icf blower door aug 2010

1
7/21/2019 ICF Blower Door Aug 2010 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/icf-blower-door-aug-2010 1/1 Blower Door Testing of Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) Homes Marzena Kasia FYDRYCH 1 , Michael STREET 1,2 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, 02139 Cambridge, United States. 2 Morehouse College ,Atlanta, GA [email protected] OBJECTIVE Evaluate the air tightness of Insulated Concrete Form single-family homes MOTIVATION B CONCRETE SUSTAINABILITY HUB IMPACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been supported by the Concrete Sustainability Hub at MIT, with sponsorship provided by the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and the RMC Research & Education Foundation. REFERENCES [1] ASTM E1827-96 Determining Airtightness of Buildings Using an Orifice Blower Door [2] ASTM E779-03 Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan Pressurization [3] ASHRAE 438RP-92 Evaluation of the Techniques for the Measurement of Air Leakage of Building Components, D.G.Colliver, W.E.Murphy, W.Sun [4] ASHRAE Fundamentals - 2009  Infiltration of air through the building envelope is often a major variable in a system’s heating and cooling loads.  Air will flow through building elements such as walls, roofs, windows, doors and bathroom and kitchen vents. The choice of wall materials, windows and doors and the quality of construction affect the total leakage area of the envelope. Air flow will depend on an envelope’s leakage area and the pressures generated by winds and buoyancy forces associated with indoor-outdoor temperature differences. These natural forces vary with building location.  ICF walls consist of a solid, continuous and seamless unit that suggests tighter construction than framed walls.  Infiltration is very difficult to predict and is better estimated with house- specific air tightness tests. Inadequate field tests have been done to evaluate the general potential for reduced air infiltration of ICF homes. MIT in cooperation with Concrete Industry personnel has scheduled air tightness tests of 40 ICF houses across the United States. To date,15 blower door experiments have been carried out in:  Mississippi – 10 houses  Florida – 2 houses  Connecticut – 2 houses  New Hampshire – 1 house House floor area has varied from 800 to 7300ft 2 METHODOLOGY BLOWER DOOR TEST Blower door tests have been performed by certified home auditors according to ASTM E1827-96 [1] or ASTM E779-03 [2] using the Minneapolis Blower Door  with TECTITE software.  Blower Door Methodology [3]  A powerful variable speed fan is placed in an opening in the building envelope  The air is blown into (pressurization) or out of (depressurization) the building.  A uniform, artificial, static pressure is imposed across the entire building envelope and the amount of air being moved by the fan to create this pressure differential is determined.  The air flow rate through the fan is usually determined from: a) measurements of the pressure drop across a known flow restriction, or b) the fan rotational speed and a calibration curve. Building Data 1782.5 ft 2  floor area 14082.1 ft 3  volume 3962 ft 2  exposed surface KEY FINDINGS Construction Classification Based on Unit Leakage Area [4] Tightness of tested ICF houses varied from good to tight. Mean air tightness was 0.016in 2  /ft 2  (1.05cm2  /m2)  Leakage area normalized by exposed surface area is a useful metric for evaluating air tightness, based on ASHRAE ratings. Measurement-based air tightness metrics indicate that IC F houses are subject to lower amounts of uncontrolled outdoor airflow than typical production housing. Tighter construction facilitates the use of mechanical ventilation with heat recovery for low-cost and low- environmental-impact building ventilation. Air tightness measurements allow us to quantify energy use and carbon emissions associated with air leakage for houses in different climate regions using building energy simulation programs. Building Leakage Curve  Airflow at 50 Pascals Calculations  Air Change per Hour  Test Data Flow at 4Pa  A L  total leakage area of the building Unit leakage area (per ft 2 of exposed surface) Example Blower Door Data

Upload: sathiaram-ram

Post on 05-Mar-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

blower door

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ICF Blower Door Aug 2010

7/21/2019 ICF Blower Door Aug 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/icf-blower-door-aug-2010 1/1

Blower Door Testing of Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) HomesMarzena Kasia FYDRYCH1, Michael STREET1,2

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, 02139 Cambridge, United States. 2 Morehouse College ,Atlanta, [email protected] 

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the air tightness of Insulated Concrete Form single-family

homes

MOTIVATION

B

CONCRETE

SUSTAINABILITY

HUB

IMPACT

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work has been supported by the Concrete Sustainability

Hub at MIT, with sponsorship provided by the Portland

Cement Association (PCA) and the RMC Research &

Education Foundation.

REFERENCES

[1] ASTM E1827-96 Determining Airtightness of Buildings Using an Orifice Blower Door

[2] ASTM E779-03 Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan

Pressurization

[3] ASHRAE 438RP-92 Evaluation of the Techniques for the Measurement of Air Leakage of

Building Components,D.G.Colliver, W.E.Murphy, W.Sun

[4] ASHRAE Fundamentals - 2009 

• Infiltration of air through the building envelope is often a major variable

in a system’s heating and cooling loads.

• Air will flow through building elements such as walls, roofs, windows,

doors and bathroom and kitchen vents. The choice of wall materials,

windows and doors and the quality of construction affect the total

leakage area of the envelope. Air flow will depend on an envelope’s

leakage area and the pressures generated by winds and buoyancy

forces associated with indoor-outdoor temperature differences. These

natural forces vary with building location.

• ICF walls consist of a

solid, continuous and

seamless unit that

suggests tighter

construction than framedwalls.

• Infiltration is very difficult

to predict and is better

estimated with house-

specific air tightness tests.

Inadequate field tests have

been done to evaluate the

general potential for

reduced air infiltration of

ICF homes.

MIT in cooperation

with Concrete Industry

personnel has

scheduled airtightness tests of 40

ICF houses across

the United States.

To date,15 blower door experiments have been carried out in:

•  Mississippi – 10 houses

•  Florida – 2 houses

•  Connecticut – 2 houses

•  New Hampshire – 1 house

House floor area has varied from 800 to 7300ft2

METHODOLOGY

BLOWER DOOR TEST

Blower door tests have been

performed by certified home auditorsaccording to ASTM E1827-96[1] or

ASTM E779-03[2] using the

Minneapolis Blower Door  with

TECTITE software. 

Blower Door Methodology[3]

•  A powerful variable speed fan is

placed in an opening in the building

envelope

• The air is blown into (pressurization)

or out of (depressurization) the building.

• A uniform, artificial, static pressure is

imposed across the entire building

envelope and the amount of air being

moved by the fan to create this

pressure differential is determined.

• The air flow rate through the fan is

usually determined from: a)

measurements of the pressure drop

across a known flow restriction, or b)

the fan rotational speed and a

calibration curve.

Building Data

1782.5 ft2 floor area

14082.1 ft3 volume

3962 ft2 exposed surface

KEY FINDINGS

Construction Classification Based on Unit Leakage Area[4]

• Tightness of tested ICF houses varied from good to tight.

• Mean air tightness was 0.016in2 /ft2 (1.05cm2 /m2) 

Leakage area normalized by exposed surface area is a usefulmetric for evaluating air tightness, based on ASHRAE ratings.

• Measurement-based air tightness metrics indicate that IC F

houses are subject to lower amounts of uncontrolled

outdoor airflow than typical production housing.

• Tighter construction facilitates the use of mechanical

ventilation with heat recovery for low-cost and low-

environmental-impact building ventilation.

• Air tightness measurements allow us to quantify energy use

and carbon emissions associated with air leakage for

houses in different climate regions using building energy

simulation programs.

Building Leakage Curve

 Airflow at 50 Pascals

Calculations

 Air Change per Hour  

Test Data Flow at 4Pa

 AL total leakage area of the building

Unit leakage area

(per ft2 of exposed surface)

Example Blower Door Data