incineration versus the alternatives · paul connett, phd executive director...

50
Incineration versus the Alternatives Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) [email protected] Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009

Upload: others

Post on 25-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Incineration versus the

Alternatives

Paul Connett, PhDExecutive Director

AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP)

[email protected]

Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009

Page 2: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

OUTLINE

1. Waste and the Big Picture

2. The arguments against incineration

3. The Zero Waste 2020 strategy

4. The Key Step Forward

5. Zero Waste Initiatives Around the World

6. Back to the Big Picture

Page 3: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

3. The ZERO WASTE 2020

strategy

Page 4: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and
Page 5: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and
Page 6: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

ZERO WASTE IS A NEW

DIRECTION

Page 7: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

NO to INCINERATORS

NO to LANDFILLS

THE BACK END

OF WASTE

MANAGEMENT

Page 8: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

NO to INCINERATORS

NO to LANDFILLS

THE FRONT END

OFINDUSTRIAL

DESIGN

THE BACK END

OF WASTE

MANAGEMENT

Page 9: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

To achieve Zero Waste

We need:

1) INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIBILITY (at the front end)

2) COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY (at the back end)

3) GOOD LEADERSHIP (to link the two together)

Page 10: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Zero Waste can be approached with a series of simple steps

which are

Practical

Cost effective and

Politically acceptable

Page 11: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY

Community responsibility begins with Source Separation and Door to door collection

Page 12: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

“The Fantastic 3”

The San Francisco system

Page 13: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 3

Page 14: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

1 2 3

Page 15: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting plant for San Francisco

Page 16: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

1 2 3

Page 17: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility

1 2 3

Page 18: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

at Pier 96

MATERIALS RECOVERY FACIILITY

Page 19: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

San Francisco

Population = 850,000

Very little space

50% waste diverted by 2000

63% waste diverted by 2004

70% waste diverted by 2008

72% waste diverted by 2009

75% waste diverted by 2010 (goal)

100% by 2020 – Zero Waste (or very close!)

Page 20: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Brescia

San Francisco

Page 21: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

For every 4 Tonsof waste burned

you get at least

1 Ton of Toxic Ash

Page 22: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Brescia

75% reduction

San Francisco

Page 23: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Brescia

75% reduction

San Francisco

72% reduction

Page 24: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility

1 2 3

ResidualFraction

Page 25: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

We have to minimize the residual fraction with…

1) Waste reduction initiatives

2) Reuse, repair and deconstruction

3) Economic incentives

Page 26: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Waste ReductionInitiatives

Page 27: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Undesirable packaging

Four options:

Ban it

Tax it

Put a returnable deposit on it

Avoid it

Page 28: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Ireland

Government put a 15 cent tax on plastic shopping bags

reduced use by 92% in one year!

Page 29: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Italy

Several supermarket chains are providing dispensers which allow customers to refill shampoo and detergentbottles…

As well as wine, water andmilk

Page 30: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Alcune iniziative italiane per la riduzione

Page 31: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

•Un pizzico di creatività a monte può far risparmiare milioni a valle

Page 32: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility

1 2 3 CommunityInitiatives to

Reducewaste

Page 33: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Reuse,Repair

andDeconstruction

Page 34: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Reuse, Repair & Deconstruction

Urban Ore, Berkeley, California

Page 35: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

reuse

Page 36: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

“Economically, incineration represents ONE BIG BLACK BOX

The Zero Waste strategy represents 100’s of LITTLE GREEN BOXES”

(Ted Ward, Zero Waste, Del Norte County, California)

Page 37: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and
Page 38: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Deconstruction

Page 39: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

DeconstructionReuse &

Repair Center

Page 40: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

DeconstructionReuse &

Repair Center

Furniture,Flooring, etc

Page 41: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

VIDEOS “On the Road to Zero Waste” Part 1: Nova Scotia

Part 2: Burlington, Vermont

Part 3: Canberra, Australia

Part 4: San Francisco

Zero Waste: Idealistic Dream or Realistic Goal?

Pieces of Zero: Creativity versus Waste

www.AmericanHealthStudies.org

Page 42: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility

Reuse & Repair

1 2 3

& Deconstruction

CommunityInitiatives to

Reducewaste

Page 43: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

EconomicIncentives

Page 44: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 $

The “ Pay by bag” system

Total cost of program comes out of local taxes

Page 45: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 3

free

The “ Pay by bag” system

Page 46: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 3

free free

The “ Pay by bag” system

Page 47: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 $

free freeThe moreyou make,the moreyou pay!

The “ Pay by bag” system

Page 48: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

1 2 $

Nosurcharge

Nosurcharge

Surcharge!

The “ Pay by bag” system

Page 49: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility

Residuals

?

Reuse & Repair

1 2 $

& Deconstruction

CommunityInitiatives to

Reducewaste

Page 50: Incineration versus the Alternatives · Paul Connett, PhD Executive Director AmericanHealthStudies.org (AEHSP) pconnett@gmail.com Oxfordshire, October 8, 2009. OUTLINE 1. Waste and

Composting

Facility

Materials

Recovery

Facility Residuals

=

Our Current

FailuresReuse & Repair

1 2 $

& Deconstruction

CommunityInitiatives to

Reducewaste