impact of different pretreatments on the anaerobic digestion of
TRANSCRIPT
Impact of different pretreatments
on the anaerobic digestion of
household waste organics
Bruno Mattheeuws, V Baltic Biogas Forum 2016, Gdansk
2
OWS: THE COMPANY
• Developer and owner of DRANCO technology: dry
continuous digestion technology developed in early
80’s
• OWS created in 1988: >25 years experience in
anaerobic digestion of household waste organics or
equivalent
• Sales: average 15 million €/y
since 2010
• 75 people
• >90% export
• Main office located in Ghent (Belgium)
3
GHENT, BELGIUM
- #3 most authentic destination (National Geographic Traveler Magazine)
- #7 must-visit (Lonely Planet)
Ordinary morning in medieval city center
One of many Ghent city festivals
4
1. BRECHT I (Belgium) 1992 20 000 tpy Biowaste+
2. SALZBURG (Austria) 1993 20 000 tpy Biowaste
3. BASSUM (Germany) 1997 105 000 tpy Residual waste
4. AARBERG (Switzerland) 1998 11 000 tpy Biowaste
5. KAISERSLAUTERN (Germany) 1999 25 000 tpy Residual waste
6. VILLENEUVE (Switzerland) 1999 10 000 tpy Biowaste
7. BRECHT II (Belgium) 2000 50 000 tpy Biowaste+
8. ROME (Italy) 2003 40 000 tpy Mixed waste
9. LEONBERG (Germany) 2004 30 000 tpy Biowaste
10. PUSAN (South Korea) 2005 70 000 tpy Biowaste
11. HILLE (Germany) 2005 100 000 tpy Residual waste+ sludge
12. MÜNSTER (Germany) 2005 80 000 tpy Residual waste
13. TERRASSA (Spain) 2006 25 000 tpy Biowaste
14. VITORIA (Spain) 2007 120 000 tpy Mixed waste
15. HOTAKA (Japan) 2008 3 000 tpy Biowaste+
16. ALICANTE (Spain) 2008 180 000 tpy Mixed waste
17. TENNEVILLE (Belgium) 2008 39 000 tpy Biowaste
18. SEOUL (South Korea) 2009 30 000 tpy Biowaste
19. KEMPTEN (Germany) 2009 18 000 tpy Biowaste
20. LESZNO (Poland) 2010 50 000 tpy Mixed waste
21. HENGELO (The Netherlands) 2011 50 000 tpy Biowaste
22. MIRANDELA (Portugal) 2012 55 000 tpy Mixed waste
23. WIJSTER (The Netherlands) 2012 57 000 tpy Residual waste
24. WIJSTER (The Netherlands) 2013 40 000 tpy Biowaste
25. BOURG-EN-BRESSE (France) 2015 66 000 tpy Mixed waste
26. CHAGNY (France) 2015 73 000 tpy Mixed waste
27. NORTH YORKSHIRE (UK) 2017 40 000 tpy Residual waste
28. NÜSTEDT (Germany) 2006 20 000 tpy Energy crops
29. LANGENDORF (Germany) 2010 Wet post-digester
BIOGAS PLANT REFERENCES
5
EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT PRETREATMENTS
1. High-pressure press
2. Short residence rotating drum followed by shredder and
screening
3. Long residence rotating drum followed by screening
4. Shredder followed by screen
6
1. HIGH-PRESSURE PRESS: KAISERSLAUTERN
7
8
1. HIGH-PRESSURE PRESS: KAISERSLAUTERN
70.000 t
PRESS
Wet fraction: 27.500 t
~ 40%
AD
Dry fraction: 42.500 t
~ 60%
9
1. HIGH-PRESSURE PRESS
• VM-Press / OREX / OEP / …
• Installed in DRANCO-plant in Kaiserslautern
(Germany) since 2006
• First MSW, then source separated organics (SSO)
• Waste is squeezed in special extrusion chambers
fitted with holes (20mm) in the external surface
– Wet fraction squeezed out of the extrusion chambers is sent
to dry AD
– ‘overflow’ = dry fraction = RDF
Consists of the pressure
resistant components of the
waste, such as plastics,
wood, paper & cardboard
10
1. HIGH-PRESSURE PRESS: EXPERIENCES IN KSL
• Current feedstock: SSO
• No shredding => compost with lower contamination
• About 40% by weight to wet fraction, 60% to dry fraction
=> small amount to wet fraction
(↔ 85-90% in Brecht (case 2-, comparable feedstock, also no shredding)
• wet fraction:
– TS: ~ 30%
– Biogas potential: 80-135 Nm³/ton (average 110 Nm³/ton)
• dry fraction:
– TS: ~ 40%
– still contains > digestible organic material (biogas potential
loss!)
– Up to 100 Nm³ biogas/ton
11
1. HIGH-PRESSURE PRESS: EXPERIENCES
• << biological loading rate AD after installing the high-
pressure press (↔ previously utilized ball mill)
• Relatively low recovery of organic fraction
• 50% of biogas in dry fraction (not valorized)
12
2. SHORT RESIDENCE TIME ROTATING DRUM: BRECHT
13
WASTE DRANCO PLANT BRECHT
14
2. SHORT RESIDENCE TIME ROTATING DRUM
• Comminuting drum (short residence time, ± 3 hrs)
• Installed in DRANCO-plant in Brecht (BE) since 2000
• Feedstock: SSO
• Drums appeared as a first processing step in the 80s – Drums use gravity to tumble, mix, break down & homogenize waste
(~ friction)
– Dimensions: Ø 3 m, length 16m
• Main purpose: selective comminution of the waste – organic fraction is comminuted
– inert fraction remains quite the same
– paper & cardboard are also partly
comminuted
15
2. SHORT RESIDENCE TIME ROTATING DRUM
• Degree of filling: ~ 50%
• Screening 40mm
– <40mm => AD
– >40 mm: shredder (slow turning screw type mill
& 2nd drum
16
FLOW DRANCO PLANT BRECHT
SHREDDER
DRANCO
DIGESTER
Digestate
GAS
STORAGE
FLARE
GAS ENGINES
Biogas
Polymer
solution
> 250 mm
PUSHING
FLOOR
SHREDDER
COMMINUTING
DRUM
MAGNET
COMMINUTING
DRUM
DOSING UNITMIXING UNIT /
FEEDING PUMP
Rejects
ROTATING
SIEVE
BIOWASTE
ROTATING
SIEVE
> 40 mm
STEAM
GENERATOR
Steam
CENTRIFUGE
Rejects
Effluent to wastewater
treatment plant
< 40 mm
Exhaust
gases
MIXING UNIT
PRESSVIBRATING
SIEVE
PRESS WATER
TANK
AEROBIC
MATURATION
Electricity
Compost
17
2. SHORT R-TIME ROTATING DRUM: EXPERIENCES
• Shredder: slow turning screw type mill (“minimisation
rolls”)
• Production of clean compost:
– Plastics are not shredded but left in large strands
– Glass is not splintered but will stay hole or breaks into
larger pieces
– Textiles are not reduced into small pieces but are torn
open
=> These items can be removed by screening (before
or after AD/composting)
18
2. SHORT R-TIME ROTATING DRUM: EXPERIENCES
• Soiled paper & other digestible organics are reduced
in size and go to the AD
• Plant has been running for >14 years
• Production of high-quality compost
• Large fraction to anaerobic digestion
(85-90% in Brecht after 2 comminuting drums)
• Biogas production: 95-145 Nm³/t (average of 120 Nm³
per ton during last 10 years)
19
3. LONG R-TIME ROTATING DRUM: BOURG-EN-BRESSE
Short residence rotating drum followed
by shredder and screening
20
MIXED WASTE DRANCO PLANT BOURG-EN-BRESSE
Short residence rotating drum followed
by shredder and screening
21
3. LONG R-TIME ROTATING DRUM: BOURG-EN-BRESSE
• Comminuting drum (slowly rotating, long residence time)
• Installed in DRANCO-plant in B-E-B (FR) since 2015
• Dimensions: Ø 4,25m, length 40m
• Residence time: ± 2,5 days
• Degree of filling: 75%
• Fraction <50mm to digester
22
FLOW DRANCO PLANT BOURG-EN-BRESSE
Mixed waste
2 COMMINUTING
DRUMS
Biogas
MIXER/
FEEDING PUMP
DRANCO
DIGESTER
Residue
Steam Process
waterFeCl2
RDF
SORDISEP
Inerts
Process water
Polymers Anti-foam
Centrifuge
cake
OVERBAND
MAGNET
NON-FERRO
SEPARATOR
High calorific
fraction
Process water
Low calorific
fraction
ION
COMPOSTING Green waste
INTENSIVE
MATURATION
POST-
MATURATION
Compost
High calorific
fractionGAS STORAGE
FLARE
Electricity
STEAM
GENERATORSteam
GAS
ENGINES
DRUM SCREEN
200 MM
50 MMDRUM SCREEN
OVERBAND
BALLISTIC
SEPARATOR
DOSING UNIT
23
• After drums: further pretreatment (screens, magnet,
ballistic, …)
• To digester: <2 inch
– 7,7 % impurities
– TS: 47,5%
– VS: 73,0%
– Biogas production: 140 Nm³/ton (125-160 Nm³/ton)
3. LONG R-TIME ROTATING DRUM BOURG-EN-BRESSE
24
4. SHREDDER FOLLOWED BY SCREEN: TENNEVILLE
25
FLOW DRANCO PLANT TENNEVILLE
SHREDDER 1
ROTATING
SIEVE (60 mm)
MAGNET
MAGNET
SHREDDER 2
DOSING UNIT FEEDING
PUMP
GAS STORAGE
STEAM
GENERATOR
Mixing
DRANCO
DIGESTER
3.150 m³
Biowaste
(& pasty waste)
Residue
FLARE
< 40
40 - 150
Rejects
Electricity GAS
ENGINES
Liquid waste streams
Bulking material
+ Yard waste
(>20 mm)
Composting
Preshredded
yard waste (<20 mm)
Sludge dryer
Water treatment plant
Heat
DOSING
SCREW
>150
Biogas
Steam
26
4. SHREDDER FOLLOWED BY SCREEN: EXPERIENCES
• Simple configuration
• Low space requirement
• Quick run-through, no waste in equipment at night
• Advantage: “low amount of overflow”
27
4. SHREDDER FOLLOWED BY SCREEN: HENGELO
28
SCREEN FOLLOWED BY SHREDDER
• Screen 3 fractions (0mm < 60mm < 150mm < ….)
• Installed in DRANCO-plant in Hengelo (NL) since
2011
• SouFeedstock: SSO
• Existing pretreatment (< DRANCO)
29
• Capacity:
– 50.000 tpy
• 40.000 tpy biowaste
• 5.000 tpy overdue products
• 5.000 tpy liquid products
• Digester volume: 3.450 m³
• Start-up: 2011
• Digestate is mixed with fraction 60-160 mm
=> dewatering is avoided
• Biogas production
– 100% gas engines (2 x 1,2 MW)
– Heat is used in district heating network
SCREEN FOLLOWED BY SHREDDER
30
FLOW DRANCO PLANT HENGELO
SHREDDER
DRANCO
DIGESTER
Digestate
GAS
STORAGE
FLARE
COOLING
Biogas
Steam
DOSING
UNIT
SHREDDERSTAR SCREEN
60-150 mm
DOSING UNITMIXING UNIT /
FEEDING PUMP
BIOWASTE
> 150 mm
BIOGAS
ENGINES
Liquid organic
waste
PRESS
COMPOSTING
Electricity
MAGNET
< 60 mm
STORAGE TANK
Heat
MIXING60-150 mm
Compost
BOILER
31
SCREEN FOLLOWED BY SHREDDER: EXPERIENCES
• Perfect pretreatment for source separated biowaste:
– Simple & cheap
– Low overflow
– Good compost quality
• Biogas production < expectations in this plant
– BMP on different fractions
– <10mm lowers the biogas production (mainly sand) (<3 mm!)
– 0-10mm = 1/3 of volume (but <<<< biogas + tear &
wear)
– Removing 0-3 mm would result in 15% more biogas
– Decision: remove 0-10mm (out of the 0-60mm)
• 0-10mm: bypass digestion
• Extra star screen installed
=> positive impact on biogas production!
32
OVERVIEW
%
RECOVERY
C/N LOADING
RATE COST REMARKS
HIGH-PRESSURE
PRESS
KAISERSLAUTERN 40% Low
Low CAPEX
High OPEX
Crushing glass?
Recycling of dry
fractions?
HIGH-SPEED
REDUCTION DRUM
BRECHT 85-90% High
Low CAPEX
Low OPEX
Efficient removal
of plastics
SHREDDER &
SCREEN
IDELUX Up to 95% High
Low CAPEX
Medium OPEX Mainly for SSO
LOW-SPEED
REDUCTION DRUM
BOURG-EN-BRESSE
60%
(80% SSO) High
High CAPEX
Low OPEX
Efficient removal
of inorganics
(more for MSW)
33
• Main goal of pretreatment & biological treatment (MBT):
reduce the amount of final residue to be disposed
• Size reduction is commonly one of the first
unit operations in pretreatment & MBT processes
• For production of low contamination compost
– From MSW:
• Excellent collection of hazardous waste
• Avoid to shred the feedstock (use drums or press)
• Efficient metal separation in the plant
• (Optional wet post-separation)
CONCLUSIONS
34
• For production of low contamination compost
– From source separated biowaste:
• (soft) shredding as a first or 2nd step
– Simple & cheap
– Limited amount of overflow
• Type of pretreatment has an influence on the (choice of)
AD-technology
– High pressure press: wet fraction of SSO too wet for
dry AD?
– Dry AD: ideal with reduction drums and shredder +
sieve
CONCLUSIONS
35
DEVELOPMENT OF AD OF MSW IN GERMANY
36
DZIĘKUJĘ ZA UWAGĘ!