http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b y-sa/2.0/. integrating the data prof:rui alves...

71
http:// creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Upload: horace-watts

Post on 28-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Integrating the Data

Prof:Rui [email protected]

973702406Dept Ciencies Mediques Basiques,

1st Floor, Room 1.08Website of the Course:http://web.udl.es/usuaris/pg193845/Courses/Bioinformatics_2007/

Course: http://10.100.14.36/Student_Server/

Outline

• Methods for reconstruction of functional protein networks– Why is it important?

• Methods for reconstruction of physical protein interactions

Proteins do not work alone!

Finding the social environment of a protein

• Finding out what a protein does is not enough – Reductase, ok, but of what? (super-mouse)

• There is an incredible ammount of information available regarding the biology of many organisms– Sequences, omics, pathways, etc…

Integrating the information is important for network recontruction

• If we can integrate all the information available for a given protein/gene, then we are likely to be able to predict its social network

• From here to reconstructing the causal set of interactions in the network, there is only a step– Who does what to whom

Methods for network reconstruction

• Mapping Gene onto known pathways– If a gene is orthologous to genes in other

organisms for which we known the pathways and circuits, then we can assume that they work in that circuit in the new organism

Find a gene in a new genome

…Sequenced … Genome…

Sequence of

ste20

Orthologue

gene

Reconstruct same pathway in new organismSte20 new organism

Methods for network reconstruction

• Mapping Gene onto known pathways • Using text analysis

– Scientific literature as accumulated over centuries now.

– No one can know everything and read everything.

– However, information is buried in there

– Mining that information can assist in network reconstruction

Publication databases are source of information

Meta text databases create network models from publication analysis

iHOP is a sofisticated context analysis motor

How does meta-text analysis create networks?

Literature database

Gene names

database

Language rules

database

scripts

Entry

Gene list Rule list

Server/

Program

Your genes

List of entries mentioning your gene

e.g Ste20e.g activate,

inhibit rescue

Problems with this set up

• Delay with respect to available information

• Disregards a lot of information available over the web

Text Miner will address this

Text Miner

Text Miner

Text Miner

Text Miner

Things to do• Statistical Significance

– Internal controls– Overall controls

• Sentence Mining– Definition of action words ontology to help

automated function mining

• Graphical Drawing– Allowing for mouse drag and droping

• Selector for interaction that are to be trusted and included in the model

Problems with this set up

• Slow, analysis and document retrieval is done live– In the future there will be an option so that if a

search has been done by someone before the user will be able to use that, instead of doing a live search

• There is more “junk info”– However you can control that by selecting the

sources of information you want to use

Methods for network reconstruction

• Mapping Gene onto known pathways • Meta text analysis• Evolutionary based protein interaction

prediction– Proteins that work together (i.e. belong to the

smae close social network) evolve together– Ergo, proteins that show co-evolution are to

likely to work together

Proteins that have coevolved share a function

• If protein A has co-evolved with protein B, they are likely to be involved in the same process

• Looking for proteins that coevolved will help prediction social networks of proteins

• There are many methods to look for co-evolution of proteins– Phylogenetic profiling, gene neighbourhoods,

gene fusion events, phylogenetic trees…

Using phylogenetic profiles to predict protein interactions

Your Sequence (A) Server/

Program

Database of profiles for each protein in each organism

Database of proteins in fully sequenced genomes

Protein id A

Target Genome

Homologue in Genome 1?

Homologue in Genome 2?

A

B

C

Y

N

Y

N

Y

N

A B

00i/number of genomes<1C

1j/number of genomes

A 1

C 0.9

… …

B 0.11

… …

Proteins (A and C) that are present and absent in the same set of genomes are likely to be involved in the same process and therefore interact

Similarly, if protein A is absent in all genomes in which protein B is present there is a likelihood that they perform the same function! 2

Calculate coincidence index

Phylogenetic coincidence server

• We have one that will be up in a few months for yeast, coli, man, chimp, candida and xanthus.

Syntheny/Conservation of gene neighborhoods

Genome 1

Genome 2

Genome 3

Genome …

Protein A Protein B Protein C Protein D

Protein A Protein BProtein C Protein D

Protein AProtein B Protein CProtein D

Protein A Protein B Protein C Protein D

Which of these proteins interact?

Proteins A and B are in a conserved relative position in most genomes which is an

indication that they are likely to interact

Gene fusion events

Genome 1

Genome 2

Genome 3

Genome …

Protein A Protein DProtein C Protein B

Protein A Protein B Protein C Protein D

Protein AProtein B Protein CProtein D

Protein A Protein B Protein C Protein D

Which of these proteins interact?Proteins A and B have suffered gene fusion

events in at least some genomes, which is an indication that they are likely to interact

Building phylogenetic trees of proteins

Genome 1

Genome 2

Genome 3

Genome …

Protein A Protein B Protein C Protein D

Protein A Protein BProtein C Protein D

Protein AProtein B Protein CProtein D

…Get sequence of all homogues, align and

build a phylogenetic tree

Phylogenetic trees represent the evolutionary history of homologue

genes/proteins based on their sequence

Similarity of phylogenetic trees indicates interaction between proteins

A1

B2

C1 D1

A2

A3

… …

B1

B3

C2

C3

D3

D2Proteins A and B have similar evolutionary trees and thus are likely to interact

Protein/Gene interactions

• Often, people use these methods to say that genes of proteins interact.

• The methods previously describe can not be used accurately to describe PHYSICAL interaction

• When people say interact in this context one is forced to assume FUNCTIONAL (not necessarily physical) interaction, unless more info is available

Methods for network reconstruction

• Mapping Gene onto known pathways • Using meta text analysis• Using phylogenetic profiling• Using omics data

– If two proteins/genes have evolve to perform a function in the same process, it is likely that their activity and gene expression is co-regulated

– Conversely, if proteins/genes are co-regulated, then they are likely to participate in the same process

Predicting gene functional interactions using micro array

datacells

cells

Stimulum

Purify cDNA

Purify cDNA Compare cDNA levels of

corresponding genes in the different

populations

Genes overexpressed

as a result of stimulus

Genes underexpressed

as a result of stimulus

Genes with expression

independent of stimulus

Group of genes/proteins

involved in response to the stimulus

Gene network reconstruction

• Reconstruction of gene networks based on micro-array data is a very difficult endeavor

• It is an inverse problem, meaning that there is usually more than one solution that fits the data

• Pioner groups used either petri nets (e.g. Somogyi, Finland) or mathematical model (Okamoto, Japan)

Group of proteins involved in response

to the stimulus

Predicting protein functional interactions using mass spec data

cells

cells

Stimulum

Purify proteins

Purify proteins Identify Proteins and compare Protein

profiles/levels in the different populations

Proteins present

as a result of stimulus

Proteins absent

as a result of stimulus

Proteins Present

in both conditions

Protein network reconstruction

• Reconstruction of protein networks based on mass spec proteomics data is still very immature.

• To my knowledge no paradigmatic, large scale example of it has yet been done

Regulation of gene expression

• Predicting which TF regulate gene expression is an important part of reconstructing biological circuits of interest

• Omics data and bioinformatics can also be used to do this

Predicting regulatory modules with CHIP-ChIp experiments

cells

Crosslink

Protein/DNA Break DNA

Break DNA

Reverse cross link & Purify DNA Pieces

Afinity Purification of Transcription factor

Reverse cross link & Purify DNA Pieces bound to TF

Compare in MicroarrayDerive consensus sequences for TF binding sites

Scan new genomes for TF regulatory modules

Predicting protein activity modulation with NMR/IR/MS

Metabolomics

cells

Stimulus

Measuring Metabolitescells

Measuring Metabolites

Compare changes in metabolic levels to infer changes in protein activity

Incorporating metabolomics information

• These changes can be incorporated into mathematical models and these models can then be used predictively

Methods for network reconstruction

• Mapping Gene onto known pathways • Using meta text analysis• Using phylogenetic profiling• Using omics data• Using protein interaction data

– Large scale protein interaction data sets are available

– If proteins physically interact, it is likely that they work together in the same network

Predicting protein networks using protein interaction data

Database of protein

interactions

Server/

Program

Your Sequence (A)

A

BC

D E

FContinue until you are satisfied

or completed the network

Outline

• Methods for reconstruction of functional protein networks

• Methods for reconstruction of physical protein interactions

How do proteins work within the network?

• Assume we now have the network our protein is involved in.

• How do we further analyze the role of the protein?

Proteins work by binding

EffectDNA

Proteins work by binding!

So what?

So, if we can predict how proteins DOCK to their ligands, then we will be able to understand how the binding allows them to work systemically

Design drugs to overcome mutations in binding sites

Design proteins to prevent/enhance other interactions

What is in silico protein docking?

• Given two molecules find their correct association using a computer:

+

=

Recep

tor Ligand

T

Complex

What types of in silico docking exist?

• Sequence Based Docking:

In silico two hybrid docking

E. coli

S. typhi

Y. pestis

AGGMEYW….

AA – CDWY…

AGG –DYW

Protein AE. coli

S. typhi

Y. pestis

VCHPRIIE….

VCH -KIIE…

VCH –KIIE…

Protein B

V C H P K I I E…

A

G

G

D

D/K or E/R may be involved in a salt bridge

Pearson Correlation

What types of in silico docking exist?

• Sequence Based Docking

• In silico structural protein docking

Structure based docking

• Protein-Protein docking

– Rigid (usually)

• Protein-Ligand docking

– Rigid protein, flexible ligand

Very demanding on computational resources

Structural docking in a nutshell

• Scan molecular surfaces of protein for best surface fit– First steric, then energetics – Can (and should) include biologically relevant

information (e.g. residue X is known from mutation experiments to be involved in the docking → discard any docking not involving this residue)

Atom based docking

• First, a surface representation is needed

Van der Waals Surface

Accessible (Connolly)Surface

Solvent accessibleSurface

Calculating the best docking

• Scan molecular surfaces of protein for best surface fit– Calculate the position where a largest number of

atoms fits together, factor in energy + biology and rank solutions according to that

Grid-based techniques

•Grid-based Techniques

–Alternative to calculating protein atom / ligand atom interactions. more efficient (number of grid points < number of atoms)

Grid based docking

Score 1

Score 2Score 3

Score 4

Place grid over protein

Calculate inter-molecular forces for each grid point

The docking function

• There are many and none is the best for all cases

•Scores will depend on the exact docking function you use

A docking function for surface matching

•Molecules a, b placed on l × m × n grid

•Match surfaces

•Fourier transform makes calculation faster

moleculetheofsurfacetheon

moleculetheinside

moleculetheoutside

ba nml

1

0

, ,,

', ', ' 1, 2, 3 ', ', ' 1, 2, 3' 1 ' 1 ' 1

,N N N

l m n l step m step n step l m n l step m step n stepl m n

Ca b a b

•Tabulate and rank all possible conformations

A docking function for electrostatics

• There are many

•they use different force field approximations to calculate energy of electrostatic interactions.

•The basics:

dVrrrrE bbaabbaaticelectrosta

Charge distributions for proteins

Potential for proteins

The full docking function

• Calculates a relative binding energy that integrates electrostatic and shape matching factors. For example:

tot Electrostatic Electrostatic shape matching shapematchingE c E c E

Overall process of docking

Overall process of docking

1, 2,,,

( , )i jp p

i j

Energy Form Matching Electrostatics

Mol 1 Mol 2

Rigid Body energy calculation

List of Complexes

Re-rank using statistics of residue contact, H/bond, biological information, etc

Re-rank using rotamers, flexibility in protein backbone angles, Molecular dynamics, etc.

Final list of solutions

Summary

• Methods for reconstruction of functional protein networks– Bibliomics

– Genomics

– Phenomics, etc

• Methods for reconstruction of protein interactions– Sequence based

– Structure based

The overall picture

The overall picture

The overall picture

The overall picture

The overall picture

The overall picture

Grid-based techniques

• Grid-based Techniques

– Notes:

• Grids spaced <1 Å

– Results show very little change in error for grids spacing between .25 and 1 Å

Problem Importance

• Computer aided drug design – a new drug should fit the active site of a specific receptor.

• Many reactions in the cell occur through interactions between the molecules.

• No efficient techniques for crystallizing large complexes and finding their structure.