identification of worst-case forces

17
1 Identification of Worst-Case Forces Identification of Worst-Case Forces MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham and Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department, RAL

Upload: tyrone-strong

Post on 01-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Identification of Worst-Case Forces. Elwyn Baynham and Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department, RAL. MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004. Aims of work. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

1

Identification of Worst-Case ForcesIdentification of Worst-Case Forces

MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004

Elwyn Baynham and Yury Ivanyushenkov

Applied Science Division,Engineering and Instrumentation Department,

RAL

Page 2: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

2

Aims of work

Calculation of axial magnetic forces in MICE by using OPERA package for various magnetic configurations:

• MICE final stage: - nominal and max p; - gap of 450mm and 600 mm, - non-flip and solenoidal modes;

• earlier stages of MICE.

Page 3: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

3

Model in OPERA

Model:-18 coils;- no iron shielding

Page 4: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

4

STEP I:

STEP II

STEP III

STEP IV

STEP V

STEP VII

By A.Blondel

MICE stages

Page 5: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

5Alain Blondel

Step VII The full two-cell MICEibid. sensitivity will be better since volts will be higher.

can try various settings of polarities and absorbers (full / empty)and of absorber thicknesses (to match available RF or beam momentum)

MICE stages (2)

Page 6: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

6

255 305

1260120

60200

620

263347

725

250

841

13751385 12501260

3660

(SFOFO, 200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

404

Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=113.95 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=96.21 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

255355

202

Matching #2 coils: J=41.46 A/mm2

2440

202

4541

4721

6041

6161

Matching #1 coils: J=65.06 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=65.22 A/mm2

792

305

Gap=600

MICE magnetic system

Note:Geometry and currents fromWing and Ulisse

Page 7: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

7

(SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

2.4 2.4

103.5

6.6

22

220

225

15.4236

103.5

6.6

22

220

225

15.4

236

All forces are in tonnes !

147 147

Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=96.21 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=41.46 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=65.06 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=65.22 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=113.95 A/mm2

12.5 5

Forces in MICE magnetic system

15.4

Page 8: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

8

(SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

4.1 4.1

83.9

13.9

20.8

235

228

14236

83.9

13.9

20.8

235

228

14

236

All forces are in tonnes !

147 147

Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=96.21 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=75.17 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=56.30 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=113.95 A/mm2

24.3 7

Forces in MICE magnetic system

14

Page 9: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

9

2.4

103.5

6.6

22

220

225

15.4236 147

12.5 5 15.4

4.1

83.9

13.9

20.8

235

228

14236 147

24.3 714

(SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

(SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

Forces Vs. Gap for p=200 Mev/c

Page 10: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

10

(SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

1.4 1.4

101

2.9

24.4

316

324

23340

101

2.9

24.4

316

324

23

340

All forces are in tonnes !

147 147

Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=115.45 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=42.65 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=78.12 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=65.22 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=136.74A/mm2

17.3 8

Forces in MICE magnetic system

23

Page 11: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

11

(SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

2.4 2.4

79

9

23.3

366.6

328

21.5340

79

9

23.3

336.6

328

21.5

340

All forces are in tonnes !

147

Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=115.45 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=83.07 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=66.82 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=136.74 A/mm2

147

33.3 38.6

Forces in MICE magnetic system

21.5

Page 12: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

12

(SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

1.4

101

2.9

24.4

316

324

23340 147

17.3 8 23

(SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

2.4

79

9

23.3

366.6

328

21.5340 147

33.3 38.6 21.5

Forces Vs. Gap for p=240 Mev/c

Page 13: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

13

Forces Vs.p for gap =450 mm

(SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

2.4

103.5

6.6

22

220

225

15.4236 147

12.5 5 15.4

(SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm)

2.4

79

9

23.3

366.6

328

21.5340 147

33.3 38.6 21.5

Page 14: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

14

(NO-FLIP, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

2.2 2.2

100.8

3.6

14

59.5

46

46.797

100.8

3.6

14

59.5

46

46.7

97

All forces are in tonnes !

146

Centre coils: J=63.81 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=93.10 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=34.99 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=68.33 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=64.01 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=68.03 A/mm2

146

39.4 13.5

Forces in MICE magnetic system

46.7

Page 15: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

15

(‘Solenoidal’, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm)

1.8 1.8

100.6

3.6

13.7

60.3

45

15.751.5

100.6

3.6

13.7

60.3

45

15.7

51.5

All forces are in tonnes !

146

Centre coils: J=63.81 A/mm2

Coupling coils: J=93.10 A/mm2

End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm2

Matching #2 coils: J=34.99 A/mm2

Matching #1 coils: J=68.33 A/mm2

End #1 coils: J=64.01 A/mm2

Focusing coils: J=68.03 A/mm2

146

26.3 15.3

Forces in MICE magnetic system

15.7

Page 16: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

16

Net Force, tonne / Case

SFOFO, p=200 Mev/c, beta=42 cm

SFOFO, p=240 Mev/c, beta=42 cm

N0-FLIP, p=200 Mev/c,

beta=42 cm

‘Solenoid’, p=200 Mev/c,

beta=42 cm

Gap=450 mm

Gap=600 mm

Gap=450 mm

Gap=600 mm

Gap=600 mm

Gap=600 mm

Central focus pair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Edge focus pair 7from centre

5towards centre

38.6from centre

8towards centre

13.5towards centre

15.3towards centre

Coupling coil 14from centre

15from centre

21.5from centre

23from centre

46.7from centre

15.7towards centre

Tracker solenoid 24.3towards centre

12.5towards centre

33.3towards centre

17.3towards centre

39.4towards centre

26.3towards centre

Summary table for axial magnetic forces

Page 17: Identification of Worst-Case Forces

17

Conclusions and next steps

Conclusions:• so far the highest net forces on modules are created in NON-FLIP mode (but the highest net force on the edge focus pair is in case of p=240 MeV/c and gap of 450 mm) -> there is no a single worst mode for all the modules;• both the edge focus pair and the tracker solenoid (but not the coupling coil) are sensitive to the value of the gap;• forces are much higher for 240 MeV/c.

Next steps:• better definition of non-SFOFO modes – Non-flip, solenoidal;• definitions of magnetic configurations and force calculation for various MICE stages.