hydrologic conditions report - minnesota department of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological and Water Resources
Hydrologic Conditions Report
October 2015
This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report for 2015. For comparative
purposes please reference the previous reports at: http://mndnr.gov/current_conditions/hydro_conditions.html
October 2015 monthly precipitation totals were variable across Minnesota. Above-average precipitation was reported in central and east central Minnesota. Below-average monthly precipitation totals were observed in northwest, northeast, west central and south central sections of the state. The U. S. Drought Monitor map released on November 5 depicts portions of west central, northwest, and far southeast Minnesota as Abnormally Dry or experiencing Moderate Drought. The map shows no other areas in Minnesota in a dryness category. Average monthly temperatures for October 2015 were above historical averages across Minnesota, ranging from two to four degrees above normal.
Stream flow across the state was primarily in the normal range for October while above normal flows remain present in the southwest corners of the state. Above normal flows in a few watersheds led to backwater conditions at two of the indicator gages – Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls and Bois de Sioux River near Doran. The Clearwater River at Plummer was at low flows throughout October. There was a slight rising trend toward the end of the month, but the monthly average was still in the low flow regime. The Marsh River at Shelly is only monitored seasonally; no flows were available for Major Watershed 59 for October.
When comparing October 2015 lake levels to their entire historic record, approximately 55% of the statewide gauged lakes were in the Normal percentile, 31% below normal or low, and 14% above normal or high. In October, approximately 52% of the reporting lakes across the state were below their average lake level of the entire historic record, 14% were at their average, and 34% above their average. Twenty-six percent of the statewide reporting lakes have lake levels more than ½ foot higher than their average, and 15% have lake levels more than ½ foot below their historic average. Three of the highlighted lakes in this report went down one percentile ranking into the Low or Below Normal percentiles, compared to last month's September rankings. Four of the selected lakes showed High or Above Normal percentiles for October.
Groundwater levels remained at normal levels when compared to monthly historical averages for the majority of the state. There was little movement from September to October’s water levels but a few did decline. The below average rainfall totals in the northwestern part of the state were evidenced in the continued low water levels in wells of that portion of the state. One Cass County water table monitoring site continued its 5th straight month in the low water level category. No wells were in the high water level category this month. The single Hennepin County well that was high in September’s report has dropped this month into the above normal range. Two wells that showed small increases in water levels were in southern counties. These wells were in the low and below normal categories in the previous month. The increases for October show recovery towards normal levels that correspond to the above-average rainfall in southern portions of the state.
The information in this report is provided by DNR through long term programs committed to recording and tracking the long term status
of our water resources. The current conditions of precipitation, stream flows, lake levels and ground water levels in this report provide
valuable information for natural and economic resource management on a state, county and watershed level.
If you have questions on the content of this report please contact Greg Spoden: 651-296-4214, [email protected]
![Page 2: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
38
24
22
55
54
47 464652 5084 53 444948
43
42
3083
31 325182 4041
2981 39
27 28
3833
1925
2018
3717
34
16
26
1534
23
3614
21
5
3510
13
1157
5812
56
8
24
6059
9
7
3
61
661
63
73
62
72
67
77 76
68 6574
78 75
79
7170
69
80
LAKE OF THE WOODS
KITTSON ROSEAU
KOOCHICHING
MARSHALL
ST. LOUIS
BELTRAMI
POLK
PENNINGTON
COOK
LAKE
CLEARWATER
RED LAKE ITASCA
NORMAN MAHNOMEN
CASSHUBBARD
CLAYBECKER
AITKIN
WADENA CROW WING
CARLTON
OTTER TAILWILKIN
PINE
TODD MORRISON
MILLELACS
KANABECGRANT
DOUGLAS
TRAVERSEBENTON
STEVENS
STEARNS
POPE ISANTI
CHISAGO
BIG STONE SHERBURNE
SWIFT KANDIYOHI
WRIGHT ANOKAMEEKER
LAC QUI PARLE
WASH
INGT
ON
HENNEPIN
CHIPPEWARAMSEY
MCLEOD CARVERYELLOW MEDICINE DAKOTA
RENVILLE
SCOTTSIBLEY
REDWOOD GOODHUE
LINCOLNLYON
LE SUEUR
RICEBROWN
NICOLLET
WABASHA
BLUEEARTH
PIPESTONE MURRAY COTTONWOOD WINONAWASECA
STEELE DODGE
OLMSTEDWATONWAN
ROCK NOBLES
JACKSON
MARTIN HOUSTONFARIBAULT
FILLMORE
FREEBORN MOWER
Minnesota Counties and Major Watershed Index
1. Lake Superior - North2. Lake Superior - South3. St. Louis River4. Cloquet River5. Nemadji River6. (none)7. Mississippi River - Headwaters8. Leech Lake River9. Mississippi River - Grand Rapids
10. Mississippi River - Brainerd11. Pine River12. Crow Wing River13. Redeye River14. Long Prairie River15. Mississippi River - Sartell16. Sauk River17. Mississippi River - St. Cloud18. North Fork Crow River19. South Fork Crow River20. Mississippi River - Twin Cities21. Rum River22. Minnesota River - Headwaters23. Pomme de Terre River24. Lac Qui Parle River25. Minnesota - Yellow Medicine Rivers26. Chippewa River27. Redwood River28. Minnesota River - Mankato29. Cottonwood River30. Blue Earth River31. Watonwan River32. Le Sueur River33. Lower Minnesota River34. Upper St. Croix River35. Kettle River36. Snake River37. Lower St. Croix River38. Mississippi River - Lake Pepin39. Cannon River40. Mississippi River - Winona41. Zumbro River42. Mississippi River - La Crescent43. Root River44. Mississippi River - Reno45. (none)46. Upper Iowa River47. Upper Wapsipinicon River48. Cedar River49. Shell Rock River50. Winnebago River51. Des Moines River - Headwaters52. Lower Des Moines River53. East Fork Des Moines River54. Bois de Sioux River55. Mustinka River56. Otter Tail River57. Upper Red River of the North58. Buffalo River59. Red River of the North - Marsh River60. Wild Rice River61. Red River of the North - Sandhill River62. Upper/Lower Red Lake63. Red Lake River64. (none)65. Thief River66. Clearwater River67. Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek68. Snake River69. Red River of the North - Tamarac River70. Two Rivers71. Roseau River72. Rainy River - Headwaters73. Vermilion River74. Rainy River - Rainy Lake75. Rainy River - Black River76. Little Fork River77. Big Fork River78. Rapid River79. Rainy River - Baudette80. Lake of the Woods81. Upper Big Sioux River82. Lower Big Sioux River83. Rock River84. Little Sioux River
Level 2 Hydrologic Unit (HUC4)Cedar RiverDes Moines RiverLower Mississippi RiverMinnesota RiverMississippi - Upper Iowa RiversMississippi River - Headwaters
Missouri - Big Sioux RiversMissouri - Little Sioux RiversRainy RiverRed River of the NorthSt. Croix RiverWestern Lake Superior
DNR Major Watershed -Level 4 Hydrologic Unit (HUC8)
![Page 3: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Climatology
Sep tem ber 29, 2015
DNR Major WatershedDrought Intensity
D0 Drought - Abnorm ally DryD1 Drought - ModerateD2 Drought - SevereD3 Drought - Extrem eD4 Drought - Exc ep tional
Total Prec ip itation - Dep arture from Norm al:
October 2015U.S. Drought MonitorNovem ber 3, 2015
(p relim inary) (p relim inary)
MNDNR State Clim atology Office
Notes:•Oc tober 2015 m onthly p rec ip itation totals were variable ac ros s Minnesota. Above-averagep recip itation was rep orted in c entral and east central Minnesota. Below-average m onthlyp recip itation totals were observed in northwest, northeast, west central and s outh centrals ec tions of the s tate•The U. S. Drought Monitor m ap released on Novem ber 5 dep ic ts p ortions of wes t c entral,northwest, and far southeast Minnes ota as Abnorm ally Dry or exp erienc ing ModerateDrought. The m ap s how s no other areas in Minnesota in a drynes s category.•Average m onthly tem p eratures for October 2015 were above historical averages ac ros sMinnesota, ranging from two to four degrees above norm al.
inches
Total Prec ip itation - Dep arture from Norm al:
Ap ril 1, 2015 - Novem ber 3, 2015
inches
2.04.0
1.0
-2.0-1.00.0
6.0
-4.0-6.0
1.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
![Page 4: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
###
#
##
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
38
24
22
55
54
47 464652 5084 53 444948
43
42
3083
31 325182 4041
2981 39
27 28
3833
1925
2018
3717
34
16
26
1534
23
3614
21
5
3510
13
1157
5812
56
8
24
6059
9
7
3
61
661
63
73
62
72
67
77 76
68 6574
78 75
79
7170
69
80
LAKE OF THE WOODS
KITTSONROSEAU
KOOCHICHING
MARSHALL
ST. LOUIS
BELTRAMI
POLK
PENNINGTON
COOK
LAKE
CLEARWATER
RED LAKE ITASCA
NORMAN MAHNOMEN
CASSHUBBARD
CLAYBECKER
AITKIN
WADENA CROW WING
CARLTON
OTTER TAILWILKIN
PINE
TODDMORRISON
MILLELACS
KANABECGRANT
DOUGLAS
TRAVERSEBENTON
STEVENS
STEARNS
POPE ISANTI
CHISAGO
BIG STONESHERBURNE
SWIFT KANDIYOHI
WRIGHT
ANOKA
MEEKERLAC QUI PARLE
WASH
INGT
ON
HENNEPIN
CHIPPEWARAMSEY
MCLEOD CARVERYELLOW MEDICINE DAKOTA
RENVILLE
SCOTTSIBLEY
REDWOOD GOODHUE
LINCOLNLYON
LE SUEUR
RICEBROWN
NICOLLET
WABASHA
BLUEEARTH
PIPESTONE MURRAY COTTONWOOD WINONAWASECA
STEELE DODGE
OLMSTEDWATONWAN
ROCK NOBLES
JACKSON
MARTIN HOUSTONFARIBAULT
FILLMORE
FREEBORN MOWER
Surface Water: Stream Flow
Previous Flow ConditionsSeptember 2015
This map is based on provisional stream gage datafrom the USGS National Water Information System
October 2015Stream Flow Conditions
* Percentile ranking based on mean daily flows for the current month averaged and ranked with all historical mean daily flows for that month. A watershed ranked at zero means that the present month flow is the lowest in the period of record; a ranking of 100 indicates the highest in the period of record. A ranking at the 50th percentile (median) specifies that the present-month flow is in the middle of the historical distribution.
# Designated major watershed gage Percentile *High Flows (>90th percentile)Above Normal Flows (75 - 90th percentile)Normal Flows (25 - 75th percentile)Below Normal Flows (10 - 25th percentile)Low Flows (<= 10th percentile)
Flow affected bybackwaterStation monitoredseasonally
![Page 5: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
LAKE OF THE WOODS
KITTSONROSEAU
KOOCHICHING
MARSHALL
ST. LOUIS
BELTRAMI
POLK
PENNINGTON
COOK
LAKE
CLEARWATER
RED LAKE ITASCA
NORMAN MAHNOMEN
CASSHUBBARD
CLAYBECKER
AITKIN
WADENA CROW WING
CARLTON
OTTER TAILWILKIN
PINE
TODD MORRISON
MILLELACS
KANABECGRANT
DOUGLAS
TRAVERSEBENTON
STEVENS STEARNSPOPE
ISANTI
CHISAGO
BIG STONE SHERBURNE
SWIFT KANDIYOHI
WRIGHT
ANOKA
MEEKERLAC QUI PARLE WA
SHIN
GTON
HENNEPIN
CHIPPEWARAMSEY
MCLEOD CARVERYELLOW MEDICINE DAKOTA
RENVILLE
SCOTTSIBLEY
REDWOOD GOODHUE
LINCOLNLYON
LE SUEUR
RICEBROWN
NICOLLET
WABASHA
BLUEEARTH
PIPESTONE MURRAY COTTONWOOD WINONAWASECA
STEELE DODGE
OLMSTEDWATONWAN
ROCK NOBLES
JACKSON
MARTIN HOUSTONFARIBAULT
FILLMORE
FREEBORN MOWER
Upper Cormorant
Turtle River
Chub
North Center
Poplar
Edward
Marion
Minnetonka
Green
Lake of the Woods
West Jefferson
Mille Lacs
Upper PriorSwan
White Bear
Shetek
Indian
East Battle
Tamarack
Pokegama
Sarah
BurntsideVermilion
Minnewaska !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
Source data from: MN DNR Waters Lake Level Minnesota Monitoring Program
October 2015Lake Level Status
Surface Water: Lake Levels
* Percentile ranking based on last reported reading for the current month compared to all historical reported levels for that month. A lake ranked at zero means that the present reported level is the lowest in the period of record; a ranking of 100 indicates the highest in the period of record. A ranking at the 50th percentile (median) specifies that the present- month reported lake level is in the middle of the historical distribution.
Previous Conditions September 2015
Percentile *!( High Water Levels (>90th percentile)!( Above Normal Water Levels (75 - 90th percentile)!( Normal Water Levels (25 - 75th percentile)!( Below Normal Water Levels (10 - 25th percentile)!( Low Water Levels (<= 10th percentile)
Level 2 Hydrologic UnitDNR Major Watershed
!( No reading available
![Page 6: Hydrologic Conditions Report - Minnesota Department of ...files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../hydrologic_conditions_october_2015.pdf · This is the seventh and final installment of the monthly](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030419/5aa6896e7f8b9a1d728e90d8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
!
!!
#
#
!!
!
!
#
#
# #
#
"
"
"
"
AquiferWater TableBuried ArtesianBedrock
Ground Water
* Percentile ranking based on last reported reading for the current month compared to all historical reported levels for that month. A water level ranked at zero means that the present reported level is the lowest in the period of record; a ranking of 100 indicates the highest in the period of record. A ranking at the 50th percentile (median) specifies that the present- month reported water level level is in the middle of the historical distribution.
Source data from: MN DNR Ground Water Level Monitoring Program
September 2015 Indicator Wells!
!!
#
##
!!
!
#
#
# #
#
"
"
"
"
Ground Water Level Historical RankingsOctober 2015
Water Level
Low Water Levels (< 10% percentile)
!(
Below Normal Water Levels (10% - 25% percentile)
Above Normal Water Levels (75% - 90% percentile)Normal Water Levels (25% - 75% percentile)
High Water Levels (> 90% percentile)!(
!(
!(
!(