image 1: modernising traditional china (source report - history 3200.pdf · image 1: modernising...
TRANSCRIPT
(Source:
Phenomenology acts as the bridge between
Image 2: Conceptual image of the Beijing Na
(Source: Skyscraper Cityii)
Image 1: Modernising traditional china
Source: Bird’s Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in Chinai)
Phenomenology acts as the bridge between the old world and the new world
Assignment 2: Theory Report
Michael Dernee: c3089219
ational Stadium ‘Birds Nest’ Theme:
Building: Beijing National Stadium (Bird’s Nest)
the old world and the new world
Assignment 2: Theory Report
Michael Dernee: c3089219
Theme: Phenomenology
Building: Beijing National Stadium (Bird’s Nest)
Abstract:
The aim of this writing is to consider in detail phenomenology in contemporary architectural theory,
developing an original and sustained critical argument that demonstrates an awareness of the
political, cultural, social and economic dimensions that have shaped the theory in question, it will
interpret, appreciate and critically dissect the Beijing national Stadium.
My argument is that phenomenology acts as the bridge between the old world and the new world
and through that a harmonious connection took place.
This writing is here to understand how Herzog and De Meuron created a building through
phenomenology that harmoniously worked for the traditional eastern nation with a political
background that is communist, whilst still working for the extremely westernised Olympic
committee.
This writing experiments with the inner theories of phenomenology; the three fields, genus loci,
senses and concept, to directly answer the question of how the political, cultural, social and
economic dimensions are balanced.
Through the theories of phenomenology the Beijing national stadium enables the Chinese
traditionalist to feel their own culture in a modern context without experiencing concerns about not
meeting Western requirements.
Phenomenology questions the most basic theories of architecture to open up the mind to new
architecture. It is a major movement that juxtaposes rationalism; instead of questioning the quantity
it focuses on the quality of architecture and not the magnitude of the enterprise. Phenomenology of
architecture refers to the viewers’ sensory experience through sensory properties through the use of
building materials, features and textures; a philosophy where the building does not function in the
first, second dimension or third dimension, but the fourth dimension of time (a perception of sight,
touch, and feel).
The following theory report will evaluate the Beijing National Stadium in reference to a major theme
in contemporary architectural theory and the implications that this movement has had upon the
location and its people. This theory report will aim to give a thorough insight into the history of the
site, government and architecture of Beijing the history of the Olympics and the problems associated
with these subjects. It will then go on to describe how the theory of phenomenology acts as the
bridge between the old world and the new world. In summary by using phenomenology in
architecture, it allows any architect whether they are a foreign or native to create harmonious
buildings that reconcile opposing themes and beliefs and then associate with the population whilst
also teaching the local audience.
In the theory of phenomenology, a sub-branch coined by Christian Norberg-Shulz as the ‘Genus lociiii’
or in other words the introduction of ‘the sense of place’ in the thought of architecture is one used
in the Beijing National stadium. The problem arises when that place that is being created is being
built under an architectural political and cultural regime that is rather controversial in nature.
China is a thriving country built on the success of the people working to overcome physical
impossibilities to create and perform at the peak of their physical and mental capacities. Sport is
hugely important aspect in their culture, physical fitness is held in high regard and as the country has
developed so too have their capabilities at the Olympics. In the two thousand and eight Olympic
Games, China sprang onto the world stage: they came first, exceeding the USA in most gold medals a
first time in sixteen years showing their countries true ability rise up to the occasion and their degree
of improvement. Within five Olympics Games, China went from the eleventh ranked nation to the
best competing country in the world, one of the most rapid improvements for a country in the top
ten and the fastest ever progress for a world championship team.
Beijing at this time was also the largest growing high-rise city in the world and as Ai Weiwei
describes: “The entire city comes from one same plan, always the same design. All the buildings look
the same, all the street looks the same and even the trees how they planted looks the same, and it is
indistinguishableiv”. The new Beijing has totally lost the identity it previously had, and it is impossible
to understand where in the city you are located, what kind of culture there is and what kind of
history surrounds the location in which they reside.
China has a rich history, from their earliest creation of buildings to the Great Wall of China; the
country is recognised for its vernacular style for which the capital city of Beijing is blessed with and
world renown. An important aspect of discussing the region comes when we examine the Beijing
imperial axis which travels through the temple of heaven, Tiananmen Square and the Forbidden City.
Sadly all the sites of Beijing and all of the cultural buildings of Beijing are obsolete in reference to a
modern Olympic stadium.
The Olympic culture and tradition aims to show the physical peak of humans, where only the great
countries are able to host the Olympics games. For Beijing this is the milestone that demonstrates
that Beijing has arrived on the world stage as a dominant figure, with the pearl of the Olympics to be
the National stadium. Out of the twenty-nine summer Olympics there have only been three eastern
countries hosting the games and only three countries have hosted the Olympic Games have been
under the political regime of a communistic institution. Chen Gang Deputy mayor of Beijing
summarises the Olympics by saying:
‘I think the Olympics presents a two way opportunity. On one hand China is given a
venue to show the world our strength our culture, our development and process. On the
other hand with the door to china open to the world, we also learn a lot from the
worldv’
The challenge then is: how do you design a building that will work during and after the Olympics,
whilst being a monumental building for the country of China and also modern building that reflects
the power of the nation.
Herzog and de Meuron’s chose a Chinese artist to assist with the construction and design of the
stadium. Ai Weiwei is an artist, architectural designer and an activist best known for his art of
dropping ancient pottery and the intensely expressive ‘fuck off’ exhibition. He shows Herzog and de
Meuron how far they could go with challenging Chinese ideas, what kind of language or what the
kind of forms the ideas would be to be understood when expressed in a certain way by the local
audience. Ai Weiwei went on to explain that for such a monumental building which is aiming to put
Beijing on the map as an Olympic host, the building itself does not need to be tied down to cliché
notions of traditional Chinese design. The aim would need to be not so much mocking the traditional
ways but showing that the building is a modern one and synthesising the old and new conceptually.
The aim as we find is to create a monument that works to describe the new powerful city of Beijing.
The Beijing National Stadium is a steel structure of woven metal columns that thread bend and twist
in a manner that is seemingly like a built version of a birds nest. The actual stadium is detached from
the steel columns; in a concrete bowl that is painted red and is raised up to steel columns which are
segregated as well. The stadium ground level is completely open which allows the public to stroll
through from the outside into the transitional space with the crisscrossing columns, then to venture
further into the arena and stare into the vast vacant cavity of the stadium.
The Beijing National Stadium is a bridge between the old world and the new world, welcoming the
traditions and culture of China whilst bringing forth a new modern China thriving on the competitive
nature of the world. The stadium depicts the Olympic stature whilst also abiding by the rules of the
local government.
‘Making a non-empirical architecture requires a conception or a formative ideavi’. The design of the
Beijing National Stadium is not of the vernacular imperial nature and due to this factor a strong
concept was needed to integrate the new with the old and keep the traditionalists happy. Deciding
on the right symbols in China can be tricky for Western architects as the design can be perceived
colossally different due to the vast cultural differences and cultural misunderstandings. The design
of the Beijing national stadium also has to depict the legacy of what the capital city of a country is:
that is rapidly becoming a world super power. The design of the columns of the national stadium
was influenced by the patterns found on traditional Chinese pottery as well as the random effects of
nature; this in turn was dubbed as a birds nest due to its resemblance to that of woven twigs. This
concept of a birds nest can continue even further when analysing the roof structure. It is finished in
a padded scheme that tactically seals the spaces within the structure veneer to control wind,
weather, and sunlight. On the rooftop, the cushions inflate to fill gaps. “Just as birds stuff the spaces
between the woven twigs of their nests with a soft filler, the spaces in the structure of the stadium
will be filled with inflated cushions.vii
” Named by the people of china the Birds Nest was a big hit, it is
now depicted on the currency of the Yuan replacing the Chairman Mao Zedong's face a moving away
from its traditional look. The metaphorical representation of the bird’s nest symbolizes the launch of
a phoenix bringing redemption and the re-birth of a country. This concept allowed for the linkage
between the two worlds by creating a modern building that was also fitting for the situation of an
Olympic centre stadium in an eastern country with a communistic parliament. It shows the
development of the nation and in many respects has acted as a nest for the development of China’s
confidence in itself.
Image 3: Ten Yuan with the Beijing National Stadium depicted on it
(Source: Neohideviii
)
The theory of Genus Loci is a key aspect of phenomenology and can be applied to the birds nest in
many ways. The Birds Nest can be an example of polar opposites balancing each other out, a ying
yang effect. When looking at the site of the birds nest, what Herzog and de Meuron have done in the
national stadium is create an environment around the building; from the green site, through the
shopping centre to the eastern corner; to which there are many places that connect with the culture
and the traditional style whilst creating a modern environment. The viewer when focusing out and
looking at the larger scale of the Olympic green sees the site where the majority of the competitions
took place. The entire site including the green area was created completely from scratch and it is
interesting to note that the site is located on the imperial axis. This axis travels through the Temple
of Heaven, Tiananmen Square and the Forbidden City. When this line is extended a further eight
kilometres it reaches Chaoyang, the centre of which is the green Olympic site. It can then focus
solely on the building itself mimicking the nature of the culture and politics of the proud nation that
it represents.
In a broader picture the imperial axis acts as polar opposites of a cultural scale. The imperial axis is a
traditional line of site that goes through the most significant building of China’s history.
The Forbidden City was the Chinese Imperial Palace which was the home for the emperor and his
entourage’s residence. It was also the Centre of Ceremonies and politics of the Chinese and a place
where much action has occurred. From the Ming Dynasty to the end of the Qing Dynasty the
Forbidden City reigned: for almost five hundred years, it served as the exclusive base of the emperor
and all other people were forbidden from entering into it. On the contrary the Beijing National
Stadium functions in a completely different manner: allowing anyone to enter into the frame of the
structure which Jacques Herzog has described as "an architectural forestix" where:
“Its beams, stairs, frames and other steel elements standing in for trees and branches,
and providing an awe-inspiring transitional space between the exterior, the Olympic
Park, and the interior, where the arena awaits.”
Image 4: Architectural Forest
(Source: archiCentralx)
Herzog and de Meuron wanted to create a space where, the stadium is more than just a building. It's
a part of a city a public space, where:
“Social life is possible, where something can happen, something that can, quite
deliberately, be subversive or -- at least -- not easy to control or keep track of.xi”
This is a juxtaposition of space where the traditional architecture of controlling peoples actions to
the freedom of the people to do what they want, acts as the bridge between the old world and the
new world and a way of letting old prejudices go. This is formed by the differing spaces created by
Herzog and de Meuron.
When looking into the site of the Birds Nest a polar opposite of a cultural scale occurs. The green site
of the Olympics was completely created from scratch allowing the site of the National Stadium to be
restructured to generate an atmosphere which is closely related to what is the natural Chinese
environment. From the inside of the foyer, where the architectural forest invites the spectators to
explore the building, so too does the greenery which completely circles the building creating a
language prevalent to the locals of area. This space differs from Chinese architecture which encloses
greenery: here the greenery encloses the structure; this can also be referred to in the Beijing
National Stadium’s foyer to "an architectural forestxii
" the plays on polar opposites balancing each
other out creating a yin yang effect of the outside and inside is created. The pathways of the stadium
also create the feel of a forest due to the pathways never going straight into the building, and hence
not allowing the patron to see the building straight away. These pathways also act as a planned
version of the birds’ nests concept, which is derived from the patterns taken from the traditional
Chinese pottery creating a random effect that acts to mimics nature. Mimesis connects the building
not only to traditional Chinese ways and theories but it also works towards creating a modern path
that is connecting the old world and the new world through the theories of Phenomenology.
Image 5: Site Plan Image 6: Green Site
(Source: "Bird's Nest" National Stadium (Beijing Olympic Games 2008)xiii
) (Source: 1800what?xiv
)
Looking in closer detail the national stadium mimics the culture and hierarchy of a proud nation in
many ways, from the seemingly arbitrary state of the building stepping up onto a mound to the
hierarchal seating arrangements in the building which allow for the culture to be expressed. Pierre
de Meuron in the documentary “Bird's Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China (2008)xv
” describes this
theory of having to step into something where there is a vertical rise, describing it as an interesting
design likening it to the Temples of China and how they have used this method to create a transition
zone between the areasxvi
. This allows for a spiritual connection between the colossal stadium and
all the major temples of China, creating a relationship between the old world and the new world
that allows for a special repoire to take place. Another very subtle but extremely important element
of enabling this rapport to be established took place in the creation of the seating arrangement. The
design had to relate back to the culture of china where the hierarchy exists but on the other hand it
had to not make a grand gesture that the building would not be oppressive and overwhelming. To do
this they created a design that balanced between disorder and order, seeming random and chaotic
at the same time but when explained it showed a very clear structural rationale. By allowing a
persona to explore the building the architect is allowing the persona to create their own perspective
on the building and not telling them what to feel. This is present in the stairs to the higher levels.
Branching off the columns the stairs do not go straight up but curve with the structure. This curve
creates a certain mystique to the building whilst creating a chaotic form as the stairs cut and
drastically change in width. The balance of these stairs occurs extremely subtly as the stairs are the
most direct way up to the higher levels. This links throughout the theory of genus loci where old and
new worlds are linked together although extremely subtly these two worlds exist in unison through
the building.
The Birds Nest also uses the theory of the senses from the theme of phenomenology to allow
differing perspectives to liberate the local’s whilst also showing the complexity and incredible
quantity of work that the nation can create. A main argument in the theory of phenomenology is
that architecture should be designed in reference to the experience through sensory properties;
these sensory properties should be from many different stimuli and not only sight. This is displayed
in the latticework of the columns where the intensities of light and dark act to warm and cool down
the perceiver. The design of the Stadium also allows a natural wind to come across and whisper
through the columns creating a natural passive ventilation system that the patrons can hear and
feel. This theory creates a dramatic difference of feel in a building, a positive effect where the spirit
can bond with the building.
Picture 7: View from the Greenery Picture 8: Transitional Foyer
(Source: The Official Website of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Gamesxvii
) (Source: The Official Website of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Gamesxviii
)
Traditional Chinese culture relies on the bright visual display to associate with different feelings and
sensory cues or impressions. The cultural beliefs of colours and their effect on the Chinese way are
very dubious for instance happiness and good luck is believed to be brought on by the colour red a
colour used in the concrete shell. Red is an auspicious colour which for an Olympic stadium is also a
perfect choice of colour to represent the vitality of the Olympics.
Another sense is depicted by the use of nature. The stadium is enveloped by serenity due to the
natural surroundings of the Olympic forest park. The forest park enhances the space by allowing
nature to surround the Olympic stadiums. Nature is a mechanism for sensory interaction; the
colours, sounds and textures as well as scents provoke the sensory systems. The Olympic forest park
has a lake that rests around the building from the north around the eastern side to which it curves
around the structure and follows down south towards other Olympic venues. This forest park is an
artificial one that allows patrons to stand right next to the lotus flower and observe the five hundred
thousand plants and one hundred and eighty species right next to the national stadium. This type of
landscape was created in a much larger scale in China’s past. The Old Summer Palace was built in the
seventeenth and eighteenth century and had a mound that was created from digging up an artificial
lake, this cost the emperor in an excessive amount and because of tradition of burying the emperor
it did not matter despite the discomfort it caused to the emperor’s subjects. The Olympic forest park
was planned to have a large mound but due to costs the area was instead turned into a green forest
area.
Picture 9: the Chinese lotus
(Source: The Official Website of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Gamesxix
)
Due to the use of all the senses and not just one key sense, Herzog and De Meuron created a journey
through each threshold. This journey through the threshold could be from an inner room to an outer
room and was achieved by the architects by using juxtaposing materials, environments and colours
to create a feel that no geometry can create. This journey is a memorable one where the viewer
walking through the architects design could see a positive idea and concept and also would
experience nostalgia for the old ways.
In the readings by Steven Holl’s ‘Pre-Theoretical Ground’ we find that in understanding the
importance of using the senses to understand a structure one has to understand that perception of
perspectives is the basis of the process. Steven described the three fields; ‘the foreground, middle
ground and distant view’. It is apparent that Herzog and De Meuron designed with these techniques
in mind as the Beijing pavilion is instantly recognisable from the great distances and successfully
creates an iconic image; the nickname itself is enough evidence to explain that Herzog and De
Meuron have successfully achieved recognition through continuous focus on the use of three fields.
Picture 10: View from the North East
(Source: Kinabalooxx
)
As the patron comes closer the building and passes the threshold of the middle ground a new
environment comes forth. It cleverly integrates concept of Chinese pottery through the allocation of
entrances and the use of lighting and through the integrated columns throughout the transitional
area works on building the new environment.
Picture 11: In the middle ground looking outside Picture 12: looking through the structure from the outside
(Source: Dezeenxxi
) (Source: Dezeenxxii
)
When the patron arrives in the stadium the use of the EFTE light padded roof allows for the
maximum amount of light into the stadium without overexposure, while the chairs reciprocate the
colour of the concrete shell to which the chairs colours fade up into at the top where it rejoins the
nest and meshes the two entities together.
Picture13: Looking from the inside watching
(Source: Dezeenxxiii
)
The Beijing stadium uses phenomenology to bridge between the differences old world and the new
world, welcoming the traditions and culture of ancient China whilst bringing forth a new modern
China thriving on the competitive nature of the world. This is achieved through a strong concept of
integrating the new with the old and the old with the new to keep the traditionalists happy. Herzog
and De Meuron received this idea from Ai Weiwei; the idea influenced by the patterns found on
traditional Chinese pottery as well as the random effects of nature. Another way this building utilises
Phenomenology is through the application of the theory of Genus Loci; a particular space having a
particular identity to which every space has its own, the Genus Loci is crucial in the sense of creating
a sensation of internal and external world and causing a seamless merge between the two which
reflects the wish that China has to reconcile its past with its future.
The Birds Nest utilisation of the senses by Herzog and De Meuron aims to stimulate through basic
feelings that there is a sense connection to the building and the outer world creating experiences
with the viewer will never forget. These experiences and design using the senses one has to
understand that perception of perspectives as the basis of the process. To do such a thing though is
not to design in plan or section but to design in perspectives of all three fields; the foreground,
middle and distant view, to allow for the finest detail to the complete building in view a memorable
one. The foreground, middle and distant view are not like China’s cultural history in that at each
level and stage there have been infinite twists and turns and challenges, and they echo with China’s
urge to making a lasting impression on the rest of the world.
The Beijing National stadium depicts the Olympic stature whilst also abiding by the rules of the local
government. The following theory report has shown that the Beijing National Stadium in reference
to a phenomenology has acted to bridge between the differences old world and the new world,
welcoming the traditions and culture of China whilst bringing forth a new modern China thriving on
the competitive nature of the world. The stadium depicts the Olympic stature whilst also abiding by
the rules of the local government. It aims to reconcile the cultural differences by creating a modern
synthesis that maintains the grandeur of past enterprises but is comparable on a modern scale to
western cultures: it seeks through principles of phenomenology to demonstrate the struggles
between the outer and inner worlds: the internal culture of China that has been dominated by its
attempts to become a greater world power. This structure has allowed the Chinese traditional
culture to retain its sense of pride and belonging and at the same time achieve greater status by
creating a modern building that is such a prestigious structure. Phenomenology enables the Chinese
traditionalist to feel their own culture in a modern context without experiencing concerns about not
meeting Western requirements, by using the three fields and the genus loci, senses and concept as a
mechanism to “modernise” traditional culture in harmonious way.
Bibliography:
Lecture:
• Phenomenology: Week 3 Tuesday
Video:
• 2 June 2008 Talking Heads - Glenn Murcutt
• Birds Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China(2008)
Book:
• Peter Zumthor, Thinking Architecture (Basel: Birkhäuser, 1999), pp. 246, 248-250.
• Juhani Pallasmaa, “The Geometry of Feeling” in Kate Nesbitt (ed), Theorizing a New Agenda
for Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996), pp. 448-452.
• Christian Norberg-Schulz, “The Phenomenology of Place” in Kate Nesbitt, Theorizing a New
Agenda for Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996), pp. 414- 415.
• Steven Holl, “Pre-theoretical Ground” in Steven Holl (Basel: Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1996), [up].
i A screenshot in the film ‘Bird's Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China’ (2008) 1:00min ii http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=660330&page=71
iii Christian Norberg-Schulz, “The Phenomenology of Place” in Kate Nesbitt, Theorizing a New Agenda for
Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996), pp. 414- 415 iv Birds Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China(2008) 56:30
v Interview with Chen Gang Deputy mayor of Beijing ‘Bird's Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China’ (2008)
7:00min vi Steven Holl ‘Pre-theoretical Ground’
vii http://www.chinese-architecture.info/OLYMPICS/OL-001.htm
viii http://www.neohide.com/new-china-bird-nests-currency-note
ix Metaphors and materials meet in Beijing’s National Stadium, Fabric Architecture | May 2008, By Frank
Edgerton Martin, http://fabricarchitecturemag.com/articles/0508_f3_stadium.html x http://www.archicentral.com/national-stadium-beijing-wins-ribas-prestigious-international-architecture-
award-21885/ xi Spiegel Online: an online interview with Jacques Herzog
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,569011,00.html xii
Metaphors and materials meet in Beijing’s National Stadium, Fabric Architecture | May 2008, By Frank
Edgerton Martin, http://fabricarchitecturemag.com/articles/0508_f3_stadium.html xiii
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=545983627281&set=o.21502051911 xiv
http://www.1800what.com/2008/08/ xv
Birds Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China(2008) xvi
Birds Nest - Herzog & De Meuron in China(2008) 21:00 xvii
http://en.beijing2008.cn/cptvenues/venues/nst/n214078095.shtml xviii
http://en.beijing2008.cn/cptvenues/venues/nst/n214078095.shtml xix
http://en.beijing2008.cn/cptvenues/venues/nst/headlines/n214102748.shtml xx
http://www.kinabaloo.com/olympics.html xxi
http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/30/national-stadium-beijing-by-herzog-de-meuron/ xxii
http://www.dezeen.com/2009/07/15/national-stadium-in-beijing-wins-riba-lubetkin-prize/ xxiii
http://www.dezeen.com/2009/07/15/national-stadium-in-beijing-wins-riba-lubetkin-prize/