husserl's phenomenology a short introduction for psychologists
DESCRIPTION
This is the presentation I used to set the philosophical context for students in my graduate seminar in descriptive phenomenological psychological research--it is an outline of some central Husserlian concepts, and assumes no prior acquaintance with Husserl's work. Naturally, I supplemented the slides with many experiential examples!TRANSCRIPT
Husserl’s phenomenology: A short introduction for psychologists
August 2012
Marc Applebaum, PhD
Faculty of Psychology and Interdisciplinary InquiryAssociate Editor, Journal of Phenomenological PsychologyFounding Editor, PhenomenologyBlog
Acknowledgment
This presentation is deeply indebted to the many lectures of Amedeo Giorgi’s I have been fortunate to attend over the years…
An attitude of open expectancy
Phenomenology is not simply an approach to philosophy, but more than that, as Giorgi has said, it is a way of seeing.
This course is an introduction to this way of seeing, an invitation to what Gendlin (1982) might term a “felt sense” of phenomenology.
What is phenomenology?
Introduction to some core concepts in Husserl’s phenomenological philosophy
Φαινόμενoν that which appears or is seenΛόγος a discourse or reasoned account
Phainomenon + Logos
Phenomenology is a practice of carefully describing and unfolding what is given to us in perception
A provisional definition…
For phenomenology, consciousness is privileged because it is the medium through which anything whatsoever is knownConsciousness is not “thing-like;” it is that by means of which we encounter the world and others
Consciousness—our means of access to the world
The fundamental attribute of consciousness is that it presents
Attention to lived perception is the foundation of phenomenological praxis
For phenomenology…
Phenomenology offers a presentational theory of consciousness, not a representational theoryFor Husserl, we perceive the “things themselves,” not representations of thingsOf course, perception is fallible and always in the process of self-correcting…
Perceptual presence
The German term for intuition, Anschauung, can also be translated as “perception”The Latin root of intuition is intueri, “looking upon”In philosophy this means that an object is present in perception for a subject
“Intuition”—the presentational faculty of consciousness
For phenomenology, consciousness “reaches out” to an object—this quality of reaching out is called the intentionality of consciousnessThe Latin root of intend is intendere, “stretching out toward”
Intentionality
This stretching out is a distinctive activity of consciousness…
Anything we can be conscious of is referred to as an “object of consciousness”We can distinguish between different types of objects--For example, there are objects that transcend the conscious acts that grasp them
Objects of consciousness
And there are objects that are immanent in the conscious acts
Likewise phenomenology distinguishes between real and irreal objects—Real objects are located in space, time, and causality—like this table, Abraham Lincoln, or Chicago
Real and irreal objects
Irreal objects lack one or more of these attributes—a unicorn, a triangle, or the idea of justice
Though they are different kinds of objects, both are genuine objects for consciousness
Real and irreal objects
The natural attitude is the way in which we encounter the world in everyday life—objects are assumed to be real and the world is assumed to be the way we grasp it…The natural attitude is usually not recognized as an attitudeThis is contrasted to chosen, reflective attitudes such as a scientific attitude
The natural attitude
An object’s factual attributes are those that locate it in space, time, and causalityPositivist philosophy seeks to ground science in only these attributes Phenomenology rejects reducing human phenomena to (only) their facticityBecause this would imply viewing human phenomena as merely thing-like
Facticity
Husserl’s phenomenological philosophical method
To investigate a phenomenon, we adopt the attitude of the phenomenological reduction, which means—
We bracket past knowledge of that phenomenon, andWe withhold affirming existentially that that the phenomenon “is” as it appears, in order to carefully describe how it appears
Is a shift in attitude that frees the researcher from the natural attitudeReduction means returning something to a more primordial mode
The reduction--
We set aside the facticity of the object, and describe it just as it appears to us, as a presence
ἐποχή means suspending or “withholding from”We withhold from making the habitual existential affirmation regarding what we perceive By doing this, we become free to linger with and examine the perceptions themselves as presences instead of as facts
In doing this we employ an epoché
1. We employ the reduction and epoché, 2. We view the given as a phenomenal
presence,3. We next seek to identify the essential
structure of the phenomenon using imaginative variation
Review of methodical steps so far…
We use our imagination to change any aspect of the phenomenon we’re examining, in order to discover what’s essential and what isn’tThe test for what’s essential is: if we remove an essential constituent, the phenomenon is no longer be recognizable as itself—
Free imaginative variation
Demonstrates that for phenomenology, possibilities are as important as factsHusserl didn’t claim to be inventing this technique, he was relying upon and clarifying something consciousness does all the time…
This methodical varying---
We will be working with the research method developed by Giorgi (2009)As you will see, the descriptive method closely follows Husserl’s methodical steps for phenomenological inquiry
The psychological research method
Selected ReferencesGendlin, E. T. (1978). Focusing. (first edition). New York:
Everest House.Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological
method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Giorgi, A. (2000). Psychology as a human science revisited. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40 (3): 56-73.
Mohanty, J. N. (1987). Philosophical description and descriptive philosophy. In Phenomenology: Descriptive or hermeneutic? (pp. 40-61). The First Annual Symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.