i r 2 gemini cqm4 gemini y - ibiblio · made using the fortran model of the gdc ascent mode. of the...

86
U National Aeronautics and Space Administration I Lyndon B. Johnwrn Spsce Center1 I Houston, Texas 77058 I GEMINI PROGRAM MISSION REPORT I PH4 CqM4 1 ; - r 2 -J RARY 2 COPY GEMINI Y 3: JUN 29 1966 $1 SPACECRAFT CENTER E OUSTON, TEXAS I 4 0 - / -7' AND COMPUTER ANALYSIS AUGUST 1965 . NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION CJ MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER ! ! (I

Upload: others

Post on 18-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

U National Aeronautics and Space Administration

I Lyndon B. Johnwrn Spsce Center1

I Houston, Texas 77058

I

GEMINI PROGRAM MISSION REPORT I P H 4

CqM4 1;: - r 2 -J

R A R Y 2

C O P Y

GEMINI Y

3: JUN 2 9 1966

$ 1 SPACECRAFT CENTER E OUSTON, TEXAS

I 4 0

-/ -7' AND COMPUTER ANALYSIS

A U G U S T 1965 . NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION CJ MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER

! ! ( I

Page 2: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

FOREWORD

This report consis ts of Part A - Gemini V Ascent P3s t f l igh t Analysis Report, and Part B - Gemini V Reentry Mission Reconstruction Report prepared by :

i -

ll Internat ion Business Machines Corporation Federal Systems Division Space Guidance Center Owego, New York

This report i s published a s Supplement 6 t o the Gemini V Mission Report, MSC-G-R-65-4, by:

Gemini V Mission Evaluation Team National Aeronautics and Space Administration Manned Spacecraft Center Houston, Texas

Page 3: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

PART A-

GEMINI V

ASCENT

POSTFLIGHT

ANALYSIS

REPORT

(u)

I B Y NO 3-260-6145

COPY NO

COHTENT APPROVED BY 1

7 . CLASSIFICATION AND AUTOMATJC 4EGRADfNC 4PPROVED BY

18 October 1965 DATE

Contributors: T. L. Anthony R. B. Jasinski

- R. F. Miller DGD DIR 5200.10

F E D E R A L S Y S T E M S D I V I S I O N S P A C E G U I D A N C E C E N T E R O W E G O N E W Y O R K

Page 4: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page -

h

.

I.

11.

111.

IV.

List of Tables

List of F i g u r e s

A-i

A - i i

Introduction A- 1

Discuss ion of Ascent F l igh t Reconstruct ion A-2

A. Gimbal Angle and Attitude E r r o r A-3 Behavior

B. Pos i t ion and Velocity Compar isons A-6

A-9 C. P l a t fo rm Azimuth Alignment

D. IGS Injection Conditions A-11

E. Navigation Ac cu r ac y A-13

F. IVAR and IVI Operat ion A- 14

G. IGS Disc re t e s and Lift-off Synchronization A-16

Conclusions A-19

Re commendations

Appendix AA

GT- 5 Flight Data

Appendix AB

F l igh t Reconstruct ion Graphs

A-20

A-21

A-34

A-49 Reference s

Page 5: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

i

LIST OF TABLES

Page

A-7 1 Posi t ion and Velocity Comparison

P l a t f o r m Azimuth Misalignment

IGS Injection Conditions

IVAR Operation

IGS Disc re t e Events

A-10

A- 12

A-15

A-17 5

.

.

Page 6: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

LIST OF FIGURES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

1 2

1 3

14

Pitch Command

Yaw Command

Roll Command

Commanded Pi tch Rate

Time-To-Go

X Component of Velocity

Y Component of Velocity

Z Component of Velocity

X Component of Posit ion

Y Component of Posit ion

Z Component of Posi t ion

Pi tch Steer ing P a r a m e t e r s

Y a w Steering P a r a m e t e r s

Pi tch Steering P a r a m e t e r s f r o m R e - construction Simulation

Page

A-35

A-36

A-37

A-38

A-39

A-40

A - 4 1

A-42

A-43

A-44

A-45

A-46

A-47

A-48 .

Page 7: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

ABSTRACT

This r e p o r t p resents a n ana lys i s of the Ascent portion of the GT-5 flight. ICs s y s t e m per formance during the Ascent phase of the mis s ion was n e a r perfect. The r e su l t s of the analysis indicate that the in-plane s y s t e m navigation components were within lC of ideal performance. With the exception of Stage I1 guidance initiation, the maximum IGS pitch and yaw attitude e r r o r s s een during flight were l e s s than 2. lo and lo, respectively. The yaw attitude e r r o r s ignal anomaly which was observed in the flight a t SECO t4 seconds was reproduced in the post- flight reconstruct ion. No other anomalies were noted.

C

Page 8: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

A-1

I. Introduction

This r epor t p re sen t s the resul ts of the analysis of the per formance of the on-board computer during the Ascent phase of the GT-5 flight.

The purpose of this study was to verify that no anomalies occurred i n the computer o r its p rogram during the Prelaunch and Ascent phases of the flight. simulation which executes a Gemini computer p rogram tape (magnet ic) on the 7090 DPS. computer word length. Also, severa l associated simulation runs were made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is d iscussed in detai l in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight a r e d iscussed in the sections to follow.

The study was made using the Operational P r o g r a m interpret ive

The simulation uses fixed point a r i thmet ic and Gemini

The implementation The r e su l t s obtained f rom

Page 9: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-2 -

11. Disccusion of Ascent Fl ight Reconstruction

Appendix AA contains a tabulation of the DAS da ta obtained f r o m the G T - 5 flight. The da ta was obtained f r o m one t e l eme t ry s ta t ion and, therefore , has s e v e r a l d i scre te a r e a s where data is i n c o r r e c t o r miss ing , However, the DAS parameter t ime h is tor ies a r e sufficiently complete to allow compar ison with the flight reconstruct ion da ta which is included in graphical f o r m in A p p e n d i x AB. The data presented in Appendix AB was der ived using the G T - 5 Operational P r o g r a m a s s imulated on the 7090 DPS. pe r fo rms all the Gemini a r i thmet ic and logic operat ions in a manner ident ical to the GDC including fixed point a r i thmet ic and p a r a m e t e r scaling. Additional detai ls on the operation of this simulation as well a s suggested improvements to the techniques used a r e descr ibed in Reference 1. have a s yet not been implemented s ince authorization to do s o h a s not been obtained.

This simulation

These improvements

The remainder of this section desc r ibes and explains the var ious data obtained from the flight and through mission reconstruct ion. into the following genera l a r e a s of interest :

It is divided

A. Gimbal Angle and Attitude E r r o r Behavior

B. Posit ion and Velocity Comparisons

C. P la t form Azimuth Alignment

D. IGS Injection Conditions

E. Navigation Accuracy

F. IVAR and IVI Operation

G. IGS Discre tes and Lift-off Synchronization

' 1 I

Page 10: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-3 -

11. A. Gimbal Angle and Attitude E r r o r Behavior

F i g u r e s 1 through 3 p re sen t a comparison of the p r i m a r y and back-up Inspection of the IGS attitude e r r o r s f r o m lift-off s y s t e m attitude e r r o r s .

through SECO revealed no unusual o r unexpected behavior. e r r o r signal anomaly a t SECO f 4 seconds which was observed in the flight data was reproduced in the post flight reconstruction.

The yaw attitude

The differences noted in the Stage I pitch attitude e r r o r a r e believed due to pitch p r o g r a m m e r e r r o r in the p r i m a r y s y s t e m and pitch p r o g r a m s t a r t t ime uncertaint ies i n the back-up system. I t is noted that the pitch attitude e r r o r signal i n c r e a s e s to approximately t1 . l o when Step I of the pitch p r o g r a m occurs . Evaluation of the te lemetry data indicates that the IGS s t a r t e d i t s pitch p r o g r a m a t approximately 22.8 seconds. of 23. 0 4 seconds but within the anticipated range of 23. 04 t. 28 seconds. Also, the DAS data indicates that a t 24. 15 seconds, the pitch gimbal angle r ead 90.036O. In the t ime in t e rva l f r o m 22.82 to 24. 15 seconds, the IGS would have computed the vehicle should pitch down to 89.06O, result ing in an e r r o r s igna l of + l o , which a g r e e s closely with the value of 1. lo recorded by the DAS.

This i s . 2 2 seconds before the programmed t ime

At Stage I1 guidance initiation the IGS pitch attitude e r r o r reached a 0 maximum of t 11. 4 . This is considerably s m a l l e r than the maximum value of

t23O seen on the G T - 3 flight and s m a l l e r than the GT-4 flight where i t reached t 14O. miss ions resul ted in a significant improvement.

Thus the changes to the pitch p r o g r a m made f o r the GT-4 and GT- 5

During Stage 11 operation, the IGS pitch attitude e r r o r signal r ema ins l e s s than one degree a f t e r the initial pitch down maneuver is completed a t guidance initiate. signal deviates noticeably f r o m the RGS signal n e a r 223, 293 and 325 seconds. The f i r s t deviation a t 223 seconds results when the f ina l s t ee r ing loss t e r m s a r e included in the guidance computations a t 110 seconds before shutdown.

Examination of F igu re I will show that the IGS pitch attitude e r r o r

The subsequent deviations d i rec t ly re f lec t changes in the pitch attitude of the vehicle. This can readi ly be verified by examining F igu re 14, which shows the pitch s t ee r ing p a r a m e t e r s obtained f rom the FORTRAN reconstruct ion run. This plot shows the pitch gimbal angle, ob, the computed value of vehicle pitch attitude with r e s p e c t to local horizontal ,@ PM, and the commanded value of vehicle t h r u s t pitch attitude with r e s p e c t to local horizontal A’ h e t w e e n e PN and /? PM is used i n generating the IGS pitch attitude e r r o r signal. A s expected, #? PN is approximately a monotonic decreasing function (the apparent noise O n p P M and p’ PN resu l t s f r o m the l i nea r interpolation a t DAS a c c e l e r o m e t e r data used in the reconstruction).

PN. The difference

Page 11: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-4 -

11. A . (Continued)

The q u a n t i t y p PM resembles the pitch g imbal angle quite c losely although the effects of the rapidly increas ing down range posit ion is noticeable la te in the flight. seconds, note that the pitch att i tude r a t e of the vehicle changes a t this point and the measu red pitch attitude r ema ins near ly constant. dec rease a t a near ly constant r a t e , the IGS att i tude e r r o r s ignal s t a r t s to inc rease positively (pitch down) and changes f r o m approximately -. 75 a t 283 seconds to t . 4 O a t 298 seconds. At this t ime, the vehicle pi tches down m o r e rapidly and the measu red att i tude d e c r e a s e s m o r e rapidly than the commanded att i tude. A t about 305 seconds, the two att i tudes a r e decreas ing a t about the s a m e ra t e and the IGS e r r o r s ignal r ema ins relatively constant until about 320 seconds when the above desc r ibed sequence of events is approximately duplicated. It is believed that the changes noted in the vehicle pitch attitude r a t e may be due to the f i l ter ing o r smoothing used in the p r imary sys t em which is controll ing the vehicle.

With re ference to the IGS att i tude e r r o r s ignal action beginning a t 283

S i n c e p PN continues to

0

This causes the IGS e r r o r s ignal to dec rease .

.

The yaw attitude e r r o r s ignal seen in F igure 2 indicates good a g r e e m e n t between the IGS and RGS sys t ems during Stage I operation. the behavior of the yaw att i tude e r r o r s ignals is ve ry s i m i l a r to that s een in e a r l i e r flights. e r r o r in genera l is l e s s than lo, e r r o r i s changing rapidly, increas ing to n e a r - 1' jus t p r i o r to SEGO. evidently due to the out-of-plane velocity measu red by the IGS which r equ i r e s a yaw r ight correct ion by the launch vehicle to null the component.

During Stage I1

The difference between the p r i m a r y and back-up s y s t e m att i tude As SEGO is approached i t is noted that the IGS

This is

The rol l at t i tude e r r o r compar ison provided i n F i g u r e 3 readi ly i l l u s t r a t e s severa l perturbation.$which a r e affecting the ro l l or ientat ion of the vehicle on the flight. ro l l axis (note the change in ro l l e r r o r a t s taging) and the TARS ro l l gyro d r i f t ra tes a t high acce lera t ion (note the change in IGS ro l l e r r o r between 100 and 150 seconds and 270 to 330 seconds) . those seen on GT-3 and GT-4.

The mos t obvious a r e the engine misal ignments alonp t h e

The affects a r e somewhat s i m i l a r to o r l e s s than

Inspection of the ro l l gimbal angle da ta indicate the vehicle rol led 12. 78O during the roll p r o g r a m as compared to 12.867O which was des i red .

Page 12: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-5 -

. ' L

11. A. (Continued)

Immediately following SEGO the IGS pitch att i tude e r r o r s ignal i n c r e a s e s in the posit ive direct ion, going f r o m -. 6' to a max imum of about t4O n e a r 343 seconds; then d e c r e a s e s to about - 5 act ion re f lec ts vehicle att i tude changes during this per iod; the corresponding pitch gimbal angles at the re ferenced points a r e - 13.4, -8 .9 and - 18.4. The yaw att i tude of the vehicle a l s o changes during this SECO- separa t ion period. A t SECO, the yaw gimbal is about -. 4' and slowly changes to -4.4' a t 345 seconds. The yaw att i tude e r r o r s ignal changes to re f lec t the yaw att i tude change fo r about the first four seconds a f te r SECO, changing f r o m -. 86O 336-337 seconds. unt i l the spacecraf t att i tude e r r o r signals a r e generated a t SECO t 2 0 seconds. p r o g r a m e r r o r was found which caused this anomaly. difference between measu red and commanded yaw gimbal angles ( A #' multiplied by the var iable N22 (s ine of roll gimbal angle) when t ransforming the att i tude e r r o r s ignals f r o m the platform f r a m e to the GLV f r a m e . quantity is computed once eve ry s low loop until the SECO countdown is commenced. It was found that N22 is synonomous with the var iable TX which is used in o ther modes. A t SEGO plus approximately four seconds, the IVI routine is en tered to display the velocity cor rec t ions f o r orbi t adjustment (IVAR) and TX is s e t equal to 100. Since TX is sca led B17 and N22 i s scaled B1, the net r e s u l t is that the value used a s N22 in the a scen t f a s t loop becomes ve ry s m a l l (. 0015). When the m e a s u r e d yaw att i tude e r r o r A q is multiplied by the "new" value of N22, the r e s u l t is insignificant and yaw control i s lost . During the fl ight, the yaw att i tude e r r o r s ignal dropped to -. 65O, not zero , because the contribution of o ther t e r m s (notably$b'o') used in computing the GLV signal was not a f fec ted by the N22 problem This p r o g r a m e r r o r has been co r rec t ed and a new tape generated f o r subsequent fl ights using MF6.

0 jus t before separat ion. This

It then slowly r e v e r s e s and re turns to -3.6O a t about 352 seconds.

to about -2 . 5' a t about It then abrupt ly changes to -. 65O and r ema ins nea r this value

A In the Ascent f a s t loop the

) is

The N22

The att i tude e r r o r signals generated for the spacecraf t a t SEGO t 2 0 seconds for the o rb i t ad jus tment (IVAR) a r e d iscussed in Section 11-F, IVAR and IVI operation.

Page 13: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-6 -

11. B. Position and Velocity Comparisons

Table 1 compares the in-flight DAS navigation da ta with s imi l a r data der ived f rom miss ion reconstruct ion using the FORTRAN and Operational P r o g r a m simulations. compar ison was not obtained in e i ther reconstruct ion simulation, nor is i t immediately obvious that one simulation provides a be t te r reproduction of the flight than the other.

Inspection of this data indicates that a bi t - for-bi t

It should be noted that no DAS data was available for this flight f r o m 45 to 60 seconds and f r o m 72 to 86 seconds. by interpolation using the data surrounding the vacant a r e a s . fairly successful , 98 .028 seconds.

The miss ing da ta was synthesized This p rocess was

a s can be noted by the sma l l e r r o r s which a r e p re sen t a t

.

The l a r g e s t position difference between the flight r e su l t s and those obtained through reconstruct ion is seen in the Y component of the FORTRAN Run (183 fee t a t 359 seconds) . 13 feet of the Operational P r o g r a m resu l t . d i f ference appears to be l inear interpolation of data between DAS f r a m e s .

Inspection will show that the FORTRAN r e s u l t is within The m a j o r contr ibutor to the 183 foot

The recons t ruc ted velocit ies a r e within 0. 5 fps of the flight values. The velocity differences which ex is t at the end of the reconstruct ion a r e a t t r ibutable to s e v e r a l fac tors . These a r e interpolat ion of miss ing da ta , l inear interpolation of data between DAS data f r a m e s , differences caused by the f ixed point vs. floating point a r i thmet ic of the s imulat ions and different navigation e r r o r growth charac te r i s t ics between the FORTRAN and operat ional p rograms . fac tors have been d iscussed in detai l i n previous pos t flight analysis repor t s . Since the velocity and position differences fo r this flight reconstruct ion a r e s o smal l , a detailed analysis to prec ise ly isolate the var ious e r r o r contributions did not s e e m warranted.

These

Page 14: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-7 -

oo*

o*o

mm

m

..

. dm4

ON

9

99

m

mm

m

**

*

000

mm

m

Il

l

..

.

Ga

l9

*

N4

0

00

P-P

-P

-

**

*

..

.

11

1

..

.

44

4

P-P

-P

-

P-P

-P

-

44

4

11

1

P-m

r- ea** 0

00

.

..

1

11

coalal

mm

m

mm

m

000

49*

NO

N

44

4

dr

-4

mad

om

*

NO

N

"N

999

mm

m

999

... .

..

"

N

cocoa0

NN

N

..

.

"N

alalal

..

.

"N

alalal

"N

4

44

N

NN

4

44

m

mm

m

m

. m

44

4

094

co

r-co

*

**

9\09

mm

m

Il

l

Ne

0

em*

999

mm

m

000

44

4

Il

l

C 0 .r

l c,

Y 999

mm

m

00

0

44

4

11

1

11

1

N4

N

mm

m

000

00

0

mmm

000

"N

1

11

44

4 999

alalal

mmm

000

NN

N

Il

l

000

099

9m

m

mm

m

999

44

4

Il

l

Page 15: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-a -

000

Na

3-

r

mm

N

999

cm

m

..

.

Il

l

..

.

00

0

00

0

44

4

Il

l

m*o

mo

d

co ma

mm

m

00

0

ln

mm

N

"

Il

l

..

.

..

.

999

r-r-Ic

0

00

..

.

00

0

999

mom

mm

m

..

.

44

4

999

**

*

**

*

mm

m

omm

N9

4

co

ma

.

..

4

44

mm

m

mm

m

mm

m

"N

c

m,

uo

NI 0

05

m

mc

o

mm

ln

4

44

4

44

I

ll

N9

N

mm

r-

44

4

44

4

N*

*

r-d

r-

moo

04

4

000

r-r-r-

mm

m

N*

N

N9

0

mm

co

moa

I 4

Page 16: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-9 -

11. c. P la t fo rm Azimuth Alignment

Reconstruction of the in-flight DAS data indicated that the platform ro l l gimbal angle a t the t ime of platform re l ease was a lmost within one quanta (. 036O) of the value des i red by the IGS. degrees (2165 quanta) and the commanded ro l l gimbal angle was 77. 896 degrees .

The value read by the GDC was 77.940

The in-flight resu l t s indicated that both azimuth updates were received and properly used by the GDC. alignment values obtained f rom the flight reconstruct ion runs. in misal ignment es t imates a f te r the 140 second update is l e s s than 6 s e c and would contribute l e s s than a 0. 75 f t / s e c out-of-plane velocity difference a t SECO.

Table 2 lists the platform azimuth The difference -

Page 17: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-10 -

O\

NO

N

rn

F

mo

l

0"

00

0

+I

I

- v) a, a, k

M

Q)

cl Y

ul c,

.-I

v) 9

2 C

ld k

k

0

0

6(

00

0

+I

I

.

Page 18: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-11 -

I -

t

I

11. D. IGS Injection Conditions

Table 3 presents the IGS measured injection conditions obtained during the flight and those obtained f r o m the post-flight reconstruct ion simulations. Column 4 of the table l i s t s the IGS navigation e r r o r s a s measu red by STL. These e r r o r s have been combined with the X, Y, and Z velocity and posit ion data f rom the flight, to der ive the ac tua l X , Y, and Z velocity and posit ion achieved in the flight, which is given in Column 4. The inser t ion p a r a m e t e r s quoted in Column 4 w e r e computed f r o m the co r rec t ed X , Y, 2; data and should thus represent the ac tua l inser t ion con- ditions achieved in the flight ( V i m a y be in e r r o r by 1 to 2 F P S s ince the reconstruct ion value fo r platform misal ignment had to be used in its com- putation). p a r a m e t e r s a r e thus 2. 7 FPS in total velocity, - 1. 2 FPS in rad ia l velocity, - 3 . 6 FPS in out-of-plane velocity and - 28 feet in alt i tude.

The indicated IGS navigation e r r o r s in t e r m s of the inser t ion

The IGS targeting quantities w e r e biased to account for anticipated navigation e r r o r s of 1. 8 F P S in X-velocity, 1. 3 FPS in Y-velocity, and z e r o in Z-velocity. It i s noted that the in-plane velocity e r r o r s rea l ized exceeded the anticipated e r r o r s by . 6 FPS in X and . 7 FPS in Y-velocity and the out-of-plane velocity e r r o r was 3. 2 FPS. It is concluded that had a switchover to the IGS been made ea r ly in the flight, the IGS would have achieved the des i red inser t ion conditions within the specified to le rances . ( T h e yaw att i tude e r r o r s ignal anomaly at 6ECO t4 eecondr would not have significantly affected the out-of-plane velocity s ince mos t of the cut-off impulse thrus t had been real ized when i t occurred. )

I

Page 19: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

h

* P

- W C

P L

.

co

r- o

m

99

NN

o*

em

m

d

N .

.

*o

NN

.

.

04

m

o

co

co

Od

*

m

m*

N

ii

ln

N

dd

l

nm

.

.

s*

o*

*m

In

*

N

co

r- o

m

09

.

.

In

*

o*

em

ln

d

N

m 0

* m

m l

a

m I

co N

t-

In

m I

m 9

0

9

m I

CF 0

02

m

m I

- A-12 -

%

m-

I

N

I

om

0

m-

0

e-- I

*-

I N

I

..

G

Nd

m

0-

I

co

r- m

r-

N

m

d

N

4

N

m*

0

ON

0

-

m

..

c

oo

*

m

ON

I c

or-

mr

-

N*

* N

4

A

N

d

9: r-

NN

*

N*

4

N

9

N

0 0 0

I

&

m 9

0 0 0

4 I

m

m

0 0

0

4 I

W 9

0

0

0

4 I.

a,

5 W

0 Id

0

a, k

s ; 0 *

4

3 rn a, k

E (d

k

M

0

a ,-I (d

c

Page 20: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-13 -

.

11. E. Navigation Accuracy

Table 3 quotes the ICs velocity and position e r r o r s a t SECO i - 2 0 . As can be noted, the wors t velocity e r r o r is seen along the Z-axis ( p e r - pendicular to the orbi t plane). F rom the p la t form per formance standpoint, this flight su rpassed the accuracies obtained during Ascent on any previous flight. the o r d e r of 2 FPS a t SEGO and the out-of-plane e r r o r was approximately 4 FPS. Thus, platform per formance was within 1 u of nominal.

The in-plane component platform e r r o r s ( X and Y-axis) were on

Page 21: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-14 -

b 11. F. IVAR and IVI Operation

ia

The attached table l i s t s the IVI and F D I readings following SEGO

The ro l l at t i tude e r r o r is init ially sa tura ted (unlimited value is t20 seconds. simulation. 89') indicating the spacecraf t should be rolled upright. is a l so saturated (unlimited value -47O). l a rge because the out-of-plane velocity to be gained i s comparable to the in- plane velocity to be gained. m e t e r while the spacecraf t is rolled over . indicating pitch up i s required. 3 5 8 seconds and completes thrusting a t about 366 seconds, gaining about 7 fps. The spacecraf t is rolled upright s tar t ing a t this t ime and reaches the heads-up position a t about 379 seconds. At the completion of the separat ion maneuver , the IVI indicate a deficiency of 3 fps forward in-plane and a deficiency of 11 fps out- of -plane.

These readings were obtained f r o m the post f l ight reconstruct ion

The yaw attitude e r r o r This s ignal indicates yaw r ight and is

The out-of-plane velocity i s displayed on the Z The pitch attitude e r r o r s ignal is -8O

The astronaut begins to thrus t forward a t about

Page 22: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

353.9 355.9 357.9 358. 7 359.6

0 360.7 363. 5 364.4 365. 5 366. 5 367.5 368.3 369.2 370. 3 371. 3 374.0 375.1 376. 1 377.1 378.0 378.8 379.9 380.2 381.9 383.6 385.7 388.4 390. 5 393.2 395.3

9 9 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

- A-15 - TABLE 4 - IVAR OPERATION

- 1 - 1 -2 -1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 t l t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 9

10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12

IVI- z (fps )

- 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10

-9 -9 - 8 - 7 - 7 -6 -6 -4 - 3 -1 t l t 1

1 1 1 1 0 0 0

- 7.4 - 9 . 3

-10.5 - 10.7 - 10.9 -11.0 -11.2 -11.1 - 10.9 - 10.8 -10.7 - 10.6 -10 .5 -10.5 -10.5 - 10.4 -10 .3 -10.2

- 9 . 5 - 9 . 0 -8 .4 -2.2 -0 .8 - 0 . 3 t o . 1 t o . 9 t l . 5

2 . 3 2.9 3 .5

-46.9 -48.2 - 53.0 - 56.2 -60.1 -61.3 -65.4 -66.9 -69.8 - 73.4 -73.7 -74.5 -75.3 -75.1 -74 .1 -76.2 -75.7 -75.2 -75.3 -75 .3 -75.5 -74.7 -75.0 -75.1 -75.5 -74.0 - 74.4 -74.9 -74.8 -75.6

88.7 89. 5 90.0 90.0 90. 1 90. 3 90. .6 90.6 81.4 73.3 65. 5 58. 7 51.9 44.1 37.3 35 .8 32. 2 29.0 20 .1 1 2 . 3 4. 5

-5. 1 - 7.4 -6. 3 -5. 3 -4 .8 -4 . 3 - 1 . 5 - 1 . 3 -1. 5

Page 23: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

11. G. IGS Discre tes and Lift-off Synchronization

Detailed analysis of IGS t ime s ince l if t-off, IttDA;and comparison

On this flight the analysis indicated the IGS was 20 t 1 5 milli- with range time provides an es t imate of lift-off synchronization (See Reference 1 Section IV. G) . seconds la te in the determinat ion of lift-off. known to exis t in a p rogram constant used in lift-off determinat ion (See IBM Report #65-554-0042, Reference 3). IGS lift-off synchronization. this flight appears reasonable

An e r r o r of 9 mil l iseconds is

This e r r o r resu l t s in an apparent delay in Thus the synchronization accuracy obtained f r o m

Table 5 presents a list of var ious d i sc re t e events i s sued o r controlled by the IGS.

It was determined that the IGS SEGO discre te was i ssued a t a tDAS The tDAS t ime is lagging r e a l t ime by 0.020 t ime of 333.234 f. 003 seconds.

to. 015 seconds a t lift-off but the analysis indicates that the clock is running f a s t a t about 50 ppm. Therefore , a t the t ime the SEGO d i sc re t e is i ssued , about 0.017 seconds have been gained and the co r rec t ed t ime for del ivery of the IGS SEGO discre te is 333.237 to. 015 seconds a f te r lift-off. by Aerospace for RGS SEG% time i s 333.258 seconds.

-

A pre l iminary value quoted

Analysis of the IGS velocity data in the a r e a nea r SEGO provides a n es t imate of 93 t 5 fps for the Stage I1 engine cutoff impulse. -

Page 24: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-17 -

TABLE 5 - IGS DISCRETE EVENTS

T ime ( ) I sec)

-3 .64 -3.22 II

0

10.34

20.284

22. 802

88.03

104.72

107.44

119.28

146.21

167.97

Event Comments

P la t form Re leas e Based on reconstruction of the IGS position and velocity data in the t ime per iod p r i o r to platform re l ease through lift- off.

Lift- off

Roll P r o g r a m Initiate

Roll P r o g r a m Te r mination

IGS lift-off sync was late by 20 t 1 5 m seconds. -

S t a r t Pi tch Step 1

S t a r t Pi tch Step 2

Gain Change

Receipt of F i r s t Update (Value -319. 5 mode when update i s s een on F P S ) te lemetry.

T ime quoted i s DAS t ime in

S tar t Pitch Step 3

Receipt of Second Update Time quoted is DAS time in (Value - 204.0 mode when update is seen on F PS) te lemetry.

Time Stage I1 Guidance Initiate

Time quoted is the t ime a t which attitude e r r o r s ignals , generated by the IGS Stage I1 equations, a r e f i r s t sen t to the autopilot.

(1) All t imes a r e quoted based on GDC clock readings. not co r rec t ed for lift-off sync e r r o r s .

The t imes a r e

Page 25: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

TABLE 5 (Continued)

Time (set)

3 3 3 . 2 3 7

3 5 4 . 7 2 ( 1 )

Event Comments

IGS SECO (Uncertainty - t3. 0 msec )

Time quoted is based on the GDC clock reading just a f te r the SECO discre te is issued. Lift-off time synchronization e r r o r and clock dr i f t a r e accounted for in quoted time.

IVAR Initiation Time is again quoted to ref lect the t ime a t which IVAR attitude e r r o r s a r e f i r s t displayed.

(1) A l l times a r e quoted based on GDC clock readings. corrected for lift-off sync e r r o r s .

The t imes a r e not

Page 26: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-19 -

111. Conclusions

The following conclusions a r e formed based on the analysis per- formed and documented in this report:

1. IGS system performance during the Ascent portion of this mission up to SECO t 4 seconds was near perfect. t ime the yaw attitude e r r o r signal anomaly appeared (See Section 11-A). has since been corrected. Other than this anomaly, no discrepancies were found.

At that

This was caused by a program e r r o r which

2. IGS navigation e r ro r s a t SECO + 2 0 were approximately t 2 . 4 , t 2 . 0 , and - 3 . 6 F P S on the X, Y, and Z-axes, respectively. 2 . 5 FPS in velocity magnitude and 3 . 6 FPS in the out-of- plane direct ion.

This resulted in IGS e r r o r s of approxirpately

3 . IMU performance was within 1 Q of nominal.

4. With the exception of the attitude e r r o r s seen a t Stage I1 guidance initiation, the maximum ICs pitch and yaw attitude e r r o r seen during flight were less than 2. 1" and 1" r e - spectively.

5. IGS was successful in accepting a i rborne azimuth updates and reducing what could have been a potential 118 FPS out-of- plane velocity e r r o r to one l e s s than 9 FPS. platform misalignment on this flight was on the o rde r of - . 2 6 " .

The calculated

6 . IGS lift-off synchronization was established late by 2 0 *15 milliseconds.

c

Page 27: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

A IV. Recommendations

The analysis performed did not resu l t in any recommendations in the GDC analytic equation a r e a . as a resul t of the analysis of the GT-4 flight (Reference 2) . as follows:

Several recommendations were made These were

1 ) Sequence Tx, VZG, SFX, S F y , S F Z and t ime of IGS SECO by multiplexing the DAS word position now allotted to VZG.

2) Add IGS SECO discre te to Martin telemetry to be sampled at 400 cps ra te .

3 ) Use "START COMP' pushbutton in Ascent mode to eliminate undesirable entry into the Ascent mode af te r Ascent guidance is completed.

Of these recommendations, the first has been implemented in Math Flow 7 .

s

Page 28: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

a

a a

W

hl

W

>

>

d

u

>

X

d

W

>

I

Y

Y

IA

0

>

Y

v)

n

X

U

VI

-I

0

a

;L

4

>

I

u

c

P - w

5 c

*+

m

m

om

e

m

mm

*.

66

II

*m

mm

m

66

6

mm

mm

I

II

I 9

N

m9

90

NN

66

II

.*

mm

mo

*

@

96

06

em

m

m

II

*.

me

m

m

9m

tnm

m

m

mm

I

I

**

m

m

m

m

* . 4

I * 9

0

I- m

I m . m 9

9

m e m

I . m * 0

* r- e I m d

* 9

In e

m

I

N

* N * I- m I . d

m N

e I

m

m , @

9

* r- I d

m tn @

0

0 e

m

I

0

N

I-

9

I

a

m N

r- m

r- 9

m

1

4

9

m m

m

N

I

** tn

N

N@

dN

mm

I-m

NI

2s'

dr-

** m

d

mm

*

m

mm

I

1

**

90

99

e-

**

m

oD

mm

m

N

II

I-0

m

*

Ud

NN

m

m

I1

e*

m

-i dm

*

N

66

Otn

Nd

mm

I

1

e*

Wt

-

md

m

d

UN

00

mm

..

90

mo

m

m

mm

I

.

cc dm

lnrn N

9

46

06

me

..

O*

O

b

*d

90

.. lcm

N

m 6 6

e

't. m

0

d

m

m

d

0

e

m 0

c

c

lc 4

9

m 6

6

U

9 6

c

e

m

d . @

m

U

c1

m

m 6 c

6

m 6 0

6 .

* N

I-

@

r- s c

tn d

. d 6 0

. 0

6

m

3 c

d

0

d

d . d 0 m

~ m

a

*o

be

90

mN

d

N

.*

rnd

00

@@

mm

1.

dd

crm

90

rr

m

6O

D

eo

mm

om

.*

N9

em

00

.*

dd

be

UQ

N

m

r-0

N

m

me

m-

.I

~m

cc

dU

e9

00

@e

..

09

em

em

..

N9

m

a

mm

0-4

4-

4

49

Fd

99

.*

00

6@

I-0

dm

r-d

m

r- I-@

U

rn

.. d

m

dd

mm

m

m

In* 00

06

.* so

Om

nJ6

9r

n

mh

i m

e

.. rcm

d

cI

em

NN

uu

00

6@

..

Nm

am

me

I-+

m

4

**

m*

Nb

nJN

tnm

N

d

I.

0

0

66

m~

Page 29: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-23 -

-I

N

r- m U

9

1 0

U

N

e 0

m

d

I

r- Q

Q

Q

N

N

(CI

. d 0

N 0

0

3

I N e

9

9

I-

I

d

4

m

e

m

0.

N

m

U

m 0

N

m

lP

9

I 9

9

N

W

N

U

I

d

. d

m 0

m 9

U

9

m

4 N 6

U- .u L* 9

I 0

V

I m

I h

e

U

I d

c

6

N

h

m 9

n

m

Lp

U

5

m

in 9

I

rn z

Q

-2 9

m I . - c a

m 0 0

J

m . 4 9

c

4

m

*ul 0

I in 0

Ln

U- N

9

I

6

m 0

0

0

U

c

U

d U

m U

9

in 9

I N c

m . d m

9

I d

. In 0

e

J- 9

I 0

Ln

m ? U

m c I

6

9

0.

9

m

U

a

U

4 Q

rc

d

e

lP

9

1 6

m

4)

e

e c I

+ N

9

LF 0

9

9

I h 0

in 4

Ln m 4 I

.. 9

N

rn

d

r-

U9

99

99

II

u-

dm

mm

~

pm

..

U-N

O

d

h' N

I

I

u-

-0.

ND

-e

mu

a04

N9

99

.. .. rn

- "

U

mfl

hF

39

99

1

1

ms

NN

9

Ln

UU

09

NN

NN

II

e.

a 6

m 0

e

9

1

U

In

D

9

m

N

I

d

h

m

n

h

9

I 6

m

m

4

I

m m

* N

I

I

m U 0

U

c

9

I N

Q

U

m

U

U

N I . d

U

6

Ln 0 0

Ln . n

h

U

- rn c 9

I 0

N

Ln

D

4

N

I

d

m

U

in c

9

I 6

9

m . m

N

U- N

I N

m N

0. N

m

6

41

.. L

nN

ec

QO

L

n9

G

r- 9

9

II

-0

O(c

o

m

.I

96

m m

UlU-

NN

I

I

am

0-

mm

.. dN

90

NU

66 .. 00

9.t

d

N

99

h

rc

9

9

I1

N

rn

m

-

CU

mL

n

**

mu?

Nh

l I

1

.. N

c

9

c

9

I h

I)

h I

h

U

in

N

I

4

I 9

U

U

9

c

9

I

* U

m m N I z . n7 0

m .J e 9

I 6 9

d * 9

Ln m N

I

lP

Ln m 0

h

9

I

* 2 c

In

U- N

I

J- 0

9 9

9

I 9

.n

h

4

X

kP m N

I

0

m 9

9 c

9

I 0

r- 4 . d

9

m ry

I

m

m

9

9

c

9

I U

U

0

m J m

N 4

nl h

9

h

Q

I h

0 0

in

9

v\

ry . d

m c 9

h

9

I N

N

m . a 3 m h I . L

p

h

IC

9

h

0

I

U

e e 0

c

m N

I d N

0 e

9 c

9

I 6 6

U-

U

e

m

N 1 . m

0

m

9

9

I d

h

Ln

c

m e

m N

I

d

I)

9

"\

h 9

I Q

9

m

N

U

U

N

I

9

m m . U

e 6

F

W

5 0 e

9

9

0)

4

um

hl-4 e6

eo

mm

ur-

0-

00

.. d

d o

a-

-o

um

~-

~

aa

mu

dh

mm

O

-~

~Q

ON

N~

.........

VI c 0

Page 30: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-24 -

c L

ud V

IU

cv)

vc

r- N

d

0

m

N

I 4

90

99

C

PO

QU

h

0

00

I1

.. dd

9 0

9

0

c

c I

0

'9

0. b.

m

9

I

m

h

N

m 0

9

I

N

m

0

U

h

VI I

U

9

N

0

U

U

I

VI m

m

m

m

m I

I--

9-

m-

mlr CF

.. 4

9 e

* m

0

U c

U

9

Q

m oc U

0

4

0

I-

ln

N

I-

m

6

4 N

N

m0

.

om

m

*

04

dd

.. -

4 W

N

mu

.tu

mln

m

e

mJm

.. -

4

Page 31: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-25 -

.

A

.

Y

-J w

w

X

U

v)

t

I

V c I

4.

u

I: I

c

tn 0. N

m

N

m n

0

9

0

m . V

I cn 0

m

m

m

.I

mI- m

m

mm

VIln

c

n6

Ne

ON

e.7

mm

1. .. ln

f-

** m

m .. 6

N

*VI m

m

VIV

I 3-m

*

W

.. c

nd

ln

9

mm

n

cn 9

9

9

m . V

Iln

0.0

O*

.I

6-

Qt-

mm

nu

l 6

cn

9

0

.. m-

mm

f-m

In

cn c

N

0

4

VI 0. * . C

0

*

Page 32: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-26 -

tn c

V

a

I

w

P

N

W

>

* w

>

X

-I W

>

0

Y

y.

m

%

* u. m

0

Y

U

m

c

z

UJ u

Y,

*A

-I a

d

3

4

>

X

2 - Q

UJ E

I- L

b

b

Er QI

s QI

7

c

3.

'z

QI

b

Page 33: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-27 -

.

'.

a

N

U

Ln

%

>

U

wl

u .............................................

c 30~~-~~~~~~*~4~----~-00~0000~~000~00---~----~

Page 34: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-2

a -

a

W a

N

-I u

>

>

-I u

>

X

-I u

>

a - U VI

n >

U

VI

uo

mc

0

-!n

o

Od

N4

.

I.

.

NN

NN

m

mm

m

-I---

*uoo

*e

o0

N

O0

0

....

--.to

rn

au

-9

n

cm

~

.... 0

00

0

ce

~n

~

cm

~

rns

rno

ooc-

11

11

....

.

Page 35: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-29 -

rib

0

0

oh

cla

30

30

YN

l

l

-m

rib

-

9

nm

-4N

.*

-4

.. r

o

09

-3

nm

.. 3

0

I1

CP

N-N

IP

I-

w~

~r

nm

~r

m

l---+

-d

d4

(L

....... c

oo

oo

oc

o

-l

ol

l 1

1

n

c

L

om

O

N

-9

z U

J U

V

I

4

- x W

U

VI

<

0000000

coocoooo

OO

OO

GO

OO

a.......

3*

**

*.Y

uu

~0000000

w N

N h

N N

N

l

ll

l0

l

m c 0

.I

30

UN

c

lm

11

nm

3

N

.- 0

30

I

I

.. x .............................................

. -

N

'u- t*

.. 3

0

II

2.n

rcp

+a

..

Page 36: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-30 -

me

me

a

ou

m

~m

mm

mN

-0

00

00

....

....... o----oo

3--..1

--r.

mm

mm

mm

m

*4

4*

+-

4

NN

NN

NN

N

II

II

II

I

z w

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

m u

cco~ooooooooaoocoocoooo~

c. m

00000000000000000000~00~

0 a

n.

~,

,.

..

..

..

..

~.

..

~.

.~

~

3*

uf

f4

*u

*u

J*

**

*u

**

*f

*~

1u

>

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

co

oo

oo

oo

oo

i

~N

NN

~N

N~

N~

,~

N~

N~

NN

NN

N~

~~

I

ll

I1

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

Il

l

30000000000C00000000000000000000000000

300000C0000000000000000000000000000000

30000000000000000000000000000000000000

................................ ;

;;

;;

;f

ff

f*

uu

**

u~

ff

u*

uJ

~u

~*

uJ

uf

fu

uJ

~*

~u

uf

fu

3oocoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

I1

Il

1l

l1

ll

II

ll

Il

ll

Il

lI

lI

ll

ll

lI

0l

lI

lI

l

VW

N~

NN

N~

NN

~N

~h

NN

Nh

Nh

~N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

~N

~N

&N

Page 37: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

11

-1

1-

1-

1 I

I lllil I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

ON

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

N

~0

9Q

QQ

QQ

QQ

99

QQ

9Q

QQ

QQ

9Q

QQ

9Q

~Q

9Q

9Q

~Q

99

9Q

U

ow

ww

mw

wm

m~

ww

ww

ww

ww

mw

wm

ww

ww

ww

ww

ww

ww

mw

w

cm

6

0

0

-0

-0

0.

56

-6

Ub

*N

e

CC

Q

WO

N

CU

P

...

v

I

Page 38: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-32 -

UC

NN

NN

NN

C 0 C

Q Q

9

Q

........ o

om

aw

mm

m

c

P Ln 0 c 9 h

' m 4

Q

o. c C

c e 9 c 9

Y

<?

m Q

G- N

oe m

N m

.c - m c e e

.................... 3

*?

-c

-r

-d

-~

-r

cn

cr

v

J o A

N%

u c

n~

9-

c

wi

t ?a v

*

nu

-<

o~

cw

eC

c n--** r

.................. .................

--

--

+-

-

........ 7

% r.,

.-;e--

.- :

s:

Ti

.x

I

,-

,

I,

I,

I

L

I- C

u.

7

c

c.3 e <-

L

.A

!> , 1

<: a

L? .t

Page 39: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

. .

- A-33 -

nm

o

U"

"

m

V"

0109

Il

l

... -4

-

... 300

Il

l

30

0

3o

c

300

... 3

00

m

I

- c

I

Page 40: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

APPENDIX AB

FLIGHT RECONSTRUCTION GRAPHS

Page 41: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 42: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-36 -

E

Page 43: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

.

Page 44: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

I I +r

Page 45: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

. .

Page 46: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 47: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

c

Page 48: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 49: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-43 - F1

Page 50: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 51: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

- A-45 - 19

Page 52: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

8 b

Page 53: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

8

t S

C

- A-47 -

62

s

Page 54: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

I - A-48 -

Page 55: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

1.

2 .

3.

References

Gemini CT-3 Ascent Post-Flight Analysis Report , dated 9 Apri l 1965, IBM CD No. 3-260-6096 (CONF.) .

Gemini G T - 4 Ascent Post- Flight Analysis Report , dated 1 July 1965, IBM CD NO. 3-260-6118 (CONF.).

Ascent Operational P r o g r a m Math Flow 3 MOD I1 M V S Analysis, dated 25 May 1965, IBM No. 65-554-0042.

Page 56: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 57: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

PART B-

GEMINI V

REENTRY

MISS1 ON

RECONSTRUCTION I

Prepared by:

N. J. Kemercr J. B. MacPhcrson

Page 58: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are
Page 59: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. Introduction B -1

11. Summary B-1

Appendix BA B-5

DCS Quantities used in GT-5 Reconstruction

Appendix BB B-6

Reconstructed Navigation Data vs. Time

Reconstructed Guidance Data vs. Time

.

Page 60: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

4

Page 61: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B- 1

T h i s r e p o r t prc*sc.nts t h c rc:sults of thc- rc ( onstriic ion of the G e m i n i compt i tc r ope ra t ion du r ing G T - 5 Re-cmtry . T h e p u r p o s e of t h e r e c o n s t r u c t i o n w a s to v e r i f y tha t t hc c o m p u t e r nab igated p r o - p t > r l y , antl t o c>zrplain c e r t a i n anon in l i e s o1iscrvc.d i n t h t t e l e m e t r y guidance da la.

T h e s t i i dy was m a d e itsing the o p t r a t i o v a l p r o g r a m s i m u l a - t ion, which e x t c u t c s a Gemin i p r o g r a m on t h e 7090 Data P r o c e s s i n g Systcxm in f ixed point a r i t h m e t i c and 2 6 b i t word length. o m e t e r outputs antl r o l l gimbal ang le f r o m thc. f l ight tclerqc.try d a t a w e r e u s t ~ l a s i n p u t s to thc p r o g r a m . In addi t ion , t h c cornpiitation c y c l c t i m e m~iltiplc~xetl with t h v flow tag on t e l e m e t r y w a s used t o a l low a c c u r a t e eva lua t ion of s p l i t DAS frames.

T h e a c c e l e r -

T h e DCS quant i t ies u s t d in the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n a r e sIJowm for (Ver i f i ca t ion of t h e s e quan t i t i e s was P e r - r e f e r e n c e in Appendix a.

f o r m e d us ing r eadou t of the c o m p u t e r m e m o r y made a v a i l a b l e s h o r t l y a f t e r t he f l ight . ) given in Appendix BB.

A pr in tou t of the e n t i r e recons t ruc t i*on

11. SUMMARY

A. times dur ing R e - e n t r y a r e shown i n the following t ab le : deno tes r e c o n s t r u c t e d va lues , a n d T / M t e l e m e t r y v a l u e s )

T h e va lues of t he s i x naviga t ion p a r a m e t e r s a t t h r e e k e y ( R / C

End of R e t r o ( t = 1672. 101)

I S QE - V E - b' VIE a, - - R / C 2 1 , 7 6 5 , 7 4 6 f t 17 .962" 217 .571" 23821. 070 fps - . 9 1 4 " 60 .564" T I M 2 1 , 7 6 5 , 7 1 9 f t 17 .162" 217. 572" 23821. 160 fps - . 9 1 4 " 60. 565"

400, 000 f t ( t :- 2472. 101)

- TS - QE - V E - - d 2 E (?

R / C 2 1 , 2 9 5 , 166 f t 3 2 . 6 2 6 " 272.483" 24393.967 i p s - 1. 666" 8 9 . 2 8 4 " T / M 21, 295 ,043 f t 32. 625" 272.484" 24394. 175 fps - 1. 665" 89 . 285"

T e r m i n a t i o n of Guidance ( t = 2887. 277)

I S - QE - V E - d * a, - - R / C 20 , 9 7 2 , 2 9 0 f t 29. 636" 297 .995" 1608. 586 fps - 3 5 . 0 5 9 " 123. 536" T / M 20, 972, 083 f t 29. 634" 297 .997" 1609. 097 fps - 3 5 . 0 8 2 " 123. 536"

Page 62: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-2

Analys is of t h v rc~ronstr i ic toc] da t a s t i g g c s t s two conc lus ions :

Tlie G c . r i i i n i cotI iput( , r i i s c r l in t h c G ' T - 5 r i i i s s i o n navigated p rop c r l y , and g t? n c ra c d g \ I i dan c: c c o rrim a ntl s cons i s t c: n t with thc in i t ia l condi t ions and tht: navigatcitl t r a j c c t o r y ; and

C e r t a i n anonmlics i n thc attitude. c r r o r s i g n a l s res i i l t c~d froin the e r r o n e o u s in i t i a l condi t ion i.iput f o r thc quant i ty boR. T h e s e a n o m a l i e s w i l l now be d e s c r i b e d .

Anomal i c s in Gui_dancc Data f o r Tlcconst r i i c t rd Miss ion

Bank C o m m a n d Anomaly - IBM r e p o r t H 6 5 - 5 5 4 - 0 0 7 1 , "Ef fec t of E r r o n e o u s hQ, Input on GT-5 R e - e n t r y " , da ted 3 S e p t e m b e r 1965 d e s c r i b e s t h e condi t ions u n d e r whicli a d iv ide ove r f low in the ca l cu la t ion of the quan t i ty

c a u s e s s p u r i o u s bank c o m m a n d s to be ca l cu la t ed f r o m the equation:

F r o m the tc l ( .n ie t ry da t a , onc c a n o b s e r v e tha t the d iv ide ope ra t ion , p r i o r to t h e ove r f low, w a s g e n e r a t i n g l a r g e negat ive vaJ,ir:s fo r by the p r o g r a m , ca i i sed equat ion ( 2 ) to y ie ld a v a l u e of

&!,R which, upon he ing l i m i t e d to - 0. 387

c o s p i -- 0

whence

and thc,rr.for(- the magn i tude of thc Ixii ik a n g l e \vas a l s o 90" The qiiantity all, howc.ver, i s s c a l c d sii(-h tha t i t c a n g r t

.

Page 63: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B -3 s/

n o 1arg:c.r than - 177. 79- - -9 . that \ a l u ( ~ , an o v c . r l l o w oc.c-urrc.d in such a w a y that t h e s ign bit was iost and a posit ive nui-nhcr rc~sul ted. This n \un l ) c~r consis tent ly left A R a t a value l a r g e r than 0 . h29 and 1 hereby caused equation ( 2 ) to yield a value of

W1ic.n thc. qiiolicnt vxc er-dcd

cos p 1 = 1

whence

j n,( P, 0 0 .

T h c r e f o r c , p r i o r to the tcrminat ion of giiidance, the tr, le- m e t r y data shows commandc4 hank anglvs o f 0" in sp i te of thc fact that the down-range e r r o r obviously r e q u i r e s a z c r o lift command.

This s a m e overflow o c c u r r e d in the reconstruct ion during exact ly the same computer cyc le as the flight computer exhibited it. However, it did not produce the ident ical r e s u l t s because the Gemini s i m u l a t o r p r o g r a m s e t s the quotient to z e r o following a divide overflow; i. e . , it s e t s

A R = O

whence

cos p1 = 0 . 5

and therefore

The effect is seen in Appcmdix B a s a s t r i n g of 60" bank commands f r o m a t ime- in-mode of 2849.620 seconds to the terminat ion of closed-loop guidance.

( 2 ) C r o s s - R a n g e E r r o r Signal Anomaly - The reconstruct ion contained a n anomaly in the c r o s s - range e r r o r s ignal which was not Seen in the digital t e l e m e t r y , hut which may have caused e r r a t i c needle behavior in the yaw channel of the ADG just p r i o r to t h e terminat ion of guidance. This anomaly was caused by a divide overflow in the calcula- t ion of the c r o s s - r a n g e e r r o r

Page 64: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-4

This ciiioticnt is sca lc~ t l so that i t cannot c,xc(.c*tl 127. 99- - -9 , which is inor(' than a d ~ . q u a t e (or a nominal m i s s i o n , Lilt unde r the conditions o f the G'T-5 R e - e n t r y caused divide 0 v c 1' I- 1 ow s : 1.0.

Rc c ~ x c c c d c d - 130 n. m . whilc: (1,,T3 approac1ic.d

This fact is dcinonstratcd in Appcndix B unc1r.r t h c ~ column 1 1 D P S I ~ O ' I , wliicIi is tiic c r o s s - r a n g c e r r o r A qk, rc*fi*rrccj t o above. F r o n i a t ime- in -mode of 2862. 254 seconds until the* t crimination o f guidance, this quantity shows a valricx of z c r o in spite o f thc fact that the magnitudc of R obviously rcquii-cs a valric of - 1. 0. The value of z e r o again r e s u l t s f r o m thc fact that t he Gcrnini s i m u l a t o r s e t s a quotient to z e r o following a divide overflow.

c

( 3 ) Conclusions and Recommendat ions - The r econs t ruc t ion d e m o n s t r a t e s that t he Gemin i compute r navigated p r o p e r l y during the G T - 5 m i s s i o n , and gene ra t ed guidancc cominands consis tent with the ini t ia l conditions and navigated t r a j cctor y . It is recomrncnded that no act ion be taken r ega rd ing the divide overf lows obse rvcd in the fl ight, s ince: ( 1 ) they r e su l t ed f r o m a n a t t empt to f ly the compute r to a n un- r e a l i s t i c t a r g e t ; ( 2 ) no s u c h p r o b l e m can ex i s t i f the ini t ia l conditions a r e r e a l i s t i c ; and ( 3 ) r e s c a l i n g the quant i t ies involved r e s u l t s in a degradat ion of p e r f o r m a n c e under r e a l i s t i c conditions.

Page 65: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-5 '*

- Octa l Vnliic.

167 353 000 152 006 000

056 004 000

567 745 000 157 515 000 133 372 000 020 402 000

243 052 000

140 300 000

146 770 000

000 026 000

000 104 000

777 665 .OOO 777 747 000 144 150 000

777 770 000

632 617 000

000 021 000

001 463 000

767 146 000 771 130 000

004 425 000 000 400 000

Decimal V - l ue

15 657 900 f t 13 895 400 ft

6 030 300 ft - 17 414. 7 fps

14 291.4 fps 11 710 .5 fps

29. 55"

292. 00"

172. 569 0. 10057 f t / s e c / p u l s e

0.00004 f t / s e c / p u l s e

0. 00013 f t / s e c / p u l s e

- 0. 00014 f t / s e c / p u l s e - 0.00005 f t / s e c / p u l s e 0. 09785 f t / s e c / p u l s e

- 0.00002 f t / s e c / p u l s e

- 0. 09885 f t / s e c / p u l s e

0. 00003 f t / s e c / p u l s e

0. 02499 p u l s e / s e c

- 0. 13751 p u l s e / s e c - 0. 10669 p u l s e / s e c

8. 1309" 1. O f t l s e c 2

Page 66: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-6

A P P E N D I X BB

1. Rcconstructyd Navigation Data vs. Tirne - -

Definition of T c r m s :

T DAS = 'UAS TT T T

S F X P = S F X ' S F Y P = S F Y ' S F Z P = SFZ ' RS = rs i'1 TI = @ THETAE QE

GAMMA = ' f V E = V E

PSIE = 3iE

C o mput e r t im c: - in - mod e Intcgration t i m e

Accumulated pulse s u m s , X platforrn a x i s Accumulated pu l se s u n i s , Y platform a x i s Acciumiilated pulse s u m s , Z p la t fo rm a x i s S / C d i s t ance f rom e a r t h c e n t e r

S I C lat i tude S / C ea r t h- ref e r en ced longitude S / C velocity r e l a t ive to e a r t h S/ C flight-path-angle S I C e a r t h - r e f e r e n c e d heading

2. Reconstructed Guidance Data vs . T i m e -

Definition of T e r m s :

PHBI

DTHBO

DPSBO

DPHBO

BA

R D

R C BC

R P D PSIT

R T

Roll gimbal angle

Compute r output t o ADG pitch channel, converted to nautical m i l e s Compute r output t o ADG yaw channel, converted to units of R,/CDB Compute r output t o ADG r o l l channel , converted to clegr e e s Actual bank angle

Down-range e r r o r

C r o s s - r a n g e e r r o r Commanded bank angle

P r e d i c t e d half- lift r a n g e Dens i ty-at t i tude p a r a m e t e r S I C heading to t a r g e t

Range to t a r g e t

Page 67: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

c

eo

0

WOd

mQ

O

99

-

00

0

mr

om

“N

... m

mm

m

0

n I

h

0

m

m

N w

me

9

-0

nw-

CC

P

000

mm

m

mo

m

“N

...

-w

IO

a-

- c w

w

lL

I V

IY

a-

- VI c

2

NO

L

LU

m

-

a>

e

Y)

IL

V

in-

.................................

Page 68: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B -8

Page 69: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-9

d 2

..................................................... N

9

d

c z

0

Q

n

h

i N

0

0 .

. h

a

9 . r

l

I

d

d

n

U

Q

N

a

H

a

wE

>

" 0

W

bd

U

UN

069

m4.3

mo

-

... -

mu

mmm

NN

N

90-

om

u

mf-0

- 0.m

I-9

m

m

.. m

a

mln

N

N

mN

urn

-4

m

.. -4

mm

U 9

f- I- in

N

Q 0

rl

d

m In

mm

N

lc

-0

-

4m

a

0-N

JQ9

"N

... m

u0

N

Q0

.

060

-I

-N

m

mm

... m

4N

N

tnrn

m

or

u

mm

a

... Q

QI

O

"N

-I-

U-lN

Q

h

hd

(o

f-

w*

N

N

r-r- N

N

.. 00

mm

9

9

NN

mm

..

Q-

dN

m

o

wn

N

O

aQ

mm

-I-

NN

.. &

m

W6

..

um

m

Nm

m

I-

WD

uu*

NN

W

... 9

Q; 41 In

nl

5 0. n N

w a-

ce

wW

S

O

9

* N

mu

Q

U

NN

c-

4

pl m . h N

00

mm

90-

.. 6

N

L

m h

9 . 4 m

mu

4

006

Nm

m

tvm

99

.. NN

mn

mm

N

m

. N

m

0 Q

N

0

m ... 000

mm

m

.*. N

NN

m

mm

w

w

NN

N

F w

o

60

m

w

.. N

Q.

0

9

N

m

U

m

m N

4

0

m

N

m

0)

u

N

. 4

U

9

-4

6

N

u -4

N

N OG

N

3, 00

VI*

9e

m.4

N

N

NN

.. m

rn

-Id

uau

h-0

o

.-u

... N

9

Oln

N

JU

I.

.

om

s

9 0

0. N

N

-.I

Q . N 6 m

N

4

... 0

-(

v

N-IO

"N

222

c

W

W

LL 1

In

%

.II N

*O

L

LV

In

-

c-

Page 70: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-10

......................................................

.

lno

oln

h

OO

r

9m

o0

w

oo

w

wm

mw

w

wc

om

....

Page 71: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

a

2 c z

0

Q

I

wo

r

w

g!? L

YS

>

- m

Ne

m

eu

0

r.N

000

mm

m

N 1U

N

... 4

-w

mu.?

.Tu*

... NNN

mm

m N

N

rcl m

mo

V

.P

Q

mu

m

000

NN

N

... m

mm

mQ

m

uue

... N

NN

m

mm

Pe

d

FQ

U

9r

-w

...

4-4

4

mm

w

NN

N

ou

m

mum

NN

N

mm

m

mm

m

...

lne

e

mm

+

.*

e

N"IN

(Y

NN

~a

-

mc

nm

..

..... . 0

m

..... N

N"

N

mm

mm

m ... N

NN

m

mm

- 0

-w

IO

a-

NQ

N

om

ru

u

mm

9

e-t

... FW

-4

uuo

... -ro

o

4dd

N"

44

d

NN

N

m*u

000

NN

N m

Nd

000

"N

c

Y

Y

&

I m

x

4-4

.4

NN

N

NN

N

VI c

2

xo

Y

c)

VI-

a7

Page 72: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-12

......................................................

0

U

r(

* e U

N

mo

0

.0.

0-e

e

.

NN

0

0

U*

uu

NN

u

0

0

U u

N

r(

. d e0

-m

mUN

e0

.m

... -lo

o

03

-0

.

uuu

uuu

N"

N

.r 0

U

u n(

m m m

e

um

mr-

am

uu

*u

NN

.rm

.. 4

0.

Nm

N

P

QU

I*

uu

"

.. m

m N

u

In

9

90

mN

mm

uu

uu

NN

I.

m

.Q

U

0

U

N

m ...... w

c*

mo

w

r-r-r-f-c

a

rn

QU

-

99

OdN

... m

urm

u

uu

*u*

"N

WQ

CI

Od

w

m

00

OC

mu

*U

uu

NN

.. N

r- 9

N

U

u

u N o

w

UP

Wm

m

m

eu

uu

NN

mw

.. N c 0

0.

cy e

u

N o

m

mU

l m

w

.. z

m

N-l

eu

u*

NN

Q

l- Q

CI

U

* N

. rl m

oo

d O

ln

r-

4-

...

cN

m

00

-

uu

m

*uu

"N

ud

w

Nm

0

w0

.u

...

VN

Q

nm

m

uu

rt

NN

N

mm

c d

m

0 . 0 9

0

e

N a W

. d 9

CI e

N

.......................................................

mo

m

*O

r-

*a

m

e.

.

(Y

OU

c

oI0

0

00

m

C

c)

In

0

0 0

0

00

mm

.e

Q

c

0.P

-0

3m

ln

ON

+

an

9W

wo

o

00

0

00

0

... ,- mI

n0

hwn

md

tu

... 4

-e

0

00

0

00

d

4-l moon

-*en

m~

+m

0000

00

00

CO

.n

h

.... urm

r-N

0

4

0-r

O-r

0

0

.. d

d

In

0

-0

rn

mu

00

.. 4

-

-4

0

'n C

VI 4

fllno

fl r-

c.1 tn r-

CI

0L

-m

....

NN

NN

0000

m

u 0

0

OV

I O

N

Qf-

NN

00

.. L

d 00

r-

0

om

WO

N

N

00

.I

Ad

mu!

N-

0-

m

m

00

am

.. --

Ul h

m

Q

FQ

0

H

mm

-e

W.0

00

m

u

00

.. 4

- m N

d

. N U

0

4

oo

ln

on

-

'n r- n

... m

ar

-

UJ

U

00

0

-ra

d O

Ul

Oh,

0-

00

*In

0

0

44

..

Y

Page 73: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-13

. c

a-

- v) c z WO

a3

P3

*

O

ILU

...

44

-

NQO

CF

W

nm

n

..

..

I

ll

. --

c-

... c

mo

9

9-

99

9

"N

r-m

m

mN

n

9w

0

sms

cc

-c

9

99

N

Nh

l

...

... oomo

fiO

Nlr

\

CO

-IY

....

mo

dtw

r

-m

mm

0000

-(..I-- ................ m

u&

aw

ci

d-

~m

u~

~~

~-

o

wm

wm

m~

e0

0b

6e

0b

00

000000000000000-

OQ

h

om

o

cmb

Page 74: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-14

O

d

c . d 0

d

0

M

0. e 0

* r

.9m

a

m-

~

r-

m

NN

N

000

ddd

... m CP m

N 0

r. m

m

-9

mo

Nm

00

dd

.. m

U

4

m 0

d 0

-0

m

-.o

Nm

U

m m

<.l

000

-..d

d

... me

ff

m

mm

00

drl

mr,

.. 6

IF

4

m 0

d

ND

.0'

Nr.0

OdN

.tu.? 000

... d

dd

m 0

m

d 0

.o 6

m Q m

0

m

N

m

..

a

mm

m

000

U 0

d

.. U

0

d

..

d

d

dd

00

d

d 0 4

4

0

N

2 0000000

dd

d-.d

*d

. rw

e0

e-

- vl h

mw

NC

N

ma

o

9C

NP

m

-.Inc

NN

NN

"N

N

Nm

Cm

.... -

mu

m

U

0

.r O

m-

N

VIC

I

mu

0

... w

uu

9

-U

"nI

hw

m

ddd r- e

m 90

-w

M

U

.. m

l- w

w

Nd

d

d

nIN

I- 0'

Q

h

h 0

ry

A m

po

m

~m

W

OP

hm

d

Y

hl-

.. e

m

96

0'

QNO

c-

cy

090

QN

0

Nr

tO

000

NN

N

... m

m

e9

Qln

.. N

m

c

m

0

4

m

m 00

NQ

0

-

wr-

NO

m

s

mra

.. d

d

m

U

h . In h

0'

h

r(

ma

NC

-R

om

..

4N

r.

Q

N 9

C 4

ry

m

. 0 e m

N

d

... m

-lm

N

W

m 0

N

m 0

N

N

&-.

*V

I 00

NN

wo

9

9

-.d

n

m

-4d

c

In P

3 0o

-l

ma

m

00

0

... 6

c

b u

oln

Q

1i\C

I 00'P

e.

.

000

mm

m

N

Q

m 0

m +

NC

mm

m

.... 000

mm

m hl 0

m

m

'n c . 0 m w

m

.rN

hr-

.. 00

mm

N

h I 0

m

-4 ro

w

99

00

mm

em

.. m

9

.O N

m

mm

f

3

00

mm

N

N 9 . 0 m m

0 9 . N

co

0

-r- m

m

.. N 9

VI

0 . m

m 4

VI

0

m m

m

om

mu

00

m m

.. 0

00

0'

.... 0

m

... 000

mm

m

0

m

............ 000000000000

~m

mm

mm

nm

mm

mn

0

m

0

m 00

mm

d

*) 4

44

m

mm

d4

dO

m

mm

m

0

W

0 u

9

m

d N

N

mm

4.4

.. m

v

4

Q

d 0

0-

d . m

m

dd

c(d

.. .to

Wr

C

00

04

00

NN

.. m

r- -4 N

9

m

h

r- 0

d

N

N

0

* 4 d d N

0: 9

m

0: c 0

4

d

N

rn o

ou

um9

m"

000

44

-

Ad

4

NN

N

cm

m

... U

m

F

.?

c. N

m

-. -.I

0-

mW

N

RI N

.T R

I

V m

-n

00

Nh

l 0

.? .

e

Q

ON

N

... 0 0

.. .. U

b

o

mm

00

NU

d

d

U

0

N

m

d m

N

00

mm

4

m 0

c

w

w

Y

I

U 0

d

d

N

m 0 N

d e

m

00

NN

8

4A

m 0 N

4

m 0

N 4

m 0

N 4

r.

d

N

MA

IN

N 4

N

. d ....

mu

mr

- * N

u

N

N

I .. N

Q

99

-

m

0.

h

d m

.. N

C

Nm

m

N

QC

"

I1

... d

A

rl

N

I m

.. Q

Ul

dN

mm

I

1

dm

. h

r- N VI m

I .. 0

N 9

m

m

I .. h

m Vl N

U

I ..

99

r

-9

m

N

mV

I U

U

II

.. m

d 9

m 0 (0

N

9

N .. rn

ry

ow

49

*In

In

m

I1

d

4

m

C

ln I

r.

W N

U 9

I

h

e

N

6

Y 6

N

h

@ 0

m

N

I

00-4

000

mmm

N(C

V

I1

um

er-

o.? O

m

0-

.tu

I1

N 0

Q

U

'n

In N

I

Od

mb

U

4

I1

A

0

0

nm

I

I

NN

.r N

I

9r-

mm

I

1

c

Z

03

NO

* 1 ul I

.n

I d

1

UV

V

I- ..

d0

-

e-4

In a

00

o

f- . 0 U .. m

m . 9

WN

--

mum

CC

h

I

0

N

c

c

I

m

n

m

m

I

m

ln @

I

h .. Nm

c en

I-e

eu

ll

.. a

m

mm

m

u,

00

I1

d

d IC

N

h

0

d

I

m

V

r. 4

d

I

m

SI 0 4

d

I I.

4

1x) r-

.. 9

N

NU

N

U

NN

4-

4

11

.. 90

90

-u

mm

m In .. +

m

OU

l e4

-u

ll

A

d d

N

U

U

I d

n 0 N

m

m

m

A 0

I A

a

m 0 0 4

r- ff m

d

d

I

9

9

N

n

d

9

0

I a-4

N

m I

d U

VI d

h. I

.. c

t

07

K

O

d

A

I

cw

m

Il

l

d

I I

1

I I

_-

~

......................................................

Page 75: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

I I B-15

c; 2

c

z

0

"

a

. 9 m

1

....... ~

mu

m~

r-

m

99

69

99

9

4*

11

1*

1 .... D

Od

N

9c

cI-

*1

1*

... m

4m

m

mm

*

4*

e.

.

Nm

*

JU

U

41u

cm

m

cmc

Od

N

..* m

e1

d

dd

ddd

m

9

r- . 1 d d m

6Q

QDN

em

0

... 0

00

d

dr.

.... d

dN

N

dd

dd

d

dd

d

... (

se

w

00

0

ddd

............... 0000000000000000d

~~

mw

mm

mm

mm

~~

m~

~~

o

...... 9999ct-

00

00

00

0-

Nr-d

U

N-

m

N9

... moo

mo

u

mm

q

m

4-

D

.. N

e

m-4

W

m

N

0

n

m m

f-

cr

2 U . m

m

9

r- 0

c

m .

. e

5

CIN

-IO

m

md

6

mm

mr

-

mm

m

0

crcr ..

mo

m

N

m 0

96

0.04

6mO

d

r- 6 @NO

NU

'-

odm

m

6

N

Q

N

... m

wm

6

o.

P

GU

N

(sr-r-

... u

mu

l

9

0

0

m N

r- 9

O d

m

U

O

F

m 0

a-

m m

(s

0

9

0

N

. 4

0 0

d

99

m

N

Nd

.. 0

m

9 . m

U

0

N

d

m

NU

9

uuu

N-4

0

J4

.t

000

NN

N

mm

d

... ddd N

W9

Ic

r-0

6W

r-

000

N"

*:VI ..

n

mm

ddd

m

9

0

m

d

2 N

0

9

U 0

0

mr-

mu!

NN

00

d.4

NN

.. 9

VI 9

N

W

6

d

d

2 N N

Q

04

m

m

mr- .. 4"

dd

00

NN

.. w

m

de

6r-

4.9

m

m N

m

al 9 . "

2 N

U9

N

O

mm

4

m

00

NN

.. d

d

.. 40

em

-0.

NN

d

m

4-

0

4-

N

m

5 2 N

9

N

0

N

d

. m

N

2 -4

c

m 0

N

.4

c

W

Ly

40

mm

0

0

mm

m

000

4.4

-

NN

N m

m

00

NN

dd

Y

d

d

NN

... O

mN

m

r-r- r

-d

v

rm

00

I v

lx

a-

n

vl

. d 9

r- In 0

.. U

d

lnd

d

f-

mo

O

O

Id

I . W

0

0

m

m

N

m

9

9 .. dF W

m

U

U

m

d

I .. e 9 N N

U

m

N

m

h .. m

e

m

U

m

I

0

m

m I

.

4m

U

N

6"

09

9

9

I

U 0

U

m

9

I d

r-

. N

m e

9

f-

.* m

f- uo

60

W

d

r-n

9

m 6

N

m

d

I

0

9

W

m

m

I d

N

m

m

0

N

I

.. m

m

r-r- oo

49

m

m

9

W

d

4

I

rn 0

e

W

2 d

dd

I

-6

mm

I

1

dr

.

-. -I 9

I

&

d

I

.-

A

d

4.4

I1

d

I d

I d

I

dd

I

1

d

I dd

II

d

I d

d

d

I I

I

I1

I

I

I I

1

cv

) c-

Ice

N1

-8

N

we

Ic

r- CYN

.. (0

9

u-l

m

b

U

9

m

mo

u

um

m

ff

mc

U

4

W

m

0

N

. m N

N

Nm

O

d N

N-Y

4

NO

m

u9

r

mm

... m

r-*

-60

cw

o

Od

m

"N ... 4

4-4

w

mm

dum

NU

-

oa

r--

mu

m

om

m

... N

NN

NN

N dm

rc

mo

oD

wm

9-m

9-6

N"

NN

N

... (s

s m

mm

I

0

m

N

m

. 0 OI ..

me

r

n6

_-

...

Od

N

00

0

mw

m

"CY

- ..

m9

00

NN

m

m

.. d

d

UV

I

NN

m

a.

.. -0

m

e

...... m

mm

NN

N

mw

Dm

000

mm

cu

N

NN

mu

<W

O

Ur

c-

_.

cr-

NN

F

N

hi- " r- N r-rc

N

N

Page 76: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

I

B-16

L

0

0

00

Q

r-

W0

..

.

-W

so

P-

- l- W

w

y. I

Y)Y

a-

NO

0

oum

mt-+

~ e

..

0

0w

0

00

00

0,2220, N""

06

0

00

0

-0

0

NN

N

..... ... IN*

2

NO

a3

--

Y)-

.. ...

rn

4L

Nnn

Aom

000

NN

W

00

00

N

WN

N

r oa

10

I 1- I

II

I 1

11

Page 77: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-17

.

I

L

1

be

-0

r

w

a-

0 -. x

az

a-

- e W

vo

m

- - L VZ

a-

- L 02

a-

- u w

:E

0-

IW

0-

0

v)

mo

n

o

m a

0

0-

WL

x -

2

a- -

-0

w

w

xo

a-

1

mu

(

W

0-

Cr

ee

e~

e~

ee

~e

ee

.e

ee

e.

.*

~

.e

e*

.*

e*

**

.e

*e

ee

**

~e

**

e*

ee

~*

*.

e*

e

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

..................................................... 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

.................................................... 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

0d

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

0

.......... ........................................

OOOOOOOOOOddddOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

'U

.r

NU

UO

99

v

IS

-i

(u

~O

mc

m

o w

ut m

N o w

0

6w

mn

mn

c

........

Page 78: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-18

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

-

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

r ....................................................

L

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

~0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

h

i9

mu)

-0

0

- .....................................................

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0d

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

- 0

00

00

0~

00

00

d0

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

00

0

a

.................................................... L

02

e- ......................................................

- 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

00

0

...................................................... -

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

L

02

a- ...............................

................... -

~~

o~

~~

oo

~a

oo

a~

no

nn

nn

nn

n~

nn

-n

nn

~n

~~

~n

~n

nn

nn

nn

nn

~n

~~

~~

~o

0

w

252 0

-

.................................................... ao

mo

d

d0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

XU

0- ......................................................

0

a

0

a

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0-

I

8-22 0

-

mO

t

mw

Io

0

- ...............

VO

OV

VV

OO

OO

OU

QV

V

.................................... V

Ov

vO

uO

uO

wO

OO

Ov

V0

00

vu

~o

ov

ov

vv

uo

vv

v~

o

Page 79: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-19 a

...................................................... -

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

t

&X

&

-

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

o

uo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

vo

o

oo

oo

oo

oo

ov

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

......................................................

- OOOOoOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

99

99

94

99

99

99

99

99

90

99

l

1I

II

II

lI

II

I1

88

I1

11

1

u

Ly .......................................................

- 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~

L

0

Q

0

...................................................... tn

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

...................................................... 0

-

ooovvuoouoo~voovvovvvvouvvvovvovvvoou~uvowvovvavo~ovvo

mx

I cz

Page 80: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-20

.................................................... d

d0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0v

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

....................................................

d~0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

11

11

1l

l1

11

11

l1

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

l1

l1

l1

l1

11

11

11

11

01

11

1l

11

1

99

99

99

99

99

99

99

49

99

99

99

99

9Q

99

99

99

99

99

49

99

99

99

99

99

~9

99

Q9

.............*............;...............,.*,...,,.~..,.,.. 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

...................................................... oouoooooooooooo~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

l1

l1

11

11

11

11

11

1

l1

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

l1

11

11

11

11

11

l1

.................................................... d

~0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

................................................... ;

J~

"o

vv

ov

oo

oo

vo

vo

oo

uu

vo

v~

u~

o~

~o

oo

vo

oo

ov

~v

vv

ov

vv

vo

vv

o0

0o

L

Page 81: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

I-=

a-

- bo

................ 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

dd

dd

4-U

4-ld

-d

*d

-l-ld

-4

OO

dd

dd

-l

-l

d1

dd

dN

NN

9O

-l

mm

m

mu

m

0.

.

NN

W

00

0 m

m*

N

Ww

Nm

s-mv

.... N

NN

N

00

00

.......... m

mm

mm

mm

m-

m

00

00

00

00

00

d

--l4

-l-l.4

44

+ .......

4*

+3

.+

*J

0

00

00

00

d

d-ld

dd

d

................................................... dddOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

0

...................................................... I

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

L

02

a-

- 0

Y

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

v0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

30

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

949999999999~~999999~999~999099~9999909~~~9999~s9999~9

1l

11

11

l1

11

l1

11

1l

11

11

ll

lt

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

lt

lt

ll

ll

l1

11

11

11

ooooqooooooqoooooqooooqooooooo0oooooooooooooooo~ooooqooo

................................................

w

40

C

D-

on

...................................................... m

e oooooooooooooo~oooooooooooooooooooo~ooooo~oooooooooooooo

fW

1

11

11

11

11

11

1l

l1

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

l1

11

11

l1

11

11

1

am

-_

a-

0

5

...................................................... v)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

0

...................................................... 0

-

OO

OO

OO

VO

OO

OO

~v

Ou

vO

OO

ou

VO

UO

UO

OO

OO

OO

OV

OU

OD

OO

VO

OQ

O

QE

I

Page 82: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-22

-. t

cz

a-

I

co

-ul -0

a-

0 - L a=

a-

u

W

uo

a-

- L UZ

a-

- L 02

a-

n

:: :e 0

-

IW

0-

0

m

v)

0

0

mu

a

m

0-

s=

=z

0

-

n

-0

mu

20

a-

- v)U

*

W

Ov)

c-

‘c c

...................................................... 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

II

II

II

...................................................... 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

11

11

11

11

l1

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

1l

11

11

1l

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

L

...................................................... woovovvovovooooovoovvwoovvvovvovwovoovovwvooooovo~uowv

Page 83: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-23

L.'

- cu r

w

-0

a-

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

- 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

U

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

~e

~0

~0

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

0~

00

06

e0

00

a-

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oq

oo

oo

oq

oq

oo

oo

oq

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

o

..................................................

On

...................................................... m

a 0

00

00

00

00

00

OO

OO

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

IW

1

1

nn

0

Q

...................................................... cn

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

a

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

~I

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

...................................................... 0

-

oo

ow

oo

vv

oo

oo

ov

ov

vo

ov

oo

oo

oo

ov

vo

~o

vo

ov

vv

o~

~o

Oo

oo

ov

oo

ou

ov

oo

v

ms

I -

-0

IO

Q-

mu

Page 84: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

B-24 b

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Q0

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

@0

00

......................................................

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

~0

00

O

oo

oo

oo

oo

o~

oo

oe

~P

o~

ee

o0

~e

eo

ee

~e

ee

ee

ee

em

ee

me

ee

ee

e~

~~

~o

0

....... ...........................................

ooooooododooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooooo

1~

11

11

ll

11

1l

1l

1

11

1l

1l

11

11

l1

1

...................................................... 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

00

00

00

00

0~

00

00

0

11

1l

11

l1

11

Il

ll

ll

ll

ll

lr

ll

ll

ll

l1

11

l1

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

ll

.................................................... d

dO

OO

OO

OO

OO

OO

Ov

0O

OO

O0

v0

vv

00

00

00

0v

00

00

v0

v0

0v

00

00

0v

00

00

0

Page 85: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

L

X

Ct

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

n

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

u 00000000000000000~00000~0000P@0000000~0000O00000000009

a- ooooooooooooooqooqqq~q~oooooooooooqo~~q~~oooooooq~~ooo

................ ............

*.*

.......

w U

O

Q- L.

0

UZ

e-

n I

02

a-

L.

W

w

(0

Q

-

0- ......................................................

me ~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~~

~o

o~

oo

oo

oo

o~

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

~o

oo

I

W

no

0-

0

b)

....................................................... 0

ul 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

0.

l1

11

11

l1

11

11

l1

11

11

1l

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

1l

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

...................................................... 0

-

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

vo

oo

ov

oO

OO

OO

OO

Oo

oo

oo

oo

vo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

o~

oo

oo

oo

oo

I

a-

WU

*

W

0-

C-

Page 86: I r 2 GEMINI CqM4 GEMINI Y - ibiblio · made using the FORTRAN model of the GDC Ascent mode. of the study is discussed in detail in Reference 1. the analysis of the GT-5 flight are

8-26

0- .................................................

mu

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooooooooooooooooooooo

on

n

- s

w

o- .................................................

mu

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooooooooooooooooooooo

on

s

w

n-

Q o

.................................................. m

n

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

~o

o~

oo

oo

oo

~o

oo

OO

OO

OC

Cc

o~

o~

~~

-o

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

oo

o

l1

11

11

11

1

0

et

0-

rO

m

w

IO

0-

99m

WO

N

OQ

W

PON

rnrn

m

...