iapp... · web viewandres bonifacio avenue, tibanga. 9200 iligan city, philippines. 2005 isrp:...

MSU-ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYAndres Bonifacio Avenue, Tibanga

9200 Iligan City, Philippines

2005 ISRP:Implementing

Guidelinesand

Procedures

A.Y. 2010-2011_______________________________________________________

0

VISIONA world-class institution of higher learning, renowned

for its excellence in Science and Technologyand for its commitment to the

holistic developmentof the individual

and society

MISSION

To provide quality education for the industrial and socio-economic development of Mindanao with its diverse

cultures, through relevant programs in instruction, research, extensionand community involvement.

1

Foreword

The 2005 Revised ISRP was approved by the MSU Board of Regents through BOR Resolution No. 211, S. 2006. The scheme is primarily intended to serve as a guide for the evaluation of new and incumbent faculty members for ranking purposes and promotion, respectively.

Through its years of existence, the Institute Academic Promotion Panel (IAPP) has evolved with the true intention of delivering the objectives for its being. In an attempt to facilitate and systematize evaluation of faculty members, this supplemental guide, which is aptly called the “2005 Revised ISRP: Implementing Guidelines and Procedures” is prepared.

It is highly recommended that faculty recruits, as well as faculty members who qualify for promotion, browse through this guide and familiarize themselves with the intricacies related to the evaluation process, viz., procedures, qualifications, entry requirements, document submittals, etc. In the end, a well-prepared set of documents will definitely facilitate the evaluation process.

We would like to thank the IAPP members for sharing their time and efforts in preparing this guide. Their inputs, undoubtedly, have contributed greatly for its realization.

We would also like to thank the MSU-IIT administration under Chancellor Marcelo P. Salazar and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Arnulfo P. Supe for their support particularly in the publication of this guide.

___________________________________ Jerson N. Orejudos, Ph.D.

Chair, Institute Academic Promotion Panel

i

Prepared and submitted by the Institute Academic Promotion Panel:

_________________________ _______________________________Dr. Jerson N. Orejudos, Chair Prof. Edwin O. Deiparine, Vice Chair

_________________________ _______________________________Mrs. Estrella G. Abreu Mr. Ismael B. Alango

_________________________ _______________________________Prof. Griselda Z. Albao Prof. Aloha May H. Ambe

_________________________ _______________________________Prof. Luisita S. Cabanos Dr. Lomesindo T. Caparida

_________________________ _______________________________Prof. Rohane M. Derogongan Prof. Vicente E. Empig

_________________________ _______________________________Ms. Khandy Lorraine B. Guerrero Dr. Myrna E. Lahoylahoy

_________________________ _______________________________Prof. Josie Vic D. Mendoza Prof. Maria Rizalia Y. Teves

_________________________ Dr. Liwayway S. Viloria

ii

Table of Contents

Section Description Page

Foreword iInstitute Academic Promotion Panel ii

Evaluation ProcedureEvaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Initial Rank) 1Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Final Rank) 1Evaluation Procedure on Faculty Promotion 3

Flow ChartsEvaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Initial Rank) 5Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Final Rank) 6Evaluation Procedure on Faculty Promotion 7

General Format 8

Brief Description of IAPP Forms 8IAPP Form 01: Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit (Initial or Final Rank) 8

IAPP Form 02: Faculty Evaluation for Promotion 9IAPP Form 03: Evaluation Details 10IAPP Form 04: Summary of Evaluation for Faculty Recruits 12

IAPP Form 05: Summary of Faculty Evaluation for Promotion 13

IAPP Form 06: Research Report Rating Form 13IAPP Form 07: Invention: Impact & Utility Rating Form 14IAPP Form 08: Terminal Report 14IAPP Form 09: Echo Report 15IAPP Form 10: Accomplishment Report (Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Services) 15

IAPP Form 11: Program/Academic Adviser Summary Form 15IAPP Form 12: Program/Academic Adviser Form (Per Academic Year) 16

IAPP Form 13: Evaluation for a New Faculty Recruit (Final Rank) 16

IAPP Form 14: Faculty Evaluation for Promotion 16

IAPP Forms IAPP Form 01: EVALUATION FOR A FACULTY RECRUIT (Initial or Final Rank) 17

IAPP Form 02: FACULTY EVALUATION FOR PROMOTION 18

IAPP Form 03: EVALUATION DETAILS 20IAPP Form 04: SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FOR FACULTY RECRUITS (Initial or Final Rank) 23

IAPP Form 05: SUMMARY OF FACULTY EVALUATION FOR PROMOTION 24

IAPP Form 06: RESEARCH REPORT RATING FORM 25IAPP Form 07: INVENTION: IMPACT & UTILITY RATING FORM 26

iii


IAPP Form 08: TERMINAL REPORT 27IAPP Form 09: ECHO REPORT 28IAPP Form 10: ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT (Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities) 29

IAPP Form 11: PROGRAM/ACADEMIC ADVISER SUMMARY FORM 30

IAPP Form 12: PROGRAM/ACADEMIC ADVISER FORM (Per Academic Year) 31

IAPP Form 13: EVALUATION FOR A FACULTY RECRUIT (Final Rank) 32

IAPP Form 14: FACULTY EVALUATION FOR PROMOTION (USAPP) 33

IIT Form: APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO STUDY 35

Documents Submittals I. Educational Attainment 37II. Work Experience 37III. Productivity 38IV. Teaching Efficiency Rating (TER) 41V. Professional Growth 41VI. Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities 42VII. Extension Services 45

Integrated Scheme for Ranking and Promotion (ISRP) Revised 2005

Rationale A-1Purpose of Evaluation and Ranking A-1 I. Initial Ranking A-2 II. Rank Promotion A-2 Considerations for Promotions A-2 Requirements for Promotion Based on Current Rank: A-2 Instructor/Teacher A-3 Assistant Professor A-3 Associate Professor A-3 Professor A-3

The Scheme A-4 Part I: Rank Categorization A-4 Teacher (Levels I - III) A-4 Master Teacher (Levels I – IV) A-4 Instructor (Levels I – III) A-4 Assistant Professor (Levels I – IV) A-5 Associate Professor (Levels I – V) A-5 Full Professor (Levels I – VI) A-6 Research/College Professor A-7 University Professor A-7 Professor Emeritus A-7

Professorial Lecturer A-8 Special Lecturer A-8 Lecturer A-8 Associate Lecturer A-9 Assistant Lecturer A-9

iv


Part II. Level Specification A-9 The Criteria A-9 I. Educational Attainment A-9 II. Work Experience A-11 III. Productivity A-11 IV. Teaching Efficiency Rating A-15 V. Professional Growth A-16 VI. Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities A-18

VII. Extension Services A-19

Ranking A-21 Table 2. Table of Weights A-21 Table 3. Table of Base Points A-21

Implementing Guidelines A-23University Council Committee Members A-24

Functions and Duties of Professor Emeritus A-25

Other FormsTeaching Efficiency Rating (TER) Scale Form I (Students as Raters) A-26

Teaching Efficiency Rating (TER) Scale Form II (Peers as Raters) A-27

Teaching Efficiency Rating (TER) Scale Form III (Chairpersons/Deans as Raters) A-28

Faculty Observation Audit (For Elementary and Secondary Faculty) A-29

v

Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Initial Rank):

1. Applicant submits two sets of his/her credentials to the College/School IAPP Coordinator. These must be certified true copy by the Human Resource Management Department. Each set must be fastened to a folder using the required format and order of documents, as stipulated in this guide. Pagination should be placed at the lower right-hand corner. The pages are referenced in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

2. The coordinator evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank (Level 1 in each Rank Category) using IAPP Form 01 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit) and IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

3. The IAPP coordinator submits two (2) sets of Form 01(Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit) and ten (10) sets of Form 03 (Evaluation Details) to the IAPP Chair.

4. The IAPP Chair schedules a meeting for deliberation of the documents and signing of Form 01(Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit).

5. IAPP submits its recommendation, consisting of IAPP Form 01 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit, duly signed by all members), Form 03 (Evaluation Details) and Form 04 (Summary of Evaluation for Faculty Recruits) to OVCAA for proper action.

6. A copy of the recommendation is furnished to the College/School Coordinator and the HRMD Head.

7. OVCAA endorses its recommendation to the APC (Academic Planning Committee) for deliberation.

8. APC endorses its recommendation to the Chancellor who endorses the same to BOR for approval.

Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Final Rank):

1. Applicant submits two sets of his/her credentials to the College/School IAPP Coordinator. These must be certified true copy by the Human Resource Management Department. Each set must be fastened to a folder using the required format and order of documents as stipulated in this guide. Pagination should be placed at the lower right-hand corner. The pages are referenced in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

2. The coordinator evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank using IAPP Form 01 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit) and Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

3. For Associate Professor or higher rank, applicant should submit one (1) original copy and one (1) Xerox copy of thick documents, e.g., thesis, dissertation, etc. These will serve as attachments and must be properly numbered/catalogued for reference in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details). For Assistant Professor or lower rank, only one (1) Xerox copy of the aforestated documents may be submitted.

4. A cover letter, addressed to the IAPP Chair, must be attached in each set of documents (folder + attachment) requesting for the evaluation. The request must be duly recommended by the Department Chair, College/School Coordinator and College/School Dean.

5. The College/School Coordinator submits one set of the documents to the IAPP Chair.

6. The other set will be reviewed by the College/School Coordinator for presentation in the next meeting.

7. The IAPP Chair schedules a meeting for deliberation of the documents.8. Ten (10) sets of Form 03 (Evaluation Details) must be copied for distribution to

the panel members.

1

9. Deliberation of the documents will be conducted and recommended final rank is decided during this meeting using the 2005 Revised ISRP (Integrated Scheme for Ranking and Promotion).

10. The two folders are returned to the College/School Coordinator so that corrections, if any, will be applied, particularly on Forms 01(Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit) and 03 (Evaluation Details).

11. Once the corrections are applied, the two sets of documents, containing the corrected copies, are submitted to the IAPP Chair.

12. Form 03 (Evaluation Details) containing notations from the College/School Coordinator during the initial evaluation must likewise be returned to facilitate review on compliance.

13. The chair schedules a meeting for signing Form 01(Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit).

14. IAPP submits its recommendation, consisting of Form 01 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit, duly signed by all members), Form 03 (Evaluation Details) and Form 04 (Summary of Evaluation for Faculty Recruits), to OVCAA for proper action. Supporting credentials are likewise attached.

15. A copy of the recommendation is furnished to the College/School Coordinator(s) and HRMD Head.


17. APC endorses its recommendation to the Chancellor.

18. For Assistant Professor or lower ranks:18.1. The Chancellor endorses the application to BOR for approval.

19. For Associate Professor or higher ranks: 19.1. The Chancellor endorses the documents to the Chair of Cluster B, USAPP

(University System Academic Promotion Panel) tasked to evaluate faculty members from MSU-IIT and MSU-Naawan.

19.2. Members of Cluster B, USAPP, evaluate the documents. Corrections are duly noted.

19.3. The documents are returned to OC/OVCAA for correction. 19.4. OVCAA endorses the documents to the College/School IAPP Coordinator

who then instructs the applicant to apply the corrections.19.5. The documents, with the corrections duly applied, particularly on Form 03

(Evaluation Details) reproduced in eight (8) copies, together with eight (8) copies of Form 13 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit, Final Rank), are submitted to OVCAA, which then endorses the same to Cluster B, USAPP.

19.6. Members of Cluster B, USAPP, signs Form (13) and endorses its recommendation, together with the set of documents, to the MSU Technical Panel for further deliberation.

19.7. MSU Technical Panel submits its recommendation to the MSUS President.

19.8. The MSUS President submits the application to BOR for approval.

Note: Documents confirming the approval by OVCAA on the hiring of the applicant as

a faculty recruit must be included in the two folders. A faculty recruit shall be evaluated based on the four categories, viz., Educational

Attainment, Work Experience, Professional Growth and Productivity. With due consideration of the applicant’s preference, initial or final rank may be

given. Initial rank will be pegged at the 1st level of each rank category. Additional documents may be submitted within the year for evaluation to the final

rank. Otherwise, initial rank becomes final. Only documents whose related

2

activities have materialized prior to employment will be considered, i.e., those documents prior to evaluation of the initial rank.

The Civil Service Commission requires at least one year of teaching experience for Instructor III (three) and above. Although not clearly stipulated in the 2005 ISRP, the IAPP is guided by this ruling.

Inasmuch as the Civil Service Commission requires receipt of appointment papers within a grace period of 30 days from the day of employment, preferred dates for all documents to be submitted to the panel are as follows:

1st semester: May 15th 2nd semester: Oct. 15th Summer: March 15th

Evaluation Procedure on Faculty Promotion:

1. Applicant requests the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for evaluation of his/her credentials. The request must state the merits for the promotion, e.g., return from a study leave, etc. Considerations for promotion (see Form 02, Faculty Evaluation for Promotion) must be satisfied. The request must be duly recommended by the Chair of the Department, College/School Coordinator and College/School Dean. A Permit to Study Form must also be attached, if applicable (refer to IIT Form).

2. OVCAA advises IAPP for evaluation of the applicant’s credentials for possible promotion.

3. IAPP communicates to the applicant for submission to the College/School coordinator two (2) sets of his/her credentials, using the required format and order of documents, as stipulated in this guide. These must be certified true copy by the Human Resource Management Department.

4. Each set of the credentials is fastened to a folder. Pagination should be duly observed, preferably on the lower right corner of the page. The pages are appropriately referenced in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

5. For Associate Professor or higher rank, applicant should submit one (1) original copy and one (1) Xerox copy of thick documents, e.g., thesis, dissertation, etc. These will serve as attachments and must be properly numbered/catalogued for reference in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details). For Assistant Professor or lower rank, only one (1) Xerox copy of the aforestated documents may be submitted.

6. Cut-off dates for all documents, which are stamped and certified true copy by HRMD, are as follows: For 1st semester evaluation - May 31

For 2nd semester evaluation – October 31 For summer evaluation – March 317. The coordinator evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank using

Form 02 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion) and Form 03 (Evaluation Details).8. The College/School Coordinator submits one set of the documents to the IAPP

Chair. 9. The other set will be reviewed by the College/School Coordinator for presentation

in the meeting to be called by the Chair.10. Ten (10) sets of Form 03 (Evaluation Details) must be copied for distribution to

the panel members.11. Deliberation of the documents is conducted and recommended rank for promotion

is decided based on the 2005 Revised ISRP.12. The two folders are returned to the College/School Coordinator so that

corrections, if any, will be applied, particularly on Form 02 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion) and Form 03 (Evaluation Details). Additional documents may also be required.

3

13. Once the recommendations made by the panel are complied with, the two folders (containing the corrected copies) are submitted to the IAPP Chair. The notations made by the College/School Coordinator on Form 03 (Evaluation Details) must be returned to facilitate checking of documents, vis-à-vis, compliance to panel recommendations.

14. The chair schedules a meeting for further deliberation of the documents and/or signing of IAPP Form 02 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion).

15. IAPP submits its recommendation, consisting of Form 02 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion, duly signed by all members), Form 03 (Evaluation Details) and Form 05 (Summary of Faculty Evaluation for Promotion), to OVCAA for proper action.

16. A copy of the recommendation is furnished to the College/School Coordinator(s) and HRMD Head.


18. APC endorses its recommendation to the Chancellor.

19. For Assistant Professor or lower rank:19.1. The Chancellor endorses the application to BOR for approval.

20. For Associate Professor or higher rank: 20.1. The Chancellor endorses the documents to the Chair of Cluster B, USAPP

(University System Academic Promotion Panel) tasked to evaluate faculty members from MSU-IIT and MSU-Naawan.

20.2. Members of Cluster B, USAPP evaluate the documents. Corrections are duly noted. The documents are returned to OC/OVCAA.

20.3. OC/OVCAA endorses the documents to the College/School IAPP Coordinator who then instructs the applicant to apply the corrections.

20.4. The documents, with due compliance to panel recommendations, particularly on Form 03 (Evaluation Details) reproduced in three (3) copies, together with three (3) copies of Form 14 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion) are submitted to OC/OVCAA, which then endorses the same to Cluster B, USAPP.

20.5. Members of Cluster B, USAPP, sign Form 14 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion) and endorse their recommendations, together with the set of documents, to the MSUS Technical Panel for further deliberation.

20.6. MSUS Technical Panel submits its recommendation to the MSUS President.

20.7. The MSUS President endorses the recommendation to BOR for approval.

Note for faculty members whose study is not supported by MSU-IIT: Applicant must have studied and graduated from one of the top five universities in

the Philippines, program-wise, as determined by the faculty members of the Department. Otherwise, the program must be accredited by AACCUP, PAASCU or other accrediting agencies, at least 2nd level. In principle, the program must be at par or better than that in MSU-IIT.

A permit to study is required for all semesters enrolled in the program. It must be clearly indicated that the program pursued is within the thrust of the Department and that the study is valid for faculty development purposes.

4

Evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank.

Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit ( Initial Rank )

5

APPLICANT

COLLEGE/SCHOOLIAPP

COORDINATOR

IAPP CHAIR

I A P P

O V C A A

APC

Schedules a meeting for deliberation of documents

Deliberates the application and submits recommendation consisting of IAPP Forms 01, 03 and 04.

cc: College/School Coordinator and HRMD Head Endorses its

recommendation

BOR

Preferred dates for submission of documents:1st semester employment : May 15th

2nd semester employment : October 15th

Summer employment : March 15th

Submits two sets of credentials arranged based on the order of their appearance in

Deliberates the application and endorses its recommendationApproves the application

Evaluation Procedure for a Faculty Recruit (Final Rank)

6

Evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank using IAPP Form 01( Evaluation for Faculty Recruit) and Form 03 ( Evaluation Details).Ensures that notations made by the panel are complied with (for returned documents).

APPLICANT

Submits two sets of credentials, together with a cover letter addressed to the IAPP Chair requesting for evaluation. The request must be duly recommended by the Dept. Chair, College/School Coordinator and College Dean/School Director.

College/School Coordinator

I A P P Evaluates the credentials and recommends final rank based on 2005 Revised ISRP.Signing of Form 01 may be done.

With Corrections?

Yes

No

No

Yes

O V C A A

A P C

Chancellor

Evaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the Chancellor

Endorses the documents to APC for deliberation.

Endorses the documents to:* BOR for approval (for Asst. Prof. or lower rank), or to* USAPP Cluster B for further deliberation (for Asso. Prof or higher rank)

USAPP – Cluster B

Asst. Prof. or Lower Rank?

BOR

MSU Technical Panel

MSUS President

Evaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the Technical Panel

Evaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the MSUS President

Approves the application

Endorses the application to BOR for approval

Evaluation Procedure on Faculty Promotion :

7

No

Yes

APPLICANTRequests the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for evaluation of his/her credentials. The request must be duly recommended by the Department Chair, College/School IAPP Coordinator and College/School Dean/Director.

OVCAA Advices IAPP Chair for evaluation of the applicant for promotion.

IAPP ChairCommunicates to the applicant for submission to the College/School Coordinator two (2) sets of the required credentials.

APPLICANT Submits two sets of credentials.

College/School Coordinator

I A P P Evaluates the credentials and recommends final rank based on 2005 Revised ISRP.Signing of Form 02 may be done.

With Corrections?

Yes

Evaluates the credentials and recommends appropriate rank using IAPP Form 01( Evaluation for Faculty Recruit) and Form 03 ( Evaluation Details).Ensures that notations made by the panel are complied with (for returned documents).

No

O V C A A

A P C

Chancellor

Evaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the Chancellor

Endorses the documents to APC for deliberation.

Endorses the documents to:* BOR for approval (for Asst. Prof. or lower rank), or to* USAPP Cluster B for further deliberation (for Asso. Prof or higher rank)

USAPP – Cluster B

Asst. Prof. or Lower Rank?

BOR

MSU Technical Panel

MSUS President

Evaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the Technical PanelEvaluates the documents and endorses its recommendation to the MSUS President

Approves the application

Endorses the application to BOR for approval

General Format: All credentials must be arranged based on the order of their appearance in the

2005 Revised ISRP (Integrated Scheme for Ranking and Promotion) (See sample Evaluation Details: IAPP Form 03).

The credentials must be fastened to a folder. All pages in the folder must be consecutively numbered at the lower right-hand

corner of the page using Arabic numerals. Use of pencil will be more convenient, particularly in cases when renumbering will have to be done once corrections noted by the IAPP panel are applied.

Thick compilations, e.g., journal, thesis, dissertation, etc., if Xeroxed, may be fastened to a separate folder. They must be properly numbered/catalogued based on ISRP, and marked consecutively as Attachment No. x, where “x” is an Arabic numeral.

Reference to pagination, vis-à-vis attachment numbering, is indicated in IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

Cut-off dates for all documents, which are stamped and certified true copy by HRMD, are as follows:

For 1st semester evaluation - May 31 For 2nd semester evaluation – October 31

For summer evaluation – March 31

Brief Description of IAPP Forms

IAPP Form 01: Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit (Initial or Final Rank)

Check the appropriate box under the evaluation heading, i.e., whether the evaluation is for initial or final rank.

Date Last Evaluated:o Indicate “n/a” on evaluation for initial rank; otherwise, use appropriate

date when initial rank was last evaluated.

Date:o Indicate date of evaluation for the recommended initial or final rank.o This is the date coinciding with the signing of the form.

Initial Rank o Indicate “n/a” on evaluation for initial rank; otherwise, use appropriate

initial rank, e.g., Instructor I (One) on evaluation for final rank.

Date of effectivity:o Indicate “n/a” on evaluation for initial rank; otherwise, indicate date of

effectivity of the initial rank, in case of a final rank evaluation.

Rank Category refers to the rank coinciding with the current evaluation. It is any of the following:

o Instructoro Assistant Professoro Associate Professoro Professoro Research Professoro University Professor

8

Evaluation Criteria cover the following items:o Educational Attainmento Work Experienceo Productivity o Professional Growth

Raw points, weights and weighted points are those derived from IAPP Form 03 (Evaluation Details).

Entry Requirement refers to the provisions under Part I – Rank Categorization of the 2005 ISRP. It must be noted that, specifically for a new recruit, teaching experience in MSUS may be substituted with an equivalent teaching experience in another campus outside MSUS provided that the required performance rating of very satisfactory and the required years of experience are met. These must be fully supported with appropriate documents.

Description/Document/Page refers to the details (title, date, etc.) of the supporting document with corresponding page number as indicated in the folder.

Remarkso Indicate if satisfied or not satisfied.

Recommended Rank:o This refers to the recommended initial or final rank.o The initial rank is pegged at the first level of each rank category (e.g.,

Teacher I, Instructor I, Asso. Prof. I or Prof. I)o The new recruit will be re-evaluated and re-ranked based on additional

documents, but limited to the four criteria above, submitted within the first year of employment; and provided that the documents cover those that materialized prior to employment, and provided further that seminars and trainings attended are within the last three (3) years prior to employment.

o Initial rank becomes final if no evaluation is done within the first year of employment.

o The rank must show both the Roman Numeral and its word equivalent, e.g., Asst. Prof. I (One)

All members of the Institute Academic Promotion Panel must sign on the form.

IAPP Form 02: Faculty Evaluation for Promotion

Date Last Evaluated:o Indicate the date when present rank was last evaluated.

Date:o Indicate date of evaluation for the recommended rank.o This is the date coinciding with the signing of the form.

Present Rank:o Shows the present rank of the faculty, e.g., Asso. Prof. III (Three)o Note that the rank indicates both the Roman Numeral and its word

equivalent.

Date of Effectivity:o Refers to the date when the present rank was implemented.

Rank Category refers to the rank coinciding with the current evaluation. It is any of the following:

9

o Instructoro Assistant Professoro Associate Professoro Professoro Research Professoro University Professor

Priority No.:o 1 for an applicant who has complied item IV-1 under “Considerations for

Promotion” indicated in the form, in addition to items I, II and III.o 2 for an applicant who has complied item IV-2, in addition to I, II and III.o 3 for an applicant who has complied item IV-3, in addition to I, II and III.o Note that a Permit to Study or any SO/MO related to the study must be

filed along with the credentials.

Use the following base points (ISRP Annex, Table 3):o 0 for Instructor and Assistant Professoro 70 for Associate Professoro 100 for Professoro 280 for Research Professoro 420 for University Professor

Use the following for the weights:o 1.0 for Instructor and Assistant Professor o Refer to Table 2 of the ISRP Annex for Associate Professor or higher

ranks

For each evaluation criterion, compute weighted points using the following formula: weighted points = raw points × weight

Summing all weighted points results to the total weighted points.

Columns for the details and remarks under considerations for promotion must be fully filled-out.

o Items under details provide more specific information on the corresponding consideration for promotion.

o Notations under “Remarks” may be “satisfied”, “n/a”, etc.o Items that do not apply may be indicated with “n/a”

Recommended Rank must show both the Roman Numeral and its word equivalent, e.g., Asso. Prof. III (Three)

All members must sign on the form

IAPP Form 03: Evaluation Details

General:o This form serves to facilitate evaluation of the documents, particularly in

arriving at the raw and weighted points.o Detailed computations are presented in this form with due reference to

supporting documents.

10

o Resulting data, i.e., raw and weighted points are used in IAPP Form 01 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit) or 02 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion).

o This form must be presented in landscape mode.o All characters found on the following area of the form should be in bold

attribute: Heading of the table where the fields for the columns are shown The rows in the table corresponding to the major evaluation criteria

(e.g., I Educational Attainment……, etc.)o If the table crosses another page (which is the usual case), the row heading

of the table must be repeated in each page.o Delete “(SAMPLE)” on the heading for the final presentation.

ISRP Section/Subsection:o These are the sections or sub-sections found in the ISRP. The order,

including section numbering/lettering, must follow the order in which these appear in the ISRP. For clarity, all section letterings are case-sensitive, as they appear in ISRP.

o Presentation is hierarchical. To facilitate evaluation, sections move from a higher to a lower level.

o Refer to the annex “Document Submittals” for guidance.

Titleo This must be the same title corresponding to the section/sub-section

indicated in the ISRP.o Exact wordings as specified in the ISRP must be presented.

Description/Documentso These are the description of the supporting documents under the indicated

section/sub-section.o There can be one or more documents even under a single section/sub-

section.o Supporting documents for each section or sub-section where raw points

are to be computed should be provided exhaustively.o For educational attainment, indicate the corresponding degree, school,

date of graduation, etc., and provide appropriate reference to other pertinent information/attachments.

o For work experience, indicate the employer , period and other pertinent information based on the attachments.

o For productivity, indicate the title of the book/article/poster read, number of authors, date, and other related attachments.

o For teaching efficiency rating, starting from the latest school year, indicate TER for 1st and 2nd semester, and summer, if applicable, and provide appropriate reference to other pertinent information/attachments.

o For Professional Growth, indicate details to iclude type, date, etc.o For Institutional Services/Extra-academic activities, indicate type, date,

corresponding attachments (accomplishment report, echo report, etc.), etc.o For Extension Services, , indicate type, date, etc. and provide appropriate

reference to other pertinent information/attachments..o Refer to the section “Document Submittals” for guidance.

Page/Attachment No.o This refers to the page number/s in the submitted folder where the

documents are found; or the attachment no. of a thick compilation, e.g., thesis, dissertation, etc.

11

o Note that, except for hard bound copies of pecial projects, theses or dissertations, all other credentials should be fastened to a folder.

o The pages in the folder must be numbered consecutively at the lower right-hand corner of the page using Arabic numerals.

o Thick compilations, e.g., theses, dissertations, etc., if Xeroxed, must be fastened to a separate folder and marked consecutively as Attachment No. x, where “x” is an Arabic numeral.

Computations:o The column shows the detailed computation for the raw points along a

section or sub-section.o All required units, including parameters used, if any, must be shown for

clarity.o All figures must be rounded-off to the third decimal place (e.g., 3.001,

2.000, 16.235, etc.).o Sub-totals must be placed where there are more than one (1) computation

in each section/sub-section (see sample on Teaching Efficiency Rating).

Raw Pointso These are the results of the computations.o Sub-totals are shown if there are more than one item in each section or

sub-section.o Total raw points for each major evaluation criterion are placed under this

column in bold face, and in the same row as the major evaluation criterion.o All figures must be rounded-off to the third decimal place (e.g., 8.201,

6.000, 11.005, etc.).

Weightso Use the following for the weights:

1.0 for Instructor and Assistant Professor. Refer to Table 2 of the ISRP Annex for Associate Professor or

higher rankso Indicate these only on rows containing the major evaluation criteria.

Weighted Points:o For each evaluation criterion, compute weighted points using the

following formula: weighted points = raw points × weight

o Indicate these only on rows containing the major evaluation criteria.o All figures must be rounded-off to the third decimal place (e.g., 6.101,

38.011, 10.978, etc.).

Total Weighted Points:o Summing all weighted points results to the total weighted points.o This will serve as the basis for determining the rank of the faculty

member.o The figure must be rounded-off to the third decimal place (e.g., 103.001,

292.000, 130.235, etc.).

IAPP Form 04: Summary of Evaluation for Faculty Recruits

This form is used by the IAPP Chair to endorse evaluated rank of faculty recruit/s to the administration.

12

The box with the caption initial or final rank, whichever is appropriate, is checked.

The following data are filled out:o Name of the faculty recruito College/Schoolo Highest Educational Attainmento School Graduated (indicate also the country for foreign school)o Present/Initial Rank

Indicate n/a if evaluated for the first time, whether for initial or final rank.

Indicate the present or initial rank if evaluation has been done previously and that current evaluation is for the final rank.

o Points Earned Total points earned considering the four categories (educational

attainment, work experience, productivity and professional growth)

o Recommended Rank Rank corresponding to the total points.

o Justification Indicate evaluation for final or initial rank.

This form is signed by the IAPP Chair, HRMD Head, VCAA and Chancellor.

IAPP Form 05: Summary of Faculty Evaluation for Promotion

This form is used by the IAPP Chair to endorse to the administration faculty members evaluated for promotion.

The following data are filled out:o Name of the faculty member to be promotedo College/Schoolo Highest Educational Attainmento School Graduated (indicate also the country for foreign school)o Present Rank

Indicate the rank of the faculty member prior to evaluation.o Points Earned

Total points earned considering all categories in ISRP.o Recommended Rank

Rank corresponding to the total points earned subject to entry requirements.

o Justification Indicate whether evaluation is due to:

- conferment of an authorized degree- completion of a degree on one’s own time, or - TER of at least very satisfactory for the last four semesters plus

specific requirements based on current rank

This form is signed by the IAPP Chair, HRMD Head, VCAA and Chancellor.

13

IAPP Form 06: Research Report Rating Form

This form is used for publications that that are not peer reviewed.

Three peer reviewers must fill out this form and rate the paper based on set criteria, viz.:

o Statement of Problemo Description of Methodo Presentation of Resultso Interpretation

The average of the three peer reviews will be used in computing the points.

The rater signs on the form.

IAPP Form 07: Invention: Impact & Utility Rating Form

This form is used in cases where the applicant has come up with invention/s, discovery/ies, designs, etc.

This form is accomplished by a peer rater based on two set criteria, viz., impact and utility to people.

Impact is rated under three sub-categories, namely, GNP (Gross National Product), Safety, Quality of Life and Environmental Friendliness, each of which has three rating scales, viz., limited impact (1-3), moderate impact (4-6) and tremendous impact (7-10).

Utility is rated under five sub-categories, namely, industry, business, academe, community and government, each of which has two rating scales, namely, limited to moderate usefulness (1-5) and tremendous usefulness (6-10).

The following computation guide will be used:

Point = (I + U) × V (re: section III.E, ISRP)where: I = impact weight

I = 15% for Pi in [10%, 30%] I = 30% for Pi in (30%, 60%]* I = 50% for Pi in (60%, 100%] where Pi = percentage obtained for impact

U = utility weight U = 25% for Pu in [10%, 50%] U = 50% for Pu in (50%, 100%]

where Pu = percentage obtained for utility

V = earned points in the category

*( #, # ] means that the left number and the right number is excluded and included, respectively, in the range.

14

IAPP Form 08: Terminal Report This form is filled out to account for the applicant’s attendance to trainings,

seminars, symposia, etc. in the international, national, regional or local fora.

Among the fields to fill out include the title/theme of the training, seminar, etc., the inclusive dates, venue and objectives.

A synthesis of the activity should also be included.

15

Knowledge learned from the activity should be echoed for the benefit of IIT constituents. The activity is certified by the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs in the IAPP Form 09 (Echo Report Form).

For international participation, the following documents must be attached, viz., list of speakers, list of participants and sponsoring agencies.

The form is signed by the applicant, Department Chair, IAPP coordinator and School/College Dean.

IAPP Form 09: Echo Report

This is filled out when the applicant has conducted an echo of the training, seminar, etc., attended.

Among the information supplied include the details of the echo and the training/seminar attended.

Details regarding participation on the echo seminar are also supplied.

Attachments include an SO to conduct the echo, program and list of participants.

This form is signed by the Department Chair, IAPP Coordinator, Dean and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs.

IAPP Form 10: Accomplishment Report (Institutional Services/ Extra- Academic Services)

This form is used to account for the applicant’s participation in any extra-academic services in the institute that include membership in committees, advisorship in student publication, manpower training, etc.

Position held in the committee together with the corresponding functions are supplied.

Details regarding meetings in the committee are likewise indicated.

Any supporting administrative issuances (Office Order, Special Order, Memorandum Order, etc.) must be attached.

Applicant signs over his/her printed name on the form.

IAPP Form 11: Program/Academic Adviser Summary Form

This form summarizes information regarding advisorship in a program showing the number of advisees per academic year, and the corresponding points earned.

This form is used as a cover page for IAPP Form 12 (Program/Academic Adviser Form, Per Academic Year)

16

This is signed by the applicant and the IAPP coordinator.

IAPP Form 12: Program/Academic Adviser Form (Per Academic Year)

This is used to document student advising per academic year.

Among the documents to be attached include SO, MO or Office Order designating the applicant as an adviser. Other related documents, e.g., list of advisees, activities done during the advising, etc., must also be attached.

Computations for the earned points are indicated.

This is signed by the applicant, Department Chair, IAPP Coordinator and Dean.

IAPP Form 13: Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit (Final Rank)

This is similar to IAPP form No. 1 (Evaluation for a Faculty Recruit), except that only final rank is reflected and that the signatories are members of the University System Academic Promotion Panel (USAPP).

This is used for applicants evaluated to the rank of Associate Professor and up.

IAPP Form 14: Faculty Evaluation for Promotion

This is similar to IAPP Form 2 (Faculty Evaluation for Promotion), except that the signatories are members of the University System Academic Promotion Panel (USAPP).

This is used for applicants evaluated to the rank of Associate Professor and up.

17

IAPP Form 01(Updated Nov. 2010)

MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITYILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

ILIGAN CITY

INSTITUTE ACADEMIC PROMOTION PANEL

EVALUATION FOR A FACULTY RECRUIT Initial Rank Final Rank

Name: ___________________________ Date: ________________________College/School: ___________________ Initial Rank: __________________Department: ______________________ Date of Effectivity: _____________Specialization: ____________________ Rank Category: ________________Date Last Evaluated: _______________

Summary of Points EarnedEvaluation Criteria Raw Points Weights Weighted Points

I Educational AttainmentII Work ExperienceIII ProductivityIV Teaching Efficiency

Rating n/a n/a n/a

V Professional GrowthVI Institutional Services/

Extra-Academic Activities n/a n/a n/a

VII Extension Services n/a n/a n/aSub-Total

Add: Base PointsTotal

Entry Requirements(Part I - Rank Categorization, ISRP) Description/Documents/Page Remarks

Recommended Rank: _____________________________Effectivity: _____Sem., A.Y. _____________

Recommended by:

Signature Date

Dr. Jerson N. Orejudos, Chairperson ______________ ____________Prof. Edwin O. Deiparine (SET), Vice Chairperson ______________ ____________Prof. Akima M. Bangcola, Member ______________ ____________Prof. Luisita S. Cabanos (CSM), Member ______________ ____________Dr. Lomesindo T. Caparida (SCS), Member ______________ ____________Prof. Rohane M. Derogongan (CASS), Member ______________ ____________Prof. Vicente E. Empig (COE), Member ______________ ____________Prof. Khandy Lorraine B. Guerrero (CoN), Member ______________ ____________Dr. Myrna E. Lahoylahoy (CED), Member ______________ ____________Prof. Josie Vic D. Mendoza (IDS), Member ______________ ____________Prof. Maria Rizalia Y. Teves (CBAA), Member ______________ ____________

18



ILIGAN CITY


FACULTY EVALUATION FOR PROMOTION

Name: ___________________________ Date: _________________________College/School: ___________________ Present Rank: __________________Department: ______________________ Date of Effectivity: _____________Specialization: ____________________ Rank Category: ________________Date Last Evaluated: _______________ Priority No.: ___________________



RatingV Professional GrowthVI Institutional Services/

Extra-Academic ActivitiesVII Extension Services

Sub-TotalAdd: Base Points

Total

Considerations for Promotion Details RemarksI At least probationary

statusII Has served the University

for at least two yearsIII Handling at least three (3)

units at the time of evaluation

IV Satisfying at least one of the following: 1. Conferment of an officially authorized degree 2. Completion of a degree on one’s own time 3. TER of at least very satisfactory for the last four (4) sem. plus specific requirements based on current rank (p. A-2, ISRP)

19

IAPP Form 02 (contd.)Name: ___________________



Recommended by:


Signature Date

Dr. Jerson N. Orejudos, Chairperson ______________ ____________

Prof. Edwin O. Deiparine (SET), Vice Chairperson ______________ ____________

Prof. Akima M. Bangcola, Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Luisita S. Cabanos (CSM), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Lomesindo T. Caparida (SCS), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Rohane M. Derogongan (CASS), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Vicente E. Empig (COE), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Khandy Lorraine B. Guerrero (CoN), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Myrna E. Lahoylahoy (CED), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Josie Vic D. Mendoza (IDS), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Maria Rizalia Y. Teves (CBAA), Member ______________ ____________

20



ILIGAN CITY


EVALUATION DETAILS (SAMPLE)Name: ____________________________

ISRP Section/

SubsectionTitle Documents/Description

Page/Attachment

No.Computations Raw

Points Weights Weighted Points

I Educational Attainment 75.00 1.0 75.00IB Credit Points for Academic

DegreesIB1 Degree EarnedIB1b Master’s Degree Diploma

TOR, MPAThesis Approval SheetThesis Manuscript

p. 3p. 4p. 5attach. 1

45.00IB1e Bachelor’s Degree Diploma

TOR, AB Pol. Sci.p. 6p. 7 30.00

II Work Experience 30.82 1.0 30.82IIA Service per year in one’s

field of specialization at

21

ISRP Section/


Page/Attachment

No.Computations Raw


MSU

IIA1 Teaching Employee’s Service Record

p. 8 5.5 years × 5/year 27.50

IIC Service per year in one’s field of specialization outside MSU

IIC1 Teaching Employee’s Service Record

p. 9 10/12 yr x 4/yr 3.32

III Productivity 0.00 1.0 0.00

IV Teaching Efficiency Rating 43.46 1.0 43.46Summary of TER 1st sem, AY 2007-2008 2nd sem, AY 2007-2008 1st sem, AY 2006-2007 2nd sem, AY 2006-2007 1st sem, AY 2005-2006 2nd sem, AY 2005-2006 1st sem, AY 2004-2005 2nd sem, AY 2004-2005 1st sem, AY 2003-2004 2nd sem, AY 2003-2004

p. 10(98.03-75) × 0.2(98.29-75) × 0.2(97.01-75) × 0.2(97.35-75) × 0.2(95.03-75) × 0.2(95.50-75) × 0.2(97.34-75) × 0.2(97.52-75) × 0.2(94.88-75) × 0.2(96.81-75) × 0.2

4.614.664.404.474.014.104.474.503.984.36

22

IAPP Form 03 (Contd.)Name: _______________________

ISRP Section/


Page/Attachment

No.Computations Raw


Sub-Total 43.56

V Professional Growth 12.15 1.0 12.15

VB Civil Service Career Professional Eligibility

Career Service Professional Examination Result

p. 115.00

VC Training ProgramVC1 International Training on …………….

(10 days)p. 12 By Interpolation:

[(10-1)/(20-1)] × (7.2-7.1) + 7.1 7.15

VI Institutional Services/Extra Academic Activities

0.00 1.0 0.00

VII Extension Service 0.00 1.0 0.00

Total 161.43 161.43

Recommended by:

23

IAPP Form 03 (Contd.)Name: _______________________

________________________________________IAPP Coordinator (Signature Over Printed Name)

24

IAPP Form 04(Updated: Nov. 2010)


ILIGAN CITY


Summary of Evaluation for Faculty Recruits Initial Rank

Final Rank

No. Name of Faculty

College/School Highest Educational Attainment

School Graduated

Present/Initial Rank

Points Earned

Recommended Rank

Justification

123

Prepared by: Checked by: Recommending Approval: Approved:

_____________________ ___________________ _____________________________ _________________________Chair, IAPP Head, HRMD Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Chancellor

25

IAPP Form 05(Updated: Nov. 2010)


ILIGAN CITY


Summary of Faculty Evaluation for Promotion

No. Name of Faculty

College/School Highest Educational Attainment

School Graduated

Present Rank

Points Earned Recommended Rank Justification

123

Prepared by: Checked by: Recommending Approval: Approved:

_____________________ ___________________ _____________________________ _________________________Chair, IAPP Head, HRMD Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Chancellor

26

IAPP Form 06(updated Nov. 2010)

RESEARCH REPORT RATING FORM

Author: __________________________________________

Title: ____________________________________________

Publication Reference: ______________________________

Rater: ___________________________________________

Date: ____________________________________________

Check (√) Appropriate Columns 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

I. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM1. Clarity of statement2. Significance of Problem3. Documentation

II. DESCRIPTION OF METHOD1. Appropriateness of Method2. Adequacy of Sample or Field3. Replicability

III. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS1. Completeness2. Comprehensibility3. Yield4. Novelty of Results

IV. INTERPRETATION1. Accuracy2. Impartiality3. Usefulness

Sub-total

Total

Rating [( ) ÷ 78] × 100 = %

Please check below:Is the work pioneering in nature? ___ Yes ____NoIs it an extension, refinement, or correction of existing works? ___ Yes ___ No Is it a replication of existing works? ___ Yes ___ No

__________________

Signature of Rater

27


INVENTION: IMPACT & UTILITY RATING FORM

Inventor/s : ____________________________________________________________________

Title: _________________________________________________________________________

Authentication/Patent Reference : ____________________________________________________

Rater : ________________________________________________________________________

Date : _________________________________________________________________________

Scale Description I. Impact: II. Utility: 1 - 3 - Limited Impact 1 - 5 - Limited to Moderate Usefulness 4 - 6 - Moderate Impact 6 -10 - Tremendous Usefulness 7 -10 - Tremendous Impact Check ( √ ) Appropriate Box 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10I. IMPACT (I) - Please rate the Impact of the invention, discovery, etc., considering its effect on the following economic operational/environmental factors: 1. GNP 2. Safety 3. Quality of Life 4. Environmental friendliness

Check ( √ ) Appropriate Box 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10II. UTILITY TO PEOPLE (U) - Please rate the Utility of the invention, discovery, etc., considering its usefulness to the following sectors directly utilizing it: 1. Industry 2. Business 3. Academe 4. Community 5. Government

______________________________Signature of Rater

28


TERMINAL REPORT

[] Training [] International[] Seminar/Symposium/Workshop/Conference [] National Convention/Congress/Assembly/On Line [] Regional / Local Attendance/Others:___________________

Title:

Inclusive Dates: Month Day Year Month Day Year Days HoursFrom _____ ___ ____ To ______ ___ ____ ________ _______ From _____ ___ ____ To ______ ___ ____ ________ _______ Total ________ _______ Venue:

Objective(s):

Synthesis(es):

Attachments:[] Certificate of Participation [] Program /Proceedings[] Echo Report Certified by OVCAAAdded attachments for International Participation:[] List of Speakers[] List of Participants[] Sponsoring Agencies

Prepared by: ________________________________________________ Signature over Printed Name

Noted by: ________________________________________________ Department Chairperson

________________________________________________ Institute Academic Promotion Panel Coordinator

________________________________________________ Dean

29


Mindanao State UniversityILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Iligan CityInstitute Academic Promotion Panel

Date: __________________Echo Report

[] Training[] Seminar/Symposium/Workshop/Conference/Convention/Congress

Assembly/Others:___________________Echo Training/Seminar* Details

Title:

Inclusive Dates: Month Day Year Month Day Year Days HoursFrom ____________ _____ _______ To ____________ _____ _____ = _____ _____From ____________ _____ _______ To ____________ _____ _____ = _____ _____

Total _____ _____Venue:

Objective(s): Participants: No. of Participants colleagues _______ students _______ Others: _________ _______

Total _______

Synthesis(es):

Training/Seminar* Attended

Title:

Inclusive Dates: Month Day Year Month Day Year Days HoursFrom ____________ _____ _______ To ____________ _____ ______ = _____ _____From ____________ _____ _______ To ____________ _____ ______ = _____ _____

Total _____ _____Attachments

Echo Training/Seminar*:1. S.O. to conduct echo 2. Program/Proceedings 3. Attendance sheet

Prepared by:

________________________________________________Signature over Printed Name

Department:

College/School:

Noted by:

________________________________ ___________________________________ Department Chairperson IAPP College/School Coordinator

________________________________ ____________________________________Dean Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs

*Seminar/Symposium/Workshop/Conference/Convention/Congress/Assembly/On Line Attendance/Others

30


ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTInstitutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities

Name: _____________________________________________School/College: _____________________________________________

Please tick appropriate box and supply required data:

Membership/Officialship in Campus/College Committee:Name of Committee: ______________________________________

Advisorship: Student Publication Others: (specify) ______________________ Manpower Training Information/Communication Program Sports Arts, Cultural and other Similar Activities Pioneering or Founding a Unit/Office or Program

System-wide use Campus-wide use College-wide use

Crafting of Academic Policies, Schemes, Guidelines or Institutional Programs

System-wide Campus-wide College-wide

Position held: ___________________________________________________Function(s): ____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________Meetings:

Date Venue Agenda Activities/Output

Supporting Administrative Issuances: Office Order

Special OrderMemorandum OrderBOR ResolutionOthers: (specify) _________________

_________________________________Applicant’s Signature Over Printed Name

31


PROGRAM/ACADEMIC ADVISER SUMMARY FORM(Summary of Points)

P/AAF No. Academic Year No. of Advisees Points Earned

TOTAL POINTS

Adviser:


Department:

College/School:

Checked by:

____________________________IAPP College/School Coordinator

____________________________Date

32


PROGRAM/ACADEMIC ADVISER FORM(Per Academic Year)

Program/Academic Adviser Form (P/AAF) No.____ of ____ sheet(s)

1. Designation as Program/Academic Adviser:SO/MO/Office Order No. : Date : Period (AY) :

2. Required documents:1. Copy of SO/MO/Office Order.2. Program of study showing courses and grades of the advisee/s3. System printout (or related documents) confirming enrolment of student/s

during the semester & academic year4. At least one of the following;

Adviser’s Enrolment Checklist Others, if any (e.g., withdrawal/adding form, intention to shift, shiftee’s

form, consultation log, resolution of cases, student evaluation sheet form, etc.):

3. Total Points Earned:

Number of Advisees : ________ Computation: ______________________

Points Earned : ________

Adviser:


Department:

College/School:

Noted by:

__________________________ _______________________________ Department Chairperson Dean/Director

Checked by:

____________________________IAPP College/School Coordinator

___________________________Date

33


MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITYMarawi City

UNIVERSITY SYSTEM ACADEMIC PROMOTION PANEL

EVALUATION FOR A FACULTY RECRUIT (Final Rank)

Name: ___________________________ Date: _________________________College/School: ___________________ Present Rank: _____________Department: ______________________ Date of Effectivity: _____________Specialization: ____________________ Rank Category: ________________Date Last Evaluated: _______________ Priority No.: ___________________






Total



Recommended by: Signature Date

Dr. Arnulfo P. Supe (MSU-IIT), Chairperson ______________ ____________

Dr. Renato B. Boniao (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Milan T. Daitia (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Edwin O. Deiparine (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Milagros N. Marohombsar (MSU-IIT), Member_____________ ____________

Dr. Jerson N. Orejudos (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Corazon P. Tejano (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Helen J. Vicente (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Liwayway S. Viloria (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

34


MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITYMarawi City


FACULTY EVALUATION FOR PROMOTIONName: ___________________________ Date: _________________________College/School: ___________________ Present Rank: _____________Department: ______________________ Date of Effectivity: _____________Specialization: ____________________ Rank Category: ________________Date Last Evaluated: _______________ Priority No.: ___________________






Total

Considerations for Promotion Details RemarksI At least probationary

statusII Has served the University

for at least two yearsIII Handling at least three (3)

units at the time of evaluation

IV Satisfying at least one of the following:1. Conferment of an officially authorized degree2. Completion of a degree on one’s own time3. TER of at least satisfactory for the last four (4) sem. plus specific requirements based on current rank



35

IAPP Form 14 (contd.)Name: ___________________

Recommended by:


Signature Date

Dr. Arnulfo P. Supe (MSU-IIT), Chairperson ______________ ____________

Dr. Renato B. Boniao (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Milan T. Daitia (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Edwin O. Deiparine (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Milagros N. Marohombsar (MSU-IIT), Member_____________ ____________

Dr. Jerson N. Orejudos (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Prof. Corazon P. Tejano (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Helen J. Vicente (MSU-NAAWAN), Member ______________ ____________

Dr. Liwayway S. Viloria (MSU-IIT), Member ______________ ____________

36

IIT Form

Mindanao State UniversityILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Iligan City

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO STUDY(for Faculty and Academic Non-Teaching Employees)

Name of Applicant: __________________________ Date of Filing: ___________Position: ___________________________________ School/ Office: ___________Degree Program pursued: __________________________________________________Name and Location of School/ University: _____________________________________Semester: ____ Academic Year: _______ No. of Semesters previously enrolled in same program: ____ COURSES UNITS DAY/TIME

_____________________ _________ _____________________________________________ _________ _____________________________________________ _________ ________________________

TOTAL _________

________________________ Signature of Applicant

________________________________________________________________________

I certify that program being pursued is: Within Department’s/ Office’s Thrust Recommending Approval: Personal Improvement Only

_______________________________ ________________________ Chairperson/Head of Office Dean/Director

APPROVED: Valid for Faculty/Staff development purposes For monitoring purposes only

__________________________________ Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs

37

DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL

S

38

Section/Subsectio

nCriteria/Description Points

Required Documents/Remarks

I Educational AttainmentI.B Credit Points for Academic

DegreesI.B.1 Degree earnedI.B.1.a Doctorate degree 65.000 * Xerox copy of Transcript

of Records (TOR) with notation “graduated”* Xerox copy of Diploma; * Certificate from Dep’t. Chair and College Dean that degree is in line with, allied to or not related with the thrust of the Department;* PRC/Board Certificate (if applicable)

Note:* full credit – within one’s field of specialization and in line with the thrust of the Department* 2/3 credit – allied field of specialization* 1/3 credit – unrelated or outside one’s field of specialization

I.B.1.b Master’s degree 45.000I.B.1.c Bachelor’s degree with more than

five years, e.g. M.D., Ll.B., DDM, DVM and other equivalent courses shall be treated as masteral degrees

45.000

I.B.1.d Bachelor’s degree of at least five years

35.000

I.B.1.e Bachelor’s degree 30.000I.B.2 Additional degrees earnedI.B.2.a Doctorate degree 15.000I.B.2.b Master’s degree 10.000I.B.2.c Bachelor’s degree 5.000I.B.3 Advance additional study programI.B.3.a Post-doctorate study 10.000I.B.3.b Diplomate/Fellowship in Medicine 5.000

I.C Scholastic Performance based on Grade Point Average (GPA)

I.C.1 Doctorate/Master’sI.C.1.a GPA 1.00-1.25 10.000 * Computation sheet of

GPA duly signed by the Department Chair and College IAPP Coordinator; or* TOR/diploma with notations as honor graduate; or,* certification from Registrar as honor graduate.

Other supporting documents: * Xerox copy of commence-ment program highlighting name and honors received

I.C.1.b GPA 1.26-1.45 8.000I.C.2 Bachelor’s DegreeI.C.1.a Summa Cum Laude or a GPA 1.00-

1.2010.000

I.C.1.b Magna cum laude or a GPA of 1.201-1.45

8.000

I.C.1.c Cum laude or a GPA of 1.451-1.75 5.000

II Work ExperienceII.A Service per year in one’s field of * Official service records or

39

Section/Subsectio



specialization at MSU certification showing year, month and date of employment. * Contract of services (for lecturers)

* Sample computations: Given : Employment started June 1, 2000 Employment ended March 31, 2005

2005 03 31 - 2000 06 01

---------------------- 4 9 30+1 The above work experience covers 4 years, 9 months and 31 days = 4 + 9/12 + 31/365 = 4.835 years (rounded-off to three decimal places) Note: * Work experience refers to actual service (study leaves are not considered)* For lecturers and faculty members, minimum of 12 units for a regular semester, and a minimum of 6 units for summer* Type of work must be clearly specified and service rendered should be at least satisfactory (supported by TERs or performance rating)* Only one work experience on any given range of date is considered

II.A.1 Teaching 5.000II.A.2 Research 3.000II.A.3 Extension 3.000II.A.4 Other Work Experience 2.000II.B Service per year outside one’s field of

specialization at MSUII.B.1 Teaching 3.000II.B.2 Research 1.500II.B.3 Extension 1.500II.B.4 Other Work Experience 1.000II.C Service per year in one’s field of

specialization outside MSUII.C.1 Teaching 4.000II.C.2 Research 2.000II.C.3 Extension 2.000II.C.4 Other Work Experience 2.000II.D. Service per year outside one’s field of

specialization outside MSUII.D.1 Teaching 2.000II.D.2 Research 1.000II.D.3 Extension 1.000II.D.4 Other Work Experience 0.500

II.NB Unbroken Service at MSUS 5.000 * given at the end of each 5-year period* no point for semester with less than satisfactory TER

III Productivity * all productivities which are not ISI reviewed should be evaluated by at least 3 peers or experts using Form 06 (Research Report Rating Form).

40

Section/Subsectio



* All points stated herein are maximum and are subject to factors considering role (principal or co-author), number of authors, awards, exposure (international, national, etc.), type (journal, proceedings, technical magazine, newsletter, etc.), etc.

III.A Published Productivity Output (Print or electronic publication)

* certification that productivity is within or outside one’s field of specialization to be signed by the Dep’t. Chair and IAPP Coordinator

Notes:* ISI accredited articles are automatically given maximum points* With copyright, publishing company, etc.* evaluated by the textbook board* additional points for winning productivities (with supporting credentials)* shared publications shall be awarded points based on a scheme (p A-9)

III.A.1 Books/MonographsIII.A.1.a General, Professional, Scientific

Researches25.000

III.A.1.b Textbooks used by MSU and other Schools (Approved by the Textbook Board)

20.000

III.A.1.c Literary (Novel, Book of Plays, Book of Short Stories and Book of Poems)

20.000

III.A.1.d Translation of Books 10.000III.A.1.e Anthologies and Compilations 10.000III.A.1.f Editorial Work 5.000III.A.2 Articles in Technical, Scientific,

Professional and Scholarly Journals

III.A.2.a General Professional, scientific researches

15.000

III.A.2.b Medical health treatises, case studies 15.000III.A.2.c Critical review of books 15.000III.A.2.d Critical review of articles 7.000III.A.2.e Descriptive and expository articles 5.000III.A.2.f Translation of articles 3.000III.A.2.g Abstract of one’s work or somebody

else’s work2.000

III.A.3 Literary Pieces (per piece)III.A.3.a Plays 10.000III.A.3.b Short Stories 5.000III.A.3.c Poems/Lyrics 3.000III.A.3.d Essay 3.000III.A.3.e Translations (50% of the points

assigned to the piece)III.B Unpublished Productivity Output Note:

* earned points will be deducted if published later

III.B.1 Instructional Materials (A complete set used in a course, e.g., Modules, Kits Workbooks, Prototypes

5.000 * certification from Dep’t. Chair that the materials have been used for instructions* certification from the textbook board that the

41

Section/Subsectio



materials have been scrutinized and approved for instructional materials

III.B.2 Researches 5.000III.B.3 Literary PiecesIII.B.3.1 Poem 1.000III.B.3.2 Short Story 1.000III.B.3.3 Essay 1.000III.B.4 Declamation and Oratorical Pieces

(delivered), Essay1.000 * write-up

* program details* hard copyNote:* only delivered pieces are given points

III.B.5 Scripts: Drama and Play/Movie 1.000III.C Musical/Dance Composition and

New Games* documentation on the implementation/execution of the dance/game

III.C.1 Original CompositionAdditional points (earned once only, whichever is higher)

5.000 * musical score* lyrics* write-up/ written piece* brochure* hard copy* program details (schedule, venue, etc.)

III.C.1.a International 3.000III.C.1.b National 2.000III.C.1.c Regional 1.000III.C.1.d Local 0.500III.C.2 Adaptation and Arrangement

Additional points (earned once only, whichever is higher)

* must be supported with pertinent documentation

III.C.2.a International 3.000III.C.2.b National 2.000III.C.2.c Regional 1.000III.C.2.d Local 0.500III.C.3 New Games

Additional points(earned once only, whichever is higher)

III.C.3.a International 3.000III.C.3.b National 2.000III.C.3.c Regional 1.000III.C.3.d Local 0.500III.D Paintings and other works of arts

(per piece)* pictures* certification* plaques* documentation (proceedings, etc.)* additional credentials for winning pieces

III.D.1 International 10.000III.D.2 National 7.000III.D.3 Regional 5.000III.D.4 Local 3.000

III.E Inventions, Discoveries or Designs, New Technologies or Procedures, Methods of Production, Original Architectural or Engineering Designs and Computer Programs

III.E.1 Inventions 30.000** * Use IAPP Form 07

42

Section/Subsectio



(Invention: Impact and Utility Rating Form)* proof of authentication* patent * Write up on the uses and general characteristics

** Subject to I and U factors (refer to ISRP, III.E.5)

III.E.2 Discoveries or Design (Patented or authenticated by relevant national authority)

20.000**

III.E.3 New Technologies or Procedures, Methods of Production

20.000**

III.E.4 Original Architectural or Engineering Designs (Research – based with extensive write-up)

10.000**

III.E.5 Computer Programs (Documented with extensive write-up)

10.000**

III.F Papers Read and Posters Presented (Percentage of credits given to A or B to an appropriate category.)

* proof where and when paper was presented (program, schedule of presentation, proceedings, etc.)* a paper is read in an international forum if: 1. participants come from various countries 2. speakers/readers are from various countries

III.F.1 International 25.000%III.F.2 National 20.000%III.F.3 Regional 15.000%III.F.4 Local 10.000%

III.G Legal Briefs, Court Memoranda (of cases won)

III.G.1 Supreme Court 7.000 * only for cases won* court decision* case briefs* memoranda

III.G.2 Appellate Court 3.000

IV Teaching Efficiency Rating (TER)

* TER certification signed by College/School Dean/Director

Notes:* only faculty members with a TER of at least very satisfactory (85%) during evaluation period shall be qualified for evaluation* aggregate ratings from students, dep’t. chair, dean and peers.* show evaluation period (by semester)* For lecturers, TER is considered for a load of at least 12 units on a regular semester, or 6 units for summer.* TER’s from non-MSU schools are accepted, as long as the rating scheme is synchronized with that used within the MSUS.

V Professional Growth

43

Section/Subsectio



V.A Professional/Board/Licensure/Bar Examination

V.A.1 Passing 10.000 * licensure examination results* newspaper clippings or Internet printout

V.A.2 Topping (additional points)V.A.2.a 1st to 2nd place 15.000 * PRC/Board certificationV.A.2.b 3rd to 10th place 10.000V.A.2.c 11th to 20th place 5.000V.B Civil Service Career Professional

Eligibility or its equivalent (Only one)

5.000 * Civil Service Career Professional Eligibility Results

V.C Training Program (maximum of one training per year; a written report required)

* Use IAPP Form 8 (Terminal Report) and Form 9 (Echo Report).

Notes:* An Echo Report is not necessary for a new recruit* Training is pro-rated at 8hrs/day, 160 hours/month or 20days/month (Table 1, p A-13)

V.C.1 International 7-10V.C.2 National 4-6V.C.3 Local/Regional 1-3

V.D Role in an Editorial Board of a Technical and Professional Journal/Newsletter

V.D.1.a Editor/Chairman/Newsletter * copy of Journal showing Editorial Board* at least 2 issues of newsletter or 1 for journal

V.D.1.a.i International 5.000V.D.1.a.ii National 4.000V.D.1.a.iii Local 3.000V.D.1.b Editor/Chairman/JournalV.D.1.b.i International 10.000V.D.1.b.ii National 7.000V.D.1.b.iii Local 5.000V.D.2.a Member/NewsletterV.D.2.a.i International 3.000V.D.2.a.ii National 2.000V.D.2.a.iii Local 1.000V.D.2.b Member/JournalV.D.2.b.i International 7.000V.D.2.b.ii National 5.000V.D.2.b.iii Local 3.000V.E Consultancy per projectV.E.1 Critics of books 5.000 * letter of invitation

* acknowledgement of the review

V.E.2 Critics of articles 3.000

V.E.3 Consultants (i.e. medical/health/cultural/academic/construction projects, program/institutional accreditation)

* letter of invitation* MOA with IIT * details of project* report

44

Section/Subsectio



V.E.3.a International 10.000V.E.3.b National 5.000V.E.3.c Local 3.000V.E.4 Visiting Professors (with a

Memorandum of Agreement between universities/ institutions)

V.E.4.a Foreign University 3/termV.E.4.b Local/Domestic University 2/termV.F Professional Awards, Honors,

Distinctions* copy of citations* report

Note:Mercenary and mercantilist awards are excluded

V.F.1 International 7.000V.F.2 National 5.000V.F.3 Regional 3.000V.F.4 Local 2.000V.F.5 University-wide 1.000V.H Seminars, Symposia, Workshops,

Conferences, Conventions, Congresses, Assemblies, online attendance included (per seminar or convention, maximum of three (3) seminars, etc. per year)

* Use IAPP Form 8 (Terminal Report and Form 9(Echo Report).

Notes: * An echo report is not required for a new recruit* only three (3) seminars per year may be considered* Seminars must be arranged by year, starting with the latest.

V.H.1 International 2.000V.H.2 National 1.000V.H.3 Local 0.500

V.G Honoris causa degree, only one (Only for doctorate level)

10.000 * certificate of recognition* commencement program

VI Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities

* Use IAPP Form 10 (Accomplishment Report)* Doctrinal or religious-related activities are not considered

VI.A Membership/Officialship in a Campus/College Committee (tasked with significant, substantial academic and academic-related work, with an output or accomplishment report)

* Equal points for Chair or Co-Chair

VI.A.1 Standing Committee (per year basis)

VI.A.1.a Chair 2.000VI.A.1.b Vice Chair/Secretary 1.500VI.A.1.c Member 1.000VI.A.2 Ad Hoc Committees (per

project/activity)VI.A.2.a Chair 1.000VI.A.2.b Vice Chair/Secretary 0.750VI.A.2.c Member 0.500VI.A.3 Program Adviser (per * Use IAPP Form 11

45

Section/Subsectio



advisee/year) (Program Academic Adviser Summary Form) and IAPP Form 12 (Program Academic Adviser Form)

VI.A.3.a Graduate 0.250VI.A.3.b Undergraduate 0.150

VI.A.4 Adviser, Student Publication/Organization (per year)

0.500 * copy of the publication* schedule of activities of the organization for the school year

VI.A.5 Thesis/Dissertation Adviser/Panel Member (which is not assigned an equivalent teaching load)

VI.A.5.a Graduate (Doctorate Dissertation) * copy of teaching load to support that advising is not assigned a teaching load)* copy of approval sheet

VI.A.5.a.i Adviser 3.000VI.A.5.a.ii Panel Member 1.500VI.A.5.b Graduate (Master’s Thesis)VI.A.5.b.i Adviser 2.000VI.A.5.b.ii Panel Member 1.000VI.A.5.c UndergraduateVI.A.5.c.i Adviser 1.000VI.A.5.c.ii Panel Member 0.500VI.B Manpower Training per project

per semesterVI.B.1 Coordinator/Team Leader/Organizer 1.000VI.B.2 Planner/Programmer/Proponent 1.000VI.B.3 Discussant/Demonstrator/Trainer 0.500VI.B.4 Facilitator/Resource person/lecturer 0.500VI.B.5 Field Worker/Technician/Consultant 0.500VI.C Information/Communication

Program per project per semesterVI.C.1 Proponent/Conceptualizer/

DesignerVI.C.1.a International 4.000VI.C.1.b National 3.000VI.C.1.c Regional 2.000VI.C.1.d Local 1.000VI.C.2 Information Production OfficerVI.C.2.a International 3.000VI.C.2.b National 2.000VI.C.2.c Regional 1.000VI.C.2.d Local 0.500VI.C.3 Editor/DirectorVI.C.3.a International 3.000VI.C.3.b National 2.000VI.C.3.c Regional 1.000VI.C.3.d Local 0.500VI.C.4 Field Exhibit

Organizer/CoordinatorVI.C.4.a International 3.000VI.C.4.b National 2.000VI.C.4.c Regional 1.000

46

Section/Subsectio



VI.C.4.d Local 0.500VI.C.5 MSU SASE ExaminerVI.C.5.a Regional 1.000VI.C.5.b Local 0.500VI.C.6 Announcer/BroadcasterVI.C.6.a International 5.000VI.C.6.b National 4.000VI.C.6.c Regional 3.000VI.C.6.d Local 2.000VI.D SportsV1.D.1 ManagerV1.D.1.a International 5.000V1.D.1.b National 4.000V1.D.1.c Regional 3.000V1.D.1.d Local 2.000V1.D.2 Coach/Asst. Coach/TrainerV1.D.2.a International 4.000V1.D.2.b National 3.000V1.D.2.c Regional 2.000V1.D.2.d Local 1.000V1.D.3 Referee/UmpireV1.D.3.a International 5.0V1.D.3.b National 4.0V1.D.3.c Regional 3.0V1.D.3.d Local 2.0V1.D.4 Other Officiating OfficialV1.D.4.a International 3.0V1.D.4.b National 2.0V1.D.4.c Regional 1.0V1.D.4.d Local 0.5VI.E Arts, Cultural and other similar

activities per performance/ play/show/production/Exhibit

VI.E.1 Executive Producer/Conductor/Director

VI.E.1.a International 5.000 * copy of the program which includes the cast/working committees* Proof of participation* photographs/digital images of the performance

Note:* maximum of 10 performances per year

VI.E.1.b National 4.000VI.E.1.c Regional 3.000VI.E.1.d Local 2.000VI.E.2 Production Manager/Technical

Director/Musical DirectorVI.E.2.a International 4.000VI.E.2.b National 3.000VI.E.2.c Regional 2.000VI.E.2.d Local 1.000VI.E.3 Coach/TrainerVI.E.3.a International 4.000VI.E.3.b National 3.000VI.E.3.c Regional 2.000VI.E.3.d Local 1.000VI.E.4 Technical Staff

47

Section/Subsectio



VI.E.4.a International 3.000VI.E.4.b National 2.000VI.E.4.c Regional 1.000VI.E.4.d Local 0.500VI.E.5 Lead Actor/Supporting

Actor/Performer/ InterpreterVI.E.5.a International 3.000VI.E.5.b National 2.000VI.E.5.c Regional 1.000VI.E.5.d Local 0.500VI.E.6 Artist/Painter/Sculptor/Playwright/

Choreographer/ Composer/Arranger

VI.E.6.a International 3.000VI.E.6.b National 2.000VI.E.6.c Regional 1.000VI.E.6.d Local 0.500VI.E.7 Quizmaster/HostVI.E.7.a International 3.000VI.E.7.b National 2.000VI.E.7.c Regional 1.000VI.E.7.d Local 0.250VI.E. 8 JudgeVI.E.8.a International 2.000VI.E.8.b National 1.000VI.E.8.c Regional 0.500VI.E.8.d Local 0.250VI.E.9 Adviser/Consultant/CoordinatorVI.E.9.a International 3.000VI.E.9.b National 2.000VI.E.9.c Regional 1.000VI.E.9.d Local 0.500VI.F Pioneering or Founding a

Unit/Office or Programs of the University

VI.F.1 System-wide use 7.000 * approved proposal for pioneering or founding a unit/office or program of the University

VI.F.2 Campus-wide use 5.000VI.F.3 College-wise use 3.000

VI.G Crafting of Academic Policies, Schemes, Guidelines, Institutional Programs

VI.G.1 System-wide use 7.000 * output (handbook, manual, etc.)VI.G.2 Campus-wide use 5.000

VI.G.3 College-wise use 3.000

VII Extension Services * Proof of actual involvement (flyers, certificates, programs, etc.)* certification from program director, etc.

VII.A Manpower Training and Involvement in Civic Activities of Governmental Organizations (GO’s), Local Government Units

48

Section/Subsectio



(LGU’s), Local Assemblies (LA’s), Non- Governmental Organizations (NGO’s), Private Volunteer Organizations (PVO’s), Private Organization (PO’s), Civic Organization (CO’s) per project per semester.

* Memorandum/Special Order* LOA/MOA* accomplishment report duly certified by the program or project director* photographs/digital images of the activities* List of participants for international activities* travel order, if applicable

Note:* purely doctrinal (religious activities) are not included* extension activities shall be related to one’s filed of specialization* extension activities while on leave, detail or secondment (outside MSUS) shall not be considered.

VII.A.1 Coordinator/Team Leader/Programmer

VII.A.1.a International 5.000VII.A.1.b National 4.000VII.A.1.c Regional 3.000VII.A.1.d Local 2.000VII.A.2 Planner/Organizer/ProponentVII.A.2.a International 5.000VII.A.2.b National 4.000VII.A.2.c Regional 3.000VII.A.2.d Local 2.000VII.A.3 Trainer/Discussant/DemonstratorVII.A.3.a International 3.000VII.A.3.b National 2.000VII.A.3.c Regional 1.000VII.A.3.d Local 0.500VII.A.4 Consultant/Resource

Person/LecturerVII.A.4.a International 3.000VII.A.4.b National 2.000VII.A.4.c Regional 1.000VII.A.4.d Local 0.500VII.A.5 Field

Worker/Technician/FacilitatorVII.A.5.a International 3.000VII.A.5.b National 2.000VII.A.5.c Regional 1.000VII.A.5.d Local 0.500VII.B Information/Communication

Program per project per semesterVII.B.1 Proponent/Conceptualizer/

DesignerVII.B.1.a International 4.000VII.B.1.b National 3.000VII.B.1.c Regional 2.000VII.B.1.d Local 1.000VII.B.2 Information Production OfficerVII.B.2.a International 3.000VII.B.2.b National 2.000VII.B.2.c Regional 1.000VII.B.2.d Local 0.500VII.B.3 Editor/DirectorVII.B.3.a International 3.000VII.B.3.b National 2.000

49

Section/Subsectio



VII.B.3.c Regional 1.000VII.B.3.d Local 0.500VII.B.4 Field Exhibit

Organizer/CoordinatorVII.B.4.a International 3.000VII.B.4.b National 2.000VII.B.4.c Regional 1.000VII.B.4.d Local 0.500VII.B.5 Announcer/BroadcasterVII.B.5.a International 5.000VII.B.5.b National 4.000VII.B.5.c Regional 3.000VII.B.5.d Local 2.000VII.C Sports Activities per

competition/tournament/ season/league

VII.C.1 ManagerVII.C.1.a International 5.000VII.C.1.b National 4.000VII.C.1.c Regional 3.000VII.C.1.d Local 2.000VII.C.2 Coach/Asst. Coach/TrainerVII.C.2.a International 4.000VII.C.2.b National 3.000VII.C.2.c Regional 2.000VII.C.2.d Local 1.000VII.C.3 Officiating OfficialVII.C.3.a International 4.000VII.C.3.b National 3.000VII.C.3.c Regional 2.000VII.C.3.d Local 1.000VII.C.4 Other Officiating OfficialVII.C.4.a International 3.000VII.C.4.b National 2.000VII.C.4.c Regional 1.000VII.C.4.d Local 0.500VII.D Arts, Cultural and other similar

activities per performance/ play/show/production/ exhibit

VII.D.1 Executive Producer/Conductor/Director

VII.D.1.a International 5.000VII.D.1.b National 4.000VII.D.1.c Regional 3.000VII.D.1.d Local 2.000VII.D.2 Production Manager/Technical

Director/Musical DirectorVII.D.2.a International 4.000VII.D.2.b National 3.000VII.D.2.c Regional 2.000VII.D.2.d Local 1.000

50

Section/Subsectio



VII.D.3 Coach/TrainerVII.D.3.a International 4.000VII.D.3.b National 3.000VII.D.3.c Regional 2.000VII.D.3.d Local 1.000VII.D.4 Technical StaffVII.D.4.a International 3.000VII.D.4.b National 2.000VII.D.4.c Regional 1.000VII.D.4.d Local 0.500VII.D.5 Lead Actors/Supporting

Actor/Performer/ InterpreterVII.D.5.a International 3.000VII.D.5.b National 2.000VII.D.5.c Regional 1.000VII.D.5.d Local 0.500VII.D.6 Artist/Painter/Sculptor/Playwright/

Choreographer/ VII.D.6.a International 3.000VII.D.6.b National 2.000VII.D.6.c Regional 1.000VII.D.6.d Local 0.500VII.D.7 Composer/ArrangerVII.D.7.a International 3.000VII.D.7.b National 2.000VII.D.7.c Regional 1.000VII.D.7.d Local 0.500VII.D.8 Quizmaster/HostVII.D.8.a International 3.000VII.D.8.b National 2.000VII.D.8.c Regional 1.000VII.D.8.d Local 0.500VII.D.9 JudgeVII.D.9.a International 2.000VII.D.9.b National 1.000VII.D.9.c Regional 0.500VII.D.9.d Local 0.250VII.D.10 Adviser/Consultant/CoordinatorVII.D.10.a International 3.000VII.D.10.b National 2.000VII.D.10.c Regional 1.000VII.D.10.d Local 0.500

51

INTEGRATED SCHEME FOR

RANKING AND PROMOTION

(ISRP)

Revised 2005

0

Republic of the Philippines

Mindanao State University System

INTEGRATED SCHEME FOR RANKING AND PROMOTION (ISRP)Revised 2005

Rationale

Promotion is a major concern of both the institution and its employees. Rank promotion of the faculty is a major policy concern of the University as it defines both their academic stature and salary. Necessarily, the University must maintain a precise, reliable and relevant faculty ranking scheme to ensure that its main objectives, that of attracting highly qualified faculty applicants and that of retaining very competent and productive faculty members are consistently and persistently met.

The Mindanao State University initially had a faculty ranking scheme patterned after the 1962 UP model. However, since the University has unique features and needs, it developed its own Faculty Ranking Scheme (FRS) in the 70’s to respond to those special characteristics. In 1982, the FRS was revised to become more comprehensive and responsive. It became the MSU INTEGRATED SCHEME FOR RANKING AND PROMOTION or the MSU ISRP. It was further amended in 1993 to accommodate paradigm shifts in education, among others. So that, while the 1982 ISRP gave special focus on educational attainment to encourage the faculty to pursue MS and Ph.D. degrees, the 1993 scheme accentuated research, publication and extension services as these are equally important in the academic operation conditions.

Ranking of faculty members must continually conform to the development, institutional maturity and changing needs and emphases of the University in consonance with changing and relevant national policies. For example, in 1988 the Salary Standardization Law was passed and implemented requiring adjustments in some provisions of the ISRP. In addition, although the Civil Service Commission recognizes the MSU Faculty Merit System, it has imposed specific personnel policies that ISRP must respect.

Recent developments in the national and global academic communities likewise indicate that there should be major amendments in the Scheme. These developments include the following:

1. The program of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and the Philippine Regulatory Commission (PRC) to professionalize all baccalaureate degrees in the Philippines which renders the Faculty Classification in the ISRP irrelevant.

2. A new avenue for academic advancements has been opened by Information Technology, such as the Electronic/Open Universities, international teleconferencing and the publication of research outputs online through the internet, which allows everybody to access an infinite body of knowledge now overlaying the communication and academic superhighways.

PURPOSE OF EVALUATION AND RANKING

The purpose of the MSU-ISRP is for the determination of the initial rank of newly recruited faculty members and for promotion of those who are in the service.

Annex - 1

I. INITIAL RANKING

Initial ranking of newly recruited faculty shall include the following criteria:

1. Educational Attainment2. Work Experience3. Professional Growth*4. Productivity

*Only seminars and trainings attended within the last three (3) years shall be considered.

Initial ranks shall be pegged at the first level of each rank category (Teacher I, Instructor I, Asst. Prof. I, Assoc. Prof. I, Full Prof. I). The new recruit will be re-evaluated and re-ranked based on additional documents submitted within the first year of employment; otherwise the initial rank becomes final.

II. RANK PROMOTION

Ranking for promotion is a form of institutional recognition of the meritorious performance and outstanding achievements of a faculty. A faculty member who has attained significant achievement or has demonstrated exemplary performance is given due recognition through the evaluation for rank promotion.

To ensure efficient implementation of this policy of the University, each faculty member shall be required to provide the Office of the Academic Affairs or its equivalent, updated and complete personal academic records. On the other hand, each academic unit shall maintain a periodic review of the faculty records to find out who among its faculty members may be qualified for rank promotion.

Considerations for Promotion

Regular faculty members with at least a probationary status or occupying an itemized position, who have served the university for at least two (2) years, and are handling at least three (3) units of teaching load during the time of evaluation, may be considered for promotion, provided that they have achieved or satisfied at least one of the following:

1. Conferment of an officially authorized degree to a faculty grantee who has reported back to duty with TOR and approved bound copy of thesis or dissertation, if applicable; TOR and SO required for those who graduated from private institutions;

2. Completion of a graduate degree on one’s own time and expense with approved permit to study PROVIDED, the degree is within or in the allied/related field of study or specialization duly recognized by the University as certified by the concerned academic department or college, with a certified true copy TOR and an approved bound copy of thesis or dissertation if applicable; an SO for those from private institutions shall be required;

3. An average Teaching Efficiency Rating (TER) of not less than Very Satisfactory (VS) in the last four (4) semesters and meeting at least one of the following requirements based on current rank:

Annex - 2

INSTRUCTOR/TEACHER

1. 3 years of continuous teaching in the MSUS immediately prior to evaluation

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR (any of the following in one’s field of specialization)

1. Publication of a technical/professional/scientific paper or its equivalent or presentation/performance/exhibition of creative work;

2. Involvement in at least two (2) researches;

3. Involvement in the production of at least two (2) instructional materials (e.g. workbooks, manuals, modules, prototypes, etc.);

4. Involvement in two (2) regional Extension projects*;

5. Involvement in two (2) significant (regional or system wide) institutional Service**

* see Section VI** see Section V

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR (any of the following in one’s field of specialization)

1. Publication of two (2) technical/professional/scientific papers or their equivalent, or presentation/performance/exhibition of two (2) creative works;

2. Completion of at least one (1) research project as principal researcher;

3. Sole authorship of one (1) book or co-authorship of two (2) books;

4. Conceptualization and spearheading of two (2) major Extension projects;

5. Conceptualization and spearheading of two (2) significant institutional Services.

PROFESSOR (any of the following in one’s field of specialization)

1. Publication of three (3) technical/professional/scientific papers or their equivalent or presentation/performance/exhibition of three (3) creative works;

2. Completion of at least two (2) research projects as principal researcher;

3. Sole authorship of at least two (2) books or co-authorship of 4 books;

4. Conceptualizing and spearheading of three (3) major extension projects;

5. Conceptualizing and spearheading of three (3) significant Institutional Services.

For Full Professor to be promoted to Research/College Professor or University Professor the given entrance requirements must be satisfied.

Annex - 3

N.B. 1. Publication of a solely authored book should be duly recognized and accredited by the University through the University/Campus Textbook Board based on established criteria.

2. All supporting documents for consideration in each rank category are new or not used in previous considerations for rank promotion.

3. The number of faculty to be promoted shall conform to the faculty promotion plan of each campus.

THE SCHEME

The Scheme consists of two parts:

Part I Rank Categorization andPart II Level-Specification based on established criteria

Part IRANK - CATEGORIZATION

Rank categorization shall be based on the following established entrance requirements which are singular in the Instructor and Teacher ranks and with several options for the rest of the ranks:

TEACHER(Levels I – III)

1. At least a Bachelor’s degree with appropriate majors or in a closely allied field and passing the Licensure Examination for Teachers/Professional Board Examination for Teachers (LET/PBET).

MASTER TEACHER(Levels I – IV)

1. At least a Master’s degree in one’s field of specializationa. With an average TER not below Very Satisfactory** for the last two (2)

years prior to the evaluation; and,b. must be a PBET or LET passer

**not applicable to new recruits

2. A Bachelor’s degree*** in education anda. Passing PBET or LET; andb. Having ten (10) years of continuous actual and full time teaching

experience in MSU with an average TER of VS or an Outstanding TER for the last three (3) consecutive years.

***a maximum of MT II (Master Teacher Two)

INSTRUCTOR (Levels I – III)

1. At least a Bachelor’s degree within one’s field of specialization or in a closely allied field plus passing a licensure examination, when required in the degree. Passing a licensure examination may be waived for those teaching courses not requiring the same.

Annex - 4

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR(Levels I – IV)

1. A Master’s Degree in one’s field of specialization plus an average TER of at least VS for the last two (2) years.

2. A Master’s degree in a related or allied field of specialization, plus all of the following:

a. Three (3) years of full time teaching experience in MSU or other reputable University in the Philippines;

b. An average TER of at least Very Satisfactory for the last two (2) years;

3. A Baccalaureate degree**** with five (5) years of teaching experience in the MSUS or in any other reputable University and an average TER of ‘Outstanding’ for the last two (2) consecutive years plus any two (2) of the following:

a. Certificate of Proficiency/Diploma for a special study/training in one’s field of specialization earned from a prestigious institution/agency, provided that it is undertaken in a period of at least ten (10) months.

b. Presentation of a technical/professional/scientific paper or its equivalent in a national professional conference or presentation/performance/ exhibition of creative work; or

c. Co-authorship of at least one (1) research or scholarly article published in a professional or technical journal or scientific invention or creative work or computer program used by an agency or institution; or

d. Involvement in the successful implementation of two (2) extension activities duly authorized/recognized and certified by a competent body created by the OVCRE (or its equivalent) with required supporting documents; or

e. Involvement in two significant***** 2) institutional service

****Maximum of Asst. Prof. I (One)*****See Section V

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR(Levels I – V)

1. A Doctorate degree in one’s field of specialization with an average TER of at least Very Satisfactory in the last four (4) semesters in the MSUS; or

2. A Doctorate degree in an allied or related field of specialization with at least three years (3) of work experience in the MSUS or in other reputable University, two years of which were served as an Assistant Professor, with an average TER of VS in MSUS or in other reputable university; or

3. A master’s degree in one’s field of specialization and at least three (3) years of teaching experience in the MSUS or in other reputable University, at least two (2) years of which are served as an Assistant Professor in MSUS with an average TER of not below VS, plus any of the following:

a. Authorship of one scholarly article published in a professional or technical journal; or

b. Completion of one research project duly recognized by the University/ Campus Research Council; or

Annex - 5

c. Presentation of two (2) technical/professional/scientific papers or its equivalent in a national conference or presentation/performance/exhibition of two (2) creative/scientific works; or

d. Spearheading and active involvement in two (2) extension programs/projects adjudged by the Campus APC to have high social impact; or

e. Designing of an academic or scientific/technical system or software program adjudged to be of institutional significance by a qualified panel of peers; or

f. An international or national award from prestigious professional/technical body; or

g. A national or international publication of legal or medical treatises and other equivalent works or outputs; or

h. Significant contribution (with tremendous impact and usefulness to many sectors) to the development and national/international prestige of MSU through any of the following as recognized by the APC upon recommendation of a competent body created for the purpose:

i. culture and arts appreciation or exchangesii. sports awareness and development

iii. scientific, medical and legal advancementiv. economic growth

i. Leadership (Principal Authorship/Editorship) in the production of one (1) textbook or two (2) instructional materials for an entire course, e.g., workbooks, manuals, modules and prototypes which are officially used in the campus.

4. A master’s degree in allied or related field of specialization with thesis and at least three (3) years of teaching experience in the MSUS or in any other reputable University, at least two (2) years of which are served as an Assistant Professor in MSUS with an average TER of at least VS, plus any two (2) or double of any of those mentioned in Item 3.

FULL PROFESSOR(Levels I – VI)

1. A Doctorate degree in one’s field of specialization and five (5) years of work experience in the MSUS, two (2) years of which are as Associate Professor with an average TER of at least VS plus any of the following:

a. Sole authorship of at least one (1) or co-authorship of two (2) refereed scholarly articles published in a professional or technical journal; or

b. Co-authorship of a book adjudged to be of high quality (>85%) by a qualified panel of peers; or

c. Conceptualization and spearheading the implementation of three (3) extension services/activities; or

d. Completion of at least three (3) researches duly recognized by the University Research Council or appropriate body en banc and presented in a forum within the last five years; or

e. At least one paper read in an international academic conference or three (3) papers read in national academic conferences.

2. A Doctorate degree in allied or related field of specialization with dissertation directly relevant to one’s teaching assignment with not less than seven (7) years of service in the MSUS, at least two (2) years of which are served as Associate Professor with an average TER of not below VS, plus any two (2) or double of any item listed in No. 1.

Annex - 6

3. MS or MA****** in one’s field of specialization with thesis, with no less than ten (10) years of service in the MSUS, at least five (5) years of which are as Associate Professor and with a TER of not below VS in any of the last four (4) semesters, plus any three (3) of those listed in No. 1.******Applicable only within six years upon approval of this Scheme and a maximum of Prof. III, after which this entry point for Full Prof. shall no longer apply.

RESEARCH/COLLEGE PROFESSOR

1. A Doctorate degree with at least five (5) years of service in the MSUS as Full Professor provided that two (2) years are served as Full Prof. VI plus all of the following:

a. Presentation/Publication/Performance/Exhibition of seven (7) technical/ professional/creative/scientific papers/outputs;

b. Completion of at least five (5) research projects as principal researcher; and

c. Sole authorship of at least three (3) books or co-authorship of at least six (6) books.

2. Completion of a regular term as Chancellor in any of the MSUS campuses with a VS performance based on a BOR-approved Scheme, provided that upon appointment as such he/she had a rank of Full Professor.N.B. Chancellors with ranks lower than Full Professor at the time of their appointment will be given one rank higher upon the completion of their term. (e.g., Associate Prof. III to Full Prof. III)

UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR

1. A faculty member who has met all of the following requirements:

a. A doctorate degree in one’s field of specialization and has served the University for not less than fifteen (15) years, at least three (3) years of which are as Research/College Professor with an average TER of not below VS;

b. Publication and principal authorship of at least seven (7) books adjudged by a qualified panel of peers to be of high quality each of which should have an average rating of not below 85%.

c. Principal authorship of at least twelve (12) scientific/professional papers, five (5) of which must be refereed;

d. Attendance in at least twelve (12) international conferences, in five (5) of which a paper has been delivered; and

e. Capability to teach courses in two (2) allied disciplines.

2. A faculty member appointed as President of the MSUS who has completed his/her term with at least a VS performance based on a BOR-approved Scheme.

PROFESSOR EMERITUS

A Professor Emeritus is a retired faculty member of the University who is not more than seventy (70) years old, with at least an Associate Professor rank and whose services and expertise are still very much needed by a unit/college as recommended by the College Council, approved by the Academic Planning Committee (APC) and thereafter invited immediately after retirement, on the bases of all the following:

Annex - 7

1. Academic Distinction1.1. Expertise in one’s field still unparalleled in the department/college.1.2. A minimum of 15 years of distinguished teaching experience at MSU.

2. Academic Competence2.1 Extensive experience in Research and/or Extension services.2.2 Brought honor and distinction to MSU through national and

international awards and/or commendations

3. Physical and mental fitness to assume duties and responsibilities of a faculty in teaching, research and/or extension

4. Of good moral character, and unquestionable probity.

N.B. 1. The position is renewed annually subject to semestral evaluation of a) mental and physical health, b) needs of concerned unit, c) performance. 2. For duties, functions and privileges, see Annex A

PROFESSORIAL LECTURER

1. A doctorate degree or MD with diplomate and professional license with at least five years of professional experience in a field of study relevant to the courses to be taught in the University;

2. Master’s degree, with at least two (2) publications in professional journals and at least ten (10) years of professional experience;

3. LLB or M.D. D.V.M., D.D.M with a) professional license, b) at least two (2) publications in professional journals and c) at least ten (10) years of professional experience.

4. Former or current Justice or its equivalent executive positions in law, in medical profession, and other fields.

SPECIAL LECTURER

1. A Special Lecturer is one whose credentials speak conclusively of exceptional achievements lending him/her national or international stature and is invited by the department and recommended by the college and approved by Campus APC. He/She does not occupy a regular plantilla item in the University.

LECTURER

1. A doctorate degree holder in a field of study with 2 years professional experience relevant to the courses to be taught in the University;

2. Master’s degree in one’s field of study with at least five (5) years of professional experience;

3. LLB or M.D., D.V.M., or D.D.M. with professional license and at least five (5) years of professional experience;

Annex - 8

4. Former or current Judge of Regional courts and its equivalent courts of law or its equivalent executive positions in other professions with at least five (5) years of professional experience.

ASSOCIATE LECTURER

1. Master’s degree in one’s field of study with less than five (5) years of professional experience, including fresh graduates with no official records of professional experience;

2. Baccalaureate degree with appropriate professional license and at least five years (5) of professional experience relevant to the courses to be taught in the University.

ASSISTANT LECTURER

1. Bachelor’s degree holder with appropriate professional license.

Part IILEVEL SPECIFICATION

After the rank category has been established based on the entry requirements, the Campus Academic Promotion Panel (CAPP) shall further evaluate the credentials of the faculty members and assign points on the seven criteria for promotion in accordance with the Scheme, namely:

1) Educational Attainment2) Work Experience3) Productivity4) Teaching Efficiency Rating5) Professional Growth6) Institutional Services7) Extension Services

THE CRITERIA

I. Educational Attainment

A. Educational Attainment Within One’s Field of Specialization

Field of specialization, in this Scheme, refers to the field where the faculty member is currently appointed to teach and/or do research and extension service.

1. A degree within one’s field of specialization shall be given full credit if it satisfies any of the ff:

1.1. The degree title clearly states the field of study or if it is found in the Peterson’s Index of Majors and Graduate Courses (Latest Edition).

1.2. The degree reflects at least 60% of the courses taken are within the curricular programs offered by the department/academic unit, or

1.3. If a degree has no coursework, at least 70% of the content of the thesis/dissertation is in the field of specialization as determined by a qualified panel of peers with at least 3 members.

2. A degree in allied field of specialization is one that reflects at least 40% of the courses taken are within the curricular program/s of the department/academic unit. It shall be given two-thirds (2/3) credit.

Annex - 9

3. A degree is unrelated or outside one’s field of specialization if it reflects less than 40% of the courses within the curricular programs of the department/academic unit where the faculty belongs. It shall be given only one-third (1/3) credit.

B. Credit Points for Academic Degrees:

1. Degree earneda. Doctorate degree 65 pointsb. Master’s degree 45 pointsc. Bachelor’s degree with more than five years, e.g., M.D., Ll.B., DDM, DVM and other equivalent courses shall be treated as masteral degrees* 45 points*d. Bachelor’s degree of at least five years 35 pointse. Bachelor’s degree 30 points

N.B. 1. A transcript of records or its equivalent indicating the degree earned and a final bound copy of the dissertation or thesis for programs requiring dissertation or thesis are non-negotiable requirements. 2. For graduate of other education systems, like the British system, equivalent credential is required.

2. Additional degrees earneda. Doctorate degree 15 pointsb. Master’s degree 10 pointsc. Bachelor’s degree 5 points

N.B. 1. Degrees within the field of specialization, (only one for each level) shall earn full points; related or cognate field shall earn 2/3 of the points and unrelated 1/3 of the points indicated above (honoris causa, excluded.) 2. For graduate of other education system like the British System, equivalent credential shall be required.

3. Advance Additional study programa. Post-Doctorate study 10 pointsb. Diplomate/Fellowship in Medicine 5 points

C. Scholastic Performance based on Grade Point Average (GPA) indicated below or its equivalent for degree within one’s field of specialization. (Only one for each degree level and only those from AACCUP and PASSCU and other accredited schools where MSU sent its faculty to study).

1. Doctorate / Master’s a. GPA 1.00 – 1.25 10 points b. GPA 1.26 – 1.45 8 points 2. Bachelor’s Degree a. summa cum laude

or a GPA of 1.00 – 1.20 10 pointsb. magna cum laude or a GPA of 1.201 – 1.45 8 pointsc. cum laude or or a GPA of 1.451 – 1.75 5 points

Annex - 10

N.B. 1. A post-baccalaureate degree required as a pre-requisite to a higher degree, or as a rung in the ladder-type study program shall not be awarded points, if the higher degree is given credits. 2. In the grade point average (GPA) computation, rounding off rules shall be strictly enforced.

II. Work Experience

Only the primary type of experience, where a major portion of one’s time is spent shall be counted. Work experience points shall be based on official service records or duly accomplished certifications, covering explicitly the periods claimed for credit, provided the service rendered is at least satisfactory. Work Experience shall be classified and rated as follows:

A. Service per year in one’s field of specialization at MSUB. Service per year outside one’s field of specialization at MSUC. Service per year in one’s field of specialization outside MSUD. Service per year outside one’s field of specialization outside MSU

A B C D

1. Teaching 5 pts. 3 pts. 4 pts. 2 pts.2. Research 3 1.5 2 1.03. Extension 3 1.5 2 1.04. Other Work Experience 2 1 2 0.5

N.B. In case of a new recruit, for entrance requirements to the rank, teaching experience may be substituted with other forms of work experiences strictly within or strongly allied to his/her field of specialization, equal to the required length and quality as prescribed for in the different rank categories. Unbroken service at MSU shall be awarded 5 points at the end of each five-year period. However, a faculty member enjoying a study leave shall not earn points for work experience which here refers to an actual service. Moreover, study leave and similar activities, which do not serve one’s official ties with the University, shall be included in the computation of points for unbroken service. In the computation of points, a fraction of a year is given its proportionate point. However, faculty members who obtain less than Satisfactory (S) rating during any semester cannot claim any point for work experience during said academic semester.

III. Productivity

Productivity refers to the output of a faculty member resulting from his/her creative and scholarly activities. Productivity outside one’s field of specialization shall earn ½ of the points of the work. The points indicated under productivity unless otherwise specified are the maximum.

A winning productivity output refers only to the first, second or third prizes of the competition and gets additional points. Paintings and other works of art, treated as equivalent published productivity output, must be supported with appropriate document. For winning or for acclaimed pieces, additional relevant credentials shall be required. Below is the percentage matrix of additional points to be awarded by level:

Annex - 11

1st 2nd 3rd

Local 25% 20% 15%Regional 50% 40% 30%National 75% 60% 45%International 100% 80% 60%

The faculty member shall be credited for his/her role as author or co-author, editor or co-editor, principal or junior writer. For shared publications, points shall be awarded as follows:

1. Where there are two authors, each of the authors gets 50% of the earned points.

2. Where principal and secondary authorships are expressly stated, points should be divided with 55% to the principal author and 45% to the junior author.

3. For productivity outputs that have more than two authors and with an editor, the principal author shall be given 55% of the earned points while each of the other authors shall be given 25%, and the editor shall get 20% of such earned points.

4. For productivity outputs that have editors and contributors instead of authors, the general editor shall get 40% of the earned points, and each of the contributors shall be given 25% of the earned points.

5. For productivity outputs which have more than two (2) authors whose roles are not differentiated, the earned points are equally divided among the authors, but in no case shall each of the authors be given points lower than 25% of the earned points.

(Note: Numbers 3, 4 and 5 are cases when the sum of the parts is not necessarily equal to the whole.)

N.B. 1) Claims of principal authorship or co-authorship should be supported by appropriate documents. (e.g., certification by the concerned co-authors or junior authors.) 2) Points for new editions shall be awarded only if there is substantial revision of the earlier works. Moreover, only the difference of points between the earlier edition and the current shall be awarded. Points indicated for Productivity output are maximum points.

A. Published Productivity Output (Print or electronic publication)

1. Books/Monographsa. General, Professional, Scientific Researches 25

b. Textbooks used by MSU and other Schools (Approved by the Textbook Board) 20 c. Literary (Novel, Book of Plays, Book of Short Stories and Book of Poems) 20 d. Translation of Books 10 e. Anthologies and Compilations 10 f. Editorial Work 5

2. Articles in Technical, Scientific, Professional and Scholarly Journals

a. General Professional, scientific researches 15 b. Medical health treatises, case studies 15 c. Critical review of books 15

Annex - 12

d. Critical review of articles 7 e. Descriptive and expository articles 5 f. Translation of articles 3 g. Abstract of one’s work or somebody else’s work 2

Factors for computation Externally reviewed/refereed

International 100%National 80%

Internally reviewed/refereed Professional journal & proceedings 50%Technical Professional Magazine 50%Newsletter/broadsheet 20%

N.B. Reprints of articles previously published without substantial revision shall not be considered as separate publication.

For published books and articles of general, professional, and scientific researches, and for inventions, discoveries and designs (see III-E), additional points ranging from 1-15 may be recommended under extraordinary conditions when the magnitude of the contribution is tremendous and acclaimed by a community of scholars. Proof of acclamation is required.

A panel of peers/raters/referees shall determine the scholarliness of each article submitted for evaluation and the journal where it was published. The provision on scholarliness shall cover all disciplines; hence, they can be scientific journals (pure and applied sciences, social sciences) or creative journals (the Humanities) or strictly professional journals. Articles in common non-professional journals may be credited with points within half the range assigned to articles in technical and professional journals. Scientific articles published in an international, peer-reviewed, Institute or Scientific Information (ISI) – accredited journal are automatically given the maximum points.

3. Literary Pieces (per piece)A. Plays 10B. Short Stories 5C. Poems/Lyrics 3D. Essay 3E. Translations (50% of the points assigned to the piece)

No ceiling but with factor for computation:International 100%National 80%Local 50%

B. Unpublished Productivity Output 1. Instructional Materials (A complete set used in a course e.g. Modules, Kits Workbooks, Prototypes) 5 2. Researches 5 3. Literary Pieces 3.1 Poem 1 3.2 Short story 1 3.3 Essay 1 4. Declamation and Oratorical Pieces (delivered), Essay 1 5. Scripts: Drama and Play/Movie 1

N.B. If outputs get published and submitted for re-evaluation, the points earned earlier should be deducted from points given for publication.

Annex - 13

C. Musical/Dance Composition and New Games1. Original Composition 52. Adaptation and Arrangement 33. New Games 3

N.B. 1. Additional points are given when performed in any of the following venues but the points shall be earned only once whichever is higher. International 3 National 2 Regional 1 Local 0.5

2. Documentation for dances and games shall include a write-up on the implementation/execution of steps and on the dance game as a whole.

D. Paintings and other works of arts (per piece)1. International 102. National 73. Regional 54. Local 3

N.B. Paintings and other works of art are treated as equivalent published productivity output, and must be presented with appropriate document. For winning or acclaimed pieces, additional relevant credentials shall be required.

E. Inventions, Discoveries or Designs, New Technologies or Procedures, Methods of Production, Original Architectural or Engineering Designs and Computer Programs Proof of authentication/patent by relevant national authority is required.

Documentation should include the patent from an appropriate Patent Office and a write-up of the output’s uses and general characteristics.

E.1. Inventions 30 E.2. Discoveries or Design (Patented or authenticated 20 by relevant national authority) E.3 New Technologies or Procedures, Methods of Production 20 E.4 Original Architectural or Engineering Designs (Research–based with extensive write-up) 10 E.5 Computer Programs (Documented with extensive write-up) 10

Awarding of points shall be based on impact and utility Impact (I) Tremendous Impact 50% Moderate Impact 30% Limited Impact 15% Utility to People (U) Useful to many sectors 50% Useful to a few sectors 25%

The formula shall be: Point = (I + U) x V Where: I is the impact weight, U is the Utility weight and V is the earned points for the category. Impact, here, refers to its effects on economic

operational/environmental factors (i.e. increasing the GNP, improving safety, enhancing quality of life, promoting environmental friendliness), while utility refers to the project’s usefulness to the sectors directly utilizing it (i.e. industry, business, academe, community, government).

Annex - 14

F. Papers Read and Posters Presented (Percentage of credits given to A or B to an appropriate category.) International 25% National 20% Regional 15% Local 10%

G. Legal Briefs, Court Memoranda (of cases won) Supreme Court 7 Appellate Court 3

N.B. Productivity credentials which are not externally reviewed should be evaluated by at least three (3) referees who are chosen for their expertise, competence, objectivity and integrity. Whenever necessary, referees from other campuses or outside the MSU System may be selected for some specific productivity outputs. To assess the quality or the acceptability of works claimed to be textbooks, references and other forms of instructional materials, there shall be a University System Textbook Board (USTB) which may have functions and responsibilities other than USAPP-related tasks.

IV. TEACHING EFFICIENCY RATING (TER)

Teaching Efficiency refers to the ability of a faculty member to carry out his tasks and obligations effectively in relation to his students, peers and superiors. In determining efficiency ratings, college teachers shall be evaluated by their: (1) Students, (2) Department Chairman, Dean or immediate Supervisor and (3) Peers. In relatively smaller academic units where there is no departmentalization, the dean evaluates the faculty member’s teaching efficiency. However, in case there is a department chairman, evaluation should be done by the chairman and the dean. The weights shall be as follows: (1) Students 50%; (2) Department Chairman, Dean or Immediate Supervisor, 30% and (3) Peers, 20%.

Similarly, high school teachers shall be evaluated by their: (1) Principal or immediate Superior, 50% (2) Students, 30% and (3) Peers 20%. Elementary teachers shall be evaluated by their: (1) Peers, 40% and (2) Principal or immediate Supervisor 60%.

Formula for determining the points:

Actual Points/semester = (TER – 75) x 0.20 Where, 75% score = is the established boundary between the Satisfactory and Unsatisfactory ratings TER = teaching efficiency rating which is the weighted average of students, peers, and supervisor’s ratings of a faculty member for a given semester/academic year.

N.B. Only faculty members who have obtained at least an average of Very Satisfactory rating during the evaluation period shall be qualified for purposes of evaluation.

Descriptive Equivalents of TER Percentage Equivalent

Outstanding 93-100Very Satisfactory 85-92Satisfactory 75-84Poor 66-74Failed 50-65

Annex - 15

V. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH

Professional growth refers to the additional training and exposure of a faculty member in his/her field of specialization and allied/related fields.

A. Professional/Board/Licensure/Bar Examination1. Passing 102. Topping (additional points) 1st to 2nd place 15 3rd to 10th place 10 11th to 20th place 5

N.B. Only one professional board/licensure examination shall be considered even in the fields where there are two or more distinct levels of board examinations. The same restriction applies to civil service eligibility.

B. Civil Service Career Professional Eligibility or its equivalent, Only one 5C. Training Program (maximum of one training per year; a written report required) 1. International 7 – 10

2. National 4 – 6 3. Local/Regional 1 – 3

N.B. Please see Table 1 for assigning of pointsIn case the faculty member has several training opportunities in a year, he/she shall earn points for only one, whichever is highest. Faculty sent on training whether MSU funded or externally funded should submit a report and give an echo to his/her colleagues to be certified by the OVCAA. Likewise, faculty sent on seminars, conferences and other academic fora should render the same.

Assigning of points is done according to training level and duration. Please see table below. To get ten points however, the international training involved must meet the 3 qualifiers, namely: an international composition of training participants, an international composition of trainors/resource persons, and an international composition of sponsoring/training agencies. For training programs conducted during weekends or intermittently, equivalent computation shall be done crediting eight (8) hours per day or 160 hours per month.

For conducting echo training, additional points will be given under Institutional Service (Manpower Training, B2)

Table 1Training Classification

Period Local/Regional National International1 – 20 days 1.0 – 1.2 4.0 – 4.2 7.0 – 7.221 – 40 days 1.21 – 1.4 4.21 – 4.4 7.21 – 7.441 – 60 days 1.41 – 1.6 4.41 – 4.6 7.41 – 7.661 – 80 days 1.61 – 1.8 4.61 – 4.8 7.61 – 7.85 months 1.81 – 2.0 4.81 – 5.0 7.81 – 8.06 months 2.01 – 2.2 5.01 – 5.2 8.01 – 8.27 months 2.21 – 2.4 5.21 – 5.4 8.21 – 8.48 months 2.41 – 2.6 5.41 – 5.6 8.41 – 8.69 months 2.61 – 2.8 5.61 – 5.8 8.61 – 8.810 months 2.81 – 3.0 5.81 – 6.0 8.81 – 9.0

Annex - 16

D. Role in an Editorial Board of a Technical and Professional Journal/NewsletterInternational National Local

1. Editor/Chairmana. Newsletter 5 4 3b. Journal 10 7 5

2. Member a. Newsletter 3 2 1 b. Journal 7 5 3

N.B. Points given per year. Proof of output required as follows: 2 issues for newsletter, 1 for Journal

E. Consultancy per project 1. Critics of books 5 2. Critics of articles 3 3. Consultants (i.e. medical/health/cultural/academic/ construction projects, program/institutional accreditation)

International 10 National 5 Local 3

N.B. 1. Critics refer to referees to books/articles before publication in specialized journal.

2. Consultancy in this context refers to the service requiring the practice of one’s field of specialization performed to benefit sectors outside MSU. Those performed to benefit MSU only not requiring one’s field of specialization shall be considered extra- academic activities (see page 13) but considered extension service (see page 15) if requiring the practice of one’s field of specialization.

4. Visiting Professors (with a Memorandum of Agreement between universities/ institutions)

Foreign University 3/term Local/Domestic University 2/term

N.B. Applicable only between institutions not within the System

F. Professional Awards, Honors, Distinctions International 7 National 5 Regional 3 Local 2 University-wide 1

N.B. Awards considered are only those given by prestigious and/or competent award-granting assemblies prescribing a basis of competition that falls within any of the seven criteria. Mercenary and mercantilist awards are excluded.

G. Seminars, Symposia, Workshops, Conferences, Conventions, Congresses, Assemblies, online attendance included (per seminar or convention, maximum of three (3) seminars etc. per year).

International 2 National 1 Local 0.5

N.B. Report and echo seminars required before given credit

H. Honoris causa degree, only one (Only for doctorate level) 10

Annex - 17

VI. Institutional Services/Extra-Academic Activities

Institutional Services or Extra-academic Activities refer to non-inherent tasks (those outside of what are reflected in the Faculty Workload Report as defined in BOR Res. No. 38, s. 1996) performed in the furtherance or advancement of University operations and functions. Output/report of accomplishment is required.

A. Membership/Officialship in a Campus/College Committee (tasked with significant, substantial academic and academic-related work, with an output or accomplishment report)

1. Standing Committee (per year basis)a. Chair 2b. Vice Chair/Secretary 1.5c. Member 1

2. Ad Hoc Committees (per project/activity)a. Chair 1b. Vice Chair/Secretary 0.75c. Member 0.50

3. Program Adviser (per advisee/year)a. Graduate 0.25b. Undergraduate 0.15

4. Adviser, Student Publication/Organization (per year) 0.50 5. Thesis/Dissertation Adviser/Panel Member (which is not assigned an equivalent teaching load)

a. Graduate (Doctorate Dissertation)Adviser 3.0Panel Member 1.5

b. Graduate (Master’s Thesis)Adviser 2.0Panel Member 1.0

c. UndergraduateAdviser 1.0 Panel Member 0.5

N.B. Points given to adviser/panel members should be prorated based on actual engagement per implementing guidelines

B. Manpower Training per project per semester

Position PointsCoordinator/Team Leader/Organizer 1Planner/Programmer/Proponent 1Discussant/Demonstrator/Trainor 0.5Facilitator/Resource person/lecturer 0.5Field Worker/Technician/Consultant 0.5

C. Information/Communication Program per project per semester

Position International National Regional LocalProponent/Conceptualizer/Designer 4 3 2 1Information Production Officer 3 2 1 0.5Editor/Director 3 2 1 0.5Field Exhibit Organizer/Coordinator 3 2 1 0.5MSU SASE Examiner 1 0.5Announcer/Broadcaster 5 4 3 2

Annex - 18

D. Sports

Position International National Regional LocalManager 5 4 3 2Coach/Asst. Coach/Trainer 4 3 2 1Referee/Umpire 4 3 2 1Other Officiating Official 3 2 1 0.5

E. Arts, Cultural and other similar activities per performance/play/show/production/Exhibit

Position International National Regional LocalExecutive Producer/Conductor/Director 5 4 3 2Production Manager/Technical Director/Musical Director

4 3 2 1

Coach/Trainor 4 3 2 1Technical Staff 3 2 1 0.5Lead Actors/Supporting Actor/ Performer/Interpreter 3 2 1 0.5Artist/Painter/Sculptor/Playwright/ Choreographer/Composer/Arranger 3 2 1 0.5Quizmaster/Host 3 2 1 0.25Judge 2 1 0.5 0.25Adviser/Consultant/Coordinator 3 2 1 0.5

N.B. 1. Points will be determined based on the extent of the role played by the group on a given activity. Roles assumed in full length performance/show are given full point. Those in intermission numbers are half. 2. A maximum of ten (10) performances per year will be considered.

F. Pioneering or Founding a Unit/Office or Programs of the UniversitySystem-wide use 7Campus-wide use 5College-wise use 3

N.B. In case pioneered by a committee/team, points shall be divided/shared equally.

G. Crafting of Academic Policies, Schemes, Guidelines, Institutional ProgramsSystem-wide use 7Campus-wide use 5College-wise use 3

N.B. Points shall be given per person. Proof of involvement and output required.

VII. Extension Services

Extension service refers to the organized service or out-reach programs designed to improve the quality of life in communities other than the University community, i.e., faculty, students and staff. It may be carried out employing the following approaches or strategies: conduct of seminars and skill-upgrading and skill acquisition training; establishment of demonstration farms; community organizing; information/ communication programs; and direct community assistance through project consultancy work. Purely doctrinal (religious) activities are not included.

Annex - 19

N.B. In case of mixed participation, and if majority are outsiders, then it is considered as extension

A. Manpower Training and Involvement in Civic Activities of Governmental Organizations (GO’s), Local Government Units (LGU’s), Local Assemblies (LA’s), Non- Governmental Organizations (NGO’s), Private Volunteer Organizations (PVO’s), Private Organizations (PO’s), Civic Organizations (CO’s) per project per semester.

Position International National Regional LocalCoordinator/Team Leader/Programmer 5 3 2 1Planner/Organizer/Proponent 5 3 2 1Trainor/Discussant/Demonstrator 3 2 1 0.5Consultant/Resource Person/Lecturer 3 2 1 0.5Field Worker/Technician/Facilitator 3 2 1 0.5

N.B. Extension activities shall be related to one’s field of specialization including participation in civic activities of government organizations (GO’s), Local Government Units (LGU’s), Local Assemblies (LA’s). Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s), Private Volunteer Organizations (PVO’s), Private Organizations (PO’s), and Civic Organizations (CO’s). The burden of proof of actual involvements in the form of flyers, certificates, programs or their equivalent lies upon the faculty without prejudice of verification by CAPP or USAPP.

B. Information/Communication Program per project per semester

Position International National Regional LocalProponent/Conceptualizer/Designer 4 3 2 1Information Production Officer 3 2 1 0.5Editor/Director 3 2 1 0.5Field Exhibit Organizer/Coordinator 3 2 1 0.5Announcer/Broadcaster 5 4 3 2

C. Sports Activities per competition/tournament/season/league

Position International National Regional LocalManager 5 4 3 2Coach/Asst. Coach/Trainer 4 3 2 1Officiating Official 4 3 2 1Other Officiating Official 3 2 1 0.5

D. Arts, Cultural and other similar activities per performance/play/show/production/ exhibit

Position International National Regional LocalExec. Producer/Conductor/Director 5 4 3 2Production Manager/Technical Director/Musical Director

4 3 2 1

Coach/Trainor 4 3 2 1Technical Staff 3 2 1 0.5Lead Actors/Supporting Actor/ Performer/Interpreter 3 2 1 0.5Artist/Painter/Sculptor/Playwright/ Choreographer 3 2 1 0.5Composer/Arranger 3 2 1 0.5Quizmaster/Host 3 2 1 0.5

Annex - 20

Judge 2 1 0.5 0.25Adviser/Consultant/Coordinator 3 2 1 0.5

N.B. 1. Points will be determined based on the extent of the role played by the group on a given activity. Roles assumed during full point and those in partial show will be given half.

2. A maximum of ten (10) performances per year will be considered.

NOTE: Extension Services shall be authorized by the University Campus in the form of Special Orders, and/or Memorandum Order, or Memorandum of Agreement and/or LOA’s.

Extension activities performed while on leave, detail, or secondment (outside MSU System) shall not be considered. In case the faculty member has a dual/multiple role in the same extension activity, he/she shall be given points for only one role, whichever is higher.

RANKING

I. For the TEACHER, MASTER TEACHER, INSTRUCTOR and ASSISTANT PROFESSOR rank categories and other non-tertiary faculty, the base point is zero (0) and the computation is simply cumulative.

II. Faculty members categorized as ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR or PROFESSOR shall be evaluated using a set of weights. The weights will vary from rank to rank as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Table of Weights

Assoc. Prof. Full Prof Research Prof. University Prof.Educational Attainment 0.3 0.2 0.1 -Work Experience 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1Productivity 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0TER 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4Professional Growth 0.2 0.1 - -Institutional Service 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6Extension Service 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6

Table 3 Table of Base PointsRank Category Base Points

Instructor 0Assistant Professor 0Associate Professor 70Full Professor 100Research Professor 280University Professor 420

The computation of earned points in order to determine the equivalent ranks will be according to the following formula:

TP = w1EA + w2WE + w3Prod + w4TER + w5PG + w6EAC + w7Ext + base points

where:TP = Total Points base points = values vary for higher rank categoriesEA = Educational Attainment points WE = Work Experience pointsProd = Productivity points TER = Teaching Efficiency Rating points

Annex - 21

PG = Professional Growth points EAC = Extra Academic pointsExt = Extension Services points

w1 … w7 = weights vary, see Table 2

This revised scheme is cumulative only within one-rank category, that is, additional points are merely added to his/her earlier points when the faculty member moves within the Associate or Full Professorial rank using the set of weights in Table 2. As soon as he/she is qualified to enter the Full Professorial rank, there shall be a recomputation of points using the full professor’s weight distribution of the criteria. Evaluated and assessed points of incremental credentials shall be added to the list of those previously rated.

For the purpose of assigning equivalent ranks to earned points, the following scheme will be used:

Collegiate Ranks:Instructor I 30

II 40 III 50

Assistant Professor I 60 II 70 III 80 IV 90

Associate Professor I 100 II 110 III 120

IV 130 V 140

Full Professor I 155 II 170 III 185 IV 200 V 215 VI 230

Research Professor 350University Professor 500

Teacher RanksTeacher I 30

II 40 III 50

Master Teacher I 60 II 70 III 80

IV 90

Annex - 22

IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES

1. Initial evaluation of credentials shall be done by the Campus Academic Promotion Panel (CAPP) with the Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs, or his/her equivalent as ex-officio Chairperson and submitted to the Academic Planning Committee (APC) of each campus which may then recommend the established ranks to the Board of Regents (BOR) through the University President. However, evaluations involving or resulting in Associate Professor ranks or higher, shall be reviewed further by the University System Academic Promotion Panel (USAPP Cluster). The APC of each campus shall be officially informed of the results before recommendations are made by the University President to the BOR.

2. It will be the duty of the faculty member to update his/her own personal academic records. The burden of proof shall rest on the personnel concerned. All submitted documents shall form part of the University’s official records. The original document must be presented for authentication of the photocopies.

3. Certification shall be acceptable only if signed by individuals who, by virtue of their office or designation, have the authority to use such documents. For an entity with legal status or personality, there must be an appropriate dry seal.

4. Promotion should not be more than one rank category at a time.

5. As a rule, a faculty applicant whose academic records show more than five (5) failures in the degree considered by the recruiting unit shall not be recruited/promoted. However, failures in three (3) to five (5) courses but not more than two (2) in major courses may be offset by an above average performance (meaning, grades not lower than 1.75 or its equivalent) in a higher degree in his/her field of specialization involving a minimum of twelve (12) units.

6. In a re-evaluation requiring the use of another set of weight distribution criteria, glaring errors, like assigning points beyond the scheme provisions shall be corrected, however, such rectification which may be initiated by the Campus APP or USAPP shall in no way result in demotion.

7. Computation shall be up to 3 decimal places and rounding off shall be done only in the computation of the grand total.

8. If a faculty member’s total points after an evaluation is one point or less short of the required points for the next level/rank, he/she shall get the next higher level/rank.

9. Delivery of paper means presenting or reading of the paper by the author himself/herself. In case the paper is read or presented by someone other than the author, the credit still goes to the author/s.

10. Participation in online conferences, trainings, seminars, advanced study program, etc., shall be validated through the submission of a hard copy of proceedings and certificate duly signed by the sponsoring organization or agency.

11. In case the faculty member has multiple roles performed in a particular activity/event, he/she shall earn points for only one, whichever is the highest.

12. For purposes of rank conversion, only those who have taught at least six (6) collegiate units in at least four (4) semesters with an average TER of VS in the collegiate load may qualify for collegiate ranks. However, in the case of

Annex - 23

Laboratory Schools of the College of Education, conversion to collegiate ranks is automatic.

Repealing ClauseUpon the approval of the Scheme, any and all BOR Resolutions, rules and

regulations or parts thereof, which are inconsistent thereof, are hereby repealed and/or modified accordingly.

UNIVERSITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEMBERS THAT REVISED THE 2004 PROPOSED ISRP

MSU-IIT:

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR. BRIGIDA ROSCOM DR. RHODORA ENGLIS DR. ELISEO VILLANUEVA

MSU-GENERAL SANTOS

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR. SERGIO REVUELTA DR. EPIMACO CABANLIT JR. PROF. TERSA CASTILLO

MSU-TAWITAWI

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed)PROF. CORAZON TAN PROF. ALVENTINO JALBUNA PROF. BENECITO MARATAS

MSU-MAGUINDANAO

(Signed) (Signed)DR. TOMANDA ANTOK DR. DATUMANOT PENDALIDAY

MSU-NAAWAN

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR. PROSERPINA G. ROXAS DR. WILFREDO UY DR. HELEN VICENTE PROF. MILAN DAITIA

MSU-MARAWI

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR.HERMIE TIAMTING DR.ZAINAL KULIDTOD PROF. BENILDA R. FLORES PROF. NUR-HANNIPHA DERICO

MSU SYSTEM COMMITTEE MEMBERS THAT PROPOSED THE 2004 REVISION OF THE ISRP

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR. THELMA A. ANTONIO DR. MARIANITA D. DABLIO DR. ERLINDA OLA-CASAN

(Signed) (Signed) (Signed)DR. ERLINDA C. DE LUNA ATTY. BARATUCAL CAUDANG PROF. CORAZON U. MORGIA

(Signed)DR. CAHARODIN A. CALI

(Signed) (Signed)PROF. YUSOPH C. LATIP DR. CLENIO T. DUMLAOVice President & Chairman Assistant Vice President & Vice Chairman

Presiding Officer

Annex - 24

Function and Duties of Professor Emeritus

a. Lectures in 1 or 2 courses (3 – 6 units) in each semester, plus any of the following:

I. Undertake research in one’s field of academic interest, either individually or collaboratively, in such case, providing leadership and supervision of consultancy. II. Conducts/coordinates/speaks in public or community lectures or seminars. III. Provides technical and professional assistance in upgrading/improving the teaching, research and publication activities of the College/University. IV. Performs other relevant or allied functions that may be officially assigned by competent College/University authority.

Privilegesa. Living allowance of not more than 50% of the salary of last position held.

b. Actual traveling expenses for delivering lectures related to his expertise in accordance with standard rules and regulations on travel expenditures. c. Free access to and use of University buildings and facilities in the pursuit of assigned tasks, to include academic lecture halls and classrooms, the libraries, health and sports facilities. d. Others that may be determined by competent authority.

Annex - 25

TEACHING EFFICIENCY RATING (TER) SCALE FORM 1(Students as Raters)

Instructor: _______________________________ Subject: _________________________Time/Day: _______________________________ Date Rated: ______________________

Director: Please answer all questions carefully. Please describe your instructor and his/her way of teaching.

Encircle the appropriate number which corresponds to your honest evaluation.

Never Seldom Often Always 5 6-7 8-9 10

I. 1. Attends class regularly 5 6 7 8 9 102. Comes to class on time 5 6 7 8 9 103. Gives reasons when the class is

suspended. 5 6 7 8 9 104. Dismisses class on time 5 6 7 8 9 10

II. 5. Comes to class well prepared 5 6 7 8 9 106. Answers well the question of

the students. 5 6 7 8 9 107. Presents lessons in an orderly

manner 5 6 7 8 9 108. Presents lessons clearly with

present and future application/use 5 6 7 8 9 109. Covers satisfactorily the contents

of the course 5 6 7 8 9 10III. 10. Gives illustrations, examples that make lessons clear 5 6 7 8 9 10

11. Gives and returns quizzes/exams regularly after correcting 5 6 7 8 9 10

12. Encourages active participation of students 5 6 7 8 9 10

13. Listens attentively to students reports discussion in class. 5 6 7 8 9 10

14. Uses different methods and techniques of teaching to make lessons clear 5 6 7 8 9 10

15. Varies teaching strategies to make lessons interesting 5 6 7 8 9 10

16. Motivates students to think and analyze 5 6 7 8 9 10

17. Shows approachability and open mindedness 5 6 7 8 9 10IV. 18. I learn from this teacher 5 6 7 8 9 10

19. The teacher is fair in giving grades 5 6 7 8 9 10 20. I will advise my friends to be “under” this teacher 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please write here comments regarding your instructor and this class. _________________________________________________________________________________________________

(You may continue at the back)

Annex - 26

TEACHING EFFICIENCY RATING (TER) SCALE FORM II(Peers as Raters)

Instructor: ________________________________________ Date Rated: _________________

Direction: Rate your co-faculty on the items below according to the following scale: Encircle the appropriate number which corresponds to your honest evaluation.


I. Scholarship 1. Upgrades knowledge in one’s field of specialization 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Contributes new innovative ideas for the development of instruction, research and extension 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. Conversant with new trends in other fields 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Stimulates intellectual discussion with colleagues 5 6 7 8 9 10 5. Performs competently assigned scholarly tasks 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Keeps abreast with issues/concerns of local/national/international significance 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. Shows professional maturity and cultural adaptability 5 6 7 8 9 10 8. Possesses a good command of the medium of instruction 5 6 7 8 9 10 9. Demonstrates intellectual honesty 5 6 7 8 9 10

II. Personality 1. Maintains wholesome and cordial relations with colleagues 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Welcomes criticisms and suggestion from colleagues 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. Respects rights of others 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Behaves within the bounds of morality and decency 5 6 7 8 9 10 5. Handles difficult and trying situations professionally 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Demonstrates leadership quality 5 6 7 8 9 10

III. Commitment & dedication to Service 1. Exudes enthusiasm in his job 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Devotes official times in the accomplishments of one’s official function and responsibilities 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. Participates actively in the department/ college/University activities 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Attends regularly in the department/ college meetings 5 6 7 8 9 10 5. Observes administrative protocol 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Performs additional tasks even without remuneration 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. Upholds the ideals of the University 5 6 7 8 9 10

Annex - 27

TEACHING EFFICIENCY RATING (TER) SCALE FORM III(Chairpersons/Deans as Raters)


Direction: Rate your faculty on the items according to the following scale:


(Encircle the appropriate number, which corresponds to your honest evaluation.)

1. Comes to class regularly 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Starts classes punctually 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. Makes optimum use of the class hours 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Conducts make-up classes whenever necessary 5 6 7 8 9 10 5. Does institutional services outside of teaching (e.g., Registration advising, committee task) 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Observes official consultation hours 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. Makes himself available to students for completion of grades 5 6 7 8 9 10 8. Submits grades sheets, reports and other requirements on time 5 6 7 8 9 10 9. Informs department/colleges of possible absences 5 6 7 8 9 10 10. Communicates clearly in written and spoken words 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Observes administrative protocol 5 6 7 8 9 10 12. Tends to be flexible and open-minded or welcomes criticism and suggestions 5 6 7 8 9 10 13. Observes/respects department policies 5 6 7 8 9 10 14. Accepts assigned tasks with alacrity 5 6 7 8 9 10 15. Attends official meetings 5 6 7 8 9 10 16. Handles disagreements with composure and finesse 5 6 7 8 9 10 17. Exercises his rights and accepts rights of others to participate in making collective decisions 5 6 7 8 9 10 18. Inspires a feeling of friendliness and teamwork in an institutional task 5 6 7 8 9 10 19. Behaves and appears in accordance with professional standards 5 6 7 8 9 10 20. Keeps abreast with developments in one’s field of specialization 5 6 7 8 9 10 21. Exhibits a certain degree of exposure for recent trends in other fields 5 6 7 8 9 10

Annex - 28

FACULTY OBSERVATION AUDIT(For Elementary and Secondary Faculty)


Direction: Rate your faculty on the items below according to the following scale:


(Encircle the appropriate number which corresponds to your answer.)

1. Comes to class with a written lesson plan as a guide 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Presents the subject matter to class with clarity 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. Demonstrates ability to arouse students’ interest in the lesson 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. Shows ability to sustain the interest of the students 5 6 7 8 9 10 5. Exhibits mastery of subject matter 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Observes official consultation hours 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. Gives quality answer to students’ questions5 6 7 8 9 10 8. Employs appropriate methods and techniques including audio-visual materials 5 6 7 8 9 10 9. Demonstrates classroom management abilities 5 6 7 8 9 10 10. Gives quality assignment to students 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Shows ability to relate current lessons with the past lessons 5 6 7 8 9 10 12. Shows ability to relate the subject matter with practical and useful applications 5 6 7 8 9 10 13. Exhibits updated knowledge and exposure to recent developments in the field discussed in the class 5 6 7 8 9 10 14. Achieves the objectives set for the day 5 6 7 8 9 10

Brief description of the topic covered: _______________________________Remarks: ______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

_____________________ Supervisor

___________________ Date Observed

@ Applicable only when the superior and the subordinate belong to the same discipline of field of specialization

Annex - 29