http www.wirelessweek

7
LOG IN REGISTER Articles Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice? Tue, 01/24/2012 - 7:36pm by Steven Glapa, Ruckus Wireless Get today's wireless headlines and news - Sign up now! As operators are confronted with insane demand for mobile data, there are at least four distinct areas where congestion may appear: • the access radio network • the signaling and control portions of the network • the network packet core and • the backhaul network Each of these choke points pose a unique challenge to the operator and generally can be addressed in one of three ways: 1. increasing capacity of the affected network resource 2. offloading the network resource to relieve congestion or 3. doing both The move to smaller cells to augment existing macro networks is widely viewed as a potential panacea to the access radio network congestion these problems but also creates a new one: backhaul. This has become one of the telecom industry's hottest debates. Mobile operators are planning their LTE networks as a combination of macro cells and an 'underlay' network of smaller micro and picocells. To achieve the capacity density required by rapidly rising mobile Internet bandwidth demand, these small cells will need to be much larger in number in a given area than is the case in current cellular networks. This presents a new and very significant backhaul challenge — because the mounting locations of these small cell nodes (such as utility poles or other street- level assets) will very rarely be a natural fit for fiber or microwave solutions. The concept of LTE self-backhaul or meshing is one possible solution, but as with early mesh Wi-Fi networks that attempted to provide access and meshing all within the same spectrum band, this approach rapidly consumes scarce (and expensive) LTE access-capable spectrum with backhaul traffic. The option of using a 5 GHz 802.11n point-to-point solution is a very attractive alternative — easily delivering the more than 100 Mbps of backhaul capacity an LTE cell will need. Getting Smaller Small cells are low-powered, multi-radio access points (cellular/Wi-Fi/backhaul) that improve indoor and outdoor coverage to increase capacity and offload traffic - as much as 80 percent during peak times. While small cells benefit 3G service deployments today, their importance will only grow as the industry moves towards higher capacity 4G/LTE, especially in urban environments. According to In-Stat's latest report, Femtocells and Small Cells: Making the Most of Megahertz, small cell shipments will reach $14 billion in 2015. The problem is, as network operators continue to increase coverage and capacity and look to offload data to relieve traffic pressures, they also increase the stress on their cell site backhaul connectivity. In this small cell world, conventional point-to-point microwave, bonded copper and fiber-based backhaul solutions can quickly become impractical or uneconomical. While microwave point-to-point equipment costs have come down in recent years, it generally requires a line-of-sight (LOS) link with the connecting backhaul hub, a condition many small-cell locations will be unable to meet. Sub-6 GHz NLOS solutions using a point-to-multipoint architecture are better suited for dense underlays, but when using licensed spectrum, narrow bandwidth channels put strict limits on backhaul capacity, and most sub-6 GHz spectrum bands are expensive and frequently not available for licensing. NEWS ARTICLES REVIEWS BLOGS MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS Page 1 of 7 Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice? 6/5/2013 http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Upload: indianbuddy

Post on 08-Feb-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

source wireless week

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Http Www.wirelessweek

LOG IN REGISTER

Articles

Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

Tue, 01/24/2012 - 7:36pm

by Steven Glapa, Ruckus Wireless

Get today's wireless headlines and news - Sign up now!

As operators are confronted with insane demand for mobile data, there are at least four distinct areas where congestion may appear:

• the access radio network

• the signaling and control portions of the network

• the network packet core and

• the backhaul network

Each of these choke points pose a unique challenge to the operator and generally can be addressed in one of three ways:

1. increasing capacity of the affected network resource

2. offloading the network resource to relieve congestion or

3. doing both

The move to smaller cells to augment existing macro networks is widely viewed as a potential panacea to the access radio

network congestion these problems but also creates a new one: backhaul. This has become one of the telecom industry's hottest

debates.

Mobile operators are planning their LTE networks as a combination of macro cells and an 'underlay' network of smaller micro and

picocells. To achieve the capacity density required by rapidly rising mobile Internet bandwidth demand, these small cells will

need to be much larger in number in a given area than is the case in current cellular networks. This presents a new and very

significant backhaul challenge — because the mounting locations of these small cell nodes (such as utility poles or other street-

level assets) will very rarely be a natural fit for fiber or microwave solutions.

The concept of LTE self-backhaul or meshing is one possible solution, but as with early mesh Wi-Fi networks that attempted to provide access and

meshing all within the same spectrum band, this approach rapidly consumes scarce (and expensive) LTE access-capable spectrum with backhaul

traffic. The option of using a 5 GHz 802.11n point-to-point solution is a very attractive alternative — easily delivering the more than 100 Mbps of

backhaul capacity an LTE cell will need.

Getting Smaller

Small cells are low-powered, multi-radio access points (cellular/Wi-Fi/backhaul) that improve indoor and outdoor coverage to increase capacity

and offload traffic - as much as 80 percent during peak times. While small cells benefit 3G service deployments today, their importance will only

grow as the industry moves towards higher capacity 4G/LTE, especially in urban environments. According to In-Stat's latest report, Femtocells

and Small Cells: Making the Most of Megahertz, small cell shipments will reach $14 billion in 2015.

The problem is, as network operators continue to increase coverage and capacity and look to offload data to relieve traffic pressures, they also

increase the stress on their cell site backhaul connectivity. In this small cell world, conventional point-to-point microwave, bonded copper and

fiber-based backhaul solutions can quickly become impractical or uneconomical.

While microwave point-to-point equipment costs have come down in recent years, it generally requires a line-of-sight (LOS) link with the

connecting backhaul hub, a condition many small-cell locations will be unable to meet. Sub-6 GHz NLOS solutions using a point-to-multipoint

architecture are better suited for dense underlays, but when using licensed spectrum, narrow bandwidth channels put strict limits on backhaul

capacity, and most sub-6 GHz spectrum bands are expensive and frequently not available for licensing.

NEWS ARTICLES REVIEWS BLOGS MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS

Page 1 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 2: Http Www.wirelessweek

Another choice, fiber, is clearly the preferred backhaul option for mobile operators (if you can get it). But pulling fiber to every small cell location

is, well, just not going to happen. It's simply too expensive, disruptive and time consuming. Consequently, traditional cellular backhaul solutions

must now be rethought in the context of moving to smaller cells.

Wanted: New Backhaul Options

New backhaul options, well suited for dense urban environments and for close-to-the ground equipment (both line of sight and non-line of sight),

are required to make small cells viable.

Counterintuitive to most, unlicensed smart Wi-Fi has become a viable and affordable option to solve this problem and looks to play a crucial role

in backhauling licensed small cell traffic. Yes, cellular traffic. Here's why:

Assume a mobile network operator (MNO) deploys an infill underlay radio network of small cells to add access capacity to areas where there is a

high density of mobile data users, perhaps in an urban city center such as in London, New York or Hong Kong.

Today this small cell network would likely be comprised of lower-powered 3G and/or Wi-Fi nodes, or possibly in the future LTE radio nodes. No

matter what the access radio technology is used, how does the operator get the data from the access radio node back to the network?

One obvious high performance solution is fiber, assuming that it's available. The operator may have to lease this fiber from a fixed line carrier

which drives up operational costs, but perhaps more significantly there is the very real possibility that the fiber POPs will not exist in specific

locations where the MNO needs to place the small cell.

The reality is that small cells only increase network capacity if you place them in close proximity to subscribers trying to access the network.

Therefore site acquisition becomes a major determinant in the relative effectiveness of the small cell deployment.

But this then poses a very real problem – given the constraints of where operators must place small cells. It is highly unlikely that a fiber POP will

exist in all of those locations. And given the cost and time delays of provisioning new fiber runs to each small cell location, an alternative solution

is clearly needed.

Microwave radio links are of course a well-understood alternative technology that can be used to at least partially address the problem. But while

microwave point-to-point (PtP) links are high performance, reliable workhorses for backhauling data and voice traffic, they have issues.

First and foremost, PtP microwave solutions generally rely on licensed radio bands for transmission. This improves reliability, however, acquiring

new licensed spectrum takes deep pockets filled with lots of cash. Also radio capacity is directly related to how much spectrum is used for the

radio transmissions. This means deploying more capacity on the access radio side exacerbates both the cost and the shortage of spectrum for the

backhaul radio network. Add to this the problem that PtP radio links require highly skilled installation to aim or align the radio nodes. In a crowded

urban area or near street level, this quickly becomes an onerous task.

Using the Unlicensed Band for Transporting Licensed Band Traffic?

Exactly. Wi-Fi has evolved to become an ideal solution for this small cell backhaul problem – if done properly.

New Wi-Fi technology has been developed that combines integrated adaptive directional antennas with smart meshing technology and predictive

channel management – all used within the channel-rich 5 GHz 802.11n spectrum. The combination of these technologies makes the use of Wi-Fi

for both line-of-sight and non-line of sight backhaul applications advantageous.

Page 2 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 3: Http Www.wirelessweek

Adaptive antenna arrays deliver more reliable connectivity at longer ranges by focusing and steering RF energy only where it helps deliver the

best throughput across a specified link. As the environment changes, these smart antennas mitigate Wi-Fi and non-Wi-Fi interference, constantly

selecting better signal paths that yield the highest data rates and lowest latency at any given time. When used within the 5 GHz band, these

antenna arrays become ideal for constructing highly resilient, long range, adaptive backhaul connections between Wi-Fi nodes.

Predictive channel management is then used to optimize RF channel selection by maximizing network capacity specifically in high-density, noisy

public Wi-Fi environments. It does this by measuring actual channel throughput and building a statistical model that allows access points to learn

over time what channel will yield the highest capacity. By relying on real-time, observed capacity on all 2.4 and 5 GHz frequencies, backhaul links

can be automatically moved to a better channel with less interference thereby realizing higher data rates.

Utilizing smart mesh techniques with adaptive antenna arrays as an alternative to fixed PtP links eliminates much of the complexity associated

with aiming and alignment during the installation process. This also results in a much more affordable solution with greater resiliency in crowded

urban environments given its intrinsic capabilities to dynamically adjust to changing conditions by choosing alternate paths to the network.

In live field trials with multiple network operators today, this small cell Wi-Fi backhaul approach has proven to deliver reliable, carrier grade

transport of 3G mobile data and circuit switched voice traffic along with the prioritized transport of timing signals (eg. IEEE 1588v2/PTP or NTP)

necessary for small cell network synchronization.

Wi-Fi backhaul technology is currently being built into small cell nodes housing cellular and Wi-Fi access – within a fairly small footprint. This

allows operators to deploy a single box to provide Wi-Fi access, cellular access and backhaul together.

Ultimately with small cells and better backhaul, mobile subscribers should enjoy higher speeds with more coverage in more places. In turn, mobile

operators can reduce subscriber churn and increase revenue by having visibility into both cellular and Wi-Fi traffic – giving the customers more

options to connect in more places.

Steven Glapa is director of field marketing at Ruckus Wireless.

TOPICS BACKHAUL LTE IMHO

0

SHARE THIS STORY

0 Like 0 Send

RELATED CONTENT

■ Waiting To Download

■ AT & T Network Exec Dishes on Small Cells, SON, DAS

■ Compact Base Stations Bridge Capacity Gaps

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 4: Http Www.wirelessweek

0 comments

What's this?

New Efforts to Curb Cellphone Theft

— Thieves steal mostly so they can sell the phone.

Need to discourage them from the thought of selling them. If they

can still get rid of a bricked phone, they …

Sprint Making Good on June 29 iDen Shutdown

— I wish Sprint would work on the Vancouver, Camas,

Washougal area for better service. Camas and Washougal

especially, It's rediculous that these towns …

Wheeler Appointment Gets Applause All Around

— You notice that all the comments and support come from

carriers. Not a single person stood up from the public safety side of

the family. Time will tell just how fair …

Softbank Claims Its Sprint Bid Represents 21 Percent

Premium over Dish Bid

— Good catch, Ron. Thanks for the heads up. Both Softbank

and Sprint have asked the FCC to reject the request.

Leave a message...

Best Community #⤤Share

0★

Advertisement

Featured Whitepapers

Superstorm Sandy: Fuel Cell Design for Disaster Recovery vs. Backup Power

May 10, 2013 9:13 am | by ReliOn

Maximizing Visibility of GTP Sessions in Mobile Networks

April 5, 2013 4:35 pm | by Ixia

Page 4 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 5: Http Www.wirelessweek

Advertisement

Blogs Events

Viva Móvil Could Be a Step in the Right Direction

May 29, 2013 5:13 pm | by Ben Munson

The "Un-Carrier" Cometh

March 19, 2013 3:32 pm | by Andrew Berg

Samsung Made it Weird, and I Liked it

March 15, 2013 11:52 am | by Ben Munson

Buyer Beware: Future-proofing Can Save You Some Heartache

March 4, 2013 10:02 am | by Ben Munson

View More Blogs »

Advertisement

Advertisement

Page 5 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 6: Http Www.wirelessweek

Latest Cell Phone Accessories,

Batteries, Covers, and Cases

with Free shipping!

Trending

■ Dish Crystalizing Sprint Bid With $2.5 Debt Offering

2 comments · 2 weeks ago

■ T-Mobile Sells 500K iPhone 5s in First Month

3 comments · 3 weeks ago

■ New Efforts to Curb Cellphone Theft

3 comments · 2 weeks ago

■ Device Innovation Is Passé: Why UE Is King in 2013

3 comments · 6 days ago

■ Sprint Making Good on June 29 iDen Shutdown

3 comments · 1 day ago

Advertisement

Page 6 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...

Page 7: Http Www.wirelessweek

WIRELESS WEEK

About Us

Contact Us

Advertise With Us

Subscriptions

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

RESOURCES

Articles

Blogs

Events Calendar

News

Videos

White Papers

TOPICS

Business

Carriers

Devices

Emerging Technologies

Mobile Content

Policy and Industry

CONNECT WITH US

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

RSS

OUR PARTNER SITES

Advantage Business Media © Copyright 2013 Advantage Business Media

Page 7 of 7Can Wi-Fi Really Be Used to Backhaul Cellular Voice?

6/5/2013http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2012/01/can-wi-fi-really-be-used-backhaul-cellular-v...