improved executive functioning from wii active exergame play
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Amanda E. Staiano, Anisha Abraham, and Sandra L. Calvert given May 27, 2010, at the annual Games for Health conference in Boston, MA.TRANSCRIPT
Improved Executive Functioning from Wii Active Exergame Play
Amanda E. Staiano, Anisha Abraham, & Sandra L. Calvert
Games for Health 2010May 27, 2010
Children’s Digital Media CenterDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown UniversityFunded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health
Games Research
1
2
Outline
• Study 1: Social Exergame Play for Caloric Expenditure among Adolescents
• Study 2: Improved Executive Functioning from
Wii Active Exergame Play
3Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
1998
Rise of Adult Obesity(Obesity = *BMI 30, or about 30 lbs. overweight for 5’4” person)
2007
1990
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%
BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, http: //www.cdc.gov/brfss/
4Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Rise of Pediatric Obesity
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Examination Surveys II (ages 6–11) and III (ages 12–17), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I, II and III, and 1999–2006.
5Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Rise of Pediatric Obesity
6
The National Survey of Children's Health. Childhood Obesity Action Network. State Obesity Profiles, 2008. National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality, Child Policy Research Center, and Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. Retrieved 5/9/09 from http://www.nschdata.org:80/Content/ObesityReportCards.aspx.
Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Consequences of Pediatric Obesity
• Physiological– Cardiovascular risk factors, type 2 diabetes,
asthma, sleep apnea (McGinnis, Gootman, & Kraak, 2006)
• Psychosocial– Social discrimination, low self-esteem (Eisenberg, Neumarck-
Sztainer, & Story, 2003)
• Cognitive– Missed school days, poorer academic achievement
(Staiano, 2010)Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, CDC, 2009
7Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Low Physical Activity RatesYouth are not meeting
physical activity recommendations
Eaton, Kann, & Kinchen, et al., 2006
Adolescents Not Exercising 5 or More Days per Week
All
Male
Female
White
Black
Hispanic
40
50
60
70
80
Per
cent
age
8Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
High Gaming RatesYouth spend 36 minutes daily
playing on video game consoles
Rideout, Foehr, & Roberts, 20109Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010
Georgetown University
• Exergames burn calories – Similar to walking at 3 miles per hour, skipping, or jumping (Staiano & Calvert, 2010;
Maddison et al., 2007)
• Exergames meet requirements for aerobic fitness (Unnithan, Houser, & Fernhall, 2006; Tan et al., 2002)
• Exergames are engaging (Warburton et al., 2007)
• Wii Sports: Youth expend more energy when playing boxing, tennis, and bowling than when playing sedentary video game (Graves et al., 2007)
– Males expend more energy than females, particularly in Wii tennis
Exergames for Caloric Loss
10Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Limitations in Current Research
• Small sample sizes• Only target athletic youth• Short-term exposure• Little comparison to sports activities• Only solitary game play
11Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Study 1
Social Exergame Play for Caloric Expenditure
among Adolescents
12Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Research Questions
1. How does playing a videogame alone (solitary) versus playing a videogame with a partner (social) affect energy expenditure?
2. How does energy expenditure during exergame play compare to actual sport play?
3. How does enjoyment of playing the Wii game differ by gender?
13Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Hypotheses
H1: Exergame play will burn more calories than a sedentary activity
H2: Social group will burn more calories than solitary group
H3: Tennis court play will burn more calories than exergame play
H4: Boys will enjoy exergame more than girls
14Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Methodology
• 74 low-income African American 12- to 18-year-old adolescents – Mean BMI percentile = 69.28 (SD = 28.06)– Proportion overweight/obese = 41.89%– Mean Age = 14.45 years (SD = 1.67)
• Setting: Campus of Georgetown University
15Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Stimulus:Nintendo Wii Sports Tennis
16Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Solitary Condition
17Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Social Condition
18Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Control Condition
19Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Treatment
• 10 min of tennis skills test on tennis court
• 30 min of solitary or social exergame play or 30 min of sedentary computer activity
20Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Measures
• Weight, BMI percentile, waist-to-hip ratio
• Actical physical activity monitor
• Self-reported enjoyment of exergame play
21Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Results
Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Linear regression predicting caloric expenditure by condition.
Variable B SE B β________ Gender -6.59 2.15 -0.19**
Age -1.45 0.64 -0.15* Solitary Condition -6.72 2.49 -0.19**
Control Condition -20.12 2.58 -0.58***
Weight 0.64 0.09 0.65***
BMI Percentile -0.09 0.06 -0.14
Waist-to-Hip Ratio 3.75 18.36 0.01 R2 0.76
_____________________________________________________________________Values are expressed as coefficient. *** = p < .001, ** = p < .01, * = p < .05. For Gender, 0 = Male, 1 = Female. F(7,66) = 30.373, p = .000, r2 = .763 (adjusted r2 = .738). Condition was dummy-coded so that Solitary = 1, Control = 1, and
Social = 0.
Caloric Expenditure: By Condition
23Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Caloric Expenditure & METs (by condition)
Social Solitary Control
Condition (kCal) 62.93 54.83 37.69
Condition (METs) 2.017 1.788 1.262
Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University 24
Caloric Expenditure: Tennis Court Play vs. Exergame Play
= tennis court play is significantly different than treatment, p < .05. 25Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010
Georgetown University
Enjoyment of exergame play
Enjoy Do Not Enjoy
Males 18 4
Females 25 0
Note. 2(1, N = 47) = 4.968, p = .026
26Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Summary of Results
As expected: Social expended more calories than solitary. Both expended more calories than control.
Also, males, younger, and heavier weight individuals burned more calories.
27Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Summary of Results
• Social exergame play was comparable to tennis court play
• Solitary play and control condition burned significantly fewer calories than during tennis court play.
28Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Summary of Results
• 100% of girls and 82% of boys enjoyed playing the exergame
29Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Implications of Findings
• Social exergame play is a more physically active option than solitary gameplay
• Exergames may be a viable supplemental physical activity, particularly for low-income adolescents
• Incorporating enjoyable physical activities in schools and homes may encourage energy expenditure and potentially improve health for at-risk youth
30Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Study 2
Social Exergame Play for Improved Executive
Functioning among Adolescents
31Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Research Question
Exergames produce caloric expenditure that may promote physical health,
but can they also promote cognitive health?
32Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Activity Improved Cognition
• Executive function hypothesis (Davis et al., 2007)
• Aerobic Activity– Enhanced executive control skills (Etnier et al., 2006;
Hertzog et al., 2008; Hillman et al., 2009)
– Enhanced attention and concentration (Budde et al., 2008)
33Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Video Games Improved Cognition
• Attention (Green & Bavelier, 2003)
– Capacities: Task-switching– Visual Spatial Skills: Useful field of view, spatial
and temporal resolution, attentional blink paradigm, alerting and orienting
• Retention (Pivec, 2008)
34Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Hypothesis
Participants who play an exergame will improve more in executive functioning and visual spatial skills than those in a sedentary control group.
35Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Methodology
• 50 (34 female) low-income African American 14- to 19-year-old overweight and obese adolescents – Mean BMI = 33.27 (SD = 6.38)– Mean BMI percentile = 94.76 (SD = 5.51)– Mean Age = 16.8 years (SD = 1.14)
• Setting: Inner-city public high school
36Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Stimulus:EA Active for Nintendo Wii
37Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Game Play Exposure
• Baseline cognitive assessment
• Two 15 minute sessions of Wii Active play
– Immediate cognitive assessment following each 15 minute session of game play
38Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Cognitive Measures
• Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (DKEFS)– Design Fluency– Trail-Making Test
• Bender Gestalt visual spatial skills test
39Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Results
Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Executive Functioning (DKEFS)
41Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Executive Functioning (DKEFS)• Repeated measures ANOVA at baseline and week 6
• All participants improved over time– F (1, 45) = 11.073, p = .002
• Wii players improved more than control – F (1, 45) = 4.502, p = .039
• Wii players increased on average 11.26% vs. 3.34% for control group
42Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Visual Spatial Skills (Bender Gestalt)
43Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Visual Spatial Skills (Bender Gestalt)
• Repeated measures ANOVA at baseline and week 6
• Wii players improved more than control F (1, 48) = 5.014, p = .030
• Wii players increased average of 9.45% vs. 5.44% for the control group
44Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Summary of Results
• Wii Active players significantly improved scores on executive functioning and visual spatial skills more than the sedentary control group did
45Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Implications of Findings• Only 15 minutes of exergame play produces short-
term improved cognitive outcomes
• The physical activity component and video game component may enhance cognitive outcomes from exergames
• Exergames could be integrated within the school day (PE; Recess) to produce short-term gains in cognitive performance
46Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Future Work
• Analysis of the full 8 month Wii Active exergame intervention– Game enjoyment– Physical health change (BMI, caloric expenditure)– Cognitive change (memory, attention,
concentration)– Socio-emotional change (self-efficacy, motivation,
self-esteem, attitude towards physical activity)
47Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Conclusion• Exergames produce physiological and
cognitive benefits for at-risk adolescents• Social exergame play produces caloric expenditure
similar to low to moderate intensity physical activity and matches actual sport play
• Social exergame play produces short-term cognitive gains in executive function skills and visual spatial skills
Exergames may be a tool to promote physical and cognitive health
48Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University
Acknowledgements
49Staiano, Abraham, & Calvert, 2010 Georgetown University