iigratorypattern ofhoming atlantic (salmo salar in

23
Not to be cited without prior reference to the authors International Council for the Exploration of the Sea C.M.1997/CC:09 J\'IIGRATORY PATTERN OF HOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN COASTAL WATERS W-ICELAND;RECORDEDBYDATASTORAGETAGS by Johannes Sturlaugsson 1 and Konrad Thorisson 2 IInstitute ofFreshwater Fisheries, Vagnhofdi 7, 112, Reykjavik, leeland 2Marine Research Institute, SkUlagata 4, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland Abstract •• Amigration study on the homing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) was carried out in coastal w- leeland waters in August 1996. External data storage tags (OSTs) were used to record pressure (depth), temperature and conductivity (salinity) during the migration. The OSTs were programmed to measure at 3-30 minutes intervals for 17-24 days. The present OST recordings are the first to inelude salinity measurements. A·total of 100 salmon were captured and tagged in the estuaries when entering their horne waters at the ocean ranching stations in Laros and Hraunsfjord. Of these, 92 were transfered and released at the shore in Borgarfjord (shortest sea route 170-200 km), but the remaining 8 serYed as controls and were released near their horne water. The recapture rates of different groups ranged from 58 to 65 %, whereof 40-51 % were recaptured in the ocean ranching stations 3-82 days after release, but others in inshore nets or in rivers. The mean travelling speed of the salmon from release to recapture, ranged from 0,1-1,8 km/hour, hut examples up 4 kmlhour were found based on the actual departure from release site arid the arrival to horne estuary. Comparison with temperature data from satellites showed that most of the salmon migrated quite elose to the coast. The DSTs salinity measurements showed that so me individuals migrated. into estuaries and even into rivers on their way to their horne waters in Laros and Hraunsfjord. The depth records showed that the salmon migrated mostly in the uppermost few meters. The salmon often showed diurnal rythm in vertical movements, staying deeper at night. The salmon were elosest to the surface during noon and the majority of the deepest dives were related to sunset and sunrise .. The usual pattern of migration through deeper layers were aseries of rapid dives. Usually the dives were just a few meters, but occasional dives were taken down trough the thermocline at 20-40 m depth, and even down to 110 meters. The migratory patterns of the salmon are further discussed in relation to the possible cues/clues used by the salmon while navigating 'tq .. horne water. . Key words: Atlantic salmon, naloigation, coastal data

Upload: others

Post on 08-May-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Not to be cited without prior reference to the authors

International Council forthe Exploration of the Sea

C.M.1997/CC:09

J\'IIGRATORY PATTERN OF HOMING ATLANTIC~ALMON (Salmo salar L~) IN COASTAL WATERS

W-ICELAND;RECORDEDBYDATASTORAGETAGS

by

Johannes Sturlaugsson1

and Konrad Thorisson2

IInstitute ofFreshwater Fisheries, Vagnhofdi 7, 112, Reykjavik, leeland2Marine Research Institute, SkUlagata 4, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland

Abstract ••Amigration study on the homing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) was carried out incoastal w- leeland waters in August 1996. External data storage tags (OSTs) were used torecord pressure (depth), temperature and conductivity (salinity) during the migration. TheOSTs were programmed to measure at 3-30 minutes intervals for 17-24 days. The presentOST recordings are the first to inelude salinity measurements. A·total of 100 salmon werecaptured and tagged in the estuaries when entering their horne waters at the ocean ranchingstations in Laros and Hraunsfjord. Of these, 92 were transfered and released at the shorein Borgarfjord (shortest sea route 170-200 km), but the remaining 8 serYed as controls andwere released near their horne water. The recapture rates of different groups ranged from58 to 65 %, whereof 40-51 % were recaptured in the ocean ranching stations 3-82 daysafter release, but others in inshore nets or in rivers. The mean travelling speed of thesalmon from release to recapture, ranged from 0,1-1,8 km/hour, hut examples up 4kmlhour were found based on the actual departure from release site arid the arrival to horneestuary.

Comparison with temperature data from satellites showed that most of the salmonmigrated quite elose to the coast. The DSTs salinity measurements showed that someindividuals migrated. into estuaries and even into rivers on their way to their horne watersin Laros and Hraunsfjord. The depth records showed that the salmon migrated mostly inthe uppermost few meters. The salmon often showed diurnal rythm in vertical movements,staying deeper at night. The salmon were elosest to the surface during noon and themajority of the deepest dives were related to sunset and sunrise.. The usual pattern ofmigration through deeper layers were aseries of rapid dives. Usually the dives were just afew meters, but occasional dives were taken down trough the thermocline at 20-40 mdepth, and even down to 110 meters. The migratory patterns of the salmon are furtherdiscussed in relation to the possible cues/clues used by the salmon while navigating 'tq '~heir ..horne water. .

Key words: Atlantic salmon, mi~ration, homin~, naloigation, coastal waters~ data stor.l~e ta~s.

bookeye
Thünen
Page 2: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

> ••

e

2

IntroductionThe sea migration of Atlantic salmon (Sa/mo salar L.) includes long migration routes but atthe s:ime time very precise spa\\TIing migration back to freshwater to spa\\TI in their hornewater. Questions about the coastal waters part of the homirig migration of salmon werc thcmain reasons for that we started in 1993. to use Dara storage tags (OSTs) to sbidy thismigration phase. This pioneeririg work lead to use of these tags on anadromous bro\\TI trout(So/mo lrulta L.) to study their feeding migration and this summer westarted OST taggingexperiment on anadromous artic charr (Sa/velinus a/pinus L.). All together this work hasgiven us lot of new infonnation about the migration of these species in the sea, .but also abouttheir migration iri estUaries and rivers (Sturlaugsson 1995; Sturlaugsson and Thorisson 1996;Studaugsson and Johannsson 1996; Sturlaugsson arid Gudbjomsson 1997; Sturlaugsson andJoha.nnsson 1997; Sturlaugsson et. aI. unpublished). The OSTs ;,\"e have used areinanufactured in Iceland by Star-Oddi Ltd. These tags record series of nieasurements inrelation to time from the environment of the fish. Until i996 these parameters \\'eretemperattire together \\ith pressure giving the depth of the fish. In 1996 a s~l1inity sensor wasadded to these tags, enabling us to get specially interesting information about the reaction ofsalrrionids to this environrnental parameter.

in the migration stUdy on homing of salmon described here, a salinity sensor equipped OSTswere used for the first time on fish. Tbe main aim was to use combined depth-temperature­salinity information to get new vie;,v of homirig migration of salmon in coastal waters inrelation to the environmerital stimuli experienced. In relation to that \...e chose Borgarfjord asthe main release site, because the fjord area is heavily influenced by fresh\\'ater from the largeHvita river system.

l"laterial arid methods

Study area, tagging and releases. '.. . .In August 1996 100 salmon were tagged \\ith OSTs at two salmon oceao ranching stations atSrixfellsnes penirisula at Breidafjord > W-Iceland (Fig.I. and 2). Schools of homing salmonwere caught in captllre facilities in theestuaries when entering their horne water. Tbesalmonwere taggoo with OSTs and fork length and weight nleasured. Tags were fastenedexternally adjacent to the dorsal fin by the Carlin method using stainless steel wire.

Following tagging the saimon were transplanted in the sea away from the tagging site inorder to get the information about the migration back to their horne waters. Most of thesalmon were transferroo by truck (in freshwater) to Borgarfjord and released there at theshore 10. AugUst (GMT: 0:30-1:30), following taggin"g in Hraunstjord (8. August) aridLaros (9. August) (Fig.l., Table 1). Small numher ofsalmon were also,OST tagged 13.August arid released in Kolgrafatjord from boat and few were kept in riet a pen inHraunstjord as control (Fig.2., Table 1).

Tag types and programmingTbe OSTs used were of OST-200 type from Star-Oddi. Half of the tags had no salinitysensors, and the results from those tags were mostly exluded from the data processing thatthis paper is based on. AU fish were also tagged with conventional tags (Floy), In fact someofthem were tripIe tagged, because when available microtagged fish werc used in the taggings_

The OSTs' used had- 2 Kb}te memory. DSTs having pressure (depth), coriductivity (salinity)arid temiJerature sensors \\:ere progrrimmed to measure either at 12 minutes intervals for 22days or during 24 days at two different time intervals, that were 6 minute$ intervals fOf one day(Tl) followed by 30 minutes intervals for 1\\"0 days (T2) , then 6 miriutes intervals again etc.The OSTs not rrieasuring conductivity had measuring intervals ranging from 3-12 minutes.

Page 3: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

3

The OSTs data is prescrvcd in the rricmor)' without battcI')' backup. Thc OSTs arc cylindrial inshape (48x17 mm) wcighed less than 1 gram in water and 12 g in air. Thc tcmperature andpressure range were 0 to 20 oe and 0 to (90-110) m respcctivcly. Thc salinity range were4 to37, (max value) psu (%0). The nominal accuracy for the temperature was +/- 0.2 °C and +/­0.5 m for pressure. In case of salinity the nominal accuracy varies along the scale, being themost accurate in the lower values +/- < 0.5 psu but dO\m to around +/- 1.5 psu at 34 psu.

Calibration of DSTs dataThe measured conductivity (salininity) measurcments wcre calibrated in the uploading programfor the tags, by giving kno\m value at given time, that \'..ere derived from comp:uativemeasurements on salinity before the salmon were re1eased. In case of depth recordings, theywere compared to the recordings received from the tagging and transport phases, when thesalmon were in tanks with knO\m height of water column. In some cases the depth recordingsof salmon while in the cinks were a little bit below the water column of these tanks (0,8-1,4 m).In those caSes the depth recordings were reset so that the values from periods in the tanks fittedto the maximum depth values possible in the tanks (0,8 - 1,4 )m.

Comparative environmental dataHydrographicaJ data were sampled in Hraunsfjord, Kolgrafafjord, and Laros usingcondtictivity, depth, temperature probe (COT) and a light meter was used to measure visiblelight radiation (JlE/m2/s) (Fig. 2.). OSTs were used for sampling continuous series ofhydrographical measurements (salinity, temperarure) troughout the stUdy period at 0,5 m depthin Laros near the fish trap and in Hraunsfjord (Fig. 2.). In addition hydrographical data fromouter areaswere received from the Hydrography department at the Marine Research Institute inIceland and images of satellites sea surface temperature (SST) wcre rcccivcd from the RoyalNetherland l\feterological Institute. Tidal stream data were received from the IcelandieHydrographie Service.

Data handlingIn this paper the OSTs data used is based on recaptures of salmon equipped with depth­salinity-temperature OSTs, although some references are made to the results from the OSTs,,,ithout salinitysensor. In order to compare easily the environmental recordings received bymeans of OSTs to measured comparative environmental data, the OSTs data set wassubsampled dO\m to 30 min intervals, matching the measured environmental data. In the caseof 12 minutes intervals the measuring per 36th (X:36) minute of each hour were set as thevaluc opposite to eomparative data mcasured at the halfhour past a given hour (X:30). .The salinty values recorded by migrating salmon were used to group the rrugration intointervals tci work ,,,ith seperately. For tagged fish released in Borgartjord, the migration wasgrouped the follo\'.ing way:

1) Migration in Borgarfjord was classified as the time period from release to the first salinityrecording of ~ 31 psu (ma.ximum fish depth recordings during that period showed also to be,,,ithin the bottom depth range in Borgartjord). This first ~ 31 psu recording were most oftenfollowed by higher salinity values shortly afterwardS, but there were a few examples wheresalinity values typiCal for Borgartjord were experienced after this ~ 31 psu recording. In thosecases the migration speed to horne water based on this c1assification is undcrestimated.

2) Migration iri the period ranging from the first salinity recordirig of ~ 31 psu to the first lowsalinity recording in the horne cstuaI')' (the actual sea migration). The fixed point of this firstrecording of low salinity value « 30 psu) in the horne estuary were based on values that werefollowed by regular tidal reIated fluctations in saliriity (freshwater 01' vef)' low salinityexpcricnccd cach tide) until rccapturc. Thcrcfore this mcthod have the tendcncy to

Page 4: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

overestimatc (len!:,'then) this pcnod compared to thc actual behaviour if fishes docs not stickcontiniously to the estuary area after first enteririg it.

3) The third arid last phase ofthe migration were defined as the time pcriod froin first enteringthe estuary until captured (Hraunsfjord) or trapped (in Laros). Duc to weil mixed ,vaters inmost of Hraunsfjord this defination of this last period of the sea migration has the tendency tobe shartened in relation to the actu::lI behaviour in that area in cases \,here fishes did notmigrate on regular basis into the head ofthe fjord after first entering the fjord.

The calculation of the migration speed of fish that were "recaptured in Hraurisfjord and Laroswere based on the time between the point "hen the salmon left: the Borgafjord area until eotryto horne estuary. When calcubting migration speed, it was based on the shortest seawaybetween the release site and recapture site. The shortest sea route from Borgarfjord release siteto Laros and Hraunsfjord are 170 and 200 km respectively , but the shortest sea way alorig theshore is very little longer beacause of how unjagged it is and elose to the shortest possibleroute. To compensate for the distance already migrated oUt\,'ard from the release site to thepoint when the salmon left: Borgarfjord accordirig to salinity values, a 20 krri were taken offtheshartest possible route that in fact does more than to cornpensate for the distarice that thefreshwater from Borgarfjord rivers are influencing in the degree worked \,ith here.

The results of the homing migration study.are presented here both .ls main trends that wereobsen:ed and also by giving examples on individual basis ofthe homirig migration patterns.

Resillts and discussion

RecapturesSalmon of sizes ranging bet\veen 52.6 - 93.5 cm in length and 2010 - 8750 g in weight weretagged arid the recaptures had the same size interVal. Tagged salmon ,vere grilse, except 2individuals that \;"ere 2 sea "inter old. The total mean recapture mis 63% involvingapproxiImiiely a totai of 250 thausand of recordirigs. Vast majority of the salmon "'ererecaptured at Laros arid Hraunsfjord, but all together the number recaptured at other placeswere considerably high and the sites involved quite inany (Figs. 1.&3.). Double taggmg did notindicate DST tag loss . Most of the recaptures in Laros and Hraunsfjord were dunng the 3weck interval that the tags ,vere recording.

Migration intl> ri~ers in Borgarfjord 'Follm\ing release some ofthe salmon migrated into the Hvita n,'er system "here some ofthem\;"ere recaptUred by anglers (Fig.3, Table 1). In earlier transplant::ttion studies in Iceland ~...heresalmon at the same life and migration stage have been released into fuH saline sea, salmon fromthe releases have only been recaptured in the salmon ranches ,...here the}' were initially capturedarid tagged (Sturlaugsson 1995: Sturlaugsson andThonssori 1996). The salmon recaptured bythe anglers" had started continuous migration in the nvers after being in the estuary area ofBorgarfjord for 16 - 26 hours. The fish migraiing up into fresh\vater were "idely disiributedin nvers in the area. ". The longest upriver migration reported was 30 km from sea (meanmigraton speed 0,3 krriIklst) and the fastest one migrated 8. km up Rh'er Hvita at the at themean speed ofO,8 kmlhour aceording to time ofrecapture (Fig. 3., Table 1). .

Not:lbiy same of the fish migrating into rivers in Borgarljord following release (continuousfreshwater migration among them started 20-52 hours after release), hut migrated out offreshwater some wecks l:iter. These salmOlI had then stayed in that system at least during the 3wecks that thc tags reeordcd arid thein migrated baek to sca and to their horne waters. Fivesalmon that showed this behaviour were .feeaptured iri late September or Oetober. Timing oftheirrecaptUre indicates that there could hal,'c bccn more fish that beha'.'ed in this way. Two of

Page 5: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

-- ~---~~~~~

5

these fish were reeaptured by fishennen in the lake above Laros estuary in September and 3salmon were recaptured in Hraunsfjord in Oetober two together on the 15th and onc on the29th of Oetober. This special migration refleets the strong nature to migrate to home waterprior to spa\ming, and also indieates that all Lhe fishes captured by anglers could havemigrated baek to home waters after the angling season finished.

Although it is reasonible to conelude that the transplantation [rom horne water to Borgarfjordhave confused these fish so that it resulted in sueh migration pattern, it should be borne in mindthat similar straying behaviour of salmon into rivers other than their horne river (for period upto 4 weeks) have been reported from tagging e::perirrients whefe no transport was involved(Milner 1989). Such behaviour is believed to be influenced by the proximity and relative sizeof salmon river. The River Hvita is the largest salmon river system in leeland.

Recapture in coastal nets and in rivers out of BorgarfjordTwo salmon from the Borgarfjord release were captured in coastal nets, at Lambastadir inBorgartjord and Innri Holmur and they were captured in the nets 0.5 m and < 30 m from theshoreline respectively (Fig. 1.). That indicates elose relationship to the shore. Also one salmon[rom the Borgarfjord release was recaptured in River Leirvogsa. That salmon wasmicrotaggedwas released as smolt in the river next to River Leirvogsa (Kollatjord salmonranching station). This showed that the fish wcre not disoriented, as it is common phenomenonthat salmon from Kollafjord migrate into River Leirvogsa during their, spa\\ning migrations.The recordings fromthat fish showed that it had migrated intci another river (according to ,:erylow temperature)where it stayed for one day (in the cold river ofKollafjord ?) before migratingback into sea, follo\\'ed 'Iatel' on by migration into River Leirvogsa. One of the salmon releasedin mouth of Kolgrafatjord (Fig. 2.) was recaptured in Kollafjord and that one could as the fishrecaptllred in River Leirvogsa have been originated from Kollatjord as reflectcd by microtagged salmon from Kollafjord in the captures in Hraunsfjord every year.

Horizontal distribution of salmon during migration from Borgarfjord to homewater

,Shoreline related migrationThe saltnori migrating to Laros and Hraunsfjord migrated out of Borgafjord 1.3-4.9 days afterrelease. The vertical distribution of OST equipped homing salmon during their sea migrationshows that the temperature recorded during that period is mostly reflecting sea temperaturemeasured in the uppermost meters (Table 3, Figs 5-6a). The hydrographical data (Figs.7-12)can give indication in relation to trus but not the least in relation to at \\'hat depth the thermo­and haloclines are in this sca area.

SST images are valuable to compare to temperature recordings from mignints in order to locatethem approximately (Karlsson et.al. 1996). But their usefuIness is dependent on the size of thearea of interest (Iength of the migration) the e10ud cover in the area of interest at a given timeand of course of the available temperature gradients in a given area and also the migrationspeed ofthe fish.

Figure 13 is SST composite image for the period 6.-22. August. That figure is in a coarsescale but shows the main trends in the temperature gradient out from the west coast of Icelarid,decreasing temperature oceanward and a tongue of cold water that goes into Breidafjord. SSTimages [rom the best satellite circumstances (deal' sky on the 17. August) from this samplingperiod \\'ere processed separatei}' to get as good aresolution of the temperature distribution aspossible for the area out from shore betwecn Borgarfjord and Breidafjord where Laros aridHraunsfjord are located (Fig. 14.). That SST composite sho\ved e1early that there was anarrow zone of high temperature 11,5-12,4 oe laying along the shore north to whereBreidatjord opens out at the tip of Snaefellsnes peninsula. According to the temperaturerecordings the salmon were migrating largcly in this area dosest to shore after they migrated

Page 6: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

6

out of Borgarfjord (Figs. 14,15, 17-20b). Occasional pulses of low salinity werc also noted·when migrating in this high temperature also underlining this shorc1ine rclatcd' "orientation"(Fig. 17).

Ouring . the homeward migration of the OST cquipped sahnon it was common that thetemperature in the suiface layer dccrcased during somcfrom around 12 oe dO\m to aroundIloe and then sometimes shortly afterwards dO\m to around 10 oe. This stepwardtemperatUre pattern in relation to the SST distribution, takirig the the migraton speed of the fishand how shortly afterwards some of them entcrcd Laros, leads to thc conclusion that thisstarted 3.t area where the current-complex area Iying out from the Sn<efellsncs peninsula,reflected by the temperatUre boundarics mdicated byarro\v on Fig. 14.

Estuarine and river migration during the homeward sea migration period .Many ofthe salriion entered estUaries on their way to homewater, most often for abrief period(Figs. 17,18 & 20b). Examples ofrivenne migration during this phase wcre also seen, wherethe fish sbyed in the river up to more than a day, as for exarnplc fish number 166 (Fig. 19).Tbat fish is also a good example of the high versatility of the salmon often recorded, as shO\mby non-acelimating behaviour as the fish mignites straight from high saliriity. into fresh\\'ater.·Salmon record6d estuarine salinity more frcqeUlitly during da)tirrie than dui-ing nighttime:Salmon were found that expericnced estUarine salinity during da}time and wcre diving do\m todepths e10se tothe 40 m bottom depth during night. Such behaviour must stand for closerrclationship to the shore during da)time than during nights. It is likely that the odor sensing is

. playing role in the final homing in coastal \vaters arid use of that sense might expIairi some ofthese esniarines-nvers experienced (Westerberg 1982)

Verticai distribution during homingTbc vertical distribution of salmon migrating frorn Borgarfjord to horne estuaries inHraunsfjord arid Laros showed how stongly the salmon prcferred the uppermost meters whilehoming, with overall of 91% of the rriigration time spent in the uppermost 2 meters (Table 3,Fig. 5.) One fish showed though exceptional swimining behaviour from the others prefemngdeep layers for part ofthe migration (6a, 6b).

Hydrographical data from section measuremerits in August and from Hraunsfjord tagether withdistribution of sea surface temperature (SST) during the homing migration gives ci. pieture ofthe distribution of temperatlJre and/or salinity at given dcpths for companson to dcpthspreferred by the salmon (Fig. 7-14).

\Vhen fish depth was compared to light me~uremcnts and strengih of tides, some iridividualsshowed significant relationship tothe o;,'erall fluctation ofthose parameters, especially to light.But the tides were more influential during the esrilarine migration that followed.

\Vhen the very deepest dives are examined it shows that they are mostly distributed within thedusk hours (Fig. 6a).

l\tany exarnples were obserVed, when salmon experienced large changes in temperature in thesurface layers in sh6rt time (as shO\\TI by temperatUre before rind after di\'cs), that seemed totrigger on diving activities (Fig. 17-18,20a, 2Ia,b). Paralell to the temperature changes therecan be same currents disturbance involved aS in the area out ofSn:efellsnes peninsula.

Tbe most interesting information in context to the \'ertical distribution of the salmon is that thesalmon were highly significantly e10sest to the sea surface duririg noon, although the dcpthdistribution of them at other time of day were not necessary in relation to the position of thesun or the light condition. Tbis informations may iridicate that the salmon is using suncompass, giveri that the sea surface preference at rieon is re1ated to the orientation of thesalmon, becaüse of the homing. It is also interesting to note that due to the position of the sun

Page 7: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

7

at that time, the magnetic field generated by the earth movemcnts are also strongest at that timeand in addition these magnetic potentials have the highest values in thc surface laver.

Migration speedThe mean migration speed of the salinity DST equipped salmon that were recaptured in Larosand Hraunsfjord in August, were respectively 1.8 kmJhour (st.dev.=1.0) and 1.2 kmlhour(st.dev.=O.I). The northward moving surface current in the coastal area W-Ieeland is movingat the speed< 5 cm . S'\ (Malmberg et.al. 1972).

Concluding remarksThis first results from use ofsalinity measuring DST in migration study ofhoming salmonhave given valuable new information about the coastal part oftheir spa\ming migration, not theleast in relation to migration trough non-native estuaries and river while homing.

AcknowlegdmentsThanks are due to director Sigmar Gudbjornsson at the Star Oddi Ltd for his supportthroughout the project. The directors of the Oeean ranehing staions in Laros and HraunsfjordOöinn Sigporsson and Birgir Gudmundsson and thanked for their assistanee. SumarlidiOskarsson get special thanks for his help during the figures processing. We would also like tothank H6dinn Valdimarsson at the Marine Research Institute for providing hydrographie data.This work \vas sponsored by the Research Council of Iee1and.

References

KarIsson, L., Ikonen, E., Westerberg. H and Sturlaugsson J. 1996. Use of Data Storage Tagsto Study the Spa".uing Migration of Baltie Salmon (Salmo salar L.) in The Gulf ofBothnia. -ICES. C.M. 1996/M:9. 16 p.

Milner , N.J. (ed.) (1989). Fish' movement in relation to freshwater flow and quality.Proceedings of the Atlantie Salmon TrustlWessex Water Workshop, held atUniversity of Bristol, 4-6 April 1989. The Atlantic Salmon Trust, Pitlochry, 54 pp.

Sturlaugsson, 1. 1995. l\figration Study of Homing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) inCoastal Waters W-Ieeland - Depth movements and sea temperatures recorded atmigration routes by data storage tags. -ICES. C. M. 1995/M:17. 13 p.

Sturlaugsson, J. og Guöbjörnsson, S. 1996. Tracking of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) andsea trout (Seilmo trutta L.) with Icelandic data storage tags. Institute ofFreshwaterFisheries Res. Rep. VMST-R/96015. 3 p.

Sturlaugsson, J. and Johannsson M. 1996. Migratory pattern ofwild sea trout (Sqlmo t'n:ttaL.) in SE-Iceland reeorded by data storage tags. - ICES. C. M. 1996/M:5., 16 p., ,.'.

Sturlaugsson, J. and J6hannsson, M. 1997. Migration study ofwild sea trout (Salmo trutta .)in SE-Ieeland: Depth movements and water temperatures recorded by duta storagetags in freshwater and marine environment. Proceedings of Fifth European' Conference .on·Wildlife Te1emetry. Strasbourg, France 25 -30 August 1996. 10 p. (In print).

Westerberg, H. 1982. Ultrasonic Tracking of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) - H.Swimming depth and temperature stratification.- Drottingholm report. 60: 102-120

Page 8: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

.'

8

Fig. i~ ~1:ip of West coast of Iceland, shO\\'ing the area that the OST tagged Atlantic salmonmigratcd through. Loc3tions are shown for thc releasc sites, the capture sites arid the rccapture sites.Rh'ers arc also shO\\'n at shores in the region from Hraunsljord arid south\\'3rd. Rh'crs are s)'mbolizedin relation to mean salmon catch per year (1974-1996), Wate I' depth intervals are shö\\n by 40, 100,arid 200 m bottom depth isolines. The mairt coastal currerlt direction is symbolized "1tl1 arro\\'s.

" . . . \

Page 9: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

........ .:":;;'::::;i:;;:::'i\"!i\l;~;~'ElbA~JÖRrr!:i:i:':m:::i':::;::::;';!W"

'-'i:':;:'

Fi~. 2. Map of Hraunsfjord and Kolgrafatjord and the nearest \;cinity. Locations are shown for tllerelease site (19), the capture- arid recapture site (1), hydrogrnphical stations (1-19), light mctcr andnet pcn for control fish. Water depth intervals arc shown by 10 and 20 m bottom depth isolines.

9

'.'

Page 10: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

.... ...

..P.· ..:;':':'.:'

..-... ,,-

..., ... ...... ... :.: :-:;:~! :;::::::::r::::-: :;', .. :: ....: . :.. ' ::.:.::':";:;.. :.

Fig.3. Map of the Hvita river system in Borgarfjord and other rivers that runs into the head ofBorgarfjord.Location are shov.n for the recapture sites ofDST equipped Atlantic salmon from the Borgarljord release 10.August (GMf: 0:30-1:30). The largest river, is the glacier River Hvita, that is also largely springfed (meanyearly river discharge around 75 m)· sec·I

). Other rivers are runoffrivers, some ofthem partiaily springfed. Allthe rivers are salmon rivers except River Gufua. Total mean yearly salmon catch in these rivers (1974-1996) is6035 salmon.

Table 1. Timing ofthe recapture of salmon in rivers in Borgarfjord. Date ofrecapture is given and in caseswhere DSTs v.ith salinity sensor were involved, the timing ofbeginning of continiuous river migration is given.

'. ',-~

10

Page 11: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Table 2. Recapture sites and number and rates of salmon recaptured, in relation to capture (tagging) sites.Number ofcontrol fish in net pen is also given.

Sites ofcapture and release Recapture ratesRecaptured by

Numberof anglers in theDST Total Recaptures at Recaptured in "vita river Recaptured in

Capture- and Release slte tagged recapture tagging site nels in sea') system ather rivers2)

tagging slte '>Control site salmon rate (%) Number (%) Number (%) Number (%) Number (%)

Laros Borgarfjord 49 65 25 51 2 4 5 10

Hraunsfjord Borgartjord 43 58 18 42 7 16 2

Hraunsfjord KoJgrafafjord S 60 2 40 20

Hraunsfjord l'Hraunsfjord 3

Table 3. Overall depth distribution ofDST equipped salmon during their homing migration from theBorgarfjord mouth area to Laros and Hraunsfjord shown as time proportion at given depth intervals. Totalnumber ofsalmon= 17 and the total number ofDSTs recordings = 5817 (121 days).

Time Depth intervals (m)

(%) 0-10 10,1·20 20,1·30 30,1-10 40,1·50 50,1-60 61,1·::: 110

Proportions97,1 1,6 0,6 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,3

oftime

. :'

11

Page 12: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

-- ----- -------------------1

Time (haurs)

2 3 .I 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

15.5

14.5

13.5

12,5:;;~....,

11.5 -...3

10,5 -g.,0>

9.5 C~

8,5...,n

7.5

6.5

C

CeC

CC

•C

CeC

CCC

Number ofrecordings per parameter =519 (tot 1038)Time period: 13. August (0:00) - 23. August (19:00)

• • •• ••• • • • • • • •• • •••••:.::.+:.:+: .. . ... : .. :~ ::::: •.. :.:::::: •.. :.::::::::::+:::::+:::: : :::i: ·:····· ... ·········i···· · ····0· · ·• • : •• 0:. : ••••• :: •• :.. ..:: •••• 10 •• : ••

• •••••••••••• ••• • • •• • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • •• ••••••••• •••••• • ••• : •• : 0 •••........ ... : .:.. .. ::.. .~Q.

DD a ····6 D

acoac oaD

Fig. 4. Overall daily depth distribution of one DST tagged salmon during rh'ermigration in River Hvita and corresponding river temperature . The relationship betweenthe fish depth and the corresponding rivcr temperature was cheked for one fish (Fig. 4.)and shov:ed to be significant «0,00 I and cl = 0,17).

Proportional time (%)

706040302010o

2

3

,.... 4E--- 5 0,7 "10-!0-e..

6 0,60/.~l:l Numberofrecordings = 5817

7 0,4 "10 Time proportion at depth > 10m =2,9 %

8 0,3 "10 Number of salmon =17Time interval: 11. August ( 7:30)

9 0.2 0/0 - 2. September (20:00)

10 0,3°/•.

Fig. 5. Overall depth distribution of salmon in the uppennost 10 meters of the sea, from DSTsrccordings duririg their homing migration from the Borgarfjord mouth area to Laros und Hraunsfjord.Bars represent the proportions oftime spent at I-rn depth intervals (% oftotal dcpth distribution).Total number ofthe DSTs recordings involved are given along with time proportion spcnt below 10meter depth. Thc numbcr of salmon are givcn amI the total time interval involvcd.

Page 13: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Time (hours)0 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

0

0020

00 0 o 0

0 0 00 0o 0 o

o 08 040 - -- .. - _ __ .. _ _ ..•.........

o 0

.......................- - - - .

oo o o

o

80 ...•- --.-- .. - """"" - _ _.. _ _. .. __ _ _ _ ..o

0000000 00 0

100 ..••. - -- ..• - -.- .--.------ _ __ •......... _ ._ .. __ __ .

o 0

DuskoonDusk120 .L---_---'__....... .....L.._-'- '--_......--'

Fig. 6a. Overall daily depth distribution 01' 17 out 01' 18 salmon equipped with DSTs withsalinity sensor that migrated out 01' Borgartjord and to Laros or Hraunstjord during the DSTstotal recording interval. Open bars represent noon and dusk intervals during the recordingperiod. Total number 01' DSTs recordings involved are 5817 (l21 days).

Time (hours)

o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

o .. " •• :; .. ooycl •• " .... lj .. ;,. .. 30

15 0 , .. ""u""":~·5 ...1"o 00 00 00 000 • 0

o. 0 0: 0 00 0 0

20 ~ - --<>-- ••••• ~••••?-••••••••••••• __••.••••. -••••• -<> __ ._~ ••• _. __ •••~ •• •••••• _ ••o

oo

40 -- -- -.. -- __ . __ _ _ ._ __ _,.• --E---= 60

C.eJCl

80

100

120Dusk

o 0

Noon Dusk

Fig. 6b. Overall daily depth distribution 01' one deep swimming salmon equipped \,ithDSTs with salinity sensor that migrated out ofBorgarfjord and to Laros during the DSTstotal recording interval. Open bars represent noon and dusk intervals during the recordingperiod. Total number ofDSTs recordings involved are 1000 (21 days).

Page 14: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

•Sca tcmpcnlturc (Oe) Sea temperature eq

10 tt98

·······

765432o

\ f.....____a'·_.

-=.' - ..---.---. .'.'.....:...'......

'.....................................- ~ _ ..·•·..·······

Stations (L I-L9) and their

distanee oulward from shore :

.. -- ...................... _- ... _--_ .......................LI L2 L3 L~ L5 L6 L7 L8 L9J 22 4J 66 85 110 135 1~6 161km km kill &uu km kill tun km km 1t t t t f t 1

I:

-2 -I

o

20··········

40

60

80

100Fig.8. Sea temperature profiles measured 25.-26, August 1996, using CDTprobe at a hydrographie stations at seetion between latititudes N 65° 30'and N 66° 09' at longitudes 24° 34' to 27° 15' (Latrarost coastal waters =LI, nonh through Inninger sea, to the sill ofthe Iccland - Greenland Ridge= L7-L9). TIle temperature profiles are shown in relation to depth (3-100m)for each station. The positions oftlle stations are givcn as their distanee inkm from nearest shore (Latrabjarg).

Depth(m)

11,510,59,58,57,56,5

O'l:--"'-----l---'----I---'---..I...--'-----l---'---j

Fig.7. Sea temperature profiles measured 27.-28. August 1996, usingcondllctivity, temperature, depth (CD1') probe at a hydrographie stations atscction along latititlldc N 6-1° 20' atlongitlldes 22° 25' to 27° 55'(Fax:.bay -Inninger seal. The temperaturc profiles are shown in relationto depth (3-100 m). TIle positions ofthe stations are given as their distanel

in km from the shore nearest to station LI (Akranes).

20

Stations (F I-F9) and their dislanee

outward from shore:

80 I FI F2 F3 F~ F5 F6 F7 F8 F9

1 14 JIJ 5~ 77 1116 IJ~ 1~6 2J~ 27~

kPl kill L". kill km km km km kill

It t t t f tI

60

-10

100

Deplh(m)

Page 15: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

•Salinity (pSU) Salinity (psu)

.....) .

t f t

._---..'.'.····.'.····•.,•.•................................................····.'..'.'....-.••...............

············.........·...........•..···.

LI L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8

3 22 4J GG 85 11 tl 135 14G

km km Im. Lm km km' km km km

t t t

20

40

30,0 30,5 31,0 31,5 32,0 32,5 33,0 33,5 3~,0 34,5 35,0

o

60 Sl.1tions (Ll-L9), their distanee outward. ···f~~~·~·h~;~·~d·b~·ii~;;;·d~pih·(b~~~~·;II·····

stations symbols):

80·

Depth(m)

35,0

, .

1'8 1'9

234 278

3~,5

Sl.1tions (I' I-Pi). their distancc ou(ward from

shore and bollom depth (bcncath slations symbols):

3~,0

O\---'~"'-"'--'--"'----'--'---'-----''--'''-'''--'---'---i

20

~o

60

1'1 1'2 1'3 F4 1'5 FG 1'7

14 JU 54 77 lUG 13H IHG&.111 &.111 Lm 1.... &.111 ..... km

80

t t t t f t

Depth

(m)

53 32 H3 1'8 2U5 21H 3U5 418 96232 54 83 249 21 tl 2GO 45G G50 507

PI fII m PI PI ßI m Alm In h1 nl m m

100 L------------ --l._il:l~----I

Fig.9. SalinilY profiles lI1easured 27.-28. August 1996, using CDTprobe at a hydrographie stations at seetion along latititudc N 64° 20' atlongitudes 22° 25' to 27° 55" (Faxabay -Irminger seal. The salinityprofiles are shown in relation to depth (3-100 m) for eaeh station. lllepositions orthe stations are givcn as their distanee in km from shore(Akrancs). llle bollom depth atthe stations are shown.

100 -=--:-::-:--:-:----------...L.------SWFig. 10. Salinity profiles measured 25.-26. August '96, using CDT probeat a hydrographie stations at seetion bctween latititudes N 65° 30' andN 66° 09' at longitudes 24° 34' to 27° 15' (Latrarost coastal waters = LInOl1h through Inninger sea, to the sill ofthe Iceland - Greenland Ridge ,;L7-L9). llle salinity profiles are shown in relation to depth (3.100 m)for eaeh station. llle positions of the Sl.1tions are given as their dislanee inkm from share (Latrabjarg). The bOllom depth al the sl.1tions are shown.

Page 16: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

•SCil tcmpcraturc eq Salinity (pSu)

·I·I•,... - •......

I.\.\i•\.\....\

t T tt t t4,6 J,8 1,1 1,0 1,5 2,6 1,1 5,0mmmmmmmm

111 112 113 114 115 116 H7 H8

The hydrographie stations H I-H8 and the

bottom dcpth at cach si te :

. - .I·Ii·I·,ii -.i·Iii•I....................... __ .....•..I

i·L-. L4,5

4,0

Fig. 12. Salinity profiles measured using COT probe at a hydrographicstations in Hraunsfjord, [rom the head of the csluary (H I) and out to themouth area ofthe fjord (H8), 11. August 1996 (time interva) GMT: 14-16).lllc salinity profilcs are shown in relation to dcpth (0,05-4,5 m) for eachstation. llic bottom depth at cach station are shown.

3,5

3,0· ..

2,5

1,5

1,0

0,5

13,0 15,0 17,0 19,0 21,0 23,0 25,0 27,0 29,0 31,0 33,0 35,0

0,0

2,0Dcpth

(m)

14,013,513,0

t f t

12,5

t t t

The hydrographie stations H 1-118 and the

bottom deplh al cach site :

111 112 IIJ 114 H5 116 H7 118

4,6 J,8 1,1 I ,ll 1,5 2,6 1,1 5,ll

m m m m m m m m

/.I..

I.I

/..I.

/

l

I.I.I

i45 <---. .J

, Fig. 11. Sea temperature profiles mcasured using COT probe at ahydrographie stations in Hraunsfjord, from thc head of the estuary (1-11)and outto the mouth area of the fjord (H8), 11. August 1996 (time intervalGl\IT: 14-16). lllC lemperature profiles are shown in relation to depth(0.05-4,5 m) for cach station. llle bottom depth at cach station are shown.

4,0

3,5

1,5

2,5

3,0

1,0

10,0 10,5 11,0 11,5 12,0

0,0 Ir0,5 ~

~

2,0Depth

(m)

Page 17: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

lj

I IV

I .6101220

b...-..................._ ........._""""""~__.........-....;.................~"""'""'-_.....L..~_ .....~~

D Cloud'·

.; Land;

1:oC'

Fi~. 13. Map of mean sea surface temperature (SST) in the area around Iceland in August 1996. The mean SST are composite of60 NOAAAVlIRR satcllite images (6.- 22. August). The temperature scale is shown in relation to given gray-scale stepward gradient and also with fewsea temperature values within different temperature zones (the lower value of the SST intervals of each zone is shown). For comparision aregiven the locations of the Fand L sections of hydrographical stations.

Page 18: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Sea:temperat~re'

intervals:,

10.0:-10:4 °c"10:5,- 10:9 °c,

12:0;- 12.41°C

Fig. 14. Map ofmean sea surface temperature (SST) 17th of August 1996, in the area between release site in Borgarfjord and recapture sitcs in Laros and Hraunsfjord.The mean SSTare composite of4 NOAAAVHRR satellite images (GMT: 8-18). The temperature scale is shown in relation to given gray-scale stcpward gradient.The affOW points towards the area where SST starts to decline rapidly along the last part of the migration route of the sahnon homing towards Laros and Hraunsfjord.'

00

Page 19: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Time (days - G:\tT)

19

12.0;()() 13.0:00 14. O:(JO

15

14

13

...:j11 '":I~

'".,11 :0;:.,~

-.10 n--9

8

Fig. 15. Depth distribution ofhoming saIffion in coastal waters in the area Borgarfjord •Laros and corresponding temperature and salinity. This salmon was the ftrst one to returnback to horne water, of the salmon released in Borgarfjord. The end ofthe salinity proftleshows weIl the regular decrease in salinity sho\\u after the ftsh is trapped, because of seawater entering the trap facilities at high tide. The difference in the strength ofthe tidalwaters ure reflected both in the scale of salinity decrcase und is also reflected a litde indcpth shown as the fish is lowering a litde bit in the watcr column whcn the water columnis rismg in the trap paralell to high tide.

10

~ IS.cc....

20~

.c...~

2S

30

3S

40

11.0:00Time (daYs. GMT)

12. 0;00 13. 0:00 14. 0:00 15. 0:00

16

14

...:j

'":I~,..,

11 :0;:.,tri

-.;n--

10

Fig. 16. Dcpth distribution ofhoming salmon in coastal waters in Borgarljord und thearea out from Borgarljord und corrcsponding temperature und saIinity. The dcpth ofthedives shows that the fish had \eil shallow Borgarfjord 12th ofAugust. The stcpward increasein ma.ximum depth during diving activity that folIows, shows that the ftsh have moved at leastcouple or more of kilometers from shore. The s\\irriming depth pattern, the capture site atInnri Hairnur (at 30 km from release site und< 30 from shoreline) together \\ith thctemperature gradient in the uppest meters indicates that the fish were migrating betweenareas elose to shore and outcr arcas.

Page 20: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

Au~st

13. 0:00

o

30

3S

40

Time (days • G:\IT)u. 0:00 15. O;O() 16. O:O()

15

8

7

20

~..cC..."':l

e ..c~

i,e,0:§-;CI]

Fig. 17. Depth 'distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west of Iceland and correspondingtemperature and salinity. The recordings from lhe migration of salmon 169 sho\\n hereshow frequent dives in phase between very high sea surface temperature and colder surfacetemperature aller maximum diving activity.

Time (da)'!. Gl\IT)

Fig. 18. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west ofIccland and correspondingtemperature and salitiity. The recordings from lhe migration of salmon 195 sho\\n hereshow deep dive in lhe phase during steep deCIine in temperature shortly aller having briel1yexperienced sea weil intluenced by freshwater,

14

13

Page 21: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

21

Time (days· GMT).... 0:00 15. 0:00 16. 0:00

t:~~;r:z::sE;S::~3"";:::r;::==::;;-;r~:11;:;:~:;:~====0~==::::::;:;~~>:..:::;:'&;,"X::;:·~,:::::;:.::;.~",;;··:;;;t 15

August13. 0:00

0

5

~ 10..cC..."'=' 15-5ti:

...... 20=...:;~ 25

:5-;tI1 30

35

40

Fig. 19. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west ofIceland and correspondingtemperature and salinity. Tbc recordings from the migration of salmon 166 sho\\n hereshow similar diving pattern followed by decline in surface layers temperature. In addition itshows migration into river without any signiticant preadaption in estuary prior to thefreshwater migration. Tbe salmon stayed in the river for roughly a day.

Fig.20a. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west ofIceland and correspondingtemperature and salinity. Tbc recordings from the migration of salmon 159 sho\\TI hereshow briefperiod of decline in salinity related to estuary migration and then the same divingpattern as observed among many other fishes migrating lhrough surface layers \\heretemperature is ehanging rapic.11y. (see Fig. 20b. for full seale resolution in relation torecording intervals.)

Page 22: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

22

U. -15. August Time (G~Il)

12:00 1~:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 0:00 2:00 ~:OO 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00

or::=~;~M1~m~~73:t:,::~~~~~:::=~~~:t;::;~ 17

5 16

10 15,-.

S..cC. 15 I~.. ..,";l ....c 20 133'"~ ";l...,

25 12~,-.C:2., .,

Co ..-- 30 1l~0 ("')

:§ --'; 35 10cn

40 9

e 45 8

SO 7

Fig. 20b. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west ofIceland and correspondingtemperatufe and salinity. The recordings from the migration of salmon 159 sho\\u herein the seale of6 min intervals, shows weil the eommon very rapid exeursion series fromthe very uppest meters do\\u to deeper layers. In order of rapid mcasurements exeursion asthe deepest dive represent can be deteeted (not on Fig. 20a· the 30 min subsampie). TheS\\imming pattern sho\\u here are also typical in relation to the maximum depth of suchdivcs that are ollen quite similar to the depths ofthe thermocline or go little bclow it, as inthe fIrst and last dive on this figure.

17. -18. Augmt Time (GMl)12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 17:00'

or;~Il~~~M~~~~~W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~15

20,-.:2.,,eo 25:§';cn 30

Fig.20c. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon (no 159) and corresponding temperature andsalinity during the last day before rceaptured in home water in Hraunsfjord.

Page 23: IIGRATORYPATTERN OFHOMING ATLANTIC (Salmo salar IN

23

13

12

11

10 --l..3

"':l9 ...,

:0

8 C-a

7'Cl,!J

6

5

4

3

Sl'pll'mbl'r

1

Time (days)18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

August10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

°1-.......~~.....r-..."-"'l~"'l"ii~ __"I"9If7-......"..;;:;o9;~.-;l1rw

10

l20

..c 30C.0:.

"':l 40..c~ SO

';' 60'"-5'C 70:5'; 80tIl

90

100

110

Fig.21a. Depth distribution ofhoming salmon in waters west ofIceland and correspondingtemperature and salinity. These recordings are the only one from two sea \\inter old salmonin this migration study and represent quite different pattern compared to the grilse in relationto the sea area migrated trough. The extremely cold surface layers that the salmonexperience suggest that he have brietly entered the area where Icelandic waters (Irmingercurrent) and cold northem waters comes together along the sill Iceland - Greenland ridge.This suggestion is based on the sea temperature distribution around Tceland together \\ithkno....n migration speed of salmon and the main current direction and speed west of Iceland.

2

3

10

so

70

August Time (days - GMT)17. 0:00 18. 0:00 19. 0:00 20. 0:00 21. 0:00 22. 0:00

°t~~~]rn]mmtß~mf~~WrJ:~0~3ttSJ~~~~~~Elrll10

80

20

60

90

-.::l....&C:5';tIl

Fi~. 21 b. Depth distribution of salmon 20 I. looking eloser into the coldest temperaturerecordings and the diving activity that followed. Increased temperature in the surface layersindicate landward migration.