improved assessment of voltage dips with common monitoring devices
DESCRIPTION
Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices. M. Bollen, A. Robert & P. Goossens Session 2 Paper No5. Voltage Dip Representation. Why Voltage Phasors? Limitations of RMS-representation. Dip produced by single phase fault. single phase dip. 2-phase dip. Depth = 36 %. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring
Devices
M. Bollen, A. Robert & P. Goossens
Session 2 Paper No5
![Page 2: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Voltage Dip Representation
Why Voltage Phasors?
Limitations of RMS-representation
![Page 3: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Dip produced by single phase fault
Depth = 36 % Depth = 16 %
single phase dip 2-phase dip
![Page 4: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Dip produced by single phase fault
D y
primary side trafo secondary side trafo
MAGNITUDE (PP)-U1 = 94%-U2 = 80%-U3 = 93%
![Page 5: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Why phasors?
• indication about origin– fault type and characteristics
• dip propagation– through transformers– connection : star or delta
• depth: phase-to-ground phase-to-phase
![Page 6: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Improved Dip Characterisation (M. Bollen)
Voltage Type: A, B, C, D, E, F & G
Characteristic Magnitude V
Phase Angle Jump
![Page 7: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
7 Dip Types
4 types of faults– 3-phase faults– 1-phase faults– 2-phase faults– 2-phase-to-ground faults
• propagation through transformers• delta or star connection
Seven types of voltage dips
AB (C, D)C (D)E (F, G)
![Page 8: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Dip Type A
Origin: balanced three phase fault
« A »
![Page 9: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Dip type B, C & D« B »
« C » « D »
origin: single phase faultstar connection
origin: 2-phase fault, star connectionor single phase fault, delta connection
2-phase fault, delta connection
![Page 10: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Dip Type E, F & G
Connection: star
Origin: 2-phase to ground
Connection: delta Connection: delta
Behind Dy or Yd trafo
« E » « F » « G »
![Page 11: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Propagation of voltage dips
Yd
Dy
I
II
III
Fault Type Dip Location
I II III
3-phase A A A
3-phase-to-ground A A A
2-phase-to-ground E F G
2-phase C D C
1-phase-to-ground B C D
line & phase voltages are swapped: rms-voltages changes !
![Page 12: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
V
Characteristic Voltage
Characteristic Magnitude V & Phase Angle Jump A, C, D, F, G: MIN(3 UPN & 3 UPP) B, E: first remove U0
= Invariable of connection type (PP PG) and location (primary secondary trafo)
sincos jVVV V
![Page 13: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Voltage Dip Conversion Algorithms
RMS PHASORS
![Page 14: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Why conversion algorithms?
Common power quality monitors only measure rms-voltages during dip
Voltage phasors interesting / required for analysis / statistics
conversion!
![Page 15: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Rms phasors algorithm
2 STEPS:• step 1: determine type of dip
– from relation between the three rms-voltages– number of possible dips is limited
• step 2: determine dip characteristics & phasors– 3 rms-voltages & dip type the characteristic
voltage V and phase-angle jump can be estimated
![Page 16: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Step 1: determine dip type (1)
• A : three-phase drops• C, E and G: two-phase drops• B, D and F: single-phase drops
Umin
Umax Voltage Dip Type
![Page 17: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Step 1: determine dip type (2)
1 & 3 phase drops 2 & 3 phase drops
![Page 18: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Step 2: determine characteristic voltage & phase angle jump
3 rms voltagesU1, U2, U3
dip type
C
characteristic voltage
&
phase angle jump
voltage phasors
sincos jVVV
![Page 19: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
RMS Voltage Phasorsfor PP measurements
• no zero-sequence component• 3 phasors makes up closed triangle
phasors can easily be estimated out of 3 rms voltages with trigonometry equations
![Page 20: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Conclusions
![Page 21: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Evaluation of algorithms
• check of twenty voltage dips in Belgium HV-stations
• accuracy better than 5% for 95% of dips: acceptable for statistical purposes
• fine tuning of algorithms in progress
![Page 22: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Monitor spec’s
Best solution: recording of rms & phasor evolution during voltage dip
Alternative: only rms recordings to be able to apply conversion algorithms
– all three rms-voltages must be recorded during voltage dip
– snapshot of three rms-voltages when maximum depth is reached
if necessary: adapt firmware of monitor
![Page 23: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Connection of monitor (rms)
phase-to-phase measurement (PP)• phasors can be calculated with trigonometry equations
(closed triangle)• propagation of voltage dips can be estimated
accurately • no indication about the origin
phase-to-ground measurement (PN)• often preferable because indication about origin• propagation can be estimated with proposed
algorithms
![Page 24: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Voltage dip statistics (depth & length)
• phase-to-ground phase-to-phase statistics
– not comparable & should never be mixed
– always mention which connection is considered in tables or statistics (PG or PP)
• avoid phase-to-ground statistics
– too pessimistic view
– especially in impedance grounded systems
– zero-sequence component is removed in Yd and Dy transformers
![Page 25: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Voltage dip statistics (depth & length)
• phase-to-phase statistics are preferable
– can be derived from phase-to-ground measurements with proposed algorithms
• alternative: statistics with characteristic magnitude
– characteristic magnitude can be estimated with proposed algorithms,
– remains invariable during propagation (primary or secondary side trafo)
– is independant of connection
![Page 26: Improved Assessment of Voltage Dips with Common Monitoring Devices](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012922/568146c2550346895db3f942/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26GOOSSENS (BE) Session 2 – Block 3
Barcelona 12-15 May 2003
Thank You!