracted total RNA from 2

post-larvae (body weight 0.5-0.6 gram) individuals. Dissected and pooled tissues including gill

(G), antennal gland (A), and hepatopancreas (H) from adults and whole individual of post-larvae

(PL) were transferred to a mortar containing liquid nitrogen, and tissues were crushed into a fine

powder using pestles. Powdered tissues were then used for total RNA extraction using an RNeasy

Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Genomic DNA was

removed using a Turbo DNA-free kit (Ambion, Life Technologies) and the integrity and

concentration of extracted total RNA was checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent

Technologies, version 6) and a Nano Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific),

respectively. RNA samples were stored at -80 °C for later use. 4 µg of total RNA were used as

starting material for mRNA purification, using a TrueSeqV1 Standard mRNA Sample Prep kit

(Illumina, USA). Purified mRNA was then fragmented into smaller fragments to initiate cDNA

synthesis. After synthesizing the first and second strands of cDNA, an Illumina barcoding adapter

(individual index) ligation step was performed chemically according to the manufacturer’s

protocol. Adapter ligated cDNA was purified using the AMPure XP magnetic bead (Beckman

Coulter, Beverly, USA) system combined with ten subsequent washing steps. Quality of

constructed cDNA libraries was checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent), Qubit® 2.0

43

Fluorimeter (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) and RT-qPCR (BJS Biotechnologies, UK). All

libraries were normalized via dilution before the final sequence run. The resulting four cDNA

libraries (G, A, H and whole PL) were subjected to the Illumina NextSeqTM 500 Platform for 75

bp paired end sequencing. All activities were performed at the Molecular Genetics Research

Facility (MGRF) under the Central Analytical Research Facility (CARF) at Queensland University

of Technology.

2.3.3 Quality control of Illumina sequence data

High throughput Illumina sequencing produced >257 million raw reads from the four cDNA

libraries. Quality of the sequence data was checked first with FastQC (version 0.11.3) software

(Andrews, 2010). Trimmomatic software (version 0.36) was used for quality filtering of raw data

(Bolger et al., 2014), to trim noisy reads (low quality bases) at both ends, reads <36 bases were

not considered. Only high quality and filtered reads (Phred Score, Q≥30) were used in the

subsequent bioinformatics analyses.

2.3.4 Bioinformatics analyses

All of the quality controlled raw reads from the four cDNA libraries were pooled to make a single

reference transcriptome from Bulimba Creek M. australiense. De novo assembly of high quality

reads was performed using the Trinity software package (version 2014-04-13p1) applying perl

script (Trinity --seqType fq --JM 200G --left Combined_1.fastq --right Combined_2.fastq --

trimmomatic --CPU 12) and default settings (Haas et al., 2013) to obtain contigs. We assessed

transcriptome assembly completeness using the CEGMA software package (Parra et al., 2007).

De novo assembled contigs were then blasted (BLASTX searched) against the NCBI non-

redundant database using BLAST+ (version 2.2.29) with an e value of 1e-5 for significant blast

hits. The resulting blasted files were loaded into Blast2GO pro software (version 3.0) (Camacho

44

et al., 2009) to map and annotate sequences to determine potential functions of each transcript

based on gene ontology (GO) analysis. Following this step, we exported the top hit species

distribution chart using the same Blast2Go pro software to check blast hits matching with other

species. The annotated contigs were further used in Blast2Go software for InterPro scanning in

order to obtain InterProScan IDs. Annotated and InterPro scanned results were then exported and

extracted as text files to use for preparing WEGO plots (Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plotting)

to categorize gene functions into three different categories (cellular components, molecular

functions and biological processes) (Ye et al., 2006). We also used the de novo assembled

transcripts for differential gene expression analysis that included: mapping of raw reads against

the reference transcriptome using Bowtie (version 1.1.1) (Song et al., 2014), abundance estimation

using RSEM (version 1.2.7) (Li and Dewey, 2011) and differential gene expression analysis using

edgeR Bioconductor (version 3.3) (Robinson et al., 2010). The RSEM approach generates

expression value matrices by calculating maximum likelihood abundance estimation at 95%

credibility intervals for genes. Expression value matrices were normalized via the Trimmed Mean

of M-values (TMM) method in edgeR to adjust for library size and skewed expression of

transcripts (Nakasugi et al., 2013).

2.3.5 Identification of potential genes

Prior to bioinformatics analysis, a list of candidate genes (Table 2-1) was prepared from a literature

survey. The blasted and annotated transcriptome data sets were mined for candidate gene

identification. Results of Blastx searches identified a large number of transcripts belonging to

different gene families. The full length of each transcript was identified using open reading frames

(ORF) finder to identify a start and stop codon in both strands. (Liu et al., 2012).

45

Table 2-1: Specific genes previously identified as having a functional role in salinity tolerance in

crustaceans (only the authors who worked with the specific genes have been cited) .

GENE FUNCTION REFERENCE

Aquaporin 3 (AQP) cell volume regulation and water

permeability under stress

(Gao, 2009)

Calreticulin (CRT) signal transduction in many biological

processes of growth, moulting and stress

response

(Luana et al., 2007)

Na+/K+- ATPase (NKA) creating an electrochemical gradient

across the cell membrane in the gills of

crustaceans for actively absorb or release

ions

(Santos et al., 2007)

(Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2014)

Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC) transport ions into gill cells either from the

blood or media based on salinity

(Faleiros et al., 2010)

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) involved in all main gill function such as

regulation of Na+, Cl-, H+, HCO3-

(specifically in low salinities)

(Henry et al., 2003)

V type- (H+) ATPase role in salinity acclimation and

osmoregulation

(Tsai and Lin, 2007)

ILF2 (interlukin enhancer binding

factor 2)

a transcriptional regulator against biotic

stresses

(Barman et al., 2012)

Alkaline phosphatase involved in salinity acclimation and

osmoregulation response

(Lovett et al., 1994)

Selenophosphate (SPS1) involved in salinity tolerance, oxidative

role

(Gillanders et al., 2003)

Integrin involved in salinity stress (Pongsomboon et al., 2009)

ABC protein C12 (ABCC 12) functional role in osmoregulation and

salinity tolerance under osmotic stresses

(Liu et al., 2012)

P38 MAP kinase regulation processes (mRNA stability,

protein degradation) under environmental

stress

(He et al., 2013)

USP involved in salinity tolerance (Kotlyar et al., 2000)

Na+/H-exchanger regulation of Na+ and H- levels and

involved in regulation of extracellular

acid-base

(Freire et al., 2008)

Ca2+ -ATPase involved in Ca2+ regulation and

calcification

(Freire et al., 2008)

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane

Regulator (CFTR)

regulation of Cl- channels and increases

the osmoregulatory capacity

(Bodinier et al., 2009)

Arginine kinase involved in active ion transport across

membrane

(Kotlyar et al., 2000)

OST complex maintaining homeostasis during

salinity/osmotic stress

(Pongsomboon et al., 2009)

Acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP)

role in salinity tolerance and adaptation

within low and high salinity levels

(Kiruthika et al., 2013)

Catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) association with low and high salinity and

crucial role within salinity stresses

(Rajesh et al., 2012)

46

2.4.1 Illumina sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation

Illumina sequencing results from four different cDNA libraries based on important osmoregulatory

tissues (gill, antennal gland, hepatopancreas) as well as whole individual postlarvae from M.

australiense are presented in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2: Summary of raw reads and quality control of Illumina results (Q ≥ 30, 75 bp paired-end reads).

Sequencing Parameters Gill Antennal Gland Hepatopancreas PL

Number of raw reads 65,713,435 61,417,916 59,472,637 70,538,605

Read length (bp) 26-70 35-76 26-70 26-70

% of GC content 42 42 43 42

Number of read after trimming 61,184,264 57,182,730 55,385,162 65,229,834

% of read after trimming 93.10 93.10 93.12 92.47

Data from the four cDNA libraries were pooled together to make a single reference transcriptome

for M. australiense. Overall, Illumina paired end sequences were assembled into a total of 125,196

non-redundant contigs (≥200 bp) with an N50 length of 2282 bp (Table 2-3). Average and median

contig lengths for the transcriptome were 968 bp and 389 bp respectively. 27,052 contigs were

greater than 1000 bp in length. CEGMA (Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach) based

transcriptome assembly completeness test revealed 97.98% completeness for full length genes and

98.6% completeness for partial length genes, indicating a high quality transcriptome assembly. An

overview of assembly results are presented in Table 2-3.

Mitochondrial carrier protein involved in osmoregulation signal

transduction

(Menze et al., 2005)

2.4 Results

47

Table 2-3: Summary of de novo assembly and functional annotation results for M. australiense.

Number of contigs 125,196

Total bases in contigs 124,731,462

Number of large contigs (≥ 1000bp) 27,052

N50 (bp) 2,282

Average contig length 968

Median contig length 389

Contigs blasted 32,597

Contigs mapped 29,160

Contigs annotated 20,722

Transcriptome assembly completeness 97.98%

Fig 2-1: represents the top hit species distribution chart from blast results. Daphnia pulex was the top hit

species. While D. pulex is distantly related to M. australiense, it is to date, one of the crustacean species for

which a complete sequenced and well annotated genome is available. The ‘Others’ category contained many

crustacean taxa including commercially important Penaeids, in particular, P. monodon and L. vannamei.

48

2.4.2 Identification of putative osmoregulatory gene families (contigs)

32 different candidate gene families that are potentially involved with osmoregulation (Table 2-4)

were identified based on blast hits and GO annotation. Most of the key candidate genes involved

with osmoregulation in aquatic crustaceans were identified in the analysis of the M. australiense

transcriptome.

Table 2-4: Summary of identified candidate genes potentially associated with osmoregulation in M.

australiense from this study.

Contig ID Contig (Gene) Name Contig

Length

(bp)

Amino

Acid

Length

Gene Ontology (GO)

c57301_g1_i3 Alkaline phosphatase 2671 548 phosphatase activity;

metabolic process

c54762_g4_i3 Arginine kinase 1843 363 ATP binding; kinase activity; phosphorylation

c58410_g1_i4 Aquaporin (AQP) 5176 299 substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity;

transmembrane transport

c58153_g1_i1 ATP-binding cassette 11145 3471 protein binding; cellular process; regulation of

biological process; response to a stimulus

c52504_g1_i1 Carbonic anhydrase (CA) 3027 269 carbonate dehydratase activity; zinc ion binding

c46606_g1_i1 Calreticulin 1717 404 calcium ion binding

c37700_g1_i1 H+ transporting ATP

synthase

944 233 proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, ATP

synthesis coupled proton transport

c59162_g1_i2 Integrin 7468 1771 cell adhesion, stress response

c45418_g1_i2 Interleukin 2113 538 cellular response to unfolded protein

c48742_g1_i1 Mitochondrial carrier 2728 310 Ion transport

c55567_g3_i2 Na+/K+-ATPase alpha

subunit

4263 1036 sodium, potassium-exchanging potassium ion

transport; sodium ion transport; cation transmembrane

transport

c55187_g2_i1 P38 map kinase 776 103 MAP kinase activity; ATP binding; protein

phosphorylation

c46739_g1_i1 V-type proton (H+)-

ATPase

2931 426 proton-transporting V-type ATPase, proton-

transporting ATP synthase activity, proton-

transporting ATPase activity, ATP hydrolysis coupled

proton transport

c55321_g1_i1 USP6 n-terminal-like 2474 724 regulation of GTPase activity

c57918_g1_i1 Sodium Hydrogen

Exchanger

6777 672 an integral component of membrane; sodium: proton

antiporter activity, sodium ion transport; regulation of

pH; inorganic cation transmembrane transport

c57172_g1_i5 Sodium bicarbonate

cotransporter

6754 1191 sodium, bicarbonate symporter activity; anion, anion

antiporter activity; sodium ion transport; chloride

transport; bicarbonate transport

49

c54650_g1_i1 Sodium potassium chloride

cotransporter

4878 1051 sodium, potassium, chloride symporter activity;

sodium, chloride symporter activity; amino acid

transmembrane transport; potassium ion transport;

rubidium ion transport; chloride transmembrane

transport

c8687_g1_i1 Selenophosphate (SPS) 2204 326 Involved in stress tolerance

c88643_g1_i1 Sodium myo-inositol

cotransporter

2453 669 Ion transporter, transmembrane transport

c47111_g1_i1 Sodium channel protein

60e

1907 385 regulation of ion transmembrane transport; sodium ion

transmembrane transport

regulation of ion transmembrane transport

c57445_g1_i2 Sodium Calcium

Exchanger 1

8944 814 integral component of membrane; calcium, sodium

antiporter activity; calcium ion transport; cell

communication; transmembrane transport

c52329_g1_i1 Selenoprotein s 2044 209 regulation of biological process; regulation of cellular

process; response to stimulus

c58145_g1_i4 Potassium voltage-gated

channel protein shaker-like

isoform 1

5784 618 potassium ion transport; transmembrane transport;

signal transduction by phosphorylation

c44674_g1_i2 Potassium Sodium

hyperpolarization- channel

1422 342 voltage-gated potassium channel activity; potassium

ion transmembrane transport

c58353_g6_i2 Potassium channel

subfamily K member 16-

like

2476 640 potassium channel activity; potassium ion

transmembrane transport

c53215_g1_i2 Mitochondrial

transcription factor

isoform a

2244 252 response to oxidative stress and stress tolerance

c52854_g1_i1 Magnesium transporter

protein 1-like

3159 326 magnesium ion transmembrane transporter activity

c52684_g1_i1 Heat shock protein 90 3461 726 response to stress

c58231_g3_i1

Chorion peroxidase 4172 922 response to oxidative stress; oxidation-reduction

process

c58101_g3_i4 Chloride channel protein 3 6326 826 chloride transport; ion transmembrane transport;

regulation of anion transport

c28616_g2_i1 Calcium-binding

mitochondrial carrier

protein 1

293 697 transport; biological regulation, regulation of cellular

process

c56962_g1_i7 Bestrophin isoform a 2668 370 chloride transport; cellular water homeostasis

A total of 32,597 transcripts were specified with 145,870 GO terms and were assigned to GO

categories, as either associated with molecular function (33551 GOs), biological process (73826

GOs) or cellular component (38493 GOs) (Figure 2-2). The highest numbers of GO term categories

were found to be involved with biological process while molecular function showed the smallest

number.

50

Fig 2-2: Top most represented GO terms per biological categories: a) molecular function, b) cellular

component and c) biological process.

51

2.4.3 Differential gene expression (DGE) patterns

Abundance estimation of expressed genes based on transcript per million values (TPM≥ 20)

showed that 3810, 2707, 3806 and 4011 transcripts were expressed in antennal gland, gill,

hepatopancreas and post-larval tissues, respectively (Figure 2-3). 1625 transcripts were found to

be in common and expressed in all libraries. Table 2-5 shows the expression patterns (TPM values)

of the top most 10 important candidate osmoregulatory genes. The heatmap (based on quality

filtered raw read counts for differentially expressed transcripts) in supplemental figure (Figure 2-

3) shows the qualitative pattern of differentially expressed transcripts in different M. australiense

tissues.

Table 2-5: Top 10 osmoregulatory genes expressed in different tissues in adult and PL individuals.

Contig ID Contig Description Transcript Per Million (TPM)

Gill Antennal Gland Hepatopancreas Post-Larvae

c54762_g4_i3 Arginine kinase 7098 5525 2077 4153

c55567_g3_i2 Na+/K+-ATPase 660 407 90 266

c46606_g1_i1 Calreticulin 385 262 683 524

c57445_g1_i2 Na+/Ca+2 exchanger 71 74 28 80

c54650_g1_i1 Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter 115 73 50 78

c57172_g1_i5 Na+/HCO3- cotransporter 61 54 4 25

c46739_g1_i1 V-type ATPase 70 33 70 85

c59162_g1_i2 Integrin 38 31 5 21

c52504_g1_i1 Carbonic anhydrase 211 27 20 41

c8687_g1_i1 Selanophosphate 12 22 7 19

52

Fig 2-3: Venn diagram showing the number of expressed transcripts shared among different samples

based on abundance of transcripts per million (TPM).

Palaemonid prawns contain the most impressive list of crustacean invaders of freshwater from an

ancestral marine habitat and they manifest a diverse array of osmoregulatoy capacities (Towle et

al., 2011). Various tissues including gill, antennal gland and hepatopancreas all contribute to ion

balance and regulation that has allowed this family to colonise a wide variety of osmotic aquatic

niches (Shekhar et al., 2013). New technologies linked to NGS developments have allowed

mechanisms that permit adaptive colonisation of freshwater to be explored with high data

accuracy, at relatively low cost and generation of very large amounts of data (Lv et al., 2013). The

current study generated a comprehensive NGS database for a freshwater-adapted Palaemonid

species as an initial step to better understand the role of various potential candidate genes with a

2.5 Discussion

53

function in osmoregulation and to provide a model for more detailed investigations of other related

and commercially important crustacean taxa. The transcriptome was generated as a starting point

to investigate the molecular foundation for osmoregulation in FW crustaceans. M. australiense is

a freshwater inhabitant, but this taxon’s ability to tolerate brackish water conditions is well

documented (Sharma and Hughes, 2009). This species is widely distributes and abundant across

Australia and possesses a comparatively large body (provides sufficient tissue material) size,

characteristics that make it an ideal candidate species for identification of the molecular basis of

osmoregulation (and the associated candidate genes involved) under different salinity conditions.

The highest number of raw reads (over 70 million) was obtained for post-larvae (Table 2-2)

because at this early stage of the life cycle, a higher number of genes are expressed. Different

genes are expressed in different tissue types and more reads were obtained from tissues where

more genes were actively expressed (Tian et al., 2011). Thus, availability of reads can vary

according to the tissue sampled. The transcriptome data set generated here from four cDNA

libraries resulted in over 250 million copies of 75 bp paired end raw reads that generated 125,196

longer contigs from de novo assembly.

In total, 32 important gene families were identified that have potential roles in osmoregulation and

ion regulation that contribute to salinity tolerance in this species. Overall, 32,597 (25.43%) of the

assembled contigs showed significant blast hits and 20,722 (16.55%) contigs produced GO term

annotations (Table 2-3). In the current study, we identified more potential osmoregulatory genes

(32 genes, Table 2-4) compared with the total number of genes (21 genes, Table 2.1) identified in

the literature survey. This is because we focused only on prawn species for the literature review

but our GO annotation approach involved blast matching with all identified genes for many

different species that were available in the public database. Thus, the M. australiense transcriptome

54

dataset provided us with a set of potential target genes available (not only for osmoregulation but

for many other phenotypes) for further explanation in this and other related species with different

osmotic capacities so that an investigation of the key genes and their functional mutations can be

explored in greater details.

Abundance estimates of expressed genes based on TPM values showed that 1625 transcripts

common to, and expressed in, all four libraries that represent different life history stages and tissue

types. The 1625 common transcripts (Fig. 2-4) suggest an important functional role (potentially

housekeeping roles) for basic cellular maintenance in this species as they are expressed in all

tissues and at all different stages of life. The hepatopancreas in adults showed the highest number

of distinct expressed transcripts (1082) implying that it is probably the most important tissue as

this is the master tissue that controls most body functions. A higher number of transcripts (808)

were found to be expressed commonly between hepatopancreas and in PLs indicating expression

of important genes that are required for all stages of life. Gill and antennal gland tissues shared

454 transcripts in common. This is likely because these 2 tissues are involved with ion exchange

(osmoregulatory function), gas exchange and some other common functions (Lignot et al., 2000).

Based on identified candidate genes in other species, we were able to target the most important

genes related to metabolic process, ATP binding, transmembrane activities, regulation of ion

transportation, response to environmental stresses and stress tolerance in M. australiense.

Efficient osmoregulatory capacity does not depend on ion exchange only; it also involves many

other biological processes. Of the 32 osmoregulatory gene families identified here, 17 genes were

identified to be involved with transport of the most important ions (Na+, K+, H+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3-

and Cl-), all of which impact osmoregulation and influence salinity tolerance. Differential

expression patterns (based on transcript abundance estimates) of candidate genes involved with

55

osmoregulation, clearly indicate the more important role of gill and antennal gland tissues to

perform osmoregulation in adult individuals as the expression patterns of potential osmoregulatory

genes in these tissues were high compared with that seen in the hepatopancreas (Table 2-5). Of

interest however, was that postlarvae showed only moderate expression levels of the same

candidate genes. Differential gene expression patterns showed a higher number of genes expressed

differentially in post-larvae (supplemental Figure 2-3). This is likely related to rapid

developmental changes that are occurring during earlier life history stages that require raised levels

of expression of genes involved with growth, tissue development and other developmental

processes. The heatmap also shows the highest level of expression pattern in hepatopancreas for

adult prawns because this tissue is considered to be the master organ that controls most cellular

activity.

Arginine kinase (AK) in gill tissue has been recognised as one of the most important genes

associated with osmoregulatory performance. Expression levels of AK in crustacean gill tissue is

generally very high in actively osmoregulating individuals (used in energy production and

metabolism) (Abe et al., 2007; Kotlyar et al., 2000), but it also has a role in immune responses

(Kinsey and Lee, 2003; Yao et al., 2009). In the current study, AK levels in the four M. australiense

cDNA libraries were highest in gill tissue (7098 expressed copies, Table 2-5) indicating that it may

also function in energy generation for osmoregulation in M. australiense as well.

High expression levels of certain other genes including the calreticulin in the hepatopancreas and

also in PL indicates that this gene family has a role in many biological processes ranging from

Ca2+ storage (more important for PL stage involved in calcifications and metamorphosis) (Barman

et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2015), gene regulation (Duan et al., 2014; Gelebart et al., 2005), signalling

56

pathway and fast immune reaction against serious environmental stressors apart from osmotic

regulation (Tian et al., 2011; Visudtiphole et al., 2010).

NKA (Na+/K+-ATPase), is also critical for osmoregulation in M. australiense. This gene is an

important integral membrane protein involved in ion transport and ammonia excretion, so it has

an associated role in osmoregulatory systems in many taxa, but particularly in aquatic crustaceans

(Tsai and Lin, 2007). The activity of NKA in osmoregulatory tissues, where it plays a major role

in ion exchange, has been investigated in both hyper/hypo osmoregulating and osmoconforming

crustacean taxa (Charmantier and Anger, 2011; Cieluch et al., 2004; Lucu and Towle, 2003). In

this study, we identified different NKA isoforms and subunits of NKA ranging from 819-4263 bp

in sequence length. Maximum expression level was evident in gill tissue where gills obviously

provide the major osmoregulatory organs (Table 2-5). NKCC (Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter) located

in the basal membrane drives Cl- and Na+ exclusion across salt-secreting epithelia and is involved

in both Na+ and Cl- uptake and excretion powered by Na+ and Cl- turnover. Mediation of relative

expression levels of NKA during hypo/hyper osmotic challenges (Luquet et al., 2005) has been

demonstrated in a number of studies, in particular two different crab taxa Chasmagnatus

granulates and Carcinus maenas (Genovese et al., 2000). Here we also found 212-4878 bp of the

NKCC gene family involved in Na+, K+ and Cl- transport activity and transmembrane transport.

The different functions of Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) in cellular components, respiration and

metabolic process have been the focus of many case studies. Its pivotal role in the crustacean gills

is associated with Na+ and Cl- regulation and it is directly involved in ion transport in M.

australiense. Transcript lengths ranged from 218-3027 bp. This enzyme constitutes one of the

primary components of osmotic regulation, and is highly expressed in the organs that are

57

responsible for osmotic and ionic regulation (Jasmani et al., 2010; Jasmani et al., 2008; Roy et al.,

2007).

Another significant gene involved with osmoregulation in crustaceans is V-type ATPase (VA) that

is a crucial gene for regulation of ion balance and cell volume (Freire et al., 2008). The important

role/s of this gene have been documented in many aquatic animals including in; euryhaline crabs,

Carcinus maenas and Eryocheir sinensis (Weihrauch et al., 2001) and two freshwater crayfish,

Cherax destructor and C. cainii (Ali et al., 2015). Here, we identified an M. australiense VA gene

and recovered gene ontology terms indicate a role for this gene in many different complex

mechanisms including acid/base balance, nitrogen excretion, ion exchange and proton regulation

in the freshwater environment.

Some other candidate genes identified here were found to be involved with cellular response to

stress, ATP binding, regulation of biological responses, response to stimuli and in oxidative stress.

Potential genes for these processes likely include: selenoprotein, aquaporin, USP, ATP-binding

cassette, alkaline phosphatase (AP), integrin and interleukin (Table 2-3 and Table 2-4). Among

these gene families, AP codes for well-known metallo-enzymes in mammals with diverse

functions, mostly related to metabolic processes. Some studies however, have reported a role for

this gene in osmoregulatory performance in blue crab, Callinectess apidus (Lovett et al., 1994),

green crab, Scylla serrata (Park et al., 2001) and in the euryhaline crab, Cyrtograpsus angalatus

(Pinoni and Mananes, 2004). Aquaporin acts as a water channel for selective transfer of water and

other molecules across cell membranes in gill and antennal gland tissues (Gao, 2009). This gene

is directly involved in cellular osmotic challenge and cell volume regulation. Aquaporin is also

one of the most-studied genes across taxa (invertebrates to mammals) because it has a reported

58

functional role in salinity tolerance (Barman et al., 2012; Boyle et al., 2013; Grosell 2006;

Nishimura and Fan, 2003; Pongsomboon et al., 2009).

In summary, the current study has generated a comprehensive genomic resource for identification

of key candidate genes involved in osmoregulation in M. australiense and has also provided a

platform for functional genomic studies of other freshwater prawn taxa more widely. 32 different

potential genes were identified that are likely to play major functional roles in osmoregulation and

salinity tolerance processes. The current study can provide a baseline for developing a more

comprehensive understanding of the functional genomic basis of ion exchange and ion balance

processes in invertebrate aquatic taxa. Results of this study could be used for functional genomic

scans among different populations of the target species collected from different natural osmotic

niches to better understand the functional genomic adaptive processes occurring in different

natural populations. In the future, it will also be important to assess the gene expression patterns

of the major candidate genes identified here under different salinity conditions in M. australiense

to explore the interactions that contribute to effective ionic regulation in this species.

Data availability:

All of the de novo assembled sequences are available in a public data base (figshare) under the

following accession number:

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3444992.v1

59

Fig 2-4: Heatmap showing differential gene expression pattern (based on read counts) of different tissues

of adult and post-larvae. AEB= Antennal Gland, GB= Gill, HIB= Hepatopancreas, PL= Post-Larvae. Y-

axis represents the hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed transcripts, while red colored lines

indicate highly expressed transcripts and green colored lines indicate lowly expressed transcripts.

2.6 Supplementary files

60

3 Chapter 3. Understanding the genomic basis of adaptive

response to variable osmotic niches in freshwater prawns:

a comparative intraspecific analysis of Macrobrachium

australiense

1. Moshtaghi et al. (submitted). Understanding the genomic basis of adaptive response to variable

osmotic niches in freshwater prawns: a comparative intraspecific analysis of Macrobrachium

australiense. Manuscript submitted in the Journal of Heredity.

61

Understanding the genomic basis of adaptive response to variable osmotic niches in freshwater

prawns: a comparative intraspecific analysis of Macrobrachium australiense

Azam Moshtaghi, Md. Lifat Rahi, Peter B. Mather and David A. Hurwood

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Science and Engineering Faculty, School of Earth

Environmental and Biological Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia

*Corresponding author: Azam Moshtaghi, [email protected]

Email addresses:

AM: [email protected]

MDR: [email protected]

PBM: [email protected]

DAH: [email protected]

62

Understanding the molecular genetic basis that drives adaptive response to variable environmental

conditions is a central goal of evolutionary biology. Here we sought to identify potential outlier

SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in 3 populations of a freshwater prawn species;

Macrobrachium australiense exposed to differing natural osmotic niches using a comparative

transcriptomics approach to understand the molecular basis of osmoregulation. De novo assembly

of approximately 542 million (75 nt) pair end reads collected from 10 individuals revealed 123,396

long contigs/transcripts of variable length, that showed 97.38% transcriptome assembly

completeness. DGE analysis of major osmoregulatory genes revealed that Calreticulin, Na+/H+

exchanger and V-type (H+) ATPase showed the highest expression levels in the Blunder Creek

population, while Crustacean cardiovascular peptide (CCP), Na+/K+-ATPase, Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-

transporter (NKCC) and Na+/HCO3- exchanger showed the highest expression levels in the

Bulimba Creek population. In total, 16 gene ontology (GO) term categories were functionally

enriched among Blunder/Bulimba and Blunder/Stony population comparisons. We identified 4144

raw, and 835 high quality filtered SNPs, in the 3 M. australiense populations, of which 84 SNPs

were identified as outliers. Outlier loci were detected in 4 important osmoregulatory genes that

include: Calreticulin, Na+/H+ exchanger, Na+/K+-ATPase and V-type-(H+)-ATPase. All outliers in

the osmoregulatory genes were located in non-coding regulatory regions (untranslated regions,

UTRs) of the gene. We hypothesise that outlier SNPs identified here in M. australiense populations

exposed naturally to different osmotic conditions influence specific gene expression patterns that

allow individuals to respond to local environmental salinity conditions.

Keywords: Macrobrachium australiense, Semi-ALD, outlier, osmoregulation, SNPs.

3.1 Abstract

63

Life is considered to have originated first in the sea and competition among early marine species

forced some ancestral species to migrate to new environments (specifically to inland and

continental freshwaters) (Root et al., 2003). Exposure to new osmotic conditions by migrants

required rapid adaptation to permit persistence in the new environment. A common strategy for

adaptation is that genetic plasticity can lead to adaptation by selection (Lee et al., 2011). This

phenomenon is considered by many to be an interesting problems and one where evolutionary

biologists seek to understand changes at the genomic level during local adaptation (Butlin, 2010).

Of the diverse array of extant animal taxa, only a few phylogenetic groups have been able to adapt

successfully to low osmotic conditions (inland fresh waters) following a marine ancestry. One of

the most critical challenges that animals need to deal with, in this new environment is the ability

to maintain their ionic balance via osmoregulatory processes. Crustaceans are one of the major

animal groups that have made this transition successfully and, this group now displays a wide

diversity of osmoregulatory capacity (Freire et al., 2008). There are many crustacean species

therefore that provide ideal candidate species for understanding the mechanisms underlying

osmoregulatory capacity in variable osmotic gradients.

The freshwater (FW) prawn, Macrobrachium australiense is a good candidate for studying the

genetic basis for control of osmoregulation under variable environmental salinity conditions

(Luikart et al., 2003). M. australiense can complete its entire life cycle in freshwater but can also

tolerate brackish water conditions upto 17‰ salinity (Dimmock et al., 2004). Life history traits of

inland water populations of this species show an abbreviated larval development (ALD) pattern,

characterized by only a single larval stage (Short, 2004). In contrast, populations that inhabit

coastal streams and creeks and that have access to brackish waters are characterized by a Semi-

3.2 Introduction

64

ALD pattern (3-4 larval developmental stages). Length of larval duration is considered to be an

adaptive response to sub lethal osmotic conditions (Short, 2004). Thus, M. australiense provides

a good model for identifying and characterising key genetic loci and functional mutations that are

responsible for osmoregulatory performance in different sub-lethal osmotic niches.

Population genomics approaches are now widely available for investigating the molecular basis of

the adaptive process where populations are experiencing different natural environmental

conditions that show a clear footprint of natural selection on genetic variation (Kohn et al., 2006).

Such approaches are useful for understanding the process of speciation where markers derived

from transcriptomic data can identify candidate genes and functional mutations in key genes under

selection (Berdan et al., 2015). Modern genomic approaches (particularly Next-Generation

Sequencing methodologies) have made it relatively easy to either acquire a list of candidate

polymorphic loci, or to search for SNPs and/or outliers (loci under selection or adaptive loci) in a

set of candidate genes in contrast to using a blind shotgun approach to identify > 1000 SNPs from

massive sequence data. SNP calling from transcriptomic data (using expressed sequences)

provides a cost effective way for reducing genomic complexity while still retaining a significant

fraction of the functionally relevant information (De Wit et al., 2015). An important additional

outcome from this type of data is the potential to identify outlier loci from expressed sequences.

Another powerful feature of a transcriptomic data set is that it allows us to examine changes in

gene expression patterns among natural populations or different individuals in a controlled

experimental set up. Furthermore, transcriptomic approaches can focus on genetic variation in

specific candidate genes that potentially may be under selection and this allows investigation of

the molecular basis of local adaptation in wild populations (Helyar et al., 2012).

65

It has long been realised that differences in gene expression pattern play a significant role in

population specific adaptation and also in population differentiation. A number of studies have

confirmed that there is a genetic basis for differences in relative transcript abundance (Gracey et

al., 2004), that can lead to adaptive divergence in wild populations (Eguavoen et al., 2015; Leder

et al., 2015). Thus, combining gene expression pattern data (transcript abundance) and SNP

detection from the same set of individuals from a transcriptomic data set can provide a novel way

to examine the functional roles of population specific SNPs in controlling gene expression

patterns. Under recent climate change and rising sea level scenarios, it is obvious that inland

freshwater bodies face increasing threat from salinity intrusion and hence freshwater adapted biota

may potentially need to address this issue as impacts increase over time. A population genomic

study of different populations of the same species exposed naturally to different osmotic conditions

can help us to understand the process of genomic response by which species can adapt to future

climate change impacts. Genomic techniques are also being used increasingly to better understand

the genetic factors that affect variation in economically important traits in many cultured species

(Brumfield et al., 2003), but wild populations are less well studied in this regard (Luikart et al.,

2003).

M. australiense wild populations are exposed naturally to different osmotic gradients. Natural

populations therefore provide a genomic resource for identifying and characterising important

osmoregulatory genes and functional or regulatory mutations in these genes that may have

diverged during adaptation to inland freshwaters. These data can be used to investigate whether

this process is controlled largely by mutations in regulatory sequences or mutations in functional

protein coding regions. In the current study, we adopted a population genomic (transcriptomic)

approach to investigate underlying genomic control of osmoregulation in a widespread Australian

66

endemic FW prawn species, M. australiense. Overall aim of the present study was to examine

population specific expression patterns of candidate genes that influence osmotic regulatory

capacity and also to detect outlier SNPs.

3.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance

M. australiense individuals were collected from three natural populations: Blunder Creek

(17°76ʹ 4321ʺ S, 145°50ʹ 9073ʺ E), a tributary of the Herbert River in North Queensland,

Bulimba Creek (27°56ʹ 292ʺ S, 153°09ʹ 76ʺ E) and Stony Creek (26°87ʹ 87ʺ S,

152°73ʹ 1226ʺ E) tributaries of the Brisbane River that are exposed naturally to different osmotic

conditions. The Stony Creek population (considered to be a pure freshwater population) is

separated from the main channel of the Brisbane River due to Somerset dam that was built in 1935.

The Blunder Creek collection site was located upstream in the Herbert River system far from any

tidal influence and prawns in this population can complete their entire life cycles in pure low ionic

freshwater conditions. The Bulimba creek population is located only 10 kms from the Brisbane

River confluence, and only 2 kms upstream from tidal influence. Individuals in this population

have direct access to brackish water. The Stony creek population has been confined to freshwater

for less than 100 years because of the dam. Local salinity and conductivity conditions for each

sampling sites were recorded as: 0‰ and 225 µS/m for the Blunder Creek, 0‰ and 430 µS/m for

the Stony Creek, 0.5‰ and 678 µS/m for the Bulimba Creek, respectively. Salinity levels at all

sites were very similar. But very large differences in conductivity were evident among sites

contributing to different osmotic niches (sites are not different in terms of salinity but are

remarkably different for total ionic content). Thus, the Blunder Creek population site can be

3.3 Materials and methods

67

considered to be a pure FW ionic osmotic environment compared with the Stony and Bulimba

sites. To confirm species identification, total genomic DNA was extracted from sampled pleopods

and screened for a mtDNA CO1 gene fragment following methods outlined in a previous study on

M. rosenbergii (Hurwood et al., 2014). All of the sampled individuals were confirmed to be M.

australiense.

3.3.2 RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation and Illumina sequencing

For transcriptomic analyses, 10 individuals were used for Illumina sequencing at the Molecular

Genetics Research Facility (MGRF) under the Central Analytical Research Facility (CARF) at

Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Live prawns were collected from the Bulimba and

Stony creek populations and brought back to the MGRF for RNA extraction. Live individuals were

then dissected immediately to obtain fresh tissue to use for high quality RNA extraction. For the

North Queensland population, tissues (gill, antennal gland and hepatopancreas) from live animals

were dissected in the field and preserved in RNAlater® solution (Ambion, USA). Due to the

limited amount of available tissue material, tissues were pooled together from each individual

before RNA extraction. Pooled tissues were crushed into a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and

powdered tissues were used for RNA extraction using a TRIzol/chloroform extraction method.

This was followed by total RNA purification using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany)

according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA samples were treated with Turbo DNA-free

kit (Ambion, Life Technologies) for genomic DNA digestion. Integrity and concentration of

extracted total RNA was checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, version 6) and

a Nano Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific), respectively.

68

RNA samples were stored at -80 °C for later use. In total, 4 µg of total RNA was used as the

starting material for mRNA purification, using a Truseq Standard mRNA Sample Prep kit

(Illumina, USA). Purified mRNA was then fragmented into small fragments to initiate cDNA

synthesis. After synthesizing both the first and second strands of cDNA, an Illumina barcoding

adapter ligation step was performed chemically according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Adapter

ligated cDNA was purified using the AMPure XP magnetic bead (Beckman Coulter, Beverly,

USA) system combined with several subsequent washing steps. Quality of constructed cDNA

libraries were checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent), Qubit® 2.0 Fluorimeter (Invitrogen,

Life Technologies) and RT-qPCR (BJS Biotechnologies, UK). All libraries were normalized via

dilution before the final sequence run. The resulting 10 cDNA libraries (3 for Blunder creek of

North Queensland, 3 for Stony creek and 4 for Bulimba creek) were subjected to the Illumina

NextSeqTM 500 Platform for 75 bp paired end sequencing.

3.3.3 Quality control of Illumina sequence data

High through-put Illumina sequencing produced >542 million raw reads from the 10 cDNA

libraries. Initially, quality of sequence data was checked using FastQC software (Andrews, 2010).

Trimmomatic software was then used for quality filtering of raw sequence reads (Bolger et al.,

2014), to trim poor quality sequences at both ends. Only high quality and quality filtered reads

(Phred Score, Q≥30) were used in subsequent bioinformatics analyses.

3.3.4 Bioinformatics analysis

All high quality reads from the 10 cDNA libraries were pooled to make a single reference

transcriptome for the three sampled populations. De novo assembly of high quality reads was

performed using the Trinity software package (version 2014-04-13p1) applying perl script and

default settings (Haas et al., 2013) to obtain contigs. Transcriptome assembly completeness then

69

assessed using CEGMA software (Parra et al., 2007). De novo assembled contigs were then blasted

against the NCBI non-redundant database using BLAST+ (version 2.2.29) applying an e value of

1e-5 for significant blast hits. Resulting blasted files were loaded into Blast2GO pro software

(version 3.0) (Camacho et al., 2009) to map and annotate sequences and to determine the potential

functions of each transcript based on gene ontology (GO) analysis. Annotated contigs were then

resubmitted to Blast2Go pro software for InterProScanning in order to obtain InterProScan

domains. The data set was checked carefully to identify and extract candidate genes with any

potential role in osmoregulation and/or ion balance maintenance based on GO term categories.

3.3.5 SNP detection

Each cDNA library was mapped individually to the reference transcriptome using BOWTIE2

(Berdan et al., 2015; Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) applying default parameters. We used

PICARD software to mark and remove duplicate reads. De-duplicated reads were then realigned

to the reference transcriptome using the software GENOME ANALYSIS TOOLKIT (GATK)

(Auwera et al., 2013; De Pristo et al., 2011) to correct mapping-related artefacts. SNPs were then

called using the GATK-module Unified Genotyper, applying default settings from the GATK

website. After the primary step of SNP calling we applied several levels of filtering. At the first

level, GATK used a threshold of 30 (QUAL > 30) to filter all SNPs based on Phred-scaled quality

score. Next, we filtered out variants of more than 10 % (DP ≥ 10) of the reads that had a mapping

quality of zero. Then, variants were further removed if any of the following criteria were true:

normalized quality score by the amount of coverage was < 2 (QD < 2.0), root mean square for

mapping quality across all genotypes were < 40 (MQ < 40.0), Phred-scaled P-value for the Fisher

exact test for stand base was > 60 (FS > 60.0) and Haplotype score was > 13.0 (Berdan et al.,

2015).

70

3.3.6 Outlier detection

Quality filtered SNPs obtained from GATK software were then loaded in VCFTOOLS to convert

SNPs into VCF format and these data were then loaded into the PGDSpider software program

(Lischer and Excoffier, 2012) to convert to appropriate data format for outlier loci detection. The

data set was then loaded in BAYESCAN (Foll and Gaggiotti, 2008) software for Outlier detection.

3.3.7 Differential gene expression (DGE) and functional enrichment analysis

For DGE analysis, we estimated transcript abundance initially using RSEM software (Li and

Dewey, 2011). Transcript abundance data were then loaded subsequently into the edgeR

Bioconductor package for final DGE analysis (Haas et al., 2013). The Trinotate software package

was used to perform functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed transcripts

(Brekhman et al, 2015). At first, assembled contigs were blasted locally against three different

protein databases: SwissPort, Uniref90 and Pfam. All GO term categories were then extracted for

each gene feature including all parent terms using Perl script in Trinotate software. Final

enrichment analysis results were obtained in the software package Bioconductor GOSeq that

yielded enriched and depleted gene sets at FDR≤ 0.001 (Young et al., 2010).

3.4.1 Illumina sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation

De novo assembly of high quality Illumina paired end sequences yielded a total of 123,396 non-

redundant contigs (≥ 200 bp) with an N50 value of 2423 bp. In total, 30,764 contigs showed

significant blast hits and 27,325 contigs received GO terms. Table 3-1 shows the detailed features

of the assembly and annotation statistics for the M. australiense libraries. CEGMA (Core

Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach) based transcriptome assembly completeness test revealed

3.4 Results

71

97.38% complete mapping, a result that confirms the relatively high quality of the M. australiense

transcriptome data set. The top hit species distribution chart in figure 3-1 (supplementary figure)

shows the highest top hit matches with a micro-crustacean, Daphnia pulex. In total, 138,438 GO

terms were obtained for 30,764 transcripts that had significant blast hits (figure 3-2, supplementary

figure shows the top most abundant GO term categories) and the GOs involved in three different

processes including: biological process, molecular function and cellular components.

Table 3-1: Assembly, annotation and transcriptome completeness features of M. australiense.

Parameters Results

Total Number of Reads 542,062,139

Number of Assembled Contigs 123,396

Number of bases assembled 124,731,462

N50 value 2423

Average contig length 1010.82

Transcriptome completeness 97.38%

Number of contigs blasted 30,764

Number of contigs mapped 27,325

Number of contigs annotated 19,337

3.4.2 Candidate gene identification and differential gene expression (DGE) analysis

In total, 32 different candidate gene families in the M. australiense data set were found to be

involved with osmoregulation in this species (Table 3-6, supplementary table). The heatmap in

figure 3-4 (supplementary figure) presents the expression patterns of 9,374 differentially expressed

transcripts in the three different M. australiense populations sampled here. Table 3-2 shows

transcript abundance (in TPM values where TPM stands for transcript abundance per million of

reads) based expression pattern of the 15 most important osmoregulatory genes in the 3 sampled

populations. The other 17 osmoregulatory genes identified here (Table 3-2) are known to play

72

either minor or indirect role/s in osmoregulation in the target species. Table 3-3 shows the

expression pattern of the top 20 expressed genes in the three M. australiense populations.

Table 3-2: Abundance estimation (DGE) of the most important 15 osmoregulatory genes between three

different populations of Macrobrachium australiense.

Transcript ID Gene Name Bulimba Creek Stony Creek Blunder Creek

c57163_g1_i2 Alkaline Phosphatase 416.34 296.47 152.13

c58766_g7_i1 Aquaporin 223.78 227.82 234.62

c58721_g2_i2 Arginine Kinase 1026.41 924.75 915.25

c57014_g1_i1 Calreticulin 586.13 659.97 1052.66

c44335_g2_i2 Carbonic Anhydrase 121.15 112.19 90.83

c51607_g1_i1 Crustacean Cardiovascular Peptide 1038.74 803.93 530.55

c55224_g2_i1 Mitochondrial Carrier protein 6.08 7.86 2.3

c60147_g2_i1 Na+/K+-ATPase 1068.71 573.99 510.96

c57874_g2_i4 Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter 806.37 212.83 103.57

c60020_g1_i2 Na+/HCO3- Exchanger 667.97 321.88 139.94

c59059_g1_i4 Na+/Ca+2 Exchanger 13.72 15.88 16.6

c59083_g1_i8 Na+/H+ Exchanger 618.89 626.93 1050.53

c46998_g1_i1 Na+/K+/Ca+2 Exchanger 1.95 0.54 0

c50128_g1_i1 Selanophosphate 23.69 26.2 19.4

c57275_g2_i2 V-type H+-ATPase 717.85 795.94 1414.22

Table 3-3: Top 20 genes/transcripts expressed in different populations of M. australiense.

Blunder Creek Population Bulimba Creek population Stony Creek Population

Transcript ID Description TPM Transcript ID Description TPM Transcript ID Description TPM

c7022_g1 Hypothetical

protein

136595 c7022_g1 Hypothetical

protein

125548 c7022_g1 Hypothetical protein 89473

c56593_g1 α-actin 26014 c57533_g1 Uncharacterized 40361 c54062_g2 GTPase protein 17611

c57533_g1 Uncharacterized 25104 c58711_g5 Phospholipase 19201 c58434_g3 Ca+2 binding protein 12239

c58434_g3 Ca+2 binding

protein

18046 c55913_g1 α-elongation

factor

14918 c54527_g1 Uncharacterized 11901

c58711_g5 Phospholipase 13670 c50364_g1 Cytochrome Cii 14190 c50364_g1 Cytochrome Cii 11364

c56593_g3 Actin 13476 c56488_g2 Uncharacterized 10995 c58711_g5 Phospholipase 10142

c57805_g1 Myosin 8117 c56488_g3 Uncharacterized 9836 c59176_g7 Uncharacterized 10058

c52370_g1 Uncharacterized 7821 c52418_g1 Uncharacterized 9754 c59176_g4 Hypothetical protein 9465

c50254_g1 Uncharacterized 7638 c52219_g1 Reproductive

protein (male)

8329 c55913_g1 α-elongation factor 8376

73

c59291_g1 Troponin 7545 c57602_g1 Cytochrome Ci 7810 c57602_g1 Cytochrome Ci 8311

c56488_g3 Uncharacterized 6995 c59871_g1 Receptor protein 7145 c60174_g1 Uncharacterized 6854

c55913_g1 α-elongation

factor

6870 c54612_g1 Cytochrome Ciii 5992 c54612_g1 Cytochrome Ciii 5602

c52219_g1 Reproductive

protein (male)

6326 c56593_g1 α-actin 5906 c56097_g1 POU class protein 4259

c52418_g1 Uncharacterized 6127 c51222_g1 60S ribosomal

protein

5771 c56593_g1 α-actin 4204

c45223_g1 Myosin protein 5478 c47530_g1 Uncharacterized 5633 c57785_g1 Actin 1 4170

c58683_g4 Myosin protein 5234 c49357_g1 Ribosomal protein 5425 c56693_g3 Actin 4085

c53420_g1 40S ribosomal

protein

4761 c60338_g1 Transitional

protein

5398 c53495_g1 Uncharacterized

protein

4047

c47530_g1 Uncharacterized 4626 c7100_g1 34 ribosomal

protein

5390 c53063_g1 Pleckstrin homology

protein

3882

c50178_g1 37 ribosomal

protein

4507 c38441_g1 18S ribosomal

protein

5099 c51222_g1 60S ribosomal

protein

3773

c7100_g1 34 ribosomal

protein

4441 c50924_g1 35 ribosomal

protein

4977 c57948_g3 Protein inhibitor 3705

3.4.3 SNP and outlier detection

Table 3-4 shows the number of raw and high quality SNPs identified in the three sampled M.

australiense populations. Number of raw SNPs was quite high but after several filtering steps, only

248-308 high quality filtered SNPs were obtained among the populations.

Table 3-4: SNP table for three Macrobrachium australiense populations.

Populations

Blunder Creek Stony Creek Bulimba Creek

Total number of raw SNPs 1292 1351 1501

Total number of filtered SNPs 248 279 308

Figure 3-1 represents the number of common and population specific outlier loci detected for

different populations. Bulimba/Stony comparison showed the lowest number (8) of outliers while

74

the Blunder/Bulimba comparison showed the highest number (17) of population specific outliers.

All populations shared 18 outlier contig (loci) in common.

Fig 3-1: Venn diagram of outlier contigs for different population comparisons (Blunder/Bulimba

comparison in blue, Blunder/Stony comparison in yellow and Bulimba/Stony comparison in green).

3.4.4 Functional enrichment analysis

Significantly enriched GO categories for Blunder/Bulimba and Blunder/Stony population pairs are

presented in the Table 3-5. In total, 16 different GO categories were significantly enriched for

differentially expressed transcripts between Blunder/Bulimba and Blunder/Stony population pairs.

Table 3-5: Enriched GO terms for the Blunder/Bulimba comparison and the Blunder/Stony comparison.

GO-ID Term Category GO

Level

FDR P-value for

Blunder/Bulimba

FDR P-value for

Blunder/Stony

GO:0042302 Cuticle structural

constituent

MF 23 0.00000 0.00000

GO:0007602 Phosphorylation BP 09 0.00001 0.00001

GO:0018298 Protein

chromosome

linkage

BP 07 0.00001 0.00004

GO:0009881 Receptor activity MF 07 0.00003 0.00001

GO:0005198 Structural

molecular

activity

MF 23 0.00002 0.00008

GO:0006030 Metabolic

process

BP 06 0.00005 N/A

GO:0009583 Stimulus

detection

BP 09 0.00006 0.00005

75

GO:0005856 Cytoskeleton CC 12 0.00008 N/A

GO:0008061 Chitin binding MF 06 0.00009 N/A

GO:1901071 Glucose

metabolic

process

BP 06 0.00009 N/A

GO:0006040 Amino acid

metabolic

process

BP 06 0.0001 N/A

GO:0005576 Extracellular

region

CC 12 0.0002 0.0002

GO:0006022 Aminoglycan

metabolism

BP 06 0.0004 N/A

GO:0031409 Protein binding MF 04 N/A 0.0007

GO:0007165 Signal

transduction

BP 27 0.0001 0.0001

GO:2000257 Protein activation BP 09 0.0007 N/A

The comparative population transcriptomic data set generated here for three populations of M.

australiense exposed naturally to different ionic conditions provides an important genomic

resource for understanding the functional role of key osmoregulatory genes. Mechanistic aspects

of osmoregulation in aquatic environments requires: i) sensing an osmotic stress, ii) ionic

regulation via active uptake or release of ions depending on the surrounding medium, iii) active

ion transport, transfer signals, regulatory cellular volume increase or decrease depending on

external environmental conditions, iv) and activating pathways and specific candidate genes to

respond to the stressors. In total, 32 different candidate genes (Table 3-6, supplementary table)

were found to be involved with osmoregulatory control in this species. The diversity of genes

identified reinforces the complex nature of this trait in the target species. Currently the most

important osmoregulatory genes identified in crustaceans are considered to be: Alkaline

Phosphatase, Aquaporin (AQP), Arginine Kinase, Calreticulin (CRT), Carbonic Anhydrase (CA),

Crustacean Cardiovascular Peptide (CCP), Mitochondrial Carrier Protein, Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA),

Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter (NKCC), Na+/HCO3- Exchanger, Na+/Ca+2 Exchanger, Na+/H+

3.5 Discussion

76

Exchanger (NHE), Na+/K+/Ca+2 Exchanger, Selanophosphate and V-type H+-ATPase (VTA) (Ali

et al., 2015; Faleiros et al., 2010; Freire et al., 2008; Gao, 2009; Gillanders et al., 2003; Henry et

al., 2003; Kotlyar et al., 2000; Luana et al., 2007; Tsai and Lin, 2007). These important

osmoregulatory genes are well studied in a range of crustacean species and are known to be

involved with: ion transport, ion exchange, cell volume control, signal transduction, activating

pathways and sensing osmotic stress (Ali et al., 2015; Freire et al., 2008; Genovese et al., 2005;

Stillman et al., 2008; Faleiros et al., 2010). Other candidate genes that have a minor or indirect

role in adaptive responses however, have remained unstudied or are only poorly characterised.

Table 3-2 showed the expression patterns (in terms of transcript abundance per million reads,

TPM) of the osmoregulatory genes that are considered to be the most important. More than 50 %

(8 out of 15) of the most important candidate gene families showed similar expression patterns (no

large variation in expression pattern were detected) among the sampled populations. In contrast,

Calreticulin, CCP, NKA, NKCC, VTA, NHE and Na+/HCO3- exchanger showed large differences

in expression among the three sampled M. australiense populations indicating that they likely play

more important roles in osmotic adaptive responses in M. australiense under different natural ionic

conditions. NKA, NKCC, VTA and Na+/HCO3- exchanger are the main genes that are directly

involved with active uptake and release of a range of ions used to maintain ion balance and achieve

ion regulation (Barman et al., 2012; Faleiros et al., 2010). VTA is also involved with cellular

volume control apart from maintaining ionic balance and is expressed at higher levels under pure

freshwater conditions (Stillman et al., 2008). Calreticulin acts as a salinity stress biomarker and

transfers osmotic signals while providing energy to address osmoregulatory stress (Barman et al.,

2012). We observed highest expression level for VTA, NHE and Calreticulin in the Blunder Creek

population (exposed to pure, low ionic freshwater conditions) compared with the other two

77

populations. Potentially, this is because osmoregulation for M. australiense individuals is more

energy expensive under pure low ionic freshwater conditions than in brackish water, and raised

expression levels of Calreticulin may provide the additional energy required to address this

challenge. In addition, higher expression level of NHE likely plays a pivotal role in absorbing ions

from water and releasing H+ into water in Blunder Creek, an environment characterized by low

ionic conditions. Another major challenge in low ionic freshwater conditions is to maintain cell

volume and resist ion loss from the body and higher expression of VTA in this regard may assist

in this process. These three gene families obviously play more important roles in M. australiense

osmoregulation under freshwater conditions compared with their individual role(s) in

brackishwater.

CCP, NKA, NKCC and Na+/HCO3- exchanger genes showed highest expression levels in the

Bulimba Creek population which indicates an important role for these four genes in salinity

tolerance. NKA, NKCC and Na+/HCO3- exchanger genes play a critical role in osmoregulation

under brackishwater or under higher osmotic gradient conditions by actively pumping out excess

ions gained from surrounding water (Ali et al., 2015; Anger 2003, Barman et al., 2012). Thus,

individuals in Bulimba Creek may overcome the problem of gaining excess ions by expressing

these three gene families at higher levels. In contrast, individuals also need to regulate their body

fluid (haemolymph) concentration under a changing osmotic gradient. Relatively high expression

levels of CCP in M. australiense individuals under brackishwater conditions potentially may

promote production of more haemolymph (Zhao et al., 2015) that allows individuals to deal with

this osmotic challenge.

The top 20 differentially expressed genes among the sampled populations in Table 3-3 shows that

both specific mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Actin, Cytochrome, 18S, 37S, 40S, 60S RNA etc.)

78

were all highly expressed. Not all highly expressed genes in all populations were involved with

osmoregulatory activities, even though they were exposed to different osmotic conditions. The

role(s) of other genes that do not have a primary osmotic role and are likely to be involved with

house-keeping activities specific to this species. Functional enrichment analysis of all

differentially expressed genes (Table 3-5) revealed an absence of enriched GO categories in the

Bulimba/Stony comparison while significant enrichment was observed in both the

Blunder/Bulimba and Blunder/Stony comparisons. FW prawns collected from Bulimba and Stony

Creeks showed similar expression patterns and as a result no significantly enriched GO categories

were detected. Significant differences were observed however, in comparisons of gene expression

patterns between individuals from Blunder/Stony and Blunder/Bulimba population pairs. As a

result, there were significantly enriched GO categories identified in these two comparisons. This

distinction most probably reflects a more distant phylogeographical relationship between the

Blunder Creek population with the other two populations (separated geographically by >1800

kms).

Transcriptome wide SNP calling revealed 4,144 raw and 835 high quality filtered SNP variants

among the 3 sampled populations (Table 3-4). Figure 3-1 shows both population specific outliers

and common outlier loci in population comparisons. In total, 84 contigs were found to show

outliers in at least one comparison. Nearly half of the outlier contigs (40 out of 84) were unique to

only a single population comparison and 18 contigs were found to be outliers in all three

comparisons. Considerably higher numbers of outliers were obtained when comparisons involved

the Blunder Creek population. This confirms that the Blunder Creek population was more often

different for gene expression patterns for potentially adaptive loci. In part, at least this may result

from geographical isolation between the north (Blunder) and the two southern sampling sites

79

(Bulimba and Stony), but also likely reflects impacts of different osmotic environments. A

relatively high number (18) of common outliers in all comparisons potentially indicate that genetic

response to freshwater invasion of inland waters has occurred under strong selection pressure on

specific expressed genes influencing osmoregulation in the newly invaded environment. Bulimba

and Stony Creek are both tributaries of the Brisbane River and share many common environmental

features as they are members of the same major catchment. While Bulimba and Stony populations

of M. australiense have been physically isolated from each other over the last 80 years due to the

dam construction, this time has not been sufficient from an evolutionary time perspective for novel

adaptive mutations to develop.

Identification of outlier loci under selection can provide important insights for understanding local

adaptation and speciation under different environmental or ecological conditions (Rundle and

Nosil, 2005). With the advent of modern genomic tools, there is now well-accepted and developed

methodology that can identify adaptive genetic loci using transcriptome scanning and examination

of a large number of loci to detect outlier loci (Storz, 2005). Here we identified four different

outlier loci in identified target candidate (osmoregulatory) genes: Na+/H+ exchanger, Na+/K+-

ATPase, V-type-(H+)-ATPase and Calreticulin. These four genes are considered to be the major

candidate genes involved with osmoregulation in a wide range of aquatic crustacean species. We

compared sequences of the outlier contigs/genes between the different sampled populations to

determine the physical locations of identified oulier SNPs (the mutations could either be in coding

regions of the gene or in untranslated regions, UTRs). All outlier SNPs in the 4 important

osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense were found to be present in UTR regions (outside protein

coding regions) and were located prior to the start codon region. This suggests that they are likely

to be regulatory mutations that control gene expression patterns of the functional genes.

80

Osmoregulation is a complex physiological trait and the genomic control of adaptive response

under different osmotic conditions can be mediated by changes in gene expression pattern initially

(i.e. genes regulation) but longterm adaptation to a changed osmotic niche is more likely to involve

adaptive mutations in functional parts of a gene. Here, we found most mutations (outliers) in M.

australiense were located outside of coding regions (i.e. in UTRs), suggesting that osmoregulatory

control under different environmental conditions is not controlled by changes in amino acid

sequence in M. australiense, rather it is controlled by regulatory mutations that alter expression

patterns of essentially identical functional genes. This implies that adaptation by M. australiense

to various osmotic niches is likely to be an ongoing process and is currently largely controlled by

changes in gene expression under different environmental conditions. M. australiense in general,

can tolerate a wide range of variation in sub lethal salinity conditions naturally and so would

unlikely be impacted severely by any climate change effects including long term changes in local

salinity levels. The more critical issue however, will be to determine how quickly individuals can

respond and whether they experience stress during this process that may affect their normal growth

and development.

81

Fig 3-2: Top hit species distribution chart (absolute values of blast match hits with different species).

3.6 Supplementary files

82

83

Fig 3-3: Top most abundant GO term categories for different mechanisms: a) biological process, b) cellular

component and c) molecular function (absolute number of expressed transcripts assigned to each GO

categories).

Fig 3-4: Expression pattern of the differentially expressed transcripts for individuals collected from

different populations (the red coloured transcripts are highly expressed or upregulated and the green

coloured transcripts are downregulated). BuC = Bulimba Creek, StC = Stony Creek, BlC = Blunder Creek

84

Table 3-6: Summary of the identified candidate genes potentially associated with osmoregulation in M.

australiense from this study. (GenBank Accession Numbers will be available upon acceptance of the

paper).

Transcript ID Transcript/Gene

Name

Transcript

Length (bp)

Amino Acid

Length

Functional Roles of the Genes Based

on Gene Ontology (GO)

GenBank

accession # c57163_g1_i2 Alkaline phosphatase 2684 548 phosphatase activity;

metabolic process

c53495_g1_i4 Arginine kinase 1856 436 ATP binding; kinase activity;

phosphorylation

c59694_g2_i2 Aquaporin (AQP) 4809 318 substrate-specific transmembrane

transporter activity; transmembrane

transport

c55960_g1_i1 ATP-binding cassette 7159 1849 protein binding; cellular process;

regulation of biological process;

response to a stimulus

c44335_g2_i2 Carbonic anhydrase

(CA)

1444 467 carbonate dehydratase activity; zinc ion

binding

c57014_g1_i1

Calreticulin 1728 404 calcium ion binding

c59009_g2_i1 H+ transporting ATP

synthase

3809 604 proton-transporting ATP synthase

activity, ATP synthesis coupled proton

transport

c59162_g1_i2 Integrin 7438 1761 cell adhesion, stress response

c43728_g2_i1 Interleukin 2348 538 cellular response to unfolded protein c57027_g1_i1 Mitochondrial carrier 2758 310 Ion transport

c60147_g2_i1 Na+/K+-ATPase alpha

subunit

5197 1009 sodium, potassium-exchanging

potassium ion transport; sodium ion

transport; cation transmembrane

transport

c54650_g4_i2 P38 map kinase 1550 365 MAP kinase activity; ATP binding;

protein phosphorylation

c57275_g2_i2 V-type proton (H+)-

ATPase

4984 840 proton-transporting V-type ATPase,

proton-transporting ATP synthase

activity, proton-transporting ATPase

activity, ATP hydrolysis coupled

proton transport

c54022_g1_i1 USP6 n-terminal-like 2310 640 regulation of GTPase activity

c58582_g2_i1 Sodium Hydrogen

Exchanger

6805 663 an integral component of membrane;

sodium: proton antiporter activity,

sodium ion transport; regulation of pH;

inorganic cation transmembrane

transport

c60020_g1_i4 Sodium bicarbonate

cotransporter

4475 1191 sodium, bicarbonate symporter

activity; anion, anion antiporter

activity; sodium ion transport; chloride

transport; bicarbonate transport

85

c59709_g1_i1 Sodium potassium

chloride cotransporter

4882 1066 sodium, potassium, chloride symporter

activity; sodium, chloride symporter

activity; amino acid transmembrane

transport; potassium ion transport;

rubidium ion transport; chloride

transmembrane transport

c50128_g1_i1 Selenophosphate

(SPS)

2205 326 Involved in stress tolerance

c54700_g2_i1 Sodium myo-inositol

cotransporter

1775 410 Ion transporter, transmembrane

transport

c45470_g2_i1 Sodium channel

protein 60e

1907 385 regulation of ion transmembrane

transport; sodium ion transmembrane

transport

regulation of ion transmembrane

transport

c59059_g1_i2 Sodium Calcium

Exchanger 1

6552 846 integral component of membrane;

calcium, sodium antiporter activity;

calcium ion transport; cell

communication; transmembrane

transport

c51905_g1_i2 Selenoprotein s 1955 209 regulation of biological process;

regulation of cellular process; response

to stimulus

c57071_g1_i2 Potassium voltage-

gated channel protein

shaker-like isoform 1

4762 618 potassium ion transport;

transmembrane transport; signal

transduction by phosphorylation

c45473_g1_i1 Potassium Sodium

hyperpolarization-

channel

1735 423 voltage-gated potassium channel

activity; potassium ion transmembrane

transport

c58346_g1_i2 Potassium channel

subfamily K member

16-like

3813 640 potassium channel activity; potassium

ion transmembrane transport

c52212_g1_i2 Mitochondrial

transcription factor

isoform a

2243 296 response to oxidative stress and stress

tolerance

c52854_g1_i1 Magnesium

transporter protein 1-

like

3140 326 magnesium ion transmembrane

transporter activity

c58746_g1_i2 Heat shock protein 90 3460 726 response to stress

c56292_g1_i1 Chorion peroxidase 4116 922 response to oxidative stress; oxidation-

reduction process

c57861_g1_i4 Chloride channel

protein 3

5229 826 chloride transport; ion transmembrane

transport; regulation of anion transport

c53950_g2_i2 Calcium-binding

mitochondrial carrier

protein 1

3224 697 transport; biological regulation,

regulation of cellular process

c58142_g8_i2 Bestrophin isoform a 2637 370 chloride transport; cellular water

homeostasis

86

4 Chapter 4. An investigation of gene expression patterns

that contribute to effective osmoregulation in

Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of adaptive

responses to variable sub-lethal osmotic conditions

1. Moshtaghi et al. (submitted). An investigation of gene expression patterns that contribute to

effective osmoregulation in Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of adaptive responses to

variable osmotic gradients. Manuscript submitted in the Hydrobiologia.

87

An investigation of gene expression patterns that contribute to effective osmoregulation in

Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of adaptive responses to variable sub-lethal osmotic

conditions

Authors: Azam Moshtaghi*, Md. Lifat Rahi, Peter B. Mather and David A. Hurwood

Queensland University of Technology, Science and Engineering Faculty, Earth Environment and

Biological Sciences School

*Corresponding author: Azam Moshtaghi, PhD Candidate, Queensland University of Technology,

Science and Engineering Faculty, School of Earth Environment and Biological Sciences, 2 George Street,

Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Md. Lifat Rahi, PhD Candidate, Queensland University of Technology, Science and Engineering Faculty,

School of Earth Environment and Biological Sciences, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4001,

Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Peter B Mather, Adjunct Professor, Queensland University of Technology, Science and Engineering

Faculty, School of Earth Environment and Biological Sciences, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland

4001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

David A Hurwood, Senior Lecturer, Queensland University of Technology, Science and Engineering

Faculty, School of Earth Environment and Biological Sciences, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland

4001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

88

An investigation of gene expression patterns that contribute to effective osmoregulation in

Macrobrachium australiense: assessment of adaptive responses to variable sub-lethal

osmotic conditions

The present study was conducted to assess osmoregulatory performance and gene expression

patterns of five candidate osmoregulatory genes in a euryhaline Palaemonid prawn species,

Macrobrachium australiense, exposed to three sub-lethal salinities across six different time

intervals up to 120 hours, using qRT-PCR. Relative gene expression patterns revealed

comparatively higher expression levels of Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) and Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter

(NKCC) genes at raised sub-lethal salinities (5‰ and 10‰). At 0‰ vs 10‰, expression levels of

these two genes were significantly higher (p < 0.05) and showed 2-3 fold and 4-6 fold higher

(higher in 10‰ than 0‰) expression levels for NKA and NKCC, respectively. Significantly

different expression levels (p < 0.05) were also observed for the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) gene

among salinity treatments up to 24 hours, after which expression levels remained essentially

constant across all treatments. A similar pattern was evident for the V-type H+-ATPase (VTA)

gene over the same time frame (significant differences up to 24 hours and then constant

subsequently). The water channel regulatory gene, Aquaporin (AQP) showed very high expression

levels initially (1 hour) that were significantly different among treatments (p < 0.05), gene

expression levels then declined subsequently to the end of the experiment (120 hour). Results of

this study indicate that the target genes examined here are likely to play key roles in adaptive

responses to variable environmental salinity conditions in the wild.

Key words: Palaemonid prawn, gene expression, osmoregulation, M. australiense, qRT-PCR

4.1 Abstract

89

Environmental salinity concentration in aquatic environments is considered to be one of the most

important abiotic factors that determine species boundaries, their natural distributions and their

potential for adaptive radiation (Anger, 2013). Variation in salinity levels can lead to osmotic stress

that potentially may alter osmotic concentrations in aquatic animal tissues and this can affect

adversely natural distributions, physiology and long-term persistence of organisms (Vogt, 2013).

Osmotic stress has been considered to be an acute stress and in multi-cellular organisms it can be

controlled by a number of functional genes in specific target tissues that prepare individuals to

cope with external changes in environmental salinity (Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016). During

acclimation to osmotic stress, significant changes can occur in target aquatic organisms, including

changes to protein structure and changes in permeability and function of gill epithelium cells; this

can modify expression patterns of key genes that regulate internal body osmotic conditions (Nadal

et al., 2011; Barman et al., 2012).

A vast number of crustacean taxa are well adapted to environmental osmotic challenges because

many regularly transit between fresh and saline water environments, and are therefore able to

osmoregulate successfully under a wide range of environmental salinities (Vogt, 2013). Recent

studies of some crustacean taxa have revealed specialized attributes of their physiology and

morphology that allow successful adaptation to variable sub-lethal saline environments (Freire et

al., 2008; McNamara et al., 2015; Mykles and Hui, 2015). Specialized gill features have evolved

in many crustacean taxa in response to associated selection pressures (e.g. lack or excess of ions

in the external medium) that allow active transport and ion exchange against any osmotic gradient

(Lee et al., 2011; McNamara and Faria, 2012).

4.2 Introduction

90

Paleamonid prawns are one of the most successful crustacean groups that have colonized

freshwater environments multiple times during their evolutionary history and that can show

efficient osmoregulatory performance under a wide range of salinity conditions. This group of

prawns is known to have originated from an ancestral tropical marine clade that has shown a

worldwide evolutionary tendency to colonize freshwater after first successfully invading estuarine

environments (Augusto et al., 2009; Anger, 2013; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016). One of the

most diversified and species rich genus in the palaemonid group is the genus Macrobrachium that

includes approximately 258 extant species, globally (Wowor et al., 2009; Pileggi and Mantelatto,

2010). Macrobrachium spp. display a wide variety of life history strategies and occur in a diverse

array of aquatic habitats and naturally occupy a wide range of environments (including salinities).

They also show a wide variety of behavioural patterns that allow them to deal with changing

external environments (Jalihal et al., 1993; Murphy and Austin, 2005). Thus, Macrobrachium taxa

provide excellent models for investigating the genomic basis of effective osmoregulation in

aquatic crustaceans.

As a model for the current study, Macrobrachium australiense is appropriate for exploring the

functional genomic basis of adaptive responses to variable environmental salinity conditions. This

is the most widespread freshwater prawn species across mainland Australia and is also one of the

few that has adapted successfully to a fully freshwater life style (Dimmock et al., 2004). Natural

populations can also be found in brackish water (upper regions of estuaries) and under laboratory

conditions they can tolerate salinity up to 17‰ (Sharma and Hughes, 2009). Moreover, they

possess a moderate body size that can provide sufficient tissue material from different organs to

investigate tissue specific functional roles in osmoregulation under a variety of environmental

conditions. Gill tissue from M. australiense in particular provides an ideal target tissue (because

91

genes for ionic regulation are highly expressed there) to understand genomic responses (expression

patterns of osmoregulatory genes) under a variety of environmental conditions (various salinity

levels).

Recent genomic technological advances now offer great power for investigating the molecular

basis of a variety of important ecological and evolutionary research questions at fine detail. In

particular, a real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) approach is a highly cost

effective and reliable method for measuring gene expression patterns of specific candidate genes

under different environmental conditions to better understand the functional genomic basis of a

specific adaptive response. In a previous study that used a next generation sequencing (NGS)

approach, 32 potential candidate genes were identified that are likely to play a role in

osmoregulation and salinity tolerance in M. australiense (Moshtaghi et al., 2016). To date, the

most important osmoregulatory genes in crustaceans are reported to be: Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA),

V-type H+-ATPase (VTA), Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter (NKCC),

Aquaporin (AQP), Na+/HCO3- Co-transporter (NHC), Carbonic Anhydrase (CA), Claudin and

Calreticulin (Barman et al., 2012; Ali et al., 2015; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016; Moshtaghi et

al., 2016). In general, the functional roles of these genes involve active ion transport and exchange,

tolerance of osmotic stress, water channel maintenance and regulatory cell volume control. There

are also a number of additional osmoregulatory genes but they are considered to play minor roles

in adaptive responses to salinity changes in crustaceans (Nadal et al., 2011).

In the current study, a qRT-PCR based gene expression study was conducted on five

osmoregulatory genes (NKA, NKCC, NHE, AQP and VTA) that are considered to be the major

genes involved with adaptive response to variation in external salinity levels in crustacean taxa.

The objectives of the study were to measure relative gene expression levels of the five genes in M.

92

australiense exposed to three experimental sub-lethal salinity levels (0‰, 5‰ and 10‰) at

different time intervals over a period of five days, to understand the potential roles that they play

in the adaptive response.

4.3.1 Sample collection and maintenance

Specimens of the target species (M. australiense) for this study was collected from Samford Creek

(27°23′22 S, 152°52′37 E) located at the SERF (Samford Ecological Research Facility) of QUT

(Queensland University of Technology). Water salinity, conductivity and temperature at the

sampling site were 0‰, 448 µS/cm and 23ᴼ C, respectively at time of collection. In total, 183 live

adult prawns varying in size (3-7 g in total body weight) were collected using a 3m seine net.

Individuals were then transferred in plastic containers with aeration to the Banyo Pilot Plant

Precinct of QUT. 24 rectangular 25L glass fishtanks were used for this experiment. Tanks were

filled initially with 8L of tap water and sampled individuals maintained under continuous aeration

for 5 days, removing any chlorine from the water. Natural creek water was sourced from the same

location where the prawns were sampled and added to each tank to minimize stress, bringing the

total volume to 20L per tank. Six to eight prawns (depending on individual size) were allocated

randomly to each tank. Prawns were then acclimated to tank conditions over 14 days prior to the

commencement of the salinity stress experiment. Individuals in each tank were fed once a day (late

afternoon) with commercially available aquarium pellets (Ocean NutritionTMFormula 2).

4.3.2 Salinity stress experiment and tissue collection

Saline water was prepared to 40‰ by mixing sea salt (Tropic Marine® Pro-Reef) with de-

chlorinated tap water. Saline water was then added slowly to each tank to establish three

experimental salinity levels. Three different salinities (0‰, 5‰ and 10‰) were maintained for

4.3 Methodology

93

this experiment with eight replicate tanks (total 24 tanks) used for each treatment. Salinity was

raised by 2.5‰ per day in the 16 tanks to bring salinity levels up to 5‰ and 10‰, respectively

(increase in salinity for 5‰ tanks started two days after the 10‰ tanks to attain final treatment

conditions simultaneously). The remaining eight tanks (0‰ salinity) were considered to reflect

normal freshwater conditions (control) for the prawns. Gill tissue was collected from individuals

at different time intervals after exposure to salinity stress. There were six collection times (T1-1hr,

T2 - 6hr, T3 - 24hr, T4 - 48hr, T5 -72hr and T6 - 120hr) over a 5 day period. Seven individuals

were sampled (7 biological replicates) randomly from each salinity treatment for gill tissue

collection at each sampling time. Gill tissue was preserved separately for each individual in

RNAlater® solution (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) immediately after sampling.

Preserved tissues were kept at room temperature for 1 hour and then brought back to Molecular

Genetics Research Facility (MGRF) at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) where the

tissues were preserved at -80ᴼ C temperature prior to use.

4.3.3 RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Preserved tissues were removed from -80ᴼ C and thawed on ice. Gill tissue was then removed

from RNAlater® solution and transferred to mortars filled with liquid nitrogen. Tissue was crushed

to a fine powder using pestles that helped to maximize RNA yield. Powdered tissues were then

used for total RNA extraction using a Trizol/Chloroform method (Chomczynski and Mackey,

1995). This included purification via an RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) according to the

manufacturer’s protocol. Genomic DNA was then removed from total RNA samples via a DNA

digestion step using a TURBO DNA-freeTM kit (Ambion, Life Technologies, USA). Quality

(integrity and concentration) of extracted total RNA was checked with a Nano Drop 2000

Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed

94

from total RNA (1 µg of total RNA was used for each sample) using a SensiFAST cDNA synthesis

kit (Cat # BIO-65054, Bioline, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

4.3.4 Primer design and quantification of gene expression via real time quantitative PCR

(RT-qPCR)

Gene sequences for the five selected osmoregulatory genes (Aquaporin, Na+/H+ exchanger,

Na+/K+-ATPase, Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter and V-type ATPase) and an 18S RNA gene sequence

from M. australiense were available from an earlier study (Moshtaghi et al., 2016) to design

specific primers for the current study (Table 4-1). Here, we used the 18S gene as a house keeping

(Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016) gene to obtain relative gene expression values for each of the

five osmoregulatory genes examined here. Primers for each gene were designed using Primer3

software (Untergasser et al., 2012).

Table 4-1: Specific primers used in the current study (after Moshtaghi et al., 2016).

Gene Name Primer Type Sequence Tm

(ᴼ C)

Product Size (bp)

Aquaporin (AQP) Forward CTTCGCCTTCGGAGTCAC 55.7 193

Reverse GGATTCACCGTCGTCATACC 55.3

Na+/H+ exchanger

(NHE)

Forward GTGGATCTTCTGCGCTTGTT 55.7 204

Reverse CCAGGTGGTCGAAGAAGAGT 56.4

Na+/K+-ATPase

(NKA)

Forward ACTGCTCTTGTGGATTGGTG 55.3 215

Reverse GTCTTCTGCCTGCACATTCT 53.3

Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-

transporter (NKCC)

Forward GGGTCACCAGGGTCCAGAT 59.1 180

Reverse TAGCACCAGCAACAATTCCA 54.7

V-type H+-ATPase

(VTA)

Forward GGCAACTTTTGAGAAACTTGAAA 52.5 197

Reverse CCAGCAACAAATCCAATGTG 52.6

18S Forward GCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCA 55.0 200

Reverse AGCCTGCTTTGAGCACTCTC 57.6

Reactions were performed in a 20 µl reaction mix that included: 3 µl ultra-pure distilled water

(Invitrogen, USA), 5 µl cDNA (template), 1 µl forward primer, 1 µl reverse primer and 10 µl 2x

SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Mix (Bioline, UK). Reaction mixtures were then transferred to the

thermal cycler R-Corbett (RG-6000, Australia). Initially, reaction conditions included polymerase

95

inactivation at 95ºC for 2 minutes and then 40 cycles of: denaturation at 95ºC for 5 minutes,

annealing at 60ºC for 20 seconds and extension at 72ºC for 20 seconds. Quantitative gene

expression values for each gene from each sampled individual were obtained in terms of Ct (cycle

threshold) values. Ct values were then used to obtain relative gene expression values using the

delta-delta Ct method (Pfaffli, 2001) that applies the equation: R = 2-[∆Ct sample - ∆Ct control]. To

compare relative gene expression patterns at different salinities, we analyzed gene expression

values with Minitab software (Version 17) to test for statistical differences in gene expression

pattern in three different salinity treatments for each gene. We used two-way analysis of variance

(ANOVA) applying the 0.05 level of significance.

The present study quantified relative gene expression patterns (using an RT-qPCR approach) of

five selected osmoregulatory genes for an endemic, Australian freshwater prawn species, M.

australiense. Expression patterns relative to the 18S RNA housekeeping gene were measured for

selected candidate genes under three different salinity treatments over five days. Of the five

analyses, all returned a significant two-way interaction except for NHE where no significant

differences were recorded among salinity treatments across the duration of the experiment (Fig. 4-

3).

4.4.1 Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) expression

The results of the two-way ANOVA showed that expression levels of NKA showed a significant

interaction between salinity level and duration of exposure to saline conditions (F (5, 120) = 41.3,

p=0.002 < 0.05). Levels of NKA gene expression were relatively high under raised salinity

conditions (5‰ & 10‰) at T1. In the 10‰ treatment expression levels continued to increase until

4.4 Results

96

T2 when levels plateaued after which there appeared to be a slight downward trend to T6 (Fig. 4-

1), but this was not statistically significant.

4.4.1.1 Within sampling times

The 5‰ treatment showed significantly higher NKA expression compared with the 0‰ treatment

at all times (p<0.05), indicating that some degree of osmoregulatory stress may be occurring at a

relatively low raised salinity level. Significant differences in relative gene expression pattern were

also observed between the 10‰ treatment and both lower salinity conditions across the complete

duration (T1 to T6) of the experiment (p < 0.05); approximately 2-3 fold higher than in the 0‰

treatment and 1.4-2.2 fold higher than in the 5‰ treatment.

4.4.1.2 Between sampling times

While NKA expression level in the 0‰ and 5‰ treatments did not vary significantly across the

whole experiment (T1-T6). Expression levels in the 10‰ treatment however, increased

significantly (p<0.05) from T1 to T2 (from approximately 2-fold to 3-fold) and then remained high

for the remainder of the experiment.

97

Fig 4-1: NKA (Na+/K+-ATPase) mRNA expression patterns (relative to 18S expression) in the gill of M.

australiense for three salinity treatments over a five day period. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different

letters above bars indicate significant difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences

among treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated significant differences within

treatments between sampling times).

4.4.2 Na+/K+/2Cl-Co-transporter (NKCC)

There was a significant interaction between salinity treatment and sampling time for the NKCC

gene (F (5, 120) = 62.5, p=0.000 < 0.05). As with NKA, expression at 0‰ did not change, while

in the 5‰ treatment they increased to T3 following which they declined. As for NKA, the 10‰

treatment showed significantly higher expression, a difference that was maintained across the

whole experimental period (Fig. 4-2).

4.4.2.1 Within sampling times

Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in NKCC expression levels across the

experimental period between treatments (0‰ vs 5‰, 0‰ vs 10‰ and 5‰ vs 10‰). While

consistently higher NKCC expression was observed at 10‰ for the whole experimental period,

with up to ~6 fold higher than was observed for freshwater (0‰), the degree of difference in

expression level between 5‰ and 10‰ never exceeded ~1.5 fold.

Aa

Aa

Aa A

a

Aa

Aa

Bb

Bb

Bb B

bBb

Bb

Cc

Dc

Dc

Dc

Dc

Dc

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Rel

ati

ve

Gen

e E

xp

ress

ion

Sampling Time

0‰ 5‰ 10‰

98

4.4.2.2 Between sampling times

In the 5‰ and 10‰ salinity treatments, gene expression levels increased to T3 (1.7 and 2-fold,

respectively) following which they gradually declined to the end of the experiment.

Fig 4-2: Relative NKCC (Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter) mRNA expression levels in M. australiense in 3

salinity treatments. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant difference

at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time; uppercase

letters indicated significant differences within treatments between sampling times).

4.4.3 Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE)

4.4.3.1 Within sampling times

Expression levels of the NHE gene were in relative terms, quite low in all three salinity treatments

(Fig. 4-3). Initially at T1, expression levels of this gene were high in both 5‰ and 10‰ salinity

treatments relative to the 0‰ treatment, but levels slowly declined over time until no differences

were evident among treatments by T6. NHE expression levels were significantly different between

the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments only up to T3 after which they were not significantly different to the

end of the experiment.

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Bb

Bb

Fb

Bb B

b

Bb

Cc

DEc

Dc

DEc

CDEc

CEc

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Rel

ati

ve

Gen

e E

xp

ress

ion

Sampling Time

0‰ 5‰ 10‰

99

4.4.4 Between sampling times

There was no significant difference in NHE expression pattern among treatments (0‰, 5‰ and

10‰) over the sampling period (T1 to T6).

Fig 4-3: Relative NHE (Na+/H+ exchanger) mRNA expression patterns in the gill tissues of M. australiense

in 3 salinity treatments. Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant

difference at α=0.05 level (lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time;

uppercase letters indicated significant differences within treatments between sampling times).

4.4.5 Aquaporin (AQP)

4.4.5.1 Within sampling times

Very high levels of AQP expression patterns were observed at the first sampling time (T1) in the

5‰ and 10‰ treatments, after which expression levels declined rapidly by T2 and then remained

constant (but trending down) until the end of the experiment (Fig. 4-4). Significant differences (p

< 0.05) in relative AQP expression levels were observed between the 0‰ and 10‰ treatments up

to T4 following which (T5 to T6) gene expression levels among treatments were not significantly

different. Although the difference was not significantly different (p > 0.05), for the first time, a

Aa A

aAa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Ba B

a

Bb

Bb

Bab

Ba

Cb C

bCc C

bCb

Ca

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Rel

ati

ve

Gen

e E

xp

ress

ion

Sampling Time

0‰ 5‰ 10‰

100

higher expression pattern was observed in the freshwater condition compared with the 5‰ salinity

treatment from T4 to the end of the experiment (T6).

Fig 4-4: Relative AQP (aquaporin) mRNA expression levels in M. australiense at 3 salinity treatments.

Error bars represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at α=0.05 level

(lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated

significant differences within treatments between sampling times).

4.4.5.2 Between sampling times

Significantly higher AQP expression was observed in both the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments only at T1

(p<0.05) compared to the rest of the sampling periods (T2 to T6); while no significant difference

was evident between the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments from T2 to T6. We did not observe any

significant difference in AQP expression levels at 0‰ across the experimental period.

4.4.6 Vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (VTA)

4.4.6.1 Within sampling times

Expression results showed that VTA expression levels increased in the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments

from T1 to T3, following which they then had declined by T4 and then all remained essentially

Aa A

a

Aa

Aa

Aab

Aab

Bb

Db D

b

Da

Db

Db

Cc

Eb

Eb E

bEa

Ea

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Rel

ati

ve

Gen

e E

xp

ress

ion

Sampling Time

0‰ 5‰ 10‰

101

constant at the same level as the 0‰ treatment to the end of the experiment (Fig. 4-5). Significant

differences (F (5, 120) = 27.1, p = 0.028 < 0.05) were observed in VTA expression levels between

the 0‰ and 10‰ treatments from T1 to T3 with 1.5 to 3 fold higher expression levels observed in

the 10‰ treatment compared with freshwater (0%). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were also

observed between the 0‰ and 5‰ treatments (1.2 to 1.4 fold different) from T1 to T3.

Fig 4-5: Relative VTA (V-type H+-ATPase) mRNA expression levels in 3 salinity treatments. Error bars

represent +/- 1 SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at the α=0.05 level (lowercase

letters indicate differences among treatments within sampling time; uppercase letters indicated significant

differences within treatments between sampling times).

4.4.6.2 Between sampling times

The highest VTA expression levels were obtained between T2 and T3 in the 10‰ treatment. There

was no significant difference between VTA expression levels in the 0‰ and 5‰ treatments across

the whole experimental period (T1 to T6).

As expected, gene expression levels of five target osmoregulatory genes did not show the same

patterns and were affected differently by both sampling time and salinity treatments. Gene

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Aa

Bb

Bb B

b Ba

Ba

Ba

Cb

Dc

Dc

Ca

Ca

Ca

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Rel

ati

ve

Gen

e E

xp

ress

ion

Sampling Time

0‰ 5‰ 10‰

4.5 Discussion

102

expression patterns for the NKA gene were consistent among treatments across the whole

experimental period (T1 to T6) with relative expression levels ranked as 10‰ > 5‰ > 0‰,

showing a clear functional role of this gene in dealing with sub-lethal salinities above freshwater

(control conditions) (Fig. 4-1). The functional role of this gene is to allow active transport and

absorption of Na+ and other cations into cells in freshwater, while at raised salinities this gene is

considered to drive the reverse process where it pumps ions actively from the body (Freire et al.,

2008; Henry et al., 2012; McNamara et al., 2015). NKA is a well-studied gene (more than any

other crustacean osmoregulatory gene) and studies have already been conducted on a wide range

of crustacean species to identify, characterize and to understand the functional roles of this gene

under different environmental conditions: crab (Genovese et al., 2005; Furriel et al., 2010; Leite

and Zanotto, 2013), lobster (Havird et al., 2013), crayfish (Gao and Wheatly, 2004; Ali et al.,

2015), freshwater prawn (Faleiros et al., 2010; Barman et al., 2012; Boudour-Boucheker et al.,

2016) and marine shrimp (Pongsomboon et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2016). The general consensus is

that NKA is considered to be a master gene for maintaining ionic balance in both freshwater and

raised salinity conditions but it plays a more active role in raised salinity conditions to assist

maintenance of internal osmotic balance. Specifically, Barman et al. (2012) observed 2 to 3.5 fold

higher NKA expression under saltwater conditions compared with freshwater depending on the

intensity of salinity stress in M. rosenbergii. Results of our study correlate well with findings of

previous studies as we observed higher (1.4 to 3 fold higher) expression level of NKA in the 5‰

and 10‰ treatments compared with freshwater (0‰). As M. australiense is well-adapted to inland

freshwaters, raised salinity conditions may increase osmotic problems and cause higher levels of

stress and so, induce higher expression levels of NKA essentially as a rapid adaptive genomic

response to minimize salinity-induced osmotic stress. Moreover, an increase in NKA expression

103

after exposure to higher salinity may also be related to synthesis of other enzymes necessary for

dealing with the new/changed environmental conditions. Thus, Na+/K+-ATPase in M. australiense

can be considered an important gene for both hypo- and hyper-ionic regulation.

In this study, we also observed a consistent pattern of raised NKCC expression levels with elevated

salinity level in M. australiense (Fig. 4-2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among

all treatments with 3 to 6 fold difference in expression level. Results clearly indicate a very

important functional role for this gene under raised salinity conditions while in contrast, it may

play only a very minor functional role in freshwater. Previous studies (Genovese et al., 2005;

Luquet et al., 2005; Barman et al., 2012; Moshtaghi et al., 2016) reported the functional role of

NKCC to be that it drives Cl- and Na+ transport across salt-secreting epithelia, specifically involved

with Na+ and K+ excretion and Cl- uptake depending on the ionic concentration of the surrounding

medium. NKCC exchanges one Na+ and one K+ for every 2 Cl- ions and therefore it plays a greater

functional role in saline media (Genovese et al., 2005; Moshtaghi et al., 2016). Barman et al.

(2012) observed several fold higher expression of NKCC in M. rosenbergii when individuals

experienced higher environmental salinity compared with low salinity conditions. The pattern for

M. australiense was similar, also indicating a more important role for NKCC under elevated

environmental salinity compared with low ionic, freshwater conditions. Raised salinity (5‰ and

10‰) induced higher NKCC expression apparently to facilitate ion transport and exchange under

the changed osmotic conditions.

While levels of NHE under saltwater conditions (5‰ and 10‰) were relatively low, they were

always higher than in freshwater (Fig. 4-3). Significant differences were observed for the relative

expression of NHE among treatments initially but this pattern decreased with time over the

experiment. This gene is known to have an important functional role in maintaining osmotic

104

balance in low ionic environments (freshwater habitats) (Brett et al., 2005). Reported functional

roles of NHE indicate that this gene is involved with a diverse array of physiological processes,

including control of the cell cycle and cell proliferation, trans-epithelial Na+ movement, ion

transport, exchange of monovalent ions for osmoregulation, and ion absorption in low ionic

environments (Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016; Moshatghi et al., 2016). Currently, there is only

very limited information available from decapod crustaceans about this gene. To our knowledge,

there have been only 3 studies conducted previously on palaemonid prawns that have considered

the NHE gene (Barman et al., 2012; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016; Moshatghi et al., 2016).

Towle et al. (1997) conducted an experiment on a crab species (Carcinus maenas) and identified

potential role(s) for this gene as being an electrogenic and electroneutral exchanger. In M.

australiense, we observed a slight early increase in expression level in the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments

(T1-T3) followed by a gradual decrease in NHE expression levels until no differences were evident

among treatments by T6. This suggests that the gene may be important for dealing with initial

exposure to a raised sub-lethal salinity but after acclimation over a 120 hour period, expression

levels declined as hyper-regulation was apparently no longer required. Earlier work is consistent

with this hypothesis, suggesting that NHE is more important for osmoregulation in freshwater than

under raised saline conditions (Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2016), indicating that this gene can be

considered to have a primary role in hypo-ionic regulation. Further molecular studies will be

required however, on the NHE gene to investigate potential function roles in other crustacean taxa

under varying salinity environments.

As with NHE, expression levels of the Aquaporin (AQP) gene were initially (T1) very high after

which expression levels declined sharply (by T2), with a further gradual decline from T2 to T4.

After this, expression levels in all treatments remained fairly constant and at relatively low levels

105

from T4 to the end of the experiment (T6). This gene also shows an initial response to salinity

stress followed by a relatively rapid return to baseline levels.

Of interest, we observed higher expression (even though the difference was not significant) levels

of this gene at 0‰ than at 5‰ at T4 to the end of the experiment. Aquaporin has been very well

studied in vertebrate taxa with also a number of studies having been conducted on crustacean

species (Freire et al., 2003; Augusto et al., 2009; Barman et al., 2012; McNamara and Faria, 2012;

McNamara et al., 2015). In general, results of these studies suggest that AQP acts as a master gene

involved in selective transfer of water and other molecules across cell membranes in particular in

the gill and antennal gland tissues in crustaceans, while it also maintains water balance and

regulates cell volume (Gao and Wheatly, 2004; Anger, 2013; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2013).

As a consequence of the change in osmotic gradient between the 5‰ and 10‰, we observed higher

levels of AQP expression initially (up to T3). Following this (from T4), expression levels declined

in the 5‰ treatment more than at 0‰ which may result from near iso-osmotic conditions between

the external salinity level and a prawn’s haemolymph at 5‰. The initially higher expression levels

may simply be a short-term response to a perceived salinity stress. While freshwater is the normal

habitat for M. australiense, 0‰ can still impose some osmotic stress because the surrounding

environment may be of lower ionic content compared with the internal body fluid. Thus, major

challenges in freshwater conditions for maintaining osmotic balance include, restricting external

water gain by regulating water channels and holding internal ions inside cells to avoid critical ion

loss (Towle et al., 2011). This may explain why AQP expression was higher in the 0% treatment

than at 5% in the current study.

In parallel, we believe that we can also explain the reason for higher expression of AQP in the

highest salinity treatment (10‰) where the osmotic gradient difference was very high between the

106

environment and the body fluid. Major challenges for a prawn under this condition involve

potential for excessive water loss and excess ion gain. These challenges may induce higher

expression levels of AQP to regulate water channels in M. australiense in the opposite direction.

We also observed comparatively high VTA (V-type H+-ATPase) expression levels in the 5‰ and

10‰ treatments over the first 24 hours (T1 to T3), after which expression levels declined between

24 and 48 hours and then established a relatively constant expression pattern in all treatments from

T4 to the end of the experiment (Fig. 4-5). VTA is reported to be a key gene involved with

osmoregulation that has been well studied in many organisms (Faleiros et al., 2010; Lee et al.,

2011; Towle et al., 2011; Ali et al., 2015; Moshtaghi et al., 2016). VTA is functionally involved

in ion uptake and ion regulation, the control of cellular volume and also in maintaining ionic

balance. In general, it is expressed at higher levels in freshwater compared with raised salinity

conditions (Stillman et. al., 2008; Charmantier and Anger, 2011; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2014).

While VTA is considered to play a more important functional role in freshwater environments

(0‰) in M. australiense, we initially observed higher expression levels of this gene in the 5‰ and

10‰ treatments (up to T3). This may be a perceived change in osmotic gradients with prawns in

raised salinities needing to respond to a variety of stimuli to maintain their osmotic balance (ion

exchange) and to regulate cellular volume. These factors may result in an increased requirement

for energy to allow active regulation of ions and to control cell volume (Boudour-Boucheker et

al., 2016). Initial higher expression levels of VTA over the first 24 hours of the experiment may

be an adaptive response after which when osmotic control has been achieved, less energy is

required to maintain osmotic equilibrium.

For all of the five genes examined here, we did not observe major differences in expression patterns

among the treatments, among sampling times after T3 in both the 5‰ and 10‰ treatments.

107

Significantly higher expression levels over the experimental time period were observed for each

gene only within the first 24 hours (T1 to T3). These results for M. australiense correlate well with

a recent study conducted by Boudour-Boucheker et al. (2016) where they compared expression

patterns of NKA, VTA and NHE at two different salinity levels on two different Macrobrachium

species (one freshwater species and the other, a brackish water endemic) to understand

environmental stress specific responses of each gene (i.e. which is more active under which

condition) for osmoregulation. Here, we conducted our study on a single species (collected from

a single catchment) exposed to three different sub-lethal salinity levels over different time intervals

to better understand how the functional responses (in terms of gene expression changes) of

individual genes occur with elevated salinity levels and with time.

Adapting to new environmental conditions potentially can be achieved via two potential pathways:

adaptive mutations and/or changes in the expression pattern of existing copies of candidate genes

(Wray, 2013). In general, adaptive novel mutations are likely to require longer evolutionary time

to evolve so, initial adaptive response are more likely to result from modification of the expression

patterns (because gene expression is highly plastic and controlled by external environmental

factors) of existing functional genes (Stillman et al., 2008; Wray, 2013). The standard theory of

functional gene expression and regulation suggests that, genes are expressed at very high levels

initially as a result of a specific perceived stress, but expression level should decline over time

(once organisms have acclimated to the new environmental conditions). When this point is

reached, expression levels should decline (to conserve energy) and should reach a stable, lower

constant level (Nadal et al., 2011). Here, we observed initial raised expression levels for all of our

gene targets (up to T3), following which I observed sharp or in some cases gradual declines in

expression levels normally from 24 to 48 hours (T3 to T4), and by the end of the experimental

108

period we observed fairly constant, relatively low expression levels for all genes (after T4). This

clearly mirrors the expected pattern for standard theoretical models of gene expression.

Our model crustacean, M. australiense is widely distributed across mainland Australia with many

natural populations found in the vicinity of coastal streams and creeks on the east coast of Australia

(Short, 2004; Bernays et al., 2015) where prawns would be exposed continuously to regular

changes in sub-lethal environmental salinity levels. M. australiense apparently can modify

expression levels of a set of key genes that allow effective osmoregulation in the wild when

individuals are exposed to variable osmotic environments. Successful osmoregulatory

performance however, does not only depend on efficient maintenance of ionic balance, it also

involves mechanistic, morphological (changes to the ultra-structure of gill tissue and other

osmoregulatory tissues) and physiological (changes in concentration and osmolality of body fluid

haemolymph) responses (McNamara and Faria, 2012; Boudour-Boucheker et al., 2014;

McNamara et al., 2015). To better understand the overall adaptive process, a comprehensive study

will be required that examines all three aspects (gene expression patterns, physiological and

morphological changes) in the target species (M. australiense) in the future. This will allow a

comprehensive model to be developed for how the target species can achieve effective

osmoregulation under sub-lethal, raised salinity conditions.

Osmoregulatory performance is considered to be the principal mechanism for maintaining ionic

balance when sub-lethal environmental salinity levels vary. A study of relative gene expression

patterns (based on qRT-PCR) of five key osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense has revealed

remarkable differences and some consistent expression patterns of the selected candidate genes

over an experimental time frame under three sub-lethal salinity conditions. Different genes

4.6 Conclusions

109

exhibited different expression patterns depending on the intensity of the salinity treatment and

timing (or duration) of exposure to salinity stress. At the start of the experiment, we had considered

it unlikely that all genes would exhibit similar expression profiles because functional roles vary

and some may play primary vs secondary roles depending on the osmotic conditions experienced.

In essence, response to osmotic stress and the adaptive strategy adopted to deal with variation in

external salinity levels by M. australiense can be explained by both: multiple allelic interactions

(epistatic) and pleiotropic interactions among the candidate genes; as many genes are likely to be

engaged in the response and the same genes potentially have multiple functional roles that in

combination have evolved to allow effective osmoregulatory capacity.

110

5 Chapter 5: General Discussion

Currently, little information is available about how genes and their mutations, and indeed response

from ‘whole genomes’, have evolved to provide efficient osmoregulation in FW crustaceans. Since

a number of FW crustaceans constitute both wild and farmed resources that are important to human

populations, understanding how these organisms deal with variation in their osmotic environments

provides a starting point for their effective conservation and management. Investigations of the

physiological aspects of biochemical pathways that support phenotypic differences in salinity

tolerance among FW taxa can provide a foundation for developing this knowledge (Cnaani and

Hulata, 2011).

The most important farmed FW prawns are all members of the Genus Macrobrachium (Family

Palaemonidae). Macrobrachium spp. display a wide variety of life history strategies and occur in

a diverse array of aquatic habitats (in both tropical and subtropical waters). This genus is present

naturally on all continents except Antarctica with more than 250 extant species (Murphy and

Austin, 2005). . All have a common marine ancestor and so constitute a monophyletic clade.

Modern species are in various stages of colonizing FW with only 25 described species able to

complete their entire lifecycles in FW. Evolution of FW life history therefore, most likely involves

changes (functional mutations and/or changes to gene regulation patterns) in the same set of critical

genes that confer ability (or otherwise) to deal with extreme osmotic conditions. M. australiense

is a member of the relatively small sub-group that can complete their entire lifecycle totally in

fresh water and is considered to be a good hyper-osmoregulator when exposed to environments

with high osmotic stress. It has evolved a mechanism to reduce Na+ loss from its body by producing

hypo-osmotic urine (Denne, 1968). Identifying CG loci and functional mutations within genes that

affect salinity tolerance as well as developing an understanding of how they are regulated (gene

111

expression patterns) provides a basis for developing deeper understanding of how various

Macrobrachium taxa deal with variable osmotic environments.

To better understand how osmoregulatory performance in FW crustaceans allow individuals to

acclimate and adapt to raised salinity conditions, we performed a transcriptomic analysis of M.

australiense (using gill, antennal gland, hepatopancreas tissues) to identify candidate genes

involved with osmoregulation. We used M. australiense (Palaemonidae) in this study as a model

for other congeneric freshwater prawns in the genus Macrobrachium because this species is the

most widespread FW prawn across mainland Australia and shows high phenotypic diversity and

is one of only a small number of endemics that has adapted completely to a freshwater life cycle

(Dimmock et al., 2004). Individuals can tolerate up to 17 ‰ salinity and hence should possess

copies of critical genes capable of dealing with both FW and raised saline conditions (Sharma and

Hughes, 2009).

From the transcriptome results, approximately 30% of the contigs were annotated successfully,

implying that they represent functional genes documented in other taxa (Table 2-1). Thirty-two

important gene families were identified that play potential roles in osmoregulation and ion

regulation that potentially contribute to salinity tolerance in. M. australiense. This generated a set

of candidate genes for further analysis and comparisons with other related species with different

osmotic capacities so that an investigation of the key genes and their functional mutations could

be explored in greater detail. Based on identified candidate genes in other species, we were able

to target the most important genes related to important metabolic processes including: ATP

binding, transmembrane activities, regulation of ion transportation, response to environmental

stressors and stress tolerance in M. australiense. Efficient osmoregulatory capacity does not

depend solely on ion exchange; it also involves many other biological processes. Of the 32

112

osmoregulatory gene families identified here, 17 genes were involved with transport of the most

important ions (Na+, K+, H+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3- and Cl-), all of which impact osmoregulation and

directly impact salinity tolerance. The other 15 genes are involved with other aspects of

osmoregulation and might play minor or secondary roles. Differential expression patterns clearly

indicate major roles of gill and antennal gland tissues in adult M. australiense individuals for

osmoregulation (Fig 2-1 of chapter 2).

NKA (Na+/K+-ATPase) is considered to be a master gene for osmoregulation in a wide range of

crustacean species (Charmantier and Anger, 2011; Cieluch et al., 2004; Lucu and Towle, 2003).

Here we identified multiple isoforms and subunits of NKA with maximum expression in gill tissue.

Gills obviously provide a major osmoregulatory site in the target species and more widely in most

aquatic taxa (Table 2-4). Another important gene affecting osmoregulation in crustaceans is V-

type ATPase (VTA). This is a crucial gene for regulating ion balance and cell volume in

crustaceans in low ionic FW environments (Freire et al., 2008). The important role/s of this gene

have been documented in many aquatic animals including in: rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

(Lin and Randall, 1993), euryhaline crabs, Carcinus maenas and Eryocheir sinensis (Weihrauch

et al., 2001) and two freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor and C. cainii (Ali et al., 2015; Zare

and Greenaway, 1998). Here, in M. australiense VTA gene was identified and the recovered gene

ontology terms indicate a role for this gene in many different complex processes including

acid/base balance, nitrogen excretion, ion exchange and proton regulation in the freshwater

environment.

To date, the most important osmoregulatory genes identified in crustaceans are considered to be:

Alkaline Phosphatase, Aquaporin (AQP), Arginine Kinase, Calreticulin (CRT), Carbonic

Anhydrase (CA), Crustacean Cardiovascular Peptide (CCP), Mitochondrial Carrier Protein,

113

Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), Na+/K+/2Cl- Co-transporter (NKCC), Na+/HCO3- Exchanger, Na+/Ca+2

Exchanger, Na+/H+ Exchanger (NHE), Na+/K+/Ca+2 Exchanger, Selanophosphate and V-type H+-

ATPase (VTA). In general, these genes have been well-studied in a great number of crustacean

species and shown to influence: ion transport, ion exchange, cell volume control, signal

transduction, activating pathways and sensing osmotic stress (Ali et al., 2015b; Stillman et al.,

2008; Faleiros et al., 2010). All have been linked to FW adaptation but VTA and NKA are

considered to be the most critical for colonization of FW habitats in most aquatic taxa (Glenner et

al., 2006; Tsai and Lin, 2007). Many studies have already been conducted on NKA and VTA genes

but there is severe dearth of information on the other osmoregulatory genes.

Modern genomic technologies have made it relatively easy to either identify a list of candidate

polymorphic loci, or to search for SNPs and/or gene outliers (loci under selection or adaptive loci)

in a set of candidate genes. Here, identification of potential outlier SNPs in three populations of

M. australiense exposed to differing natural salinity regimes provides a foundation for narrowing

down the critical mutations driving physiological responses to different sub-lethal salinity

conditions. Individuals were collected from three natural populations with individuals from

Blunder Creek completing their entire life cycles in pure low ionic freshwater conditions while

individuals from the Bulimba Creek population have direct access to brackish water and the Stony

Creek population has been confined to freshwater for less than 100 years because of a dam. While

salinity levels at all sites were very similar, very large differences in conductivity level were

evident among sites that contributed to different osmotic niches (sites are not different in terms of

salinity but are remarkably different for total ionic content). So any differences detected between

sites relate primarily to different osmotic niches influenced by variation in ion content but not

necessarily Na+ and Cl-, specifically.

114

The population from northern Queensland (Blunder Ck) has been physically isolated by distance

from the Brisbane River sites (Stony and Bulimba Ck) for a long period of time, providing potential

for unique mutations to accumulate differentially in both locations. As it is highly unlikely for

gene flow between these sites, novel mutations at individual sites would not have been able to be

exchanged. This could result in different gene copies due to essentially independent evolution of

genes as part of the adaptive response to variation in local osmotic environments. The same

argument does not hold however, between Stony and Bulimba Creeks because they have been

connected physically (same catchment) until recent times.

As mutations occur randomly, the probability of changing amino acid sequences to produce better

phenotypes is inherently low. Over short evolutionary timeframes therefore, it is more likely that

selection would act more strongly on UTR regions if a gene has important functions because minor

changes to regulatory functions are less likely to produce poor phenotypes than random changes

to amino acid sequences in a coding region of a functional gene (Nadal et al., 2001). Here

functional mutations were not detected in protein coding regions of the candidate osmoregulatory

genes examined, but mutations were detected in regulatory sequences that shape and/or control

gene expression patterns. So the pattern detected in M. australiense is as predicted given that the

populations have evolved recently from a common ancestor so local adaptation has been driven

largely by changes to gene expression patterns in the same functional coding sequences. Whether

the same mutations in gene regulatory sequences are conserved across greater phylogenetic

distances (among closely-related and more-distantly related Macrobrachium taxa) remains to be

seen, but as evolutionary time extends, eventually chance mutations are likely to change functional

sites in coding regions and their associated phenotypes.

115

The major function of VTA (V-Type H+-ATPase) is to induce a H+ gradient for cations such as

Na+ that allows them to be transported via different mechanisms into the cell and would be under

positive selection compared with in brackish/saline water (Beyenbach and Wieczorek, 2006; Lee

et al., 2011). Here the Blunder Creek population under pure FW conditions showed the highest

expression level of the VTA suggesting that this may be an adaptive response to concentrate ions

inside cells. The lowest expression, as was expected, was seen in the Bulimba Creek site where

individuals had direct access to brackish water (Table 3-2). NKA also showed lower activity

expression in dilute media and this is probably related to more demand by cells to maintain their

internal ion concentration at constant levels while haemolymph osmotic/ionic concentration tends

to be higher than in external media in saline habitats. Expression levels of NKA in saline adapted

populations are generally higher than in FW (Lee et al., 2011). Expression levels of NKA reached

the highest levels in Bulimba Creek but potentially this is a costly strategy for maintaining ion

transport to cells and the haemolymph.

While over 50% of the potential candidate genes examined here showed similar patterns of

expression in all populations in the trials (Table 3-2), Calreticulin, CCP, NKA, NKCC, VTA, NHE

and Na+ /HCO3- exchanger in contrast, showed large differences indicating that they likely play

more important roles in osmotic adaptive response in M. australiense when individuals are

exposed to different natural ionic conditions. Further studies including these genes under different

experimental salinity conditions would be of great interest to generate a better idea of how these

genes respond to changes in osmotic gradients over time.

NKA, NKCC, VTA and Na+/HCO3- exchanger are directly involved with active uptake and release

of a diverse range of ions used to achieve internal osmotic balance (Barman et al., 2012). VTA, a

gene that plays a primary role in cellular volume control in addition to maintaining ionic balance

116

(Stillman et al., 2008), was expressed at significantly higher levels under pure freshwater

conditions, in Blunder Creek individuals. This suggests that this gene is activated to drive ion

update in low ionic conditions, while gene activity is limited in environments with naturally higher

levels of environmental ions as was evident in Bulimba Creek where there is direct access to

brackish water.

NKA should also be considered to be one of the most important genes that assist FW adaptation

because expression levels in dilute media were reduced as a result of greater need for cells to

maintain their internal ion concentration at a constant level while haemolymph ionic concentration

tends to be higher than external media in saline habitats. Expression level of NKA individuals

experiencing raised saline conditions is commonly higher than in FW conditions as been

demonstrated in many fishes (Lee et al., 2011). A maximum expression level of NKA in the

Blunder Creek population was a result that suggests a relatively costly approach to dealing with a

need for ion transportation by cells to the haemolymph.

The highest expression levels of VTA, NHE and Calreticulin genes in the Blunder Creek

population, potentially, may result from a need for extra energy by M. australiense individuals

under pure low ionic freshwater conditions to attain osmoregulatory stability. High expression

levels of Calreticulin in particular, may provide the additional required energy to address this

challenge. In addition, raised expression levels of some genes, NHE in particular, is likely to be

associated with a need to absorb ions from the surrounding water and to release H+ into the external

environment that is characterized by low ionic gradients. Another major challenge in low ionic

freshwater conditions is to maintain cell volume to resist ion loss from the body. VTA may assist

this process as it is highly expressed under these conditions. These three gene families obviously

117

play more important roles in osmoregulation in M. australiense under freshwater conditions

compared with their role(s) in brackish water.

CCP, NKA, NKCC and Na+/HCO3- exchanger genes showed maximum expression levels in the

Bulimba Creek population implying they have an important role in osmoregulation in brackish

water. In particular, they actively pump out any excess ions gained from the surrounding water

(Ali et al., 2015; Anger 2003; Barman et al., 2012). Higher expression levels of NKA, NKCC and

Na+/HCO3- exchanger gene families can address the problems with gaining excess ions from the

environment in Bulimba Creek. In parallel, individuals also need to change their body fluid

(haemolymph) concentration under higher osmotic conditions. So far, three master genes have

already been identified in crustaceans that are likely to control haemolymph balance including

CCP, DH and CHH (Anger, 2003; Moshtaghi et al., 2016). High expression levels of CCP in M.

australiense individuals in brackish water conditions potentially promote production of extra

haemolymph (Zhao et al., 2015) that may allow individuals to deal with this osmotic challenge.

Thus, higher expression of CCP might be providing a necessary supportive role to help cope with

the ion-rich Bulimba Creek environment.

The top 20 differentially expressed genes among the sampled populations here (Table 3-3) shows

that both specific mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Actin, Cytochrome B, 18S, 37S, 40S, 60S

RNA etc.) were also highly expressed but not all highly expressed genes in all populations were

influenced by osmoregulatory activities, even though individuals were exposed to different

osmotic conditions. The role(s) of other genes that do not have a primary osmotic control role are

likely to be involved with house-keeping activities specific to this species. Functional enrichment

analysis of all differentially expressed genes (Table 3-5) revealed an absence of enriched GO

118

categories in the Bulimba/Stony comparison while significant enrichment was observed in both

the Blunder/Bulimba and Blunder/Stony comparisons.

Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of major osmoregulatory genes revealed that

Calreticulin, NHE and VTA showed highest expression levels in the Blunder Creek population,

while CCP, NKA, NKCC and NHE showed the highest expression levels in the Bulimba Creek

population. In total, 16 GO categories were functionally enriched among Blunder/Bulimba and

Blunder/Stony population comparisons. A comparative population genomic scan for searching for

adaptive loci (outliers) revealed their presence in four important osmoregulatory genes.

In total, from transcriptome wide SNP calling, 84 contigs were found to show outliers in at least a

single comparison. Nearly half of all outlier contigs were unique to only a single population

comparison while 18 contigs were found to be outliers in all three population comparisons (Fig 3-

1). Considerably higher numbers of outliers were obtained when comparisons involved the

Blunder Creek population. This confirms that the Blunder Creek population was more often

different for individual gene expression pattern for potentially adaptive loci. In part, at least this

may result from geographical isolation between the north (Blunder) and the two southern sampling

sites (Bulimba and Stony), but also likely reflects impacts of different osmotic environments. A

relatively high number (18) of common outliers in all comparisons potentially indicate that genetic

response to freshwater invasion of inland waters has occurred under strong selection pressure on

specific expressed genes influencing osmoregulation in the newly invaded environment. Bulimba

and Stony Creek are both tributaries of the Brisbane River and share many common environmental

features as they are connected physically in the same catchment. While Bulimba and Stony

populations of M. australiense have been physically isolated from each other over the last 80 years

119

due to dam construction, it is unlikely that there has been sufficient evolutionary time for novel

adaptive functional mutations to occur between the two populations.

Identification of outlier loci under selection can provide important insights for understanding local

adaptation and speciation under different environmental or ecological conditions (Rundle and

Nosil, 2005). With the advent of modern genomic tools, there is now well-accepted and developed

methodology that can identify adaptive genetic loci using transcriptome scanning and examination

of a large number of loci to detect outlier loci (Storz, 2005). Here we found, four different outlier

loci in identified target candidate (osmoregulatory) genes: Na+/H+ exchanger, Na+/K+-ATPase, V-

type-(H+)-ATPase and Calreticulin. These four genes are considered to be the major candidate

genes involved with osmoregulation in a wide range of aquatic crustacean species. A comparison

of sequence alignments revealed that all outlier SNPs in the four important osmoregulatory genes

were present in UTR regions (outside protein coding regions) and were located prior to the start

codon region. This suggests that they may underly gene regulatory differences that control gene

expression patterns of the same functional genes.

Since all mutations identified were in non-coding UTR regions of functional genes, this suggests

that differential evolution of osmoregulatory control under different environmental conditions

results from modification of the expression pattern of the same (otherwise identical) functional

genes. This implies that adaptation by M. australiense to different sub-lethal osmotic niches is

likely to be an ongoing process and is currently largely controlled by changes in gene expression

patterns when environmental conditions vary. So, we can predict that the adaptive response of M.

australiense to variable osmotic niches is not due to changes in amino acid sequences of the

candidate genes, but rather it is being controlled by regulatory mutation located outside the coding

region of the candidate genes that have a direct role on gene expression pattern. As M. australiense

120

can tolerate a wide range of salinity fluctuation, this species is unlikely to be impacted severely by

salinity intrusion due to climate change effects.

In general, a wide range of CGs is involved with osmotic regulation under raised salinity conditions

compared with under low salinity conditions (Berger and Kharazova, 1997; Wieser and

Krumschnabel, 2001). It is highly unlikely that all genes would exhibit similar expression profiles

because functional roles vary and some may play primary vs secondary roles depending on the

osmotic conditions experienced. In M. australiense, we observed the interacting effects of many

candidate osmoregulatory genes underlying successful ionic balance.

There are a number of stages to the adaptive response to osmotic stress at the cellular level; the

first step is sensing a stress using specialized cells and sensors in specific tissues that lead to

appropriate reactions via signal transduction to connect sensors to activate target molecules to

allow cellular adaptation. During environmental stress (during the first hours of exposure to an

osmotic stress), the transcriptional rate of some key candidate genes with a role in rapid stress

management is elevated and this leads to more gene products that facilitate adaptation to stressful

conditions. Modification of chromatin structure at this stage can lead to epigenetic changes which

mean changes in gene expression patterns are passed through generations without change in

protein function (Nadal et al., 2011).

Generally, when an osmotic stress is sensed, adaptive responses first require activation of cell-

cycle checks and allocation of major energy and metabolic processes to stress management. These

responses divert energy from cell growth under stressful conditions. Reactions of stress-response

genes have been investigated in a large number of taxa from different groups for example in yeast,

the expression levels of more than 600 genes were reduced after exposure to different

121

environmental changes (Nadal et al., 2011). These genes work together as a network for sufficient

and optimal reaction to osmotic stress, to improve individual survival rate and to facilitate the

chance for adaptation to long term environmental change. Gene transcripts with osmoregulatory

roles interact with cellular stress response signalling pathways that are all involved in six molecular

processes including, 1) stress reaction signalling pathway, 2) appropriate osmolyte accumulation,

3) regulation of energy metabolism, 4) transfer of lipids molecules to protect the cell membrane,

5) implementation of actin into cytoskeleton and 6) stability of mRNA and protein products (Fiol,

2006).

Based on available published gene ontology information on potential candidate osmoregulatory

genes and our experiments here, a simple conceptual schematic model was developed that

describes the potential interactions of these key genes and the phenotypes they produce involved

in salinity tolerance in M. australiense as a useful foundation for understanding the molecular basis

of osmoregulation in FW prawns in Macrobrachium more widely.

Based on both recent published information and the current study, five groups of genes have been

categorized that are likely to be involved with successful osmoregulation performance in M.

australiense (Fig. 5.1). The general consensus is that osmosensors control effector mechanisms in

response to environmental osmotic changes. Published data about the role of osmosensors in

osmotic regulation is currently very limited, at least in Macrobrachium.

Some studies suggest that an osmosensory signal transduction network, that includes a variety of

osmosensors with different sensitivity, are present that detect extracellular osmolarity (plasma

osmolarity) and that initiate an appropriate physiological reaction to the osmotic stress (Fiol and

Kültz, 2007). After sensing an osmotic stress, signal transduction pathways are activated to initiate

122

an appropriate and rapid response. In fact, this pathway is essentially a connection sensor for

cellular adaptation between the signalling pathways with target molecules inside the cell. Some

specific electromagnetic/sensing organs (antennal glands, gills, hepatopancreas) are present in

crustaceans that can detect osmotic stress and these play a major role in signal transduction. When

osmotic stress is detected by an animal, changes at the cellular level occur in the electromagnetic

organs that are rapidly followed by activation of stress responsive genes that initiate effector

processes that include modifying translation rates and physiological features of ion channels and

ion transporters.

Changes are mediated by the actual candidate genes identified here. The same genes play primary

roles in this cascade of responses that ultimately allow individuals to meet the osmotic challenges

they face. While different genes play different roles, their integration leads to several phenotypes

that constitute specific adaptive responses to the environmental stress. Osmosensors for salinity

stress associated with osmoregulatory capacity in M. australiense include; Ca2+-sensing receptor

(CaSR) and Aquaporin (AQP) as a signalling pathway and to regulate function (Fiol and Klutz,

2007). During osmotic stress, high expression of AQP is costly energetically, but it deals with the

osmotic challenge and expression levels are consequentially higher in FW acclimated fish species

compared with SW adapted ones (Inokuchi et al., 2008)

123

Fig 5-1: A model for integration of potential candidate genes involved in osmoregulation in M. australiense.

124

Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Aquaporin (AQP), Acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP), Bestrophin

(BEST), Carbonic Anhydrase (CA), Catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), Calreticulin (CRT),

Hedgehog signalling pathway (HOG), Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and

Mitochondrial carrier protein (MTCP) constitute the most important genes with osmosensory and

signalling pathway transduction functions. Localization of osmotic sensors are either within cell

membranes or are intracellular. The role of Protein Kinase family genes including AMP-activated

protein kinase (AMPK) is significant in regulation of ATP consumption during this stage

(Karagounis and Hawley, 2009). AMP acts as a switch that regulates energy metabolism for

different processes under stress conditions (Li et al., 2016). MAPK is involved in signalling

pathways to induce a rapid stress response to osmotic stress. This gene in tilapia gill can

alter/modify the structure of protein via post-transitional modifications (Fiol et al., 2006) In M.

australiense, MAPK is a family of several proteins with a role in signal transduction linked to

osmotic stress. This gene family has already has been identified in yeast, animals and plants cells

all with similar functions (Arbabi and Maier, 2002; Nguyen et al., 2016). AP is another protein

that acts as a promoter for Ca+2 and PO4- and is involved in salinity adaptation (Lovett 1994). AQP

is also important because it provides water channels for selective transfer of water and other

molecules across cell membranes in the gill and antennal gland (Agre et al., 2002; Boyle et al.,

2013; Grosell, 2006; Nishimura and Fan, 2003). CA also has an important role in ion

regulation/osmoregulation because it supplies H+ and HCO3- for Na+/Cl- exchange. Its role in gas

exchange has already been documented in a large number of crustacean species (Serrano and

Henry, 2008; Havird et al., 2013, Herny et al., 2012). Calreticulin acts as a biomarker that transfers

osmotic signals while providing energy to address salinity stress (Barman et al., 2012). Different

5.1 Group 1 Genes (Stress sensing and signalling)

125

organisms possess different specific stress sensors to initiate and maximize their response to

unprecedented external environmental conditions. One of the well-known sensors is the HOG

signalling pathway (high osmolarity glycerol). Under hyperosmotic conditions in yeast, the HOG

signalling pathway is activated by osmosensors that alter elongation and remodelling of chromatin

following which HOG can bind to osmostress genes and change mRNA processing/stability

(Nadal et al., 2011). Mitochondrial carrier protein is also involved in the osmotic signalling

pathway in some species.

Ion transporters/exchangers are involved in active transport of ions into and out of cells during

osmotic stress (Barman et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2013; Kotlyar et al., 2000; Towle and Weihrauch,

2001). They include, Na+/HCO3- cotransporter (NBC), Na+/Ca+2 exchanger (NCX), Na+/H+

exchanger (NHE), Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC), Cl- channel, K+

channel, Na+ channel, Na+/K+ channel, Mg2+ transporter, Ca2+/Na+ channel and H+/Cl- channel.

NKA referred to as the ‘sodium pump’ is an electrogenic transmembrane enzyme located in the

basolateral membrane of the gill where it controls secretion of Na+ ions to the outside and transfer

of K+ into cells. This gene plays a critical role in ion transport in crustaceans and high expression

level of this gene have been documented in a number of decapods exposed to marine conditions

including P. marmoratus and P. trituberculatus (Bradley and Bradley 2013; Havird et al., 2014;

Jayasundara et al., 2007). When metabolism is depressed, NKA activity strongly increases

(Ramnanan and Storey, 2006). As an integral membrane protein, this gene is involved in ion

transport and ammonia excretion, so it has an associated role in osmoregulatory systems in many

taxa (Tsai and Lin, 2007). NKA expression level in SW species is generally higher than in those

with a FW ancestor (Lee et al., 2011). Furthermore, this pump is involved in signal transduction

5.2 Group 2 Genes (Ion regulation)

126

to regulate the AMPK cascade pathway and cell volume and has an effect on transport of other

ions and for these activities it can use up to 70 % of available ATP energy (Schiener-Bobis, 2002;

Morris, 2001). Ion channels including Na+ and K+ channels play a critical role in ion

transmembrane transport and regulation of the main ions in osmoregulation.

NKCC, NHE, Ca2+/Na+ exchanger, Mg2+ transporter, Cl- channel protein, Na+/HCO3- exchanger,

Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, H+/Cl- exchanger. NKCC (Na+/K+ /2Cl- cotransporter) located in the basal

gill membranes drive Cl- and Na+ exclusion across salt-secreting epithelia and are involved in both

Na+ and Cl- uptake and excretion powered by Na+ and Cl- turnover. Mediation of relative

expression levels of NKCC during hypo/hyper osmotic challenge (notably in weak hyper-

osmoregulators) (Luquet et al., 2005) has been demonstrated in a number of studies, in particular

two different crab taxa Chasmagnatus granulatus and Carcinus maenas (Genovese et al., 2000;

Riestenpatt et al., 1996). A similar Na+ uptake function has been reported for NKCC because it

actively moves Na+, K+, 2Cl- from the extracellular fluid to the cytosol of cells. NKCC has been

shown to be more important in Na+ regulation in brackish media. Apical NKCC is very active in

M. australiense and controls inward flow of Na+ supplied by apical K+ channels where this channel

reuses K+ and increases polarization of the apical cell membrane, inducing Cl- influx into the

haemolymph via Cl- channels in the basolateral gill area. All of these drivers can amplify the Na+

inward gradient.

Acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Aquaporin (AQP), Integrin (ITG),

Oligosaccharyltransferase Complex (OST), Selenoprotein (SP), Selenophosphate1(SPS1), V-

type-(H+) ATPase (VTA) are involved in salinity tolerance processes, GTPase activity and

5.3 Group 3 Genes (Cell volume control)

127

adaptation under osmotic stress (Gillanders et al., 2003; Kotlyar et al., 2000; Shekhar et al., 2013;

Pongsomboon et al., 2009). AK is a phosphotransferase that is involved in metabolic processes,

phosphatase activity and supports ion transport activity. During regulation of ATP levels and

osmoregulation, AK play a significant role more specifically in species that require active ion

transport and in critical cell processes that need ATP as the main energy supply (Kotlyer et al.,

2000; Towle and Weihrauch, 2001).

VTA, Selenoprotein and the OST complex are the most important members of this group. The

other important member is VTA (HAT) that is highly conserved during evolution of crustaceans

as it constitutes the main ion pump in FW taxa (Krischner, 2004; Faleiros et al., 2010). Up

regulation of this gene has been documented in species that have been acclimated to FW conditions

(Havird et al., 2013). This membrane enzyme transfers ions into osmoregulatory tissues and when

being expressed it accounts for approximately 30% of overall ATP requirements (Toei et al.,

2010). The OST complex and Selenoprotein are also involved in maintaining haemostasis and

cellular process regulation during osmotic stress, respectively (Pongsomboon et al., 2009;

Gillanders et al., 2003).

Members if this group play a major role in maintaining osmotic pressure balance between

extracellular and intracellular media and include CFTR, AQP, Integrin, NHE, ILF, SPS1. CFTR

and ABCC genes that increase osmoregulatory capacity under osmotic challenge. The role of these

genes has been discussed above.

5.4 Group 4 Genes (Water channel regulation)

128

ATP Binding Cassette C12 (ABCC), Bestrophin (BEST), Crustacean cardiovascular peptide

(CCP), Na+ channel, K+ channel, Na+/K+ channel constitute the most critical genes in this category.

In addition, some of these genes are structural and alter cytoskeleton components to enhance cell

survival under stressful osmotic conditions. These include Annexin that is a significant Ca2+

binding protein that regulates components of the actin-based cytoskeleton that influences osmotic

adaptation in gill cells, at least in the gills of fish. Furthermore, the actin-based cytoskeleton is

important for NKCC activity and gill permeability via MRCs (Fiol and Kultz, 2007). In

crustaceans, there are also some pivotal processes that occur under hyperosmotic conditions to

enhance survival during osmotic stress that include: oxidation-redaction, glycin/L-serin

metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, cellular protein modulation (CPM) and phosphorylation.

CPM and phosporylation are related to post-translational regulation. For example, reducing

oxidation in cells is vital for maintaining homeostasis and can influence appropriate responses to

stimuli (Lv et al., 2013).

After sensing an osmotic change by osmosensors, structural genes are activated to rearrange the

cell cytoskeleton to regulate cell membrane permeability and lipid membrane composition.

Following this, cell protective and immune genes regulate movement of the ions into and out of

the cell. Specific genes are responsible for immune response and for protection/repair of cells

under hyperosmotic conditions.

5.5 Group 5 Genes (Body fluid maintenance)

129

Osmoregulatory performance is considered to be the principal mechanism for maintaining ionic

balance under environmental salinity fluctuation. Based on the available literature, co-operation

among a set of the genes that work together in unison is crucial for effective osmoregulation in

both FW and SW conditions. Based on an indepth literature review and our study 1 & 2, we have

generated a list of candidate genes upon which to conduct further investigations. Study 2 revealed

that ion regulation under different osmotic niches is largely controlled by changes in gene

expression pattern in M. australiense. We selected five important osmoregulatory genes to better

understand the role of these genes under different salinity conditions over time (Study 3) using a

RT-qPCR approach. Relative gene expression patterns (based on RT-qPCR) of five key

osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense showed remarkable differences in expression patterns

over a five day experimental timeframe under sub-lethal salinity conditions. The following section

describes the inferred interaction of the five genes in M. australiense under three different sub-

lethal osmotic conditions.

5.6 Interaction of the five most important osmoregulatory genes

in M. australiense under salinity stress and their role with

respect to FW adaptation

130

Figures 5-2a, b and c show the patterns of gene expression of the five critical osmoregulatory genes

in M. australiense at three sub-lethal salinities (0‰, 5‰ & 10‰) over a five day experimental

Fig 5-2: Expression levels of the five major osmoregulatory genes in M. australiense over a five

day period (a – 0ppt, b – 5ppt and c – 10ppt).

a

b

c

131

period. Note that the x-axis has been adjusted to reflect linear time over the five day period.

Relative low and consistent expression for all five genes at 0‰ salinity clearly indicates that M.

australiense is well-adapted to freshwater conditions and apparently does not experience any

osmotic stress at 0‰. Amongst the five genes studied, the lowest expression level for NKCC was

observed at 0‰ salinity indicating a negligible or only very minor role for this gene in freshwater

(5.2a). In contrast, relatively higher expression levels of NHE, VTA and Aquaporin were observed

over the whole experimental period at 0‰ salinity indicating important functional roles for these

genes in freshwater.

At 5‰ salinity, expression levels of NHE, VTA and Aquaporin were relatively low (Fig. 5-2b),

indicating less important roles for these genes under elevated salinity conditions. Even though

initial expression levels for Aquaporin and VTA were realtively high, they declined over time

indicating that initial exposure to osmotic stress most probably induces their expression. VTA and

NHE are genes well known for their functional role in driving absorption of ions from the

surrounding environment in freshwater but not in salt water. Consistently high expression levels

were observed for NKA and NKCC under raised salinity levels (5‰ and 10‰) indicating

important functional roles for these two genes in M. australiense under raised sub-lethal salinity

conditions. As discussed earlier, NKA acts as a master gene for ionic balance (osmoregulation) in

both freshwater and in saltwater (pumps ion in or pump ions out depending on the external ionic

gradient) (Charmantier et al., 2009; McNamara and Faria, 2012). Thus, high expression of NKA

was evident under each of the three osmotic conditions examined in M. australiense in the current

study. Relatively higher expression of NKCC (both at 5‰ and 10‰ salinities) indicates an

important role of this gene at elevated salinity levels.

132

Relatively high expression levels were observed in M. australiense for all five genes across the

whole experimental period at the highest sub-lethal salinity examined at 10‰ (Fig. 5-2c). We also

observed rapid fluctuation in expression levels of the genes at this salinity clearly indicating that

10‰ is very stressful for M. australiense and requires rapid response from many genes. As a result

of higher levels of stress imposed on M. australiense, a rapid response is required from these genes

to address the imposed stress. While high levels were observed initially, over time, they declined

for Aquaporin, NHE and VTA suggesting that their major role maybe to deal with stresses imposed

from raised salinity conditions. Consistently very high levels of NKA and NKCC expression here

also indicate important functional roles for these two genes in M. australiense under raised

salinities. The functional role of Aquaporin however, is to deal with regulation of water channels

and to maintain cellular volume iso-osmotic with the surrounding environment (Freire et al., 2008;

Furriel et al., 2010). While Aquaporin is known to be less important in raised salinity

environments, relatively high expression of this gene at 10‰ in M. australiense probably occurs

to maintain regulatory cellular volume under the changed osmotic conditions as well.

Here we conducted a comparative population and functional genomic study of three populations

of an endemic Australian freshwater-adapted (ALD) species of freshwater prawn (M. australiense)

to understand how effective osmoregulation is achieved at the molecular level under different sub-

lethal salinity conditions. A major outcome of the study was recognition that mutations in coding

regions of key osmoregulatory genes were not detected but mutations were only detected in

regulatory sequences of the same genes that potentially shape and/or control gene expression

patterns under different external sub-lethal salinity conditions. So at least for M. australiense,

adaptation to different sub-lethal salinity conditions that apparently impose osmotic stress on

5.7 Conclusions

133

individuals is achieved primarily by modifying gene expression patterns of essentially identical

coding gene sequences of key osmoregulatory genes.

In the current study, we obtained a huge amount of sequence data (≈70% of the assembled contigs)

that did not receive any blast hit matching with the existing public databases. Many of these

transcripts could be smaller fragments from different parts of existing genes or these could contain

many important lineage specific genes (known as taxonomically restricted or orphan genes). These

genes can also play very important role in adaptation process. It will be interesting to make an

attempt in the future to discover how many of the unidentified transcripts (without blast hits) are

under the orphan category. However, the results of the current study provide the basic genomic

data required for developing simple molecular models that can characterize how freshwater prawns

in the monophyletic genus, Macrobrachium, achieve effective salinity adaptation under a variety

of sub-lethal osmotic conditions.

Gene expression profiles are effective instruments for identifying potential CGs that, in this case,

may contribute to salinity tolerance via altering osmoregulatory performance. Here we employed

M. australiense essentially as a model for identifying key functional genetic loci that contribute to

salinity tolerance in general, more widely in FW prawns. In the future, it is proposed to extend the

analysis to other Macrobrachium taxa with different natural tolerance ranges to raised salinity

conditions to identify which genes (and mutations within the same genes) have been most

important during repeated independent colonization of freshwater by this decapod group.

The current study contains the first comprehensive EST transcriptomic dataset recovered from the

freshwater prawn, M. australiense. This species has provided an ideal foundation model for

understanding the molecular basis of freshwater adaptation and colonization by other

134

Macrobrachium species. Availability of expressed putative genes that are potentially associated

with salinity tolerance will also facilitate genomic approaches in other Macrobrachium species

that may have applications for improving productivity of farmed freshwater prawn species

(notably M. rosenbergii). Detectable differences in key gene expression patterns identified here

will likely present novel genes of interest to other researchers, in particular those candidate genes

and functional mutations that affect osmoregulatory capacity more widely in decapod crustaceans.

Climate warming will cause significant changes to many rivers and FW lakes, (including changes

to their ionic balance) making them in some cases less productive and so the information developed

here provides an important resource for investigating osmoregulation systems and salinity/FW

adaptation more widely in aquatic species. In particular, ESTs provide a powerful and effective

method for predicting expressed protein components encoded by genes in uncharacterized

genomes. Ultimately the information may also be applied potentially to developing more saline-

tolerant FW prawn culture lines that can withstand, and acclimate to, increased ionic

concentrations in their farm environments.

135

6 References:

Abe, H., Hirai, S., and Okada, S. (2007). Metabolic responses and arginine kinase expression under hypoxic

stress of the kuruma prawn Marsupenaeus japonicus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:

Molecular and Integrative Physiology 146: 40-46.

Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across

scales. Global Environmental Change 15(2): 77-86.

Agard, J. B. R. (1999). A four-dimensional response surface analysis of the ontogeny of physiological

adaptation to salinity and temperature in larvae of the palaemonid shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de

Man). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236(2): 209-233.

Ali, M. Y, Pavasovic, A., Amin, S., Mather, P. B., and Prentis, P. J. (2015). Comparative analysis of gill

transcriptomes of two freshwater crayfish, Cherax cainii and C. destructor. Marine Genomics 22: 11-13.

Ali, M. Y., Pavasovic, A., Mather, P. B., and Prentis, P. J. (2015). Analysis, characterization and expression

of gill-expressed carbonic anhydrase genes in freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Gene 564(2):

176-187.

Allison, E. H., Adger, W. N., Badjeck, M. C., Brown, K., Conway, D., Dulvy, N. K., and Perry, A. (2005).

Effects of climate change on the sustainability of capture and enhancement fisheries important to the poor:

analysis of the vulnerability and adaptability of fisherfolk living in poverty. Final Technical Report.

Andrews, S. (2010). FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Reference Source:

http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.

Anger, K. (2003). Salinity as a key parameter in the larval biology of decapod crustaceans. Invertebrate

Reproduction and Development 43: 29 -45.

Anger, K. (2013). Neotropical Macrobrachium (Caridea: Palaemonidae): on the biology, origin, and

radiation of freshwater-invading shrimp. Journal of Crustacean Biology 33: 151–183.

Arbabi, S., and Maier, R. V. (2002). Mitogen-activated protein kinases. Critical Care Medicine, 30(1), S74-

S79.

Auwera, G. A., Carneiro, M. O., Hartl, C., Poplin, R., Del, A. G., Levy‐Moonshine, A., Jordan, T., Shakir,

K., Roazen, D., Thibault, J., Banks, E., Garimella, K. V., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., DePristo, M. A. (2013).

136

From FastQ data to high‐confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline.

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 43: 11.10.1-33. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43.

Augusto, A., Silva, P. A., Greene, L. J., Laure, H. J., and McNamara, J. C. (2009). Evolutionary transition

to freshwater by ancestral marine palaemonids: evidence from osmoregulation in a tide pool shrimp.

Aquatic Biology 7: 113–122.

Barman, H. K, Patra, S. K., Das, V., Mohapatra, S. D, Jayasankar, P., Mohapatra, C., Mohanta, R., Panda,

R. P., and Rath, S. N. (2012). Identification and characterization of differently expressed transcripts in the

gills of freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) under salt stress. The Scientific World Journal

2012: 1-11. doi: 10.1100/2012/149361.

Belli, N. M., Faleiros, R. O., Firmino, K. C. S., Masui, D. C., Leone, F. A., McNamara, J. C., and Furriel,

R. P. M. (2009). Na, K-ATPase activity and epithelial interfaces in gills of the freshwater shrimp

Macrobrachium amazonicum (Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part

A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 152(3): 431-439.

Berdan, E. L., Mazzoni, C. J., Waurick, I., Roehr, J. T., and Mayer, F. (2015). A population genomic scan

in Chorthippus grasshoppers unveils previously unknown phenotypic divergence. Molecular Ecology 24:

3918-3930. doi: 10.1111/mec.13276.

Berger, V. J., and Kharazova, A. D. (1997). Mechanisms of salinity adaptations in marine molluscs.

In Interactions and Adaptation Strategies of Marine Organisms (pp. 115-126). Springer Netherlands.

Bernays, S. J., Schmidt, D. J., Hurwood, D. A., and Hughes, J. M. (2015). Phylogeography of two

freshwater prawn species from far-northern Queensland. Marine and Freshwater Research 66(3): 256-266.

Blinn, D., Halse, S., Pinder, A., and Shiel, R. (2004). Diatom and micro-invertebrate communities and

environmental determinants in the western Australian wheatbelt: a response to

salinization. Hydrobiologia, 528(1-3): 229-248.

Blewett, T. A., Wood, C. M., and Glover, C. N. (2016). Salinity-dependent nickel accumulation and effects

on respiration, ion regulation and oxidative stress in the galaxiid fish, Galaxias maculatus. Environmental

Pollution 214: 132-141.

137

Boyle, R., Oliveira L, Bianchini A, and Souza, M. (2013). The Effects of Copper on Na+/K+-ATPase and

Aquaporin Expression in Two Euryhaline Invertebrates. Bulletin of the Environmental Contamination and

Toxicology 90: 387-390.

Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence

data. Bioinformatics 2014 (btu170): 1–7.

Boudour-Boucheker, N., Boulo, V., Lorin-Nebel, C., Elgero, C., Grousset, E., Anger, K., Charmantier-

Daures, M., and Charmantier, G. (2013). Adaptation to freshwater in thepalaemonid shrimp

Macrobrachium amazonicum: comparative ontogeny of osmoregulatoryorgans. Cell and Tissue Research

353: 87–98.

Boudour-Boucheker, N., Boulo, V., Charmantier-Daures, M., Grousset, E., Anger, K., Charmantier, G.,

and Lorin-Nebel, C. (2014). Differential distribution of V-type H+-ATPase and Na+/K+-ATPase in the

branchial chamber of the shrimp Macrobrachium amazonicum. Cell and Tissue Research 357: 195–206.

Boudour-Boucheker, N., Boulo, V., Charmantier-Daures, M., Anger, K., Charmantier, G., and Lorin-Nebel,

C. (2016). Osmoregulation in larvae and juveniles of two recently separated Macrobrachium species:

Expression patterns of ion transporter genes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular

and Integrative Physiology 195: 39-45.

Bradley, T. J. (2009). Animal osmoregulation, Oxford University Press (Book).

Bradley, J. E., and Bradley, J. L. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 8,506,811. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and

Trademark Office.

Brander, K. (2010). Impacts of climate change on fisheries. Journal of Marine Systems 79(3): 389-402.

Brekhman, V., Malik, A., Haas, B., Sher, N., and Lotan, T. (2015). Transcriptome profiling of the dynamic

life cycle of the scyphozoan jellyfish Aurelia auritia. BMC Genomics 16: 74. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-

1320-z.

Brett, C.L., Donowitz, M., and Rao, R. (2005). Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton

exchangers. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology 288: C223–C239.

Brierley, A. S., and Kingsford M. J. (2009). Impacts of Climate Change on Marine Organisms and

Ecosystems. Current Biology 19(14): R602-R614.

138

Brumfield, R.T,. Beerli, P,. Nickerson, D. A,. and Edwards, S.V. (2003). The utility of single nucleotide

polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 249-256.

Butlin, R. K. (2010). Population genomics and speciation. Genetica 138: 409-418. doi: 10.1007/s10709-

008-9321-3.

Camacho, C,. Coulouris, G,. Avagyan, V,. Ma, N,. Papadopoulos J,. Bealer, K,. and Madden, T. (2009).

BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421.

Cañedo-Argüelles, M., Kefford, B. J., Piscart, C., Prat, N., Schäfer, R. B., and Schulz, C. J. (2013).

Salinisation of rivers: urgent ecological issue. Environmental Pollution 173: 157-167.

Chan, S. M., Rankin, S. M., and Keeley, L. L. (1988). Characterization of the molt stages in Penaeus

vannamei: setogenesis and hemolymph levels of total protein, ecdysteroids, and glucose. The Biological

Bulletin 175(2): 185-192.

Charmantier, G., and Charmantier-Daures, M. (2001). Ontogeny of osmoregulation in crustaceans: the

embryonic phase. American zoologist 41(5): 1078-1089.

Charmantier, G. (1998). Ontogeny of osmoregulation in crustaceans: a review. Invertebrate Reproduction

and Development 33(2-3): 177-190.

Charmantier, G., and Anger, K. (2011). Ontogeny of osmoregulatory patterns in the South American shrimp

Macrobrachium amazonicum: Loss of hypo-regulation in a land-locked population indicates phylogenetic

separation from estuarine ancestors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 396: 89-98.

Cieluch, U., Anger, K., Aujoulat, F., Buchholz, F., Charmantier-Daures, M., and Charmantie, G. (2004).

Ontogeny of osmoregulatory structures and functions in the green crab Carcinus maenas (Crustacea,

Decapoda). Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 325-336.

Cheng, W., and Chen, J. C. (2000). Effects of pH, temperature and salinity on immune parameters of the

freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 10: 387-391.

Chen, X., and Stillman, J. H. (2012). Multigenerational analysis of temperature and salinity variability

affects on metabolic rate, generation time, and acute thermal and salinity tolerance in Daphnia pulex.

Journal of Thermal Biology 37(3): 185-194.

Cheng, W., and Chen J. C. (2000). Effects of pH, temperature and salinity on immune parameters of the

freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 10(4): 387-391.

139

Cochrane, K. L., Andrew, N. L., and Parma, A. M. (2011). Primary fisheries management: a minimum

requirement for provision of sustainable human benefits in small‐scale fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 12(3):

275-288.

Cnaani, A., and Hulata, G. (2011). Improving salinity tolerance in tilapias: past experience and future

prospects. Israel Journal of Aquaculture 63: 1-21.

Cochrane, K., De Young, C., Soto, D., and Bahri, T. (2009). Climate change implications for fisheries and

aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 530: 212.

Conte, F. P., Hootman, S. R., and Harris, P. J . (1972). Neck organ of Artemia salina nauplii. Journal of

Comparative Physiology 80(3): 239-246.

Costa, C., Costa, J. M., Desterke, C., Botterel, F., Cordonnier, C., and Bretagne, S. (2002). Real-time PCR

coupled with automated DNA extraction and detection of galactomannan antigen in serum by enzyme-

linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Journal of Clinical

Microbiology 40(6): 2224-2227.

Craig, M. T., Eble, J. A., Bowen, B. W., and Robertson, D. R. (2007). High genetic connectivity across the

Indian and Pacific Oceans in the reef fish Myripristis berndti (Holocentridae). Marine Ecology Progress

Series 334: 245-254.

Dall, W. (1967). Hypo-osmoregulation in Crustacea. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 21(3):

653-678.

Davidson, W. S., Koop, B. F., Jones, S. J. M., Iturra, P., Vidal, R., Maass, A., Jonassen, I., Lien, S., and

Omholt, S.W. (2010). Sequencing the genome of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genome Biology 11(9):

403.

Denne, L. B. (1968). Some aspects of osmotic and ionic regulation in the prawns Macrobrachium

australiense (holthuis) and M. equidens (dana). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 26(1): 17-30.

De Wit, P., Pespeni, M. H., Palumbi, S. R. (2015). SNP genotyping and population genomics from

expressed sequences–current advances and future possibilities. Molecular Ecology 24: 2310-2323. doi:

10.1111/mec.13165

DePristo, M. A., Banks, E., Poplin, R., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J. R., Hartl, C., Philippakis, A. A., Angel,

G. D., Rivas, M. A., Hanna, M., McKenna, A., Fennel, T. J., Kernytsky, M., Sivachenko, A. Y., Cibulskis,

K., Gabriel, S. B., Altshuler, D., and Daly, M. J. (2011). A framework for variation discovery and

140

genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics 43: 491-498. doi:

10.1038/ng.806.

Dimmock, A., Williamson, I., Mather, P. B. (2004). The influence of environment on the morphology of

Macrobrachium australiense (Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Aquaculture International 12: 435-456.

Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R.

J., Prieur-Richard, A. H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J., and Sullivan, C. A. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity:

importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81(2): 163-182.

Edwards, M., and Richardson, A. J. (2004). Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and

trophic mismatch. Nature 430(7002): 881-884.

Eissa, A. E., and Zaki, M. M. (2011). The impact of global climatic changes on the aquatic environment.

Procedia Environmental Sciences 4: 251-259.

Eguavoen, I., Schulz, K., de Wit, S., Weisser, F., and Müller-Mahn, D. (2015). Political dimensions of

climate change adaptation: conceptual reflections and African examples. In: Handbook of Climate Change

Adaptation, pp. 1183-1199, Springer.

Ekblom, R., and Galindo, J. (2011). Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of

non-model organisms. Heredity 107(1): 1-15.

Eyckmans, M., Celis, N., Horemans, N., Blust, R., and De Boeck, G. (2011). Exposure to waterborne copper

reveals differences in oxidative stress response in three freshwater fish species. Aquatic Toxicology, 103(1),

112-120.

Faleiros, R.O., Goldman, M. H., Furriel, R. P., and McNamara, J. C. (2010). Differential adjustment in gill

Na+/K+- and V-ATPase activities and transporter mRNA expression during osmoregulatory acclimation in

the cinnamon shrimp Macrobrachium amazonicum (Decapoda, Palaeomonidae). Journal of Experimental

Biology 213: 3894-3905.

Faria, S. C. D., Augusto, A. S., and McNamara, J. C. (2011). Intra- and extracellular osmotic regulation in

the hololimnetic Caridea and Anomura: a phylogenetic perspective on the conquest of fresh water by the

decapod Crustacea. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 181(2): 175-186.

Ficke, A. D., Myrick, C. A., and Hansen, L. J. (2007). Potential impacts of global climate change on

freshwater fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17: 581-613. doi: 10.1007/s11160-007-9059-

5.

141

Fiol, D. F., and Kültz, D. (2007). Osmotic stress sensing and signaling in fishes. Febs Journal, 274(22),

5790-5798.

Foll, M., and Gaggiotti, O. (2008). A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both

dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977-993.

Freire, C. A., Amado, E. M., Souza, L. R., Veiga, M. P. T., Vitule, J. R. S., Souza, M. M., and Prodocimo,

V. (2008). Muscle water control in crustaceans and fishes as a function of habitat, osmoregulatory capacity

and degree of euryhalinity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A: Molecular and Integrative

Physiology 149: 435-446.

Freire, C.A., Cavassin, F., Rodrigues, E.N., Torres, A.H., and McNamara, J.C., (2003). Adaptive patterns

of osmotic and ionic regulation, and the invasion of fresh water by the palaemonid shrimps. Comparative

Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 136: 771–778.

Freire, C. A., Onken, H., McNamara, J. C. (2008). A structure-function analysis of ion transport in

crustacean gills and excretory organs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and

Integrative Physiology 171: 272-304.

Funge-Smith, S. J ., Taylor, A. C., Whitley, J., and Brown, J. H. (1995). Osmotic and ionic regulation in

the giant Malaysian fresh water prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man), with special reference to

strontium and bromine. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 110(4): 357-365.

Furriel, R. P. M., Firmino, K. C. S., Masui, D. C., Faleiros, R. O., Torres, A. H., and McNamara, J. C.

(2010). Structural and biochemical correlates of Na+, K+-ATPase driven ion uptake across the posterior gill

epithelium of the true freshwater crab, Dilocarcinus pagei (Branchyura, Trichodactylidae). Journal of

Experimental Zoology 313A: 508-523.

Gao, Y. (2009). Cloning and Expression of Aquaporin in the Antennal Gland of Crayfish, Procambarus

clarkii. M.Sc. Thesis, Chapter 1 and 4, Wright State University.

Gao, Y., and Wheatly, M. G. (2004). Characterization and expression of plasma membrane Ca+2 ATPase

(PMCA3) in the crayfish Procambarus clarkia antennal gland during molting. The Journal of Experimental

Biology 207: 2991-3002.

Gelebart, P., Opas, M., and Michalak, M. (2005). Calreticulin, a Ca2+-binding chaperone of the endoplasmic

reticulum. The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 37: 260-266.

142

Genovese, G., Luquet, C., Paz, D., Rosa, G., and Pellerano, G. (2000). The morphometric changes in the

gills of the estuarine crab Chasmagnathus granulatus under hyper- and hypo-regulation conditions are not

caused by proliferation of specialised cells. Journal of Anatomy 197: 239-246.

Genovese, G., Ortiz, N., Urcola, M. R., and Luquet, C. M. (2005). Possible role of carbonic anhydrase V-

H-ATPase and Cl−/HCO−3 exchanger in electrogenic ion transport across the gills of the euryhaline crab

Chasmagnathus granulatus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 142A: 362–369.

Gillanders, B., Able, K., Brown, J., Eggleston, D., and Sheridan, P. (2003). Evidence of connectivity

between juvenile and adult habitats for mobile marine fauna: an important component of nurseries. Marine

Ecology Progress Series 247: 281-295.

Gracey, A. Y., Fraser, E. J., Li, W., Fang, Y., Taylor, R. R, Rogers, J., Brass, A., and Cossins, A. R. (2004).

Coping with cold: an integrative, multitissue analysis of the transcriptome of a poikilothermic vertebrate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 101: 16970-16975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403627101.

Grosell, M. (2006). Intestinal anion exchange in marine fish osmoregulation. Journal of Experimental

Biology 209: 2813-2827.

Grosell, M., McDonald, M. D., Walsh, P. J., and Wood, C. M. (2004). Effects of prolonged copper exposure

in the marine gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta) II: copper accumulation, drinking rate and Na+/K+-ATPase

activity in osmoregulatory tissues. Aquatic Toxicology 68(3): 263-275.

Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J., Couger, M. B., Eccles,

D., Li, B., Lieber, M., MacManes, M. D., Ott, M., Orvis, J., Pochet, N., Strozzi, F., Weeks, N., Westerman,

R., William, T., Dewey, C. N., Henschel, R., LeDuc, R. D., Friedman, N., and Regev, A. (2013). De novo

transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using Trinity platform for reference generation and

analysis. Nature Protocols 8(8): 1494-1512.

Haines, A., Kovats, R. S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., and Corvalán, C. (2006). Climate change and human

health: impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health 120(7): 585-596.

Halse, S. A., Ruprecht, J. K., and Pinder, A. M. (2003). Salinisation and prospects for biodiversity in rivers

and wetlands of south-west Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 51(6): 673-688.

Handisyde, N., and Britain, G. (2006). The effects of climate change on world aquaculture: a global

perspective, Department for International Development.

143

Harrison, G. W. (1979). Stability under environmental stress: resistance, resilience, persistence, and

variability. American Naturalist 113: 659-669.

Hart, B. T., Bailey, P., Edwards, R., Hortle, K., James, K., McMahon, A., Meredith, C., and Swadling, K.

(1991). A review of the salt sensitivity of the Australian freshwater biota. Hydrobiologia 210(1-2): 105-

144.

Havird, J. C., Henry, R. P., and Wilson, R. E. (2013). Altered expression of Na+/K+-ATPase and other

osmoregulatory genes in the gills of euryhaline animals in response to salinity transfer: A meta analysis of

59 quantitative PCR studies over 10 years. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology D: Genomics and

Proteomics 8(2): 131-140.

Havird, J. C., Santos, S. R., and Henry, R. P. (2014). Osmoregulation in the Hawaiian anchialine shrimp

Halocaridina rubra (Crustacea: Atyidae): expression of ion transporters, mitochondria-rich cell

proliferation and hemolymph osmolality during salinity transfers. Journal of Experimental Biology 21(13):

2309-2320.

Henry, R. P., Lucu, C., Onken, H., and Weihrauch, D. (2012). Multiple functions of the crustacean gill:

osmotic/ionic regulation, acid-base balance, ammonic excretion, and bioaccumulation of toxic metals.

Frontiers in Physiology 3: 1-33.

Henry, R. P., Gehnrich, S., Weihrauch, D., and Towle D. W. (2011). Salinity-mediated carbonic anhydrase

induction in the gills of the euryhaline green crab, Carcinus maenas. Comparative Biochemistry and

Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 136: 243-258.

Henry, R. P., Gehnrich, S., Weihrauch, D., and Towle, D. W. (2003). Salinity-mediated carbonic anhydrase

induction in the gills of the euryhaline green crab, Carcinus maenas. Comparative Biochemistry and

Physiology A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 136: 243-258.

Helyar, S. J., Limborg, M. T., Bekkevold, D., Babbucci, M., Houdt, J. V., Maes, G. E., Bargelloni, L.,

Nielsen, R. O., Taylor, M. I., Ogden, R., Cariani, A., Carvalho, G. R., Consortium, F. P. T., and Panitz, F.

(2012). SNP Discovery Using Next Generation Transcriptomic Sequencing in Atlantic Herring (Clupea

harengus). PLoS ONE 7: e42089.

Tiu, S. H. K., Jian-Guo, H., and Siu-Ming, C. (2007). The LvCHH-ITP gene of the shrimp (Litopenaeus

vannamei) produces a widely expressed putative ion transport peptide (LvITP) for osmo-regulation. Gene

396(2): 226-235.

144

Höher, N., Regoli, F., Dissanayake, A., Nagel, M., Kriews, M., Köhler, A., and Broeg, K. (2013).

Immunomodulating effects of environmentally realistic copper concentrations in Mytilus edulis adapted to

naturally low salinities. Aquatic Toxicology 140: 185-195.

Huong, D. T. T., Wang, T., Bayley, M., and Phong, N. T. (2010). Osmoregulation, growth and moulting

cycles of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) at different salinities. Aquaculture

Research 41(9): e135-e143.

Huong, D. T. T., Yang, W. J., Okuno, A., and Wilder, M. N. (2001). Changes in free amino acids in the

hemolymph of giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii exposed to varying salinities:

relationship to osmoregulatory ability. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular &

Integrative Physiology 128(2): 317-326.

Huong, D. T. T., Wang, T., Bayley, M., and Phuong, N. T. (2010). Osmoregulation, growth and moulting

cycles of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) at different salinities. Aquaculture

Research 41: e135-e143.

Hurwood, D. A., Dammannagoda, S., Krosch, M. N., Jung, H., Salin, K. R., Youssef, M. A. B. H, de Bruyn,

M., and Mather, P. B. (2014). Impacts of climatic factors on evolution of molecular diversity and the natural

distribution of wild stocks of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Freshwater Science

33(1): 217-231.

Hurwood, D. A., Singh, S., Dammannagoda, S. T, Nandlal, S., and Mather, P. B. (2014). Experimental

evaluation of the culture performance of three exotic and a ‘local’ giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium

rosenbergii, De Man 1879) culture strain in Fiji. Aquaculture Research 45: 961-972.

Inokuchi, M., Hiroi, J., Watanabe, S., Lee, K. M., and Kaneko, T. (2008). Gene expression and

morphological localization of NHE3, NCC and NKCC1a in branchial mitochondria-rich cells of

Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) acclimated to a wide range of salinities. Comparative

Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 151(2): 151-158.

Jalihal, D. R., Sankolli, K. N., and Shenoy, S. (1993). Evolution of larval development and the process of

freshwaterization in the prawn genus Macrobrachium Bate, 1868 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Crustaceana

65: 365-376.

James, K. R., Cant, B., and Ryan, T. (2003). Responses of freshwater biota to rising salinity levels and

implications for saline water management: a review. Australian Journal of Botany 51(6): 703-713.

145

Jasmani, S., Jayasankar, V., Shinji. J., and Wilder, M. N. (2010). Carbonic anhydrase and Na+/K+-ATPase

activities during the molt cycle of low salinity-reared white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fisheries

Science 76: 219-225.

Jasmani, S., Jayasankar, V., and Wilder, M. N. (2008). Carbonic anhydrase and Na+/K+‐ATPase activities

at different molting stages of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fisheries Science

74: 488-493.

Jayasundara, N., Towle, D. W., Weihrauch, D., and Spanings-Pierrot, C. (2007). Gill-specific

transcriptional regulation of Na+/K+-ATPase α-subunit in the euryhaline shore crab Pachygrapsus

marmoratus: sequence variants and promoter structure. Journal of Experimental Biology 210(12): 2070-

2081.

Jin, S., Fu, H., Zhou, Q., Sun, S., Jiang, S., Xiong, Y., Gong, Y., Qiao, H., and Zhang, W. (2013).

Transcriptome analysis of androgenic gland for discovery of novel genes from the oriental river prawn,

Macrobrachium nipponense, using Illumina Hiseq 2000. PLoS ONE 8(10): e76840.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076840.

Joseph, A., and Philip, R. (2007). Acute salinity stress alters the haemolymph metabolic profile of Penaeus

monodon and reduces immunocompetence to white spot syndrome virus infection. Aquaculture 272(1): 87-

97.

Jung, H., Lyons, R. E., Hurwood, D. A., and Mather, P. B. (2013). Genes and growth performance in

crustacean species: a review of relevant genomic studies in crustaceans and other taxa. Reviews in

Aquaculture 5(2): 77-110.

Jung, H., Lyons, R. E., Dinh, H., Hurwood, D. A., McWilliam, S., and Mather, P. B. (2011).

Transcriptomics of a giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii): de novo assembly, annotation

and marker discovery. PLoS ONE 6: e27938.

Kaeodee, M., Pongsomboon, S., and Tassanakajon, A. (2011). Expression analysis and response of Penaeus

monodon 14-3-3 genes to salinity stress. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry

and Molecular Biology 159(4): 244-251.

Kang, H., Bradley, M. J., Elam, W. A., and Enrique, M. (2013). Regulation of actin by ion-linked

equilibria. Biophysical journal, 105(12), 2621-2628.

146

Karagounis, L. G., and Hawley, J. A. (2009). The 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase:

regulating the ebb and flow of cellular energetics. The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell

Biology 41(12): 2360-2363.

Karraker, N. E. (2007). Are embryonic and larval green frogs (Rana clamitans) insensitive to road deicing

salt? Herpetological Conservation and Biology 2(1): 35-41.

Kartavtsev, Y. P., Jung, S. O., Lee, Y. M., Byeon, H. K., and Lee, J. S. (2007). Complete mitochondrial

genome of the bullhead torrent catfish, Liobagrus obesus (Siluriformes, Amblycipididae): Genome

description and phylogenetic considerations inferred from the Cytb and 16S rRNA genes. Gene 396(1): 13-

27.

Kefford, B. J. (1998). Is salinity the only water quality parameter affected when saline water is disposed in

rivers? International Journal of Salt Lake Research 7(4): 285-299.

Kennedy, A. J., Cherry, D. S., and Currie, R. J. (2003). Field and laboratory assessment of a coal processing

effluent in the Leading Creek Watershed, Meigs County, Ohio. Archives of Environmental Contamination

and Toxicology 44(3): 0324-0331.

Klos, P. Z., Rosenberry, D. O., and Nelson, G. R. (2015). Influence of hyporheic exchange, substrate

distribution, and other physically linked hydrogeomorphic characteristics on abundance of freshwater

mussels. Ecohydrology 8(7): 1284-1291.

Kocher, T. D., Lee, W. J., Sobolevska, H., Penman, D., and McAndrew, B. (1998). A genetic linkage map

of a cichlid fish, the tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Genetics 148(3): 1225-1232.

Kohn, M. H., Murphy, W. J., Ostrander, E. A., and Wayne, R. K. (2006). Genomics and conservation

genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 629-637.

Kotlyar, S. I. M. O. N., Weihrauch, D. I. R. K., Paulsen, R. S., and Towle, D. W. (2000). Expression of

arginine kinase enzymatic activity and mRNA in gills of the euryhaline crabs Carcinus maenas and

Callinectes sapidus. Journal of Experimental Biology 203(16): 2395-2404.

Kinsey, S. T., and Lee, B. C. (2003). The effects of rapid salinity change on in vivo arginine kinase flux in

the juvenile blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B: Biochemistry and

Molecular Biology 135: 521-531.

Kirschner, L. B. (2004). The mechanism of sodium chloride uptake in hyperregulating aquatic

animals. Journal of Experimental Biology 207(9): 1439-1452.

147

Kotlyar, S., Weihrauch, D., Paulsen, R. S., and Towle, D. W. (2000). Expression of arginine kinase

enzymatic activity and mRNA in gills of the euryhaline crabs Carcinus maenas and Callinectes sapidus.

Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2395-2404.

Langmead, B., and Salzberg, S. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods 9:

357-359.

Leder, E. H., McCairns, R. J. S., Leinonen, T., Cano, J. M., Viitaniemi, H. M., Nikinmaa, M., Primmer, C.

R., and Merilä, J. (2015). The evolution and adaptive potential of transcriptional variation in sticklebacks-

signatures of selection and widespread heritability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 674-689. doi:

10.1093/molbev/msu328.

Lee, C. E., Kiergaard, M., Gelembiuk, G. W., Eads, B. D., and Posavi, M. (2011). Pumping ions: rapid

parallel evolution of ionic regulation following habitat invasions. Evolution 65: 2229-2244.

Leite, V.P., and Zanotto, F. P. (2013). Calcium transport in gill cells of Ucides cordatus, a mangrove crab

living in variable salinity environments. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and

Integrative Physiology 166(2): 370-374.

L, B., and Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or

without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 1.

Lischer, H., and Excoffier, L. (2012). PGDSpider: an automated data conversion tool for connecting

population genetics and genomics programs. Bioinformatics 28: 298-299.

Li, E., Chen, L., Zeng, C., Yu, N., Xiong, Z., Chen, X., and Qin, J. G. (2008). Comparison of digestive and

antioxidant enzymes activities, haemolymph oxyhemocyanin contents and hepatopancreas histology of

white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, at various salinities. Aquaculture 274(1): 80-86.

Li, X., Ma, J., and Li, Y. (2016). Molecular Cloning and Expression Determination of p38 MAPK from the

Liver and Kidney of Silver Carp. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 30(5): 224-231.

Li, B., and Dewey, C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or

without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323.

Lignot, J. H., Spanings-Pierrot, C., and Charmantier, G. (2000). Osmoregulatory capacity as a tool in

monitoring the physiological condition and the effect of stress in crustaceans. Aquaculture 191: 209-245.

148

Lima, A. G., McNamara, J. C., and Terra, W. R. (1997). Regulation of hemolymph osmolytes and gill

Na+/K+-ATPase activities during acclimation to saline media in the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium

olfersii (Wiegmann, 1836)(Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and

Ecology 215(1): 81-91.

Liu, Z. J., and Cordes, J. F. (2004). DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics.

Aquaculture 238(1–4): 1-37.

Li, Y., Hui, M., Cui, Z., Liu, Y., Song, C., and Shi, G. (2015). Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides

insights into the molecular basis of metamorphosis and nutrition metabolism change from zoeae to

megalopae in Eriocheir sinensis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and

Proteomics 13: 1-9.

Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z., Waldbieser, G., Sun, F., Lu, J., Zhang, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, X.,

Rajendran, K. V., Khoo, L., Kucuktas, H., Peatman, E., and Liu, Z. (2012). Efficient assembly and

annotation of the transcriptome of catfish by RNA-Seq analysis of a doubled haploid homozygote. BMC

Genomics 13: 595.

Lovett, D. L., Towle, D. W., and Faris, J. E. (1994). Salinity-sensitive alkaline phosphatase activity in gills

of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B: Comparative

Biochemistry 109: 163-173.

Lobanov, A. V., Hatfield, D. L., and Gladyshev, V. N. (2008). Selenoproteinless animals: selenophosphate

synthetase SPS1 functions in a pathway unrelated to selenocysteine biosynthesis. Protein Science 17(1):

176-182.

Lockwood, A. (1962). The osmoregulation of Crustacea. Biological Reviews 37(2): 257-303.

Loro, V. L., Jorge, M. B., da Silva, K. R., and Wood, C. M. (2012). Oxidative stress parameters and

antioxidant response to sublethal waterborne zinc in a euryhaline teleost Fundulus heteroclitus: protective

effects of salinity. Aquatic Toxicology 110: 187-193.

Luana, W., Li, F., Wang, B., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., and Xiang, J. (2007). Molecular characteristics and

expression analysis of calreticulin in Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Comparative

Biochemistry and Physiology B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 147: 482-491.

Lucena, M. N., Garcon, D. P., Mantelatto, F. L., Pinto, M. R., McNamara, J. C., and Leone, F. A. (2012).

Hemolymph ion regulation and kinetic characteristics of the gill (Na+, K+)-ATPase in the hermit crab

149

Clibanarius vittatus (Decapoda, Anomura) acclimated to high salinity. Comparative Biochemistry and

Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 161(4): 380-391.

Lucu, C., Towle, D. W. (2003). Na+/K+-ATPase in gills of aquatic crustacea. Comparative Biochemistry

and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 135: 195-214.

Luikart, G., England, P. R., Tallmon, D., Jordan, S., and Taberlet, P. (2003). The power and promise of

population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 981-994.

Luquet, C. M., Weihrauch, D., Senek, M., and Towle, D. W. (2005). Induction of branchial ion transporter

mRNA expression during acclimation to salinity change in the euryhaline crab Chasmagnathus granulatus.

Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 3627-3636.

Lushchak, V. I. (2011). Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquatic

Toxicology 101(1): 13-30.

Lv, J., Liu, P., Wang, Y., Gao, B., Chen, P., and Li, J. (2013). Transcriptome analysis of Portunus

trituberculatus in response to salinity stress provides insights into molecular basis of osmoregulation. PLoS

ONE 8(12): e82155.

MacKenzie, B. R., Gislason, H., Möllmann, C., and Köster, F. W. (2007). Impact of 21st century climate

change on the Baltic Sea fish community and fisheries. Global Change Biology 13(7): 1348-1367.

Maina, J. N. (1990). A study of the morphology of the gills of an extreme alkalinity and hyperosmotic

adapted teleost Oreochromis alcalicus grahami (Boulenger) with particular emphasis on the ultrastructure

of the chloride cells and their modifications with water dilution. Anatomy and Embryology 181(1): 83-98.

Manfrin, C., Tom, M., De Moro, G., Gerdol, M., Giulianini, P.G., and Pallavicini, A. (2015). The eyestalk

transcriptome of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Gene 557: 28-34.

Marshall, W. S. (2002). Na+, Cl−, Ca2+ and Zn2+ transport by fish gills: retrospective review and prospective

synthesis. Journal of Experimental Zoology 293(3): 264-283.

McNamara, J. C., and Lima, A. G. (1997). The route of ion and water movements across the gill epithelium

of the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium olfersii (Decapoda, Palaemonidae): evidence from ultrastructural

changes induced by acclimation to saline media. The Biological Bulletin 192(2): 321-331.

McNamara, J. C., and Faria, C. S. (2012). Evolution of osmoregulatory patterns and gill ion transport

mechanisms in the decapod crustacea: A review. Journal of Comparative Physiology 182B: 997-1014.

150

McNamara, J. C., Freire, C. S., Torres, A. H., and Faria, S. C. (2015). The conquest of fresh water by

palaemonid shrimps: an evolutionary history scripted in the osmoregulatory epithelia of the gills and

antennal glands. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 114(3): 673-688.

McClanahan, T. R., Cinner, J. E., Maina, J., Graham, N. A. J., Daw, T. M., Stead, S. M., Wamukota, A.,

Brown, K., Ateweberhan, M., Venus, V., and Polunin, N. V. C. (2008). Conservation action in a changing

climate. Conservation Letters 1(2): 53-59.

Morris, S. T. E. P. H. E. N. (2001). Neuroendocrine regulation of osmoregulation and the evolution of air-

breathing in decapod crustaceans. Journal of Experimental Biology 204(5): 979-989.

Moshtaghi, A., Rahi, M. L., Tuan, V. T., Mather, P. B., and Hurwood, D. A. (2016). A transcriptomic scan

for potential candidate genes involved in osmoregulation in an obligate freshwater palaemonidprawn

(Macrobrachium australiense). PeerJ 4: e2520. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2520

Morrell, P. L., Buckler, E. S., and Rose-Ibarra, J. (2012). Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nature

Reviews Genetics 13(2): 85-96.

Murphy, N., and Austin, C. M. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of the globally distributed freshwater

prawn genus Macrobrachium: biogeography, taxonomy and the convergent evolution of abbreviated larval

development. Zoologica Scripta 34: 187-197.

Mykles, D. L., and Hui, J. H. L. (2015). Neocaridina denticulate: A decapod crustacean model for

functional genomics. Integrative and Comparative Biology 55(5): 891-897.

Nadal, E. D., Ammerer, G., and Posas, F. (2011). Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nature

Reviews Genetics 12: 833-844.

Nakasugi, K., Crowhurst, R. N., Bally, J., Wood, C. C., Hellens, R. P., and Waterhouse, P. M. (2013). De

novo transcriptome sequence assembly and analysis of RNA silencing genes of Nicotiana benthamiana.

PLOS ONE 8(3): e59534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059534

Nishimura, H., and Fan, Z. (2003). Regulation of water movement across vertebrate renal tubules.

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 136: 479-498.

Nguyen, P., Do, H., Mather, P. B., Hurwood, D. A. (2014). Experimental assessment of the effects of

sublethal salinities on growth performance and stress in cultured tra catfish (Pangasianodon

hypophthalmus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 40: 1839-1848.

151

Nguyen, T. V., Jung, H., Nguyen, T. M., Hurwood, D. A., and Mather, P. B (2016). Evaluation of potential

candidate genes involved in salinity tolerance in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) using an

RNA-Seq approach. Marine Genomics 25: 75-88.

Pallas, A., Garcia, B., Corgos, A., Bernardez, C., and Freire, J. (2006). Distribution and habitat use patterns

of benthic decapod crustaceans in shallow waters: a comparative approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series

324: 173-184.

Park, Y. D., Yang,Y., Chen, Q. X., Lin, H.N., Liu, Q., and Zhou, H. M. (2001). Kinetics of complexing

activation by the magnesium ion on green crab (Scylla serrata) alkaline phosphatase. Biochemistry and

Cell Biology 79: 765-772.

Parra, G., Bradman, K., and Korf, I. (2007). CEGMA: A pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in

eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23: 1061-1067.

Perry, A. L., Low, P. J., Ellis, J. R., and Reynolds, J. D. (2005). Climate change and distribution shifts in

marine fishes. Science 308(5730): 1912-1915.

Pequeux, A. (1995). Osmotic regulation in crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology 15(1): 1-60.

Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., Zhou, L., Liu, H., Ma, Y., Ding, Y., Friedlingstein,

P., Liu, C., Tan, K., Yu, Y., Zhang, T., and Fang, J. (2010). The impacts of climate change on water

resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467(7311): 43-51.

Piscart, C., Usseglio-Polatera, P., Moreteau, J. C., and Beisel, J. N. (2006). The role of salinity in the

selection of biological traits of freshwater invertebrates. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 166(2): 185-198.

Pinoni, S., and Mañanes, A. L. (2004). Alkaline phosphatase activity sensitive to environmental salinity

and dopamine in muscle of the euryhaline crab Cyrtograpsus angulatus. Journal of Experimental Marine

Biology and Ecology 307: 35-46.

Pileggi, L.G., and Mantelatto, F. L. (2010). Molecular phylogeny of the freshwater prawn genus

Macrobrachium (Decapoda, Palaemonidae), with emphasis on the relationship among selected American

species. Invertebrate Systematics 24: 194-208.

Pongsomboon, S., Udomlertpreecha, S., Amparyup, P., Wuthisuthimethavee, S., and Tassanakajon, A.

(2009). Gene expression and activity of carbonic anhydrase in salinity stressed Penaeus monodon.

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 152: 225-233.

152

Pörtner, H. O., and Knust, R. (2007). Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation

of thermal tolerance. Science 315(5808): 95-97.

Ramnanan, C. J., and Storey, K. B. (2006). Suppression of Na+/K+-ATPase activity during estivation in the

land snail Otala lactea. Journal of Experimental Biology 209(4): 677-688.

Rainbow, P., and Black, W. (2001). Effects of changes in salinity on the apparent water permeability of

three crab species: Carcinus maenas, Eriocheir sinensis and Necora puber. Journal of Experimental Marine

Biology and Ecology 264(1): 1-13.

Rajesh, S., Kiruthika, L., Ponniah, A. G., and Shekhar, M. S. (2012). Identification, cloning and expression

analysis of Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene from shrimp, Penaeus monodon and its relevance

to salinity stress. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 32(5): 693-699.

Read, G. (1986). A surface response analysis of the role of salinity in the development of larval and post

larval Macrobrachium petersi (Hilgendorf). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology

84(1): 159-168.

Revenga, C., Brunner, J., Henninger, N., and Kassem, K. (2000). Freshwater Systems. World Resources

Institute Washington, DC.

Rodó, X., and Comin, F. (2003). Global climate: current research and uncertainties in the climate system,

Springer.

Romano, N., and Zeng, C. (2012). Osmoregulation in decapod crustaceans: implications to aquaculture

productivity, methods for potential improvement and interactions with elevated ammonia exposure.

Aquaculture 334–337: 12-23.

Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., Smyth, G. K. (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor package of differential

expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1): 139-140.

Rogl, K. (2015). Constraints on dispersal within and among drainages in the widespread freshwater prawn

Macrobrachium australiense. BSc Honours Thesis, Queensland University of Technology

Roy, L. A,. Davis, D. A., Saoud, I. P., and Henry, R. P. (2007). Branchial carbonic anhydrase activity and

ninhydrin positive substances in the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, acclimated to low and

high salinities. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 147:

404-411.

153

Root, T. L., Price, J. T., Hall, K. R., Schneider, S. H., Rosenzweig, C., and Pounds, J. A. (2003). Fingerprints

of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60

Rosegrant, M. W., and Cline, S. A. (2003). Global food security: challenges and

policies. Science 302(5652): 1917-1919.

Rundle, H. D., and Nosil, P. (2005). Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8: 336-352.

Salem, M., Rexroad, C. E., Wang, J., Thorgaard, G. H., and Yao, J. (2010). Characterization of rainbow

trout transcriptome using Sanger and 454-pyrosequencing approaches. BMC Genomics 11(1): 564.

Sandifer, P. A., Hopkins, J. S., and Smith, T. I. J. (1975). Observations on salinity tolerance and

osmoregulation in laboratory-reared Macrobrachium rosenbergii post-larvae (Crustacea: Caridea).

Aquaculture 6(2): 103-114.

Schmidhuber, J., and Tubiello, F. N. (2007). Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences 104(50): 19703-19708.

Scott, G. R., Clai, B., Edwards, S. L., Schulte, P. M., and Wood, C. M. (2005). Gene expression after

freshwater transfer in gills and opercular epithelia of killifish: insight into divergent mechanisms of ion

transport. Journal of Experimental Biology 208(14): 2719-2729.

Seeb, J. E., Carvalho, G., Hauser, L., Naish, K., Roberts, S., and Seeb, L. W. (2011). Single-nucleotide

polymorphism (SNP) discovery and applications of SNP genotyping in nonmodel organisms. Molecular

Ecology Resources 11: 1-8.

Serrano, L., and Henry, R. P. (2008). Differential expression and induction of two carbonic anhydrase

isoforms in the gills of the euryhaline green crab, Carcinus maenas, in response to low

salinity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 3(2): 186-193.

Shaw, J. (1958). Osmoregulation in the muscle fibres of Carcinus maenas. Journal of Experimental Biology

35(4): 920-929.

Sharma, S., and Hughes, J. M. (2009). Genetic structure and phylogeography of freshwater shrimps

(Macrobrachium australiense and Macrobrachium tolmerum): the role of contemporary and historical

events. Marine and Freshwater Research 60: 541-553.

154

Shekhar, M., Kiruthika, J., and Ponniah, A. (2013). Identification and analysis of differentially expressed

genes from shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in response to low salinity stress. Fish and Shellfish Immunology

35: 1957-1968.

Schiener-Bobis, G. (2002). Action of palytoxin on apical H+/K-ATPase in rat colon. European Journal of

Biochemistry 269: 3905-3911.

Short, J.W. (2004). A revision of the Australian river prawns: Macrobrachium (Crustacea: Decapoda:

Palaemonidae). Hydrobiologia 525: 1-100.

Sliva, L., and Williams, D. D. (2001). Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use

impact on river water quality. Water Research 35(14): 3462-3472.

Sokolova, I. M., Frederich, M., Bagwe, R., Lannig, G., and Sukhotin, A. A. (2012). Energy homeostasis as

an integrative tool for assessing limits of environmental stress tolerance in aquatic invertebrates. Marine

Environmental Research 79: 1-15.

Somero, G. N. (2002). Thermal physiology and vertical zonation of intertidal animals: optima, limits, and

costs of living. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42(4): 780-789.

Song L, Florea L, and Langmead B. (2014). Lighter: fast and memory-efficient sequencing error correction

without counting. Genome Biology 15: 509. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0509-9.

Song, C., Cui, Z., Hui, M., Liu, Y., Li, Y., and Li, X. (2015). Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides

insights into the molecular basis of brachyurization and adaptation to benthic lifestyle in Eriocheir sinensis.

Gene 558: 88-98.

Stephenson, M. J., and Knight, A. W. (1982). Temperature and acclimation effects on salinity preferences

of post-larvae of the giant Malaysian prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Journal of

Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 60(2–3): 253-260.

Stillman, J. H., Colbourne, J. K., Lee, C. E., Patel, N. H., Phillips, M. R., Towle, D. W., Eads, B. D.,

Gelembuik, G. W., Henry, R. P., Johnson, E. A., Pfrender, M. E., and Terwilliger, N. B. (2008). Recent

advances in crustacean genomics. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48: 852-868.

Storz, J. F. (2005). Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence.

Molecular Ecology 14: 671-688.

155

Stillman, J. H., Colbourne, J. K., Lee, C. L., Patel, N. H., Phillips, M. R., Towle, D. W., Eads, B.D.,

Gelembuik, G. W., Henry, R. P., Johnson, E. A., Pfrender, M.E., and Terwilliger, N. B. (2008). Recent

advances in crustacean genomics. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48(6): 852-868.

Streelman, J. T., and Kocher, T. D. (2002). Microsatellite variation associated with prolactin expression

and growth of salt-challenged tilapia. Physiological Genomics 9(1): 1-4.

Thanh, N. M., Jung, H., Lyons, R. E., Chand, V., Tuan, N. V., Thu, V. T. M., and Mather, P. B. (2014). A

transcriptomic analysis of striped catfish (Panganasiadon hypophthalmus) in response to salinity

adaptation: De novo assembly, gene annotation and marker discovery. Comparative Biochemistry and

Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 10: 52-63.

Tian, J., Chen, J., Jiang, D., Liao, S., and Wang, A. (2011). Transcriptional regulation of extracellular

copper zinc superoxide dismutase from white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei following Vibrio alginolyticus

and WSSV infection. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 30: 234-240.

Tipsmark, C. K., Madsen, S. S., Seidelin, M., Christensen, A. S., Cutler, C. P., and Cramb, G. (2002).

Dynamics of Na+, K+, 2Cl− cotransporter and Na+, K+‐ATPase expression in the branchial epithelium of

brown trout (Salmo trutta) and atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Experimental Zoology 293(2):

106-118.

Toei, M., Saum, R., and Forgac, M. (2010). Regulation and isoform function of the V-

ATPases. Biochemistry 49(23): 4715-4723.

Towle, D. W., Henry, R. P., and Terwilliger, N. B. (2011). Microarray-detected changes in gene expression

in gills of green crab (Carcinus maenus) upon dilution of environmental salinity. Comparative Biochemistry

and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 6: 115-125.

Towle, D.W., Rushton, M.E., Heidysch, D., Magnani, J.J., Rose, M.J., Amstutz, A., Jordan, M.K., Shearer,

D.W., and Wu, W.S., (1997). Sodium/proton antiporter in the euryhaline crab Carcinus maenas: molecular

cloning, expression and tissue distribution. Journal of Experimental Biology 200: 1003–1014.

Tsai, J. R., and Lin, H. C. (2007). V-type H+-ATPase and Na+, K+-ATPase in the gills of 13 euryhaline

crabs during salinity acclimation. Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 620-627.

Tyler‐Walters, H., Rogers, S. I., Marshall, C. E., and Hiscock, K. (2009). A method to assess the sensitivity

of sedimentary communities to fishing activities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater

Ecosystems, 19(3), 285-300.

156

Untergaser, A., Cutcutache, I., Koressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B.C., Remm, M., and Rosen, S.G. (2012).

Primer3- new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40(15): e115.

Visudtiphole, V., Watthanasurorot, A., Klinbunga, S., Menasveta, P., and Kirtikara, K. (2010). Molecular

characterization of Calreticulin: A biomarker for temperature stress responses of the giant tiger shrimp

Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 308: S100-S108.

Vogt, G. (2013). Abbreviation of larval development and extension of brood care as key features of the

evolution of freshwater Decapoda. Biological Reviews 88: 81-116. doi: 10.1111/j1469-185X.2012.00241.x

Vutukuru, S. S., Chintada, S., Madhavi, K. R., Rao, J. V., and Anjaneyulu, Y. (2006). Acute effects of

copper on superoxide dismutase, catalase and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater teleost fish, Esomus

danricus. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 32(3): 221-229.

Wang, W. N., Wang, A. L., Wang, A. P., Liu, Y., and Sun, R. Y. (2004). Changes of protein-bound and

free amino acids in the muscle of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium nipponense in different salinities.

Aquaculture 233(1-4): 561-571.

Weihrauch, D., Ziegler, A., Siebers, D., and Towle, D. W. (2001). Molecular characterization of V-type

H+-ATPase (β-subunit) in gills of euryhaline crabs and its physiological role in osmoregulatory ion uptake.

Journal of Experimental Biology 204: 25-37.

Wieser, W., and Krumschnabel, G. (2001). Hierarchies of ATP-consuming processes: direct compared with

indirect measurements, and comparative aspects. Biochemical Journal 355(2): 389-395.

Wilder, M. N., Ikuta, K., Atmomarsono, M., Hatta, T., and Komuro, K. (1998). Changes in osmotic and

ionic concentrations in the hemolymph of Macrobrachium rosenbergii exposed to varying salinities and

correlation to ionic and crystalline composition of the cuticle. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology

Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 119(4): 941-950.

Wilder, M. N., Huong, D. T. T., Jasmani, S., Jayasankar, V., Kaneko, T., Aida, K., Hatta, T., Nemoto, S.,

and Wigginton, A. (2009). Hemolymph osmolality, ion concentrations and calcium in the structural

organization of the cuticle of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii: Changes with the

molt cycle. Aquaculture 292(1): 104-110.

Williams, W., and Sherwood, J. (1994). Definition and measurement of salinity in salt lakes. International

Journal of Salt Lake Research 3(1): 53-63.

157

Williams, K., Wilson, M. A., and Bressler, J. (2000). Regulation and developmental expression of the

divalent metal-ion transporter in the rat brain. Cellular and Molecular Biology 46(3): 563-571.

Xu, B., Long, C., Dong, W., Shao, Q., and Shu, M. (2015). Molecular characterization of calreticulin gene

in mud crab Scylla paramamosain (Estampador): implications for the regulation of calcium homeostasis

during moult cycle. Aquaculture Research 47(10): 3276-3286. doi: 10.1111/are.12781.

Yao, C. L., Ji, P. F., Kong, P., Wang, Z. Y., and Xiang, J. H. (2009). Arginine kinase from Litopenaeus

vannamei: cloning, expression and catalytic properties. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 26: 553-558.

Ye, .F, Fang, L., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Li, S., Li, R., Bolund, L., and Wang,

J. (2006). WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Research 34: W293-W297.

Ye, L., Jiang, S., Zhu, X., Yang, Q., Wen, W., and Wu, K. (2009). Effects of salinity on growth and energy

budget of juvenile Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 290: 140-144.

Young, A. L., Abaan, H. O., Zerbino, D., Mullikin, J. C., Birney, E., and Margulies, E. H. (2010). A new

strategy for genome assembly using short sequence reads and reduced representation libraries. Genome

Research 20(2): 249-256.

Zhao, Q., Pan, L., Ren, Q., and Hu, D. (2015). Digital gene expression analysis in haemocytes of the white

shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in response to low salinity stress. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 42: 400-

407.

Zolk, O., Schenke, C., and Sarikas, A. (2006). The ubiquitin–proteasome system: focus on the heart.

Cardiovascular Research 70(3): 410-421.

Wowor, D., Muthu, V., Meier, R., Balke, M., Cai, Y., and Ng, P. K. L. (2009). Evolution of life history

traits in Asian freshwater prawns of the genus Macrobrachium based on multilocus molecular phylogenetic

analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52: 340-350.

Wray, G. A. (2013). Genomics and the evolution of phenotypic trait. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution

and Systematics 44: 51-72.