Implementation and Development Sites Implementation and Development Sites

Arizona State University

Mesa, Arizona

California State University – East Bay Hayward, California

University of Houston

Houston, Texas

Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis

Indianapolis, Indiana Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia

M C

E

E

P

P

C

University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico

M

E

Portland State University Portland, Oregon

California State University – FresnoFresno, California

P

Strive - University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio

University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee Implementation

Site (EPIN)

Development Site (EPDN)

Effective Evidence Efficient

Similar organizations collecting quality data for the same outcomes in a coordinated and collaborative network

Similar organizations collecting quality data that align under similar outcomes for broad community impact

Similar organizations collecting quality data, but uncoordinated and isolated

Alignment

Accountability

*This document is meant to be a conceptualization of the context of academic and social programming which impact student success.

Synergy

3

Data Criteria• The indicator must be a valid

measure of concepts outlined on the birth to career framework‘s Student Roadmap to Success, measuring student success from birth through post-secondary and into a career.

• The indicator must be easily understandable to local stakeholders.

• The indicator must be reasonably similar across jurisdictions.

• The data underlying the indicator must be produced by a reputable source.

• All or most of the indicators must be affordable to gather and report.

• The data should be available consistently over time.

• Each indicator should be useful in the day to day work of educators and organizations working to improve student outcomes.

• Data must be disaggregated (or disaggregate-able) to identify differences among different groups of students.

• Although priority is given to using existing data sources, it is possible that consensus will emerge around the creation of new indicators and measures.

• We should utilize data points that are most likely to generate synergy across multiple organizations.

• The number of indicators for each goal area should be kept to a minimum for the sake of clarity and simplicity.

Cradle to Career Process

Prenatal care, quality child care, Head Start and full day kindergarten programs are not reaching all eligible children.

In-school and out-of-school programs are not reaching all parts of the region. More coordination of data collection is needed.

A higher percentage of Asian and white students are enrolling in OUS institutions than students of color. Enrollment in higher education is increasing.

Degree completion rates in community colleges and universities are in a range of 35-60 percent with students of color less likely to graduate. Education attainment impacts income and employment status.

Significant differences in academic achievement and high school graduation rates exist among students of color, students of limited English proficiency and students with disabilities compared to whites. Poverty is increasing in the county.

Challenges• How can our youngest and most vulnerable children all

receive the best start possible prior to entering school?

• How can we develop a more comprehensive, community-wide system of support for students inside and outside of school?

• How can we create successful responses to improve academic achievement and graduation rates?

• How can we improve the readiness levels of students for post-secondary education?

• How can we increase the number of students successfully completing post-secondary education?