i.a.e.a. vienna crp atomic and molecular data for plasma modelling
DESCRIPTION
I.A.E.A. Vienna CRP Atomic and Molecular Data for Plasma Modelling Coordination Meeting 17-20 November, 2008 INTERACTION OF SLOW IONS WITH SURFACES : ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY ON CARBON, TUNGSTEN AND BERYLLIUM SURFACES (ROOM TEMPERATURE AND HEATED) ZDENEK HERMAN and J AN ŽABKA - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
I.A.E.A. ViennaCRP Atomic and Molecular Data for Plasma Modelling
Coordination Meeting 17-20 November, 2008
INTERACTION OF SLOW IONS
WITH SURFACES:
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY
ON CARBON, TUNGSTEN AND BERYLLIUM SURFACES
(ROOM TEMPERATURE AND HEATED)
ZDENEK HERMAN and JAN ŽABKA
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, v.v.i.
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
Prague
IAEA, Vienna, 17-20 Novermber, 2008
EXPERIMENT
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITYpercentage of incident ions
surviving a surface collision as product ions
SA = 100 Σ Iprod / Iinc (%)
( Iinc = Itarg,m + Σ Iprod )
Experimental determination
1. Direct measurement of projectile ion current incident on the target (Itarg,m)
2. Determination of total current of product ions from ion current to the detector, collecting efficiency of the apparatus, and angular distributions
Einc= 16.3 eV Einc=31.3 eV Einc=46.3 eV
projectile Sa(%) Sa(%) Sa(%)
C3H2+•(1-propene) 1.7±0.1 2.5
C3H3+(c-propane) 3.6±0.3
C3H3+(1-propene) 7.8±0.5
C3H3+(propane) 6.3 5.5±0.3 3.9
C3H4+•(c-propane) 2.3±0.7 2.0 ±0.7
C3H4+•(1-propene) 1.8±0.1
C3H5+(c-propane) 2.5±0.2 2.0 ±0.7
C3H5+(1-propene) 2.3±0.9
C3D5+(D-propane) 9.9±1.4
C3H5+(propane) 11.2±0.7 4.6±0.2
C3H6+•(c-propane) 1.8±0.5 2.2±0.1
C3H6+•(1-propene) 0.7±0.3 3.8±0.9
C3D6+•(D-propane) 4.8±0.9
C3H6+•(propane) 6.6±0.9 7.2±1.2 6.8±2
C3D7+(D-propane) 20 ±3 16 ±3
C3H7+(propane) 11.9 ±4 17 ±6
C3D8+•(D-propane) 1.4 ±0.7
C3H8+•(propane) 0.7±0.3 2.7 ±0.5 4.2 ±2
PERCENTAGE OF SURVIVING IONS C3Hn+, Sa (%)
(room-temperature carbon (HOPG) surfaces)
incident angle: 300 with respect to the surface
SURFACE 15.4 eV 30.9 eV 45.4 eV
ROOM-TEMP
CD4+• W
BeHOPG
0.050.05
0.37±0.1
0.05
0.34±0.2
0.120.05
0.27±0.2
CD5+ W
BeHOPG
5.82.1
12.5±5
0.82.1
12±5
1.21.2
(18±7)
C2D4+• W
BeHOPG
0.170.4
1.0±0.5
0.170.7
1.0±0.4
0.19
0.9±0.2
C2H5+ W
HOPG2.7
1.1±0.031.6
1.0±0.10.85
0.3±0.03HEATED
CD4+• W
BeHOPG
0.03
0.5
0.020.080.23
0.02
CD5+ W
BeHOPG
1.1 0.5 0.50.15(23)
C2D4+• W
BeHOPG 0.35
0.10.4
0.4±0.05
C2H5+ W 0.56 0.32 0.24
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY, Sa (%)
CONCLUSION: survival probability on W or Be usually about 5-10x smaller than on HOPG
1.COLLISIONS OF CDn+ (n=3-5) WITH CARBON (HOPG),
ROOM TEMPERATURE, Φs = 300
VERY LOW ENERGY 3 – 11 eV
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY
Sa(%)
SA decreases below Einc. = 10 eV to zero
PROBABILITY OF ION SURVIVAL DEPENDENCE ON INCIDENT ANGLE
IONS FROM ETHANOL (SS SURFACE COVERED BY HYDROCARBONS)
C2H5OH+•
C2H5OH2+, C2H5O+
CONCLUSIONS
- survival probability depends strongly on incident angle: lower for steep collisions
- survival much higher for ions of low ionization energy (usually closed-shell ions), for ions of IE> ~10.5 eV about an order of magnitude lower
5 10 15
0
5
10
15
CO+
2
C2H+
4
C2H+
2
C3H+
6
CD+
3
CD+
4
C3H+
8
C3H+
4
C2H+
5
C2H+
3
C3H+
5
C3H+
3
C7H+
8
C3H+
7
CD+
5
C1 C2 C3 C7
Ar+, CO+
2
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
C7H+
7
Ar+
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES (Carbon (HOPG) surface at room temperature, E inc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface)
correctly should be recombination energy (RE) of the projectile ion, but RE values little known, replaced by well-known ionization energies of the projectile ions (IE)
in most cases RE = IE, sometimes RE<IE (CH4+)
SURFACES HYDROCARBONS
C-chain IE (eV) n-alkanes olefins (C-C=C-….)
C4 10.53 9.1 C5 10.35 9.04 C6 10.13 8.97 C7 9.92 8.84 C8 9.86 8.91 C9 9.72 8.90 C10 9.65 8.90____________________________________
n-alkanes (pump oil) crack to form olefins
5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
CD+
5
CD+
5
C2H+
4
C2H+
2CD+
3 CD+
4
C2H+
5
C2H+
3
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
N2
+
HOPGheated 600o
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES (Carbon (HOPG) surface HEATED, Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface)
5 10 15
0.01
0.1
1
10
1,3,5-Triaz
NH+
3
3-F-BzN
Bz
y = (3.9±0.5) + (-0.39±0.04).x
C1 C2 C3 C7
Ar+, CO+
2
CO+
2
C2H+
4
C2H+
2
C3H+
6
CD+
3
CD+
4
C3H+
8C
3H+
4
C2H+
3
C2H+
5
C3H+
5
C3H+
3
C7H+
8C3H+
7
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
C7H+
7
Ar+
Styr
5 10 15
0.01
0.1
1
10
y = (3.9±0.5) + (-0.39±0.04).x
C1 C2 C3 C7
Ar+, CO+
2
CO+
2
C2H+
4
C2H+
2
C3H+
6
CD+
3
CD+
4
C3H+
8C
3H+
4
C2H+
3
C2H+
5
C3H+
5
C3H+
3
C7H+
8C3H+
7
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
C7H+
7
Ar+
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES (Carbon (HOPG) surface, room temperature Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface)
SEMILOG PLOT
*) data from A.Somogyi..(V.H.Wysocki),JACS 13(2002)1151
5 10 15
1E-3
0.01
0.1
1
10
HOPG Heatedy = (5.4±1.1) + (-0.5±0.1).x
y = (3.9±0.5) + (-0.39±0.04).x
C2H+
4
C2H+
2
CD+
3
CD+
4
C2H+
3
C2H+
5
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
N2
+
HOPG Room Temp
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES (Carbon (HOPG) surface, Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface)
SEMILOG PLOT
COMPARISON:
- ROOM-TEMPERATURE (hydrocarbon-covered)
- HEATED (“naked”) SURFACES
RT: slope -0.39 ± 0.04
HEATED: slope -0.5 ± 0.1
log SA = a - b (IE)
Analogy with the Arrhenius equation?
(dependence of rate constant of a chemical reaction on temperature T)
log k = a – b/T
k = A exp (- E / RT)
5 10 150.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
WolframRoom Temp
N+
2CD+
4
C3H+
8
C3H+
5
C3H+
3
C3H+
7
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
Ar+
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface
TUNGSTEN
• ROOM-TEMPERATURE SURFACE
• HEATED ( 6000C) SURFACE
10 15
1E-3
0.01
0.1
1
10
Sa
[ % ]
N+
2
y = (2.5±0.4) + (-0.36±0.04).x
N+
2
CD+
4
C2H+
2
C2H+
4
C2H+
5
CD+
5
Ar+
CD+
4
C3H+
8
C3H+
5
CD+
5
C3H+
3
y = (2.9±0.2) + (-0.35±0.02).x
C3H+
7
IE [ eV ]
Wolfram at Room Temperature
Wolfram heated ~ 600oCE = 30.0 eV
inc. Angle = 30o
meas. ang. 49oEva => 19o
8.10.08
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface
TUNGSTENSEMILOG PLOT
• ROOM-TEMPERATURE SURFACE
• HEATED ( 6000C) SURFACE
CONCLUSION
Very similar slopes (-0.35 – 0.36) on both RT and HEATED W- surface
5 10 15
1E-3
0.01
0.1
1
10
C3H+
8
C3H+
7
C3H+
3
C3H+
5CD+
5
CD+
4
N+
2
Ar+
y = (2.9±0.2) + (-0.35±0.02).x
y = (3.9±0.5) + (-0.39±0.04).x
C1 C2 C3 C7
Ar+, CO+
2
CO+
2
C2H+
4
C2H+
2
C3H+
6
CD+
3
CD+
4
C3H+
8C
3H+
4
C2H+
3
C2H+
5
C3H+
5
C3H+
3
C7H+
8C
3H+
7
CD+
5
Sa
[ % ]
IE [eV]
C7H+
7
Ar+
HOPG Room T
Wolfram Room T
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES Einc = 30 eV, inc. angle 300 w.r. to the surface
SEMILOG PLOTSCOMPARISON OF ROOM-TEMPERATURE SURFACES
• CARBON (HOPG)
• TUNGSTEN (W)
• BERRYLIUM (Be)
CONCLUSION
Similar slopes (-0.35- 0.39), similar behavior of surfaces covered by a hydrocarbon layer
log SA = a - b (IE)
____________________________________surface a b____________________________________
C (HOPG) - H 5.4 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 C (HOPG)-RT 3.9 ± 0.5 0.39 ± 0.04
W – H 2.5 ± 0.4 0.36 ± 0.04W – RT 2.9 ± 0.2 0.35 ± 0.02
Be – RT (3.9 ± 0.5) (0.39?) Be – H ??
_____________________________________
ION SURVIVAL PROBABILITY vs. IONIZATION ENERGY OF PROJECTILES
SEMILOG PLOT
CONCLUSIONS
1. Survival probability of ions in collisions with surfaces, SA, changes over several orders of magnitude (from ~10% to 10-3% ) depending on the type of ion, type of surface and incident angle.
2. SA for even-electron ions (low ionization energies) appears to be much higher than for radical cations (open-shell ions, higher ionization energies)
3. A dependence of SA vs. IE of the projectile ion shows a drastic change (from ~10 % to less than 1%) at IE ~ 9 - 10 eV. For surfaces covered with hydrocarbons this correlates well with the IE of C4-C10 olefins with non-terminal C=C.
4. A dependence log SA vs. IE shows a good correlation over many orders of magnitude
log SA = a – b (IE)
with „a“ dependent on the type of the surface, and b = - 0.35 - 0.4 for room-temperature (hydrocarbon-covered surfaces)