inclusion in the connected classroom jutta treviranus adaptive technology resource centre university...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Inclusion in the Connected Classroom
Jutta Treviranus
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
University of Toronto
This PPT is missing videos that were included in Jutta’s keynote. DG
• Established in 1994
• Three functions:1. Service,
2. Education,
3. Research and Development
• 40 to 65 researchers, programmers, access specialists
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ATRC
• Lessons of levers, food chains and concrete
• The most influence with laughingly limited resources
• Exemplars that act as challenges
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Significant Moment in History
• Destabilization and profound change brought about by widescale adoption of technology– Social order
– Systems of government
– Economic structures
– Ways of thinking
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Affects…
• Language
• Physical workings of our brain
• Who we respect and trust
• What we wear
• How we socialize
• Our view of time and space
Participants in Historically Critical Choices
• Rules
• Conventions
• What matters moving forward
• Much greater impact than our parents or grandparents
Most profound effect on Teaching and Learning
• Not yet fully realized
• The classroom
• The teacher
• The student
• What, how, why, where, and when we learn
Shift in Learning
• What do we need to know >>
• What do we need to know how to find
• What do we need to remember >>
• What do we need to remember exists
• Internal vs. external knowledge store
• What are the skills of value
Shift in Learning
• Accumulation of knowledge >>• Just-in-time learning
• Subject experts >>• Knowledge nomads
• Information as a possession >>• Information as a resource
Shift in Knowledge Power Structure
• Who is the expert?
• Who do you consult?
• Hoarders >>
• Filterers, reviewers, sorters
• Critics or skeptics
• Engaged and challenged high school students to explore inclusion
• Produce inclusively designed works on the theme of inclusion
Missing video
Benefits of diversity and inclusion..
• Economic- market diversification
• Biological– “Devolution”-- absence of survival of the fittest
and its selective pressures allows for larger variety of life forms, preserving and unleashing wonderful things…(Terry Deacon)
• Social - enriches and assists in survival of a society- anti-dote to extremism
Threats to diversity and inclusion
• Globalization and world-wide homogenization (loss of language, horticultural species, traditional crafts)
• Commodification and privatization• Rising fundamentalism, sectarianism, anti-
progressive forces, protectionist responses and focus on security
• Genetic selection
Impact of exclusion…
• Personal -disenfranchisement, lack of self-esteem• Motivated by ignorance and insecurity--perpetuates
ignorance and insecurity• Downward spiral- lack of education, lack of
employment, poverty• Impact on society and economy - squanders human
potential, loss of productivity, escalating need for security -violence
• Hurts society as a whole• “When we exclude- we ultimately exclude ourselves”
Dangers of designing for the norm
• Stagnation
• Shrinking of ideas
• Self perpetuating rut
• Lack of innovation
Missing video
Benefits of inclusive design..
• Innovation occurs at the margin
• Greater flexibility and responsiveness
• Spurs creativity and agility
• Helps to distill “what really matters”
• Benefits everyone
Workshop for educators and educational policy makers
• Challenge concepts of quality in education
• Make room for divergent thinking
“Wabi-sabi principle” in e-learning
Japanese Aesthetic principle: Wabi-sabi is the beauty of things imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete.
Thoughts…
• “The perils of like-mindedness”
• “Leave room for divergent thinking”
• “Photo-realism can hinder understanding”
• Provoking meaningful input in evaluations through the intended flaws
Students and Teachers
http://snow.utoronto.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=388&Itemid=351
Innovation occurs at the margins
Inclusive Instruction
• Translating into another sense
• View from a number of perspectives
• Derive the essence of the message
• Question what is being communicated
• Analyze what is being learned
• Spurs creativity and perfects the lesson
Outcomes of E-learning
• Does not save money
• Does not save instructor time
• Does not shift the Bell curve higher
* Campus Computing Project, Educause, UCLA, Flashlight Implementations, Project 25, What's the Difference?: A
Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education , NEA Affiliate Capacity Building--Higher Education
Outcomes of E-learning
• Compresses the Bell curve
• Assists students who had difficulty with traditional delivery
• Makes academic life easier for students
Other side of Bell Curve• Fewer high achievers
Why?• Students unprepared for self-directed
learning• We have cultivated “Educational
Bulimics”- binge and purge on facts Thomas Marino
• Require stress or tension to perform
Determinates of Success• Action and Interaction
– passive vs active learning– Retention: “half the fun is in the chase”– Engagement: “it’s good to feel needed”– Ownership
• Personal relevance• Personalization• Convenience and trustworthiness of the tool
The Right Motivators
• External vs Internal
• Competition vs collaboration and the competition of collaboration
• Private and public rewards
Beyond No Significant Difference
Opportunity to• Emulate one-on-one teaching• Address educational breakdown• If done well, allows scaling of the small class experience
to large classes– Problem based learning or discovery learning– Interaction and feedback (student-student, student-instructor)
Can Address Education Breakdown
• Mismatch of pace– Flexible pace
– Adjust time for reflection
• Mismatch of knowledge assumptions– Opportunity to address gaps
• Mismatch of learning style with teaching style– Flexible sequencing, choice of modalities
– Redundant presentation of information
Marginalized Student
• The student who is shy– Flexible balance between social and private learning
• The student who is learning English– Dual language displayed
• The student who is disorganized– Single structured view of content
• The student with a disability– Flexible presentation and control
Re-Learned?
• Every learner learns differently
• Personalize learning to match needs of each learner
What’s different?
• Computer as mediator
• Digital content
• Connected Classroom
• Differentiation in many dimensions
Disability in eLearning Context
• Disability= Mismatch between learner needs and education offered
• Not a personal trait but artifact of relationship between the learner and the learning environment or education delivery
• Accessibility= The ability of the learning environment to adjust to the needs of all learners
Accessibility =
• Flexibility of education environment, curriculum and delivery
• Availability of adequate alternative-but-equivalent content and activities
“You need to be a miracle worker to optimize learning for everyone
in my class”
• Integrated classroom
• Increasing diversity
• Decreasing time to prepare
The Miraculous Digital Age
• A digital resource shared is not consumed
• The multiplier effect of sharing and pooling resources
• A digital resource can be “automatically” transformed
Missing video
The Community of Networked Educators
Sharing and Pooling Resources
• Reduce redundancy
• Polish and refine rather than replicate
• Mechanisms of attribution (glory)
“With a little help from my friends”
• The larger the pool -- the greater the options• The more likely there will be a match for each
learner’s uniquely individual needs• The more likely we can provide a rich and
challenging learning experience with limited resources
With a little help from networked systems and supports
1. “Learning Object Repositories” – Help find the right resource– Help transform the resource to meet the
student’s needs
2. Participatory Web
What do we need?• Alternative formats• Equivalent content• Alternative learning activities• Learner scaffolds• Feedback and reviews• Motivating content and activities• Incentives for engagement• Credibility and quality• Navigation tools
What do we need?
• Computers for teachers
• Computers for students
• Accessible computers
• Assistive technologies
Assistive Technology and Rich Internet Applications
• Crisis
• Confounding strategies for interoperability
• Distributed applications
• Lack of semantic information
Sustainability of AT market
• Interoperability with many applications
• Constantly changing
• Proprietary specifications
• Small customer base
Computers for Students
• One Laptop Per Child Program– Also called “100 Dollar computer”
• Accessible standard technologies
• Access system friendly computers and applications
Three Approaches to Meeting Accessibility Commitments on
the Web
1. Single Compliant Resource approach
2. Media rich plus “accessible” alternative approach
3. Transformation based approach
Problems Identified with Single Compliant Resource Approach
• Rejection of valuable resources that are not compliant
• “Accessible for everyone but optimal for no-one”
• Time and expertise required of all resource creators
• Reluctance to use new or innovative technologies
• Design decisions often do not make the experience better for all users (breaks the “curbcut rule”)
Problems Identified with “Two Versions” Approach
• “Accessible” version not maintained and becomes outdated
• Unequal access to resource
• People with disabilities not a homogenous group
The Transformation Approach• A transformable, flexible resource
system• Dynamically matching resources and
resource delivery to needs of each individual
The Difference
• “Just in case” approaches vs. “Just in time” approach
• Resource compliance vs. system compliance
• Accessible to “everyone” vs. optimized for every individual
TILE
E-learning environment that enables learner-centric transformation of learning content and delivery
http://inclusivelearning.ca
Specifications and Standards
• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
• http://www.w3.org/WAI/guid-tech.html
• “AccessForAll” Standards
• http://imsglobal.org/accessibility/index.html
Community of Educators
• SNOW http://snow.utoronto.ca
• Pooling knowledge and resources
• Online workshops
• Hands on intensive workshops in the summer
Shift for Educators
• Flexibility of presentation rather than quality of single presentation
• Flexibility of path
• Flexibility of pace
• Modularity rather than completeness
• Cumulative, collaborative authoring
• Harness learning peers
Conclusion…
In this new reality where consumption does not consume and space has no limits, there is no downside to inclusion…and it is possible to make room for us all
Resources
• Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
• http://atrc.utoronto.ca
• Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities
• http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/accessibilityOntario/
Jutta’s parking lot
• Computer lock down
• Internet lock down
• Copyright
• Curriculum distribution mechanisms