iesco 6th resetlement plan - world bank

RP490

IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)

Resetlement Plan

Ref.: DRT06VO1 IES-RP

August 2006

Prepared forIslamabad Electric Supply Company Limited (IESCO)

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Elan Partners (Pvt.) Ltd.Suite 4, 1 st Floor, 20-B Blair Center, G-8 Markaz, IslamabadTel.: +92 (51) 225 3696-97 * Fax: +92 (51)225 3698 * Email: [email protected]

Report disclaimer:Plan Partners has prepared this document in accordance with the instructions ofIslamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) for its sole and specific use. Any other persons,companies, or institutions who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk.

IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Executive Summarv

The Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) is planning to undertake the6th Secondary Transmission and Grid (STG) and Energy Loss Reduction (ELR) project invarious parts of its territory. IESCO is seeking financing from the World Bank (WB) for aportion of-this 5-year project. In line with the prevailing legislation in the country, and WBsafeguard policies, an environmental and social assessment (ESA) of the project hasbeen carried out.

In order to address the resettlement issues identified during the ESA study, aResettlement Plan (RP) has also been developed. This document presents the RP forthe proposed project.

Policy and Legal FrameworkThe RP has been developed in accordance with the WB Operational Policy 4.12(OP 4.12), which specifies the procedure that needs to be followed to address theinvoluntary resettlement the Bank-financed project would cause.

In addition, the WB OP 4.01 requires that environmental and social assessment becarried out before commencing projects such as the 6'h STG and ELR.

The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (PEPA 1997) requires the proponentsof every development project in the country to conduct an environmental' assessmentand submit its report to the relevant environmental protection agency.

Project OverviewThe overall objective of the 65h STG and ELR project is to help increase the efficiency,reliability, and quality of its electricity supply. The project seeks to decrease technical aswell as commercial losses, increase electricity availability, and improve the voltage profilewithin IESCO's electricity network.

The 3-year slice of the 6th STG project - for which IESCO is seeking the WB financing -consists of establishing 6 new grid stations, converting 11, augmenting 3, extending 17existing grid stations, and laying of 509 km transmission lines. The ELR activities duringthe proposed project include works on 30 HT feeders and 575 LT lines.

The ESA addresses the project components that will be undertaken during theYear 2006-07. The STG works for this year include the establishment of 4 new gridstations, in addition to the conversion of 7, extension of 6, and augmentation of 2 existinggrid stations. A total of about 287 km of new transmission line will also be added to theexisting IESCO system. The ELR works for the Year 2006-07 include works on thirty 11-kV HT feeders and 575 LT lines.

'Environment mentioned here includes physical, biological, social and human environment, asdefined in the Act.

e- iii August 2006DRT06V01 ES-RP

Executive Summary IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Stakeholder Consultation

Stakeholder consultations were carried out as part of the ESA study. At the outset,

stakeholder analysis was carried out to identify and characterize the project stakeholders.

The consultations were held with the stakeholders thus identified, which included the

institutional as well as the grassroots stakeholders. The main objectives of the

consultations were to apprise the stakeholders of the proposed project activities and to

obtain their views, concerns, and recommendations so that these could be incorporated

into the project design in order to enhance the environmental and social performance of

the project.

Key socioeconomic Issues

The key socioeconomic issues identified during the ESA study include the following:

* Involuntary resettlement issues

* Damage to crops

* Safety hazards and public health concerns

* Aesthetic value

* Blocked access routes

* Noise and vibration

* Damage to infrastructure

* Gender issues

* Social issues, and

* Impacts on sites of archeological, historical, cultural or religious significance.

The ESA has recommended mitigation measures to minimize if not completely eliminate

the above concerns associated with the project.

Resettement Plan

The ESA recorded the number of project affectees to be more than 200 hence the

present RP has been developed in keeping with OP 4.12. The RP addresses the

involuntary resettlement issues likely to arise during the proposed project. The RP

provides an entitlement framework, implementation procedure, institutional arrangement,

monitoring requirements and grievance redressal mechanism. The key aspects of the

Plan are briefly discussed below.

Golding PrinCIplesThe basic resettlement principles and guidelines include the following:

* The PAPs are defined as those who stand to lose land, houses, structures, trees,

crops, businesses, income, livelihood or access to assets/livelihood as a

consequence of the proposed project activities.

e! iv August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Executive Summay IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* All PAPs are equally eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance,irrespective of land ownership status, to ensure that those affected by the project willbe at least as well off, if not better off than they would have been without the Project.

* Absence of title will not be a bar for PAPs to receive compensation and rehabassistance except for compensation for land.

* The compensation packages will reflect replacement costs for all losses (such aslands, crops, trees, structures, businesses, income, etc.).

* PAPs will be systematically informed and consulted about the project, and RP will bedisclosed and made available to the affected persons and communities.

Entitlement Framewerk

The entitlement framework defines the entitled persons and entitlement policy for theproposed project. The framework takes into account loss of agricultural land; loss ofresidential, commercial or institutional land; loss of residential, commercial or institutionalstructure; loss of standing crops or trees; and loss of public infrastructure.

For the legal title holders, customary or usufruct rights holders, cash compensation ofaffected land would be paid on the basis of market value of the acquired land, inaccordance with the LAA (1894). The tenants and sharecroppers will be compensatedfor the un-expired duration of the lease. The vulnerable encroachers or squatters will becompensated for affected structure at the replacement cost.

The owners of the affected structure, with or without legal title, will be entitled to cashcompensation at the replacement value (salvage value of the structure will not beconsidered).

The affected cultivators will be entitled to cash compensation for the damaged cropscalculated on the basis of market prices. The owners of the affected trees, with orwithout land title, will be paid cash compensation, on the basis of market value of thetrees according to the type, age, size and productivity of trees

In case of the loss of any common resources or facilities, the project will replace orrestore the affected facility or resource, in consultation with the affected community.

The project will pay cash compensation to the relevant agency based upon thereplacement value of the affected infrastructure. Alternatively, the project will replace orrestore the damaged infrastructure in the pre-project condition or better, in consultationwith the concerned agency.

The project will pay cash compensation for the replacement cost of the religious sites,such as mosques. Alternatively, the project will construct the religious site, inconsultation with the affected community. Project will also pay cash for the relocation ofgraves.

v August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP

Executive Summary IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Institutenal and Implementation Arrangements

At the corporate level, IESCO will establish an Environmental and Social Cell, in order tomanage the environmental as well as social issues being faced by the Company duringits entire operation.

The Environmental and Social Inspectors will be appointed at the proposed project sites,in order to ensure effective implementation of the RP and EMP, as well as complying withCompany's other social/environmental obligations. A Tesildar (Land Officer) and aPatwari (Land Revenue Clerk) will also be appointed at the project sites, for implementingthe land/assets compensation.

A communication and documentation system will be established at the project sites. TheGrievance Redressal Mechanism will be the key element of the system.

monitorln Requirements

The key objectives of the RP monitoring system are to ensure implementation of the RPprocedures; and to ensure the effectiveness of the RP in minimizing the project's impactsrelated to involuntary resettlement.

In order to achieve the above objectives, three types of monitoring have been proposedfor the project. These include the Compliance Monitoring, Effects Monitoring andExternal Monitoring. The first two of these will be implemented by the IESCO site staff(ESI and others), while for the third type of monitoring, ie, External Monitoring, anindependent consultant will be engaged by IESCO.

A set of monitoring indicators have also been identified, which will be used during theabove-mentioned monitoring systems.

Resetlement BudJet

The cost of RP implementation is included in the overall environmental andsocioeconomic management budget of the proposed project. The total amount of thisbudget is about Rs. 14.8 million, of which about Rs. 8.6 million is for the cropcompensation.

eN vi August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


AcronymsAEB Area Electricity BoardAJK Azad Jammu and KashmirDC Deputy CommissionerEA Environmental assessmentEDO Executive District OfficerEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentELR Energy loss reductionEMP Environmental Management PlanEPA Environmental Protection AgencyESA Environmental and Social AssessmentESC Environmental and Social CellESI Environmental and Social InspectorESM Environmental and Social MonitorGRM Grievance Redressal MechanismGSC Grid Station Construction (Department)GSO Grid Station Operation (Department)GS Grid StationHSE Health safety and environmentHT High tensionICT Islamabad Capital TerritoryIEE Initial Environmental ExaminationIESCO Islamabad Electric Supply CompanyIUCN International Union for Conservation of NatureKESC Karachi Electric Supply CompanyKV Kilo voltsKWh Kilo watt hourLAA Land Acquisition Act (of 1894)LT Low tensionMVA Mega volt amperesM&E Monitoring and EvaluationNGO Non Governmental OrganizationNTDC National Transmission and Dispatch CompanyOP Operational PolicyO&M Operation and MaintenancePAPs Project affected personsPCB Poly Chlorinated BiphenylPD Project Director

LA vii August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Acronyms IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

PEPA Pakistan Environmental Protection Act

PM Project Manager

RE Resident Engineer

RoW Right of Way

RP Resettlement Plan

SCR Social Complaint Register

STG Secondary transmission and grid

TL Transmission line

ToR Terms of Reference

WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority

WB World Bank

WWF World Wide Fund for Nature

viii August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP


Contents

Executive Summary ........................................ iii

Acronyms ............................................... viI

I Introduction .......................................... 1-

1.1 Project Proponent ............................... 1-11.2 Project Background and Justification .................1-11.3 Project Overview ................................ 1-21.4 ESA Study and Resettlement Plan ................... 1-31.5 Document Structure .............................. 1-6

2 Policy and Legal Framework ............................ 2-12.1 The World Bank Operational Policies ................. 2-12.2 National Laws and Regulations ...................... 2-4

3 Description of the Project ............................................ 3-13.1 Project Objectives ............................... 3-13.2 Project Components .............................. 3-13.3 Project Implementation ........................... 3-33.4 Operation and Maintenance Activities ................. 3-5

4 Stakeholder Consultations .............................. 4-1

4.1 Objectives ..................................... 4-14.2 Participation Framework .......................... 4-14.3 Stakeholder Analysis ............................. 4-14.4 Consultation Process .............................4-34.5 Consultations with Institutional Stakeholders ........... 4-34.6 Grass Root Stakeholders Consultations ............... 4-4

5 Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues ............................ 5-15.1 Project Area Profile .............................. 5-15.2 Socioeconomic Impacts during Design Phase ..........5-25.3 Socioeconomic Impacts and Mitigation during

Construction Phase .............................. 5-35.4 Affected Persons and Assets ....................... 5-6

6 Entitlement Principles and Framework ........................................ 6-16.1 Principles of Resettlement Plan ..................... 6-16.2 Entitlement Framework for Proposed Project ........... 6-2

A N ix August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Contents IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

7 Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........... 7-1

7.1 Organizational Structure, Roles and Responsibilities . 7-1

7.2 RP Implementation Procedure .................... 7-3

7.3 Communication and Documentation ................ 7-4

7.4 Grievance Redressal Mechanism .................. 7-5

7.5 Environmental and Social Trainings ................ 7-7

7.6 Public Disclosure ............................. 7-7

8 Monitoring and Evaluation ................................ 8-1

8.1 Social Monitoring Framework .................... 8-1

8.2 Monitoring Plan .............................. 8-1

8.3 Monitoring Indicators .......................... 8-3

8.4 Monitoring Reports ........................... 8-4

9 Resettlement Budget ............................... 9-1

Appemnix

Appendix A: Details of the Crop Compensation (Details of affectedcultivated land under the transmission lines,estimates of crop compensation and list of affectedland owners)

e! x August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


List of E bts

Exhibit 3.1: Project Components .......................... 3-7

Exhibit 4.1: Participation Framework ........................ 4-7

Exhibit 4.2: Conceptual Framework ................................................. 4-9

Exhibit 4.3: List of Participants during Grass Root Consultations ...... 4-10

Exhibit 4.4: Checklist used for Stakeholder Consultations ........ 4-14

Exhibit 5.1: Summary of Land Required for the Project ....................... 5-7

Exhibit 5.2: Summary of Affected Land and EstimatedCompensation ................................................. 5-7

Exhibit 6.1: Entitlement Framework ........................ 6-4

Exhibit 7.1: Organizational Structure for Environmental andSocial Management ........................... 7-8

Exhibit 7.2: Roles and Responsibilities .............................................. 7-10

Exhibit 7.3: Grievance Redressal Mechanism ................ 7-11

Exhibit 7.4: Environmental and Social Trainings ................................ 7-13

Exhibit 8.1: Social Monitoring Framework ............................................ 8-6

Exhibit 9.1: Environmental and Social Management Budget ............... 9-2

L xi August 2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP


1 Introduction

The Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) is planning to undertake the

6th Secondary Transmission and Grid (STG) and Energy Loss Reduction (ELR) project invarious parts of its territory. IESCO is seeking finances from the World Bank (WB) for a

portion of this 5-year project. In line with the prevailing legislation in the country, and WB

safeguard policies, an environmental and social assessment (ESA) of the project has

been carried out.

In order to address the resettlement issues likely to arise during the proposed project, as

identified during the ESA study, a Resettlement Plan (RP) has been prepared, in

accordance with the WB Operational Policies. This document presents the RP for theproposed project.

1.1 Project Proponent

IESCO is a public utility company, providing electricity to the Islamabad Capital Territory(ICT), northern districts of the Punjab Province (Rawalpindi, Attock, Jhelum and Chakwal)

and southern parts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). IESCO was incorporated in April1998 under the Companies Ordinance 1984. Before this, it was one of the eight Area

Electricity Boards (AEBs) of the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA).

Established in 1958, WAPDA had two wings: Water and Power. The Water Wing was(and still is) responsible for developing and managing large water reservoirs and

barrages, while its Power Wing was a vertically integrated utility, responsible for

generation, transmission and distribution of electricity throughout Pakistan (except for theCity of Karachi, where the Karachi Electric Supply Company - KESC - performed asimilar function).

Under its un-bundling and restructuring program, WAPDA's Power Wing has beenbroken down into eight distribution companies collectively called DISCOs, threegenerating companies collectively called GENCOs and a transmission company calledNational Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC). IESCO is one of the eightDISCOs.

1.2 ProjectDackgroUnd andlustification

Pakistan as a whole is an energy-deficient country and per capita electricity generationhas traditionally been low (581 KWh as against the World average of 2,657 KWh2). Muchlike rest of the country, the areas where IESCO supplies the electricity are experiencingrapid increase in electricity consumption, owing to increasing population, urbanization,industrialization and per capita income.

In order to meet the increasing electricity demand, the existing secondary transmissionand grid system (132 and 66 kV) has to be expanded, in addition to the increasedgeneration and primary transmission (500 kV and 220 kV) capacity. Towards this end,

2 Source: World Bank, Medium Term Development Framework 2005-10.

ei-1 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Introducton IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

IESCO, being responsible for the expansion, operation and maintenance of thesecondary transmission and grid (STG) system within its territory, has developed the 6'hSTG project. The ELR project on the other hand ensures increased system reliability andreduced losses at the HT and LT levels (11 kV and 0.4 kV, respectively).

The project includes establishment of new grid stations, extension / conversion /augmentation of existing grid stations, laying of new transmission line and replacingweaker/undersized transmission lines. The project will ensure supply of electricity in newareas, load reduction on presently overloaded grid stations and transmission lines, andimprovement in the voltage profile as well as the system reliability.

1.3 Project OverviewThe overall objective of the 6th STG and ELR project is to help increase the efficiency,reliability and quality of the electricity supply. The project seeks to decrease the technicalas well as commercial losses, increase the electricity availability, and improve the voltageprofile, within the IESCO's electricity network.

1.3.1 STG Project

The 6'h STG is a 5-year project, from 2005-6 to 2009-10, and has been broken down infive distinct year-wise phases. Each phase of the project consists of establishing newgrid stations, extending/upgrading/augmenting existing grid stations, and layingtransmission lines. IESCO is seeking the WB loan for a three-year slice of the project.The key components of this three-year slice are tabulated below.

Year I Year 2 Year 3 I Year 4 Year 5(2005-06) (2006-07) i (2007-08) (2008-09) (2009-10)

New Grid Stations (GS) 4 2GS Conversion 7 3 1GS Augmentation O 2 1 - 2GS Extension I i: 6 9 2

7 7Transmission Lines (km) 287 82 140 z

1.3.2 ELR Project

The ELR is also a 5-year project, from 2002-03 to 2006-07. The project consists ofrehabilitation of high tension (HT) feeders and low tension (LT) lines, replacement ofundersized and/or old transformers, replacement of sluggish energy meters, andassociated activities. The key components of the project which would be covered underthe WB loan are summarized below.

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5(2002-03) 1 (2003-04) 1 (2004-05) (2005-06) (2006-07)

Rehabilitation of HT Feeders Not included in WB Loan 30Rehabilitation of LT Feeders Not induded in WB Loan 575

IESCO is seeking finances from the WB for the 5th year of the ELR project, ie, 2006-07.

e 1-2 August2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Introduction IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

1A ESA Study and Resetllement Plan

The RP is one of the outcomes of the ESA study, and addresses some of the mostsignificant adverse impacts of the proposed project. In this section, need of the entire

study, its scope and methodology are presented.

1.4.1 Need of the Study

The World Bank Operational Policy 4.01 (OP 4.01) states that 'The Bank requires

environmental assessment (EA) of projects proposed for Bank financing to help ensurethat they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus to improve decisionmaking"3. The OP 4.12 (further discussed in Chapter 2) requires that an RP is

developed if the project affectees are likely to be more than 200.

In addition, the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (PEPA 1997) requires the

proponents of every development project in the country to submit either an Initial

Environmental Examination (IEE) or 'where the project is likely to cause an adverse

environmental effect," an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to the concernedenvironmental protection agency (EPA). The IEE/EIA Regulations 2000 issued under the

PEPA 1997 provide separate lists for the projects requiring IEE and EIA.

1.4.2 Study Objectives

ESA Study

The objectives of the ESA were:

* To assess the existing environmental and socioeconomic conditions of the project

area,

* To identify likely impacts of the proposed project on the natural, human and social

environment of the area, to predict and evaluate these impacts, and determinesignificance of these impacts, in light of the technical and regulatory concerns,

* To propose appropriate mitigation measures that should be incorporated in the

design of the project to minimize if not eliminate the adverse impacts,

* To assess the compliance status of the proposed activities with respect to theenvironmental legislation and WB's Operational Policies,

* To develop an environmental management plan (EMP) to provide an implementationmechanism for the environmental as well as social mitigation measures identified

during the study.

Resettlement Plan

Based upon the outcome of the ESA study, the present RP has been developed as oneof the mitigation measures. The objectives of the RP are:

* To provide an entailment framework for the project affectees - project affectedpersons (PAPs),

* To assess the type and magnitude of resettlement

3 Excerpts from WB OP4.01 - Environmental Assessment. January, 1999.

e1-3 August 2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP


* To identify the PAPs

* To define institutional and implementation arrangements

* To define the monitoring and evaluation requirements,

* To provide the cost estimates for the RP implementation.

1.4.3 Study Scope

The ESA study and the RP cover the components of the proposed 6'h STG andELR project which will be carried out during the year 2006-07. These components of the6th STG and ELR project will be referred to as the proposed project in this document.The ESA study addresses the potential environmental and social impacts that may beencountered during the design, construction and operation phases of the proposedproject, in accordance with the terms of reference (ToR) provided by IESCO for thispurpose. The RP on the other hand primarily focuses on the resettlement issuesidentified by the ESA study, along with the mitigation measures. (The ToR of the RP isincluded in the ESA ToR, which is provided in the ESA report.)

1.4.4 Study Methodology

The key steps that were followed while conducting the ESA, and developing the RP, arebriefly described below.

Scoping

During this phase, key information on the project was collected and reviewed. A 'long list'of the potential environmental as well as social issues likely to arise as a result of theproject was developed.

Analysis of the stakeholders was one of the key elements of the scoping phase of thestudy. During this, identification of the stakeholders was canied out, followed by ananalysis of their interests and influence with respect to the proposed project. Based uponthis analysis, the plan was developed to carry out the stakeholder consultation (describedbelow).

Stakeholder Consultation

Stakeholder consultations were carried out during the ESA study, in order to disseminatethe project information among the key stakeholders, and to address their concerns in theproject implementation, as much as possible. Meetings were held in Islamabad with theinstitutional stakeholders and key environmental and social issues discussed.Consultations with the grass root stakeholders were carried out at the project sites (gridstation locations and transmission line routes).

During these consultations, the stakeholders were provided the key project information,and their apprehensions/comments/suggestions noted. In particular, detailedconsultations were carried out with the grass root stakeholders, including the projectbeneficiaries as well as the people likely to be adversely impacted by the project.

1-4 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


Data CollectionlCompilation

During this phase, data was collected and compiled, in order to develop a baseline of the

project area's physical, biological and human environment. For this purpose, both reviewof secondary sources and field data collection were carried out. Field visits to each of the

new grid station site, existing grid stations (which are to be extended/augmented/upgraded) and transmission line routes, were carried out.

The secondary resources that were consulted included reports of the studies carried out

earlier, published books and data, and relevant websites. With the help of these

resources a generic profile of the entire project area was developed.

In addition to the above, extensive field visits were carried out in order to collect the

primary data specific to the project sites (grid station locations and transmission line

routes). During these field visits, key information on environmental and social

parameters was collected. During the primary data collection, environmental as well as

social hot spots falling at or near the project sites were identified, and most importantly,the project affectees were determined.

During the field investigations, detailed information was collected on the cultivated area

falling under the transmission line routes, since damage to the crops would be the

primary asset loss during the proposed project. Information was also collected on the

owners/tenants of the cultivated land under the transmission line.

Impact Assessment

During the impact assessment, the environmental, socioeconomic, and project

information collected in previous steps was used to determine the potential impacts of the

proposed project. Subsequent to this, the potential impacts were characterized in orderto determine their significance. Mitigation measures were identified where required to

minimize the significant environmental and social impacts. A management frameworkwas also developed in the form of an EMP for the implementation of the mitigationmeasures identified during the study.

In addition to the above, the present Resettlement Plan has also been developed as partof the ESA to mitigate the resettlement and other social issues that are likely to arise as

a result of the proposed project. The social screening checklist, provided in the terms of

reference (ToR), was also used as one of the tools to conduct the social impact

assessment.

The impact assessment has been carried out and the associated mitigation measures

recommended on the basis of the surveyed transmission line routes and other projectlocations. Variations in the impacts and associated mitigation measures are expected ifthe project components are moved outside the surveyed corridor.

RP DevelopmentThe ESA report compilation was carried out towards the end of the study, and followed

the standard structure defined by the relevant guidelines.

The RP has been developed in accordance with the OP 4.12. The primary data collectedduring the earlier phase of the study was used to identify the PAPs and to determine themagnitude of the compensation. The RP provides entitlement framework, compensation

1-5 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP


assessment and disbursement procedure, monitoring requirements and resettlementbudget for the proposed project.

1.4.5 Study Team

The ESA team consisted of environmental and socioeconomic experts havingconsiderable experience in their respective field of expertise. The list of the experts isprovided in Appendix A of the ESA report.

1.5 Document StmctureChapter 2 discusses the World Bank's safeguard policies, as well as the regulatory andlegislative setup in the country, relevant to the social assessment and resettlement.

Chapter 3 provides a simplified and brief description of the project and its components.

The stakeholder consultation has been covered in Chapter 4. The Chapter providesstakeholder analysis carried out during the ESA, and participation framework to beemployed during the project. Also given in the chapter is the outcome of the institutionalas well as grass root stakeholder consultations.

Chapter 5 provides an overview of the socioeconomic conditions of the project area.Also provided in the Chapter are the resettlement issues as well as other socioeconomicimpacts and their respective mitigations.

The entitlement framework for the proposed project is provided in Chapter 6. Theframework defines the entitlement criteria to be followed while assessing thecompensation for different types of involuntary resettlement that could arise as a result ofthe project.

Chapter 7 presents the institutional as well as implementation mechanism for addressingthe involuntary resettlement and other socioeconomic issues associated with the project.The Chapter defines organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of various projectentities. A step-wise procedure is also provided for the RP implementation in the field.Also given in the Chapter is the communication and documentation protocol to befollowed at the project sites. The Grievance Redressal Mechanism is the key element ofthe implementation mechanism.

The monitoring and evaluation requirements are provided in Chapter 8. The Chapterdescribes the monitoring types, their procedure, timing and the associated reportingrequirements.

Finally Chapter 9 presents the resettlement budget for the proposed project. The budgetcovers the entire cost of implementing the RP and EMP of the proposed project.

Appendix A provides details of the cultivated land that would fall under the proposedtransmission lines, the landowner names, the cultivated area to be affected andestimates of the associated compensation.

-N 1-6 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


2 Policy and Legal Framework

This Chapter discusses the policy and legal framework relevant to the social assessmentand resettlement issues of the proposed project.

2.1 The World Bank OPerational Policies

Applicability of the WB Operational Policies (OPs) with respect to the resettlement andother social issues associated with the proposed project is tabulated below.

Operational Policy Applicability

Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) Yes

Cultural Property (OP 4.11) No

Indigenous People (OP 4.10) No

Project in Disputed Area (7.60) Yes

These policies are discussed in the following sections.

2.1.1 Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12)

The WB's experience indicates that involuntary resettlement under development projects,

if unmitigated, often gives rise to severe economic, social, and environmental risks:

production systems are dismantled; people face impoverishment when their productive

assets or income sources are lost; people are relocated to environments where their

productive skills may be less applicable and the competition for resources greater;

community institutions and social networks are weakened; kin groups are dispersed; and

cultural identity, traditional authority, and the potential for mutual help are diminished orlost. This policy includes safeguards to address and mitigate these impoverishment

risks.4

The overall objectives of the Policy are given below.

* Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring

all viable alternative project designs.

* Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be

conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient

investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in

project benefits. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and shouldhave opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement

programs.

* Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and

standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement

4 Excerpts from WB OP 4.12. WB Operational Manual. December 2001.

2-1 August 2006DRT06V01 ES-RP

Policy and Legal Framework IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation,whichever is higher.

The Policy defines the requirement of preparing a resettlement plan or a resettlementpolicy framework, in order to address the involuntary resettlement.

For the proposed project, land will need to be acquired for the establishment of the newgrid stations. During the site/route selection, settlements are generally avoided, howeverat some places acquisition of cultivable land - though temporary - cannot be avoided.

Similarly, crops along the proposed transmission lines may be damaged during theconstruction and operation phases of the proposed project.

In view of the above, the OP 4.12 will be triggered; the present Resettlement Plan hasthus been developed in accordance with this OP.

2.1.2 Cultural Property (OP 4.11)

The World Bank's general policy regarding cultural properties is to assist in theirpreservation, and to seek to avoid their elimination. The specific aspects of the Policyare given below. 5

* The Bank normally declines to finance projects that will significantly damage non-replicable cultural property, and will assist only those projects that are sited ordesigned so as to prevent such damage.

* The Bank will assist in the protection and enhancement of cultural propertiesencountered in Bank-financed projects, rather than leaving that protection to chance.In some cases, the project is best relocated in order that sites and structures can bepreserved, studied, and restored intact in situ. In other cases, structures can berelocated, preserved, studied, and restored on alternate sites. Often, scientific study,selective salvage, and museum preservation before destruction is all that isnecessary. Most such projects should include the training and strengthening ofinstitutions entrusted with safeguarding a nation's cultural patrimony. Such activitiesshould be directly included in the scope of the project, rather than being postponedfor some possible future action, and the costs are to be internalized in computingoverall project costs.

* Deviations from this policy may be justified only where expected project benefits aregreat, and the loss of or damage to cultural property is judged by competentauthorities to be unavoidable, minor, or otherwise acceptable. Specific details of thejustification should be discussed in project documents.

* This policy pertains to any project in which the Bank is involved, irrespective ofwhether the Bank is itself financing the part of the project that may affect culturalproperty.

During the ESA, no site of historical, cultural or archaeological importance was found tobe affected by the project. Hence OP 4.11 is not triggered.

5 Excerpts from the OPN 11.03. WB Operational Manual. September 1986.

e, 2-2 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


However, in case of discovery of any sites or artifacts of historical, cultural, archeologicalor religious significance during the project execution, the work will be stopped at that site.The provisions of this Policy will be followed. Additionally, the provincial and federalarcheological departments will be notified immediately, and their advice sought beforeresumption of the construction activities at such sites.

2.1.3 Indigenous People (OP 4.10)

For purposes of this policy, the term "Indigenous Peoples" is used in a generic sense torefer to a distinct, vulnerable, social and cultural group possessing the followingcharacteristics in varying degrees:6

* self-identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and recognitionof this identity by others;

* collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in theproject area and to the natural resources in these habitats and territories;

* customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate fromthose of the dominant society and culture; and

* an indigenous language, often different from the official language of the country orregion.

The OP defines the process to be followed if the project affects the indigenous people.

During the ESA, no indigenous people - with a social and cultural identity distinct from thedominant society that makes them vulnerable to being disadvantaged in the developmentprocess - were found in the areas where different project components are planned to belocated. Therefore this OP is not triggered.

However if such groups are identified during the project implementation, the proponentswill develop an Indigenous People Development Plan, in compliance with the OP and getit approved by the Bank.

2.1.4 Projects in Disputed Areas (OP 7.60)

Projects in disputed areas may raise a number of delicate problems affecting relationsnot only between the Bank and its member countries, but also between the borrower andone or more neighboring countries. In order not to prejudice the position of either theBank or the countries concerned, any dispute over an area in which a proposed project islocated is dealt with at the earliest possible stage.

The Bank may proceed with a project in a disputed area if the governments concerned

agree that, pending the settlement of the dispute, the project proposed for country Ashould go forward without prejudice to the claims of country B.

Since parts of the proposed project falls in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir, which is adisputed area, the provisions of this Policy will be followed.

6 Excerpts from the OP 4.10. WB Operational Manual. July 2005.7 Excerpts from the OP 7.60. WB Operational Manual. November 1994.

2-3 August 2006DRT06V01 IES-RP


2.2 Nadonal Laws and RegulauonsPakistan's statute books contain a number of laws concerned with the regulation andcontrol of the environmental and social aspects. However, the enactment ofcomprehensive legislation on the environment, in the form of an act of parliament, is arelatively new phenomenon. Most of the existing laws on environmental and socialissues have been enforced over an extended period of time, and are context-specific.The laws relevant to the developmental projects are briefly reviewed below.

2.2.1 Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997

The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (the Act) is the basic legislative toolempowering the govemment to frame regulations for the protection of the environment(the 'environment' has been defined in the Act as: (a) air, water and land; (b) all layers ofthe atmosphere; (c) all organic and inorganic matter and living organisms; (d) theecosystem and ecological relationships; (e) buildings, structures, roads, facilities andworks; (0 all social and economic conditions affecting community life; and (g) the inter-relationships between any of the factors specified in sub-clauses 'a' to 'f). The Act isapplicable to a broad range of issues and extends to socioeconomic aspects, landacquisition, air, water, soil, marine and noise pollution, as well as the handling ofhazardous waste. The discharge or emission of any effluent, waste, air pollutant or noisein an amount, concentration or level in excess of the National Environmental QualityStandards (NEQS) specified by the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (Pak-EPA) has been prohibited under the Act, and penalties have been prescribed for thosecontravening the provisions of the Act. The powers of the federal and provincialEnvironmental Protection Agencies (EPAs), established under the PakistanEnvironmental Protection Ordinance 1983,8 have also been considerably enhancedunder this legislation and they have been given the power to conduct inquiries intopossible breaches of environmental law either of their own accord, or upon theregistration of a complaint.

The requirement for environmental assessment is laid out in Section 12 (1) of the Act.Under this section, no project involving construction activities or any change in thephysical environment can be undertaken unless an initial environmental examination(IEE) or an environmental impact assessment (EIA) is conducted, and approval isreceived from the federal or relevant provincial EPA. Section 12 (6) of the Act states thatthis provision is applicable only to such categories of projects as may be prescribed. Thecategories are defined in the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of IEEand EIA Regulations, 2000 and are discussed in Section 2.2.2 below.

The requirement of conducting an environmental assessment of the proposed projectemanates from this Act.

8 Superseded by the Pakistan environmental Protection Act, 1997.

aA 2-4 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


2.2.2 Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of IEE and EIA Regulations,2000

The Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of IEE and EIA Regulations,

2000 (the 'Regulations'), developed by the Pak-EPA under the powers conferred upon it

by the Act, provide the necessary details on preparation, submission and review of the

initial environmental examination (IEE) and the EIA. Categorization of projects for IEE

and EIA is one of the main components of the Regulations. Projects have been classifiedon the basis of expected degree of adverse environmental impacts. Project types listed

in Schedule I are designated as potentially less damaging to the environment, and those

listed in Schedule II as having potentially serious adverse effects. Schedule I projects

require an IEE to be conducted, provided they are not located in environmentallysensitive areas. For the Schedule II projects, conducting an EIA is necessary.

The proposed project falls under the Schedule II of the Regulations, hence an EIA has to

be conducted for it.

2.2.3 Land Acquisition Act, 1894

The Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894 amended from time to time has been the de-

facto policy governing land acquisition for public purposes in the country. The LAA is the

most commonly used law for acquisition of land and other properties for developmentprojects. It comprises of 55 sections pertaining to area notifications and surveys,

acquisition, compensation and apportionment awards and disputes resolution, penaltiesand exemptions. The key sections of the LAA are briefly described below.

Section 3

According to this Section, land means land along with any superstructure, fixtures, etc.,thereon and benefits accruing there from. For the purposes of Act, land includes

buildings, and also trees and standing crops. Land thus is a sum total of land plusbenefits arising out of land plus all objects/things attached to or permanently fastened to

anything attached to earth.

Section 4

The Section 4 is the first step in the land acquisition process under the LAA. Under thisSection, a preliminary notice is served by the government expressing its desire to "enterupon" broadly identified private lands for surveying and soil-testing for the specified

public purpose/s.

Requirements of publication of the notification under Section 4 are mandatory, and theacquisition proceedings would stand invalid if requisites of this section are not fully

satisfied. Notification of Section 4 is a public pronouncement by appropriate governmentofficer, empowered to publish a notification to that effect in official gazette in order to putthose who are affected or likely to be affected on due notice. It is an introductorymeasure and is tentative in its nature, as there is no finality or result in acquisition.

Purpose of Section 4 is to carry out preliminary investigation/land survey with a view tofind out after necessary survey whether land was adapted for purposes for which it wassought to be acquired. The Section 4 puts owners of land on alert that land is to be

acquired.

el-wa_vu 2-5 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


Section 5

The initial notification under the Section 4 is followed and confirmed by way of a secondnotification under Section 5 of the Act. Under this Section, the marking andmeasurement of the land and assessment of compensation is carried out. The cashcompensation is assessed on the basis of five or three years average registered marketrate, and is paid to the landowners for their lands being acquired.

Under Section 5, the owners of land or affectees or those likely to be affected, may raiseobjections over the intent of land acquisition or survey report to the competent authoritywithin 30 days for the hearing of objections.

Section 6

Once an area in the locality is fixed to be acquired, it is notified by publishing thenotification under Section 6 of the Act. The exact purpose of acquisition of land is alsomentioned in the notification, and the land may be acquired only for the purpose thusspecified. Any proposal for further acquisition in the same locality would have to befollowed up by a fresh notification under Section 4.

Section 8

Affectees are made aware of the exact measurement of their respective lands/structuresand the value of land under acquisition through issuance of notification under Section 8 ofthe Act.

Section 9

The government issues notice under Section 9 stating that the land is intended to bepossessed and claims for compensation for all interests in the land may be made to theofficer concerned and all persons interested/affectees in the land should appear beforehim at a given place and time not being earlier than 15 days after the publication of saidnotice under Section 9.

Sections 10,11 and 12

The Collector under Sections 11 and 12 based on the proceedings under Section 9 and10 publicly declares/announces awards. Generally the award is declared at place whereaffectees can get together and hear the award. Affectees can either accept the award orreject the award, however, in any case the affectees have to sign the award mentioningwhether they accept the award and the compensation offered therein or reject the awardand sign under protest.

Section 17

Under the this section, collector is authorized to acquire land on the basis of the situationdeclared as 'emergency situation' on behalf of the government and can avoid theformalities to be completed and to avoid any delay in proceedings. In such a situation,the collector under section 17(4) can pass an award without looking into or addressingthe objections/complaints of affectees. Proceedings under this section are independentand not subject to any restrictions and conditions.

2-6 August 2006DRT06V01 IES-RP


Possession of Land

When the Collector has made an award under section 11/12, he may take possession of

the land which shall thereupon vest absolutely in the govemment] or acquiring

department free form all encumbrances.

Under this Act, only legal owners and tenants officially registered with the Land Revenue

Department or possessing formal lease agreements are considered 'eligible" for land

compensation.

Land Acquisition under the Proposed Project

WAPDA has been acquiring land for the grid stations under the provisions of this Act.

However, for the proposed project, the grid station sites will be procured directly from the

owners, after paying the mutually agreed price. And in case some parts of the land

required for the proposed project is acquired under this Act, the Urgency/Emergency

Clause (Section 17) will not be used, in the absence of an urgency or emergency.

2.2.4 National Resettlement Policy I Ordinance

The Ministry of Environment, Local Government and Rural Development formulated a

draft policy in 2004 on involuntary resettlement with technical assistance from ADB. The

policy aims to compensate for the loss of income to those who suffer loss of communal

property including common assets, productive assets, structures, other fixed assets,

income and employment, loss of community networks and services, pasture, water rights,

public infrastructure like mosques, shrines, schools and graveyards.

The government has also developed a document entitled "Project Implementation and

Resettlement of the Affected Persons Ordinance, 2002", later referred to as the

"Resettlement Ordinance", for enactment by provincial and local governments, after

incorporating local requirements. The Ordinance, being a new law, shall be

supplementary to the LAA as well as other laws of Pakistan, and wherever applicable

under this policy. However, if necessary, appropriate amendments to the LAA 1894 will

also be proposed to facilitate the application of the Resettlement Ordinance.

There has not been much progress on the enactment of the Resettlement Ordinance;

hence this is not relevant for the proposed project.

2.2.5 Telegraph Act, 1885

This law was enacted to define the authority and responsibility of the Telegraph authority.

The law covers, among other activities, installation and maintenance of telegraph lines

and posts (poles). The Act defines the mechanism to determine and make payment of

compensation associated with the installation of these lines and posts.

Under this Act, the land required for the poles is not acquired (or purchased) from the

owner, nor the title of the land transferred. Compensation is paid to the owner for any

structure, crop or tree that exists on the land; cost of the land is not paid to the owner.

WAPDA has been installing the transmission lines and their towers, and determining the

associated compensation, on the basis of this Act.

e 2-7 August 2006DRTo6VO1 IES-RP


IESCO plans to use this Act while installing the transmission lines during the proposedproject. However, it will be ensured that the PAPs have access to the land under thetowers for productive use. Otherwise, the land under the tower will be acquiredaccording to the LAA discussed above.

2.2.6 Provincial Local Government Ordinances, 2001

These ordinances were issued under the devolution process and define the roles of thedistrict governments. These ordinances also address the land use, conservation ofnatural vegetation, air, water and land pollution, disposal of solid waste and wastewatereffluents, as well as matters relating to public health.

Under the new system of district governments, the Executive District Officer - Revenue(EDO-Revenue) is the Revenue Officer for the district. (In the earlier system, which isstill prevalent in AJK, the District Commissioner (DC) had the additional charge of theRevenue Officer of the district as well.)

2.2.7 Antiquity Act, 1975

The Antiquities Act of 1975 ensures the protection of cultural resources in Pakistan. TheAct is designed to protect 'antiquities' from destruction, theft, negligence, unlawfulexcavation, trade and export. Antiquities have been defined in the Act as ancientproducts of human activity, historical sites, or sites of anthropological or cultural interest,national monuments, etc. The law prohibits new construction in the proximity of aprotected antiquity and empowers the Govemment of Pakistan to prohibit excavation inany area that may contain articles of archeological significance.

Under this Act, the project proponents are obligated to:

* Ensure that no activity is undertaken in the proximity of a protected antiquity, and

* If during the course of the project an archeological discovery is made, it should bereported to the Department of Archeology, Government of Pakistan.

During the ESA, no site of historical, cultural or archaeological importance was found tobe affected by the project. However, in case of discovery of any sites or artifacts ofhistorical, cultural, archeological or religious significance during the project execution, thework will be stopped at that site. The provincial and federal archeological departmentswill be notified immediately, and their advice sought before resumption of the constructionactivities at such sites.

2.2.8 Factories Act, 1934

The clauses relevant to the IESCO's proposed project are those that address the health,safety and welfare of the workers, disposal of solid waste and effluents, and damage toprivate and public property. The Act also provides regulations for handling and disposingtoxic and hazardous substances. The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act of 1997(discussed above), supersedes parts of this Act pertaining to environment andenvironmental degradation.

IESCO and contractors will be liable to follow the provisions of the Act, where relevant.

2-8 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


2.2.9 Employment of Child Act, 1991

Article 11(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan prohibits employment of children below the

age of 14 years in any factory, mines or any other hazardous employment. In

accordance with this Article, the Employment of Child Act (ECA) 1991 disallows the child

labor in the country. The ECA defines a child to mean a person who has not completed

his/her fourteenth years of age. The ECA states that no child shall be employed or

permitted to-work in any of the occupation set forth in the ECA (such as transport sector,

railways, construction, and ports) or in any workshop wherein any of the processes

defined in the Act is carried out. The processes defined in the Act include carpet

weaving, bidi (kind of a cigarette) making, cement manufacturing, textile, construction

and others).

IESCO and its contractors will be bound by the ECA to disallow any child labor at the

project sites or campsites.

e 2-9 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


3 Descripuon of the Prolect

This Chapter provides a simplified and brief description of various components of theproposed project and their salient features, location, and phases.

3.1 Project Obiectives

The overarching objective of the 6'h STG and ELR project is to increase the efficiency,reliability and quality of the electricity supply. The project aims to achieve:

* Strengthening of electricity transmission network to reduce bottlenecks and improvesystem reliability and quality

* Strengthening of electricity distribution network to reduce losses and improvement insupply.

This will be achieved by adding new grid stations, upgrading/augmenting/converting theexisting ones, adding new transmission lines, bifurcating long distribution feeders andreplacing old/undersized conductors as well as transformers.

3.2 Project Components

The 3-year slice of the 6'h STG project - for which IESCO is seeking the WB financing -consists of establishing 6 new grid stations, converting 11, augmenting 3, extending 17existing grid stations, and laying of 509 km transmission lines. The ELR activities duringthe proposed project include works on 30 HT feeders and 575 LT lines.

The present RP addresses the project components which will be undertaken during theYear 2006-07. These components are shown in Exhibit 3.1 and their salient informationtabulated below.

Project Component Features

New Grid Stations (GS)

Gangal GS, Rawalpindi 132 kV grid station;1 x 13 MVA transformer

Adyala Road GS, Rawalpindi 132 kV grid station;2 x 13 MVA transformers

MES GS, Rawalpindi 132 kV grid station;2 x 13,MVA transformers

Sohawa GS 132 kV grid station;(altemate for the MES grid station, in case of 2 x 13 MVA transformersnon-availability of land)

Bahter More GS, Wah 132 kV grid station;2 x 13 MVA transformers

Conversion of Existing Grid Stations (66 kV to 132 kV)

rAN 3-1 August 2006

DRT06VOl IES-RP

Project Description IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Project Component | Features

Dandot GS 132 kV grid station;

2 x 13 MVA transformers

Pinanwal GS 132 kV grid station;

2 x 13 MVA transformers

Ahmadal GS 132 kV grid station;

1 x 13 MVA transformer

Pindi Gheb GS 132 kV grid station;


Conversion of Existing Grid Stations (33 kV to 132 KV)

Plandri GS (AJK) 132 kV grid station;

_ 1 x 13 MVA transformer

Hajira GS (AJK) 132 kV grid station;


Minhasa GS (AJK) 132 kV grid station;


Extension of Existing Grid Stations

Fateh Jang GS 1 x Line Bay

Azad Pattan GS I x Line Bay

Choa Saidan Shah GS 1 x Line Bay

Murree GS 1 x Line Bay

Trar Khal GS (AJK) 2 x Line Bays

Pir Wadhai GS 1 x Line Bay

Augmentation of Existing Grid Stations

Nilore GS I1 x 26 MVA transformer

Rewat GS 1 x 26 MVA transformer

Transmission Lines9

Feed for Gangal GS Length: 8 km

Feed for MES GS Length: 6 km

Feed for Adyala Road GS Length: 9 km

Feed for Sohawa GS Length: 1 km

Trar Khal GS to Hajira GS (AJK) Length: 25 km

Trar Khal GS to Plandri GS (AJK) Length: 25 km

Azad Pattan GS to Plandri GS (partly in Length: 15 kmAJK)

9 The lengths of the proposed transmission lines are indicative only.

eL 3-2 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Project Descripbon IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Project Component Features

Ftaeh Jang GS to Ahmadal GS to Pindi Length: 65 kmGheb GS

Feed for Bahter More GS Length: 10 km

Choa Saidan Shah GS to Dandot GS Length: 25 km

Dandot GS to Pinanwal GS Length: 25 km

Chak Sawari GS to Kotli GS (AJK) Length: 31 km

Murree to Minhasa Length: 30 km

University GS to Nilore GS Length: 12.5 km

ELR Works

HT Works i Number of feeders: 30

LT Works ! Number of LT lines: 575

Replacement of Energy Meters I Number of Energy Meters: 60,500.

Further details of the above project components are provided in the Chapter 3 of theESA report.

3.3 Project ImplementalibnThis section briefly describes the various activities that will be carried out during theimplementation of the proposed project.

3.3.1 Grid Stations

The sequence of activities which are carried out for the establishment of a new gridstation is provided below.10

* First of all, the location where the new grid station should be established is identified.This is carried out on the basis of load on the existing feeders, load on the nearbyexisting grid stations, lengths of the existing feeders, trend of the load growth andfuture outlook of the area.

* After the broad identification of the required location, availability of land isdetermined. Usually, 3 candidate sites are identfied at this stage.

* In order to make the final selection, a committee of concerned departments (usuallyGSO, GSC and Planning) is constituted. After conducting the site inspection, the siteof the proposed grid station is finalized.

* WAPDA has traditionally been acquiring land through the district/city administration(now district govemment)"1 , following the procedure laid down in the Land Acquisition

10 Because of the on-going re-structuring of WAPDA into the DISCOs and NTDC, some of theexisting procedures and responsibilities do need to be redefined. Some of the functions whichused to be centralized need to be distributed/replicated in the individual DISCOs.

" The District Governments have been introduced in Pakistan, however in AJK and IslamabadCapital Territory, the old system of district management still prevails.

e 3-3 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


Act. However, for the proposed project, IESCO plans to purchase the required landthrough direct price negotiation with the land owner.

* The site is surveyed and its contour plan developed. This activity is carried out bythe GSC department. Soil survey and geo-technical investigations are also carried

out at this stage.

* The contour plan and result of the above investigations are sent to the Design

Department.

* The Design Department prepares the detailed design of the grid station, including thecivil design, construction drawings, general layout plan and equipment details.

* Once the civil design is available, estimates are prepared and approvals obtainedfrom the concerned authority.

* Subsequent to the above, tendering and contract awarding is carried out for the civil

construction.

* Parallel to the civil works, the grid station equipment (transformers, breakers,isolators, control panels, feeder panels and allied equipment) is obtained from thecentral stores.'2

* The equipment is handed over to GSC Department, who installs it once the civil

works are complete.

* Once the installation is complete, the system is tested jointly by the GSO and GSC

departments.

* After the testing, the grid station is commissioned and put into operation.

For the proposed project, some of the grid station works can be implemented throughturn-key contract, where the contractor is responsible for the supply, installation and

commissioning of the entire grid station.

Furthermore, in view of the extent of the works under the proposed project, IESCO may

employ a supervision consultant, in order to ensure quality of the construction, installation

and testing works.

3.3.2 Laying of Transmission Line and Feeders

The sequence of activities which are carried out for the laying of transmission lines and

11 -kV feeders is provided below.

* First of all a reconnaissance site visit is carried out by the GSC Department in orderto determine feasible routes for the transmission line.

* Three candidate routes are marked on the map, and sent to the Design Department.

* The Design Department approves one of the routes.

* The GSC carries out detailed survey (plain tabling as well as profiling) of theapproved route.

12 For all future projects, DISCOs will be responsible for the procurement of all equipment andstore.

e 34 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Project Description iESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* The results of the detailed survey are sent to the Design Department.

* The Design Department prepares the detailed design.

* Material is procured after tendering.

* Tendering for the construction works is carried out and contract awarded.

* Construction activities are started by demarcating the tower locations. Temporaryright of way (RoW) is acquired along the transmission line route to carry out theconstruction activities. Additional construction RoW is acquired for the routes toaccess the transmission line corridor/tower locations.

* Compensation is determined and disbursed (the relevant procedures to be adoptedduring the proposed project are discussed later in the document).

* Excavation for tower foundation is carried out subsequent to the above. Appropriatemachinery is employed for this purpose, such as excavator. In the hilly/rocky areas,blasting is also sometimes needed for excavation. Once excavation is complete,construction of the tower foundation is taken in hand. Towers are erectedsubsequent to this.

* Once towers are erected, stringing is carried out and accessories (insulators, etc.)installed.

* After the completion of installation activities described above, testing is carried out.After that the line is commissioned and put into operation.

3A Operalien and Maintenanes ActiviUesThe operation and maintenance (O&M) activities of grid stations and transmission linesare briefly described below.

* Operation Activities

* The grid stations are manned round the clock and important parameters (such asvoltage, load and power factor) monitored. Daily log sheets are filled, recordingthe key data.

* Any abnormality is recorded and concerned departments informed for takingremedial measures.

* Scheduled Maintenance

* Checking/testing of transformers (further discussed below)

* Testing of breakers

* Testing of protection system

* Transmission line patrolling

*. Washing/replacement of insulators

*. Emergency Maintenance

* Locating the fault

e 3-5 August 2006DRT06Vo0IES-RP


*. Carrying out repairs or replacements, as needed

* Restoring the system to the normal operating conditions.

Maintenance of Transformers

Power transformer repairs: The minor repairs for the power transformers are carriedout at the grid stations, however for the major repairs, the transformers are transported to

the WAPDA's Power Transformer Reclamation Workshop at Kot Lakhpat, Lahore.IESCO, much like the other DISCOs, intends to utilize the same facility in the future aswell.

Distribution transformer repairs: No field repair is allowed for the distribution

transformers. If the transformers are damaged within two years of their delivery, they arereturned to the suppliers. If damaged after this period, the transformers are sent to the

Distribution Transformer Reclamation Workshop at Nowshera. IESCO has also

developed its own workshop at Wah as well, and minor repairs are now carried at this

facility.

Transformer oil testing: The dielectric strength of the transformer oil filled in the powertransformers is tested every year at the gird stations. For this purpose, a simple device

called the oil testing set is used. Oil sample is taken out of the transformer and testperformed. A record is maintained for these yearly tests. No action is taken if the testresults are within the prescribed limits. However, if the dielectric strength of thetransformer oil is found to be less than the allowable limits, the oil is replaced.

After every five years, a more comprehensive test is carried out for the transformer oil.

Three oil samples are taken from each transformer and sent to the WAPDA's HighVoltage and Research Laboratory in Faisalabad. At the Laboratory, the following tests

are carried out:

* Flash point

> Viscosity

o Moisture

* Gas contents

* Dielectric strength.

Currently, no tests are performed to check the presence of poly-chlornated biphenyl(PCB) in the transformer oil, though the transformer specifications include a clause that

the oil should be PCB-free.



Exhibit 3.1: Project Components

(Please see the following page.)

e 3-7 August2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

M2UPRREE -/

O -- :-i.

-PW.C..'A

. P t* ' ;GANGAL l -

NEW-m REWAT

, i I iA .i/1 CHA(

~ 4 ~ SWARI

TO VIANWANA

/Poet 66 STC and ELR'' -i

N' '- *' 'U-Dd S,, , 4K K' f''1

- > - . f-V

mf :s.,' i i -x g -P

,-,~~' ,, ;'; '-'i:;

tps$thiJ'~~~I tt U;,.. i!ll

New Transmission Line Client: IESCO

New Grid Station Source: Data Provided by IESCO

Tit''le:- it- g

Grd Station Conversion Tide:

Augmentation Project Components

ExtensionRef: IESCO-ESA-001I Date: June 2006

IESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

4 Stakebolder Consulaons

This Chapter provides the objectives, process and outcome of the stakeholdersconsultations conducted as part of the present assignment.

4.1 Obhectives

Consultation with the stakeholders is an integral part of the environmental and socialassessment, as well as RP development, for a project such as the 6'h STG and ELR, andaims to provide a two-way communication channel between the stakeholders and theproject proponents. In line with this aim, the objectives of the stakeholder consultationconducted as part of the present assignment were to:

* develop and maintain communication links between the project proponents andstakeholders,

* provide key project information to the stakeholders, and to solicit their views on theproject and its potential or perceived impacts, and

* ensure that views and concerns of the stakeholders are incorporated into the projectdesign and implementation with the objectives of reducing or offsetting negativeimpacts and enhancing benefits of the proposed project.

An attempt has been made during the present assignment to initiate consultations withthe stakeholders, to solicit their views and concerns, and to address these concems whiledeveloping the mitigation plan for the proposed project.

4.2 Parlicipaliln FrameworkThe stakeholder consultation is a continued process, and should be maintainedthroughout the project. The consultations carried out during the ESA and reported in thisChapter are essentially a first step in this process. During the subsequent project phasesas well, participation of the project stakeholders need to be ensured.

Exhibit 4.1 charts out the proposed participation framework during different projectphases, while Exhibit 4.2 provides the conceptual framework employed during thestakeholders consultation carried out as part of the ESA.

4.3 StakehuldlerPAnalsisStakeholder analysis reveals the nature and magnitude of the stakeholders' interests inand influence on a project. The first step for the analysis is to identify the stakeholders,who are essentially not limited to those affected by the project. They also include thosewho can affect or influence the project. They can be winners, losers or indifferent. Thestakeholder analysis aims to distinguish between the actual effects of the project ondifferent stakeholders, and those stake stakeholders' perceptions about the project andits effects.

eLAN 4-1 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

The second step in the stakeholder analysis is to analyze the interests and influence of

the stakeholders, examining their assets and capabilities. The small landowners mayhave high stakes in a development project, but very little influence. As a contrast, theregulatory agencies may have very high influence but low interest in a project.

The third step is to differentiate stakeholders by their attachment to the status quo, orconversely, their desire/willingness to change.

The stakeholders can be best analyzed by comparing their commitment to the status quoagainst the influence they wield. The diagram given below conceptually presents theinterplay of stakeholders' interest and their influence.13

+ Influence

Quadrant A Quadrant B

(eg, Big landowners) (e,g, Media)

-Interest 4 0 +Interest

Quadrant C Quadrant D

(eg, Small shopkeepers) (eg, Share croppers)

- Influence

The stakeholders that have considerable influence and are determined to prevent

changes (Quadrant A in the above diagram), are the greatest challenges for many

projects. The groups that want change, whether or not they have much influence, are the

possible counterbalances (Quadrants B and D in the diagram). The project needs to findways to increase the influence of groups that favor change but lack influence and to

mediate between the influential groups that favor change and groups that oppose it.

13 Source: Social Analysis Sourcebook: Incorporating Social Dimensions into Bank-SupportedProjects. The World Bank. December 2003.

LAN 4-2 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

During the present assignment, the stakeholder analysis was carried out to identifyrelevant stakeholders on the basis of their ability to influence the project or theirvulnerability to be negatively impacted from it. This approach ensured that no relevantgroups are excluded from the consultation, and appropriate engagement strategies aredeveloped for each stakeholder.

Key stakeholders consulted at various levels include:

* People directly affected by the Project (ie, project affected persons or PAPs) (mostlyhaving high negative interest and low influence).

* Project beneficiaries (mostly having high positive interest and low influence).

* IESCO officials (mostly having high positive interest and high influence)

* District governments (revenue and other departments) (mostly having low/mediuminterest and high influence)

* Environment Protection Agency (mostly having medium interest and high influence)

* The broader interested community (mostly having low interest and low influence)

* The NGOs, international organizations and other interest groups (mostly havingmedium interest and medium to high influence).

4A Consultatison ProcessConsultations with the project stakeholders were carried out while conducting the ESA. Aparticipatory and consultative approach was employed for information gathering and datacollection.

Meetings were held with a range of key informants as well as government and civilsociety stakeholders at different levels. The focus group discussions with smaller groupsof grassroots stakeholders were held, whereas one-to-one meetings were held with theinstitutional stakeholders. These discussions were held with project affected people,project beneficiaries and other local communities in Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Attock,Jhelum, Chakwal, Punch and Mirpur districts. This process of public consultation wasconceived to interact meaningfully with affected communities and other stakeholders.The consultations also helped better understand local knowledge with respect to thevarious sets of issues and concerns, and integrate these into the project design andEMP.

4.5 Consultauons wth Institutional StakeholdersThe institutional stakeholder consultations were held with the representatives of thefollowing organizations:

* Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

* Energy Wing - Planning Commission, Government of Pakistan

* Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI)

* Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF)

e 4-3 August 2006

DRT06VO0 IES-RP


* National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP)

* International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

In addition, a meeting was also held with Dr Yusuf Hyat, who was part of the Persistent

Organic Pollutants (POPs) Project.

Concerns Raised by Institutional Stakeholder

The institutional stakeholders raised several concerns and provided useful

suggestions/recommendations. These are provided below.

* IESCO should fulfill the regulatory requirement of conducting environmental

assessment of all of its projects.

* The project proponent should develop organizational capability for the

implementation of EMP, and to handle environmental as well as social issues during

the project implementation as well as routine operation of the organization.

* The issues related to land acquisition and compensation should be appropriately

addressed during the proposed project.

* Installation of the underground PVC cables should be considered near the grid

stations in the congested urban areas.

* Possible damage to the flora and fauna particularly along the Murree - Minhasa

transmission line route should be addressed during the project.

* The construction related issues - such as waste disposal, soil erosion and hazards

for the nearby communities - should be adequately addressed during the proposed

project.

* The potential environmental issues during the operation and maintenance of the

proposed project - such as soil and water contamination caused by the

leakage/spillage of the PCB-containing transformer oil - should be adequately

mitigated.

* IESCO should have PCB testing arrangements at its grid stations and workshops.

* The PCB-containing transformer oil should be eliminated from the IESCO system.

* The effects of electromagnetic radiation caused by the high power transmission lines

should be appropriately addressed during the proposed project.

* The possible obstruction to the avifauna caused by the transmission lines,

particularly while passing over the rivers should be addressed during the project.

4.6 Grass RBet Stakeholders ConsulltationsThe grass root consultations were carried out at the following project locations:

* Murree - Minhasa transmission line route

* Kotli - Chak Swari transmission line route

* Azad Pattan - Plandri - Trar Khal transmission line route

e___ 4-4 August2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP


* Fateh Jang - Ammadal - Pindi Gheb transmission line route

* Choa Saidan Shah - Dandot - Pinanwal transmission line route

* New grid station sites at Sohawa, Bahter More, Adyala Road and MES.

Exhibit 4.3 presents list of the discussants and the key issues raised during theconsultations. The questionnaire used during the consultations is provided inExhibit 4.4. A summary of these consultations is presented below (details of theconsultations are provided in Appendix D of the ESA report).

Murree - Minhasa Transmission Line RouteDuring the consultations, people complained about low voltage, frequent interruptionsand voltage fluctuations in the area which was causing a lot of hardship as well asdamage to the electric appliances.

Their main concern regarding the proposed project was the possibility of the transmissionline passing through the privately owned land. They informed that the transmission linesand feeders could cause forest fires and safety hazard for people and livestock. Theyexpected IESCO to take all necessary precautions to avoid such problems. They alsoshared their concerns regarding the transmission lines passing through the settlements.

Kotli - Chak Swari Transmission Line RouteDuring the consultations, people complained about low voltage, frequent interruptionsand voltage fluctuations in the area which was causing a lot of hardship as well asfinancial loss to the residents of the area. They generally appreciated the proposedproject, and were supportive of the initiative.

Their main apprehensions regarding the proposed project was the possibility of thetransmission line passing through the privately owned land. They expected IESCO toconsult them before acquiring any land and payment of full compensation. They alsorecommended that the transmission line route should avoid thickly populated areas.

Azad Pattan - Plandri - Trar Khal - Hajira Transmission Line Route

During the consultations, people complained about low voltage, frequent interruptionsand voltage fluctuations in the area. This was causing a lot of hardship as well asfinancial loss to the residents of the area. They generally appreciated the proposedproject, and were supportive of the initiative.

The main apprehension that was shared by the people during the consultations was theover-billing by the electricity department, and they thought this problem might continue,even aggravate, as a result of the project.

Fateh Jang - Ammadal - Pindi Gheb Transmission Line Route

People of the area regularly face low voltage, long load-shedding, frequent interruptionsand voltage fluctuations in the area. This was causing a lot of hardship as well asfinancial loss to the residents of the area. They generally appreciated the proposed gridstation in the area, and were supportive of the initiative.

The apprehensions regarding the proposed project was shared by the respondentincluded the possibility of the transmission line passing through the privately owned land.

e AN 4-5 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


They expected IESCO to consult them before acquiring any land and payment of fullcompensation. They also recommended that the transmission line route should avoid

settlements.

Choa Saidan Shah - Dandot-Pinanwal Transmission Line Route


One of the concerns of the people was the risk of electrocution. They observed that newtransmission line would increase the risk to their lives and property.

The respondent generally expected IESCO to take all necessary precautions to minimizethe electrocution risk. They also recommended that the transmission line should avoidthe settlements.

New Grid Station Sites


Their main concern was the payment of cost of land. They expected that IESCO will pay

market price to the land owner(s). Another of their concems was over-billing by theelectricity department (IESCO), and felt that this problem would escalate as a result ofthe proposed project.

eLAtN 4-6 August 2006DRT06V01 IES-RP

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 4.1: Participation Framework

Project Stage Proposed Tool Stakeholders Consulted Responsibility

Project Design Meetings with institutional stakeholders (carried out Institutional stakeholders; ESA consultant.Phase during the ESA); Grass root stakeholders, including

Meetings with grass root stakeholders (carried out the communities to be affectedduring the ESA) during the project implementation.(See Section 4.3 for a list of key stakeholders.) - ---_-.-

Project I Sharing of the Resettlement Plan with the affected Institutional stakeholders; i(Environmental SocialConstruction communities (and other stakeholders). i Grass root stakeholders, including Inspectors (ESI);Phase the communities to be affected Environmental and Social

during the project implementation. Monitors(ESM)(Roles and responsibilities ofESI and ESM are definedlater in the document).

Grievance Redressal Mechanism and Social Complaint The affected communities. ESI;Register (discussed later in the document). ESM.

Consultations with the communities during Compliance Affected communities. ESI;Monitoring and Effects Monitoring (discussed later in ESM.the document).

Fortnightly meetings at the site. IESCO site staff; ESI;Contractors. ESM.

Consultations with the project affectees / communities Affected communities. External monitoringduring the external monitoring (discussed later in the consultant.document).

Consultations with the project affectees / communities IESCO site staff; WB monitoring mission.during the site visits by the WB monitoring mission. Contractors;

The affected communities.

A 4-7 August 2006DRT06V01iES-RPL

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

....Contd. Exhibit 4.1.

Project Stage Proposed Tool Stakeholders Consulted Responsibility

Project Liaison with the communities around the grid stations; The communities around the grid IESCO O&M staff;

Operation Liaison with the communities along the transmission stations and along the IESCO Environmental and

Phase line routes. transmission line routes. Social Cell (discussed laterin the document).

ESAs and RP Meetings with institutional stakeholders; Institutional stakeholders; ESA Consultant.

development of Meetings with grass root stakeholders. Grass root stakeholders, including

subsequent the communities to be affected

phases of the during the project implementation;

6th STG Project. Affectees of the previous phase of

the project (ie, 6 STG Project,2006-07).

4-8 August 2006DRT06Vo1 IES-RP


Exhibit 4.2: Conceptual Framework

Identification of grassrootslevel and management level

stakeholders

Individual Individual Group consultationconsultation with the consultation with the with the grassrootsmanagement level grassroots level level stakeholders

stakeholders stakeholders

Discussion on the likely impactsof the project

Identification of the mitigation ofI the impacts of the project


Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 4.3: List of Participants during Grass Root Consultations

Location Number of Key Issue DiscussedParticipants

Bhurban (between 9 Inadequacy of the existing power supplyMurree and (villagers, in the area;Minhasa). mostly Forest fires and safety hazards caused

farmers and by transmission line;shopkeepers) Possibility of the transmission line

passing through the settlement;Compensation for the land acquisition.

Osiah (between 6 Frequent power failures and voltageMurree and (residents of the fluctuation;Minhasa) village) Safety hazard caused by the

transmission line and feeders, for thepeople of the area.

Kohala (between 6 Frequent power failures and voltageMurree and (shopkeepers, fluctuation;Minhasa) workers at the tea Possibility of dedicated feeder for the

stalls and farmers) area.No apprehensions on the proposed

_ __ _ project.

Kotli (AJK) 7 Frequent power failures and voltage(residents of the fluctuation;

, town) Over billing;Compensation for land acquisition;Safety precautions to be taken during theproject works.

Barali (between Kotli | 5 Safety hazard caused by the electricityand Chak Swari) I (farmers, workers network for people as well as livestock;

at the shops and Low voltage and frequent power shutdaily wage earners) down;

Loss of agriculture land.

Nar (between Kotli . 6 Low voltage, persistent load sheddingand Chak Swari) (farmers, workers and frequent power shut down;

at the shops and No apprehensions on the proposeddaily wage earners) project.

Islam Garh (between 5 Low voltage, persistent load sheddingKotli and Chak (farmers, workers and frequent power shut down;Swari) at the shops and Safety hazards caused by transmission

daily wage earners) line.

e. 4-10 August 2006DRT06V01 IES-RP

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6t' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

...Continued Exhibit 4.3.


Siah (between Azad 5 Low voltage, persistent load sheddingPattan and Plandri) (villagers, mostly and frequent power shut down;

farmer) Over billing by the Barqiat department;The electricity will become furtherexpensive as a result of the proposed

j |project.

Safety hazards caused by transmissionline.

fPlandri 7 Low voltage, load shedding and frequent

(shopkeepers, power shut down;workers at the tea No apprehensions on the proposedstalls) project.

Papaynar (between 5 Safety hazards caused by thePlandri and Trar transmission line.Khal)

Mandol (between 7 1 Low voltage, persistent load sheddingTrar Khal and Hajira) (villagers mostly and frequent power shut down;

I farmers and daily Appropriate measures should be adoptedwage earners) | to reduce the safety hazards associated

with the transmission lines.

Islam Nagar 1 6 Frequent power shut down, low voltage,(Sohawa) (farmers and unannounced load shedding;

workers at the tea Excessive electricity billing;stalls). Apprehensions of higher electricity billing

after the completion of the proposedl _ project.

Pid (Choa Saidan 7 Low voltage;Shah) (farmers and Occasional power outages and shut

workers at the tea down;stalls). Excessive electricity billing;

Hazard of electrocution caused by thetransmission line.

Dandot 5 Low voltage, power outages.(industrial workers) No apprehensions on the proposed

project.

Khewra 6 Low voltage, voltage fluctuations, load(industrial workers) shedding and power failure;

No apprehensions on the proposedproject.Dedicated feeder for the Khewra SaltMines.

eL 4-11 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


... Continued Exhibit 4.3.

Location Number of Key Issue Discussed

I Participants I

Pind Dadan Khan 5 Low voltage, power shutdown and

(residents of the unscheduled load shedding;

town, including Excessive billing;teachers, Use of underground cables instead ofbusinessmen) over-head transmission line;

Transmission line should follow the road| alignment.

Pinanwal 7 Low voltage, elongated and uninformed

(villagers, mostly load shedding, power shutdown;farmers and daily No apprehensions on the proposedwage earners) project.

Ahmadal 6 Load shedding, low voltage;

(villagers, mostly No apprehensions on the proposedfarmers and daily project.wage earners)

Khaur 7 Frequent load shedding, low voltage,

(villagers, mostly power shutdown and fluctuation;

farmers and daily The transmission line should avoidwage eamers, and cultivated land.

_ industrial workers) !Dhulian 5 Unscheduled and elongated load

. (farmers and daily shedding, low voltage, voltagewage earners, and fluctuation, power shut down;

industrial workers) Apprehensions of higher electricity billingafter the completion of the proposedproject.

Hussainabad, Pindi 7 Frequent power outages;

Gheb (shopkeepers, daily Excessive billing;

wage earners, No apprehensions on the proposed

other residents) project.

Pindi Gheb 5 Frequent load shedding, low voltage,

(residents of the power shutdown and fluctuation;town, including Sparking and risk of electrocution fromteachers, the existing feeder passing over thebusinessmen) buildings;

The transmission line should avoid, passing over the houses and other_ buildings.

Pindi Gheb 5 Low voltage, load shedding, voltage

(Residents of the fluctuation;town) No apprehensions on the proposed

project.

CLAN 4-12 August 2006

DRT06VO0 IES-RP


...Continued Exhibit 4.3.


Pir Wedhai 6 Frequent load shedding, low voltage,(Rawalpindi) (industrial workers, power shutdown;

entrepreneurs) The transmission line route should avoidprivate land.

Westridge 5 Low voltage, load shedding and(Rawalpindi) (Residents, fluctuation;

housewives and Large transmission line towers shouldshopkeepers in the not be installed in the area;residential and The transmission line should not passcommercial area over the houses and other buildings;along the route) Adverse effects of electromagnetic

radiation caused by the transmission line.Noise (audible corona, or chattering)caused by the transmission line;Safety hazards caused by thetransmission line;The underground cable should be usedfor the proposed transmission line(between Pir Wadhai and MES gridstations).

Adyala Road 7 Safety hazards caused by the(Rawalpindi) (Residents, transmission line and feeders;

housewives and The transmission lines and feedersshopkeepers in the should not pass over the buildings;residential and Privacy of households during thecommercial area maintenance by the IESCO staff;along the route) Gird station should be established on

State land, in an unpopulated area.

e 4-13 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP

Stakeholder Consultations IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 4.4: Checklist used for Stakeholder Consultations

1. Overview of basic necessities of livelihood available in the area other than theproposed project (e.g sources of water supply, availability of electricity, sourcesof fuel wood, means of communication, availability of health and educationalfacilities, technical and vocational training centers, sources of information)?

2. Does the proposed project strengthen the social network already existing in thearea or affect it?

3. Who are the people affected by the project with categories of persons andintensity of impacts?

4. Are directly affected stakeholders agreeable to allow the project?5. What are the social benefits of the proposed project like provision of electricity to

majority of the people, if not all, and stability of electricity in the area at large?6. What social issues/ losses will be triggered as a result of the project intervention

(e.g loss of land, loss of livelihood, bifurcation of land, any risks associated withhuman and animal health etc)

7. Any commercial activities affected in the visited area due to this project?8. Apprehensions of the visited communities and their suggestions for the

improvement of the proposed project.

eL 4-14 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


5 Key Socioeconomic and ReseWement Issues

The proposed project's adverse socioeconomic impacts and resettlement aspects havebeen assessed and their mitigation identified in Chapter 9 of the ESA report. The keyissues are summarized in this chapter.

5.1 Project Area Profile

Most of the project area falls in the Potohar Plateau-which spreads over 2.2 millionhectares in the Province of Punjab-lies to the south of the northem mountains, and isflanked in the west by the River Indus and in the east by the River Jhelum. This 1,000-2,000 feet (305-610 m) of upland is a typical arid landscape with denuded and brokenterrain characterized by undulations and irregularities. There are a few outlying spurs ofthe Salt Range in the south and of the Khair Murat and Kala Chitta Ranges in the north.Two seasonal streams, the Haro and Soan Rivers, flow from east to west and, aftercrossing the region in the north and in the middle, respectively, fall into the Indus. TheRiver Kanshi traverses the eastern part of the plateau from north to south and drains intothe River Jhelum. These rivers and other hill torrents have cut deep valleys and are oflittle use for irrigation. Agriculture is thus almost entirely dependent on the 15-20 inches(380-500 mm) of rainfall the area receives, and on the small dams built in the catchmentareas of the streams.

Administratively, the project area falls under four districts of the Punjab Province-Rawalpindi, Chakwal, Jhelum, and Attock; the Islamabad Capital Territory; and Punch,Bagh, Sudhnoti, Kotli and Mirpur - the districts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).

Much like rest of the country, the male members of the family in the project area are thebreadwinners, both in rural and urban areas (excluding big cities like Rawalpindi andIslamabad). Of the total male population, on average 47 % are economically active,while remaining 53 % are inactive. Among them 25 % are under the age of 10, remainingare students, domestic workers, landlords, property owners, retired persons, disabledand unemployed.'4

The bigger part of the rural population belongs to middle class or lower middle class,because of small landholdings and barani (rain-fed) area. The population of the Mirpurand Jhelum districts is relatively better off, because many people from these areas aresettled in European countries, and send remittances to their families in Pakistan/AJK.

Agriculture is the main occupation in the rural areas of Potohar. Two seasonal streams -Haro and Soan - flow from east to the west and after crossing the region in the north andin the middle respectively, fall in the Indus. River Kanshi traverses the eastern part of theplateau from north to south and drains into River Jhelum. These rivers and other hilltorrents have cut deep valleys and are of little use for canal irrigation, a feature found in

'4 Source: District Census Reports, 1999 and 2000.

e__N 1 August 2006

DRT06VOl IES-RP

Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

other parts of the Indus valley. Agriculture is thus almost entirely dependent on rainfall

and on the small dams built in the catchments areas of the streams.

Fields of wheat, barley, jawar, bajra and pulses are found in valley bottoms and on the

terraced slopes along riverbanks. In most of the areas of Potohar Plateau, due to

unreliable rainfall, the crop production is risky and yields fluctuate widely from year to

year. The main crops of the region are wheat, bajra, sugarcane and maize. Through

there is also some fruit and vegetable cultivation. Maize is the staple Kharif crop; potato

cultivation has also made considerable progress. In the hilly districts of the area, the

cultivable area is usually in small patches. In barani parts of the area, because of the

absence of the canal irrigation system, reliance on water from the tube-wells has been

increasing.

5.2 Socioecenomic ImpaCts duning Design Phase

The following aspects should be considered during the design of the proposed project, inorder to improve the social performance of the project.

Impacts Likely Causes for Measures to be Incorporated in ProjectProposed Project . Design

ReseHtlement Poor site selection; * The grid stations to be established

Issues Poor route alignment during the proposed project will belocated in open areas, free of anyexisting structure.

| The transmission line routes included inthe proposed project will be selected

avoiding settlements, buildings, other

structures. And cultivation, as far aspossible, thus minimizing theresettlement issues (Resettlement isdiscussed later in the Chapter).

Safety Poor site selection; * All safety precautions will be taken to

hazards and Poor route alignment; minimize the safety hazards and risk of

public health Inappropriate accidental electrocution. These will

concems equipment selection include double periphery walls at the grid

(such as PCB- stations and appropriate clearancecontaining (between the live wires/connectors andtransformers) the buildings/structures/trees).

* Transmission lines will not be routedthrough the settlements as far aspossible. Appropriate clearance will bemaintained all along the transmissionlines and feeders.

* Appropriate waste disposal systems will

ekAN 5-2 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

T Likely Causes for Measures to be Incorporated in ProjectImpacts Proposed Project Design

be included in the design of the gridstations. These include sewagedisposal, and if required, treatmentsystem (such as septic tank).

* PCB-free transformers will be selectedfor the project. (This aspect is alreadyincluded in the IESCO's transformerspecifications.)

* The transmission line routes will avoidpassing over the buildings.

Aesthetic | Intrusion in the natural * Tree plantation will be carried inside andvalue ,landscape at the periphery of the grid stations,

without compromising the safety aspects(ie, required clearances will bemaintained). For this purpose, provisionwill be made in the site layout of the gridstations.

* Transmission lines and feeders throughthe cities will be constructed after astuteplanning, in order to avoid denseconcentration of electrical lines.

5.3 Sscioeconomic Impacts and Miloaion dauring Constructien PhaseThe key socioeconomic impacts associated with the construction phase of the proposedproject and recommended mitigation measures are provided in the following table.

Impacts Mitigation

Land acquisition * Land for the grid stations will be procured directly from theand damage to landowners on willing seller - willing buyer basis. The price willcrops be mutually agreed, based upon the market price. The

agreement will be documented.

* Compensation will be paid for the crops damaged during theconstruction activities. The compensation will be paid to thecultivator, and absence of the land title will not be a bar toreceiving the compensation.

* It will be ensured that the land under the 1 32-KV transmission linetower remains available and accessible for cultivation.

eLA 53 August 2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP


Impacts Mitigation

* In case the above is not possible, the land under the tower will beacquired in accordance with the LAA procedures (Section 17.4 ofthe LAA will not be used).

* The 11 -KV feeders will be routed along the existing right of waysor roads, avoiding any existing structures. The cultivated fieldswill also be avoided as far as possible. In case, it is not possible,damage to crops will be compensated.

* Operation of project vehicles and construction machinery outsidethe RoW will be avoided. Attempts will be made to use existingtracks/roads to access the transmission line corridor/towerlocations. In case new access routes are necessary, thecultivated land will be avoided as far as possible. Damage tocrops will be compensated.

* Grievance redressal mechanism will be put in place to addressthe community complaints.

Blocked access * In case of the blockage of the existing routes, alternate routes willbe identified and provided in consultation with affectedcommunities.

Noise * Vehicular traffic through the communities will be avoided as far aspossible. Project routes will be authorized by the IESCO.

* Vehicle speeds will be kept low, and horns will not be used whilepassing through or near the communities.

* Vehicles will have exhaust silencers to minimize noisegeneration.

* Nighttime traffic will be avoided near the communities.

* Movement of all project vehicles and personnel will be restrictedto within work areas, to avoid noise disturbance.

* Working hours for construction activities within the communitieswill be limited to between 8 am and 6 pm.

* Liaison with the community will be maintained. Grievanceredressal mechanism will be put in place to address thecommunity complaints, as stated earlier.

Safety hazard * The construction sites will have protective fencing to avoid anyunauthorized entry.

* The project drivers will be trained for defensive driving skills(environmental trainings are described in Chapter 10).

* Vehicular speeds near/within communities will be kept low tominimize safety hazards.

eLAN 5-4 August2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP

Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues IESCO 6t' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Impacts Mitigation

* Construction camp sites will be located at least 500 m away fromthe nearest community. Camp sites will be selected withIESCO's approval. The camps will have periphery fencing toavoid any unauthorized entry.

* Firefighting equipment will be made available at the camps.

* The camp staff will be provided fire fighting training.

* All safety precautions will be taken to transport, handle and storehazardous substances, such as fuel.

* Liaison with the community will be maintained. In particular, thenearby communities will be informed before commencing thetesting commissioning of the system. Protective fencing will beused where appropriate/possible. Awareness raising program willbe implemented to educate the communities regarding thehazards associated with the transmission lines, feeders and otherelectrical systems/equipment. Warning signs will be used at theappropriate locations.

Public Health * The construction camps will have septic tanks and soaking pits ofIssues adequate size.

* Camps will be at least 500 m from any groundwater wells used bythe community.

* The construction camps will have appropriate solid wastedisposal mechanism.

* The construction camps and site offices will have first-aid kits.

* The construction crew will be provided awareness for thetransmissible diseases (such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C).

Damage to * All damaged infrastructure will be restored to original or betterinfrastructure condition.

Gender issues * The routes used by the women will be avoided as far as possible.If unavoidable, alternate routes to be identified for thecommunities, if required, especially along routes frequented bywomen folk, such as route to the local well or water source.

Social Issues * Camp sites for construction will be 500 m away from the nearestcommunity, as recommended earlier.

* Construction crew will avoid in entering villages and settlements.

* Communities will be informed and consulted before commencingworks inside or near the communities.

* Strict code of conduct will be maintained by the construction

e AN 5-5 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Impacts Mitigation

crew. Local norms will be respected.

* Child labor will not be allowed at any of the construction sites orcampsites.

Impacts on Sites * In case of discovery of any sites or artifacts of historical, cultural,of Historical, archeological or religious significance, the work will be stopped atCultural, that site.Archeological orReligious * Relocation of such project components will be carried out ifSignificance feasible.

* The provincial and federal archeological departments will benotified immediately, and their advice will be sought beforeresumption of the construction activities at such sites.

* The existing graveyards will not be damaged. The constructionwork close to the graveyards will be carried out afterinforming/consulting the relevant communities.

5A Affected Persons and Assets

The land affected by the project activities comprises the following:

* Grid station sites

* The transmission line corridor

* Access routes.

Exhibit 5.1 summarizes the land requirement for the project.

The gird station sites will be purchased directly from the owners on willing seller - willingbuyer basis. The price will be mutually agreed, and the agreement will be documented.

During the transmission line laying, any crops falling within the 30-m construction right ofway (RoW) will be damaged. IESCO will pay compensation for this crop damage to the

affected landowners/cultivators. A summary of the crop damage and the estimated

compensation amount is provided in Exhibit 5.2 (details of the landownership andcompensation amounts are provided in Exhibit A of this document).

Crop compensation has been estimated based upon wheat crop for two seasons -assuming that the construction activities will continue for two crop-seasons.

The community properties, physical infrastructure or sites of religious importance (suchas mosques, graves and shrines) will not be affected by the construction activities, asidentified by the ESA study.

e5 5-6 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


Exhibit 5.1: Summary of Land Required for the Project

Description Land Take Mode of Number ofAcquisition / Landowners I

Compensation Affectees

New grid stations 16 acres (4 acres Land to be directly i 3 (IESCO owns the(qty: 4) for each grid purchased from the Adyala Road GS

station) (permanent owners on mutually I site; MES GS siteland take) agreed price. is State-owned)

Temporary right of About 2,145 acres Compensation will 453way (RoW) along (temporary land be paid for thetransmission lines take). damaged crops or(286 km long x 30 m any structure.wide) duringconstruction phase.

Temporary RoW for About 70-80 acres Compensation will Not known at thisaccess routes (to (temporary land be paid for the stage.accessthe take). damaged crops or ltransmission line I any structure.corridor) duringconstruction phase(one route every 5km; 500 m long, 10m wide)

Exhibit 5.2: Summary of Affected Land and Estimated Compensation

Cultivated Area Crop and Tree NumberProject Component Affected by Compensation of

Project Amount Affectees(Acres) (Rs)

1 Feed for Gangal Grid Station 14.38 146,500 8

2 Feed for MES Grid Station 0.00 0 1

3 Feed for Adyala Road Grid 62.13 646,700 76Station

4 Feed Bahter More Grid 11.25 109,000 22Station

5 Feed for Sohawa Grid 4.50 39,600 9Station l

6 Murree - Minhasa 8.00 570,400 10Transmission Line

7 Kotli - Chak Swari 37.00 625,600 52Transmission Line

8 Azad Pattan - Plandri 1.50 73,200 3Transmission Line

e5 7 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

... Contd. Exhibit 5.2.

Cultivated Area Crop and Tree Number

Project Component Affected by Compensation ofProjectCopnn(Ars Amount Affectees

j __ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ (A cres) j (Rs)_ _ _ _ _

9 I Plandri - Trar Khal 50.63 595,500 1 46Transmission Line I

10 Trar Khal - Hajira 19.88 294,900 50Transmission Line

11 Choa Saidan Shah - Dandot 15.88 169,700 4Transmission Line

12 Dandot - Pinanwal 49.38 474,500 25Transmission Line I i

13 Fateh Jang - Ahmadal 165.63 1,657,500 56Transmission Line j i _

14 Ahmadal - Pindi Gheb 143.63 1,443,900 52Transmission Line _

15 University - Nilore 66.13 581,900 40Transmission Line

16 Access routes 16.00 140,800 Noti_ I I _ Known

17 Miscellaneous 0 1,000,000compensations

Total 665.92 8,569,700 453


IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

6 Entement Principles and Framework

This chapter provides the resettlement principles and entitlement framework to beemployed during the proposed project.

6.1 Principles of Resettilement PlanSo far, there is no specific policy on resettlement in Pakistan. The LAA deals with allaspects of land acquisition, and resettlement issues are addressed on project-by-projectbasis under special provisions made by the concerned Government, as mentionedabove. In the absence of a formal policy to assist PAPs (including the non-titledpersons), a project-specific set of reseKtlement principles has been adopted in thisProject.

The basic resettlement principles and guidelines include the following:

* The PAPs are defined as those who stand to lose land, houses, structures, trees,crops, businesses, income, livelihood or access to assets/livelihood as aconsequence of the proposed project activities.

* All PAPs are equally eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance,irrespective of land ownership status, to ensure that those affected by the project willbe at least as well off, if not better off than they would have been without the Project.

* Absence of title will not be a bar for PAPs to receive compensation and rehabassistance except for compensation for land. Compensation for land will require atitle.

* The compensation packages will reflect replacement costs for all losses (such aslands, crops, trees, structures, businesses, income, etc.).

* PAPs will be systematically informed and consulted about the project, and RP will bemade available to the affected persons and communities.

* For land acquired under the LAA (1894), section 17(4) the emergency/urgencyclause, will not be used in the absence of an emergency/urgency situation

* For land purchased, the concept of willing buyer/willing seller at market price andwith consensus of both parties will be used.

* For land located under the towers, compensation will be paid for crops and only if theland becomes inaccessible and out of productive use, it will be purchased.

* All assets/infrastructure and livelihood negatively impacted will be compensated atreplacement cost (salvage value will not be deducted).

* All community and religious sites affected by the project activities will becompensated or rebuilt.

* All public utilities affected/damaged by the project will be compensated.

eLAN 6-1 August 2006DRTo6VOlIES-RP

Entitlement Principles and Framework IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* All trees affected by the project will be compensated and affectees allowed tosalvage the trees.

6.2 Entitlement Framework for Proposed Project

As stated in Section 5.3 above, damage to the crops is expected to be the onlysignificant resettlement issue likely to arise during the proposed project. However, anentitlement framework has been developed to address other possible resettlementissues. The framework is tabulated in Exhibit 6.1 and described below.

6.2.1 Loss of Agricultural Land

For the legal title holders, customary or usufruct rights holders, cash compensation ofaffected land would be paid on the basis of willing seller-willing buyer at the mutuallyagreed market value of the acquired land.

The tenants and sharecroppers will be compensated for the un-expired duration of thelease.

The vulnerable encroachers or squatters will be compensated for affected structure at thereplacement cost.

6.2.2 Loss of Residential, Commercial or Institutional Land

The compensation entitlement in case of loss of residential, commercial or institutionalland will essentially be similar to the one for the loss of agricultural land, described above.The PAPs with legal title holders, customary or usufruct rights will be compensated onthe basis of willing seller-willing buyer at the mutually agreed market value of theacquired land.

The tenants will be compensated for the un-expired duration of the lease.

The vulnerable encroachers or squatters will be compensated for affected structure at thereplacement cost.

6.2.3 Loss of Residential, Commercial or Institutional Structure

The owners of the affected structure, with or without legal title, will be entitled to cashcompensation at the replacement value (salvage value of the structure will not bededucted). In addition, an allowance will also be paid to the owner for the repairs of theremaining structure, if any.

6.2.4 Loss of Common Resources and Facilities

In case of the loss of any common resources or facilities, the project will replace orrestore the affected facility or resource, in consultation with the affected community.

6.2.5 Loss of standing crops

The affected cultivators will be entitled to cash compensation for the damaged cropscalculated on the basis of market prices.

eA"N 6-2 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Entitlement Principles and Framework IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

6.2.6 Loss of Trees

The owners of the affected trees, with or without land title, will be paid cashcompensation, on the basis of market value of the trees according to the type, age, sizeand productivity of trees

6.2.7 Loss of Public Infrastructure

The project will pay cash compensation to the relevant agency based upon thereplacement value of the affected infrastructure. Alternatively, the project will replace orrestore the damaged infrastructure in the pre-project condition or better, in consultationwith the concerned agency.

6.2.8 Loss of or Damage to Religious Sites

The project will pay cash compensation for the replacement cost of the religious sites,such as mosques. Alternatively, the project will construct the religious site, inconsultation with the affected community. Project will also pay cash compensation forthe relocation of graves/shrines.


Entitlement Principles and Framework IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 6.1: Entitlement Framework

Definition of EntitledType of Loss Persons Entitlement Policy Responsibility

Loss of Legal users with valid PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;agriculture title, customary or o Cash compensation Environmentalland'5 usufruct rights. for acquired land at and Social

market value. Inspector (ESI)If LAA is used, an Inpco(E)amount of 15% will be (these areadded to the market defined later inprice, in accordance the document)with the LAA.thdoue)

Tenant, leaseholder and PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;sharecropper o Reimbursement for un- ESI

expired lease..I

PAPs without valid title PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;(vulnerable encroachers I o Cash compensation ESIor squafters) | for affected structures

- at replacement value.

Loss of Legal users with valid PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;

residential, title, customary or o Cash compensation ESIcommercial, usufruct rights. for affected portion ofindustrial or land at replacement

institutional value.

land Tenant, leaseholder and PAPs will be entitled to: i Tehsildar;sharecropper o Reimbursement for un- ESI

expired lease.

PAPs without valid title PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;(vulnerable'6 o Cash compensation ESIencroachers or for affected structuressquatters) at replacement value.

Structures Owners of affected PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;

(residential, structure, with or without o Cash compensation ESIcommercial, legal title, customary or for affected structures,industrial or usufruct rights or portion of the

structure, atinstitutional) replacement value.

o Allowance to cover therepair cost of theremaining structure. |

'5 In case of land acquisition, Section 17 of the LAA will not be used, in the absence of theemergency/urgency.

16 Vulnerable: below poverty line.


Entitlement Principles and Framework IESCO 6r' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

....Contd. Exhibit 6.1.

Definition of Entitled FType of Loss Persons Entitlement Policy Responsibility

Loss of Communities/households o Replacement of the Contractors;common common property Environmentalresources resources/facilities, in and Socialconsultation with the Monitor (ESM);and facilities affectees.

o Access to equivalentresources/facilities.

Loss of Households who PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;standing cultivate the land o Cash compensation ESIcrops equivalent to the

market value ofdamaged crops.

Loss of trees Owners of the affected PAPs will be entitled to: Tehsildar;trees (irrespective of the o Cash compensation ESIland title) equivalent to the

market value of treeson the basis of type,age and productivity.

Loss of public Relevant agencies Compensation in cash at Contractors;infrastructure replacement cost to ESM;

respective agencies, or ESI.

Restoration/repair of thedamaged infrastructure ina similar or better conditionas before.

Loss of or Community and affected Replacement cost for Contractors;damage to households religious sites. Cost of ESM;religious sites removal of graves and all ESI.(eg, related costs for itsmosques, relocation.graveyards,shrines)

Notes:1. Compensation for the affected structure will be calculated on the basis of the

replacement cost at market prices, without taking salvage value into consideration.

2. All compensations will be paid before commencement of the construction activities.

eA"N 6-5 August 2006

DRT06VOl IES-RP


7 Instiulonal and Implementation Arrangements

This chapter defines the institutional and implementation arrangements for theresettlement and other socioeconomic aspects of the proposed project.

7.1 Organizational Structure, Roles and ResPonsibilities

This section describes the organizational structure required for managing the social (as

well as environmental) aspects of the proposed project. Also defined in this section are

the roles and responsibilities of the various role players during the project.

7.1.1 Management Approach

IESCO will establish an Environmental and Social Cell (ESC) within the Organization, in

order to handle the environmental and socioeconomic matters during the proposedproject, other future projects as well as its routine operations.16 The ESC will not be part

of the proposed project organization, and will provide advisory services to the project andother IESCO departments. Initially, the ESC will have one environmental and one

socioeconomic expert of relevant qualification and experience; the strength can be

increased in the future as required.

The role of the ESC and other key entities for the proposed project is described below.

IESCO: The overall responsibility for compliance with the RP rests with the project

proponents (IESCO).

IESCO's Environmental and Social Cell (ESC): The ESC will provide overall

supervision and advisory services during the construction phase of the project. The ESCwill supervise the IESCO's environmental and social monitors (discussed below). TheESC will also advise GSC and other IESCO departments on social (as well as

environmental) matters during the project.

Contractor(s): The contractor(s) will be responsible for the construction activities of the

project. The contractor(s) will be responsible for the implementation of the mitigationmeasures detailed in the RP and Environmental Management Plan (EMP)17, where

relevant. The contractors will also ensure that the project is not put out of compliancewith the Bank policies through their actions. The contractor(s) will also be subject to

certain liabilities under the environmental laws of the country, and under its contract withIESCO.

Other essential features of the institutional arrangement proposed for the project are:

* IESCO will appoint a Tehsildar (Land Officer) and a Patwari (Land Revenue Clerk)for the implementation of the RP in the field. IESCO will also appoint Environmentaland Social Inspectors (ESIs) for overseeing and monitoring the entire implementationof the RP.

16 The cost of ESC will not be included in the proposed project.17 The EMP is provided in the ESA report in its Chapter 10.

e 7-1 August 2006DRT06VO1 iES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6¶h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* In case IESCO appoints Supervision Consultant, the ESIs will be appointed by theConsultant (instead of IESCO).

* The RP as well as environmental/socioeconomic management requirements andspecifications will be included in all contracts IESCO and its contractors/consultantsexecute.

* Each contractor will be required to appoint a dedicated field Environmental andSocial Monitor (ESM) at the project site.

* IESCO, through the ESC, will cooperate with regulatory agencies (such as the Pak-EPA) or other stakeholders who may want to visit the project sites and review theproject activities.

7.1.2 Organizational Structure and Responsibilities

The organizational structure for the construction phase of the project is shown inExhibit 7.1, and its salient features described below.

1. Primary responsibilities:

* The Grid Station Construction (GSC) Department through its Project Director(PD) will be responsible for the project's compliance with the RP, ESA and EMPthroughout the project. The ESC will assist GSC Department and will providepolicy support in all environment and socioeconomic matters.

*. The Supervision Consultant (if IESCO chooses to employ one) through itsResident Engineer (RE) will be responsible for ensuring that the contractorsadhere to the quality requirements and other commitments includingimplementation of the RP, EMP and ESA.

*. The contractors' Chief Executive Officer or Country Manager will assume themain responsibility for all environmental and socioeconomic matters pertaining totheir work.

*. The PD will coordinate with relevant government departments (Pak-EPA) andother stakeholders through the ESI.

2. Field management and quality control:

*. Carrying out construction activities in an environmentally and socially soundmanner during the construction phase will be the responsibility of the sitemanagers of the contractor(s).

* The GSC's site incharge (or RE, if the Supervision Consultant is employed) willbe responsible for the environmental and social soundness of all constructionactivities.

3. On-the-job supervision and monitoring:

* IESCO will appoint a Tehsl/dar at the site, who will have the prime responsibilityfor the RP implementation related to compensation of land and other assets.The Tehsidarwill be assisted by a Patwari, in matters relating to determining landownership, assessing crop damage and determining compensation amounts.

eLAN 7-2 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* The ESI will oversee implementation of the RP in the field. He will coordinate

with the PD, the Tehsidar and the contractor's project management and ESM of

each contractor. ESI will be part of IESCO's site organization if no SupervisionConsultant is employed. Otherwise, the ESI will be part of the SupervisionConsultant's site staff.

* If any external monitoring teams visit the sites during the field activities, the ESI

will be responsible for coordinating their visits.

The responsibilities of various role players are summarized in Exhibit 7.2.

7.2 BP Implementation Procedure

A stepwise procedure is provided below for the implementation of RP during the

proposed project.

* The Tehsildar and Patwari will move to the site at the time of mobilization.

* Immediately after the exact marking of the transmission line route and tower

locations, the Patwari will identify the cultivated area falling under the construction

RoW and, if needed, update the data collected during the ESA (see Section 5.3

above; details provided in Appendix A).

* Patwari will reconfirm the ownership of the cultivated land falling under the RoW. For

this purpose, coordination with the local Patwari of the area may also be needed.

The revenue records (latha) will be consulted if required.

* Patwari will identify the type of crop that will be damaged during the construction

activities. Patwari will also identify the trees that will need to be cut for the

transmission line construction.

* The Tehsildar and Patwari will determine the compensation amount to be paid to

each of the PAPs. For this purpose, coordination with the local district government

officials (such as EDO-Revenue) will also be maintained.

* On the basis of the above, the PAPs list (developed at the ESA stage and attached in

Appendix A of this document) will be revised.

* The PAPs list thus prepared will be shared with the key project staff, and the affected

communities.

* The compensation will be paid before any construction activities commence. A

receipt will be obtained from each PAP for the payment.

* A complete record will be kept for the PAPs receiving the payments including names,

National Identity Card numbers, receipts and PAPs' photographs.

* For any crop damage not included in the PAPs list prepared by the Tehsildar and

Patwari, similar procedure as described above for the compensation estimation will

be employed. Compensation will be paid to such PAPs as soon as the estimates are

available.

e 7-3 August 2006DRT06VO IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* Any damage to infrastructure/public utilities will be assessed by ESI with the helpfrom the contractor's engineers. The ESI will be responsible to coordinate with therelevant agency and/or community. Cash compensation will be paid to the relevantagency for the damaged infrastructure or public utility. Alternatively, the contractorwill repair/restore the damaged infrastructure or public utility, in consultation with theconcerned agency.

* Any damage to community asset will be assessed by ESI with the help from thecontractor's engineers. The ESI will be responsible to coordinate with the relevantcommunity. Cash compensation will be paid to the affected community for thedamaged asset. Alternatively, the contractor will repair/restore the damaged asset,in consultation with the affected community.

* Any damage to the religious sites (such as mosques/shrines) will be assessed by ESIwith the help from the contractor's engineers. The ESI will be responsible tocoordinate with the relevant affected community. Cash compensation will be paid tothe relevant community for the damaged site. Alternatively, the contractor willrepair/restore the damaged religious site, in consultation with the affectedcommunity. If required, cost of relocating the graves will be paid to the affectedcommunity.

* A complete record will be maintained for the above procedure, and made available atthe project sites.

1.3 Communication and DocumentationAn effective mechanism for storing and communicating relevant information during theproject is an essential requirement of an RP. The key features of such a mechanism are:

* Recording and maintenance of all information generated during the monitoring in apredetermined format.

* Communicating the information to a central location.

* Storing raw information in a central database.

* Processing the information to produce periodic reports.

A description of the various components of the communication and documentationsystem is given below.

7.3.1 Data Recording and Maintenance

The forms to be used for recording information during the social monitoring will bedeveloped by the ESI, under the supervision of ESC. These forms will follow a standardformat, which will correspond to the database into which all the information gathered willbe placed. All common fields will have identical formats in the database and on theforms. Check boxes will be used as much as possible for ease in filling out the forms andto facilitate data entry.

All forms will be numbered and a tracking system will be developed for each. Whenevera form is released for use in the field, its number will be recorded. The field staff will be

e &N 7-4 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6?h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

required to account for each form after completion. In this manner, it will be ensured thatall forms are returned to the office.

7.3.2 Meetings

The following social (and environmental) meetings will take place during the project:

* Project initiation meetings (one each for each of the contractors).

* Fortnightly meetings. 18

These are described below.

Project Initiation Meeting

The purpose of the project initiation meetings will be to ensure that the requirementsgiven in the RP and EMP are fully understood, and to ensure full commitment fromconcerned parties for their implementation.

Attendees: The meeting will be attended by all relevant staff, including PD, GSC's siteincharge, contactors' site managers, ESI, ESM, Tehsildar and representative of ESC.

Fortnightly Meeting

A periodic meeting will be held at site during the construction phase. The purpose of themeetings will be to discuss the conduct of the operation, non-compliances noted by theESI or Contractors' ESMs. The remedial measures will also be discussed and agreedduring these meetings.

Attendees: The meeting will be recorded in the form of a report prepared by the ESI.The meetings will be attended by the GSC' site incharge (or RE if IESCO appointsSupervision Consultant), Contractors' site managers, ESI, ESM and Tehsildar.

7.3.3 Reports

The ESI will produce periodic reports based on the information collected. These will

include reports for:

* Project initiation meetings with each contractor,

* Fortnightly meetings,

* Compliance monitoring (Non-compliances),

* Effects monitoring.

At the end of the construction phase, a final report will also be prepared.

7A Grievance Rhlressal MechanismAn attempt has been made during the ESA and while developing the RP, to identify all

potential impacts of the proposed project, to identify all PAPs, to provide mitigationmeasures to address the potential impacts, and to chart out a mechanism to implementthese mitigation measures (including payment of compensation).

18 Frequency of meetings may be adjusted per the situation.

e7-5 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

However during the project implementation, the stakeholders (mostly the communities inthe vicinity of the project sites/transmission line routes) may still have some grievanceswith respect to the project activities, their impacts, compensation and other mitigationmeasures. The key reasons of these grievances are listed below:

* PAPs not enlisted,

* Losses (such as damaged crops) not identified correctly,

* Compensation inadequate or inappropriate,

* Dispute about ownership,

* Delay in disbursement of compensation,

* Improper distribution of compensation in case of joint ownership

* Any other issue arising during the project implementation.

In order to address the above eventualities, the Grievance Redressal Mechanism (GRM)has been devised. The main objective of the GRM will be to provide a mechanism tomediate conflict and cut down on lengthy litigation, which often delays the infrastructureprojects such as the 6th STG. It will also facilitate people who might have objections orconcems about their assistance, a public forum to raise their objections and throughconflict resolution, address these issues adequately. The main functions of the GRM willbe as follows:

* Provide a mechanism to the PAPs on problems arising as a result of projectactivities,

* Record the grievance of the PAPs, categorize and prioritize the grievances that needto be resolved, and

* Report to the aggrieved parties about the developments regarding their grievancesand the decision of the project authorities.

Under the GRM, the ESI will maintain the Social Complaint Register (SCR) at the sites todocument all complaints received from the local communities. The information recordedin the Register will include date of the complaint, particulars of the complainant,description of the grievance, actions to be taken, the person responsible to take theaction, follow up requirements and the target date for the implementation of the mitigationmeasure. The register will also record the actual measures taken to mitigate theseconcerns.

As soon as a complaint is received, the ESI will discuss it with the ESMs, and determinethe remedial action. If required, consultations will also be undertaken with thecontractor's site managers and GSC's PD. Once the remedial action is decided,implementation responsibility as well as schedule will be determined.

The proposed remedial action will be documented in the SCR, with complete details (bywhom and by when). The proposed remedial action will be shared with the complainant.Similarly, the actual action taken will also be documented in the Register and shared withthe complainant. The complainant's views on the remedial action taken will also bedocumented in the Register.


Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

The SCR will be reviewed during the fortnightly meetings at the site during the project,

and the action items discussed. The progress on the remedial actions will also be

reviewed during the meetings.

The Register will also be shared with the PD and ESC, on regular basis, for information

and further action, if any.

In order to address any unresolved grievances at a higher level of the organization, a

Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) will be constituted. The Committee will be

headed by the PD, with ESI and the ESC social expert its other members. Any un-

resolved issue will be sent to the Committee for determining the remedial action.

The GRM's roles, responsibilities, implementation mechanism and timeframe are

explained in Exhibit 7.3.

1.5 Environmental and Social Traininos

Environmental and social trainings will help to ensure that the requirements of the RP,

ESA and EMP are clearly understood and followed by all project personnel throughoutthe project period. The primary responsibility for providing training to all project

personnel will be that of the ESI. The environmental and social training program will be

finalized before the commencement of the project, during the detailed design phase. The

training will be provided to the IESCO staff, the construction contractors, and other staff

engaged for the project. Training will cover all staff levels, ranging from the management

and supervisory to the skilled and unskilled categories. The scope of the training will

cover general environmental awareness and the requirements of the ESA and the EMP,

with special emphasis on sensitizing the project staff to the environmental and social

aspects of the area. Exhibit 7.4 provides types of trainings and target groups. Additionaltrainings may be provided as and when required.

7.6 Public Disclosure

IESCO will disclose the RP to all the stakeholders at the commencement of the proposed

project. A Summary of RP will be prepared specifically for this purpose and translatedinto Urdu language, and provided to the affected communities (and also kept at the

project sites). This will ensure that the local communities are aware of the project's

benefits and provisions available for various types of PAPs, as given in the entitlementframework (Section 6.2). In addition, the Summary RP will be disclosed through the

IESCO's official websites.


Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 7.1: Organizational Structure for Environmental and Social Management

(Please see the following page.)

e 7-8 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP'

Organizational Structure for Environmental and Social Management

Chief Executive

Enironrnental and

l Social Coll

PrJct Drector(Cif Engineer)

MangarConstructo

(SE) L- -- -

|DptManager ||Deputy Manager | eput Mnager | Environmental and

|CvlWrks (XEN) T| | C(XNstuclo Gri CoN? ct | Social Inspector Tehsida

Civlv Transmission Line | rl Statlnrl

Contractor Contractor I Contracto p

IEnvironmen tal and Environmental and Environmental and

Construction Crew I |ScaMoir| Construction Crew | oilMntr||Construction Crew | |Sca oio

Fc IS cal onitr F I Socal onior Scia Moito


Exhibit 7.2: Roles and Responsibilities

Organization Designation Responsibilities

Environmental Environmental and Advise GSC and other IESCO departments on matters relating to environment and social aspects of the project.and Social Cell Social Experts Advise and support ESI for the implementation of RP, ESA and EMP.

Grid Station PD Fulfill IESCO's and GSC's obligations as laid out various project documents.Construction Ensure that the construction is carried out within the agreed timeframe according to satisfactory HSE and technical(GSC) standards.Department

Site Incharge (or RE if Facilitate field management of contractors;Supervision Consultant Report regularly to the Project Manager and PD.is employed)

Environmental and Ensure that the entire project is conducted in an environmentally friendly manner.Social Inspector (ESI) Ensure compliance with all relevant environmental laws.

Facilitate full implementation of RP, EMP and ESA requirements during the project.Assist the PD and Project Manager in fulfilling IESCO's and GSC's environmental responsibilities and keep themupdated on environmental matters relating to the construction.Review environmental reports (ER), and ensure implementation of corrective measures, if any.Coordinate with other stakeholders, including relevant EPAs.Ensure that the project operations comply with EMP, RP.

Tehsildar I Ensure the implementation of the crop compensation in accordance with the RP, with Patwari's assistance.

Contractors Site Manager Manage construction activities, manage construction crew, camp crew and other site personnel, in anenvironmentally responsible manner;Liaise with GSC's Project Manager;Liaise with GSC's Site Incharge.

Environment and Manage the implementation of mitigation measures given in the ESA and EMP;Social Monitoros Manage implementation of entire EMP;(ESM) Report regularly to Site Manager;

Liaise with ESI;Provide environmental training to construction crew.Ensure that the project operations comply with EMP, RP.

AW 7-10 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP,


Exhibit 7.3: Grievance Redressal Mechanism

Stage/Description T Action Action By By When 1 Monitoring Notes

Mobilization at site Placement of Social Complaint ESM At the time ESI 1 The SCR will have separate columns for: i) date of

Register (SCR) at the site office of site I complaint; ii) description of complaint; iii) particularsmobilization. | of complainant; iv) details of action required/decided;

v) person(s) responsible to take action; vi) person(s)1 responsible to monitor the action; vii) details of action

taken (when, by whom, where); viii) comments of thecomplainant after the action taken.

A separate SCR will be placed at each grid stationi included in the proposed project, and any other

i____ ,_I_project site offices.

Complaint raised The complaint is recorded in ESM ESI The relevant columns of the SCR are filled.

by any the SCR.complainant

Identification of A meeting is held between ESI Within 2 ESC The relevant columns of the SCR are filled.

remedial action ESM and ESI, and if required days of thewith PM and Site Incharge. newThe remedial action is complaint.identified.The PD and ESC are informedregarding the grievance andthe remedial action identified.

Implementation of The remedial action is Contractors or 4 weeks ESI The relevant columns of the SCR are filled.

remedial action implemented IESCO, (max.)depending uponthe nature of theremedialmeasure

Feed back to the Information is provided to the ESM Within 1 ESI The relevant columns of the SCR are filled.

complainant complainant regarding the week of theremedial action taken. action taken.

The comments/observations ofthe complainant are obtainedand documented.

AU 7-11 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

...Cont'd. Exhibit7.3.

Stage/Description Action Action By By When Monitoring Notes

Fortnightly site The SCR will be discussed. ESI Fortnightly. PM The discussion will be documented in the minutes ofmeetings meeting.

On monthly basis The summary of SCR will be ESI Monthly. PMsent to PD and ESC. --

Un-resolved The GRC will identify the PD Within one 1 Chief ESI will send the complaint to the GRC after onecomplaint sent to remedial action. I week. Executive j month of receiving the complaint, if remains un-Grievance I I resolved.Redressal I ICommittee (GRC) [ I i

e-LA 7-12 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP'

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 7.4: Environmental and Social Trainings

Contents Participants By Whom Monitored by Duration and Schedule

General environmental and socioeconomic Design team; External consultant ESC Duration: 1-day session.

awareness; Selected IESCO Prior to the start of the project

ESA and RP development process; management staff activities.

Environmental and social sensitivity of the project (To be repeated as needed.)

area;Key findings of the ESA;Mitigation measures;RP;EMP;Social and cultural values of the area (includinggender).

General environmental and socioeconomic All site personnel External consultant ESC Duration: half a day.

awareness; Prior to the start of the field

Environmental and social sensitivity of the project activities.

area; (To be repeated as needed.)

Consultation process and its importance;ESA process;Mitigation measures;Community issues;Awareness of transmissible diseasesSocial and cultural values (including gender).

RP; Tehsildar and Patwari ESI ESC Duration: half a day.

EMP Prior to the start of the fieldactivities.(To be repeated as needed.)

EMP; Construction crew External consultant ESI Duration: One day

RP; Prior to the start of the

Waste disposal construction activities, to berepeated every 2 months.

a 7-13 August 2006DRT06VO1IES-RP

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

.... Contd. Exhibit 7.4.

Contents Participants By Whom Monitored by Duration and Schedule

Road safety; Drivers ESM ESI Duration: half a dayDefensive driving; Before and during the fieldWaste disposal; operations (once every 2Cultural values and social sensitivity. months).

Camp operation; Camp staff ESM ESI Duration: half a dayWaste disposal; I Before and during the fieldNatural resource conservation; operations (once every 2Housekeeping. I m

Restoration requirements; Restoration teams ESM ESI Before the start of theWaste disposal l restoration activities.

e 7-14 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP i

IESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

8 Monitoring and Evaluation

Resettlement monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system will be put in place in order toensure that the RP is effectively implemented. The following aspects of the RP andresettlement process will be monitored during the proposed project:

* Number of PAPs and asset loss,

* Payment of compensation to the PAPs with category of loss;

* Land acquired by type, mode of acquisition and payment of compensation

*. Timely disbursement of funds;

* Any outstanding issues and grievance monitoring.

The social monitoring framework and monitoring tools to be employed during theproposed project are discussed below.

8.1 Social Monitoring Framework

The social monitoring framework, presented in Exhibit 8.1, defines the desired outcomesand their associated outputs as well as verification mechanisms. The social monitoringframework focuses on the resettlement issues, however it also addresses the other socialissues likely to arise during the project execution as well.

8.2 Monitoring Plan

The objective of the monitoring during the various phases of the proposed project will beas follows:

* Ensuring that the RP implementation procedure (given in Section 7.2) is fullycomplied with.

* Ensuring the effectiveness of the RP in minimizing the project's impacts related toinvoluntary resettlement.

To achieve these objectives, the following monitoring program will be implemented.

8.2.1 Compliance Monitoring

The compliance monitoring of the project activities is principally a tool to ensure that theRP implementation procedure is strictly adhered to during the project execution.

Various aspects of the RP compliance monitoring will be to:

* Systematically observe the activities undertaken by the Tehsildar, Patwari,contractors (and sub-contractors) or any other person associated with the project

* Verify that the activities are undertaken in compliance with the RP implementationprocedure.


Monitoring and Evaluation IESCO 6rn STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* Document and communicate the observations to the concerned person(s) of theGSC Department, ESC and contractors, so that any corrective measures, if required,can be taken in a timely fashion

* Maintain a record of all incidents of social significance, related actions and correctivemeasures

* Maintain contact with the communities, solicit their views and concerns, and discussthem during the fortnightly meetings.

* Prepare periodic reports of the RP implementation during the project.

Compliance monitoring will be the responsibility of all organizations involved in the fieldactivities, ie, GSC Department and the contractors. It will be carried out by the following:

* ESI

* ESM.

8.2.2 Effects Monitoring

The RP has been developed based upon the potential impacts of the proposed projectpredicted while conducting the ESA study. This impact prediction was in turn carried outon the basis of information available at the time of conducting the assessment and thenatural processes that link various environmental and social parameters. Based on thisprediction, mitigation measures are introduced such that the predicted residual effects donot exceed acceptable levels. However, there is always an element of uncertainty insuch predictions due to an insufficient grasp of the processes, limitations in predictiontechniques, or inadequate data on the environment. This is true for the physical,biological, as well as socioeconomic environment. Consequently, it is possible that evenif the mitigation measures are implemented fully, the negative impacts of the project willexceed acceptable limits.

In order to address the above concerns, effects monitoring will be undertaken during theproject activities, with the overall objective of proper management of social (andenvironment) risks and uncertainties. Broadly, effects monitoring has the followingobjectives:

* To verify that the socioeconomic impacts - particularly related to the involuntaryresettlement - of the proposed project are within acceptable limits, thus establishingcredibility (public assurance)

* To immediately warn the project proponents (and the regulatory agencies, if required)of unanticipated adverse impact or sudden changes in impact trends so thatcorrective actions can be undertaken, which may include modifications in theproposed activities, or the inclusion of modified or additional mitigation measures

* To provide information to plan and control the timing, location, and level of certainproject activities so that the effects are minimized.

* To facilitate research and development by documenting the effects of the proposedproject that can be used to validate impact-prediction techniques and provide a basisfor more accurate predictions of future projects.

e 8-2 August 2006DRTo6VO1 IES-RP

Monitoring and Evaluation IESCO 6"h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

The RP effects monitoring will comprise the following:

* Socioeconomic aspects, particularly the resettlement and compensation,

* Grievance monitoring.

The social indicators, discussed later in the section, will be used during the effect

monitoring of the construction activities.

In addition, contact will be maintained with the communities, their views and concerns

solicited. The outcome of these consultations will be discussed during the fortnightly

meetings at the site.

8.2.3 External Monitoring

In addition to the compliance and effects monitoring discussed above, IESCO will engage

an independent consultant to carry out external monitoring of RP (and EMP19)

implementation on periodical basis. The objective of this external monitoring is to

validate the internal monitoring results, and specifically ensure that:

* the RP (and EMP) is being adequately implemented,

* mitigation measures are being implemented,

* the compliance and effects monitoring are being conducted,

* environmental and social trainings are being conducted as planned, and

* complete documentation is being maintained.

The extemal monitoring consultant will periodically visit the sites (grid stations as well as

the transmission line routes), examine the documentation maintained at the site,

interview key site staff, make spot checks, take photographs where necessary, interview

the PAPs, and meet with the communities. After each extemal monitoring visit, the

consultant will prepare a monitoring report and submit to IESCO. The report will include

the observations made during the visits, highlight non-compliances observed, if any,

salient information obtained from PAPs/communities, and make recommendations.

The external monitoring consultant will visit the project sites as follows:

* First visit: about 3 months after the site mobilization

* Second visit: about middle of the project

* Last visit: at the end of the project, just before demobilization.

8.3 Monitoring Indicators

An indicative list of monitors is provided below, which will be used during the affects

monitoring and external monitoring in order to evaluate various aspects of the RP

implementation.

* Total number of PAPs, broken down in gender groups and intensity of impacts

* Number/area/type of affected assets

19 The EMP is provided in the ESA report in its Chapter 10.

8-3 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Monitoring and Evaluation IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

* Amount of compensation estimated for land, crops, trees and other assets

* Amount of compensation disbursed, broken down in by PAPs, assets

* Number of persons compensated by types of losses

* Number of persons not compensated as planned (with reason for the gap)

* Total numbers of grievances recorded

* Total number of grievances addressed

* Amount of land required

* Amount of land purchased/state land acquired/acquired under LAA

* Total number of transmission line towers in cultivated area

* Total number of transmission line towers in cultivated area, with access available forthe cultivators to the land under the tower.

* Total number of transmission line towers in cultivated area, with no access availablefor the cultivators to the land under the tower.

* Total number of non-compliances recorded by ESI (derived from the ComplianceMonitoring Reports)

* Actions taken to address non-compliances identified by ESI

* Total number of non-compliances recorded by the External Monitoring Consultant

* Actions decided to address non-compliances identified by the External MonitoringConsultant

* Actions taken to address non-compliances identified by the Extemal MonitoringConsultant.

* Number of training sessions planned and undertaken by target groups and types oftrainings.

The list of indicators to be used during the project will be finalized by ESI with the help ofESC.

8A Monitoring Repors

Three types of monitoring reports will be prepared during the project. These aredescribed below.

8.4.1 Compliance Monitoring Reports

These reports will be prepared as an outcome of the compliance monitoring discussed inSection 8.2.1 above. These reports will be developed on the basis of the checklists filledduring the monitoring. The report will focus on the non-compliances observed during themonitoring, with reasons of the non-compliances, any subsequent action taken and anyother relevant detail. The reports will be produced by the ESI on a weekly basis.

eLAN 8-4 August 2006

DRT06VOlIES-RP

Monitoring and Evaluation IESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

8.4.2 Effects Monitoring Reports

These reports will be prepared as an outcome of the effects monitoring discussed inSection 8.2.2 above. These reports will be compiled by the ESI on a monthly basis.These reports will document the project performance on the basis of the monitoringindicators discussed in Section 8.3 above.

8.4.3 External Monitoring Reports

The Extemal Monitoring Consultant will prepare a report after each monitoring visits. Thereport will include the monitoring methodology, the filled checklists, field observations,photographs, account of the consultations with the PAPs and communities, andrecommendations. The reports will be submitted within 2 weeks of the externalmonitoring visits.

The Consultant will also prepare a final report after the completion of the entire externalmonitoring program. The report will provide an overview of each individual monitoringvisit, any commonalities or trends found during different visits, an analysis of the externalmonitoring, and recommendations for future projects.

e"8-5 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Monitoring and Evaluation IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 8.1: Social Monitoring Framework

Outcome Outputs Verification Source

Land acquisition for the grid stations is carried out Value of the land reflective of the market price. Sales-purchase agreements.on fair and mutually accepted terms.

Farmers are compensated in a fair and mutually The PAPs are correctly identified. List of PAPs in RP;accepted manner for the crop damages (during both List of PAPs updated by Tehsildar and Patwariconstruction and O&M phases of the project) during project execution (see Section 7.2).

The magnitude of crop damage (affected area List of PAPs in RP;under cultivation) is correctly recorded. List of PAPs updated by Tehsildar and Patwari

during project execution.

Compensation for crop damaged is paid based Receipts of payments to PAPs;upon the market rates.

A swift and transparent grievance redressal The Social Complaint Register (discussed later in The Social Complaint Register;mechanism in place. the RP) for checking. Affectees consultations during compliance

monitoring (monitoring reports)Affectees consultations during external monitoring

.. _ (visit reports).

The RP and EMP are effectively implemented Staff trainings according to the Monitoring Plan Training reports including list of trainees and types| (discussed later in the document). I of training.

The skills and knowledge acquired during the Compliance monitoring record;trainings are effectively employed. External monitoring visit reports.

The mitigation measures implemented by the Compliance monitoring record;construction staff are appropriately documented. External monitoring visit reports.


IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

9 Resettlement Budget

The project proponent will make the necessary budget provisions to ensure that themitigation commitments including compensation and the monitoring programs can befully implemented. The entire budget for managing the environmental andsocioeconomic aspects, including the resettlement, is provided in Exhibit 9.1.

e 9- August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Resettlement Budget IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Exhibit 9.1: Environmental and Social Management Budget

Description Cost Basis Notes(Pak Rs.)

1 Personnel

ESI (3) 2,160,000 18 months x 40,000 PM a Responsible for CompliancceMonitoring.

ESM (6) 0 To be included in the Contractor's cost

2 Effects Monitoring 1,145,000 - See details in EMP (Section 10 ofEMP)

3 External Monitoring 900,000 3 x 1-day visits; 5 locations (GS): (15 days).3 x 2 day visits; 5 TL locations (30 days).45 days x 0,000 per day x 2 experts

4 Environmental and 440,000 11 training sessions x one-day duration; Rs 40,000 per See Exhibit 7.4 (trainings to besocial Trainings training. b conducted by external consultants

only)..

5 Tree Plantation 100,000 About 500 trees Explained in ESA report (Chapter 10)

6 Development of PCBs 520,000 26 days x 20,000 per day. Explained in ESA report (Chapter 10)Eliminabon Plan

7 Crop Compensation 8,569,700 Estimates carried out by Patwari. See Section 5.3 above.

8 Miscellaneous 500,000 Lump sumExpenses

9 Contingencies 430,000 3 % of the above.

Total 14,764,700

The duration of the proposed project has been assumed as 18 months.b Frequency of the trainings may be altered per the requirements.

e 9-2 August 2006DRT06V01lES-RP,


Aipendix A Details of Crop CompensaUon

This appendix provides the details of the transmission line routes, the cultivated area

falling under these routes, the crop compensation amounts and the names of land

owners/cultivators.

Citation in the Main Document: Section 5.4.

eLA=N A-1 August 2006DRTo6VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationFeed for Gangal Grid Station

| Cultivated I CropLand under Land Compensationi Description Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount 2 1

Line (Acres) t (Rs)

I 0 m Tee-off from the existing | 01 32-KV transmission line

2 0 - 900 m Cultivation fields. 4.75 Akbar, Shah 41,800Nawaz

Graveyard L - -_°i House right side of the 0

route.

3 900 m Angle 110 - 20' Right - 0

4 900 - 1,492 m Cultivation fields. 4.375 Amir Khan, M 38,500Akram

House left side of the - 0route.

---

i Road crossing 0

5 J 1,492 m Angle 80 Right 0

6 1,492 - 2,002 m Cultivation fields. 3.75 Amir Khan, M 33,000Akram

House left side of the | 0route.

7 2,002 m Angle 35045' Left - 0

8 2,002 - 2,602 m Cultivation fields. 1.5 Akhtar 13,200I Hussain, M

l ~AshrafNullah crossing 0

Broken area - 0

9 2,602 m Gangal Grid Station Site | 0Generally flat terrain, withno cultivation or anystructure over it.

10 Estimated number 1 10 20,000oftreestobe I I 2removed2 2

I

Total 14.375 8 146,500

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationFeed for Adyala Road Grid Station

Cultivated Crop

Description | Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) I CompensationTransmidssion A mount

l Line (Acres) | (Rs)

1 0 m Tee off from the 1 0existing Rewat-

| Chakwal 132-KVtransmission line

2 0-1,1315 m Cultivation 3.38 Fazal Karim, M 29,700Khalid, Faqir M, M

l Mazhar, Karam-. _Hussain, M Tarig,

21 Compensation has been calculated for two wheat crop season; Rs 4,400 per acre per season. This rate isthe govemment approved rate for wheat crop, and is provided by IESCO.

22 Exact number of the affected trees and identification of their owners can only be determined when the towerlocations are finalized during the construction phase.

eu A-2 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6"h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropLand under Compensation

Description Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

M Khaliq, Haji Iqbal _

Broken land 0

Cultivation 3.00 M Zafar, Haji lqbal, 26,400M Khaliq, M

i_ Mehrban

House left of the route j - 0

T House left of the route 0

1 t-KV feeder crossing 0

Road crossing 0

3 1,315m Angle 12°-30'Left j I , 0

4 1,315 - 2,277 m Cultivation. 2.25 M Ramzan, M 19,800Bashir, M Mushtaq,M Yunus, MRahim, M Akhtar,Faqir M.

Broken land - - 0

Cultivation. 2.25 T Rahim Baksh, M 19,800Ismail, Tanveer,

i _ _ _ _ |Faujdar. _

Cultivation. 1.88 M Javed, M 16,500Manzoor, NoorHussain, Farooq,

I M Nawaz

Cultivation. 2.25 M Ejaz, Karamat 19,800Hussain, ARazzaq, M Farooq,M Javed, M Nisar,M Ali, Ismail,Shahid

I Track crossing 0

5 2,277 m Angle 60 - 30'Left - 06 2,277 - 4,064 m Track crossing 0

Broken land 0

Nullah crossing - 0

Cultivation. 3.00 Babu Mehboob, A 26,400l ! Razzaq

11-KV feeder crossing j - 0

7 4,064 m Angle 10 Right _ _ |_ 0

8 4,064- 5,689 m Road crossing | 0

Cultivation. 3.50 Malik A Ghaffor, 30,800Qurban Hussain,Malik Daud, MalikShahid

Nullah crossing | 09 5,689m Angle70-15' Left I 1 0

10 5,689 - 6,604 m [ Broken land _ 1 | 0

Nullah crossing - j j 0

500 KV Transmission - - 0Line crossing i j

Cultivation. 4.13 | Noor Hussain, A | 36,300- ______ _____ I |__ [Razzaq, Pissran _

A-3 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A iESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropLand under CompensationI Description Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)Abbas, Karam !

i Hussain, llyas. IGhulam Rasul

| Nullah crossing - 0

_1 6,604 m_| Angle 9° - 15' Left 0

12 6,604 - 8,088 m Vacant land - - 0

j|500 KV Transmissio j - j - j 0L Linecrossing [ - 0

Vacant land - i - 0

13 8,088 m Angle 370 - 50' Right - 0

14 8,088 - 8,758 m 500 KV Transmission - 0Line crossingNullah crossing _ _0

vacant land - 0

15 8,758 m Angle 15°- 10' Right - - 0

16 8,758 - 12,089 m i Hilly area | 0

Nullah crossing | 0

Road crossing | 0

1 1-KV feeder crossing - - 0

Houses along the - 0route

Cultivation 2.25 A Razzaq, Abbas, 19,800Karam Hussain,llyas

Soan River crossing - 0Cultivation 8.50 i Noor M, Naheed 74,800

Khan, Allah Ditta,Cut o | Mumtaz, Taj,

I ! i I Rashid, M Khaliq _

Cultivation 9.63 M Jahangir, Haji 84,700Shabbir, M Asad,Shoukat Ali, M

I !Yaqub, Tabarak, Mj Ahmed

17 12,089m |Angle130-80' Left - 0

18 12,089 - 13,648 m Cultivation 7.38 Ghulam Sarwar, M 64,900Salim, M Tazeem,Ali M, M Ashraf

Huts near the route - 01 9 13,648 m Angle 160 Right 0

20 13,648 - 14,368 m Soan River crossing 0

21 14,368 m Angle 140 Right , 0. - 1 022 14,368 - 15,238 m Soan River crossing - j 0

Cultivation 6.50 M Ahmed Shah, 57,200_ _ __ShahM M

23 15,238 m Angle 410 - 50' Left - 0

24 15,238 - 15,428 m Hilly area 0

25 15,428 m I Angle 260- 10' Left 0

26 15,428 - 15,658 m Broken land 0

eA"N A-4 August 2006

DRT06VOl IES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) CoAmount27!r andsndriomenaion AonLine (Acres) ! (Rs)

27 15,658 m Angle 130 Right - 0

28 15,658 - 1 I,758m Broken land 0

Cultivation 2.25 Bostan Khan 19,800

1 1-KV feeder crossing - 0Road crossing - | 0

29 16,758m Angle 11 0 Right = 0

30 16,758 - 17,158 m Land plotted for 0housing societies

031 17,158 m Angle 400 Left 0

32 17,158 - 17,608 m Land plotted for , | 0i housing societies _ _ _

33 17,608 m Adyala Road Grid - - 0Station Site |_ _ _ _

34 Estimated number 50 . 100,000of trees to beremoved

Total 62.13 76 646,700

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationFeed for Bahter More Grid Station

Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

1 0 m Tee-off fromexisting132-KV

_ _ Transmission Line - - 0

2 0 - 244 m Cultivation 1.13 M Sharif, M Nazir 9,900

Cultivation 0.75 M Azam 6,600

3 244 m Angle 27D-38' Left 0

4 244 - 1,1534 m Cultivation 0.75 Asif Ali 6,600

Local road crossing [ - 0

Cuitivation 0.63 Deen Mohammad 5,500

House left of the |route - I , 0

Cultivation M Akram, M Afzal, Aj 1 _ 1.13 Rahim | 9,900

Cultivation M Khalid, M Asif, M2.25 nazir, A Karm 19,800

Cultivation Shahid Mehmood, MI 1.25 Zahid and brotehrs 11,000

Cultivation M Manzoor and1 0.63 brothers 5,500

Cultivation 0.38 M Nazir and Brothers 3,300

Cultivation Wali Khan, Ali M,i i 1 1.50 Karam Dad 13,200

5 1,1534 m Angle 13 °-20 ' 0Right _ _ _ __

e- A-5 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

I Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) Compensaton

Line (Acres) (Rs)

6 1,1534 - 1,719 m Road crossing - - | 0Cultivation M Manzoor, Ali M,

- - - - - .-88 Wali M 7,700House right of the - 0

I-route L7, _ 1,719_ m Angle450 Left -

8 1,719-i,779m Vacant Land 09 m Grid Station Site - -0

10 Estimated number of 5- - 10.000trees to be removed

Total 11.25 22 109,000

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationFeed for Sohawa Grid Station

Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Transuission Land Owner(s) Compensaton

Line (Acres) (Rs)

1 O m Tee-off from 0existingl32-KVTransmission Line

2 0 - 640 m Brokenland 0Cultivation 1.50 Ghulam Rasool,

I Ghulam Mutaza,Fazal Karim 13,200

Cultivation 1.63 Fazal Karim,Muqarab Khan, MHussain 14,300

Cultivation 1.38 M Akram, MuqarabKhan, M Sodagar

iHussain 12,1003 640 m Grid Station Site 0

Estimated number of . O4 trees to be removed

Total 4.51 9 39,600

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationMurree - Minhasa Transmission Line

Cultivated CropDescription Key Features TLand under Land Owner(s) CAmount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

1 0 m Minhasa Grid Station - - 02 0-190 m Cultivation | 1.38 M Hanif, M 12,100

Khurshed| | Hilly terrain - 0

Houses left of the route | - 0

3 190 m Angle 240 Right ! - 0

4 190 - 340 m ! Cultivation 1.13 M Khurshid 9,900

e A-6 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


- Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Landmissio Land Owner(s) CompensationITransmidssion LnOwe() Amount, Line (Acres) (Rs)

I Hilly terrain - - 011 KV feeder crossing - 0

33 KV T.L. crossing 0

5 340 m Angle 460 - 30' Left 0

6 340 - 468 m Cultivation 0.88 Fareed Khan 7,700

Hilly terrain - 0

7 468 m Angle 25° - 35' Left | - 0

8 468 - 1,276 m j Hillyterrain - - 0Nullah crossing 0

33 kv T.L crossing | - 0

Cultivation 0.63 Zahoor Ahmed 5,500

9 I 1,276 m Angle70- 30' Right , 0

10 1,276 - 1,370 m Hilly terrain 0

Trees 0

11 1,370 m Angle 140 - 15' Right 0

12 1,370 - 2,564 m Vacant land .,~| 0

Hilly terrain 0-~Vc n a d _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -__ _ _ _ _

Cultivation 1.25 Najeeb 11,000| Houses right of the route - - 0 °

Settlement either side of -the route _ 0

Cultivation 0.50 . Not known 4,400

13 2,564 m Angle 0° - 10' Right 0

14 2,564 - 4,300 m Nullah crossing - - _

Hilly terrain | -_ 0

Nullah crossing j | 0

Nullah crossing | - 0

Steep slope I 0-_ I .-- _----0

15 4,300 m Angle 280 - 30' Right - I 0

16 4,300- 5,100m Jhelum nver crossing 0 - 0

grave yard under T.L 3 - 0

_ Village left of the route ] - _ 0_ Hillyterrain ,_-_!j - j 0

Sparse tree population - 0

| House left of the route _ ___ 0

17 5,100m Angle 9°-40' Left - 0

18 5,100 - 5,300 m Graveyard right of the - - I 0route

Hilly terrain - 0

Sparse tree population - 019 5,300 m Angle 8° - 40' Right | 0

20 5,300 -7,228 m Nullah crossing - 0

Track crossing _ _ j__j 0

Hilly terrain j j___ 0

e. A-7 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6!h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated I Crop

Description Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Compensation

Transrr___ ___ss_iounahAcossngt Une (Acres) _ (Rs)

Track crossing - -- 0

Nullah crossing _ [ °

House under the T.L. 0

Hilly terrain { 0

Road crossing | - - 0

Track crossing ---- -0

House right of the route - - 0

21 7,228m Angle 6°-35' Right j - , 0

22 7,228 8,138 m House left of the route - 0

- Hilly terrain ------ L---.- -- ° -

- - Sparse tree population - 0

Houses both sides of 0_ _ route _

LT feeder crossing 0

House left of the route , 0

- . 11-KV feeder crossing -- - 0

House right of the route J 0

23 8,138m Angle 28°-45' Left - 0

24 8,138 - 8,628 m Road crossing | 0

Road crossing - - 0Hilly terrain I 0

11-KV feeder crossing | - 0

25 8,628 m Angle 10'- 30' Left - L 0-_ _ .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - --. - -__ -

26 8,628 - 9,408 m Road crossing -

Houses both sides of - 0route I --- __ - _-_- - -

= Hilly terrain - - - 0 --

- Sparse tree population - - 0

27 9,408m Angle 34°-30' Left - | F 0

28 9,408- 10,798 m Houses both sides of j j I 0route j

Hilly terrain 0

Houses both sides of j 0route 0

1 1-KV feeder crossing 0

| Sparse tree population - 0 j 011-KV feeder crossing i - - 0

29 10,798 m Angle 1j7- 50' Left - 0

30 10,798 - 12,768 m 1 1-KVfeedercrossing | - 0

House right of the route - 0

Sparse tree population - j 0

Houses both sides of - 1 0_ _ route 0 _ _- - - _

| Hilly terrain _ _ - 0

i Road crossing - - 0

A-8 August 2006DRT06VO IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6'" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) CompensationTransmission LnOwes) Amount

I Line (Acres) | (Rs)

House left of the route 0

31 12,768 m Angle 8° - 20' Right 0

32 12.768 - 13,268 m House left of the route 0

- Hilly terrain -._--_---.-- 0House right of the route 0

Sparse tree population 033 13,268 m Angle 500 Right . _-_._._.-.-.- - 034 13,268 - 13,388 m House left of the route 0


Hilly terrain -- - - 035 13,388 m Angle 18° - 10O' Right ------|--....0

36 13,388 - 13,908 m Houses both sides of - - 0route

Road crossing | | 0

Cultivation 1.50 Ghulam Qadir I 13,200

37 1 m 1 1-KV feeder crossing t_°37 13,908_ m Angle 280 Left ,---- [ 038 13,908 - 14,338 m 33-KV transmission line ! -. - 0

Houses right of the route - - .0Hilly terrain 0

11 -KV feeder crossing - -[ 0

39 14,338 m Angle 160 Right - i - 0

40 14,338 - 14,948 m Houses both sides of 0route||--- ---...--

Nullah crossing - j - 0

Hilly terrain _ 1 -- __ --- 0

_ Sparse tree population - j 041 14,948m Angle50 -30' Left - - 042 ] 14,948- 15,042 m I Sparse tree population - j 0

4 | Hilly terrain 0

43 | _15,042m_| Angle 5°-30' Left - _ 044 15,042 - 15,512 m Sparse tree population - - 0

| Hilly terrain 045 15,512 m Angle 30- 50' Right - 0

46 15,512 -16,452 m Hilly terrain 0

Settlement right of route - - 0_ _ Sparse tree population -

47 16,452 m Angle 23°-30' Left - | ___ 048 16,452- 17,318m Housesbothsidesof !

} ! ~~~route 'I- - -

| Nullah crossing i- -0i _ Road crossing j - ' 0_ | Mosque right of route J - [ 0

49 17,318 m | Angle 50 -25' Left j _ 0

50 17,318 -18,340 m Houses both sides of 0

e . A-9 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6r' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

j Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) CompensationTransmidssion Amount

- Une (Acres) (Rs)route

Nullah crossing -- 0Hilly terrain - 0

51 18,340 m Angle 200 Right | 0

52 18,340 - 19,446 m Houses both sides of - - 0route

Hilly terrain - - 0Nullah crossing -

33 KV T.L. crossing 0- - . - 0

53 19,446 m Angle 290 - 40 Left -54 19,446 - 19,928 m Houses both sides of . - 0

i route;--

i___ __________ Nullah crossing i . - __r

_ Hilly terrain - f - 055 19,928m Angle 320- 30' Right -

56 j19,928 -20,688 m Settlement right of route | LNullah crossing - - 0

Hilly terrain 0Sparse tree population - 0

57 20,688 m Angle 50-45' Right _ - --- -- - 0

58 20,668 - 21,186 m Steep slope 0

Conifer trees 0

59 21,186 m Angle 320 Left 060 21,186 - 21,986 m Nullah crossing ! - ° 0

Hilly terrain - 0Conifer trees 0

Cultivation 0.75 Faridullah Khan 6,600Settlement right of route - 0

61 21,986 m Angle 310- 10' Left - - - 062 21,986-22,441 m Nullah crossing j [ 0

! Hilly terrain 0 - 0

Conifer trees - : 063 | m Angle 160-20' Right 0 0

13 _,44_m igh

64 22,441 -22,691 m Nullah crossing J -

||Hilly terrain | 0

6 Conifer trees ;

65 22,691 m Angle 320- 10' Right -

66 22,691 - 22,931 m Nallah crossing i|67 22,931 m Angle 52°-20' Right 0 068 22,931 -23,231 m Road crossing 0

_ |_| Hilly terrain ] -- 0

Conifer trees ] _ - 0

69 21,231 m Angle 240 - 20' Right 0

70 23231-23,400 m Hilly terrain - - r 0

L N A-10 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop


Line (Acres) (Rs)

Conifer trees 0

71 23,400 m Angle 410 - 10' Left 0

72 23,400 - 23,610 m Hilly terrain _ ._.-- 0

Conifer trees 0

73 23,610 m - Angle 280 - 50' Left - 0

74 23,610 - 23,970 m Hilly terrain | - 0

Conifer trees 4 - .0

75 23,970 m Angle 210 Right - - 0

76 23,970 - 24,120 m Hilly terrain - - - 0

Conifer trees | - 0

77 24,120 m Angle 21° Left | 0 0

78 241,20 - 24,210 m Hilly terrain - - 0

Conifer trees 0

79 24,210 m Angle 390 Right . --- - - 0

80 24,210 - 24,632 m Houses both sides of 0route

Road crossing | - 0

_ Hilly terrain . 081 24,632 m Angle 16°-20' Right - -

82 24,632 - 24,842 m Hilly terrain 0

Conifer trees 0

. Road crossing - - 0

83 24,842 m Murree Grid Station - 0

84 Estimated number of 100 500,000trees to be removed _

Total 8.00 10 570,400

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationKotli - Chak Swarl Transmission Line

Cultivated Cropi e Land under Land Compensation

Description KeyFeatures |Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) | (Rs)

I 0 m Chak Swar Grid Station p j | 0

2 0- 600m Residential plots 0

3 600 m Angle 230 Right - - 0

4 600-904 m Vacantland - 0

5 904 m Angle 250 Right j j 0

6 904 - 1,514 m ISettlement left of route | 0

| | Undulating terrain | 07 1,514 m Angle 320 Right - - 0

8 1,514 - 1,697 m Road crossing | - 0

9 1,697 m Angle 290 Left 0

10 1,697 -2,887 m Vacant land ! _ !___-oNullah crossing , I - I 0

A-11 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP


I Cultivated CropDescripton Key Features Land under Land Compensation

Transmission Owner(s) AmountLine (Acres) (Rs)

Cultivation 0.13 Ali Akbar 1,100

Cultivation 2.38 Sabit 20,900i Hussain,

_1Ch Munir 11 1 2,887 m Angle 200 Right | 0

12 2,887 - 3,649 m Nullah crossing 0

13 3,649 m Angle 80 Right 0 0

14 3,649-4,197 Road crossing - - 0

11 -KV feeder crossing - 0

15 1 4,197m Angle 340-40' Right . 0

16 4,197 - 4,807 m Flat terrain i 0

17 angle 23 L Angle 230 Left -- °

18 4,807 - 5,905 m Village left of route - - 0

- | Water tank right of route - 0

19 5,905 m | Angle 15° Left | 0

20 5,905-6,112m Flat terrain - 0

21 6,112m Angle240Left ' - 0

22 6,112 - 6,569 m Houses both sides of route - -- -- -0-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.__ _ _ _ -._ _ -._ _ 0-.- .- - - -

Generally flat terrain

23 6,569 m Angle 50 Left j 0

24 I 6,569 - 7,118 m Settlements both sides of ; 0ti | route

Cultivation 2.25 Sabir 19,800Hussain,Nazir

25 | Ahmed

25 j 7,118m Angle8 0Left - 0

26 7,118-8,416 Houses both sides of route - 0

Nuilah crossing - 0

27 8,416 m Angle 7°- 20' Right 0

28 8,416 - 8,599 m Road crossing I - - 0

Shops along the route 0

29 8,599 m Angle 150 Left 0

30 8,599 - 9,269 m Road crossing | 0

__ Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 0.25 Nazir 2,200Ahmed,Haji MMalik

31 9,269 m Angle 200 Right 0 - 0

32 9,269 - 9,726 m Village along the route - - I 0

Road crossing 0 - 0I 1-KV feeder crossing 0

33 9,726 m Angle 31°- 20'Left °

34 9,726 - 10,641 m Settlement left of route - | 0

Road crossing - 4 ; 0


DRT06VO1 IES-RP


Cultivated Crop. . Land under Land Compensation

Descrpton Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Cultivation 1.50 M Aziz, 13,200ManzurHussain,Fazal Elahi I

Cultivation 1.50 Fazal i 13,200| I Hussain, j

i Faiz___ _Mohammad |

35 10,641 m | Angle 12°- 10' Right - 0

36 10,641 - 11,739 m Houses near the route - 0

Market near the route - - 0

! Road crossing - - ° 0Cultivation 5.25 Ali Adalat, 46,200

NoorHussain, MNazir, MRafiq, Ali

. Khan, M_ _Ramzan

37 11,739m Angle8 -20'Right - 0

38 11,739 - 12,623 m Houses both sides of route - I -

39 12,623 m Angle 200 Left - 0

40 12,623-12,867 m Hilly terrain -0

41 12,867 m Angle 100 Right ! - 0

42 12,867 - 13,111 m Hilly terrain 0

43 13,111 m Angle 120 Left - - 0

44 13,111 - 13,477 m Hillyterrain 0

45 13,477m Angle 250 Right 0

46 13,477 - 14,056 m [HiDlyterrain . [ 0

47 14,056 m Angle 200 Right - - [ 0

48 14,056 - 14,574 m Hilly terrain 0

49 14,574 m Angle 100 Right - | 0

50 14,574- 15,461 m Houses near route - i 0

Road crossing - - 0

_ 11-KV feeder crossing I - 0

51 15,461 m Angle 5-20'Right - - 0

52 15,461 - 16,107 m Telephone line crossing - | 0

11 -KV feeder crossing - - 0

53 ', 16,107 m Angle 50 - 40' Right - - 0

54 16,107- 16,259m 11-KVfeedercrossing - - 0

Houses near the route - | 0

55 16,259 m Angle 150 Right - - 0

56 16,259 - 16,548 m Settlement along route - 0

| | Hilly terrain 0

57 16,548 m | Angle 320 Left - - 0

58 1 16,548- 16,913 m Graveyard near the route j - - 0

|___________ 1 Police Post near the route - j - 0


Appendix A IESCO 6h STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

iCultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land CompensationDecito e ars Transmission OWner(s) Amnount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Settlement both sides of - - 0!_____ !____ __ route I _ _ - - -

59 16,913m Angle43° Left - ° 060 T 16,913 - 17,492 m College near the route 0

Settlement near the route 0

Cultivation 2.63 Banaras 23,100Khan,PannoKhan, DrSalim

61 17,492 m Angle 170 - 20' Right - -0


i Road crossing 063 | 18,455 m Angle 60 Right | 064 18,455 - 19,009 m Road crossing 0

- Houses near the route - 0- 11-KV Feeder crossing j 0

1 Cultivation 1.25 M Raiq, M 11,000i_ 1 Razzaq

65 19,009m Angle 120 Left - - 0

66 19,009 - 19,909 m Conifer trees 0

Nullah crossing 0

Hilly terrain ---

Houses both sides of route -- 0Road crossing - 0

67 |19,909 m Angle 140 Left -0

68 19,909-20,589 m Hilly terrain -- 0

Nullah crossing- 0

Nullah crossing - 0

69 20,589 m Angle 250 Right 0

70 20,589 - 20,789 m Hilly terrain - I - 0

Nullah crossing - - 071 20,789 m |Angle 350 Left E 072 20,789 - 21,809 m Hilly terrain 0

I Nullah crossing j - - 0Conifer trees - 0

73 21,809m Angle 350 Right | | | 074 21,809- 22,309 m Hillyterrain - - 0

Road crossing | 1 - 0

House left of the route - f - 0

7 Settlement left of route | 0

75 22,309 m Angle 180 Right 0

76 22.309 - 22,454 m Hilly terrain , 0

Settlement left of route - - 0

Cultivation 1.50 M Javed 13,200I______ _ I and _

eLAN A-14 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


Cultivated CropLand under Land Compensation

Description Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

i ! *brothers

77 22,454 m Angle 600 Right 0

78 22,454 - 22,654 m Houses right of the route - 0

hilly area 0

Cultivation 0.75 M Javed 6,600and

I i ibrothers

79 22,654 m Angle 450 Left 0

80 22,654 - 23,894 m Settlement both sides of 0route

Nullah crossing 0

School left of the route - 0

Hilly terrain 0

Road crossing | 0

House left of the route - 0

Cultivation 1.13 M Zahid 9,900

81 23,894 m Angle 140 Left - 0

82 23,894 - 24,544 m Hilly terrain - 0

Nullah crossing - 0

Road crossing - - 0

House left of the route | 0

Conifer trees | 0Cultivation 0.75 M 6,600

Mehmood,M Nazir

83 24,544 m Angle 200 Right 0

84 24,544 - 25,744 m Hilly terrain 0

Nu-lah crossing 1 0

Nullah crossing - 0

Madnssa (school) under 0Transmission Line

Poultry Farm under 0transmission line

Cultivation 1.13 I M Habib, M 9,900rafiq. M!

!Mazhar, M |1! Majid

Road crossing 085 25,744 m Angle 430 Right - | 0

86 25,744 - 26,194 m Cultivation 2.25 Haji Aslam | 19,800

Road crossing | - 0Conifer trees - | 0

87 26,194 m Angle 350 Right - - 0

88 26,194- 26,944 m Cultivation 1.50 Haji M 13,200Rafiq, MKabir, MSarfraz,Jan j

l l I | ~Mohama

ekA A-15 August 2006DRT06VO1IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6"' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land CompensationITransmTission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Settlement left of route j 0

| Hilly terrain -0

House left of the route 0

89 26,944 m Angle 130 Right 0

90 26,944 - 27,879 m Mosque right of the route 0

_ Hilly terrain 0Nullah~~- --__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _0! ~~~~Scrub forest --- -

Nutlah crossing - 0

Existing 132-KV 0transmission line left of theroute

91 27,879 m Angle 10° Right .0

92 27,879 - 28,579 m Existing 132-KV 0transmission line left of theroute

i House right of the route - 0

Scrub forest0

Settlement left of route 0

Cultivation 1.50 M Khaliq, 13,200| Haji Karim,

i Wali Khan,!_ M Siddiq

132 KV transmission line 0crossing

93 ! 28,579 m Angle 350 Right 0

94 28,579 - 29,284 m River Poonch crossing 0

95 29,284 m Angle 100 Right 0

96 29,284 - 29,834 m River Poonch crossing 0

Houses left of the route 0

Cultivation 3.00 Lala 26,400Dhodho,Wali Dad,Azam,KaramDad,

97 29,834 m Angle 60 Left | | 0

98 29,834 - 30,864 m Cultivation 3.38 Rafiq, Ch 29,700Nazuk, ChLal

House right of the route - | 0

Settlement left of route - | 0

Houses left of the route - - 0

Road crossing i- 0

| Mosque right of the route | - - r|;Nullah crossing | 0

_ I _ _ _ _ _

99 30,864m |Angle10° g -R| 0

100 | 30,864 - 31,564 m | Cultivation 2.25 Clh 19,800! I i ~Akba

Houses along the route I - - 0

eL A-16 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6 STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropLand under Land Compensation

Description Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Residential plots i - j 0

Houses along the route | 0

101 31,564 m Angle 100 Right | 0

102 31,564 - 31,964 m 132-KV transmission line 0crossing

_ Disused brick kiln ° -0

Cultivation 0.75 Ch Lal 6,600

103 31,964 m Angle 0

104 31,964 - 32,009 m Residential plots 0

105 32,009 m Kotli Grid Station 0

106 Estimated number of 100 - - 300,000| treestobe removed j _ _ j

| Total 37.00 52 625,600

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationAzad Pattan - Plandri Transmission Line

Cultivated 1 Crop

Description Key Features Land nd Land Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) | (Rs)

I1 0 m Azad PattanGrd - - 0Station - - 0

2 i 0-60 m |- -

3 60m Angle 800 Right - - 0

4 60 - 170 m Grid colony under the 0transmission line

5 angle 60 R Angle 600 Right - 0

6 170 - 790 m Road crossing

River Jhelum crossing - - 0

Existing 33-KV 0transmission linecrossing

7 790 m Angle 50° Left 0

8 790 -1,070 m Nu=lah crossing - - 0

Houses right of the - - 0route

Cultivation 1.50 |Munir, Shabbir I 13,200Hussain, Jamil

Hilly terrain, steep slope - - 0

9 1070m Angle50 Left j j 0

10 1,070-1,670m Housesleftoftheroute - - 0

OiA A-1 7 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


| Cultivated CropKyFaue Ladunder CompensationDescription Key Features Land sndes Land Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Road crossing - 0

Houses nght of the 0

routeHilly terrain, steep slope 0

11 1,670 m Angle 250 Right 0

12 1,670-1,900 m Ravine 0

Hilly terrain - -

13 1,900 m Angle 60° Right 0

14 1,900 - 2,200 m Hilly terrain 0- .-.- --.----.--..........

Sparse tree cover 0

15 2,200m Angle360 Left - 0


Houses right of the 0route

_ Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover - - 0

17 2800 m Angle 360 Right 0

18 2,800 - 3,200 m Nuliah crossing 0

Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

19 3,200m |Angle 290 Left | 0

20 3,200 - 3,600 m J Hilly terrain [ 0

Sparse tree cover - 0

21 3,600 m Angle 300 Right - - 0. . . -- ..- -- - - -

22 3,600 - 3,930 Hilly terrain - - 0


23 3,930m Angle100 Left 0

24 |3,930-4,250m Cultivation - - 0


25 4,250 m Angle 350 Right 0

26 4,250-4,950 m Hilly terrain r I - ! 0

| Road crossing - j - 0

Ravine - J 1 0

eLAN A-18 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

thAppendix A IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)

Resettlement Plan



Line (Acres) | (Rs)

Road crossing - 0

27 4,950 m Angle 500 Right r028 4,950 - 5,600 m Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

27 5,600 m Angle 15° Left 0

28 5,600- 6,300 m Hilly terrain 0

Road crossing | 0

29 6,300 m Angle 80 Right - -

30 6,300 - 7,260 m Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

31 7,260 m Angle 8° Right 0

32 i7,260-8,110m Hillyterrain - i 0

Sparse tree cover 0

33 8,110 m Angle 310 Left - - 0

34 8,110 - 8,910 m Road crossing - - 0

Nullah crossing - - 0

Road crossing -

Hilly terrain -0

35 8,910 m Angle 300 Left - - 0

36 8,910 - 8,950 m Hilly terrain 0

37 8,950 m Plandri Grid Station -

38 Estimated number of 20 - 60,000trees to be removed I_I

| Total 1.5 3 73,200

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationPlandri - Trar Khal Transmission Line

Cultivated Crop

Descripton Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) CompensationDecito e etrs Transmission AmountLine (Acres) (Rs)

1 0 m Plandri Grid Station | | 0

2 0 -127 m Hilly terrain - 0

3 127m Angle 320 Right - - 0

4 127- 387 m Road crossing | j 0LAN!

e . A-1 9 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6t" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) CompensationDecpinTransmYission LnOwe() Amiount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

; Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

5 387 m Angle 120 Left 0

6 367 - 853 m Road crossing 0

Settlement both sides of 0the route

Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

7 853 m Angle 9°- 20' Left 0

8 853 - 1,265 m Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

9 1,265 m Angle 140 Right

10 1,265 - 1,971 m Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

11 1,971 m j Angle 50 Right | 0

12 1,971 -2,221 m Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 1.75 Gulzar, Tariq, M i 15,400Manzur, MSadiq, M Hyat

13 2,221 m Angle 15° Left 0

14 2,221 - 2,425 m I Road crossing = 0

. Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 1.38 Khaliq, Syed 12,100Mohammad,Babu NoorMohammad,Shoukat, Haji MSiddiq, M Sarwar

15 2,425 m Angle 50 Left 0

16 2,425-2,901 m Hillyterrain j - 0

33-KV transmission line 0crossing

Cultivation 0.75 M lshaq, Sh A 6,600Rahman, MunsifKhan, SaidalKhan, SyedHussain

17 2,901 m Angle 100 Right --

18 2,901 -3,206 m Hilly terrain [ | | 0

L A-20 August2006DRT06VOlIES-RP


i Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Am onIITransmission LnOwe() Amount

|Line (Acres) (Rs)

. Sparse tree cover n (

19 3,206 m Angle 5°Left 0

20 3,206 - 3,968 m | Road crossing 0

Houses both sides of 0the route

Nullah crossing - - j 0

33-KV transmission line 0| crossing

21 3,968 m AngleS0Left 0

22 3,968 - 4,145 m Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 1.88 M Yusuf, M 16,500Akram, Sarwar

23 4,145 m Angle 540 Right - 0

24 4,145 - 4,307 m Market along the route 0

I Hilly terrain 0

25 4,307 m Angle 240 Right 0

26 4,307 - 5,343 m Road crossing 0

Settlements both sides 0|_ .__ of the route l

_ Hilly terrain 0

27 5,343 m Angle 210 Right 0

28 5,343 - 5,809 m Hilly terrain 0

.Houses both sides of ! t* ~~the routet !

Cultivation 1.50 Yasir, Babar, j 13,200Akram Khan

29 5,809 m i Angle 100 Left - v

30 5,809-6,401 m j Hillyterrain 0

Houses both sides of - 0the route

Cultivation 3.50 Master Khaliq 30,800

31 6,401 m Angle 120 Left I - 0

32 6,401 - 7,148 m j Nullah crossing 0

_ Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 3.38 M Ashraf 29,700

33 7,148 m Angle 300 Left - 0

eA A-21 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop| Descrption Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Compensationesrponetrs Transmivssion LnOwe() Amount

Line (Acres) | (Rs)

34 7,148 - 7,361 m Houses both sides of - - 0i ! ~the route!

Road crossing | 0

Cultivation 1.50 M Rafiq 13,200

35 7,361 m Angle 330 Left - 0

36 7,361 - 8,161 m Road crossing - - 0

- Houses both sides of -- 0the route

Cultivation 2.25 M Ashiq 19,800

Hilly terrain - 0

37 8,161 m Angle 250 Right 0

38 8,161 - 9,098 m Houses both sides of - 0the route

i ISparsetreecover I

Hilly terrain - - 0

39 9,098 m I Angle 450 Right - | - 0

40 9,098 - 9,648 m Houses left of route - 0

- - Hilly terrain 0

Cultivation 1.88 M Sadiq, M Aziz, 16,500* I M Ajmal, M Aqib

41 9,648 m Angle 40 Right -0

42 9,648 - 10,166 m Houses both sides of 0the route

Hilly terrain 0

43 10,166 m Angle 290 Right - 0

44 10,166 - 11,476 m Houses left of route - 0

| 33-KV transmission line 0crossing

Road crossing - 0

Cultivation 1.63 Nawaz, Jehangir, 14,300Kamal Ahmed,Ibrahim

45 11,476 m Angle 150 Left - - 0

46 11,476 - 11,964 m Houses left of route - - 0

- Hilly terrain - 0

Cultivation 4.00 Farooq 35,200

47 11,964m Angle260Right - i 0



Cultivated CropLand under Cme to

Description Key Features Trans uno Land Owner(s) AmountTesratiosSttemetiefonfmuemompnstioLine (Acres) (Rs)

48 11,964-12,512m -Settlementleflofroute 0

Shops right of route - 0

49 12,512 m Angle 100 Right - 0

50 12,512 - 13,134 m 11 -KV feeder crossing - 0

Shops right of route - 0

Cultivation 6.25 Makhan Khan 55,000

51 13,134 m Angle 150 - 20'Left 0

52 13,134-14,354m Housesonrightside | - - 0

Cultivation 4.63 M Azam, M [ 40,700l ~Halim

Hilly terrain | 0

| | Sparse tree cover 0

53 14,354 m Angle 130 Left 0

54 i 14,354 - 15,574 m Houses both sides of - 0

|~ '___ the route 3.Road crossing - - 0

i Hilly terrain 0

Sparse tree cover 0

55 15,574 m Angle 260 Left 0

56 15,574 - 16,974 m Houses on left side of - - 0the route

Houses both sides of 0the route

Settlement along the j - 0route i _ _!

Cultivation 2.00 M Azam, M 17,600Halim

Cultivation 1.88 Nazir Ahmed, 16,500Mukhtar Khan

57 16,974 m Angle 100 Left 0

58 16,974 - 18,014 m ,Settlement left of route

Cultivation 5.88 M Atiq, M Nazir 51,700

Hilly terrain - - 0

59 18,014m Angle 100 Left - - 0

60 18,014 - 18,804 m Houses right side of the - j 0| route | | i

Cultivation 4.63 M Arif, M Altaf 40,700

61 | 18,804m Trar Khal Grid Station | - j - 0

e L A-23 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6 STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Landsmisio Land Owner(s) CompensationTransmission anOwe() AmountLine (Acres) (Rs)

62 Estimated number of 50 1 i j 150,000trees to be removed.

Total 50.63 46 595,500

- List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationTrar Khal - Hajira Transmission Line

Cultivated i CropDesrLpiond Kyndatusr1Compensation

Description Key Features under Land Owner(s) |Transmission AmountLine (Acres) _ (Rs)

1 l ° m | TrarKhal Grid Station | - | | 0

2 0 - 50 m Hilly terrain [ - - 0

Sparse tree cover I- 0

3 50 m Angle45° Left -_0

5-500 m Nullah crossing 0

_ Hilly terrain | l - 0

Sparsetree cover | - 0

5 500 m Angle 150 Left | 0

6 500 - 710 m Nullah crossing | 0

Sparse tree cover - . 0

Hilly terrain 0

7 {710 m Angle 380 Left 0

8 710-1,410 m Road crossing 0


Houses right of route 0

Houses right of route 0

Shops right of route . 0

Mosque rght of route . .0

9 1,410m Angle 340 Right | 0

10 1,410 -1,910 m Nullah crossing | 0

Sparsetreecover - . 0

= Hilly terrain 0

11 1,910 m Angle 40 Left 0

12 1,910 - 2,430 m Houses left of route 0

Road crossing - - 0

A-24 August 2006DRT06VOlIES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Transnission Land Owier(s) ACompensaton

Line (Acres) (Rs)


Cultivation 5.25 lqbal Khan, 46,200Rauf, M Sakhi,Khan Bahadur,Hasan M Khan,Fateh NoorKhan, M Jamil,Ejaz, AqilHussain, AliHassan,Chabbo Khan,Ejaz Khan

Houses along the route 0

11-KV feeder crossing - 0

13 2,430m j Angle 60 Right - - 0

14 2,430 - 3,330 m Sparse tree cover 0

i Houses left of the route 0

_ Nullah crossing 0

Mosque right of route . - 0

. School near the route 0

151 3,330m Angle 150 Left 0

16 3,330 - 3,590 m Houses left of the route 0


Hilly terrain 0

17 Road crossing 0

1 7 3,590 m Angle 15° Right 0

18 3,590- 3,765m Sparse tree cover | 0


Hilly terrain - 0

1.50 M Aziz, M 13,200Daud, M Aslam,

Cut o ' Aurangzeb, MNisar, M Adib,

i SalehMohammad

19 3,765 m Angle 320 Right 0

201 3,765 -4,165 m Road crossing 0

Sparse tree cover 0

11-KV feeder crossing - - 0Road crossing .| .| 0

e A-25 August 2006DRT06VO0 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6t STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop


Line (Acres) (Rs)

0.75 Abdul Hasan, 6,600I Cultivation Maqbool

Hussain

21 4,165 m Angle 200 Left . 0

22 415-435m Houses both sides of T 022 4,165 - 4,365 m the route 0

Cultivation 1.50 Azim, Gulzar 13,200

Sparsetree cover ! I 0

_ _ _ Hilly terrain - - _

23 _ _4,365 m | Angle 5° Left 0

24 4,365 - 4,955 m I Houses along the route - | 0

Road crossing 0

Shops along the route 0

| Road crossing 0

Cutiaton0.75 i Haji Anwar, 6,600Cultivation,Feoi Feroz

25 4,955 m |Angle 280 Left - | 0

26 4,955 -5,675 m Road crossing | 0

Bridge under the route 0

Nallah crossing 0

Sparsetree cover - - 0

Hilly terrain 0

Shops left of the route 0

27 5,675 m Angle 290 Left 0

28 5,675-5,955 m , Houses right of the 0

rorutete1j Track rcrossing | -i 0


29 5,955 m Angle 330 Right 0

30 5,955 - 6,165 m '.Nullah crossing - - 0


Hilly terrain | | 0

31 6,165 m Angle 30 Left - - 1 0

32 16,165 - 6,315 m Nullah crossing - - 0


DRT06VOI IES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Land undsrm Land Owner(s) Compensation

llLine (Acres) !(Rs)Sparse tree cover - 0

Hilly terrain 0

33 6,315 m Angle 180 Right - -0

34 6,315 - 6,725 m Houses left of the route 0

Sparse tree cover 0

Nullah crossing 0

0.75 M Sain, M 6,600Cultivation Arshad, Abdul

l_ Khaliq

35 6,725m Angle 110-30' Right 0

36 6,725-7,072 m Sparse tree cover _l Nullah crossing -

Cultivation 4.50 State land | 39,600


37 7,072 m Angle 270 Right 0

38 7,072 - 7,612 m Houses right of the 0route

Hilly terrain 0

39 |7,612 m Angle 270 Left 0

4 Graveyard left of the | 040 7612 - 7,952 m r._ __


41 7,952 m Angle 260 Left 0

42 7,952 - 8,312 m Road crossing 0

Houses left of the route - . - 0

1.13 Khadim 9,900Hussain,Hussain Din,

Cultivation Barkat Khan, Maslam, Ch NoorHussain, FaqirMohammad

Hilly terrain . - , H F 0

43 8,312 m Angle 100 Right l 0

44 8,312 - 8,472 m Hilly terrain l 0

Sparse tree cover | 0

45 8,472 m Angle 450 Right 0

AN A-27 August 2006DRTo6VO0 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features |rLLad under nd Owner(s) Compensation

Line (Acres) (Rs)

I i 1.50 M Akram, M 13,20046 8,472-8.832m Cultivation Daud, M Rafiq,

- Ch M Aslam

Hilly terrain 0

- Sparse tree cover -

47 8,832 m iAngle 160 Right - -

48 8,832 - 9,032 m Hilly terrain 0

- Sparse tree cover 0

49 9,032 m Angle 330 Left 0

50| 9,032-9,262m Graveyard along the I | 0

Road crossing 0


!Hilly terrain 0

51 9,262 m Angle 10° - 30' 0

52 9,262 - 9,532 m Houses left of the route

Hilly terrain 0


53 9,532 m Angle 15° Right I - - 0

54 9,532 - 9,717 m Hilly terrain - - 0


55 9,717 m Angle 8 Right 0

56 9,717 - 10,060 m Nullah crossing - 0

Hilly terrain | 0

Sparse tree cover !

57 10,060m Angle7 Right - - 0

58 10,060- 10,250 m Nullah crossing | | 0

Hilly terrain - - 0

Sparse tree cover - 0

59 10,250m I Angle 6 -40' - - 0

60 10,250- 10,485 m Road crossing | - 0

Hilly terrain - - 0

Sparse tree cover 0-

61 | 10,485m Angle6 Left 0





! _ Line (Acres) (Rs)

62 10,485-10,585 m Road crossing - - 0

2.25 Farooq, 19,800Shoukat Ali,Makhan Khan,

Cultivation M atiq, M Nazir,M Azam, MHalim, M Anf, MAltaf

Hilly terrain . 0

63 10,585m Angle 460 Left 0

64 10,585 - 11,185 m Road crossing 0


1 11 -KV feeder crossing | 0

Houses right of the 0route

Sparse tree cover 0

Road crossing 0

65 11,185 m Angle 350 Left 0

66 1 11,185 - 11,685 m Shops along the route 0

Road crossing 0

33-KV transmission line 0Grossing.

Nullah crossing 0

67 11,685m Angle40° Left - - | 0

68 11,785 m Hajira Grid Station - - 0

69 Estimated number of 40 120,000trees to be removed.

, Total 19.88 50 294,900

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationChoa Saidan Shah - Dandot Transmission Line

I Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features TLand under Land Owner(s) CAmount

I Une (Acres) (Rs)

Choa Saidan Shah Grid II r m 1Station--0

2 0 - 548 m Orchards 0.13 I M Sardar 1,100

Foothills r ] - 0

3 548m Angle 13- 10' Left _ 1 | 0

4 |548 - 1,674 m |Vacant land | 0

A A-29 August 2006DRT06Vol IES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Amount

LTne (Acres) (Rs)

Hilly terrain ' 0

5 1,674 m Angle 57° - 30' Left - 0

6 1,674 - 2,134 m Orchards 1.38 M Sardar 12,100

Road crossing - 0I , _ _ _ _ _

Hilly terrain | 0

7 2,134m Angle 39°-45' Left - 0

8 2,134 - 2,534 m Hilly Terrain 0

Scrub vegetation - i 0

9 2,534 m Angle 90° 10' Left - 0

10 2,534 - 2,934 m Hilly terrain 0

Scrub vegetation 0

11 2,934 m Angle 58° - 30' Right - - 0

Cultivation Residents of 68,20012 2,934 - 4,184 m 7.75 Ratosha village

Road crossing - 0

I Undulating terrain I 0

13 4,184 m Angle 130 - 10' Right 014 - 6

Cultivation | Residents of 58,30014 !4,184 - 5,806 m 6.63 Raoh ilg


Pipeline crossing . 0

Broken land 0

15 5,806 m Angle 140 - 20'Left - 0

16 5,806 - 7,355 m Hilly terrain --

Scrub vegetation |

17 1 7,355 m Angle 330 - 40' Left !18 7,355-7,875m Hilly terrain - - 0

||Nullah crossing - 0

| Scrub vegetation - 0

19 |7,875 m |Angle 5° - IO' Right | 0

20 |7,875 - 8,905 m |Hilly terrain - 0

7 | Road crossing ] _ | 0

Nullah crossing | - | | 0


DRT06VO1 IES-RP


Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Land under Land Owner(s) Compensation

Ke etrs ITransmission Amount_ Line (Acres) (Rs)

21 8,905 m Angle 140 Right - - 0

22 8,905 -9,365 m Hilly terrain t -- - - - 0

Scrub vegetation -i -- 0

23 9,365 m Angle 9° - 20' Right j - 0

24 9,365 - 10,015 m Hilly terrain 0

Nullah crossing 0

25 10,015 m Angle 80 - 10'Right | 0

26 i 10,015 - 10,395 m I Hilly terrain - - j o

Scrub vegetation l -0

27 10,395 m Angle 130 - 40' Left l _

28 10,395 - 11,145 m Undulating terrain - | 0

Foothills - , 0

29 11,145 m Angle 8° - 10' Left ] J 0

30 11,145 - 11,765 m Road crossing i - 0

Railway line crossing - - 0

Road crossing - - 0

Flat terrain 0

31 11,765 m Angle 900 Right | 0

32 11,765 m Dandot Grid Station - - 0

Estimated number 15 i - 30,00033 of trees to be I

removed.

Total 15.88 4 169,700

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationDandot - Pinanwal Transmission Line

Cultivated Crop


Line (Acres) (Rs)

1 0 m Pinnawal Grid Station - 0

Cultivation 11.13 Raja Suba Khan, 97,900Raja M Hyat,Abbas, Raja

2 0 - 1,633 m Nisar, Nazar,Ashraf Minhas

Track crossing . 0

Road crossing 0



Cultivated CropILand under Compensation

Description Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) AC muntLine (Acres) (Rs)

Settlement left side of0

j__;__the route _

A small water pond on -- - 0

the route

3 1,633 m Angle 190 - 30' Left 0

4 1,633 - 1,705 m Flat terrain -0

Vacant land -- -- 0

5 1,705 m Angle 24°- I0' Right - | 0

6 1,705 - 6,890 Cultivaion 3.00 Rasheed Minhas 26,400

Flat terrain -0

Track crossing - - -0

Track crossing 0

Track crossing ---- 0

1 Cultivation 0.75 M Safdar 6,600

Barren land - 0

2 6,890 m i Angle 30 -O' Right 0

3 6,890 - 10,922 m Houses left of the route - - 0

Cultivation 1.50 M Ashraf 13,200

Barren land - 0

Road crossing | 0

=|Track ruossing | 0

Barren land 0

Track crossing | 0

- Cultivation 6.13 Raja Sabit 53,900

Water pond on the 0route

Railway line crossing 0

Barren land -

4 10,922 m Angle 570 - 20' Right - 0

5 10922 - 11372 500-KVmtransmission .5 10,92 - 11372 m line crossing--0

Flat terrain -- 0

Barren land 0


DRT06VOl IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07)

Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropDecito e etrs Land under CompensationDescription Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) Amount

l Line (Acres) (Rs)

6 11,372 m I Angle 40° - IO' LeRfl 01,7m66-KV transmission line

7 1 1,372 - 15,267 m crossing- -

Barren land - 0

- . [Track crossing . 0

Cultivation 3.13 Raja Asghar 27,500

| Track crossing - . -

-|Railway line crossing - 0

Barren land -0

8 15,267 m Angle 10 0 Right 0

9 15,267 - 19,660 m Barren land 7| Vacant land . -

I Flat terrain - 0

Road crossing - 0

Barren land 0

10 Barren land --- 0

Track crossing j 0

Cultivation 2.38 Sardar M amin, 20,900Pind Gujar

- ---. Barren land - 0

132-KV transmission 0line crossing

11 19,660 m Angle 260 - 30' Right | 0

12 19,660 - 22,946 m Road crossing - - 0

Cultivation 2.50 Syed Nazar 22.000Hussain, SyedLal Shah,Ghulam Rasul,Shahid Khan

Barren land 0

Cultivation . 0

Road crossing - - 0

- Cultivation 1.88 M Abbas, M 16,500| | Nazirl

I Flat terrain |a| 0

Barren land - | 0

A A-33 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


Cultivated CropKe etrs Land uLnder gCompensation

Description Key Features Transmission Land Owner(s) Amountl Line (Acres) (Rs)

Track crossing - | | 0

13 22,946 m Angle 6°- 10' Left 0

Cultivation 4.88 Ghulam 42,90014 22,946 - 23,806 m Murtuza, M

- Ashraf

t ~Settlement right side of,the route

Flat terrain - l 0

15 23,806 m Angle 250 - 10' Right - 1 0

16 23,806 - 25,106 m Cultivation 4.25 Ch Salim 37,400

Cultivation 7.88 Ch llyas, 69,300Residents ofDhok Malkan

1 Broken land 0

17 25,106 m Angle 80 - 10' Left 0

18 25,106 - 27,536 m 11 -KV feeder crossing 0

Broken land 0

-- LT lines crossing

Broken land - - 0

11-KV feeder crossing --- 0

66-KV transmission line 0crossing

19 27,536 m Dandot Grid Station 0

Estimated number of 20 40,00020 trees to be removed.

Total 49.38 25 474,500

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationFateh Jang - Ahmadal Transmission Line

Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Arander Land Owner(s) CompensationTransmission n e~, AmountLine (Acres) (Rs)

1 0 m FatehJang Grid Station | - | | 0

2 0-40 m - 0

3 40m Angle600°Left | 0



Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Area under Land Owner(s) Amount

! Line (Acres) (Rs)

4 140-202 m .Cultivation 1.25 Sh Mehboob 11,00040- 02 CulivaionElahi, M Asghar

5 202 m Angle 590- 30 Left 0

4 , 202-292 m Cultivation 0.63 Mazhar Khan 5,500

5 j 292 m Angle 350- 45 Left J | | 0

6 292 - 1,964 m Cultivation 4.38 . Haq Nawaz 38,500

166 KV transmission line -crossing

I Railway Line crossing 0

Main Road crossing 0

I Cultivation 3.13 Noor Mohammad 27,500

Road crossing 0

Cultivation 1.25 Riaz 11,000

Cultivation 2.50 Nisar 22,000

7 1,964 m Angle 130 - 20 'Left 0

8 1,964 - 3,074 m Cultivation 1.88 M Yaqub 16,500

[Broken area - -- 0


10 3,074 - 3,354 m Cultivation 2.13 M Banaras 18,700

Generally flat terrain 0

11 3,354 m Angle 340 Left 0


A Ali, Mushtaq,Cultivation 7.88 Hyder, Yasmin, 69,300

Khan Yusuf

Cultivation 8.50 Bareat 74,800Majeed

1Cliain9.63 Lai Khan, M 84,700|_Cultivation 9.63 Hussain

eL A-35 August 2006DRT06V011IES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Area under Land Owner(s) AmountTAreaunderCopesaion AonLine (Acres) (Rs)

Road crossing | 0


13 7,044 m - Angle 300 Right 0

Baqir Khan, Omar14 7,044 - 21,044 Cultivation 8.88 Hyat, Mushtaq, M 78,100

Tariq

House on the 0transmission line route _ I _

Cultivation 8.88 M Amin, Dost 78,100

Cutvto .8 Mohammad Dar 7,0

House near the route 0

Vacant land - - 0

Cuttivation 4.88 Safdar, Sher Ali 42,900

Broken area - - 0

Nullah crossing - 0

Houses on the route - -0

| Cultivation 8.88 Farooq, Safdar. 78,100

Hilly area N 0

15 21,044 m ,Angle 250 Right - 0

16 21,044 - 27,669 m Cultivation 8.88 Zafar 78,100

| Road crossing | 0

I Grave yard | | 0


Cultivation 8.88 Afzal, Fayyaz, 78,100Nawaz


Cultivation 13.25 Pir Baksh, Qamar 116,600Zaman

e A-36 August 2006DRT06VOI IES-RP


Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Area under Land Owner(s) CompensationesrponKyTransmission LnOwe() Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Road crossing | - l - 0

Broken area | - 0

17 27,669 - 38,669 m Hilly area 0

= Cultivation 8.50 Ashraf 74,800

i Houses near the route - - 0

Vacant land | - 0

Broken area -0

TCultivtio 8.50o Islam, Ahmed 7,0|Cultivation 8.5 Khan 74,800

Broken area 0

Cultivation 4.50 Sher Khan 39,600

Road crossing 0

Sher Khan, KhanCultivation 11.25 Malik, Sultan 99,000

Khan, Taj Khan

Broken area - - 0

Afzal Khan dam | - | - 0

Broken area - - 0

Cultivation 8.88 Taj Khan, Hyat 78,100_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ K han

Hyat Khan,Cultivation 8.88 Sikandar Khan, 78,100

Hammad

Fateh

Cultivation 4.00 NazrmHmajd HaMq 35,200

Nawaz

18 38,669- 38,869 m Broken area - - , 0

19 38,869 - 39,989 m | Cultivation 5.50 Khan, Haq Nawaz 48,400

20 39,989 m Ahmadad Grid Station 0

AN A-37 August 2006

DRT06VOl IES-RP


Cultivated Crop

Description Key Features Area under Land Owers) CompensationITransmission LadOwe(smount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Estimated number of 100 j 200,00021 trees to be removed. i |

Total | 165.63 56 1,657,500

- List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationAhmadal - Pindi Gheb Transmission Line

Cultivated CropDKArea under Land CompensationDescription Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

1 ' 0 m j Tee-off point near . 0Ahmadal Grid Station

2 0 - 860 m Broken area 0 l 0

Cultivation 8.88 Ahmed Khan | 78,100{ ~M Shah 7,0

3 860 m Angle 500 Right - - 0

4 860 - 1,31 0 m Houses right side of the 04 860-1310m Iroute0

Generally flat terrain - 0

5 1,310 m I Angle 330 Left - 0

6j1 1,310 -1,810 m i Houses right side of the


Broken area 0

7 1,810 m Angle 80 Left 0

8 1,81 0 - 7,210 m Avoids Ahmadal's8 1,8107.210 m populated area--0

Nullah crossing - 0

Nazir Ahmed,Cultivation 8.88 Taimur, M 78,100

Shah

7ultivation 17.50 Taimur, Iqbal 154,000

Generally flat terrain - 0

91 7,210 m Angle 550 Left 0

t I I Zamanullah l

10 i7,210 -8,01 0m Cultivation | 3.75 |Qurban Khan, i 33,000| } | |M Naeem l

||Generally flat terrain ||| 0

11 |8,010 m| Angle 56° Right | 0

12 8,010-21,320 m Cultivation 5.88 Faisal, Babu 51,700Khalid, Rustam 5,0

e A-38 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6' STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropArea under Land CompensationDescription Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

Line (Acres) (Rs)

Broken area - - 0


Hilly area 0

Cultivation 5.88 M Ali, 11am 51,700[ __ ____ ____ Deen

Road crossing - 0

Hatim Khan,

Cultivation 8.88 Ao Ahae, 78,100i Noor Khan,Mukhtar Ali

Cultivation 8.88 Hakam Khan, 78,100Baqir Ali

i 500-KVtransmission line 1 0crossing --

Akhtar Khan,l | Abdullah Khan,

Cultivation 9.75 Noor 85,800Mohammad,Allah Ditta


1 Generally flat terrain 0

13 21,320 m Angle 130 Right 0

lqbal, M Hyat,14 21.320 - 25,980 m Cultivation 8.88 M nawaz, M 78,100

Sabir

888 .M Deen, SherCultivation 8.88 Khan, Haji 78,100

Sadiq

T Haji GhulamI Cultivation 8.88 | Ali,Ghulam 78,100Rasool

i Cultivation 7.88 Khan00

I Generally flat terrain - o 0

15 25,980 m Angle 300 Right . - . r- 0

Jabir Khan, MArshad, AtaMohammad,

16 25,980 - 27,520 m Cultivation 7.38 Gul 64,900Mohammad,FatehMohammad


Alam, SultanCultivation 4.00 Mohammad, 35,200

Khushdil


e-. A-39 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP

Appendix A IESCO 6!" STG and ELR Project (2006-07)Resettlement Plan

Cultivated CropDescription Key Features Area under Land Compensation

Transmission Owner(s) AmountLine (Acres) (Rs)

17 t 27,520 m 1Angle 150 Right 0

18 27,520 - 30,740 m Barren land - 0

Cultivation 4.75 Malik Zahid 41,800_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _lq b a l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Haji Aslam,

Cultivation 8.88 Ghulam 78,100

Malik Saeed

I i Malik Saeed, |Cultivation 5.88 uanar d51,700

I Khan Noor 5,0I |_ I _Mohammad

i Generally flat terrain I - j 0

20 30,740 - 30,800 m Vacant land 0

21 30,800 m Pindi Gheb Grid Station 0

Estimated number I 90 | 180,00022 of trees to be

removed. 436

|Tobl 143.63 52 1,443,900

List of Landowners with Estimates of Crop CompensationUniversity - Nilore Transmission Line

Cultivated i

Description Key Features Area under CompensabonDecrptonKy eaurs Transmission Ownier(s) AnmountLine (Acres) (1s)

1 0 m Nilore Grid Station 0

1~ 02 0 - 60 m Factory area

3 60 m Angle 600 Left 0

O4 _60_-4,720m | Generally flat terrain

Factory area 0

Ravine

Factory fencing 3 00

_ _ Road crossing i j j

T 0Houses both sides of theroute

Cultivation 8.75 Majid, Nasir, 77,000I Tanvir,_I _ _ Sakhawat

ekAN A-40 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP


| ArCultivated | CompensationDescription Key Features Transmission Owner(s) Amount

. Line (Acres) (Rs)

Cultivation 1.38 iGul Sher, 12,100! . ! Najeeb, Alil l |Asghar, Saeed

i 'Afzal, Abdur i,Rasheed

- Cultivation 1.50 Noor Khan, 13,200Waseem, M|

i { Akbar

Nullah crossing j F 0

Houses both sides of the 0route

Cultivation 10.38 Ajun, Akhtar, 91,300Inayat Ali

0Road crossing

011 -KV feeder crossing _

Cultivation 6.63 ISyed Zaman, 58,300Nawab

Road crossing 0


6 4,720 - 5,230 m Houses near the route j 0

Cultivation 3.75 Imdad Ali, 33,000Arshad, UsmanKhan


7 5,230 m Angle 260 Left 0

Cultivation 6.25 Raja Rehmat, 55,000

8 5,230 - 6,080 m I M Deen, Sahfiq


9 6,080 m Angle 150 Right _ 0

Cultivation 2.50 Rab Nawaz 22,000Khan, BegumBibi, Sher Ali.Noor Bukhsh,

10 6,080 - 10,200 m Sher Baz

Broken area 0Cultivation 2.25 Kifayat Hussain 19,800

Road crossing 0i . 0

Nallah crossing i _

Broken area _ _ 0Cultivation I 1.88 Rab Nawaz 16,500

___ _ I __ Khan

Cultivation | 10.75 Raja Shoukat, 94,600[ ____| ___ |Raja Shoiab

kN A-41 August 2006DRT06VO1 IES-RP


Cultivated Cmesto

I Description Key Features Area under Owner(s) AmountTransmigssion Owers) Amun

_____ ____ ____ ____ Line (Acres) ( s

Cultivation 3.63 Sher Bahadur, 31,900Tajammul IHussain, lmranKhan

j Cultivation j 6.50 Raja Rehmat 57,200

, Road crossing I _ _

11 10,200m Angle 28° Left I131 10,200 m ,~IIIL12 10,200 -10,370 m Broken area

1 3 10,370 m Angle 13° Left

14 10,370 -10,690 m I Hilly area

15 10,690 m Angle 80 Left 0

16 10,690 - 12,990 m Residential plotting

Nullah crossing .- 0

Generally flat terrainI I 0

Road crossing 0

17 12,990 m Angle 90 Left 0t 0

18 12,990-13,550m Murree Road crossing | j 0

_ _ _ | Broken area _19 13,550 m Angle 40 Left 0

20 13,550 - 13,670 m Broken area

21 13,670m j Angle 260 Left | 0


23 13,930 m Angle 350 Left 0

24 1 14,000 m University Grid Station 0

Estimated number 0of trees to be

25 removed.

Total 66.13 40 581,900

ekAN A-42 August 2006DRT06VOl IES-RP

--- -- -----

iesco 6th resetlement plan - world bank

Documents