i35 capital area improvement program...

IImprovement Program(Mobility35)

Corridor Implementation Plan

SH

WilliamsonApril 2015

I-35 Capital Area Improvement Program(Mobility35)


SH 130

WilliamsonApril 2015

35 Capital Area Improvement Program(Mobility35)


30 to RM 1431

Williamson County

35 Capital Area Improvement Program(Mobility35)


RM 1431

County, Texas

35 Capital Area Improvement Program


, Texas



Improvement Program

Table of Contents

1.01.01.01.0

2.02.02.02.0

3.03.03.03.0

4.04.04.04.0

5.05.05.05.0

6.06.06.06.0

7.07.07.07.0

8.08.08.08.0

Table of Contents

1.01.01.01.0 Introduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and B

Mobility351.1

2.02.02.02.0 Need for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing Factors

Population and Employment2.1

2.2 Corridor Traffic

3.03.03.03.0 Previous Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning Efforts

3.1 I

Williamson County Improvement Efforts3.2

4.04.04.04.0 Implementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan Development

Definition of Corridor Planning Area4.1

Phases of Project Development4.2

Program Objective4.3

4.4 Public and Agency Involvement

Tech4.5

5.05.05.05.0 Overarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement Concepts

Future Transportation Corridor (FTC)5.1

Corridor Access Improvements5.2

Conventional Intersection5.3

Diverging Di5.4

Roundabout5.5

Continuous Flow Intersection5.6

Median U5.7

Travel Demand Management5.8

Integrated Corridor Management5.9

6.06.06.06.0 Recommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of Projects

6.1 Assumptions and Limitations

6.2 Williamson County S

6.3 Current Williamson County Construction Projects

6.4 Segments W1

7.07.07.07.0 Other Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 Initiatives

7.1 Regional Projects

Integrated Corridor Ma7.2

Trip Reduction7.3

Non7.4

8.08.08.08.0 Preliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and Funding

Williamson County8.1

8.2 Project Funding

Table of Contents

Introduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and B

Mobility35 ................................

Need for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing Factors

Population and Employment

Corridor Traffic

Previous Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning Efforts

I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35)

Williamson County Improvement Efforts

Implementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan Development

Definition of Corridor Planning Area

Phases of Project Development

Program Objective

Public and Agency Involvement

Technical Concept Development

Overarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement Concepts

Future Transportation Corridor (FTC)

Corridor Access Improvements

Conventional Intersection

Diverging Di

Roundabout

Continuous Flow Intersection

Median U-turn

Travel Demand Management

Integrated Corridor Management

Recommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of Projects

Assumptions and Limitations

Williamson County S

Current Williamson County Construction Projects

Segments W1

Other Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 Initiatives

Regional Projects

Integrated Corridor Ma

Trip Reduction

Non-motorized Travel Considerations

Preliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and Funding

Williamson County

Project Funding

Introduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and BIntroduction and Backgroundackgroundackgroundackground

................................



Corridor Traffic ................................

Previous Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning Efforts

35 Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35)


Implementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan Development



Program Objective ................................


nical Concept Development

Overarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement Concepts




Diverging Diamond Intersection

Roundabout ................................


turn ................................



Recommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of Projects


Williamson County Segments


Segments W1 – W3 Program of Projects

Other Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 InitiativesOther Mobility35 Initiatives ................................................................................................................................

Regional Projects ................................

Integrated Corridor Management Study and Development Strategy

Trip Reduction ................................

motorized Travel Considerations

Preliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and Funding

Williamson County ................................

Project Funding ................................

I-35 Capital Area Improvement Program

ackgroundackgroundackgroundackground ................................................................................................................................

................................................................


Population and Employment ................................

................................................................

Previous Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning EffortsPrevious Studies and Planning Efforts ................................................................................................................................



Implementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan DevelopmentImplementation Plan Development ................................................................................................................................


Phases of Project Development ................................

................................

Public and Agency Involvement ................................

nical Concept Development ................................

Overarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement ConceptsOverarching Improvement Concepts ................................................................................................................................


Corridor Access Improvements ................................

Conventional Intersection ................................

amond Intersection ................................

................................................................

Continuous Flow Intersection ................................

................................................................

Travel Demand Management ................................

Integrated Corridor Management ................................

Recommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of ProjectsRecommended Program of Projects ................................................................................................................................

Assumptions and Limitations ................................

egments ................................


Program of Projects

................................................................................................................................

................................

nagement Study and Development Strategy

................................................................


Preliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and FundingPreliminary Project Costs and Funding ................................................................................................................................

................................

................................


................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................

Need for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing FactorsNeed for Improvement and Contributing Factors ................................................................................................................................

................................

................................

................................................................................................................................


Williamson County Improvement Efforts................................

................................................................................................................................

Definition of Corridor Planning Area ................................

................................

................................................................

................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

Future Transportation Corridor (FTC) ................................

................................

................................................................

................................

................................

................................

................................

................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

................................

................................


Program of Projects ................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................


................................

motorized Travel Considerations ................................

................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................


................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

35 Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35) ................................

................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................

................................................................

Current Williamson County Construction Projects ................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

................................................................


................................................................

................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................................................

................................................................

35 Capital Area Improvement Program - Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015

....................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................

........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

.................................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

..................................................

..............................................................

................................................................................................................................

................................

................................

................................

................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

................................

................................

...................................................

................................

................................

.............................................

................................

.............................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

.............................................

.............................................

............................................

...........................................................

............................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................

nagement Study and Development Strategy...............

................................

................................

................................................................................................................................

...............................

................................

Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015

.................................................................................... 1111

.............. 1

........................................................................................ 2222

................. 2

....................................... 3

............................................................................................................................................................ 4444

.................. 5

.............................. 5

................................................................................................................................................................................ 6666

..................................... 6

........................................... 6

................................. 6

............................................ 7

.......................................... 9

................................................................................................................................................................ 11111111

................................. 11

........................................... 12

................... 13

......................................... 13

......................................... 14

............. 14

...................................... 15

............. 15

....................................... 15

................................................................................................................................................................ 17171717

............. 17

............. 17

............ 18

........................... 18

............................................................................................ 25252525

................................. 25

............... 25

...................................... 25

................................ 26

................................................................................................................................................ 27272727

............................... 27

.................................... 29

Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015 i

9.09.09.09.0

10.010.010.010.0

Appendices

Appendix A:

Appendix B:

Appendix C:

Acronyms

AADT

ATIS

ATMS

CAC

CAIP

CAMPO

CCTV

C

CFI

CIP

CSC

CTECC

CTRMA

DC

DDI

DMS

FEMA

FHWA

FTC

HOV

ICM

ITS

MUT

NAFTA

P3

PS&E

RIF

RM

8.3 Potential Funding Sources

9.09.09.09.0 Next StepsNext StepsNext StepsNext Steps

10.010.010.010.0 ReferenReferenReferenReferen

Appendices

Appendix A:

Appendix B:

Appendix C:

Acronyms

AADT

ATIS

ATMS

CAC

CAIP

CAMPO

CCTV

C-D

CFI

CIP

CSC

CTECC

CTRMA

DC

DDI

DMS

FEMA

FHWA

FTC

HOV

ICM

ITS

MUT

NAFTA

P3

PS&E

RIF

RM

Potential Funding Sources

Next StepsNext StepsNext StepsNext Steps ................................................................................................................................

ReferenReferenReferenReferencescescesces ................................................................................................................................

Appendices

Refined Improvement Concepts

Project Development Summary Sheets

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Annual Average Daily Traffic

Advanced Traveler Informati

Advanced Traffic Management System

Corridor Advisory Committee

Capital Area Improvement Program

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Closed Circuit Television

Collector Distributor

Continuous Flow Inter

Capital Improvement Plan

Corridor Segment Committee

Combined Transportation, Emergency & Communications Center

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

Direct Connector

Diverging Diamond Interchange

Dynamic Message S

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal Highway Administration

Future Transportation Corridor

High Occupancy Vehicle


Intelligent Transportation Systems

Median U

North American

Public Private Partnership

Plans, Specifications and Estimates

Regional Infrastructure Fund

Ranch to Market


................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................





Advanced Traveler Informati






Collector Distributor

Continuous Flow Inter





Direct Connector


Dynamic Message Sign







Median U-turn

North American Free Trade Agreement




Ranch to Market


Potential Funding Sources ................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................





Advanced Traveler Information System












ign







Free Trade Agreement





................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................


on System









Free Trade Agreement



................................

................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................




..................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................................................



.................. 29

.................................................................... 36363636

................................................................ 37373737

Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015 ii

RMA

SH

SIB

STIP

TDM

TIF

TIFIA

TIGER

TIM

TRZ

TTI

TxDOT

RMA

SH

SIB

STIP

TDM

TIF

TIFIA

TIGER

TIM

TRZ

TTI

TxDOT

Regional Mobility Authority

State Highway

State Infrastructure Bank

State Transportation Improv


Tax Increment Finance

Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA)

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery

Traffic Incident Management

Transportation Reinves

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Texas Department of Transportation


State Highway


State Transportation Improv






Transportation Reinves






State Transportation Improvement Plan






Transportation Reinvestment Zone




ement Plan



tment Zone









Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015 iii

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK








Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015Corridor Implementation Plan, April 2015 iv

1.01.01.01.0

The existing Interstate 35 (I

from the Oklahoma state line

original Interstate Highway System in the 1950s,

a variety of daily users including commuters, freig

Interstate Highway connecting Mexico and Canada through the U.S. heartland, the majority of

American Free Trade Agreement

commercial truc

is the backbone of the Texas economy and it plays a critical role in facilitating economic activity and

business productivity in the state.

I-

economic development.

I-

A&M Transportation Institute’s (TTI’s)

more congestion than any other roadway in the

Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, and San Antonio, are in the top twen

These cities are expected to see robust population growth in the future, which will place an even

g

In

area)

traffic demand. Previous improvement studies and recommendations for I

focused primarily on large

environmental, and political challenges to implementation. Delay in implementation of these long

term solutions has resulted in severe congestion for many sections of I

1.1

In light of these challenges, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)

transportation partners

Mobility35

Williamson and Hays Counties as well

term strategies that can be implemented to improve mobility and connectivity along and across the

I-

partner agencies and stakeholders are working together to develop mobility solutions that are

implementable, cost

or substa

Mobility35

M

from RM 1431 to SH 45 is the subject of an independent implementation plan.

1.01.01.01.0 Introduction and Background







commercial truc



-35 is one of the most


-35 currently seeing over 200,000 vehicles per day.





greater strain on the existing I

In Central Texas

area), improvements to the existing I





Mobility351.1



Mobility35, in 2011 with



-35 corridor (while cons


implementable, cost

or substantial additional right

Mobility35 efforts

Market (RM)


Introduction and Background







commercial trucks and rail.



is one of the most import


currently seeing over 200,000 vehicles per day.





reater strain on the existing I

Central Texas, which includes Williamson, Travis and Hays Counties

improvements to the existing I





obility35



in 2011 with



35 corridor (while cons


implementable, cost-effective, and generally do not require wholesale reconstruction of

ntial additional right

efforts in Williamson County

arket (RM) 1431 (University



The existing Interstate 35 (I-35) corridor spans approximately 550 miles across the state of

from the Oklahoma state line to the international border




American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

ks and rail. In addition to serving many



important corridors in the state of Texas in terms of future growth and

economic development. The diverse users of I






reater strain on the existing I-35 corridor.

which includes Williamson, Travis and Hays Counties

improvements to the existing I


focused primarily on large-scale, lo




developed

in 2011 with an initial focus on Travis County



35 corridor (while considering long


effective, and generally do not require wholesale reconstruction of

ntial additional right-of-way.

in Williamson County

1431 (University Boulevard




corridor spans approximately 550 miles across the state of

the international border




(NAFTA) trade pa

In addition to serving many


corridors in the state of Texas in terms of future growth and

The diverse users of I-


A&M Transportation Institute’s (TTI’s) 2014 Top 100 Most Congested Roadways list, indicating




corridor.


improvements to the existing I-35 facility have not kept pace with increasing population and


scale, long-term solutions, which have presented numerous financing,




developed the I-35 Capital Area Improvement Program, locally known as

focus on Travis County

Williamson and Hays Counties as well. Mobility35


idering long-term corridor needs).



way. This Corridor

in Williamson County from S

Boulevard) in Round Rock




the international border with Mexico

original Interstate Highway System in the 1950s, I-35 is the hub of transportation in Texas, serving

a variety of daily users including commuters, freight trucker


trade passes through Texas along the I

In addition to serving many major population centers, the I



-35 create substantial demand, with some sections

currently seeing over 200,000 vehicles per day. Eighteen

Top 100 Most Congested Roadways list, indicating

more congestion than any other roadway in the state. Four Texas cities along the I




35 facility have not kept pace with increasing population and


term solutions, which have presented numerous financing,




35 Capital Area Improvement Program, locally known as

focus on Travis County

Mobility35 focuses on feasible and effective short


term corridor needs).




State Highway

) in Round Rock.




with Mexico.

is the hub of transportation in Texas, serving

ht truckers, and business


sses through Texas along the I

major population centers, the I



create substantial demand, with some sections

Eighteen segments of I


Four Texas cities along the I

Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, and San Antonio, are in the top twenty larges










which was eventually expanded to include

focuses on feasible and effective short


term corridor needs). Using past I



Implementation Plan

ighway (SH) 130

The Williamson County segment of I




. Constructed as part of the


s, and business travellers


sses through Texas along the I

major population centers, the I




segments of I-35 are on


Four Texas cities along the I

ty largest cities in the United States.


which includes Williamson, Travis and Hays Counties (also known as the capital


traffic demand. Previous improvement studies and recommendations for I-35 in this region have



term solutions has resulted in severe congestion for many sections of I-35 in the

In light of these challenges, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and local


was eventually expanded to include

focuses on feasible and effective short


Using past I-35 studies as background,



Implementation Plan report focuses on

130 in Georgetown

e Williamson County segment of I




Constructed as part of the


travellers. As the only


sses through Texas along the I-35 corridor via

major population centers, the I-35 corridor




are on the Tex


Four Texas cities along the I-35 corridor,

t cities in the United States.


also known as the capital


35 in this region have



35 in the capital area.

and local



focuses on feasible and effective short- and mid


35 studies as background,


effective, and generally do not require wholesale reconstruction of the corridor

report focuses on

Georgetown to Ranch to

e Williamson County segment of I


corridor spans approximately 550 miles across the state of Texas

Constructed as part of the


. As the only

Interstate Highway connecting Mexico and Canada through the U.S. heartland, the majority of North

corridor via

corridor



create substantial demand, with some sections of

the Texas


corridor,

t cities in the United States.


also known as the capital


35 in this region have


environmental, and political challenges to implementation. Delay in implementation of these long-

rea.



and mid-


35 studies as background,


the corridor

anch to

e Williamson County segment of I-35

1

2.02.02.02.0

I-

C

provides connectivity

along the corridor include

Population and employment growth in Williamson County

projected

Without question the single most important issue relating to economic development was the

location of

was very much in doubt as most alignments had the road going through or near

Taylor was the economic hub of Williamson County as the center for cott

Taylor leadership supported the Taylor route, local farmers opposed it. The interstate required a

then

and many farmers worried that their

concerns about noise relating to cattle and other farm animals. Meanwhile, Round Rock and

Georgetown leadership strongly lobbied for a route along the

which wo

2.1

In every decade since the 1970s

p

from

Table 2.1: Historical Population Growth, 1950

Source: U.S. Census Bureau (1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010)

2.02.02.02.0 Need for Improvement and Contributing Factors

-35 is one of the pr

Canada. It is the major north

provides connectivity



projected congestion on I


location of Interstate 35




then-unheard




which would later become U.S. Highway 81 and eventually

Population and Employment2.1


phenomenal

from 38,853


YearYearYearYear

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010


Need for Improvement and Contributing Factors

35 is one of the primary

anada. It is the major north

provides connectivity between



congestion on I


Interstate 35




unheard-of 300 feet of




uld later become U.S. Highway 81 and eventually



henomenal growth rate,

38,853 in 1950 to


YearYearYearYear

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010



imary NAFTA roadways connecting Mexico to the continental United States and

anada. It is the major north-south freeway in Texas and serves as a primary commuter route that

between Georgetown

along the corridor include commercial,


congestion on I-35.


Interstate 35 through Georgetown. Originally, when first conceived, a Georgetown route




of 300 feet of Right of Way






In every decade since the 1970s the population in Williamson

growth rate, as shown in

in 1950 to 422,679 in 2010





NAFTA roadways connecting Mexico to the continental United States and

south freeway in Texas and serves as a primary commuter route that

Georgetown, Round Rock and

commercial, retail, motels, residential,



through Georgetown. Originally, when first conceived, a Georgetown route




Right of Way across the entire county and through nearby Taylor farms

and many farmers worried that their homes might





the population in Williamson

s shown in Table Table Table Table 2.2.2.2.

in 2010.


PopulationPopulationPopulationPopulation

38,853

35,044

37,305

76,521

139,551

250,466

422,679






Round Rock and

retail, motels, residential,

Population and employment growth in Williamson County, detailed below,






across the entire county and through nearby Taylor farms

homes might be cut off from their field. There were also




the population in Williamson

2.2.2.2.1111, the population of

Table 2.1: Historical Population Growth, 1950-2010

Williamson CountyWilliamson CountyWilliamson CountyWilliamson County


38,853

044

37,305

76,521

139,551

250,466

422,679






Round Rock and the greater capital area.

retail, motels, residential, and undeveloped tracts.

, detailed below,







cut off from their field. There were also


Georgetown leadership strongly lobbied for a route along the Balcones Escarpment

uld later become U.S. Highway 81 and eventually Interstate 35

the population in Williamson County

, the population of Williamson County

2010






the greater capital area.

and undeveloped tracts.

, detailed below, contribute to current and




Taylor was the economic hub of Williamson County as the center for cotton and cattle. While the





Balcones Escarpment

Interstate 35.

County has experienced a

Williamson County


% Change% Change% Change% Change

-

6.5%

105.1%

82.4%

79.5%

68.8%





the greater capital area. Land uses

and undeveloped tracts.

contribute to current and



was very much in doubt as most alignments had the road going through or near Taylor. At the time,

on and cattle. While the





Balcones Escarpment fault line, a line

has experienced a

Williamson County increased


--

-9.8%

6.5%

105.1%

82.4%

79.5%

68.8%




Land uses

contribute to current and



. At the time,

on and cattle. While the





fault line, a line

increased

2

The robust population

current estimates project 2035 population to reach over 1.

County having the most growth

presents forecasted

Table 2.2: Future Projec

Source: CAMPO 2035 Regional Transportation Plan (2

Estimated employment levels in

year period from 2005 to 2035, to over

forecasted employment growth for

Table 2.3: Fut

Source: CAMPO 2035 Regional Transportation Plan (2010)

2.2

As population and employment in

regional highway system, including I

pace with population growth, resulting in heavy congestion a

during peak travel periods.

The robust population



presents forecasted


YearYearYearYear

2015

2025

2035





Table 2.3: Fut

YearYearYearYear

2005

2015

2025

2035


2.2 Corridor





The robust population growth in Williamson County



presents forecasted population levels and growth ra


YearYearYearYear

2015

2025

2035





Table 2.3: Future Projected Employment Growth

YearYearYearYear

2005

2015

2025

2035


Corridor Traffic





growth in Williamson County


County having the most growth among the three counties in the

population levels and growth ra

Table 2.2: Future Projected Population Growth, 2015


Estimated employment levels in Williamson



ure Projected Employment Growth


Traffic

As population and employment in Williamson



during peak travel periods. Annual


growth in Williamson County


among the three counties in the

population levels and growth ra

ted Population Growth, 2015


473,300

702,700

1,026,500


Williamson County

year period from 2005 to 2035, to over 400,000 jobs.

forecasted employment growth for Williamson

ure Projected Employment Growth

EmploymentEmploymentEmploymentEmployment

101,500

165,700

253,000

400,300


Williamson County

regional highway system, including I-35. In many cases transportation improvements have not kept


Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown in


growth in Williamson County is forecasted to continue i


among the three counties in the

population levels and growth rate for

ted Population Growth, 2015



473,300

702,700

1,026,500


County are expected to nearly

,000 jobs. Table Table Table Table

County to the year

ure Projected Employment Growth, 2005


EmploymentEmploymentEmploymentEmployment

101,500

165,700

253,000

400,300


County have increased, so have demands on the

n many cases transportation improvements have not kept


Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown in


is forecasted to continue i

current estimates project 2035 population to reach over 1.0 million residents

among the three counties in the Mobility35

te for Williamson

ted Population Growth, 2015-2035


010)

are expected to nearly

Table Table Table Table 2.2.2.2.3333 provides information regarding

County to the year 2035.

, 2005-2035



have increased, so have demands on the


pace with population growth, resulting in heavy congestion at many locations along I

Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown in


is forecasted to continue into the future, as

million residents with

Mobility35 program.

Williamson County for

2035



are expected to nearly quadruple

provides information regarding

2035.

2035





t many locations along I

Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown in Table Table Table Table


nto the future, as

with Williamson

rogram. Table Table Table Table 2.2.2.2.

for 2015 – 2035


--

48.5%

46.1%

quadruple over the 30



--

63.3%

52.7%

58.2%



t many locations along I-35, especially

Table Table Table Table 2222.4.4.4.4.


nto the future, as

Williamson

2.2.2.2.2222

2035.

over the 30-




35, especially

3

Table 2.4: I

LocationLocationLocationLocation

North of SH 130

South of SH 29

South of RM 1431

Source: TxDOT Annual Count Data

* Projected

Three year h

preliminary crash analysis included a summary of crashes based on severity.

developed within the limits of this analysis.

facilities

vehicle miles.

2013 and exceeded the statewide average

–

3.03.03.03.0

By the mid

the

appropriate solutions.

of projects were constructed on I

Table 2.4: I

LocationLocationLocationLocation

North of SH 130

South of SH 29

South of RM 1431


* Projected

Three year h



facilities varies over the three year period from approximately 96

vehicle miles.


– 2013 for I

Table 2.5: 3

YearYearYearYear Average Average Average Average

ADT*ADT*ADT*ADT*

2011 99,000

2012 97,000

2013 100,000

Three Year

Average*http://www.dot.state.tx.us/apps/statewide_mapping/StatewidePlanningMap.html

**http://www.txdot.gov/government/enforcement/annual

3.03.03.03.0 Previous Studies and Planning Efforts

By the mid-1980s, TxDOT identified the need to address

the Austin area

appropriate solutions.


Table 2.4: I-35 Average Daily Traffic Volumes

1980198019801980

15,200

22,000

26,000


Three year historical crash data was collected and compiled for I



varies over the three year period from approximately 96

vehicle miles. The number of crashes in Williamson County has increased significantly from 2011


I-35 in Williamson County

Table 2.5: 3-year Crash Data

Average Average Average Average

ADT*ADT*ADT*ADT*

Total Total Total Total

CrashesCrashesCrashesCrashes

99,000 173

97,000 276

100,000 597

Three Year

Average 348.7

/www.dot.state.tx.us/apps/statewide_mapping/StatewidePlanningMap.html


Previous Studies and Planning Efforts

1980s, TxDOT identified the need to address

area. In the years since s

appropriate solutions. While Travis County


35 Average Daily Traffic Volumes

1985198519851985

23,000

37,000

44,000


istorical crash data was collected and compiled for I




The number of crashes in Williamson County has increased significantly from 2011


Williamson County

year Crash Data

Total Total Total Total


Fatal Fatal Fatal Fatal


173 3

276 2

597 5

348.7 3.3





In the years since s

While Travis County

of projects were constructed on I-35 in Wil



1990199019901990

32,000

50,000

56,000



developed within the limits of this analysis. The statewide average crash rate f



2013 and exceeded the statewide average in 2012 and 2013.

Williamson County is shown in

Fatal Fatal Fatal Fatal


Injury Injury Injury Injury


3 84

2 115

5 117

3.3 105.3





In the years since several studies have been conducted by TxDOT to try to find

While Travis County was

35 in Williamson County from the mid



1995199519951995

42,000

64,000

76,000



The statewide average crash rate f



in 2012 and 2013.

shown in Table 2.5Table 2.5Table 2.5Table 2.5

Injury Injury Injury Injury


NonNonNonNon


84

115

117

105.3 216.7




1980s, TxDOT identified the need to address ever increasing

everal studies have been conducted by TxDOT to try to find

was the focus of those

liamson County from the mid


2000200020002000

60,000

83,000

101,000

istorical crash data was collected and compiled for I-35 in Williamson County


The statewide average crash rate f

varies over the three year period from approximately 96 to 121


in 2012 and 2013. A summary of

Table 2.5Table 2.5Table 2.5Table 2.5.

NonNonNonNon----Injury Injury Injury Injury


85

155

410

216.7


**http://www.txdot.gov/government/enforcement/annual-summary.html

ever increasing


the focus of those previous

liamson County from the mid


2005200520052005

69,000

83,750

105,000


preliminary crash analysis included a summary of crashes based on severity. Crash rates were

The statewide average crash rate for urban interstate

to 121 crashes per 100 million


A summary of crash data from 2011

Corridor Corridor Corridor Corridor

Crash Rate Crash Rate Crash Rate Crash Rate

(per 100 (per 100 (per 100 (per 100

millmillmillmillion ion ion ion

vehvehvehvehicleicleicleicle miles)miles)miles)miles)

79.8

129.9

272.6

160.8


summary.html

ever increasing congestio


previous studies, a large number

liamson County from the mid-1980s to the present with


2010201020102010

85,000

101,000

128,000

in Williamson County. The

Crash rates were

or urban interstate

crashes per 100 million


crash data from 2011


Crash Rate Crash Rate Crash Rate Crash Rate

(per 100 (per 100 (per 100 (per 100

miles)miles)miles)miles)

Statewide Statewide Statewide Statewide

Urban Crash Urban Crash Urban Crash Urban Crash

Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100

million vehmillion vehmillion vehmillion veh

miles)**miles)**miles)**miles)**

96.4

114.8

120.8

110.7


congestion on I-35 through


studies, a large number

1980s to the present with


2035*2035*2035*2035*

154,000

183,000

232,000

The

Crash rates were

or urban interstate

crashes per 100 million

The number of crashes in Williamson County has increased significantly from 2011 –

crash data from 2011

Statewide Statewide Statewide Statewide

Urban Crash Urban Crash Urban Crash Urban Crash

Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100 Rate (per 100

million vehmillion vehmillion vehmillion vehicleicleicleicle

miles)**miles)**miles)**miles)**

96.4

114.8

120.8

110.7

35 through


studies, a large number

1980s to the present with

4

considerable collaboration between TxDOT, Williamson County, and the Cities of Georgetown and

Round Rock. Those projects served to enhance mobility with increased mainlane capacity,

road improv

Mobility35 program builds upon and refines previous efforts and is separated by county. This

refined effort began in earnest in 2008.

3.1

In 2008, the Texas Transportation Commission established the I

(CAC) to engage the citizens of Texas and develop a plan to address transportation challenges

along the I

of the CAC included business professionals, environmental planners, rail advocates, professors,

local officials, and residents that lived and did business in the I

public at the loca

Transportation Commission enlisted assistance from four I

(CSCs) located geographically along the I

recommendations of the CSCs and developed the I

Plan) to address mobility challenges along I

recommendations for the I

�

�

�

�

The CAC planning effort was a needs

Recommendations did not include any dedicated funding sources for improvements. Thus

recommendations made by

Mobility Authorities (RMAs), cities and counties. My 35 recommendations have been considered as

part of this current effort.

3.2

Williamson

These improvements

for ramping improvements, frontage road improvements, intersection improvements, new f

roads, conversion of frontage roads from 2

count

entity can expedite a project by fronting project

These and other innovative funding practices



road improv



3.1 I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee P



along the I-35 corridor from the Oklahoma/Texas border t



public at the loca






� Freight and passeng

� Roadway design to separate cars and trucks to increase safety.

� Managed lanes to ease congestion and provide relief to transportation funding.

� Integrated, real

alternate routes.






Williamson County Improvement Efforts3.2

Williamson C

These improvements



county utilized bond fund





road improvements and ramp revisions, and the construction of several turnaround structures.



Corridor Advisory Committee P



35 corridor from the Oklahoma/Texas border t



public at the local level and to better understand the local needs associated with I






Freight and passeng

Roadway design to separate cars and trucks to increase safety.

Managed lanes to ease congestion and provide relief to transportation funding.

Integrated, real-time traffic information systems that

alternate routes.







County has m

These improvements included



utilized bond fund





ements and ramp revisions, and the construction of several turnaround structures.



Corridor Advisory Committee P






l level and to better understand the local needs associated with I





recommendations for the I-35 Corridor in Texas:

Freight and passenger rail projects to alleviate freight demands on roadways.



time traffic information systems that



recommendations made by the CAC could only be pursued by other agencies




made significant improvements to the I

included all phases of project development through design and construction



utilized bond funds, city funds, and pass









Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35)








(CSCs) located geographically along the I-35 corridor to report to the CAC. The CAC co


Plan) to address mobility challenges along I-35. The plan made the following general

35 Corridor in Texas:

er rail projects to alleviate freight demands on roadways.



time traffic information systems that

The CAC planning effort was a needs-based planning effort and was financially unconstrained.


the CAC could only be pursued by other agencies



ade significant improvements to the I

all phases of project development through design and construction


roads, conversion of frontage roads from 2-way to 1

city funds, and pass


These and other innovative funding practices are available to






lan (My 35)








35 corridor to report to the CAC. The CAC co

recommendations of the CSCs and developed the I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35

35. The plan made the following general

35 Corridor in Texas:




time traffic information systems that alert drivers to delays and provide

based planning effort and was financially unconstrained.





ade significant improvements to the I



way to 1-way, and the addition of U

city funds, and pass-through financing

entity can expedite a project by fronting project costs to be partially reimbursed by TxDOT over time.

are available to






In 2008, the Texas Transportation Commission established the I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee


35 corridor from the Oklahoma/Texas border to the Texas/Mexico border. Membership


local officials, and residents that lived and did business in the I-35 corridor. In order to engage the


Transportation Commission enlisted assistance from four I-35 Corridor Segment Committees


35 Corridor Advisory Committee Plan (My 35





alert drivers to delays and provide





ade significant improvements to the I-35 corridor



way, and the addition of U

inancing — a mechanism by which a public

costs to be partially reimbursed by TxDOT over time.

are available to help counties facilitate improvements






35 Corridor Advisory Committee


o the Texas/Mexico border. Membership


35 corridor. In order to engage the


35 Corridor Segment Committees









the CAC could only be pursued by other agencies — TxDOT, Regional


35 corridor within



way, and the addition of U-turn structures

a mechanism by which a public


help counties facilitate improvements



Round Rock. Those projects served to enhance mobility with increased mainlane capacity, frontage








l level and to better understand the local needs associated with I-35, the Texas


35 corridor to report to the CAC. The CAC considered the








TxDOT, Regional


within the county limits


for ramping improvements, frontage road improvements, intersection improvements, new frontage

turn structures






frontage

ements and ramp revisions, and the construction of several turnaround structures. The







35, the Texas


nsidered the



TxDOT, Regional


county limits.


rontage

turn structures. The




5

along the corridor.

transportatio

4.04.04.04.0

Development of the

Plan (Implementation Plan)

describes these efforts, as well as the improvement concepts developed and refined as part of

process

4.1

The planning area for this Implementation Plan extends

SH 130 just within the northern city limits of Georgetown, Texas, to

in Round Rock, Texas

4.2

Multiple efforts are underway as part of

vari

terminology, for purposes of Mobility35, these phases are defined as:

�

�

�

�

�

4.3

The Mobility35 program

construct

Posey Road

along the corridor.

transportatio

4.04.04.04.0 Implementation Plan Development

Development of the



process.

Definition of Corridor Planning Area4.1



in Round Rock, Texas

Phases of Project Development4.2


various phases of the


� Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning

scope; a

� Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan

components and geometrics; operational assessment; fatal flaw analysis; develop preliminary

cost estimates; identify funding opportunities;

� Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination

right-of-way

agency coordination.

� Phase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, Right

construction plans; acquire necessary

estimates.

� Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction

secure funding, release final proposal, advertise request for bids, review bids and award

contract, and initiate project construction.

Program Objective4.3


construction services for a program of

Posey Road

along the corridor. The City of Georgetown is currently considering over $100 million in

transportation bond projects up for voter approval in May 2015.

Implementation Plan Development

Development of the I-35 Capital Area Improvement Program/






in Round Rock, Texas.



ous phases of the project development process. In order to ensure consistent use of


Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning

scope; and public outreach.

Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan



Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination

way needs; develop and process environmental documentation; public involvement and


Phase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, Right


estimates.

Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction



Program Objective


ion services for a program of

in Hays County

The City of Georgetown is currently considering over $100 million in

n bond projects up for voter approval in May 2015.


35 Capital Area Improvement Program/

Plan (Implementation Plan) included technical evaluations and public outreach. Th







project development process. In order to ensure consistent use of


Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning Phase 1: Conceptual Planning ––––

nd public outreach.

Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan Phase 2: Implementation Plan ––––




needs; develop and process environmental documentation; public involvement and


Phase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, Right


Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction



Program Objective

The Mobility35 program includes engineering, public involvement,

ion services for a program of

in Hays County. The improvements include an additional lane on I






included technical evaluations and public outreach. Th






Multiple efforts are underway as part of the Mobility35



–––– Perform high

–––– Identify issues and constraints; assess project scope, critical





Phase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, RightPhase 4: Construction Plans, Right----ofofofof----Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination

construction plans; acquire necessary right

Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction Phase 5: Letting and Construction –––– Final approval of



engineering, public involvement,

ion services for a program of improvements to

The improvements include an additional lane on I








The planning area for this Implementation Plan extends 1


Mobility35 planning process



Perform high-level concept planning; identify project need and

Identify issues and constraints; assess project scope, critical


cost estimates; identify funding opportunities; and public outreach.

Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination Phase 3: Schematic and Environmental Coordination ––––


Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination

right-of-way; adjust utilities; and prepare detailed cost

Final approval of


engineering, public involvement,

improvements to I-35





35 Capital Area Improvement Program/Mobility35



11 miles along existing I

SH 130 just within the northern city limits of Georgetown, Texas, to RM 1431 (University

planning process



level concept planning; identify project need and



and public outreach.

–––– Prepare design


Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination

; adjust utilities; and prepare detailed cost

Final approval of Plan Specifications and Estimates (


engineering, public involvement, environmental services

-35 from SH




Mobility35 Corridor Implementation



miles along existing I

RM 1431 (University

planning process; these efforts fall into






and public outreach.

design schematic; determine


Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination Way, and Utility Coordination –––– Prepare detailed


Plan Specifications and Estimates (


environmental services

from SH 130 in Williamson County

The improvements include an additional lane on I-35 in each direction



Corridor Implementation

included technical evaluations and public outreach. This section


miles along existing I-35 from north of

RM 1431 (University Boulevard

; these efforts fall into





schematic; determine


Prepare detailed


Plan Specifications and Estimates (


environmental services, and


35 in each direction


Corridor Implementation

is section

describes these efforts, as well as the improvement concepts developed and refined as part of this

35 from north of

Boulevard)

; these efforts fall into




schematic; determine



Plan Specifications and Estimates (PS&E),


, and

in Williamson County to

35 in each direction

6

and associated ramping, interchange, frontage road and multi

improvements to enhance overall mobility along and across the corridor. The program of

improvements for Williamson County

General guiding considerations

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

4.4

P

program

phase

and the public with unified and coordinated

multi

open houses and online efforts.

Stakeholder Outreach

Stakeholder outreach for Phase 1 and 2 efforts included five primary outreach methods: public

open houses (including online virtual open houses), small group prese

social media postings, and community events. Additional project

during Phase 3

Phase 3,

methods

Public Open Houses

TxDOT hosted three rounds of public open house meetings on the Mobility35 Williamson County

Feasibilit

house meetings, the Mobility35 team sought public input to identify specific problems in the

corridor and opportunities that should be studied. Open house meetings were h

�





� Increase capacity

� Better manage traffic

� Enhance safety

� Optimize exi

� Minimize need for additional right

� Improve east/west connectivity

� Improve compatibility with neighborhoods

� Enhance

4.4 Public and Agency Involvement

Public and stakeholder outreach

program; the project team will

phases. The intent


multi-jurisdictional and includes one






during Phase 3

Phase 3, the outreach methods initiated dur

methods, including

Public Open Houses


Feasibility Study



� February 11, 2014, from 5





Increase capacity

Better manage traffic

Enhance safety

Optimize existing facility

Minimize need for additional right

Improve east/west connectivity

Improve compatibility with neighborhoods

Enhance bicyclist, pedestrian and


ublic and stakeholder outreach

; the project team will

s. The intent of these efforts


jurisdictional and includes one






during Phase 3 is in accordance with rules and regulations governing the NEPA process. During

the outreach methods initiated dur

including public meetings and hearings

Public Open Houses


y Study area from



February 11, 2014, from 5




General guiding considerations or goals

Better manage traffic

ting facility

Minimize need for additional right



, pedestrian and


ublic and stakeholder outreach has been and will continue to be

; the project team will continue

of these efforts


jurisdictional and includes one





in accordance with rules and regulations governing the NEPA process. During

the outreach methods initiated dur

public meetings and hearings


area from north of SH 130 to RM 1431 corridor



February 11, 2014, from 5 – 8 p.m. at the Georgetown High School cafeteria in Georgetown




improvements for Williamson County is complete and the

or goals for the Mob

Minimize need for additional right-of-way



, pedestrian and transit-user


has been and will continue to be

continue this outreach throughout

of these efforts is to provide stakeholders, resource

and the public with unified and coordinated information and opportunities for feedback

jurisdictional and includes one-on-one meetings, small





the outreach methods initiated during

public meetings and hearings


orth of SH 130 to RM 1431 corridor



8 p.m. at the Georgetown High School cafeteria in Georgetown




complete and the

e Mobility35 Program

user options

has been and will continue to be

this outreach throughout

is to provide stakeholders, resource

information and opportunities for feedback

one meetings, small





ing Phases 1 and 2

public meetings and hearings, are undertaken as appropriate.


orth of SH 130 to RM 1431 corridor





and associated ramping, interchange, frontage road and multi-modal modif


complete and the subject of this Implementation Plan.

ility35 Program include:

options

has been and will continue to be a critical part of the

this outreach throughout subsequent project development

is to provide stakeholders, resource


one meetings, small group meetings, large group meetings,



social media postings, and community events. Additional project-specif


Phases 1 and 2 continue

undertaken as appropriate.


orth of SH 130 to RM 1431 corridor. During the first round of open





modal modifications and operational


of this Implementation Plan.

include:

a critical part of the

subsequent project development

is to provide stakeholders, resource agencies,


group meetings, large group meetings,


open houses (including online virtual open houses), small group presentations, website updates,

specific outreach


continue and more formal outreach



. During the first round of open


corridor and opportunities that should be studied. Open house meetings were held:



ications and operational



a critical part of the Mobility35


agencies, partner agencies

information and opportunities for feedback. Outreach



ntations, website updates,

ic outreach conducted


and more formal outreach





eld:



ications and operational


Mobility35


partner agencies

Outreach is



ntations, website updates,

conducted


and more formal outreach





7

�

An online virtual open house was available from February 11

A seco

concepts to improve

identified during the first round of open houses

�

�

An online virtual open house was conducted June 10

A third and final round

feedback on proposed projects to improve mobility along and across I

Open house meetings were held:

�

�

An online virtual open house was available Nov

Stakeholder Meetings

TxDOT and the project team held 20 fac

County Feasibility Study. The meetings

about Mobility35, the Williamson County Feasibility Study, and provide input on the feasibility study

It also provided the project team with an opportunity to hear from specific groups about their

priorities and concerns.

Key stakeholder meetings included representatives from:

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

� February 12, 2014, from 5


A second round of public open house meetings was held to obtain public input on the preliminary

concepts to improve


� June 10, 2014, from 5

� June 11, 2014 from 5


A third and final round



� November 18, 2014, from 5

� November 20, 2014, from 5

Georgetown









� Williamson County

� City of Georgetown

� City of Round Rock

� Georgetown Chamber of

� Round Rock Chamber of Commerce, Transportation Committee

� St. David’s Hospital in Georgetown

� Scott and White Hospital in Round Rock

� Simon Properties Group

� TECO Westinghouse

February 12, 2014, from 5


nd round of public open house meetings was held to obtain public input on the preliminary

concepts to improve the problems and study the


June 10, 2014, from 5

June 11, 2014 from 5


A third and final round of open house meetings was held so the public could review and provide



November 18, 2014, from 5

November 20, 2014, from 5

Georgetown









Williamson County

City of Georgetown

City of Round Rock

Georgetown Chamber of

Round Rock Chamber of Commerce, Transportation Committee

St. David’s Hospital in Georgetown

Scott and White Hospital in Round Rock

Simon Properties Group

TECO Westinghouse

February 12, 2014, from 5 – 8 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca Senior Center in Round Rock



the problems and study the


June 10, 2014, from 5 – 8 p.m. at the Georgetown High School cafeteria in Georgetown

June 11, 2014 from 5– 8 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca Senior Center in Round Rock


of open house meetings was held so the public could review and provide



November 18, 2014, from 5 – 7:30 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca

November 20, 2014, from 5 – 7:30 p.m. at the Georgetown High School cafeteria in








Georgetown Chamber of Commerce




Simon Properties Group

TECO Westinghouse


8 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca Senior Center in Round Rock



the problems and study the







7:30 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca

7:30 p.m. at the Georgetown High School cafeteria in


TxDOT and the project team held 20 face-to-face stakeholder meetings as part of the Williamson

County Feasibility Study. The meetings provided an opportunity for the stakeholder group to learn




Commerce








the problems and study the mobility

identified during the first round of open houses. Open house meetings were



An online virtual open house was conducted June 10-20, 2014.



7:30 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca


An online virtual open house was available November 18

face stakeholder meetings as part of the Williamson

provided an opportunity for the stakeholder group to learn







An online virtual open house was available from February 11-28, 2014.


opportunities

. Open house meetings were



20, 2014.



7:30 p.m. at the Allen R. Baca Senior Center in Round Rock


– December









28, 2014.


opportunities along and across I

. Open house meetings were held:




feedback on proposed projects to improve mobility along and across I-35 within the study area.

Senior Center in Round Rock


ember 1, 2014.








along and across I-35

held:




35 within the study area.









35



35 within the study area.




about Mobility35, the Williamson County Feasibility Study, and provide input on the feasibility study.


8

�

�

�

�

Onli

Mobility35

located at

Mobility35 program across the three counties and all five phases of project development. The site

is being updated as needed to incorporate new information for all program efforts in Williamson,

Travis, and Hays counties. It is anticipated that the

umbrella website, located at

The Mobility35 website provides information about the

objectives, limits, process, pa

comments. It also offers downloadable handouts and presentations from public meetings, a list of

“Frequently Asked Questions” and links to a virtual open house (when open for public comment),

ne

Community Events

The Mobility35 team participated in community events in 2013 and 2014 to generate awareness

and interest in the program

Pflugerville

events, where they distributed

sheets, talked one

list.

successful outreach efforts.

4.5

Limitations

Phase 1 activities were con

evaluation and refinement. Concepts shown in the following chapters are in a preliminary stage and

are subject to

No final decisions have been made regarding implementation of any specific concepts included in

the following chapters. All concepts recommended in this Implementation Plan must undergo

Phase 3 (NEPA) and Phase 4 (PS&E) development prior to po

(Construction).

� Texas Crushed Stone

� HEB

� Teravista neighborhood

� Sun City neighborhood

Online Information

Mobility35 is represented online via an integrated website for all

located at www.mobility35.org









news articles and the program’s interactive forum and social media sites.

Community Events



Pflugerville and


sheets, talked one

list. The Mobility35


Technical Concept Development4.5

Limitations



are subject to




(Construction).

Texas Crushed Stone

Teravista neighborhood

Sun City neighborhood

ne Information

is represented online via an integrated website for all

www.mobility35.org









ws articles and the program’s interactive forum and social media sites.

Community Events



and a Farmer’s Market in Round Rock. Mobility35 staff hosted booths at each these


sheets, talked one-on-one with event

Mobility35 team will continue to target future community events





are subject to change as the Mobility35 program evolves and the concepts it presents




(Construction).

Texas Crushed Stone

Teravista neighborhood

Sun City neighborhood


www.mobility35.org. Website content as of the date of this report is focused on the




umbrella website, located at www.my35.org


objectives, limits, process, participants and ways to contact the





and interest in the program in Williamson County

a Farmer’s Market in Round Rock. Mobility35 staff hosted booths at each these

events, where they distributed Mobility35

one with event

team will continue to target future community events



Phase 1 activities were concluded with Open House #1.


change as the Mobility35 program evolves and the concepts it presents






. Website content as of the date of this report is focused on the




www.my35.org.


rticipants and ways to contact the







Mobility35 open house announcements, brochures, and kids’ activity

one with event participants, and signed people up for the



cluded with Open House #1.











Travis, and Hays counties. It is anticipated that the website will eventually reside under the “My 35”

The Mobility35 website provides information about the Mobility35

rticipants and ways to contact the





in Williamson County. These events included a


open house announcements, brochures, and kids’ activity

participants, and signed people up for the


cluded with Open House #1. Phase 2 and 3 efforts are subject to further







is represented online via an integrated website for all Mobility35




website will eventually reside under the “My 35”

Mobility35’s history, purpose, goals and

rticipants and ways to contact the Mobility35





. These events included a





Phase 2 and 3 efforts are subject to further





Phase 3 (NEPA) and Phase 4 (PS&E) development prior to possible implementation of Phase 5


Mobility35 efforts. This website is





’s history, purpose, goals and

Mobility35 team and submit





. These events included a family Easter festival in




team will continue to target future community events to continue these






ssible implementation of Phase 5


efforts. This website is






team and submit




family Easter festival in



participants, and signed people up for the Mobility35 mailing

to continue these



change as the Mobility35 program evolves and the concepts it presents are refined





efforts. This website is

. Website content as of the date of this report is focused on the entire





team and submit




family Easter festival in



mailing



are refined.




9

Environmental Re

As part of the Phase 2

natural environment (environmental resources) in and along the I

counties has been developed. This

in the

this study

Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations

A bicycl

efforts

documents as a

and propose I

on existing roadway conditions, taking into consideration long term plans

agencies and organizations.

Traffic and Operational Analysis

Traffic and operational analysis is a critical component to understand the impact of potential

improvements on the overall mobility of the I

effectiveness, current traffic counts

collection, operational modelling of proposed improvement concepts, incident management, and

ITS as part of development

In general, operational analysis has confirmed the following:

�

�

�

�

�

Environmental Re

As part of the Phase 2



in the corridor

this study with a focus


A bicyclist and pedestrian needs assessment was completed as part of the Phase 2 planning

efforts, including

documents as a

and propose I










� Developing the

corridor provides the single largest mobility gain for I

� Reconfiguring ramps to optimize and consolidate mainlane access locations

corridor mobility.

� Adding or extending

improve merging/weaving

� Improving frontage

frontage road and cross

� Improving existing interchange configurations

diverging

Environmental Resources

As part of the Phase 2 efforts



corridor, and a planning

with a focus on “fatal flaws”


and pedestrian needs assessment was completed as part of the Phase 2 planning

, including review

documents as a basis for bicycl

and propose I-35 bicycl










Developing the Future Transportation Corridor (

provides the single largest mobility gain for I

Reconfiguring ramps to optimize and consolidate mainlane access locations

corridor mobility.

or extending

improve merging/weaving

Improving frontage road intersections

frontage road and cross

Improving existing interchange configurations

diverging diamond intersections improves frontage road and local mobility.

sources

efforts, an inventory and preliminary



and a planning-level assessment of potential impacts from concepts developed in

on “fatal flaws”



reviewing local jurisdictions’ proposed improvements and existing planning

basis for bicyclist and pedestrian needs. The intent of the assessment is to analyse

ist and pedestrian longitudinal and cross








ITS as part of development and evalu


Future Transportation Corridor (



or extending mainlane auxiliary lanes

improve merging/weaving also improves

road intersections

frontage road and cross street operations


diamond intersections improves frontage road and local mobility.


, an inventory and preliminary


counties has been developed. This work included

level assessment of potential impacts from concepts developed in

on “fatal flaws” that might be present.



local jurisdictions’ proposed improvements and existing planning

and pedestrian needs. The intent of the assessment is to analyse

and pedestrian longitudinal and cross



improvements on the overall mobility of the I-35 corridor. Phase 2 efforts i

effectiveness, current traffic counts, projections of future traffic, crash data analysis, traffic data


and evaluation of the refined concepts.


Future Transportation Corridor (



mainlane auxiliary lanes

also improves corridor mobility.

road intersections as well as east/west vehicular cross streets

operations.




, an inventory and preliminary


work included information on


might be present.




and pedestrian longitudinal and cross



35 corridor. Phase 2 efforts i

projections of future traffic, crash data analysis, traffic data


of the refined concepts.


Future Transportation Corridor (FTC) to enhance mainlane mobility through the

provides the single largest mobility gain for I-35 through t


mainlane auxiliary lanes and adding

corridor mobility.

as well as east/west vehicular cross streets

Improving existing interchange configurations, including use of innovative concepts such as



, an inventory and preliminary evaluation

natural environment (environmental resources) in and along the I-35 corridor in e

information on existing


might be present.




and pedestrian longitudinal and cross-connectivity improvements based



35 corridor. Phase 2 efforts i



of the refined concepts.


to enhance mainlane mobility through the

35 through t


and adding collector

corridor mobility.


, including use of innovative concepts such as



evaluation of the social, economic, and

35 corridor in e

existing environmental resources





connectivity improvements based

on existing roadway conditions, taking into consideration long term plans established by lo


35 corridor. Phase 2 efforts include measurements of




35 through the corridor.


collector-distributor road segments to





of the social, economic, and

35 corridor in each of the three

environmental resources






established by local


nclude measurements of




he corridor.

improves overall

distributor road segments to

as well as east/west vehicular cross streets improve



of the social, economic, and

ach of the three

environmental resources






cal


nclude measurements of




improves overall

distributor road segments to

improves


10

Engineering Analysis

Phase 2 engineering analysis efforts focus on

and developing additional concepts as necessary to

concepts for the corridor. Concept

Roadway Design Manual

(

Development of corridor concepts

improvements in some sections

engineering process are coordinated with the tra

are workable

In addition, drainage considerations are a key component to the development of improvement

concepts. Drainage considerations will

proposed concepts, as well as how these concepts affect

This is critical in order

5.05.05.05.0

Types of improvements c

auxiliary lanes, U

The

and

the corridor concepts. These are described below. Specific discussion of where these types of

improvements would be utilized is found in the s

Section 6.

5.1

Add

is a proposed additional freeway lane in each directi

widening the footprint of the interstate mainlanes, it would not require additional right

Potential lane types include general purpose lanes

express lanes, tran

types.

For the purposes of this Phase 2 effort, to represent the widest potential cross section, the footprint

of

footprint because it would include

from the general purpose lane; therefore,

fit within the footprint developed for the FTC presented herein. The parameters used for the FTC are

shown in






(FHWA) design requirements, and other applicable federal




are workable




This is critical in order

5.05.05.05.0 Overarching


auxiliary lanes, U

The improvement

and pedestrian



Section 6.

Future 5.1

Adding mainlane capacity,




express lanes, tran

types. The FTC lane use in Williamson County has yet to be determined.


of a managed lane was utilized to plan for the FTC. A managed lane is considered the widest




shown in Figure Figure Figure Figure






design requirements, and other applicable federal




are workable. These concepts are described in




This is critical in order to

Overarching Improvement Concepts


auxiliary lanes, U-turns at intersections, intersection turn lanes

improvement concepts

pedestrians in the form of a shared use path



uture Transportation

mainlane capacity,




express lanes, transit-only lanes, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes or a combination of lane

The FTC lane use in Williamson County has yet to be determined.


a managed lane was utilized to plan for the FTC. A managed lane is considered the widest




Figure Figure Figure Figure 5555.1.1.1.1.



concepts for the corridor. Conceptual design

Roadway Design Manual, the TxDOT


Development of corridor concepts may

improvements in some sections due to existing constraints.


These concepts are described in




to determine any potential design flaws.

Improvement Concepts

Types of improvements considered for the corridor include ramping modifications, addition of

turns at intersections, intersection turn lanes

concepts include consideration for the needs of transit users as wel

in the form of a shared use path



ransportation Corridor

mainlane capacity, identified




only lanes, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes or a combination of lane




footprint because it would include desirable






ual designs are developed in accordance with the TxDOT

, the TxDOT Hydraulic Design Manual


may require design exceptions from FHWA to implement

due to existing constraints.


These concepts are described in


concepts. Drainage considerations will continue to


determine any potential design flaws.


onsidered for the corridor include ramping modifications, addition of


include consideration for the needs of transit users as wel

in the form of a shared use path



orridor (FTC)

identified specifically as








desirable buffers, additional shoulders and physical separation

from the general purpose lane; therefore, it is thought that



Phase 2 engineering analysis efforts focus on initial development of

and developing additional concepts as necessary to determine the feasib

s are developed in accordance with the TxDOT

Hydraulic Design Manual


require design exceptions from FHWA to implement

due to existing constraints.

engineering process are coordinated with the traffic and operational analysis to ensure concepts

These concepts are described in Section Section Section Section 5555.


continue to be eval







in the form of a shared use path. Several innovative concepts are also included in


improvements would be utilized is found in the segment-specific descriptions of the summaries

specifically as the FTC, is a primary goal of

is a proposed additional freeway lane in each direction of I


Potential lane types include general purpose lanes and various types of





buffers, additional shoulders and physical separation

it is thought that



initial development of concepts, refining concepts,

determine the feasib


Hydraulic Design Manual, Federal Highway Administration

design requirements, and other applicable federal, state, and local regulations.


due to existing constraints. Concepts developed through the

ffic and operational analysis to ensure concepts

.


be evaluated to determine major impacts to

the major watersh



turns at intersections, intersection turn lanes, and additional mainlane capacity


. Several innovative concepts are also included in


specific descriptions of the summaries

the FTC, is a primary goal of

on of I-35. Although this lane would require


various types of






it is thought that any of the potential lane options would



concepts, refining concepts,

determine the feasibility of implementing



, state, and local regulations.


Concepts developed through the



uated to determine major impacts to

the major watersheds along the corridor.


, and additional mainlane capacity





the FTC, is a primary goal of Mobility35

Although this lane would require


various types of managed lane






the potential lane options would




implementing



, state, and local regulations.






eds along the corridor.


, and additional mainlane capacity

include consideration for the needs of transit users as well as bicycl




Mobility35.


widening the footprint of the interstate mainlanes, it would not require additional right-of-way.

managed lanes such as









implementing







eds along the corridor.


, and additional mainlane capacity.

bicyclist



specific descriptions of the summaries in

. The FTC


way.

such as







11

5.2

Ramp Modifications

Some

close to heavily congested intersections, forcing drivers to make sudden movements between

frontage road lanes after exiting or causing ramp traffic to back up due to frontage road congestion.

Mobility

maximize operational performance.

access.

Auxiliary Lanes

Mobility35

locations

entrance and exit ramps, allowing a lane for drivers to accelerate and decelerate (merge) to match

traveling speeds between

the distance between an on

Corridor Access Improvements5.2

Ramp Modifications

Some entrance and exit ramps do not



Mobility35 proposes to modify these ramps to better manage traffic flow, increase safety


access.

Auxiliary Lanes

Mobility35 proposes the addition of auxiliary lanes (

locations along the corridor. Auxiliary lanes function like an extension of the already available





Ramp Modifications

entrance and exit ramps do not



35 proposes to modify these ramps to better manage traffic flow, increase safety


Auxiliary Lanes

proposes the addition of auxiliary lanes (

along the corridor. Auxiliary lanes function like an extension of the already available





entrance and exit ramps do not








traveling speeds between mainlanes and frontage roads. These lanes are usually installed

the distance between an on-ramp and an off

Figure Figure Figure Figure



entrance and exit ramps do not meet current design standards. Some exit ramps end too




maximize operational performance. Ramp modifications may require changes in the control of




mainlanes and frontage roads. These lanes are usually installed

ramp and an off-ramp.

Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.15.15.15.1: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters


meet current design standards. Some exit ramps end too




Ramp modifications may require changes in the control of

proposes the addition of auxiliary lanes (or speed




ramp.

: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters







or speed-change lanes) in several




: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters: FTC Parameters







change lanes) in several








35 proposes to modify these ramps to better manage traffic flow, increase safety, and


change lanes) in several



mainlanes and frontage roads. These lanes are usually installed within





and




within

12

Collector

Collector

on a frontage road to bypass signalized intersections without having to stop

intersection

speed changes.

roads.

5.3

A conventional intersection helps move large volumes of traffic through limited amounts of space

safely and efficiently. Potential modifications could include improving signal timing, addi

additional turn lanes or through lanes

of

improved

5.4

A

reduces travel times, and improves safety for

free left turns fo

prior to it entering the intersection. Two

significantly reduce delay compared to four

roadway, vehicles can turn left onto the frontage roads without stopping and without conflicting

with through traffic.

shown)

connections

Collector-distributor (C

Collector-distributor


intersection.

speed changes.

roads.

Conventional Intersection5.3




of traffic through the intersection. Benefits of modifying conventional intersections include

improved safety, mobility, connectivity

Diverging Diamond Intersection5.4

A Diverging D


free left turns fo




with through traffic.

shown) under a bridge

connections

distributor (C-D) road

istributor (C-D) roads help manage traffic flow along a corridor by allowing through traff


. C-D roads can also improve safety by providing safer opportunities for merging and

speed changes. C-D roads are typically located between the main





traffic through the intersection. Benefits of modifying conventional intersections include

safety, mobility, connectivity


Diamond Intersection


free left turns for motorists. This is accomplished by shifting traffic to the left side of the roadway




with through traffic. Frontage road through traffic

under a bridge,

connections to the frontage road

Source: FHWA Publication Number FHWA

D) road

D) roads help manage traffic flow along a corridor by allowing through traff


D roads can also improve safety by providing safer opportunities for merging and

D roads are typically located between the main






safety, mobility, connectivity


ntersection (DDI)


r motorists. This is accomplished by shifting traffic to the left side of the roadway




Frontage road through traffic

, though access to properties abutting the frontage road between the C

to the frontage road is restricted










additional turn lanes or through lanes, and adding dedicated U


safety, mobility, connectivity, and frontage road


(DDI), shown in

reduces travel times, and improves safety for drivers


prior to it entering the intersection. Two-phase traffic signals are installed at the crossovers

significantly reduce delay compared to four-phase signals


Frontage road through traffic

cess to properties abutting the frontage road between the C

is restricted.

Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection









and adding dedicated U


and frontage road

shown in Figure Figure Figure Figure 5555

drivers, bicycl


phase traffic signals are installed at the crossovers

phase signals


Frontage road through traffic bypasses the intersection via a C


5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection5.2: Diverging Diamond Intersection






D roads are typically located between the mainlanes of



and adding dedicated U-turn lanes


and frontage road traffic flow.

5555.2.2.2.2, handles higher traffic volumes,

, bicyclists and pedestrians.



phase signals. Once on the left side of the arterial


bypasses the intersection via a C



Source: FHWA Publication Number FHWA-HRT



on a frontage road to bypass signalized intersections without having to stop at a signalized


lanes of the freeway and frontage



turn lanes to improve the efficiency


traffic flow.

handles higher traffic volumes,

and pedestrians.



he left side of the arterial


bypasses the intersection via a C



HRT-09-054



at a signalized


freeway and frontage


safely and efficiently. Potential modifications could include improving signal timing, adding

improve the efficiency



and pedestrians. The DDI allows


phase traffic signals are installed at the crossovers, and



bypasses the intersection via a C-D road (not



D) roads help manage traffic flow along a corridor by allowing through traffic


freeway and frontage


improve the efficiency


allows


, and



(not

cess to properties abutting the frontage road between the C-D

13

5.5

A

island. A roundabout eliminates some

roundabout traffic enters or exits only through right turns, the occurrence of severe cr

substantially reduced.

slo

roundabout

5.6

A continuous flow intersection (CFI)


bicycl

through the intersection

roadway before they enter the intersection at a separate traffic signal. This eliminates the need for

separate left turn signals at the intersection.

Roundabout5.5

A modern roundabout



substantially reduced.

slow excessive traffic speeds while improving traffic flow.

roundabout.

Continuous Flow Intersection 5.6


Figure Figure Figure Figure 5555.4.4.4.4, handles

bicyclists and pedestrians




Roundabout

oundabout is a one



substantially reduced. Modern roundabouts reduce traffic delays, in

w excessive traffic speeds while improving traffic flow.

.



handles high

s and pedestrians




is a one-way, circular intersection in which traffic flows around a center



Modern roundabouts reduce traffic delays, in




higher traffic volumes, reduces travel times, and improves safety for

s and pedestrians by allowing left

through the intersection. In a CFI, vehicles that intend to turn left cross t





way, circular intersection in which traffic flows around a center

island. A roundabout eliminates some of the conflicting traffic, such as left turns. Because





A continuous flow intersection (CFI), also known as a

er traffic volumes, reduces travel times, and improves safety for

by allowing left-turning traffic and through traffic to move simultaneously

, vehicles that intend to turn left cross t




Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection



of the conflicting traffic, such as left turns. Because




also known as a displaced left turn intersection,


turning traffic and through traffic to move simultaneously



Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout

5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection5.4: Continuous Flow Intersection





Modern roundabouts reduce traffic delays, increase traffic capacity, and can

Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.5.5.5.3333 shows an example of a

displaced left turn intersection,





5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout5.3: Roundabout






crease traffic capacity, and can

shows an example of a

displaced left turn intersection,



, vehicles that intend to turn left cross to the left side of the






roundabout traffic enters or exits only through right turns, the occurrence of severe crashes is



displaced left turn intersection, shown in

er traffic volumes, reduces travel times, and improves safety for drivers


o the left side of the




ashes is



shown in

drivers,


o the left side of the


14

5.7

The median U

5555

then a right turn at the intersection. Eliminating the left turn at the main intersection simplifies

signal timing and provi

5.8

Travel Demand Management (TDM) concepts work to decrease peak

commuting

�

�

�

�

Effective implementation of TDM strategies often includes strong partnerships across government

and business.

5.9


management and operations of a transportation system. I

operational improvements that can have compoundin

efficiency. M

capital programs, similar to Mobility35. The

the following four c

Median U5.7

The median U

5555.5.5.5.5)))). Drivers who


signal timing and provi

Travel Demand Management5.8


commuting and

� Flexible work hours

� Teleworking

� Ridesharing, carpooling and vanpooling

� Bicycling


and business.

Integra5.9




efficiency. M


the following four c

Median U-turn

The median U-turn (MUT) intersection shifts left turn

Drivers who desire to turn left make a U


signal timing and provides more green time and less congestion.



and travel volumes and increase trip reliability through strategies that include:

Flexible work hours.

Teleworking.

idesharing, carpooling and vanpooling

icycling, walking and transit


and business.





efficiency. Many ICM projects are relatively mo


the following four categories and are shown in

turn (MUT) intersection shifts left turn

desire to turn left make a U


des more green time and less congestion.



travel volumes and increase trip reliability through strategies that include:

.

idesharing, carpooling and vanpooling

and transit-riding


ted Corridor Management

Integrated Corridor Management (I



projects are relatively mo


ategories and are shown in


turn (MUT) intersection shifts left turn

desire to turn left make a U-turn in the median beyond the main intersection, and






idesharing, carpooling and vanpooling incentives

riding incentives


ted Corridor Management

(ICM) projects use technology and communications to improve



projects are relatively mo

capital programs, similar to Mobility35. The ICM

ategories and are shown in

Figure Figure Figure Figure 5.5: Median U5.5: Median U5.5: Median U5.5: Median U


turn (MUT) intersection shifts left turn movement

turn in the median beyond the main intersection, and





incentives.

incentives.


) projects use technology and communications to improve


operational improvements that can have compounding benefits on transportation system

projects are relatively modest in cost and are often included as part of larger

ICM projects recommended for the

ategories and are shown in Table Table Table Table 5555.1.1.1.1.

5.5: Median U5.5: Median U5.5: Median U5.5: Median U----


movements out of the intersection








management and operations of a transportation system. ICM typically involve

g benefits on transportation system

in cost and are often included as part of larger

projects recommended for the

----turnturnturnturn


out of the intersection



Travel Demand Management (TDM) concepts work to decrease peak-hour single




typically involves moderate scale



projects recommended for the Mobility35


out of the intersection (Figure Figure Figure Figure



hour single-occupant auto




moderate scale



Mobility35 fall into





occupant auto



moderate scale


fall into

15

Table 5.1: ITS Capital Improvement Costs

Expansion and replacement of Dynamic Messaging Signs (DMS)

Deployment and upgrade of Closed Circuit Television Cameras (CCTV)

Dep

Apply vehicle detection systems at ramps, system to system ramps, frontage roads, and mainlanes

Flood Warning Systems in areas inside FEM

Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS)

Enhance Tx

Connected Vehicle Roadside Integration

Use smart work zones

Upgrade HERO patrol fleet

Program DMS from HERO Vehicles

Video to/from HERO and other emergency vehicles

Coordinate with the Intersections

Support Regional Weigh Enforcement

Combined Transportation, Emergency & Communicati

Support Regional Communication Program

Implement adequate ITS bandwidth and redundancy on I

Develop an ITS Maintenance and Project Planning Plan

Implement a new ITS Maintenance Program

Develop an ITS Asset

Develop Special Event Traffic Management Plans

Virtual integration of CTECC and City of Austin

Additional incident management training for first responders




Deploy vehicle detection systems (Bluetooth, video, and inductive loops)




Enhance TxDOT






Coordinate with the Intersections







Develop an ITS Asset







loy vehicle detection systems (Bluetooth, video, and inductive loops)




DOT traveller






Coordinate with the local agenciesIntersections







Develop an ITS Asset Management System





ATMS ATMS ATMS ATMS ---- Advanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management Systems





ATIS ATIS ATIS ATIS ---- Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced



traveller information website

TIM TIM TIM TIM





local agencies







Management System






Advanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management SystemsAdvanced Traffic Management Systems





Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced TravellerTravellerTravellerTraveller

Flood Warning Systems in areas inside FEMA flood plains


information website

TIM TIM TIM TIM ---- Traffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident Management



CoordinationCoordinationCoordinationCoordination

to Implement Signal Control Strategies on Frontage Roads







Management System











TravellerTravellerTravellerTraveller Information SystemsInformation SystemsInformation SystemsInformation Systems

A flood plains

Traffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident Management


CoordinationCoordinationCoordinationCoordination


Combined Transportation, Emergency & Communications Center (CTECC) Software Consolidation

Implement adequate ITS bandwidth and redundancy on I-










Information SystemsInformation SystemsInformation SystemsInformation Systems

Traffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident ManagementTraffic Incident Management


ons Center (CTECC) Software Consolidation

-35







Information SystemsInformation SystemsInformation SystemsInformation Systems











16

Advanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management System

improve the flow of vehicle traffic and improve safety. Real

sensors, etc. flow into a Transportation Management Center (TMC) where it is integrated and

processed (e.g. for incident detection), and may

informational messages on dynamic message signs (DMS) and so forth

is to improve traffic flow.

An

presents information to assist surface transportation travelers in moving from a starting location

(origin) to their desired destination. An ATIS may operate through information supplied entirely

within the vehicle (autonomous system) or it ca

centers. Relevant information may include locations of incidents, weather and road conditions,

optimal routes, recommended speeds, and lane restrictions

Traffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident Managemen

different partner agencies and private sector companies to detect, respond to, and clear traffic

incidents as quickly as possible to reduce the impacts of incidents on safety and congestio

protecting the safety of on

ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination

and jurisdictions

6.06.06.06.0

By identifying a recommended program of projects, this implementation plan

for I

implemented. The con

corridor are described in

in Section 4.2.

and, in a few cases, construction.

6.1

For the purposes of this plan, the following assumptions were made:

�

�

6.2

Williamson County is divided into four segments for the purpose of planni

development. The four segments are:







An Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)










ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination

and jurisdictions

6.06.06.06.0 Recommended Program of Projects


for I-35 corridor improvements and provide

implemented. The con


in Section 4.2.


6.1 Assumptions and Limitations


� The improvement concepts delineated in

improve I

� Cost of implementation is based on preliminary, order of magnitude assessment

6.2 Williamson County Segments









Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)










ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination ITS Coordination projects or policies

and jurisdictions outside of TxDOT

Recommended Program of Projects


corridor improvements and provide

implemented. The concepts and implementation plan for


in Section 4.2. Some concepts




The improvement concepts delineated in

improve I-35. These concepts could change as further development occurs in Phases 3 and 4.

Cost of implementation is based on preliminary, order of magnitude assessment
















Traffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident ManagemenTraffic Incident Management (TIM) t (TIM) t (TIM) t (TIM)



protecting the safety of on-scene responders and the traveling public.

projects or policies

outside of TxDOT in order to accomplish corridor



corridor improvements and provide

cepts and implementation plan for

corridor are described in this plan.

concepts have progressed beyond the planning phase




The improvement concepts delineated in

se concepts could change as further development occurs in Phases 3 and 4.






Advanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management SystemAdvanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)(ATMS)(ATMS)(ATMS)











t (TIM) t (TIM) t (TIM) t (TIM) is the process of coordinating the resources of a number of



scene responders and the traveling public.

projects or policies include those items

in order to accomplish corridor



corridor improvements and provides guidance as to how corridor improvements


plan. The project phases, as used in these descriptions,

have progressed beyond the planning phase



The improvement concepts delineated in this section fo







(ATMS)(ATMS)(ATMS)(ATMS) provides a top



processed (e.g. for incident detection), and may result in actions taken (e.g. traffic routing, placing


Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) is any system that acquires, a



within the vehicle (autonomous system) or it can also use data supplied by traffic management



is the process of coordinating the resources of a number of




include those items that will require the support of agencies

in order to accomplish corridor



guidance as to how corridor improvements


The project phases, as used in these descriptions,



this section fo





provides a top-down system for usin

improve the flow of vehicle traffic and improve safety. Real-time traffic data from cameras, speed


result in actions taken (e.g. traffic routing, placing


is any system that acquires, a



n also use data supplied by traffic management


optimal routes, recommended speeds, and lane restrictions, and alternate mode choices





that will require the support of agencies

in order to accomplish corridor-wide ITS



the Williamson County




this section form the basis for a program of projects to





down system for usin

time traffic data from cameras, speed



informational messages on dynamic message signs (DMS) and so forth). The overall goal of ATMS

is any system that acquires, analyzes, and





, and alternate mode choices






wide ITS improvements.

By identifying a recommended program of projects, this implementation plan serves


Williamson County


have progressed beyond the planning phases into

rm the basis for a program of projects to



Williamson County is divided into four segments for the purpose of planning and project


down system for using technology to




The overall goal of ATMS

nalyzes, and





, and alternate mode choices.



incidents as quickly as possible to reduce the impacts of incidents on safety and congestion, while


improvements.

serves as a blueprint

guidance as to how corridor improvements may

Williamson County portion of the

The project phases, as used in these descriptions, are described

into project design



Cost of implementation is based on preliminary, order of magnitude assessments.

ng and project


g technology to




The overall goal of ATMS

nalyzes, and







n, while


s a blueprint

may be

portion of the

described

design



17

�

�

�

�

Segments W1

referenced to address all the Mobility35 work in Williamson County. Segment W4

independent planning effort begun earlier than Segments W1

Implementation Plan.

6.3

I-

Williamson County is the project sponsor and developed plans, specifications, and estimates

improvements along I

(Phase 5), involves the construction of the northbound frontage road, auxiliary lanes, ramp

reconfiguration, new frontage road bridges over the South San Gab

Smith Branch, and a U

intermittent

mobility and safety


first half of 2015.

I-

T

improvements at University Boulevard and I

Diamond Intersection by reconfiguring the existing intersection as well as a

shared use paths for pedestrians and bicyclists. The project has been let for construction and the

contract has been awarded. Construction of the project began in October of 2014

anticipated to take about a year to complete

6.4

For project development purposes, identified improvements have been formulated as individual

projects.

intended to be cumulative betw

developed with

minimizing re

the individual projects.

� Segment W1

� Segment W2

� Segment W3

� Segment W4

Segments W1




6.3 Current Williamson County Construction Projects

-35 Northbound Frontage Road Improvements from Westinghouse Road to SH 29 (Phase 5)


improvements along I



Smith Branch, and a U

intermittent

mobility and safety


first half of 2015.

-35 Diverging Diamond Intersection at RM 1431 (University Boulevard) (Phase 5)

TxDOT is the project sponsor and has developed plans, specifications, and estimates for






6.4 Segments W1


projects. Each project is intended to have independent utility, but the effect of improvements is


developed with

minimizing re


Segment W1 – North of SH 130 to Williams Drive;

Segment W2 – Williams Drive to SE Inner Loop;

Segment W3 – SE Inner Loop to RM 1431 (University Boulevard);

Segment W4 – RM 1431 (University Boulevard) to S

Segments W1 – W3 are the subject of this Corridor Implementation Plan. Segment W4





35 Northbound Frontage Road Improvements from Westinghouse Road to SH 29 (Phase 5)


improvements along I-35, f



Smith Branch, and a U-turn bridge north of Ranch to Market (RM) 2243. The project adds

intermittent sidewalks between Southeast Inner Loop Drive and Westinghouse Road to enhance

mobility and safety. The

the Williamson County proposed

first half of 2015.

35 Diverging Diamond Intersection at RM 1431 (University Boulevard) (Phase 5)

xDOT is the project sponsor and has developed plans, specifications, and estimates for






gments W1 –


Each project is intended to have independent utility, but the effect of improvements is


developed with the intent to facilitate future efforts to

minimizing re-work and temporary construction.


North of SH 130 to Williams Drive;

Williams Drive to SE Inner Loop;

SE Inner Loop to RM 1431 (University Boulevard);

RM 1431 (University Boulevard) to S

W3 are the subject of this Corridor Implementation Plan. Segment W4






35, from Westinghouse Road to SH 29.



turn bridge north of Ranch to Market (RM) 2243. The project adds

sidewalks between Southeast Inner Loop Drive and Westinghouse Road to enhance

. The work to provide conti

proposed program of projects








– W3 Program of Projects



intended to be cumulative between projects. In addition, each project, to the extent possible, will be

intent to facilitate future efforts to

work and temporary construction.

Refined improvement concepts, described in





RM 1431 (University Boulevard) to S







rom Westinghouse Road to SH 29.





work to provide continuous bicycle and pedestrian facilities is included in

program of projects



improvements at University Boulevard and I-35. The project involves implementing a Diverging




anticipated to take about a year to complete.

Program of Projects



een projects. In addition, each project, to the extent possible, will be

intent to facilitate future efforts to

work and temporary construction.






RM 1431 (University Boulevard) to SH 45N







rom Westinghouse Road to SH 29.





nuous bicycle and pedestrian facilities is included in

program of projects. Construction completion is anticipated in the



35. The project involves implementing a Diverging




Program of Projects




intent to facilitate future efforts to implement

work and temporary construction. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are include




H 45N



independent planning effort begun earlier than Segments W1 – W3 with its own C




rom Westinghouse Road to SH 29. The project, now under construction


reconfiguration, new frontage road bridges over the South San Gabriel River and the West Fork of




. Construction completion is anticipated in the










implement corridor

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are include






W3 with its own C



The project, now under construction


riel River and the West Fork of








Diamond Intersection by reconfiguring the existing intersection as well as adding sidewalks and






corridor improvements,


Refined improvement concepts, described in Appendix AAppendix AAppendix AAppendix A,


W3 are the subject of this Corridor Implementation Plan. Segment W4 is

referenced to address all the Mobility35 work in Williamson County. Segment W4 was an

W3 with its own Corridor













dding sidewalks and


contract has been awarded. Construction of the project began in October of 2014 and is




improvements,


, have been



Williamson County is the project sponsor and developed plans, specifications, and estimates for







dding sidewalks and





Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are included within

have been

18

develope

sheets are provided in

Williamson County program of projects.

Generally, the program of improvements consists of stand

independently of one another as funding becomes available. From a corridor standpoint, the

proj

Williamson County Improvement Concepts

In all segments, multiple improvement concepts

operational and geometric analysis. In many segmen

concept to carry forward into future phases of the project. In other segments, multiple concepts

may be viable to carry forward. In all cases, no final decisions have been made regarding what

improvement concept

through Phases 3 and 4 of project development. In addition

with additional Mobility35 projects in

segment, concepts

Project Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary Sheets

developed for each project

sheets are provided in




projects can be grouped into priorities, and considered for phased implementation






improvement concept



segment, concepts



d for each project

sheets are provided in Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix




ects can be grouped into priorities, and considered for phased implementation






improvement concepts should be constructed. Further evaluation and analysis will continue



segment, concepts are


Figure Figure Figure Figure 6.4.16.4.16.4.16.4.1: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment

d for each project in the Williamson County

Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix BBBB










s should be constructed. Further evaluation and analysis will continue



presented in


: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment W1 W1 W1 W1



and Appendix CAppendix CAppendix CAppendix C












with additional Mobility35 projects in Williamson

presented in Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined

Project Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary Sheets....

W1 W1 W1 W1


the Williamson County corridor

Appendix CAppendix CAppendix CAppendix C contains




In all segments, multiple improvement concepts have been

operational and geometric analysis. In many segments of the corridor, the analysis yield





Williamson County as those efforts progress. Wi

Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts

Segment

Study –

(Phase 2)

Segment W1 is shown i

improvement concepts for this segment would

include adding the FTC, improving frontage road

traffic flow, and improving bicyclist and

pedestrian mobility.

Key intersections

include SH 195, SH 130, Lakeway

Northwest Boulevard

team evaluated

improvements, and operational improvements.

Proposed concepts were presented at pairs of

open houses h

June 10 and 11, 2014

20, 2014

concepts

improvements are described below.


corridor. Project Development Summary

contains prelimina

Generally, the program of improvements consists of stand-alone projects that could be advanced



have been evaluated and vetted through

ts of the corridor, the analysis yield




through Phases 3 and 4 of project development. In addition, concepts will be refined to coordinate

County as those efforts progress. Wi

Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts

Segment W1 – Williamson County Feasibility

– North of SH

(Phase 2)

Segment W1 is shown i





Key intersections evaluated


Northwest Boulevard

evaluated ramp locations, intersection



open houses held on February 11 and 12, 2014,

June 10 and 11, 2014

20, 2014. Final analysis of the proposed

concepts is now complete and the recommended



Project Development Summary

preliminary cost estimates for the

alone projects that could be advanced



evaluated and vetted through

ts of the corridor, the analysis yield




concepts will be refined to coordinate

County as those efforts progress. Wi


Williamson County Feasibility

SH 130 to Williams Drive

Segment W1 is shown in Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1





evaluated in this


Northwest Boulevard, and Williams Drive

ramp locations, intersection



eld on February 11 and 12, 2014,

June 10 and 11, 2014, and November 18 and

Final analysis of the proposed

now complete and the recommended




cost estimates for the



ects can be grouped into priorities, and considered for phased implementation.

evaluated and vetted through

ts of the corridor, the analysis yielded one





County as those efforts progress. Within each

Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts and Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B:


to Williams Drive

Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1Figure 6.4.1. Overall




in this segment

include SH 195, SH 130, Lakeway Drive,

, and Williams Drive





and November 18 and






cost estimates for the



one





thin each

Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B:


to Williams Drive

Overall



segment

,

, and Williams Drive. The





and November 18 and



19

Improvement concepts

Appendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project Develo

SH 195/Berry Creek Drive Intersection Improvements

The proposed concept at the SH 195/Berry Creek Drive intersection

Appendix B, sheet

for through

Creek Drive, add lanes to Berry Creek Drive at the intersection, provide a free right

Berry Creek to southbound SH 195, and install

would be completed to improve connectivity.

SH 195 Interchange Direct Connec

The proposed concept at the junction of I

Appendix B, sheet 3)

I-

The traffic operations model indicates

the 2035

considerations with operations at Ft. Hood may dictate implementation of the direct connectors

sooner than later.

I-

The proposed concept at the inte

and Appendix B, sheet 4)

I-

Berry Creek and widening southbound and northbound frontage road bridges at Berry Creek. The

southbound SH 195 connection to the I

accommodate the future SH 195 Interchange Direct Connect

would be completed to improve east/west and north/south connectivity.

Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop Interchange Improvements

The proposed concept at the intersection of I

A, sheets 6

provide for

levels of service for

south of Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop.

relocating

exists to partner with the City of Georgetown who





Appendix B, sheet

for through-traffic. The project would construct a right







-35, southbound SH 195 and southbound SH 130, and northbound I


the 2035 planning horizon of


sooner than later.

-35 Frontage Roads



-35 frontage roads







A, sheets 6 –

provide for additional

levels of service for


relocating State Spur (SS) 158 (






Appendix B, sheet 2) widens SH 195 to provide northbound left

traffic. The project would construct a right






Appendix B, sheet 3) provides di

35, southbound SH 195 and southbound SH 130, and northbound I


planning horizon of


sooner than later.

Frontage Roads at SH 195



frontage roads. The project includes







– 10 and Appendix B, sheet 5)

additional through traffic and turning lanes.

levels of service for a seven


State Spur (SS) 158 (


are also illustrated in

Appendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project DeveloAppendix B: Project Development Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheets



widens SH 195 to provide northbound left







provides direct connect



planning horizon of this Corridor Implementation Plan.


at SH 195


and Appendix B, sheet 4) consists of widening

. The project includes







ppendix B, sheet 5)

through traffic and turning lanes.

seven-lane section.


State Spur (SS) 158 (Austin Avenue



illustrated in Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined

pment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheets








SH 195 Interchange Direct Connectors

The proposed concept at the junction of I-35 and SH 195

rect connectors


The traffic operations model indicates construction

this Corridor Implementation Plan.


rsection of I-35 and SH 195

consists of widening

. The project includes widening the southbound frontage road bridge at Dry


southbound SH 195 connection to the I-35 southbound frontage would be realigned to




The proposed concept at the intersection of I-35 and Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop

ppendix B, sheet 5) includes widening the existing underpass bridge to

through traffic and turning lanes.

lane section. A new northbound frontage road would be c

south of Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop. The northbound frontage road construction

Austin Avenue



Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined

pment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheetspment Summary Sheets.




traffic. The project would construct a right-turn lane from southbound SH 195 to Berry


Berry Creek to southbound SH 195, and install traffic signals. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

35 and SH 195

ors between southbound SH 195 and southbound


construction of the direct connectors is not warranted

this Corridor Implementation Plan.


35 and SH 195

consists of widening existing pavement

widening the southbound frontage road bridge at Dry


35 southbound frontage would be realigned to




35 and Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop

includes widening the existing underpass bridge to

through traffic and turning lanes. The traffic modeling indicates acceptable

new northbound frontage road would be c

northbound frontage road construction

Austin Avenue) to the east of its current location

exists to partner with the City of Georgetown who proposed the relocation.


Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement

The proposed concept at the SH 195/Berry Creek Drive intersection (see Appendix A, sheet 4 and

widens SH 195 to provide northbound left-turn storage capacity an

turn lane from southbound SH 195 to Berry


traffic signals. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

35 and SH 195 (see Appendix A, sheets 3

between southbound SH 195 and southbound


of the direct connectors is not warranted

this Corridor Implementation Plan. Economic and political



existing pavement to provide continuous three




accommodate the future SH 195 Interchange Direct Connectors. Bicycle and pedestr





The traffic modeling indicates acceptable



east of its current location

proposed the relocation.


Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement ConceptsConceptsConceptsConcepts

(see Appendix A, sheet 4 and

turn storage capacity an




(see Appendix A, sheets 3


35, southbound SH 195 and southbound SH 130, and northbound I-35 and northbound SH 195.


Economic and political



to provide continuous three




. Bicycle and pedestr







east of its current location

proposed the relocation.


ConceptsConceptsConceptsConcepts and


turn storage capacity and a bypass


Creek Drive, add lanes to Berry Creek Drive at the intersection, provide a free right-turn lane from


(see Appendix A, sheets 3 – 5 and


35 and northbound SH 195.


Economic and political


(see Appendix A, sheets 1 – 3, 5

to provide continuous three




. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

35 and Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop (see Appendix



new northbound frontage road would be constructed

northbound frontage road construction is contingent on

east of its current location. An opportunity


and


d a bypass


turn lane from


5 and


35 and northbound SH 195.

of the direct connectors is not warranted within


3, 5 – 6

to provide continuous three-lane



ian facilities

(see Appendix



onstructed

is contingent on

. An opportunity

20

The

right

provide

complete

the southbound mainlanes. Frontage road auxiliary lanes would be provided between SH 130 and

Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop in each direction. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities would be

completed to improve east/west and north/south connectivity.

Northwest Boulevard Extension

The proposed concept

Boulevard

Boulevard extension to

bridge. Connections would be made to the

northbound frontage road. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities would be completed to improve

east/west connectivity.

State Spur 158 (


sheets 10

underpass bridge would provide additional lanes to accommodate turning movements

traffic,

mainlane bridge at the North Fork San Gabriel River would be widened for the southbound

collector

an

intersections

bypass for

(

The northbound frontage road will be extended from

existing frontage roads will be improved to provide continuous three

frontage road extension will require an evaluation of the need for additional right

future phases of project development.

right

29. The southbound frontage road bridge at the North Fork San Gabriel River would be widened for

an additional lane, shoulders, and a shared use path. Ramp modifications would be included to

implement the collec

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities would be completed to improve east/west and north/south

connectivity.

The existing

right-turn lane and the intersections will be signalized. Existing frontage roads would be widened to

provide a continuous three

complete the





The proposed concept

Boulevard (see Appendix A, sheet 12)





State Spur 158 (


sheets 10 –


traffic, proposed collector


collector-distributor transition to

and southbound would provide for frontage road through movements

intersections

bypass for SS 158 (

(Austin Avenue





right-turn lane to Rivery Boulevard and an auxiliary



implement the collec


connectivity.

frontage road box at the I

turn lane and the intersections will be signalized. Existing frontage roads would be widened to

continuous three

the X-pattern interchange configuration. Auxiliary lanes are proposed in two locations for





The proposed concept,

(see Appendix A, sheet 12)





State Spur 158 (Williams Drive


15 and Appendix B, sheet 6)


proposed collector


distributor transition to

d southbound would provide for frontage road through movements

intersections. The Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection will be

SS 158 (Austin Avenue

Austin Avenue) to Westbound Williams Drive traffic





turn lane to Rivery Boulevard and an auxiliary



implement the collector


connectivity.

frontage road box at the I


continuous three-lane roadway

pattern interchange configuration. Auxiliary lanes are proposed in two locations for





, to be developed by others,

(see Appendix A, sheet 12)

SS 158 (Austin Avenue



Williams Drive) Interchange Improvements




proposed collector-distributor


distributor transition to the


. The Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection will be

Austin Avenue)

to Westbound Williams Drive traffic








tor-distributor roadways and complete the X



frontage road box at the I-35/SH 130 intersection will be improved with a northbound


ne roadway section





developed by others,

(see Appendix A, sheet 12) extends Northwest Boulevard from the future Rivery

Austin Avenue

bridge. Connections would be made to the existing


Interchange Improvements

The proposed concept at the intersection of I-35 and

15 and Appendix B, sheet 6) is a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). A new wider


ributors, and allow


the mainlanes



through traffic and a right

to Westbound Williams Drive traffic




future phases of project development. The southbound frontage road will be widened to provide a




distributor roadways and complete the X



35/SH 130 intersection will be improved with a northbound


ection. Ramp modifications would





developed by others, at the intersection of I

extends Northwest Boulevard from the future Rivery

Austin Avenue) and includes the construction of a new underpass

existing southbound frontage road and a new



35 and SS 158 (

is a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). A new wider


and allow for I-35 mainlane widening. The southbound


s. Constructing collector



through traffic and a right

to Westbound Williams Drive traffic.

The northbound frontage road will be extended from SS 158 (



The southbound frontage road will be widened to provide a

turn lane to Rivery Boulevard and an auxiliary lane between



distributor roadways and complete the X





. Ramp modifications would





at the intersection of I


and includes the construction of a new underpass

bound frontage road and a new



S 158 (Williams Drive



35 mainlane widening. The southbound


. Constructing collector


. The Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection will be reconfigured

through traffic and a right-turn lan

SS 158 (Williams Drive

existing frontage roads will be improved to provide continuous three-lane roadway



lane between SS 158 (



distributor roadways and complete the X-pattern interchange configuration.





. Ramp modifications would be incorporated to




at the intersection of I-35 and Northwest





Williams Drive) (see Appendix A,





. Constructing collector-distributor roads northbound

d southbound would provide for frontage road through movements to circumvent the signalized

reconfigured

turn lane for southbound

Williams Drive) to the north and

lane roadway



SS 158 (Williams Drive



pattern interchange configuration.





be incorporated to




35 and Northwest





(see Appendix A,


underpass bridge would provide additional lanes to accommodate turning movements, through



distributor roads northbound

to circumvent the signalized

reconfigured by adding a

southbound SS 158

to the north and

lane roadway sections.

frontage road extension will require an evaluation of the need for additional right-of-way during


Williams Drive) and SH








be incorporated to



35 and Northwest



(see Appendix A,


through


distributor roads northbound

to circumvent the signalized

by adding a

SS 158

to the north and

. The

way during


and SH





21

FTC and Mainlane Improvements (North)

The FTC would be incorporated the

and Appendix B, sheet 1) and into Segment W2

and could be accomplished with median and outside

bridge widening, both northbound and southbound, at Dry Berry Creek, Berry Creek and North Fork

San Gabriel River.

planning horizon to be no worse than level of service B. C

Improvements (North) would not be warranted until a future date.

Improvement concepts are also illustrated in

Appendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary Sheets

SH 29 (University Ave



improve traffic operations, and






San Gabriel River.





SH 29 (University Ave










San Gabriel River. The traffic operations model forecasts mainlane traffic operation within the 2035





SH 29 (University Avenue) Interchange Improvements


Appendix B, sheet 8) is for a wider conventional interchange to accommodate additional turn lanes,


Figure Figure Figure Figure 6.4.26.4.26.4.26.4.2






The traffic operations model forecasts mainlane traffic operation within the 2035





nue) Interchange Improvements


is for a wider conventional interchange to accommodate additional turn lanes,

improve traffic operations, and reduce congestion. A new underpass bridge would be constructed to

6.4.26.4.26.4.26.4.2: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment



The FTC would be incorporated the full length of Segment







Improvement concepts are also illustrated in Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined



The proposed concept at the intersection of I-35 and SH 29


reduce congestion. A new underpass bridge would be constructed to

: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment W2W2W2W2


length of Segment

and Appendix B, sheet 1) and into Segment W2. The FTC would fit within the existing right

and could be accomplished with median and outside mainlane



planning horizon to be no worse than level of service B. Construction of the FTC and Mainlane


Segment

Study

2)

Segment W2 is shown in

improvement con

include adding the FTC, improving frontage

road traffic flow, and improving bicycle and


Key intersections

include SH 29 (University

(Leander Road)

evaluated



open houses h

2014,

18 and 20, 2014

proposed concepts is now complete and the

recommended improvements are described

below.

Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined

Appendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary SheetsAppendix B: Project Development Summary Sheets.


35 and SH 29




length of Segment W1 (see Appendix A, sheets 1

. The FTC would fit within the existing right

mainlane widening. FTC construction includes



onstruction of the FTC and Mainlane


Segment W2 – Williamson County Feasibility

Study – Williams Dr


improvement con




Key intersections

include SH 29 (University

(Leander Road), and SE Inner L




open houses held on February 11 and 12,

2014, June 10 and 11, 2014

18 and 20, 2014



below.

Appendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: RefinedAppendix A: Refined Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts







widening. FTC construction includes





Williams Drive to SE Inner Loop

Segment W2 is shown in Figure Figure Figure Figure





Key intersections evaluated

include SH 29 (University Avenue

, and SE Inner L




eld on February 11 and 12,

June 10 and 11, 2014

18 and 20, 2014. Final analysis








(see Appendix A, sheets 1 – 3, 5

. The FTC would fit within the existing right-of






SE Inner Loop

Figure Figure Figure Figure 6666....4444.2.2.2.2. Overall

cepts for this segment would



in this segment

Avenue), RM 2243

, and SE Inner Loop. The team





June 10 and 11, 2014, and November

Final analysis of the



Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts and

(see Appendix A, sheets 15 – 18 and




3, 5 – 15

of-way






SE Inner Loop (Phase

Overall

cepts for this segment would



in this segment

), RM 2243

The team




, and November



and

18 and



22

allow mainlane widening and provide additional vertical clearance

remain.

The frontage road approaches to SH 29 would be improved to provide turning lanes a

accommodate SH 29

address merging traffic from the southbound to northbound turnaround and the northbound exit

ramp to Williams Drive. The signalized intersection

I-

modifications to complete the X

the I

pedestrian facilities would be completed to improve east/west and north/south connectivity.

RM 2243 (Leander Road) Interchange Improvements

The proposed concept at the I

18

additional turn lanes, improve traffic operations, and reduce congestion.

acceptable

coordination will be required.

as a Phase 3 activity

desi

provided to pair with the southbound to northbound turnaround structure currently being

constructed.


lane roadway on SE Inner Loop by converting the existing three

and adding two eastbound lanes under span 4 of the existing overpass bridges.

The southbound frontage road would be widened to pr

section

southbound frontage road auxiliary lanes would be provided, one between RM 2243/Leander Road

and SE Inner Loop and one betwee

frontage road would be widened in select locations to provide a continuous three

Ramp modifications would be included to complete the X

Bicycle and pede

connectivity.

The SW Bypass is a Williamson County sponsored project that will ultimately construct a new

controlled access highway including mainlanes and frontage roads between I

Leander Road initially with an ultimate connection to SH 29. A new fully directional interchange is

planned at I

project roughly along the SE Inner Loop alignme


remain.


accommodate SH 29



-35 is proposed to be relocated


the I-35 Northbound Frontage R




18 – 22 and Appendix B, sheet 9)


acceptable levels of ser


as a Phase 3 activity

desirable vertical cle


constructed.





section and realigned at SE Inner Loop to a more conventional interchange configuration. Two





Bicycle and pede

connectivity.




planned at I




accommodate SH 29 intersection



35 is proposed to be relocated


35 Northbound Frontage R






levels of ser


as a Phase 3 activity. The new underpass bridge would allow mainlane widening and provide

vertical clearance. A


constructed.





and realigned at SE Inner Loop to a more conventional interchange configuration. Two






connectivity.




-35 and the roadway will continue east of I




intersection improvements. The northbound frontage road will be improved to



35 is proposed to be relocated farther to the east

modifications to complete the X-pattern interchange configuration

35 Northbound Frontage Road Improvements from Westinghouse Road to SH 29



The proposed concept at the I-35 and RM 2243/Leander

22 and Appendix B, sheet 9) is a partial Continuous Flow Interchange to accommodate


levels of service from the partial CFI.

coordination will be required. Further study

The new underpass bridge would allow mainlane widening and provide

arance. A new northbound to southbound turnaround structure would be


The proposed concept at the I-35 and SE Inner Loop intersection con









strian facilities would be completed to improve east/west and north/south




35 and the roadway will continue east of I





improvements. The northbound frontage road will be improved to



farther to the east

pattern interchange configuration

oad Improvements from Westinghouse Road to SH 29



35 and RM 2243/Leander

is a partial Continuous Flow Interchange to accommodate


vice from the partial CFI.

urther study to develop the proposed improvement


new northbound to southbound turnaround structure would be


35 and SE Inner Loop intersection con






and SE Inner Loop and one between SE Inner Loop and Westinghouse Road. The northbound







35 and the roadway will continue east of I







ramp to Williams Drive. The signalized intersection for the

farther to the east to accommodate planned redevelopment. Ramp

pattern interchange configuration




35 and RM 2243/Leander



vice from the partial CFI. Access modifications and signal timing

to develop the proposed improvement







The southbound frontage road would be widened to provide a continuous three



n SE Inner Loop and Westinghouse Road. The northbound


Ramp modifications would be included to complete the X-





35 and the roadway will continue east of I-35 as a City of Georgetown sponsored

project roughly along the SE Inner Loop alignment. The previously described frontage road and SE


allow mainlane widening and provide additional vertical clearance. The




for the major commercial/retail

to accommodate planned redevelopment. Ramp

pattern interchange configuration are being completed as part of



35 and RM 2243/Leander Road intersection



ccess modifications and signal timing






lane roadway on SE Inner Loop by converting the existing three-lane roadway to westbound travel


ovide a continuous three





-pattern interchange configurations.





35 as a City of Georgetown sponsored

nt. The previously described frontage road and SE


. The existing turnarounds will




commercial/retail


are being completed as part of



Road intersection (see Appendix A, sheets


additional turn lanes, improve traffic operations, and reduce congestion. Traffic modeling indicates






35 and SE Inner Loop intersection consists of constructing a five

lane roadway to westbound travel


ovide a continuous three-lane roadway





pattern interchange configurations.



controlled access highway including mainlanes and frontage roads between I-35 and RM 2243/





existing turnarounds will

The frontage road approaches to SH 29 would be improved to provide turning lanes and



commercial/retail center east of



oad Improvements from Westinghouse Road to SH 29. Bicycle and


(see Appendix A, sheets


Traffic modeling indicates


to develop the proposed improvement is recommended




sists of constructing a five



lane roadway




frontage road would be widened in select locations to provide a continuous three-lane roadway.




35 and RM 2243/





existing turnarounds will



east of



. Bicycle and




Traffic modeling indicates

is recommended



sists of constructing a five-


lane roadway




lane roadway.




35 and RM 2243/




23

Inner Loop improvements are the interim facility, though they are designed in anticipation of the

future SW Bypass.

FTC and Mainlane Improvements (South)

The FTC would be incorporated through the lengths o

A, sheets 15

could be accomplished with median and outside widening. FTC construction includes replacement

of the overpass bridg

San Gabriel River. Mainlane auxiliary lanes would be constructed, southbound and northbound, at

the Westinghouse Road interchange and ramp modifications would be implemented to

acco

Westinghouse Road Interchange Improvements


26

additional lanes to accommodate additional turn lanes, improve traffic operations, and reduce

congestion. A new underpass bridge would be constructed to allow mainlane widening and provide


future SW Bypass.



A, sheets 15


of the overpass bridg



accommodate mainlane widening.



26 – 28 and Appendix B, s





future SW Bypass.



A, sheets 15 – 28 and Appendix B, sheet 7)


of the overpass bridges at SE Inner Loop and widening of the mainlane bridges at the South Fork



mmodate mainlane widening.



28 and Appendix B, s



Figure Figure Figure Figure 6.4.36.4.36.4.36.4.3: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment






es at SE Inner Loop and widening of the mainlane bridges at the South Fork









: Segment : Segment : Segment : Segment W3W3W3W3





28 and Appendix B, sheet 7). The FTC would fit within the existing right






Segment

Inner Loop


improvement concepts for this segment would include

adding the FTC, improving frontage road tra

and improving bicycle and pedestrian mobility.

The key

Road.



houses h

and 11, 2014

analysis of the proposed concepts is now complete and

the recommended improvements are described below.


A: RefinedA: RefinedA: RefinedA: Refined



The proposed concept at the intersection of I-35 and Westinghouse Road

heet 10) is for a wider conventional interchange to provide





The FTC would be incorporated through the lengths of Segment






Segment W3 –

Inner Loop to RM





The key intersection in this segment

Road. The team



houses held on February 11 and 12, 2014,

and 11, 2014




A: RefinedA: RefinedA: RefinedA: Refined Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts



35 and Westinghouse Road

is for a wider conventional interchange to provide





f Segment W2 and Segment






– Williamson County Feasibility Study

to RM 1431 (Phase 2)





intersection in this segment

The team evaluated




and 11, 2014, and November 18 and 20, 2014






35 and Westinghouse Road






2 and Segment






Williamson County Feasibility Study

1431 (Phase 2)

Segment W3 is shown in Figure Figure Figure Figure 6.4.36.4.36.4.36.4.3




intersection in this segment





, and November 18 and 20, 2014




Improvement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement ConceptsImprovement Concepts and


35 and Westinghouse Road (see Appendix A, sheets






2 and Segment W3 (see Appendix

. The FTC would fit within the existing right-of-way and





Williamson County Feasibility Study

6.4.36.4.36.4.36.4.3. Overall


adding the FTC, improving frontage road traffic flow,


intersection in this segment is Westinghouse



Proposed concepts were presented at pairs of open

eld on February 11 and 12, 2014, June 10

, and November 18 and 20, 2014



Improvement concepts are also illustrated in AAAAppendix ppendix ppendix ppendix

and Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B:

Project Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary SheetsProject Development Summary Sheets.


is for a wider conventional interchange to provide four





(see Appendix

way and




Williamson County Feasibility Study – SE


ffic flow,

Westinghouse


open

June 10

, and November 18 and 20, 2014. Final



ppendix ppendix ppendix ppendix

Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B: Appendix B:




24

de

provided to pair with the existing northbound to southbound turnaround structure.

The frontage roads would be reconstructed on new alignments to a more traditional in

configuration

the signalized intersection on grade

reconstructed to provide continuous three

constructed; one on the southbound frontage road south of Westinghouse Road and two on the

northbound frontage road north and south of Westinghouse Road. Ramp modifications would be

included to complete the X


7.07.07.07.0

7.1

Mobility35 improvements are part of a regional effort to enhance the primar

the greater

within Travis County though the US 183 North project extends to the SH 45 Toll Road in southwest

Williamson County. Williamson Count

provide a new roadway between SH 29

to SE Inner Loop. These projects have the potential to

will

7.2

TxDOT, along with local transportation partners, has begun an Integrated Corridor Management

(ICM) Study for

evaluate a series of corridor improvements including ITS, incident management, travel demand

management, and other improvements to develop a strategy to better move traffic th

c

7.3

As part of its mission to provide safe and reliable transportation solutions for Texas, TxDOT is

actively seeking multi

agency for Texas and a major employer in

reduction best practices. That includes examining its internal workforce policies for ways to

unnecessary work trips.

In March 2014, TxDOT kicked off a Peak

policies allowing flexible work schedules, compressed work weeks and teleworking. In addition, a

number of TxDOT employees share rid

desirable vertical clearance



configuration







7.07.07.07.0 Other Mobility35 Initiatives

7.1 Regional Projects


the greater capital





will require on

Integrated Corridor Management Study7.2


(ICM) Study for



capital area.

Trip Reduction7.3


actively seeking multi







vertical clearance



configuration, retaining the southbound frontage pavement to allow for an at







Other Mobility35 Initiatives

Regional Projects


capital area.





require on-going coordination with Williamson County and the City of Georgetown.

Integrated Corridor Management Study


(ICM) Study for the I-35 corridor through Williamson, Travis, and Hays counties. This study will



rea. TxDOT is sponsoring the study, which

Trip Reduction


actively seeking multi-dimensional







vertical clearance. A new southbound to northbound turnaround structure would be



, retaining the southbound frontage pavement to allow for an at





included to complete the X-pattern



Regional Projects


area. The CTRMA is advancing a number of regional mobility projects





going coordination with Williamson County and the City of Georgetown.



35 corridor through Williamson, Travis, and Hays counties. This study will



TxDOT is sponsoring the study, which


dimensional








new southbound to northbound turnaround structure would be




the signalized intersection on grade. The southbound and northbound frontage roads will be

reconstructed to provide continuous three-lane roadways.



interchange configurations. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities




The CTRMA is advancing a number of regional mobility projects


Williamson County. Williamson County is developing the Southwest Bypass project which will

provide a new roadway between SH 29 and I-35








TxDOT is sponsoring the study, which


dimensional solutions to reduce roadway congestion. As the transportation

agency for Texas and a major employer in the capital area


In March 2014, TxDOT kicked off a Peak-time, Work


number of TxDOT employees share rides and participate in a Clean Air Program, which includes






. The southbound and northbound frontage roads will be

lane roadways.








y is developing the Southwest Bypass project which will

35, which will continue east of I

to SE Inner Loop. These projects have the potential to impact Mobility35 construction phasing and


Integrated Corridor Management Study and Development Strategy





TxDOT is sponsoring the study, which is anticipated to be complete in


solutions to reduce roadway congestion. As the transportation

the capital area


time, Work-trip Reduction Initiative. Currently, TxDOT has


es and participate in a Clean Air Program, which includes







lane roadways. Frontage road auxiliary lanes would be









, which will continue east of I

impact Mobility35 construction phasing and


and Development Strategy





is anticipated to be complete in



the capital area, TxDOT wants to be a leader in trip


trip Reduction Initiative. Currently, TxDOT has







, retaining the southbound frontage pavement to allow for an at-grade truck bypass of


Frontage road auxiliary lanes would be





Mobility35 improvements are part of a regional effort to enhance the primary corridor system within




, which will continue east of I-35 with improvements



and Development Strategy





is anticipated to be complete in



, TxDOT wants to be a leader in trip








The frontage roads would be reconstructed on new alignments to a more traditional interchange

grade truck bypass of






y corridor system within

The CTRMA is advancing a number of regional mobility projects, primarily



35 with improvements






management, and other improvements to develop a strategy to better move traffic through the

is anticipated to be complete in Spring 2017



, TxDOT wants to be a leader in trip







terchange

grade truck bypass of






y corridor system within

primarily



35 with improvements





rough the

Spring 2017.



, TxDOT wants to be a leader in trip-

reduce




25

voluntarily reducing drive

to further reduce peak

reduce the number of vehicles on Austin roads at peak commuting times.

As part of this initiative, TxDOT began a telework

employees in November 2014. By having eligible employees limit their work co

than three days per week, the pilot will set an important baseline for TxDOT’s ultimate trip

initiative. The broader trip

and would include expanding tele

and

launch the fall of 2015.

Some of the ultimate benefits of a successful TxDOT peak

include:

�

�

�

�

�

7.4

As the population density along the

comprehensive, sustainable, multi

I-

barrie

discontinuous, and

corridor

for

vehicular traffic within the corridor.

Short trips are generally defined as 1.5 miles one

pedestrians.

from a transit mode such as a bus or light rail.

demographics and land uses help drive the d

throughout the corridor with these key goals st

�

�

�


to further reduce peak







and discounted transit passes



include:

� Improved congestion management

� Improved air quality.

� Increased productivity.

� Reduced commute hours

� Improved facilities management

Non-motorized Travel Considerations7.4



--35 corridor bisects the

barrier to ma

discontinuous, and

corridor would increase the opportunities for cycling or

for short trip and end



pedestrians.




� Provide safer bicycle/pedestrian routes

� Increase corridor

� Provide continuous routes


to further reduce peak-time work trips and improve a flexible set of employee options inte







discounted transit passes



Improved congestion management

Improved air quality.

Increased productivity.

Reduced commute hours

Improved facilities management




35 corridor bisects the

r to many bicyclists and pedestrians. Existing p

discontinuous, and cross

would increase the opportunities for cycling or

short trip and end-of



pedestrians. End-of-trip travel relates to transportation needs once someone arrives at or departs




Provide safer bicycle/pedestrian routes

Increase corridor east/west

Provide continuous routes

voluntarily reducing drive-alone trips. The goal of the trip

time work trips and improve a flexible set of employee options inte





initiative. The broader trip-reduction initiative could potentially involve all

and would include expanding teleworking as well as other trip

discounted transit passes. If approved to move forward, the expanded pilot initiative



Improved congestion management

Improved air quality.

Increased productivity.

Reduced commute hours.

Improved facilities management



comprehensive, sustainable, multi-

35 corridor bisects the urban core

ny bicyclists and pedestrians. Existing p

cross-connectivity is uneven.


of-trip travel.



trip travel relates to transportation needs once someone arrives at or departs




Provide safer bicycle/pedestrian routes

east/west permeability

Provide continuous routes.


alone trips. The goal of the trip






reduction initiative could potentially involve all

working as well as other trip

If approved to move forward, the expanded pilot initiative


Improved congestion management.

Improved facilities management.


As the population density along the I-35 corridor continues to grow in

-modal transportation network increases

urban core of Austin.

ny bicyclists and pedestrians. Existing p

connectivity is uneven.


These bicycl





demographics and land uses help drive the de


Provide safer bicycle/pedestrian routes.

permeability.


alone trips. The goal of the trip-reduction initiative is to identify strategies



As part of this initiative, TxDOT began a telework-specific pilot for a portion of its




working as well as other trip



dor continues to grow in

modal transportation network increases

of Austin. Within the planning area

ny bicyclists and pedestrians. Existing parallel bicycle and pedestrian routes are

connectivity is uneven. Safe, continuous routes along and within the

would increase the opportunities for cycling or walk

These bicyclist and pedestrian trips, in turn,

Short trips are generally defined as 1.5 miles one-way for bicyclists and 0.5 mi


from a transit mode such as a bus or light rail. Short trip distances, end

evelopment

throughout the corridor with these key goals steering the design:


reduction initiative is to identify strategies



specific pilot for a portion of its




working as well as other trip-reduction options


Some of the ultimate benefits of a successful TxDOT peak-time, work

dor continues to grow in

modal transportation network increases

planning area

arallel bicycle and pedestrian routes are

, continuous routes along and within the

walking trips within the corridor, as well as

and pedestrian trips, in turn,

way for bicyclists and 0.5 mi


Short trip distances, end

of bicycle and pedestrian improvements

eering the design:





specific pilot for a portion of its

employees in November 2014. By having eligible employees limit their work commutes to no more


reduction initiative could potentially involve all capital

reduction options


time, work-trip reduction program would

dor continues to grow in the area, the need for a

modal transportation network increases, particularly

planning area, I-35 can



ips within the corridor, as well as

and pedestrian trips, in turn, could

way for bicyclists and 0.5 mile one


Short trip distances, end-of-trip needs, existing




time work trips and improve a flexible set of employee options intended to

specific pilot for a portion of its capital area

mmutes to no more

than three days per week, the pilot will set an important baseline for TxDOT’s ultimate trip-reduction

capital area employees

reduction options like ride sharing

If approved to move forward, the expanded pilot initiative could

trip reduction program would

, the need for a

, particularly where the

can present a physical




could reduce

le one-way for


trip needs, existing




nded to

area

mmutes to no more

reduction

area employees

ride sharing

could

trip reduction program would

, the need for a

where the

present a physical


, continuous routes along and within the I-35


reduce

way for


trip needs, existing


26

�

�

These goals are based on the repeated themes of

Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Authority (

Regional Transportation Plan

“

Roadway Networks in Williamson County are generally more rural section

pedestrian networks.

I-

8.08.08.08.0

8.1

The Willi

going development efforts already authorized by TxDOT and others. However, most implementation

recommendations for the

preliminary estimates of probable cost are shown by project in

estimates of probable cost may be found in

� Support multi

� Improve corridor safety.



Authority (Capital Metro


“Building a Multimod


pedestrian networks.

-35 to facilitate future urbanization and multimodal travel.

8.08.08.08.0 Preliminary Project Costs and Funding

Williamson County8.1

The Williamson County recommended program of projects for Segments W1





Support multi-modalism

ve corridor safety.



Capital Metro


Building a Multimodal Transportation System.”


pedestrian networks. Mobility35 proposes to include bike and pedestrian facilities along and across

35 to facilitate future urbanization and multimodal travel.

Preliminary Project Costs and Funding

Williamson County

amson County recommended program of projects for Segments W1





modalism.

ve corridor safety.



Capital Metro), the City of Austin

Regional Transportation Plan recognizes bicycle and pedestrian accommodation

al Transportation System.”


Mobility35 proposes to include bike and pedestrian facilities along and across



Williamson County



recommendations for the Mobility35





Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO

ity of Austin and se

recognizes bicycle and pedestrian accommodation








Mobility35 program


estimates of probable cost may be found in Appendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost Estimates


These goals are based on the repeated themes of non-motorized

CAMPO), the Capital Metropolitan Transportation

and several other local organizations.









in Williamson


Appendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost Estimates


motorized planning efforts by

the Capital Metropolitan Transportation

ral other local organizations.







Williamson County are currently u

preliminary estimates of probable cost are shown by project in Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.



planning efforts by


ral other local organizations.


Roadway Networks in Williamson County are generally more rural sections with limited b


amson County recommended program of projects for Segments W1 – W3 incorporates on


County are currently u

Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.1111. More detailed preliminary



planning efforts by the Capital


ral other local organizations. CAMPO’s 2035

recognizes bicycle and pedestrian accommodations as a part of

s with limited bicycle and


W3 incorporates on


County are currently unfunded. The

. More detailed preliminary

Appendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost EstimatesAppendix C: Preliminary Cost Estimates.


the Capital

2035

s as a part of

icycle and


W3 incorporates on-


nfunded. The

. More detailed preliminary

27

Table 8

Project Project Project Project

FTC and Mainlane

Improvements (North)

SH 195/Berry Creek

Drive Intersection

I-

SH 195

Lakeway Drive/NE Inner

Loop Interchange

Northwest Boulevard

Extension

Williams Drive

Interchange

FTC and Mainlane

Improvements (South)

SH 29 Interchange

RM 2243/Leander Road

Interchange

Southwest Bypass/

SE Inner Loop

Improvements

Westinghouse Road

Interchange

TotalTotalTotalTotal

Future Future Future Future

SH 195 Interchange

Direct Connectors

Future Project TotalFuture Project TotalFuture Project TotalFuture Project Total

Phase 3 costs estimated at 6% of Phase 5 prob

Phase 4 costs estimated at 10% of Phase 5 probable costs.

Table 8.1:


FTC and Mainlane


SH 195/Berry Creek

Drive Intersection

-35 Frontage Roads at

SH 195


Loop Interchange

Northwest Boulevard

Extension

Williams Drive

Interchange

FTC and Mainlane


SH 29 Interchange


Interchange

Southwest Bypass/

SE Inner Loop

Improvements

Westinghouse Road

Interchange


Future Future Future Future Project Project Project Project

SH 195 Interchange

Direct Connectors




: Williamson County (Segments W1

FTC and Mainlane


SH 195/Berry Creek

Drive Intersection

35 Frontage Roads at


Loop Interchange

Northwest Boulevard

Williams Drive

Interchange

FTC and Mainlane


SH 29 Interchange


Interchange

Southwest Bypass/

SE Inner Loop

Improvements

Westinghouse Road

Interchange


SH 195 Interchange

Direct Connectors




Williamson County (Segments W1

Phase 3Phase 3Phase 3Phase 3

$3,992,340

$145,560

35 Frontage Roads at $828,540

Lakeway Drive/NE Inner $1,432,500

Project by

others

$2,797,140

$5,476,740

$1,220,640

RM 2243/Leander Road $2,473,080

Projects by

others

$2,335,680

$20,702,220$20,702,220$20,702,220$20,702,220


$4,749,960

$$$$4,749,9604,749,9604,749,9604,749,960




Williamson County (Segments W1


$3,992,340

$145,560

28,540

$1,432,500

Project by

others

797,140

$5,476,740

$1,220,640

$2,473,080

Projects by

others

$2,335,680

$20,702,220$20,702,220$20,702,220$20,702,220


$4,749,960

4,749,9604,749,9604,749,9604,749,960




Williamson County (Segments W1 – W3) Estimates


$6,653,900

$242,60

$1,380,900

$2,387,500

Project by

others

$4,661,900

$9,127,900

$2,034,400

$4,121,800

Projects by

others

$3,892,800

$34,503,700$34,503,700$34,503,700$34,503,700


$7,916,600

$7,$7,$7,$7,916,600916,600916,600916,600




W3) Estimates


$6,653,900 $66,539,000

$242,600 $2,426,000

,900 $13,

$2,387,500 $23,875,000

Project by

others

Pro

661,900 $46,619

$9,127,900 $91,279,000

$2,034,400 $20,344,000

$4,121,800 $41,218,000

Projects by

others

Projects by

$3,892,800 $38,928,000

$34,503,700$34,503,700$34,503,700$34,503,700 $345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000


$7,916,600 $79,166,000

916,600916,600916,600916,600 $79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000

able costs.



W3) Estimates of Probable Cost


$66,539,000

$2,426,000

$13,809,000

$23,875,000

Project by

others

$46,619,000

$91,279,000

$20,344,000

$41,218,000

Projects by

others

$38,928,000

$345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000


$79,166,000

$79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000


of Probable Cost


$66,539,000 $77,185,240

$2,814,160

9,000 $16,018,44

$23,875,000 $27,695,000

Project by

others

,000 $54,078,0

$91,279,000 $105,883,640

$20,344,000 $23,599,04

$41,218,000 $47,812,8

Projects by

others

$38,928,000 $45,156,480

$345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000$345,037,000 $400,242,290$400,242,290$400,242,290$400,242,290


$79,166,000 $91,832,560

$79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000$79,166,000 $91,832,560$91,832,560$91,832,560$91,832,560


of Probable Cost


$77,185,240

$2,814,160

$16,018,440

$27,695,000

Project by

others

$54,078,040

$105,883,640

$23,599,040

$47,812,880

Projects by

others

$45,156,480

$400,242,290$400,242,290$400,242,290$400,242,290


$91,832,560

$91,832,560$91,832,560$91,832,560$91,832,560

28

8.2

Table 8.2Table 8.2Table 8.2Table 8.2

unfunded construction needs for the proposed

W1

and projected funding would cover

amount of

Table 8.2: Construction Funding Needs

8.3

Texas transportation revenues are generated by motor fuel taxe

funds, bonds, and public

were funded entirely with state and federal revenues.

to keep up with demand

borrowed funds generated by bond issues.

transportation funding is the federal and state motor fuel tax.

gallon and the federal tax is $

price

increasingly fuel

to inflation.

8.2 Project

Table 8.2Table 8.2Table 8.2Table 8.2 provides a


W1 – W3. This table indicates a total project construction cost of $


amount of just over


Total Corridor Total Corridor Total Corridor Total Corridor

Construction Construction Construction Construction

CostCostCostCost

$345,037$345,037$345,037$345,037,000,000,000,000

8.3 Potential Funding Sources








price of gasoline. Many people are purchasing fewer gallons of fuel because they purchase

increasingly fuel

to inflation.

Project Funding

provides a summary of anticipated construction


W3. This table indicates a total project construction cost of $


just over $143


Total Corridor Total Corridor Total Corridor Total Corridor


Annual Average Annual Average Annual Average Annual Average

TxDOT Construction TxDOT Construction TxDOT Construction TxDOT Construction

Expenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures I

(over 20 years)(over 20 years)(over 20 years)(over 20 years)

,000,000,000,000 $124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000









of gasoline. Many people are purchasing fewer gallons of fuel because they purchase

increasingly fuel-efficient vehicles. Also, the purch

Funding

summary of anticipated construction




143 million.




Expenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures I


$124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000



funds, bonds, and public-private partnerships as shown in


to keep up with demand and have been supplemented by allocations from private partners and



gallon and the federal tax is $0.184 per gallon.


efficient vehicles. Also, the purch





and projected funding would cover approximately




Expenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures IExpenditures I----35 35 35 35


Infrastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure

(FY(FY(FY(FY

$124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000$124,800,000 $77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000


private partnerships as shown in


and have been supplemented by allocations from private partners and

borrowed funds generated by bond issues. As seen in


.184 per gallon.


efficient vehicles. Also, the purch



unfunded construction needs for the proposed program of


approximately $202 million, leaving an unfunded construction

CTRMA CTRMA CTRMA CTRMA

Regional Regional Regional Regional


FundFundFundFund

(FY(FY(FY(FY 2029202920292029----FY FY FY FY

2035)2035)2035)2035)

$77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000


private partnerships as shown in

were funded entirely with state and federal revenues. Since 2002, revenues have been inadequate


As seen in Figure Figure Figure Figure


.184 per gallon. Both are flat taxes and do not vary according to the


efficient vehicles. Also, the purchasing power of the motor fuel tax is declining due


summary of anticipated construction costs, identified project fundi

rogram of projects in Williamson County, Segments

W3. This table indicates a total project construction cost of $345.037

million, leaving an unfunded construction


FY FY FY FY

Current Available Current Available Current Available Current Available

Funding for Funding for Funding for Funding for


ConstructionConstructionConstructionConstruction

$77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000$77,000,000 $201,800,000$201,800,000$201,800,000$201,800,000

Texas transportation revenues are generated by motor fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees, federal

private partnerships as shown in Figure Figure Figure Figure 8.18.18.18.1

Since 2002, revenues have been inadequate


Figure Figure Figure Figure 8.1,8.1,8.1,8.1, currently the primary source of

transportation funding is the federal and state motor fuel tax. The state tax on gasoline is

Both are flat taxes and do not vary according to the


asing power of the motor fuel tax is declining due


, identified project fundi

rojects in Williamson County, Segments

345.037 million. Of this, current


Current Available Current Available Current Available Current Available

Funding for Funding for Funding for Funding for


ConstructionConstructionConstructionConstruction

$201,800,000$201,800,000$201,800,000$201,800,000

s, vehicle registration fees, federal

8.18.18.18.1. Until 2002, TxDOT’s projects



urrently the primary source of

The state tax on gasoline is





, identified project funding and


million. Of this, current


Total Unfunded Total Unfunded Total Unfunded Total Unfunded


NeedsNeedsNeedsNeeds

$143,247$143,247$143,247$143,247


Until 2002, TxDOT’s projects




The state tax on gasoline is $0





ng and


million. Of this, current


Total Unfunded Total Unfunded Total Unfunded Total Unfunded


NeedsNeedsNeedsNeeds

$143,247$143,247$143,247$143,247,000,000,000,000


Until 2002, TxDOT’s projects




0.20 per




29

Source: TxDOT

FigureFigureFigureFigure

However, in 2013, the 83

constitutional amendment authorizing annual

production tax collections to the State Highway Fund. In November 2014, voters approved the

constitutional amendment. On

proposed amendments to the T

of the passage of Proposition 1 (the constitutional amendment voter referendum authorized in SJR

1) and the recommendations from the House Select Committee on Transportation Funding,

Exp

amendments provide greater flexibility in the methods used for distributing funds through the

Department’s Unified Transportation Program (UTP). Included in the amendments

the scope of Category 2, Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects, to include safety, maintenance

or rehabilitation projects; clarifying the term “strategic corridors” to include any strategic corridors

located on the state highway network w

allocated to individual

basis to cover project cost overruns; and, supplementing funds allocated to individual districts

un

Discretionary, in response to special initiatives, safety issues, or unforeseen environmental factors.

Such supplemental funding is not required to be allocated proporti

is not required to be allocated according to the prescribed formulas for Category 1, Preventative

Maintenance and Rehabilitation, and Category 11, District Discretionary.

Source: TxDOT

FigureFigureFigureFigure 8.18.18.18.1: Standard Revenue (2009








Expenditures and Finance, and the Department’s Proposition 1 Stakeholder Committee. The






allocated to individual


under Category 1, Preventative Maintenance and Rehabilitation, and Category 11, District





Source: TxDOT

: Standard Revenue (2009








enditures and Finance, and the Department’s Proposition 1 Stakeholder Committee. The






allocated to individual TxDOT


der Category 1, Preventative Maintenance and Rehabilitation, and Category 11, District





: Standard Revenue (2009

However, in 2013, the 83rd Texas Legislature passed Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 1, a



constitutional amendment. On February 26, 2015

proposed amendments to the Texas Administrative Code relating to Transportation Funding, in light









TxDOT districts under Category 11, District Discretionary on a case








: Standard Revenue (2009-2035).

Texas Legislature passed Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 1, a



February 26, 2015

exas Administrative Code relating to Transportation Funding, in light








located on the state highway network which provide statewide connectivity; supplementing funds

districts under Category 11, District Discretionary on a case









disbursements from the state’s oil and gas


February 26, 2015, the Texas Transportation Commission









hich provide statewide connectivity; supplementing funds












, the Texas Transportation Commission














Such supplemental funding is not required to be allocated proportionately among the districts and







, the Texas Transportation Commission














onately among the districts and







, the Texas Transportation Commission adopted






Department’s Unified Transportation Program (UTP). Included in the amendments are expanding




districts under Category 11, District Discretionary on a case-by








adopted






are expanding




by-case





30

Revenue collection, which will fluctuate from year t

allocation for future years. The Transportation Policy Board of the Capital Area Metropolitan

Planning Organization (

I-

A variety of funding mechanisms exist that could be applied to I

For this CIP update, a list of potential funding sources has been identified. As part of continued

implement

project financing developed. Currently, f

entities, private entities, and via district overlays, associations, and agreements

Government Entities

Government funding may come from federal, state, county, or municipal sources. Federal and state

funding are primarily motor fuel taxes, and are disbursed and administered by TxDOT.

historically

significant changes to the TxDOT budget, this funding should be expected to remain relatively

constant.

As noted above, a percentage of anticipated revenues could come from Proposition 1 funding

which will fluctuate year

Those revenues are not included in

Local governmental entities typically fund transportation projects

with proj

requests state or federal assistance, the project must be placed on the State Transportation

Improvement Plan (STIP). Funding for such projects can include regular CIP p

in bond elections and/or use of pass

funding through government entities are described below.

Federal Credit Assistance

The federal government provides assistance to states

capital through the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan program.

Through TIFIA, the federal government provides federal credit assistance to projects that meet

certain criteria

nationally or regionally significant projects. A project must be on the National Highway system, part

of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan, and have a capital cost

to be considered for TIFIA funding. TIFIA funding is limited to 33 percent of total eligible project

cost. A project must also be supported in whole or in part by user charges or other non

dedicated funding sources. At prese

this corridor.



Planning Organization (

-35 within the MPO’s pl



implementation assessment, these funding options will be evaluated and recommendations for



Government Entities



historically invest


constant.





with projects identified)









certain criteria






this corridor.



Planning Organization (CA

35 within the MPO’s pl



ation assessment, these funding options will be evaluated and recommendations for



Government Entities



invested $6.24 million






ects identified)









certain criteria (such as the use of public






this corridor.



CAMPO) has pledged its share of Proposition 1 funds to improvements on

35 within the MPO’s planning area, which includes Williamson County.








$6.24 million annua



which will fluctuate year-to-year and will ultimately affect future spending on the I



ects identified) through a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process. If the local entity









(such as the use of public









MPO) has pledged its share of Proposition 1 funds to improvements on

anning area, which includes Williamson County.




project financing developed. Currently, funding for transportation




annually on the I



year and will ultimately affect future spending on the I

Those revenues are not included in Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.


through a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process. If the local entity



in bond elections and/or use of pass-through or State Infrastructure Bank financing. Examples of





(such as the use of public-private partnerships and/or advanced technology) for





dedicated funding sources. At present, no potential TIFIA applications are under development for


Revenue collection, which will fluctuate from year to year based on oil prices, will affect the







unding for transportation




on the I-35 corridor through Williamson County.




Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.Figure 8.1.





through or State Infrastructure Bank financing. Examples of


The federal government provides assistance to states to lower interest rates and expand access to



private partnerships and/or advanced technology) for





nt, no potential TIFIA applications are under development for


o year based on oil prices, will affect the




A variety of funding mechanisms exist that could be applied to I-35 projects in Williamson County.



unding for transportation comes from governmental




35 corridor through Williamson County.




Local governmental entities typically fund transportation projects (using General Obligation Bonds






to lower interest rates and expand access to














35 projects in Williamson County.



comes from governmental

entities, private entities, and via district overlays, associations, and agreements.







(using General Obligation Bonds



Improvement Plan (STIP). Funding for such projects can include regular CIP programming, inclusion







of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan, and have a capital cost of at least $50 million












.


funding are primarily motor fuel taxes, and are disbursed and administered by TxDOT. TxDOT




year and will ultimately affect future spending on the I-35 corridor.




rogramming, inclusion







of at least $50 million


cost. A project must also be supported in whole or in part by user charges or other non-federal











TxDOT has

35 corridor through Williamson County. Barring



35 corridor.




rogramming, inclusion







of at least $50 million


federal


31

Federal Discretionary Grant Programs

Originally authorized in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,

Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) d

highway, bridge, freight and passenger rail, transit or port transportation improvements. TIGER

grants have been awarded every year since. Applicants must demonstrate a project’s ability to meet

five long

environmental sustainability. Projects are also evaluated on their expected contributions to

economic recovery, as well as their ability to facilitate innovation and new partnership

December 16, 2014,

was enacted, which contains a $500 million authorization for the TIGER grant program. HR 83

specifies that grants may not

than 25 percent of the funds made available for grants may be awarded to projects in a single

State; Federal share of project costs are limited to 80%; not less than 20% of funds are available

for projects located in rural a

$1 million and the Federal share of costs may be increased above 80%. As of the date of this

technical memorandum, the Fiscal Year 2015 Notice of Funding Availability is forthcoming.

State Infrastructure Banks

State Infrastructure Banks (SIB) may be used by states as a revolving fund mechanism to finance

highway and transit projects. SIBs provide direct loans with attractive interest rates, with revenues

from repayment and interest

a guarantor for the funding agreement. At present, no potential SIB applications are under

development for this corridor.

Rider 42 of the General Appropriations Act

Rider 42 of the

bond proceeds to acquire right

outsource engineering work for the most congested roadway segments in each of the

congested regions in the state (Dallas

areas). Furthermore, Rider 42 required that TTI serve as a facilitator and project coordinator of

studies conducted by the four most congested regio

the greatest impacts considering such factors as congestion, economic benefits, user costs, safety

and pavement quality; (2) identify funding options to support completion of the projects and

suggest the best

and demand management practices; (4) ensure open and transparent public participation; and (5)

make recommendations to TxDOT at each major decision point for the projects.

In February 2012, TTI published,

Report






five long-term outcom



December 16, 2014,















Rider 42 of the








suggest the best




Report. The Texas Transportation Commission accepted the report on February 23, 2012.






term outcomes: safety, economic competitiveness, state of good repair, livability and



December 16, 2014, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (HR 83)















Rider 42 of the General Appropriations Act authorized TxDOT to use $300 million of Proposition 12








suggest the best use of future revenues for the projects; (3) include implementation of best traffic




. The Texas Transportation Commission accepted the report on February 23, 2012.






es: safety, economic competitiveness, state of good repair, livability and



the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (HR 83)


specifies that grants may not be less than $10 million and not gre



for projects located in rural areas; and, for projects located in rural areas, the minimum grant size is






from repayment and interest to fund additional loans. SIB projects require a local sponsor to act as




General Appropriations Act authorized TxDOT to use $300 million of Proposition 12

bond proceeds to acquire right-of-way, conduct feasibility studies and project planning, and







use of future revenues for the projects; (3) include implementation of best traffic



In February 2012, TTI published, Mobility Investment Priorities Project Early Recommendation













less than $10 million and not gre



reas; and, for projects located in rural areas, the minimum grant size is





to fund additional loans. SIB projects require a local sponsor to act as




way, conduct feasibility studies and project planning, and


congested regions in the state (Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio metropolitan








Mobility Investment Priorities Project Early Recommendation




Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) discretionary grants provide funding for








less than $10 million and not gre













Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio metropolitan


studies conducted by the four most congested regions to: (1) determine which projects would have










iscretionary grants provide funding for








less than $10 million and not greater than $200 million; no more















ns to: (1) determine which projects would have









Originally authorized in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Transportation









ater than $200 million; no more
























Transportation






economic recovery, as well as their ability to facilitate innovation and new partnerships. On















outsource engineering work for the most congested roadway segments in each of the four most









. The Texas Transportation Commission accepted the report on February 23, 2012. In


Transportation






s. On













four most









In

32

December 2013, the final

specific Williamson County projects were identified for fund

Mobility Bond Elections

A county or city government may issue bond funding, upon voter approval for corridor

improvements.

development and/or construction funding for several I

2006 and 2013 bond programs. These include the completed turnaround at RM 620, northbound

collector

and, the northbound frontage road and ramp pass

Westinghouse Road to SH 29 anticipated to be completed in spring 2015. Currently under

development with funding from the F

1 bridge replacements with ramp and frontage road improvements at Reagan Blvd. and CR 305

(Yankee Road). The

RM 1431 throug

under construction as the region’s first

the development of the Southwest Bypass from RM 2243 (Leander Road) to I

improvements at the intersection with I

Agreement with the City of Georgetown has contributed $4.5 million towards the development of

the proposed bridge over I

Private F

In some cases the public entity can partner with a private landowner to share project development

costs on a segment of roadway if the private landowner desires such improvements to enhance

their property or development of same. The governmental en

landowner to pay for some or all of a mobility enhancement as part of the land development

process to mitigate a development’s impact on the roadway network. In other cases a private entity

may agree to pay for limited mob

value of, a private development. An example of the latter is the current project under development

at I

development of this project was funded by a private entity. There are no similar projects under

development within this corridor as of the date of this report.

District Overlays, Associations, and Agreements

There are several mechanisms that allow pub

provide improvements in a corridor. These mechanisms require legislative authorization for

implementation. Desired outcomes may include improved safety, increased consumer flow, and

beautification.





improvements.



collector-distributor ramp and frontage road





(Yankee Road). The

RM 1431 throug






Private Funding








at I-35 from Howard Lane to Parmer Lane,







beautification.





improvements. Williamson County has or is participating wi



distributor ramp and frontage road





(Yankee Road). The county

RM 1431 through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Cedar Park. The interchange is now






unding








35 from Howard Lane to Parmer Lane,







beautification.

December 2013, the final Mobility Investment Priorities Project report




Williamson County has or is participating wi



distributor ramp and frontage road





ounty contributed $1 million towards the operational improvements study at

h an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Cedar Park. The interchange is now





the proposed bridge over I-35 at Northwest Blvd.






may agree to pay for limited mobility improvements on a public facility to enhance assess to, or


35 from Howard Lane to Parmer Lane,








Mobility Investment Priorities Project report






distributor ramp and frontage road improvements at RM 1431, and turnarounds at SH 29;



development with funding from the FY 2013 Williamson County Road Bond Program are the Phase


contributed $1 million towards the operational improvements study at


under construction as the region’s first DDI. The


improvements at the intersection with I-35 and the


35 at Northwest Blvd.






ility improvements on a public facility to enhance assess to, or


35 from Howard Lane to Parmer Lane, a Mobility35 project in Travis County




There are several mechanisms that allow public agencies and associations of property owners to








development and/or construction funding for several I-35 projects through the County’s 2000,


improvements at RM 1431, and turnarounds at SH 29;

and, the northbound frontage road and ramp pass-through finance improvements from


Y 2013 Williamson County Road Bond Program are the Phase




The county has also programmed $2 million towards


35 and the SE Inner Loop and through an Interlocal


35 at Northwest Blvd.








a Mobility35 project in Travis County




lic agencies and associations of property owners to





specific Williamson County projects were identified for funding.


Williamson County has or is participating with TxDOT and/or CAMPO in the

35 projects through the County’s 2000,



through finance improvements from






has also programmed $2 million towards


Inner Loop and through an Interlocal




their property or development of same. The governmental entity may also require the private





a Mobility35 project in Travis County







Mobility Investment Priorities Project report was released by TTI. No


th TxDOT and/or CAMPO in the











the development of the Southwest Bypass from RM 2243 (Leander Road) to I-35 which





tity may also require the private





a Mobility35 project in Travis County. The Phase 1






s released by TTI. No


th TxDOT and/or CAMPO in the











35 which will address










. The Phase 1






s released by TTI. No









will address










. The Phase 1 – 4





33

Part

the property in a special overlay district. Involuntary participation in association goals may include

taxation or the taking of a property. Examples of types of

Reinvestment Zones (TRZ), Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Zone, Transportation Corporations, and

driveway sharing agreements. There are currently no known district overlays, associations or other

entities active that seek to f

Legislative districts, Municipal Management Districts,

utilized to provide improvements in the I

corridor in Willi

and frontage road improvements may facilitate economic development or redevelopment along the

corridor. Diversion of some portion (or all) of the increased tax revenues attrib

development could be used to fund project development and construction of improvements.

Public

Public

a private sector entity that

of transportation projects

private

another. Additionally, different types of P3s lend themselves to the development of new facilities

and others to the operation or expansion of existing assets.

required for the use of P3 development fo

Tolling

Tolling may be used by a government entity, a P3 or a private developer to raise revenue to repay

loans incurred in order to construct a transportation facility. Tolling may be collected electronically

such as thro

numbers. Once construction costs are paid through tolls, the tolls could be used to maintain the

facility.

Congestion Pricing

Congestion pricing may be used by the t

For example, a tolled lane may charge a relatively low toll when the traffic is light and a much higher

toll during rush hour in order to reduce congestion on the toll facility and maintain an a

speed for toll facility users. Congestion pricing may also apply to bridge tolls, parking fees, or any

other transportation activity where driver behavior may be influenced by price. Congestion pricing

may be used to encourage

occupant vehicle. Congestion pricing will be evaluated as part of the sketch

revenue study.

Participation in a property owners association may be voluntary or required due to the location of








corridor in Willi




Public-Private Partnerships

Public-Private P



private sector assumes responsibility




Tolling



such as thro


facility.

Congestion Pricing








revenue study.

icipation in a property owners association may be voluntary or required due to the location of








corridor in Williamson County as a funding source is promising. Identified intersection operation




Private Partnerships

Private Partnerships (P3s) are contractual agreements formed between a public agency and



sector assumes responsibility






such as through a TxTag, or with a cash toll both or through the mail by photographing license plate


Congestion Pricing








revenue study.






entities active that seek to fund improvements in the corridor.



amson County as a funding source is promising. Identified intersection operation




Private Partnerships

artnerships (P3s) are contractual agreements formed between a public agency and

a private sector entity that allow for greater private sector participation in the delivery and financing

of transportation projects. There are many different P3 structures, and the degree to which the

sector assumes responsibility






ugh a TxTag, or with a cash toll both or through the mail by photographing license plate







may be used to encourage travellers








und improvements in the corridor.


utilized to provide improvements in the I-35 corridor. The possibility of creating TRZs along the I






allow for greater private sector participation in the delivery and financing

There are many different P3 structures, and the degree to which the

sector assumes responsibility — including financial risk



required for the use of P3 development for any portion of the





Congestion pricing may be used by the transportation facility owner or operator to regulate traffic.





travellers to use transit and carpool rather than driving a single





taxation or the taking of a property. Examples of types of associations are: Transportation




Legislative districts, Municipal Management Districts, and

35 corridor. The possibility of creating TRZs along the I








including financial risk



r any portion of the





ransportation facility owner or operator to regulate traffic.





ransit and carpool rather than driving a single





associations are: Transportation




and Public Improvement Districts can









including financial risk — differs from on


and others to the operation or expansion of existing assets. Project-specific legislation would be

r any portion of the Mobility35


















Public Improvement Districts can




corridor. Diversion of some portion (or all) of the increased tax revenues attributable to such





differs from one application to


specific legislation would be

Mobility35.











occupant vehicle. Congestion pricing will be evaluated as part of the sketch-level traffic and







Public Improvement Districts can




utable to such





e application to









toll during rush hour in order to reduce congestion on the toll facility and maintain an advertised



ransit and carpool rather than driving a single-

level traffic and






Public Improvement Districts can also be

35 corridor. The possibility of creating TRZs along the I-35



utable to such





e application to









dvertised



level traffic and

34

Interlocal Agreements

Within statutory limitations, organizations charged with improving mobility

agreements to fund transportation projects.

Williamson County has entered into Interlocal Agreements with the Cities of Cedar Park, Round

Rock and Georgetown for funding towards improvements on I

improvements operational study at RM 1431, Southwest Bypass improvements, Northwest Blvd.

bridge and RM 620 railroad bridge at I

County and other entities to address responsibilities and funding for proje

construction costs will be determined in future phases of the

Program.

Interlocal Agreement between CAMPO and CTRMA

There is an existing interlocal agreement between CAMPO and the CTRMA, in which

a

projects in the region. CTRMA deposit

for the benefit of CAMPO. If all of the expected Surplus Revenu

$230,000,000 will be deposited into the RIF by 2041 via annual deposits beginning in 2017 and

ending in 2041 in accordance with an approved payment schedule. This is a potential source of

revenue for

require action by the CAMPO Policy Board. For the purposes of the plan, it is assumed that all

scheduled RIF deposits occurring through FY 2021 will be used to fund improvements to I

It is

could be used to fund improvements to I

through Year 19 (FY 2035) of the RIF contribution schedule. As these payment

begin after some or all of the identified improvements in the plan could be developed and let for

construction, it is anticipated that funding for those development and/or construction costs would

be provided by another entity with rei

Agreement. These payments are reflected as a funding source in

Texas 84th Legislature

In late 2014, Governor Greg Abbott proposed reallocating the majority (over $2 billion) of the $3.3

bi

Highway Fund for roadway improvements and maintenance as part of his $4 billion road plan.

Limiting the diversion of monies from the State Highway Fund is also an e

Abbott’s plan, although he confirmed his intention to continue funding the Texas Department of

Public Safety.










Program.



agreed to establish a Regional Infrastructure Fund (RIF) to be used to fund other transportation





revenue for



t is further assumed that approximately one









billion sales tax paid on vehicles, revenues currently going to General Revenue, to the State




Public Safety.












greed to establish a Regional Infrastructure Fund (RIF) to be used to fund other transportation





revenue for Mobility35. However, it should



assumed that approximately one









llion sales tax paid on vehicles, revenues currently going to General Revenue, to the State




Public Safety.
















. However, it should



assumed that approximately one


















bridge and RM 620 railroad bridge at I-35. Future Interlocal Agreements between Williamson






projects in the region. CTRMA deposits and hold




. However, it should be noted that allocation of these funds to I



assumed that approximately one-third ($77 million) of the anticipated RIF deposits

could be used to fund improvements to I-35 in Williamson County, beginning in Year 13 (FY 2029)




be provided by another entity with reimbursement through the CTRMA RIF through an Interlocal












35. Future Interlocal Agreements between Williamson






and holds the RIF in a dedicated interest




be noted that allocation of these funds to I



third ($77 million) of the anticipated RIF deposits

35 in Williamson County, beginning in Year 13 (FY 2029)




mbursement through the CTRMA RIF through an Interlocal










Rock and Georgetown for funding towards improvements on I-35, including the intersection




construction costs will be determined in future phases of the Mobility35



the RIF in a dedicated interest

for the benefit of CAMPO. If all of the expected Surplus Revenue is realized, a total of












Agreement. These payments are reflected as a funding source in Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.







Within statutory limitations, organizations charged with improving mobility may enter into interlocal


35, including the intersection



County and other entities to address responsibilities and funding for project development and

Mobility35 Williamson County



the RIF in a dedicated interest

e is realized, a total of








through Year 19 (FY 2035) of the RIF contribution schedule. As these payments are anticipated to




Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.Table 8.2222.




Limiting the diversion of monies from the State Highway Fund is also an element of Governor



may enter into interlocal





ct development and

Williamson County

There is an existing interlocal agreement between CAMPO and the CTRMA, in which CTRMA has


the RIF in a dedicated interest-bearing account

e is realized, a total of



be noted that allocation of these funds to I-35 would


scheduled RIF deposits occurring through FY 2021 will be used to fund improvements to I-35



s are anticipated to







lement of Governor



may enter into interlocal





ct development and

Williamson County

CTRMA has


bearing account



35 would


35....



s are anticipated to







lement of Governor


35

As of late April 2015, major transportation funding bills focused on sales taxes were moving

through the legislative process.

House Joint Resolution 13

dedicat

F

proposal was approved by the

Senate Bill 5 and

R

revenue to be put into the state's general fund

State Highway Fund

going to the State Highway Fund

House Transportation Committee

9.09.09.09.0

As part of the overarching

for those

this p

continue to include,

recommended that TxDOT

coordination to collaboratively establish project and funding priorities to advance corridor

development.

Public outreach w

Several of the concepts under development would result in major changes to the existing traffic

operations within the corridor; public input on these concepts is very important to

refinement. The planning team intends to continue small group outreach efforts with additional

stakeholders, as well as revisit many of those that have already been contacted to provide project

updates. Continued update of social media and

information to the public.

It should be noted that

planning initiative

(spanning from

expanded Phase 2 efforts

this

future (annual) updates to




dedicate a portion of the revenue derived from

Fund. The plan


Senate Bill 5 and

R-Jacksonville, would


State Highway Fund



9.09.09.09.0 Next Steps


for those projects currently under development

this plan will progress into Phases 3

continue to include,



development.

Public outreach w








planning initiative

(spanning from


this Corridor Implementation Plan





a portion of the revenue derived from

The plan would provide TXDOT with at least $3 billion per


Senate Bill 5 and Senate Joint Resolution 5, authored by State Senator Robert Nichols,

Jacksonville, would author


State Highway Fund. Any revenue collected beyond $5 billion a year would be split



ext Steps


projects currently under development

lan will progress into Phases 3

continue to include, coordination with elected officials and staff f



development.

Public outreach will continue to be a key ongoing process as project development progresses.








planning initiative has been

(spanning from north of





through the legislative process. Both measures

House Joint Resolution 13, sponsor


would provide TXDOT with at least $3 billion per

proposal was approved by the House Transportation Committee

Senate Joint Resolution 5, authored by State Senator Robert Nichols,

authorize that each fiscal year the first $2.5 billion in vehicle sales tax


. Any revenue collected beyond $5 billion a year would be split

going to the State Highway Fund. The proposal

House Transportation Committee.

As part of the overarching Mobility35


lan will progress into Phases 3

coordination with elected officials and staff f

recommended that TxDOT and its partners, including


ill continue to be a key ongoing process as project development progresses.







It should be noted that with the initiation of

has been effectively extended through the greater

north of SH 130 in

expanded Phase 2 efforts for Williamson County

Corridor Implementation Plan. As project development prog

future (annual) updates to the Corridor



oth measures

sponsored by State Rep





ize that each fiscal year the first $2.5 billion in vehicle sales tax



The proposal

Mobility35 Program


lan will progress into Phases 3 – 5. Project development efforts have included


and its partners, including








with the initiation of Phase 2 efforts in Williamson

effectively extended through the greater

Georgetown to Posey Road

for Williamson County

. As project development prog

Corridor Implementation Plan.



oth measures would require

tate Representative

a portion of the revenue derived from the state sales and use tax to the





revenue to be put into the state's general fund and the next $2.5 billion collected wou


The proposal passed the Senate and has been referred to the

Program, project development will continue to move forward

projects currently under development.... As funding is identified, more projects identified in

Project development efforts have included


and its partners, including counties







updates. Continued update of social media and web resources will also provide updated

Phase 2 efforts in Williamson

effectively extended through the greater

Georgetown to Posey Road

for Williamson County, including recommended projects,

. As project development prog




would require voter approval.

resentative Joe Pickett, D

state sales and use tax to the

would provide TXDOT with at least $3 billion per year for road

House Transportation Committee.



he next $2.5 billion collected wou


passed the Senate and has been referred to the

, project development will continue to move forward

s funding is identified, more projects identified in


coordination with elected officials and staff from the counties and cities. It is

counties and cities







web resources will also provide updated

Phase 2 efforts in Williamson

effectively extended through the greater-

Georgetown to Posey Road in San Marcos).

, including recommended projects,

. As project development progresses, progress will be reported




voter approval.

Joe Pickett, D-El Paso

state sales and use tax to the

year for road project



he next $2.5 billion collected wou






rom the counties and cities. It is

and cities, continue a high level of








Phase 2 efforts in Williamson County

-Austin metropolit

San Marcos). Results of the

, including recommended projects,

resses, progress will be reported



El Paso, propos

state sales and use tax to the State Highway

projects. The



he next $2.5 billion collected would go to the

. Any revenue collected beyond $5 billion a year would be split, with 50 percent




Project development efforts have included, and will


continue a high level of




operations within the corridor; public input on these concepts is very important to their continued




y, the Mobility35

Austin metropolitan area

Results of the

, including recommended projects, are captured

resses, progress will be reported



roposes to

ighway

The


ld go to the

h 50 percent




, and will


continue a high level of



their continued



Mobility35

an area

Results of the

captured in

resses, progress will be reported in

36

10.010.010.010.0

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

10.010.010.010.0 References

� CAMPO-Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Interlocal Agreement, June 27, 2012.

� Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 201

235, December 16, 2014.

� Dallas Business Journal. Abbott’s $4 billion road plan would reallocate vehicle sales tax,

December 9, 2014.

� Scarbrough, Linda (2009).

Farm to Supersuburb

� Texas Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Texas Transportation Institute, Center

for Transportation Research, & Texas Department of Transportation. Funding the Future,

28, 2009.

� Texas Transportation Commission Minute Order No. 114212, February 26, 2015.

� The Texas Tribune. Abbott Plans to Add $4 Billion to Road Funding, December 9, 2014.

� TxDOT (2013, August) Corridor Implementation Plan, SH 45N to SH 45 SE. Austin

Area Improvement Program.

� Williamson County Road Bond Program Management Various Historical Budget and Interlocal

Agreement documents. Various dates.

References

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Interlocal Agreement, June 27, 2012.

Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 201

235, December 16, 2014.

Dallas Business Journal. Abbott’s $4 billion road plan would reallocate vehicle sales tax,

December 9, 2014.

Scarbrough, Linda (2009).

Farm to Supersuburb

Texas Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Texas Transportation Institute, Center


28, 2009.

Texas Transportation Commission Minute Order No. 114212, February 26, 2015.

The Texas Tribune. Abbott Plans to Add $4 Billion to Road Funding, December 9, 2014.

TxDOT (2013, August) Corridor Implementation Plan, SH 45N to SH 45 SE. Austin


Williamson County Road Bond Program Management Various Historical Budget and Interlocal




235, December 16, 2014.


December 9, 2014.

Scarbrough, Linda (2009). Road, River and Good Ol' Boy Politics: A Texas County's Path from

Farm to Supersuburb. Austin, Texas: Texas State Historical Association.













Road, River and Good Ol' Boy Politics: A Texas County's Path from

. Austin, Texas: Texas State Historical Association.






















Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (HR 83), Public Law No. 113












5 (HR 83), Public Law No. 113












5 (HR 83), Public Law No. 113







TxDOT (2013, August) Corridor Implementation Plan, SH 45N to SH 45 SE. Austin: I-35 Capital



5 (HR 83), Public Law No. 113-




for Transportation Research, & Texas Department of Transportation. Funding the Future, July


35 Capital


37

Appendix A:


User Name: rblair

...\I-35 WC_FTCRPT01.dgn File Name:PLOTDRIVER:TXDOT_PDF_COLOR.plt

4:34:28 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:

TXDOT.tbl PENTABLE: PLOTTING TIME:

CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T

ransportation all rights reserved

LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

545+

00

550+

00

555+

00

560+00

565+00

4

43

N

MATCH LINE STA 565+00.00

ST

A 5

42+

00 T

O S

TA

565+

00

ST

A 5

44+

00

BE

GIN

PR

OJE

CT

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 1

User Name: rblair


4:35:33 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

565+

00

570+

00

575+

00

580+

00

585+

00

DRY BERRY CREEK

5

3

1

5

1

4

1

1

4

1

2

41

3

N



ST

A 5

65

+0

0 T

O S

TA

58

8+

00

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 2

User Name: rblair


4:36:38 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

590+

00

595+

00

600+

00

605+

00

610+00

DRY

BERRY

CREEK

2 3

1

1

3

2

4

22

3

23

1

1

5

4

3

2

3 1

2

N



ST

A 5

88

+0

0 T

O S

TA

61

1+

00

MATC

H LI

NE S

H 195

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

BR

IDG

E

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 3

User Name: rblair

...\I-35 WC_FTCRPT03A.dgn File Name:PLOTDRIVER:TXDOT_PDF_COLOR.plt

4:37:43 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

STATE

HW

Y 195

CREEK DR

BERRY

2

2

23

3

2

1

N

SH

19

5 -

BE

RR

Y C

RE

EK

DR

.

MATCH LINE SH 195

2 2

APPENDIX A SHEET 4

User Name: rblair


4:38:47 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

61

5+

00

62

0+

00

62

5+

00

63

0+

00

MARKET ST

2

3

3

1

1

3

3

3

2

2

3

3

1

2

3

N



ST

A 6

11

+0

0 T

O S

TA

63

4+

00

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 5

User Name: rblair


4:39:53 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

63

5+

00

64

0+

00

64

5+

00

65

0+

00

65

5+

00

SCOTSMANWILLIAM

BERRY CREEK

BERRY CREEK

34

3

1

3

3

3

1

N



ST

A 6

34+

00 T

O S

TA

657+

00

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

BR

IDG

E

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

BR

IDG

E

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

HO

RIZ

ON

TA

L C

LE

AR

AN

CE

DU

E T

O R

ES

TR

IC

TE

D

RE

DU

CE

D S

HO

UL

DE

R W

IDT

H

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 6

User Name: rblair


4:40:59 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

660+00

665+00

670+00

675+00

680+00

RV LN

LIVE

OAKS

130 (T

OLL)

STATE

HW

Y

EX TENSIONFUTURE AVIATION DR

1

1

3

1

1

4

4

3

3

1

N



ST

A 6

57

+0

0 T

O S

TA

68

0+

00

EX

IT

RA

MP

RE

AL

IG

N E

XIS

TIN

G

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-3

5 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 7

User Name: rblair


4:42:05 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

680+00

685+00

690+00

695+00

700+00

3

1

1

3

4

3

1

3

1

1

3

3

1

1

4

3

N



ST

A 6

80

+0

0 T

O S

TA

70

3+

00

EX

IT

RA

MP

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

EN

TR

AN

CE

RA

MP

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IT

RA

MP

PR

OP

OS

ED

I-3

5 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 8

User Name: rblair


12:37:43 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

3.

RO

W R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

MU

ST

BE

EV

AL

UA

TE

D D

UR

IN

G F

UT

UR

E P

RO

JE

CT

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T P

HA

SE

S.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

RO

W M

AY

BE

RE

QU

IRE

D.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

70

5+

00

71

0+

00

71

5+

00

72

0+

00

72

5+

00

105+00

110+00

115+00

PECAN BRANCH

LAKEWAY DR

NE INNER LOOP

(A

USTIN

AVE)

FUTURE SS 15

8

3

1

1

4

1

33

2

23

4

1

3

N



ST

A 7

03+

00 T

O S

TA

726+

00

(A

USTIN

AVE)

FUTURE SS 15

8

EX

IT R

AM

P

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

WID

EN

ING

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IT

RA

MP

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IS

TIN

G B

RID

GE

WID

EN

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 9

User Name: rblair


12:33:44 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

3.

RO

W R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

MU

ST

BE

EV

AL

UA

TE

D D

UR

IN

G F

UT

UR

E P

RO

JE

CT

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T P

HA

SE

S.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

RO

W M

AY

BE

RE

QU

IRE

D.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

73

0+

00

73

5+

00

74

0+

00

74

5+

00

AIR

PORT

RD

PECAN BRANCH

PECAN BRANCH

3

3

1

1

3

34

1

4

N



ST

A 7

26

+0

0 T

O S

TA

74

9+

00

FUTURE SS 158

(A

USTIN

AVE)

WID

EN

ING

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IT

RA

MP

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 10

User Name: rblair


4:45:25 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

3.

RO

W R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

MU

ST

BE

EV

AL

UA

TE

D D

UR

IN

G F

UT

UR

E P

RO

JE

CT

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T P

HA

SE

S.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

RO

W M

AY

BE

RE

QU

IRE

D.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

75

0+

00

75

5+

00

76

0+

00

76

5+

00

77

0+

00

3

1

4

1

1

3

4

3

N



ST

A 7

49

+0

0 T

O S

TA

77

2+

00

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IT R

AM

P

PR

OP

OS

ED

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 11

User Name: rblair


4:46:31 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

3.

RO

W R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

MU

ST

BE

EV

AL

UA

TE

D D

UR

IN

G F

UT

UR

E P

RO

JE

CT

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T P

HA

SE

S.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

RO

W M

AY

BE

RE

QU

IRE

D.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

77

5+

00

78

0+

00

78

5+

00

79

0+

00

79

5+

00

105+00110+00115+00120+00

FUTURE FO

NTA

NA

DR

APP

LE CREEK

D

R

NORTHWEST BLVD

3

1

1

3

1

3

33 3

1

1

3

3

N



ST

A 7

72+

00 T

O S

TA

795+

00

WID

EN

ING

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

EDF

RO

NT

AG

E R

OA

D

PR

OP

OS

ED

EN

TR

AN

CE

RA

MP

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

EX

IT R

AM

P

PR

OP

OS

ED

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 12

User Name: rblair


12:21:32 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

1

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

3.

RO

W R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

MU

ST

BE

EV

AL

UA

TE

D D

UR

IN

G F

UT

UR

E P

RO

JE

CT

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T P

HA

SE

S.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

RO

W M

AY

BE

RE

QU

IRE

D.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

795+00

800+00

805+00

810+00

815+00

100+00

105+00110+00115+00

W SPRI

NG ST

SS 158

WILLIAMS DR

MCCOY LN

AUSTIN

AVE

SS 158

CLAY ST

3

2

1

4

1

3

1

1

3

2

1

21

2

1

1

N



ST

A 7

95+

00 T

O S

TA

818+

00

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

ST

IN A

VE

RE

LO

CA

TIO

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

SIG

NA

L

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

ST

IN A

VE

EN

TR

AN

CE

RA

MP

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

EN

TR

AN

CE

RA

MP

RE

AL

IG

N E

XIS

TIN

G

FO

R F

TC

PR

OP

OS

ED

WID

EN

ING

EX

IT R

AM

P

RE

AL

IG

N E

XIS

TIN

G

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

INT

ER

CH

AN

GE

DIV

ER

GIN

G D

IAM

ON

D

PR

OP

OS

ED

W

IL

LIA

MS

DR

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 13

User Name: rblair


4:48:56 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

820+00

825+00

830+00

835+00

840+00

RIVERY BLVD

VILLAGE BLVDSAN GABRIEL

FOREST ST

RIV

ER

SA

N

GA

BRIE

L

N FK.

3

1

1

3

4

1

3

N



ST

A 8

18

+0

0 T

O S

TA

84

1+

00

SEGMENT W1SEGMENT W2

SE

GM

EN

T W

1, W

2

45

3

3

1

1

3

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

BR

IDG

E

4

I-3

5 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 14

User Name: rblair


4:50:04 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

845+00

850+00

855+00

860+00

COVE RIVER OAKS

COVE

RIVER OAKS

HILLS DRRIVER

WATERS EDGE CIR

N



ST

A 8

41

+0

0 T

O S

TA

86

4+

00

4

3

3

3

1

1

1

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 15

User Name: rblair


11:20:22 AM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

865+00

870+

00

875+

00

880+

00

885+00

135+00

140+00

145+00

STATE HWY 29

HOLLOW

SPRING

NB FRO

NTA

GE RD

H.E.B

SB FRO

NTA

GE RD

N



ST

A 8

64+

00 T

O S

TA

887+

00

STATE HWY 29

4

4

3

53

34

35

4

1

1

1

3

1

1

LA

NE

IN

TE

RC

HA

NG

E

CO

NV

EN

TIO

NA

L 8

SH

-2

9 P

RO

PO

SE

D

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 16

User Name: rblair


12:42:47 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

890+00

895+00

900+00

905+00

910+00

TO

WN CENTER

WO

LF RA

NCH

S FK.

SAN

GA

BRIEL

RIV

ER

HOSPIT

AL

GEO

RGETO

WN

ST

DA

VID'S

N



ST

A 8

87+

00 T

O S

TA

910+

00

3

3

4

3

4

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

(UN

DE

R C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

)

RO

AD

IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

TS

FR

ON

TA

GE

(UN

DE

R C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

)

RA

MP

RE

VE

RS

AL

PR

OP

OS

ED

WID

EN

IN

G F

OR

FT

C

1

(UN

DE

R C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

)

BR

IDG

E T

O R

EM

AIN

BR

IDG

E W

IDE

NIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ED

4

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 17

User Name: rblair


12:47:38 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

91

0+

00

91

5+

00

92

0+

00

92

5+

00

93

0+

00

110+00

115+00

120+00

125+00

RM 2243 (LEANDER RD)

HOSPIT

AL

GEO

RGETO

WN

ST

DA

VID'S

N



ST

A 9

10

+0

0 T

O S

TA

93

3+

00

3

34

65

3

5

44

11

1

1

3

4

1

1

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

S

PR

OP

OS

ED

AC

CE

SS

AC

CO

MM

OD

AT

E F

TC

MO

DIF

Y G

OR

E T

O

U-T

UR

N B

RID

GE

RM

22

43

SO

UT

HB

OU

ND

U-T

UR

N B

RID

GE

NO

RT

HB

OU

ND

RM

22

43

PR

OP

OS

ED

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

IN

TE

RC

HA

NG

E (

CF

I)

CO

NT

INU

OU

S F

LO

W

RM

2243 P

RO

PO

SE

D

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 18

User Name: rblair


12:59:58 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

93

5+

00

94

0+

00

94

5+

00

95

0+

00

95

5+

00

SB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

NB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

ROCKMOOR DR

OAKS BLVD THOUSAND

N



ST

A 9

33+

00 T

O S

TA

956+

00

3

3

34

1

1

1

1

EN

TR

AN

CE

RA

MP

RE

MO

VE

CH

AN

NE

L

DR

AIN

AG

E

EX

IS

TIN

G

RA

MP

RE

VE

RS

AL

PR

OP

OS

ED

RO

AD

WID

EN

ING

PR

OP

OS

ED

FR

ON

TA

GE

4

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 19

User Name: rblair


1:06:48 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

2

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

960+00

965+00

970+00

975+00

SW BYPASS

FUTURE

CA

VERNS

SPA

CE

INNER

SB FRO

NTA

GE RD

SE IN

NER LOOP

SS 26

SS 26

N



ST

A 9

56

+0

0 T

O S

TA

97

9+

00

3

3

3

4

31

1

3

1

1

3

2

2

3

3

2

4

CH

AN

NE

L

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E

RE

AL

IGN

ME

NT

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

CH

AN

NE

L

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E

AC

CO

MM

OD

AT

E F

TC

TO

BE

RE

PL

AC

ED

TO

EX

IS

TIN

G B

RID

GE

CH

AN

NE

L

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E

RA

MP

RE

VE

RS

AL

PR

OP

OS

ED

4

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

LO

OP

IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

TS

PR

OP

OS

ED

SE

IN

NE

R

I-35 [

(B

Y O

TH

ER

S)

SE

IN

NE

R L

OO

P C

OR

RID

OR

PR

OP

OS

ED

SW

BY

PA

SS

/

APPENDIX A SHEET 20

User Name: rblair


12:16:56 PM

4/24/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

980+00

985+00

990+

00

995+00

1000+00

SW BYPASS

FUTURE

RV

OUTLET

MALL

SPRINGS BLVD.

BLUE

SS 26

N



ST

A 9

79

+0

0 T

O S

TA

10

02

+0

0

SEGMENT W2 SEGMENT W3

SE

GM

EN

T W

2,

W3

4

3

3

3

3

3

1

1

1

RE

AL

IGN

ME

NT

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

4

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-35 [

(B

Y O

TH

ER

S)

SE

IN

NE

R L

OO

P C

OR

RID

OR

PR

OP

OS

ED

SW

BY

PA

SS

/

(UN

DE

R C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

)

CO

NN

EC

TIO

N

SS

26/A

US

TIN

AV

E

APPENDIX A SHEET 21

User Name: rblair


4:58:01 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

10

05

+0

01

01

0+

00

10

15

+0

01

02

0+

00

1025+00

SIERRA

W

AY ST

N



ST

A 1

002+

00 T

O S

TA

1025+

00

4

3

1

1

1

3

1

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

3

4

34

EX

IT R

AM

P

PR

OP

OS

ED

4

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

3

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 22

User Name: rblair


4:59:11 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

1025+00

1030+00

1035+

00

1040+

00

1045+00

STO

NE

TEX

AS CRUSHED

FOX D

R

N



ST

A 1

025+

00 T

O S

TA

1048+

00

3

4

1

1

CH

AN

NE

L

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E

4

33

3

4

1

1

4

1

3 RA

MP

PR

OP

OS

ED

EN

TR

AN

CE

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 23

User Name: rblair


5:00:22 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

1050+00

1055+00

10

60

+0

01065+00

1070+00

GATEW AY DR

FO

RD LIN

CO

LN

MA

C

HAIK

N



ST

A 1

04

8+

00

TO

ST

A 1

07

1+

00

3

1

1

1

43

3

4

4

41

1

3

RA

MP

PR

OP

OS

ED

EN

TR

AN

CE

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 24

User Name: rblair


5:01:32 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

1075+

00

1080+

00

1085+

00

1090+

00

105+00

110+00115+00

120+00

WESTIN

GHOUSE RD

OF

GEO

RGETO

WN

SUBA

RU

FO

RD LIN

CO

LN

MA

C

HAIK

CHEV

RO

LET BUIC

K

DO

N

HE

WLETT

MAZ

DA

RO

GER BEASLEY

OF

GEO

RGETO

WN

MERCEDES-BENZ

N



ST

A 1

071+

00 T

O S

TA

1094+

00

4

1

1

3

3

3

4

1

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E C

HA

NN

EL

6 L

AN

E I

NT

ER

CH

AN

GE

PR

OP

OS

ED

CO

NV

EN

TIO

NA

L

WE

ST

ING

HO

US

E R

OA

D

CH

AN

NE

L

DR

AIN

AG

E

EX

IS

TIN

G

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 25

User Name: rblair


5:02:43 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

1095+

00

1100+

00

1105+

00

1110+

00

1115+

00

NB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

SB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

PAGE W HITNEY PKW Y

HEWLETT LOOP

VO

LKS

WA

GEN

HE

WLETT

CHEV

RO

LET

DO

N

HE

WLETT

N



ST

A 1

09

4+

00

TO

ST

A 1

11

7+

00

3

1

1

3

4

1

1

3

3

LA

NE

PR

OP

OS

ED

AU

XIL

IAR

Y

RA

MP

RE

VE

RS

AL

PR

OP

OS

ED

3

1

1

3

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 26

User Name: rblair


5:03:53 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

1120+

00

1125+

00

1130+

00

1135+

00

1140+

00

NB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

BASS PRO

DR

SB

FR

ON

TA

GE

RD

TECO

N



ST

A 1

11

7+

00

TO

ST

A 1

14

0+

00

4

1

3

RA

MP

RE

VE

RS

AL

PR

OP

OS

ED

3

1

1

3

3

1

1

3

4

4

I-35 [

APPENDIX A SHEET 27

1140+

00

1145+

00

1150+

00

1155+

00

1160+

00

RM 1431

UNIVERSITY

BLVD.

RO

UN

D RO

CK

IKEA

User Name: rblair


5:05:03 PM

4/15/2015 DATE:


CO

NC

EP

TU

AL

DE

SIG

N S

CH

EM

AT

IC

I-3

5 W

IL

LIA

MS

ON

CO

.

RC

2014 by T

exas D

epartm

ent of T


LE

GE

ND

:

075

30

0

SC

AL

E I

N F

EE

T

15

0

PL

AN

SH

EE

T

SE

GM

EN

T W

3

NO

TE

S:

FU

TU

RE

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N C

OR

RID

OR

(F

TC

)

MA

INL

AN

E W

IDE

NIN

G

MIL

L &

OV

ER

LA

Y

FR

ON

TA

GE

RO

AD

S A

ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

TS

RA

MP

S, C

OL

LE

CT

OR

DIS

TR

IB

UT

OR

S, A

ND

DIR

EC

T C

ON

NE

CT

OR

S

BR

IDG

E

SH

AR

ED

-US

E P

AT

H

RE

MO

VA

L

PR

OJE

CT

S U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

FU

TU

RE

RO

AD

WA

Y P

RO

JE

CT

1. E

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

IN

AG

E S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S S

HO

WN

IN

CL

UD

E M

AJO

R F

EM

A

CR

OS

SIN

GS

ON

LY

.

2. T

HE

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N S

HO

WN

ON

TH

IS

DR

AW

IN

G C

ON

CE

RN

IN

G T

YP

E A

ND

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

UT

IL

IT

IE

S I

S N

OT

GU

AR

AN

TE

ED

TO

BE

AC

CU

RA

TE

OR

AL

L I

NC

LU

SIV

E.

AL

L U

TIL

IT

IE

S M

US

T B

E F

IE

LD

VE

RIF

IE

D P

RIO

R T

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N.

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y

TH

IS

PR

IN

T I

S F

UR

NIS

HE

D F

OR

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N O

NL

Y.

TH

E P

LA

N I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N O

R O

TH

ER

DA

TA

SH

OW

N H

ER

EO

N I

S

SU

BJE

CT

TO

CH

AN

GE

AN

D M

US

T N

OT

BE

CO

NS

TR

UE

D A

S F

IN

AL

.

N


ST

A 1

140+

00 T

O S

TA

1163+

50

3

1

1

3

4

2

3

1

1

3

2

2

3

(NA

RR

OW

SH

OU

LD

ER

S)

EX

IS

TIN

G C

-D

AC

CO

MM

OD

AT

E F

TC

MO

DIF

Y G

OR

E T

O

(UN

DE

R C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

)

INT

ER

CH

AN

GE

DIV

ER

GIN

G D

IAM

ON

D

RM

1431

3

I-35 [

ST

A 1

16

3+

50

EN

D P

RO

JE

CT

APPENDIX A SHEET 28

Appendix B:


FTC and Mainlane Improvements (North)0.782 miles north of Dry Berry Creek to 0.833 miles south of SS 158 (Williams Drive)

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsWiden I-35 mainlanes to provide an additional lane in each direction, all within existing right of way. Add auxiliary lanes between ramp pairs at SH 130 and Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop.

Bridge ImprovementsWiden northbound and southbound mainlane bridges at Dry Berry Creek, Berry Creek, and North Fork San Gabriel River.

Ramp ImprovementsModify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate mainlane widening.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases corridor capacity from the addition of one lane in each direction. Auxiliary lanes facilitate entering and exiting traffi c, balance the traffi c load, and improve mainlane level of service.

Estimated Project Development Costs

Future Unfunded EffortsPhase 3: Schematic and Environmental $3,992,340Phase 4: Final Design $6,653,900Phase 5: Construction $66,539,000

Total Costs $77,185,240

Proposed Improvements

Durations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

Phase 3: Schematic & EnvironmentalPhase 4: Final DesignPhase 5: Construction


LegendFUTURE TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR

I-35 MAINLANES

I-35 RESURFACED MAINLAINES

FRONTAGE ROADS AND CROSS STREETS

COLLECTOR DISTRIBUTOR ROAD

BRIDGE STRUCTURE

SIDEWALKS AND/OR BIKE PATHS

PAVEMENT REMOVAL

Texas Department of TransportationAustin District

Preliminary Subject to Change

April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 1

SH 195/Berry Creek Road Intersection0.149 miles west of Berry Creek Drive to the I-35 Southbound Frontage Road

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsWiden SH 195 to provide northbound left-turn storage and a bypass for through traffi c. Construct a right-turn lane from southbound SH 195 to Berry Creek Drive. Install traffi c signals at SH 195/Berry Creek Road intersections.

Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities to improve east-west connectivity.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency and reduces congestion. Enhances mobility and safety. Accommodates planned development.


Future Unfunded EffortsPhase 3: Schematic and Environmental $145,560Phase 4: Final Design $242,600Phase 5: Construction $2,426,000



Durations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Phase 3: Schematic and EnvironmentalPhase 4: Final DesignPhase 5: Construction

SH 195/Berry Creek Drive Intersection


I-35 MAINLANES




FUTURE DIRECT CONNECTORS


PAVEMENT REMOVAL



April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 2

I-35/SH 195 Direct Connectors0.249 miles west of Berry Creek Drive to 0.070 miles north of Berry Creek

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsConstruct direct connectors from southbound SH 195 to southbound I-35 mainlanes and southbound SH 130 access road. Construct direct connector from northbound I-35 collector-distributor to northbound SH 195. All improvements are contained in the existing right of way.

Ramp ImprovementsRemove existing entrance ramp from southbound I-35 frontage road to SH 130 access road. Modify northbound I-35 collector-distributor and northbound exit ramps to the northbound I-35 frontage road.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases interchange effi ciency, reduces travel time, and eliminates out of direction travel.





SH 195 Interchange Direct

Connect Ramps





April 2015


I-35 MAINLANES






PAVEMENT REMOVAL

APPENDIX B SHEET 3

I-35 Frontage Roads at SH 1950.311 miles north of Dry Berry Creek to 0.027 miles south of Berry Creek

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsWiden frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways. Realign the southbound SH 195 connection to the I-35 frontage road to accommodate the future SH 195 Interchange Direct Connect Ramps.

Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.


Future Unfunded EffortsPhase 3: Schematic and Environmental $828,540Phase 4: Final Design $1,380,900Phase 5: Construction $13,809,000


I-35 Frontage Roads at SH 195






April 2015


I-35 MAINLANES






PAVEMENT REMOVAL

APPENDIX B SHEET 4

Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop Interchange0.027 miles south of Berry Creek to 0.402 miles south of Lakeway Drive

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsImprove the existing conventional interchange. Widen Lakeway Drive and NE Inner Loop to accommodate additional lanes. Relocate SS 158 (Austin Avenue) east of its current location. Construct new northbound frontage road and widen existing frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways.Bridge ImprovementsWiden the existing Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop underpass bridge to a 7-lane roadway with bicycle lanes and sidewalks.Ramp Modifi cationsReverse ramps to complete X-pattern interchange confi gurations. Modify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate frontage road widening.Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities on frontage roads and cross roads to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.




Lakeway Drive/NE Inner Loop Interchange




I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL




April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 5

SS 158 (Williams Drive) Interchange0.402 miles south of Lakeway Drive to 0.833 miles south of SS 158 (Williams Drive)

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsReplace the existing interchange with a Diverging Diamond Interchange. Construct southbound and northbound collector-distributor roads. Construct new northbound frontage road and widen existing frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways. Construct improvements at the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection.Bridge ImprovementsReplace the SS 158 (Williams Drive) underpass bridge. Widen the southbound mainlane bridge at North Fork San Gabriel River.Ramp Modifi cationsReverse ramps to complete X-pattern interchange confi gurations. Modify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate frontage road widening.Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities on frontage roads and cross roads to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Accommodates Future Transportation Corridor. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.




Williams Drive Interchange




I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL




April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 6

FTC and Mainlane Improvements (South)0.833 miles south of SS 158 (Williams Drive) to 0.080 miles south of RM 1431

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsWiden I-35 mainlanes to provide an additional lane in each direction, all within existing right of way. Add auxiliary lanes between ramp pairs at SH 29, RM 2243/Leander Road, SE Inner Loop and Westinghouse Road.

Bridge ImprovementsReplace northbound and southbound mainlane bridges at SE Inner Loop and widen mainlane bridges at South Fork San Gabriel River.

Ramp ImprovementsModify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate mainlane widening.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases corridor capacity from the addition of one lane in each direction. Auxiliary lanes facilitate entering and exiting traffi c, balance the traffi c load, and improve mainlane level of service.




Durations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2



I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL





April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 7

SH 29 Interchange0.833 miles south of SS 158 (Williams Drive) to 0.549 miles south of SH 29

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsConstruct a new conventional interchange at SH 29 that provides additional turn lanes. Widen frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways. Modify the south-north turnaround transition to the northbound frontage road and the northbound exit ramp to SS 158 (Williams Drive). Relocate commercial access and signal east of I-35. Bridge ImprovementsReplace the SH 29 underpass bridge to allow mainlane widening and provide additional vertical clearance.Ramp Modifi cationsReverse ramps to complete X-pattern interchange confi guration. Modify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate frontage road widening.Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities on frontage roads and cross roads to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Accommodates Future Transportation Corridor. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.




SH 29 Interchange




I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL




April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 8

RM 2243/Leander Road Interchange0.549 miles south of SH 29 to 1.229 miles north of Westinghouse Road

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsReplace the existing interchange with a partial Continuous Flow Interchange. Widen existing frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways and add frontage road auxiliary lanes. Realign southbound frontage road at SE Inner Loop and widen SE Inner Loop.Bridge ImprovementsReplace the RM 2243/Leander Road underpass bridge to accommodate additional turn lanes, allow mainlane widening and provide additional vertical clearance.Ramp Modifi cationsReverse ramps to complete X-pattern interchange confi guration. Modify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate frontage road widening.Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities on frontage roads and cross roads to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Accommodates Future Transportation Corridor. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.




RM 2243/Leander Road Interchange




I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL




April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 9

Westinghouse Road Interchange1.229 miles north of Westinghouse Road to 0.080 miles south of RM 1431

Project Description

Mobility ImprovementsConstruct a new conventional interchange that provides additional lanes for turning movements and through traffi c. Realign frontage roads at Westinghouse Road, widen existing frontage roads to provide continuous three-lane roadways and add frontage road auxiliary lanes.Bridge ImprovementsReplace the Westinghouse Road underpass bridge to accommodate additional lanes, allow mainlane widening and provide additional vertical clearance.Ramp Modifi cationsReverse ramps to complete X-pattern interchange confi guration. Modify entrance ramps and exit ramps to accommodate frontage road widening.Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesConstruct bicycle and pedestrian facilities on frontage roads and cross roads to improve north-south and east-west connectivity.

Anticipated Benefi tsIncreases intersection effi ciency, reduces congestion, enhances intersection mobility and safety. Accommodates Future Transportation Corridor. Provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities.




Westinghouse Road Interchange




I-35 MAINLANES




BRIDGE STRUCTURE


PAVEMENT REMOVAL




April 2015

APPENDIX B SHEET 10

Appendix C:


PROJECT: I-35 CAIP (WILLIAMSON COUNTY)

I-35 WILLIAMSON COUNTY CORRIDOR PROJECTS SUMMARY

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH

HDR Engineering, Inc.

PROJECT

FTC AND MAINLANE IMPROVEMENTS (NORTH) $ 66,539,000

SH 195/BERRY CREEK ROAD INTERSECTION $ 2,426,000

I-35 FRONTAGE ROADS AT SH 195 $ 13,809,000

LAKEWAY DRIVE/NE INNER LOOP INTERCHANGE $ 23,875,000

STATE SPUR 158 (WILLIAMS DRIVE) INTERCHANGE $ 46,619,000

FTC AND MAINLANE IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH) $ 91,279,000

SH 29 INTERCHANGE $ 20,344,000

RM 2243/LEANDER ROAD INTERCHANGE $ 41,218,000

WESTINGHOUSE ROAD INTERCHANGE $ 38,928,000

TOTAL CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION COST $ 345,037,000

FUTURE PROJECT

SH 195 DIRECT CONNECTORS $ 79,166,000

TOTAL FUTURE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST $ 79,166,000

CORRIDOR SUMMARY

This estimate represents our engineering judgment as professionals knowledgeable with the construction of similar projects. This

estimate is for planning and programming purposes only and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from it. This estimate is based

upon TxDOT Austin District and statewide average unit bid prices (2013-2014).

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST

Program of Projects_Const Cost Estimates_04242015.xlsx

4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 1


SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION

ITEMS ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST

100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 309 618,000$

110 EXCAVATION (ROADWAY) CY 10.00$ 77,700 777,000$

132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 36,600 330,000$

260 LIME TREATMENT SY 3.00$ 161,300 484,000$

260 LIME TON 175$ 5,450 954,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 106,500 8,520,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 71,400 6,070,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 18,100 1,720,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C (SURF) TON 110$ 34,800 3,830,000$

4XX BRIDGES (CONC) SF 80$ 35,300 2,830,000$

4XX BRIDGES (STEEL) SF 130$ - -$

354 PLANE ASPH CONC PAV SY 1.80$ 148,300 267,000$

423 RETAINING WALLS (MSE) SF 42$ - -$

432 RIPRAP (DRAINAGE CHANNEL) CY 350$ - -$

450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 10,860 598,000$

462 CONC BOX CULV LF -$ - -$

529 CONC CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 15$ - -$

531 CONC SIDEWALKS (5") SY 48$ - -$

536 CONC MEDIAN (RAISED MEDIAN) SY 55$ - -$

540 MBGF LF 20$ 6,900 138,000$

ITEMIZED COST SUBTOTAL 27,136,000$

UNIT PERCENTAGE COST

100 REMOVALS AND DEMOLITION % 5.0% - 1,360,000$

46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 2,720,000$

502 BARRICADES, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC HANDLING % 14.0% - 3,800,000$

666 PAVEMENT MARKINGS % 1.0% - 272,000$

6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 1,360,000$

6XX TRAFFIC SIGNALS & LIGHTING % 5.0% - 1,360,000$

UTILITIES % 5.0% - 1,360,000$

PERCENTAGE BASED COST SUBTOTAL 12,232,000$

UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST

MOBILIZATION % 10.0% - 3,937,000$ 1MISCELLANEOUS % 20.0% 7,874,000$

MISCELLANEOUS COST SUBTOTAL 11,811,000$

CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL 51,179,000$ 230% CONTINGENCY 15,360,000$

3TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 66,539,000$

NOTES

1. 20% has been added to account for miscellaneous items such as: ITS, SW3P; landscaping; irrigation; seeding; and aesthetics

2. 30% contingency was also included to account for planning level of detail.

3. Construction cost only. Right of Way and other Program costs are not included.

FTC AND MAINLANE IMPROVEMENTS (NORTH)

This estimate represents our engineering judgment as professionals knowledgeable with the construction of similar projects. This estimate is for planning

and programming purposes only and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from it.

This estimate is based upon TxDOT Austin District and statewide average unit bid prices (2013-2014).

I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Mainlane widening to accommodate FTC; widen mainlane bridges at Dry Berry Creek, Berry Creek, and North Fork San Gabriel River; construct auxiliary

lanes.

LIMITS : 0.782 MI N OF DRY BERRY CREEK TO 0.833 MI S OF SS 158 (WILLIAMS DR)


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 2


LIMITS : 0.149 MI W OF BERRY CREEK DR TO THE I-35 SOUTHBOUND FRONTAGE RD

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 26 52,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 7,900 72,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 140 25,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 2,700 216,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 1,300 111,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 700 67,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C (SURF) TON 110$ 800 88,000$

4XX BRIDGES (CONC) SF 80$ - -$





450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ - -$


529 CONC CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 15$ 3,200 48,000$

531 CONC SIDEWALKS (5") SY 48$ 2,100 101,000$


540 MBGF LF 20$ - -$

ITEMIZED COST SUBTOTAL 844,000$


100 REMOVALS AND DEMOLITION % 5.0% - 43,000$

46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 85,000$

502 BARRICADES, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC HANDLING % 8.0% - 68,000$


6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 43,000$

6XX TRAFFIC SIGNALS & LIGHTING LS - - 300,000$

UTILITIES % 5.0% - 43,000$

PERCENTAGE BASED COST SUBTOTAL 591,000$


MOBILIZATION % 10.0% - 144,000$ 1MISCELLANEOUS % 20.0% 287,000$

MISCELLANEOUS COST SUBTOTAL 431,000$

CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL 1,866,000$ 230% CONTINGENCY 560,000$


NOTES




SH 195/BERRY CREEK ROAD INTERSECTION




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Improve SH 195/Berry Creek Drive intersection by constructing "high-T" intersection, added lanes, and install signals; construct bicycle and pedestrian

improvements.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 3


LIMITS : 0.311 MI N OF DRY BERRY CREEK TO 0.027 MI S OF BERRY CREEK

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTIONWiden frontage roads; widen frontage road bridges; construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements.


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 85 170,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 28,500 257,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 320 56,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 6,300 504,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 3,300 281,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 1,500 143,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C (SURF) TON 110$ 7,800 858,000$




423 RETAINING WALLS (MSE) SF 42$ 8,670 365,000$






536 CONC MEDIAN (RAISED MEDIAN) SY 55$ 110 7,000$

540 MBGF LF 20$ 3,800 76,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 588,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 294,000$

6XX TRAFFIC SIGNALS & LIGHTING % 5.0% - 294,000$

UTILITIES % 5.0% - 294,000$



MOBILIZATION % 10.0% - 817,000$ 1MISCELLANEOUS % 20.0% 1,634,000$




NOTES




I-35 FRONTAGE ROADS AT SH 195




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 4


LIMITS: 0.027 MI S OF BERRY CREEK TO 0.402 S OF LAKEWAY DR

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 125 250,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 31,100 280,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 1,300 228,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 25,600 2,050,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 13,800 1,180,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 5,900 561,000$


4XX BRIDGES (CONC) SF 80$ 7,700 616,000$





450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 900 50,000$

462 CONC BOX CULV LF 600$ 440 264,000$


531 CONC SIDEWALKS (5") SY 48$ 27,300 1,320,000$

536 CONC MEDIAN (RAISED MEDIAN) SY 55$ 3,600 198,000$

540 MBGF LF 20$ 4,000 80,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 1,020,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 508,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 508,000$







NOTES




LAKEWAY DRIVE/NE INNER LOOP INTERCHANGE




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Widen Lakeway/NE Inner Loop underpass to construct conventional interchange; relocate Austin Ave.; widen frontage roads; construct mainlane and

frontage road auxiliary lanes; reverse ramps; construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 5


LIMITS: 0.402 MI S OF LAKEWAY DR TO 0.833 MI S OF SS 158 (WILLIAMS DR)

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 158 317,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 58,900 531,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 2,470 433,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 48,500 3,880,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 27,500 2,340,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 10,600 1,010,000$






432 RIPRAP (DRAINAGE CHANNEL) CY 350$ 130 46,000$

450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 7,190 396,000$

462 CONC BOX CULV LF 600$ 87 53,000$




540 MBGF LF 20$ 4,200 84,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 1,990,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 992,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 992,000$







NOTES




STATE SPUR 158 (WILLIAMS DRIVE) INTERCHANGE

This estimate represents our engineering judgment as professionals knowledgeable with the construction of similar projects. This estimate is for

planning and programming purposes only and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from it.


I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Construct new Williams Drive underpass to accommodate diverging diamond interchange (DDI); widen southbound mainlane bridge at North Fork San

Gabriel River; construct collector-distributor roads; improve Austin Ave; construct frontage road; construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 6


LIMITS: 0.833 MI S OF SS 158 (WILLIAMS DR) TO 0.080 MI S OF RM 1431

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 311 621,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 105,200 947,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 5,020 879,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 98,300 7,870,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 65,800 5,600,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 16,700 1,590,000$









529 CONC CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 15$ - -$



540 MBGF LF 20$ 9,900 198,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 3,730,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 1,870,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 1,870,000$







NOTES




FTC AND MAINLANE IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH)




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Mainlane widening to accommodate FTC; reconstruct mainlane bridges at SE Inner Loop; construct auxiliary lanes; widen mainlane bridges at South Fork

San Gabriel River.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 7


LIMITS: 0.833 MI S OF SS 158 (WILLIAMS DR) TO 0.549 MI S OF SH 29

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 88 177,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 15,700 142,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 640 112,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 12,500 1,000,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 6,900 587,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 2,800 266,000$







450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 900 50,000$





540 MBGF LF 20$ 1,100 22,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 866,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 433,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 433,000$







NOTES




SH 29 INTERCHANGE




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Replace SH 29 underpass; construct new conventional interchange; improve frontage roads; reverse ramps; construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 8


LIMITS: 0.549 MI S OF SH 29 TO 1.229 MI N OF WESTINGHOUSE RD

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 115 230,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 358,400 3,230,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 1,640 287,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 32,200 2,580,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 17,700 1,510,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 7,300 694,000$







450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 900 50,000$

462 CONC BOX CULV LF 600$ 438 263,000$




540 MBGF LF 20$ 5,800 116,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 1,760,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 879,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 879,000$







NOTES




RM 2243/LEANDER ROAD INTERCHANGE




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Replace RM 2243/Leander Road underpass; construct new continuous flow interchange (CFI); construct turnaround; improve frontage roads and SE

Inner Loop crossing; reverse ramps; construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 9


LIMITS: 1.229 MI N OF WESTINGHOUSE RD TO 0.080 MI S OF RM 1431

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTION


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 157 313,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 109,100 982,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 1,830 321,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 35,800 2,870,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 20,200 1,720,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 7,900 751,000$






432 RIPRAP (DRAINAGE CHANNEL) CY 350$ 160 56,000$

450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 900 50,000$

462 CONC BOX CULV LF 600$ 1,440 864,000$




540 MBGF LF 20$ 5,500 110,000$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 1,660,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 828,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 828,000$


UNIT UNIT PRICE COST





NOTES




WESTINGHOUSE ROAD INTERCHANGE




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Replace Westinghouse Road underpass; construct new conventional interchange; construct turnaround; improve frontage roads; reverse ramps;

construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities.


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 10


LIMITS: 0.249 MI W OF BERRY CREEK DR TO 0.070 MI N OF BERRY CREEK

SPEC YEAR: 2014

UNITS: ENGLISH


DESCRIPTIONConstruct Direct Connectors between I-35 and SH 195.


100 PREP ROW STA 2,000$ 55 110,000$


132 EMBANKMENT CY 9.00$ 63,100 568,000$


260 LIME TON 175$ 790 139,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - A TON 80$ 15,400 1,240,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - B TON 85$ 10,300 876,000$

340 D - GR HMA (SQ) TY - C TON 95$ 2,600 247,000$


4XX BRIDGES (CONC) SF 80$ - -$

4XX BRIDGES (STEEL) SF 130$ 217,274 28,250,000$


423 RETAINING WALLS (MSE) SF 42$ 27,140 1,140,000$


450 RAIL (TY SSTR) LF 55$ 5,590 308,000$





540 MBGF LF 20$ - -$




46X DRAINAGE % 10.0% - 3,370,000$



6XX SIGNING % 5.0% - 1,690,000$


UTILITIES % 5.0% - 1,690,000$







NOTES




SH 195 DIRECT CONNECTORS




I-35 CAIP

QUANTIFIED ITEMS

PERCENTAGE ITEMS

MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS


4/29/2015

APPENDIX C SHEET 11

i35 capital area improvement program...

Documents