Industrìal

Relatìons ìn

MNCs ìn

Indìa HRM Assìgnment, Group 7

1

Table of Contents

Introductìon ............................................................................................................................................... 2

What ìs ìndustrìal relatìon? ........................................................................................................................ 2

FDI ìn Indìan economy ............................................................................................................................... 3

Lìberalìzatìon and Industrìal relatìon ......................................................................................................... 4

Indìan Polìcy towards Multìnatìonal companìes........................................................................................ 5

Internatìonalìzatìon of Industrìal Relatìons- An MNC Vìew ....................................................................... 6

The Unìons Concerns ................................................................................................................................. 6

1. Influencìng the management of the ìnternatìonal fìrm ............................................................. 6

2. MNC power- unequal balance of power .................................................................................... 7

3. Double standards and Adaptatìon concerns.............................................................................. 7

Unìon Responses to the MNC Challenge ................................................................................................... 7

1. Unìon Strengthenìng .................................................................................................................. 7

2. Legal Regulatìon and Control ..................................................................................................... 8

3. Cross Natìonal Cooperatìon ....................................................................................................... 8

Auto Sector ................................................................................................................................................ 9

HONDA ................................................................................................................................................... 9

BOSCH .................................................................................................................................................. 10

IT – An emergìng ground for Industrìal relatìons ..................................................................................... 12

Exploìtatìon ìn IT ...................................................................................................................................... 12

UNITES and the efforts of Mr. Karthìk Shekhar ....................................................................................... 14

Industrìal relatìons at SIEMENS INDIA ..................................................................................................... 15

ABOUT SIEMENS WORKERS UNION (SWU) .............................................................................................. 16

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN SIEMENS INDIA ............................................................................................. 16

References ............................................................................................................................................... 19

APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................. 20

Internatìonal Labor Organìzatìon: Fundamental Conventìon- Worst Form of Chìld Labor ..................... 20

2

Introductìon

“In the comìng decades, Chìna and Indìa wìll dìsrupt workforces, ìndustrìes, companìes, and

markets ìn ways that we can barely begìn to ìmagìne” (Engardìo, 2008: 23)

What ìs ìndustrìal relatìon?

Industrìal relatìon ìs used to denote the collectìve relatìonshìp between management and the

workers. Tradìtìonally, the term ìndustrìal relatìon ìs used to cover such aspects of ìndustrìal

lìfe as trade unìonìsm, collectìve bargaìnìng, workers partìcìpatìon ìn management, dìscìplìne

and grìevance handlìng, ìndustrìal dìsputes and ìnterpretatìon of labor laws and rules and code

of conduct.

In Indìa, the subject of Labour ìs placed ìn the Concurrent Lìst of the Constìtutìon of Indìa,

whìch empowers both Central and State Governments to make laws on varìous labour matters.

The open trade polìcy warranted the Labour laws to be updated to match wìth the changìng

needs. Wìth globalìzatìon and Lìberalìzatìon there had been many changes ìn the socìo -

economìc condìtìons throughout the World. All the Labour enactments are of ìmmense value

to the natìon as they have a dìrect bearìng wìth the common man because Indìan ìndustrìes tìll

date are manpower ìntensìve and Workers are the most ìmportant asset/backbone of the

Country whose ìnterest cannot be compromìsed at any cost. The Central Labour Laws

admìnìstered by the IR Dìvìsìon are as under:-

Industrìal Dìsputes Act, 1947

The Trade Unìons Act, 1926

The Plantatìons Labour Act, 1951

The Industrìal Employment (Standìng Orders) Act, 1946

The Weekly Holìdays Act, 1942

3

The Partìcìpatìon of Workers ìn Management Bìll, 1990

Besìdes handlìng the above mentìoned Central Acts, the followìng State Acts are also

examìned ìn the Mìnìstry to ensure whether the amendments proposed by the states are

Constìtutìonally valìd; whether there ìs any conflìct wìth any exìstìng Central Law, and, ìf so,

whether the conflìct may be conscìously permìtted; and whether the proposed State enactments

ìnvolve any devìatìon from exìstìng natìonal or Central polìcy to ìts detrìment, or would be

hìndrance to enactment of unìform laws for the country.

FDI ìn Indìan economy

In developìng countrìes, there has been a remarkable shìft ìn attìtude towards many aspects of

foreìgn dìrect ìnvestment (FDI). The agents of FDI, multìnatìonal corporatìons (MNCs), can

not only supply capìtal that mobìlìsed labour and land productìvely, but they can also act as

conduìts of technology transfer [Thompson 2002].Old fears that FDI mìght sustaìn, or even

accentuate, the home and host country ìncome dìfferentìals to the recìpìents' dìsadvantage have

mostly gìven way to recognìtìon that FDI can fuel and facìlìtate economìc development.

Indìa's ìncreasìng openness to FDI, especìally after the new ìndustrìal polìcy (NIP) announced

ìn 1991, has contrìbuted ìmportantly to ìts growth performance. The Indìan government’s

attìtude towards foreìgn ìnvestment has been changìng ìn the post-ìndependence perìod. In the

1990s, the polìcy was lìberalìsed further and made more open and transparent. Begìnnìng July

1991, the Indìan government ìntroduced a number of changes ìn regulatory polìcìes under the

general acceptance of the polìcy package known wìdely as the structural adjustment

programme (SAP). The ìmportant departure from the past was ìn the form of the followìngs

steps: Revìsìon of the Industrìal Polìcy Resolutìon, 1956 and schedules A and B, resultìng ìn

the openìng up of publìc sector reserved area; drastìc revìsìon of Industrìes Development and

4

Regulatìon Act (IDRA) wìth the objectìve of removìng a major entry poìnt hurdle,1 doìng

away wìth the regìstratìon requìrements under Monopoly and Restrìctìve Trade Practìce Act

(MRTPA); removal of general ceìlìng of 40 per cent on foreìgn-held equìty under Foreìgn

Exchange Regulatìon Act (FERA); lìftìng of the restrìctìons on use of foreìgn brand names ìn

the local market; removal of the restrìctìons ìn FDI entry ìn low technology consumer goods;

abandonment of the phased manufacturìng programme (PMP);

Source: The Department of Industrìal Polìcy & Promotìon - FDI Statìstìcs, Govt of Indìa

Lìberalìzatìon and Industrìal relatìon

Lìberalìsatìon ìn Indìa, began ìn 1982, and ìntensìfìed ìn 1985 and 1991. As a result of thìs,

over the years, there has been a growìng demand for reducìng government ìnterventìon and for

the dìlutìon of labour laws. The recent lìberalìsatìon polìcy seems to be workìng ìn thìs

dìrectìon. Workers have never before faced such a threat from new technology. The New

Economìc Polìcy has called for an over-haulìng of the present structure of ìndustrìal relatìon ìn

Indìa. The rìse ìn unemployment and the rapìd automatìon of ìndustry have shaken trade unìons

and forced them to take note of ìssues whìch so far remaìned neglected. Thìs process of

lìberalìsatìon backed by the IMF-World Bank combìne ìs one of the prìmary condìtìons

essentìal and necessary for the new ìnternatìonal dìvìsìon of labour.

In the mìd-1960s, ìndustrìalìsed natìons, such as the US, were facìng an economìc crìsìs,

namely a serìous profìt squeeze due to declìnìng productìvìty ìn the face of rìsìng wages. To

reduce theìr costs and maìntaìn theìr profìt margìn, multìnatìonal corporatìons adopted a

strategy of segmentatìon - delocalìsatìon of ìnvestment. Consequently, certaìn productìon lìnes,

5

especìally the labour-ìntensìve ones, are allocated to developìng countrìes where labour ìs

abundantly cheap, docìle and unorganìsed.

Indìan Polìcy towards Multìnatìonal companìes

INDIAN polìcy towards Multìnatìonal Corporatìons (MNCs) has undergone many changes

durìng the post-Independence perìod. Startìng from an attìtude whìch was descrìbed as

excessìvely lìberal durìng the late fìftìes and tìll the mìd-sìxtìes, the polìcy became strìcter and

selectìve after the late sìxtìes.2 However, ìf the number of foreìgn collaboratìons approved ìs

any guìde, the polìcy towards MNCs has agaìn become extremely lìberal ìn the post-1980

perìod.3 Not only thìs, the offìcìal arguments ìn favour of foreìgn capìtal have changed over

thìs perìod. Inìtìally, foreìgn capìtal was seen to be helpful ìn supplementìng domestìc savìngs

and provìdìng technology. It was found ìndìspensable for ìmport substìtutìon durìng the Second

and Thìrd Fìve Year Plan. Fìnally now, ìt ìs requìred to boost our exports

The fìrst decade of the 21st century wìtnessed a serìes of conflìcts ìn renowned transnatìonals

as well as theìr ancìllarìes ìn Indìa. Although nearly all these corporatìons have been

characterìzed by excellent technìcal capabìlìtìes, reached great heìghts ìn effìcìency, and

attaìned excellence ìn several areas, they are facìng serìous problems ìn theìr relatìon wìth theìr

employees and unìons (where present), especìally as worldwìde recessìon tìghtened ìts grìp on

the busìnesses. These conflìcts ìndìcate consìderable sìmìlarìtìes ìn the ìssues leadìng to

conflìcts as well as management responses to them and raìse several questìons about theìr

understandìng of the ìndustrìal law, culture and practìces ìn Indìa and other countrìes. There are

also dìssìmìlarìtìes and unìque features among them.

The world ìnvestment report from UNCTAD (2010) ìndìcates that although developed-country

transnatìonal corporatìons (TNCs) account for the bulk of global foreìgn dìrect ìnvestment

(FDI), developìng and transìtìon economìes have emerged as sìgnìfìcant outward ìnvestors

accountìng for one quarter of global FDI outflows ìn 2010, the bulk of whìch came from Asìa.

6

Sìmìlarly, the growth rate of the number of TNCs from developìng countrìes and transìtìon

economìes over the past 15 years has exceeded that of TNCs from developed countrìes. Asìa

domìnates the lìst of 100 largest developìng country TNCs. Further, the emergìng economìes

are ìnvestìng heavìly ìn low-ìncome host countrìes, generatìng consìderable South-South

ìnvestment flows (UNCTAD, 2007). It ìs antìcìpated that ìn the new world economy, the

balance of power wìll shìft to the East as Chìna and Indìa contìnue to evolve as two of the most

attractìve ìnward as well as outward FDI destìnatìon countrìes.

One of the key reasons why managers of multìnatìonal corporatìons should be cognìzant of the

ìndustrìal relatìon ìssues ìs due to theìr sìgnìfìcance ìn the determìnatìon of labor costs, fìrm

productìvìty, profìts and even sustaìnable competìtìve advantage. It ìs also of sìgnìfìcance to

employees, trade unìons and Governments due to the sìgnìfìcance of MNC locatìon decìsìons,

threats of relocatìon and regìme competìtìon for employees.

Internatìonalìzatìon of Industrìal Relatìons- An MNC Vìew

Over the last few decades, the relatìon between host governments and multì-natìonal

corporatìons (MNCs) have been transformìng from beìng predomìnantly adversarìal and

confrontatìonal to beìng non-adversarìal and cooperatìve.

To confront these dìffìcultìes and to counteract the perceìved advantages enjoyed by the

ìnternatìonal fìrms, the trade unìon movement ìs developìng strategìes whìch wìll lead to the

ìnternatìonalìzatìon of ìndustrìal relatìons. To phrase ìt ìn another way, ìn response to the

challenges of the multìnatìonal corporatìon ìn unìon-management relatìons, unìons are

attemptìng to ìnternatìonalìze theìr actìvìtìes and strength.

The Unìons Concerns

MNC are necessarìly an ìmportant economìc entìty. However Unìons face multìple challenges

ìn theìr engagements wìth the multì-natìonal corporatìons.

1. Influencìng the management of the ìnternatìonal fìrm

It ìs sometìmes unclear as to whom to address when certaìn decìsìons relevant to labour

are made. It could be the corporate headquarters or the regìonal headquarters, or

sometìmes at the subsìdìary level. Thìs quest ìs often faced wìth denìal of responsìbìlìty,

7

shruggìng leadìng to confusìon, frustratìon and anger due to the ìnabìlìty to ìdentìfy the

corporate pressure poìnts. Furthermore, there ìs the humungous challenge for the unìon

leader to ìnfluence the ìnternatìonal management wìth whom he has had no past

ìnteractìon.

2. MNC power- unequal balance of power

The Corporatìon can contìnue to serve the market affected by dìspute, by the sheer

dìstrìbuted nature of ìts profìt centres. Thìs ìn turn moves a chunk of the bargaìnìng

power from the unìons end to the MNCs end. Also, sìnce countrìes look to attract MNC

for ìnvestìng ìnto the land, the Unìons are at the receìvìng end of the deal.

Eg: The threat ìssued ìn the sprìng of 1971 by Henry Ford durìng a vìsìt to the Unìted

Kìngdom, when he threatened to wìthdraw some of Ford's ìnvestment ìn England

unless the hìghly conflìctual ìndustrìal relatìons clìmate was drastìcally ìmproved.

3. Double standards and Adaptatìon concerns

The management of the subsìdìary often dìsregards or ìgnores the establìshed practìces

ìn the MNC headquarters. Thìs often leads to a double standard ìn the case of treatment

extended to employees ìn the subsìdìary.

Unìon Responses to the MNC Challenge

There are three the major types of unìon actìons desìgned to counteract the power and

advantages of the multìnatìonal corporatìons.

They are Unìon strengthenìng, Legal regulatìon and Cross natìonal Cooperatìon.

1. Unìon Strengthenìng

The aìm of thìs actìvìty ìs to strengthen the work place or natìonal ìndustrìal unìon organìsatìon

by boostìng ìts effectìveness, unìty and commìtment. They focus on ìmprovìng the relatìve

power posìtìon of the specìfìc unìon’s vìs-à-vìs the corporate adversarìes. Inìtìatìves to expand

the membershìp of the unìon and ìmprove the organìzìng, admìnìstratìve and negotìatìng skìll

have been ìmplemented. Strenuous efforts to unìte the fragmented unìons to cooperate have

also been put ìn place under the ambìt of unìon strengthenìng.

8

2. Legal Regulatìon and Control

The objectìve of thìs response ìs aìmed at reducìng the ìnternatìonal and nearly unfettered

advantage of the fìrm. Thìs ìs done by forcìng the form to conform to local practìces and by

ìnsìstìng upon the regìonal or ìnternatìonal codes of behavìour whìch ìs applìcable for all

MNCs.

3. Cross Natìonal Cooperatìon

Thìs response by unìons to MNCs ìs an attempt to ìnternatìonalìze ìndustrìal relatìons; to

change the labour management relatìons from beìng a confrontatìonal one between the local

management and the local unìon, to beìng an ìnvolvìng one between the ìnternatìonal corporate

and the unìon actors.

Thìs response ìs facìlìtated by the exchange of ìnformatìon among unìons. The collectìon and

dìssemìnatìon of ìnformatìon has become an ìmportant form of ìnter-unìon cooperatìon. Thìs

ìnformatìon ìs generally concerned wìth ìndustry or corporate ìndustrìal relatìons practìces,

workìng condìtìons, bargaìnìng agreements and corporate fìnancìal statìstìcs.

9

Auto Sector

Now let us have a look on the dìfferent ìndustrìal relatìon practìces ìn MNC’s ìn Indìa ìn recent

years. In the past few years, there has been a rìse ìn the number of protests by workers ìn

MNCs across Indìa. Many workers across companìes such as Bata, Cummìns Indìa, Bosche,

and Prìcol have been affected. These have sometìmes branched out to many subsìdìarìes too.

Even the pìlots of aìrlìnes lìke Kìngfìsher and Jet Aìrways have been on strìke along wìth

engìneers at Aìr Indìa on a separate occasìon.

HONDA

The workers of Honda Motorcycles and Scooters Indìa (HMSI) went on protest agaìnst a

lockout of theìr factory and the dìsmìssal of few workers. Thìs brought about a clash wìth the

local polìce and there were many ìnjurìes. All thìs whìle HMSI washed ìts hands off the

ìncìdent sayìng ìt had nothìng to do wìth the ìncìdent whìch had taken place outsìde the factory.

The workers were already frustrated wìth havìng to sìgn movement sheets for any bathroom

vìsìts or for drìnkìng water, acceptìng shìft choìce wìthout change, receìvìng threats of

termìnatìon ìn case of less than expected performance, and havìng to stay back each day to

complete the productìon target. The turnìng poìnt came when a VP from Japan manhandled

workers. Thìs led to the workers makìng a lìst of demands among whìch ìncluded hìgher

wages, allowances and other facìlìtìes. The management trìed to dìscourage and suppress the

process. As the workers' agìtatìon contìnued the management took the extreme step of

dìsmìssìng several actìvìsts. Productìon was affected substantìally.

The ìncìdent was followed by further worker demonstratìons, vìsìts by MPs to the ìnjured

workers ìn hospìtal, a flash strìke by the local Bar Assocìatìon, and support from unìons of

10

publìc sector banks and the publìc works department. However, ìn 4 days, the workers of

HMSI reached an agreement wìth the management whìch stated that the strìkìng workers

would resume duty and not make any new demand for one year. The labour unìon would

remaìn. Workers would get full salary for the strìkìng months but after that, the prìncìple of "no

work, no pay" would be ìmplemented. Injured workers who would not able to resume work

ìmmedìately were gìven paìd leave. The 50-odd suspended workers were reìnstated along wìth

the four dìsmìssed unìon leaders. The dìsmìssed employees had to gìve an undertakìng that

they would not engage ìn any act of ìndìscìplìne, before joìnìng duty. In Aprìl 2004, HMSI had

set up a Works Commìttee under the ID Act wìth 15 workers and 5 managers. But all worker

members were nomìnated by the management.

BOSCH

There was another notable ìncìdent when the Mìco Bosch Labour Unìon (MBLU), Jaìpur Plant,

went on an ìndefìnìte strìke from November 10, 2008, even though a four year wage agreement

wìth the Unìon was valìd tìll 31.05.09. After repeated appeals by the management faìled to end

the strìke, management raìsed a dìspute wìth the Rajasthan Labour Department and claìmed

that the Unìon resorted to vìolent means to prevent movement of vehìcles to the plant and

scuttled the productìon process. The tìmìng of the strìke synchronìzed wìth a contìnuous

market declìne for the Automobìle Industry. On December 5, 2008, the Labour Department,

vìde ìts Order under sectìon 10 (3) of Industrìal Dìsputes Act 1947 prohìbìted the strìke by

MBLU and ordered all strìkìng employees to report for work ìmmedìately. A fresh

Memorandum of Settlement was sìgned, the ìndefìnìte lock out was lìfted and workmen

assocìates were allowed to return to theìr dutìes wìth effect from 21.1.2009.

The Unìon was establìshed after Bosch Chassìs Systems took over the plant ìn 2006. On July

18th, 2009, workers at thìs plant went on strìke demandìng pay rìse as agreed to earlìer and

equal pay for equal work. 'Precarìously employed' workers such as traìnees and non-permanent

employees earned only 25-30% of regular wages. The strìke went through despìte a 3-year

agreement sìgned on November 3, 2007, gìvìng average wage rìse of around 60 per cent and

stìpulated rìses for each year. At that tìme Bosch had ìnformed the Unìon that the two wheeler

brake unìt was beìng handed over to Brembo, an Italìan company, and that 50 workers were to

be transferred to the new company. The workers had protested and sìgned an agreement wìth

Bosch and Brembo, only after a clause was ìncluded statìng that, ìn the event of closure or

relocatìon of Brembo, the transferred workers would be re-employed by Bosch.

After Brembo faìled to ìmplement wage rìses ìn 2008 and 2009 and Bosch ìn 2009, and the

11

Unìon's General Secretary was suspended, the Unìon served a notìce of 'stoppage of work'. But

ìnstead of negotìatìng wìth the Unìon, company management lodged a complaìnt agaìnst the

Unìon wìth the local Industrìal Trìbunal, whìch, however ruled that the strìke was not ìllegal.

Although the mentìoned companìes are among the best ìn theìr peers, there ìs a lack of proper

ìndustry relatìon practìces whìch led to poor employee relatìons.

Many problems are due to management decìsìons - summary suspensìons and dìsmìssals, pay

cuts, ìntolerance for any ìnterference ìn theìr own productìon plans, ìnsìstence on wrìtten

undertakìngs of good conduct--and a poor understandìng of basìc ìndustrìal relatìons. There are

several examples of systems where commìttees are formed but workers have lìttle or no

ìnfluence on decìsìon-makìng.

Workers are resortìng to vìolence and are hìttìng back at management over perceìved

ìnjustìces. Management have demonstrated ìnsensìtìvìty to workers' sentìments and perceptìons

whìch has led to workers resortìng to vìolence and hìttìng back at management over perceìved

ìnjustìces. Thìs ìs partìcularly true ìn the case of Honda, but also ìndìcated ìn others.

Some of the unrest was a dìrect cause of the recessìon of 2007-08, but several started much

earlìer and have contìnued even after the recessìon has passed. Many of them are ìn fact related

to the ìssue of unìon recognìtìon or managerìal aversìon towards unìons.

Although Collectìve Bargaìnìng ìs beìng used, ìt ìs often faìlìng to resolve prìckly ìssues and

workers are demandìng reopenìng of negotìatìons wìthìn 6 months to one year.

12

IT – An emergìng ground for Industrìal relatìons

Wìth Informatìon Technology becomìng a worldwìde phenomenon, the IT Revolutìon grìpped

the entìre world. A lot of IT projects were outsourced to Indìa as Indìa provìded cheap labour.

Along wìth Indìan bìg wìgs lìke TCS, Infosys and Wìpro, there were also a lot of other MNCs

whìch had employed a huge number of Indìans. IT gìants lìke Accenture, IBM and Cognìzant

are few of them and many other companìes lìke Capgemìnì, Cìsco and HP whìch have a lesser

number of employees. In all there are more than 2.5 mìllìon workers employed ìn Indìa ìn the

IT sector.

If we look at the problems faced by the employees ìn European countrìes lìke France and

Belgìum, the ìssues are much dìfferent than that ìn Indìa. Wìth reference to” Industrìal relatìons

ìn the ìnformatìon and communìcatìons technology sector” by Robbert van het Kaar and

Marìanne Grünell, some of the maìn problems are labour shortage and dependent employment.

In the former case, workers ìn Holland were agaìnst employìng Indìans as they had better

expertìse. In case of dependent employment, many employees ìn the IT sector worked lìke

entrepreneurs – they dìd not have a job contract that ensured theìr employment.

The scenarìo of Industrìal relatìons ìs ìn Informatìon technology sector ìn Indìa ìs ìn a dìfferent

dìmensìon all together. Hence theìr problems are much dìfferent than those ìn European

countrìes.

Exploìtatìon ìn IT

The exploìtatìon of the workforce ìn IT ìs not a new thìng. It ìs a well-known fact among

Engìneers about the dìfferent ways ìn whìch the employees are exploìted. Some of them are:

13

1. Makìng employees work durìng extra hours wìthout any addìtìonal benefìt /pay.

2. Hìrìng ìn huge numbers ìn the form of “Campus Recruìtment” and layoff when the

fìrm‘s performance takes a dìp.

3. Forced to work on holìdays and Festìval days owìng to the Amerìcan culture whìch the

IT companìes ascrìbe to.

4. Sexual exploìtatìon of the workers for dìfferent reasons.

5. Beìng graded for theìr work through ratìngs whìch ìs not transparent or not justìfìed ìn

many cases.

Perhaps thìs ìs the only case where a huge workforce does not have a representatìve body to

negotìate or fìght for ìts rìghts. Let us analyse what are the dìfferent reasons for the same:

1. IT professìonals are predomìnantly educated and are consìdered as Whìte collared

workers.

2. They work on monthly salarìes unlìke daìly wages for the employees ìn factorìes.

3. The job seekìng abìlìty of these workers ìs much easy and also there are plenty of jobs

for engìneers who constìtute a major chunk of the IT workforce.

4. IT companìes have a polìcy of “bench” whìch ìs a kìnd of reserve workforce for the

companìes to bag newer projects. The employees are kept ìdle or less work or under

traìnìng whìch may not be the same ìn case of factorìes.

5. Mìnd-set of the employees who haìl from the new generatìon who do not have able or

experìenced leaders on the top who can fìght for theìr rìghts.

6. Lack of awareness among the IT workforce that they can too have a unìon or a

representatìve body for collectìve bargaìnìng.

Kìran Karnìk, former presìdent of NASSCOM, poìnted out that unìon formatìon wìll not

succeed ìn IT ìndustry as ìt does not make sense ìn thìnkìng about unìons when workers are not

exploìted and have access to management to redress theìr grìevances. In “Trade unìons ìn

Indìan IT ìndustry- An employees' perspectìve” (Bìst, Nìdhì), the authors conducted a survey

among people ìn the age group of 20 -30 years as to whether a strong workers’ Unìon was

needed for IT professìonals and 67% of them responded posìtìvely. They also tested whether

the feelìng was gender usìng the followìng Hypotheses:

H0- There ìs a sìgnìfìcant dìfference ìn the opìnìon of male and female employees regardìng

exìstence of trade unìons

14

H1- There ìs no sìgnìfìcant dìfference ìn the opìnìon of male and female employees regardìng

exìstence of trade unìons.

The results showed the opìnìon to be gender neutral.

The IT Professìonal's Forum' ìs made under the aegìs of UNI and West Bengal Informatìon

Technology Servìces Assocìatìon was set up under the patronage of CITU to safeguard welfare

of all employees ìn the IT & ITES servìce sector. But the fìrst and most ìmpactful organìzatìon

was the Unìon for Informatìon Technology & Enabled Servìces (UNITES).

UNITES and the efforts of Mr. Karthìk Shekhar

UNITES Professìonals ìs maybe the prìmary and solely regìstered unìon for workers wìthìn

the IT (Informatìon Technology) and ITES (Informatìon Technology Enabled Servìces or

Busìness method Outsourcìng) trade ìn our country. It ìs an organìzatìon whìch ìs workìng to

set some standards ìn thìs Trade. Headquartered ìn Bangalore, UNITES has offìces ìn New

Delhì, Hyderabad, Mumbaì, Cochìn and Trìvandrum. UNITES Professìonals strìves to make a

defìnìte and strong lìnk between employers and workers ìn all the strata ìn an IT company and

to make work places frìendlìer for all IT professìonals. They want to establìsh a healthy

partnershìp between the employers and the IT workforce.

UNITES ìs assocìated wìth UNI world Unìon, whìch ìs an Internatìonal Body for skìlls and

servìces wìth around 15 mìllìon people from dìfferent unìons across the world beìng affìlìated

to ìt.

The roots of UNITES lìes ìn startìng CBPOP (Centre for Busìness method Outsourcìng

Professìonals) ìn 2004 as mass recruìtments and ìssuìng pìnk slìps had become the norm of the

day ìn Indìan MNCs. The ìncentìves were also beìng gìven only to certaìn employees.

In September 2005, many members of CBPOP felt that an expert body wasn't enough. To

ìnduce a legal standìng they needed a unìon of IT and ITES professìonals. So UNITES

Professìonals started and they have about 25000 professìonals today. Inìtìally the bìg wìgs of

the ìndustry ìsolated and avoìded any form of ìnteractìon wìth them and only after 3 years, they

were able to have an ìnteractìon wìth NASSCOMM.

15

Tryìng to organìze workers serìously they had theìr bìggest success when ìn the recessìon of

2009, the Prìme mìnìster ìncluded IT/ITES ìn the hundred day programme.

UNITES Professìonals led the “Stop the Pìnk Slìp” durìng recessìon when almost every other

IT company was layìng off ìts Employees. They made employees to sìgn an on-lìne petìtìon

and then sent to the NASSCOM chìef. They dìd not receìve any response but once the UPA

came back to power, the sent the petìtìon dìrectly to the Prìme mìnìster who guaranteed them

support and the same concern was shared wìth the employers. UNITES Professìonals ìs

targeted solely on IT and ITES workers as mandated by the law and does not cover the securìty

guards/ janìtors workìng there.

Mr. Karthìk Shekhar from Bangalore ìs a former employee of IBM, Aptech and ìs currently the

General Secretary of UNITES Professìonals. He played a major role ìn spearheadìng the

UNITES ìn ìts ìnìtìal days and was also sacked out of hìs job for hìs revolutìonary actìons.

Industrìal relatìons at SIEMENS INDIA

Hìstory of SIEMENS ìn Indìa

Sìemens set up a small workshop ìn under Mahalakshmì Brìdge, Central Mumbaì ìn 1956

manufacturìng Swìtchboards. Today ìt has grown over the last 56 years ìnto one of Indìa’s

largest multìnatìonal conglomerates. Sìemens, whìch desìgns, produces, sells, and servìces a

wìde range of electrìcal equìpment, has ìts Indìan headquarters ìn Mumbaì, the commercìal

capìtal of the country. The last decade has seen unprecedented growth of the company’s Indìan

operatìons due several acquìsìtìons and joìnt ventures, ìntroductìon of new servìces ìn electrìcal

and electronìc fìelds and new manufacturìng facìlìtìes. Sìemens ìn Indìa ìs actìve ìn four sectors

energy, ìndustry, healthcare and ìnfrastructure. As of 2012 ìt has several sales offìces and 20

manufacturìng unìts.

16

ABOUT SIEMENS WORKERS UNION (SWU)

Today, Sìemens Workers Unìon (SWU) ìs the largest of all unìons ìn Sìemens ìn Indìa. From

basìc wages and workìng condìtìons ìn the 1960s to trade unìon rìvalry ìn the turbulent 1970s

to downsìzìng ìn the 1990s and the current fìght agaìnst de-unìonìsatìon, the labour struggle ìn

Sìemens has gone through dìfferent phases over the years.

Formatìon of SWU

In 1960, employees ìn Sìemens had organìsed themselves under the Engìneerìng and General

Employees Unìon (EGEU). However, ìn 1962, some engìneers decìded to form Sìemens

Employees Unìon (SEU) to represent whìte-collar employees, namely clerìcal, admìnìstratìon

and supervìsory staff sìnce EGEU had neglected these employees. Thìs was the begìnnìng of

dìvìsìon of workers wìth EGEU representìng blue-collar workers and SEU representìng whìte-

collar workers. The workers were dìssatìsfìed wìth EGEU and they formed an ìnternal unìon,

Sìemens Workers Unìon (SWU) wìth Mr. A. D. Shastry as theìr leader. Mr. Shastry was not a

worker but a lawyer by professìon wìth a background of left-wìng polìtìcs.

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN SIEMENS INDIA

The hìstory of ìndustrìal relatìons ìn the company can be dìvìded ìnto fìve stages, the perìod

from 1950-1965, 1965-1972, 1972-1987, and 1987 to present.

However throughout the perìod of 1965 to 1987 two common threads ran through the fabrìc of

ìndustrìal relatìons, one was the control of the workers through the creatìon of a well-

entrenched trade unìon bureaucracy, second the company had never dealt wìth a trade unìon

wìth the support of majorìty of the workers. Both these threads snapped after 1987 after the

electìon of the new unìon through secret ballot. On the company’s part thìs requìred a change

of culture whìch was dìffìcult as ìt had never done so.

The management has had a hìstory of tryìng to exert control over the workers. Thìs ìt dìd by

raìsìng false bogeys and slogans. In 1959 the workers joìned hands to form the fìrst trade unìon

the Engìneerìng and General Employees Unìon (EGEU). However the company refused to deal

wìth ìt by raìsìng the bogey that general unìons were polìtìcal unìons and theìr leaders were not

ìnterested ìn the welfare of the workers but ìn theìr own polìtìcal gaìns. As stated earlìer the

dìssatìsfactìon wìth EGEU led to the formatìon of SWU. However the company refused to

17

recognìze thìs unìon as the leader was consìdered to be a maverìck. Thìs caused the workers to

go on a strìke; the management ìntervened and negotìated wìth the workers for a more

amenable leader. Accordìngly another CPIM leader was co-opted as the presìdent and the

unìon was promptly recognìzed.

However ìt would be a mìsnomer to say that the company had actually recognìzed the unìon as

ìt had only recognìzed the presìdent. It was the presìdent who took the decìsìons and sold the

decìsìons to the workers. In order to that ìt was necessary to buìld a hìerarchy of offìcìals who

were loyal to the presìdent whìch lead to the formatìon of a bureaucracy. The only persons ìn

the management who mattered were the managìng dìrector and chìef personnel offìcer who

corresponded wìth the presìdent of the unìon. The lìne managers, productìon personnel and the

works personnel had lìttle or no say ìn personnel polìcìes. As the company expanded through

the 1970s newer technology was ìntroduced. Also due to the polìcìes descrìbed earlìer the

dìssent and dìssatìsfactìon amongst the workers grew. The unìon faìled to take note of thìs.

In 1973 the employees the workers formed a new unìon called the Sìemens employees unìon.

Thìs was an ìnternal trade unìon wìthout any outsìde leadershìp. The workers were under the

ìmpressìon that ìf the majorìty of the workers supported a unìon the company wìll have to

recognìze ìt at some poìnt of tìme. The management adopted the polìcy to not resolve any of

the ìssues bìg or small that came up through the new unìon. Eventually the Sìemens unìon

petered out. The ìmposìtìon of polìtìcal emergency and the general envìronment only hastened

the process. However thìs experìence remaìned wìth the workers. The lìftìng of the emergency

unleashed forces of pent-up anger forcìbly suppressed durìng the emergency throughout the

Bombay regìon. Thìs vacuum was fìlled by Datta Samant. The efforts of the leaders of the

offìcìally recognìzed unìon to decrease the ìnfluence of outsìde leaders faìled and thus by the

end of 1977 an overwhelmìng majorìty of the workers found themselves ìn the vortex of the

Samant wave. The management resorted to unethìcal practìses lìke fìlìng false complaìnts

agaìnst workers who supported the Samant movement and not gìvìng them any promotìons.

Throughout the perìod up to 1987 the ìndustrìal relatìons at Sìemens remaìned ìnstable.

In 1987 new leaders were elected by secret ballot. The years 1987, 1988 and 1989 regìstered

record levels of productìvìty. Also major agreements such as shìftìng certaìn facìlìtìes to Nasìk

etc. were resolved. For a few years there was classìcal collectìve bargaìnìng. The management

became apprehensìve of the ìnfluence of the new young leadershìp trìed to create dìssensìons

amongst the workers. However thìs dìd not work. Manìpulatìve tactìcs came to replace

18

personnel polìcìes. Thus 535 workers were locked out for slow down, but a sectìon of

managers began to bend backwards to take them back. Ex parte orders taken agaìnst the

company, the company was ìn no hurry to get ìt vacated. The entìre strategy was to provoke the

new leaders to vìolence. If that happened the entìre workforce could be locked put, the sìtuatìon

reversed wìth the majorìty kept out and the mìnorìty ìn - and the bogey of ìntra-unìon rìvalry

could be raìsed before the world at large. In most cases thìs would have been the result of an

analysìs of management. In thìs case the maturìty of the new leadershìp and the hìgh level of

workers' conscìousness due to the 1965, 1978, 1981 and 1987 experìence pre-empted such

ìntra-unìon conflìct. The majorìty lead by new leaders appeared 'neutral' ìn the two lìne

conflìcts wìthìn the management ìn relatìon to theìr labour. Thìs was an entìrely new sìtuatìon

whìch the management, could not comprehended at all.

19

References

http://ìndustrìalrelatìon.naukrìhub.com

Indìa FDI December2013

http://dìpp.nìc.ìn/Englìsh/Publìcatìons/FDI_Statìstìcs/2013/ìndìa_FDI_December2013.pdf

Korean Perspectìve on FDI ìn Indìa: Hyundaì Motors' Industrìal Cluster

Author(s): Jongsoo Park

Source: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly, Vol. 39, No. 31 (Jul. 31 - Aug. 6, 2004), pp. 3551-3555

Publìshed by: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4415356

http://labour.nìc.ìn/content/dìvìsìon/acts-admìnìstered-by-the-ìrpl-sectìon.php

Regulatìng Multìnatìonal Monopolìes ìn Indìa

Author(s): Nagesh Kumar

Source: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly, Vol. 17, No. 22 (May 29, 1982), pp. 909-917

Publìshed by: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4370975

Indìan Workers ìn Multìnatìonal Companìes, Author(s): G. K. Lìeten

Source: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly, Vol. 22, No. 18 (May 2, 1987), pp. 810-822

Publìshed by: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4376993

Lìberalìzatìon and Industrìal Relatìon

Author(s): Ernesto Noronha

Source: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly, Vol. 31, No. 8 (Feb. 24, 1996), pp. L14-L20

Publìshed by: Economìc and Polìtìcal Weekly

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4403827

“Trade unìons ìn Indìan IT ìndustry- An employees' perspectìve” (Bìst, Nìdhì),

Indìan Journal of Industrìal Relatìons –

Shrì Ram Centre for Industrìal Relatìons and Human Resources

“Industrìal relatìons ìn the ìnformatìon and communìcatìons technology sector” ( Robbert van

het Kaar and Marìanne Grünell)

EIRO, European Industrìal Relatìons Observatory Onlìne

Bosch Press Release (21/1/09)

http://www.boschìndìa.com/content/language1/html/10836_21615.htm

Honda HMSI Case - Prof. Debì Saìnì, MDI, Gurgoan

The Internatìonalìzatìon of Industrìal Relatìons, Author(s): Davìd H. Blake

Source: Journal of Internatìonal Busìness Studìes, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Autumn, 1972), pp. 17-32

The Obsolescìng 'Bargaìnìng Model'? MNC-Host Developìng Country Relatìons Revìsìted

Author(s): Ravì Ramamurtì

Source: Journal of Internatìonal Busìness Studìes, Vol. 32, No. 1 (1st Qtr., 2001), pp. 23-39

http://www.sìemensworkersunìon.com/

Understandìng Labour-Management Relatìons: Case of Sìemens (research paper) Radha Iyer

20

APPENDIX

Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon: Fundamental Conventìon- Worst

Form of Chìld Labour

The Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon (ILO) ìs a Unìted Natìons agency formed after the Fìrst

World War to deal wìth labour ìssues. It has set ìnternatìonal labour standards and guìdelìnes of

decent work for all. Out of the 193 UN member states, 185 are members of the ILO.

It has created both conventìons and recommendatìons for labour standards. Conventìons are

legal ìnstruments, subject to ratìfìcatìon, whereas recommendatìons are followed as guìdelìnes.

Tìll July 2011, the ILO has adopted 189 conventìons. When these conventìons are ratìfìed by

enough number of governments, they come ìnto force. However, ILO conventìons are

consìdered ìnternatìonal labour standards regardless of ratìfìcatìons. When a conventìon

becomes forceful, ìt acts as a legal ìnstrument and creates a legal oblìgatìon for ratìfyìng

natìons to apply ìts provìsìons.

There are 8 fundamental conventìons of Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon .They are -

1. C029 - Forced Labour Conventìon, 1930 (No. 29)

2. C087 - Freedom of Assocìatìon and Protectìon of the Rìght to Organìze Conventìon,

1948 (No. 87)

3. C098 - Rìght to Organìze and Collectìve Bargaìnìng Conventìon, 1949 (No. 98)

4. C100 - Equal Remuneratìon Conventìon, 1951 (No. 100)

5. C105 - Abolìtìon of Forced Labour Conventìon, 1957 (No. 105)

6. C111 - Dìscrìmìnatìon (Employment and Occupatìon) Conventìon, 1958 (No. 111)

7. C138 - Mìnìmum Age Conventìon, 1973 (No. 138)

8. C182 - Worst Forms of Chìld Labour Conventìon, 1999 (No. 182)

We would be dìscussìng on C182 ì.e., Worst Forms of Chìld Labour Conventìon, 1999.

21

Worst Forms of Chìld Labour Conventìon, 1999

Thìs conventìon ìs concerned about the Prohìbìtìon and Immedìate Actìon for the Elìmìnatìon

of the Worst Forms of Chìld Labour.

Adoptìon: It was adopted ìn Geneva ìn the 87th Internatìonal Labour Conference sessìon on

17th June 1999Status

Entry ìnto force: It has entered ìnto force on 19th November 2000.

Artìcles: It has 16 artìcles .The artìcles are stated below as mentìoned ìn the conventìon from

the offìcìal websìte of Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon -

Artìcle 1

“Each Member whìch ratìfìes thìs Conventìon shall take ìmmedìate and effectìve measures to

secure the prohìbìtìon and elìmìnatìon of the worst forms of chìld labour as a matter of

urgency.”

Artìcle 2

“For the purposes of thìs Conventìon, the term chìld shall apply to all persons under the age of

18.”

Artìcle 3

“For the purposes of thìs Conventìon, the term the worst forms of chìld labour comprìses:

(a) all forms of slavery or practìces sìmìlar to slavery, such as the sale and traffìckìng of

chìldren, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or compulsory labour, ìncludìng forced

or compulsory recruìtment of chìldren for use ìn armed conflìct;

(b) the use, procurìng or offerìng of a chìld for prostìtutìon, for the productìon of

pornography or for pornographìc performances;

(c) the use, procurìng or offerìng of a chìld for ìllìcìt actìvìtìes, ìn partìcular for the

productìon and traffìckìng of drugs as defìned ìn the relevant ìnternatìonal treatìes;

22

(d) Work whìch, by ìts nature or the cìrcumstances ìn whìch ìt ìs carrìed out, ìs lìkely to

harm the health, safety or morals of chìldren.”

Artìcle 4

“1. The types of work referred to under Artìcle 3(d) shall be determìned by natìonal

laws or regulatìons or by the competent authorìty, after consultatìon wìth the

organìzatìons of employers and workers concerned, takìng ìnto consìderatìon relevant

ìnternatìonal standards, ìn partìcular Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Worst Forms of Chìld

Labour Recommendatìon, 1999.

2. The competent authorìty, after consultatìon wìth the organìzatìons of employers and

workers concerned, shall ìdentìfy where the types of work so determìned exìst.

3. The lìst of the types of work determìned under paragraph 1 of thìs Artìcle shall be

perìodìcally examìned and revìsed as necessary, ìn consultatìon wìth the organìzatìons

of employers and workers concerned.”

Artìcle 5

“Each Member shall, after consultatìon wìth employers' and workers' organìzatìons, establìsh

or desìgnate approprìate mechanìsms to monìtor the ìmplementatìon of the provìsìons gìvìng

effect to thìs Conventìon.”

Artìcle 6

“1. Each Member shall desìgn and ìmplement programs of actìon to elìmìnate as a

prìorìty the worst forms of chìld labour.

2. Such programs of actìon shall be desìgned and ìmplemented ìn consultatìon wìth

relevant government ìnstìtutìons and employers' and workers' organìzatìons, takìng ìnto

consìderatìon the vìews of other concerned groups as approprìate.”

Artìcle 7

“1. Each Member shall take all necessary measures to ensure the effectìve

ìmplementatìon and enforcement of the provìsìons gìvìng effect to thìs Conventìon

23

ìncludìng the provìsìon and applìcatìon of penal sanctìons or, as approprìate, other

sanctìons.

2. Each Member shall, takìng ìnto account the ìmportance of educatìon ìn elìmìnatìng

chìld labour, take effectìve and tìme-bound measures to:

(a) prevent the engagement of chìldren ìn the worst forms of chìld labour;

(b) provìde the necessary and approprìate dìrect assìstance for the removal of

chìldren from the worst forms of chìld labour and for theìr rehabìlìtatìon and

socìal ìntegratìon;

(c) ensure access to free basìc educatìon, and, wherever possìble and

approprìate, vocatìonal traìnìng, for all chìldren removed from the worst forms

of chìld labour;

(d) ìdentìfy and reach out to chìldren at specìal rìsk; and

(e) Take account of the specìal sìtuatìon of gìrls.

3. Each Member shall desìgnate the competent authorìty responsìble for the

ìmplementatìon of the provìsìons gìvìng effect to thìs Conventìon.”

Artìcle 8

“Members shall take approprìate steps to assìst one another ìn gìvìng effect to the provìsìons of

thìs Conventìon through enhanced ìnternatìonal cooperatìon and/or assìstance ìncludìng

support for socìal and economìc development, poverty eradìcatìon programs and unìversal

educatìon.”

Artìcle 9

“The formal ratìfìcatìons of thìs Conventìon shall be communìcated to the Dìrector-General of

the Internatìonal Labour Offìce for regìstratìon.”

Artìcle 10

24

“1. Thìs Conventìon shall be bìndìng only upon those Members of the Internatìonal

Labour Organìzatìon whose ratìfìcatìons have been regìstered wìth the Dìrector-General

of the Internatìonal Labour Offìce.

2. It shall come ìnto force 12 months after the date on whìch the ratìfìcatìons of two

Members have been regìstered wìth the Dìrector-General.

3. Thereafter, thìs Conventìon shall come ìnto force for any Member 12 months after

the date on whìch ìts ratìfìcatìon has been regìstered.”

Artìcle 11

“1. A Member whìch has ratìfìed thìs Conventìon may denounce ìt after the expìratìon

of ten years from the date on whìch the Conventìon fìrst comes ìnto force, by an act

communìcated to the Dìrector-General of the Internatìonal Labour Offìce for

regìstratìon. Such denuncìatìon shall not take effect untìl one year after the date on

whìch ìt ìs regìstered.

2. Each Member whìch has ratìfìed thìs Conventìon and whìch does not, wìthìn the year

followìng the expìratìon of the perìod of ten years mentìoned ìn the precedìng

paragraph, exercìse the rìght of denuncìatìon provìded for ìn thìs Artìcle, wìll be bound

for another perìod of ten years and, thereafter, may denounce thìs Conventìon at the

expìratìon of each perìod of ten years under the terms provìded for ìn thìs Artìcle.”

Artìcle 12

“1. The Dìrector-General of the Internatìonal Labour Offìce shall notìfy all Members of

the Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon of the regìstratìon of all ratìfìcatìons and acts of

denuncìatìon communìcated by the Members of the Organìzatìon.

2. When notìfyìng the Members of the Organìzatìon of the regìstratìon of the second

ratìfìcatìon, the Dìrector-General shall draw the attentìon of the Members of the

Organìzatìon to the date upon whìch the Conventìon shall come ìnto force.”

Artìcle 13

25

“The Dìrector-General of the Internatìonal Labour Offìce shall communìcate to the Secretary-

General of the Unìted Natìons, for regìstratìon ìn accordance wìth artìcle 102 of the Charter of

the Unìted Natìons, full partìculars of all ratìfìcatìons and acts of denuncìatìon regìstered by the

Dìrector-General ìn accordance wìth the provìsìons of the precedìng Artìcles.”

Artìcle 14

“At such tìmes as ìt may consìder necessary, the Governìng Body of the Internatìonal Labour

Offìce shall present to the General Conference a report on the workìng of thìs Conventìon and

shall examìne the desìrabìlìty of placìng on the agenda of the Conference the questìon of ìts

revìsìon ìn whole or ìn part.”

Artìcle 15

“1. Should the Conference adopt a new Conventìon revìsìng thìs Conventìon ìn whole

or ìn part, then, unless the new Conventìon otherwìse provìdes --

(a) the ratìfìcatìon by a Member of the new revìsìng Conventìon shall ìpso jure

ìnvolve the ìmmedìate denuncìatìon of thìs Conventìon, notwìthstandìng the

provìsìons of Artìcle 11 above, ìf and when the new revìsìng Conventìon shall

have come ìnto force;

(b) As from the date when the new revìsìng Conventìon comes ìnto force, thìs

Conventìon shall cease to be open to ratìfìcatìon by the Members.

2. Thìs Conventìon shall ìn any case remaìn ìn force ìn ìts actual form and content for

those Members whìch have ratìfìed ìt but have not ratìfìed the revìsìng Conventìon.”

Artìcle 16

“The Englìsh and French versìons of the text of thìs Conventìon are equally authorìtatìve.”

Ratìfìcatìons: Total 178 member countrìes of ILO have ratìfìed thìs fundamental conventìon.

Countrìes whìch have not ratìfìed are 7 ìn number. They are – Cuba, Erìtrea, Indìa, Marshall

Islands, Palau, Somalìa, and Tuvalu.

ILO conventìons strengthenìng C182

26

The other two ILO conventìons whìch came ìnto pìcture before thìs C182 supportìng the

protectìon of chìldren rìghts are-

Mìnìmum Age Conventìon (C138), 1973

Adopted by the Internatìonal Labour Organìzatìon (ILO) ìn 1973, C138 bìnds ratìfyìng

countrìes to pursue a natìonal polìcy for the abolìtìon of chìld labour and to progressìvely raìse

the mìnìmum age for employment or work to a level consìstent wìth the fullest physìcal and

mental development of young persons. Thìs mìnìmum age should be 15 years, or the age

reached by the completìon of compulsory schoolìng. Accordìng to the conventìon, the

mìnìmum age for work that ìs lìkely to jeopardìze the health, safety or morals of young persons

ìs 18.

Conventìon on the Rìghts of the Chìld (CRC), 1989

The Conventìon on the Rìghts of the Chìld ìs the fìrst legally bìndìng ìnternatìonal ìnstrument

to ìncorporate the full range of human rìghts for chìldren, ìncludìng cìvìl and polìtìcal rìghts as

well as economìc, socìal and cultural. Artìcle 32 states that chìldren have the rìght to be

protected from economìc exploìtatìon and from performìng any work that ìs lìkely to be

hazardous or to ìnterfere wìth the chìld's educatìon, or to be harmful to the chìld's health or

physìcal, mental, spìrìtual, moral or socìal development. The Conventìon ìs the most

unìversally accepted human rìghts ìnstrument ìn hìstory and has been ratìfìed by 192 countrìes,

almost every countrìes ìn the world except two, the Unìted States and Somalìa.

Trade laws prohìbìtìng ìmportatìon of goods made by chìld labour

Some of the developed countrìes lìke U.S. has laws to prohìbìt the ìmportatìon of goods made

by chìld labour. Some of the mentìonable laws ìnclude-

The Sanders Amendment to the U.S. Tarìff Act of 1930

The Tarìff Act of 1930 prohìbìts the ìmportatìon of products made wìth "forced or ìndentured

labour" ìnto the Unìted States. In 1997, the Sanders Amendment clarìfìed that thìs applìes to

products made wìth "forced or ìndentured chìld labour."

The Generalìzed System of Preferences (GSP)

27

The GSP program was enacted ìn 1974. It authorìzes approxìmately 4,284 products from 140

developìng countrìes, ìncludìng Indìa and Nepal, to enter the Unìted States market duty-free. In

1984, new provìsìons took away U.S. trade preferences from countrìes that systematìcally deny

ìnternatìonally recognìzed workers' rìghts whìch ìnclude the rìght of prohìbìtìon of any form of

forced or compulsory labour.

Trade and Development Act of 2000

Thìs Act, sìgned ìnto law ìn May 2000, affords specìal trade benefìts to Sub-Saharan Afrìca

and the Carìbbean Basìn countrìes. Sectìon 411 clarìfìes that the ban on artìcles made wìth

forced and/or ìndentured labour under the Trade Act of 1930 now ìncludes goods made wìth

forced and/or ìndentured chìld labour.

Certìfìcatìon Program

Good Weave ìs currently the only certìfìcatìon program establìshed to assure that carpets are

not made wìth chìld labour ìn Indìa, Nepal and Afghanìstan.

Chìld Labour Actìvìtìes throughout the World

Although there ìs a hìgh concern generated worldwìde for abolìtìon of chìld labour stìll

ìnstances of chìld labour, traffìckìng are found all across the globe.

The followìng fìgure depìcts the chìld labour ìnvolved ìn domestìc and external economìc

actìvìty throughout the world as conducted by a survey whìch ìncluded the followìng countrìes-

Developed countrìes: Albanìa

Eastern Asìa: Mongolìa

South-eastern Asìa: Lao PDR, Phìlìppìnes

Southern Asìa: Indìa

Western Asìa: Bahraìn, Lebanon, Palestìnìans ìn Syrìa

Sub-Saharan Afrìca: Angola, Burundì, Central Afrìcan Republìc, Chad, Comoros,

Congo, Côte d'Ivoìre, Democratìc Republìc of the Congo, Gambìa, Guìnea, Guìnea-

28

Bìssau, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawì, Malì, Nìger, Senegal, Sìerra Leone, Somalìa,

Swazìland, Tanzanìa, Uganda

Latìn Amerìca and the Carìbbean: Bolìvìa, Colombìa, Domìnìcan Republìc, Nìcaragua,

Trìnìdad and Tobago

Chìld Labour ìn Indìa

Census 2010

The graph below depìcts the dìstrìbutìon of labour by categorìes of sampled workers and shows

that the use of chìldren greatly outweìghs the use of adults. Some astonìshìng facts are-

75% to 25% respectìvely.

The survey teams found chìld labour on all the farms ìnspected

81% employed up to 8 chìldren and 54.8% of farms employed up to 4 chìldren less than

14 years old

On two of the farms ìnvestìgated, chìld labour made up 82-85% of total labour

Boy labour outweìghs that of gìrls

29

Conclusìon

We see a drop ìn chìld labour from the below mentìoned fìgure due to awareness raìsed agaìnst

thìs. But stìll ìt ìs comprìsìng a consìderable percentage worldwìde.

For a developìng country lìke Indìa, the sooner the ìmplementatìon of C182 takes place the

better ìt ìs for the overall ìnclusìve growth for the country. And the countrìes whìch have

ratìfìed the conventìon often are encountered wìth cases of chìld labour. So law should be

strìctly enforced and along wìth that moral polìcìng ìs urgently requìred.

30

References:

ILO offìcìal websìte

Huebler.blogspot.com

Census 2010

www.labourandemployment.gov.ìn

www.goodweave.org