hvdc class after minor1
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
1/42
High Voltage DC TransmissionHigh Voltage DC Transmission
Dr.Dr. SukumarSukumar MishraMishra
IIT DelhiIIT Delhi
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
2/42
Representation for Stability studies
In stability program, the ac network equations are represented interms of +ve sequence quantities.
This imposes a fundamental limitation on the modelling of the dc
systems, in particular commutation failures cannot be predicted
accurately.
Notwithstanding the above limitation, models of various degrees
of detail have been effectively used to represent dc systems in
stability studies.
Some of the early efforts to incorporate HVDC system models
into stability programs used detailed representation.In recent years
the tend has been toward simpler models.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
3/42
Functional block diagram of an HVDC SYSTEM MODEL
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
4/42
Representation for Stability studies Simpler models are adequate for general purpose stability studies
of systems in which the dc link is connected to strong parts of theac system.
For weak ac system applications & for multiterminal dc systems
require detailed models.
So, the trend is to have flexible modelling capability with wide
range of detail.
The required degree of detail depends on the purpose of the study
and the particular dc system.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
5/42
Representation for Stability studies
contd
Each dc system tends to have unique characteristics tailored to
meet the specific needs of its application.
Therefore, standard models of fixed structures have not been
developed for representation of dc system in stability studies.
So, three categories, as :
A. Simple model
B. Response or performance model &
C. Detailed model with flexible modelling capability.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
6/42
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
7/42
Representation for Stability studies
contdB. Response models :
For general purpose stability studies the dynamics of dc lineand pole control may be neglected.
The pole control action is assumed to be instantaneous and
the lines are represented by their resistances.
Many control functions are represented in terms of their net
effects, rather than their actual characteristics of the
hardware.
Different features included in a typical response type model
are:
(1). Converter & line equations
(2).Current control order with limits
(3).Control actions during ac faults
(4).Commutation failure checks
(5).Power/current order modulations
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
8/42
(1). Converter & line equations :
The three modes of control are:
Mode 1: Rectifier on CC ; Inverter on CEA .
Mode 2: Inverter on CC ; Rectifier on CIA .
Mode 3: Rectifier on CIA ; Inverter on constant- control .
In this case T/F taps are not adjusted as they are no fast enough to be
effective during the period of interest.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
9/42
(2)Current control order with limits:
Iord is determined so as to provide either current control or power
control as desired. Constraints are imposed on the current-order level to keep the
current within the range of min. & max. limits
The maximum current is determined by VDCOL as shown.
The VDCOL may be given a time delay to assist in riding throughac system faults.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
10/42
(3)Control actions during ac faults :
It is necessary to have adequate representation of the actions of
control during the faults.
If the ac voltage on either side falls below a certain value for
longer than a specified time, the direct-current order is set to zero.
A ramp limit restricts the rate of decrease of direct current.
The line is shut off when the current falls below a specified
minimum value.The direct current is restored after the ac voltage
recovers to an acceptable level.
If the voltage recovers before the direct line current has reached its
minimum value, the direct current is restored to its original value
immediately
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
11/42
(3).Control actions during ac faults :
contd.
If the voltage recovery occurs after the after the line has been shutdown, the recovery has been delayed by a specified time.
After this, the direct line current is restored to its original value at a
specified maximum rate.
The alternative recovery procedures.
(i). The current is increased by controlling rectifier , with the
inverter firing angle fixed at 900
.When the current reachesIdesired- Im,the inverter extinction angle is ramped down to a
specified value.
(ii). The current is increased with a maximum possible dc voltage.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
12/42
(3).Control actions during ac faults :
contd.
Option (i) ensures ,
during recovery maximum reactive power is drawn
from the ac system and may be used to control the ac over
voltages.
Option (ii) ensures,
maximum possible power is transmitted through the
dc link.
The mode of operation & dc blocking and deblocking sequences
are system dependent.
The optimum sequence is established by experimentation.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
13/42
Shutoff and recovery sequence
Current control block diagram
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
14/42
(4).Commutation failure checks :
The dc model usually includes a logic for shutting of the dc linefor commutation failure, detected by monitoring commutation
voltage or converter margin angle.
(5).Power / Current order modulations: Dynamics of controls used for ac system stabilization are
represented accurately, consistent with the representation used
for other forms of stability controls. Eg: PSS
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
15/42
The dq0 transformation
The stator phase currents (ia,ib,ic) in new variables (id, iq) as :
id = kd [iacos + ibcos(-2/3) +iccos(+2/3) ]
iq = -kq [iasin + ibsin(-2/3) + icsin(+2/3) ]
The constants kd., kq are arbitary and their values may be chosen
to simplify numerical coefficients in performance equations.
If kd & kq = 2/3, for a balanced sinusoidal conditions, the peak
values of id & iq are equal to the peak value of the stator
currents.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
16/42
For balanced condition,
ia = imsin stib = imsin (st - 2/3)
ic = imsin (st + 2/3)
id = kd [imsin st cos + imsin (st - 2/3) cos(-2/3)+ imsin (st+2/3)cos(+2/3) ]
= kd (3/2) Imsin (st- )
Similarly,iq = -kq (3/2) Im cos (st- )
i0 = 1/3 (ia + ib + ic)
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
17/42
The transformation from the abc to dq0 in matrix form is:
The inverse transformation is :
These transformations also applicable to stator flux
linkages and voltages.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
18/42
Design of a variable structure current
regulator for weak AC/DC systems
For weak AC/DC systems the modulation of DC power for stabilization results in transient changes of both frequency and
amplitudes of the alternating voltages on the converter bus bar.
This transient modulation of the commutating voltages, and theassociated shiftings of the voltage zero crossings, activates the
converter controls.
This may lead to instability and collapse of the DC link due to
repetitive commutation failures.
In order to assure proper operation of the DC link and minimize
voltage fluctuations throughout the network it is best to maintain the
converterAC bus voltage constant during the modulation period.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
19/42
To overcome the mentioned difficulties, coordinated active and
reactive power modulations using input signals from both the
converter stations have been used
A Kalman filtering technique to minimize the system measurement
requirements, and observer based on the Kalman filtering approachis used for controlling AC/DC systems.
Both optimal and modal control of the rectifier current regulators
have been undertaken to damp electromechanical oscillations ofweak AC/ DC systems.
However, none of the above schemes possesses disturbance
rejection properties, nor are they insensitive to plant parameter
variations or the non-linear loads at the AC/DC interface buses.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
20/42
A new approach based on sliding mode control and variablestructure systems theory for the design of the rectifier current
regulator can be used to get above said benifits.
The same technique can also be applied to the reactive power
control schemes using a static VAR compensator or gamma
modulation regulator.
The sliding mode control constrains the system motion to a state
trajectory and provides a robust, realizable control scheme.
The problem of designing the controller is to determine a suitable
switching surface that yields a desired control input forcing the
instantaneous states to sliding modes.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
21/42
The variable structure current regulator has a normal DC currentregulator along with a control signal derived from speed, voltage
or load angle deviation signals using sliding mode theory.
A two-terminal integrated AC/DC system model
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
22/42
The synchronous generator supplying power through an ACtransmission line and an HVDC transmission link is represented
by an equivalent voltage source E behind the transient reactance
xd!.
The DC transmission link modelled in this study is a two-terminal
one, having one controlled rectifier and one controlled inverter as
links to the AC system. Shunt capacitors are used at both the
rectifier and inverter ends to provide reactive power support.
A static VAR compensator is either connected to the rectifier or
the inverter bus to provide adequate damping for oscillations ofthe AC/DC system during transient disturbances.
A non-linear load is connected at the rectifier bus and its active
and reactive power are non-linear functions of the load bus
voltage.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
23/42
System model :Using a simplified generator model of a voltage behind the transient
reactance, the following equations hold good for the integrated AC/DC
system at the generator:
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
24/42
System model :
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
25/42
System model :
For the DC transmission link, constant current control is assumedat the rectifier and constant extinction angle control at the inverter.
The DC power modulation for the improvement of AC/DC system
dynamic performance is implemented by adding a modulating
signal to the reference current of the converter current controller.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
26/42
The model of the converter current controller with the auxiliary
stabilizing control u1 derived from the generator speed deviation
signal and using a feedback gain K .
HVDC link current control with active power modulation by speed
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
27/42
HVDC link current control with a variable structure control
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
28/42
The equation for the rectifier firing angle control is
given by:
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
29/42
The DC line is represented by an equivalentRL circuit yielding adynamic first-order response for the DC current:
Rac and Lac are the resistance and inductance, respectively, of the DC
line.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
30/42
Static VAR compensator model :
Reactive power control with variable structure control
A static VAR compensator (SVC) with thyristor controlled reactor
(TCR) is considered for reactive power modulation control.
SVC is either placed at the rectifier or the inverter end depending on
the system requirements and the effective short-circuit ratio.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
31/42
The primary function of the SVC is to control the reactive powerand stabilize the commutating bus voltage.
The auxiliary stabilizing signal us is added to the main controller to
improve the dynamic performance of the AC/DC system.
The dynamic equation for the susceptance presented to the converter
bus is
Qs is the reactive power rating of the SVC and o the initial firing
angle (0 o )
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
32/42
Sliding mode control of the HVDC link:
variable structure systems (VSSs) are used to enhance the dynamic
performance of the AC/DC system.
VSS controllers possess several attractive features, for example, fast
response, good transient performance, and insensitivity to variations
in plant parameters and external disturbances.
Further, the sliding mode control, which constrains the system motion
to a state trajectory, provides greater robustness than classical control
schemes.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
33/42
To design a variable structure current regulator for the HVDC link,the system equations (discussed earlier) are linearized about an
operating point to yield,
and u1 is the auxiliary control for the current regulator.
The constants g1 to g8 are obtained by linearizing the system eqns.
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
34/42
The switching hyperplane is defined by the equation
where parameters cl to c3 are chosen to achieve the desired system
performance.
A non-linear combination of state variables may be used, provided
that the desired dynamic performance can be obtained with the
Chosen form.
The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a sliding
mode on the switching surface require, in the vicinity = 0,
that
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
35/42
Eliminating x4
from switching hyperplane (with ), the
Reduced state equation in a matrix form
The characteristic equation of this reduced system is
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
36/42
Assuming the above characteristic equation has one eigen value at
zero and two other eigen values at 1 and 2 (which can be fixed as
desired),
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
37/42
The expression for auxiliary control u1 is taken as
Thus,
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
38/42
Hence, if feed back gain parameters 1,2,and 3 are chosen to be
and the dynamics ofx3 are neglected, then the condition
yields the following set of inequalities:
Where,
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
39/42
Further, the simplification pIdc
= 0 can be used without much effect
on the controller design, thus neglecting the dynamics of the DC line
(its time constant being small). With this simplification, the system
equations are :
The switching hyperplane is
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
40/42
The characteristic matrix with one pole at zero of the reduced system
is
Proceeding in the same way as before, we obtain the values of c1 and c2
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
41/42
Instead of the rotor angle deviation , the voltage deviation at the
rectifier bus can be used as a feedback signal for the DC link current
controller design:
The expression for Vs is
The gains 1 and 2 are obtained in a similar way:
-
8/7/2019 HVDC class after minor1
42/42
However, if a coordinated current control at the rectifier and a
modulation at the inverter is required, the change in is given by
Also, in a similar way, if a static VAR controller is used at the
inverter end, the change in the susceptance at the inverter end isgiven by
These equations are to be incorporated in the linearized equations of
the system to give the coefficients g1, g2 . . . . . g12 of the coordinatedControl scheme.