“in-operando” neutron scattering studies on commercial li
TRANSCRIPT
Technische Universität München
A. Senyshyn, M.J. Mühlbauer, O. Dolotko, H. Ehrenberg
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
A. Senyshyn, M.J. Mühlbauer, O. Dolotko, H. Ehrenberg
“In-operando” neutron scattering studies on
commercial Li-ion batteries
“In-operando” neutron scattering studies on
commercial Li-ion batteries
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 1
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
4C Market
Electromobility
Local storage of renewable energy
Why lithium?
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 2
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
1. Specific energy – amount of energy per unit mass (C/3, 150Wh/kg);
2. Energy density – amount of energy per unit volume (C/3, 230Wh/l);
2. Calender life – (10 15 years);
3. Operating temperature range – (-40oC 50oC) ;
4. Selling price – (150$/kWh);
5. Safety – serious hazards have been reported.
Major challenges of Li-ion battery technology
Ways to improve: 1. Use of new materials;
2. Optimisation of the battery design
and processing;
3. Understanding of the fatigue
processes;
4. Enhancement of thermal stability;
Studies of the battery „in-operando“.
New non-destructive technique of studies is needed
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 3
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Advantages of neutron scattering
The energy of thermal neutrons is
in range of meV
Neutrons are highly penetrating
into the matter
Neutrons interact with nucleous.
The wavelength of thermal
neutrons is similar to interatomic
spacings.
Neutrons weakly perturb the
experimental system, i.e. non-
destructive.
Studies of bulk processes under
realistic conditions (in complex
environments).
Neutrons can localize light atoms
(e.g. hydrogen, lithium) in the
presence of heavier ones and to
distinguish neighboring elements
from Periodic Table and isotopes.
Details of the crystal structure.
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 4
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
l
PSD collimated
neutron beam
L
sample pinhole
diaphragm
D n
Radiography: a principle (µm resolution)
© F. Piegsa, PSI
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 5
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
ANTARES - Neutron radiography and tomography
Cylindrical cells (18650-type, 2600 mAh, 3.0-
4.2 V window); Electrodes: LiCoO2, graphite
Collimation ratio L/D=800,
Field of view 100x100 mm2 ~ 100 µm pixel resolution
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 6
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Tomography: a principle
Inverse Radon transformation;
filtered back projection algorithm;
number of projections 600;
Assignment of Absorption Levels
to a chosen color scheme
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 7
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Tomography reconstruction on 18650-type battery
Photo 3D model Sketch
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 8
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Tomography reconstruction on 18650-type battery
Polychromatic beam Monochromatic beam*
*=1.5482 Å
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 9
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Single crystal
Polycrystal
Diffraction from crystalline materials (pm resolution) High resolution neutron powder
diffractometer SPODI at FRM-II
Transmission mode, Take-off 155o
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 10
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
© R. Dinnebier, MPI FKF
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 11
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
20
40
60
80
100
20 40 60 80 100 120 140-12
0
12
observed
calculated
difference
Bragg position
6)5)4) 3)2)
2 (degs.)
No
rma
lise
d in
ten
sity (
%)
1)
"fresh" Li-ion battery
(charged to 4.10V)
=1.5482(1) Е
LiCoO2 (1) Cu (2) Fe (3)
LiC12 (4) LiC6 (5)
Al (6)
Rietveld refinement of typical diffraction pattern
for 18650 Li-ion battery Beam dimensions:
40x15 mm2
Profile function:
Pseudo-Voight (TCH)
Contributions
- Cathode material LiCoO2;
- Anode material (graphite
and Li-intercalated carbons);
- Steel housing + centre pin;
- Copper and aluminum
current collectors;
A. Senyshyn et al., J. Power Sources 203 (2012)
126-129.
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 12
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Fatigue of battery: introduction Two batches of Li-ion cells purposefully cycled (CCCV, 1C) at 25oC
and 50oC for 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 times
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14001900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
21
.9 %
cycled at 25oC
cycled at 50oCD
ischa
rge
capa
city, m
Ah
Cycles number12
.8 %
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 13
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Fatigue of battery: crystal structure
Effect on Li-concentration cathode anode
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 140030
40
50
70
80
90
100
~2
1.0
%
21
.0 %
25oC
50oC
25oC
50oC
discharge
Li occup
atio
n in
LiC
oO
2, %
Cycle number
charge
10
.6 %
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 140070
75
80
85
90
95
100
cycled at 25oC
cycled at 50oC
Re
lative
Li a
mm
ou
nt in
an
od
e, %
cycles number
15
.7 %
26
.8 %
By the fatigue introduced the system looses free (transport) lithium;
Lithium loss correlate to the reduction of discharge capacity;
Possible reasons: Li-plating (dendrite growth), microcracks formation in
electrodes; oxidation processes and phase transformations; SEI
growth/electrolyte decomposition
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 14
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Evolution of diffraction data vs.
Electrochemical treatment (Cathode, SPODI, =2.536 Å)
14.05
14.10
14.15
14.20
14.25
14.30
14.35
14.40
14.45
3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2
2.808
2.809
2.810
2.811
2.812
2.813
2.814
2.815
2.816
La
ttic
e p
ara
me
ter
c, A
La
ttic
e p
ara
me
ter
a, A
Cell potential, V
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 15
Technische Universität München
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
Evolution of diffraction data vs.
Electrochemical treatment (Anode, SPODI, =2.536 Å)
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 16
Technische Universität München
Phase diagram of Li-intercalated carbons
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
Forschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRMII)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.51.68
1.69
1.70
1.71
1.72
1.73
1.74
1.75
1.76
1.77
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
1.69
1.70
1.71
1.72
1.73
1.74
1.75
1.76
1.77
discharge
charge
J.R. Dahn, Phase diagram of LixC6, Phys. Rev. B
44(17) 9170-9177 (1991).
T. Ohzuku, Y. Iwakoshi, K. Sawai, Formation of
Lithium-Graphite Intercalation Compounds in
Nonaqueous Electrolytes and Their Application
as a Negative Electrode for a Lithium Ion
(Shuttlecock) Cell , J. Electrochem. Soc., 140(9)
2490-2498 (1993).
„Energy Challenges
Germany 2050“ 28 June 2012 17