inclusion or mainstreaming jenn combest and liz raymer

21
Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Upload: timothy-pitts

Post on 26-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Inclusion or MainstreamingJenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Page 2: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Our Nation’s Past

In the past, physically and mentally disabled children were often stricken from society and placed in separate institutions.

This ended on Nov. 29, 1975 when President Ford signed the Education for all Handicapped Children Act. This Act required the government to provide ample funding for all handicapped children from age 3 to 21 in order for them to receive a free education.

The signing of this act, otherwise known as P.L 94-142 marked the beginning of mainstreaming.

Page 3: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

IDEA 1997emphasis on results "wait to fail" model dual system; general & special education lack of validity in methods of identification LD identification based on IQ-achievement discrepancy formulafocus on compliance encouraged mainstreaming students with disabilities into regular classrooms

IDEA 2004emphasis on process early intervention to prevent failure unified single system rigorous, scientifically based identification methodsLD identification based on: student response to scientific, research-based interventions (RTI) focus on student achievement requires inclusion of students with disabilities in regular classrooms

CHANGES IN THE LAW

Page 4: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Signed into law January 2002Improve outcomes for ALL childrenClose the achievement gap between

children with or without disabilitiesEmphasis on reading and using

approaches that have been proven to be effective

Ensures that teachers are highly qualified

Page 5: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Placement in the Least Restrictive Environment -LRE

“to the maximum extent appropriate children with disabilities …are educated with children who are not disabled”

“Removal of children with disabilities from the regular education environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in the regular class with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily”

Page 6: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer
Page 7: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Inclusion

Page 8: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Definitions

Inclusion is the commitment to educate each child to the maximum extent appropriate in the school and classroom he or she would attend if the child did not have a disability.  Inclusion involves bringing support and supplemental services to the student, instead of placing or moving the student for the services.

Page 9: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Inclusion

Inclusion means that the IEP team begins with the regular classroom as placement for the child unless it is shown that the regular classroom setting does not allow the student to be successful. The team must consider a wide range of services and supplemental aides available within the regular classroom before moving a student to a separate learning environment. Services are brought to the student as much as possible.

Page 10: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Advantages for ALL from InclusionAllows sp. ed. students to build friendships,

self-esteem, and feel like they belongGives sp. ed. students role modelsIntroduces diversity to both sp. ed. and

reg. ed. students. Helps reg. ed. students develop respect for

all.Creates awareness of the importance of

direct individualized instruction in teachers, as well as the importance of team work.

Page 11: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Problems with Inclusion

Practical difficulties of managing students with disabilities and all other students together.

Disruptions for pull-out services for special ed. students.

Difficulties in adapting curriculum for some students and not others.

Page 12: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Mainstreaming

Page 13: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Definitions

The aim of mainstreaming is to give special education students the opportunity to gain appropriate socialization skills and access to the same education as regular education students while still allowing them access to resource rooms and special education classrooms.

Page 14: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Mainstreaming

Generally, mainstreaming has been used to refer to the selective placement of special education students in one or more "regular" education classes. Proponents of mainstreaming generally assume that a student must "earn" his or her opportunity to be placed in regular classes by demonstrating an ability to "keep up" with the work assigned by the regular classroom teacher. This concept is closely linked to traditional forms of special education service delivery.

Page 15: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Mainstreaming… Research shows children with disabilities have

the desire and self-motivation to learn.

When placed in classrooms with regular achieving students higher expectations are placed on special needs students increasing their desire to excel.

Teaches all children non-discrimination.

Learning to interact in a normal society as well as learning about the attitudes of people in society.

Page 16: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Mainstreaming has many advantages: Students are more likely to attend the school

they would normally attend. The educational setting is more authentic. Regular and special education support provides

a more individualized approach. Greater social opportunities Curricula is more relevant to the grade Greater sense of belonging The IEP is still in place in the regular classroom

Page 17: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Reverse Mainstreaming

Reverse mainstreaming was born from the concept of mainstreaming. In reverse mainstreaming, regular education students are brought into the special education classroom either part-time or for the full school day. This encourages social interaction, allows special education students to glean information from regular education students, and gives regular education students a better understanding of different special needs. Reverse mainstreaming is often done in preschool and kindergarten classrooms to develop acceptance and tolerance while children are young enough to be less aware of social stigma.

Page 18: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Accommodations

An accommodation is a teaching support or service that a student needs in order to meet the expectations or goals of the general education curriculum. An accommodation addresses the questions of how a student will learn.

accommodations do not alter what is being taught

allow students with disabilities to pursue a regular course of study

Examples: sign language interpreters computer text-to-speech

computer extended time large-print books and

worksheets Proximity Preferential seating

Page 19: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Modifications

A modification is a change in the general education curriculum.

When the goals or expectations of the general education

curriculum are beyond the student's level of ability, a modification

is needed. A modification addresses what a student will learn: instructional level, content, and

performance criteria.

• assignments might be reduced

• Different curriculum• Expectations may

differ• NCLB accountability

requirements do not allow for the inclusion of modifications in a state accountability system.

Page 20: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Mainstreaming vs.  Inclusion

• generally, a student must "earn" the opportunity to participate in a regular setting by demonstrating the ability to "keep up" with the regular class.

• students travel to the services.

• educate each child in the regular classroom setting, to the maximum extent appropriate.

• services are brought to the student.

Page 21: Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer

Inclusion/ CWC