improving fumigation with closed loop systems

45
Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems Carol Jones Oklahoma State University

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jun-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Carol JonesOklahoma State University

Page 2: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

CLF Mission:

Seal bins – contain as much fumigant as possible

Circulate fumigant through grain bulk– improved distribution

Hold required concentration– specified duratio

200 ppm for 100 hours

Page 3: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

ReviewPhosphine Dosage

aluminum phosphide – 1 tablet = 1.0 gram of phosphine gas– 1 pellet = 0.2 grams of phosphine gas– 1 tablet = 5 pellets– 1 case (pellets or tablets) = 7,000 grams

of phosphine– BUT…check your label…

Different vendors may package differently

Page 4: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

ReviewPhosphine Release RatesConditions:

75-85°F and 11-12% moisture content– Complete release:

tablets 70-90 hours pellets 36-48 hours

Gas concentration depends upon:– dose,– temperature, – grain moisture, – time, – absorption

Page 5: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

ReviewInsects

Beetle have four life stages:– Egg, larva, pupa, adultLarvae and adults are active stages…– “breathing” and mobile– easier to killEggs and pupae are immobile…– not “breathing” much– difficult to kill

Page 6: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

ReviewPhosphine the InsecticideSufficient dosage and time required to

effectively killTarget dosage:– 200 ppm of phosphine over …– 100 hours to kill all life stages.

Gas loss from a structure depends on:– weather– atmospheric conditions– and leaks in the structure

Page 7: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

CLF in flat storage

Page 8: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Flat Warehouse

Capacity of 3,300,000 bushelsClosed Loop Fumigation

Page 9: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Fumigation in 2000 (non-CLF)

42 cases of pellets42 cases of PH3 = 1,225 ppm for 3.3 million bushels

(Phosphine readings taken from fan outlets)

Page 10: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

2000 Fumigation Data

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2 4 14 18 22 25 32 39 45 53 65 75

Hours after Ph3 Release

PPM

of P

h 3

Fan 1Fan 2Fan 3Fan 4Fan 5Fan 6Tunnel

Fumigation in 2000 (non-CLF)

Page 11: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Fumigation in 2002 (with CLF)

Dosage was 42 cases of tabletsExtensive sealing was done in advance (68 man-hours)– Top vents and end louvers with tape, glue, 6 mil

plastic sheeting;– cross belt tunnel and top side entrance with plastic

sheeting, glue, sandbags, and lumber; – tunnel fans, entrances, and plates with plastic, glue,

and tape; – fans removed and all holes (man- and rodent-made)

sealed with glue, tape, sheeting, and spray foam

Page 12: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Fumigation in 2002 (with CLF)

Lines were inserted into the headspace and aeration ducts to monitor gas levelsLast reading taken 4 hours after roof vents opened

Page 13: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

2002 Fumigation Data

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

5 7 10 17 21 25 29 33 43 47 51 55 67 71 101Hours after Ph3 Release

PPM

of P

h 3

O. space

SE fan

SM fan

SW fan

NE fan

NM fan

NW fan

Fumigation in 2002 (with CLF)

Page 14: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Comparison:2000 (non-CLF) and 2002 (CLF)

2002

2000

Average PPM After Ph3 Release

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

4.5 17.5 21.5 25 32.5 44 54 66 75 101

Hours after Ph3 Release

PP

M o

f Ph 3

2000

2002

adults dead

larvae & pupae die

all life stages dead

Page 15: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

What happened?

2000 (non-CLF)– Pellets released gas quickly, but levels fell

quickly– Gas escaped from inadequate sealing– Gas levels not high enough for long enough

time to kill all life stages2002 (CLF)– Tablets released gas slower, keeping levels

higher, longer– Thorough sealing kept gas at high levels for

>100 hours

Page 16: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

CLF in steel bins

Page 17: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Sealing pit vent

Page 18: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Fan connections to bins

Page 19: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

CLF plumbing

Page 20: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

New CLF installation: Concrete Silos

Page 21: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Bin diagram

Page 22: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Sealing inner connecting vents:“I didn’t realize how much air was blowing through here!!!” – Mark F., Manager

Page 23: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Sealing top outer vent

Page 24: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Sealing top outer vent

Page 25: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Fan assembly

Page 26: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

PVC return to distributor

Page 27: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Distributor connected to bins

Page 28: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Bin plumbing

Page 29: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Bin plumbing

Page 30: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Bin plumbing

Page 31: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Manhole cover at bin bottom with small distributor and valve

Page 32: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Manhole cover on top with strap to hold monitoring equip.

Page 33: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Sealing for fumigation

Page 34: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Dosage:

ManagerManager’’s standard practice: s standard practice: –– Dose 475 pellets/1000 ftDose 475 pellets/1000 ft33

Dosed CLF side and nonDosed CLF side and non--CLF side the CLF side the samesameMonitor gas levels at 3 locations in Monitor gas levels at 3 locations in each bin for 100 hourseach bin for 100 hours

Page 35: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Results: CLF versus Conventional Fumigation

CLF versus Conventional Fumigation

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Hour from Treatment

ppm

CLF

CONVENTIONAL

200 PPM

Page 36: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Cost Analysis of ClosedCost Analysis of Closed--loop Fumigationloop Fumigation

The Economics of IPM in Stored The Economics of IPM in Stored GrainGrain

Information by Dr. Brian D. Adam, Ag EconInformation by Dr. Brian D. Adam, Ag EconOklahoma State UniversityOklahoma State University

Page 37: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Cost Comparison of Traditional Cost Comparison of Traditional and Closedand Closed--loop Fumigationloop Fumigation

TraditionalTraditional

–– Turning Costs Turning Costs (shrink)(shrink)

–– More fumigantMore fumigant

–– More labor per More labor per fumigationfumigation

ClosedClosed--looploop

–– Installation Installation costscosts

–– Less fumigantLess fumigant

–– Less laborLess labor

Page 38: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Summary:

Installed CLF system treating 6 bins at Installed CLF system treating 6 bins at onceonceTreated CLF and Conventional bins Treated CLF and Conventional bins with with ““managermanager’’s standards standard”” dosagedosageCLF bins held 10X required CLF bins held 10X required concentrationconcentrationConventional bins never reached Conventional bins never reached required concentrationrequired concentration

Page 39: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Cost of Fumigation w/turning vs. Cost of Fumigation w/turning vs. ClosedClosed--loop Fumigation ($4 wheat)loop Fumigation ($4 wheat)

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5

Fumigation (withturning)

Fumigation-Closed Loop

Cen

ts/b

ul

LiabilityinsuranceTraining

Equip. cost(amortized)Turning(shrink)Electricity

Fumigant

Labor

Page 40: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Cost of Fumigation w/turning vs. Cost of Fumigation w/turning vs. ClosedClosed--loop Fumigation ($8 wheat)loop Fumigation ($8 wheat)

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5

Fumigation (withturning)

Fumigation- ClosedLoop

Cen

ts/b

u

LiabilityinsuranceTraining

Equip. cost(amortized)Turning(shrink)Electricity

Fumigant

Labor

Page 41: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Advantage Advantage CLFCLFHigher turning (shrink), fumigant, and Higher turning (shrink), fumigant, and labor cost for traditional fumigation labor cost for traditional fumigation outweigh installation cost of closedoutweigh installation cost of closed--loop system.loop system.The difference is greater the higher The difference is greater the higher the price of wheat, because of shrink.the price of wheat, because of shrink.

Page 42: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Take-Home Message:

CLF CLF saves fumigantsaves fumigantCLF CLF provides better distributionprovides better distributionCLF CLF saves $$$saves $$$

Page 43: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

Questions?

Page 44: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

PVC connection to aeration

Page 45: Improving Fumigation with Closed Loop Systems

PVC distributor