indian child welfare act of 1978 a brief summary

INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT OF 1978

A Brief Summary

Contents

Historical Perspective - Pre 1978 Federal Policy Behind ICWA Applicability of ICWA Proceedings Not Covered Jurisdiction Procedural Requirements Placement Provisions

Historical Perspectives- Pre 1978

States w/significant NA populations: 25-35% of children were removed and placed in foster or adoptive homes;

Minnesota: 1 of 4 under one adopted; usually by non-native families

1969: Survey of 16 states - 85% of NA children placed in non-native foster homes’

1971: 17% of NA children removed and placed in BIA boarding schools

Historical Perspective - Pre 1978

Removal based on: Anglo traditions and practices: NA leaving children with extended family for prolonged periods;

Alcoholism: disproportionate rate of removal compared to other families afflicted;

Due Process: no counsel, no interpretors, and non-native SW as expert witness

Federal Policy Behind ICWA

Realization that NA have unique practices and traditions regarding child rearing– Holistic: social structure and oral storytelling

which focused on land & animals and key to tribal existence;

– Unwritten rules regarding group relations; behavior so governed;

– Removal from group is disastrous


ICWA not a racial distinction, but a political relationship

Tribes = domestic dependent nations Congress = exclusive authority to regulate

commerce with Indian Tribes - very broad and expansive definition

States = not authority if clash with Federal

Federal Policy Behind the ICWA

Indian Nations retain inherent authority to regulate relations among members: marriage, divorce/property distribution, adoption, rights and privileges of children

ICWA codifies and reaffirms the continued authority of tribes over their members


“It is the policy of this Nation to protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian Tribes and families by the establishment of minimal federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which


Will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing assistance to Indian Tribes in the operation of child and family service programs.”

Summary: further the best interests of NA children; integrity and future of Tribes; and assistance with programming

Applicability of ICWA

ICWA applies only to child custody proceedings in state courts, defined as:– “foster care placement” - any action removing an

Indian child from its parent or Indian custodian for temporary placement in a foster home or institution or the home of a guardian or conservator where the parent or Indian custodian cannot have the child returned upon demand, but whose parental rights have not been terminated.

Applicability of ICWA

IWCA applies only to child custody proceedings in state courts, defined as:– TPR - any action resulting in the TPR;– Preadoptive Placement - temporary placement of an

Indian Child in a foster home or institution after the TPR, but prior to or in lieu of adoptive placement;

– Adoptive Placement - the permanent placement of an Indian child for adoption including any action resulting in a final decree of adoption

Proceedings Covered

ICWA applies in child custody preceedings when:– Indian child - member of or eligible for

membership in an Indian Tribe and be a biological child of a member of an Indian Tribe;

– Secretary of Interior - publishes a list of Tribes eligible for federal services or programs; I.E. Tribe must be federally recognized

Proceedings Covered

ICWA applies in child custody proceedings when:– Relevant Tribe declares the child is a member or

eligible for membership– Relevant Tribe has the inherent authority to

determine & such determinations are binding on federal and state governments

Proceedings Not Covered

Divorce Proceedings: ICWA did not intend to supplant parents rights to custody of children in divorce or similar proceedings

IntraFamily Disputes*: Non-parent of a NA child awarded custody in a divorce or similar proceeding (Exception:unless they apply to a court against the wishes of the parent; or TPR for step-parent adoptions)


Delinquency: Does not apply to a placement outside of the home if it is a result of an “act which, if committed by an adult, would be deemed a crime.

Voluntary Placements: “foster care placement” excludes placements where the parent can regain custody of the child upon demand******


Judicially Created Exceptions: Mississippi Band of Choctaw vs Holyfield - Miss. Supreme Court upheld the decision to permit an adoption of twins of reservation domiciled couple to a non-native family off the reservation– U.S. Supreme Court: rejected the decision and

returned to Tribal Court - parents actions doesn’t defeat ICWA - Tribe has rights


Judicially Created Exceptions:

– Washington, Oklahoma, and Alabama have held the exception is alive and well

– Summary: Most states have applied the clear language of the statute and held that ICWA applies in any child custody proceeding involving NA children

Jurisdiction

ICWA vests Tribal Court with exclusive jurisdiction over child custody proceedings “when an Indian child resides or is domiciled within the jurisdiction of such tribe;I.E. Reservation

Reservation - should be defined broadly; “Indian Country”; don’t interpret in a manner that frustrates congressional intent

Jurisdiction - Transfer

If a child custody proceeding arises outside the jurisdiction of the Tribe- I.E., State Court, ICWA provides for the proceeding to be transferred to Tribal court absent:– declination by the Tribe– objection by a parent– good cause

Jurisdiction -Transfer

ICWA permits four separate parties to request a transfer to Tribal Court:

– Mother– Father– Indian Tribe– “Indian Custodian” - Recognized by the Tribe and

on paper

Jurisdiction - Transfer

ICWA permits for the objection of transfer:

– Natural parent, Indian or Non-Indian

– Indian adoptive parent

Jurisdiction

Denial of transfer based on good cause* BIA guidelines for denial:

– No Tribal Court; however, definition is broad– Proceeding at an advanced stage– Child over 12 objects– Parent(s) unavailable; child little/no contact with

members of Tribe & child over 5 yrs old– Inconvenient forum

Jurisdiction-Reassumption

ICWA provides for the Tribal reassumption of jurisdiction over child custody proceedings

Recognized Tribe without a tribal court, but have plans to reassume jurisdiction as well as administer to the cases

Procedural Requirements- Notice

Indian Tribes role critical in the initial determination of applicability of ICWA:

Notice is imperative anytime the parties suspect a Indian child is involved

Notice to every tribal affiliation Good standard: notify whether voluntary or

involuntary; domiciled on or off or unsure; check state law for notices

Procedural Requirements-Notice

ICWA requires notice by:– Registered Mail, return receipt requested

– to parents, Indian custodian, Tribe, or Dept of Interior if Tribal affiliation is unknown

– Proceeding cannot advance until at least 10 days after notice has been effected


Notice shall include:– Name of the child– Tribal affiliation, if known– Copy of petition or documentation– Name of petitioner and their attorney– Statement informing parents, Indian custodian,

and tribe with respective rights to intervene


Notice shall include:– Right of parents or Indian custodian to counsel or

appointment of counsel– Statement the parties may have up to 20 days to

prepare upon request– Location, mailing address, and phone # of the

Court– Statement the parties have a right to request

transfer to Tribal Court


Notice shall include:– Potential legal consequences on the rights of

parties if the child is adjudicated

– Statement the child custody proceedings should be kept confidential

Procedural Requirements-Standards of Proof - Foster Care

Active Efforts have been made to provide remedial and rehabilitative services designed to prevent the breakup which have been unsuccessful

Clear & Convincing evidence, supported by the testimony of a QEW that continued custody is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage

Procedural Requirements - QEW

Member of the Indian child’s Tribe who is recognized by the Tribal community as knowledgeable in tribal customs as they pertain to family organization and childrearing practices

Procedural Requirements - QEW

A lay expert witness having substantial experience in the delivery of child and family services to Indians, and extensive knowledge of prevailing social and cultural standards and childrearing practices within the Indian child’s Tribe.

A professional person having substantial ed & exp. In the area of their speciality

Procedural Requirements- QEW

Purpose - to provide the court with knowledge of the social and cultural aspects of Indian life to diminish the risk of any cultural bias

Defer to the Tribe to ID the QEW

Procedural Requirements - Standards of Proof - TPR

ICWA requires that to support a TPR, a petitioner must establish, by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, that the continued custody of the parents or Indian custodian would result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child

BIA silent on conditions

Procedural Requirements -Voluntary Foster Care

Valid consents must be:

– Given in writing– recorded before a judge of competent jurisdiction– certified to by the presiding judge that the

consequences of the consent were fully explained

Procedural Requirements - Voluntary Placements

Valid Consents must be:

– certified by the court that the parent or custodian understood the explanation

– executed after the child is ten days old

Procedural RequirementsVoluntary Placement

ICWA mandates the unconditional return of custody to a parent who executed a lawful consent to foster care placement

No formal requirement for revocation Oral notice would suffice

Procedural Requirements Voluntary TPR/Withdrawal

Consent provisions are similar to voluntary foster care placement

Parent or Indian custodian may withdraw consent for any reason at any time prior to the entry of a final decree of termination or adoption - child shall be returned

Procedural Requirements - Full Faith & Credit

ICWA unequivocally provides that: the United States, every state & federal territory, and every Indian Tribe must give full faith and credit to the “public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of any Indian Tribe applicable to Indian child custody proceeding to the extent that those entitites give full faith and credit to…” “ of any other entity.

Placement Provisions Preferences - Foster Care

An Indian child shall be placed with:

– a member of the Indian child’s extended family

– a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child’s Tribe;

Placement Provisions Preferences - Foster Care

An Indian Child shall be placed with– an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an

authorized non-Indian licensing authority, or

– an institution for children approved by an Indian Tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet the child’s needs

Placement Provisions Preferences - Adoptive

An Indian Child shall be placed with:

Extended Family

Other members of the child’s Tribe

Other Indian families

References

Jones, B. J. 1995. The Indian Child Welfare Act Handbook: A Legal Guide to the Custody and Adoption of Native American Children. American Bar Association, Chicago, Il.

Indian Child Welfare Law Center

indian child welfare act of 1978 a brief summary

Documents