indigeneity, science and difference: notes on the...

16
Indigeneity, science and difference: notes on the politics of how 1 Solveig Joks a and John Law b a Sámi Allaskuvla, Sámi University of Applied Science, Hánnoluohkká 45, NO-9520 Guovdageaidnu, Norway [email protected] b Department of Sociology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK, [email protected] and Centre for Science Studies, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YN 11 th October 2017; ThePoliticsOfHow20171011.docx 1 We are grateful to Nils Henrik Måsø, Sonja Måsø, Eva Måsø and Ole Johan Gaup for their hospitality and their willingness to share their knowledge of Deatnu salmon. Solveig would also like to thank the many fisherpeople who so willingly shared their knowledge with her in the course of her fieldwork, the Sámi Allaskuvla for financial support for the PhD-research on which this paper is based and her supervisor Britt Kramvig for her support during the fieldwork and the writing of her dissertation. John would like to thank the Centre for Advanced Study in Oslo, Norway which funded and hosted the research project ‘Arctic Domestication in the Era of the Anthropocene’ during the academic year of 2015/2016 and the work of writing of this paper.

Upload: hakhanh

Post on 18-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Indigeneity,scienceanddifference:notesonthepoliticsofhow1

SolveigJoksaandJohnLawbaSámiAllaskuvla,SámiUniversityofAppliedScience,Hánnoluohkká45,NO-9520Guovdageaidnu,[email protected],TheOpenUniversity,WaltonHall,MiltonKeynesMK76AA,UK,[email protected],DepartmentofSociology,LancasterUniversity,Bailrigg,LancasterLA14YN11thOctober2017;ThePoliticsOfHow20171011.docx

1WearegratefultoNilsHenrikMåsø,SonjaMåsø,EvaMåsøandOleJohanGaupfortheirhospitalityandtheirwillingnesstosharetheirknowledgeofDeatnusalmon.Solveigwouldalsoliketothankthemanyfisherpeoplewhosowillinglysharedtheirknowledgewithherinthecourseofherfieldwork,theSámiAllaskuvlaforfinancialsupportforthePhD-researchonwhichthispaperisbasedandhersupervisorBrittKramvigforhersupportduringthefieldworkandthewritingofherdissertation.JohnwouldliketothanktheCentreforAdvancedStudyinOslo,Norwaywhichfundedandhostedtheresearchproject‘ArcticDomesticationintheEraoftheAnthropocene’duringtheacademicyearof2015/2016andtheworkofwritingofthispaper.

1

AbstractThispaperexploresacolonialcontroversy:theimpositionofstaterulestolimitsalmonfishinginaScandinaviansubarcticriver.Theserulesreflectbiologicalfishpopulationmodelsintendedtopreservesalmonpopulations,butthisriverhasalsobeenfishedforcenturiesbyindigenousSámipeoplewhohavetheirowndifferentpracticesandknowledgesoftheriverandsalmon.IntheorytheNorwegianstaterecognisestraditionalecologicalknowledge(TEK)andincludesthisinitsbiologicalassessments,butinpracticethisdoesnothappen,soSámifishingpracticesandtherealitiesthattheyenactaredisappearing.Thepaperexploreshowtoconceptualisecolonialdifferencesinknowing.Drawingonrecentanthropology,itaskshow(scientific)‘settler’and(Sámi)‘nomadic’enactworldsandtheirrealities,suggestingthatunlikethelatter,theformercreateasinglerealityintolerantofalternatives.Thefocusisthusona‘politicsofhow’,andthewaysinwhichcolonialrealitiesandknowledgesmightintersectlessdestructively.

KeywordsNature,environmentalcontroversy,indigenousknowledges,biologicalmodelling,TEK,Sámi

OntologyOntology,onceabranchofphilosophy,isnowcentraltoSTSwhereittypicallycomesintheformofthreeclaims:one,thatrealitiesareenactedinpractices;two,thatsincetherearedifferentpracticestherearealsodifferentenactedrealities;andthree,thatthesepracticesandrealitiesoverlapandweavetogethertogenerateontologicalmultiplicity.2Severalpoliticalcorrelatesfollow.First,sincerealsareembeddedandenactedinwebsofpractices,realitiescannotbeeasilyshiftedorwilledintobeing:thereisnocomfortherefor‘alternativefacts’(Law2009).Second,sincerealitiesarenotgivenandtherearedifferentreals,itbecomesimportanttoattendtoa‘politicsofwhat’aswellasa‘politicsofwho’(Mol2012).Andthird,asapartofthis,italsobecomesimportanttoattendtothewayinwhichpracticesengageorfailtoengagewithdifference,ortowhatwemightthinkofasa‘politicsofhow’.3

Inthispaperweexplorethepoliticalandanalyticalwhos,whats,andhowsofacolonialcontroversy:theimpositionofstaterulestolimitsalmonfishinginaScandinaviansubarcticriver.Theserules,whichreflectbiologicalsalmonstatisticsandtheprojectionsoffishpopulationmodels,areintendedtopreservesalmonpopulations.ButthisisariverthathasalsobeenfishedforcenturiesbyindigenousSámipeoplewhohavetheirowndifferentpractices,andunderstandingsoftheriverandsalmon.IntheorytheNorwegianstaterecognisestraditionalecologicalknowledge(TEK)andthisisincludedintheassessmentsmadebybiologists,butinpracticethisdoesnothappen.Asaresult,arangeofSámifishingpracticesincludingdriftnetfishing(onwhichwefocus)arebeingextinguished,andtherealitiesthatgowiththosepracticesarealsodisappearing.

Wearenotneutralobservers,andtakeitthatthereareseveralreasonswhySámifishingpracticesandtherealitiesthatgowiththeseshouldbesustained.Mostobviously,thisisamatterofcolonial

2Therearemanyaccounts.See,forinstance,Mol(1999,2002),ViveirosdeCastro(2004),Latour(2004b,a),Law(2004),Henareetal.(2007),Thompson(2007),Escobar(2008),Green(2013),WoolgarandLezaun(2013),andPickering(2017).3Asensibilitytothe‘politicsofhow’underpinsmuchcontemporaryworkinSTS.See,forinstance,Callonetal,(2009),Latour(2013),WatertonandTsouvalis(2015)andVerran(2002).

2

politics:awrongisbeinginflictedonSámifishersandlong-standingpracticesarebeingstifled.Again,sinceSámifishingpracticeshavebeensustainableforcenturies,itseemslikelythattherearelessonshereforoutsidersthatitmightbesensibletoexplore(Berkes2012).Butunderpinningouraccountisanotherconcernthatisbothpoliticalandpractical.Aswehavejustnoted,weareinterestedinhowtowork,andworkwell,acrossdifference(Verran2002).Thus,ifthepracticesofSámifishersontheonehand,andfisheriesbiologists(andpolicymakers)enactdifferentworlds,thentheissueis:howmighttheseintersectinwaysthatarelessdestructive?Ourcorefocus,then,isondifferenceandonhowthisisdone.

DriftnetfishingAnethnographicmoment.WeareintheheartofSápmi,theSámiareainnorthernScandinavia.Wehavedrivenmorethan200milesacrossthetundraandalongthebanksoftheDeatnuRiverinFinnmark,thenorthernmostcountyinNorway,toSolveig'schildhoodvillage.4WehavebeenwarmlyreceivedbyherfriendsNils-HenrikandSonja,andtheirdaughterEva.Eva,wholivedandworkedforfifteenyearsinOslo,isnowbackinSápmiwithherreindeer-herdingpartnerandtheirchild.WearesittingintheirkitchenfiftymetresfromDeatnulookingacrosstoFinland,forthoughitwasnotalwaysso,Deatnunowformsthe(colonial)borderbetweenNorwayandFinland.Nils-Henrikhasfishedsincechildhood,andJohnisaskinghimaboutthenamesfordifferentsizesofsalmon.Yesterdaytheycaughtalargemalefish,agoadjin,whichisnotsogoodtoeat,thoughokaytosmoke.Better,saysNils-Henrik,aresmallluossa,uptotenkilos,thoughtherearemanynamesfordifferentkindsofsalmon.Ashetalksaboutwheretheyswim,thevariouskindsofsalmon,andhowyoucatchthemEvalistensattentively.Atonepointshesays:‘WhenIwasyoungIdidn’tlearnaboutdriftnetfishing.Mybrotherlearned,butIdidn’t.’Now,however,shewantstolearn.Infact,sheisjuststarting.Yesterdayshewentoutintheboatwithherfatherforthefirsttime.Thereasonsheisnotoutwithhimnowisthatitiswindyanddifficulttocontroltheboat.

Indriftnetfishingtwopeoplegooutinanarrowboataroundfivemetreslong.Whentheygettotherightplaceintherivertheycuttheoutboard,andthepersonsittingonthebowscullsverygentlydownstreamwiththecurrent.Thesecondpersonstandstowardsthesternandpaysoutanet.Thenet,thirtyorfortymetreslong,spreadsoutacrossthecurrenttowardsthemiddleoftheriver.Heldupbysmallfloats,italsotrailsalongthebottomoftheriver,makingagentleupstreamcurveasitdragsbetweentheboatatoneendandabigfloatattheother.Apartoftheskillistoholdthiscurvedshapeasyoudriftslowlydownstream,butyoualsoneedtoknowwheretherearerocksontheriver-bedsothatmightcatchthenet.Soonepersonrows,andtheotherholdstheendofthenetinonehand.S/hesensesifithassnagged,orwhetherasalmoniscaughtinthenet.Intheotherhands/heholdsalongpolefeelingtheriverbed,punting,andoccasionallybangingthesideoftheboattofrightenfishintothenet.

RulesDeatnu,whichisoneofthegreatsalmonriversoftheworld,hasbeenattractingtouristssincethe1850s(Solbakk2011).Thosewholivetheremayfishwitharodfromthebankorfromaboat(manytouristsdothistoo),useadriftnet,oraweirtodrivethesalmonintoav-shapednet.Therearestrictrulesaboutwhocanandcannotfishwithwhichtechniquesinwhichperiodsandatwhattimeofday(JoksandLaw2017).Roughlyspeaking,onlyaparticulargroupoflocalpeoplecannet.Variouspointsarise.

4DeatnuisknowninNorwegianastheTana,andinFinnishastheTeno.

3

1. Theserulesarecomplex.Indeed,thoughthereisco-ordination,theregulationsarerelevantlydifferentontheNorwegianandtheFinnishsidesoftheriver.

2. Theyaredeeplyrestrictive.Everyoneisconstrained,butformanylocal–oftenSámi-–peopletheconsequencesareprofound.Driftnetfishingislimitedtoasmallishnumberofpeoplewholivealongtheriver,andthetimeswhentheycanfishhavebeencut,andcutagain.SámihistorianAageSolbakk(2016)reckonsthatfixednetandweirfishinghavefallen70%sincethemiddlenineteeneightiesbutthecutscontinue:in2017driftnetfishingwasrestrictedtofourdaysayear.

3. TheserulesareseriouslyenforcedbytheDeanučázádagaGuolástanhálddahus/TanavassdragetsFiskeforvaltning(TheTanaWatercourseFishManagementAuthority).

4. Therestrictionsreflecttheauthorities’concernsaboutoverfishingtogetherbasedonsalmonpopulationdataandtheprojectionsoffishstockmodels.ADeatnu‘WorkingGroup’ofFinnishandNorwegianexpertscollectsstatistics,modelsfishstocks,andrunspopulationprojections(Erkinaroetal.2012).Theirconcern(andconclusion)isthatmanyDeatnusalmonsubpopulationsareunderthreatfromoverfishing.Samipeopletendtoagreethattherearefewersalmon,butworryaboutoverfishinginquitedifferentways.

SothisisapolicycontroversythatisalsoadisagreementbetweenthepracticesofbiologyandthoseofTEK,wherethereisanalmostcompletepowerasymmetrybetweentheprotagonists,andthepolicybeingimposedwillpushSámidriftnetandweirfishingtoextinction.Perhaps,then,Evaisonlyjustintimetolearnthecraftoffishingfromherfather.Orperhapsitisalreadytoolate.

History,politics,anddifferenceTounderstandthisbetterweneedsomecontext.Briefly,overfivecenturiesSápmi,thearealivedinbySámipeople,wascolonisedbyfivenationstates:Denmark,Norway,Finland,SwedenandRussia.Unequaltradingrelationswereimposed.Borderswerecreatedwhichcutlong-distanceannualpathsofreindeermigrationandkinshiprelations.Settlerscamefromthesouth.Extractionindustriesbecameimportant(mostrecentlyoilandgas).Farmingwaspatchilyattemptedthoughoftenabandoned.Christianitybecameobligatory(thoughnineteenthcenturyLaestadianLutheranismalsobecameatoolofSámiresistance).InmanyplacesitbecameshamingtotalkSámi,andthelanguagewasforbiddeninschool.Indeed,itbecameshamingformanytobeknownasSámi.Andthen,asthestatestightenedtheirgriptheydidallthethingsthatstatesdo:theytaxed,theymapped,theycountedandtheyregulated.5Land,people,fishing,thenumbersofreindeer,andmostrecently,biodiversity,allweretallied,knownthroughthosetallies,andwere–are–subjecttostateregulation.Sámiwaysofbeingwereandarebeingsqueezed(Sara2009,Benjaminsenetal.2015,Johnsen,Benjaminsen,andEira2015).

Otherfactorshavealsobeenatwork.Economicprosperityandtechnicalchangemeanthatmostofthetimereindeerherdersliveinhouses,notlávvu(tents),andusesnowmobilesandquadbikes.Andthoughsomewouldargueabouttheallocationofresources,since1945Scandinaviansocialdemocracy,viciouslynormalisingthoughithasalsobeen,hasbroughtthebenefitsofawelfarestate.Butthelastthirtyyears–andlargescaleprotests–haveseenotherkindsofchangestoo.Norwaynowformallyrecognisestherightsofitsindigenouspeople(NorwaysignedILOConvention169in1990.)EducationintheSámilanguageisavailableinsomeschoolsinSámispeakingareas,andintheSámiAllaskuvlaspecificsubjects–journalism,teacherandkindergartentraining,duoji(handicrafts),andreindeerherding–aretaughtatuniversitylevelinSámi.ThereisaNorwegian

5TheexemplaryaccountisMitchell(2002)

4

Sámiparliament,theSámediggi.6Around95%ofthelandinFinnmarkhasbeenreturnedtothejointadministrationoftheSámediggiandthecounty.Landrightclaimsbytraditionalownersareonlypatchilyrecognisedandtheprocessworksbadly,butthedoctrineoflegalterranulliusinabsenceofsettlementhasdisappeared.

So,hereisthebottomline.Ontheonehand,insomewaysthingshavechangedforthebetterintherelativelyrecentpast.Butontheother,Sámiwaysofbeingarestillunderpressure,andSápmiisinmanyrespectscolonial.Sofishingrestrictionsarematchedbydraconianrulesaboutreindeerherdingandnatureconservationwhilethereisalsoconstantpressureonlandandlanduse.Butwhattomakeofthis?AndwhattomakeofthelimitstofishingbypeoplesuchasNils-Henrik?

DwellinganddifferenceTothinkaboutthis,weneedastrategyforthinkingaboutthesignificanceofdifference.Twocontrastingpointscatchwhygettingthisrightissodifficult.

First,differenceisubiquitous.Albeitoftenunrecognised,itisalsowithin.AsAnnemarieMol(2002)notes,itishardatworkevenwithinthepracticesinasinglehospital.Butifitiseverywhere,thenwhendoesitcountassignificantandwhendoesitnot?Howandwhenshoulditbebroughtout?Howcanweavoidthedangerthatnoparticulardivideistakentobesignificant?Suchisthefirstissue.

Thesecondtugsintheotherdirection.Thisisbecauseunlesswearecareful,significantdifferencebecomesessentialisedand/orbinary:thereis‘Sámi’thisversus‘Norwegian’that.Thoughsomeindeedproposethatdivision,boththeoryandthecolonialhistorythatwehavejustsketchedsuggestthathoweversignificanttheymaybe,differencesaremultiple,allravelledupandfractal(Mol2002,Law1999,Strathern1991).SoinnorthNorwayanythingthatis‘Sámi’includes‘Norwegian’,andvice-versa.Andthisreasoningappliesjustasmuchtothequestion:whoisSámi?Ifidentitiesaremobile,complex,oftenblurred,andtheeffectofhistoriesofpower,thentheanswercannotbestraightforward.Inpractice,forinstance,theSámediggitreatsthisasamatterofbothself-perceptionandlanguage.Ifyou,yourparents,grandparentsorgreatgrandparentshadSámiasahomelanguage,andyoualsoperceiveofyourselfasSámi,thenyoucanregistertovote(Sámediggin.d.).Overall,however,thelessonisclear.Thereisnoonegoodwayofmakingsuchcuts.Theyarefractalandeachincludestheotherateverylevelofscale.Thelessonisthatwhatisbestintermsofmakingdivisionsdependsonwhatyouaretryingtoachieve.

Sohowtothinkaboutwhatishappeningforfishingpeople?Tothinkaboutthisinthecontextofapoliticsofhow,wewanttomakeananalyticalcutbetweentwomodesoflivingandtheirsocial,spatialandtemporallogics.TodothisweborrowfromMazzulloandIngoldwhodistinguishbetweennomadicandsettledformsofdwelling.Theywritethatforpeoplewhoaresettled:

‘Toleaveone’splaceofabodeis…totakeastepupwards,fromasmaller,moreexclusiveplacetoalarger,moreinclusiveone’.(MazzulloandIngold2008,30).

Heretheworldisexperiencedasasetofnestedboxes.InSTSlanguage,wemightsaythatsettlersenactregionalformsofspatiality(MolandLaw1994)inwhichtheworldisexperiencedandperformedasanisometricspace-timebox,asingle‘one-worldworld’(Law2015).Thisbox-worldispartitionedintospatialandtemporalsectionscontainingpeople,animalsandothersomewhatstableobjectswithparticularattributesthatrelatetogetherinmoreorlesspredictableways.Andatleastinprincipleitispossibletoidentifythoseattributesandrelationsinwaysthatarerelatively

6TherearealsoSámiparliamentsinFinlandandSweden.

5

general.Such,forinstance,istheassumptionthatunderpinsthebiologyofsalmonpopulationsdiscussedbelow.

However,MazzulloandIngoldaremuchmoreinterestedinthealternativewayofbeing,thatofnomadism.Forherders,atleastinthepast,theworldwasnotlikethis:

‘Forwhatiscalledtheforest,meahcci…,isunderstoodnotsomuchasatree-coveredexpanseasatexturedenselyinterwovenfromthepathsalongwhichpeoplecarryontheiractivitiesofherding,fishing,berry-gathering.’

Ingoldvisualisesthedistinctionso:

7

Themessageisthatforherderstheworldisasetofrelationsarisingfromembodiedmovements.Peopledonot‘existinplaces’,but‘placesoccuralongthelife-pathsofpeople.’(MazzulloandIngold2008,32).Noticethereversal.Movementcomesbeforespaceandplace.Tasksarisewhentheyariseandclocktimehaslittleornorelevanceinthisworld.Indeed,theweatheris‘[t]heonlymasterofdeadlines’(MazzulloandIngold2008,34).Nothingcanbeanticipated–excepttheunexpected.

‘[W]hatcountsisnotpunctualitybutreadiness,nottheprecisetargetingofapointintimebutacontinualmonitoringofthewaythingsaregoing,inaworldinwhicheveryoneandeverythingisinmovement,eachattheirownpace,alongalternatelyconverginganddivergingpaths.’(MazzulloandIngold2008,34)

PutinSTSlanguage,thespatiallogicofherdinganditstaskscapesisnotregional,butvariablyrelationalorfluid,enactingrealitiesthatarecontingentanduncertain(MolandLaw1994,deLaetandMol2000).Theyarefarremovedfromthesingleworldwithitsspace-timeisometrybeingenacted(butsimultaneouslypresupposed)bythepracticesofregionalism.Thisalsomeansthattheaspirationstogeneralexplanationthatbelongtosettlementdonotarise.Thereisnosinglehiddenorderbehindexperiencewaitingtoberevealed.Thisisnotaone-worldworld.Butthereissomethingelsetoo.MazzulloandIngolddonotexplorethis,butcentraltothisworldofencounterswithpowerfulactorsistheimportanceofrespect.Livelyandpowerfulentitiessuchastheweather,orforestsandlakesaretobetreatedwithcaution–indeedwithdeference.Lifeisuncertain.Asitunfoldsitdependsonsuchactors.Failuretoshowrespectmayleadtodisaster.Inpractice,then,

7MazzulloandIngold(2008,31).

6

Sámipeopleoftenthankthoseactors,orblessthem(LawandØstmo2017),andtheyalsosetlimitstowhattheyaskandexpectofthem.

ThelogicoffishingNilsHenrikisnotanomad.HehaslivedallhislifeinahouseonthebanksofDeatnu.Butthoughtheterminologyneedsadjusting,thisfocushelpsustounderstandhispracticesoffishing.8So,followingMazzulloandIngoldwewanttoarguethatthelogicoffishingisrelationallyfluid.Tousedriftnetsistoliveinanunfoldingworldthatisinastateofconstantchange.NilsHenrikknowsaboutwaterlevelsinhispartofDeatnu.Heknowsaboutthesignificanceofthetimeofday,themomentintheseasons,thewaytheyhaveunfolded,thepredispositionsofthemanykindsofsalmon,theactivitiesofothersontheriver,thetemperature,sunorcloud,wind,andtherainorsnow.Allareonthemove,andallhavetobehandledtogether.Momentbymoment,whenyouareoutintheboatwiththenetinyourhand.Butalsowhenyouarethinkingaboutwhetherornottogofishing,orwhere.‘[W]hatcountsisnotpunctualitybutreadiness,nottheprecisetargetingofapointintimebutacontinualmonitoringofthewaythingsaregoing’,Mazzullo’sandIngold’swordsexactlydescribetherealitiesofdriftnetfishingonDeatnu.Thisisnotaworldinwhichthereismuchpredictability.

AtthesametimefisherssuchasNilsHenrikworryaboutthesalmon.Theydon’tworkwithnumbers,buttheydoask:willthesalmoncome?Willtheykeeponcoming?And,importantly,iftherearefewerofthemcoming,thenwhy?Therearedebates(JoksandLaw2017),butcautionandrespectforriverandsalmonarecentraltodriftnetfishing.Thisexpressesitselfinarangeofways.First,younevertakemoresalmonthanyouneed.SoNilsHenrikusedaweirtocatchfishbutstopped,partlybecauseheneededtocheckiteachmorning,butpartlybecausehedidn’tneedthefish.Respect,then,ispartlyaboutsettinglimits:youtakewhatyouneedbutnomore.

Andthenthereisasenseofplace,ofmodesty.HereisanexcerptfromSolveig’sfieldnotes.SheisoutontheDeatnufishingwithPetterSomby:

‘Wetakeabreak.Petterrowstothebank,andwedrinkcoffee.Andthen,whilewearesittingonthebank,weseeaboat.Theyarefishing.Wewatchastheycatchasalmon.Solveigcallsout.‘Canyousee?Ifwe’dbeenontheriverthatfishcouldhavebeenours.’‘No,’saysPetter.‘That’snotright.Becausethatfishwasnotmeantforus’Headds:‘Wecan’tcatchthefishthatarealreadycaught.’9

Modesty,asenseoflimits,arelationalrespectforindividualfish,aboutwhatisproperandwhatisnot,aboutwhatispossibleandwhatisnot,alloftheseareatwork.Asenseofpropriety,ofwhatisfitting,respectforwhatisappropriate,thesearethreadsthatrunthroughSámifishingpractices.Afishgivesitself,oritdoesnot.Thisexpressesitself,too,inanaversiontonumbers:youdonotcountthefishyouhavecaught.Todosowouldbedisrespectful.Butneitherdoyoutakethewrongkindofsalmon.Soyoudonottakebreedingsalmon,čáhppesguolli(blackfish).Probablyyoudonotgofishingwhensalmonareabouttobreedanyway,butifyoucatchablackfishyoureturnit.Andthenagain,itisalsoimportanttofishinwaysthatleavethesalmoninpeace.PetterSomby:

‘Nowadaystherearesomanypeoplefishing.Andofcoursetheywillcatchfishiftheyfishdayandnight.Theproblemisthatthefishnevergetanypeace,notevenforanhour.’(JoksandLaw2017).

8DespitetheDeleuzianresonances,wehereconfineourcommentarytoMazulloandIngold.9ForthisquoteinanothercontextseeJoksandLaw(2017).

7

Allthismeansthatyoudonotgototheriverasapastime.Youneverplaywithfish.Fishingisemphaticallynotarecreation,ahobby,oraformofsport.Theideaofcatchandreleaseismorallyrepugnant.Instead,fishingisaserioustask,apartofliving,awayofcopingwith,andlivingfromandinrelationtoadifficultenvironment.Itisanactivityconductedrespectfullywithappropriateandrespectfullimits.

CollisionThefollowingmorningwetalkedagainwithNilsHenrik.UsingthebigSámi-Norwegian/Englishdictionaryhecommentedthatmanyyoungpeopledon’tknowtherightwordsorusethemproperly.Theymay,forinstance,usethetermgoadjinforanymalesalmon,notjustthosethatareverylarge.AswetalkedhewaslookingfromtimetotimeattheDeatnuoutofthekitchenwindowhopingtofish–andwhenhefoundaneighbourtorowtheboathewasoff.AllofwhichisMazzullo’sandIngold’snomadisminpractice.Butittellsusonlyonehalfofthestory.Thefluidpart.Becausealongsidethistherearetherulesandregulations.Andnowwegettothecrunch.

In2016Nils-Henrikwaslimitedtoeleven24-hourfishingperiods.(Aswenotedabove,in2017thefigurewasfour).10SoaswedrankcoffeewithhimonaThursdaymorninghealsoknewthatunlesshegotoutontheriverbeforemiddayhewouldnotbefishingagainuntilMonday.Evenwithouttheruleshewouldhavebeenkeentogetoutontheriver.Thestateoftheweather,theriver,theactivitiesofotherfishers,andyesterday’sexcellentcatchalltoldhimthatthiswasagoodmomenttofish.ButherethedivisionsignalledbyMazzulloandIngoldalsocomespowerfullyintoplay.Becausewhatishappeninginthisfractalworldisthatafluidlogicwithitsresponsiveopportunity-seizingtemporalitiesiscollidingwiththeboundedclocktimeembeddedinthestateanditsregulations.Thelatterhasnoplaceinthefluiditiesoffishing,isignorantofthosefluidities,andknowsnothingofthecompetenceoflocalpeopleandtheirunfoldingpreparednessbecauseitforcesthemtofishatpredeterminedandpossiblyinappropriatetimes.

Solveighaswitnessedthiscollisionmanytimes.Therulesstopyoufishingwhentheconditionsareright.Ortheystopyoufishinginanothersectionoftherivereventhoughconditionsarerighttherebutnotinyourown.Ortherulesallowyoutofishbutthereisnopointindoingso,oryoucan’tbecausethereisnoonetofishwith,thewateristooloworhigh,ortherearetoomanytourists.Thusthoughtheyarebothpresent,theworldofrulesandtheworldoffishingareindeed,justthat,worldsapart.Aswehavejustsaid,theworldoftherulesisignorantofthefluiditiesoftheworldoffishingandtheirrelationalcontingencies.Itenactsanotherkindofreality,apartitionedspace-timecontainer,aone-worldworld.

Sowhydoesthismatter?TheanswerisencapsulatedinEva’spredicament.Shewantstolearnhowtofishsoshecanpasstheskilltoherson.Butthisisnotgoingtohappenunlessshecangooutintheboatwithherfatherandwatchandpractiseandtalkwithhim.Learnfromhimnotonlyhowtocontrolaboatandhandleanet,butalsohowtheriverworks,wherethedeepchannelsrun,wherethesalmonarelikelytobeswimming,andwheretherearerocksthatmightsnagthenet.Andallthiswilltaketimeandpatienceandpractice–togetherwiththeabilitytoseizethemoment.Butthisrelationaltimeisbeingtakenaway.ThismatterstoEvaandherfamily,butitmattersmorebroadlytoo.Andhereisthebottomline.Withfishinglimitedtofourdaysayearitwillbecomenearlyimpossibleforyoungpeopletolearntheartofdriftnetfishing.Indeed,perhapsitalreadyis.Afluidsetofreals,atradition,itsknowledges,andawholewayoflivingwillallhavedisappeared.Thesettledrealsofpowerwillhavechokedafluidalternative.Andthisiswhywechoosetoattendto10TheregulationsrestrictedfishingtobetweennoononMondayandThursdayfrom20thMayto15thJune.In2017fishinghasbeenfurtherrestrictedfrom1stto5thJunebetweennoononMondayandWednesday.

8

thisparticulardifferenceandmakeouranalyticalcutinthisparticularway.Wewanttoprotestaboutthisprocessofontologicalsuffocation.Wewanttounderstanditasamalevolentexpressionofthepoliticsofhow.

TheWorkingGroupToseehowthisworksweneedtomovetotheworldoffishstockmodelling:

‘Thebasicprocedureofthisapproachis(1)thedefinitionofstock-specificspawningtargets(i.e.thenumberofspawningfemalesalmonneededtofilltheproductionpotentialofastock),(2)anestimationofthenumberofspawningfemalesinastockafterafishingseason,and(3)acomparisonofthetargetandthespawningstockestimate.’(Erkinaroetal.2012,5)

ThiscomesfromtheofficialTanaRiverWorkingGroupwhichaddsthatDeatnuproductionpotential11andstockingtargetsarenotbeingfulfilled(Erkinaroetal.2012,5),thatthenumberofreturningsalmonisfalling,andthatsomeofitsthirtygeneticallydistinctsalmonpopulationsareunderthreat.Thethrustofthereportisthatfishing(‘exploitation’)needstobeurgentlyreduced,andwehaveseenthatthisisreflectedinpolicy.

FormanySámithefindingsoftheWorkingGrouparecontentious.Forinstance,theyareconcernedaboutthepredatorsnowprotectedbyenvironmentallegislation.Againstthis,theWorkingGrouparguesthat:

‘Thereisverylittlebiologicalbasisforarguingthatnaturallyoccurringpredatorsareathreattosalmon,andpredationmustratherbeviewedasanintegralandnaturalpartoftheecosystem.’(Erkinaroetal.2012,5)

Sámicriticsworry,too,aboutthestatistics,notingthatinsomeyearstherearemoresalmonthanothers.TheWorkingGroupindeedwantstoimprovethosestatistics(thesemostlycomefromlessthanidealsamplecatchstatistics(Erkinaroetal.2012,45ff)),butarguesthatdespiteannualvariationsthelong-termtrendisclear,anditisdown.Thentherearedebatesabouttheroleoftouristfishing(Erkinaroetal.2012,26).Andfinally,thereisthestatusofTEKitself.ThoughtheWorkingGroupislegallyrequiredtoconsiderthis,localsfindthattheirknowledgebeingmarginalised,andtheWorkingGrouparguesthattheroleforTEKisnecessarilylimited:

‘LEKandTEKislargelyoralandvisual,intuitive,experiencebased,subjectiveandhighlyqualitative,whilescienceisbasedonsystematicdatawithinamodel-orhypothesis-basedframeworkwhich,throughtheuseofastrictsamplingdesign,are[sic]largelyobjectiveandquantitative.’(Erkinaroetal.2012,29-30).

Asisobvious,thisrepresentsaparticularandcontestableviewofthecharacterofscientificinquiry(LawandJoks2017).Thereisnospaceforthequalitativeinthisworldbut,andmoreimportantforourargument,themodelsarealsoenactingaregional,settler,logic.Howdotheywork?Theansweristhattheyassumethatthereisasingleone-worldworld.Thentheyassumethatbehindthatworldtherearediscoverablemechanismsand/orcorrelationswhichgeneratethecomplexitiesofeverydayexperience.Andthisleadsustothepoliticsofhow,becausethereislittlespaceforalternativestoriesaboutfishinthisworld,andthereiscertainlynospaceforalternativerealities.‘Thereisverylittlebiologicalbasisforarguingthatnaturallyoccurringpredatorsareathreattosalmon.’Extra-biologicalreality-differencesarenotbeingtoleratedhere.

11Productionpotentialisthemaximumnumberofsmoltthatcanbeproduced(Erkinaroetal.2012,61)

9

Stock-replacementmodellingThehistoryoffishpopulationmodellingiscomplex(Holm1996)andliesbeyondthescopeofthispaper.However,itsgeneralapproachcanbeillustratedbythisfigurewhichistypicalofmanythatappearintheliterature.12

Thissetsthenumberofspawningfish(xaxis)againstthenumberofmature‘recruits’(yaxis).Theissueis:howmanyrecruitsjointhepopulationforeachspawningfish?Ifonespawnergeneratesonerecruittheresultisthediagonalhatchedlinerunningfromtheorigin.Abovethatlineandstocksizeincreases;belowanditfalls.Thehump-shapedcurveindexestheideathatiftherearefewbreedingsalmontheyarelikelytoproducemorethanonerecruit,whileiftherearemanythendensity-dependentcompetitionforscarceresourceswillreducethatnumber.Thebasicsuggestionisthatanygivenenvironmentcanonlysustainsomanysalmon.13Thereferencepointlinesshowthreedifferentpossibleequilibriabetweennewrecruitsarrivinginthepopulationandoldfishdeparting.Ifthereisnofishingthennumberoneapplies:lotsofspawnersarejustreproducingthemselvesbecausetherearenoresourcesforadditionalrecruits.Ifyoucutthenumberofspawners(forinstancebyfishing)thenthenumberofnewrecruitsismaximised.Thatisthemiddleline,numbertwo.Andifyoucutthenumberofspawnersyetagainthenyougetfewernewrecruitsintotalbutyougetmoreperspawningadult.Theadultsaremoreproductive.Thatisnumberthree.

Therearemanyuncertainbiologicallyrelevantissueshere.Determiningthemaximumcarryingcapacityisanartthatdepends,interalia,onknowledgeofriverconditionsandtheareacoveredbytheriver.Andagain,determiningwhatwillcountasapopulationisusuallylessthanobviousandhasoftenbeendebatedinfisheriesscience.Generally,however,withtheincreasingconcernwithgeneticandbehaviouralbiodiversity,whatcountsasapopulationhasbecomemorelocallyspecific.Aswesawearlier,theWorkingGroupseestheneedtoprotectuptothirtyseparatesalmonpopulationsintheDeatnuanditstributaries.

Sowhataretheimplicationsofstockmodelling?Wewanttomakethreeobservations.First,aswehavenoted,youcannotentertheworldoffishstockmodellingandthepoliciesthatfollowfromthisunlessyouarealsowillingtocount.Thereasoningwithinthosemodelscanoftenbenarrated,buttheirinputs,theirmechanics,andtheiroutputsarequantitative.Aswehaveseen,thisisoneofthe

12Wehavecomposedthisourselves,butforsimilarfiguressee,forinstance,Milneretal.(2003),Potteretal.(2003)andHindaretal.(2007)13Manyparametricstock-recruitmentmodelsassumeann-shapedrecruitmentcurveofthisform,thoughtheshapeofthatcurvevariesandthosedifferencesarenottrivial.SeeHindaretal.(2007).

10

reasonswhyTEKismarginaltothethinkingoftheWorkingGroup.ItisalsooneofthereasonswhySámifishers,forwhomcountingisimmodestanddisrespectful,findthereasoningofthebiologistsalien.14

Second,fishstockmodellingisnotjustaboutfishpopulations.Itisalsoabouteconomics.Unsurprisingly,then,‘nature’and‘culture’arebeingdonetogether.15Whatcountsasfishingtoomuch?Howmanyfishshouldyoutakeifyouwanttominimiseeffort-to-catchratiosonalong-termbasis?Oristhisbesidethepointfortouristfishing?Andwhatisthemaximumsustainableyield?Thesearethekindsofquestionsthatthemodelsaddress–ofteninthecontextofcatastrophicover-fishing(WaltersandMaguire1996).Crucially,then,theyareaboutbothproductionandbiology.Anditisthisdoublefocus–fishandeconomics–towhichthethreereferenceequilibriumlinesinthefigureabovearepointing.Thisisthinkinginaproductivistmode(Reinert2014).InthecontextofDeatnuitisabouttheleveloffishingthatcanbesustainedtakingtouristsandlocalpeopletogether.Again,thisisfarremovedfromtheSámiworldofrestrainedandrespectfulfishing.

Third,whiledifferentrivershaveparticularattributes,fishstockmodellingbelongstothelogicofsettlement.Thereisnospaceforalternativerealities,becauseitassumesthatthesamekindsofpopulationdynamicsareatworkindifferentpopulations(Hindaretal.2007,12ff).Thisiswhyknowledgecanbegeneralised,andmodelscreatedforonerivercanbemovedtoanother.Putperformativelythismeansthatfisheriessciencemodellingenactsaworldinwhichgeneralcausalmechanismsareatworkbehindthespecificitiesofparticularrivers.Populationsarebeinganimatedbygeneralmechanismssuchasdensity-dependentcompetition,orratesofexploitation.AgainweseethatthisaworldquiteunlikethefluiditiesofSámifishingpractices.Thedifferencesbetweenthetwoaresimultaneouslypolitical,epistemological,ontologicalandstylistic.Theyareaboutthewaysinwhichrealitiesareassembled.Aboutrecognisingdifference,ornot.Abouttoleratingdifference,ornot.Inshort,theyarealsoaboutthepoliticsofhow.

ConsequencesWestartedbysayingthatwearepartisan.OurpositionisthatSámidriftnetfishingisbeingwronglysqueezedoutofexistencebyadominantsetoffisheriesmanagementpractices.OurviewthatthisisunacceptableisstiffenedbythefactthatanalogousformsofpressureareunfoldingacrossSápmi,incontextsthatincludereindeerherding(Benjaminsenetal.2015),duckhunting,andlakefishing(LawandØstmo2017).ThisisunacceptableinacountrythathassignedILOConvention169andclaimstorecognisetherightsofitsindigenouspeople.Wehavesuggestedthatitisalsounwiseevenintermsofstate-sponsoredconservationpolicy.WedonotneedtosubscribetoanEdenicvisionofSámifishingpracticestosuggestthatitisperversetoextinguishatraditionthathasmaintainedsustainablerelationsbetweenpeople,riverandfishforcenturies.Butwewanttoconcludebyreturningtothepoliticsofhow.

WehaveseenthattheTanaRiverWorkingGrouparguesthatTEKisunlikebiologybecauseitisoral,visual,intuitive,experience-based,subjectiveandqualitative.ThisargumentreproducesanasymmetricalversionofthedivideexploredbyMazulloandIngoldwhichmay,withtheSTS-inflectedadditionsdiscussedabove,besummarisedso:

SETTLER NOMADregion fluid

14Therearesimilardifferencesaboutquantificationinreindeerherding.SeeReinert(2014).15Therearelargeliteraturesonthis.ForaseminaltextseeCronon(1995).

11

timeandspacewithinwhichthereismovement

movementbeforetimeandspace

clocktime encounterpartition pathways

scale fluidityunderlyingmechanisms contingency

prediction opportunisticpreparednessmastery modesty

asingleworld ?opennessnatureandcultureseparate ‘nature’and‘culture’

indistinguishable

Thistableislessthansatisfactory.Itsbinaryformenactsapartitioned‘settler’wayofbeing,ignoresthefractalcharacterofdifferencediscussedearlier,andthefactthatscienceinpracticeisfluid,heterogeneousandimpure(Latour1993).Thesecautionsnoted,itsbinarismisusefulinthinkingaboutapoliticsofhow.Torecap,the‘politicsofwho’isaboutpeople,individuallyandcollectively,theirrightsandduties,andabouthowtheyareorshouldbetreatedwithinthepolity.The‘politicsofwhat’reflectsthewidespreadSTS,feminist,andanthropologicalsensibilitytoperformativitytoarguethatrealitiesarenotgivenbutaregeneratedinpractices,andaskswhetheralternativeandbetterrealitiesmightbeenacted.Thenthe‘politicsofhow’attendstothewaysinwhichrealitiesareenactedinpractices,howthosepracticesrecogniseandhandledifference,andhowthelattermightbebetterhandled(Verran1998).

Nowconsidertheadministrative,science-based‘settler’practicesontheleftofthetable.Aswehaveseen,theseclassify,order,partitionandenactaone-worldworld.Theyusuallydistinguishculturefromnature,treatingcultureasmultiple,subjective,normative,andcontested,andnatureasasinglerealityshapedbygeneralmechanismsthatmaybediscernedbyspecialistswhotendtobeunforgivingofalternativeaccountsofnaturalrealityandintolerantofdifferencewithrespecttotheone-worldworldofnature.

MazulloandIngold’snomadismworksquitedifferently.Aswehaveseen,heretheworldisfluid,asetofnon-binarypathwaysandencounterswithpowerfulandlivelyactorsworthyanddemandingofrespect.Movementprecedestimeandspace,andactiongrowsoutofresponsiveandcontingentpreparedness.Theworldissomewhatpatterned,butitisalsomoreorlessunpredictableandtherearenounderlyinggeneralcauses.Hereknowingpracticesaremodest:whatisknownisknowninandaboutaplace.Andthismodestyextendstoreality.Whatthereis,isdonehereandnowinthisplaceandinthiscontext.Therearenogeneralmechanisms,knowledgeisnotreadilydisplaced,andthereisspaceforotherversionsofreality.Thismouldstheirpoliticsofhow:unlikebiology,thesearepracticesbroadlytolerantofdifference.

Thedisputethatwehavedescribedissimultaneouslyaboutapoliticsofwhoandapoliticsofwhat.Butitisalsoaboutapoliticsofhowbecauseitisaboutthedifferentproceduresbywhichrealities,humanandotherwise,arepractisedandintersectwithoneanother.Ourargumenthasbeenthatincolonialencountersitiscrucialtoattendtohowreality-enactingworks–andhowitworksacrossdifference.Doesitdenydifference?Doesitseektodomesticateit?Doesdifferenceleadtoconflict?Candifferentrealitiesbekeptapart?Orcantheybecaredforalongsideoneanother?Allofthesearepossibilities(Lawetal.2014).

12

Sowhatistobedone?Inaworldofdifferencethisisaquestionthataffordsnogeneralanswer.Itbecomesamatteroftime,placeandcircumstance.Thus,inSápmiithasoftenbeenwisetopressapoliticsofwhotoarguethatindigenousrightsarebeingignored.Andindeed,in2017thisbecameahotpoliticaltopicinthecontextoffishingrestrictionswithdirectactionbyEllosDeatnu.16Alongsidethis,ithassometimesbeenpossibletoworkeffectivelywithapoliticsofwhat,forintancebyattendingtodifferenceswithinscience.WedonotatpresentseehowtodothiswithDeatnufishbiology,butreindeerherdingpoliciesarenowbeingprisedapartbecausedifferentecologicalmodelsofferquitedifferentwaysofthinkingaboutthesizeofsustainablereindeerpopulations(Benjaminsenetal.2015).Finally,itisalsopossible,STS-wise,toimagineapoliticsofhowthatcraftssmallpracticesthatopenbiologytomomentsofdifference.Thishassometimesbeenachievedinotherlocations(Verran2002,WatertonandTsouvalis2015),butnotthusfarinSápmi.However,thetacticsareclear.Theneedistocreatedown-to-earthmaterialpracticesthatjuxtaposethe‘settler’offices,laboratories,modelsandquantificationsofbiologywiththenomadicpracticesofSámiexperts.Theneedisto‘soften’therealismsofbiology.Andthisisworkinprogress.

References Benjaminsen,TorA.,HugoReinert,EspenSjaastad,andMikkelNilsSara.2015."Misreadingthe

Arcticlandscape:Apoliticalecologyofreindeer,carryingcapacities,andoverstockinginFinnmark,Norway."NorskGeografiskTidsskrift-NorwegianJournalofGeography69(4):219-229.doi:10.1080/00291951.2015.1031274.

Berkes,Fikret.2012.SacredEcology.Abingdon:Routledge.

Callon,Michel,PierreLascoumes,andYannickBarthe.2009.ActinginanUncertainWorld:anEssayonTechnicalDemocracy.Cambridge,Mass.,andLondon:MITPress.

Cronon,William.1995."TheTroublewithWilderness:orGettingbacktothewrongNature."InUncommmonGround:RethinkingtheHumanPlaceinNature,editedbyWilliamCronon,69-90.NewYorkandLondon:W.W.Norton.

deLaet,Marianne,andAnnemarieMol.2000."TheZimbabweBushPump:MechanicsofaFluidTechnology."SocialStudiesofScience30(2):225-263.

Erkinaro,J.,M.Falkegård,E.Niemelä,andT.G.Heggberget.2012.StatusoftheRiverTanaSalmonPopulations.Trondheim:Miljødirektoratet,TheNorwegianEnvironmentAgency.

Escobar,Arturo.2008.TerritoriesofDifference:Place,Movements,Life,Redes.DurhamandLondon:DukeUniversityPress.

Green,Lesley,ed.2013.ContestedEcologies:DialoguesintheSouthonNatureandKnowledge.CapeTown:HSRCPress.

Henare,Amiria,MartinHolbraad,andSariWastell,eds.2007.ThinkingThroughThings:TheorisingArtefactsEthnographically.AbingdonandNewYork:Routledge.

Hindar,Kjetil,OlaH.Diserud,PederFiske,TorbjørnForseth,ArneJ.Jensen,OlaUgedal,NinaJonsson,Svein-ErikSloreid,JoVegarArnekleiv,SveinJakobSaltveit,HaraldSægrov,andLeifMagnusSættem2007.GytebestandsmålforlaksebestanderiNorge[SpawningpopulationtargetsforsalmonstocksinNorway].Trondheim:Norskinstituttfornaturforskning.

16Fordetailsofthisactivistgroupsee,https://www.ifinnmark.no/tana-avtalen/tanadalen/ellos-deatnu/norskfinsk-aksjonsgruppe-har-inntatt-holme-her-gjelder-ikke-tana-avtalen/s/5-81-525757.

13

Holm,Petter.1996."FisheriesManagementandtheDomesticationofNature."SociologiaRuralis36(2):177-188.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00014.x.

Johnsen,KathrineIvsett,TorA.Benjaminsen,andIngerMarieGaupEira.2015."Seeinglikethestateorlikepastoralists?ConflictingnarrativesonthegovernanceofSámireindeerhusbandryinFinnmark,Norway."NorskGeografiskTidsskrift-NorwegianJournalofGeography69(4):230-241.doi:10.1080/00291951.2015.1033747.

Joks,Solveig,andJohnLaw.2017."SámiSalmon,StateSalmon:LEK,TechnoscienceandCare,SociologicalReviewMonograph."InCareandPolicyPractices:Translations,Assemblages,Interventions,editedbyVickySingleton,ClaireWatertonandNatalieGill,150-171.Chichester:Wiley-Blackwell.

Latour,Bruno.1993.WeHaveNeverBeenModern.Brighton:HarvesterWheatsheaf.

Latour,Bruno.2004a.PoliticsofNature:HowtoBringtheSciencesintoDemocracy.Cambridge,Mass.andLondon:Harvard.

Latour,Bruno.2004b."WhyhasCritiqueRunoutofSteam?FromMattersofFacttoMattersofConcern."CriticalInquiry30:225-248.

Latour,Bruno.2013.AnInquiryintoModesofExistence:anAnthropologyoftheModerns.Cambridge,Mass.andLondon:HarvardUniversityPress.

Law,John.1999."AfterANT:Topology,NamingandComplexity."InActorNetworkTheoryandAfter,editedbyJohnLawandJohnHassard,1-14.OxfordandKeele:BlackwellandtheSociologicalReview.

Law,John.2004.AfterMethod:MessinSocialScienceResearch.London:Routledge.

Law,John.2009."SeeingLikeaSurvey."CulturalSociology3(2):239-256.

Law,John.2015."What'sWrongwithaOne-WorldWorld?"Distinktion16(1):126-139.

Law,John,GeirAfdal,KristinAsdal,Wen-yuanLin,IngunnMoser,andVickySingleton.2014."ModesofSyncretism:notesonnon-coherence."CommonKnowledge20(1):172-192.

Law,John,andSolveigJoks.2017."LuossaandLaks:Salmon,scienceandLEK."Revued'AnthropologiedesConnaissances12(2):aw-bi.

Law,John,andLivØstmo.2017."OnLandandLakes:ColonizingtheNorth."TechnosphereMagazine.

Mazzullo,Nuccio,andTimIngold.2008."BeingAlong:Place,TimeandMovementamongSámiPeople"InMobilityandPlace:EnactingNorthernEuropeanPeripheries,editedbyJørgenOleBærenholdtandBrynhildGranås,27-38.AldershotandBurlington:Ashgate.

Milner,N.J.,J.M.Elliott,J.D.Armstrong,R.Gardiner,J.S.Welton,andM.Ladle.2003."Thenaturalcontrolofsalmonandtroutpopulationsinstreams."FisheriesResearch62(2):111-125.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00157-1.

Mitchell,Timothy.2002.RuleofExperts:Egypt,Techno-Politics,Modernity.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.

14

Mol,Annemarie.1999."OntologicalPolitics:aWordandSomeQuestions."InActorNetworkTheoryandAfter,editedbyJohnLawandJohnHassard,74-89.OxfordandKeele:BlackwellandtheSociologicalReview.

Mol,Annemarie.2002.TheBodyMultiple:OntologyinMedicalPractice.Durham,N.Ca.,andLondon:DukeUniversityPress.

Mol,Annemarie.2012."WhatHumanityShares."NatureCulture1:25-39.

Mol,Annemarie,andJohnLaw.1994."Regions,NetworksandFluids:AnaemiaandSocialTopology."SocialStudiesofScience24:641-671.

Pickering,Andrew.2017."TheOntologicalTurn:TakingDifferentWorldsSeriously."SocialAnalysis61(2):134-150.

Potter,E.C.E.,J.C.MacLean,R.J.Wyatt,andR.N.B.Campbell.2003."Managingtheexploitationofmigratorysalmonids."FisheriesResearch62(2):127-142.

Reinert,Hugo.2014."Weight,DensityandSpaceintheNorwegianReindeerCrisis—NotesTowardsaCritique."ValuationStudies2(2):153-183.

Sámediggi.n.d.Sámediggi:ElectedassemblyfortheSámipeopleinNorway.editedbySámediggi.Karasjok/Kárášjohka.

Sara,MikkelNils.2009."SiidaandTraditionalSámiReindeerHerdingKnowledge"TheNorthernReview30:153-178.

Solbakk,Aage.2011.«TheSalmonLords»takeoverDeatnu/theTanaRiver.Kárášjohka:ČálliidLágádus.

Solbakk,Aage.2016."Buođđu:UtviklingenavgarnfisketiTanavassdraget;Medvektpåperioden1984–2015[TheFishingWeir:TheDevelopmentofNetFishingintheTanaRiverSystem;withafocusonthe1984-2015period]."http://tanafisk.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Luossabivdu-nj%C3%A1lmm%C3%A1l%C3%A1%C5%A1-g%C3%A1ldut.pdf.

Strathern,Marilyn.1991.PartialConnections.SavageMaryland:RowmanandLittlefield.

Thompson,Charis.2007.MakingParents:TheOntologicalChoreographyofReproductiveTechnologies,Insidetechnology.Cambridge,Mass.:MIT.

Verran,Helen.1998."Re-ImaginingLandOwnershipinAustralia."PostcolonialStudies1(2):237-254.

Verran,Helen.2002."APostcolonialMomentinScienceStudies:AlternativeFiringRegimesofEnvironmentalScientistsandAboriginalLandowners."SocialStudiesofScience32:729-762.

ViveirosdeCastro,Eduardo.2004."PerspectivalAnthropologyandtheMethodofControlledEquivocation(translationofIntroduçãoaométododoperspectivismo)."Tipiti2(1):3-22.

Walters,Carl,andJean-JacquesMaguire.1996."Lessonsforstockassessmentfromthenortherncodcollapse."ReviewsinFishBiologyandFisheries6(2):125-137.doi:10.1007/bf00182340.

15

Waterton,Claire,andJudithTsouvalis.2015."Onthepoliticalnatureofcyanobacteria:intra-activecollectivepoliticsinLoweswater,theEnglishLakeDistrict."EnvironmentandPlanningD:SocietyandSpace33(3):477-493.doi:10.1068/d14148p.

Woolgar,Steve,andJavierLezaun.2013."SpecialIssue:ATurntoOntologyinScienceandTechnologyStudies?"SocialStudiesofScience43(3).